Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Multiculturalism and Race >> Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1547267522

Message started by Frank on Jan 12th, 2019 at 2:32pm

Title: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jan 12th, 2019 at 2:32pm
Pauline Hanson makes eminent sense once again :

Senator Hanson questioned whether Australia’s non-discriminatory migration program would prevent members of Ms Qunun’s family from entering Australia.

“As an ex-Muslim, she has every reason to fear she might suffer death at the hands of extremists in her country of Saudi Arabia because of her decision to reject Islam. However, there have been some important issues left out of the debate that need to be addressed,” Senator Hanson wrote.

“If the people of Ms al-Qunun’s country pose such an immediate threat to her safety, should we not be offering the Australian public stronger protections against those same people? The issue of Islamic extremism has never been a racial issue. It has always been an ideological issue … our immigration program does not do enough to screen people of extreme ideological belief.”

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Captain Nemo on Jan 12th, 2019 at 2:36pm
"Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong"

Could have used that advice a couple of hundred years or so ago  ;)




Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jan 12th, 2019 at 3:07pm

Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 2:36pm:
"Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong"

Could have used that advice a couple of hundred years or so ago  ;)




Very silly. As if they could have stayed in the stone age if only the British didn't come.

In fact it's a great good luck that it was the British who came and claimed Australia and not the French (see Haiti) or the Belgians (see Congo) or Italians (Ethiopia, Somalia) or Dutch (Indonesia) or Germans (New Guinea) etc, etc.


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by miketrees on Jan 12th, 2019 at 3:30pm


Oh well Enlightenment Day is coming up soon

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Jan 12th, 2019 at 3:55pm

Frank wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 3:07pm:

Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 2:36pm:
"Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong"

Could have used that advice a couple of hundred years or so ago  ;)




Very silly. As if they could have stayed in the stone age if only the British didn't come.

In fact it's a great good luck that it was the British who came and claimed Australia and not the French (see Haiti) or the Belgians (see Congo) or Italians (Ethiopia, Somalia) or Dutch (Indonesia) or Germans (New Guinea) etc, etc.


Those others saw no benefit in colonising a country as desolate as Australia, Soren.  The British saw benefit as it seemed the best place to transport convicts to, after North America had rejected them.   The British were right, the other imperialists wrong.   None would have benefited the Indigenous folk - a fact you refuse to acknowledge in your belief in the White Man's Burden.   I wonder how well that has worked out in reality?  Look at Asia and Africa where it was applied the most.   Hasn't worked out there all that well...    ::)


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jan 12th, 2019 at 4:54pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 3:55pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 3:07pm:

Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 2:36pm:
"Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong"

Could have used that advice a couple of hundred years or so ago  ;)




Very silly. As if they could have stayed in the stone age if only the British didn't come.

In fact it's a great good luck that it was the British who came and claimed Australia and not the French (see Haiti) or the Belgians (see Congo) or Italians (Ethiopia, Somalia) or Dutch (Indonesia) or Germans (New Guinea) etc, etc.


Those others saw no benefit in colonising a country as desolate as Australia, Soren.  The British saw benefit as it seemed the best place to transport convicts to, after North America had rejected them.   The British were right, the other imperialists wrong.   None would have benefited the Indigenous folk - a fact you refuse to acknowledge in your belief in the White Man's Burden.   I wonder how well that has worked out in reality?  Look at Asia and Africa where it was applied the most.   Hasn't worked out there all that well...    ::)

Aborigines are far better off than Africans or Asians.

Not if they stick to their 'traditional ways' of drinking, raping and violence, but if they move into the 21st century. The world is their oyster, they can do anything. Can't say the same for independent African countries or third world Asia, Haiti, Central America etc.






Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Jan 12th, 2019 at 9:06pm

Frank wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 4:54pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 3:55pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 3:07pm:

Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 2:36pm:
"Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong"

Could have used that advice a couple of hundred years or so ago  ;)




Very silly. As if they could have stayed in the stone age if only the British didn't come.

In fact it's a great good luck that it was the British who came and claimed Australia and not the French (see Haiti) or the Belgians (see Congo) or Italians (Ethiopia, Somalia) or Dutch (Indonesia) or Germans (New Guinea) etc, etc.


Those others saw no benefit in colonising a country as desolate as Australia, Soren.  The British saw benefit as it seemed the best place to transport convicts to, after North America had rejected them.   The British were right, the other imperialists wrong.   None would have benefited the Indigenous folk - a fact you refuse to acknowledge in your belief in the White Man's Burden.   I wonder how well that has worked out in reality?  Look at Asia and Africa where it was applied the most.   Hasn't worked out there all that well...    ::)

Aborigines are far better off than Africans or Asians.

Not if they stick to their 'traditional ways' of drinking, raping and violence, but if they move into the 21st century. The world is their oyster, they can do anything. Can't say the same for independent African countries or third world Asia, Haiti, Central America etc.


Oh, I agree, Soren.  The problem is people like you, whom endlessly criticise them for the colour of their skin, their predicament and their lifestyle choices.   When you cease that, they'll be able to move on, secure in their own identity.   You want them to be faux white people.  They want to be black people living with white people, equal partners.    ::)

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jan 12th, 2019 at 9:16pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 9:06pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 4:54pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 3:55pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 3:07pm:

Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 2:36pm:
"Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong"

Could have used that advice a couple of hundred years or so ago  ;)




Very silly. As if they could have stayed in the stone age if only the British didn't come.

In fact it's a great good luck that it was the British who came and claimed Australia and not the French (see Haiti) or the Belgians (see Congo) or Italians (Ethiopia, Somalia) or Dutch (Indonesia) or Germans (New Guinea) etc, etc.


Those others saw no benefit in colonising a country as desolate as Australia, Soren.  The British saw benefit as it seemed the best place to transport convicts to, after North America had rejected them.   The British were right, the other imperialists wrong.   None would have benefited the Indigenous folk - a fact you refuse to acknowledge in your belief in the White Man's Burden.   I wonder how well that has worked out in reality?  Look at Asia and Africa where it was applied the most.   Hasn't worked out there all that well...    ::)

Aborigines are far better off than Africans or Asians.

Not if they stick to their 'traditional ways' of drinking, raping and violence, but if they move into the 21st century. The world is their oyster, they can do anything. Can't say the same for independent African countries or third world Asia, Haiti, Central America etc.


Oh, I agree, Soren.  The problem is people like you, whom endlessly criticise them for the colour of their skin, their predicament and their lifestyle choices.   When you cease that, they'll be able to move on, secure in their own identity.   You want them to be faux white people.  They want to be black people living with white people, equal partners.    ::)

When they stop raping their children and stop getting blotto on petrol and booze in squalor I will treat them as equal. Until then, they are and remain savages.  There is NO excuse for living like that.



The ones that have lifted themselves out of the misery of the stone age are welcomed with open arms into civilisation and are given every assistance they need as long as they are not exploiting their black privilege.

You know very well that this is how it goes.



Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by gandalf on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 9:33am
The real question here Frank, is would you or Ms Hanson support taking in Ms Qunun?

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Yadda on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 10:25am


thread title.....
Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong




Non-discriminatory immigration,             is like a person in the 1st world, who is living in a comfortable 1st world house/home [which he has worked for],
deciding to remove the front door to his house, and then putting up a large sign on his front lawn;


ALL WELCOME.
IF YOU ARE HOMELESS, PLEASE COME AND SHARE THIS HOUSE WITH ME,
AND WITH MY WIFE,
AND WITH MY CHILDREN.




It doesn't make a lot of sense.

Human nature being what it is,         no rational person would do, or accept, such a thing being imposed upon himself.

But that is exactly what people of the 1st world, are being told that they must do and must accept.



.



DUCKDUCKGO.COM;
Italy: Muslim migrants kidnap woman, hold her as sex slave for two months




.




IMAGE.....


LOL - Naive, foolish, little snowflakes.





Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 8:30pm
https://youtu.be/FqzXkzLGu1A

Differences. They are real.


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 10:15pm

Frank wrote on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 8:30pm:
Differences. They are real.


Watson stole Roselind Franklins data.  She discovered the helical structure of DNA.  He broke into her study and literally stole the results of her experiments.  Watson is a fool for believing that there are significant genetic differences between individuals of different "races".  Soren is a fool for pursuing this.  However, we are used to Soren and his foolishness.   ::)

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jan 24th, 2019 at 7:51am
Train of horror: Germans build monument to migrant murder, rape and crime

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lmc8yYe-JzA

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by miketrees on Jan 24th, 2019 at 12:06pm


Yes until recently we have built a brilliant country, our reward should be only selecting the best of the best to come here.

Not dragging the country down with "Earthscum"

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jan 24th, 2019 at 5:47pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 10:15pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 8:30pm:
Differences. They are real.


.  He broke into her study and literally stole the results of her experiments.  Watson is a fool for believing that there are significant genetic differences between individuals of different "races".  Soren is a fool for pursuing this.  However, we are used to Soren and his foolishness.   ::)



You are a compulsive liar and grief-mongering cockwomle, Bwian.



Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jun 20th, 2019 at 6:28pm


A Melbourne man [an Egyptian living in Melbourne. ed who set up an NDIS registered company that provided no services managed to defraud the disability scheme of $370,000 in just five weeks.

Mohamed Osman Omar, 36, exploited a security flaw in the NDIS which allowed him to make up participant numbers and bill 168 people for services without even knowing their names or disabilities.

Although his firm provided no services the money was removed from accounts of people who desperately needed NDIS funding simply because he had entered their participant number.

The court heard Omar started accessing participant records from June 18 and made 332 successful requests for payment for non-existent services to 168 participants.

“The world has lots of participants for us,” Omar texted an associate while on holiday to Egypt in late June.

On July 4 Omar texted another associate about whether anyone had their plans approved.

“We need to start f..king working mate,” he wrote.

“Are we going to wait until everyone robs the government and then we get shut down without making a $1?”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/ndis-company-that-offered-no-services-stole-370000/news-story/8181232a497e64ca6f10d2a32b3af2f7

Diversity of value system, eh?


Mohamed Omar? Where have I heard that name before?

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jun 25th, 2019 at 7:32pm
Canada has a NESB Somali Muslim immigration minister. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4K-D0WQ3_tg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0oWUZy6GxA


Thank god for Australia's BS detector - how long will it last??






Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Jun 25th, 2019 at 10:59pm
You know, Soren, only Racists talk about discriminating on the basis of "race".   Everybody else talks about discriminating on the basis of what individuals have done.

Seems much fairer that way, rather than deciding that a person's skin colour/shape of their eyes/thickness of their lips or some other physical evolutionary adaptation determines their behaviour.

As we all know, "race" is a social construction, Soren.  Genetics has determined that there is nothing which differentiates the various "races" apart from their physical evolutionary adaptations.   We are all members of the same "race", the Human one.   You share the same genetic structure with every other human being, Soren.   Time you faced scientific reality.   ::)


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Bias_2012 on Jun 25th, 2019 at 11:17pm
There's been a lot of home invasions, bashings and robberies by black Africans

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Jun 25th, 2019 at 11:39pm

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 25th, 2019 at 11:17pm:
There's been a lot of home invasions, bashings and robberies by black Africans


And why do you think that has happened, Bias?  Is it because of the colour of their skin?  Really?   ::) ::)

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Bias_2012 on Jun 26th, 2019 at 1:48am

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 25th, 2019 at 11:39pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 25th, 2019 at 11:17pm:
There's been a lot of home invasions, bashings and robberies by black Africans


And why do you think that has happened, Bias?  Is it because of the colour of their skin?  Really?   ::) ::)


It's because they're black Africans and nobody wants them here so they go on crime sprees vindicating why we don't want them here

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Jun 26th, 2019 at 3:40pm

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 26th, 2019 at 1:48am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 25th, 2019 at 11:39pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 25th, 2019 at 11:17pm:
There's been a lot of home invasions, bashings and robberies by black Africans


And why do you think that has happened, Bias?  Is it because of the colour of their skin?  Really?   ::) ::)


It's because they're black Africans and nobody wants them here so they go on crime sprees vindicating why we don't want them here


So why mention the colour of their skin, Bias?  What influence does it have on their behavior?  Any at all or none at all?   You keep skirting 'round my questions.  I wonder why?   ::)

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jun 26th, 2019 at 6:47pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 26th, 2019 at 3:40pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 26th, 2019 at 1:48am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 25th, 2019 at 11:39pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 25th, 2019 at 11:17pm:
There's been a lot of home invasions, bashings and robberies by black Africans


And why do you think that has happened, Bias?  Is it because of the colour of their skin?  Really?   ::) ::)


It's because they're black Africans and nobody wants them here so they go on crime sprees vindicating why we don't want them here


So why mention the colour of their skin, Bias?  What influence does it have on their behavior?  Any at all or none at all?   You keep skirting 'round my questions.  I wonder why?   ::)



OK - why are Africans doing it but not anyone else? Not skin colour? Actually, it IS skin colour, it's being 'badassniggers'.  They thrive on that because they have absolutely nothing else to look to.

It's their culture - or rather lack of it. These African kids are emulating the worst of the American negro culture. They are not tribal Kenyans or Bantus - they are all 'kill you black person' LA rappers and losers

Black American culture is largely responsible for the appalling lives of Black Americans and all other blacks who emulate them as if they were the embodiment of 'black culture'.

The religious Christian blacks are fighting a rearguard fight against the destruction of their young by rap and drugs. My heart is with them but you can see that they do not have native resources, because their native culture is a dead end, to resist the onslaught of modernity. Christianity is their strong fortress.

Being of 'tanned complexion', as one of the news reports put it the other day, is a fantastic burden to deal with.  It must be absolutely bewildering and extremely difficult to navigate.

But they must navigate it and the price is to recognise the need to supersede their 'tanned' cultures. They must find a way to leave all that hooey behind. A big ask but they must do it.


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jun 26th, 2019 at 7:01pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 25th, 2019 at 10:59pm:
You know, Soren, only Racists talk about discriminating on the basis of "race".   Everybody else talks about discriminating on the basis of what individuals have done.

Seems much fairer that way, rather than deciding that a person's skin colour/shape of their eyes/thickness of their lips or some other physical evolutionary adaptation determines their behaviour.

As we all know, "race" is a social construction, Soren.  Genetics has determined that there is nothing which differentiates the various "races" apart from their physical evolutionary adaptations.   We are all members of the same "race", the Human one.   You share the same genetic structure with every other human being, Soren.   Time you faced scientific reality.   ::)

Like being a Somali Muslim minister of immigration is a social construct, Bwian.

He is a Somali Muslim immigrant in charge of thee immigration program of Canada - a non-Somali, non-Muslim (for a little while longer) country.

dam madness.





Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Jun 26th, 2019 at 7:25pm

Frank wrote on Jun 26th, 2019 at 6:47pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 26th, 2019 at 3:40pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 26th, 2019 at 1:48am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 25th, 2019 at 11:39pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 25th, 2019 at 11:17pm:
There's been a lot of home invasions, bashings and robberies by black Africans


And why do you think that has happened, Bias?  Is it because of the colour of their skin?  Really?   ::) ::)


It's because they're black Africans and nobody wants them here so they go on crime sprees vindicating why we don't want them here


So why mention the colour of their skin, Bias?  What influence does it have on their behavior?  Any at all or none at all?   You keep skirting 'round my questions.  I wonder why?   ::)



OK - why are Africans doing it but not anyone else? Not skin colour? Actually, it IS skin colour, it's being 'badassniggers'.  They thrive on that because they have absolutely nothing else to look to.

It's their culture - or rather lack of it. These African kids are emulating the worst of the American negro culture. They are not tribal Kenyans or Bantus - they are all 'kill you black person' LA rappers and losers

Black American culture is largely responsible for the appalling lives of Black Americans and all other blacks who emulate them as if they were the embodiment of 'black culture'.

The religious Christian blacks are fighting a rearguard fight against the destruction of their young by rap and drugs. My heart is with them but you can see that they do not have native resources, because their native culture is a dead end, to resist the onslaught of modernity. Christianity is their strong fortress.

Being of 'tanned complexion', as one of the news reports put it the other day, is a fantastic burden to deal with.  It must be absolutely bewildering and extremely difficult to navigate.

But they must navigate it and the price is to recognise the need to supersede their 'tanned' cultures. They must find a way to leave all that hooey behind. A big ask but they must do it.


*SIGH* so many contradictions there, Soren.  On one hand, you attack people because of the colour of their skin/shape of their eyes/thickness of their lips/etc. and then, on the other you're attempting to paint yourself as being in sympathy with them.  Sorry, it doesn't wash, not in the slightest.

In reality, you're a Racist.  You believe that a social construct - the concept of "race" - determines the behavior of individuals.

African migrants tend to be refugees - they have fled horrendous situations.  They often have not had any parents who have looked after them - they have been "child soldiers".  They have no positive role models to emulate, except other older soldiers.  They are used to murder, to rape, to pillage.   The overwhelming majority are willing to throw those experiences behind them.  You however believe because of the colour of their skin this determines how they act and who they are.   In your mind, "black == evil".  They are uncivilised and never can be civilised, so you characterise them as "evil".   Such foolishness, such childish attitudes.

As I have already mentioned, Genetics has proved there is no substantial difference between members of humanity.  We are all members of the one race - the human one - homo sapiens sapien.  It is what allows us all to interbreed - we share the same genetic pool.   Until you recognise that and embrace people of other "races" as your brothers and sisters, Soren, you are a lost cause.  You have no understanding of other peoples and you have no desire to accept them as being related to you.   Tsk, tsk.   ::) ::)

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by John Smith on Jun 26th, 2019 at 7:29pm

Quote:
Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong


let me know when your plane leaves sore end and I'll make sure I'm there to wave you off.

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Jun 26th, 2019 at 7:44pm

Frank wrote on Jun 26th, 2019 at 7:01pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 25th, 2019 at 10:59pm:
You know, Soren, only Racists talk about discriminating on the basis of "race".   Everybody else talks about discriminating on the basis of what individuals have done.

Seems much fairer that way, rather than deciding that a person's skin colour/shape of their eyes/thickness of their lips or some other physical evolutionary adaptation determines their behaviour.

As we all know, "race" is a social construction, Soren.  Genetics has determined that there is nothing which differentiates the various "races" apart from their physical evolutionary adaptations.   We are all members of the same "race", the Human one.   You share the same genetic structure with every other human being, Soren.   Time you faced scientific reality.   ::)

Like being a Somali Muslim minister of immigration is a social construct, Bwian.

He is a Somali Muslim immigrant in charge of thee immigration program of Canada - a non-Somali, non-Muslim (for a little while longer) country.

dam madness.


His nationality is Canadian, Soren.  His ethnicity is Somali.   Just like an Australian-Italian is Australian nationally and Italian ethnicity.   Just as you're a Danish-Australian, Soren.  Do you feel that your allegiance is or should be questioned because of where you were born?  Always remember, you flew here, I was born here.   You have little connection with the nation in which you reside, if you want to question this Canadian Government Minister...   ::)

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by barryfromthebush on Jun 26th, 2019 at 7:45pm

Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 2:36pm:
"Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong"

Could have used that advice a couple of hundred years or so ago  ;)





Could the Abo's even speak before white man came and gave them everything?

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jun 26th, 2019 at 9:18pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 26th, 2019 at 7:25pm:

Frank wrote on Jun 26th, 2019 at 6:47pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 26th, 2019 at 3:40pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 26th, 2019 at 1:48am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 25th, 2019 at 11:39pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 25th, 2019 at 11:17pm:
There's been a lot of home invasions, bashings and robberies by black Africans


And why do you think that has happened, Bias?  Is it because of the colour of their skin?  Really?   ::) ::)


It's because they're black Africans and nobody wants them here so they go on crime sprees vindicating why we don't want them here


So why mention the colour of their skin, Bias?  What influence does it have on their behavior?  Any at all or none at all?   You keep skirting 'round my questions.  I wonder why?   ::)



OK - why are Africans doing it but not anyone else? Not skin colour? Actually, it IS skin colour, it's being 'badassniggers'.  They thrive on that because they have absolutely nothing else to look to.

It's their culture - or rather lack of it. These African kids are emulating the worst of the American negro culture. They are not tribal Kenyans or Bantus - they are all 'kill you black person' LA rappers and losers

Black American culture is largely responsible for the appalling lives of Black Americans and all other blacks who emulate them as if they were the embodiment of 'black culture'.

The religious Christian blacks are fighting a rearguard fight against the destruction of their young by rap and drugs. My heart is with them but you can see that they do not have native resources, because their native culture is a dead end, to resist the onslaught of modernity. Christianity is their strong fortress.

Being of 'tanned complexion', as one of the news reports put it the other day, is a fantastic burden to deal with.  It must be absolutely bewildering and extremely difficult to navigate.

But they must navigate it and the price is to recognise the need to supersede their 'tanned' cultures. They must find a way to leave all that hooey behind. A big ask but they must do it.


*SIGH* so many contradictions there, Soren.  On one hand, you attack people because of the colour of their skin/shape of their eyes/thickness of their lips/etc. and then, on the other you're attempting to paint yourself as being in sympathy with them.  Sorry, it doesn't wash, not in the slightest.

In reality, you're a Racist.  You believe that a social construct - the concept of "race" - determines the behavior of individuals.

African migrants tend to be refugees - they have fled horrendous situations.  They often have not had any parents who have looked after them - they have been "child soldiers".  They have no positive role models to emulate, except other older soldiers.  They are used to murder, to rape, to pillage.   The overwhelming majority are willing to throw those experiences behind them.  You however believe because of the colour of their skin this determines how they act and who they are.   In your mind, "black == evil".  They are uncivilised and never can be civilised, so you characterise them as "evil".   Such foolishness, such childish attitudes.

As I have already mentioned, Genetics has proved there is no substantial difference between members of humanity.  We are all members of the one race - the human one - homo sapiens sapien.  It is what allows us all to interbreed - we share the same genetic pool.   Until you recognise that and embrace people of other "races" as your brothers and sisters, Soren, you are a lost cause.  You have no understanding of other peoples and you have no desire to accept them as being related to you.   Tsk, tsk.   ::) ::)

Africans are fleeing Africans. The ones here are exactly the same as the ones who are still there.
That's  why they are a problem here - because they are a problem there.

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jun 27th, 2019 at 4:43pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 26th, 2019 at 3:40pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 26th, 2019 at 1:48am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 25th, 2019 at 11:39pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 25th, 2019 at 11:17pm:
There's been a lot of home invasions, bashings and robberies by black Africans


And why do you think that has happened, Bias?  Is it because of the colour of their skin?  Really?   ::) ::)


It's because they're black Africans and nobody wants them here so they go on crime sprees vindicating why we don't want them here


So why mention the colour of their skin, Bias?  What influence does it have on their behavior?  Any at all or none at all?   You keep skirting 'round my questions.  I wonder why?   ::)



White African have a completely different culture, a largely European culture, and so they are far more compatible with Australia, Europe and North America. They assimilate readily and they fit in more often than not. There are no white African gangs rioting and robbing in Melbourne or Sydney.

Black Africans, being culturally as distant as it's possible to be, form criminal gangs here, in Europe and North America. Race and culture map onto each other pretty readily and the case of white and black Africans illustrates it starkly.

This is not to say that black Africans or Aborigines or black Americans MUST be criminal but that it is a predicter that must not be ignored. Just like you will not be killed every time if you cross at the red light but will be killed more often than you would be when crossing when it's green. You would bee an idiot to ignore the colour of the traffic light, similarly you would be an idiot to ignore race as a predicter of culture.
A fundamentalist Muslim in his 20s or 30s is far more likely to be an Islamic terrorist than a Danish grandmother but of course when it comes to airport security we must pretend that there is no difference between them so the feelings of the sons of Mohammed are not hurt.


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jun 27th, 2019 at 6:24pm

Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 2:36pm:
"Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong"

Could have used that advice a couple of hundred years or so ago  ;)






Needless to say those are not authentic Aboriginal views or sentiments but white propagandists like you appropriating them for your own, white political purposes  - Aborigines had no ability to draw , to write or to publish - or even to boil water.
Now they can do all those things only because of the European civilising influence.


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Jun 28th, 2019 at 11:23am

Frank wrote on Jun 27th, 2019 at 4:43pm:
White African have a completely different culture, a largely European culture, and so they are far more compatible with Australia, Europe and North America. They assimilate readily and they fit in more often than not. There are no white African gangs rioting and robbing in Melbourne or Sydney.

Black Africans, being culturally as distant as it's possible to be, form criminal gangs here, in Europe and North America. Race and culture map onto each other pretty readily and the case of white and black Africans illustrates it starkly.

This is not to say that black Africans or Aborigines or black Americans MUST be criminal but that it is a predicter that must not be ignored. Just like you will not be killed every time if you cross at the red light but will be killed more often than you would be when crossing when it's green. You would bee an idiot to ignore the colour of the traffic light, similarly you would be an idiot to ignore race as a predicter of culture.

A fundamentalist Muslim in his 20s or 30s is far more likely to be an Islamic terrorist than a Danish grandmother but of course when it comes to airport security we must pretend that there is no difference between them so the feelings of the sons of Mohammed are not hurt.


Poor, poor, Soren.  It is obvious you flew here rather than grew here.   You obviously arrived well after the Bodgies and the Wedgies of the 1950s and 1960s.  The Mods and the Rockers of the 1960s and 1970s.   Before that there were the Larrikens, the various colonial "gangs" and guess what, they were all white!  Gee, just think, young white people forming gangs!

Grow up, Soren.  Please, you're too old to live in a fantasy world.  Time to leave Barbie, Ken, He-Man and Action Man behind and join the real world.  Become an adult and actually think like an adult.    ::) ::)



Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jul 7th, 2019 at 8:59pm
"German" holidaymakers accused of raping an 18-year-old tourist in Mallorca arrive at court on the Spanish island


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7219313/German-holidaymakers-accused-raping-18-year-old-tourist-Mallorca-arrive-court.html

:D
It's all that Berlin sun that tanned them and turned them into looking like Arabs. bugger knows what turned their hair black.  Their German asylum permit?

Global warming, eh?



No. They are Muslim Arabs, according to type.



Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Yadda on Jul 7th, 2019 at 10:05pm

Frank wrote on Jul 7th, 2019 at 8:59pm:

"German" holidaymakers accused of raping an 18-year-old tourist in Mallorca arrive at court on the Spanish island


.....They are Muslim Arabs, [behaving] according to type.



Moslems come to live, in secular societies.

But the moslems,    CHOOSE,    to bring their own culture and laws with them.

That mental 'attitude' by the moslem, is unacceptable.

ISLAMIC law make it lawful for a moslem, to rob, to steal, to rape, and to murder.
....if the victim of these crimes are not moslem(s).

And when moslems commit these crimes [like rape] within the Western nations, and when they appear in a court, they just 'go';
"Oh, but i'm allowed to behave in this way. This is our culture."

And too many times, the moslem will get a reduced sentence, or little or no penalty for these crimes.



.




Quote:

Infidel Women: Islam’s “Spoils of War”

02/19/2018
by Raymond Ibrahim


One of the greatest but overlooked (or ignored) fact concerning Islamic aggression and violence around the world is that non-Muslim women tend to be its greatest victims.

According to a January report dealing with the Muslim persecution of Christians, “The most significant findings were that Christian women are among the most violated in the world, in maybe a way that we haven’t seen before.”

Six women were raped every day simply for being Christian, the report found.



....Titled “Rape, Murder and Misogyny: The Real Victims of the Migrant Crisis are Europe’s Women,” the January 14 Voice of Europe report gives just a few examples:

    In Austria: A 72-year-old grandmother was raped by an Afghan minor; as a result she lost the will to live [and died].
    In Belgium: A young girl was drugged and raped by a migrant after she asked the way to the station.
    In France: Two teens were stabbed to death by a migrant in Marseille.
    In Germany: A 19-year-old student was raped and murdered by an Afghan migrant.
    In Germany: A 17-year-old girl was stabbed to death after quitting her relationship with a migrant.
    In Italy: A Polish woman was gang raped by four migrants in Rimini.
    In the Netherlands: A young girl was raped and almost drowned by an asylum seeker in Kampen.
    In the Netherlands: A woman was gang raped by a group of Africans.
    In Sweden: A girl was stabbed to death after rejecting an asylum seeker.
    In Sweden: A woman in a wheelchair was gang raped by a group of migrants.
    In Switzerland: Six women were sexually assaulted by “dark skinned” men.
    In the UK: Muslim Grooming gangs targeting white girls have been around for decades.

https://www.raymondibrahim.com/2018/02/19/infidel-women-islams-spoils-war/



.





Quote:

Pakistan: “Christian Girls Are Only Meant for the Pleasure of Muslim Men”

01/25/2016
by Raymond Ibrahim

[AN ARTICLE, ABOUT THE SYSTEMATIC PERSECUTION AND EXPLOITATION OF MEMBERS OF THE MINORITY CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY, IN 97% MOSLEM PAKISTAN]

https://www.raymondibrahim.com/2016/01/25/pakistan-christian-girls-are-only-meant-for-the-pleasure-of-muslim-men/



.




Quote:

By Robert Spencer on Apr 24, 2018

Swedish woman meets two Muslim migrants at night to prove xenophobes wrong, is brutally raped

But at least she proved it: she isn’t “racist” or “Islamophobic,” and that’s the important thing.


“Swedish woman who accompanied two Afghans to prove that xenophobes are wrong, is raped and abused,”


Voice of Europe, April 24, 2018:
A middle-aged Swedish woman was raped and abused by two Afghan asylum seekers in their asylum accommodation, Fria Tider reports.

The woman, who was a member of a Facebook group against migrant deportations,

tried to prove that xenophobes are wrong about the fact that Afghans are dangerous......

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/04/swedish-woman-meets-two-muslim-migrants-at-night-to-prove-xenophobes-wrong-is-brutally-raped



.



Isn't it time that our judges in our courts, recognised, that this behaviour is not acceptable, and should not be 'excused', or mitigated, on cultural grounds ?

And started sentencing appropriately ?




WWW search....
Afghan migrant rapists acquitted, didn't know wrong


WWW search....
migrant, nobody told me it was illegal


WWW search....
BBC covers up the true nature of the Muslim rape-gangs


WWW search....
Muslims Sexually Enslaving Children: A Global Phenomenon


WWW search....
Sharifi's lawyers claimed that due to cultural differences he was confused


WWW search....
The rapist from Afghanistan said 'cultural differences' contributed to his sex attack


WWW search....
Islamic gangs have been allowed to drug rape, torture, and sell white girls as young as 11 into sex slavery for other Muslim men to abuse.


WWW search....
Muslim Cleric: If Women Don't Want to Get Raped


WWW search....
Devout Islamic Mullah Violently Rapes a 10-Year-old Muslim Girl in Mosque, Family Plans to Honor kill the little girl


WWW search....
Muslims rape over 300 Swedish children


WWW search....
Rape epidemic in Norway caused by Muslim immigration



Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Yadda on Jul 7th, 2019 at 10:14pm


Frank wrote on Jul 7th, 2019 at 8:59pm:

"German" holidaymakers accused of raping an 18-year-old tourist in Mallorca arrive at court on the Spanish island


.....They are Muslim Arabs, [behaving] according to type.



This needs to stop.

And it is we [our justice system], which needs to stop it.

Our justice system needs to act, to help to stop these things from happening.


And to make it widely known, that this behaviour by moslems, will no longer be 'excused', or mitigated, on cultural grounds,
...because 'he didn't know it was unlawful'.




.



Isn't it time that our judges in our courts, recognised, that this behaviour is not acceptable, and should not be 'excused', or mitigated, on cultural grounds ?

And started sentencing appropriately ?




WWW search....
Afghan migrant rapists acquitted, didn't know wrong


WWW search....
migrant, nobody told me it was illegal


WWW search....
BBC covers up the true nature of the Muslim rape-gangs


WWW search....
Muslims Sexually Enslaving Children: A Global Phenomenon


WWW search....
Sharifi's lawyers claimed that due to cultural differences he was confused


WWW search....
The rapist from Afghanistan said 'cultural differences' contributed to his sex attack


WWW search....
Islamic gangs have been allowed to drug rape, torture, and sell white girls as young as 11 into sex slavery for other Muslim men to abuse.


WWW search....
Muslim Cleric: If Women Don't Want to Get Raped


WWW search....
Devout Islamic Mullah Violently Rapes a 10-Year-old Muslim Girl in Mosque, Family Plans to Honor kill the little girl


WWW search....
Muslims rape over 300 Swedish children


WWW search....
Rape epidemic in Norway caused by Muslim immigration



.



Proverbs 8:12
I wisdom dwell with prudence, and find out knowledge of witty inventions.
13  The fear of the LORD is to hate evil: pride, and arrogancy, and the evil way, and the froward mouth, do I hate.
14  Counsel is mine, and sound wisdom: I am understanding; I have strength.
15  By me kings reign, and princes decree justice.
16  By me princes rule, and nobles, even all the judges of the earth.



prudent = = acting with or showing care and thought for the future.





Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Sprintcyclist on Jul 7th, 2019 at 10:19pm

Frank wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 2:32pm:
Pauline Hanson makes eminent sense once again :

Senator Hanson questioned whether Australia’s non-discriminatory migration program would prevent members of Ms Qunun’s family from entering Australia.

“As an ex-Muslim, she has every reason to fear she might suffer death at the hands of extremists in her country of Saudi Arabia because of her decision to reject Islam. However, there have been some important issues left out of the debate that need to be addressed,” Senator Hanson wrote.

“If the people of Ms al-Qunun’s country pose such an immediate threat to her safety, should we not be offering the Australian public stronger protections against those same people? The issue of Islamic extremism has never been a racial issue. It has always been an ideological issue … our immigration program does not do enough to screen people of extreme ideological belief.”


she is correct again.

As usual, this thread has degraded

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Yadda on Jul 7th, 2019 at 10:27pm




Quote:

Australia: Muslim avoids jail for sex attacks on beach due to ...

"Teenager avoids jail for sex attacks due to 'cultural differences,'" Yahoo7 News, April 26, 2017: A teenager who immigrated to Australia from Afghanistan has escaped jail after a series of sex attacks because he grew up in a different culture.
WWW search



Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jul 19th, 2019 at 6:13pm
Brian Leach worked as a ‘greeter’ for downmarket UK supermarket chain Asda in Dewsbury, Yorkshire. He was fired for sharing a well-known Billy Connolly stand-up routine poking fun at religion, including Islam’s fondness for suicide bombing. ‘Now that’s a bright idea,’ Connolly said in between his usual swear words. ‘Every time there’s a bang the world’s a wanker short’. This ‘sharing’ was on Leach’s personal Facebook profile. Terrifyingly, the complaints came from seven work colleagues — people he thought were his friends. Leach is 55 years old, disabled, and will almost certainly never work again.



Noah Carl was a junior academic at St. Edmund’s College, Cambridge who had — perhaps unwisely — done research into stereotype accuracy. He had (consistent with most work in this area) found that common stereotypes are statistically accurate. In one paper, for example, he found that opposition to immigrants of different nationalities correlates strongly with their arrest rates in the UK. This was completed while he was still a student at Oxford, but once he won a prestigious academic fellowship at ‘the other place’, cancel culture went into overdrive. First targeted online (particularly on Twitter) by open letter and accused of promulgating ‘racist pseudoscience’, St. Edmund’s later experienced weekly protests against his appointment. It advised Carl to stay away from college grounds and not speak to the press. In the end — despite offering up the fig leaf of two internal inquiries — it sacked him. Carl is a 28-year-old scientist with an Oxford doctorate. He is currently unemployed.
https://www.spectator.com.au/2019/07/cancel-culture/

The cultural and demographic replacement of Western populations with vibrants is relentless.


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Aug 24th, 2019 at 4:55pm
Vibrant multiculti people


https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1164594614705315841

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Dec 7th, 2019 at 6:04pm
Birmingham: Police called to reports of people with machetes involved in cinema brawl
Officers are called to an entertainment complex in Birmingham after reports of people with machetes at the cinema.


Vibrants. Bring more vibrants. Not having machetes in cinema complexes was a huge monocultural, white and Euro-centric mistake all this time. Cinema without machetes is soooooo white bread, anglo and oppressive!!!!  The tinted johnnies cannot feel at home and welcome in a cinema complex without machetes. 

Feel enriched.








Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Dec 7th, 2019 at 9:42pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2019 at 9:15pm:


Gosh you talk utter BS, Soren.  ::) ::)

Have your demographic  - white, european - ever gone to the flicks with machetes, fkwt?

No.

It's  introduced by the third wold imports of vibrants.


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Dec 8th, 2019 at 1:10pm

Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2019 at 9:42pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2019 at 9:15pm:


Gosh you talk utter BS, Soren.  ::) ::)

Have your demographic  - white, european - ever gone to the flicks with machetes, fkwt?

No.


Actually, yes and all my mates have gone to the cinema with machettes, Soren. It all depends on circumstance and thinking, mate.

Run along with your Racism and your Xenophobia, Soren.  I can hear all your little friends call you back to the little kiddies' playground to play with them.  ::) ::)



Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Dec 8th, 2019 at 1:29pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 8th, 2019 at 1:10pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2019 at 9:42pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2019 at 9:15pm:


Gosh you talk utter BS, Soren.  ::) ::)

Have your demographic  - white, european - ever gone to the flicks with machetes, fkwt?

No.


Actually, yes and all my mates have gone to the cinema with machettes, Soren. It all depends on circumstance and thinking, mate.

Yes, as the demographic circumstances change. Soon they will put a bone through they  nose or a burqa on their wife when they go to the flicks in certain parts.

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Dec 8th, 2019 at 1:58pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 8th, 2019 at 1:38pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 8th, 2019 at 1:29pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 8th, 2019 at 1:10pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2019 at 9:42pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2019 at 9:15pm:


Gosh you talk utter BS, Soren.  ::) ::)

Have your demographic  - white, european - ever gone to the flicks with machetes, fkwt?

No.


Actually, yes and all my mates have gone to the cinema with machettes, Soren. It all depends on circumstance and thinking, mate.

Yes, as the demographic circumstances change. Soon they will put a bone through they  nose or a burqa on their wife when they go to the flicks in certain parts.




You demonstrate how much you are not an Australian, Soren, with every post you make.   Australians are meant to be laid back, easy going, willing to go with the flow, you just post objectionable hatred, Xenophobia, Islamophobia, Racism, etc. in every post.  Tsk, tsk.  ::) :;)



People who go to the cinema with machtes or who dress in burqas and niqabs in the West are the ones who are NOT going with the flow, Bwian.

Your eager accommodating of every imported backwardness, superstition and primitivism is not laid-back.  It's  stupid and self-hating.


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Dec 8th, 2019 at 2:36pm

Frank wrote on Dec 8th, 2019 at 1:58pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 8th, 2019 at 1:38pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 8th, 2019 at 1:29pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 8th, 2019 at 1:10pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2019 at 9:42pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2019 at 9:15pm:


Gosh you talk utter BS, Soren.  ::) ::)

Have your demographic  - white, european - ever gone to the flicks with machetes, fkwt?

No.


Actually, yes and all my mates have gone to the cinema with machettes, Soren. It all depends on circumstance and thinking, mate.

Yes, as the demographic circumstances change. Soon they will put a bone through they  nose or a burqa on their wife when they go to the flicks in certain parts.




You demonstrate how much you are not an Australian, Soren, with every post you make.   Australians are meant to be laid back, easy going, willing to go with the flow, you just post objectionable hatred, Xenophobia, Islamophobia, Racism, etc. in every post.  Tsk, tsk.  ::) :;)



People who go to the cinema with machtes or who dress in burqas and niqabs in the West are the ones who are NOT going with the flow, Bwian.


It is their choice, Soren. It is your objection to their attendance which is not going with the flow.  You are not acting laid back.  Time you started acting Australian, not like some excitable European mountebank.   ::)


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Bias_2012 on Dec 8th, 2019 at 3:15pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 8th, 2019 at 2:36pm:
You are not acting laid back.



Once upon a time we could be laid back, but no longer, it's violent times, lots to watch out for, not only physical violence, we need to watch out for fraud, scams, deception, cheating, etc etc

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Dnarever on Dec 8th, 2019 at 5:01pm
Fank does love a bit of discrimination here and there

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jan 29th, 2020 at 6:09pm

Dnarever wrote on Dec 8th, 2019 at 5:01pm:
Fank does love a bit of discrimination here and there



Discrimination is what we all do, must do. It's another word for TELLING THE DIFFERENCE.



Are you somene who active;y REFUSES to tell the difference?

These tinted people are acting on the difference https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7933441/French-police-investigate-racist-attack-white-schoolboy-kicked-beaten.html


Imagine a bunch of whites doing that to a brown kiddie.


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Dnarever on Jan 29th, 2020 at 6:35pm
Reminds me of working with discriminating repeaters in the 70's.

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Dnarever on Jan 29th, 2020 at 6:36pm
Immigration is no fun if you can't discriminate against the tinted ?

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by John Smith on Jan 29th, 2020 at 6:42pm

Frank wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 3:07pm:

Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 2:36pm:
"Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong"

Could have used that advice a couple of hundred years or so ago  ;)




Very silly. As if they could have stayed in the stone age if only the British didn't come.


that's up to them. I can just imagine the hysteria from you if  muslims forced themselves on you because they believe you'll be better off :D :D :D

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by xeej on Jan 29th, 2020 at 7:18pm
We even have headhunters from the Congo flooding in and multiplying.

"Congolese Australians are Australians of Congolese descent or who were born in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or the Republic of the Congo. The population of Congolese born Australians has increased significantly over the past 20 years, from just 21 at the 1996 Census to 5,522 at the 2016 Census."

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Jan 31st, 2020 at 6:13pm

John Smith wrote on Jan 29th, 2020 at 6:42pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 3:07pm:

Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 2:36pm:
"Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong"

Could have used that advice a couple of hundred years or so ago  ;)




Very silly. As if they could have stayed in the stone age if only the British didn't come.


that's up to them. I can just imagine the hysteria from you if  muslims forced themselves on you because they believe you'll be better off :D :D :D



Inferior people forcing themselves on superior people is not the same as taking Stone Age people into modernity by the best civilisation going.

Aborigines were very lucky it wasn't the Muslims or the Belgians or the Chinese but the British who have been trying to bring them into the modern world around them.






Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Dnarever on Jan 31st, 2020 at 7:05pm

Quote:
Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong


We should only allow people in who we can go on to discriminate against ? No I think we should let in some who are more like us as well.

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Jan 31st, 2020 at 10:16pm

Johnnie wrote on Jan 29th, 2020 at 7:18pm:
We even have headhunters from the Congo flooding in and multiplying.


There were no head hunters in the Congo.  ::)  ::)



Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Jan 31st, 2020 at 10:18pm

Frank wrote on Jan 31st, 2020 at 6:13pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 29th, 2020 at 6:42pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 3:07pm:

Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 2:36pm:
"Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong"

Could have used that advice a couple of hundred years or so ago  ;)




Very silly. As if they could have stayed in the stone age if only the British didn't come.


that's up to them. I can just imagine the hysteria from you if  muslims forced themselves on you because they believe you'll be better off :D :D :D


Inferior people forcing themselves on superior people is not the same as taking Stone Age people into modernity by the best civilisation going.

Aborigines were very lucky it wasn't the Muslims or the Belgians or the Chinese but the British who have been trying to bring them into the modern world around them.


How were they lucky, Soren?  Appears to me the British were just as brutal and uncaring as any group of Imperialists.  Tsk, tsk.  ::)


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by John Smith on Jan 31st, 2020 at 11:05pm

Frank wrote on Jan 31st, 2020 at 6:13pm:
Inferior people forcing themselves on superior people is not the same as taking Stone Age people into modernity by the best civilisation going.



inferior by your standards, not theirs.

Somehow i knew you would turn hypocrite at the first opportunity :D

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Feb 1st, 2020 at 9:00am

John Smith wrote on Jan 31st, 2020 at 11:05pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 31st, 2020 at 6:13pm:
Inferior people forcing themselves on superior people is not the same as taking Stone Age people into modernity by the best civilisation going.



inferior by your standards, not theirs.

Somehow i knew you would turn hypocrite at the first opportunity :D

Inferior even by their standards.

Otherwise they would avoid and rejects Western cultural influences.


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by PZ547 on Feb 1st, 2020 at 9:05am

Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2019 at 5:47pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 10:15pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 8:30pm:
Differences. They are real.


.  He broke into her study and literally stole the results of her experiments.  Watson is a fool for believing that there are significant genetic differences between individuals of different "races".  Soren is a fool for pursuing this.  However, we are used to Soren and his foolishness.   ::)



You are a compulsive liar and grief-mongering cockwomle, Bwian.



It's my opinion of that poster too

and I suspect he is a sock of another paid to post who's always clogging this place with extreme liberal crap

a personal meeting with that individual (and the socks jiggling around inside its crazy skull) should be arranged



Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Feb 1st, 2020 at 12:13pm

PZ547 wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 9:05am:

Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2019 at 5:47pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 10:15pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 8:30pm:
Differences. They are real.


.  He broke into her study and literally stole the results of her experiments.  Watson is a fool for believing that there are significant genetic differences between individuals of different "races".  Soren is a fool for pursuing this.  However, we are used to Soren and his foolishness.   ::)



You are a compulsive liar and grief-mongering cockwomle, Bwian.


It's my opinion of that poster too

and I suspect he is a sock of another paid to post who's always clogging this place with extreme liberal crap

a personal meeting with that individual (and the socks jiggling around inside its crazy skull) should be arranged


Anytime, you can look me up in the White Pages if you like.  Not that I expect you even live in Australia, mate.   ::) ::) ::)


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Mr Hammer on Feb 1st, 2020 at 12:21pm

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 12:13pm:

PZ547 wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 9:05am:

Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2019 at 5:47pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 10:15pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 8:30pm:
Differences. They are real.


.  He broke into her study and literally stole the results of her experiments.  Watson is a fool for believing that there are significant genetic differences between individuals of different "races".  Soren is a fool for pursuing this.  However, we are used to Soren and his foolishness.   ::)



You are a compulsive liar and grief-mongering cockwomle, Bwian.


It's my opinion of that poster too

and I suspect he is a sock of another paid to post who's always clogging this place with extreme liberal crap

a personal meeting with that individual (and the socks jiggling around inside its crazy skull) should be arranged


Anytime, you can look me up in the White Pages if you like.  Not that I expect you even live in Australia, mate.   ::) ::) ::)

I bet you believe the white pages is racist?

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Feb 1st, 2020 at 12:26pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 12:21pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 12:13pm:

PZ547 wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 9:05am:

Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2019 at 5:47pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 10:15pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 8:30pm:
Differences. They are real.


.  He broke into her study and literally stole the results of her experiments.  Watson is a fool for believing that there are significant genetic differences between individuals of different "races".  Soren is a fool for pursuing this.  However, we are used to Soren and his foolishness.   ::)



You are a compulsive liar and grief-mongering cockwomle, Bwian.


It's my opinion of that poster too

and I suspect he is a sock of another paid to post who's always clogging this place with extreme liberal crap

a personal meeting with that individual (and the socks jiggling around inside its crazy skull) should be arranged


Anytime, you can look me up in the White Pages if you like.  Not that I expect you even live in Australia, mate.   ::) ::) ::)

I bet you believe the white pages is racist?



Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by John Smith on Feb 1st, 2020 at 1:23pm

Frank wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 9:00am:

John Smith wrote on Jan 31st, 2020 at 11:05pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 31st, 2020 at 6:13pm:
Inferior people forcing themselves on superior people is not the same as taking Stone Age people into modernity by the best civilisation going.



inferior by your standards, not theirs.

Somehow i knew you would turn hypocrite at the first opportunity :D

Inferior even by their standards.

Otherwise they would avoid and rejects Western cultural influences.


weren't you the one normally claiming they're trying to make the west like the ME? :D :D

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by buzzanddidj on Feb 1st, 2020 at 2:40pm

Yadda wrote on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 10:25am:



ALL WELCOME.
IF YOU ARE HOMELESS, PLEASE COME AND SHARE THIS HOUSE WITH ME,
AND WITH MY WIFE,
AND WITH MY CHILDREN.



Yadda's sounding like Jesus Christ !





Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Feb 1st, 2020 at 3:40pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 12:21pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 12:13pm:

PZ547 wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 9:05am:

Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2019 at 5:47pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 10:15pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 23rd, 2019 at 8:30pm:
Differences. They are real.


.  He broke into her study and literally stole the results of her experiments.  Watson is a fool for believing that there are significant genetic differences between individuals of different "races".  Soren is a fool for pursuing this.  However, we are used to Soren and his foolishness.   ::)



You are a compulsive liar and grief-mongering cockwomle, Bwian.


It's my opinion of that poster too

and I suspect he is a sock of another paid to post who's always clogging this place with extreme liberal crap

a personal meeting with that individual (and the socks jiggling around inside its crazy skull) should be arranged


Anytime, you can look me up in the White Pages if you like.  Not that I expect you even live in Australia, mate.   ::) ::) ::)

I bet you believe the white pages is racist?



And the Beatles White Album simply could not be released today.  Nor Berlin's White Christmas.  Sooooo wacist.


Black is beautiful, but.

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by xeej on Feb 1st, 2020 at 3:55pm
The US have just announced immigration restrictions on another six Muslim countries, meanwhile our immigration floodgates remain open to all and sundry because our politically correct bipartisan gutless politicians would rather put our national security at risk than upset the snowflakes.

"The US has announced it is expanding its curbs on immigration to include six more countries, including Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation.

Citizens from Nigeria, Eritrea, Sudan, Tanzania, Kyrgyzstan and Myanmar will now be blocked from obtaining certain types of visas."

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Mr Hammer on Feb 1st, 2020 at 4:37pm

Johnnie wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 3:55pm:
The US have just announced immigration restrictions on another six Muslim countries, meanwhile our immigration floodgates remain open to all and sundry because our politically correct bipartisan gutless politicians would rather put our national security at risk than upset the snowflakes.

"The US has announced it is expanding its curbs on immigration to include six more countries, including Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation.

Citizens from Nigeria, Eritrea, Sudan, Tanzania, Kyrgyzstan and Myanmar will now be blocked from obtaining certain types of visas."

Trump is my hero.

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Feb 1st, 2020 at 4:59pm

Johnnie wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 3:55pm:
The US have just announced immigration restrictions on another six Muslim countries, meanwhile our immigration floodgates remain open to all and sundry because our politically correct bipartisan gutless politicians would rather put our national security at risk than upset the snowflakes.

"The US has announced it is expanding its curbs on immigration to include six more countries, including Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation.

Citizens from Nigeria, Eritrea, Sudan, Tanzania, Kyrgyzstan and Myanmar will now be blocked from obtaining certain types of visas."


Nigeria, 51.6% Muslim
Eritrea, 60% Muslim
Sudan,  90% Muslim
Tanzania, 61% Christian
Kyrgyzstan 82.7% Muslim
and Myanmar 87% Buddhist

Looks rather hit or miss as far as religion goes as a reason to ban those nation's inhabitants but hey, what else we have come to expect from el Presidente' Trump's administration on this issue: How to pick on countries and piss them off.  ::) ::)

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Mr Hammer on Feb 1st, 2020 at 5:16pm

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 4:59pm:

Johnnie wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 3:55pm:
The US have just announced immigration restrictions on another six Muslim countries, meanwhile our immigration floodgates remain open to all and sundry because our politically correct bipartisan gutless politicians would rather put our national security at risk than upset the snowflakes.

"The US has announced it is expanding its curbs on immigration to include six more countries, including Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation.

Citizens from Nigeria, Eritrea, Sudan, Tanzania, Kyrgyzstan and Myanmar will now be blocked from obtaining certain types of visas."


Nigeria, 51.6% Muslim
Eritrea, 60% Muslim
Sudan,  90% Muslim
Tanzania, 61% Christian
Kyrgyzstan 82.7% Muslim
and Myanmar 87% Buddhist

Looks rather hit or miss as far as religion goes as a reason to ban those nation's inhabitants but hey, what else we have come to expect from el Presidente' Trump's administration on this issue: How to pick on countries and piss them off.  ::) ::)

maybe it's not about religion.

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Feb 1st, 2020 at 5:21pm
Citizens from Nigeria, Eritrea, Sudan, Tanzania, Kyrgyzstan and Myanmar will now be blocked from obtaining certain types of visas.

People from those countries will still be able to visit the US as tourists.

In 2018 the US issued twice as many immigration visas to Nigeria than to the other five nations combined.

An official said the new measures were the result of failures by the six countries to meet US security and information-sharing standards.

"These countries, for the most part, want to be helpful but for a variety of different reasons simply failed to meet those minimum requirements that we laid out," acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf told reporters on Friday.


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by xeej on Feb 1st, 2020 at 5:23pm

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 4:59pm:

Johnnie wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 3:55pm:
The US have just announced immigration restrictions on another six Muslim countries, meanwhile our immigration floodgates remain open to all and sundry because our politically correct bipartisan gutless politicians would rather put our national security at risk than upset the snowflakes.

"The US has announced it is expanding its curbs on immigration to include six more countries, including Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation.

Citizens from Nigeria, Eritrea, Sudan, Tanzania, Kyrgyzstan and Myanmar will now be blocked from obtaining certain types of visas."


Nigeria, 51.6% Muslim
Eritrea, 60% Muslim
Sudan,  90% Muslim
Tanzania, 61% Christian
Kyrgyzstan 82.7% Muslim
and Myanmar 87% Buddhist

Looks rather hit or miss as far as religion goes as a reason to ban those nation's inhabitants but hey, what else we have come to expect from el Presidente' Trump's administration on this issue: How to pick on countries and piss them off.  ::) ::)

Most of them are Muslim majority countries as were the previous countries on the ban list, the rest are Muslim infected countries.

Trump wouldn't want to piss them off now would he, they might get angry,, but then they don't have MOAB's.

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Feb 1st, 2020 at 5:23pm
Citizens from Nigeria, Eritrea, Sudan, Tanzania, Kyrgyzstan and Myanmar will now be blocked from obtaining certain types of visas.

People from those countries will still be able to visit the US as tourists.

In 2018 the US issued twice as many immigration visas to Nigeria than to the other five nations combined.

An official said the new measures were the result of failures by the six countries to meet US security and information-sharing standards.

"These countries, for the most part, want to be helpful but for a variety of different reasons simply failed to meet those minimum requirements that we laid out," acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf told reporters on Friday.
...


The six countries will join a list of seven nations, most of them Muslim-majority, that faced significant travel restrictions under President Trump’s original travel ban, issued in 2017.

That order was the administration’s third attempt to craft a legally workable policy fleshing out one of Mr. Trump’s top campaign promises, after the first two versions were met with significant criticism and struck down by federal courts.

However, unlike five of the original countries—Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen—travelers from the newly added nations who seek to visit the U.S. for business or pleasure will still be permitted entry.


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Feb 1st, 2020 at 10:06pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 5:16pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 4:59pm:

Johnnie wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 3:55pm:
The US have just announced immigration restrictions on another six Muslim countries, meanwhile our immigration floodgates remain open to all and sundry because our politically correct bipartisan gutless politicians would rather put our national security at risk than upset the snowflakes.

"The US has announced it is expanding its curbs on immigration to include six more countries, including Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation.

Citizens from Nigeria, Eritrea, Sudan, Tanzania, Kyrgyzstan and Myanmar will now be blocked from obtaining certain types of visas."


Nigeria, 51.6% Muslim
Eritrea, 60% Muslim
Sudan,  90% Muslim
Tanzania, 61% Christian
Kyrgyzstan 82.7% Muslim
and Myanmar 87% Buddhist

Looks rather hit or miss as far as religion goes as a reason to ban those nation's inhabitants but hey, what else we have come to expect from el Presidente' Trump's administration on this issue: How to pick on countries and piss them off.  ::) ::)

maybe it's not about religion.


My goodness, really, Hammer?  What could be about, hey?  Perhaps it's cause they are all tinted?  Who could have guessed that, from a many like el Presidente Trump who once got taken to court over not allowing Black people to rent his apartments?  Tsk, tsk.  ::) ::)


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Feb 1st, 2020 at 10:08pm

Johnnie wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 5:23pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 4:59pm:

Johnnie wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 3:55pm:
The US have just announced immigration restrictions on another six Muslim countries, meanwhile our immigration floodgates remain open to all and sundry because our politically correct bipartisan gutless politicians would rather put our national security at risk than upset the snowflakes.

"The US has announced it is expanding its curbs on immigration to include six more countries, including Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation.

Citizens from Nigeria, Eritrea, Sudan, Tanzania, Kyrgyzstan and Myanmar will now be blocked from obtaining certain types of visas."


Nigeria, 51.6% Muslim
Eritrea, 60% Muslim
Sudan,  90% Muslim
Tanzania, 61% Christian
Kyrgyzstan 82.7% Muslim
and Myanmar 87% Buddhist

Looks rather hit or miss as far as religion goes as a reason to ban those nation's inhabitants but hey, what else we have come to expect from el Presidente' Trump's administration on this issue: How to pick on countries and piss them off.  ::) ::)

Most of them are Muslim majority countries as were the previous countries on the ban list, the rest are Muslim infected countries.

Trump wouldn't want to piss them off now would he, they might get angry,, but then they don't have MOAB's.


"Most"?  Really?  I count out of six, three who have a minority of Muslim citizens in their midst.  That doesn't qualify as "most", Xeej.  Tsk, tsk.  ::) ::)

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by xeej on Feb 2nd, 2020 at 12:00am

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 10:08pm:

Johnnie wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 5:23pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 4:59pm:

Johnnie wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 3:55pm:
The US have just announced immigration restrictions on another six Muslim countries, meanwhile our immigration floodgates remain open to all and sundry because our politically correct bipartisan gutless politicians would rather put our national security at risk than upset the snowflakes.

"The US has announced it is expanding its curbs on immigration to include six more countries, including Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation.

Citizens from Nigeria, Eritrea, Sudan, Tanzania, Kyrgyzstan and Myanmar will now be blocked from obtaining certain types of visas."


Nigeria, 51.6% Muslim
Eritrea, 60% Muslim
Sudan,  90% Muslim
Tanzania, 61% Christian
Kyrgyzstan 82.7% Muslim
and Myanmar 87% Buddhist

Looks rather hit or miss as far as religion goes as a reason to ban those nation's inhabitants but hey, what else we have come to expect from el Presidente' Trump's administration on this issue: How to pick on countries and piss them off.  ::) ::)

Most of them are Muslim majority countries as were the previous countries on the ban list, the rest are Muslim infected countries.

Trump wouldn't want to piss them off now would he, they might get angry,, but then they don't have MOAB's.


"Most"?  Really?  I count out of six, three who have a minority of Muslim citizens in their midst.  That doesn't qualify as "most", Xeej.  Tsk, tsk.  ::) ::)

Try counting them again Brian, I tally 4 out of the 6 being Muslim majority. Tsk tsk.

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Feb 2nd, 2020 at 11:26am

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 10:08pm:

Johnnie wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 5:23pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 4:59pm:

Johnnie wrote on Feb 1st, 2020 at 3:55pm:
The US have just announced immigration restrictions on another six Muslim countries, meanwhile our immigration floodgates remain open to all and sundry because our politically correct bipartisan gutless politicians would rather put our national security at risk than upset the snowflakes.

"The US has announced it is expanding its curbs on immigration to include six more countries, including Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation.

Citizens from Nigeria, Eritrea, Sudan, Tanzania, Kyrgyzstan and Myanmar will now be blocked from obtaining certain types of visas."


Nigeria, 51.6% Muslim
Eritrea, 60% Muslim
Sudan,  90% Muslim
Tanzania, 61% Christian
Kyrgyzstan 82.7% Muslim
and Myanmar 87% Buddhist

Looks rather hit or miss as far as religion goes as a reason to ban those nation's inhabitants but hey, what else we have come to expect from el Presidente' Trump's administration on this issue: How to pick on countries and piss them off.  ::) ::)

Most of them are Muslim majority countries as were the previous countries on the ban list, the rest are Muslim infected countries.

Trump wouldn't want to piss them off now would he, they might get angry,, but then they don't have MOAB's.


"Most"?  Really?  I count out of six, three who have a minority of Muslim citizens in their midst.  That doesn't qualify as "most", Xeej.  Tsk, tsk.  ::) ::)



They are corrupt, incompetent states. Having loads of Muslims probably doesn't help. Being tinted? Hmm, there must be a cultural correlation. For example, there are over 50 countries in Africa, none of them well run, most of them hell-holes. Colonialism ended more than 2 generations ago, yet the Africans can't manage themselves properly. Why?

Plus an ex Soviet republic of Muslims and a brutal dictatorship in Asia.


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Feb 2nd, 2020 at 11:48am

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 31st, 2020 at 10:18pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 31st, 2020 at 6:13pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 29th, 2020 at 6:42pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 3:07pm:

Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 12th, 2019 at 2:36pm:
"Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong"

Could have used that advice a couple of hundred years or so ago  ;)




Very silly. As if they could have stayed in the stone age if only the British didn't come.


that's up to them. I can just imagine the hysteria from you if  muslims forced themselves on you because they believe you'll be better off :D :D :D


Inferior people forcing themselves on superior people is not the same as taking Stone Age people into modernity by the best civilisation going.

Aborigines were very lucky it wasn't the Muslims or the Belgians or the Chinese but the British who have been trying to bring them into the modern world around them.


How were they lucky, Soren?  Appears to me the British were just as brutal and uncaring as any group of Imperialists.  Tsk, tsk.  ::)

Because you are wilfully blind, Bwian.


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Feb 2nd, 2020 at 11:55am

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 31st, 2020 at 10:16pm:

Johnnie wrote on Jan 29th, 2020 at 7:18pm:
We even have headhunters from the Congo flooding in and multiplying.


There were no head hunters in the Congo.  ::)  ::)



Phew!!! That's a relief, Bwian.

Only cannibals, mass rapists and butchers. The year before last. Much better.  Bring them here, no? Mustn't discrimiinate.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-congo-violence-un/mass-rape-cannibalism-dismemberment-u-n-team-finds-atrocities-in-congo-war-idUSKBN1JT2CF


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Feb 2nd, 2020 at 1:13pm

Frank wrote on Feb 2nd, 2020 at 11:55am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 31st, 2020 at 10:16pm:

Johnnie wrote on Jan 29th, 2020 at 7:18pm:
We even have headhunters from the Congo flooding in and multiplying.


There were no head hunters in the Congo.  ::)  ::)


Phew!!! That's a relief, Bwian.

Only cannibals, mass rapists and butchers. The year before last. Much better.  Bring them here, no? Mustn't discrimiinate.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-congo-violence-un/mass-rape-cannibalism-dismemberment-u-n-team-finds-atrocities-in-congo-war-idUSKBN1JT2CF


All acts which are illegal in Australia, Soren.  They either behave or they serve time and then are deported.  ::)

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by xeej on Feb 2nd, 2020 at 5:16pm

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 2nd, 2020 at 1:13pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 2nd, 2020 at 11:55am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 31st, 2020 at 10:16pm:

Johnnie wrote on Jan 29th, 2020 at 7:18pm:
We even have headhunters from the Congo flooding in and multiplying.


There were no head hunters in the Congo.  ::)  ::)


Phew!!! That's a relief, Bwian.

Only cannibals, mass rapists and butchers. The year before last. Much better.  Bring them here, no? Mustn't discrimiinate.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-congo-violence-un/mass-rape-cannibalism-dismemberment-u-n-team-finds-atrocities-in-congo-war-idUSKBN1JT2CF


All acts which are illegal in Australia, Soren.  They either behave or they serve time and then are deported.  ::)

Old habits die hard, culture runs deep, our government are risk takers on our behalf.

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Feb 2nd, 2020 at 7:50pm

Johnnie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2020 at 5:16pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 2nd, 2020 at 1:13pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 2nd, 2020 at 11:55am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 31st, 2020 at 10:16pm:

Johnnie wrote on Jan 29th, 2020 at 7:18pm:
We even have headhunters from the Congo flooding in and multiplying.


There were no head hunters in the Congo.  ::)  ::)


Phew!!! That's a relief, Bwian.

Only cannibals, mass rapists and butchers. The year before last. Much better.  Bring them here, no? Mustn't discrimiinate.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-congo-violence-un/mass-rape-cannibalism-dismemberment-u-n-team-finds-atrocities-in-congo-war-idUSKBN1JT2CF


All acts which are illegal in Australia, Soren.  They either behave or they serve time and then are deported.  ::)

Old habits die hard, culture runs deep, our government are risk takers on our behalf.


Do you have a reading comprehension problem or something else which prevents you understanding what has been typed?  ::)


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Feb 16th, 2020 at 7:58pm
Evil is being imported on a large scale in the name of multiculturalism

Omar Elomar, teen relative of terrorist Mohamed Elomar, killed in ‘targeted attack'


https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/teen-shot-dead-in-sydney-in-targeted-attack/news-story/00e61d1d36ad0f89bafe9ee9ac38bd73

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Feb 16th, 2020 at 8:22pm

Frank wrote on Feb 16th, 2020 at 7:58pm:
Evil is being imported on a large scale in the name of multiculturalism

Omar Elomar, teen relative of terrorist Mohamed Elomar, killed in ‘targeted attack'

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/teen-shot-dead-in-sydney-in-targeted-attack/news-story/00e61d1d36ad0f89bafe9ee9ac38bd73


What has this to do with Multiculturalism, Soren?  Anything?  It sounds like a crime.  Take it to the crime thread.  The actions of one or more criminals have no bearing on our tolerance of each other's culture.  ::) ::)


Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Feb 17th, 2020 at 6:02pm

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 16th, 2020 at 8:22pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 16th, 2020 at 7:58pm:
Evil is being imported on a large scale in the name of multiculturalism

Omar Elomar, teen relative of terrorist Mohamed Elomar, killed in ‘targeted attack'

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/teen-shot-dead-in-sydney-in-targeted-attack/news-story/00e61d1d36ad0f89bafe9ee9ac38bd73


What has this to do with Multiculturalism, Soren?  Anything?  It sounds like a crime.  Take it to the crime thread.  The actions of one or more criminals have no bearing on our tolerance of each other's culture.  ::) ::)



You never hear about Swiss, Dutch, Danish, Swedish terrorism in Australia.  The Mohammeds, on the other hand, are hugely over-represented in the naughty corner.  NOT a coincidence, Bwian. Culture matters. Some cultures are far less compatible with Western societies like Australia's. There is nothing but common sense in this observation - yet you fight it as if it was anathema to the dogma of multiculturalism - because it is is.

That is why multiculturalism is a crock of crap - it's feasible only if you abandon your mind.



Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Brian Ross on Feb 20th, 2020 at 10:47pm

Frank wrote on Feb 17th, 2020 at 6:02pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 16th, 2020 at 8:22pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 16th, 2020 at 7:58pm:
Evil is being imported on a large scale in the name of multiculturalism

Omar Elomar, teen relative of terrorist Mohamed Elomar, killed in ‘targeted attack'

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/teen-shot-dead-in-sydney-in-targeted-attack/news-story/00e61d1d36ad0f89bafe9ee9ac38bd73


What has this to do with Multiculturalism, Soren?  Anything?  It sounds like a crime.  Take it to the crime thread.  The actions of one or more criminals have no bearing on our tolerance of each other's culture.  ::) ::)



You never hear about Swiss, Dutch, Danish, Swedish terrorism in Australia.  The Mohammeds, on the other hand, are hugely over-represented in the naughty corner.  NOT a coincidence, Bwian. Culture matters. Some cultures are far less compatible with Western societies like Australia's. There is nothing but common sense in this observation - yet you fight it as if it was anathema to the dogma of multiculturalism - because it is is.

That is why multiculturalism is a crock of crap - it's feasible only if you abandon your mind.


Appears to me that most of the Terrorism committed in Australia over the last 50 years wasn't done by Muslims, Soren.  Perhaps you need to read up on its history downunder?  Mmmm?   ::) ::) ::)

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by xeej on Feb 21st, 2020 at 3:24am

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 2nd, 2020 at 7:50pm:

Johnnie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2020 at 5:16pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 2nd, 2020 at 1:13pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 2nd, 2020 at 11:55am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 31st, 2020 at 10:16pm:

Johnnie wrote on Jan 29th, 2020 at 7:18pm:
We even have headhunters from the Congo flooding in and multiplying.


There were no head hunters in the Congo.  ::)  ::)


Phew!!! That's a relief, Bwian.

Only cannibals, mass rapists and butchers. The year before last. Much better.  Bring them here, no? Mustn't discrimiinate.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-congo-violence-un/mass-rape-cannibalism-dismemberment-u-n-team-finds-atrocities-in-congo-war-idUSKBN1JT2CF


All acts which are illegal in Australia, Soren.  They either behave or they serve time and then are deported.  ::)

Old habits die hard, culture runs deep, our government are risk takers on our behalf.


Do you have a reading comprehension problem or something else which prevents you understanding what has been typed?  ::)

Who could argue what we wouldn't be better off without cultures that are abrasive to the our culture, say for example black savages who are accustomed  to war and spearing each other or cultures where kids are taught to hate the West like in the middle east, you know it happens.

Trump has banned these type for perfectly logical reasons, our floodgates are open.

Title: Re: Non-discriminatory immigration is wrong
Post by Frank on Mar 4th, 2020 at 5:50pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2u_hLm-SRQw


She is spot on. Pretending that there is no difference between peoples and cultures, that every person is just an interchangeable economic unit is a colossal lie.

The prog idiots for open borders are jumping on the corporatist, globalist bandwagon like the perennial idiots they always are. Useless idiots.









Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.