| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Fringe >> Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1549796093 Message started by it_is_the_light on Feb 10th, 2019 at 8:54pm |
|
|
Title: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 10th, 2019 at 8:54pm
thread is blocked by " skippy "
Posts: 20882 Gender: male Re: Child Pornography is UNACCEPTABLE * Reply #7 - Apr 21st, 2018 at 4:26pm it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 21st, 2018 at 12:51pm: but on fringe it is ok it seems , I have attempted to contact the ' moderator ' here , and I use the term loosely , to alert him or her of the imagery of child pornography here , Reply #140 http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1515880545/146#146 for my part this is unacceptable to think this is ok because a cartoon depicts as much to be funny .. it is most definitely not . ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ If you don’t like the way this board is moderated you know what you can do. You add nothing to here other than conspironut bullish it. Thread closed as the whiny little bitching threads are best suited to the whiny little bitch board run by ozzzzie. reply by skippy thread locked . http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1524279095/7#7 and so , where is skippy .. and why have you suppressed the topic of child pornograhy being unacceptable .. are you in fact some satanic freemason in disguise here ? one may wonder in love and light namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by .JaSin. on Feb 10th, 2019 at 9:11pm
Skippy hopped away from Moderating here, like I knew he would. He only went for it as a power struggle against Aussie - thats all. Once he got it, he lost interest real quick.
I always thought that YOU should be Moderator of this Section - It_is_the_Light. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Sad KangAnon on Feb 11th, 2019 at 11:48am
Are you still going on about South Park?
Also, welcome back, I think? |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 12th, 2019 at 7:51am SadKangaroo wrote on Feb 11th, 2019 at 11:48am:
well thank you sad one, I presume ..and yet child pornography is depicted in south park cartoons and people find it funny .. and if someone illuminates this child pornography that attempts to normalize and humorize CP , they are attacked for depriving the mindless idiot his or her satanic chuckle . this is mk ultra programming and many do not wish to admit they have been duped , and continue to defend their cheap thrill and attack those that expose their demented unfunnybone while depictions of child rape and penetration continue to be defended by the aforementioned idiots . thats about it namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 12th, 2019 at 7:53am
this thread is still blocked
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1524279095/7#7 by this " moderator " whom hates fringe topics .. skippy. Moderator ***** Offline If you don’t like the way this board is moderated you know what you can do. You add nothing to here other than conspironut bullish it. Thread closed as the whiny little bitching threads are best suited to the whiny little bitch board run by ozzzzie. well let me tell you " skippy " your interpretation of moderating is censorship of conspiracy topics , many of which have been sent to fringe because they are not welcomed anywhere else .. and now are not even welcomed in fringe ? how does that work ? ..how sad , and yet this only goes to serve the assumption which continues to be validated by facts that many fringe topics are being censored and banned from the light of day so they can be occulted and hidden away from public scrutiny this course of action is of course a well known freemasonic ploy and deceptionality implemented to control the narrative and suppress critical thinking and research of certain taboo topics we watch ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Sad KangAnon on Feb 12th, 2019 at 8:25am
Your concerns about the South Park video have been dealt with time and time again. You now use this faux concern to attack people on the forums and complain about a moderation decision you don't like, instead of actually doing something to report the content if you feel so strongly that it is child pornography.
In case you need a refresher friend, here are the people you need to contact if you actually care and aren't as usual simply exploiting the issue of child abuse for your own personal gains, SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 22nd, 2018 at 8:49am:
Or are you still claiming the freemasons will get you if you actually take action? it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 22nd, 2018 at 12:15pm:
FD made it clear, freediver wrote on Apr 23rd, 2018 at 12:36pm:
If you have an issue with it, you've been given the means to take action but if you refuse to, but still complain here, if I were a mod, I know what I'd do. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 12th, 2019 at 8:32am SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 22nd, 2018 at 8:49am:
many blessings sad one if child sacrifice had an m rating would you defend that also ? and point to the m rating as a legal standpoint to sacrifice children ? you sound completely insane , programmed and foolish , yet forgiven so be at peace ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 12th, 2019 at 8:33am it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 22nd, 2018 at 12:15pm:
FD made it clear, freediver wrote on Apr 23rd, 2018 at 12:36pm:
same goes here.. because its on free to air tell a lie vision does that mean its ok ? this arguement is as foolish as the people whom defend it . ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 12th, 2019 at 8:37am SadKangaroo wrote on Feb 12th, 2019 at 8:25am:
well skippy already locked fringe threads and you would simply do the same .. this seems quite normal around these parts so it wouldn't surprise one such as I am when you start moderating and deleting ontopic content because it flys in the face of your fragile reality .. again , forgiven namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Sad KangAnon on Feb 12th, 2019 at 9:29am it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 12th, 2019 at 8:37am:
Basic forum ettequite, you asked a question, you were given an answer not only from a Mod but the owner of the forums, you don't like it and continue to complain? You're out. Don't like it leave. Keep complaining, you'll be removed. Quote:
It's not a fringe issue (sadly). Child exploitation is a terrible issue that still exists today, and it shouldn't. But you're exploiting it for your own personal gain. Unforgivable mate. You've been given the means to do something, go do it, or stop minimising the issue comparing true abuse to South Park again, for your own personal gains. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Aussie on Feb 12th, 2019 at 11:19am
. (Forgot. I am banned here.)
|
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Fuzzball on Feb 12th, 2019 at 11:57am Aussie wrote on Feb 12th, 2019 at 11:19am:
Nah......you're just being a smart arse......as usual. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by .JaSin. on Feb 12th, 2019 at 1:11pm Fuzzball wrote on Feb 12th, 2019 at 11:57am:
Yep. He's just a 2-bit(coin) street peddler trying to con his way into the Palace as a Former Shah of Shangri-la. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Bobby. on Feb 12th, 2019 at 6:23pm Jasin wrote on Feb 10th, 2019 at 9:11pm:
Yes - let master Light be the moderator here. Where the hell is Skippy? |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Sad KangAnon on Feb 12th, 2019 at 10:16pm it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 12th, 2019 at 8:33am:
But again princess, I gave you the means to report it if you feel so strongly to have the rating changed, meaning it would no longer be allowed on free to air TV and then action can be taken here. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 13th, 2019 at 6:37am
many blessings dear readers ,
and so it all boils down to those that think depictions of child pornography is ok , that is a child being anally penetrated is fine because its on TV , and those that find it offensive .. the simple fact is that when you point out they are laughing at cp to the peanut gallery they are exposed , embarrassed and they attack for being as much , simple facts there .. and so it is namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 13th, 2019 at 6:43am SadKangaroo wrote on Feb 12th, 2019 at 9:29am:
yes I know because its being televised on TV and people defend it as only a cartoon .. and you cant see that simple fact . sad really namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Sad KangAnon on Feb 13th, 2019 at 7:35am it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 6:37am:
There you go, accusing others of condoning child pornography again. You're lucky I don't have a ban hammer. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 13th, 2019 at 8:32am SadKangaroo wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 7:35am:
Pretty sure he copped a lengthy ban for doing that before. That's why he hasn't been around. Some people just never learn, I guess. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:00am SadKangaroo wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 7:35am:
there you go again , getting triggered because the simple fact has been exposed . some people allow the cp on cartoons and think its funny , others dont , simple facts .. and some get emotional when they get caught out .. lets expand .. what is happening to cartman in the cartoon ? he is being penetrated by an alien , simple fact . and people find that ok . I am not attacking anyone here , merely exposing that fact .. reaction ? bann , block hammer because they cant handle that truth . you can bann people all you like and yet you cannot hide from that reality .. and then others bleat on and be all like " It's not a fringe issue (sadly). Child exploitation is a terrible issue that still exists today, " wonder why that is huh ? and then others chime in because they want to hide that truth as well . and yet banning members will not dissolve the truth of the matter ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:23am it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:00am:
No, it's not a fact at all. It's merely an assumption. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:45am greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:23am:
an assuption .. yes facts are facts and they have been illumined unto all with so very much love . again I do not attack anyone here or anywhere for that matter .. merely point to reality and the " its on tv so it must be ok " argument . so do try not to get emotional when debating one such as I am , for it is quite telling that you have been caught going along with the crowd , and succumbing to mk ultra mind control techniques employed by social engineering satanic think tanks .. you fell for it , so move onward and denounce the criminality , yet either way beloved beings be at peace namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Sad KangAnon on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:47am it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:00am:
What is your problem? Again, you've been given the means to report this to the actual body that controls what media is classified as yet you've done nothing. WHY? You can even contact them for the minutes of their ruling you know? Why don't you at least do that so you can understand the logic of their decision? Quote:
Why are you so obsessed with this? Nobody here ruled that the episode on question was not Refused Classification as it depicted child porn and instead gave it an M rating... Take your issues up with them. Especially after this topis here has been done to death AND a ruling given to you. Quote:
A possible and deserving ban headed your way has nothing to do with the actual topic, or hiding the truth, it's your behaviour after getting a ruling about it. Nobody is hiding the truth. There is no conspiracy. If you actually cared you'd use one of the many options available to you, that's I've even reposted for you, to take action. But all you do is complain on here, claiming others who question your motives condone child pornography. These false accusations are the foundation of what you're doing and you can try to explain it away by pretending to care about the issue you're clearly exploiting, FACT, but these false accusations are an attack on the character of others. This is what I mean by, you're lucky I don't control the ban hammer. False claims of sexual assault or child pornography can attract a legal conviction in the real world, I suppose this is why you make them on an anonymous online forum you coward. But some people aren't always as anonymous as they think are they Brent? |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:48am greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:23am:
|
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:51am it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:48am:
Pulling band-aids off the back of his legs. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:52am SadKangaroo wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:47am:
A possible and deserving ban headed your way has nothing to do with the actual topic, or hiding the truth, it's your behaviour after getting a ruling about it. Nobody is hiding the truth. There is no conspiracy. If you actually cared you'd use one of the many options available to you, that's I've even reposted for you, to take action. But all you do is complain on here, claiming others who question your motives condone child pornography. These false accusations are the foundation of what you're doing and you can try to explain it away by pretending to care about the issue you're clearly exploiting, FACT, but these false accusations are an attack on the character of others. This is what I mean by, you're lucky I don't control the ban hammer. False claims of sexual assault or child pornography can attract a legal conviction in the real world, I suppose this is why you make them on an anonymous online forum you coward. But some people aren't always as anonymous as they think are they Brent? [/quote] many blessings yet isnt there a law saying you cannot post private information on another poster ? but yes , as you have said my first name is Brent .. it doesn't bother me for I have nothing to hide and stand by my writings , I further do not care or wish to press charges against you for breaking forum rules , alas you are acting out again over this issue , of which has been explained without attacking anyone . love and light to all beings namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:53am it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:45am:
So why did you call it a fact? |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:56am
many blessings sad kangaroo wrote ..
Quote:
you would simply be skippy 2.0 if you were mod here , banning critical thinking and observation .. and there you go again , getting triggered because the simple fact has been exposed . some people allow the cp on cartoons and think its funny , others dont , simple facts .. and some get emotional when they get caught out .. lets expand .. what is happening to cartman in the cartoon ? he is being penetrated by an alien , simple fact . and people find that ok . I am not attacking anyone here , merely exposing that fact .. reaction ? bann , block hammer because they cant handle that truth . you can bann people all you like and yet you cannot hide from that reality .. and then others bleat on and be all like " It's not a fringe issue (sadly). Child exploitation is a terrible issue that still exists today, " wonder why that is huh ? and then others chime in because they want to hide that truth as well . and yet banning members will not dissolve the truth of the matter ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:58am it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:56am:
No, it's not a fact. It's an assumption. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 13th, 2019 at 10:01am facts are facts and they have been illumined unto all with so very much love . again I do not attack anyone here or anywhere for that matter .. merely point to reality and the " its on tv so it must be ok " argument . so do try not to get emotional when debating one such as I am , for it is quite telling that you have been caught going along with the crowd , and succumbing to mk ultra mind control techniques employed by social engineering satanic think tanks .. you fell for it , so move onward and denounce the criminality , and do try to have a lovely day everyone , yet either way be at peace namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 13th, 2019 at 10:05am
[/url]
|
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Big Pumpkin on Feb 13th, 2019 at 1:55pm greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 10:05am:
Is that the pitter patter of little feet i hear ? |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 13th, 2019 at 1:56pm BigP wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 1:55pm:
Que? |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Sad KangAnon on Feb 13th, 2019 at 2:45pm it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:52am:
You offered up your own name years ago when talking about your copper pyramids, I'm pointing out that by your own disclosure, you're not as anonymous as you might think, so you may want to be careful about the things you do and say that may have real-world consequences. After all, I've seen an antisemitism watch list with your (forum) name on it. Quote:
I can't help that you feel, or wish to characterise me "acting out" simply for correcting the record on the subject, but I'd expect nothing less from someone who has been exposed as exploiting the abuse of children for their own personal gains, over a petty squabble on an Internet forum. Again. You have past form on this, and it's disgraceful. If you truly cared, you'd take action, but you never do. There is always some conspiracy, some excuse. You just want to argue and imply that others on the forum are sympathetic, condone or even support child abuse and child pornography. It's a low act, even for you. The record needs to be corrected lest those unfamiliar with your antics buy into your horseshit. Let me remind you, SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 22nd, 2018 at 8:49am:
|
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Big Pumpkin on Feb 13th, 2019 at 4:09pm greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 1:56pm:
canal? |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 13th, 2019 at 6:04pm
Many blessings beloved beings ,
To be clear , i merely wish to expose the programmed public , and make them aware of that which they allow to be normalized and socially acceptable .. The public is conditioned , through humour , to laugh at a child , in this case cartman , a cartoon character , being molested .. Thats my intent , however .. Certain posters get triggered at the confirmation that they have been duped by social engineering programs, dreamt up by satanic freemasonic think tanks .. And choose to attack the humble messenger , and so be that Yet the facts remain , cartman gets probed/molested and people think its ok .. Either way be at peace with your conscious decisions Namaste |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Sad KangAnon on Feb 13th, 2019 at 8:19pm
And if you don't think it's ok, you can do something about it.
If you don't do something about it, it implies that you also think it's ok. Hence your concern and outrage is totally manufactured to allow you to continue this debate where you accuse others of being sympathetic to child porn. And I know this to be 100% true because I've just checked the links I posted and it seems that in quoting them the links broke and don't work. If you'd even half tried to use them you would have noticed, but again, you don't care, in the slightest, not one bit about the issue. You're just exploiting it, exploiting child sexual abuse, for your own petty desires. Utterly disgusting. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Sad KangAnon on Feb 13th, 2019 at 8:32pm SadKangaroo wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 8:19pm:
Here are the links, for the last time. Use them, don't use them, I don't care. But what you do next dictates your motives and makes your intent on this subject clear for everyone to see. Episode Rating: M Link Contact the Classification Board to complain about the rating Link How to report suspicious behaviour online Link Report offensive or illegal content Link But for the record, you are literally the only person in the world complaining that this is Child Exploitation Material... I've looked. It's not even mentioned on Wikipedia or even those silly Christian Mothers groups. It is literally only you. And you're not doing anything about it... You're not special, you've not stumbled on a hidden truth, there is no conspiracy, you're just trolling. It's very telling about you that you'd exploit this very real and serious issue in this way. The evidence is there for all to see. You've been exposed. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by The Reboot on Feb 13th, 2019 at 10:11pm |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by .JaSin. on Feb 13th, 2019 at 10:48pm
Yadda & Sad Kangaroo have some absolute beauties!
Just like Bojack Horseman and It_is_the_Light. ;D Nothing more entertaining than seeing chalk being eaten and some really cheesy writing on the wall. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 12:12am
and again we see sad kangaroo acting out to deflect from the real issue of cartmans dilemma ..
lets continue ontopic https://thelibertarianrepublic.com/child-sex-dolls/ Can Child Sex Dolls Prevent Pedophiles From Offending? Trottla, a company run by known pedophile Shin Takagi, creates eerily life-like child sex dolls for those with pedophilia. The Japanese company creates the dolls to provide pedophiles with an outlet for their sexual impulses. “I am helping people express their desires, legally and ethically.” Takagi told The Atlantic. The dolls, some modeled to be as young as five years old, are meant to be as authentic as possible. The synthetic material used for the skin is supposed to feel similar to human skin. Anatomically, the dolls are disturbingly close to real children. In fact, the more petite models even have ribs and hip bones just beneath the skin. The level of detail in each doll is unnerving. Clients can place special orders to customize the doll’s aesthetic, including clothing, age, facial expression, and custom features like tails or horns. The materials used to create the dolls are potentially hazardous, so discarding the dolls is complicated. If they need to dispose of their doll, clients must send it back to Trottla. One client wanted Takagi to “send [the doll] back home.” Takagi hopes his dolls give pedophiles a healthy channel for their urges. Is it possible to be a non-offending pedophile, though? The words pedophile and child molester are often used interchangeably, but is there more to it? It is vitally important to separate pedophilia from child molestation. Doing so does not justify or condone either. It simply allows two distinct but related issues to be addressed correctly. Despite popular usage, pedophilia is a specific and limited term. Strictly speaking, pedophilia is a persistent sexual interest in prepubescent children. Although a definitive cause for pedophilia has not been discerned, many have had unhealthy or traumatic experiences in their childhood. This sexual interest is divorced from action, meaning pedophilic attraction does not always lead to assault against a child. This distinction has found support in scientific work. David Riegel (2004) found that the vast majority (78.6%) of respondents (self-identified boy-preferring pedophiles) reported no legal history as a result of allegations of sexual contact with a boy. Dr. Michael C. Seto (2006) studied men who are likely pedophilic (all had child pornography charges), finding that 57% had no known history of sexual contact with a child. In fact, there are so-called “virtuous pedophiles,” who have never offended but are living with pedophilic attraction. They are committed to avoid the abuse of children while acknowledging their attraction to children. Their website provides a forum for these people to talk through everything from their sexual struggles to their favorite movie. For more on “virtuous pedophiles,” look into Barcroft TV’s video on Todd Nickerson, a member and public advocate for the group. As troubling as this whole phenomenon is, the big questions remains. Will Trottla’s dolls help pedophiles or hurt them? It depends on who you ask. Takagi and his clients would wholeheartedly endorse child sex dolls. Dr. Vivienne Cass, a clinical psychologist and sexual therapist, agrees. She told BuzzFeed News that “engaging with a doll provides a safe and private outlet” for pedophiles. Furthermore, Dr. Cass said “access to sex dolls might be considered a compassionate act for such individuals.” However, Dr. Peter Fargan does not share this sentiment. The paraphilia researcher told The Atlantic that child sex dolls may “cause [pedophilia] to be acted upon with greater urgency.” He pointed to a study from Dr. Drew Kingston in which pornography usage was associated with higher rates of violent and sexual reoffending in high-risk child molesters. Also, deviant pornography (including child pornography) was associated with higher rates of violent and sexual reoffending across all child molesters. Dr. Fargan suggests that Trottla’s dolls may have a similar reinforcing effect. That being said, this work was done with child molesters and pornography not pedophiles and child sex dolls. It does not translate neatly, but it is possible that the child sex dolls may rile up some high-risk pedophiles. Dr. Seto makes this same point in The Atlantic piece. He says “for some pedophiles, access to artificial child pornography or to child sex dolls could be a safer outlet for their sexual urges, reducing the likelihood that they would seek out child pornography or sex with real children. For others, having these substitutes might only aggravate their sense of frustration.” Specialized research is the only thing that will accurately reveal the efficacy of child sex dolls. Whatever the result, though, this is a disheartening, troubling, and outraging topic. Pedophilia is a worldwide taboo that evokes visceral reactions. This proposed solution to the pedophilia problem is off-putting, even if it works. The use of child sex dolls is complex and controversial, to say the least. That being said, it is far from settled. _____________ how in the blue blazes is this permitted to be lawful ?????? |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Bobby. on Feb 14th, 2019 at 4:57am
dear master Light,
many blessings it's surely another sign of the End Times. This time Christ shall return with a sword and not turn the other cheek but instead - punish the wicked. namaste |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Big Pumpkin on Feb 14th, 2019 at 5:45am
Authorities just recently prosecuted an individual for importing a child sex doll into NZ
|
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 14th, 2019 at 6:25am BigP wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 5:45am:
|
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Sad KangAnon on Feb 14th, 2019 at 6:46am it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 12:12am:
"lets continue ontopic" seems to be code for I'm ignoring your post because I have no rebuttal. And besides, you've changed the goal posts of what is on topic, as usual. It was very clear that your OP for this thread, therefore the topic, was a winge about skippy being a satanic freemason in disguise because your thread about the Southpark image was locked as a ruling and judgment was already made. And now you're posting images of child sex dolls... What's going on with you made, are you ok? |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 7:18am SadKangaroo wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 6:46am:
many blessings sad kangaroo , it simply seems you wish to call me disgusting and abuse unto one such as I am , when I am simply exposing the real problem of child exploitation/abuse ,satanic ritual and the apathy toward it from general society .. to the point where when I expose or point to certain instances of child abuse and depictions of as much , I am instantly attacked and called disgusting . 1. cartoons that depict child abuse are defended as ok . 2. child sex dolls that people are allowed to buy because it will deter peados .. 3. satanic freemasons that abduct children and ritually ,rape and or sacrifice them , either covertly or in the full view of the public spectrum and construct through , but not limited to , magistrates police mortician /funeral establishments and government ministers the public dont care because they defend cartman getting probed/ molested and family guy peado content because they think its funny .. well its not . all ontopic points yet are constantly attacked by certain people whom seem to want to hide this real problem humanity faces . all is seen and observed for what it is as the mk ultra mind control agenda plays out , and certain posters are severely programmed and attack the exposure of as much .. and so it is as we watch .. ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 7:21am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qz5IIw7YPeQ
Harassment and Gaslighting of Survivors: Freemason SRA Survivor Karly Franz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5SO4otaP1k Testimony Part 2: SRA Freemason Survivor Karly Franz this victim whom was raped by satanic freemasons is attacked also what does that tell you dear reader ? how sick a society has become .. and when you expose it people attack you and demand you report it to " authorities " when the " authorities "are satanic freemasons .. namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 7:23am
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/revealed-how-gangs-used-the-freemasons-to-corrupt-police-9054670.html
Revealed: How gangs used the Freemasons to corrupt police Gangsters able to recruit police officers through secret society, says investigation for Scotland Yard Tom Harper @TomJHarper Monday 13 January 2014 03:00 Secret networks of Freemasons have been used by organised crime gangs to corrupt the criminal justice system, according to a bombshell Metropolitan Police report leaked to The Independent ( Getty ) Secret networks of Freemasons have been used by organised crime gangs to corrupt the criminal justice system, according to a bombshell Metropolitan Police report leaked to The Independent. Operation Tiberius, written in 2002, found underworld syndicates used their contacts in the controversial brotherhood to “recruit corrupted officers” inside Scotland Yard, and concluded it was one of “the most difficult aspects of organised crime corruption to proof against”. The report – marked “Secret” – found serving officers in East Ham east London who were members of the Freemasons attempted to find out which detectives were suspected of links to organised crime from other police sources who were also members of the society. Famous for its secret handshakes, Freemasonry has long been suspected of having members who work in the criminal justice system – notably the judiciary and the police. The political establishment and much of the media often dismiss such ideas as the work of conspiracy theorists. However, Operation Tiberius is the second secret police report revealed by The Independent in the last six months to highlight the possible issue. Project Riverside, a 2008 report on the rogue private investigations industry by the Serious Organised Crime Agency, also claimed criminals attempt to corrupt police officers through Freemason members in a bid to further their interests. Concerns over the influence of freemasons on the criminal justice system in 1998 led former Home Secretary Jack Straw to order that all police officers and judges should declare membership of the organisation. However, ten of Britain’s 43 police forces refused to take part and the policy was dropped under threat of legal action. In England and Wales, the Grand Master of the Freemasons is Prince Edward, Duke of Kent. The United Grand Lodge of England declined to comment last night. The Independent revealed last week that Operation Tiberius found that organised crime syndicates such as the Adams family and the gang led by David Hunt were able to infiltrate the Met “at will”. Asked to comment on the Tiberius report, a spokesman for Scotland Yard said: “The Metropolitan Police Service will not tolerate any behaviour by our officers and staff which could damage the trust placed in police by the public. “We are determined to pursue corruption in all its forms and with all possible vigour.” |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 7:26am
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/mar/17/westminster-child-abuse-paedophile-ring-failure
The Westminster child abuse ‘coverup’: how much did MPs know? Claims that the establishment covered up a paedophile ring at the heart of Westminster are finally being investigated, decades after rumours first surfaced. Michael White, who was a parliamentary reporter at the time, asks veteran politicians why no one wanted to believe the worst Dolphin Square, Westminster, home to politicians and at the centre of allegations of historical sexual abuse by establishment figures. Photograph: Suzanne Plunkett/Reuters Another day, another set of shocking headlines about allegations of historical child abuse and high-level coverups, this time a dossier being handed over by the Metropolitan police themselves to the Independent Police Complaints Commission to examine 14 allegations of Scotland Yard’s own complicity in the alleged coverup of a high-level paedophile ring. Two weeks ago it emerged that former MP Harvey Proctor’s grace-and-favour home in Belvoir Castle had been raided by police investigating historic allegations of child abuse. Proctor has denied any involvement in, or knowledge of, the alleged establishment abuse. Other claims fester. A raid was also made on the home of the former home secretary Leon Brittan. All have denied charges levelled by alleged victims, some of them in files passed on by current MPs convinced of an extensive establishment coverup that lasted decades. But so did Cyril Smith, who got his knighthood in 1988 despite officials warning Margaret Thatcher of paedophile allegations against him, confirmed only after the former Liberal MP was dead. Freedom of Information (FoI) papers filled in fresh details this month. Smith is again central to today’s claims. Conservative politician Harvey Proctor in 1987: the former MP’s home has been searched by police investigating historical allegations of child sex abuse. Photograph: PA/PA Archive Images The allegations centering on Dolphin Square, a 7.5-acre, 1,250-flat complex by the Thames, include claims that boys in nearby Lambeth care homes were recruited as rent boys and ferried to the apartments for violent orgies where VIPs, defence and Whitehall officials, establishment types, as well as Tory MPs (one “cabinet minister”), were said to be participants. The Yard has spoken of “possible homicide” being committed. Historical and more recent allegations have been backed by Labour MP John Mann, who first encountered them as a Lambeth councillor in the 80s, but was told by police contacts that their inquiries had been stopped on orders from superiors. How could it happen, politicians prominent in the 80s ask themselves? Were some of them mixed up in coverups, voters ask? So does the media, though it, too, has questions to answer. I was a Westminster political reporter at the time. I have been asking around. This is a controversy with a long fuse. About 30 years ago, one of Margaret Thatcher’s junior ministers took me aside at Westminster and told me of serious allegations against a senior colleague. Since his version of events involved the abuse of other well-placed Tories’ children, it sounded pretty implausible to me. It still does, so I will not repeat it here, though both men are now dead and other versions of the same rumour have since surfaced. With one borderline exception, it was the only such allegation that I heard as a working political journalist in the 1980s that was not also known to a wider public beyond Westminster. In the pre-Twitter era, such stories often surfaced via Private Eye, which picked up all sorts of gossip, some of which it concluded was untrue. Occasionally, a smear might be traced to security sources trying to damage someone, as may have been the case with my junior minister: a willing conduit for malice against a reforming minister who threatened vested interests? Cyril Smith, knighted in 1988 despite officials warning of paedophile allegations against him. Photograph: Nils Jorgensen/Rex ______________ top peado and satanic freemason knighted ... wonder if there is a pattern .. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 7:30am
oh wait , whats this ?
https://richardwsymonds.wordpress.com/2017/01/23/october-27-2012-church-considers-removing-jimmy-savile-knighthood-christian-today/ October 27 2012 – Church considers removing Jimmy Savile knighthood” – Christian Today oh this peado saville was allowed to rape children because he was popular and was on TV as well .. what does this tell you dear reader ? also hanging out with vatican types .. known child murderes and rapists .. all freemasons too one may add " oh thats just a conspiracy " |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 7:33am
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-11-19/former-magistrate-avoids-jail-over-sexual-abuse-of-teenage-boys/5102610
Former magistrate avoids jail over sexual abuse of teenagers Updated 16 Dec 2013, 9:41am A former Victorian magistrate who pleaded guilty to sexually abusing two teenagers has walked from court after his three-year jail sentence was fully suspended. Simon Mitchell Cooper, 56, pleaded guilty earlier this year to seven charges of indecent assault against the brothers, who were aged 17 and 18. Some people cried and left the court when the sentence was read out. The court had heard Cooper was mentored by the teenagers' father and became a family friend. It heard the brothers looked up to Cooper, but he inappropriately touched them between 1984 and 1986. The court was told that on one occasion he attempted to interfere with one of the intoxicated teenagers after a night out with the teenager's mother. It heard that he also invited one of the teenagers to have sex with a young woman while Cooper indecently assaulted him. Cooper previously worked as a Crown prosecutor in Victoria and was appointed a magistrate in 2012. He resigned earlier this year. Judge Stephen Norrish told the court Cooper's spectacular fall from grace was taken into account in sentencing. Judge Norrish said character evidence for Cooper was impressive, and keeping the former crown prosecutor safe in jail would have been nearly impossible. One of the victims says other victims of abuse should come forward. "If one other person can stand up I think that's a great thing for society," he said. "Be warned: the victims will be heard, they will be believed." |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 7:36am
this is a case where a satanic freemason protects abuse by fellow satanic member
https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/south-australian-magistrate-threw-out-paedophile-charges-royal-commission-into-institutional-responses-to-child-sexual-abuse-told/news-story/8012edaf8c563dee691f73cdb9cb30eb South Australian magistrate threw out paedophile charges, Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse told POLICE had difficulty successfully prosecuting paedophiles almost two decades ago, an inquiry has heard, with one case thrown out by a magistrate who was himself later charged with child sex offences. Detective Senior Sergeant Walter Conte has told the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse charges were laid against a paedophile following a raid in 1993 but the matter was dropped. “The charges for some reason were brought before the Adelaide Magistrates Court whereas they were originally set down for a committal hearing at the Holden Hill Magistrates Court,” he said. “I recall bringing along my witnesses, and essentially everything was thrown out by Magistrate (Richard) Brown, or perhaps there was no evidence tendered, or something like that.” Mr Brown was later charged with child sex offences — he was on sick leave, pending a diagnosis of cancer, for the majority of the time that matter progressed through the courts. His lawyers argued the boys he had sex with were over 17, and he died from cancer soon after the charges were dropped in 2009. The paedophile who appeared before Mr Brown, part of a group of offenders, was ultimately successfully convicted in another court. Another member of the group pleaded guilty to multiple offences while the remaining counts were dismissed by another magistrate. Det Snr Sgt Conte appeared as a witness on the fourth day of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. The inquiry is examining the handling of claims of child sexual abuse at St Ann’s Special School at Marion between 1985 and 1991 by the Catholic Church and South Australia Police. Counsel Assisting the Commission, Sophie David, asked Det Snr Sgt Conte about the extradition of paedophile Brian Perkins, who was also part of the same paedophile network and is the focus of the inquiry. Det Snr Sgt Conte agreed it was his view that an application for the extradition of Perkins, who had fled interstate, was based only a charge of possession of child pornography, not more serious charges. He told the Commission he formed this view based on his experiences at the time. “Other matters had been brought before the Adelaide Magistrates Court and we went as far as an oral committal with children who weren’t mentally disabled, and the matters were thrown out,” he said. Ms David also asked Det Snr Sgt Conte about a SA Police decision to shut down Operation Deny. The inquiry has heard the decision to end the operation was made by a very senior police detective at the time and caused anger among some detectives. Operation Deny — an investigation into a group of paedophiles — was initiated after a journalist gave police a wooden box full of film canisters which contained photos of naked children. Det Snr Sgt Conte said the decision to shut down Operation Deny didn’t greatly impact him, but he thought it was “unusual”. He said he assumed the reason for the decision was to do with resources, and there would be steps put in place to assess the investigation outcomes. Det Snr Sgt Conte was asked about a meeting in October 2001 at the Catholic Education Office, between police, parents, the professional standards group and the Public Advocate. Ms David asked him what he thought about the appropriateness of letting other parents of St Ann’s children know that Perkins was alleged to have engaged in sexual misconduct with a student. “I don’t know what my view was back then, other than thinking it was probably early. Unless there is a proper examination of the exhibits that we had and taking other steps, there probably would have been a step that you would take as a last resort,” he said. A parent of a child allegedly abused by Perkins told the commission on Monday she was shocked to find out in 2001 that her son may have been a victim of Perkins. The hearing continues this afternoon, with the former principal of St Ann’s, Claude Hamam, expected to give evidence. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 7:37am
https://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2015/november/1446296400/jess-hill/suffer-children
Suffer the children Trouble in the Family Court When Erin saw the police lights flashing, she knew it was over. She steered the car to the side of the road, and turned to her two children. “OK guys, this is it,” she said. “We’ve done our best.” Her teenaged daughter started to panic. “bugger! Oh my god!” she cried. “I can’t do this. You can’t leave us!” She grabbed for the bottle of Panadol in the centre console, insisting she wanted to die. “No!” Erin said firmly. “Settle, just settle.” As the police officer approached with a warrant, Erin got out of her car. She asked for time to talk to her two children, and promised she’d follow him to the station. Back in the car, Erin tried to remain calm. “I am so sorry I have put you through all of this. This is not the life I wanted for you. Always remember how much I love you.” “What’s going to happen to us?” her 10-year-old son cried. “I don’t know,” Erin replied. “You just need to tell the truth.” By the time the police caught up with them, Erin had been on the run with her children for nine months. She was now confronting a reality she’d been avoiding for years. Since their children were born, and ever since he’d first held a knife to her throat, Erin had tried to manage her husband’s abuse. In 2012, however, a warning from her GP had broken through her denial. In front of their screaming kids, John had throttled Erin until her eyes rolled back in her head. “If you don’t leave,” her GP warned, “you’re as bad as he is.” Erin did leave, and took the children to live with her parents interstate. Soon after, the Family Court granted John regular access to his kids. For the next year, Erin weighed her responsibility to her children, who were terrified of their father, against the risks of disobeying Family Court orders. There was a further complication: Erin had consented to the orders granting John fortnightly access – under pressure from her lawyer, she says, who advised that if she didn’t compromise, John could end up with sole custody. When the children refused to see or even speak to their father, however, Erin felt she had no choice but to breach the orders. When John applied for full custody, both children refused to be assessed in the same room with him, and their counsellor wrote to the Family Court, advising that such a meeting would be traumatising for them. But when they presented their fears to a court-appointed social worker, whose job it was to assess the family, it was Erin’s motivations that were questioned, and her parenting criticised. In 2014, two months before the full custody hearing was due to be heard, the Family Court suddenly made interim orders for John to have sole custody. Police were directed to enforce the orders, and both children were prohibited from having contact with their mother. “So we fled,” says Erin. After they were stopped at the airport trying to leave the country, Erin slipped the authorities, drove the children down south, and disappeared. John went to the media, appealing for information about his missing children. He said he loved them very much, and couldn’t understand why, after their amicable separation, his ex-wife had disappeared with them. Now under arrest, Erin sat with her children in the police station, and tried to explain to the officers why they had run. By chance, her daughter had just finished writing a protest letter. Erin handed the letter to police, and asked them to read it. “My name is […], and I am scared of my dad,” it began. “I have seen him in a rage throw my brother across the room. He has held a knife to my mother’s throat telling her how easy it would be to cut it … and the court has given me to him. I have tried to tell all the legal people involved how scared he makes me but I am too young for anyone to listen …” In a recording of the letter, her unsteady voice becomes indignant. “At what point do I become old enough? I want to … think that somewhere in the cosmos is a place where I am valued and safe. I don’t want to be the next Luke Batty … Please, please help.” That afternoon, the police drove Erin and her kids to a nearby town, so Erin could front a magistrate on criminal charges of abduction. There was one last chance to say goodbye, and then the children, distraught, were taken away. That was earlier this year. Neither Erin nor anyone she knows has been allowed to contact her children. The next Family Court hearing isn’t far away. Erin’s legal advice is that, because she ran, she doesn’t stand a chance. Even its most ardent critics wouldn’t claim the family law courts have an easy task. Child custody cases can be wickedly complex, especially when one or both parents are alleging abuse. Making the wrong decision can be devastating; children may be ordered into the care of an abusive parent, or prohibited from seeing a safe and loving one. They are not easy decisions, and they require great skill and understanding to get right. Such skill and understanding, however, is dangerously inconsistent across the family law system. This has long been the case – for 15 years, studies have revealed the courts’ failure to reliably detect and comprehend abuse. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 7:43am SadKangaroo wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 6:46am:
and all you seem to want to do is attack the messenger for exposing these crimes and posting ontopic content .. what is wrong with you mate ? are you a freemason ? im interested in your bitter hatred and refusal to face the real world problem of ritual abuse of children .. then you go on to say .. Quote:
yes that may be because people watch depictions of child abuse in cartoons and defend the imagery .. attack people that expose child sex dolls , which is totally unacceptable in a divine and sacred loving society and another satanic freemasonic agenda .. then go on to attack the people , and call THEM disgusting ,that point to the abuse then say its wrong .. something very strange is going on with these people that attack the humble beings that say that " Child Pornography is Unacceptable " yet all remain loved and nurtured namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 8:15am
lets look at facts and whom is implicated..
many officials appointed to protect children I might add .. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_sexual_abuse_in_the_United_Kingdom Eliza Armstrong case - a late 19th-century child sexual abuse scandal that led to the passing of the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885, which raised the age of consent from 13 to 16. United Kingdom football sexual abuse scandal - started in November 2016 when former professional footballers waived their rights to anonymity and talked publicly about abuse by former football coaches in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s. The initial allegations centred on Crewe Alexandra and Manchester City. North Wales child abuse scandal - Scandal leading to a three-year, £13 million investigation into the physical and sexual abuse of children in care homes in the counties of Clwyd and Gwynedd, in North Wales, including the Bryn Estyn children's home at Wrexham, between 1974 and 1990. Jimmy Savile sexual abuse scandal. See also Operation Yewtree, the police investigation into abuse by Savile and others. Kincora Boys' Home - the scandal first came to public attention on 24 January 1980 after a news report in the Irish Independent titled it as "Sex Racket at Children's Home". Plymouth child abuse case - paedophile ring involving at least five adults from different parts of England. Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal - widespread child exploitation in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, England, between 1997 and 2013, estimated to have involved at least 1400 children who were subjected to 'appalling' sexual exploitation by gangs of men, many of Pakistani heritage.[10][11] Rochdale sex trafficking gang. See also Operation Doublet, an ongoing investigation by Greater Manchester Police. Nottingham Care Homes[12] Manchester Children's Homes[13] Islington Children's Homes[14] Telford child sex abuse ring[15] Oxford child sex abuse ring[16] Banbury child sex abuse ring[17] Derby child sex abuse ring[18] Bristol child sex abuse ring[19] Newcastle child sex abuse ring[20] Halifax child sex abuse ring[21] Peterborough sex abuse case[22] Notable offenders See also: Category:British people convicted of child sexual abuse This is an incomplete list of notable British personalities who have been convicted of child sexual abuse. It does not include notable people, such as Jimmy Savile and Cyril Smith, who were publicly accused of abuse after their deaths, but never prosecuted. Russell Bishop (1966–) - Convicted child molester and abductor. Arrested and convicted in the same year, 1990.[23] Ronald Castree (1953–) - Sexually assaulted, kidnapped, stabbed to death an 11-year-old girl. Castree was jailed for life with a minimum term of 32 years.[24] Max Clifford (1943–2017) - Leading publicist, found guilty in March 2014 of eight indecent assaults on four girls and women aged 14 to 19,[25] and sentenced to eight years in prison.[26][27] Sidney Cooke (1927–) - Dubbed by The Guardian as "Britain's most notorious paedophile".[28] Chris Denning (1941–) - British disc jockey. He has been jailed several times, for indecency in 1974 at the Old Bailey, 18 months in 1985, three years in 1988, three months in 1996, four years in a Czech prison in 1998 and five years in 2008. Denning regarded them to be "unfair".[29] Matthew Falder (1989–) - Falder was labelled as one of the most prolific and depraved offenders that the National Crime Agency (NCA) had ever encountered. Falder blackmailed and coerced his victims online into depraving and degrading themselves and then using the images to heighten his profile on paedophile sites on the dark web. Falder was convicted in February 2018 and ordered to serve 32 years in prison.[30] Gary Glitter (1944–) - Regarded by some to be the father of glam rock, Glitter is also one of the British entertainment industry's most infamous serial sex offenders. His career ended in 1999 when he was jailed for four months after admitting to a collection of 4,000 hardcore photographs of children being abused.[31] In March 2006, he was jailed again, this time in Vietnam, for sexually abusing two girls. He served almost three years in jail.[32] In 2012, he was the first person to be arrested under Operation Yewtree - the investigation launched in the wake of the Jimmy Savile scandal.[33] This led to his conviction and jailing again in the UK for a total of 16 years for sexually abusing three young girls between 1975 and 1980.[34] Rolf Harris (1930–) - British based Australian entertainer. In 2013, Harris was arrested as part of Operation Yewtree and charged with 12 counts of indecent assault and 4 counts of making indecent images of a child. On 30 June 2014, Harris was found guilty on all 12 counts of indecent assault and on 4 July 2014 was sentenced to 5 years and 9 months in prison for a minimum of 2 years and 10 months.[35][36] Stuart Hall (1929 - ) - Radio and television presenter in North West England and nationally, who presented It's a Knockout and Jeux Sans Frontières and later reported football matches on BBC radio. He pleaded guilty in April 2013 to having indecently assaulted 13 girls, aged between 9 and 17 years old, between 1967 and 1986,[37] and was sentenced to 30 months imprisonment.[38] In 2014 he was found guilty on two further charges and was sentenced to an additional 30 months in prison.[39] many say , its ok , they were on TV and were not banned so its ok .. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 8:16am
Antoni Imiela (1954–2018) - Since March 2012, he had been serving 12 years in prison.[40]
Jonathan King (1944–) - English singer-songwriter, businessman. He was convicted and jailed in 2001 for sexual abuse against boys in the 1980s.[41] King was subsequently denied appeal twice on both conviction and sentence,[42] was released on parole in 2005, and continues to maintain that he was wrongly convicted.[43] William Mayne (1928–2010) - Author of more than 130 books. In 2004 he was imprisoned for two and a half years.[44] Gene Morrison (1958 - ) - On September 2009, convicted of 13 child sexual offenses, he was jailed for 5 years.[45] Charles Napier (1947–) On 23 December 2014, convicted of grooming and sexually assaulting 21 victims at a school where he worked. Was also Treasurer of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE).[46] Graham Ovenden (1943–) - Known artist. On April 2013, found guilty of child sexual abuse, jailed for 2 years in October 2013.[47] Geoffrey Prime (1938–) - Former British spy, convicted of child sexual abuse, during the 1980s.[48] Peter Righton (1926–2007) - Founding member of the Paedophile Information Exchange. Found guilty in 1992 of possession of obscene child pornography. Mentioned in Tom Watson MP's 2012 Parliamentary Question to David Cameron.[49] Fred Talbot (1949–) - Former television presenter, best known for his role as a weatherman on ITV's This Morning programme. In 2015, he was sentenced to five years in prison, having been found guilty of indecent assault against two teenaged boys at the Altrincham Grammar School for Boys, where he had taught in the 1970s. Ray Teret (1941–) - Former Radio Caroline DJ and friend of Jimmy Savile, he was convicted in 2014 of seven counts of rape and 11 counts of indecent assault during the 1960s and 1970s against girls as young as 12. He was jailed for 25 years.[50] Tony and Julie Wadsworth - BBC radio personalities, in 2017 they were convicted of indecent assault on young boys during the 1990s.[51] Ian Watkins (1977–) - Founding member and lead singer of the rock band Lostprophets. In November 2013, Watkins pleaded guilty to 13 charges, including the attempted rape and sexual assault of a child under 13.[52] He was subsequently jailed for 29 years and was ordered to serve a further six years on extended licence following completion of his sentence.[53] |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 8:26am
https://www.wanttoknow.info/sexabuse/australian-network
Australian Pedophile Ring Critical Information on a Secret Pedophile Network Dear friends, The disturbing article below was written in 2005 by Dr. Reina Michaelson, founder of Australia's Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Program. She describes her harrowing experience of trying to bring a pedophile teacher to justice, only the find the man had extensive protection from key elements of the police and many others at high levels. Her valiant efforts to expose a major pedophile ring leading to high levels of government and the media were eventually shut down. More than two dozen news articles support the claims of Dr. Michaelson, many from Australia's most respected media outlets. You can access these eye-opening articles at this link. For example, Australia's leading newspaper the Sydney Morning Herald reported in this revealing article: "A highly-organised paedophile ring involving Victorian police and former politicians had been operating in the state since the 1970s, anti-child abuse groups claimed today. Dr Reina Michaelson of The Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Program (CSAPP) and Bravehearts founder Hetty Johnston today said they had been told by child sex abuse victims that former Victorian elected politicians and police members were involved in child pornography and prostitution. The allegations come in response to a damning report released by Victoria's Ombudsman George Brouwer yesterday into Victoria Police's botched handling of four cases of child sex abuse. One investigating police officer referred to a child-victim, under the age of 12, as a little slut." If you are skeptical that very powerful people are involved in child sex rings, watch at this link a suppressed Discovery Channel documentary "Conspiracy of Silence," which leaves little doubt that there are pedophile networks even at the highest levels of government. For ideas on how you can take action on this see the "What you can do" box at the bottom of this page. Together, we can stop the destructive behavior and build a brighter future. With very best wishes for a transformed world, Fred Burks for PEERS and WantToKnow.info Former White House interpreter and whistleblower Note: For a report in Australia's ABC News that this craziness continues in 2013, click here. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-05-06/inquiry-into-hunter-valley-sex-abuse-begins/4671692 Australian Pedophile Network By Dr. Reina Michaelson read on .. https://www.wanttoknow.info/sexabuse/australian-network satanic freemasons ritually attack children .. why ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADa3kaqbQ4Q Former Free Mason Exposes Satanic Rituals in Freemasonry Bill Schnoebelen some think that this topic is a venue for attacking the messenger that exposes the ritual abuse of children .. certain posters are actually attacking people that post the crimes and imagery of child exploitation these spammers and trolls will not hinder the exposure of this crime against our children , through their petty egoistic agends . I will guarantee the dear reader this .. they may get me banned and delete or lock threads again and again and again and yet that will not suppress the information available on this subject , and the exposure of these satanic crimes against our children and if you are a freemason indulging in these crimes , my angels of divine and sacred light are watching and you will not escape retribution that will swiftly befall you from the divine realms .. and so be it namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 8:33am
here is another instance of popular peado content that people will say " oh its on TV its ok "
well its not ok https://familyguy.fandom.com/wiki/John_Herbert John Herbert is an elderly pedohebephile[1] who lives at 35 Spooner Street with his old, crippled dog, Jesse. He has a high-pitched, very soft, effeminate voice and with a slight whistle lisp. He is often seen wearing a light blue robe and slippers and uses a zimmer-frame walker to get around. He is a retired United States Army veteran. He becomes fixated on Chris in "To Love and Die in Dixie" when Chris took up a paper route and developed an unhealthy obsession with him. When the family returned from the South, he left 113 messages asking what had happened to the paper boy. Herbert frequently seems to make inappropriate, sexually-tinged comments to teenage boys. It is revealed later on that he is the eldest member of the Skull and Bones secret society. He is shown to be Roman Catholic and goes to the same church as the Griffins in "Boys Do Cry". here is a totally mind controlled idiot or peado .. either way this is creepy in our society |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 8:37am Bobby. wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 4:57am:
many blessings brother being as the battle rages onward ... humanity does not consent to ritual abuse of our children namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 8:53am
" report it to authorities .. if you dont you are disgusting "
well I am reporting it here and am being limp wristedly attacked , no matter , we continue https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10950111/The-alleged-paedophile-ring-at-the-heart-of-the-British-Establishment.html The alleged paedophile ring at the heart of the British Establishment Investigation in to alleged child abuse ring in Westminster dogged by claims of cover ups and missing files The Wanless review asked Home Office staff to search their files for references to Cyril Smith, the late MP Photo: REX FEATURES The country was still reeling from the horrors of the Jimmy Savile child abuse scandal that saw the BBC accused of cover up and culture of secrecy to protect itself. But the expose opened the door on a potentially even more explosive scandal – the claims of a VIP Westminster paedophile ring operating from the heart of the British Establishment from the 1960s onwards. It has led to allegations of a massive cover up across Whitehall spanning decades, pressure on the police and prosecutors not to pursue cases and the apparent disappearance of key dossiers and files detailing claims of child abuse and alleged attackers. growing for a public inquiry. But the belated investigations only serve to highlight decades of apparent inaction in the corridors of power to get to the truth despite relentless campaigning by a number of MPs. Related Articles Home Secretary announces child abuse review 07 Jul 2014 Sedwill 'concened' over lost abuse files 08 Jul 2014 David Cameron hired Lord Brittan as £500 a day trade adviser 07 Jul 2014 'More than 10' politicians on list held by police investigating Westminster 'paedophile ring' 04 Jul 2014 Tebbit: possible Government cover-up of child abuse 06 Jul 2014 Whitehall child sex inquiry: the 114 files 'lost’ 05 Jul 2014 The story begins with Cyril Smith, the late Liberal Democrat MP, who was exposed as an alleged paedophile in 2012, two years after his death, aged 82. Rumours of child abuse had dogged the 29-stone Rochdale politician throughout his career but no action was ever taken. As early as the 1960s, he allegedly routinely assaulted young boys, especially in children’s homes and special schools in his home town, where he was MP from 1972 to 1992. He was also said to have been a visitor to the notorious Elm Guest house in South-west London, now the focus of a Scotland Yard investigation into an alleged VIP paedophile ring It was claimed earlier this year that police received 144 complaints against him over the years but no prosecution was ever brought fuelling allegations he was protected by influential friends. Smith was named as a paedophile in the House of Commons in 2012 by current Rochdale MP Simon Danczuk. He said he spoke out after new alleged victims came forward in the wake of the Savile scandal and went on to write a book exposing Smith’s alleged offending earlier this year. The Crown Prosecution Service admitted claims were investigated by police on three separate occasions – in 1970, 1998 and 1999 – but each time files were submitted to prosecutors, they were rejected. The CPS and Greater Manchester Police have since accepted that Smith should have been prosecuted due to “overwhelming evidence”. But it has still required legal action to win an order for the CPS to publish its reasons for not prosecuting at the time. However, Smith was only one of a number of alleged high profile child abusers within Westminster said to have been named in a 40-page dossier submitted to the Home Office by the late campaigning Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens in 1983. Mr Dickens told his family at the time that it named leading public figures, including senior politicians, and was going to “blow it all apart”. It was also said to contain information on the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) which was set up in 1974 to promote and lobby the legalisation of sexual activity between minors and adults. But the time bomb never exploded. The then Home Secretary Lord (Leon) Brittan was sent the file but no record of any subsequent criminal inquiry has been found and the dossier itself has disappeared. Lord Brittan, who was Home Secretary under Margaret Thatcher from 1983 to 1985, is now facing questions over his handling of the document and inconsistencies in his account of what he did with it. He told journalists last year he had no recollection of it but last week said instead that he had been handed a “substantial bundle of papers” by Mr Dickens in November 1983 and had passed them to officials for further investigation but had no further dealings with it. Just hours later he amended his position again when proof emerged that he had written to Mr Dickens in March 1984 to say the dossier had been assessed by prosecutors and handed to the police. Over the weekend, Mark Sedwill, the Home Office permanent secretary, confirmed that a review had not found “a single dossier from Mr Dickens”. However, officials did uncover “several sets of correspondence over a number of years” from the MP, who died in 1995, to several Home Secretaries containing allegations of sexual offences. Mr Sedwill also revealed that 114 official files relating to historic allegations of organised child abuse have also gone missing. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 8:54am
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jul/22/leon-brittan-westminster-child-abuse-files
Leon Brittan among senior Westminster figures named in new child abuse files Peter Morrison, Peter Hayman and William van Straubenzee also named in previously unreleased documents, which police will pass to ongoing inquiry The papers pertaining to Leon Brittan were contained in a store of Cabinet Office papers at the National Archives, accumulated over several decades up to 2007. Photograph: John Stillwell/PA Government papers about the former home secretary Leon Brittan are among a fresh batch of documents which have come to light months after the conclusion of an official review into whether allegations of child abuse were covered up by the Home Office in the 1980s. The documents also reveal that the then director general of MI5 corresponded with the Cabinet Secretary in 1986 about an unnamed MP who was alleged to have “a penchant for small boys” but accepted the politican’s word that he did not. The letter from Sir Anthony Duff to Sir Robert Armstrong added: “At the present stage ... the risks of political embarrassment to the government is rather greater than the security danger.” Making it clear that they are “concerned and disappointed” about not being told earlier about the documents, the authors of a report earlier this year into allegations historical child abuse by powerful figures cited the letter as a “striking example” of how crimes against children were not considered as seriously as they would today. “The risk to children is not considered at all,” Peter Wanless, chief executive of the NSPCC, and barrister Richard Whittam, said in a supplement to their review, published online on Wednesday. The Home Office said a fresh search of the archives had been carried out after a file emerged earlier this year that should have been submitted to Wanless and Whittam. Thousands of child abuse victims to be invited to testify in truth project Read more Previously unreleased files also concern figures including Margaret Thatcher’s parliamentary private secretary, the late Sir Peter Morrison, former diplomat Sir Peter Hayman and former minister Sir William van Straubenzee. The papers pertaining to Brittan, which are among a number shown to police, are contained in a store of Cabinet Office papers at the National Archives, known as “the cabinet secretary’s miscellaneous papers” and will be passed to an ongoing independent inquiry into child abuse within state and non-state institutions led by Justice Lowell Goddard. The papers are described by the Cabinet Office as largely uncatalogued and unregistered, and were accumulated over several decades up to 2007. No further details have so far been revealed. Advertisement Wanless and Whittam called for a broader search of material at government departments after the Cabinet Office and Home Office informed them that further relevant material had been found. The papers also contain material on allegations by a former British army intelligence agent, Colin Wallace, about the Kincora boys’ home in Northern Ireland, which has long been at the centre of abuse claims. The Wanless review, published in November after the investigation of 114 missing Home Office files, could not rule out the possibility of files being destroyed as part of a coverup of child abuse allegations in the 1980s. But the inquiry concluded that record-keeping practices at the time meant it was not possible to reach a categorical decision either way. In a joint letter written in June, Wanless and Whittam said the discovery illustrated the merit of a wide-ranging search “unconstrained by what the Home Office in particular might or might not have known, with departments paying particular attention to relevant material that is not registered. We anticipate that the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse chaired by Justice Goddard would expect no less”. They revealed that the Cabinet Office permanent secretary, Richard Heaton, wrote to Wanless in May apologising for a “flaw in the way the Cabinet Office initially responded” to their request for documents, and confirming that three categories of papers have since been identified as potentially relevant. “We are concerned and disappointed that the Cabinet Office was aware of the separate Cabinet Office store of assorted and unstructured papers, yet informed us that the searches covered all records and files held,” the note said. Thatcher stopped Peter Hayman being named as paedophile-link civil servant Read more The recently unearthed material does not suggest that documents relating to Sir Peter Hayman, a senior diplomat linked to a paedophile scandal, had been destroyed, the co-authors said. However, they added: “That said, it is essential that the public have confidence in the searches that were undertaken, not least because we had to rely on the efficiency and integrity of those who sought material on our behalf. The emergence of these papers only after our review had completed is not helpful in that regard.” It has also emerged that the Home Office failed to review unregistered government documents held at the National Archives for the Wanless review. They were only searched later following a request from MP John Hemming and a national newspaper. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Sad KangAnon on Feb 14th, 2019 at 9:30am
Classic light, backed into a corner, spams an entire page worth of posts to cover it up.
The thread boils down to you complaining about a decision on here you didn't like because it meant you cannot attack others here accusing them of supporting child porn. You've tried to change the goal posts to pretend you have a genuine concern about the issue, despite being handed on a silver plater the means by which you can take action to at least attempt to prevent the South Park imagery that was the basis for your complaint and the original topic of this thread, but you refuse to do anything about it, eroding even the slightest notion of your motives being genuine. It is there for all to see. As usual, I see no point in going around in circles with this. You won't budge, you'll refuse to accept reality or "see the light" and we'd just be wasting everybody's time, as was always the case when you'd been confronted with evidence you can't handle. When you get stuck on spam and silly memes, we all know you've lost. I'll leave this thread, you'll make some other absurd claims or personal attacks, it will go ignored and you'll think you've won. As long as everything is ok in your own little reality yeah? I honestly thought you might have come back a better person after your break. Wrong. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 9:56am
this is a serious issue , so take your sour grapes with you as the door slams shut behind you ,
we ignore trolls and continue ontopic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tbdq-QlfWrM Robert David Steele — AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED TO UNDERSTAND THIS IS ACTUALLY REAL but if you want to stay sad kangaroo , watch this then comment , lets be constructive here if you have the care if you troll you will be ignored , yet if you contribute I shall respond yet either way be at peace namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Sad KangAnon on Feb 14th, 2019 at 10:07am
My parting gift to you, you simply cannot troll this entire thread, then pretend to be the victim of trolling.
You've been caught out friend, SadKangaroo wrote on Feb 13th, 2019 at 8:32pm:
The post is there for all to see, there is no point in trying to spam it back onto past pages. It will just keep resurfacing. If there are no voices of truth in this thread, those who wonder in may believe the lies you tell. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 11:42am
This is a serious issue , so take your sour grapes with you as the door slams shut behind you ,
we ignore trolls and continue ontopic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tbdq-QlfWrM Robert David Steele — AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED TO UNDERSTAND THIS IS ACTUALLY REAL but if you want to stay sad kangaroo , watch this then comment , lets be constructive here if you have the care if you troll you will be ignored , yet if you contribute I shall respond yet either way be at peace namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Bojack Horseman on Feb 14th, 2019 at 11:55am
obert David Steele was recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2017. He is the pro bono Chief Enabling Officer (CeO) of Earth Intelligence Network, a 501c3 devoted to teaching holistic analytics (HA), true cost economics (TCE), and open source everything engineering (OSEE) and now also CeO of Open Source Everything (OSE Inc.), a for-profit that seeks to help all countries — America first if Donald Trump will listen — create a prosperous world at peace, a world that works for 100% of humanity, at 10% of the cost of the failed Western economy.
Yep, the bio of a truly sane person/. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Bobby. on Feb 14th, 2019 at 5:43pm it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 8:37am:
dear master Light, many blessings. We are part of a vanguard leading the way to prevent society from becoming perverted towards children. I even started a thread here: http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1549654742/0#0 which points that which society is accepting today - something that is just not acceptable. We will stand up to the ritual abuse along with many others. namaste |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 11:54pm
many blessings ,
it is how you say it to be so brother being ..as we continue ontopic and ignore trolls deflecting from real world issues https://www.euroweeklynews.com/2018/11/19/paedophile-ring-bust-more-than-400-users-of-child-pornography-messaging-group-identified/ PAEDOPHILE RING BUST: More than 400 ‘users’ of child pornography messaging group identified By Tara Rippin -19 November 2018 @ 18:00 CONFISCATED: Mobile phones and other devices contained ‘illicit images’. CREDIT: Guardia Civil Interior AN international network of child pornography involved in producing and distributing material in 27 countries has been identified, and 14 arrests made in Spain. A further four suspects are being investigated, and the identities of more than 400 ‘users’ who viewed the images on WhatsApp groups have been passed on to Europol and Interpol. The Guardia Civil worked with the European agencies to identify those allegedly involved in circulating images in Cadiz, Galicia, Barcelona, Madrid and Salamanca. During the operation, officers seized files from a location in Pontevedra, which contained ‘extremely crude images of children from one to 15 years-old having sexual relations with adults and even with animals’. They also identified 420 users who had shared the images. An official statement from the Guardia Civil said: “Access to these groups was through various links that could be obtained through the respective administrators of the chats or through certain websites or social networks, as was Facebook.” The investigation, known as Tygra’ began in October of last year, during which 15 home searches were made. During these raids, officers confiscated 37 mobile phones, eight computers, 15 hard drives, four cameras and 11 optical media with extremely crude images of children, in ‘explicitly pornographic situations’. After verifying that the ‘illicit activity’ was not limited to Spain, the Civil Guard has provided Europol and Interpol with the locations of all of the identified users. The source added: “The operation remains open in order to thoroughly analyse all the material intervened in order to determine the existence of a possible crime network involved in the production of paedophile material, to learn the identities of the victims and find out, where appropriate, possible connections with other users.” The operation is being carried out by the Organic Unit of the Judicial Police of the Command of the Pontevedra Guardia Civil. The case has been delivered to the Court of Instruction Number 3, Cangas. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 14th, 2019 at 11:56pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 11:55am:
many blessings pastaman ,.. he sounds more sane than certain mind controlled sad sacks here , whom continue to protest at their reality being shown to them .. and so be that as all remain dearly loved namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by Bobby. on Feb 15th, 2019 at 4:26am it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 14th, 2019 at 11:54pm:
yes master Light, please continue to expose these perverts with out fear or permission. namaste |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 16th, 2019 at 11:59am
another cartoon depicting all manner of disgustisms
this is disturbing content again getting people to laugh at child abuse .. quite confronting material here yet people laugh ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvxIxXHLL_0 Family Guy - Herbert compilation ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 17th, 2019 at 1:31am
many blessings
there are some lightweight egoistic fools that do not address issues that these teachings create, then these teachings are projected to desensitize the general public, so the perpetrators can continue their crimes .. the backbiters and " moderators " of public debate and discernment continue to obfuscate and contribute to many rapes and deaths .. as they silence and even banish those that speak out against as much , and retribution shall be visited upon these misguided souls on a spiritual level fear not dear and beloved one how sad it is that these crimes remain on their collective heads as it were https://www.dcclothesline.com/2019/02/15/trafficker-of-child-sex-slaves-admits-to-killing-hundreds-of-children/ Trafficker of child sex-slaves admits to killing hundreds of children February 15, 2019 Dr. Eowyn News Ross Kemp, 54, is an English actor, author and investigative journalist who has received international recognition as a journalist for the BAFTA Award-winning documentary series Ross Kemp on Gangs on modern gang culture in the UK and around the world. He followed this up with the documentaries Ross Kemp in Afghanistan, Ross Kemp in Search of Pirates, Ross Kemp: Battle for the Amazon and Ross Kemp: Extreme World. https://youtu.be/2x91H3eFKVI we watch as the whole tapestry unfolds ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 17th, 2019 at 1:53am
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6711955/Vatican-defrocks-cardinal-McCarrick-abuse-allegations.html
Pope defrocks top US cardinal Theodore McCarrick after church found him guilty of sexually abusing minors and 'soliciting sex during confession' Pope Francis has defrocked a former US Cardinal after church found him guilty of sexually abusing minors Theodore McCarrick, a once-powerful figure who once led the Archdiocese of Washington, was accused of sexually abusing three minors The Vatican said McCarrick was found guilty of 'solicitation in the sacrament of confession, and sins against the Sixth Commandment with minors and adults' McCarrick had denied the allegations, saying he had 'absolutely no recollection of this reported abuse' One of his victims, James Grein, said he was 'happy that the Pope believed me' He said pressure needed to be put on attorney generals and senators to change the statute of limitations so that historical allegations could be investigated The punishment for the prelate was announced five days before Francis leads gathering of bishops help the church grapple with the sexual abuse crisis McCarrick, who liked to be called 'Uncle Ted' by his victims, has become the highest-ranking churchman to be laicized, or dismissed from the clerical state By LEAH MCDONALD FOR DAILYMAIL.COM and ASSOCIATED PRESS PUBLISHED: 23:57 AEDT, 16 February 2019 | UPDATED: 02:48 AEDT, 17 February 2019 Pope Francis has defrocked a former US Cardinal after the church found him guilty of sexually abusing minors. Theodore McCarrick, 88, who once led the Archdiocese of Washington and was a powerful figure within the Catholic Church in the U.S., was accused of sexually abusing three minors and harassing adult seminarians and priests. He was also found guilty by the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith of soliciting sex while hearing confession, the Holy See said in a statement on Saturday. An investigation last year detailed settlements paid to men who had complained of abuse when McCarrick was a Bishop in New Jersey in the 1980s. It also revealed that some church leaders had long known of the allegations against him, The New York Times reported. Pope Francis has defrocked former U.S. Cardinal Theodore McCarrick after Vatican officials found him guilty of soliciting for sex while hearing confession against minors and adults Defrocking means McCarrick, 88, who now lives in a friary in Kansas after he lost his title of Cardinal last year, can no longer celebrate Mass or other sacraments, wear clerical vestments or be addressed by any religious title. The judgement was recognized by the Pope to be of a 'definitive nature,' and cannot be appealed, a Vatican statement said. The Pontiff accepted McCarrick's resignation from the College of Cardinals in July and he was suspended from all priestly duties. He was first removed from ministry in June, after a church panel proved a claim that he had abused an altar boy almost 50 years ago. McCarrick had previously denied the allegations, saying he had 'absolutely no recollection of this reported abuse.' He had appealed his penalty, but doctrinal officials earlier this week rejected it and he was notified of the decision on Friday, the Vatican said. The allegations that McCarrick had sexually abused seminarians and an altar boy decades ago have raised questions among Church leaders and victim advocacy organizations as to why he was allowed to remain in a powerful position. McCarrick became a Cardinal in 2001. He then led the Archdiocese of Washington until 2006 and frequently met political leaders, becoming an influential figure in American politics. An attorney for the former altar boy who made an accusation against McCarrick said last June that his client was abused twice, once in 1971 and again in 1972. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Feb 17th, 2019 at 1:56am
and again dear reader ,
these are peadophile satanic freemasons that deliberately target children to rape torture and sacrifice they also fund cartoon propaganda like southpark and family guy to desensitize the public and mind control them to attack the messengers that illuminate the paradigm .. we watch as this spiritual war unfolds upon this battlefield namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by it_is_the_light on Dec 21st, 2019 at 8:59am
https://www.dcclothesline.com/2019/02/15/trafficker-of-child-sex-slaves-admits-to-killing-hundreds-of-children/
Trafficker of child sex-slaves admits to killing hundreds of children February 15, 2019 Dr. Eowyn News Ross Kemp, 54, is an English actor, author and investigative journalist who has received international recognition as a journalist for the BAFTA Award-winning documentary series Ross Kemp on Gangs on modern gang culture in the UK and around the world. He followed this up with the documentaries Ross Kemp in Afghanistan, Ross Kemp in Search of Pirates, Ross Kemp: Battle for the Amazon and Ross Kemp: Extreme World. https://youtu.be/2x91H3eFKVI we watch as the whole tapestry unfolds ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ absolute Satanism on display , HUMANITY DOES NOT CONSENT TO THIS ABOMINATION * ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by cods on Dec 21st, 2019 at 9:26am
I do believe it is incurable.. so why do we allow them to go free... to carry on business as usual...
if they were serial killers who could not be cured would they be allowed to roam free after a few years??? to me its time we stopped dealing with these people as if they are really normal people who have made a mistake....... we even keep them in a safe environment in jail.... are we crazy we protect the wrong people... >:( >:( >:( >:( |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by PZ547 on Dec 21st, 2019 at 9:30am cods wrote on Dec 21st, 2019 at 9:26am:
Unfortunately, 'we' get no say. And those with the power to purge them are too often addicted to child porn (and worse) themselves |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by cods on Dec 21st, 2019 at 11:54am PZ547 wrote on Dec 21st, 2019 at 9:30am:
my old saying.. Laws are made by me with men in mind.. couldnt be more true than in this case. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by SadKangaroo on Dec 22nd, 2019 at 6:56am it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 21st, 2019 at 8:59am:
I've seen that episode before, I don't want to watch it again. I also won't blame it on satanism. That is a pathetic excuse for the evil things people do. They need to burn though. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by SadKangaroo on Dec 22nd, 2019 at 7:04am cods wrote on Dec 21st, 2019 at 9:26am:
There are some people like this that want to repent and don't want to be attracted to children who will often choose chemical castration etc, but it's not good enough. I hope there is redemption available for everyone, but, let's say you're attracted to women with big breasts. You can't just turn off that attractions. But since that is considered "normal" you're not expected to. Or take Light, he's obsessed with Trannies and fantasising about other posters being gay. There is nothing wrong with that but clearly he can't stop. And "Gay Conversion", it doesn't work either. People are wired the way they're wired. So while I'd hope there is redemption available for everyone, if someone is wired to be sexually attracted to children, you can't undo that. I don't know what can be done about them. It just doesn't seem right that they can be let back into society because even if they're able to control and not act on their desires, they still have them. But to be imprisoned or even killed for how they were born, for something out of their control, that also doesn't seem just. I don't have an answer to the issue and I suspect it's because I don't know enough about the topic. All I know is I have just as much disdain as I do for these people who abuse children and destroy lives as I do for those who exploit the issue for their own personal or political gain. |
|
Title: Re: Child Pornography is Unacceptable 2.0 Post by freediver on May 23rd, 2026 at 11:04am
This Topic was moved here from Fringe by freediver.
|
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |