Australian Politics Forum

I sent this via PM to Setanta this afternoon/evening.

Quote:

Sender: Aussie
To: Setanta
Subject: AaronCRescue
Date: Today at 4:37pm
Not that I reckon you give a flying fuq but I can guarantee that is Neferti.

Link.

Post # 25.

Quote:
There is no such place as Heaven OR Hell, so, when you die there will be no homosexuals, atheists, crooks, murderers, dogs or cats there.

Dead is Dead. End Of.

Oh, and there is no such thing as GOD (or variations thereof).

Your "soul" is what those left behind remember about you.

Your "identity" is the paperwork you left behind that can be researched by your descendants.

I was not asking for or invting a response or discussion. That was it. Report made.....end. But nah.

I get a PM back.

To which I respond via PM:

Quote:

You didn't. Neferti did. She has made the same post almost word for word for years.

And he....responds via PM......not that I wanted one or expected one. I reply:

Quote:

You and I both know it is not. I have been reading Neferti for years. I know. I will bet you pounds to peanuts that Aaron is using a proxy/VPN.

Like I portended...you don't give a flying fuq, if one of your new pals is involved.

Did it end there? Nah. Back he comes for more. So, I reply:

Quote:

Sender: Aussie
To: Setanta
Subject: Re: AaronCRescue
Date: Today at 5:35pm

So.....no bet?

Yes....I agree that did invite a response.....one in which he did not answer my question. Instead, he keeps on with stuff, to which I reply:

Quote:

Yep. Proxy/VPN or not. You know.

It could have ended there, but nah.....he keeps boring in and I reply:

Quote:

Me...xxxxxx you??????????? I did not invite or want this exchange. I reported a Rule breach to you.

Aaron, I bet is using a proxy/VPN. I know it must be....you know it to be fact.

/End.

That should have ended it.....Did it....nah. Back he comes and I reply:

Quote:

No.

The Rule is still there....do not use a sock to circumvent a ban.

And he still replies. I respond:

Quote:

I did not invite or seek this discussion. You never just shut up do you. When I respond to your uninvited comments, xxx make xxxxxxx. Weak as piss. (I have edited that so he cannot claim I have revealed his PM to me.)

I did not want you to respond to my report. I did not ask that you respond.

You opened the discussion and when you are losing it, you get all GModdy.

Weak as piss.

And back he comes.......and I reply.........hit submit......and he has blocked me.

Really Setanta? If you do not want a debate/discussion, don't start and continue one.

Weak as piss.i

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/forum-rules.html

Rules.

Privacy

OzPolitic values the privacy of all members. Do not post personal information about other members without their explicit permission. This includes the contents of personal messages and emails, photos, names, IP addresses, phone numbers, locations etc.

Bobby. wrote on Jun 24^th, 2019 at 8:20pm:

Gee Bobby...thanks for that. The PMs I disclosed were mine.

Bobby. wrote on Jun 24^th, 2019 at 8:20pm:

Ah.

So when Set posted the contents of a PM from me yesterday(?), without my permission, he broke the privacy rules?

A simple yes or no will suffice?

Aussie wrote on Jun 24^th, 2019 at 8:25pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jun 24^th, 2019 at 8:20pm:

Gee Bobby...thanks for that. The PMs I disclosed were mine.

Aussie - you wrote your post in such a way that
you didn't write your name above the quote.
You just put QUOTE.
It could have been misunderstood as words from Setanta.

Now - apologise to Set. for writing misleading posts.

So.......you did not see......'I reply'........'I respond?'

Are you really as stupid as IITL?

Aussie wrote on Jun 24^th, 2019 at 8:42pm:

So.......you did not see......'I reply'........'I respond?'

Are you really as stupid as IITL?

Apologise.

This is for Bobby. (I am not violent like Bobby obviously is:)

har har anyone who deals with you long enough Aussie blocks your PMs! why should set. be any different? aside frm that you are plyaing sherlock holmes with socks IDs again! when will you ever learn?

Aussie wrote on Jun 24^th, 2019 at 8:42pm:

So.......you did not see......'I reply'........'I respond?'

Are you really as stupid as IITL?

Besmirchment *

The OP of this thread should see Aussie stripped of the Relationships Moderator Position on OZ Politics .

This is a clear breach of rules and as such ,

The appropriate action should be taken against this attacker Besmircher and wonderer of young ladies nether regions of his immediate family..

Sickly state of affairs some have made in depth mention of and upon..

Yet all remain forgiven so go figure that doozy out

In love and light

Namaste

Feel free to post the whole exchange Aussie.

it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 25^th, 2019 at 6:03am:

I agree

There's nothing more off putting to someone who might come across an unknown forum and decide to lurk for a while to get a sense of what that forum is about, than to come across chit stirring and low-brow content

it's almost as if Oz Pol is determined to drive potential new members (as opposed to new socks) away

Aussie comes across to me as unhinged

Aussie wrote on Jun 24^th, 2019 at 8:10pm:

I sent this via PM to Setanta this afternoon/evening.

Quote:

I was not asking for or invting a response or discussion. That was it. Report made.....end. But nah.

I get a PM back.

To which I respond via PM:

[quote]You didn't. Neferti did. She has made the same post almost word for word for years.

And he....responds via PM......not that I wanted one or expected one. I reply:

Quote:

Did it end there? Nah. Back he comes for more. So, I reply:

Quote:

Sender: Aussie
To: Setanta
Subject: Re: AaronCRescue
Date: Today at 5:35pm

So.....no bet?

Yes....I agree that did invite a response.....one in which he did not answer my question. Instead, he keeps on with stuff, to which I reply:

Quote:

Yep. Proxy/VPN or not. You know.

It could have ended there, but nah.....he keeps boring in and I reply:

Quote:

Me...xxxxxx you??????????? I did not invite or want this exchange. I reported a Rule breach to you.

Aaron, I bet is using a proxy/VPN. I know it must be....you know it to be fact.

/End.

That should have ended it.....Did it....nah. Back he comes and I reply:

Quote:

No.

The Rule is still there....do not use a sock to circumvent a ban.

And he still replies. I respond:

Quote:

And back he comes.......and I reply.........hit submit......and he has blocked me.

Really Setanta? If you do not want a debate/discussion, don't start and continue one.

Weak as piss.

[/quote]

and furthermore, the appropriate wording, Aussie, would be that in your opinion, this is a material world with nothing beyond it

That is merely your opinion, but as usual you imagine you are the final word

more of your insane need to control

proving that it's you who's afraid of being controlled

you should deal with your own issues instead of attempting to foist your many issues upon the world at large

you're neither smart nor interesting

so keep your opinions AND your private messages to yourself instead of imagining the world's media awaits your every utterance

boring little bastard

So you say, yet here you are reading every word.

8-)

Aussie wrote on Jun 25^th, 2019 at 8:44am:

So you say, yet here you are reading every word.

8-)

why else do you imagine people patronise this forum? Which is why you muck up so often. You know controversy is the life blood of this place and your role is to stir

Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl Member Run Boards >> Relationships >> How the mind of a GMod works. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1561371024 Message started by Aussie on Jun 24^th, 2019 at 8:10pm