But the Question is..

how on earth is it that this come to be??

the arabs seem awfully friendly with it..  :-/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruoxcqnDKpw

This is the result of muzzos breeding

Why do you think they wear burquas?

Faceless?

That shouldn't bother you, Mechanic.

You've never looked one in the face before.

Valkie wrote on Mar 24^th, 2018 at 2:47pm:

This is the result of muzzos breeding Why do you think they wear burquas?

It wouldn't happen with normal humans.

It's only because muzzos are so close to monkeys that the seed took.

Why do you think the muzzo countries want our sheep live
It's for their filthy muzzo sex trade.

Pretty soon we will have muzzo/ sheep hybrids.

I suppose it makes a change for them from pigs

Valkie wrote on Mar 26^th, 2018 at 5:35pm:

Valkie wrote on Mar 24th, 2018 at 2:47pm: This is the result of muzzos breeding Why do you think they wear burquas? It wouldn't happen with normal humans. It's only because muzzos are so close to monkeys that the seed took. Why do you think the muzzo countries want our sheep live It's for their filthy muzzo sex trade. Pretty soon we will have muzzo/ sheep hybrids. I suppose it makes a change for them from pigs

You are a disgrace and why/how you get away with that racist crap is just incredible.

>:(

Aussie wrote on Mar 26^th, 2018 at 5:49pm:

Valkie wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 5:35pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 24th, 2018 at 2:47pm: This is the result of muzzos breeding Why do you think they wear burquas? It wouldn't happen with normal humans. It's only because muzzos are so close to monkeys that the seed took. Why do you think the muzzo countries want our sheep live It's for their filthy muzzo sex trade. Pretty soon we will have muzzo/ sheep hybrids. I suppose it makes a change for them from pigs You are a disgrace and why/how you get away with that racist crap is just incredible. >:(

Islam isn't a race fool

Islam is a sick twisted barbaric and brutal CULT

It's just asking to be made fun of.

Sorry about upsetting your gentle nature

;D ;D ;D

So precious are some......

Captain Caveman wrote on Mar 26^th, 2018 at 8:17pm:

;D ;D ;D So precious are some......

So, you support/endorse his comments?

I endorse goats.

Can you define what you mean by endorse Aussie?

freediver wrote on Mar 26^th, 2018 at 9:26pm:

Can you define what you mean by endorse Aussie?

Sure:


Quote:

endorse ɪnˈdɔːs,ɛnˈdɔːs/ verb verb: endorse; 3rd person present: endorses; past tense: endorsed; past participle: endorsed; gerund or present participle: endorsing; verb: indorse; 3rd person present: indorses; past tense: indorsed; past participle: indorsed; gerund or present participle: indorsing     1.     declare one's public approval or support of.

Gee, thanks Aussie. Now, one last question. Can you explain what you mean by "religious court"?

freediver wrote on Mar 26^th, 2018 at 9:45pm:

Gee, thanks Aussie. Now, one last question. Can you explain what you mean by "religious court"?

No, and it is not an expression I used.  It is yours, and you continue to fail to define what you mean when using it.

Jellyfish...or perhaps a pain free prawn?  You've never said.

Damn. Oh well, it was worth a try.

What sort of courts do you think they have in Aceh?

freediver wrote on Mar 26^th, 2018 at 9:51pm:

Damn. Oh well, it was worth a try. What sort of courts do you think they have in Aceh?

Those established by Government under the Law of that land.

Notice how I always answer your questions, and you can't do us the courtesy of explaining a term you use?

Yes, Effendi, that's a question.

Aussie wrote on Mar 26^th, 2018 at 10:00pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 9:51pm: Damn. Oh well, it was worth a try. What sort of courts do you think they have in Aceh? Those established by Government under the Law of that land. Notice how I always answer your questions, and you can't do us the courtesy of explaining a term you use? Yes, Effendi, that's a question.

You left out the word religious Aussie. Is that the one you are struggling with?

freediver wrote on Mar 26^th, 2018 at 10:12pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 10:00pm: freediver wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 9:51pm: Damn. Oh well, it was worth a try. What sort of courts do you think they have in Aceh? Those established by Government under the Law of that land. Notice how I always answer your questions, and you can't do us the courtesy of explaining a term you use? Yes, Effendi, that's a question. You left out the word religious Aussie. Is that the one you are struggling with?

Your expression is 'religious Court.'  It is up to you to tell us what you mean when you use it.  It will not matter how many times you avoid telling us.....I will keep asking the same question.

I would relish having you in a witness box.  You'd last a nano second.  Being a smart arse is not 'clever' there.

8-)

Son of a motherless goat....

Oh well

Another thread diverted thanks to apologists

Guess they don't like talking about family

So a law of the land based on a religious ideology does not generate a religious court?

"Tell me, Mr Bjeke-Petersen, how do you understand the division of powers?"

"Division of what?"

Too much power vested in a single power within a portfolio of powers renders the nation concerned a de facto Fascist one.  Cloaking it in the fine raiment of religion makes no difference.... so our question is :-  "Is such a regime acceptable in modern and civilised society?"

BOTR.

Aussie wrote on Mar 26^th, 2018 at 9:49pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 9:45pm: Gee, thanks Aussie. Now, one last question. Can you explain what you mean by "religious court"? No, and it is not an expression I used.  It is yours, and you continue to fail to define what you mean when using it. Jellyfish...or perhaps a pain free prawn?  You've never said.

A prawn Eyeless in Gaz's pond? (smirks at the pun)...

Aussie wrote on Mar 26^th, 2018 at 8:29pm:

Captain Caveman wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 8:17pm: ;D ;D ;D So precious are some...... So, you support/endorse his comments?

Are you saying that beastiality doesn't exist...or...shouldn't exist?

Aussie wrote on Mar 26^th, 2018 at 10:17pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 10:12pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 10:00pm: freediver wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 9:51pm: Damn. Oh well, it was worth a try. What sort of courts do you think they have in Aceh? Those established by Government under the Law of that land. Notice how I always answer your questions, and you can't do us the courtesy of explaining a term you use? Yes, Effendi, that's a question. You left out the word religious Aussie. Is that the one you are struggling with? Your expression is 'religious Court.'  It is up to you to tell us what you mean when you use it.  It will not matter how many times you avoid telling us.....I will keep asking the same question. I would relish having you in a witness box.  You'd last as nano second.  Being a smart arse is not 'clever' there. 8-)

Us? Is there anyone else who is confused about this?

"Us" is the entire Forum which has observed your failure to define what you mean when you use the expression religious Court.

freediver wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 12:18pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 10:17pm: freediver wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 10:12pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 10:00pm: freediver wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 9:51pm: Damn. Oh well, it was worth a try. What sort of courts do you think they have in Aceh? Those established by Government under the Law of that land. Notice how I always answer your questions, and you can't do us the courtesy of explaining a term you use? Yes, Effendi, that's a question. You left out the word religious Aussie. Is that the one you are struggling with? Your expression is 'religious Court.'  It is up to you to tell us what you mean when you use it.  It will not matter how many times you avoid telling us.....I will keep asking the same question. I would relish having you in a witness box.  You'd last as nano second.  Being a smart arse is not 'clever' there. 8-) Us? Is there anyone else who is confused about this?

I'm confused as to why this sort of thing is tolerated in this forum:


Valkie wrote on Mar 26^th, 2018 at 5:35pm:

It wouldn't happen with normal humans. It's only because muzzos are so close to monkeys that the seed took. Why do you think the muzzo countries want our sheep live It's for their filthy muzzo sex trade. Pretty soon we will have muzzo/ sheep hybrids. I suppose it makes a change for them from pigs

If I told you what I had seen with my own two eyes, I doubt many, if any, would believe it could possibly be true.

A major city hospital in Melbourne, where my girlfriend of the day worked, had a room down the corridor from the morgue, full of dead mutant babies in jars of alcohol, or formaldehyde, or something.
Some were obviously very old, but the specimens would lead laymen, like myself, believe that inter species breeding, was possible.
One was a goat baby, in every sense regarding the main details you would expect to see.

I have no freaking idea how these things came to be, but I am glad they came in a time when doctors could just say, sorry dear, your baby died, and they killed these things at birth.

I sincerely doubt these jars would still be around today, so difficult to check it now.

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 12:58pm:

"Us" is the entire Forum which has observed your failure to define what you mean when you use the expression religious Court.

No just a contrary mouldy brain like you "aussie  wrote"  ;)     ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 1:01pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 12:18pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 10:17pm: freediver wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 10:12pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 10:00pm: freediver wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 9:51pm: Damn. Oh well, it was worth a try. What sort of courts do you think they have in Aceh? Those established by Government under the Law of that land. Notice how I always answer your questions, and you can't do us the courtesy of explaining a term you use? Yes, Effendi, that's a question. You left out the word religious Aussie. Is that the one you are struggling with? Your expression is 'religious Court.'  It is up to you to tell us what you mean when you use it.  It will not matter how many times you avoid telling us.....I will keep asking the same question. I would relish having you in a witness box.  You'd last as nano second.  Being a smart arse is not 'clever' there. 8-) Us? Is there anyone else who is confused about this? I'm confused as to why this sort of thing is tolerated in this forum: Valkie wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 5:35pm: It wouldn't happen with normal humans. It's only because muzzos are so close to monkeys that the seed took. Why do you think the muzzo countries want our sheep live It's for their filthy muzzo sex trade. Pretty soon we will have muzzo/ sheep hybrids. I suppose it makes a change for them from pigs

When you decided it was a good thing to make jokes about other members deceased children you lost all rights to be the arbiter of what should be posted around here.

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 12:58pm:

"Us" is the entire Forum which has observed your failure to define what you mean when you use the expression religious Court.

Do not count me with your inclusive ALL of US there oz.
I am happy in knowing what is meant, because I come from that dying breed who says what they mean, and mean what they say.
You know, the opposite of Karnal's, talk poo to stir poo philosophy, which some seem to try and emulate from time to time.

mozzaok wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 1:38pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 12:58pm: "Us" is the entire Forum which has observed your failure to define what you mean when you use the expression religious Court. Do not count me with your inclusive ALL of US there oz. I am happy in knowing what is meant, because I come from that dying breed who says what they mean, and mean what they say. You know, the opposite of Karnal's, talk poo to stir poo philosophy, which some seem to try and emulate from time to time.

I will count you in unless you can point to where FD has explained what he means when he uses the expression religious Court.

Gordon wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 1:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 1:01pm: freediver wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 12:18pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 10:17pm: freediver wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 10:12pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 10:00pm: freediver wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 9:51pm: Damn. Oh well, it was worth a try. What sort of courts do you think they have in Aceh? Those established by Government under the Law of that land. Notice how I always answer your questions, and you can't do us the courtesy of explaining a term you use? Yes, Effendi, that's a question. You left out the word religious Aussie. Is that the one you are struggling with? Your expression is 'religious Court.'  It is up to you to tell us what you mean when you use it.  It will not matter how many times you avoid telling us.....I will keep asking the same question. I would relish having you in a witness box.  You'd last as nano second.  Being a smart arse is not 'clever' there. 8-) Us? Is there anyone else who is confused about this? I'm confused as to why this sort of thing is tolerated in this forum: Valkie wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 5:35pm: It wouldn't happen with normal humans. It's only because muzzos are so close to monkeys that the seed took. Why do you think the muzzo countries want our sheep live It's for their filthy muzzo sex trade. Pretty soon we will have muzzo/ sheep hybrids. I suppose it makes a change for them from pigs When you decided it was a good thing to make jokes about other members deceased children you lost all rights to be the arbiter of what should be posted around here.

I've made no jokes about other members deceased children.

Your lie has been duly noted though.

Quote:

I've made no jokes about other members deceased children. Your lie has been duly noted though.

I can't recall that happening.  Where is the link to it?

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 1:50pm:

Quote: I've made no jokes about other members deceased children. Your lie has been duly noted though. I can't recall that happening.  Where is the link to it?

It didn't happen.

There is no link.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 1:51pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 1:50pm: Quote: I've made no jokes about other members deceased children. Your lie has been duly noted though. I can't recall that happening.  Where is the link to it? It didn't happen. There is no link.

It did happen- I remember it-

Agnes wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 2:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 1:51pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 1:50pm: Quote: I've made no jokes about other members deceased children. Your lie has been duly noted though. I can't recall that happening.  Where is the link to it? It didn't happen. There is no link. It did happen- I remember it-

And what happened was dealt with at the time.  The last occasion this was dragged up, a GMod had to intervene to remind those who dredged it up that it had been resolved and that those responsible were doing no favours to the individuals involved.   I suggest this be dropped very quickly, lest there be consequences unforeseen.  Idiots.

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 2:26pm:

Agnes wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 2:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 1:51pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 1:50pm: Quote: I've made no jokes about other members deceased children. Your lie has been duly noted though. I can't recall that happening.  Where is the link to it? It didn't happen. There is no link. It did happen- I remember it- And what happened was dealt with at the time.  The last occasion this was dragged up, a GMod had to intervene to remind those who dredged it up that it had been resolved and that those responsible were doing no favours to the individuals involved.   I suggest this be dropped very quickly, lest there be consequences unforeseen.  Idiots.

Says the king of 'dredging things up'.

Greg of late has been trying to act like the moral arbiter around here so I'm simply questioning his suitability to do so.

Don't want your previous comments hanging around your neck like a rotting chicken, don't ferking say them in the first place. Simples.

The GMod:


Quote:

Give it a rest you two, you think he really wants to come in here and read this trite crap. Leave it in the past.

LEAVE IT IN THE PAST.

-

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 2:36pm:

The GMod: Quote: Give it a rest you two, you think he really wants to come in here and read this trite crap. Leave it in the past. LEAVE IT IN THE PAST.

Aussie, please tell us what is the acceptable period of time we're all allowed to reference old quotes. We all hang on your every word for the interpretation of forum rules so please, set us all straight.

Thanks in advance.

There were no revolting lies.  What Peccarry said in this Thread is correct, if you bothered to actually read what he said.

Leave it alone, or............????

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 2:43pm:

There were no revolting lies.  What Peccarry said in this Thread is correct, if you bothered to actually read what he said. Leave it alone, or............????

Nobody cares what the two people with the least credibility on this site says. Peccar and Arsie. Yuck.

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 2:36pm:

The GMod: Quote: Give it a rest you two, you think he really wants to come in here and read this trite crap. Leave it in the past. LEAVE IT IN THE PAST.

Excuse me while I just fall down laughing at who said this    ;D ;D ;D

I can't get up   :D

Black Orchid wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 3:02pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 2:36pm: The GMod: Quote: Give it a rest you two, you think he really wants to come in here and read this trite crap. Leave it in the past. LEAVE IT IN THE PAST. Excuse me while I just fall down laughing at who said this    ;D ;D ;D I can't get up   :D

GMod Setanta said it.

Still laughing?

8-)

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 3:04pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 3:02pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 2:36pm: The GMod: Quote: Give it a rest you two, you think he really wants to come in here and read this trite crap. Leave it in the past. LEAVE IT IN THE PAST. Excuse me while I just fall down laughing at who said this    ;D ;D ;D I can't get up   :D GMod Setanta said it. Still laughing? 8-)

I don't care who said it.  YOU are reiterating and telling people to leave things in the past.

So YES I am still laughing so hard my sides hurt.

Unbelievable.

Gordon wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 2:46pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 2:43pm: There were no revolting lies.  What Peccarry said in this Thread is correct, if you bothered to actually read what he said. Leave it alone, or............???? Nobody cares what the two people with the least credibility on this site says. Peccar and Arsie. Yuck.

Off-topic, personal abuse.

Black Orchid wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 3:06pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 3:04pm: Black Orchid wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 3:02pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 2:36pm: The GMod: Quote: Give it a rest you two, you think he really wants to come in here and read this trite crap. Leave it in the past. LEAVE IT IN THE PAST. Excuse me while I just fall down laughing at who said this    ;D ;D ;D I can't get up   :D GMod Setanta said it. Still laughing? 8-) I don't care who said it.  YOU are reiterating and telling people to leave things in the past. So YES I am still laughing so hard my sides hurt. Unbelievable.

No-one with even half a brain could not work out why Setanta made that comment.

Black Orchid wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 3:06pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 3:04pm: Black Orchid wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 3:02pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 2:36pm: The GMod: Quote: Give it a rest you two, you think he really wants to come in here and read this trite crap. Leave it in the past. LEAVE IT IN THE PAST. Excuse me while I just fall down laughing at who said this    ;D ;D ;D I can't get up   :D GMod Setanta said it. Still laughing? 8-) I don't care who said it.  YOU are reiterating and telling people to leave things in the past. So YES I am still laughing so hard my sides hurt. Unbelievable.

Is this the most astounding piece of hypocrisy to ever grace these boards? The man who can and regularly does with a moments notice, dredge up posts from the beginning of the internet telling people not to dredge things up.

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Mar 24^th, 2018 at 2:44pm:

But the Question is.. how on earth is it that this come to be?? the arabs seem awfully friendly with it..  :-/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruoxcqnDKpw

It's a Damascus Goat .... they breed them for this genetic facial defect.

They would have more trouble eating.


The uglier they are the more they like them.

They don't all look as bad as these goats.

But these goats are also a long floppy eared goat & if you look closely at the one you have in the clip you will see that they have cut off the ears.

Just like those Yanks do to the ears on Doberman Pinscher & Pitbull dogs.

This one is good & ugly

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvvKBDde7yc

Agnes wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 2:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 1:51pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 1:50pm: Quote: I've made no jokes about other members deceased children. Your lie has been duly noted though. I can't recall that happening.  Where is the link to it? It didn't happen. There is no link. It did happen- I remember it-

Does that mean, if I do not remember it, it din't happen?????

I will remember to file this under more petulant whining from immature twits.

PS peccaryhead is not the moral arbiter, god is. (that's me)(at least that is the closest definition that makes any sense, but personally I have serious doubts I even really exist at all)

I'm not on this Topic to defend Aussie (or GP),
but I will step in to mention the fact that the likes of the PA Sewer Forum members, seem to only turn up to have a go at Aussie if they think there is a 'gang-up' against him.

Butt-out Black Orchid. Let Aussie have his go with Gordon, FreeDiver in relation to the topic. I/we don't need your 2c worth to start another PA battle. Bugger off.

Now with that said.

Being 'Brown' Middle-Eastern, doesn't necessarily mean you are a Moslem. Those yellow Indonesians & Malaysians are Moslem.
Knowing the 'difference' between 'Race' and 'Culture' (Cult) is a major point.
Valkie is having a go at the 'Culture', not the 'Race'.

Valkie is not a 'Racist', he is a 'Culturalist' - just like Setanta said he is.
There are many 'Culturalists' here, very much so in Australia.
;)

Jasin wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 5:59pm:

I'm not on this Topic to defend Aussie (or GP), but I will step in to mention the fact that the likes of the PA Sewer Forum members, seem to only turn up to have a go at Aussie if they think there is a 'gang-up' against him. Butt-out Black Orchid. Let Aussie have his go with Gordon, FreeDiver in relation to the topic. I/we don't need your 2c worth to start another PA battle. Bugger off. Now with that said. Being 'Brown' Middle-Eastern, doesn't necessarily mean you are a Moslem. Those yellow Indonesians & Malaysians are Moslem. Knowing the 'difference' between 'Race' and 'Culture' (Cult) is a major point. Valkie is having a go at the 'Culture', not the 'Race'. Valkie is not a 'Racist', he is a 'Culturalist' - just like Setanta said he is. There are many 'Culturalists' here, very much so in Australia. ;)

Nearly right
I'm anti CULT

I have this natural abhorrence to brutal, barbaric, twisted, primitive, violent, sick and disgusting CULTS
And Islam fits perfectly into that pigeon hole.

So
Even though the goat was black, this is not my problem
My problem is the interspecies breeding that muzzos do with goats
😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😁😁😁😁

Valkie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 6:13pm:

Jasin wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 5:59pm: I'm not on this Topic to defend Aussie (or GP), but I will step in to mention the fact that the likes of the PA Sewer Forum members, seem to only turn up to have a go at Aussie if they think there is a 'gang-up' against him. Butt-out Black Orchid. Let Aussie have his go with Gordon, FreeDiver in relation to the topic. I/we don't need your 2c worth to start another PA battle. Bugger off. Now with that said. Being 'Brown' Middle-Eastern, doesn't necessarily mean you are a Moslem. Those yellow Indonesians & Malaysians are Moslem. Knowing the 'difference' between 'Race' and 'Culture' (Cult) is a major point. Valkie is having a go at the 'Culture', not the 'Race'. Valkie is not a 'Racist', he is a 'Culturalist' - just like Setanta said he is. There are many 'Culturalists' here, very much so in Australia. ;) Nearly right I'm anti CULT I have this natural abhorrence to brutal, barbaric, twisted, primitive, violent, sick and disgusting CULTS And Islam fits perfectly into that pigeon hole. So Even though the goat was black, this is not my problem My problem is the interspecies breeding that muzzos do with goats 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😁😁😁😁

Yes - I know I was nearly right.
Your view of 'one' Cult/Culture is apparent.
Nothing against that - you can't love everyone!

Of course, the 'Culture' of Islam which takes the form of Religion (rather than Politics, Sport, Science, etc) - is almost at the end of a 'transition' period.
For Centuries it has been an 'Empire', but now its coming to the end of its Era, for the New Empire of Israel has emerged and will kick on.

Look at it this way.
Islam: Religion = positive, as a Military - it really sucks.
Israel: Military = positive, as a Religion - it really sucks.

Anyway, its a long story - got to do with the New Worlds coming on the scene, the French coughing up a Messiah to sacrifice, etc, etc.

For a bunch of proletarian, poor, breeders - Islam did give the 'Empire' scene a real go.
But in the Middle-East, Military is for the Rich and Religion is for the Poor (breeders). So the Moslem military effort is almost cooked.
South America: Religion for the rich, Military for the poor.  ;)

I hear in Australia that Political Australians are pretty 'grubby' on the behaviour side too ;)
Unlike the Artists  :D

Jasin wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 5:59pm:

I'm not on this Topic to defend Aussie (or GP), but I will step in to mention the fact that the likes of the PA Sewer Forum members, seem to only turn up to have a go at Aussie if they think there is a 'gang-up' against him. Butt-out Black Orchid. Let Aussie have his go with Gordon, FreeDiver in relation to the topic. I/we don't need your 2c worth to start another PA battle. Bugger off. Now with that said. Being 'Brown' Middle-Eastern, doesn't necessarily mean you are a Moslem. Those yellow Indonesians & Malaysians are Moslem. Knowing the 'difference' between 'Race' and 'Culture' (Cult) is a major point. Valkie is having a go at the 'Culture', not the 'Race'. Valkie is not a 'Racist', he is a 'Culturalist' - just like Setanta said he is. There are many 'Culturalists' here, very much so in Australia. ;)

Go take your meds you absolute nutter and STOP talking about me in your every post    :o

Thank you!

Black Orchid wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 6:31pm:

Jasin wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 5:59pm: I'm not on this Topic to defend Aussie (or GP), but I will step in to mention the fact that the likes of the PA Sewer Forum members, seem to only turn up to have a go at Aussie if they think there is a 'gang-up' against him. Butt-out Black Orchid. Let Aussie have his go with Gordon, FreeDiver in relation to the topic. I/we don't need your 2c worth to start another PA battle. Bugger off. Now with that said. Being 'Brown' Middle-Eastern, doesn't necessarily mean you are a Moslem. Those yellow Indonesians & Malaysians are Moslem. Knowing the 'difference' between 'Race' and 'Culture' (Cult) is a major point. Valkie is having a go at the 'Culture', not the 'Race'. Valkie is not a 'Racist', he is a 'Culturalist' - just like Setanta said he is. There are many 'Culturalists' here, very much so in Australia. ;) Go take your meds you absolute nutter and STOP talking about me in your every post    :o Thank you!

It's the only excuse you ever drum against me.
(because you think you're more special than everyone else)
But hey, it must drive you nuts that I give you a dose of your own 'medicine' here, eh?  ;) ;D

The only dose of you're apt at giving out is a dose of the shytes.

And you could give diarrhoea the shytes.

Gnads wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 6:50pm:

The only dose of you're apt at giving out is a dose of the shytes. And you could give diarrhoea the shytes.

Yes - especially to PA'ers who come on here to cause trouble.
I don't see you helping much. Maybe you enjoy their 'battles' that can rip a topic into 'two'.

I would rather give diarrhoea the shytes than vote NLP or ALP. Now that's a really shiiiiiiiiitie thing to do to the country. ;)

*JaSin drops his pants, turns around, parts his legs enough to show GONADS - the 'Old Goat'

freediver wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 12:18pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 10:17pm: freediver wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 10:12pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 10:00pm: freediver wrote on Mar 26th, 2018 at 9:51pm: Damn. Oh well, it was worth a try. What sort of courts do you think they have in Aceh? Those established by Government under the Law of that land. Notice how I always answer your questions, and you can't do us the courtesy of explaining a term you use? Yes, Effendi, that's a question. You left out the word religious Aussie. Is that the one you are struggling with? Your expression is 'religious Court.'  It is up to you to tell us what you mean when you use it.  It will not matter how many times you avoid telling us.....I will keep asking the same question. I would relish having you in a witness box.  You'd last as nano second.  Being a smart arse is not 'clever' there. 8-) Us? Is there anyone else who is confused about this?

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 12:58pm:

"Us" is the entire Forum which has observed your failure to define what you mean when you use the expression religious Court.

Pretty sure it is just you Aussie. You do know what a court is, right?


Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 1:40pm:

mozzaok wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 1:38pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 12:58pm: "Us" is the entire Forum which has observed your failure to define what you mean when you use the expression religious Court. Do not count me with your inclusive ALL of US there oz. I am happy in knowing what is meant, because I come from that dying breed who says what they mean, and mean what they say. You know, the opposite of Karnal's, talk poo to stir poo philosophy, which some seem to try and emulate from time to time. I will count you in unless you can point to where FD has explained what he means when he uses the expression religious Court.

So until you cease being bewildered you don't think Mozza knows what I mean either?

They really should do something about these Christians, Buddhists and such having relationships with their goats...... newspapers are filled with this filth everyday... same as all those Chrissoes and Buddhoes drugging and raping young girls in Britain in gangs....... if this keeps up they might all become 'radicalised' and do something really evil....

Mozzaok is not a mind reader, Effendi.

The ONLY person who knows what you mean when you use the expression religious Court is you.  Yet, you wunaway or obfuscate every time you are asked to explain.

Everyone except you knows Aussie. No need to read my mind, only my post, and maybe engage the brain a bit.

Jasin wrote on Mar 27^th, 2018 at 6:57pm:

Gnads wrote on Mar 27th, 2018 at 6:50pm: The only dose of you're apt at giving out is a dose of the shytes. And you could give diarrhoea the shytes. Yes - especially to PA'ers who come on here to cause trouble. I don't see you helping much. Maybe you enjoy their 'battles' that can rip a topic into 'two'. I would rather give diarrhoea the shytes than vote NLP or ALP. Now that's a really shiiiiiiiiitie thing to do to the country. ;)

You hypocrite much of the shyte you post is meant to cause trouble.

btw it's LNP ..... & I don't vote for them either.

freediver wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 12:27pm:

Everyone except you knows Aussie. No need to read my mind, only my post, and maybe engage the brain a bit.

Gee, I wonder, then, why no-one will answer your question?

I know I won't until you define what you mean.

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 11:16am:

Mozzaok is not a mind reader, Effendi. The ONLY person who knows what you mean when you use the expression religious Court is you.  Yet, you wunaway or obfuscate every time you are asked to explain.

A Sharia Court is a religious court.

The Inquisition was a religious court system within the Catholic Church.

The difference being the Inquistion started in 1478 ceased in 1834.

Sharia started with Islam in the 7th century and is still going 1400 yrs later in many of the Muslim countries today.

And it's also creeping into non muslim countries which have opened their doors to Muslim migration(Hijra - jihad by immigration).

Gnads wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 1:02pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 11:16am: Mozzaok is not a mind reader, Effendi. The ONLY person who knows what you mean when you use the expression religious Court is you.  Yet, you wunaway or obfuscate every time you are asked to explain. A Sharia Court is a religious court. The Inquisition was a religious court system within the Catholic Church. The difference being the Inquistion started in 1478 ceased in 1834. Sharia started with Islam in the 7th century and is still going 1400 yrs later in many of the Muslim countries today. And it's also creeping into non muslim countries which have opened their doors to Muslim migration(Hijra - jihad by immigration).

I dare one of those litte sharia fcckers to try and push their law on me and my family.  They would be the ones getting whipped...and I won't even use a stick.

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 12:58pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 12:27pm: Everyone except you knows Aussie. No need to read my mind, only my post, and maybe engage the brain a bit. Gee, I wonder, then, why no-one will answer your question? I know I won't until you define what you mean.

I have only asked 3 or 4 people Aussie. They will not answer because they are spineless apologists. You won't answer because your are eternally bewildered (also).

freediver wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 8:27pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 12:58pm: freediver wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 12:27pm: Everyone except you knows Aussie. No need to read my mind, only my post, and maybe engage the brain a bit. Gee, I wonder, then, why no-one will answer your question? I know I won't until you define what you mean. I have only asked 3 or 4 people Aussie. They will not answer because they are spineless apologists. You won't answer because your are eternally bewildered (also).

Maybe, like me, they refuse to be a fly to your spider.  You define your term, and I will answer your question. 

What spider? Are you really that scared of a simple question? Or do you think this is a cunning plan to get you to say something silly about tennis courts?

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 8:32pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 8:27pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 12:58pm: freediver wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 12:27pm: Everyone except you knows Aussie. No need to read my mind, only my post, and maybe engage the brain a bit. Gee, I wonder, then, why no-one will answer your question? I know I won't until you define what you mean. I have only asked 3 or 4 people Aussie. They will not answer because they are spineless apologists. You won't answer because your are eternally bewildered (also). Maybe, like me, they refuse to be a fly to your spider.  You define your term, and I will answer your question.

piss off aussie..

like Davey Warner... EVERYONE is sick to death of your shiit as well...

if you don't like it here, do everyone a favour delete your account..

Perhaps Aussie has been tricked so many times he now sees a trap in every word.

Quote:

What spider? Are you really that scared of a simple question? Or do you think this is a cunning plan to get you to say something silly about tennis courts?

No-one has been talking about 'tennis courts.'  You introduced the question/expression...religious Court.  I'll answer it when you tell us what you mean when you used that expression.

Are you afraid you'll be embarrassed by my answer?  Or are you bewildered by my question, confused even?

Would you like to try providing an answer, Effendi?

What's this about a spider Aussie?

freediver wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 8:52pm:

What's this about a spider Aussie?

Quote:

The Spider and the Fly “Will you walk into my parlour?” said the Spider to the Fly,  'Tis the prettiest little parlour that ever you did spy;  The way into my parlour is up a winding stair, And I've a many curious things to show when you are there.” “Oh no, no,” said the little Fly, “to ask me is in vain, For who goes up your winding stair can never come down again.” “I'm sure you must be weary, dear, with soaring up so high;  Will you rest upon my little bed?” said the Spider to the Fly.  “There are pretty curtains drawn around; the sheets are fine and thin, And if you like to rest awhile, I'll snugly tuck you in!” “Oh no, no,” said the little Fly,  “for I've often heard it said, They never, never wake again, who sleep upon your bed!” Said the cunning Spider to the Fly,  “Dear friend what can I do, To prove the warm affection I 've always felt for you?  I have within my pantry, good store of all that's nice; I'm sure you're very welcome — will you please to take a slice?” “Oh no, no,” said the little Fly,  “kind Sir, that cannot be, I've heard what's in your pantry, and I do not wish to see!” “Sweet creature!” said the Spider,  “you're witty and you're wise, How handsome are your gauzy wings, how brilliant are your eyes!  I've a little looking-glass upon my parlour shelf, If you'll step in one moment, dear, you shall behold yourself.” “I thank you, gentle sir,” she said,  “for what you're pleased to say, And bidding you good morning now, I'll call another day.” The Spider turned him round about, and went into his den, For well he knew the silly Fly would soon come back again: So he wove a subtle web, in a little corner sly: And set his table ready, to dine upon the Fly. Then he came out to his door again, and merrily did sing, “Come hither, hither, pretty Fly, with the pearl and silver wing; Your robes are green and purple — there's a crest upon your head; Your eyes are like the diamond bright, but mine are dull as lead!” Alas, alas! how very soon this silly little Fly, Hearing his wily, flattering words, came slowly flitting by; With buzzing wings she hung aloft, then near and nearer drew, Thinking only of her brilliant eyes, and green and purple hue — Thinking only of her crested head — poor foolish thing!      At last, Up jumped the cunning Spider, and fiercely held her fast.  He dragged her up his winding stair, into his dismal den,  Within his little parlour — but she ne'er came out again! And now dear little children, who may this story read, To idle, silly flattering words, I pray you ne'er give heed: Unto an evil counsellor, close heart and ear and eye, And take a lesson from this tale, of the Spider and the Fly. ~By Mary Howitt, 1829

8-)

Are we trying to trick you with flattery Aussie? No flies on you eh?

freediver wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:02pm:

Are we trying to trick you with flattery Aussie? No flies on you eh?

There is no 'we,' just you, Effendi.

What do you mean when you use the expression religious Court.

You are the only one who can tell us what is in your mind.

Oh for Christ sake!

What do you call a M.A.S.H unit?
Is it really a Military trying to be Medical?
Is it really Medical trying to be Military?

There are such things as 'Hybrid'.

So Religion (Writing) via Sharia and Politics (Speaking) via Legal - come together to make 'Sharia Law'. ::)
Science + Religion = Scientology.  :P
BIG F#%$%^ DEAL  :P

Jasin wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:12pm:

Oh for Christ sake! What do you call a M.A.S.H unit? Is it really a Military trying to be Medical? Is it really Medical trying to be Military? There are such things as 'Hybrid'. So Religion (Writing) via Sharia and Politics (Speaking) via Legal - come together to make 'Sharia Law'. ::) Science + Religion = Scientology.  :P BIG F#%$%^ DEAL  :P

Great example.  You reckon the 'M' in MASH is either medical or military.  It is neither.

You're so clever Aussie. No-one could possibly trick you with such a simple question.

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:17pm:

Jasin wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:12pm: Oh for Christ sake! What do you call a M.A.S.H unit? Is it really a Military trying to be Medical? Is it really Medical trying to be Military? There are such things as 'Hybrid'. So Religion (Writing) via Sharia and Politics (Speaking) via Legal - come together to make 'Sharia Law'. ::) Science + Religion = Scientology.  :P BIG F#%$%^ DEAL  :P Great example.  You reckon the 'M' in MASH is either medical or military.  It is neither.

Mobile.

freediver wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:25pm:

You're so clever Aussie. No-one could possibly trick you with such a simple question.

Will you take a question, FD?

I'm curious.

freediver wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:25pm:

You're so clever Aussie. No-one could possibly trick you with such a simple question.

It seems you are totally baffled with this one:

What do you mean when you use the expression religious Court?

freediver wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 8:35pm:

Are you really that scared of a simple question?

FD?

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:31pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:25pm: You're so clever Aussie. No-one could possibly trick you with such a simple question. It seems you are totally baffled with this one: What do you mean when you use the expression religious Court?

It's a hard question, Aussie. Have you thought of asking it again?

That could work.

Hybrid

QLD = a piece of North America, in Australia
NSW = a piece of Oceania, in Australia
VIC = a piece of South America, in Australia
SA = a piece of the Middle-East, in Australia
NT = a piece of Asia, in Australia
North WA = a piece of Europe, in Australia
South WA = a piece of Africa, Australia

California = a piece of Australia, in North America
Chile = a piece of Australia, in South America

Valkie wrote on Mar 26^th, 2018 at 5:35pm:

Valkie wrote on Mar 24th, 2018 at 2:47pm: This is the result of muzzos breeding Why do you think they wear burquas? It wouldn't happen with normal humans. It's only because muzzos are so close to monkeys that the seed took. Why do you think the muzzo countries want our sheep live It's for their filthy muzzo sex trade. Pretty soon we will have muzzo/ sheep hybrids. I suppose it makes a change for them from pigs

FD might say they're retarded inbreds who squat down to pee and play with their dicks afterwards, but he'd never agree with all this, Matty.

Are monkeys and Muzzo/sheep hybrids a race?

A penny for your thoughts, FD.

Jasin wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:28pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:17pm: Jasin wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:12pm: Oh for Christ sake! What do you call a M.A.S.H unit? Is it really a Military trying to be Medical? Is it really Medical trying to be Military? There are such things as 'Hybrid'. So Religion (Writing) via Sharia and Politics (Speaking) via Legal - come together to make 'Sharia Law'. ::) Science + Religion = Scientology.  :P BIG F#%$%^ DEAL  :P Great example.  You reckon the 'M' in MASH is either medical or military.  It is neither. Mobile.

Yes.....so now you know why it is important that we all know what the 'M' stands for before answering a question like "What do you reckon about those M.A.S.H facilities?"

You thought it was Military or Medical, yet it was neither.  So, now you have clarified, the (example) question can be answered in such a way as we are all 'on the same page.'

Do you think FD will tell us soon what he meant when he mentioned religious Court......so we can all be on the same page?

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:38pm:

Jasin wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:28pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:17pm: Jasin wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:12pm: Oh for Christ sake! What do you call a M.A.S.H unit? Is it really a Military trying to be Medical? Is it really Medical trying to be Military? There are such things as 'Hybrid'. So Religion (Writing) via Sharia and Politics (Speaking) via Legal - come together to make 'Sharia Law'. ::) Science + Religion = Scientology.  :P BIG F#%$%^ DEAL  :P Great example.  You reckon the 'M' in MASH is either medical or military.  It is neither. Mobile. Yes.....so now you know why it is important that we all know what the 'M' stands for before answering a question like "What do you reckon about those M.A.S.H facilities?" You thought it was Military or Medical, yet it was neither.  So, now you have clarified, the (example) question can be answered in such a way as we are all 'on the same page.' Do you think FD will tell us soon what he meant when he mentioned religious Court......so we can all be on the same page?

I think he will, Aussie. It's taken a couple of weeks, but I think he's starting to feel safe.

Remember, sometimes a question is just a question.

Mobile Army Surgical Hospital and Faceless Goats.... hmmmm.

"Hawkeye - I've been meaning to talk to you..."

"What about, Colonel Potter...?"

"That goat you've got in your tent.... now I'm not one to draw hasty conclusions, but somehow it seems to me that thing is a little bit sweet on you!"

"Oh - just a case of kid love without the kid gloves, Colonel."

"Very funny, Hawkeye, but stop making eyes at that thing in front of the nurses.. you might make some of them feel jealous."

"Of a goat?  Wow - I had no idea I was that popular with the nurses, though some of them look like goats......  At least I'm not making an ass of myself."

"I've been meaning to talk to Major Burns about that mule, too ... what in the Sam Hill....?"

"Attention.. attention - incoming wounded..."

Karnal wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:42pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:38pm: Jasin wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:28pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:17pm: Jasin wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:12pm: Oh for Christ sake! What do you call a M.A.S.H unit? Is it really a Military trying to be Medical? Is it really Medical trying to be Military? There are such things as 'Hybrid'. So Religion (Writing) via Sharia and Politics (Speaking) via Legal - come together to make 'Sharia Law'. ::) Science + Religion = Scientology.  :P BIG F#%$%^ DEAL  :P Great example.  You reckon the 'M' in MASH is either medical or military.  It is neither. Mobile. Yes.....so now you know why it is important that we all know what the 'M' stands for before answering a question like "What do you reckon about those M.A.S.H facilities?" You thought it was Military or Medical, yet it was neither.  So, now you have clarified, the (example) question can be answered in such a way as we are all 'on the same page.' Do you think FD will tell us soon what he meant when he mentioned religious Court......so we can all be on the same page? I think he will, Aussie. It's taken a couple of weeks, but I think he's starting to feel safe. Remember, sometimes a question is just a question.

It does seem like a couple of weeks, but no, just one:


Quote:

Re: Beheadings in Aceh? Reply #56 - Mar 21st, 2018 at 10:27am Quote Greg do you see any particular danger in handing a religious court the authority to hand out death sentences?

That whole time, he has done everything except tell us what he meant when he used the expression religious court.

How hard can it be to answer a question about your own words?

Is this going to be the new 'mindless collective of treacherous Jews' and how soon will it be before Effendi tells me what I mean by his expression, and puts it in his Fliki?

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:51pm:

Mobile Army Surgical Hospital and Faceless Goats.... hmmmm. "Hawkeye - I've been meaning to talk to you..." "What about, Colonel Potter...?" "That goat you've got in your tent.... now I'm not one to draw hasty conclusions, but somehow it seems to me that thing is a little bit sweet on you!" "Oh - just a case of kid love without the kid gloves, Colonel." "Very funny, Hawkeye, but stop making eyes at that thing in front of the nurses.. you might make some of them feel jealous." "Of a goat?  Wow - I had no idea I was that popular with the nurses, though some of them look like goats......  At least I'm not making an ass of myself." "I've been meaning to talk to Major Burns about that mule, too ... what in the Sam Hill....?" "Attention.. attention - incoming wounded..."

Yes. It's a Mobile, Stationary, Medical, Military, Religious, Political, Sporting, Mathematical, Scientific, Artistic, Spiritual, Aquatic, Land Farm, Conservational, Culinary (Mess Tent), etc, etc ....unit (er, or is that 'units'?  :-?). :P

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:51pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:42pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:38pm: Jasin wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:28pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:17pm: Jasin wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 9:12pm: Oh for Christ sake! What do you call a M.A.S.H unit? Is it really a Military trying to be Medical? Is it really Medical trying to be Military? There are such things as 'Hybrid'. So Religion (Writing) via Sharia and Politics (Speaking) via Legal - come together to make 'Sharia Law'. ::) Science + Religion = Scientology.  :P BIG F#%$%^ DEAL  :P Great example.  You reckon the 'M' in MASH is either medical or military.  It is neither. Mobile. Yes.....so now you know why it is important that we all know what the 'M' stands for before answering a question like "What do you reckon about those M.A.S.H facilities?" You thought it was Military or Medical, yet it was neither.  So, now you have clarified, the (example) question can be answered in such a way as we are all 'on the same page.' Do you think FD will tell us soon what he meant when he mentioned religious Court......so we can all be on the same page? I think he will, Aussie. It's taken a couple of weeks, but I think he's starting to feel safe. Remember, sometimes a question is just a question. It does seem like a couple of weeks, but no, just one: Quote: Re: Beheadings in Aceh? Reply #56 - Mar 21st, 2018 at 10:27am Quote Greg do you see any particular danger in handing a religious court the authority to hand out death sentences? That whole time, he has done everything except tell us what he meant when he used the expression religious court. How hard can it be to answer a question about your own words? Is this going to be the new 'mindless collective of treacherous Jews' and how soon will it be before Effendi tells me what I mean by his expression, and puts it in his Fliki?

We'll see, Aussie, we'll see. There is also gays who do it Mardi Gras-style, Muslims taking away the freedoms of decent white people everywhere, and anything that starts with "Abu once said..."

Do you think FD upholds the use of truth or porkies in his campaign against the Muselman?

He's still too scared to say.

Quote:

Do you think FD upholds the use of truth or porkies in his campaign against the Muselman?

Direct question, direct answer.

Yes, I do think so.

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 10:48pm:

Quote: Do you think FD upholds the use of truth or porkies in his campaign against the Muselman? Direct question, direct answer. Yes, I do think so.

Me too, Aussie.

Which one?

Karnal wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 10:56pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 10:48pm: Quote: Do you think FD upholds the use of truth or porkies in his campaign against the Muselman? Direct question, direct answer. Yes, I do think so. Me too, Aussie. Which one?

Yet another follow up and direct question.  Direct answer.  (Notice how easy it is, Effendi?)

I think.....*drum roll*......porkies seasoned liberally with obstruction, obfuscation, evasion, avoidance and misrepresentation.....etc etc.

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 11:10pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 10:56pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 28th, 2018 at 10:48pm: Quote: Do you think FD upholds the use of truth or porkies in his campaign against the Muselman? Direct question, direct answer. Yes, I do think so. Me too, Aussie. Which one? Yet another follow up and direct question.  Direct answer.  (Notice how easy it is, Effendi?) I think.....*drum roll*......porkies seasoned liberally with obstruction, obfuscation, evasion, avoidance and misrepresentation.....etc etc.

Aussie thinks porkies and evasion, FD. That's a pretty straight answer.

What do you think?

Back to the OP

I thought all muzzo females had to wear a burquas?

Valkie wrote on Mar 29^th, 2018 at 6:28pm:

Back to the OP I thought all muzzo females had to wear a burquas?

Not all - just the ones where the men's sect* is too small....... most get away with a head scarf, which is kinda like a nun's outfit.... no big deal really...

*"They said your WHAT was too small?"  - Castle Keep.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gO7uemm6Yo

Valkie wrote on Mar 29^th, 2018 at 6:28pm:

Back to the OP I thought all muzzo females had to wear a burquas?

Even the goats

Or is that why they wear them??????????