Quote:

SSM: High Court to hand down decision on same-sex marriage survey today Two groups challenged the plan as unconstitutional, taking particular aim at the way the survey would be funded.

Get Stuffed you Queer fags...  >:(

what a farce...

Queers, Like Leftwits... don't seem to like Democracy...

after all these years of Queers telling us that the LARGE MAJORITY of Australians are FOR SSM it seems they are scared shitless of a democratic vote on the subject....

WHY??

and don't give me that Money angle.. just put up your white flag if thats all you have...  ::)

the Queers just don't want you to find out that they've been lying all these years.. that in fact, ITS not a large majority in favour of it at all...

all this smoke screen is doing is taking up valuable time in Policies that should be getting discussed..

like our energy crisis for instance..

Queers are selfish commy arseholes...

get stuffed.. I'll be VOTING NO!!!!  >:(

and unlike you Queers and Leftwits.. I'll accept any decision on how the vote goes...

hear hear sir Mechanic,

also -  $122 million wasted on one lousy question about sodomites
when there are 100 questions more important.

6.22 am ... and mechanic's mind is on gay sex.

Speaks Volumes.

When gay men marry ~ another segment of the population rejecting his advances.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 6:32am:

$122 million wasted on one lousy question about sodomites

Again, Booby's unhealthy obsession with male to male anal sex (when nobody was even discussing that subject).

Is there a doctor in the house?

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 7:13am:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 6:32am: $122 million wasted on one lousy question about sodomites Again, Booby's unhealthy obsession with male to male anal sex (when nobody was even discussing that subject). Is there a doctor in the house?

Greggy is a confessed sodomite.

Sodomy isn't a crime Bobby.
Gay Jesus probably practiced it with his husband.

____ wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 7:31am:

Sodomy isn't a crime Bobby. Gay Jesus probably practiced it with his husband.

Blasphemy.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 8:03am:

____ wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 7:31am: Sodomy isn't a crime Bobby. Gay Jesus probably practiced it with his husband. Blasphemy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disciple_whom_Jesus_loved

Bad Luck Bobby.
Jesus was a sodomite.

Is that why god punished him?

Blasphemy.

The Spanish Inquisition would have burnt you at the stake.

____ wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 7:31am:

Sodomy isn't a crime Bobby.

And it has absolutely nothing to do with the SSM survey.

Why is Booby so obsessed with man to man anal sex?

Is he trying to tell us something?

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 5:22am:

Quote: SSM: High Court to hand down decision on same-sex marriage survey today Two groups challenged the plan as unconstitutional, taking particular aim at the way the survey would be funded. Get Stuffed you Queer fags...  >:( what a farce... Queers, Like Leftwits... don't seem to like Democracy... after all these years of Queers telling us that the LARGE MAJORITY of Australians are FOR SSM it seems they are scared shitless of a democratic vote on the subject.... WHY?? and don't give me that Money angle.. just put up your white flag if thats all you have...  ::) the Queers just don't want you to find out that they've been lying all these years.. that in fact, ITS not a large majority in favour of it at all... all this smoke screen is doing is taking up valuable time in Policies that should be getting discussed.. like our energy crisis for instance.. Queers are selfish commy arseholes... get stuffed.. I'll be VOTING NO!!!!  >:( and unlike you Queers and Leftwits.. I'll accept any decision on how the vote goes...

Gay and lesbians remind me on Muslims.

First they ask for tolerance, then acceptance and finally for conquering entire population.

Same-sex marriage: Public money to fund Yes campaign in ACT
ABC Radio Canberra

Gay ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr has copped a backlash over his move to contribute "significant" Government resources to campaigning for a Yes vote in the upcoming same-sex marriage postal survey.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/image/7980934-3x2-340x227.jpg

Mr Barr has secured the support of the ACT Legislative Assembly to use taxpayers' money to actively campaign in favour of same-sex marriage.

He said he wanted buses and flagpoles in Canberra to be turned into symbols of support for same-sex marriage.

The ACT Government is also considering creating rainbow roundabouts and commissioning rainbow-themed murals.

"There is no doubt that what lies ahead will be traumatic for some," Mr Barr said.
"For many people the concept of their relationship, their life, their family being the subject of discussion or debate or value judgement by everyone else is frankly an appalling concept."

But appearing on ABC radio to explain his position, Mr Barr was faced with incredulity from dozens of listeners both in favour and opposed to same-sex marriage.

"I'm a strong supporter of same-sex marriage but I just think it's a really big mistake for the Government to be using taxpayers' money to support one side of the argument," one caller said.

"I personally as a taxpayer ... object to my money being spent on this question, whether the Yes or the No vote," another said.

A third caller labelled the decision "morally wrong and outrageous".

Mr Barr said he did not have an exact figure for how much will be spent.

"This isn't a political issue, it's a human rights issue," he said.

"I imagine other state and territory governments will do similar things in coming weeks and months."
ACT Opposition Leader Alistair Coe said the Opposition did not support taxpayer resources being used for campaigning on either side of the debate.

"By the ACT Government joining and actively participating in the campaign to achieve marriage equality, this is politicising the public service," he said.

"I believe it is wrong to use the resources of government for such a campaign."

In 2012, the ACT became the first jurisdiction in Australia to legalise same-sex marriage, only to have the new legislation quashed by the High Court a week later.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-17/act-chief-minister-pushes-publicly-funded-same-sex-yes-campaign/8816478

capitosinora wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 9:52am:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 5:22am: Quote: SSM: High Court to hand down decision on same-sex marriage survey today Two groups challenged the plan as unconstitutional, taking particular aim at the way the survey would be funded. Get Stuffed you Queer fags...  >:( what a farce... Queers, Like Leftwits... don't seem to like Democracy... after all these years of Queers telling us that the LARGE MAJORITY of Australians are FOR SSM it seems they are scared shitless of a democratic vote on the subject.... WHY?? and don't give me that Money angle.. just put up your white flag if thats all you have...  ::) the Queers just don't want you to find out that they've been lying all these years.. that in fact, ITS not a large majority in favour of it at all... all this smoke screen is doing is taking up valuable time in Policies that should be getting discussed.. like our energy crisis for instance.. Queers are selfish commy arseholes... get stuffed.. I'll be VOTING NO!!!!  >:( and unlike you Queers and Leftwits.. I'll accept any decision on how the vote goes... Gay and lesbians remind me on Muslims. First they ask for tolerance, then acceptance and finally for conquering entire population. Same-sex marriage: Public money to fund Yes campaign in ACT ABC Radio Canberra Gay ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr has copped a backlash over his move to contribute "significant" Government resources to campaigning for a Yes vote in the upcoming same-sex marriage postal survey. http://www.abc.net.au/news/image/7980934-3x2-340x227.jpg Mr Barr has secured the support of the ACT Legislative Assembly to use taxpayers' money to actively campaign in favour of same-sex marriage. He said he wanted buses and flagpoles in Canberra to be turned into symbols of support for same-sex marriage. The ACT Government is also considering creating rainbow roundabouts and commissioning rainbow-themed murals. "There is no doubt that what lies ahead will be traumatic for some," Mr Barr said. "For many people the concept of their relationship, their life, their family being the subject of discussion or debate or value judgement by everyone else is frankly an appalling concept." But appearing on ABC radio to explain his position, Mr Barr was faced with incredulity from dozens of listeners both in favour and opposed to same-sex marriage. "I'm a strong supporter of same-sex marriage but I just think it's a really big mistake for the Government to be using taxpayers' money to support one side of the argument," one caller said. "I personally as a taxpayer ... object to my money being spent on this question, whether the Yes or the No vote," another said. A third caller labelled the decision "morally wrong and outrageous". Mr Barr said he did not have an exact figure for how much will be spent. "This isn't a political issue, it's a human rights issue," he said. "I imagine other state and territory governments will do similar things in coming weeks and months." ACT Opposition Leader Alistair Coe said the Opposition did not support taxpayer resources being used for campaigning on either side of the debate. "By the ACT Government joining and actively participating in the campaign to achieve marriage equality, this is politicising the public service," he said. "I believe it is wrong to use the resources of government for such a campaign." In 2012, the ACT became the first jurisdiction in Australia to legalise same-sex marriage, only to have the new legislation quashed by the High Court a week later. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-17/act-chief-minister-pushes-publicly-funded-same-sex-yes-campaign/8816478

oh no...

if they bully Australians out of this vote then expect a backlash..

but you are right.. they won't stop at this garbage... they are already trying to get rid of Fathers day...  >:(

and leftist councils in Melbourne are also using tax payers money for the Yes vote while the NO vote gets nothing..

also.. they provide FREE rooms to Yes voters in council buildings to organise their propaganda while if the NO voters want rooms then they have to pay for them..

so give the leftwits and poofters half a chance and the DISCRIMINATION starts in an avalanche !!!

What backlash are you predicting, Mechanic?

mothra wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 10:02am:

What backlash are you predicting, Mechanic?

if poofter bullies in state and local government discriminate and bully citizens out of their free speech then expect to see us at the ballot box..

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 10:09am:

mothra wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 10:02am: What backlash are you predicting, Mechanic? if poofter bullies in state and local government discriminate and bully citizens out of their free speech then expect to see us at the ballot box..

Well, that doesn't sound anything like bullying. Not even a little bit.

Have you been bullied, Mechanic? Is that why you're bullying?

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 10:00am:

... they are already trying to get rid of Fathers day...

Outrageous!

;D

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 10:09am:

mothra wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 10:02am: What backlash are you predicting, Mechanic? if poofter bullies in state and local government discriminate and bully citizens out of their free speech then expect to see us at the ballot box..

You do realise that with the right to free speech comes a duty to think before you speak right.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 10:50am:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 10:09am: mothra wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 10:02am: What backlash are you predicting, Mechanic? if poofter bullies in state and local government discriminate and bully citizens out of their free speech then expect to see us at the ballot box.. You do realise that with the right to free speech comes a duty to think before you speak right.

We're still working on getting Mechanic to think after he's spoken.

We'll work on prior consideration next.

I see the P word   and I dont even bother....hate threads dont interest me..

Neferti wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 11:16am:

Quote: Consider the legislative consequences. If we redefine marriage, the Attorney-General’s Department has advised that there would be approximately 60 consequential changes across 25 Commonwealth Acts. That’s before we even understand how change would impact state and territory law, particularly as the Marriage Act interacts with anti-discrimination, charity and inheritance law. http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/opinion/redefining-marriage-will-weaken-a-cornerstone-institution-of-our-culture-says-mp-andrew-hastie/news-story/36f020e7fe0975fb9193ac956705d160

The vote needed to be compulsory so everyone votes then we could have proven without a doubt that the majority of the population hates faggots.

Pity we can't round them up and gas them like in the good old days.  8-)

https://s25.postimg.org/lop8tu6yn/20767870_1293100750816882_3437854855636641282_n.jpg

Dr Mengele wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 11:51am:

The vote needed to be compulsory so everyone votes ...

It's not a vote - it's a survey.

If the legality of 'governing by survey' is knocked back by the High Court - it will be interesting to see just what Malcolm Turnbull's 'Plan C' turns out to be


A 'vox pop' carried out on shoppers, in suburban shopping malls - perhaps ? 

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 10:30am:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 10:00am: ... they are already trying to get rid of Fathers day...  Outrageous! ;D

But they WILL be forcing school boys to wear dresses to school
Look what happened in Scotland - when THEY legalised SSM




https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4023/4710099896_1ab339b7fb.jpg

Denizens Bobbie, and Mr. Hammer have taken umbrage?

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 5:22am:

Quote: SSM: High Court to hand down decision on same-sex marriage survey today Two groups challenged the plan as unconstitutional, taking particular aim at the way the survey would be funded. Get Stuffed you Queer fags...  >:( what a farce... Queers, Like Leftwits... don't seem to like Democracy... after all these years of Queers telling us that the LARGE MAJORITY of Australians are FOR SSM it seems they are scared shitless of a democratic vote on the subject.... WHY?? and don't give me that Money angle.. just put up your white flag if thats all you have...  ::) the Queers just don't want you to find out that they've been lying all these years.. that in fact, ITS not a large majority in favour of it at all... all this smoke screen is doing is taking up valuable time in Policies that should be getting discussed.. like our energy crisis for instance.. Queers are selfish commy arseholes... get stuffed.. I'll be VOTING NO!!!!  >:( and unlike you Queers and Leftwits.. I'll accept any decision on how the vote goes...

Look mate it's okay just come out of the closet it will be fine

Dr Mengele wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 11:51am:

The vote needed to be compulsory so everyone votes then we could have proven without a doubt that the majority of the population hates faggots. Pity we can't round them up and gas them like in the good old days.  8-)

;D

I remember years ago back in Tasmania ... the toilets in the Kat and Fiddle Maul had warning signs to poofs that if they get caught with any shenanigans within the toilets they'll be charged...

why do they hang around the toilets??  :-/

in Bendigo they used "hole saws" in the toilet doors ...  :o

disgusting creatures..

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 12:44pm:

Dr Mengele wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 11:51am: The vote needed to be compulsory so everyone votes then we could have proven without a doubt that the majority of the population hates faggots. Pity we can't round them up and gas them like in the good old days.  8-) ;D I remember years ago back in Tasmania ... the toilets in the Kat and Fiddle Maul had warning signs to poofs that if they get caught with any shenanigans within the toilets they'll be charged... why do they hang around the toilets??  :-/ in Bendigo they used "hole saws" in the toilet doors ...  :o disgusting creatures..

Hang em and hang em high.

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 12:44pm:

why do they hang around the toilets??  :-/ disgusting creatures..

Most single "out" gay dudes have no problems going to a gay bar to meet OTHER single "out" gay dudes - where the question "your place, or mine" eventuates

The "disgusting creatures" you refer to are generally married "men who have sex with men" - as they call themselves
They DON'T see themselves as 'gay'
And they can't bring a guy home with them
Their wives get a bit upset

"Out" gay guys have no reason to have sex in stinking toilets
Who'd choose a blend of domestos, piss and sh!t - over crisp, white, Egyptian cotton sheets and vanilla candles, if they didn't HAVE to ?

buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 1:35pm:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 12:44pm: why do they hang around the toilets??  :-/ disgusting creatures.. Most single "out" gay dudes have no problems going to a gay bar to meet OTHER single "out" gay dudes - where the question "your place, or mine" eventuates The "disgusting creatures" you refer to are generally married "men who have sex with men" - as they call themselves They DON'T see themselves as 'gay' And they can't bring a guy home with them Their wives get a bit upset "Out" gay guys have no reason to have sex in stinking toilets

If you are a bloke who has agreed to have another blokes dick in your mouth or up your arse, there absolutely no doubt about your sexuality and it isn't straight.


This is not something they can just 'self identify' as. They are as camp as a row of rubber tents.

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 1:40pm:

buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 1:35pm: President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 12:44pm: why do they hang around the toilets??  :-/ disgusting creatures.. Most single "out" gay dudes have no problems going to a gay bar to meet OTHER single "out" gay dudes - where the question "your place, or mine" eventuates The "disgusting creatures" you refer to are generally married "men who have sex with men" - as they call themselves They DON'T see themselves as 'gay' And they can't bring a guy home with them Their wives get a bit upset "Out" gay guys have no reason to have sex in stinking toilets If you are a bloke who has agreed to have another blokes dick in your mouth or up your arse, there absolutely no doubt about your sexuality and it isn't straight.

100% incorrect, as usual.

You're confusing sexual acts with sexuality.

Moreover, it has absolutely nothing to do with the SSM survey.

Try to stay on topic.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 1:54pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 1:40pm: buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 1:35pm: President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 12:44pm: why do they hang around the toilets??  :-/ disgusting creatures.. Most single "out" gay dudes have no problems going to a gay bar to meet OTHER single "out" gay dudes - where the question "your place, or mine" eventuates The "disgusting creatures" you refer to are generally married "men who have sex with men" - as they call themselves They DON'T see themselves as 'gay' And they can't bring a guy home with them Their wives get a bit upset "Out" gay guys have no reason to have sex in stinking toilets If you are a bloke who has agreed to have another blokes dick in your mouth or up your arse, there absolutely no doubt about your sexuality and it isn't straight. 100% incorrect, as usual. You're confusing sexual acts with sexuality. Moreover, it has absolutely nothing to do with the SSM survey. Try to stay on topic.

You would have quite the knowledge of anal and oral insertions of man meat wouldn't you?

Please regal us all about your 'non-homo' sexual exploits.  ;D ;D ;D


Yes I get how homos like you filled to the brim as it were 'self identify' as straight, but once you have gobble your first dick, it's off to the other team with you. You can 'self identify' over there.



It was buzz's reply that I was commenting on you fkken dolt, so fkk your "on topic" bullsh1t no-one gives a fkk what you have to say. Fkken clown.

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 2:01pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 1:54pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 1:40pm: buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 1:35pm: President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 12:44pm: why do they hang around the toilets??  :-/ disgusting creatures.. Most single "out" gay dudes have no problems going to a gay bar to meet OTHER single "out" gay dudes - where the question "your place, or mine" eventuates The "disgusting creatures" you refer to are generally married "men who have sex with men" - as they call themselves They DON'T see themselves as 'gay' And they can't bring a guy home with them Their wives get a bit upset "Out" gay guys have no reason to have sex in stinking toilets If you are a bloke who has agreed to have another blokes dick in your mouth or up your arse, there absolutely no doubt about your sexuality and it isn't straight. 100% incorrect, as usual. You're confusing sexual acts with sexuality. Moreover, it has absolutely nothing to do with the SSM survey. Try to stay on topic. You would have quite the knowledge of anal and oral insertions of man meat wouldn't you? Please regal us all about your 'non-homo' sexual exploits.  ;D ;D ;D Yes I get how homos like you filled to the brim as it were 'self identify' as straight, but once you have gobble your first dick, it's off to the other team with you. You can 'self identify' over there. It was buzz's reply that I was commenting on you fkken dolt, so fkk your "on topic" bullsh1t no-one gives a fkk what you have to say. Fkken clown.

You're confusing sexual acts with sexuality.

Moreover, it has absolutely nothing to do with the SSM survey.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 2:02pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 2:01pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 1:54pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 1:40pm: buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 1:35pm: President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 12:44pm: why do they hang around the toilets??  :-/ disgusting creatures.. Most single "out" gay dudes have no problems going to a gay bar to meet OTHER single "out" gay dudes - where the question "your place, or mine" eventuates The "disgusting creatures" you refer to are generally married "men who have sex with men" - as they call themselves They DON'T see themselves as 'gay' And they can't bring a guy home with them Their wives get a bit upset "Out" gay guys have no reason to have sex in stinking toilets If you are a bloke who has agreed to have another blokes dick in your mouth or up your arse, there absolutely no doubt about your sexuality and it isn't straight. 100% incorrect, as usual. You're confusing sexual acts with sexuality. Moreover, it has absolutely nothing to do with the SSM survey. Try to stay on topic. You would have quite the knowledge of anal and oral insertions of man meat wouldn't you? Please regal us all about your 'non-homo' sexual exploits.  ;D ;D ;D Yes I get how homos like you filled to the brim as it were 'self identify' as straight, but once you have gobble your first dick, it's off to the other team with you. You can 'self identify' over there. It was buzz's reply that I was commenting on you fkken dolt, so fkk your "on topic" bullsh1t no-one gives a fkk what you have to say. Fkken clown. You're confusing sexual acts with sexuality. Moreover, it has absolutely nothing to do with the SSM survey.

You mean like your replies have nothing to do with this particular thread / conversation. How you just jumped in and behaved like a fkwit troll, you mean like that?

High court challenge didnt succeed, we'll get the letters and vote Yes on Sep 12.

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 2:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 2:02pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 2:01pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 1:54pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 1:40pm: buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 1:35pm: President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 12:44pm: why do they hang around the toilets??  :-/ disgusting creatures.. Most single "out" gay dudes have no problems going to a gay bar to meet OTHER single "out" gay dudes - where the question "your place, or mine" eventuates The "disgusting creatures" you refer to are generally married "men who have sex with men" - as they call themselves They DON'T see themselves as 'gay' And they can't bring a guy home with them Their wives get a bit upset "Out" gay guys have no reason to have sex in stinking toilets If you are a bloke who has agreed to have another blokes dick in your mouth or up your arse, there absolutely no doubt about your sexuality and it isn't straight. 100% incorrect, as usual. You're confusing sexual acts with sexuality. Moreover, it has absolutely nothing to do with the SSM survey. Try to stay on topic. You would have quite the knowledge of anal and oral insertions of man meat wouldn't you? Please regal us all about your 'non-homo' sexual exploits.  ;D ;D ;D Yes I get how homos like you filled to the brim as it were 'self identify' as straight, but once you have gobble your first dick, it's off to the other team with you. You can 'self identify' over there. It was buzz's reply that I was commenting on you fkken dolt, so fkk your "on topic" bullsh1t no-one gives a fkk what you have to say. Fkken clown. You're confusing sexual acts with sexuality. Moreover, it has absolutely nothing to do with the SSM survey. You mean like your replies have nothing to do with this particular thread / conversation. How you just jumped in and behaved like a fkwit troll, you mean like that?

I mean like, you're confusing sexual acts with sexuality.

Moreover, it has absolutely nothing to do with the SSM survey.

The Vote IS Going Ahead...

High Court Sham was thrown out...

Let's Vote People....

Democracy Has Prevailed 😄

It's not a vote. It's a survey. Like when you're asked what washing detergent you like best.

How many times do you need that explained to you?

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 3:30pm:

The Vote IS Going Ahead... High Court Sham was thrown out... Let's Vote People.... Democracy Has Prevailed 😄

It's a survey, not a vote.

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 3:30pm:

The Vote IS Going Ahead... High Court Sham was thrown out... Let's Vote People.... Democracy Has Prevailed 😄

BRING IT ON............................ 8-)

Ajax wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 3:35pm:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 3:30pm: The Vote IS Going Ahead... High Court Sham was thrown out... Let's Vote People.... Democracy Has Prevailed 😄 BRING IT ON............................ 8-)

There's no vote.

It's a survey.

What's going to be hilarious is all the foaming from the homos after the survey because they still can't get married.

Bill might rubber stamp it but not the Liberals.  8-)

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 4:15pm:

Ajax wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 3:35pm: President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 3:30pm: The Vote IS Going Ahead... High Court Sham was thrown out... Let's Vote People.... Democracy Has Prevailed 😄 BRING IT ON............................ 8-) There's no vote. It's a survey.

Let the people decide in a binding vote.... that might provoke secession and civil war....

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 1:40pm:

buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 1:35pm: President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 12:44pm: why do they hang around the toilets??  :-/ disgusting creatures.. Most single "out" gay dudes have no problems going to a gay bar to meet OTHER single "out" gay dudes - where the question "your place, or mine" eventuates The "disgusting creatures" you refer to are generally married "men who have sex with men" - as they call themselves They DON'T see themselves as 'gay' And they can't bring a guy home with them Their wives get a bit upset "Out" gay guys have no reason to have sex in stinking toilets If you are a bloke who has agreed to have another blokes dick in your mouth or up your arse, there absolutely no doubt about your sexuality and it isn't straight.

Try telling married men who have sex with other married men in pubic toilets that

do you think these gay righters.. have a Plan B..

they seem hell bent on stopping this postal...they go out on the 12th....so not much time left.

cods wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 6:13pm:

do you think these gay righters.. have a Plan B.. they seem hell bent on stopping this postal...they go out on the 12th....so not much time left.

they are done and dusted..

even if they happened to get a Gay Judge and ruled against this postal VOTE the Libs already had a plan B and it would have gone ahead anyways...

all they had to do is switch where the funding was coming from...

now the Poofs have to pay the Libs/tax payers legal bills..  ;D

Can't wait to VOTE>>  :)

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 8:07pm:

cods wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 6:13pm: do you think these gay righters.. have a Plan B.. they seem hell bent on stopping this postal...they go out on the 12th....so not much time left. they are done and dusted.. even if they happened to get a Gay Judge and ruled against this postal VOTE the Libs already had a plan B and it would have gone ahead anyways... all they had to do is switch where the funding was coming from... now the Poofs have to pay the Libs/tax payers legal bills..  ;D Can't wait to VOTE>>  :)

There is no postal vote.

Can't Wait to VOTE >>>  :)

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 8:10pm:

Can't Wait to VOTE >>>  :)

You'll be waiting a very long time.

Then again, it's not like you have anything better to do.

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 8:10pm:

Can't Wait to VOTE >>>  :)

You mean conduct a survey

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 8:41pm:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 8:10pm: Can't Wait to VOTE >>>  :) You mean conduct a survey

I quite honestly think that he doesn't know the difference.

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 2:01pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 1:54pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 1:40pm: buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 1:35pm: President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 12:44pm: why do they hang around the toilets??  :-/ disgusting creatures.. Most single "out" gay dudes have no problems going to a gay bar to meet OTHER single "out" gay dudes - where the question "your place, or mine" eventuates The "disgusting creatures" you refer to are generally married "men who have sex with men" - as they call themselves They DON'T see themselves as 'gay' And they can't bring a guy home with them Their wives get a bit upset "Out" gay guys have no reason to have sex in stinking toilets If you are a bloke who has agreed to have another blokes dick in your mouth or up your arse, there absolutely no doubt about your sexuality and it isn't straight. 100% incorrect, as usual. You're confusing sexual acts with sexuality. Moreover, it has absolutely nothing to do with the SSM survey. Try to stay on topic. You would have quite the knowledge of anal and oral insertions of man meat wouldn't you? Please regal us all about your 'non-homo' sexual exploits.  ;D ;D ;D Yes I get how homos like you filled to the brim as it were 'self identify' as straight, but once you have gobble your first dick, it's off to the other team with you. You can 'self identify' over there. It was buzz's reply that I was commenting on you fkken dolt, so fkk your "on topic" bullsh1t no-one gives a fkk what you have to say. Fkken clown.

Well written BigOl,
you get first prize.

Yes... and first prize is a night out with groggy

Second prize is two nights out with groggy  ;D

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 8^th, 2017 at 6:51am:

Yes... and first prize is a night out with groggy Second prize is two nights out with groggy  ;D

No way - Greggy is as queer as a $3 bill.

[urlhttp://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/samesex-marriage-supporters-count-cost-of-postal-vote-stoush/news-story/814cab331671d06bea542c6736afc124][/url]


SAME-SEX marriage campaigners face a court bill of well over $200,000 after failing to overturn the Turnbull government’s postal survey in the High Court.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) will begin mailing out surveys from next Tuesday, as both the “Yes” and “No” sides of the argument begin ramping up their campaigns.

Government sources told The Daily Telegraph their costs would exceed $300,000, with those bringing the failed challenge ordered to pay back that amount. It is likely a final order will be made of between half and two-thirds of total costs.

n a unanimous decision, the full bench of the High Court dismissed both cases against the $122 million survey, one brought by Tasmanian independent MP Andrew Wilkie, advocate Felicity Marlowe and the Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays.

The other was from Australian Marriage Equality and Greens senator Janet Rice.





well split 3 ways it shouldnt be too hard..

after bitching about the cost of the postal.... they would dare welch on this would they?

hilarious!

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/samesex-marriage-supporters-count-cost-of-postal-vote-stoush/news-story/814cab331671d06bea542c6736afc124

cods wrote on Sep 8^th, 2017 at 7:27am:

[urlhttp://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/samesex-marriage-supporters-count-cost-of-postal-vote-stoush/news-story/814cab331671d06bea542c6736afc124][/url] SAME-SEX marriage campaigners face a court bill of well over $200,000 after failing to overturn the Turnbull government’s postal survey in the High Court. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) will begin mailing out surveys from next Tuesday, as both the “Yes” and “No” sides of the argument begin ramping up their campaigns. Government sources told The Daily Telegraph their costs would exceed $300,000, with those bringing the failed challenge ordered to pay back that amount. It is likely a final order will be made of between half and two-thirds of total costs. n a unanimous decision, the full bench of the High Court dismissed both cases against the $122 million survey, one brought by Tasmanian independent MP Andrew Wilkie, advocate Felicity Marlowe and the Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays. The other was from Australian Marriage Equality and Greens senator Janet Rice. well split 3 ways it shouldnt be too hard.. after bitching about the cost of the postal.... they would dare welch on this would they? hilarious!

I hope they go bankrupt.... but people can now see who NOT to vote for..

traitors the lot of them...  >:(

thanks for the article cods...

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 10:09am:

mothra wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 10:02am: What backlash are you predicting, Mechanic? if poofter bullies in state and local government discriminate and bully citizens out of their free speech then expect to see us at the ballot box..

“My daughter has a gender!” Parents angry over introduction of gender neutral school uniforms

https://cdn.rt.com/files/2017.09/original/59aff956fc7e93525a8b456b.jpg


An East Sussex school has banned skirts in order to make its uniform gender neutral, accommodating transgender students.
Read more
Mike SegarGender neutral school: Trans rights campaigner defends widely criticized BBC show
Priory School, a mixed co-ed institution in Lewes with more than 1,100 pupils on the register, has ordered all new Year 7 pupils to wear gray trousers instead of gray skirts. Students in Year 8 to Year 11 are welcome to adopt the new uniform.

Head teacher Tony Smith brought in the rule following complaints from parents about “short skirts” and to make the uniform gender neutral for transgender students.

“Pupils have been saying why do boys have to wear ties and girl’s don’t, and girls have different uniform to boys. So we decided to have the same uniform for everybody from Year 7,” he said, according to Metro.

“Another issue that we have is a small, but increasing number of transgender students, and therefore having the same uniform is important for them.”

A number of parents reportedly feel angry that trousers have been enforced at the school, which is rated ‘good’ by Ofsted and was attended by ‘Good Morning Britain’ host Piers Morgan.

One mother, who spoke to the Telegraph but did not want to be named, said: “My daughter and her friends are appalled by this.

“The school is creating a hostile environment for girls by treating their views with contempt: there was no consultation. It was just imposed by the head.

“The hypocrisy is what gets me the most. If girls dressing differently than boys is now to be considered sexist, then it is equally sexist to have female teachers wearing skirts and not wearing ties.

“If they want this, they must live the values they force on others and go fully gender free.”

Another parent, mother-of-four Lara, who did not want to give her surname, told the newspaper: “My daughter said she has got a gender and it’s female, so being gender neutral when she has a gender is a big deal for her, as she is proud to be a girl.

“I’m not saying the skirts being worn last year weren’t obscene, but it hasn’t stopped the issues as those children are in the school for the next four years and are not being made to wear trousers.

“If the head teacher was going to bring this in, he should have done it across all years.”

https://www.rt.com/uk/402196-uniform-transgender-neutral-skirt/

http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/push-for-nsw-public-schools-to-introduce-genderneutral-uniform-policies-20170403-gvckz9.html

Push for NSW public schools to introduce gender-neutral uniform policies

capitosinora wrote on Sep 8^th, 2017 at 10:07am:

http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/push-for-nsw-public-schools-to-introduce-genderneutral-uniform-policies-20170403-gvckz9.html Push for NSW public schools to introduce gender-neutral uniform policies

like I've said before as have others.. it won't stop at the POOFTER vote...

they are trying to white ant our way of life...

Gays only get to be indulged in Western and other White cultures.
But then again, the White culture invented 'sex changes' because white men (majority) need to become women (then run to the nearest Black penis).
Black Groom, White Bride.

White Men are all Gay.
Definitely not the 'Dominant' gene.  ;D

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 8^th, 2017 at 11:35am:

capitosinora wrote on Sep 8th, 2017 at 10:07am: http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/push-for-nsw-public-schools-to-introduce-genderneutral-uniform-policies-20170403-gvckz9.html Push for NSW public schools to introduce gender-neutral uniform policies like I've said before as have others.. it won't stop at the POOFTER vote... they are trying to white ant our way of life...

;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 8^th, 2017 at 11:41am:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 8th, 2017 at 11:35am: capitosinora wrote on Sep 8th, 2017 at 10:07am: http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/push-for-nsw-public-schools-to-introduce-genderneutral-uniform-policies-20170403-gvckz9.html Push for NSW public schools to introduce gender-neutral uniform policies like I've said before as have others.. it won't stop at the POOFTER vote... they are trying to white ant our way of life... ;D

It's not funny Greggy.
The next thing will be practical homo activity lessons.

White boys need to be taught in school that they are destined to get sex changes into females and marry a darkie male like the 'white brides' they are.  ;D

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8^th, 2017 at 11:57am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 8th, 2017 at 11:41am: President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 8th, 2017 at 11:35am: capitosinora wrote on Sep 8th, 2017 at 10:07am: http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/push-for-nsw-public-schools-to-introduce-genderneutral-uniform-policies-20170403-gvckz9.html Push for NSW public schools to introduce gender-neutral uniform policies like I've said before as have others.. it won't stop at the POOFTER vote... they are trying to white ant our way of life... ;D It's not funny Greggy. The next thing will be practical homo activity lessons.

Congratulations you have found the slippery slope logical fallacy.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 8^th, 2017 at 11:57am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 8th, 2017 at 11:41am: President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 8th, 2017 at 11:35am: capitosinora wrote on Sep 8th, 2017 at 10:07am: http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/push-for-nsw-public-schools-to-introduce-genderneutral-uniform-policies-20170403-gvckz9.html Push for NSW public schools to introduce gender-neutral uniform policies like I've said before as have others.. it won't stop at the POOFTER vote... they are trying to white ant our way of life... ;D It's not funny Greggy. The next thing will be practical homo activity lessons.

You mean, two lovely young lesbians in silky lingerie kissing and scissoring?

That's what you meant, wasn't it Booby?

Please tell me you weren't thinking about male to male anal sex again.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

capitosinora wrote on Sep 8^th, 2017 at 10:05am:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 10:09am: mothra wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 10:02am: What backlash are you predicting, Mechanic? if poofter bullies in state and local government discriminate and bully citizens out of their free speech then expect to see us at the ballot box.. “My daughter has a gender!” Parents angry over introduction of gender neutral school uniforms https://cdn.rt.com/files/2017.09/original/59aff956fc7e93525a8b456b.jpg An East Sussex school has banned skirts in order to make its uniform gender neutral, accommodating transgender students. Read more Mike SegarGender neutral school: Trans rights campaigner defends widely criticized BBC show Priory School, a mixed co-ed institution in Lewes with more than 1,100 pupils on the register, has ordered all new Year 7 pupils to wear gray trousers instead of gray skirts. Students in Year 8 to Year 11 are welcome to adopt the new uniform. Head teacher Tony Smith brought in the rule following complaints from parents about “short skirts” and to make the uniform gender neutral for transgender students. “Pupils have been saying why do boys have to wear ties and girl’s don’t, and girls have different uniform to boys. So we decided to have the same uniform for everybody from Year 7,” he said, according to Metro. “Another issue that we have is a small, but increasing number of transgender students, and therefore having the same uniform is important for them.” A number of parents reportedly feel angry that trousers have been enforced at the school, which is rated ‘good’ by Ofsted and was attended by ‘Good Morning Britain’ host Piers Morgan. One mother, who spoke to the Telegraph but did not want to be named, said: “My daughter and her friends are appalled by this. “The school is creating a hostile environment for girls by treating their views with contempt: there was no consultation. It was just imposed by the head. “The hypocrisy is what gets me the most. If girls dressing differently than boys is now to be considered sexist, then it is equally sexist to have female teachers wearing skirts and not wearing ties. “If they want this, they must live the values they force on others and go fully gender free.” Another parent, mother-of-four Lara, who did not want to give her surname, told the newspaper: “My daughter said she has got a gender and it’s female, so being gender neutral when she has a gender is a big deal for her, as she is proud to be a girl. “I’m not saying the skirts being worn last year weren’t obscene, but it hasn’t stopped the issues as those children are in the school for the next four years and are not being made to wear trousers. “If the head teacher was going to bring this in, he should have done it across all years.” https://www.rt.com/uk/402196-uniform-transgender-neutral-skirt/

I would have thought    the boys would prefer to wear skirts.....I find is sexist for the H.M.  to decide trousers...and not skirts... ::) ::) ::) ::)

its only a guess mind.. but I feel there are more transgender males than females....

meaning more males preferring to dress and look like girls...

how about we dont have mixed schools anymore....then the trannies can have their own little world where they wont have to feel out of place.. >:( >:(

cods wrote on Sep 8^th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

capitosinora wrote on Sep 8th, 2017 at 10:05am: President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 10:09am: mothra wrote on Sep 7th, 2017 at 10:02am: What backlash are you predicting, Mechanic? if poofter bullies in state and local government discriminate and bully citizens out of their free speech then expect to see us at the ballot box.. “My daughter has a gender!” Parents angry over introduction of gender neutral school uniforms https://cdn.rt.com/files/2017.09/original/59aff956fc7e93525a8b456b.jpg An East Sussex school has banned skirts in order to make its uniform gender neutral, accommodating transgender students. Read more Mike SegarGender neutral school: Trans rights campaigner defends widely criticized BBC show Priory School, a mixed co-ed institution in Lewes with more than 1,100 pupils on the register, has ordered all new Year 7 pupils to wear gray trousers instead of gray skirts. Students in Year 8 to Year 11 are welcome to adopt the new uniform. Head teacher Tony Smith brought in the rule following complaints from parents about “short skirts” and to make the uniform gender neutral for transgender students. “Pupils have been saying why do boys have to wear ties and girl’s don’t, and girls have different uniform to boys. So we decided to have the same uniform for everybody from Year 7,” he said, according to Metro. “Another issue that we have is a small, but increasing number of transgender students, and therefore having the same uniform is important for them.” A number of parents reportedly feel angry that trousers have been enforced at the school, which is rated ‘good’ by Ofsted and was attended by ‘Good Morning Britain’ host Piers Morgan. One mother, who spoke to the Telegraph but did not want to be named, said: “My daughter and her friends are appalled by this. “The school is creating a hostile environment for girls by treating their views with contempt: there was no consultation. It was just imposed by the head. “The hypocrisy is what gets me the most. If girls dressing differently than boys is now to be considered sexist, then it is equally sexist to have female teachers wearing skirts and not wearing ties. “If they want this, they must live the values they force on others and go fully gender free.” Another parent, mother-of-four Lara, who did not want to give her surname, told the newspaper: “My daughter said she has got a gender and it’s female, so being gender neutral when she has a gender is a big deal for her, as she is proud to be a girl. “I’m not saying the skirts being worn last year weren’t obscene, but it hasn’t stopped the issues as those children are in the school for the next four years and are not being made to wear trousers. “If the head teacher was going to bring this in, he should have done it across all years.” https://www.rt.com/uk/402196-uniform-transgender-neutral-skirt/ I would have thought    the boys would prefer to wear skirts.....

It's more practical for them to do so.

They need to keep their testicles cool, so that they aren't shooting blanks later in life.

Let the kids wear what they want.

Oh dear good to see the High Court got it right and boo hoo for all the PC progressive Luvvies.

There will be tears.

All the little luvvies will be crying in their chardonnay when they get 75% voting NO.

Poor dears.

Now we just need to get them all to mental institutions and get this little identity problem sorted out

Who knows, perhaps with a bit of work they could be NORMAL.

Jasin wrote on Sep 8^th, 2017 at 11:40am:

Gays only get to be indulged in Western and other White cultures. But then again, the White culture invented 'sex changes' because white men (majority) need to become women (then run to the nearest Black penis). Black Groom, White Bride. White Men are all Gay. Definitely not the 'Dominant' gene.  ;D

Get f*#ked ... I'm not gay  :D

Gnads wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 1:51pm:

Jasin wrote on Sep 8th, 2017 at 11:40am: Gays only get to be indulged in Western and other White cultures. But then again, the White culture invented 'sex changes' because white men (majority) need to become women (then run to the nearest Black penis). Black Groom, White Bride. White Men are all Gay. Definitely not the 'Dominant' gene.  ;D Get f*#ked ... I'm not gay  :D

" ... a previous study from 1996 had found that homophobic yet self-identified heterosexual men showed an "increase in penile erection," in response to gay male erotica – significantly more so than non-homophobic heterosexual men."