The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 30th, 2018 at 11:37am:| It's like when lee tries to discredit the BOM by talking about smearing. |
|
So what would you call it trying to infer temperatures for places thousands of km's from a weather station? ;D ;D ;D ;D
The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 30th, 2018 at 11:37am:| lee is a fraud who clearly knows that the garbage that he posts is dishonest, misleading and discredited, yet he continues to post it. |
|
So articles of science that don't agree with you are "dishonest, misleading and discredited"
"Effects of Recent Thermometer Changes in the Cooperative Station Network"
Was co-authored by one Thomas Karl. A climate alarmist. Known for his work on SST's.
"Sensor and Electronic Biases/Errors in Air Temperature Measurements in Common Weather Station Networks*"
Is likewise a peer-reviewed paper.
From the Abstract -
"The biases of four commonly used air temperature sensors are examined and detailed. Each temperature transducer consists of three components: temperature sensing elements, signal conditioning circuitry, and corresponding analog-to-digital conversion devices or dataloggers. An error analysis of these components was performed to determine the major sources of error in common climate networks. It was found that, regardless of microclimate effects, sensor and electronic errors in air temperature measurements can be larger than those given in the sensor manufacturer's specifications. The root-sum-of-squares (RSS) error for the HMP35C sensor with CR10X datalogger was above 0.2°C, and rapidly increases for both lower (<−20°C) and higher temperatures (>30°C). Likewise, the largest errors for the maximum–minimum temperature system (MMTS) were at low temperatures (<−40°C). The temperature linearization error in the HO-1088 hygrothermometer produced the largest errors when the temperature was lower than −20°C. For the temperature sensor in the U.S. Climate Reference Networks (USCRN), the error was found to be 0.2° to 0.33°C over the range −25° to 50°C. The results presented here are applicable when data from these sensors are applied to climate studies and should be considered in determining air temperature data continuity and climate data adjustment models.
Corresponding author address: Dr. K. G. Hubbard, University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, High Plains Climate Center, 236 L. W. Chase Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583-0728"
That's an error of over 0.1C in the temperature gauge. Instrument error. You can't average out instrument error. And yet NOAA finds global warming accuracy to 2 decimal places, an order of magnitude smaller than the instrumental error.
I know you have belief, what you need is healthy scepticism.
However if you have further queries I suggest you contact the corresponding author.
