http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/law-order/child-molester-colin-charles-humphrys-will-be-freed-to-live-in-bowdenbrompton-area/news-story/cebc2885116de987839491f32297a6c1

ONE of the worst sexual predators in state history has won his bid to be released from prison — but failed in his attempt to have his location hidden from the public.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court granted Colin Charles Humphrys’ application to be released, on a supervised licence with GPS tracking, to live in the Bowden-Brompton area.

Under the terms of his release, Humphrys’ movements are restricted, he must attend counselling and he must take anti-libidinal medication.

His release will take effect from May 14 unless the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions files, and succeeds in, an appeal against Tuesday’s decision.

Humphrys, 66, had also asked the court to ban publication of the suburb in which he will live, arguing he would fall victim to violence were his location known.

Justice Trish Kelly refused that application on Tuesday, saying she agreed with prosecutors and The Advertiser that the public had a right to know.

“Having weighed this up anxiously, the interests of justice are best served in exactly the way that’s been put forward by prosecutors and, to some extent, by the media,” she said.

“It’s in the public interest, and it’s in the interests of monitoring Humphrys, that the community is aware — generally speaking — of the Bowden-Brompton area.

“That way, if he’s not where he should be, there will be more than just police looking for him.”

Humphrys’ criminal history spans five states and three decades, and he is infamous for the 1990-91 kidnapping of a boy known only as XX.

He served an eight-year term for taking the boy, 9, to Kings Cross in Sydney and abusing him after being introduced to him by fellow paedophile Laurie O’Shea.

It was the second time he had kidnapped a young boy and took him interstate — the first incident occurred in Queensland in 1985.

In 2009, Humphrys was jailed for 19 years for abuse against another boy, 14, that began 30 minutes after they first met and continued for the next three years.

Then-Justice John Sulan refused to set a non-parole period, deeming Humphrys an “opportunistic, calculated” and uncontrollable sexual predator.

In her judgment, Justice Kelly said mental health experts had concluded Humphrys’ chances of successfully re-entering the community were “as good as they’ve ever been”.

She said they still considered him unwilling to control his sexual instincts, and likely to reoffend if presented with the opportunity, and so would need close and frequent monitoring.

“Unlike other applicants, Humphrys has never had the opportunity to demonstrate his capacity to comply with licence conditions,” she said.

“Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today.”

One experts, she said, expressed concern that the Parole Board — which opposed Humphry’s release — felt it lacked sufficient resources to monitor Humphrys.

Address published.....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UVsqJWriZU

at least they got something right...

I think he well and truly lost the right to privacy..


I feel very sorry for anyone who lives there

cods wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:28am:

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/law-order/child-molester-colin-charles-humphrys-will-be-freed-to-live-in-bowdenbrompton-area/news-story/cebc2885116de987839491f32297a6c1 ONE of the worst sexual predators in state history has won his bid to be released from prison — but failed in his attempt to have his location hidden from the public. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court granted Colin Charles Humphrys’ application to be released, on a supervised licence with GPS tracking, to live in the Bowden-Brompton area. Under the terms of his release, Humphrys’ movements are restricted, he must attend counselling and he must take anti-libidinal medication. His release will take effect from May 14 unless the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions files, and succeeds in, an appeal against Tuesday’s decision. Humphrys, 66, had also asked the court to ban publication of the suburb in which he will live, arguing he would fall victim to violence were his location known. Justice Trish Kelly refused that application on Tuesday, saying she agreed with prosecutors and The Advertiser that the public had a right to know. “Having weighed this up anxiously, the interests of justice are best served in exactly the way that’s been put forward by prosecutors and, to some extent, by the media,” she said. “It’s in the public interest, and it’s in the interests of monitoring Humphrys, that the community is aware — generally speaking — of the Bowden-Brompton area. “That way, if he’s not where he should be, there will be more than just police looking for him.” Humphrys’ criminal history spans five states and three decades, and he is infamous for the 1990-91 kidnapping of a boy known only as XX. He served an eight-year term for taking the boy, 9, to Kings Cross in Sydney and abusing him after being introduced to him by fellow paedophile Laurie O’Shea. It was the second time he had kidnapped a young boy and took him interstate — the first incident occurred in Queensland in 1985. In 2009, Humphrys was jailed for 19 years for abuse against another boy, 14, that began 30 minutes after they first met and continued for the next three years. Then-Justice John Sulan refused to set a non-parole period, deeming Humphrys an “opportunistic, calculated” and uncontrollable sexual predator. In her judgment, Justice Kelly said mental health experts had concluded Humphrys’ chances of successfully re-entering the community were “as good as they’ve ever been”. She said they still considered him unwilling to control his sexual instincts, and likely to reoffend if presented with the opportunity, and so would need close and frequent monitoring. “Unlike other applicants, Humphrys has never had the opportunity to demonstrate his capacity to comply with licence conditions,” she said. “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today.” One experts, she said, expressed concern that the Parole Board — which opposed Humphry’s release — felt it lacked sufficient resources to monitor Humphrys.

Only in NSW ey?  ::) ;D

NSW??? :D

My bad ... Adelaide. :P

the home of rock spiders.

Gnads wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 1:26pm:

My bad ... Adelaide. :P the home of rock spiders.

Also the City of Churches.

Coincidence?

Gnads wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 1:26pm:

My bad ... Adelaide. :P the home of rock spiders.

they certainly have their dark history.....in fact it would appear to be Australias worst history when it comes to sick really sick people.... ::) ::)

dont think the church had a thing to do with these.

bodies in the Bank vault.. Truro......child in the suitcase...to name just recent ones... :'(

cods wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 1:43pm:

Gnads wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 1:26pm: My bad ... Adelaide. :P the home of rock spiders. they certainly have their dark history.....in fact it would appear to be Australias worst history when it comes to sick really sick people.... ::) ::)

That's what happens when you have a colony founded without good old-fashioned convict values and standards... at least you know your convicts have been vetted to some degree..... and are mainly there for minor crimes such as the proverbial loaf of bread....

cods wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 1:45pm:

dont think the church had a thing to do with these. bodies in the Bank vault.. Truro......child in the suitcase...to name just recent ones... :'(

I was merely asking if it was a coincidence.

And Truro, recent?

Wasn't that about 40 years ago?

Anyway, the NT holds the record for the highest per capita murder rate, at approximately six victims per 100,000.

Per capita, South Australia's murder rate is lower than average, at less than one person (0.9) per 100,000.

serial killing???? really!

the Beaumont children are still in the news...

though the chance of finding them or the killer is as remote as finding Jack the Ripper.. :( :(

cods wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 4:30pm:

serial killing???? really! the Beaumont children are still in the news... though the chance of finding them or the killer is as remote as finding Jack the Ripper.. :( :(

You didn't mention 'serial killing' before, cods.

And, we don't know who killed the Beaumont children, so we don't know if they were serial murders or not.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 4:40pm:

cods wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 4:30pm: serial killing???? really! the Beaumont children are still in the news... though the chance of finding them or the killer is as remote as finding Jack the Ripper.. :( :( You didn't mention 'serial killing' before, cods. And, we don't know who killed the Beaumont children, so we don't know if they were serial murders or not.

Paedophile ....

Sam Morris wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 5:01pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 4:40pm: cods wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 4:30pm: serial killing???? really! the Beaumont children are still in the news... though the chance of finding them or the killer is as remote as finding Jack the Ripper.. :( :( You didn't mention 'serial killing' before, cods. And, we don't know who killed the Beaumont children, so we don't know if they were serial murders or not. Paedophile ....

What do you mean?

cods wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:28am:

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/law-order/child-molester-colin-charles-humphrys-will-be-freed-to-live-in-bowdenbrompton-area/news-story/cebc2885116de987839491f32297a6c1 ONE of the worst sexual predators in state history has won his bid to be released from prison — but failed in his attempt to have his location hidden from the public. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court granted Colin Charles Humphrys’ application to be released, on a supervised licence with GPS tracking, to live in the Bowden-Brompton area. Under the terms of his release, Humphrys’ movements are restricted, he must attend counselling and he must take anti-libidinal medication. His release will take effect from May 14 unless the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions files, and succeeds in, an appeal against Tuesday’s decision. Humphrys, 66, had also asked the court to ban publication of the suburb in which he will live, arguing he would fall victim to violence were his location known. Justice Trish Kelly refused that application on Tuesday, saying she agreed with prosecutors and The Advertiser that the public had a right to know. “Having weighed this up anxiously, the interests of justice are best served in exactly the way that’s been put forward by prosecutors and, to some extent, by the media,” she said. “It’s in the public interest, and it’s in the interests of monitoring Humphrys, that the community is aware — generally speaking — of the Bowden-Brompton area. “That way, if he’s not where he should be, there will be more than just police looking for him.” Humphrys’ criminal history spans five states and three decades, and he is infamous for the 1990-91 kidnapping of a boy known only as XX. He served an eight-year term for taking the boy, 9, to Kings Cross in Sydney and abusing him after being introduced to him by fellow paedophile Laurie O’Shea. It was the second time he had kidnapped a young boy and took him interstate — the first incident occurred in Queensland in 1985. In 2009, Humphrys was jailed for 19 years for abuse against another boy, 14, that began 30 minutes after they first met and continued for the next three years. Then-Justice John Sulan refused to set a non-parole period, deeming Humphrys an “opportunistic, calculated” and uncontrollable sexual predator. In her judgment, Justice Kelly said mental health experts had concluded Humphrys’ chances of successfully re-entering the community were “as good as they’ve ever been”. She said they still considered him unwilling to control his sexual instincts, and likely to reoffend if presented with the opportunity, and so would need close and frequent monitoring. “Unlike other applicants, Humphrys has never had the opportunity to demonstrate his capacity to comply with licence conditions,” she said. “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today.” One experts, she said, expressed concern that the Parole Board — which opposed Humphry’s release — felt it lacked sufficient resources to monitor Humphrys.

Should be castrated and made a eunuch.

Only way to be sure.

This is why they should be hanged in public &
the show broadcast on prime time TV.

Why should the community live in fear of this predator?

3 little kids go missing? Paedophile.  3 adults go missing serial killer.

Sam Morris wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 5:12pm:

3 little kids go missing? Paedophile.  3 adults go missing serial killer.

OK.

Just replying to someone with "peadophile ..." could be taken as name calling, I just wanted to clear up what you meant.

Setanta wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 5:13pm:

Sam Morris wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 5:12pm: 3 little kids go missing? Paedophile.  3 adults go missing serial killer. OK. Just replying to someone with "peadophile ..." could be taken as name calling, I just wanted to clear up what you meant.

Does anyone know if he is a bowler??

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbV2iLH0lHc

Aw ferk it dude, let's go bowling.


I could'na put it betta meself. Well said Walter.

cods wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:28am:

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/law-order/child-molester-colin-charles-humphrys-will-be-freed-to-live-in-bowdenbrompton-area/news-story/cebc2885116de987839491f32297a6c1 ONE of the worst sexual predators in state history has won his bid to be released from prison — but failed in his attempt to have his location hidden from the public. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court granted Colin Charles Humphrys’ application to be released, on a supervised licence with GPS tracking, to live in the Bowden-Brompton area. Under the terms of his release, Humphrys’ movements are restricted, he must attend counselling and he must take anti-libidinal medication. His release will take effect from May 14 unless the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions files, and succeeds in, an appeal against Tuesday’s decision. Humphrys, 66, had also asked the court to ban publication of the suburb in which he will live, arguing he would fall victim to violence were his location known. Justice Trish Kelly refused that application on Tuesday, saying she agreed with prosecutors and The Advertiser that the public had a right to know. “Having weighed this up anxiously, the interests of justice are best served in exactly the way that’s been put forward by prosecutors and, to some extent, by the media,” she said. “It’s in the public interest, and it’s in the interests of monitoring Humphrys, that the community is aware — generally speaking — of the Bowden-Brompton area. “That way, if he’s not where he should be, there will be more than just police looking for him.” Humphrys’ criminal history spans five states and three decades, and he is infamous for the 1990-91 kidnapping of a boy known only as XX. He served an eight-year term for taking the boy, 9, to Kings Cross in Sydney and abusing him after being introduced to him by fellow paedophile Laurie O’Shea. It was the second time he had kidnapped a young boy and took him interstate — the first incident occurred in Queensland in 1985. In 2009, Humphrys was jailed for 19 years for abuse against another boy, 14, that began 30 minutes after they first met and continued for the next three years. Then-Justice John Sulan refused to set a non-parole period, deeming Humphrys an “opportunistic, calculated” and uncontrollable sexual predator. In her judgment, Justice Kelly said mental health experts had concluded Humphrys’ chances of successfully re-entering the community were “as good as they’ve ever been”. She said they still considered him unwilling to control his sexual instincts, and likely to reoffend if presented with the opportunity, and so would need close and frequent monitoring. “Unlike other applicants, Humphrys has never had the opportunity to demonstrate his capacity to comply with licence conditions,” she said. “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today.” One experts, she said, expressed concern that the Parole Board — which opposed Humphry’s release — felt it lacked sufficient resources to monitor Humphrys.

Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit.

Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around.


This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases.

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 6:51pm:

Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases.

It's never warranted, under any circumstances.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 7:29pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances.

Yes it is - only a paedophile apologist would say otherwise.

Bobby. wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 7:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. Yes it is - only a paedophile apologist would say otherwise.

Bobby. wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 7:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. Yes it is - only a paedophile apologist would say otherwise.

I'd suggest you be very careful Bobby, one more like that...

Peccary said it (capital punishment) is never warranted.  Your response:


Quote:

Yes it is - only a paedophile apologist would say otherwise.

.....amounts to a statement of fact on your part that Peccarry is an apologist for paedophelia.

Would you like to reconsider, Bobby?

Setanta wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 8:05pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. Yes it is - only a paedophile apologist would say otherwise. I'd suggest you be very careful Bobby, one more like that...

I'd like to officially report than one, Set.

Booby has been pushing the limits for far too long.

I'm not gonna cop something like that.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 7:29pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances.

And that is why recidivist child rapists always get to 'play another day'.


Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists are the problem and always will be when there is a perfectly valid solution to the rapist problem.

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 8:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. And that is why recidivist child rapists always get to 'play another day'. Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists are the problem and always will be when there is a perfectly valid solution to the rapist problem.

Yes: keep them away from children.

So, who are these "Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists"?

Oh, please, no-one take the bait. :-[

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 8:34pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. And that is why recidivist child rapists always get to 'play another day'. Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists are the problem and always will be when there is a perfectly valid solution to the rapist problem. Yes: keep them away from children. So, who are these "Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists"?

Judges, magistrates, parole board members, prison psychologist, the usual fkkheads. They will always makes sure that the minimum is applied to these filth.


Funny how your 'solution' to keep them away from children has never worked and yet that is the only solution you have proposed, well done genius.


You what keeps them away from children? Being fkking dead.

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 8:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:34pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. And that is why recidivist child rapists always get to 'play another day'. Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists are the problem and always will be when there is a perfectly valid solution to the rapist problem. Yes: keep them away from children. So, who are these "Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists"? Judges, magistrates, parole board members, prison psychologist, the usual fkkheads. They will always makes sure that the minimum is applied to these filth. Funny how your 'solution' to keep them away from children has never worked and yet that is the only solution you have proposed, well done genius. You what keeps them away from children? Being fkking dead.

You're mistaken.

Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate.

It's absolutely impossible for someone to rape a child if they don't come in contact with them.

Violence is never the answer

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 8:47pm:

Violence is never the answer

That's untrue.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 8:47pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:42pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:34pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. And that is why recidivist child rapists always get to 'play another day'. Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists are the problem and always will be when there is a perfectly valid solution to the rapist problem. Yes: keep them away from children. So, who are these "Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists"? Judges, magistrates, parole board members, prison psychologist, the usual fkkheads. They will always makes sure that the minimum is applied to these filth. Funny how your 'solution' to keep them away from children has never worked and yet that is the only solution you have proposed, well done genius. You what keeps them away from children? Being fkking dead. You're mistaken. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate. It's absolutely impossible for someone to rape a child if they don't come in contact with them. Violence is never the answer

What you socialist say you are going to do and what you manage to actually achieve in this area are two very different things.


Depends on the question as to whether violence is the answer. Being a soft cock, now that is the answer to absolutely nothing.

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 8:50pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:47pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:42pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:34pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. And that is why recidivist child rapists always get to 'play another day'. Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists are the problem and always will be when there is a perfectly valid solution to the rapist problem. Yes: keep them away from children. So, who are these "Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists"? Judges, magistrates, parole board members, prison psychologist, the usual fkkheads. They will always makes sure that the minimum is applied to these filth. Funny how your 'solution' to keep them away from children has never worked and yet that is the only solution you have proposed, well done genius. You what keeps them away from children? Being fkking dead. You're mistaken. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate. It's absolutely impossible for someone to rape a child if they don't come in contact with them. Violence is never the answer What you socialist say you are going to do and what you manage to actually achieve in this area are two very different things. Depends on the question as to whether violence is the answer. Being a soft cock, now that is the answer to absolutely nothing.

You're not listening.

Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate.

This is an indisputable fact.

Violence is for the weak.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 8:54pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:50pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:47pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:42pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:34pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. And that is why recidivist child rapists always get to 'play another day'. Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists are the problem and always will be when there is a perfectly valid solution to the rapist problem. Yes: keep them away from children. So, who are these "Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists"? Judges, magistrates, parole board members, prison psychologist, the usual fkkheads. They will always makes sure that the minimum is applied to these filth. Funny how your 'solution' to keep them away from children has never worked and yet that is the only solution you have proposed, well done genius. You what keeps them away from children? Being fkking dead. You're mistaken. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate. It's absolutely impossible for someone to rape a child if they don't come in contact with them. Violence is never the answer What you socialist say you are going to do and what you manage to actually achieve in this area are two very different things. Depends on the question as to whether violence is the answer. Being a soft cock, now that is the answer to absolutely nothing. You're not listening. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate. This is an indisputable fact. Violence is for the weak.

Here is the fact, YOU are INCAPABLE of doing that because you are SOFT-COCKS with no ability to do what you say you are going to do.

Once they are released that is the end of the conversation about protecting children and they are always released.


Saying stuff is the same as doing nothing, and all you clowns do is say stuff.

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:54pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:50pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:47pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:42pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:34pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. And that is why recidivist child rapists always get to 'play another day'. Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists are the problem and always will be when there is a perfectly valid solution to the rapist problem. Yes: keep them away from children. So, who are these "Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists"? Judges, magistrates, parole board members, prison psychologist, the usual fkkheads. They will always makes sure that the minimum is applied to these filth. Funny how your 'solution' to keep them away from children has never worked and yet that is the only solution you have proposed, well done genius. You what keeps them away from children? Being fkking dead. You're mistaken. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate. It's absolutely impossible for someone to rape a child if they don't come in contact with them. Violence is never the answer What you socialist say you are going to do and what you manage to actually achieve in this area are two very different things. Depends on the question as to whether violence is the answer. Being a soft cock, now that is the answer to absolutely nothing. You're not listening. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate. This is an indisputable fact. Violence is for the weak. Here is the fact, YOU are INCAPABLE of doing that because you are SOFT-COCKS with no ability to do what you say you are going to do. Once they are released that is the end of the conversation about protecting children and they are always released. Saying stuff is the same as doing nothing, and all you clowns do is say stuff.

They don't have to be released (and aren't always).

I find it sad that the only option you can imagine is violence.

Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate, and there's no violence involved.

Violence is for the weak, the ignorant, and the narrow minded.

Killed a paedo, have you, Big 'Ol?  Killed anyone, Big 'Ol?

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:04pm:

Killed a paedo, have you, Big 'Ol?  Killed anyone, Big 'Ol?

Have I committed murder, is that your question"

Ummm no, have you?

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:04pm:

Killed a paedo, have you, Big 'Ol?  Killed anyone, Big 'Ol?

Not a sausage. She's had a few though. They don't call her Big Hole for nothing.

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:08pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:04pm: Killed a paedo, have you, Big 'Ol?  Killed anyone, Big 'Ol? Have I committed murder, is that your question" Ummm no, have you?

No, it is not.  You talk boldly about killing people who are paedos.....so I thought the question appropriate.  Have you ever killed anyone, Big 'Ol while you looked into the whites of their eyes?

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:04pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:54pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:50pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:47pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:42pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:34pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. And that is why recidivist child rapists always get to 'play another day'. Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists are the problem and always will be when there is a perfectly valid solution to the rapist problem. Yes: keep them away from children. So, who are these "Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists"? Judges, magistrates, parole board members, prison psychologist, the usual fkkheads. They will always makes sure that the minimum is applied to these filth. Funny how your 'solution' to keep them away from children has never worked and yet that is the only solution you have proposed, well done genius. You what keeps them away from children? Being fkking dead. You're mistaken. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate. It's absolutely impossible for someone to rape a child if they don't come in contact with them. Violence is never the answer What you socialist say you are going to do and what you manage to actually achieve in this area are two very different things. Depends on the question as to whether violence is the answer. Being a soft cock, now that is the answer to absolutely nothing. You're not listening. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate. This is an indisputable fact. Violence is for the weak. Here is the fact, YOU are INCAPABLE of doing that because you are SOFT-COCKS with no ability to do what you say you are going to do. Once they are released that is the end of the conversation about protecting children and they are always released. Saying stuff is the same as doing nothing, and all you clowns do is say stuff. They don't have to be released (and aren't always). I find it sad that the only option you can imagine is violence. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate, and there's no violence involved. Violence is for the weak, the ignorant, and the narrow minded.

Unless some kind hearted crim murders the filth in gaol, they will always walk free,  As raping children is considered a big deal by the judiciary, they rarely spend much time in prison and even the ones who are classified as 'Never to be Released' get released.

I only 'imagine' violence because every non-violent solution will ultimately fail, as it always does, thanks to the soft cock socialist putting the health and welfare of peados above that of children,.


Since you soft cocks have never stopped a single peado from doing what it is they want to do once they are free, your "100% success" rate is a fkking dismal failure isn't it?

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:12pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:08pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:04pm: Killed a paedo, have you, Big 'Ol?  Killed anyone, Big 'Ol? Have I committed murder, is that your question" Ummm no, have you? No, it is not.  You talk boldly about killing people who are paedos.....so I thought the question appropriate.  Have you ever killed anyone, Big 'Ol while you looked into the whites of their eyes?

Well it is one of your more stupid questions, so you can understand my confusion.


You do realise you don't have to be a murderer to see that the DP is a valid option here, don't you?

Quote:

Since you soft cocks have never stopped a single peado from doing what it is they want to do once they are free, your "100% success" rate is a fkking dismal failure isn't it?

Okay.....so how many 'paedo' notches have you carved into your pistol handle?

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:19pm:

Quote: Since you soft cocks have never stopped a single peado from doing what it is they want to do once they are free, your "100% success" rate is a fkking dismal failure isn't it? Okay.....so how many 'paedo' notches have you carved into your pistol handle?

You know I have already answered that question, don't you?


Repeating the question will not change my answer,.

Ah!


Quote:

You do realise you don't have to be a murderer to see that the DP is a valid option here, don't you?

Yes you do have to be a killer.....not murderer because it is the State sanctioning cold blooded killing......and it outsources to a killer to do the job.  That will never happen in my name.

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:54pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:50pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:47pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:42pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:34pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. And that is why recidivist child rapists always get to 'play another day'. Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists are the problem and always will be when there is a perfectly valid solution to the rapist problem. Yes: keep them away from children. So, who are these "Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists"? Judges, magistrates, parole board members, prison psychologist, the usual fkkheads. They will always makes sure that the minimum is applied to these filth. Funny how your 'solution' to keep them away from children has never worked and yet that is the only solution you have proposed, well done genius. You what keeps them away from children? Being fkking dead. You're mistaken. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate. It's absolutely impossible for someone to rape a child if they don't come in contact with them. Violence is never the answer What you socialist say you are going to do and what you manage to actually achieve in this area are two very different things. Depends on the question as to whether violence is the answer. Being a soft cock, now that is the answer to absolutely nothing. You're not listening. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate. This is an indisputable fact. Violence is for the weak. Here is the fact, YOU are INCAPABLE of doing that because you are SOFT-COCKS with no ability to do what you say you are going to do. Once they are released that is the end of the conversation about protecting children and they are always released. Saying stuff is the same as doing nothing, and all you clowns do is say stuff.

What is it you want?  People from far and wide to converge with pitch-forks and flaming brands and a neck-tie ready?

As long as the locals know what the game is, they can take steps to protect... one (or more) may take a forward defence posture however and decided to neutralise the prospective 'enemy'.....

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:04pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:54pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:50pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:47pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:42pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:34pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. And that is why recidivist child rapists always get to 'play another day'. Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists are the problem and always will be when there is a perfectly valid solution to the rapist problem. Yes: keep them away from children. So, who are these "Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists"? Judges, magistrates, parole board members, prison psychologist, the usual fkkheads. They will always makes sure that the minimum is applied to these filth. Funny how your 'solution' to keep them away from children has never worked and yet that is the only solution you have proposed, well done genius. You what keeps them away from children? Being fkking dead. You're mistaken. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate. It's absolutely impossible for someone to rape a child if they don't come in contact with them. Violence is never the answer What you socialist say you are going to do and what you manage to actually achieve in this area are two very different things. Depends on the question as to whether violence is the answer. Being a soft cock, now that is the answer to absolutely nothing. You're not listening. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate. This is an indisputable fact. Violence is for the weak. Here is the fact, YOU are INCAPABLE of doing that because you are SOFT-COCKS with no ability to do what you say you are going to do. Once they are released that is the end of the conversation about protecting children and they are always released. Saying stuff is the same as doing nothing, and all you clowns do is say stuff. They don't have to be released (and aren't always). I find it sad that the only option you can imagine is violence. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate, and there's no violence involved. Violence is for the weak, the ignorant, and the narrow minded. Unless some kind hearted crim murders the filth in gaol, they will always walk free,  As raping children is considered a big deal by the judiciary, they rarely spend much time in prison and even the ones who are classified as 'Never to be Released' get released. I only 'imagine' violence because every non-violent solution will ultimately fail, as it always does, thanks to the soft cock socialist putting the health and welfare of peados above that of children,. Since you soft cocks have never stopped a single peado from doing what it is they want to do once they are free, your "100% success" rate is a fkking dismal failure isn't it?

Wrong, on all points.

Congratulations.

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:28pm:

Ah! Quote: You do realise you don't have to be a murderer to see that the DP is a valid option here, don't you? Yes you do have to be a killer.....not murderer because it is the State sanctioning cold blooded killing......and it outsources to a killer to do the job.  That will never happen in my name.

But you asked me if I had killed anyone and to do that I would have had to commit murder, you didn't asked my if I had carried our the DP. And you don't have to be a murderer or killer to SEE that the DP is valid for these people.

See what I mean about being a stupid question.



I agree it will never happen in this country, we prefer to set our child rapists free, rather than to guarantee the safety of children, much better.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:39pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:15pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:04pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:54pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:50pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:47pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:42pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:34pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. And that is why recidivist child rapists always get to 'play another day'. Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists are the problem and always will be when there is a perfectly valid solution to the rapist problem. Yes: keep them away from children. So, who are these "Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists"? Judges, magistrates, parole board members, prison psychologist, the usual fkkheads. They will always makes sure that the minimum is applied to these filth. Funny how your 'solution' to keep them away from children has never worked and yet that is the only solution you have proposed, well done genius. You what keeps them away from children? Being fkking dead. You're mistaken. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate. It's absolutely impossible for someone to rape a child if they don't come in contact with them. Violence is never the answer What you socialist say you are going to do and what you manage to actually achieve in this area are two very different things. Depends on the question as to whether violence is the answer. Being a soft cock, now that is the answer to absolutely nothing. You're not listening. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate. This is an indisputable fact. Violence is for the weak. Here is the fact, YOU are INCAPABLE of doing that because you are SOFT-COCKS with no ability to do what you say you are going to do. Once they are released that is the end of the conversation about protecting children and they are always released. Saying stuff is the same as doing nothing, and all you clowns do is say stuff. They don't have to be released (and aren't always). I find it sad that the only option you can imagine is violence. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate, and there's no violence involved. Violence is for the weak, the ignorant, and the narrow minded. Unless some kind hearted crim murders the filth in gaol, they will always walk free,  As raping children is considered a big deal by the judiciary, they rarely spend much time in prison and even the ones who are classified as 'Never to be Released' get released. I only 'imagine' violence because every non-violent solution will ultimately fail, as it always does, thanks to the soft cock socialist putting the health and welfare of peados above that of children,. Since you soft cocks have never stopped a single peado from doing what it is they want to do once they are free, your "100% success" rate is a fkking dismal failure isn't it? Wrong, on all points. Congratulations.

For being correct on everything I said, jeez thanks fkkhead, it means a lot.  :) :)


But it still means that your freed paedos are free to do what ever they want and your 100% is still worthless.

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 10:00pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:28pm: Ah! Quote: You do realise you don't have to be a murderer to see that the DP is a valid option here, don't you? Yes you do have to be a killer.....not murderer because it is the State sanctioning cold blooded killing......and it outsources to a killer to do the job.  That will never happen in my name. But you asked me if I had killed anyone and to do that I would have had to commit murder, you didn't asked my if I had carried our the DP. And you don't have to be a murderer or killer to SEE that the DP is valid for these people. See what I mean about being a stupid question. I agree it will never happen in this country, we prefer to set our child rapists free, rather than to guarantee the safety of children, much better.

No......I am aware (as everyone is) that you are in the military.  That is relevant to why I asked if you killed (not murdered) someone looking into the whites of his eyes.  Have you?

Quote:

hey don't have to be released (and aren't always). I find it sad that the only option you can imagine is violence. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate, and there's no violence involved. Violence is for the weak, the ignorant, and the narrow minded.

have they found  little William Tyrrell???????


do we do  a wonderful job of keeping our children safe.....DO WE REALLY ?.. :( :( :( :( :( :( :(





some seem to think so!

cods wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 10:20pm:

Quote: hey don't have to be released (and aren't always). I find it sad that the only option you can imagine is violence. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate, and there's no violence involved. Violence is for the weak, the ignorant, and the narrow minded. have they found  little William Tyrrell??????? do we do  a wonderful job of keeping our children safe.....DO WE REALLY ?.. :( :( :( :( :( :( :( some seem to think so!

No cods as you well know, they have not found Tyrell.  Why even ask?

Are you saying he was a victim of a paedo, Cods?  If so, on what evidence?

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 10:12pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 10:00pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:28pm: Ah! Quote: You do realise you don't have to be a murderer to see that the DP is a valid option here, don't you? Yes you do have to be a killer.....not murderer because it is the State sanctioning cold blooded killing......and it outsources to a killer to do the job.  That will never happen in my name. But you asked me if I had killed anyone and to do that I would have had to commit murder, you didn't asked my if I had carried our the DP. And you don't have to be a murderer or killer to SEE that the DP is valid for these people. See what I mean about being a stupid question. I agree it will never happen in this country, we prefer to set our child rapists free, rather than to guarantee the safety of children, much better. No......I am aware (as everyone is) that you are in the military.  That is relevant to why I asked if you killed (not murdered) someone looking into the whites of his eyes.  Have you?

I have already answered that, this is the third time I have done so.


But since you are a fkking cretin

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Still nothing change form the last 2 times.

Military has nothing to do with anything dickhead , not everyone in the ADF gets or wants to murder or kill people, fkkhead.

Karnal wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:09pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:04pm: Killed a paedo, have you, Big 'Ol?  Killed anyone, Big 'Ol? Not a sausage. She's had a few though. They don't call her Big Hole for nothing.

I can see why you hold such a high opinion of yourself Karnal, and your moral superiority.

You're a classy guy.

mozzaok wrote on Mar 29^th, 2018 at 11:48am:

Karnal wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:09pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:04pm: Killed a paedo, have you, Big 'Ol?  Killed anyone, Big 'Ol? Not a sausage. She's had a few though. They don't call her Big Hole for nothing. I can see why you hold such a high opinion of yourself Karnal, and your moral superiority. You're a classy guy.

Yeah karnal is nothing more than just another military impostor, soldier boy wanna be, making up for some severe personal deficit. He has spent years making out he is s a military hero while denigrating others who have actually spent time in the system.

Judging by his predilection for homosexual rape, I dare say he may have spent some time in prison suffering the same fate he threatens others with.

He is one sick fkked up unit, that's for sure.

[quote author=Aussie link=1522193306/53#53 date=1522239822]Are you saying he was a victim of a paedo, Cods?  If so, on what evidence?[/quote]

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 10:22pm:

cods wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 10:20pm: Quote: hey don't have to be released (and aren't always). I find it sad that the only option you can imagine is violence. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate, and there's no violence involved. Violence is for the weak, the ignorant, and the narrow minded. have they found  little William Tyrrell??????? do we do  a wonderful job of keeping our children safe.....DO WE REALLY ?.. :( :( :( :( :( :( :( some seem to think so! No cods as you well know, they have not found Tyrell.  Why even ask?

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 8:00pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. Yes it is - only a paedophile apologist would say otherwise.

For mine he has you there Peccar ... & all the crossing out in the world won't make a difference.

Setanta wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 8:05pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. Yes it is - only a paedophile apologist would say otherwise. I'd suggest you be very careful Bobby, one more like that...

The operative word there Set is "apologist".

It's all interpretation & application ..Yes?

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 8:13pm:

Setanta wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:05pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. Yes it is - only a paedophile apologist would say otherwise. I'd suggest you be very careful Bobby, one more like that... I'd like to officially report than one, Set. Booby has been pushing the limits for far too long. I'm not gonna cop something like that.

You bloody sook.

Then you cease calling people apologists for murder, rape, DV etc. etc.

You're inference is no different.  >:(

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 8:47pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:42pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:34pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 7:29pm: BigOl64 wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 6:51pm: Remember in this country no matter how vile of a sexual predator you are  or how dangerous you are to the public; there will always be some socialist who will make sure you get to leave gaol and continue your life as you see fit. Also, “Both psychiatrists ... echoed the same concern that, if he is not given the opportunity ... it is unlikely he will ever be in a better position than he is today", does not mean he is cured or even safe to have wandering around. This is the guarantee that is provided with the death penalty, it is absolute and it is warranted in some cases. It's never warranted, under any circumstances. And that is why recidivist child rapists always get to 'play another day'. Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists are the problem and always will be when there is a perfectly valid solution to the rapist problem. Yes: keep them away from children. So, who are these "Socialist scumbags looking out for peado rapists"? Judges, magistrates, parole board members, prison psychologist, the usual fkkheads. They will always makes sure that the minimum is applied to these filth. Funny how your 'solution' to keep them away from children has never worked and yet that is the only solution you have proposed, well done genius. You what keeps them away from children? Being fkking dead. You're mistaken. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate. It's absolutely impossible for someone to rape a child if they don't come in contact with them. Violence is never the answer

You pay for it then.

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 10:22pm:

cods wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 10:20pm: Quote: hey don't have to be released (and aren't always). I find it sad that the only option you can imagine is violence. Keeping them away from children has a 100% success rate, and there's no violence involved. Violence is for the weak, the ignorant, and the narrow minded. have they found  little William Tyrrell??????? do we do  a wonderful job of keeping our children safe.....DO WE REALLY ?.. :( :( :( :( :( :( :( some seem to think so! No cods as you well know, they have not found Tyrell.  Why even ask?

The meaning in the question was about child safety

& Noddy we are failing dismally on all counts because of softcorks like you & Peccar.

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 10:23pm:

Are you saying he was a victim of a paedo, Cods?  If so, on what evidence?

Why else is he missing?

Any evidence to the contrary?

mozzaok wrote on Mar 29^th, 2018 at 11:48am:

Karnal wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:09pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:04pm: Killed a paedo, have you, Big 'Ol?  Killed anyone, Big 'Ol? Not a sausage. She's had a few though. They don't call her Big Hole for nothing. I can see why you hold such a high opinion of yourself Karnal, and your moral superiority. You're a classy guy.

Got it in one.

Gnads wrote on Mar 29^th, 2018 at 6:00pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 10:23pm: Are you saying he was a victim of a paedo, Cods?  If so, on what evidence? Why else is he missing? Any evidence to the contrary?

I think Jesus took him.  Any evidence to the contrary?

Aussie wrote on Mar 29^th, 2018 at 6:06pm:

Gnads wrote on Mar 29th, 2018 at 6:00pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 10:23pm: Are you saying he was a victim of a paedo, Cods?  If so, on what evidence? Why else is he missing? Any evidence to the contrary? I think Jesus took him.  Any evidence to the contrary?

Where?

your enlightened self should know where & why.

Gnads wrote on Mar 29^th, 2018 at 6:00pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 10:23pm: Are you saying he was a victim of a paedo, Cods?  If so, on what evidence? Why else is he missing? Any evidence to the contrary?

Where?

your enlightened self should know where & why.

Taking a leaf out of Peccars book now ey?