Back in 2013 everyone was carrying on as though Cathy McGowan was a true blue conservative independent, running against the evil and terrible Sophie Mirabella. I forewarned that she was nothing but a lefty from the bush, in the same mound of Rob Oakeshott and Tony Windsor. Now I have been proven emphatically correct. The people of Wodonga, Wangaratta and surrounding towns were stupid enough to fall for it.

The ugly old bitch is retiring at the next election and good riddance to the bitch.

I'd sooner have a child rapist before the thoroughly disgusting Mirabella. The people of Indi just wanted to be shot of her.

crocodile wrote on Feb 13^th, 2019 at 11:41pm:

I'd sooner have a child rapist before the thoroughly disgusting Mirabella. The people of Indi just wanted to be shot of her.

Wow. Well I can see that you’re trying to rival that activist doctor or most disgusting Andy offensive quote of the week.

crocodile wrote on Feb 13^th, 2019 at 11:41pm:

I'd sooner have a child rapist before the thoroughly disgusting Mirabella. The people of Indi just wanted to be shot of her.

out of the pan into the fire....you reckon! ;D ;D

Matty is confused...

generally , in country areas, you have the "salt of the earth' farmers  and trades people and doctors and pharmacists and they are pretty chill and pretty competant and they dont need the applause of the crowd because they know they are the "shiiit".

then you have the people who just dont feel good in their bodies, dont feel right in their minds.
they are emotionally all over the place, like to create drama, like to be the centre of attention , like to think they know more then the cool people.

these are the people drawn to political office.

if you asked the people of a rural community who they would like to lead them, you will probably get a guy who has no interest in getting involved in a 'way of life" which is going to drag him down off the "narrow road to success".

he will have strong personal boundaries about what is allowed into his personal ecosystem and he recognises that politics is "lower consciousness" and not "fruitful"

matty wrote on Feb 13^th, 2019 at 11:09pm:

Back in 2013 everyone was carrying on as though Cathy McGowan was a true blue conservative independent, running against the evil and terrible Sophie Mirabella. I forewarned that she was nothing but a lefty from the bush, in the same mound of Rob Oakeshott and Tony Windsor. Now I have been proven emphatically correct. The people of Wodonga, Wangaratta and surrounding towns were stupid enough to fall for it. The ugly old bitch is retiring at the next election and good riddance to the bitch.

Good to see you've added zero evidence to back this up.

aquascoot wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 6:42am:

generally , in country areas, you have the "salt of the earth' farmers  and trades people and doctors and pharmacists and they are pretty chill and pretty competant and they dont need the applause of the crowd because they know they are the "shiiit". then you have the people who just dont feel good in their bodies, dont feel right in their minds. they are emotionally all over the place, like to create drama, like to be the centre of attention , like to think they know more then the cool people. these are the people drawn to political office. if you asked the people of a rural community who they would like to lead them, you will probably get a guy who has no interest in getting involved in a 'way of life" which is going to drag him down off the "narrow road to success". he will have strong personal boundaries about what is allowed into his personal ecosystem and he recognises that politics is "lower consciousness" and not "fruitful"

Weird consicering who they do vote in .

aquascoot wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 6:42am:

generally , in country areas, you have the "salt of the earth' farmers  and trades people and doctors and pharmacists and they are pretty chill and pretty competant and they dont need the applause of the crowd because they know they are the "shiiit". then you have the people who just dont feel good in their bodies, dont feel right in their minds. they are emotionally all over the place, like to create drama, like to be the centre of attention , like to think they know more then the cool people. these are the people drawn to political office. if you asked the people of a rural community who they would like to lead them, you will probably get a guy who has no interest in getting involved in a 'way of life" which is going to drag him down off the "narrow road to success". he will have strong personal boundaries about what is allowed into his personal ecosystem and he recognises that politics is "lower consciousness" and not "fruitful"

Nailed the majority of the Nats down to a T. Very few GENUINE farmers amongst them.

macman wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 10:13am:

aquascoot wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 6:42am: generally , in country areas, you have the "salt of the earth' farmers  and trades people and doctors and pharmacists and they are pretty chill and pretty competant and they dont need the applause of the crowd because they know they are the "shiiit". then you have the people who just dont feel good in their bodies, dont feel right in their minds. they are emotionally all over the place, like to create drama, like to be the centre of attention , like to think they know more then the cool people. these are the people drawn to political office. if you asked the people of a rural community who they would like to lead them, you will probably get a guy who has no interest in getting involved in a 'way of life" which is going to drag him down off the "narrow road to success". he will have strong personal boundaries about what is allowed into his personal ecosystem and he recognises that politics is "lower consciousness" and not "fruitful" Nailed the majority of the Nats down to a T. Very few GENUINE farmers amongst them.

Pretty well too. Most of the may be right leaning socially but most definitely on the left side of the economic map. Agrarian socialists indeed.

aquascoot wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 6:42am:

generally , in country areas, you have the "salt of the earth' farmers  and trades people and doctors and pharmacists and they are pretty chill and pretty competant and they dont need the applause of the crowd because they know they are the "shiiit". then you have the people who just dont feel good in their bodies, dont feel right in their minds. they are emotionally all over the place, like to create drama, like to be the centre of attention , like to think they know more then the cool people. these are the people drawn to political office. if you asked the people of a rural community who they would like to lead them, you will probably get a guy who has no interest in getting involved in a 'way of life" which is going to drag him down off the "narrow road to success". he will have strong personal boundaries about what is allowed into his personal ecosystem and he recognises that politics is "lower consciousness" and not "fruitful"

Good post, but it also shows how dumb some country people to fall for the lies and vote for them.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 8:59am:

matty wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 11:09pm: Back in 2013 everyone was carrying on as though Cathy McGowan was a true blue conservative independent, running against the evil and terrible Sophie Mirabella. I forewarned that she was nothing but a lefty from the bush, in the same mound of Rob Oakeshott and Tony Windsor. Now I have been proven emphatically correct. The people of Wodonga, Wangaratta and surrounding towns were stupid enough to fall for it. The ugly old bitch is retiring at the next election and good riddance to the bitch. Good to see you've added zero evidence to back this up.

1. She is pro climate change.
2. She was pro ssm.
3. The biggest of them all - siding with Labor and the Greens yesterday.

Funny how not one lefty on here has called out crocodile on his disgusting post about peadophiles. Imagine if I had said that, or another righty on here had. It goes to show yet with the left, it I sent all about the side and not the principle.

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 2:07pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 8:59am: matty wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 11:09pm: Back in 2013 everyone was carrying on as though Cathy McGowan was a true blue conservative independent, running against the evil and terrible Sophie Mirabella. I forewarned that she was nothing but a lefty from the bush, in the same mound of Rob Oakeshott and Tony Windsor. Now I have been proven emphatically correct. The people of Wodonga, Wangaratta and surrounding towns were stupid enough to fall for it. The ugly old bitch is retiring at the next election and good riddance to the bitch. Good to see you've added zero evidence to back this up. 1. She is pro climate change. 2. She was pro ssm. 3. The biggest of them all - siding with Labor and the Greens yesterday.

Thanks, thats just evidence she has a brain.

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 2:08pm:

Funny how not one lefty on here has called out crocodile on his disgusting post about peadophiles. Imagine if I had said that, or another righty on here had. It goes to show yet with the left, it I sent all about the side and not the principle.

I would have asked why you werent talking about SSM.

Speaking of which I'm still waiting for gods wrath on that.

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 2:08pm:

Funny how not one lefty on here has called out crocodile on his disgusting post about peadophiles. Imagine if I had said that, or another righty on here had. It goes to show yet with the left, it I sent all about the side and not the principle.

For fukk sake take your hand off it. I didn't say I like paedophiles only that Mirabella is worse.

Me, a raging lefty. At least you're funny.

After reading mattys rant I've think I've figured it out. (Let me know if you disagree).  The conclusion is that unless someone agree 100% with Matty, they're lefties? :D :D :D :D

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 2:08pm:

Funny how not one lefty on here has called out crocodile on his disgusting post about peadophiles. Imagine if I had said that, or another righty on here had. It goes to show yet with the left, it I sent all about the side and not the principle.

What was wrong with the comment?

He didn't say he supported pedo's. Only that scumabella is worse. He's 100% accurate

aquascoot wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 6:42am:

generally , in country areas, you have the "salt of the earth' farmers  and trades people and doctors and pharmacists and they are pretty chill and pretty competant and they dont need the applause of the crowd because they know they are the "shiiit". then you have the people who just dont feel good in their bodies, dont feel right in their minds. they are emotionally all over the place, like to create drama, like to be the centre of attention , like to think they know more then the cool people. these are the people drawn to political office. if you asked the people of a rural community who they would like to lead them, you will probably get a guy who has no interest in getting involved in a 'way of life" which is going to drag him down off the "narrow road to success". he will have strong personal boundaries about what is allowed into his personal ecosystem and he recognises that politics is "lower consciousness" and not "fruitful"

Is it fair too say you may have had a sexual encounter with a horse at least once in your life?

barryfromthebush wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 3:33pm:

aquascoot wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 6:42am: generally , in country areas, you have the "salt of the earth' farmers  and trades people and doctors and pharmacists and they are pretty chill and pretty competant and they dont need the applause of the crowd because they know they are the "shiiit". then you have the people who just dont feel good in their bodies, dont feel right in their minds. they are emotionally all over the place, like to create drama, like to be the centre of attention , like to think they know more then the cool people. these are the people drawn to political office. if you asked the people of a rural community who they would like to lead them, you will probably get a guy who has no interest in getting involved in a 'way of life" which is going to drag him down off the "narrow road to success". he will have strong personal boundaries about what is allowed into his personal ecosystem and he recognises that politics is "lower consciousness" and not "fruitful" Is it fair too say you may have had a sexual encounter with a horse at least once in your life?

Male or female ?

crocodile wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 3:49pm:

barryfromthebush wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 3:33pm: aquascoot wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 6:42am: generally , in country areas, you have the "salt of the earth' farmers  and trades people and doctors and pharmacists and they are pretty chill and pretty competant and they dont need the applause of the crowd because they know they are the "shiiit". then you have the people who just dont feel good in their bodies, dont feel right in their minds. they are emotionally all over the place, like to create drama, like to be the centre of attention , like to think they know more then the cool people. these are the people drawn to political office. if you asked the people of a rural community who they would like to lead them, you will probably get a guy who has no interest in getting involved in a 'way of life" which is going to drag him down off the "narrow road to success". he will have strong personal boundaries about what is allowed into his personal ecosystem and he recognises that politics is "lower consciousness" and not "fruitful" Is it fair too say you may have had a sexual encounter with a horse at least once in your life? Male or female ?

Who am I to judge on ones preferences...

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 2:19pm:

matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 2:07pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 8:59am: matty wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 11:09pm: Back in 2013 everyone was carrying on as though Cathy McGowan was a true blue conservative independent, running against the evil and terrible Sophie Mirabella. I forewarned that she was nothing but a lefty from the bush, in the same mound of Rob Oakeshott and Tony Windsor. Now I have been proven emphatically correct. The people of Wodonga, Wangaratta and surrounding towns were stupid enough to fall for it. The ugly old bitch is retiring at the next election and good riddance to the bitch. Good to see you've added zero evidence to back this up. 1. She is pro climate change. 2. She was pro ssm. 3. The biggest of them all - siding with Labor and the Greens yesterday. Thanks, thats just evidence she has a brain.

That’s the thing - you think that anyone who disagrees with these issues or others with which you agree, is stupid. You can’t accept that intelligent others disagree with you.

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 3:01pm:

After reading mattys rant I've think I've figured it out. (Let me know if you disagree).  The conclusion is that unless someone agree 100% with Matty, they're lefties? :D :D :D :D

Not at all, but issue 1 and 3 are decidedly left, and 2 is very much too, although I accept that there is a libertarian steak to that too. A majority of electorates which voted no were Labor.

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 7:25pm:

You can’t accept that intelligent others disagree with you.

All the evidence supports his thinking.

I never said that he supported peadophiles, but seriously to say that Sophie is not only in the same class, let alone worse, than someone who rapes or molests a child is absolutely despicable. Not only is it offensive ton Sophie, but even more so to the innocent children who have fallen prey to these creeps.

Why is Matty so worried about what other people do behind closed doors?

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 7:27pm:

matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 7:25pm: You can’t accept that intelligent others disagree with you. All the evidence supports his thinking.

I am not going back and forth over the climate science, I have done that to death and am quite frankly sick of it. We’re never going to agree there. However where is your evidence for the other two?

barryfromthebush wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 7:29pm:

Why is Matty so worried about what other people do behind closed doors?

Where did I say that I was?

matty wrote on Feb 13^th, 2019 at 11:09pm:

Back in 2013 everyone was carrying on as though Cathy McGowan was a true blue conservative independent, running against the evil and terrible Sophie Mirabella. I forewarned that she was nothing but a lefty from the bush, in the same mound of Rob Oakeshott and Tony Windsor. Now I have been proven emphatically correct. The people of Wodonga, Wangaratta and surrounding towns were stupid enough to fall for it. The ugly old bitch is retiring at the next election and good riddance to the bitch.

Your argument shoots yourself in the foot all over the place. Oakeshot and Windsor were both righties they could just see Tony Abbott as being Tony Abbott, remember his own party threw him out in that same term.

The Liberal party confirmed that Oakeshot and Windsor were both 100% correct.

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 7:30pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 7:27pm: matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 7:25pm: You can’t accept that intelligent others disagree with you. All the evidence supports his thinking. I am not going back and forth over the climate science, I have done that to death and am quite frankly sick of it. We’re never going to agree there. However where is your evidence for the other two?

1. gay marriage has been legal for a while now and the sky has not fallen
2. the inhumane treatment of people is something only an idiot would support.

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 7:27pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 3:01pm: After reading mattys rant I've think I've figured it out. (Let me know if you disagree).  The conclusion is that unless someone agree 100% with Matty, they're lefties? :D :D :D :D Not at all, but issue 1 and 3 are decidedly left, and 2 is very much too, although I accept that there is a libertarian steak to that too. A majority of electorates which voted no were Labor.

Climate change is a left issue? Not a science issue?
Same sex marriage vote...is that not voting based on electorate's will as well to some degree?

Little wonder Matty is confused by what is "left".
World is also not flat, politicians should represent the electorate.

As for inhumane treatment, i guess being inhumane is a right thing then.  Like live exports.

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 7:25pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 2:19pm: matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 2:07pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 8:59am: matty wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 11:09pm: Back in 2013 everyone was carrying on as though Cathy McGowan was a true blue conservative independent, running against the evil and terrible Sophie Mirabella. I forewarned that she was nothing but a lefty from the bush, in the same mound of Rob Oakeshott and Tony Windsor. Now I have been proven emphatically correct. The people of Wodonga, Wangaratta and surrounding towns were stupid enough to fall for it. The ugly old bitch is retiring at the next election and good riddance to the bitch. Good to see you've added zero evidence to back this up. 1. She is pro climate change. 2. She was pro ssm. 3. The biggest of them all - siding with Labor and the Greens yesterday. Thanks, thats just evidence she has a brain. That’s the thing - you think that anyone who disagrees with these issues or others with which you agree, is stupid. You can’t accept that intelligent others disagree with you.

Well if I use here as a data point, my hypothesis is correct.

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2019 at 8:23pm:

matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 7:30pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 7:27pm: matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 7:25pm: You can’t accept that intelligent others disagree with you. All the evidence supports his thinking. I am not going back and forth over the climate science, I have done that to death and am quite frankly sick of it. We’re never going to agree there. However where is your evidence for the other two? 1. gay marriage has been legal for a while now and the sky has not fallen 2. the inhumane treatment of people is something only an idiot would support.

1. Nobody said that it would. Many people have moral and religious objections to it, and not some tiny minority. Between 3/8 to 2/5 of the Australian population. There is no evidence for whether something is morally right or wrong.

2. This is a lie being pedalled by the left. There is absolutely no evidence that these people are being treated inhumanely. In fact the evidence points to the contrary. Moreover, they are not true asylum seekers. They are economic asylum seekers. If they were true, why did the house from Indonesia to Australia?

stunspore wrote on Feb 15^th, 2019 at 6:28am:

matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 7:27pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 3:01pm: After reading mattys rant I've think I've figured it out. (Let me know if you disagree).  The conclusion is that unless someone agree 100% with Matty, they're lefties? :D :D :D :D Not at all, but issue 1 and 3 are decidedly left, and 2 is very much too, although I accept that there is a libertarian steak to that too. A majority of electorates which voted no were Labor. Climate change is a left issue? Not a science issue? Same sex marriage vote...is that not voting based on electorate's will as well to some degree? Little wonder Matty is confused by what is "left". World is also not flat, politicians should represent the electorate.

Climate change maybe in and of itself isn’t left or right, but the spending of policies based on it certainly is left; big spending.

Not sure I follow what you’re saying in regards to ssm and the electorate’s will. What does that have to do regarding whether ssm is a left or right issue?

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 15^th, 2019 at 8:27am:

matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 7:25pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 2:19pm: matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 2:07pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 8:59am: matty wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 11:09pm: Back in 2013 everyone was carrying on as though Cathy McGowan was a true blue conservative independent, running against the evil and terrible Sophie Mirabella. I forewarned that she was nothing but a lefty from the bush, in the same mound of Rob Oakeshott and Tony Windsor. Now I have been proven emphatically correct. The people of Wodonga, Wangaratta and surrounding towns were stupid enough to fall for it. The ugly old bitch is retiring at the next election and good riddance to the bitch. Good to see you've added zero evidence to back this up. 1. She is pro climate change. 2. She was pro ssm. 3. The biggest of them all - siding with Labor and the Greens yesterday. Thanks, thats just evidence she has a brain. That’s the thing - you think that anyone who disagrees with these issues or others with which you agree, is stupid. You can’t accept that intelligent others disagree with you. Well if I use here as a data point, my hypothesis is correct.

So in other words you have no evidence.