| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> General Board >> Cyclist safety http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1542333954 Message started by Bojack Horseman on Nov 16th, 2018 at 12:05pm |
|
|
Title: Cyclist safety Post by Bojack Horseman on Nov 16th, 2018 at 12:05pm
https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/motoring/on-the-road/the-truth-about-this-bike-rider-behaviour-that-drivers-absolutely-hate/news-story/1f03430e9117814aa1b375d65f257cee
There’s little love lost between most motorists and cyclists in Australia, and drivers have a long list of gripes about how some riders behave. A campaign by news.com.au this week, highlighting the legacy of safety activist Cameron Frewer, who was hit by a car and killed last week, has raised plenty of complaints by readers. But perhaps the biggest issue people on four wheels have surrounds the practice of cyclists riding two abreast on the open road. The feeling is that riders jutting out into the lane is dangerous and there’s also a perception among many that it’s illegal. Before this death, Mr Frewer — a campaigner for greater awareness of safe pass laws, requiring motorists to leave at least 1m when passing a bike — spoke about riding two abreast. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 16th, 2018 at 12:11pm Anyone who went to primary school in the '60s and '70s, as I did, will remember these safety messages on the back of their school exercise books: |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Valkie on Nov 16th, 2018 at 12:34pm
Most lycra clad loonies are their own worst enemies.
They ride like they are made of iron, but in an altercation between a bike and a cor/truck, they will always lose. I rode a motorcycle for 35 years. I survived Do you know why? I did not take my right of way I did not harass drivers I did not cut drivers off expecting them to GIVE ME MY RIGHTS. I was trained in defensive riding, learning to read the road, avoid incidents and ride safely. Car drivers do not see bikes. Now for the lycra clad loonies out there CAR DRIVERS DO NOT SEE BIKES. Now this isn't deliberate. A driver scans the road looking for possible obstructions or danger. Cars, trucks all move quite fast, and present a clear and present danger. Pedestrians however move (in comparison to cars) quite slowly and present little danger to the car driver ( as he sees it) And, as much as you may hate it, bike riders have a similar profile to pedestrians, and they do not differentiate. Now this isn't because he hates pedestrians, or bikes or dogs or cats, it's just that in his mind it's not an immediate danger. Remember, a driver has quite a bit on his mind at any given time. Velocity, traffic, traffic lights, vehicle performance, speed monitoring, road surface etc, etc. So when he looks in the mirror or looks up the road to make a decision to pull out, he has a fraction of a second, easily missed. Now, some riders and pedestrians believe their bright colours and the fact that THEY ARE IN THE RIGHT has some influence on the drivers attention, it don't. We riders are taught to make eye contact, no eye contact, they dont see you. But lycra clad loonies are so focussed on watching their front wheels, this is impossible. You have two choices when you hop on a bike, motorised or not And those choices are To survive Or To be a statistic. On a final note I have also seen how bike riders treat pedestrians. They yell at them to get out of the way, they bump them, scream at them and demand right of way when, in reality, the pedestrian has right of way. It seems they treat pedestrians as car drivers treat them. Perhaps it's just a bit of Karna perhaps. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 16th, 2018 at 12:49pm Valkie wrote on Nov 16th, 2018 at 12:34pm:
This is true. I've been abused by bike riders several times, out the front of my office, for simply being on the footpath. Some are unbelievably rude. They're the ones who make it bad for all the good bike riders out there. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Bojack Horseman on Nov 16th, 2018 at 12:50pm greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2018 at 12:11pm:
LSD was also legal back then. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Bojack Horseman on Nov 16th, 2018 at 12:51pm Valkie wrote on Nov 16th, 2018 at 12:34pm:
This is either 1. confirmation bias or 2. the shithole you live in. Here in Canberra 99% of the time there is no problems. Its the 1 % of dickheads (pedestrians, cyclists, drivers) that are the issue. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 16th, 2018 at 12:57pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 16th, 2018 at 12:51pm:
I hate to do this, but I'm with Valkie on this one. Here in Perth, bike riders are incredibly rude to pedestrians. Sure, not all of them, but a fair chunk of them are. As I said before, I (and others) get abused regularly in the CBD for simply being on the footpath. I've certainly noticed bike riders getting more aggressive in the last 12 months or so. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 16th, 2018 at 12:59pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 16th, 2018 at 12:50pm:
Hey, I'm just tellin' ya how it was. Every school exercise book had that on the back cover, so we had 'single file' drummed into us as kids. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Captain Caveman on Nov 16th, 2018 at 1:46pm
Perhaps cyclist need to revise their safety equipment
If that bloke in the article didn't ride his bike on the road he'd still be alive. I won't ride a motorbike on the road because I am clever enough to work out that it won't be me that kills me...it'll be another motorist. My brother got hit years ago on his motorbike. Motorist took him out on a corner. He didn't die but he no longer rides out there. To dangerous. Anyway...this is a debate that will never sleep. Roads are built for motor vehicles, simple as that. If you ride a bicycle...walk or whatever out there then you do at your own risk....as the bloke in the article eventually found out. You're all part of the temporary Australian group. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Bojack Horseman on Nov 16th, 2018 at 1:51pm Captain Caveman wrote on Nov 16th, 2018 at 1:46pm:
So essentially you're saying that if I go out onto the road, its my fault I get crashed into. Cool. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Captain Caveman on Nov 16th, 2018 at 2:03pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 16th, 2018 at 1:51pm:
Not at all. If you go out on the road...don't be surprised if you do get crashed into....or worse, killed. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Bojack Horseman on Nov 16th, 2018 at 2:06pm Captain Caveman wrote on Nov 16th, 2018 at 2:03pm:
Cheers, I will keep that in mind. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by philperth2010 on Nov 16th, 2018 at 2:53pm
Who would deliberately drive close to a bike rider and risk an accident....Giving them as much room as possible is common sense....More cycle paths along main roads are required???
:-? :-? :-? |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by The_Barnacle on Nov 16th, 2018 at 3:13pm greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 16th, 2018 at 12:49pm:
Because motorists are always so polite and respectful, and never use their horns in anger ;) |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Bojack Horseman on Nov 16th, 2018 at 3:15pm The_Barnacle wrote on Nov 16th, 2018 at 3:13pm:
99% are. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by DonDeeHippy on Nov 16th, 2018 at 4:12pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 16th, 2018 at 3:15pm:
o 25000 in Aussie land r winkers :D |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Valkie on Nov 16th, 2018 at 4:28pm
All I'm saying is that you must ride to survive
If that means giving way to a car, riding in areas where it's safe, not on major arterial roads, and don't try and be the big tough lycra clad Looney, so be it. Pennant hills road is literally clogged with cars every day and night Parramatta road is clogged with cars The Pacific highway is clogged with cars These are three major, and poorly built roads There is no bike lanes and the lanes are barely wide enough for a car let alone a truck But on any day, there is some live a clad Looney riding along, at walking pace, holding up traffic and giving everyone the bird and a mouthful if they complain. They creep between cars, bumping mirrors, scratching paintwork to get to the front, only to take off at walking pace and holding up everyone again. Surely they could find a better place to ride and allow people to get to work? And this ridiculous 1 metre rule means you can't pass them except in the next lane. They are nothing but a moving road block. Common sense, a bit of courtesy for other road users and less attitude is the way to go. And don't say more bike tracks The ones we have are used by very few riders They prefer to hold up traffic and prove their right to ride Until they get squashed that is. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by tickleandrose on Nov 17th, 2018 at 9:15am
I live in a part of Melbourne that has alot of bike trails. One called capital city trail can get me from a park near my home to the city with only 1 to 2 traffic lights. So i consider myself lucky. I would never ride on the roads to the city, as its too dangerous. And i get very nervous when I know there is cars behind my back staring at me as I hold up the traffic.
|
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Dnarever on Nov 17th, 2018 at 9:26am
I give bike riders full respect on the road, They are entitled to the lane they are in - all of it.
When I finally get past a bike like everyone else there is a significant relief. On occasion I have passed a bike rider after much delay to stop at the next lights and see the bike wander down between traffic to the front of the queue. The second time I pass the ignorant pick I just blow straight past him at the first half chance. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by buzzanddidj on Nov 17th, 2018 at 11:37pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 16th, 2018 at 12:50pm:
I remember the LATTER - but not the FORMER ? |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by buzzanddidj on Nov 18th, 2018 at 12:45am The_Barnacle wrote on Nov 16th, 2018 at 3:13pm:
The best retaliation the cyclist can have against recalcitrant motorists - is the water pistol - filled with paint stripper |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Captain Caveman on Nov 18th, 2018 at 7:28am buzzanddidj wrote on Nov 18th, 2018 at 12:45am:
Then a cop would shoot you....so I say try it. ;) |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Term Dog on Nov 18th, 2018 at 8:20am
Aaaah CYCLIST SAFETY!!!!!
I read the thread and posts as Cyber safety and was thinking you guys had lost it. SMH |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by cods on Nov 18th, 2018 at 8:41am buzzanddidj wrote on Nov 18th, 2018 at 12:45am:
oh NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.... the best thing we can all do is get RESPECT FOR EACH OTHER. a bit of give and take....whatever happened to all that? :( :( |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Valkie on Nov 18th, 2018 at 3:02pm buzzanddidj wrote on Nov 18th, 2018 at 12:45am:
That's real smart And then drivers fill their windscreen washers with acid or oil The best thing riders can do is to use courtesy and get off major arterial roads at peak hour. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Term Dog on Nov 18th, 2018 at 3:49pm
Cyclists don't pay rego for their bikes so they don't have the same rights as car drivers.
|
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Bojack Horseman on Nov 19th, 2018 at 8:41am Term Dog wrote on Nov 18th, 2018 at 3:49pm:
I pay rego for my car, I pay insurance. You can stick that tired argument in your fat roll. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Captain Caveman on Nov 19th, 2018 at 8:49am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 8:41am:
So do you pay rego on all road going vehicles...or just one? I pay rego on my car...why isn't my trailer covered under that same rego....or my dirtbike? You can stick that tired old argument in your fat roll. Register your bike or get the farrkk off the road. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Ye Grappler on Nov 19th, 2018 at 8:57am
Cyclists are safe around me on the road - just not around themselves at times.... perfect example was driving up Mt Wellington in Hobart yesterday.. narrow road - two cyclists came down at speed and cut corners... big thrill but stupid... anyone but me would probably take one out..
|
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Bojack Horseman on Nov 19th, 2018 at 8:59am Captain Caveman wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 8:49am:
Spent 105 km on the road yesterday, tough titties. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Captain Caveman on Nov 19th, 2018 at 9:22am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 8:59am:
Thought so. ;D |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by bellamor on Nov 19th, 2018 at 10:44am
That man is sick in the head, I hope that he wrath in hell.
|
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Term Dog on Nov 19th, 2018 at 11:04am
Register your bicycle or SFU, you do not have the right to an opinion.
|
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Bojack Horseman on Nov 19th, 2018 at 11:05am Term Dog wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 11:04am:
How do I display my rego? |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Bojack Horseman on Nov 19th, 2018 at 11:09am
Actually on GVM, I need to pay 10 dollars.
|
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Fuzzball on Nov 19th, 2018 at 11:52am
No problem with cyclists, if they show me respect I'll show them respect. If they act like idiots then they only have themselves to blame if the come a cropper.......and anybody who sprays 'paint stripper' on my vehicle will hopefully have developed a taste for it.......because they'd better be prepared to drink it when I pick them up off the floor.....
|
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 19th, 2018 at 12:59pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 11:05am:
The same way they do it in Japan? |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Bojack Horseman on Nov 19th, 2018 at 1:07pm greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 12:59pm:
And how much do they pay? |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Bojack Horseman on Nov 19th, 2018 at 1:07pm |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 19th, 2018 at 1:12pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 1:07pm:
How is that relevant? |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Bojack Horseman on Nov 19th, 2018 at 1:58pm greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 1:12pm:
Humour me. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 19th, 2018 at 2:03pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 1:58pm:
A one off fee equivalent to about $6 Australian (I think). |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Bojack Horseman on Nov 19th, 2018 at 2:06pm greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 2:03pm:
How will cops know whos registered vs whos not. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 19th, 2018 at 2:07pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 2:06pm:
Remember that sticker I posted before? |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Bojack Horseman on Nov 19th, 2018 at 2:09pm greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 2:07pm:
Given how small it is, how do you expect a cop travelling at 80 km/h to specifically look |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 19th, 2018 at 2:11pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 2:09pm:
I don't. You asked me how you would display your rego. I showed you how they do it in Japan (and many other places). |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Bojack Horseman on Nov 19th, 2018 at 2:12pm greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 2:11pm:
Exucse me while I get some paint to just paint on my rego sticker. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 19th, 2018 at 2:13pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 2:12pm:
Okay. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Bojack Horseman on Nov 19th, 2018 at 2:16pm greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 2:13pm:
May as well, both as equally pointless. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by greggerypeccary on Nov 19th, 2018 at 2:17pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 2:16pm:
Okay. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Mr Hammer on Nov 19th, 2018 at 7:16pm
Two great intellects collide.
|
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Term Dog on Nov 19th, 2018 at 7:48pm
Cyclists would be much safer if they stay home.
|
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Mr Hammer on Nov 19th, 2018 at 8:38pm
Who has the financial responsibility for the cyclist crippled in an accident caused by his/her negligence?
|
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Kat on Nov 19th, 2018 at 9:10pm Term Dog wrote on Nov 19th, 2018 at 11:04am:
Oh yes we do. And mine is that you're full of it. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by .JaSin. on Nov 20th, 2018 at 12:19am
The idea of a Bicycle 'rego' is to show that the Cyclist understand the rules and regulations of the road safety and has a right of opinion as well.
The Rego would not be picked up by Cops doing 40km - 100kms. But it would stop a cyclist probably copping a bigger fine if they did find themselves in a... predicament. So the 'tired' argument is justified. You want to express your rights on the road? Then bloody well pay for it like the rest or just shut up and take it as it comes. I've driven Taxi for better part of a year. I've got to drive efficiently and as quick as I can - legally. Of course, the two regional areas where I drove, have high density tourists for various periods of the year. So, like Valkie says - most Drivers only concentrate on 'immediate' dangers like other vehicles that can have an impact on their safety. But as Taxi, I've learned the 'chaos' of both J-Walkers and Cyclists. Both are lazy and inconsiderate. Both DO NOT abide by 'motorist' rules on the road. I've had to drive like a super reflex with every corner I come around, every decision - I've got to prepare for a possible accident because that's what its like. All the while, while taking in-calls for a Taxi and writing on a pad. The mental concentration is pretty full-on and I really have to be 'jumpy' to stay focused. J-Walkers will walk across a street where it bends around as a blind spot. Cyclists WILL ride together - side-by-side whenever they can. Cyclists will put their turning arm out, at the last 5 seconds before they turn. I can only say this regarding J-Walkers & Cyclists: They need to be more considerate, need to put their EGO back in check because they DO NOT have a priority over motorists or a Equality with motorists. They are on the road by 'privilege' only. The Professional or Competing Cyclist is the worst rider, next to city couriers. They feel that they have 'rights' over motorists. Using a well planned city like Canberra is not a good example of how well Cyclists & Motorists get on. Try Melb or Syd or Regional areas during Holidays. Of course, most Cyclists are just DILLIGAFS and consider themselves 'superior' because they are riding 'environmentally friendly' forms of transports and thus they are now endowed with a 'God Given Right' to do what they like. Now you might think I hate Cyclists? No. I understand that Bicycles were a part of Australian history and culture long before the French kicked on with the Tour De France and were used by more Australians than those silly brumbies that the Media pumps out for the drizabone/Man from Snowy River wank culture of being Australian. ::) Cycling on Roads is a privilege, not a right. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Tap on Nov 20th, 2018 at 9:48am
Well, there's a movement afoot to soften helmet laws Australia wide, especially in Victoria, so expect to see more riders, but without head gear in the not to distant future.
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/?s=helmet+law |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Tap on Nov 20th, 2018 at 10:06am
Mandatory helmet laws continue to divide cyclists, survey finds
Quote:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/....... |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by .JaSin. on Nov 20th, 2018 at 11:00am
Just shows that Cyclists don't like being governed by 'Rules', like everyone else.
Shows Cyclists think they are better than everyone else because they are not emitting pollution and are getting fitter than everyone else. Soon we will be having 'Outlaw' Cyclist Gangs wearing Black and having their Club logos on their backs. Soon they will be carrying illegal weapons to threaten people with as well. Soon they will be Ganging up on innocent Public people, because they haven't the balls to take on Police or Military directly. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Captain Caveman on Nov 20th, 2018 at 1:01pm Jasin wrote on Nov 20th, 2018 at 11:00am:
As long as they stop wearing that lycra outfit then anything is a winner. ;D It also shows that cyclists have nothing in the head worth protecting. |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by .JaSin. on Nov 20th, 2018 at 1:06pm Captain Caveman wrote on Nov 20th, 2018 at 1:01pm:
;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Cyclist safety Post by Valkie on Nov 20th, 2018 at 7:48pm Captain Caveman wrote on Nov 20th, 2018 at 1:01pm:
Has anyone noticed that good looking women and women with good figures never wear lycra? Its always fat men, that look disgusting Skinny men, that look ridiculous Super skinny shelas, that look.....well yuk and they all wear these lycra outfits with lots of logos on them as if they were competing in some sort of race. In no ones wildest imagination these super thin clown costumes have any protection value what so ever, they may as well be nekked, and wouldn't that be disgusting? They ride bikes with tyres so skinny that even a small rock punctures them. I love laughing at them on the side of the road fixing blown tyres and then there are the bikes themselves some ate thousands of dollars, tens of thousands of dollars they could get a proper motorcycle for that money. Idiots |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |