Well, after all the hand wringing and tears for lost souls, it back to business for the world's most evil CULT OF DEATH.

[quote]
An attack by suspected Islamic State militants killed seven fighters linked to the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces in Syria's northern Aleppo province.

 

Anonymous threats of violence led to the evacuation of city halls in at least six German cities, with police searching for explosives.


Four al Shabaab gunmen used a car bomb to launch an attack on a government building in the Somali capital, killing at least 15 including an assistant minister.


At least four people are dead and dozens wounded after a blast in Afghanistan during a Farmer's Day celebration, with the Taliban claiming responsibility.


Boko Haram militants have killed at least 23 Chadian soldiers in what appeared to be the deadliest such attack inside Chad by the Islamist insurgents.

Guess it's OK to murder in the name of Islam.

Oh, but it's okay for them to attack because they have been victims of bombing raids for years.
It's not okay for a white man to retaliate because he's white....and we're gonna call him a supremacist, racist, privileged bigot.


Barra snack bar. 

No comment required - everyday events.

Muslim Supremacists...



A Muslim supremacist walks into a bar...... everybody ducks.....

Two Muslims Supremacists walk into a bar - everybody else runs out the doors...

Saw the heading and thought of:

https://wp-media.patheos.com/blogs/sites/583/2016/03/giotto-crucifixion.jpg

Christianity, a cult of death.

;)

Captain Nemo wrote on Mar 27^th, 2019 at 9:21am:

Saw the heading and thought of: https://wp-media.patheos.com/blogs/sites/583/2016/03/giotto-crucifixion.jpg Christianity, a cult of death. ;)

I am pretty sure that happened about 2019yrs ago, type beheadings or stonings into the google machine for some real gruesome up to date stuff.

SHUT THE GATES ON ISLAM.

One only has to venture into any city in Australia to see the Islamic uniform everywhere and its no wonder people are starting to jack up, its an invasion by stealth.

Labor and liberal have changed the face of Australia over the last 20 to 30yrs, and not for the better.

Captain Caveman wrote on Mar 27^th, 2019 at 5:06am:

Oh, but it's okay for them to attack because they have been victims of bombing raids for years. It's not okay for a white man to retaliate because he's white....and we're gonna call him a supremacist, racist, privileged bigot. Barra snack bar.

No ones bombing in Germany, Somalia and Chad.

There's more to Islamic terrorists/extremists than the Middle East.

Johnnie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2019 at 9:56am:

One only has to venture into any city in Australia to see the Islamic uniform everywhere ...

Oh dear.

How terrifying for you.

Johnnie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2019 at 9:56am:

Captain Nemo wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 9:21am: Saw the heading and thought of: https://wp-media.patheos.com/blogs/sites/583/2016/03/giotto-crucifixion.jpg Christianity, a cult of death. ;) I am pretty sure that happened about 2019yrs ago, type beheadings or stonings into the google machine for some real gruesome up to date stuff. SHUT THE GATES ON ISLAM. One only has to venture into any city in Australia to see the Islamic uniform everywhere and its no wonder people are starting to jack up, its an invasion by stealth. Labor and liberal have changed the face of Australia over the last 20 to 30yrs, and not for the better.

They had/have no intention of changing it for the better for the majority - only for their own Chosen Ones.  As long as they can perpetuate their own regime and dynasties they are more than happy to see the peasants wallow in the filth the parties have created for them.. over-crowding, loss of rights and personal sovereignty, crime, campaigns of terror with people striding the streets carrying threatening signs, forces of law poised to break down any door on suspicion and then carry off the incumbent...

It would be easy if this could simply be placed under the umbrella of 'reduce the peasantry down to powerlessness and lack of control over their own lives in order to have easy control over them' - if there was any solid social control in place as used to be in the old days when people respected one another at a basic level.  Remember - you left your house open and nobody robbed you, and the hardcore criminals robbed banks and such and not ordinary folk??

There is NO security for a populace that is kept under constant threat of violence, crime or unwarranted government intrusion.

Now they're lining up to see who can be first to rob your home even when it's locked - and that includes your own government and its agencies at times.  when you steal from a man his means of livelihood, you steal from him life itself.

Johnnie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2019 at 9:56am:

Captain Nemo wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 9:21am: Saw the heading and thought of: https://wp-media.patheos.com/blogs/sites/583/2016/03/giotto-crucifixion.jpg Christianity, a cult of death. ;) I am pretty sure that happened about 2019yrs ago, type beheadings or stonings into the google machine for some real gruesome up to date stuff. SHUT THE GATES ON ISLAM. One only has to venture into any city in Australia to see the Islamic uniform everywhere and its no wonder people are starting to jack up, its an invasion by stealth. Labor and liberal have changed the face of Australia over the last 20 to 30yrs, and not for the better.

They had/have no intention of changing it for the better for the majority - only for their own Chosen Ones.  As long as they can perpetuate their own regime and dynasties they are more than happy to see the peasants wallow in the filth the parties have created for them.. over-crowding, loss of rights and personal sovereignty, crime, campaigns of terror with people striding the streets carrying threatening signs, forces of law poised to break down any door on suspicion and then carry off the incumbent...

It would be easy if this could simply be placed under the umbrella of 'reduce the peasantry down to powerlessness and lack of control over their own lives in order to have easy control over them' - if there was any solid social control in place as used to be in the old days when people respected one another at a basic level.  Remember - you left your house open and nobody robbed you, and the hardcore criminals robbed banks and such and not ordinary folk??

There is NO security for a populace that is kept under constant threat of violence, crime or unwarranted government intrusion.

Now they're lining up to see who can be first to rob your home even when it's locked - and that includes your own government and its agencies at times.  When you steal from a man his means of livelihood, you steal from him life itself.

First the druggies to feed their habits, then the wops to steal your pet rabbits to eat, then the criminal culture immigrants who see theft as a way of life, then your own government intent on stealing your good name and your ready at any opportunity to feed their endless voraciousness.

Captain Nemo wrote on Mar 27^th, 2019 at 9:21am:

Saw the heading and thought of: https://wp-media.patheos.com/blogs/sites/583/2016/03/giotto-crucifixion.jpg Christianity, a cult of death. ;)

He was killed by non Christian Romans..... your point isn't valid.

Gnads wrote on Mar 27^th, 2019 at 11:11am:

Captain Nemo wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 9:21am: Saw the heading and thought of: https://wp-media.patheos.com/blogs/sites/583/2016/03/giotto-crucifixion.jpg Christianity, a cult of death. ;) He was killed by non Christian Romans..... your point isn't valid.

Bloody Romans   >:(


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7tvauOJMHo

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27^th, 2019 at 11:23am:

Gnads wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 11:11am: Captain Nemo wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 9:21am: Saw the heading and thought of: https://wp-media.patheos.com/blogs/sites/583/2016/03/giotto-crucifixion.jpg Christianity, a cult of death. ;) He was killed by non Christian Romans..... your point isn't valid. Bloody Romans   >:( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7tvauOJMHo

Hey Greg, you have been everywhere around Australia and to many countries in the world many times, what do you think of Yemen?

Oh... ye Men are as good as ye Women in the main.......

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 27^th, 2019 at 9:09pm:

Oh... ye Men are as good as ye Women in the main.......

How would Ye know, all the women in ye Men wear Burkas.

Here's one for you, Setanta - a tasty thread of virtue-signallers cheering on a Nazi mosque shooting as one up for Whitey.

Do you want to raise rule .303, or leave this one as it is?

FD wrote on Mar 27^th, 2019 at 10:35pm:

Here's one for you, Setanta - a tasty thread of virtue-signallers cheering on a Nazi mosque shooting as one up for Whitey. Do you want to raise rule .303, or leave this one as it is?

Oh no,, anything but the .303 rule, chick chick boom and its all over.

Karnal knows what to do.

So the apologist, sychophant,  sympathiser, islamophiles have to go back 2000 years to make some obscure point about Christianity.

I only have to go back a week, possibly less, to find evidence of the CULT OF DEATH  and it's murderous, barbaric and primitive practices.

Seriously though
Keep trying, it's quite entertaining watching you lot squirm.

Here's a fine point from Al Qatar Propaganda Service:-

https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/muslim-cleansing-global-pandemic-181220084045168.html

"Muslim cleansing: A global pandemic?

Muslims across the world persecuted, abused and murdered by Muslim and non-Muslim regimes.

What is happening to Muslims around the globe? In China they are put into concentration camps, in Myanmar they are slaughtered en masse, in India they have been the targets of systematic pogroms, in Israel along with Christian Palestinians they are mowed down on a daily basis, in Europe and the United States they are subject to increasing demonisation and persecution.

The fate of Muslims in their own homeland is not particularly rosier. From one end of the Muslim world to the next, Muslims - in Iran, Syria, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia in particular - live under tyrannical regimes, ruthless dictators, murderous military juntas, with their most basic civil liberties and human rights denied. In Yemen, they are being slaughtered and subjected to man-made famine by the Saudis and their partners - and if one journalist dared to raise his voice he is chopped up to pieces in his own country's consulate. 

What is this? What is going on? What does it all mean?"  ............  (read the rest) ......

Phew - what a relief to see that in the West, rather than being mown down and gulaged etc,  they are "subject to increasing demonisation and persecution.".....

(Now - define 'persecution' for us - what bastard took their right to vote, to an education, to travel freely, to assemble peacefully.. you know the drift.....)

ADDS:-  I guess they just couldn't resist a swipe at The Great Shaitan:-

"The epicentre of this Muslim cleansing in its current gestation is no doubt the rise of Islamophobia in the US and Europe rooted in historic hatred of Islam and Muslims in the European context."

So forget about China and all the rest, forget about the Muslim nations killing one another by the thousands daily in countless ways etc... the 'rising Islamophobia' in the West is the root cause!!

Arab logic at its best!!!

Second Add:-

Apparently the West has a cunning plan.  It  pretends to give Muslims who are persecuted in their homeland sanctuary and safety and an opportunity to prosper beyond their wildest dreams 'back home' - but secretly only brings these suffering Muslims to the West so they can be persecuted and even massacred without notice or hindrance.  Forget that many of them prosper mightily and enjoy education and such they could never hope for; forget that they have more than they can eat and that their families have better health care etc; forget that the West bends over backwards to rescue their families as well from 'back home'; forget that they are protected by the same laws and once citizens have the same rights as everyone else (unlike 'back home') - they are in the arms of The Great Shaitan and thus are being persecuted simply for being Muslim.

Truly the Gods must weep to see this kind of insanity being passed off as reality by some down here... or laugh their heads off.  Perhaps Muslims rescued to the West should be kissing the ground they land on....

Gnads wrote on Mar 27^th, 2019 at 10:37am:

Captain Caveman wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 5:06am: Oh, but it's okay for them to attack because they have been victims of bombing raids for years. It's not okay for a white man to retaliate because he's white....and we're gonna call him a supremacist, racist, privileged bigot. Barra snack bar.  No ones bombing in Germany, Somalia and Chad. There's more to Islamic terrorists/extremists than the Middle East.

I realise that.... but a few "retards" on here do not.  ;)

These are the kinds of Australians that sympathise with Muslims.  These are the Australians that need to be shut up.
Australia needs its patriots voice again, not blinded rats like this dumb bitch. 

https://youtu.be/O7FtjtF4gM0

The sad fact is that muzzos kill more muzzos than all the others put together.

When one muzzo faction meets another, they kill each other
They love stoning
They love beheading
They love throwing people off buildings

The cult of death certainly lives up to its name

Kill kill kill

Nutcases all.

FD wrote on Mar 27^th, 2019 at 10:35pm:

Here's one for you, Setanta - a tasty thread of virtue-signallers cheering on a Nazi mosque shooting as one up for Whitey. Do you want to raise rule .303, or leave this one as it is?

I'm only up to your post so far and have seen no mention of any mosque shooter upperers until now only the hand wringing and tears that followed, we all pray for the fallen K. You are trying to incite violence against those that plan attacks against govt buildings elsewhere in the world are you or alternatively absolve them from blame are you?

Valkie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2019 at 4:55am:

Well, after all the hand wringing and tears for lost souls, it back to business for the world's most evil CULT OF DEATH.

You must have misinterpreted the first post, Setanta, then all the ones after that.

A simple mishtake to make.

I blame Islam. You?

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 9:07pm:

Valkie wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 4:55am: Well, after all the hand wringing and tears for lost souls, it back to business for the world's most evil CULT OF DEATH. You must have misinterpreted the first post, Setanta, then all the ones after that. A simple mishtake to make. I blame Islam. You?

Are you sure it was referencing Christchurch? Not one of the many Islamic attacks around the world? Are you reading into it what you want to see? The thread is about the cult of death and we know there are attacks and killings in it's name every day. Why do you think it comes back to some wingnut in NZ who was no part of some cult? I'm sure there are wringing of hands, rending of clothes, tearing of hair, tears of despair of parents seeing their children die, of children seeing the same all in the name of the "religion of peace". RIP.

How much of a humanitarian are you to see this go on day after day, year after year, and still defend the ideology that spreads this cancer.

Setanta wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 9:24pm:

FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:07pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 4:55am: Well, after all the hand wringing and tears for lost souls, it back to business for the world's most evil CULT OF DEATH. You must have misinterpreted the first post, Setanta, then all the ones after that. A simple mishtake to make. I blame Islam. You? Are you sure it was referencing Christchurch? Not one of the many Islamic attacks around the world? Are you reading into it what you want to see? The thread is about the cult of death and we know there are attacks and killings in it's name every day. Why do you think it comes back to some wingnut in NZ who was no part of some cult? I'm sure there are wringing of hands, rending of clothes, tearing of hair, tears of despair of parents seeing their children die, of children seeing the same all in the name of the "religion of peace". RIP.

No, dear, I'm not. Perhaps Matty, Grappler and BigP were referencing all the handwringing over lost souls in the terrorist attacks against Whitey.

So sad, so unfair, so typical of the Muselman.

Your thoughts and prayers are with them, no?

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 9:33pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:24pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:07pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 4:55am: Well, after all the hand wringing and tears for lost souls, it back to business for the world's most evil CULT OF DEATH. You must have misinterpreted the first post, Setanta, then all the ones after that. A simple mishtake to make. I blame Islam. You? Are you sure it was referencing Christchurch? Not one of the many Islamic attacks around the world? Are you reading into it what you want to see? The thread is about the cult of death and we know there are attacks and killings in it's name every day. Why do you think it comes back to some wingnut in NZ who was no part of some cult? I'm sure there are wringing of hands, rending of clothes, tearing of hair, tears of despair of parents seeing their children die, of children seeing the same all in the name of the "religion of peace". RIP. No, dear, I'm not. Perhaps Matty, Grappler and BigP were referencing all the handwringing over lost souls in the terrorist attacks against Whitey. So sad, so unfair, so typical of the Muselman. Your thoughts and prayers are with them, no?

No, I'm not religious. It's just more waste in the name of ideology to me. but you go on supporting an ideology that kills.

I could blame the Jews if you like, they started this ME one god Abrahamic shite.

Setanta wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 9:36pm:

FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:33pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:24pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:07pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 4:55am: Well, after all the hand wringing and tears for lost souls, it back to business for the world's most evil CULT OF DEATH. You must have misinterpreted the first post, Setanta, then all the ones after that. A simple mishtake to make. I blame Islam. You? Are you sure it was referencing Christchurch? Not one of the many Islamic attacks around the world? Are you reading into it what you want to see? The thread is about the cult of death and we know there are attacks and killings in it's name every day. Why do you think it comes back to some wingnut in NZ who was no part of some cult? I'm sure there are wringing of hands, rending of clothes, tearing of hair, tears of despair of parents seeing their children die, of children seeing the same all in the name of the "religion of peace". RIP. No, dear, I'm not. Perhaps Matty, Grappler and BigP were referencing all the handwringing over lost souls in the terrorist attacks against Whitey. So sad, so unfair, so typical of the Muselman. Your thoughts and prayers are with them, no? No, I'm not religious. It's just more waste in the name of ideology to me. but you go on supporting an ideology that kills.

Good point, Setanta. White supremacism is not a race, no?

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 9:39pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:36pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:33pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:24pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:07pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 4:55am: Well, after all the hand wringing and tears for lost souls, it back to business for the world's most evil CULT OF DEATH. You must have misinterpreted the first post, Setanta, then all the ones after that. A simple mishtake to make. I blame Islam. You? Are you sure it was referencing Christchurch? Not one of the many Islamic attacks around the world? Are you reading into it what you want to see? The thread is about the cult of death and we know there are attacks and killings in it's name every day. Why do you think it comes back to some wingnut in NZ who was no part of some cult? I'm sure there are wringing of hands, rending of clothes, tearing of hair, tears of despair of parents seeing their children die, of children seeing the same all in the name of the "religion of peace". RIP. No, dear, I'm not. Perhaps Matty, Grappler and BigP were referencing all the handwringing over lost souls in the terrorist attacks against Whitey. So sad, so unfair, so typical of the Muselman. Your thoughts and prayers are with them, no? No, I'm not religious. It's just more waste in the name of ideology to me. but you go on supporting an ideology that kills. Good point, Setanta. White supremacism is not a race, no?

Drinking tonight, K? Missing the good times in Vung Tau?

Setanta wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 9:44pm:

FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:39pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:36pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:33pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:24pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:07pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 4:55am: Well, after all the hand wringing and tears for lost souls, it back to business for the world's most evil CULT OF DEATH. You must have misinterpreted the first post, Setanta, then all the ones after that. A simple mishtake to make. I blame Islam. You? Are you sure it was referencing Christchurch? Not one of the many Islamic attacks around the world? Are you reading into it what you want to see? The thread is about the cult of death and we know there are attacks and killings in it's name every day. Why do you think it comes back to some wingnut in NZ who was no part of some cult? I'm sure there are wringing of hands, rending of clothes, tearing of hair, tears of despair of parents seeing their children die, of children seeing the same all in the name of the "religion of peace". RIP. No, dear, I'm not. Perhaps Matty, Grappler and BigP were referencing all the handwringing over lost souls in the terrorist attacks against Whitey. So sad, so unfair, so typical of the Muselman. Your thoughts and prayers are with them, no? No, I'm not religious. It's just more waste in the name of ideology to me. but you go on supporting an ideology that kills. Good point, Setanta. White supremacism is not a race, no? Drinking tonight, K? Missing the good times in Vung Tau?

Not at all. What religion was the chap everybody's handwringing and shedding tears over?

Johnnie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2019 at 9:33pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 9:09pm: Oh... ye Men are as good as ye Women in the main....... How would Ye know, all the women in ye Men wear Burkas.

That's because Ye men there are absolute burkas....

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 9:46pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:44pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:39pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:36pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:33pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:24pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:07pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 4:55am: Well, after all the hand wringing and tears for lost souls, it back to business for the world's most evil CULT OF DEATH. You must have misinterpreted the first post, Setanta, then all the ones after that. A simple mishtake to make. I blame Islam. You? Are you sure it was referencing Christchurch? Not one of the many Islamic attacks around the world? Are you reading into it what you want to see? The thread is about the cult of death and we know there are attacks and killings in it's name every day. Why do you think it comes back to some wingnut in NZ who was no part of some cult? I'm sure there are wringing of hands, rending of clothes, tearing of hair, tears of despair of parents seeing their children die, of children seeing the same all in the name of the "religion of peace". RIP. No, dear, I'm not. Perhaps Matty, Grappler and BigP were referencing all the handwringing over lost souls in the terrorist attacks against Whitey. So sad, so unfair, so typical of the Muselman. Your thoughts and prayers are with them, no? No, I'm not religious. It's just more waste in the name of ideology to me. but you go on supporting an ideology that kills. Good point, Setanta. White supremacism is not a race, no? Drinking tonight, K? Missing the good times in Vung Tau? Not at all. What religion was the chap everybody's handwringing and shedding tears over?

which 'chap' among the many individuals killed and maimed in attacks on whiteys?

Anyone want to argue the points raised in the al Jazeera thing I posted - or will we just put you down for a five minute argument?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7ItQ90Fjnc

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 9:46pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:44pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:39pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:36pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:33pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:24pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:07pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 4:55am: Well, after all the hand wringing and tears for lost souls, it back to business for the world's most evil CULT OF DEATH. You must have misinterpreted the first post, Setanta, then all the ones after that. A simple mishtake to make. I blame Islam. You? Are you sure it was referencing Christchurch? Not one of the many Islamic attacks around the world? Are you reading into it what you want to see? The thread is about the cult of death and we know there are attacks and killings in it's name every day. Why do you think it comes back to some wingnut in NZ who was no part of some cult? I'm sure there are wringing of hands, rending of clothes, tearing of hair, tears of despair of parents seeing their children die, of children seeing the same all in the name of the "religion of peace". RIP. No, dear, I'm not. Perhaps Matty, Grappler and BigP were referencing all the handwringing over lost souls in the terrorist attacks against Whitey. So sad, so unfair, so typical of the Muselman. Your thoughts and prayers are with them, no? No, I'm not religious. It's just more waste in the name of ideology to me. but you go on supporting an ideology that kills. Good point, Setanta. White supremacism is not a race, no? Drinking tonight, K? Missing the good times in Vung Tau? Not at all. What religion was the chap everybody's handwringing and shedding tears over?

Are people crying, hand wringing and shedding tears over him? Why? He's just lost his liberty, not his life. He took life, he  took the liberty those that lost lives. I have to ask you, why do you and your Monks Mongs see me as an enemy? I'm not a white supremecist, I'm not a right winger, I don't hate people. Why do you try so hard to build this image of me that I do?

Setanta wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 9:53pm:

FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:46pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:44pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:39pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:36pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:33pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:24pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:07pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 4:55am: Well, after all the hand wringing and tears for lost souls, it back to business for the world's most evil CULT OF DEATH. You must have misinterpreted the first post, Setanta, then all the ones after that. A simple mishtake to make. I blame Islam. You? Are you sure it was referencing Christchurch? Not one of the many Islamic attacks around the world? Are you reading into it what you want to see? The thread is about the cult of death and we know there are attacks and killings in it's name every day. Why do you think it comes back to some wingnut in NZ who was no part of some cult? I'm sure there are wringing of hands, rending of clothes, tearing of hair, tears of despair of parents seeing their children die, of children seeing the same all in the name of the "religion of peace". RIP. No, dear, I'm not. Perhaps Matty, Grappler and BigP were referencing all the handwringing over lost souls in the terrorist attacks against Whitey. So sad, so unfair, so typical of the Muselman. Your thoughts and prayers are with them, no? No, I'm not religious. It's just more waste in the name of ideology to me. but you go on supporting an ideology that kills. Good point, Setanta. White supremacism is not a race, no? Drinking tonight, K? Missing the good times in Vung Tau? Not at all. What religion was the chap everybody's handwringing and shedding tears over? Are people crying, hand wringing and shedding tears over him? Why? He's just lost his liberty, not his life. He took life, he  took the liberty those that lost lives.

Strange. Only last week you were saying the wounded and disabled should be happy to suffer for Allah.

I have no idea about Monk's mongs or right wingers, Setanta, but last week, you kept referring to "your side".

What did you mean by that?

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 9:58pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:53pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:46pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:44pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:39pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:36pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:33pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:24pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:07pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 4:55am: Well, after all the hand wringing and tears for lost souls, it back to business for the world's most evil CULT OF DEATH. You must have misinterpreted the first post, Setanta, then all the ones after that. A simple mishtake to make. I blame Islam. You? Are you sure it was referencing Christchurch? Not one of the many Islamic attacks around the world? Are you reading into it what you want to see? The thread is about the cult of death and we know there are attacks and killings in it's name every day. Why do you think it comes back to some wingnut in NZ who was no part of some cult? I'm sure there are wringing of hands, rending of clothes, tearing of hair, tears of despair of parents seeing their children die, of children seeing the same all in the name of the "religion of peace". RIP. No, dear, I'm not. Perhaps Matty, Grappler and BigP were referencing all the handwringing over lost souls in the terrorist attacks against Whitey. So sad, so unfair, so typical of the Muselman. Your thoughts and prayers are with them, no? No, I'm not religious. It's just more waste in the name of ideology to me. but you go on supporting an ideology that kills. Good point, Setanta. White supremacism is not a race, no? Drinking tonight, K? Missing the good times in Vung Tau? Not at all. What religion was the chap everybody's handwringing and shedding tears over? Are people crying, hand wringing and shedding tears over him? Why? He's just lost his liberty, not his life. He took life, he  took the liberty those that lost lives. Strange. Only last week you were saying the wounded and disabled should be happy to suffer for Allah. I have no idea about Monk's mongs or right wingers, Setanta, but last week, you kept referring to "your side". What did you mean by that?

Are we going to play this game even though I'm sure I've been through it with someone last weekend? I'm sure I said "religions" say suffering is a way to god. I thin gave Christian, Buddhist and other quotes to show the religious aspect of suffering. Not being religious, I don't understand it at all but religious people eat it up, you know that is what I meant or you're not as smart as you think you are.

You pretty much gave me the hypothetical option of killing them or letting them suffer. I chose letting them suffer as I would not kill them. I'm sorry I did not take the option you would have liked me to take but I'm sure if I had of taken the option to shoot the light skinned creatures, you would have been on my arse over that. Catch .22 it seems.

Five minute argument then - another pound each ... c'mon... hand it over!  No - you did not pay it already....

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 10:14pm:

Five minute argument then - another pound each ... c'mon... hand it over!  No - you did not pay it already....

Not sure what you mean Grap. Can you be a little more clear?

Setanta wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 10:07pm:

FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:58pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:53pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:46pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:44pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:39pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:36pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:33pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:24pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:07pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 4:55am: Well, after all the hand wringing and tears for lost souls, it back to business for the world's most evil CULT OF DEATH. You must have misinterpreted the first post, Setanta, then all the ones after that. A simple mishtake to make. I blame Islam. You? Are you sure it was referencing Christchurch? Not one of the many Islamic attacks around the world? Are you reading into it what you want to see? The thread is about the cult of death and we know there are attacks and killings in it's name every day. Why do you think it comes back to some wingnut in NZ who was no part of some cult? I'm sure there are wringing of hands, rending of clothes, tearing of hair, tears of despair of parents seeing their children die, of children seeing the same all in the name of the "religion of peace". RIP. No, dear, I'm not. Perhaps Matty, Grappler and BigP were referencing all the handwringing over lost souls in the terrorist attacks against Whitey. So sad, so unfair, so typical of the Muselman. Your thoughts and prayers are with them, no? No, I'm not religious. It's just more waste in the name of ideology to me. but you go on supporting an ideology that kills. Good point, Setanta. White supremacism is not a race, no? Drinking tonight, K? Missing the good times in Vung Tau? Not at all. What religion was the chap everybody's handwringing and shedding tears over? Are people crying, hand wringing and shedding tears over him? Why? He's just lost his liberty, not his life. He took life, he  took the liberty those that lost lives. Strange. Only last week you were saying the wounded and disabled should be happy to suffer for Allah. I have no idea about Monk's mongs or right wingers, Setanta, but last week, you kept referring to "your side". What did you mean by that? Are we going to play this game even though I'm sure I've been through it with someone last weekend? I'm sure I said "religions" say suffering is a way to god. I thin gave Christian, Buddhist and other quotes to show the religious aspect of suffering. Not being religious, I don't understand it at all but religious people eat it up, you know that is what I meant or you're not as smart as you think you are. You pretty much gave me the hypothetical option of killing them or letting them suffer. I chose letting them suffer as I would not kill them. I'm sorry I did not take the option you would have liked me to take but I'm sure if I had of taken the option to shoot the light skinned creatures, you would have been on my arse over that. Catch .22 it seems.

Never feel bad for saying what you think, Setanta. Own it. Or, if you disagree with it the next day, just say ah. I was wrong.

The thing I didn't understand was all those references to "your side" of politics. Now I've never taken any side in politics, and I've never noticed you doing so either.

So I'm curious. Did you mean it, or did you get something mixed up?

No worries. Own it, or just say ah.

Oh - and I've never 'wrung hands' over anyone being attacked and I certainly don't take 'sides' as you do ... I sympathise like a true gentleman and a real man with any who suffer.... but that sympathy does not detract from my reasoning through related issues.

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 10:25pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 10:07pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:58pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:53pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:46pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:44pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:39pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:36pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:33pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:24pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:07pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 4:55am: Well, after all the hand wringing and tears for lost souls, it back to business for the world's most evil CULT OF DEATH. You must have misinterpreted the first post, Setanta, then all the ones after that. A simple mishtake to make. I blame Islam. You? Are you sure it was referencing Christchurch? Not one of the many Islamic attacks around the world? Are you reading into it what you want to see? The thread is about the cult of death and we know there are attacks and killings in it's name every day. Why do you think it comes back to some wingnut in NZ who was no part of some cult? I'm sure there are wringing of hands, rending of clothes, tearing of hair, tears of despair of parents seeing their children die, of children seeing the same all in the name of the "religion of peace". RIP. No, dear, I'm not. Perhaps Matty, Grappler and BigP were referencing all the handwringing over lost souls in the terrorist attacks against Whitey. So sad, so unfair, so typical of the Muselman. Your thoughts and prayers are with them, no? No, I'm not religious. It's just more waste in the name of ideology to me. but you go on supporting an ideology that kills. Good point, Setanta. White supremacism is not a race, no? Drinking tonight, K? Missing the good times in Vung Tau? Not at all. What religion was the chap everybody's handwringing and shedding tears over? Are people crying, hand wringing and shedding tears over him? Why? He's just lost his liberty, not his life. He took life, he  took the liberty those that lost lives. Strange. Only last week you were saying the wounded and disabled should be happy to suffer for Allah. I have no idea about Monk's mongs or right wingers, Setanta, but last week, you kept referring to "your side". What did you mean by that? Are we going to play this game even though I'm sure I've been through it with someone last weekend? I'm sure I said "religions" say suffering is a way to god. I thin gave Christian, Buddhist and other quotes to show the religious aspect of suffering. Not being religious, I don't understand it at all but religious people eat it up, you know that is what I meant or you're not as smart as you think you are. You pretty much gave me the hypothetical option of killing them or letting them suffer. I chose letting them suffer as I would not kill them. I'm sorry I did not take the option you would have liked me to take but I'm sure if I had of taken the option to shoot the light skinned creatures, you would have been on my arse over that. Catch .22 it seems. Never feel bad for saying what you think, Setanta. Own it. Or, if you disagree with it the next day, just say ah. I was wrong. The thing I didn't understand was all those references to "your side" of politics. Now I've never taken any side in politics, and I've never noticed you doing so either. So I'm curious. Did you mean it, or did you get something mixed up? No worries. Own it, or just say ah.

"Your side" like others here, is the side that will accept no other POV than their own. This is something you do that you do not have to do but you cannot help yourself. If that person does not agree with me, he is on the "other side". You do it all the time. I'm happy if you want to do things that way but it means we will be at odds for no good reason. I'm happy for you not to agree with me, I would like it if you could be the same. If you can't I see a dictator. So Ho Chi Min, are you digging tunnels or being open? Do I feel like I need to pick up a 1911 when I dive in to the tunnels with you or do we be somewhat civil?

Setanta wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 10:15pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 10:14pm: Five minute argument then - another pound each ... c'mon... hand it over!  No - you did not pay it already.... Not sure what you mean Grap. Can you be a little more clear?

This argument is very like the Monty Python "yes I did" - "no you didn't" thing.. goes back and forth while not contacting the real issues .....

I know it terrifies some, and that any intellectual consideration of such things terrifies them to death, but I thought I raised some very good issues with that al Jazeera blurb.... surely the overall issues surrounding Islamic thought and worldview, and the same for the 'other side', are more important than mere points scoring over comments that some choose to misinterpret.

Any attempt to discuss overall issues in a calm and reasoned way brings vitriol and hate speech down on the poster, just for wanting a fair and open discussion.  Some, like Karnal, seek to suggest that my 'rabid views' are the reason people don't answer my posts - the way I see it is they have no answer and are unable to discuss like adults and actually seek truth in these things.

Children with a keyboard and nothing else.

Frankly - if it were not for the fact that I know some trolls here would love it - this sort of thing would drive me away.

It seems I am wasting my time with people who simply do not wish to discuss issues - but would rather play childish point scoring games.

Oh, well.

Setanta wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 10:34pm:

FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 10:25pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 10:07pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:58pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:53pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:46pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:44pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:39pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:36pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:33pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:24pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:07pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 4:55am: Well, after all the hand wringing and tears for lost souls, it back to business for the world's most evil CULT OF DEATH. You must have misinterpreted the first post, Setanta, then all the ones after that. A simple mishtake to make. I blame Islam. You? Are you sure it was referencing Christchurch? Not one of the many Islamic attacks around the world? Are you reading into it what you want to see? The thread is about the cult of death and we know there are attacks and killings in it's name every day. Why do you think it comes back to some wingnut in NZ who was no part of some cult? I'm sure there are wringing of hands, rending of clothes, tearing of hair, tears of despair of parents seeing their children die, of children seeing the same all in the name of the "religion of peace". RIP. No, dear, I'm not. Perhaps Matty, Grappler and BigP were referencing all the handwringing over lost souls in the terrorist attacks against Whitey. So sad, so unfair, so typical of the Muselman. Your thoughts and prayers are with them, no? No, I'm not religious. It's just more waste in the name of ideology to me. but you go on supporting an ideology that kills. Good point, Setanta. White supremacism is not a race, no? Drinking tonight, K? Missing the good times in Vung Tau? Not at all. What religion was the chap everybody's handwringing and shedding tears over? Are people crying, hand wringing and shedding tears over him? Why? He's just lost his liberty, not his life. He took life, he  took the liberty those that lost lives. Strange. Only last week you were saying the wounded and disabled should be happy to suffer for Allah. I have no idea about Monk's mongs or right wingers, Setanta, but last week, you kept referring to "your side". What did you mean by that? Are we going to play this game even though I'm sure I've been through it with someone last weekend? I'm sure I said "religions" say suffering is a way to god. I thin gave Christian, Buddhist and other quotes to show the religious aspect of suffering. Not being religious, I don't understand it at all but religious people eat it up, you know that is what I meant or you're not as smart as you think you are. You pretty much gave me the hypothetical option of killing them or letting them suffer. I chose letting them suffer as I would not kill them. I'm sorry I did not take the option you would have liked me to take but I'm sure if I had of taken the option to shoot the light skinned creatures, you would have been on my arse over that. Catch .22 it seems. Never feel bad for saying what you think, Setanta. Own it. Or, if you disagree with it the next day, just say ah. I was wrong. The thing I didn't understand was all those references to "your side" of politics. Now I've never taken any side in politics, and I've never noticed you doing so either. So I'm curious. Did you mean it, or did you get something mixed up? No worries. Own it, or just say ah. "Your side" like others here, is the side that will accept no other POV than their own. This is something you do that you do not have to do but you cannot help yourself. If that person does not agree with me, he is on the "other side". You do it all the time. I'm happy if you want to do things that way but it means we will be at odds for no good reason. I'm happy for you not to agree with me, I would like it if you could be the same. If you can't I see a dictator. So Ho Chi Min, are you digging tunnels or being open? Do I feel like I need to pick up a 1911 when I dive in to the tunnels with you or do we be somewhat civil?

I don't think that's true, Setanta. You were very clear about sides. It was as if you were referencing a culture war, a clash of civilisations.

Now I've never heard you talk like that before, but it was the distinct impression you gave in your anti-Muslim, pro-gun spiel - a day after the Christchurch shooting.

No worries. If you've joined One Nation, it's all good. We'll all support you.

Not that there's anything wrong with it.

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 10:51pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 10:34pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 10:25pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 10:07pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:58pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:53pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:46pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:44pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:39pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:36pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:33pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:24pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 9:07pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 27th, 2019 at 4:55am: Well, after all the hand wringing and tears for lost souls, it back to business for the world's most evil CULT OF DEATH. You must have misinterpreted the first post, Setanta, then all the ones after that. A simple mishtake to make. I blame Islam. You? Are you sure it was referencing Christchurch? Not one of the many Islamic attacks around the world? Are you reading into it what you want to see? The thread is about the cult of death and we know there are attacks and killings in it's name every day. Why do you think it comes back to some wingnut in NZ who was no part of some cult? I'm sure there are wringing of hands, rending of clothes, tearing of hair, tears of despair of parents seeing their children die, of children seeing the same all in the name of the "religion of peace". RIP. No, dear, I'm not. Perhaps Matty, Grappler and BigP were referencing all the handwringing over lost souls in the terrorist attacks against Whitey. So sad, so unfair, so typical of the Muselman. Your thoughts and prayers are with them, no? No, I'm not religious. It's just more waste in the name of ideology to me. but you go on supporting an ideology that kills. Good point, Setanta. White supremacism is not a race, no? Drinking tonight, K? Missing the good times in Vung Tau? Not at all. What religion was the chap everybody's handwringing and shedding tears over? Are people crying, hand wringing and shedding tears over him? Why? He's just lost his liberty, not his life. He took life, he  took the liberty those that lost lives. Strange. Only last week you were saying the wounded and disabled should be happy to suffer for Allah. I have no idea about Monk's mongs or right wingers, Setanta, but last week, you kept referring to "your side". What did you mean by that? Are we going to play this game even though I'm sure I've been through it with someone last weekend? I'm sure I said "religions" say suffering is a way to god. I thin gave Christian, Buddhist and other quotes to show the religious aspect of suffering. Not being religious, I don't understand it at all but religious people eat it up, you know that is what I meant or you're not as smart as you think you are. You pretty much gave me the hypothetical option of killing them or letting them suffer. I chose letting them suffer as I would not kill them. I'm sorry I did not take the option you would have liked me to take but I'm sure if I had of taken the option to shoot the light skinned creatures, you would have been on my arse over that. Catch .22 it seems. Never feel bad for saying what you think, Setanta. Own it. Or, if you disagree with it the next day, just say ah. I was wrong. The thing I didn't understand was all those references to "your side" of politics. Now I've never taken any side in politics, and I've never noticed you doing so either. So I'm curious. Did you mean it, or did you get something mixed up? No worries. Own it, or just say ah. "Your side" like others here, is the side that will accept no other POV than their own. This is something you do that you do not have to do but you cannot help yourself. If that person does not agree with me, he is on the "other side". You do it all the time. I'm happy if you want to do things that way but it means we will be at odds for no good reason. I'm happy for you not to agree with me, I would like it if you could be the same. If you can't I see a dictator. So Ho Chi Min, are you digging tunnels or being open? Do I feel like I need to pick up a 1911 when I dive in to the tunnels with you or do we be somewhat civil? I don't think that's true, Setanta. You were very clear about sides. It was as if you were referencing a culture war, a clash of civilisations. Now I've never heard you talk like that before, but it was the distinct impression you gave in your anti-Muslim, pro-gun spiel - a day after the Christchurch shooting. No worries. If you've joined One Nation, it's all good. We'll all support you. Not that there's anything wrong with it.

K, I'm pro gun, that does not mean I want to see people killed. I've never killed anyone and have no desire to.
Pro firearm is is not pro killing people. You asked what should be done with the wounded. Would you have liked me to have said they should be shot? Why would I want that? The only alternative was to let them suffer until help eventually came. You made up the catch 22. You judged me by it. You perpetuated it around the forum to denigrate me.

You didn't want to see anyone shot, you wanted to bury a thread on the Christchurch shooting.

Nothing to do with guns, Setanta. You did it because the victims were Muslims, you know that.

I'm positive those Muslims would prefer to suffer than be put out of their misery.... Paradise regardless.....

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 11:16pm:

You didn't want to see anyone shot, you wanted to bury a thread on the Christchurch shooting. Nothing to do with guns, Setanta. You did it because the victims were Muslims, you know that.

This thread wasn't about the Christchurch shootings - it was about the normal day-to-day activities of various Muslims.

You can stop trying to shovel every discussion into what you want it to be now - same as gregpec with his 'Trump rape'..... discuss the issue and stop trying so desperately to find ways to sledge others.

I doubt Setanta considered their being Muslim as reason for anything - he's said repeatedly that he abhors the event.

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 11:19pm:

FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:16pm: You didn't want to see anyone shot, you wanted to bury a thread on the Christchurch shooting. Nothing to do with guns, Setanta. You did it because the victims were Muslims, you know that. This thread wasn't about the Christchurch shootings - it was about the normal day-to-day activities of various Muslims. You can stop trying to shovel every discussion into what you want it to be now - same as gregpec with his Trump rape'.....

What do you think, Setanta?

A thread on the normal day-to-day activities of various Muslims getting shot to death in a Christchurch mosque.

Not bad, eh?

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 11:23pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:19pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:16pm: You didn't want to see anyone shot, you wanted to bury a thread on the Christchurch shooting. Nothing to do with guns, Setanta. You did it because the victims were Muslims, you know that. This thread wasn't about the Christchurch shootings - it was about the normal day-to-day activities of various Muslims. You can stop trying to shovel every discussion into what you want it to be now - same as gregpec with his Trump rape'..... What do you think, Setanta? A thread on the normal day-to-day activities of various Muslims getting shot to death in a Christchurch mosque. Not bad, eh?

That's the reality of this thread - there are plenty of others about Christchurch.

You DO struggle with reality!!

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 11:28pm:

FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:23pm: Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:19pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:16pm: You didn't want to see anyone shot, you wanted to bury a thread on the Christchurch shooting. Nothing to do with guns, Setanta. You did it because the victims were Muslims, you know that. This thread wasn't about the Christchurch shootings - it was about the normal day-to-day activities of various Muslims. You can stop trying to shovel every discussion into what you want it to be now - same as gregpec with his Trump rape'..... What do you think, Setanta? A thread on the normal day-to-day activities of various Muslims getting shot to death in a Christchurch mosque. Not bad, eh? That's the reality of this thread - there are plenty of others about Christchurch. You DO struggle with reality!!

Setanta and I were talking about a certain other thread, dear. That's okay, you weren't to know.

It's Mattywisk who referenced Christchurch in this thread in his opening sentence. Matty thinks he can drown out the Jacinta Aherns by blaming Islam lots of times.

He's got form, you see. He used to crash the board by posting dozens of cut-and-pasted threads.

Freeedom, innit.

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 11:16pm:

You didn't want to see anyone shot, you wanted to bury a thread on the Christchurch shooting. Nothing to do with guns, Setanta. You did it because the victims were Muslims, you know that.

Why TF would I want to bury a thread K? The only thing I said was I saw this coming. Why? Because Islam has been killing people left, right and all ways. It was inevitable that there was return fire. I'm not saying it was right or it was good or anything beyond it was inevitable. Now we will see more from both sides. That does not make me a supporter of either side although you seem to be a supporter of one side. Allah hu Akbar! Eh? Perhaps you should be on the Govt's watch list.

Setanta wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 11:53pm:

FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:16pm: You didn't want to see anyone shot, you wanted to bury a thread on the Christchurch shooting. Nothing to do with guns, Setanta. You did it because the victims were Muslims, you know that. Why TF would I want to bury a thread K? The only thing I said was I saw this coming. Why? Because Islam has been killing people left, right and all ways. It was inevitable that there was return fire. I'm not saying it was right or it was good or anything beyond it was inevitable. Now we will see more from both sides. That does not make me a supporter of either side although you seem to be a supporter of one side. Allah hu Akbar! Eh? Perhaps you should be on the Govt's watch list.

Sides?

FD wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 12:05am:

Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:53pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:16pm: You didn't want to see anyone shot, you wanted to bury a thread on the Christchurch shooting. Nothing to do with guns, Setanta. You did it because the victims were Muslims, you know that. Why TF would I want to bury a thread K? The only thing I said was I saw this coming. Why? Because Islam has been killing people left, right and all ways. It was inevitable that there was return fire. I'm not saying it was right or it was good or anything beyond it was inevitable. Now we will see more from both sides. That does not make me a supporter of either side although you seem to be a supporter of one side. Allah hu Akbar! Eh? Perhaps you should be on the Govt's watch list. Sides?

Yes, sides, K? Why?

Set ... the deflection is strong with this one.

It seems are few here attended the same seminars.

FD wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 11:34pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:28pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:23pm: Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:19pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:16pm: You didn't want to see anyone shot, you wanted to bury a thread on the Christchurch shooting. Nothing to do with guns, Setanta. You did it because the victims were Muslims, you know that. This thread wasn't about the Christchurch shootings - it was about the normal day-to-day activities of various Muslims. You can stop trying to shovel every discussion into what you want it to be now - same as gregpec with his Trump rape'..... What do you think, Setanta? A thread on the normal day-to-day activities of various Muslims getting shot to death in a Christchurch mosque. Not bad, eh? That's the reality of this thread - there are plenty of others about Christchurch. You DO struggle with reality!! Setanta and I were talking about a certain other thread, dear. That's okay, you weren't to know. It's Mattywisk who referenced Christchurch in this thread in his opening sentence. Matty thinks he can drown out the Jacinta Aherns by blaming Islam lots of times. He's got form, you see. He used to crash the board by posting dozens of cut-and-pasted threads. Freeedom, innit.

I like it when you wit is in full swing - just accompany it with civility in all ways and you'll be fine...

Ardern .. Ardern - kinda like The Ardennes... sort of... what the hell is an Ardern?

Setanta wrote on Mar 28^th, 2019 at 11:53pm:

FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:16pm: You didn't want to see anyone shot, you wanted to bury a thread on the Christchurch shooting. Nothing to do with guns, Setanta. You did it because the victims were Muslims, you know that. Why TF would I want to bury a thread K? The only thing I said was I saw this coming. Why? Because Islam has been killing people left, right and all ways. It was inevitable that there was return fire. I'm not saying it was right or it was good or anything beyond it was inevitable. Now we will see more from both sides. That does not make me a supporter of either side although you seem to be a supporter of one side. Allah hu Akbar! Eh? Perhaps you should be on the Govt's watch list.

That's the meat of the discussion - convenient though it may be for the screeching sheila types to leap on such a comment and make it hatred of Muslims etc - that is clearly not the case. 

Side note:- This kind of insanity got out of control with the early feminists - disagree with any of their demands and you were a woman hater and a basher.  Then your government sided with them - why?  Nobody really knows apart from utter stupidity.  Now look at them in the majority in universities and such- if that's the way they carry on - what person in his or her right mind would want them to majority rule your nation with that kind of infantile mentality?

Extend that to infantile Muslims Islamists and their radicals - what person in his/her right mind would want them to majority rule your nation?  8-)  Same with the 'radical' Blacks etc.... Gays.. you name it.... if they act that way over everything they want, who would want them running anything?

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 10:11am:

Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:53pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:16pm: You didn't want to see anyone shot, you wanted to bury a thread on the Christchurch shooting. Nothing to do with guns, Setanta. You did it because the victims were Muslims, you know that. Why TF would I want to bury a thread K? The only thing I said was I saw this coming. Why? Because Islam has been killing people left, right and all ways. It was inevitable that there was return fire. I'm not saying it was right or it was good or anything beyond it was inevitable. Now we will see more from both sides. That does not make me a supporter of either side although you seem to be a supporter of one side. Allah hu Akbar! Eh? Perhaps you should be on the Govt's watch list. That's the meat of the discussion - convenient though it may be for the screeching sheila types to leap on such a comment and make it hatred of Muslims etc - that is clearly not the case.  Side note:- This kind of insanity got out of control with the early feminists - disagree with any of their demands and you were a woman hater and a basher.  Then your government sided with them - why?  Nobody really knows apart from utter stupidity.  Now look at them in the majority in universities and such- if that's the way they carry on - what person in his or her right mind would want them to majority rule your nation with that kind of infantile mentality? Extend that to infantile Muslims Islamists and their radicals - what person in his/her right mind would want them to majority rule your nation?  8-)  Same with the 'radical' Blacks etc.... Gays.. you name it.... if they act that way over everything they want, who would want them running anything?

The fact of the matter is, you judge feminists, Muslims, Aboriginals and anyone else you can't relate to by the worst behaved representatives of their demographic. You ascribe that worst behaviour to your incessantly repreated value judgements of those groups.

You don't do that with white supremacy though. That you go in to bat for.

Screams volumes.

mothra wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 10:47am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 10:11am: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:53pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:16pm: You didn't want to see anyone shot, you wanted to bury a thread on the Christchurch shooting. Nothing to do with guns, Setanta. You did it because the victims were Muslims, you know that. Why TF would I want to bury a thread K? The only thing I said was I saw this coming. Why? Because Islam has been killing people left, right and all ways. It was inevitable that there was return fire. I'm not saying it was right or it was good or anything beyond it was inevitable. Now we will see more from both sides. That does not make me a supporter of either side although you seem to be a supporter of one side. Allah hu Akbar! Eh? Perhaps you should be on the Govt's watch list. That's the meat of the discussion - convenient though it may be for the screeching sheila types to leap on such a comment and make it hatred of Muslims etc - that is clearly not the case.  Side note:- This kind of insanity got out of control with the early feminists - disagree with any of their demands and you were a woman hater and a basher.  Then your government sided with them - why?  Nobody really knows apart from utter stupidity.  Now look at them in the majority in universities and such- if that's the way they carry on - what person in his or her right mind would want them to majority rule your nation with that kind of infantile mentality? Extend that to infantile Muslims Islamists and their radicals - what person in his/her right mind would want them to majority rule your nation?  8-)  Same with the 'radical' Blacks etc.... Gays.. you name it.... if they act that way over everything they want, who would want them running anything? The fact of the matter is, you judge feminists, Muslims, Aboriginals and anyone else you can't relate to by the worst behaved representatives of their demographic. You ascribe that worst behaviour to your incessantly repeated value judgements of those groups. You don't do that with white supremacy though. That you go in to bat for. Screams volumes.

https://media.giphy.com/media/14ceV8wMLIGO6Q/giphy.gif

we are all guilty of pigeonholing people on here.

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 11:03am:

we are all guilty of pigeonholing people on here.

So true - pigeon holing is a form of violence that runs a close second to direct violence... it's an abuse of reason and of fair play and thus of the human spirit....

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 11:26am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 11:03am: we are all guilty of pigeonholing people on here. So true - pigeon holing is a form of violence that runs a close second to direct violence... it's an abuse of reason and of fair play and thus of the human spirit....

I've had the lefties on here pigeonholing about me living in Western Sydney. I've been called a bogan plenty of times. That's one big problem with Australia now, everybody is judging everybody. I can't count how many times Pauline Hanson has had her fish and chip shop thrown at her. We are all guilty of it.

mothra wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 10:47am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 10:11am: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:53pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:16pm: You didn't want to see anyone shot, you wanted to bury a thread on the Christchurch shooting. Nothing to do with guns, Setanta. You did it because the victims were Muslims, you know that. Why TF would I want to bury a thread K? The only thing I said was I saw this coming. Why? Because Islam has been killing people left, right and all ways. It was inevitable that there was return fire. I'm not saying it was right or it was good or anything beyond it was inevitable. Now we will see more from both sides. That does not make me a supporter of either side although you seem to be a supporter of one side. Allah hu Akbar! Eh? Perhaps you should be on the Govt's watch list. That's the meat of the discussion - convenient though it may be for the screeching sheila types to leap on such a comment and make it hatred of Muslims etc - that is clearly not the case.  Side note:- This kind of insanity got out of control with the early feminists - disagree with any of their demands and you were a woman hater and a basher.  Then your government sided with them - why?  Nobody really knows apart from utter stupidity.  Now look at them in the majority in universities and such- if that's the way they carry on - what person in his or her right mind would want them to majority rule your nation with that kind of infantile mentality? Extend that to infantile Muslims Islamists and their radicals - what person in his/her right mind would want them to majority rule your nation?  8-)  Same with the 'radical' Blacks etc.... Gays.. you name it.... if they act that way over everything they want, who would want them running anything? The fact of the matter is, you judge feminists, Muslims, Aboriginals and anyone else you can't relate to by the worst behaved representatives of their demographic. You ascribe that worst behaviour to your incessantly repreated value judgements of those groups. You don't do that with white supremacy though. That you go in to bat for. Screams volumes.

a) feminists are not mainstream women.... they are radicals and ratbags....

b) the Muslims and Aboriginals you speak of are those who claim to be radicals and ratbags as well ...

c) the gays of whom you speak are the radical ratbags as well..

I am always careful to differentiate between the real ones and the ratbags... you just can't see it.

What part of 'criminal and terrorist'  blah-blahs should be deported/imprisoned do you NOT understand?

What part of 'lunatic demanding, lying' feminists/Gays etc with serious issues should be totally ignored rather than permitted to become mainstream on the back of faulty non-science' do you NOT understand?

I can train an idiot to the limits of his abilities - I cannot train a fool.....

FYI -I judge people as they come to me - not by any other standard - and I heartily condemn criminals and lunatics with an agenda who are stealing control over discussion using threats and violence and intimidation and stand-over and refuse to accept them until they learn to behave like civilised human beings.

I have NEVER 'gone in to bat' for any supremacy - if you learn to read properly you will see clearly that I condemn ALL such movements... you simply do not wish to see that there are other supremacist ideologies going the rounds, and 'white supremacy' is very minor.

Indeed, it is you and greg and that kind who are a big part of the problem, since you flatly refuse to see anything wrong with anyone but white men, and seek by every means to control and demolish any discussion on a level playing field by attacking the speaker.

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 11:34am:

mothra wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 10:47am: Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 10:11am: Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:53pm: FD wrote on Mar 28th, 2019 at 11:16pm: You didn't want to see anyone shot, you wanted to bury a thread on the Christchurch shooting. Nothing to do with guns, Setanta. You did it because the victims were Muslims, you know that. Why TF would I want to bury a thread K? The only thing I said was I saw this coming. Why? Because Islam has been killing people left, right and all ways. It was inevitable that there was return fire. I'm not saying it was right or it was good or anything beyond it was inevitable. Now we will see more from both sides. That does not make me a supporter of either side although you seem to be a supporter of one side. Allah hu Akbar! Eh? Perhaps you should be on the Govt's watch list. That's the meat of the discussion - convenient though it may be for the screeching sheila types to leap on such a comment and make it hatred of Muslims etc - that is clearly not the case.  Side note:- This kind of insanity got out of control with the early feminists - disagree with any of their demands and you were a woman hater and a basher.  Then your government sided with them - why?  Nobody really knows apart from utter stupidity.  Now look at them in the majority in universities and such- if that's the way they carry on - what person in his or her right mind would want them to majority rule your nation with that kind of infantile mentality? Extend that to infantile Muslims Islamists and their radicals - what person in his/her right mind would want them to majority rule your nation?  8-)  Same with the 'radical' Blacks etc.... Gays.. you name it.... if they act that way over everything they want, who would want them running anything? The fact of the matter is, you judge feminists, Muslims, Aboriginals and anyone else you can't relate to by the worst behaved representatives of their demographic. You ascribe that worst behaviour to your incessantly repreated value judgements of those groups. You don't do that with white supremacy though. That you go in to bat for. Screams volumes. a) feminists are not mainstream women.... they are radicals and ratbags.... b) the Muslims and Aboriginals you speak of are those who claim to be radicals and ratbags as well ... c) the gays of whom you speak are the radical ratbags as well.. I am always careful to differentiate between the real ones and the ratbags... you just can't see it. What part of 'criminal and terrorist'  blah-blahs should be deported/imprisoned do you NOT understand? What part of 'lunatic demanding, lying' feminists/Gays etc with serious issues should be totally ignored rather than permitted to become mainstream on the back of faulty non-science' do you NOT understand? I can train an idiot to the limits of his abilities - I cannot train a fool..... FYI -I judge people as they come to me - not by any other standard - and I heartily condemn criminals and lunatics with an agenda who are stealing control over discussion using threats and violence and intimidation and stand-over and refuse to accept them until they learn to behave like civilised human beings. I have NEVER 'gone in to bat' for any supremacy - if you learn to read properly you will see clearly that I condemn ALL such movements... you simply do not wish to see that there are other supremacist ideologies going the rounds, and 'white supremacy' is very minor. Indeed, it is you and greg and that kind who are a big part of the problem, since you flatly refuse to see anything wrong with anyone but white men, and seek by every means to control and demolish any discussion on a level playing field by attacking the speaker.

Were you as clever as you think you are, you would have realised that you just neatly evidenced my point and refrained from posting that.

I'll just recap: every group you can't relate to speaking out = radical / other

White supremacy = defensible / like

BTW- MY theatre is currently playing Indigenous plays - two out of the four on offer... and I'm working on improving street sealing and clean-up for the Aboriginals in the town I'm moving to.

What have YOU done for the Blacks lately?  Other than do your damnedest to alienate people who are genuinely supportive of their problems? 

Some of you really need to get out more...

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 11:30am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 11:26am: Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 11:03am: we are all guilty of pigeonholing people on here. So true - pigeon holing is a form of violence that runs a close second to direct violence... it's an abuse of reason and of fair play and thus of the human spirit.... I've had the lefties on here pigeonholing about me living in Western Sydney. I've been called a bogan plenty of times.

Yeah, well, you do insist on drinking VB.

Here's proof positive of your attack on the messenger:-

"The fact of the matter is, you judge feminists, Muslims, Aboriginals and anyone else you can't relate to by the worst behaved representatives of their demographic. You ascribe that worst behaviour to your incessantly repreated value judgements of those groups.

You don't do that with white supremacy though. That you go in to bat for."

All of it utter and emotion-driven nonsense, and an absolute insult to any reasonable person.  Not my fault you simply can't read, let alone interpret what is written.

SHOW me where I've supported white supremacy or advocated for anything but refusal to give in to absurd demands such as change Australia Day or where I've advocated deporting or imprisoning any but the criminal and the terrorist .......right now - or hold your peace.

You must be confusing me with someone else.... or you are illiterate...

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 11:48am:

BTW- MY theatre is currently playing Indigenous plays - two out of the four on offer... and I'm working on improving street sealing and clean-up for the Aboriginals in the town I'm moving to. What have YOU done for the Blacks lately?  Other than do your damnedest to alienate people who are genuinely supportive of their problems?  Some of you really need to get out more...

Well, i don't call the 'the Blacks' for a start.

I certainly don't deride them on social media either, by constantly referring to them as Abos and Niqqers and other such profoundly offensive nomenclature.

And i don't try to score brownie points by making a song and dance out of my "charity" towards them, as though that actually indicates anything other than condescension,.

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 11:51am:

Here's proof positive of your attack on the messenger:- "The fact of the matter is, you judge feminists, Muslims, Aboriginals and anyone else you can't relate to by the worst behaved representatives of their demographic. You ascribe that worst behaviour to your incessantly repreated value judgements of those groups. You don't do that with white supremacy though. That you go in to bat for." All of it utter and emotion-driven nonsense, and an absolute insult to any reasonable person.  Not my fault you simply can't read, let alone interpret what is written. SHOW me where I've supported white supremacy.......right now - or hold your peace.

You've been doing it ever since Christchurch.

In fact, you do it all the time. You just say you were joking when you're called on it.

mothra wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 11:51am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 11:48am: BTW- MY theatre is currently playing Indigenous plays - two out of the four on offer... and I'm working on improving street sealing and clean-up for the Aboriginals in the town I'm moving to. What have YOU done for the Blacks lately?  Other than do your damnedest to alienate people who are genuinely supportive of their problems?  Some of you really need to get out more... Well, i don't call the 'the Blacks' for a start. I certainly don't deride them on social media either, by constantly referring to them as Abos and Niqqers and other such profoundly offensive nomenclature. And i don't try to score brownie points by making a song and dance out of my "charity" towards them, as though that actually indicates anything other than condescension,.

Call them what you will - a rose by any other name ... not my problem.

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 11:55am:

mothra wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 11:51am: Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 11:48am: BTW- MY theatre is currently playing Indigenous plays - two out of the four on offer... and I'm working on improving street sealing and clean-up for the Aboriginals in the town I'm moving to. What have YOU done for the Blacks lately?  Other than do your damnedest to alienate people who are genuinely supportive of their problems?  Some of you really need to get out more... Well, i don't call the 'the Blacks' for a start. I certainly don't deride them on social media either, by constantly referring to them as Abos and Niqqers and other such profoundly offensive nomenclature. And i don't try to score brownie points by making a song and dance out of my "charity" towards them, as though that actually indicates anything other than condescension,. Call them what you will - a rose by any other name ... not my problem.

I choose to respect them when they tell me what they find offensive.

You prefer to rank your right to be offensive over their wishes.

What does that say about you and your respect for them?

mothra wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 11:52am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 11:51am: Here's proof positive of your attack on the messenger:- "The fact of the matter is, you judge feminists, Muslims, Aboriginals and anyone else you can't relate to by the worst behaved representatives of their demographic. You ascribe that worst behaviour to your incessantly repreated value judgements of those groups. You don't do that with white supremacy though. That you go in to bat for." All of it utter and emotion-driven nonsense, and an absolute insult to any reasonable person.  Not my fault you simply can't read, let alone interpret what is written. SHOW me where I've supported white supremacy.......right now - or hold your peace. You've been doing it ever since Christchurch. In fact, you do it all the time. You just say you were joking when you're called on it.

I said 'show me' - not just rant.  Never once have I supported or advocated any supremacist movement, and have simply sought to discuss the issues in a real light and not through bigotry-tinted lenses as many do.

As for Christchurch - the most I've said is that No-Name NZ (telling enough in itself my use of that term) was not a 'white supremacist' - he is, by his own lights, an eco-warrior who seeks to generate control over his own nation, same as Arabs etc do in theirs.

As many times - why are OTHER supremacists not labeled supremacists?  Only a white sin, is it?

Is the Taliban supremacist?  Is the Iranian regime supremacist?  Are the Chinese supremacist?  the Burmese who kill Muslims? Was Sad Sam supremacist when he killed many thousands?  What about the Japanese with their limits on immigration etc?

None so blind as they who refuse to see anything but their pet hate.

Jeez - even al Jazeera - in an article you have yet to even attempt to discuss and which I posted - first larded on all the Muslim on Muslim killings in the thousands, the killings and oppression in African and Asian nations - and then went on to say that the current situation was primarily the fault of the West for 'oppressing' Muslims.... the same Muslims the West took in and gave shelter, protection and a new life with vast opportunities, as opposed to a sudden death at the hands of a mullah or some passing zealot with some funny idea of morality.

Put simply - your kind are incapable of discussing anything unless it is forced into the very narrow parameters you wish to impose - and I will not play that game.

mothra wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 11:57am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 11:55am: mothra wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 11:51am: Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 11:48am: BTW- MY theatre is currently playing Indigenous plays - two out of the four on offer... and I'm working on improving street sealing and clean-up for the Aboriginals in the town I'm moving to. What have YOU done for the Blacks lately?  Other than do your damnedest to alienate people who are genuinely supportive of their problems?  Some of you really need to get out more... Well, i don't call the 'the Blacks' for a start. I certainly don't deride them on social media either, by constantly referring to them as Abos and Niqqers and other such profoundly offensive nomenclature. And i don't try to score brownie points by making a song and dance out of my "charity" towards them, as though that actually indicates anything other than condescension,. Call them what you will - a rose by any other name ... not my problem. I choose to respect them when they tell me what they find offensive. You prefer to rank your right to be offensive over their wishes. What does that say about you and your respect for them?

Define 'respect'.....

A bit rich coming from someone who says that anyone refusing to be brow-beaten into accepting some mythical need to change Australia Day is a 'racist'...

So in your eyes anything anyone finds offensive should instantly lead to everyone else altering their thoughts and their behaviour and their way of life?  Do you even begin to see how utterly absurd that is?

You're just trying to get out of a free and open discussion.

When people like you etc attack me for holding a different view and insult me, I then will insult you by using terms like Kaffirs, Niqqers, Abos etc.... you draw down the thunder and you'll get it.  You want to use attack as your means of discussion - be prepared for a flat refusal and a radicalised response from those you attack.

Advice for today:-

Never engage in a furball with a faster moving, faster turning, more heavily armed, more agile aircraft in the hands of an experienced and capable pilot....

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 12:04pm:

mothra wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 11:52am: Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 11:51am: Here's proof positive of your attack on the messenger:- "The fact of the matter is, you judge feminists, Muslims, Aboriginals and anyone else you can't relate to by the worst behaved representatives of their demographic. You ascribe that worst behaviour to your incessantly repreated value judgements of those groups. You don't do that with white supremacy though. That you go in to bat for." All of it utter and emotion-driven nonsense, and an absolute insult to any reasonable person.  Not my fault you simply can't read, let alone interpret what is written. SHOW me where I've supported white supremacy.......right now - or hold your peace. You've been doing it ever since Christchurch. In fact, you do it all the time. You just say you were joking when you're called on it. I said 'show me' - not just rant.  Never once have I supported or advocated any supremacist movement, and have simply sought to discuss the issues in a real light and not through bigotry-tinted lenses as many do. As for Christchurch - the most I've said is that No-Name NZ (telling enough in itself my use of that term) was not a 'white supremacist' - he is, by his own lights, an eco-warrior who seeks to generate control over his own nation, same as Arabs etc do in theirs. As many times - why are OTHER supremacists not labeled supremacists?  Only a white sin, is it? Is the Taliban supremacist?  Is the Iranian regime supremacist?  Are the Chinese supremacist?  the Burmese who kill Muslims? Was Sad Sam supremacist when he killed many thousands?  What about the Japanese with their limits on immigration etc? None so blind as they who refuse to see anything but their pet hate. Jeez - even al Jazeera - in an article you have yet to even attempt to discuss and which I posted - first larded on all the Muslim on Muslim killings in the thousands, the killings and oppression in African and Asian nations - and then went on to say that the current situation was primarily the fault of the West for 'oppressing' Muslims.... the same Muslims the West took in and gave shelter, protection and a new life with vast opportunities, as opposed to a sudden death at the hands of a mullah or some passing zealot with some funny idea of morality. Put simply - your kind are incapable of discussing anything unless it is forced into the very narrow parameters you wish to impose - and I will not play that game.

You don't "discuss" anything. You repeat your biased observations ad infinitum.

And what you and others on here have observed from Christchurch is that the Muslims had it coming and that Tarrant guy sure had some points.

I repeat, you show more empathy with such ideology than you do the others you deride on here many times daily.

White supremacy = a few good points

Every other group = noisy radicals

mothra wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 12:08pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 12:04pm: mothra wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 11:52am: Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 11:51am: Here's proof positive of your attack on the messenger:- "The fact of the matter is, you judge feminists, Muslims, Aboriginals and anyone else you can't relate to by the worst behaved representatives of their demographic. You ascribe that worst behaviour to your incessantly repreated value judgements of those groups. You don't do that with white supremacy though. That you go in to bat for." All of it utter and emotion-driven nonsense, and an absolute insult to any reasonable person.  Not my fault you simply can't read, let alone interpret what is written. SHOW me where I've supported white supremacy.......right now - or hold your peace. You've been doing it ever since Christchurch. In fact, you do it all the time. You just say you were joking when you're called on it. I said 'show me' - not just rant.  Never once have I supported or advocated any supremacist movement, and have simply sought to discuss the issues in a real light and not through bigotry-tinted lenses as many do. As for Christchurch - the most I've said is that No-Name NZ (telling enough in itself my use of that term) was not a 'white supremacist' - he is, by his own lights, an eco-warrior who seeks to generate control over his own nation, same as Arabs etc do in theirs. As many times - why are OTHER supremacists not labeled supremacists?  Only a white sin, is it? Is the Taliban supremacist?  Is the Iranian regime supremacist?  Are the Chinese supremacist?  the Burmese who kill Muslims? Was Sad Sam supremacist when he killed many thousands?  What about the Japanese with their limits on immigration etc? None so blind as they who refuse to see anything but their pet hate. Jeez - even al Jazeera - in an article you have yet to even attempt to discuss and which I posted - first larded on all the Muslim on Muslim killings in the thousands, the killings and oppression in African and Asian nations - and then went on to say that the current situation was primarily the fault of the West for 'oppressing' Muslims.... the same Muslims the West took in and gave shelter, protection and a new life with vast opportunities, as opposed to a sudden death at the hands of a mullah or some passing zealot with some funny idea of morality. Put simply - your kind are incapable of discussing anything unless it is forced into the very narrow parameters you wish to impose - and I will not play that game. You don't "discuss" anything. You repeat your biased observations ad infinitum. And what you and others on here have observed from Christchurch is that the Muslims had it coming and that Tarrant guy sure had some points. I repeat, you show more empathy with such ideology than you do the others you deride on here many times daily. White supremacy = a few good points Every other group = noisy radicals

You force repeat since you refuse to discuss.. like just now - don't blame me for having to repeat simple realities over and over to you until you get it -  where is the answer to my question - 'show me!

You are repeating yourself and adding no reality to your discussion...

This, Grasshopers, is what happens when you seek to discuss issues with the ideologically driven emotionals.... over and over the same nonsense for no result.

I've got things to do..... be back to slice you finely later...

And why do you think i have not tried to discuss your much lauded article, Grap? Because you present it and ensconce it in all of your bigotry and short-sightedness, holding it up as a prop in the great war on white civilisation you see unfolding before you and moan about daily?

It's ridiculous. you can't reason with someone who thinks like that, God knows i've tried over the years.

I've given up almost entirely.

And the fact that this is the engine driving you in the wake of Christchurch just shows a complete deficiency in tact and empathy. As i said, justifications for white supremacy and the victimhood you clutch to you like a shield.

I reserve the right to chip in when i feel so inclined.

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 12:18pm:

This, Grasshopers, is what happens when you seek to discuss issues with the ideologically driven emotionals.... over and over the same nonsense for no result. I've got things to do..... be back to slice you finely later...

You've not tried to discuss anything at all. You've just tried to evidence you're not a supremacist while behaving very much like one.

And i've yet to see you "slice" anybody at all. Ever.

Here's the thing ... you, Setanta, the rest of you .... the basic premise of your argument is wrong. You simply cannot be reasoned with because your foundation is polar extremes from where it needs to be to achieve the most beneficial outcome for the entire world, moving forward.

To you guys, it's all about sides. Us and them. Your targets rotate a little but it's always a dichotomy of warring sides.

The whole premise of everything you've said since Christchurch is that it happened to "them". The braver of you go on to say "for a change". Overlooking utterly that these were residents of New Zealand who have and had far more in common with you and i than some terrorist jihadi.

But you all lump them in with the terrorist jihadi because you draw a blank with their religion. As though that is the sum total of person.

I instead, when i think of Christchurch think of people, ostensibly like me, who were gunned down in a part of the world so unaccustomed to such things, people probably didn't joke about it being an outside prospect. It's also a country that shares very close ties with our country.

Most importantly, the killer was from here.

Now, we get back to sides. You have, by virtue of assessing Christchurch as an attack on "them" and even arguing positions of the murderer, assigned yourself a 'side' ... if sides are to be assigned. And it's you assigning them.

Feeling a bit sheepish now?

Whereas i, exactly as i have with every instance of loss of life owing to violence i have ever heard about in my living memory, taken the side of the victims.

They didn't cut off anyone's head. Or perform FGM. Or throw a gay off a building. They were, more than likely, law abiding Kiwis assembled to practice their faith that we can extrapolate from the overwhelming majority of those who share that faith, they intended to embody peacefully.

And these people are our brothers and sisters. They are not responsible for anything done in the contorted name of their religion.

For if you hold them to account for the sins of people they share a commonality with, then you must accept some responsibility for Tarrant.

You simply can't have it both ways.

mothra wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 12:48pm:

They didn't cut off anyone's head. Or perform FGM. Or throw a gay off a building

You're quite certain about that?

Remember

According to world stats

1 in 4 are radicals

mothra wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 11:51am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 11:48am: BTW- MY theatre is currently playing Indigenous plays - two out of the four on offer... and I'm working on improving street sealing and clean-up for the Aboriginals in the town I'm moving to. What have YOU done for the Blacks lately?  Other than do your damnedest to alienate people who are genuinely supportive of their problems?  Some of you really need to get out more... Well, i don't call the 'the Blacks' for a start. I certainly don't deride them on social media either, by constantly referring to them as Abos and Niqqers and other such profoundly offensive nomenclature. And i don't try to score brownie points by making a song and dance out of my "charity" towards them, as though that actually indicates anything other than condescension,.

You are confusing me with someone else - I never 'make a song and dance' about 'charity' to them - I merely point out that given the numbers of Muslims ACTUALLY persecuted and even killed worldwide, the West has been been open-handed and civilised in giving them shelter and a chance for a far better life.

That precise position is supported by the al Jazeera rant I posted.. even the Muslims know that they are better off in the West, and they come to the West and are welcomed, but their official line says they must say they are oppressed there.

What oppression?  I asked gregpec what this 'oppression' was - he said some Muslim lass was cat-called in a street.. Jesus God!  In Islamiland she could have been stoned to death for walking alone... or grabbed off the streets in a 'traditional' 'courtship' and raped and then forced to learn 'love' for her rapist (which is why they are forced to go outside with a male family member - after being raped she has no choice but to 'love' her rapist or be cast out and shunned by her family and tribe)...

Something desperately wrong with you people these days.... do you understand how desperately hard it is for a widowed Muslim woman to get by and feed her family, since she - as a widow - is considered 'soiled goods'?

Talk about propaganda.....

In the West - a widow can find another husband and prosper - not in Islam .. she must rely on charity from friends and relatives...

God, some of you people are sick and uneducated.

mothra wrote on Mar 29^th, 2019 at 12:24pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 29th, 2019 at 12:18pm: This, Grasshopers, is what happens when you seek to discuss issues with the ideologically driven emotionals.... over and over the same nonsense for no result. I've got things to do..... be back to slice you finely later... You've not tried to discuss anything at all. You've just tried to evidence you're not a supremacist while behaving very much like one. And i've yet to see you "slice" anybody at all. Ever.

Nor have you, sweetheart - all you've done is attack the messenger... not once have you actually offered anything but vitriol and verbiage.

I slice and dice you every time you arrive here.... thanks for coming - not my failure that you are unable to see ...

Still waiting for you to prove that I 'support' white supremacism...... or any supremacism for that matter, when all I have done is condemn ANY supremacism and violence to achieve an end - (BTW - you perpetrate violence against reason and against my good name by even suggesting that I support anything extreme without your providing any proof)...

Where is your proof that I've supported white supremacism?

Can't do it, eh? I'm part Irish, Scottish, German Jew and a Chinese or Indian great-grandmother  - something sallow - never beat on a Black or a Gay or a Musso or anyone else in my life... not in any way.

You??  You just love attacking White Men.... the mainstay of the civilisation that protects and supports you...

I can train an idiot.........


Never get into a furball with a faster moving......