| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> The unsolvable conundrum http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1526709177 Message started by red baron on May 19th, 2018 at 3:52pm |
|
|
Title: The unsolvable conundrum Post by red baron on May 19th, 2018 at 3:52pm
The unsolvable conundrum facing Australians next year, is a Government led by an ex Merchant Banker who MUST have known about the grand theft Banks were carrying out on an unsuspecting Public and an Opposition led by a man who has an unsavoury past
So Australians are faced with a Bleak House choice of a leader who is in bed with the banks and in fact will give them a multi Billion Dollar Free Kick on the back of the dirty deeds inflicted by those self same banks over who knows how years. And a Leader who is likely to throw the doors wide open to Country Shoppers thereby inflicting on the Australian Public a mirror of the European Disaster of human tide of misery stuffing their countries Dead Man's Choice |
|
Title: Re: The unsolvable conundrum Post by Aussie on May 19th, 2018 at 4:06pm red baron wrote on May 19th, 2018 at 3:52pm:
Throttled with cliches as usual but it's nice to see you know that Turnbull wants to give those same Banks a share in an $B80 windfall. |
|
Title: Re: The unsolvable conundrum Post by LEFTWINGER on May 19th, 2018 at 5:08pm
100% voting Labor
|
|
Title: Re: The unsolvable conundrum Post by Bobby on May 19th, 2018 at 5:17pm
Malcolm has allowed the same policies in our Banks that caused the 2008 GFC from which we still suffer to this day:
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/economics/08/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-credit-crisis.asp Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac And The Credit Crisis Of 2008 By Barry Nielsen | Updated March 19, 2018 — 6:00 AM EDT When the housing bubble of 2001-2007 burst, it caused a mortgage security meltdown. This contributed to a general credit crisis, which evolved into a worldwide financial crisis. Many critics have held the United States Congress - and its unwillingness to rein in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac - responsible for the credit crisis. In this article, we'll examine the extent to which Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and their allies in Congress contributed to the largest financial and economic crisis since the Great Depression. (For background reading, see What Caused The Great Depression?) |
|
Title: Re: The unsolvable conundrum Post by red baron on May 20th, 2018 at 9:39am
The thing that angers me is that the Banking Royal Commission will come and go and after revealing a dog's breakfast culture in the banking industry, I'm very much afraid it will be business as usual
This corporate fraud on a grand scale cannot go unpunished We cannot allow our Prime Minister to give his million dollar smile and say, "don't worry about it. Oh and by the way we are going to give the banks a giant free kick in the budget and help them along with billions in tax cuts and you guys who go out and work can have ten bucks a week." This attitude doesn't cut it Mr. Turnbull and unless there is a radical reform of the banking system voters will be so angered that aside from any other issue this one is the game breaker There is hardly a citizen out there who has not been affected in some way in their lives by the Banks' criminal activities..and they ARE Criminal Goodbye Liberals you have shot yourselves in the foot |
|
Title: Re: The unsolvable conundrum Post by Bam on May 20th, 2018 at 12:14pm red baron wrote on May 19th, 2018 at 3:52pm:
Of course Turnbull knew. He was involved. Remember the Royal Commission into the collapse of HIH? Turnbull was forced to appear at that Royal Commission and confess to his dubious conduct. As for an "unsavoury past", that's pretty common among politicians. Turnbull's misconduct that contributed to the collapse of HIH. Bishop's unsavoury career as a lawyer litigating asbestos victims to death. A few have been jailed. It's hardly compelling when so many have a dubious past. red baron wrote on May 19th, 2018 at 3:52pm:
We know the government is tainted by association with corporations. The damning findings of the Banking Royal Commission isn't all. They are fighting tooth and nail against the introduction of an anti-corruption commission, which Shorten has pledged to introduce as a National Integrity Commission. What does the government know and are trying to hide? Asserting that a Shorten government "is likely to throw the doors wide open to Country Shoppers" is baseless speculation. On corporate misconduct and corruption, which would you prefer: a government that gets tough on it, or a government that tacitly allows it with a business-as-usual approach? |
|
Title: Re: The unsolvable conundrum Post by LEFTWINGER on May 20th, 2018 at 12:22pm
There is no conundrum , not big business so you know not to vote Libs
|
|
Title: Re: The unsolvable conundrum Post by mozzaok on May 20th, 2018 at 12:56pm Its time wrote on May 19th, 2018 at 5:08pm:
What if you find out that the Labor member you are choosing to vote for was a contemporary of Eddie Obeid, and offered both moral and physical support to that slimy crook? Still good with it? I used to be mates with a guy who was very high up in the Victorian Liberal Party, and he was a good bloke. He used to have numerous meetings with Mathew (not really a nice) Guy, where he was incessantly lied to, to maintain his support. My second hand experience makes me believe him to be absolutely disingenuous, self absorbed, and basically a bit of an arse. Another Liberal I know is a decent, honest, well intentioned man, serving with honour, and personal integrity intact, in Canberra. I could happily vote for the latter, but not for either of the former options. I would suggest finding out about your candidate before committing to them 100%. Surely if we want to see better results from our pollies, we need to make sure that we only support decent ones, wherever they may arise. |
|
Title: Re: The unsolvable conundrum Post by juliar on May 20th, 2018 at 3:54pm
What the Lefties forget is the banks were playing up when Labor was there.
|
|
Title: Re: The unsolvable conundrum Post by lee on May 20th, 2018 at 3:58pm Bam wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 12:14pm:
So if being forced to appear at a Royal Commission was a cause for debarments from politics; Labor would be leading? |
|
Title: Re: The unsolvable conundrum Post by philperth2010 on May 21st, 2018 at 9:28am juliar wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 3:54pm:
And Labor called for a Royal Commission which the Coalition opposed....Malcolm and Scott were dragged kicking and screaming into an RC they vehemently opposed and considered unnecessary....The Coalition can blame no one but themselves for looking foolish in their attempts to run a protection racket for the banks and big business!!! ::) ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: The unsolvable conundrum Post by philperth2010 on May 21st, 2018 at 9:29am lee wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 3:58pm:
But it isn't is it mate....How about you comment on the Coalition opposing what has become an embarrassment for the banks and the Coalition??? :-? :-? :-? |
|
Title: Re: The unsolvable conundrum Post by Bam on May 21st, 2018 at 10:38am lee wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 3:58pm:
Wow. That you would even think of supporting persecution of political opponents is a bad sign. |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |