Anyone watching SBS new tonight would have heard the SBS editors' oblique but clear support for Muzlim terrorism in their analysis of the Prakesh citizenship case. They are saying the government action is nothing more than politics, while Prakesh advocates Islamic violence against the Australia people.

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/more-dual-nationals-face-losing-australian-citizenship-after-neil-prakash-s-case

Been telling yez from the outset - once a person swears allegiance to another state, even a 'state without borders' such as Islamic State (kind of a Catholic religion on super-steroids and driven by maniacs) - that person has willingly surrendered his/her nationality of and citizenship in Australia.....

Catholicism may be a 'state without borders' - but it is a state that does not advocate violent overthrow of governments and replacing them with Canon law, nor does it advocate the killing of innocents to make a point... and Catholicism keeps separate State and Religious belief...

Come in, gregg - here's your cue.... quote us the IRA chapter and verse...

Been saying it for ever.

Get rid of all muzzos.

NOW

I think Gandalf was opposed to these laws.

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/more-dual-nationals-face-losing-australian-citizenship-after-neil-prakash-s-case

Neil Prakash has become the 12th dual national to lose his Australian citizenship.

The Australian government said it is examining the cases of dual nationals who could lose their Australian citizenship over their activities as foreign fighters.

The Melbourne-born man, who is currently in jail in Turkey over charges related to being a member of Islamic State, has become the 12th dual national to have their citizenship annulled over associations with offshore terror groups.

Australia is seeking extradition of the 27-year-old in relation to several serious terrorism charges but the Kilis Criminal Court in southern Turkey earlier this year rejected Australia's extradition request.

Prakash has been in custody near the border with Syria since 2016 after he attempted to enter Turkey with false documents.

His Australian passport was cancelled in 2014 and he was added to a sanctions list in 2015.

Prakash has previously admitted being a member of Islamic State but said he had nothing to do with the group in Australia.

He faces a potential life sentence if convicted in Australia of terrorism offences.

The former rapper from Melbourne had featured in IS videos and has been linked to a failed Melbourne plot to behead a police officer and another attack in which two officers were stabbed outside a Melbourne police station.

The government announced in November that it planned to change legislation to make it easier to strip dual Australian citizens of their citizenship, if they are convicted of terrorism.

No dual citizenship - you're either here or not... look at Slim Mehajer lifting a few lazy mill to Lebanon... nuffin' new and end of story ...

No dual citizen may sit on any governing board, whether elected or appointed...... guest workers work in specific jobs....

Lock The Gates!!

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 7:11am:

I think Gandalf was opposed to these laws. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/more-dual-nationals-face-losing-australian-citizenship-after-neil-prakash-s-case Neil Prakash has become the 12th dual national to lose his Australian citizenship. The Australian government said it is examining the cases of dual nationals who could lose their Australian citizenship over their activities as foreign fighters. The Melbourne-born man, who is currently in jail in Turkey over charges related to being a member of Islamic State, has become the 12th dual national to have their citizenship annulled over associations with offshore terror groups. Australia is seeking extradition of the 27-year-old in relation to several serious terrorism charges but the Kilis Criminal Court in southern Turkey earlier this year rejected Australia's extradition request. Prakash has been in custody near the border with Syria since 2016 after he attempted to enter Turkey with false documents. His Australian passport was cancelled in 2014 and he was added to a sanctions list in 2015. Prakash has previously admitted being a member of Islamic State but said he had nothing to do with the group in Australia. He faces a potential life sentence if convicted in Australia of terrorism offences. The former rapper from Melbourne had featured in IS videos and has been linked to a failed Melbourne plot to behead a police officer and another attack in which two officers were stabbed outside a Melbourne police station. The government announced in November that it planned to change legislation to make it easier to strip dual Australian citizens of their citizenship, if they are convicted of terrorism.

rapper from Melbourne - that alone must be worth 10 years.

The SBS editorial policy is pro-Islam, and anti-European.

issuevoter wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 9:39am:

The SBS editorial policy is pro-Islam, and anti-European.

And SBS is govt/taxpayer funded & as such should be pro-Australian & anti religion .... especially Islam.

issuevoter wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 9:39am:

The SBS editorial policy is pro-Islam, and anti-European.

Fun fact: the majority of terrorist attacks in Europe aren't Islamic.

In fact, they only make up 16% of all attacks.

For those who failed maths at school - which is probably most of you white-supremacist, Islamophobes - that means that 84% of terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Islam.

There ya go   ;)

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 10:04am:

issuevoter wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 9:39am: The SBS editorial policy is pro-Islam, and anti-European. Fun fact: the majority of terrorist attacks in Europe aren't Islamic. In fact, they only make up 16% of all attacks. For those who failed maths at school - which is probably most of you white-supremacist, Islamophobes - that means that 84% of terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Islam. There ya go   ;)

thats different Greg .... they're not muslim so we can overlook it.

John Smith wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 10:14am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:04am: issuevoter wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 9:39am: The SBS editorial policy is pro-Islam, and anti-European. Fun fact: the majority of terrorist attacks in Europe aren't Islamic. In fact, they only make up 16% of all attacks. For those who failed maths at school - which is probably most of you white-supremacist, Islamophobes - that means that 84% of terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Islam. There ya go   ;) thats different Greg .... they're not muslim so we can overlook it.

Not only overlook, but openly encourage.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 10:04am:

issuevoter wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 9:39am: The SBS editorial policy is pro-Islam, and anti-European. Fun fact: the majority of terrorist attacks in Europe aren't Islamic. In fact, they only make up 16% of all attacks. For those who failed maths at school - which is probably most of you white-supremacist, Islamophobes - that means that 84% of terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Islam. There ya go   ;)

Over what time span?  The clear and PRESENT danger is Islam...

John Smith wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 10:14am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:04am: issuevoter wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 9:39am: The SBS editorial policy is pro-Islam, and anti-European. Fun fact: the majority of terrorist attacks in Europe aren't Islamic. In fact, they only make up 16% of all attacks. For those who failed maths at school - which is probably most of you white-supremacist, Islamophobes - that means that 84% of terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Islam. There ya go   ;) thats different Greg .... they're not muslim so we can overlook it.

Not going through this nonsense again - in the past several years, by far the greatest number of attacks in Europe that cause multiple death and injury are from Muslims.

You may have missed it, smith, and Peccary will not accept it.. but the major security services all do and clearly point to Islam as the major clear and present danger.

Stick your heads in the sand and cry wolf to any dissidents as much as you like - you are still wrong and are quoting false figures to make no point at all.   ::)

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 10:16am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:04am: issuevoter wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 9:39am: The SBS editorial policy is pro-Islam, and anti-European. Fun fact: the majority of terrorist attacks in Europe aren't Islamic. In fact, they only make up 16% of all attacks. For those who failed maths at school - which is probably most of you white-supremacist, Islamophobes - that means that 84% of terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Islam. There ya go   ;) Over what time span?  The clear and PRESENT danger is Islam...

Last year (and the year before, and the year before that, etc.), old boy.

I've posted the report several times but you refuse to read it.

Here it is again:

EUROPEAN UNION TERRORISM SITUATION AND TREND REPORT 2018 (TESAT 2018)

16% of attacks are Jihadist.

84% of attacks are not.

Where I come from 84 is a much bigger number than 16, thus, the majority of terrorist attacks in Europe are carried out by non-Muslims.

I'm only reporting the facts.

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 10:18am:

John Smith wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:04am: issuevoter wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 9:39am: The SBS editorial policy is pro-Islam, and anti-European. Fun fact: the majority of terrorist attacks in Europe aren't Islamic. In fact, they only make up 16% of all attacks. For those who failed maths at school - which is probably most of you white-supremacist, Islamophobes - that means that 84% of terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Islam. There ya go   ;) thats different Greg .... they're not muslim so we can overlook it. Not going through this nonsense again - in the past several years, by far the greatest number of attacks in Europe that cause multiple death and injury are from Muslims. You may have missed it, smith, and Peccary will not accept it.. but the major security services all do and clearly point to Islam as the major clear and present danger. Stick your heads in the sand and cry wolf to any dissidents as much as you like - you are still wrong and are quoting false figures to make no point at all.   ::)

Can you perhaps tell us which figures are false?

Here's the report, once again:

https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/main-reports/european-union-terrorism-situation-and-trend-report-2018-tesat-2018

Page 9, bottom right hand corner.

Does it or does it not say "Jihadist 16%"?

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 10:41am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:18am: John Smith wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:04am: issuevoter wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 9:39am: The SBS editorial policy is pro-Islam, and anti-European. Fun fact: the majority of terrorist attacks in Europe aren't Islamic. In fact, they only make up 16% of all attacks. For those who failed maths at school - which is probably most of you white-supremacist, Islamophobes - that means that 84% of terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Islam. There ya go   ;) thats different Greg .... they're not muslim so we can overlook it. Not going through this nonsense again - in the past several years, by far the greatest number of attacks in Europe that cause multiple death and injury are from Muslims. You may have missed it, smith, and Peccary will not accept it.. but the major security services all do and clearly point to Islam as the major clear and present danger. Stick your heads in the sand and cry wolf to any dissidents as much as you like - you are still wrong and are quoting false figures to make no point at all.   ::) Can you perhaps tell us which figures are false? Here's the report, once again: https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/main-reports/european-union-terrorism-situation-and-trend-report-2018-tesat-2018 Page 9, bottom right hand corner. Does it or does it not say "Jihadist 16%"?

Page 7, #10.

Does it or does it not say:

"Ethno-nationalist and separatist terrorist attacks
continue to far outnumber attacks carried out by
violent extremists inspired by any other ideologies or
motivations."

I'm curious.

And are not some of those separatist terrorists Muslim separatists?

Gnads wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 10:48am:

And are not some of those separatist terrorists Muslim separatists?

No.

Read the report.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 10:04am:

issuevoter wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 9:39am: The SBS editorial policy is pro-Islam, and anti-European. Fun fact: the majority of terrorist attacks in Europe aren't Islamic. In fact, they only make up 16% of all attacks. For those who failed maths at school - which is probably most of you white-supremacist, Islamophobes - that means that 84% of terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Islam. There ya go   ;)

Clap hands, here comes Turdy,
Clap hands,  trollface Turdy,
Clap hands, here comes Turdy now.

What's the body count?

I'm curious.

Actually I am not. Not curious, I know why turdy ignores that aspect.  Cos he's an apologist for Islamic inspired violence and the body count is an inconvenient truth he prefers to ignore and instead will like the ducking bird automoton repeat his preferred apologist narrative.

There is a reason why the entire security and intelligence apparatus in Europe has changed, that's because intelligently they are focusing on the most lethal threat, the one with a record of deadly violence, murder and mayhem. 

Thank bugger that cretins like Gregg don't get to allocate resources and priorities.  ::) ::)

He is much safer spending all his time posting Trump and gay memes, the forum is a public service in that way.

Secret Wars wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 11:29am:

What's the body count? I'm curious. Actually I am not. Not curious, I know why turdy ignores that aspect.

The body count is extremely high for the Jihadist attacks, and I've never ignored that fact.

The highest of all groups, I believe.

It's in the report, if you took the time to read it.

The report also shows that Jihadists are only responsible for 16% of all attacks in Europe.

And, that's what I'm discussing: the total number of attacks.

The vast majority of terrorist attacks in Europe are not carried out by Jihadists.

84% of all attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism.

As an apologist for white-supremacist, right-wing terrorism, you conveniently choose to ignore this fact.

Interesting.

Gregg, people who are not apologist cretins and SJW poseurs focus on deadly and murderous incidents, resources and measures are directed at that.

And what is that deadly and murderous threat that is leading the body count, can you say it cretin?

Starts with I... sounds like

The truth will set you free.

Actually maybe not in your case, your relationship to honesty is like a vampires to sunlight.  ;D ;D

Secret Wars wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 11:55am:

Gregg, people who are not apologist cretins and SJW poseurs focus on deadly and murderous incidents, resources and measures are directed at that. And what is that deadly and murderous threat that is leading the body count, can you say it cretin? Starts with I... sounds like The truth will set you free. Actually maybe not in your case, your relationship to honesty is like a vampires to sunlight.  ;D ;D

To recap:

84% of all attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism.

Fact.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:00pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 11:55am: Gregg, people who are not apologist cretins and SJW poseurs focus on deadly and murderous incidents, resources and measures are directed at that. And what is that deadly and murderous threat that is leading the body count, can you say it cretin? Starts with I... sounds like The truth will set you free. Actually maybe not in your case, your relationship to honesty is like a vampires to sunlight.  ;D ;D To recap: 84% of all attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. Fact.

Gregg is a proven and demonstrated liar.

Fact.

;D ;D  ;D

Secret Wars wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:03pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 12:00pm: Secret Wars wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 11:55am: Gregg, people who are not apologist cretins and SJW poseurs focus on deadly and murderous incidents, resources and measures are directed at that. And what is that deadly and murderous threat that is leading the body count, can you say it cretin? Starts with I... sounds like The truth will set you free. Actually maybe not in your case, your relationship to honesty is like a vampires to sunlight.  ;D ;D To recap: 84% of all attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. Fact. Gregg is a proven and demonstrated liar. Fact. ;D ;D  ;D

Are you saying that my figure, quoted directly from the Europol report, is incorrect?

I'm curious.

Get a grip of yourself wankstain, you are trying to gain minor debating points by apologising and distracting from the bloody gore of Islamic terrorism.

Curious, you ain't curious, what you are is an apologist cretin.

Muslims going choppy choppy and you are all, but, but, but, 84% as if that fact is more pertinent and more important than the body parts littering the ground at a kiddies concert.

Secret Wars wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:18pm:

Get a grip of yourself wankstain, you are trying to gain minor debating points by apologising and distracting from the bloody gore of Islamic terrorism. Curious, you ain't curious, what you are is an apologist cretin. Muslims going choppy choppy and you are all, but, but, but, 84% as if that fact is more pertinent and more important than the body parts littering the ground at a kiddies concert.

To be clear then, you aren't saying that my figure, quoted directly from the Europol report, is incorrect?

84% of terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Jihadism.

So, where's the lie?

I'm curious.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:21pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 12:18pm: Get a grip of yourself wankstain, you are trying to gain minor debating points by apologising and distracting from the bloody gore of Islamic terrorism. Curious, you ain't curious, what you are is an apologist cretin. Muslims going choppy choppy and you are all, but, but, but, 84% as if that fact is more pertinent and more important than the body parts littering the ground at a kiddies concert. To be clear then, you aren't saying that my figure, quoted directly from the Europol report, is incorrect? 84% of terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Jihadism. So, where's the lie? I'm curious.

You are comparing jaywalking to mass murder and insist that because there is more jaywalking than mass murder the former is somehow more significant simply because of your misleading euro stats lump them all into the same report.
Thats how stupid and dishonest you are.

Valkie wrote on Dec 29^th, 2018 at 7:59pm:

Been saying it for ever. Get rid of all muzzos. NOW

Get rid of the darkies.

NEXT

Frank wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:38pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 12:21pm: Secret Wars wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 12:18pm: Get a grip of yourself wankstain, you are trying to gain minor debating points by apologising and distracting from the bloody gore of Islamic terrorism. Curious, you ain't curious, what you are is an apologist cretin. Muslims going choppy choppy and you are all, but, but, but, 84% as if that fact is more pertinent and more important than the body parts littering the ground at a kiddies concert. To be clear then, you aren't saying that my figure, quoted directly from the Europol report, is incorrect? 84% of terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Jihadism. So, where's the lie? I'm curious. You are comparing jaywalking to mass murder and insist that because there is more jaywalking than mass murder the former is somehow more significant simply because of your misleading euro stats lump them all into the same report. Thats how stupid and dishonest you are.

So it's not just graffiti, it's jay walking too?

Oh my, when will this apologism ever end?

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 10:49am:

Gnads wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:48am: And are not some of those separatist terrorists Muslim separatists? No. Read the report.

The report says that Muslims are the only political, ideological or religious group to get their own separate category.

Nearly all deaths and most of the casualties are attributable to that category.

Greg has to look very hard for some statistics to quote without making it appear that even among terrorists, Muslims are setting a new low. This is how slippery you have to be, to be an Islamic apologist.

Besides

Graffiti is not much of a terrorist crime , is it?

Valkie wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 3:23pm:

Besides Graffiti is not much of a terrorist crime , is it?

Greg seems to think that one act of graffiti is equivalent to 9/11. But it is hard to get a straight answer from him.

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 3:31pm:

Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:23pm: Besides Graffiti is not much of a terrorist crime , is it? Greg seems to think that one act of graffiti is equivalent to 9/11. But it is hard to get a straight answer from him.

That is because he is
An Apologist for murdering , lazy, freeloading parasites.
A liar who will not leave the forum as he stated he woukd when Trump won.
A supporter of the sick and twisted minority of mentally ill.
A troll who simply looks for the worst in the world to support.

He can't help it,
He does not even know what sex he is.

Valkie wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 3:23pm:

Besides Graffiti is not much of a terrorist crime , is it?

No, not really.

That's why it's not included in the Europol report.

They only include violent terrorist incidents.

Interestingly, only 16% of all attacks were carried out by Jihadists.

That means that a whopping 84% of all violent terrorism in  Europe has nothing to do with Jihadism.

But, you knew that already.

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 1:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:49am: Gnads wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:48am: And are not some of those separatist terrorists Muslim separatists? No. Read the report. The report says that Muslims are the only political, ideological or religious group to get their own separate category. Nearly all deaths and most of the casualties are attributable to that category. Greg has to look very hard for some statistics to quote without making it appear that even among terrorists, Muslims are setting a new low. This is how slippery you have to be, to be an Islamic apologist.

The report says that the vast majority of violent terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Jihadism.

84% of them, in fact.

Are you disputing this official statistic, FD?

I'm curious.

I am saying you are cherry picking misleading statistics Greg. Not sure I can say this any slower for you.

Why are you so desperate to defend Muslim terrorists?

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 3:47pm:

I am saying you are cherry picking misleading statistics Greg. Not sure I can say this any slower for you. Why are you so desperate to defend Muslim terrorists?

So, the number is correct then - 84% of all violent terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Jihadism?

A simple 'yes' or 'no' will suffice.

I do not know whether they are correct Greg.

Why are you so desperate to defend Muslim terrorists?

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:26pm:

I do not know whether they are correct Greg. Why are you so desperate to defend Muslim terrorists?

Do you have any reason to doubt the figures?

Valkie wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 3:39pm:

freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:31pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:23pm: Besides Graffiti is not much of a terrorist crime , is it? Greg seems to think that one act of graffiti is equivalent to 9/11. But it is hard to get a straight answer from him. That is because he is An Apologist for murdering , lazy, freeloading parasites. A liar who will not leave the forum as he stated he woukd when Trump won. A supporter of the sick and twisted minority of mentally ill. A troll who simply looks for the worst in the world to support. He can't help it, He does not even know what sex he is.

I didn't say I would leave the forum when Trump won.

You shouldn't tell lies you know.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:42pm:

Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:39pm: freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:31pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:23pm: Besides Graffiti is not much of a terrorist crime , is it? Greg seems to think that one act of graffiti is equivalent to 9/11. But it is hard to get a straight answer from him. That is because he is An Apologist for murdering , lazy, freeloading parasites. A liar who will not leave the forum as he stated he woukd when Trump won. A supporter of the sick and twisted minority of mentally ill. A troll who simply looks for the worst in the world to support. He can't help it, He does not even know what sex he is. I didn't say I would leave the forum when Trump won. You shouldn't tell lies you know.

That is exactly what you said, Turd, there  are several people here who will confirm it.

You bloody dishonest liar.

Frank wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 7:28pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:42pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:39pm: freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:31pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:23pm: Besides Graffiti is not much of a terrorist crime , is it? Greg seems to think that one act of graffiti is equivalent to 9/11. But it is hard to get a straight answer from him. That is because he is An Apologist for murdering , lazy, freeloading parasites. A liar who will not leave the forum as he stated he woukd when Trump won. A supporter of the sick and twisted minority of mentally ill. A troll who simply looks for the worst in the world to support. He can't help it, He does not even know what sex he is. I didn't say I would leave the forum when Trump won. You shouldn't tell lies you know. That is exactly what you said, Turd, there  are several people here who will confirm it. You bloody dishonest liar.

Too many people know the truth

You said you would leave if Trump won.

Trump won

You should leave

You refuse to leave my turd mc turdface

Therefore, you is a liar.

Simple enough for ya?

Frank wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 7:28pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:42pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:39pm: freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:31pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:23pm: Besides Graffiti is not much of a terrorist crime , is it? Greg seems to think that one act of graffiti is equivalent to 9/11. But it is hard to get a straight answer from him. That is because he is An Apologist for murdering , lazy, freeloading parasites. A liar who will not leave the forum as he stated he woukd when Trump won. A supporter of the sick and twisted minority of mentally ill. A troll who simply looks for the worst in the world to support. He can't help it, He does not even know what sex he is. I didn't say I would leave the forum when Trump won. You shouldn't tell lies you know. That is exactly what you said, Turd, there  are several people here who will confirm it. You bloody dishonest liar.

No.

I did not say that at all.

If I did, somebody would have provided a link by now.

So, why must you tell lies?

I'm curious.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 7:47pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:42pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:39pm: freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:31pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:23pm: Besides Graffiti is not much of a terrorist crime , is it? Greg seems to think that one act of graffiti is equivalent to 9/11. But it is hard to get a straight answer from him. That is because he is An Apologist for murdering , lazy, freeloading parasites. A liar who will not leave the forum as he stated he woukd when Trump won. A supporter of the sick and twisted minority of mentally ill. A troll who simply looks for the worst in the world to support. He can't help it, He does not even know what sex he is. I didn't say I would leave the forum when Trump won. You shouldn't tell lies you know. That is exactly what you said, Turd, there  are several people here who will confirm it. You bloody dishonest liar. No. I did not say that at all. If I did, somebody would have provided a link by now. So, why must you tell lies? I'm curious.

You lie. That's all you ever do.

We know what you said even if you deleted those post, Turd.

Locating posts on this site is near impossible, the search facilities are shite. But we have been giving you hell for two years for your blatant lies. Nobody would put you on the spot about leaving the forum if you yourself hadn't said that you would leave if trump won.

You are a Slovenian efnik lowlife, a son-of-Bwian/Karnal lying prick who enjoys lying and playing the '86% village idiot" game. We get it. Don't pretend otherwise, Turd.  Your reputation is well-established.

Frank wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 7:55pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:47pm: Frank wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:42pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:39pm: freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:31pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:23pm: Besides Graffiti is not much of a terrorist crime , is it? Greg seems to think that one act of graffiti is equivalent to 9/11. But it is hard to get a straight answer from him. That is because he is An Apologist for murdering , lazy, freeloading parasites. A liar who will not leave the forum as he stated he woukd when Trump won. A supporter of the sick and twisted minority of mentally ill. A troll who simply looks for the worst in the world to support. He can't help it, He does not even know what sex he is. I didn't say I would leave the forum when Trump won. You shouldn't tell lies you know. That is exactly what you said, Turd, there  are several people here who will confirm it. You bloody dishonest liar. No. I did not say that at all. If I did, somebody would have provided a link by now. So, why must you tell lies? I'm curious. You lie. That's all you ever do. We know what you said even if you deleted those post, Turd. Locating posts on this site is near impossible, the search facilities are shite. But we have been giving you hell for two years for your blatant lies. Nobody would put you on the spot about leaving the forum if you yourself hadn't said that you would leave if trump won. You are a Slovenian efnik lowlife, a son-of-Bwian/Karnal lying prick who enjoys lying and playing the '86% village idiot" game. We get it. Don't pretend otherwise, Turd.  Your reputation is well-established.

No, you do.

I never said that I would leave when Trump won.

Every day, in every way, I get the better of you and it drives you crazy.

Your only way to get back at me is to make up lies.

Well, everyone in the forum can see what you're doing.

So sad.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:22pm:

freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:26pm: I do not know whether they are correct Greg. Why are you so desperate to defend Muslim terrorists? Do you have any reason to doubt the figures?

I have no particular reason to pay any attention at all to them, except to point out that even among terrorists, Muslims yet again manage to set a new low.

Why are you so eager to defend Islamic terrorists with misleading statistics?

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 8:08pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:55pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:47pm: Frank wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:42pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:39pm: freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:31pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:23pm: Besides Graffiti is not much of a terrorist crime , is it? Greg seems to think that one act of graffiti is equivalent to 9/11. But it is hard to get a straight answer from him. That is because he is An Apologist for murdering , lazy, freeloading parasites. A liar who will not leave the forum as he stated he woukd when Trump won. A supporter of the sick and twisted minority of mentally ill. A troll who simply looks for the worst in the world to support. He can't help it, He does not even know what sex he is. I didn't say I would leave the forum when Trump won. You shouldn't tell lies you know. That is exactly what you said, Turd, there  are several people here who will confirm it. You bloody dishonest liar. No. I did not say that at all. If I did, somebody would have provided a link by now. So, why must you tell lies? I'm curious. You lie. That's all you ever do. We know what you said even if you deleted those post, Turd. Locating posts on this site is near impossible, the search facilities are shite. But we have been giving you hell for two years for your blatant lies. Nobody would put you on the spot about leaving the forum if you yourself hadn't said that you would leave if trump won. You are a Slovenian efnik lowlife, a son-of-Bwian/Karnal lying prick who enjoys lying and playing the '86% village idiot" game. We get it. Don't pretend otherwise, Turd.  Your reputation is well-established. No, you do. I never said that I would leave when Trump won. Every day, in every way, I get the better of you and it drives you crazy. Your only way to get back at me is to make up lies. Well, everyone in the forum can see what you're doing. So sad.

Yeah you did.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 8:08pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:55pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:47pm: Frank wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:42pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:39pm: freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:31pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:23pm: Besides Graffiti is not much of a terrorist crime , is it? Greg seems to think that one act of graffiti is equivalent to 9/11. But it is hard to get a straight answer from him. That is because he is An Apologist for murdering , lazy, freeloading parasites. A liar who will not leave the forum as he stated he woukd when Trump won. A supporter of the sick and twisted minority of mentally ill. A troll who simply looks for the worst in the world to support. He can't help it, He does not even know what sex he is. I didn't say I would leave the forum when Trump won. You shouldn't tell lies you know. That is exactly what you said, Turd, there  are several people here who will confirm it. You bloody dishonest liar. No. I did not say that at all. If I did, somebody would have provided a link by now. So, why must you tell lies? I'm curious. You lie. That's all you ever do. We know what you said even if you deleted those post, Turd. Locating posts on this site is near impossible, the search facilities are shite. But we have been giving you hell for two years for your blatant lies. Nobody would put you on the spot about leaving the forum if you yourself hadn't said that you would leave if trump won. You are a Slovenian efnik lowlife, a son-of-Bwian/Karnal lying prick who enjoys lying and playing the '86% village idiot" game. We get it. Don't pretend otherwise, Turd.  Your reputation is well-established. No, you do. I never said that I would leave when Trump won. Every day, in every way, I get the better of you and it drives you crazy. Your only way to get back at me is to make up lies. Well, everyone in the forum can see what you're doing. So sad.

You got the handle turd mc turdface because you lid and refused to leave when you said you would.

Altering past posts in a futile attempt to withdraw your lies proves that you are dishonest.

You stated that if Trump won, you would leave the forum.
Then when you lost, you attempted to twist the lie by saying you woukd leave, when was the question.

Your continued attacks on Trump at every chance, again in a futile and infantile attempt to justify your Les, have been more than obvious.

The simple FACT is that you lie.
You lie , twist statements, deliberately mislead, deliberately misinterpret and of course lie incessantly.

You apologist activities are well known and you lost a bet to me and ...........refuse to pay up.

Lies, lies, lies
Turd mc turdface

I charge you with lies
Everyone on this forum knows these above facts.

You also stand accused of using socks, but proof is difficult to obtain.
But it is quite coincidental that similar syntax, similar sentence structure, similar wording and common statements abound with many trolls who always seem to appear whenever you are under attack, they, and only they support you.
They attempt to create an attack which will get the person calling you out BANNED.

These are your tactics.
You use them incessantly
But, you simply lie, about everything, all the time
THIS IS A FACT.

Wrong as it is when right wing extremist acts of defacing a synagogue or a Mosque is considered violent terrorism the terror stats can be distorted...from Gregs stat site...

"in any terrorist category have been as lethal and have had such an impact on society as a whole as those committed by jihadist terrorists – such as those also committed in 2017 and since the beginning of 2018."

Which is the point of concern...the nature of that 16% is extreme violence.

In other words, Muslims are giving terrorists a bad name.

How is valkie getting away with that abuse?

Spot

The Jihadist extremist is one element, then consider people online are ranting extreme views of all types left, right or religious... a NAZI rants online then goes out and throws a pigs head on a Mosques steps, then the next day he is trying to blow the Mosque up....such is today's world...full of ratbag elements.

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 9:53pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:22pm: freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:26pm: I do not know whether they are correct Greg. Why are you so desperate to defend Muslim terrorists? Do you have any reason to doubt the figures? I have no particular reason to pay any attention at all to them, except to point out that even among terrorists, Muslims yet again manage to set a new low. Why are you so eager to defend Islamic terrorists with misleading statistics?

Turd is a taqiyya merchant and so has a very strong affinity to others who live by taqiyya - muslims, bwians, karnals, progs.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 8:49am:

How is valkie getting away with that abuse? Spot

Truth is his defence. He's not  lying about Turd.

Pedro Curevo wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 8:21am:

Wrong as it is when right wing extremist acts of defacing a synagogue or a Mosque is considered violent terrorism the terror stats can be distorted...from Gregs stat site... "in any terrorist category have been as lethal and have had such an impact on society as a whole as those committed by jihadist terrorists – such as those also committed in 2017 and since the beginning of 2018." Which is the point of concern...the nature of that 16% is extreme violence.

The nature of the other 84% - which has nothing to do with Jihadism - is extreme violence.

I suggest you read the report.

Frank wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 9:33am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 8:49am: How is valkie getting away with that abuse? Spot Truth is his defence. He's lying about Turd.

That's right.

Glad you admit it.

Gnads wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 6:49am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 8:08pm: Frank wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:55pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:47pm: Frank wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:42pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:39pm: freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:31pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:23pm: Besides Graffiti is not much of a terrorist crime , is it? Greg seems to think that one act of graffiti is equivalent to 9/11. But it is hard to get a straight answer from him. That is because he is An Apologist for murdering , lazy, freeloading parasites. A liar who will not leave the forum as he stated he woukd when Trump won. A supporter of the sick and twisted minority of mentally ill. A troll who simply looks for the worst in the world to support. He can't help it, He does not even know what sex he is. I didn't say I would leave the forum when Trump won. You shouldn't tell lies you know. That is exactly what you said, Turd, there  are several people here who will confirm it. You bloody dishonest liar. No. I did not say that at all. If I did, somebody would have provided a link by now. So, why must you tell lies? I'm curious. You lie. That's all you ever do. We know what you said even if you deleted those post, Turd. Locating posts on this site is near impossible, the search facilities are shite. But we have been giving you hell for two years for your blatant lies. Nobody would put you on the spot about leaving the forum if you yourself hadn't said that you would leave if trump won. You are a Slovenian efnik lowlife, a son-of-Bwian/Karnal lying prick who enjoys lying and playing the '86% village idiot" game. We get it. Don't pretend otherwise, Turd.  Your reputation is well-established. No, you do. I never said that I would leave when Trump won. Every day, in every way, I get the better of you and it drives you crazy. Your only way to get back at me is to make up lies. Well, everyone in the forum can see what you're doing. So sad. Yeah you did.

No, I most certainly did not.

If you think otherwise, show us the proof.

:)

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 9:55am:

Frank wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:33am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 8:49am: How is valkie getting away with that abuse? Spot Truth is his defence. He's not lying about Turd. That's right. Glad you admit it.

We all know you are lying.

Frank wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 10:01am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:55am: Frank wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:33am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 8:49am: How is valkie getting away with that abuse? Spot Truth is his defence. He's not lying about Turd. That's right. Glad you admit it. We all know you are lying.

Yet, not one of you can produce the evidence   ;D

Keep trying.

;D knew you would go that line.

A little bird told me you been back deleting posts

not that I'd go looking for it

and I'm not playing you said I said .... I know what I saw posted at the time.

You are a liar.

Gnads wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 10:04am:

;D knew you would go that line. A little bird told me you been back deleting posts not that I'd go looking for it and I'm not playing you said I said .... I know what I saw posted at the time. You are a liar.

So, no evidence of this "lie"?   ;D

Keep trying.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 8:49am:

How is valkie getting away with that abuse? Spot

I dont think hes regarded as a full quid by anyone on this site. Hes like one of those incoherent babbling nut jobs who walk up to people on the street saying a lot about nothing. Then you give them a dollar and they go away.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 8:49am:

How is valkie getting away with that abuse? Spot

Because it's not abuse

I'm stating FACTS

And a sock like you should stick to attacking as ordered,
Oh, that's right, you are

rhino wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 10:07am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 8:49am: How is valkie getting away with that abuse? Spot I dont think hes regarded as a full quid by anyone on this site. Hes like one of those incoherent babbling nut jobs who walk up to people on the street saying a lot about nothing. Then you give them a dollar and they go away.

Sock no2 at it

Keep sending them in turd mc turdface.

Everyone knows a sock when one sees it.

rhino wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 10:07am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 8:49am: How is valkie getting away with that abuse? Spot I dont think hes regarded as a full quid by anyone on this site. Hes like one of those incoherent babbling nut jobs who walk up to people on the street saying a lot about nothing. Then you give them a dollar and they go away.

;D

Gnads wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 10:04am:

;D knew you would go that line. A little bird told me you been back deleting posts not that I'd go looking for it and I'm not playing you said I said .... I know what I saw posted at the time. You are a liar.

Everyone knows the truth

How pathetic can a troll like turd mc turdface be to have to go back deleting posts so that he can pretend he isn't a lying Turd?

But we always knew that he and his socks are immoral and devoid of any honest posts don't we?

Valkie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 10:49am:

Gnads wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 10:04am: ;D knew you would go that line. A little bird told me you been back deleting posts not that I'd go looking for it and I'm not playing you said I said .... I know what I saw posted at the time. You are a liar. Everyone knows the truth How pathetic can a troll like turd mc turdface be to have to go back deleting posts so that he can pretend he isn't a lying Turd? But we always knew that he and his socks are immoral and devoid of any honest posts don't we?

I can't delete other people's posts.

And, several people quoted what I said about Trump winning and me leaving, so why can't you find any of those old posts?

I'm curious   :)

Not playing this game turd mc turdface.

You know you lied

You argued about it for months

You know, we know, everyone knows

Just give up and leave like you promised.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 9:55am:

Frank wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:33am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 8:49am: How is valkie getting away with that abuse? Spot Truth is his defence. He's lying about Turd. That's right. Glad you admit it.

Is that you changing another member's post to misrepresent what they have said?

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 11:10am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:55am: Frank wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:33am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 8:49am: How is valkie getting away with that abuse? Spot Truth is his defence. He's lying about Turd. That's right. Glad you admit it. Is that you changing another member's post to misrepresent what they have said?

No, it's not.

It's him going back and changing his post, once he realised his mistake.

"« Last Edit: Today at 8:00am by Frank » "

I quoted exactly what he originally wrote.

Let's see if the huge intellects here can spot the difference in these two sentences.

"I will leave this Forum if Donald wins."

"I will leave this Forum when Donald wins."

First to give the correct answer wins a brown paper bag of boiled lollies.

Valkie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 10:40am:

rhino wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 10:07am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 8:49am: How is valkie getting away with that abuse? Spot I dont think hes regarded as a full quid by anyone on this site. Hes like one of those incoherent babbling nut jobs who walk up to people on the street saying a lot about nothing. Then you give them a dollar and they go away. Sock no2 at it Keep sending them in turd mc turdface. Everyone knows a sock when one sees it.

Well it appears everyone would only include you Valkie, and Ive got news for you. You arent everyone. Heres a dollar.

Aussie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 11:24am:

Let's see if the huge intellects here can spot the difference in these two sentences. "I will leave this Forum if Donald wins." "I will leave this Forum when Donald wins." First to give the correct answer wins a brown paper bag of boiled lollies.

Who stated this and where is the link to these statements.

Valkie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 11:01am:

Not playing this game turd mc turdface. You know you lied You argued about it for months You know, we know, everyone knows Just give up and leave like you promised.

There's no argument to be had.

I never said that I would leave the forum when Trump wins.

You're just making up nonsense.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 11:22am:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:55am: Frank wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:33am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 8:49am: How is valkie getting away with that abuse? Spot Truth is his defence. He's lying about Turd. That's right. Glad you admit it. Is that you changing another member's post to misrepresent what they have said? No, it's not. It's him going back and changing his post, once he realised his mistake. "« Last Edit: Today at 8:00am by Frank » " I quoted exactly what he originally wrote.

Sounds plausible.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 11:29am:

Valkie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:01am: Not playing this game turd mc turdface. You know you lied You argued about it for months You know, we know, everyone knows Just give up and leave like you promised. There's no argument to be had. I never said that I would leave the forum when Trump wins. You're just making up nonsense.

That's right. You said you would leave if he won the erection, which he did not, as every schoolboy knows.

Hillary won the erection. Mr Trump won the electoral colleges.

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 11:10am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:55am: Frank wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:33am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 8:49am: How is valkie getting away with that abuse? Spot Truth is his defence. He's lying about Turd. That's right. Glad you admit it. Is that you changing another member's post to misrepresent what they have said?

Premature and very telling Choo Choo.  It is crystal clear that you are hovering on Peccarry so much so that you are making it embarrassing to watch.

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 11:31am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:22am: Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:55am: Frank wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:33am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 8:49am: How is valkie getting away with that abuse? Spot Truth is his defence. He's lying about Turd. That's right. Glad you admit it. Is that you changing another member's post to misrepresent what they have said? No, it's not. It's him going back and changing his post, once he realised his mistake. "« Last Edit: Today at 8:00am by Frank » " I quoted exactly what he originally wrote. Sounds plausible.

Indeed, because that's exactly what happened.

I did not remove the word "not" - it was added after I quoted him.

rhino wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 11:27am:

Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:24am: Let's see if the huge intellects here can spot the difference in these two sentences. "I will leave this Forum if Donald wins." "I will leave this Forum when Donald wins." First to give the correct answer wins a brown paper bag of boiled lollies. Who stated this and where is the link to these statements.

Peccarry posted the former.  People who are dishonestly verballing him have posted the latter.  Can you spot the difference?

Desperation is setting in

Turd mc turdface is sending in the socks to defend him.

But facts are facts.

Turd mc turdface said he woukd leave if Trump won.

Trump won

Turd mc turdface argued for months that he would leave, but only when he was ready

In simple terms , he lied.

He has no intention of leaving.

And his little socks have now been sent it to support his lies and back him up.

Pathetic innit?

At least, now we know about rinoassitis

Sock.

Valkie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 11:40am:

Desperation is setting in Turd mc turdface is sending in the socks to defend him. But facts are facts. Turd mc turdface said he woukd leave if Trump won. Trump won Turd mc turdface argued for months that he would leave, but only when he was ready In simple terms , he lied. He has no intention of leaving. And his little socks have now been sent it to support his lies and back him up. Pathetic innit? At least, now we know about rinoassitis Sock.

What's pathetic about having socks, Matty?

Quote:

Turd mc turdface said he woukd leave if Trump won.

Correct.


Quote:

Trump won

Not the popular vote but he became POTUS, so to that extent, correct.


Quote:

Turd mc turdface argued for months that he would leave, but only when he was ready

Correct.


Quote:

In simple terms , he lied.

Incorrect.


Quote:

He has no intention of leaving.

Incorrect.  He has said repeatedly that he will leave.


Quote:

And his little socks have now been sent it to support his lies and back him up.

Name these socks of his.

Yeah - but still - most deaths and injuries due to terrorism over the past 2-3 years in Europe have been from Muslims.... all the ranking security services in Europe consider them the immediate - the clear and present - danger to peace and harmony, security, and European civilisation...

Why are we discussing Peccary in this context?  Who cares?

He trots out his now long-dead Ozymandias type general statement like some Egyptian mummy find or a stone tablet signed by Adam, and thus generates needless conflict and distraction from the real issue - the clear and present danger in Europe posed by Islam.  If he chooses to ignore that elephant in the room, why does he harp on about miniature homegrown acts?

How's that FundMe thing going taking up a collection to put a bounty on the heads of those Moroccan Morons?

US$100,000 to the guard who writes the report of the first death in custody by accident.... US$200,000 if it's the ringleader.......  :o

The combined corps of guards at El Fetid prison regret to inform the governor that the prisoners held in relation to the killings of two Scandinavian backpackers have all died suddenly.  Each case was an accident or suicide, and full reports will follow.

Signed,
Oyor Momma
Chief Warder

p.s. please to advise the Norwegian Embassy..... giving list of warder's names involved ...

Aussie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 11:35am:

rhino wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:27am: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:24am: Let's see if the huge intellects here can spot the difference in these two sentences. "I will leave this Forum if Donald wins." "I will leave this Forum when Donald wins." First to give the correct answer wins a brown paper bag of boiled lollies. Who stated this and where is the link to these statements. Peccarry posted the former.  People who are dishonestly verballing him have posted the latter.  Can you spot the difference?

he appears to be denying he said either. Are you calling him a liar? Maybe you could clear this up by posting the link to where he made the statement.

rhino wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 12:38pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:35am: rhino wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:27am: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:24am: Let's see if the huge intellects here can spot the difference in these two sentences. "I will leave this Forum if Donald wins." "I will leave this Forum when Donald wins." First to give the correct answer wins a brown paper bag of boiled lollies. Who stated this and where is the link to these statements. Peccarry posted the former.  People who are dishonestly verballing him have posted the latter.  Can you spot the difference? he appears to be denying he said either. Are you calling him a liar? Maybe you could clear this up by posting the link to where he made the statement.

I need nothing cleared up.  I know what he said which was that IF Trump won he'd leave.  He did not say WHEN Trump won he would leave.  You do know the difference, don't you?

To shut the dishonest verballers right up.......Link.

rhino wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 12:38pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:35am: rhino wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:27am: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:24am: Let's see if the huge intellects here can spot the difference in these two sentences. "I will leave this Forum if Donald wins." "I will leave this Forum when Donald wins." First to give the correct answer wins a brown paper bag of boiled lollies. Who stated this and where is the link to these statements. Peccarry posted the former.  People who are dishonestly verballing him have posted the latter.  Can you spot the difference? he appears to be denying he said either. Are you calling him a liar? Maybe you could clear this up by posting the link to where he made the statement.

I'm not denying I said either.

I said I would leave if Trump won the election.

Nothing has changed.

Word games

It all comes down to a simple fact

Turd mc turdface said he woukd leave if/ when Trump won.

Regardless of the twisting, squirming, deceit and lies.

Trump won And is and has been the surely elected president of America.

Therefore, by refusing to leave

Turd mc turdface lies and continues to lie.

Until the day he leaves, and hopefully takes all his socks with him.

He will be, and can only be.........A LIAR.

QED

Valkie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 1:48pm:

Word games It all comes down to a simple fact Turd mc turdface said he woukd leave if/ when Trump won. Regardless of the twisting, squirming, deceit and lies. Trump won And is and has been the surely elected president of America. Therefore, by refusing to leave Turd mc turdface lies and continues to lie. Until the day he leaves, and hopefully takes all his socks with him. He will be, and can only be.........A LIAR. QED

No.

I said I would leave if Trump won.

Mr Pecarry did not say he would leave "if/ when Trump won."

He said he would leave IF (no mention of when) Trump won.  Words have meanings.  Buy a Dictionary or just suck it up Princess, as you are pissing into the wind.

https://media.giphy.com/media/iG36A36bKIgM/giphy.gif

Aussie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 11:33am:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:55am: Frank wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:33am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 8:49am: How is valkie getting away with that abuse? Spot Truth is his defence. He's lying about Turd. That's right. Glad you admit it. Is that you changing another member's post to misrepresent what they have said? Premature and very telling Choo Choo.  It is crystal clear that you are hovering on Peccarry so much so that you are making it embarrassing to watch.

Simple question Arsie.

Why did you ask it?

Aussie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 2:49pm:

Why did you ask it?

That should be obvious.

Valkie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 10:38am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 8:49am: How is valkie getting away with that abuse? Spot Because it's not abuse I'm stating FACTS And a sock like you should stick to attacking as ordered, Oh, that's right, you are

Whos sock am i? Im curious

Spot

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 2:54pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 2:49pm: Why did you ask it? That should be obvious.

No-one else asked...why did you?

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 1:18pm:

rhino wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 12:38pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:35am: rhino wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:27am: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:24am: Let's see if the huge intellects here can spot the difference in these two sentences. "I will leave this Forum if Donald wins." "I will leave this Forum when Donald wins." First to give the correct answer wins a brown paper bag of boiled lollies. Who stated this and where is the link to these statements. Peccarry posted the former.  People who are dishonestly verballing him have posted the latter.  Can you spot the difference? he appears to be denying he said either. Are you calling him a liar? Maybe you could clear this up by posting the link to where he made the statement. I'm not denying I said either. I said I would leave if Trump won the election. Nothing has changed.

no you didnt, i know exactly what you stated. Neither of you will produce the link because you are both lying.

Aussie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 2:00pm:

Mr Pecarry did not say he would leave "if/ when Trump won." He said he would leave IF (no mention of when) Trump won.  Words have meanings.  Buy a Dictionary or just suck it up Princess, as you are pissing into the wind. https://media.giphy.com/media/iG36A36bKIgM/giphy.gif

yet you wont produce the link to support this.

rhino wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 3:01pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 1:18pm: rhino wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 12:38pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:35am: rhino wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:27am: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:24am: Let's see if the huge intellects here can spot the difference in these two sentences. "I will leave this Forum if Donald wins." "I will leave this Forum when Donald wins." First to give the correct answer wins a brown paper bag of boiled lollies. Who stated this and where is the link to these statements. Peccarry posted the former.  People who are dishonestly verballing him have posted the latter.  Can you spot the difference? he appears to be denying he said either. Are you calling him a liar? Maybe you could clear this up by posting the link to where he made the statement. I'm not denying I said either. I said I would leave if Trump won the election. Nothing has changed. no you didnt, i know exactly what you stated. Neither of you will produce the link because you are both lying.

The onus is on you, old boy   ;)

Start digging.

Aussie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 2:58pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 2:54pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 2:49pm: Why did you ask it? That should be obvious. No-one else asked...why did you?

Stupid question.

rhino wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 3:01pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 1:18pm: rhino wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 12:38pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:35am: rhino wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:27am: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:24am: Let's see if the huge intellects here can spot the difference in these two sentences. "I will leave this Forum if Donald wins." "I will leave this Forum when Donald wins." First to give the correct answer wins a brown paper bag of boiled lollies. Who stated this and where is the link to these statements. Peccarry posted the former.  People who are dishonestly verballing him have posted the latter.  Can you spot the difference? he appears to be denying he said either. Are you calling him a liar? Maybe you could clear this up by posting the link to where he made the statement. I'm not denying I said either. I said I would leave if Trump won the election. Nothing has changed. no you didnt, i know exactly what you stated. Neither of you will produce the link because you are both lying.

Jayzuz....why ought anyone hold your hand?  Do an advanced Google search and you can find it all yourself.  It will produce what you have already been told, but being a retard, you can't accept truth when it does not suit your agenda.

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 3:08pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 2:58pm: Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 2:54pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 2:49pm: Why did you ask it? That should be obvious. No-one else asked...why did you? Stupid question.

Evasion of a very good question.  If it is truly 'stupid' it ought be very easy to answer responsively and not with obfuscation.

We both know the only truthful answer you can give, and we both know that if you give it, you are painting yourself into a corner....again.

;)

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 2:55pm:

Valkie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 10:38am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 8:49am: How is valkie getting away with that abuse? Spot Because it's not abuse I'm stating FACTS And a sock like you should stick to attacking as ordered, Oh, that's right, you are Spot

Sir Sock of Borg's ....

.. deep in the Pantasargon, while the allied chiefs argued the merits of a minute detail contained in an obscure and meaningless comment made years ago, the Muslim terrorists were outside the door wreaking havoc and killing innocents in countless planned attacks  intended to maim and murder people who have never done them any harm....... but have, rather like Cleopatra and the asp, taken them in as fellow sufferers on the road to human decency.....

This is the kind of rot that has crept into academic circles...... and the cry of Allahu Akbar was taking over the streets of Europe .......   ::)  ::)  ::)

Aussie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 3:16pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 3:08pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 2:58pm: Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 2:54pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 2:49pm: Why did you ask it? That should be obvious. No-one else asked...why did you? Stupid question. Evasion of a very good question.  If it is truly 'stupid' it ought be very easy to answer responsively and not with obfuscation. We both know the only truthful answer you can give, and we both know that if you give it, you are painting yourself into a corner....again. ;)

It is a stupid question unless you think whatever Gregg does should be ignored. The only truthful answer is that it at first appeared a breach of rules, he cleared that up. Are you saying Gregg should be given a pass and should not be questioned? Give it up and stop being a dick.

The point is...why did YOU question him.

Aussie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 4:20pm:

The point is...why did YOU question him.

Why didn't you? Then no-one else would need to. Are you saying I should not question Gregg? Is that your best? Anyone but me? Tough luck, suck it up.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 3:05pm:

The onus is on you, old boy   ;) Start digging.

So you are now denying that you said you'd leave the forum if Trump won the presidency?

And you want to have an argument about your lies and deceptions for the 47th time - we had about that many threads about your spineless dishonesty which has earned you the richly deserved name of Turdy McTurdface?



Be aware that everyone else engages in these threads simply to rub your ugly face into your lies and dishonesty. You must also enjoy being pilloried and called out as a barefaced liar otherwise you wouldn't restart this particular lie again and again

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 4:23pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 4:20pm: The point is...why did YOU question him. Why didn't you? Then no-one else would need to. Are you saying I should not question Gregg? Is that your best? Anyone but me? Tough luck, suck it up.

I had no reason to.  I saw that the original post had been edited.

I am not asking if you are entitled to ask...I am asking WHY you bothered to ask.

Frank wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 5:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 3:05pm: The onus is on you, old boy   ;) Start digging. So you are now denying that you said you'd leave the forum if Trump won the presidency? And you want to have an argument about your lies and deceptions for the 47th time - we had about that many threads about your spineless dishonesty which has earned you the richly deserved name of Turdy McTurdface? Be aware that everyone else engages in these threads simply to rub your ugly face into your lies and dishonesty. You must also enjoy being pilloried and called out as a barefaced liar otherwise you wouldn't restart this particular lie again and again

If you opened your eyes, Sore End, you would see that Greg does not make the denial you alllege.

Further...he did not open the issue in this Thread, or any other than I know of...your retarded mates did and have done in a pointless and futile pursuit of someone who has you all outflanked and intellectually outgunned. 

Take it up with them.

A lie is a lie is a lie

If you promise/ vow to do something after a specific event.

It is expected, by honest people, that immediately after said event , the vow/ promise will be fulfilled.

Holding off for two months, 6 months, 12 months or two years.

Makes you a lying troll.

Simple fact.

Turd mc turdface is a convicted liar.

And no amount of twisting, squirming, fabrication, misdirection, or on going lies will change that fact.

Therefore, nothing, not one single thing turd mc turdface says can ever be considered anything but a lie

Typical apologist troll

Valkie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 5:44pm:

A lie is a lie is a lie If you promise/ vow to do something after a specific event. It is expected, by honest people, that immediately after said event , the vow/ promise will be fulfilled. Holding off for two months, 6 months, 12 months or two years. Makes you a lying troll. Simple fact. Turd mc turdface is a convicted liar. And no amount of twisting, squirming, fabrication, misdirection, or on going lies will change that fact. Therefore, nothing, not one single thing turd mc turdface says can ever be considered anything but a lie Typical apologist troll

Tell me Valkie....are you a believer in God and JC etc?

Aussie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 5:52pm:

Valkie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 5:44pm: A lie is a lie is a lie If you promise/ vow to do something after a specific event. It is expected, by honest people, that immediately after said event , the vow/ promise will be fulfilled. Holding off for two months, 6 months, 12 months or two years. Makes you a lying troll. Simple fact. Turd mc turdface is a convicted liar. And no amount of twisting, squirming, fabrication, misdirection, or on going lies will change that fact. Therefore, nothing, not one single thing turd mc turdface says can ever be considered anything but a lie Typical apologist troll Tell me Valkie....are you a believer in God and JC etc?

What's it to you sock?

It is a relevant question.  Will you answer it?

Aussie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 6:03pm:

It is a relevant question.  Will you answer it?

Why is it relevant sock?

Valkie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 6:10pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 6:03pm: It is a relevant question.  Will you answer it? Why is it relevant sock?

You will see after you answer the question.  Suddenly, very shy aren't you.  Why is that?

Frank wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 5:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 3:05pm: The onus is on you, old boy   ;) Start digging. So you are now denying that you said you'd leave the forum if Trump won the presidency?

No.

Not at all.

Aussie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 6:22pm:

Valkie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 6:10pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 6:03pm: It is a relevant question.  Will you answer it? Why is it relevant sock? You will see after you answer the question.  Suddenly, very shy aren't you.  Why is that?

I have made no secret of the fact that I am a Christian.

But I also believe that God gave us freedom of choice.

Freedom to defend ourselves, eliminate animals who do not consider us or our families.

I will give help, when required or needed.
I give of myself to volunteer work
I am respectful, when respected.
I defend myself when attacked
And I do not forgive, that is Gods right to forgive, not mine.

How this is relevant will be interesting sock.

Okay......so can you see the analogy with what Peccarry said in this?


Quote:

“Let not your heart be troubled...In My Father’s house are many mansions; if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to Myself; that where I am, there you may be also.”

"Come again"...."leave forever?"  No when involved.

Get it?  Or is JC too a liar?

Aussie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 7:01pm:

Okay......so can you see the analogy with what Peccarry said in this? Quote: “Let not your heart be troubled...In My Father’s house are many mansions; if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to Myself; that where I am, there you may be also.” "Come again"...."leave forever?"  No when involved. Get it?  Or is JC too a liar?

Are you comparing turd mc turdface with JC?

Now I know you have lost it.

Turd mc turdface had never intended to fulfil his promise

He thought Trump had no chance

But it backfired, and he and his army of socks will lie, cheat, mislead and twist each and every avenue possible to disprove and indisputable fact.

HE IS A LIAR

Simple, straight forward, and indisputable

Trump won the election........Turd mc turdface must leave
Or
He is a liar.

Aussie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 7:01pm:

Okay......so can you see the analogy with what Peccarry said in this? Quote: “Let not your heart be troubled...In My Father’s house are many mansions; if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to Myself; that where I am, there you may be also.” "Come again"...."leave forever?"  No when involved. Get it?  Or is JC too a liar?

Who was it who said:

"Holding off for two months, 6 months, 12 months or two years.

"Makes you a lying troll."

I'm curious?


http://www.quickmeme.com/img/1f/1f55fe410c3592ee2187eef0de618a1d18b3687fe71e18363d41f05830da3fc1.jpg

Aussie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 6:22pm:

Valkie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 6:10pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 6:03pm: It is a relevant question.  Will you answer it? Why is it relevant sock? You will see after you answer the question.  Suddenly, very shy aren't you.  Why is that?

I think it's because Valkie's that sock you refer to. I forget the name. IRSQ...

We know him as Mattywisk, the poster who kept crashing the board.

Freeeeedom, innit. FReEwIlL, you see.

Ahhhhh

Now I see, you seek to use religion as a weapon against me.

But it will not work troll liar.

I know your game.

And as you follow in the footsteps of a sociopath, self confessed pedophile, nutcase, lying retard known as Muhammad the mad, it bothers me not.

Jesus did not write the bible.
It was written many years after he died.

You wrote a short time ago that you woukd leave if Trump won.

Well my lying troll, Trump won.

You can do naught but leave, or

Be forever known as

TURD MC TURDFACE, THE TROLL, APOLOGIST LIAR.

Quote:

Jesus did not write the bible. It was written many years after he died.

Correct, but you believe what the Bible ascribes to him, don't you....or do you cherry pick?

He said he would return.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Peccary said he would leave.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Do you see the common point, or are you just stupid?

Aussie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 7:23pm:

Quote: Jesus did not write the bible. It was written many years after he died. Correct, but you believe what the Bible ascribes to him, don't you....or do you cherry pick? He said he would return.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Peccary said he would leave.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Do you see the common point, or are you just stupid?

Tis you who are challenged my sock friend.

Jesus did not specify a metric, or for a thick individual such as yourself, he did not say when.
If he had stated, after some specific event or timeframe, you would have an argument, but he did not.

On the other hand, turd mc turdface specified that "if/ when" Trump won, he woukd leave.
This is a specific point or event indicating a specific time.

You foolish, infantile little game has been undone sock.

Had he said " sometime after Trump won" or "one day after Trump wins" he might have had an out.
But he clearly stated that when/if Trump won, he would leave the forum.

Try again sock.

You loose

It's just not a fair fight, you vs me
I have you over a barrel.

Come on.

I'm getting bored.

Can't think of a comeback sock?

So dull, so incapable, so slowwwwwwwww

You bore me.

Good night sock, try again tomorrow.

Valkie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 7:39pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:23pm: Quote: Jesus did not write the bible. It was written many years after he died. Correct, but you believe what the Bible ascribes to him, don't you....or do you cherry pick? He said he would return.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Peccary said he would leave.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Do you see the common point, or are you just stupid? Tis you who are challenged my sock friend. Jesus did not specify a metric, or for a thick individual such as yourself, he did not say when. If he had stated, after some specific event or timeframe, you would have an argument, but he did not.

I didn't state any specific time frame either.

White flag accepted.

Valkie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 7:39pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:23pm: Quote: Jesus did not write the bible. It was written many years after he died. Correct, but you believe what the Bible ascribes to him, don't you....or do you cherry pick? He said he would return.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Peccary said he would leave.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Do you see the common point, or are you just stupid? Tis you who are challenged my sock friend. Jesus did not specify a metric, or for a thick individual such as yourself, he did not say when. If he had stated, after some specific event or timeframe, you would have an argument, but he did not. On the other hand, turd mc turdface specified that "if/ when" Trump won, he woukd leave. This is a specific point or event indicating a specific time. You foolish, infantile little game has been undone sock. Had he said " sometime after Trump won" or "one day after Trump wins" he might have had an out. But he clearly stated that when/if Trump won, he would leave the forum. Try again sock. You loose It's just not a fair fight, you vs me I have you over a barrel.

Nope.

I never used the word "when".

You lose   ;)

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 7:50pm:

Valkie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:39pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:23pm: Quote: Jesus did not write the bible. It was written many years after he died. Correct, but you believe what the Bible ascribes to him, don't you....or do you cherry pick? He said he would return.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Peccary said he would leave.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Do you see the common point, or are you just stupid? Tis you who are challenged my sock friend. Jesus did not specify a metric, or for a thick individual such as yourself, he did not say when. If he had stated, after some specific event or timeframe, you would have an argument, but he did not. I didn't state any specific time frame either.

And you do not think that you were deliberately deceptive??  OF COURSE you wanted to be deliberately deceptive. That's all you EVER do.



F orf, Turd.

Frank wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 8:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:50pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:39pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:23pm: Quote: Jesus did not write the bible. It was written many years after he died. Correct, but you believe what the Bible ascribes to him, don't you....or do you cherry pick? He said he would return.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Peccary said he would leave.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Do you see the common point, or are you just stupid? Tis you who are challenged my sock friend. Jesus did not specify a metric, or for a thick individual such as yourself, he did not say when. If he had stated, after some specific event or timeframe, you would have an argument, but he did not. I didn't state any specific time frame either. And you do not think that you were deliberately deceptive??  OF COURSE you wanted to be deliberately deceptive. That's all you EVER do. F orf, Turd.

Face it...accept it....you were outgunned intellectually and always will be beyond a contest of who can say what 1 + 1 equals. I have some confidence you might get that one right.

Happy New Year, Soren.

Valkie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 7:39pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:23pm: Quote: Jesus did not write the bible. It was written many years after he died. Correct, but you believe what the Bible ascribes to him, don't you....or do you cherry pick? He said he would return.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Peccary said he would leave.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Do you see the common point, or are you just stupid? Tis you who are challenged my sock friend. Jesus did not specify a metric, or for a thick individual such as yourself, he did not say when. If he had stated, after some specific event or timeframe, you would have an argument, but he did not. On the other hand, turd mc turdface specified that "if/ when" Trump won, he woukd leave. This is a specific point or event indicating a specific time. You foolish, infantile little game has been undone sock. Had he said " sometime after Trump won" or "one day after Trump wins" he might have had an out. But he clearly stated that when/if Trump won, he would leave the forum. Try again sock. You loose It's just not a fair fight, you vs me I have you over a barrel.

The Turd did use "when" in this post, referring to a Hillary win. (No different to saying "when Trump loses")

Re:

Reply #43 - Oct 30th, 2016 at 3:26pm

bogarde73 wrote on Oct 30th, 2016 at 12:57pm:

Got your bags packed mate? Sent for Uber?



greggerypeccary

Yes, you all need to pack your bags.

When Hillary wins, you're all out of here.

That was the deal, remember.

Trump wins, I go; Hillary wins, you go.

I hope none of you are going to renege.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1477701054/40#40 - Reply #43

Aussie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 8:05pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 8:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:50pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:39pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:23pm: Quote: Jesus did not write the bible. It was written many years after he died. Correct, but you believe what the Bible ascribes to him, don't you....or do you cherry pick? He said he would return.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Peccary said he would leave.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Do you see the common point, or are you just stupid? Tis you who are challenged my sock friend. Jesus did not specify a metric, or for a thick individual such as yourself, he did not say when. If he had stated, after some specific event or timeframe, you would have an argument, but he did not. I didn't state any specific time frame either. And you do not think that you were deliberately deceptive??  OF COURSE you wanted to be deliberately deceptive. That's all you EVER do. F orf, Turd. Face it...accept it....you were outgunned intellectually and always will be beyond a contest of who can say what 1 + 1 equals. I have some confidence you might get that one right. Happy New Year, Soren.

You are both deceptive, compulsive liars.


When you sign this contract I'll give you a million dollars.

If you sign this contract I'll give you a million dollars.




There is no difference - you would be expecting your million dollars if/when you signed, not at some unspecified and unspecifiable time in the future.

That you and Turd fancy yourselves as having the smarts to argue and wriggle yourselves out of his vapid, idiotic, shallow, stupid deception is laughable.  You are an unschooled, ignorant taxi driver, he is an out of work ignorant and unschooled union hack. You are too thick, too base, to much used to lying.

No reneging it said.  Of course the deceptive lying piece of crap was talking about others if Hillary won. 

As it was, turdy made a commitment to leave if Trump won.  The dickhead never expected to be called on it, but none the less, that was what it was bragging in multiple posts and challenging multiple posters.

No reneging.

Turd even said he would leave even if no one took him up on his bet.  It wasn't down to a single statement, the clown was at it for months. Multiple posts.

Yer a piece of poo Gregg.  You know it. A lying deceptive sack of crap. 

Regardless - he did not specify WHEN he would leave... it may be at the time of his passing over into the next life.....

Greg should be a politician...  this was not a core promise -- it was a 'COR' promise! 

COR, Guv, E' moight one day carry it aht!  But don't 'old yer breaf'.....

Over two years. Two years you lot have committed how much time and energy to this?

Seriously, who gives a toss?

It's nothing more than an excuse to pile onto a forum member you don't like. It in itself is not a big deal. Like, so trivial i'm embarrassed for you.

Just move on already. For the love of god.

mothra wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 1:38am:

Over two years. Two years you lot have committed how much time and energy to this? Seriously, who gives a toss? It's nothing more than an excuse to pile onto a forum member you don't like. It in itself is not a big deal. Like, so trivial i'm embarrassed for you. Just move on already. For the love of god.

My sentiments exactly!!!  Who actually gives a flying bugger.. buggar?? I meant FLICK!!!.. Well..... FLICK you, asshole!?? Far Ken morals monitor.... **fumes**

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J74ttSR8lEg

blip... blimp... Rebel... fat chicks have no reason to live...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYna-UAt75c

Frank wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 8:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:50pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:39pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:23pm: Quote: Jesus did not write the bible. It was written many years after he died. Correct, but you believe what the Bible ascribes to him, don't you....or do you cherry pick? He said he would return.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Peccary said he would leave.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Do you see the common point, or are you just stupid? Tis you who are challenged my sock friend. Jesus did not specify a metric, or for a thick individual such as yourself, he did not say when. If he had stated, after some specific event or timeframe, you would have an argument, but he did not. I didn't state any specific time frame either. And you do not think that you were deliberately deceptive??  OF COURSE you wanted to be deliberately deceptive. That's all you EVER do. F orf, Turd.

Poor old turd mc turdface hates being under attack.

But he has only himself for this.

He gives no quarter to anyone
He attacks incessantly without feeling or consideration
He sends in his socks to support and attack.

But we have him in this
He lies, no question about it.
He has tried for two years to twist, change, modify and now justify his continued presence in this forum.

The simple fact is
He said he woukd leave if or when Trump won.

No amount of squirming, twisting, adjustment or interpretation can change that simple fact

If and when are quite specific

Not perhaps, or maybe, or even at some time after.

He stated, quite clearly IF or WHEN as in at the time that Trump wins

He would leave the forum.

His deliberate and on going refusal to do as he said, amounts to nothing less than a lie.

Pure, simple and straight forward.

His socks have tried to defend the indefensible,  a lie is a lie.

TURD MC TURDFACE IS A LYING TROLL

EVERYTHING HE WRITES MUST THEREFORE BE SUSPECT

PURELY BECAUSE ONCE HE LIES ONCE, IT SETS A PRESIDENT

Trump won, turd mc turdface either leaves or is a liar.

Bias_2012 wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 8:24pm:

Valkie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:39pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:23pm: Quote: Jesus did not write the bible. It was written many years after he died. Correct, but you believe what the Bible ascribes to him, don't you....or do you cherry pick? He said he would return.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Peccary said he would leave.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Do you see the common point, or are you just stupid? Tis you who are challenged my sock friend. Jesus did not specify a metric, or for a thick individual such as yourself, he did not say when. If he had stated, after some specific event or timeframe, you would have an argument, but he did not. On the other hand, turd mc turdface specified that "if/ when" Trump won, he woukd leave. This is a specific point or event indicating a specific time. You foolish, infantile little game has been undone sock. Had he said " sometime after Trump won" or "one day after Trump wins" he might have had an out. But he clearly stated that when/if Trump won, he would leave the forum. Try again sock. You loose It's just not a fair fight, you vs me I have you over a barrel. The Turd did use "when" in this post, referring to a Hillary win. (No different to saying "when Trump loses") Re: Reply #43 - Oct 30th, 2016 at 3:26pm bogarde73 wrote on Oct 30th, 2016 at 12:57pm: Got your bags packed mate? Sent for Uber? greggerypeccary Yes, you all need to pack your bags. When Hillary wins, you're all out of here. That was the deal, remember. Trump wins, I go; Hillary wins, you go. I hope none of you are going to renege. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1477701054/40#40 - Reply #43

Here is a question, a simple question for all here.

Looking at the above post where turd mc turdface states


Quote:

I hope none of you are going to renege.

Does anyone believe that turd mc turdface would allow the others to simply continue on the forum without him hounding them incessantly?

Woukd turd mc turdface simply accept the same pathetic arguments had he won?

We all know the answer, he is a troll, and would harass, hound and generally troll all those he won against, without mercy.

It is for this reason, and only this reason I am hounding him.
Trolls hate being trolled.
It is their pet hate and they do not like their tactics used against them.

Had turd mc turdface been better to other posters
Had turd mc turdface been more accepting of other posters
Had turd mc turdface been more human to other posters

I would be happy to let it lie.

But he will never change

So he must go.

Valkie wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 8:20am:

Frank wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 8:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:50pm: Valkie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:39pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 7:23pm: Quote: Jesus did not write the bible. It was written many years after he died. Correct, but you believe what the Bible ascribes to him, don't you....or do you cherry pick? He said he would return.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Peccary said he would leave.  He hasn't.  Yet.  Do you see the common point, or are you just stupid? Tis you who are challenged my sock friend. Jesus did not specify a metric, or for a thick individual such as yourself, he did not say when. If he had stated, after some specific event or timeframe, you would have an argument, but he did not. I didn't state any specific time frame either. And you do not think that you were deliberately deceptive??  OF COURSE you wanted to be deliberately deceptive. That's all you EVER do. F orf, Turd. Poor old turd mc turdface hates being under attack. But he has only himself for this. He gives no quarter to anyone He attacks incessantly without feeling or consideration He sends in his socks to support and attack. But we have him in this He lies, no question about it. He has tried for two years to twist, change, modify and now justify his continued presence in this forum. The simple fact is He said he woukd leave if or when Trump won. No amount of squirming, twisting, adjustment or interpretation can change that simple fact If and when are quite specific Not perhaps, or maybe, or even at some time after. He stated, quite clearly IF or WHEN as in at the time that Trump wins He would leave the forum. His deliberate and on going refusal to do as he said, amounts to nothing less than a lie. Pure, simple and straight forward. His socks have tried to defend the indefensible,  a lie is a lie. TURD MC TURDFACE IS A LYING TROLL EVERYTHING HE WRITES MUST THEREFORE BE SUSPECT PURELY BECAUSE ONCE HE LIES ONCE, IT SETS A PRESIDENT Trump won, turd mc turdface either leaves or is a liar.

So as far as you are concerned he is trying to lie once? I thought you said he was such a liar?

Spot

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 12:29am:

Regardless - he did not specify WHEN he would leave... it may be at the time of his passing over into the next life.....

The reneging turd specified when in this post (below) by saying "When Hillary wins". The context of this post implies that when Trumps loses, he hopes that "none of us are going to renege", and that "when Hillary wins", he would not renege

"When" has two meanings, it can be asked in question form like: "When is the event going to happen?"  OR it can be a specific time that an event will happen. The following post by the turd has the latter meaning of "when", a specific time

The specific time for a "Hillary win" was the 19th of January 2017, that was the finalization date for the Electoral College vote determination. The winners of the bet, including myself, were happy to wait for that day to come around and see what the final result would be. Trump won the White House and that's when the bet should have been honored according the an unwritten law in the Aussie culture, "pay up as soon as the result of the bet is known"

Deliberately reneging is a small step towards attempting to destroy the Aussie culture Grap. Are you an Aussie, or are you a globalist progressive, who's side are you on?


Yes, you all need to pack your bags.

When Hillary wins, you're all out of here.

That was the deal, remember.

Trump wins, I go; Hillary wins, you go.

I hope none of you are going to renege.

Bias_2012 wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 12:22pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 12:29am: Regardless - he did not specify WHEN he would leave... it may be at the time of his passing over into the next life..... The reneging turd specified when in this post (below) by saying "When Hillary wins". The context of this post implies that when Trumps loses, he hopes that "none of us are going to renege", and that "when Hillary wins", he would not renege "When" has two meanings, it can be asked in question form like: "When is the event going to happen?"  OR it can be a specific time that an event will happen. The following post by the turd has the latter meaning of "when", a specific time The specific time for a "Hillary win" was the 19th of January 2017, that was the finalization date for the Electoral College vote determination. The winners of the bet, including myself, were happy to wait for that day to come around and see what the final result would be. Trump won the White House and that's when the bet should have been honored according the an unwritten law in the Aussie culture, "pay up as soon as the result of the bet is known" Deliberately reneging is a small step towards attempting to destroy the Aussie culture Grap. Are you an Aussie, or are you a globalist progressive, who's side are you on? Yes, you all need to pack your bags. When Hillary wins, you're all out of here. That was the deal, remember. Trump wins, I go; Hillary wins, you go. I hope none of you are going to renege.

Peccarry said that if Trump wins, he'll leave.  Trump won...so he will leave...when he wants to.  Simple as that, and you blokes harping on will change SFA.  What on Earth do you reckon this crap will produce?  His departure or a determination to stay even longer to annoy the schit out of you....as it is obviously getting up your collective noses.  That's exactly what I'd do...to piss you off even more.

:)

I'll piss you off in a minute taxidriver lawyer big hands - some claim to fame, what other low life things do you get up to?

Aussie wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 3:13pm:

rhino wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 3:01pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 1:18pm: rhino wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 12:38pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:35am: rhino wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:27am: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:24am: Let's see if the huge intellects here can spot the difference in these two sentences. "I will leave this Forum if Donald wins." "I will leave this Forum when Donald wins." First to give the correct answer wins a brown paper bag of boiled lollies. Who stated this and where is the link to these statements. Peccarry posted the former.  People who are dishonestly verballing him have posted the latter.  Can you spot the difference? he appears to be denying he said either. Are you calling him a liar? Maybe you could clear this up by posting the link to where he made the statement. I'm not denying I said either. I said I would leave if Trump won the election. Nothing has changed. no you didnt, i know exactly what you stated. Neither of you will produce the link because you are both lying. Jayzuz....why ought anyone hold your hand?  Do an advanced Google search and you can find it all yourself.  It will produce what you have already been told, but being a retard, you can't accept truth when it does not suit your agenda.

Im not making the claim, you are. Thought you had legal training. Doesnt show. Support your claim Perry mason or its a lie.
a

Aussie wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 12:33pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 12:22pm: Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 12:29am: Regardless - he did not specify WHEN he would leave... it may be at the time of his passing over into the next life..... The reneging turd specified when in this post (below) by saying "When Hillary wins". The context of this post implies that when Trumps loses, he hopes that "none of us are going to renege", and that "when Hillary wins", he would not renege "When" has two meanings, it can be asked in question form like: "When is the event going to happen?"  OR it can be a specific time that an event will happen. The following post by the turd has the latter meaning of "when", a specific time The specific time for a "Hillary win" was the 19th of January 2017, that was the finalization date for the Electoral College vote determination. The winners of the bet, including myself, were happy to wait for that day to come around and see what the final result would be. Trump won the White House and that's when the bet should have been honored according the an unwritten law in the Aussie culture, "pay up as soon as the result of the bet is known" Deliberately reneging is a small step towards attempting to destroy the Aussie culture Grap. Are you an Aussie, or are you a globalist progressive, who's side are you on? Yes, you all need to pack your bags. When Hillary wins, you're all out of here. That was the deal, remember. Trump wins, I go; Hillary wins, you go. I hope none of you are going to renege. Peccarry said that if Trump wins, he'll leave.  T

No he didnt, in fact he actually admitted what he said if you look at this  thread. You are making yourself appear ever more stupid.

Are you telling me he never said that IF Trump wins, he'd leave?

And...you did not answer this question.

Simple as that, and you blokes harping on will change SFA.  What on Earth do you reckon this crap will produce?  His departure or a determination to stay even longer to annoy the schit out of you....as it is obviously getting up your collective noses.  That's exactly what I'd do...to piss you off even more.

Aussie wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 12:33pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 12:22pm: Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 12:29am: Regardless - he did not specify WHEN he would leave... it may be at the time of his passing over into the next life..... The reneging turd specified when in this post (below) by saying "When Hillary wins". The context of this post implies that when Trumps loses, he hopes that "none of us are going to renege", and that "when Hillary wins", he would not renege "When" has two meanings, it can be asked in question form like: "When is the event going to happen?"  OR it can be a specific time that an event will happen. The following post by the turd has the latter meaning of "when", a specific time The specific time for a "Hillary win" was the 19th of January 2017, that was the finalization date for the Electoral College vote determination. The winners of the bet, including myself, were happy to wait for that day to come around and see what the final result would be. Trump won the White House and that's when the bet should have been honored according the an unwritten law in the Aussie culture, "pay up as soon as the result of the bet is known" Deliberately reneging is a small step towards attempting to destroy the Aussie culture Grap. Are you an Aussie, or are you a globalist progressive, who's side are you on? Yes, you all need to pack your bags. When Hillary wins, you're all out of here. That was the deal, remember. Trump wins, I go; Hillary wins, you go. I hope none of you are going to renege. Peccarry said that if Trump wins, he'll leave.  Trump won...so he will leave...when he wants to.  Simple as that, and you blokes harping on will change SFA.  What on Earth do you reckon this crap will produce?  His departure or a determination to stay even longer to annoy the schit out of you....as it is obviously getting up your collective noses.  That's exactly what I'd do...to piss you off even more. :)

[smiley=thumbsup.gif]

rhino wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 3:01pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 1:18pm: rhino wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 12:38pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:35am: rhino wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:27am: Aussie wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:24am: Let's see if the huge intellects here can spot the difference in these two sentences. "I will leave this Forum if Donald wins." "I will leave this Forum when Donald wins." First to give the correct answer wins a brown paper bag of boiled lollies. Who stated this and where is the link to these statements. Peccarry posted the former.  People who are dishonestly verballing him have posted the latter.  Can you spot the difference? he appears to be denying he said either. Are you calling him a liar? Maybe you could clear this up by posting the link to where he made the statement. I'm not denying I said either. I said I would leave if Trump won the election. Nothing has changed. no you didnt, i know exactly what you stated. Neither of you will produce the link because you are both lying.

Oh, yes I did   ;)