If you value men being men and women being women, vote NO.

If you want boys to be boys and girls to be girls, vote NO.

If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, vote NO.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:14pm:

If you value men being men and women being women, vote NO. If you want boys to be boys and girls to be girls, vote NO. If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, vote NO.

Channelling Tony Abbott, are we?

I'm voting yes

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:14pm:

If you want boys to be boys and girls to be girls, vote NO.

Why did you involve children in this discussion?

I'm curious.

If political correctness has gone to far then here is a chance to voice your opinion in secret, don't waste this chance, it may never come around again. Vote NO ffs.

Vote for yourself. Vote for you.

If you are a homo who wants to get married, vote for that.

If you are a normal person, vote no.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:30pm:

Vote for yourself. Vote for you. If you are a homo who wants to get married, vote for that. If you are a normal person, vote no.

Looks like Sprint will be voting 'yes'.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:30pm:

Vote for yourself. Vote for you. If you are a homo who wants to get married, vote for that. If you are a normal person, vote no.

If that was the case it would be a resounding 99% victory to the NO case, a certain element in the community seems hell bent on catering to the queer as anything minority groups for some unknown reason, maybe an unhappy childhood or perhaps some psychological impairment.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:32pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 8:30pm: Vote for yourself. Vote for you. If you are a homo who wants to get married, vote for that. If you are a normal person, vote no. Looks like Sprint will be voting 'yes'.

Should we help Sprint out and vote 'yes' then?

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:30pm:

Vote for yourself. Vote for you. If you are a homo who wants to get married, vote for that. If you are a normal person, vote no.

I agree Sprint,
I'm voting no because I do not give my approval or consent
for men to sodomise each others backsides like animals or beasts.

It's revolting & disgusting.
Only 150 years ago you could be hanged by the neck until dead in most countries in the world -
including Australia - for such behavior.
To think that we should be approving this now is beyond comprehension.

If you value equality and the right to choose vote yes!!!

If you want everyone to be treated equal under the law vote yes!!!

If you want a future where freedom is placed before prejudice vote yes!!!

::) ::) ::)

The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law.
Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC)

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:58pm:

If you value equality and the right to choose vote yes!!! If you want everyone to be treated equal under the law vote yes!!! If you want a future where freedom is placed before prejudice vote yes!!! ::) ::) ::) The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law. Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC)

Aristotle! how would he go these days, flailing in the quagmire I would suspect, but that's not important right now.

Johnnie wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 9:13pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 8:58pm: If you value equality and the right to choose vote yes!!! If you want everyone to be treated equal under the law vote yes!!! If you want a future where freedom is placed before prejudice vote yes!!! ::) ::) ::) The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law. Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC) Aristotle! how would he go these days, flailing in the quagmire I would suspect, but that's not important right now.

He would probably vote for equality like all free thinking people???

:-? :-? :-?

Yes

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 9:17pm:

Johnnie wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 9:13pm: philperth2010 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 8:58pm: If you value equality and the right to choose vote yes!!! If you want everyone to be treated equal under the law vote yes!!! If you want a future where freedom is placed before prejudice vote yes!!! ::) ::) ::) The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law. Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC) Aristotle! how would he go these days, flailing in the quagmire I would suspect, but that's not important right now. He would probably vote for equality like all free thinking people??? :-? :-? :-?

Equality has certain limitations, certain social demands, for example we don't allow beastiality, its not a free for all.

Quote:

Normal People should vote NO

Following that rule almost everyone here is obviously voting yes, normal holds a very small minority in this place.

Dnarever wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 9:38pm:

Quote: Normal People should vote NO Following that rule almost everyone here is obviously voting yes, normal holds a very small minority in this place.

Ducks don't count.

Johnnie wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 9:29pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 9:17pm: Johnnie wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 9:13pm: philperth2010 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 8:58pm: If you value equality and the right to choose vote yes!!! If you want everyone to be treated equal under the law vote yes!!! If you want a future where freedom is placed before prejudice vote yes!!! ::) ::) ::) The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law. Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC) Aristotle! how would he go these days, flailing in the quagmire I would suspect, but that's not important right now. He would probably vote for equality like all free thinking people??? :-? :-? :-? Equality has certain limitations, certain social demands, for example we don't allow beastiality, its not a free for all.

What does your comment have to do with allowing same sex marriage....Homosexuality is not a crime yet you conflate irrelevant bullshit to prove what exactly???

:-? :-? :-?

You Homophobes are so out of touch with reality. The Yes campaign has the media on its side, so bend over and take it like a man.

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 9:43pm:

Johnnie wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 9:29pm: philperth2010 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 9:17pm: Johnnie wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 9:13pm: philperth2010 wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 8:58pm: If you value equality and the right to choose vote yes!!! If you want everyone to be treated equal under the law vote yes!!! If you want a future where freedom is placed before prejudice vote yes!!! ::) ::) ::) The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law. Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC) Aristotle! how would he go these days, flailing in the quagmire I would suspect, but that's not important right now. He would probably vote for equality like all free thinking people??? :-? :-? :-? Equality has certain limitations, certain social demands, for example we don't allow beastiality, its not a free for all. What does your comment have to do with allowing same sex marriage....Homosexuality is not a crime yet you conflate irrelevant bullshit to prove what exactly??? :-? :-? :-?

To merely point out limitations are applicable and weird behavior will not be tolerated.

Johnnie wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:52pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 8:30pm: Vote for yourself. Vote for you. If you are a homo who wants to get married, vote for that. If you are a normal person, vote no. If that was the case it would be a resounding 99% victory to the NO case, a certain element in the community seems hell bent on catering to the queer as anything minority groups for some unknown reason, maybe an unhappy childhood or perhaps some psychological impairment.

yes, that 'certain element in the community' have used false propaganda to push everyone into the mindset that we should vote for what other people want, we should vote for who tells the nicest story.

that does not work.

vote for yourself.

issuevoter wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 9:54pm:

You Homophobes are so out of touch with reality. The Yes campaign has the media on its side, so bend over and take it like a man.

The media worked well with the silent majority in the US election didn't it.

Normal People should vote NO

I'm sure that they both will.

Dnarever wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 10:15pm:

Normal People should vote NO I'm sure that they both will.

What do you mean Duck.

Dnarever wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 10:15pm:

Normal People should vote NO I'm sure that they both will.

;D

Its time wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 10:22pm:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 10:15pm: Normal People should vote NO I'm sure that they both will. ;D

Have you heard the one about the horse walking into the bar.

issuevoter wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 9:54pm:

You Homophobes are so out of touch with reality. The Yes campaign has the media on its side, so bend over and take it like a man.

The media onside?  That's a good reason to vote NO.... if those d1cks want it, it can't be good.  Bloody heterophobes....

Why are the Lefties so keen on this sick SSM rubbish ?

juliar wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 8:55am:

Why are the Lefties so keen on this sick SSM rubbish ?

It annoys you.

That's good enough reason.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:54pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 8:30pm: Vote for yourself. Vote for you. If you are a homo who wants to get married, vote for that. If you are a normal person, vote no. I agree Sprint, I'm voting no because I do not give my approval or consent for men to sodomise each others backsides like animals or beasts. It's revolting & disgusting. Only 150 years ago you could be hanged by the neck until dead in most countries in the world - including Australia - for such behavior. To think that we should be approving this now is beyond comprehension.

Doesn't anyone agree with me?

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 9:16am:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 8:54pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 8:30pm: Vote for yourself. Vote for you. If you are a homo who wants to get married, vote for that. If you are a normal person, vote no. I agree Sprint, I'm voting no because I do not give my approval or consent for men to sodomise each others backsides like animals or beasts. It's revolting & disgusting. Only 150 years ago you could be hanged by the neck until dead in most countries in the world - including Australia - for such behavior. To think that we should be approving this now is beyond comprehension. Doesn't anyone agree with me?

Everyone agrees that you have no idea what SSM is, and that you are obsessed with male to male anal sex, yes.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 9:18am:

Everyone agrees that you have no idea what SSM is, and that you are obsessed with male to male anal sex, yes.

OK - now you're gunna tell me that they just hold hands.

Greggy - they're sodomites.

Medically: Putting a penis inside a Rectum results in Urinary Tract Infections (often) because of the 'bacteria' in the Rectum. Then the penis is often put in the mouth and in regards to Hetero couples who practice 'anal-sex' the bacteria is transferred to the Vagina where infection eventually also occurs. Anal-sex also results in the eventual damage to the rectum area which results in it needing 'repair' (I used to watch these ops in theatre where the patient is laid bent over and the rectum pulled out to be repaired). Later in life, Continence Pads are a common need because the rectum muscles are no longer strong enough to 'hold' it in.
Basically - its a result of 'spreading bacteria' from the Rectum.
Really a very 'dirty' expression of sex, if you call it that.
It's not proven, but the possibility of this Bacteria into other anus's and vaginas may be the 'trigger' to more serious infections that come under such things as The Clap and other STD's.

Just because it can, doesn't mean it should.

We could always tell the guy who goes down on his female partner at work. He was always a C-word  :P

Jasin wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 9:30am:

Medically: Putting a penis inside a Rectum results in Urinary Tract Infections (often) because of the 'bacteria' in the Rectum. Then the penis is often put in the mouth and in regards to Hetero couples who practice 'anal-sex' the bacteria is transferred to the Vagina where infection eventually also occurs. Anal-sex also results in the eventual damage to the rectum area which results in it needing 'repair' (I used to watch these ops in theatre where the patient is laid bent over and the rectum pulled out to be repaired). Later in life, Continence Pads are a common need because the rectum muscles are no longer strong enough to 'hold' it in. Basically - its a result of 'spreading bacteria' from the Rectum. Really a very 'dirty' expression of sex, if you call it that. It's not proven, but the possibility of this Bacteria into other anus's and vaginas may be the 'trigger' to more serious infections that come under such things as The Clap and other STD's. Just because it can, doesn't mean it should. We could always tell the guy who goes down on his female partner at work. He was always a C-word  :P

And yet they never mention that in parliament.

If you support Voluntary Euthanasia.

Vote Yes to Marriage Equality, so we can then can have a postal survey for V.E.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 9:23am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 9:18am: Everyone agrees that you have no idea what SSM is, and that you are obsessed with male to male anal sex, yes. OK - now you're gunna tell me that they just hold hands. Greggy - they're sodomites.

SSM has nothing to do with male to male anal sex.

Your obsession with that subject is becoming quite a concern, Booby.

Jasin wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 9:30am:

Medically: Putting a penis inside a Rectum results in Urinary Tract Infections (often) because of the 'bacteria' in the Rectum. Then the penis is often put in the mouth and in regards to Hetero couples who practice 'anal-sex' the bacteria is transferred to the Vagina where infection eventually also occurs. Anal-sex also results in the eventual damage to the rectum area which results in it needing 'repair' (I used to watch these ops in theatre where the patient is laid bent over and the rectum pulled out to be repaired). Later in life, Continence Pads are a common need because the rectum muscles are no longer strong enough to 'hold' it in. Basically - its a result of 'spreading bacteria' from the Rectum. Really a very 'dirty' expression of sex, if you call it that. It's not proven, but the possibility of this Bacteria into other anus's and vaginas may be the 'trigger' to more serious infections that come under such things as The Clap and other STD's. Just because it can, doesn't mean it should. We could always tell the guy who goes down on his female partner at work. He was always a C-word

Off topic.

Try to remain focused.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 9:38am:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 9:23am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 9:18am: Everyone agrees that you have no idea what SSM is, and that you are obsessed with male to male anal sex, yes. OK - now you're gunna tell me that they just hold hands. Greggy - they're sodomites. SSM has nothing to do with male to male anal sex. Your obsession with that subject is becoming quite a concern, Booby.

It's the painful truth that is never mentioned in the debate in parliament.
All they talk about is love not arse banging.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 9:41am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 9:38am: Bobby. wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 9:23am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 9:18am: Everyone agrees that you have no idea what SSM is, and that you are obsessed with male to male anal sex, yes. OK - now you're gunna tell me that they just hold hands. Greggy - they're sodomites. SSM has nothing to do with male to male anal sex. Your obsession with that subject is becoming quite a concern, Booby. It's the painful truth that is never mentioned in the debate in parliament. All they talk about is love not arse banging.

Childish, off topic garbage.

Stay on topic, Booby.

We will have marriage equality before year is finished

Its time wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 10:16am:

We will have marriage equality before year is finished

What bloke will you marry?

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 10:21am:

Its time wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 10:16am: We will have marriage equality before year is finished What bloke will you marry?

I'm flattered booby but I've been with my wife for nearly 30 years

I will vote yes.  Because I value humans being humans.

In the very unlikely event YES happens it will open up the Greeny political correctness flood gates.

Perhaps THIS is why the Lefties are supporting YES ?   Or maybe they just don't have a clue and are just being misled by the sick GetUp! lying propaganda.

juliar wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 10:40am:

In the very unlikely event YES happens it will open up the Greeny political correctness flood gates.

It'll do more than that.

If same sex couples are allowed to marry, it'll be the end of the world as we know it.

Homosexuality will become compulsory, children will be taken away from their parents and handed over to paedophiles, the oceans will dry up, and the sky will fall in.

Don't say you weren't warned, juliar.

Its not just the left who are voting yes.  Our family is traditionally liberal and live in a traditional liberal electorate.  We are going to vote yes, just as my grand parents voted yes in 1967.  This is not a decision of left or right, but rather of human decency and fairness.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 10:44am:

juliar wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 10:40am: In the very unlikely event YES happens it will open up the Greeny political correctness flood gates. It'll do more than that. If same sex couples are allowed to marry, it'll be the end of the world as we know it. Homosexuality will become compulsory, children will be taken away from their parents and handed over to paedophiles, the oceans will dry up, and the sky will fall in. Don't say you weren't warned, juliar.

;D the same thing will happen as it did in NZ, SSM, and that's it , rightards are farkkkn insane

tickleandrose wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 10:45am:

Its not just the left who are voting yes.  Our family is traditionally liberal and live in a traditional liberal electorate.  We are going to vote yes, just as my grand parents voted yes in 1967.  This is not a decision of left or right, but rather of human decency and fairness.

Well said.

Its time wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 10:54am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 10:44am: juliar wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 10:40am: In the very unlikely event YES happens it will open up the Greeny political correctness flood gates. It'll do more than that. If same sex couples are allowed to marry, it'll be the end of the world as we know it. Homosexuality will become compulsory, children will be taken away from their parents and handed over to paedophiles, the oceans will dry up, and the sky will fall in. Don't say you weren't warned, juliar. ;D the same thing will happen as it did in NZ, SSM, and that's it , rightards are farkkkn insane

Rightards?  They are he ones trying to force their own party to legislate for SSM.

It was luvvies not that long ago who just voted no, couldnt even be arsed. It's actually funny now watching Penny Wong hyperventilating with outrage.

You clowns have short memories.

It's a vote about what is right or wrong.

It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.'

We do not accept you.

In our world, 'anything' does not go.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you.

We have to put up with Christians , and most of them are batshit crazy

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go.

But isnt the whole point of a democratic free society that we should accept rather than limit weirdness?

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 11:09am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. But isnt the whole point of a democratic free society that we should accept rather than limit weirdness?

That's a word he won't be familiar with.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 11:09am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. But isnt the whole point of a democratic free society that we should accept rather than limit weirdness?

"Democratic free society"

So vote as you wish!  :D :D :D :D  yes/NO

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 11:09am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. But isnt the whole point of a democratic free society that we should accept rather than limit weirdness?

I think a democratic free society should look after itself first.

europe did badly by accepting germanys rampage or the muslims infux.

maoris did badly by accepting the whites, fijians were almost wiped out by accepting the whites

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 11:53am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:09am: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. But isnt the whole point of a democratic free society that we should accept rather than limit weirdness? I think a democratic free society should look after itself first. europe did badly by accepting germanys rampage or the muslims infux. maoris did badly by accepting the whites, fijians were almost wiped out by accepting the whites

Off topic.

Stay focused.

SSM

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:14pm:

If you value men being men and women being women, vote NO. If you want boys to be boys and girls to be girls, vote NO. If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, vote NO.

100% agree.
Stop Paedophilia.

capitosinora wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 11:59am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 8:14pm: If you value men being men and women being women, vote NO. If you want boys to be boys and girls to be girls, vote NO. If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, vote NO. 100% agree. Stop Paedophilia.

Off topic.

Stay focused.

SSM

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go.

What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you?

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:06pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you?

Probably your open-mindedness, acceptance, and tolerance.

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:06pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you?

don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ?

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 11:09am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. But isnt the whole point of a democratic free society that we should accept rather than limit weirdness?

I may be wrong here but in a truly free society we can either accept weirdness or reject it as equally valid options.


As soon as you force someone to accept your ideology against their own beliefs, then you are wrong. Something most socialist do not understand.

I really couldn't give a rats who does what.
They were already rooting each other before they wed so SSM won't start a massive influx of new disease because the sex side is already happeing and the diseases are going to happen regardless.

SS relationships aren't normal, period.
You want to do it then fine but it's not normal. Stop looking for it to be accepted as "normal". For reproduction to happen there has to be a male and female. Simple. Nothing will change that. None of you would be here without it.

IMO its a load of crap that this is even being considered as important. I'm not even voting. Shows what this world really is. Blind idiots running around making loud noises.
On the bright side it might be time to open up that divorce lawyers firm because the amount of divorces now will skyrocket.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:31pm:

____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:06pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you? don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ?

None.
Yet you are the one claiming I have.
So in your mind, what are they?

Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:35pm:

I really couldn't give a rats who does what. They were already rooting each other before they wed so SSM won't start a massive influx of new disease because the sex side is already happeing and the diseases are going to happen regardless. SS relationships aren't normal, period. You want to do it then fine but it's not normal. Stop looking for it to be accepted as "normal". For reproduction to happen ...

This is about marriage, not reproduction.

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:58pm:

If you value equality and the right to choose vote yes!!! If you want everyone to be treated equal under the law vote yes!!! If you want a future where freedom is placed before prejudice vote yes!!! ::) ::) ::) The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law. Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC)

This is the reason why I am responding "yes" to the survey - to reduce legal inequality.

Funny how you often read that those who oppose SSM are being bullied and or abused by a minority.

The Thread title says it all, does it not?

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:42pm:

Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:35pm: I really couldn't give a rats who does what. They were already rooting each other before they wed so SSM won't start a massive influx of new disease because the sex side is already happeing and the diseases are going to happen regardless. SS relationships aren't normal, period. You want to do it then fine but it's not normal. Stop looking for it to be accepted as "normal". For reproduction to happen ... This is about marriage, not reproduction.

So marriage between anything and anything or will the homos decide who and what can't join in?


The freak list is pretty big, best let the freaks decide what can or can't get married, all in one go. Don't want to bother with these people anymore after this bullsh1t.

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:38pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:31pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:06pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you? don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ? None. Yet you are the one claiming I have. So in your mind, what are they?

Well if you list all of your sexual proclivities, Ill have a go at pointing out the ones that most people would consider pretty fkken wrong.  :) :)

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:42pm:

Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:35pm: I really couldn't give a rats who does what. They were already rooting each other before they wed so SSM won't start a massive influx of new disease because the sex side is already happeing and the diseases are going to happen regardless. SS relationships aren't normal, period. You want to do it then fine but it's not normal. Stop looking for it to be accepted as "normal". For reproduction to happen ... This is about marriage, not reproduction.

Yep and marriage has always been between male and female and most of the time involved children at some stage.
Why cant they call it something else instead? Marraige is what us straights have, find another word/meaning.

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:51pm:

____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:38pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:31pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:06pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you? don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ? None. Yet you are the one claiming I have. So in your mind, what are they? Well if you list all of your sexual proclivities, Ill have a go at pointing out the ones that most people would consider pretty fkken wrong.  :) :)

Abstinent

Now over to you to point them out.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:14pm:

If you value men being men and women being women, vote NO. If you want boys to be boys and girls to be girls, vote NO. If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, vote NO.

The qualification 'normal' disqualifies Sprintcyclist and his ratbag right wing extremist ilk.

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:04pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:51pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:38pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:31pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:06pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you? don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ? None. Yet you are the one claiming I have. So in your mind, what are they? Well if you list all of your sexual proclivities, Ill have a go at pointing out the ones that most people would consider pretty fkken wrong.  :) :) Abstinent Now over to you to point them out.

Did he know that?

He may think deliberately not getting laid is a bit weird. Personally I think it is a lot weird, it's something catholic priests do and they a seriously fkked up.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:14pm:

If you value men being men and women being women, vote NO. If you want boys to be boys and girls to be girls, vote NO. If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, vote NO.

Do not listen to the above. 

A man is not less of a man if he loves a man. 
A woman is not less of a woman if she loves a woman.

If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, and not be caged in by some outdated 'tradition' - that was also made by humans, then you should vote a resounding YES.

tickleandrose wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:28pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 8:14pm: If you value men being men and women being women, vote NO. If you want boys to be boys and girls to be girls, vote NO. If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, vote NO. Do not listen to the above.  A man is not less of a man if he loves a man.  A woman is not less of a woman if she loves a woman. If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, and not be caged in by some outdated 'tradition' - that was also made by humans, then you should vote a resounding YES.

Print  Email  Facebook  Twitter  More
Same-sex marriage survey: Petition to deregister Pansy Lai, doctor in No campaign ad, taken down
By Lily Mayers
Updated 51 minutes ago

Media player: "Space" to play, "M" to mute, "left" and "right" to seek.

VIDEO: A No television advert ahead of the same-sex marriage survey (ABC News)
RELATED STORY: Tighter same-sex marriage survey restrictions on hold as first No ad airsRELATED STORY: Why the No campaign's first TV ad will work
MAP: Sydney 2000
A CommunityRun petition calling for a doctor featured in a same-sex marriage No Campaign ad to be deregistered has been removed for breaching the site's terms and conditions.

The petition asked for a review of Dr Pansy Lai's medical registration after she appeared in a Coalition for Marriage advertisement calling for a no vote in the upcoming same-sex marriage survey.

GetUp, who created the community petition platform, said it was removed after receiving dozens of complaints.

"Following the review, the petition was found to breach CommunityRun's terms and conditions and was taken down on Monday morning," a GetUp spokesman said.

Petitions listed on CommunityRun can be uploaded by anyone and are not run or endorsed by GetUp.

A GetUp spokesman said while the organisation was opposed to a same-sex marriage survey, it condemned personal attacks against individuals on either side of the campaign.

"GetUp does not support a petition targeting Dr Pansy Lai, which was uploaded over the weekend, nor did GetUp endorse or organise it," he said.

AMA slams 'inappropriate' petition

The petition was addressed to the Australian Medical Association, which has criticised it as being inappropriate and concerning.

"Individuals should be able to express an opinion on a political matter, without being shouted down," AMA President, Dr Michael Gannon said.

"Everyone's entitled to an opinion and to call for someone to have their livelihood taken away, which is effectively what medical deregistration would mean to a doctor, is utterly inappropriate."
Mr Gannon said the Medical Board of Australia, which is the registrational authority for doctors, would dismiss this complaint very quickly.

"Doctors, like other members of the community, are entitled to an opinion and that should be heard," Dr Gannon said.

Dr Lai and the Coalition for Marriage have been contacted for comment.

DONT HAVE AN OPINION DIFFERENT TO THE YES VOTER  FFFS >:( >:( >:( >:(

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:23pm:

____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:04pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:51pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:38pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:31pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:06pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you? don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ? None. Yet you are the one claiming I have. So in your mind, what are they? Well if you list all of your sexual proclivities, Ill have a go at pointing out the ones that most people would consider pretty fkken wrong.  :) :) Abstinent Now over to you to point them out. Did he know that? He may think deliberately not getting laid is a bit weird. Personally I think it is a lot weird, it's something catholic priests do and they a seriously fkked up.

Highlighted and enlarged your post.

tickleandrose wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:28pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 8:14pm: If you value men being men and women being women, vote NO. If you want boys to be boys and girls to be girls, vote NO. If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, vote NO. Do not listen to the above.  A man is not less of a man if he loves a man.  A woman is not less of a woman if she loves a woman. If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, and not be caged in by some outdated 'tradition' - that was also made by humans, then you should vote a resounding YES.

they are certainly a strange man or woman to want to have sex with their own kind.

this is not about love.
normal real men do love other normal real men.
I love my brothers

if strange people want to hijack centuries old traditions to bend those traditions to suit their own strange kinks, they can't.

the homos can invent their own traditions.
we have offered a civil union certificate.
they don't like that, invent your own

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:50pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:42pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:35pm: I really couldn't give a rats who does what. They were already rooting each other before they wed so SSM won't start a massive influx of new disease because the sex side is already happeing and the diseases are going to happen regardless. SS relationships aren't normal, period. You want to do it then fine but it's not normal. Stop looking for it to be accepted as "normal". For reproduction to happen ... This is about marriage, not reproduction. So marriage between anything and anything ...

Marriage between consenting adult humans, who aren't related.

Where's the problem?

Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:03pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:42pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:35pm: I really couldn't give a rats who does what. They were already rooting each other before they wed so SSM won't start a massive influx of new disease because the sex side is already happeing and the diseases are going to happen regardless. SS relationships aren't normal, period. You want to do it then fine but it's not normal. Stop looking for it to be accepted as "normal". For reproduction to happen ... This is about marriage, not reproduction. Yep and marriage has always been between male and female and most of the time involved children at some stage.

Incorrect.

tickleandrose  - thank for debating this in a nature manner

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:48pm:

tickleandrose  - thank for debating this in a nature manner

Yet, according to you, tickleandrose is not a normal person!

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:46pm:

Marriage between consenting adult humans, who aren't related. Where's the problem?

Greggy - if you knew what they did you'd see the problem.

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:38pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:31pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:06pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you? don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ? None. Yet you are the one claiming I have. So in your mind, what are they?

Repost ... waiting for a reply !

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:46pm: Marriage between consenting adult humans, who aren't related. Where's the problem? Greggy - if you knew what they did you'd see the problem.

Why are we required to know what consenting adult humans do in the privacy of their own homes?

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:46pm: Marriage between consenting adult humans, who aren't related. Where's the problem? Greggy - if you knew what they did you'd see the problem.

Some of them kiss & cuddle, and have anal, vaginal, and oral sex - just like heterosexuals.

Again: where's the problem?

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:44pm:

tickleandrose wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:28pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 8:14pm: If you value men being men and women being women, vote NO. If you want boys to be boys and girls to be girls, vote NO. If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, vote NO. Do not listen to the above.  A man is not less of a man if he loves a man.  A woman is not less of a woman if she loves a woman. If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, and not be caged in by some outdated 'tradition' - that was also made by humans, then you should vote a resounding YES. they are certainly a strange man or woman to want to have sex with their own kind. this is not about love. normal real men do love other normal real men. I love my brothers if strange people want to hijack centuries old traditions to bend those traditions to suit their own strange kinks, they can't. the homos can invent their own traditions. we have offered a civil union certificate. they don't like that, invent your own

The traditions were made by humans, and therefore can be changed by humans.  There is not a golden rule to say that just because something is tradition, that it cannot be changed. 

A civil union certificate will not do.  And it does not have the same recognition in law as marriage currently.  And for your information, those on the no camp are ALSO  against a civil union certificate that is equivalent to marriage.   So you better get your position right. 

tickleandrose wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 2:07pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:44pm: tickleandrose wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:28pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3rd, 2017 at 8:14pm: If you value men being men and women being women, vote NO. If you want boys to be boys and girls to be girls, vote NO. If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, vote NO. Do not listen to the above.  A man is not less of a man if he loves a man.  A woman is not less of a woman if she loves a woman. If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, and not be caged in by some outdated 'tradition' - that was also made by humans, then you should vote a resounding YES. they are certainly a strange man or woman to want to have sex with their own kind. this is not about love. normal real men do love other normal real men. I love my brothers if strange people want to hijack centuries old traditions to bend those traditions to suit their own strange kinks, they can't. the homos can invent their own traditions. we have offered a civil union certificate. they don't like that, invent your own The traditions were made by humans, and therefore can be changed by humans.  There is not a golden rule to say that just because something is tradition, that it cannot be changed.

No its tradition, so bring back slavery.

Meanwhile the SSM Nazis launch a vicious attack on a dissenter....

https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/36946222/online-petition-wants-dr-pansy-lai-from-sydney-deregistered/?cmp=ydn&utm_source=Marketing&utm_medium=Emarsys&utm_campaign=DailySnapshot&utm_content=

A woman that appeared in the advertisement for the 'no' camp in the same-sex marriage debate is now at the centre of an online campaign to have her medical licence stripped.

The online petition has just over 6,000 signatures and calls for a "review of the registration of Dr Pansy Lai".

Dr Lai, a GP in northern Sydney, appeared as one of three mothers in the Marriage Coalition advertisement that first aired at the end of last month.

She told The Australian she has been inundated with phone and social media threats since the ad was released and said she had reported one threat to police that she would be shot "this week".

The online petition, backed by GetUp!, calls on the Australian Medical Association to deregister Dr Lai "for violation of its code of ethics and violation of the Declaration of Geneva by her participation in the recent 'no' campaign against marriage equality".

"It is clear that Dr Pansy Lai has misused her privileged position as a medical practitioner in the harmful and hateful 'no' campaign, which is a clear violation of her oath to the Declaration," the petition reads.

Coalition for Marriage spokeswoman Monica Doumit said after the threat to Dr Lai’s career from this petition, that it would now apply to any doctor who spoke against the 'Yes' case, The Australian reports.

“In seeking to ruin the career of a doctor who dares to disagree with its agenda, the same-sex marriage lobby has shown, yet again, that it has no interest in freedom of speech,” Ms Doumit said.

“The petition against Dr Lai is a threat not only to her, but to any others who might try to voice their opinion. The message is loud and clear: agree on same-sex marriage or else.”

Dr Lai has been a campaigner against gay rights and activism for some time, taking the lead to secure 17,500 votes against the Safe Schools anti-bullying program, which she said last year discriminated against Chinese culture.

Just one day after the 'no' ad was aired, the 'yes' camp aired their first commerical claiming the 'no' camp is "trying to mislead us".

The ad features Dr Kerryn Phelps.

It begins with the grandmother watching the "No" video before telling the camera "sadly some are trying to mislead us, like this ad does by saying there will be a negative impact" if Australia allows same-sex couples to get married.

Dr Kerryn Phelps features in the "yes" commercial. Source: Supplied

The online petition against Dr Lai concludes that "she has used her standing as a medical professional to directly cause harm to the LGBTIQ population, in direct opposition to her ethical obligation to be supporting the health and welfare of people".

Dr Lai said she was speaking out against same-sex marriage as a parent.

I think ban Phelps too.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:46pm: Marriage between consenting adult humans, who aren't related. Where's the problem? Greggy - if you knew what they did you'd see the problem.

Two questions for you, Booby:

1. What is it that lesbians do, that you don't like?

2. Do homosexual men have premarital sex?

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 2:20pm:

Meanwhile the SSM Nazis launch a vicious attack on a dissenter.... https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/36946222/online-petition-wants-dr-pansy-lai-from-sydney-deregistered/?cmp=ydn&utm_source=Marketing&utm_medium=Emarsys&utm_campaign=DailySnapshot&utm_content= A woman that appeared in the advertisement for the 'no' camp in the same-sex marriage debate is now at the centre of an online campaign to have her medical licence stripped. The online petition has just over 6,000 signatures and calls for a "review of the registration of Dr Pansy Lai". Dr Lai, a GP in northern Sydney, appeared as one of three mothers in the Marriage Coalition advertisement that first aired at the end of last month. She told The Australian she has been inundated with phone and social media threats since the ad was released and said she had reported one threat to police that she would be shot "this week". The online petition, backed by GetUp!, calls on the Australian Medical Association to deregister Dr Lai "for violation of its code of ethics and violation of the Declaration of Geneva by her participation in the recent 'no' campaign against marriage equality". "It is clear that Dr Pansy Lai has misused her privileged position as a medical practitioner in the harmful and hateful 'no' campaign, which is a clear violation of her oath to the Declaration," the petition reads. Coalition for Marriage spokeswoman Monica Doumit said after the threat to Dr Lai’s career from this petition, that it would now apply to any doctor who spoke against the 'Yes' case, The Australian reports. “In seeking to ruin the career of a doctor who dares to disagree with its agenda, the same-sex marriage lobby has shown, yet again, that it has no interest in freedom of speech,” Ms Doumit said. “The petition against Dr Lai is a threat not only to her, but to any others who might try to voice their opinion. The message is loud and clear: agree on same-sex marriage or else.” Dr Lai has been a campaigner against gay rights and activism for some time, taking the lead to secure 17,500 votes against the Safe Schools anti-bullying program, which she said last year discriminated against Chinese culture. Just one day after the 'no' ad was aired, the 'yes' camp aired their first commerical claiming the 'no' camp is "trying to mislead us". The ad features Dr Kerryn Phelps. It begins with the grandmother watching the "No" video before telling the camera "sadly some are trying to mislead us, like this ad does by saying there will be a negative impact" if Australia allows same-sex couples to get married. Dr Kerryn Phelps features in the "yes" commercial. Source: Supplied The online petition against Dr Lai concludes that "she has used her standing as a medical professional to directly cause harm to the LGBTIQ population, in direct opposition to her ethical obligation to be supporting the health and welfare of people". Dr Lai said she was speaking out against same-sex marriage as a parent.

this is the way of the left.

violence and threats

Friends of mine were at the pro rally in Canberra on Saturday. Were threatened by some anti- campaigners. Its both sides.

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 2:20pm:

Meanwhile the SSM Nazis launch a vicious attack on a dissenter.... https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/36946222/online-petition-wants-dr-pansy-lai-from-sydney-deregistered/?cmp=ydn&utm_source=Marketing&utm_medium=Emarsys&utm_campaign=DailySnapshot&utm_content= A woman that appeared in the advertisement for the 'no' camp in the same-sex marriage debate is now at the centre of an online campaign to have her medical licence stripped. The online petition has just over 6,000 signatures and calls for a "review of the registration of Dr Pansy Lai". Dr Lai, a GP in northern Sydney, appeared as one of three mothers in the Marriage Coalition advertisement that first aired at the end of last month. She told The Australian she has been inundated with phone and social media threats since the ad was released and said she had reported one threat to police that she would be shot "this week". The online petition, backed by GetUp!, calls on the Australian Medical Association to deregister Dr Lai "for violation of its code of ethics and violation of the Declaration of Geneva by her participation in the recent 'no' campaign against marriage equality". "It is clear that Dr Pansy Lai has misused her privileged position as a medical practitioner in the harmful and hateful 'no' campaign, which is a clear violation of her oath to the Declaration," the petition reads. Coalition for Marriage spokeswoman Monica Doumit said after the threat to Dr Lai’s career from this petition, that it would now apply to any doctor who spoke against the 'Yes' case, The Australian reports. “In seeking to ruin the career of a doctor who dares to disagree with its agenda, the same-sex marriage lobby has shown, yet again, that it has no interest in freedom of speech,” Ms Doumit said. “The petition against Dr Lai is a threat not only to her, but to any others who might try to voice their opinion. The message is loud and clear: agree on same-sex marriage or else.” Dr Lai has been a campaigner against gay rights and activism for some time, taking the lead to secure 17,500 votes against the Safe Schools anti-bullying program, which she said last year discriminated against Chinese culture. Just one day after the 'no' ad was aired, the 'yes' camp aired their first commerical claiming the 'no' camp is "trying to mislead us". The ad features Dr Kerryn Phelps. It begins with the grandmother watching the "No" video before telling the camera "sadly some are trying to mislead us, like this ad does by saying there will be a negative impact" if Australia allows same-sex couples to get married. Dr Kerryn Phelps features in the "yes" commercial. Source: Supplied The online petition against Dr Lai concludes that "she has used her standing as a medical professional to directly cause harm to the LGBTIQ population, in direct opposition to her ethical obligation to be supporting the health and welfare of people". Dr Lai said she was speaking out against same-sex marriage as a parent.

http://kingdomeducation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/fake-news.jpg

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:46pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:50pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:42pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:35pm: I really couldn't give a rats who does what. They were already rooting each other before they wed so SSM won't start a massive influx of new disease because the sex side is already happeing and the diseases are going to happen regardless. SS relationships aren't normal, period. You want to do it then fine but it's not normal. Stop looking for it to be accepted as "normal". For reproduction to happen ... This is about marriage, not reproduction. So marriage between anything and anything ... Marriage between consenting adult humans, who aren't related. Where's the problem?

Anyone and anyone or will there be a list of variants?

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:41pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:23pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:04pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:51pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:38pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:31pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:06pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you? don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ? None. Yet you are the one claiming I have. So in your mind, what are they? Well if you list all of your sexual proclivities, Ill have a go at pointing out the ones that most people would consider pretty fkken wrong.  :) :) Abstinent Now over to you to point them out. Did he know that? He may think deliberately not getting laid is a bit weird. Personally I think it is a lot weird, it's something catholic priests do and they a seriously fkked up. Highlighted and enlarged your post.

And you post one single think abstinence and I said that is pretty weird, giving the example of priests.


Do you not understand english?

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 2:44pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:46pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:50pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:42pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:35pm: I really couldn't give a rats who does what. They were already rooting each other before they wed so SSM won't start a massive influx of new disease because the sex side is already happeing and the diseases are going to happen regardless. SS relationships aren't normal, period. You want to do it then fine but it's not normal. Stop looking for it to be accepted as "normal". For reproduction to happen ... This is about marriage, not reproduction. So marriage between anything and anything ... Marriage between consenting adult humans, who aren't related. Where's the problem? Anyone and anyone or will there be a list of variants?

Anyone and everyone, as long as they are consenting adult humans, who aren't related.

Where's the problem?

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 2:48pm:

____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:41pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:23pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:04pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:51pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:38pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:31pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:06pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you? don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ? None. Yet you are the one claiming I have. So in your mind, what are they? Well if you list all of your sexual proclivities,[ United Patriots Front   :) :) Abstinent Now over to you to point them out. Did he know that? He may think deliberately not getting laid is a bit weird. Personally I think it is a lot weird, it's something catholic priests do and they a seriously fkked up. Highlighted and enlarged your post. And you post one single think abstinence and I said that is pretty weird, giving the example of priests. Do you not understand english?

Cherrypicking priests, where it is a condition of being a priest.

This is voluntary.
So walk the walk.

What is weird with what we do in our bedroom.

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 3:10pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:48pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:41pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:23pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:04pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:51pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:38pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:31pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:06pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you? don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ? None. Yet you are the one claiming I have. So in your mind, what are they? Well if you list all of your sexual proclivities,[ United Patriots Front   :) :) Abstinent Now over to you to point them out. Did he know that? He may think deliberately not getting laid is a bit weird. Personally I think it is a lot weird, it's something catholic priests do and they a seriously fkked up. Highlighted and enlarged your post. And you post one single think abstinence and I said that is pretty weird, giving the example of priests. Do you not understand english? Cherrypicking priests, where it is a condition of being a priest. This is voluntary. So walk the walk. What is weird with what we do in our bedroom.

Or don't do in this case

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 3:08pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:44pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:46pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:50pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:42pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:35pm: I really couldn't give a rats who does what. They were already rooting each other before they wed so SSM won't start a massive influx of new disease because the sex side is already happeing and the diseases are going to happen regardless. SS relationships aren't normal, period. You want to do it then fine but it's not normal. Stop looking for it to be accepted as "normal". For reproduction to happen ... This is about marriage, not reproduction. So marriage between anything and anything ... Marriage between consenting adult humans, who aren't related. Where's the problem? Anyone and anyone or will there be a list of variants? Anyone and everyone, as long as they are consenting adult humans, who aren't related. Where's the problem?

Will make for interesting weddings when the seriously fkked up weirdos start looking to get hitched.


Do you Fecalphiliac take this Felcher to be your lawful wedded toilet receptical?  :) :) :)


Yep good times ahead

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 3:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:08pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:44pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:46pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:50pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:42pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:35pm: I really couldn't give a rats who does what. They were already rooting each other before they wed so SSM won't start a massive influx of new disease because the sex side is already happeing and the diseases are going to happen regardless. SS relationships aren't normal, period. You want to do it then fine but it's not normal. Stop looking for it to be accepted as "normal". For reproduction to happen ... This is about marriage, not reproduction. So marriage between anything and anything ... Marriage between consenting adult humans, who aren't related. Where's the problem? Anyone and anyone or will there be a list of variants? Anyone and everyone, as long as they are consenting adult humans, who aren't related. Where's the problem? Will make for interesting weddings when the seriously fkked up weirdos start looking to get hitched.

Weirdos get married now.  Every day.

Moreover, attending the weddings is not compulsory.

So, where's the problem?

Aussie wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:47pm:

Funny how you often read that those who oppose SSM are being bullied and or abused by a minority. The Thread title says it all, does it not?

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_UNvwuPPXlVU/S10bd2xfBYI/AAAAAAAACpc/WRXq9mQraTg/s400/nail+hammer.jpg

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 3:33pm:

____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:10pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:48pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:41pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:23pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:04pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:51pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:38pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:31pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:06pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you? don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ? None. Yet you are the one claiming I have. So in your mind, what are they? Well if you list all of your sexual proclivities,[ United Patriots Front   :) :) Abstinent Now over to you to point them out. Did he know that? He may think deliberately not getting laid is a bit weird. Personally I think it is a lot weird, it's something catholic priests do and they a seriously fkked up. Highlighted and enlarged your post. And you post one single think abstinence and I said that is pretty weird, giving the example of priests. Do you not understand english? Cherrypicking priests, where it is a condition of being a priest. This is voluntary. So walk the walk. What is weird with what we do in our bedroom. Or don't do in this case

Christians think Gay Jesus and band of merry men abstained ... and created a religion out of it.
Now you indirectly call Gay Jesus weird.

Far right christians will burn you at the stake, if you're not to careful.

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 3:44pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:33pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:10pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:48pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:41pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:23pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:04pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:51pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:38pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:31pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:06pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you? don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ? None. Yet you are the one claiming I have. So in your mind, what are they? Well if you list all of your sexual proclivities,[ United Patriots Front   :) :) Abstinent Now over to you to point them out. Did he know that? He may think deliberately not getting laid is a bit weird. Personally I think it is a lot weird, it's something catholic priests do and they a seriously fkked up. Highlighted and enlarged your post. And you post one single think abstinence and I said that is pretty weird, giving the example of priests. Do you not understand english? Cherrypicking priests, where it is a condition of being a priest. This is voluntary. So walk the walk. What is weird with what we do in our bedroom. Or don't do in this case Christians think Gay Jesus and band of merry men abstained ... and created a religion out of it. Now you indirectly call Gay Jesus weird. Far right christians will burn you at the stake, if you're not to careful.

As a devout atheist Im calling gay jezzus a non existent, made up delusion.


Nice troll bro but a total fail  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 3:40pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:08pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:44pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:46pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:50pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:42pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:35pm: I really couldn't give a rats who does what. They were already rooting each other before they wed so SSM won't start a massive influx of new disease because the sex side is already happeing and the diseases are going to happen regardless. SS relationships aren't normal, period. You want to do it then fine but it's not normal. Stop looking for it to be accepted as "normal". For reproduction to happen ... This is about marriage, not reproduction. So marriage between anything and anything ... Marriage between consenting adult humans, who aren't related. Where's the problem? Anyone and anyone or will there be a list of variants? Anyone and everyone, as long as they are consenting adult humans, who aren't related. Where's the problem? Will make for interesting weddings when the seriously fkked up weirdos start looking to get hitched. Weirdos get married now.  Every day. Moreover, attending the weddings is not compulsory. So, where's the problem?

No problem, merely having a conversation, so keep your pantaloons on.

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 3:51pm:

____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:44pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:33pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:10pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:48pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:41pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:23pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:04pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:51pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:38pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:31pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:06pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you? don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ? None. Yet you are the one claiming I have. So in your mind, what are they? Well if you list all of your sexual proclivities,[ United Patriots Front   :) :) Abstinent Now over to you to point them out. Did he know that? He may think deliberately not getting laid is a bit weird. Personally I think it is a lot weird, it's something catholic priests do and they a seriously fkked up. Highlighted and enlarged your post. And you post one single think abstinence and I said that is pretty weird, giving the example of priests. Do you not understand english? Cherrypicking priests, where it is a condition of being a priest. This is voluntary. So walk the walk. What is weird with what we do in our bedroom. Or don't do in this case Christians think Gay Jesus and band of merry men abstained ... and created a religion out of it. Now you indirectly call Gay Jesus weird. Far right christians will burn you at the stake, if you're not to careful. As a devout atheist Im calling gay jezzus a non existent, made up delusion. Nice troll bro but a total fail  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Not an atheist.

Now you said you will list what is wrong with myself and my partner's sexual practices.

Put up ... or admit you have been beaten to a pulp yet again. 

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 4:06pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:51pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:44pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:33pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:10pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:48pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:41pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:23pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:04pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:51pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:38pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:31pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:06pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you? don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ? None. Yet you are the one claiming I have. So in your mind, what are they? Well if you list all of your sexual proclivities,[ United Patriots Front   :) :) Abstinent Now over to you to point them out. Did he know that? He may think deliberately not getting laid is a bit weird. Personally I think it is a lot weird, it's something catholic priests do and they a seriously fkked up. Highlighted and enlarged your post. And you post one single think abstinence and I said that is pretty weird, giving the example of priests. Do you not understand english? Cherrypicking priests, where it is a condition of being a priest. This is voluntary. So walk the walk. What is weird with what we do in our bedroom. Or don't do in this case Christians think Gay Jesus and band of merry men abstained ... and created a religion out of it. Now you indirectly call Gay Jesus weird. Far right christians will burn you at the stake, if you're not to careful. As a devout atheist Im calling gay jezzus a non existent, made up delusion. Nice troll bro but a total fail  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Not an atheist. Now you said you will list what is wrong with myself and my partner's sexual practices. Put up ... or admit you have been beaten to a pulp yet again.

Who isn't an atheist?


Well since you only stated that you and it seems your partner are abstinent, then that would be it wouldn't it?


You know Im not the person who start this line of inquiry, I was merely hoping to help with your confusion and you are even more confused that ever before.

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 4:10pm:

____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 4:06pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:51pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:44pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:33pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:10pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:48pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:41pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:23pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:04pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:51pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:38pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:31pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:06pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you? don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ? None. Yet you are the one claiming I have. So in your mind, what are they? Well if you list all of your sexual proclivities,[ United Patriots Front   :) :) Abstinent Now over to you to point them out. Did he know that? He may think deliberately not getting laid is a bit weird. Personally I think it is a lot weird, it's something catholic priests do and they a seriously fkked up. Highlighted and enlarged your post. And you post one single think abstinence and I said that is pretty weird, giving the example of priests. Do you not understand english? Cherrypicking priests, where it is a condition of being a priest. This is voluntary. So walk the walk. What is weird with what we do in our bedroom. Or don't do in this case Christians think Gay Jesus and band of merry men abstained ... and created a religion out of it. Now you indirectly call Gay Jesus weird. Far right christians will burn you at the stake, if you're not to careful. As a devout atheist Im calling gay jezzus a non existent, made up delusion. Nice troll bro but a total fail  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Not an atheist. Now you said you will list what is wrong with myself and my partner's sexual practices. Put up ... or admit you have been beaten to a pulp yet again.  Who isn't an atheist? Well since you only stated that you and it seems your partner are abstinent, then that would be it wouldn't it? You know Im not the person who start this line of inquiry, I was merely hoping to help with your confusion and you are even more confused that ever before.

So the whole thread is a beat up and there's nothing abnormal with same sex people.

Thanks for proving sprint wrong.

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 4:15pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 4:10pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 4:06pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:51pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:44pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:33pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 3:10pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:48pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:41pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:23pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:04pm: BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:51pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:38pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:31pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 12:06pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 11:00am: It's a vote about what is right or wrong. It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.' We do not accept you. In our world, 'anything' does not go. What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you? don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ? None. Yet you are the one claiming I have. So in your mind, what are they? Well if you list all of your sexual proclivities,[ United Patriots Front   :) :) Abstinent Now over to you to point them out. Did he know that? He may think deliberately not getting laid is a bit weird. Personally I think it is a lot weird, it's something catholic priests do and they a seriously fkked up. Highlighted and enlarged your post. And you post one single think abstinence and I said that is pretty weird, giving the example of priests. Do you not understand english? Cherrypicking priests, where it is a condition of being a priest. This is voluntary. So walk the walk. What is weird with what we do in our bedroom. Or don't do in this case Christians think Gay Jesus and band of merry men abstained ... and created a religion out of it. Now you indirectly call Gay Jesus weird. Far right christians will burn you at the stake, if you're not to careful. As a devout atheist Im calling gay jezzus a non existent, made up delusion. Nice troll bro but a total fail  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Not an atheist. Now you said you will list what is wrong with myself and my partner's sexual practices. Put up ... or admit you have been beaten to a pulp yet again.  Who isn't an atheist? Well since you only stated that you and it seems your partner are abstinent, then that would be it wouldn't it? You know Im not the person who start this line of inquiry, I was merely hoping to help with your confusion and you are even more confused that ever before. So the whole thread is a beat up and there's nothing abnormal with same sex people. Thanks for proving sprint wrong.

Uuum oookay.


But you didn't answer my question who isn't an atheist?

The Queer (abnormal) community will be voting yes.
God help the next generation if this ludicrous proposal gets up, their are enough sick weirdos around as it is, normal marriage is what holds society together and should never be changed on the whim of a minority in a day and age where political correctness has gone crazy.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 2:03pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:52pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:46pm: Marriage between consenting adult humans, who aren't related. Where's the problem? Greggy - if you knew what they did you'd see the problem. Some of them kiss & cuddle, and have anal, vaginal, and oral sex - just like heterosexuals. Again: where's the problem?

Greggy,
just because you're an admitted sodomite doesn't mean that it's right -
it's an abomination & used to be punished by death.

I cannot give my approval of such depravities.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 5:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:03pm: Bobby. wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:52pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:46pm: Marriage between consenting adult humans, who aren't related. Where's the problem? Greggy - if you knew what they did you'd see the problem. Some of them kiss & cuddle, and have anal, vaginal, and oral sex - just like heterosexuals. Again: where's the problem? Greggy, just because you're an admitted sodomite doesn't mean that it's right - it's an abomination & used to be punished by death. I cannot give my approval of such depravities.

The vote has nothing to do with sodomy, Booby.

Johnnie wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 5:05pm:

normal marriage is what holds society together ...

Really?

Care to explain how?

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 5:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:03pm: Bobby. wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:52pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 1:46pm: Marriage between consenting adult humans, who aren't related. Where's the problem? Greggy - if you knew what they did you'd see the problem. Some of them kiss & cuddle, and have anal, vaginal, and oral sex - just like heterosexuals. Again: where's the problem? Greggy, just because you're an admitted sodomite doesn't mean that it's right - it's an abomination & used to be punished by death. I cannot give my approval of such depravities.

The question is on marriage equality. Not sodomy.
If it was on sodomy then there would be many current marriages you would have to break up if it got voted down.

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 5:40pm:

The question is on marriage equality. Not sodomy.

The vote is all about whether you give your approval & consent to
homosexuals sodomising each other & spreading AIDS throughout society.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 5:47pm:

____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:40pm: The question is on marriage equality. Not sodomy. The vote is all about whether you give your approval & consent to homosexuals sodomising each other & spreading AIDs throughout society.

Take your childish nonsense elsewhere, Booby.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 5:48pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:47pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:40pm: The question is on marriage equality. Not sodomy. The vote is all about whether you give your approval & consent to homosexuals sodomising each other & spreading AIDS throughout society. Take your childish nonsense elsewhere, Bobby.

AIDS Rate 50 Times Higher in Homosexual Men: Center for Disease Control

By Patrick B. Craine

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/aids-rate-50-times-higher-in-homosexual-men-center-for-disease-control


ATLANTA, Georgia, August 24, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - An official with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced the CDC's estimate Monday that in the United States AIDS is fifty times more prevalent among men who have sex with men ('MSM') than the rest of the population.  Dr. Amy Lansky revealed this statistic during a plenary session at the 2009 HIV Prevention Conference in Atlanta.

The CDC had already revealed last year that approximately 53% of the estimated 56,300 new HIV cases in 2006 were in homosexual men, with the African American population being particularly affected.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 5:47pm:

____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:40pm: The question is on marriage equality. Not sodomy. The vote is all about whether you give your approval & consent to homosexuals sodomising each other & spreading AIDS throughout society.

AIDS is doing a great job of wiping out fags and n!ggers.

Karma...nature style!  ;D

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 5:47pm:

____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:40pm: The question is on marriage equality. Not sodomy. The vote is all about whether you give your approval & consent to homosexuals sodomising each other & spreading AIDS throughout society.

Marriage equality would reduce the number of partners of sodomising homosexuals. As it has done with heterosexual sodomites.

If you are worried about the spread of HIV, then marriage equality is the way to reduce.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 5:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:48pm: Bobby. wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:47pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:40pm: The question is on marriage equality. Not sodomy. The vote is all about whether you give your approval & consent to homosexuals sodomising each other & spreading AIDS throughout society. Take your childish nonsense elsewhere, Bobby. AIDS Rate 50 Times Higher in Homosexual Men: Center for Disease Control By Patrick B. Craine https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/aids-rate-50-times-higher-in-homosexual-men-center-for-disease-control ATLANTA, Georgia, August 24, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - An official with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced the CDC's estimate Monday that in the United States AIDS is fifty times more prevalent among men who have sex with men ('MSM') than the rest of the population.  Dr. Amy Lansky revealed this statistic during a plenary session at the 2009 HIV Prevention Conference in Atlanta. The CDC had already revealed last year that approximately 53% of the estimated 56,300 new HIV cases in 2006 were in homosexual men, with the African American population being particularly affected.

Off topic.

Try to remain focused, Booby.

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 5:57pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:47pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:40pm: The question is on marriage equality. Not sodomy. The vote is all about whether you give your approval & consent to homosexuals sodomising each other & spreading AIDS throughout society. Marriage equality would reduce the number of partners of sodomising homosexuals. As it has done with heterosexual sodomites. If you are worried about the spread of HIV, then marriage equality is the way to reduce.

evidence of that claim , please?

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 5:57pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:47pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:40pm: The question is on marriage equality. Not sodomy. The vote is all about whether you give your approval & consent to homosexuals sodomising each other & spreading AIDS throughout society. Marriage equality would reduce the number of partners of sodomising homosexuals. As it has done with heterosexual sodomites. If you are worried about the spread of HIV, then marriage equality is the way to reduce.

Poor old Booby.

He believes that:

a) Lesbians don't exist;

b) gay men don't have sex outside of marriage; and

c) homosexuals have some sort of secret sexual moves that only they know about.

Oh, Booby   ;D

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 6:01pm:

____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:57pm: Bobby. wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:47pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:40pm: The question is on marriage equality. Not sodomy. The vote is all about whether you give your approval & consent to homosexuals sodomising each other & spreading AIDS throughout society. Marriage equality would reduce the number of partners of sodomising homosexuals. As it has done with heterosexual sodomites. If you are worried about the spread of HIV, then marriage equality is the way to reduce. evidence of that claim , please?

Marriage encourages couples towards monogamy.
Hard right christians should see this as something to support.


And it's a bit rich asking for evidence when you wouldn't supply evidence when asked.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 2:37pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:20pm: Meanwhile the SSM Nazis launch a vicious attack on a dissenter.... https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/36946222/online-petition-wants-dr-pansy-lai-from-sydney-deregistered/?cmp=ydn&utm_source=Marketing&utm_medium=Emarsys&utm_campaign=DailySnapshot&utm_content= A woman that appeared in the advertisement for the 'no' camp in the same-sex marriage debate is now at the centre of an online campaign to have her medical licence stripped. The online petition has just over 6,000 signatures and calls for a "review of the registration of Dr Pansy Lai". Dr Lai, a GP in northern Sydney, appeared as one of three mothers in the Marriage Coalition advertisement that first aired at the end of last month. She told The Australian she has been inundated with phone and social media threats since the ad was released and said she had reported one threat to police that she would be shot "this week". The online petition, backed by GetUp!, calls on the Australian Medical Association to deregister Dr Lai "for violation of its code of ethics and violation of the Declaration of Geneva by her participation in the recent 'no' campaign against marriage equality". "It is clear that Dr Pansy Lai has misused her privileged position as a medical practitioner in the harmful and hateful 'no' campaign, which is a clear violation of her oath to the Declaration," the petition reads. Coalition for Marriage spokeswoman Monica Doumit said after the threat to Dr Lai’s career from this petition, that it would now apply to any doctor who spoke against the 'Yes' case, The Australian reports. “In seeking to ruin the career of a doctor who dares to disagree with its agenda, the same-sex marriage lobby has shown, yet again, that it has no interest in freedom of speech,” Ms Doumit said. “The petition against Dr Lai is a threat not only to her, but to any others who might try to voice their opinion. The message is loud and clear: agree on same-sex marriage or else.” Dr Lai has been a campaigner against gay rights and activism for some time, taking the lead to secure 17,500 votes against the Safe Schools anti-bullying program, which she said last year discriminated against Chinese culture. Just one day after the 'no' ad was aired, the 'yes' camp aired their first commerical claiming the 'no' camp is "trying to mislead us". The ad features Dr Kerryn Phelps. It begins with the grandmother watching the "No" video before telling the camera "sadly some are trying to mislead us, like this ad does by saying there will be a negative impact" if Australia allows same-sex couples to get married. Dr Kerryn Phelps features in the "yes" commercial. Source: Supplied The online petition against Dr Lai concludes that "she has used her standing as a medical professional to directly cause harm to the LGBTIQ population, in direct opposition to her ethical obligation to be supporting the health and welfare of people". Dr Lai said she was speaking out against same-sex marriage as a parent. this is the way of the left. violence and threats

Feel free to label them Nazis any time you wish....

As for the media - when they come out with blatant lies such as  Kerryn Phelps 'has six children with her partner Virginia' - when both of them have children from previous marriages to men, who get no mention at all as 'having children with Phelps or Virginia'... .. there are definitely a couple of wing-nuts loose in Propaganda Central... aka The Media...

Phelps and Virginia may have possession of the marital hostages.... but they have NEVER 'had children together' and never can....

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 6:08pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 6:01pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:57pm: Bobby. wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:47pm: ____ wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 5:40pm: The question is on marriage equality. Not sodomy. The vote is all about whether you give your approval & consent to homosexuals sodomising each other & spreading AIDS throughout society. Marriage equality would reduce the number of partners of sodomising homosexuals. As it has done with heterosexual sodomites. If you are worried about the spread of HIV, then marriage equality is the way to reduce. evidence of that claim , please? Marriage encourages couples towards monogamy.

You are, of course, 100% correct.

Why, then, are the so called Christians in here so opposed to it?

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 6:15pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:37pm: Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:20pm: Meanwhile the SSM Nazis launch a vicious attack on a dissenter.... https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/36946222/online-petition-wants-dr-pansy-lai-from-sydney-deregistered/?cmp=ydn&utm_source=Marketing&utm_medium=Emarsys&utm_campaign=DailySnapshot&utm_content= A woman that appeared in the advertisement for the 'no' camp in the same-sex marriage debate is now at the centre of an online campaign to have her medical licence stripped. The online petition has just over 6,000 signatures and calls for a "review of the registration of Dr Pansy Lai". Dr Lai, a GP in northern Sydney, appeared as one of three mothers in the Marriage Coalition advertisement that first aired at the end of last month. She told The Australian she has been inundated with phone and social media threats since the ad was released and said she had reported one threat to police that she would be shot "this week". The online petition, backed by GetUp!, calls on the Australian Medical Association to deregister Dr Lai "for violation of its code of ethics and violation of the Declaration of Geneva by her participation in the recent 'no' campaign against marriage equality". "It is clear that Dr Pansy Lai has misused her privileged position as a medical practitioner in the harmful and hateful 'no' campaign, which is a clear violation of her oath to the Declaration," the petition reads. Coalition for Marriage spokeswoman Monica Doumit said after the threat to Dr Lai’s career from this petition, that it would now apply to any doctor who spoke against the 'Yes' case, The Australian reports. “In seeking to ruin the career of a doctor who dares to disagree with its agenda, the same-sex marriage lobby has shown, yet again, that it has no interest in freedom of speech,” Ms Doumit said. “The petition against Dr Lai is a threat not only to her, but to any others who might try to voice their opinion. The message is loud and clear: agree on same-sex marriage or else.” Dr Lai has been a campaigner against gay rights and activism for some time, taking the lead to secure 17,500 votes against the Safe Schools anti-bullying program, which she said last year discriminated against Chinese culture. Just one day after the 'no' ad was aired, the 'yes' camp aired their first commerical claiming the 'no' camp is "trying to mislead us". The ad features Dr Kerryn Phelps. It begins with the grandmother watching the "No" video before telling the camera "sadly some are trying to mislead us, like this ad does by saying there will be a negative impact" if Australia allows same-sex couples to get married. Dr Kerryn Phelps features in the "yes" commercial. Source: Supplied The online petition against Dr Lai concludes that "she has used her standing as a medical professional to directly cause harm to the LGBTIQ population, in direct opposition to her ethical obligation to be supporting the health and welfare of people". Dr Lai said she was speaking out against same-sex marriage as a parent. this is the way of the left. violence and threats Feel free to label them Nazis any time you wish....

;D

Now that WOULD be the pot calling the kettle black.

AIDS Rate 50 Times Higher in Homosexual Men: Center for Disease Control

By Patrick B. Craine

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/aids-rate-50-times-higher-in-homosexual-men-center-for-disease-control


ATLANTA, Georgia, August 24, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - An official with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced the CDC's estimate Monday that in the United States AIDS is fifty times more prevalent among men who have sex with men ('MSM') than the rest of the population.  Dr. Amy Lansky revealed this statistic during a plenary session at the 2009 HIV Prevention Conference in Atlanta.

The CDC had already revealed last year that approximately 53% of the estimated 56,300 new HIV cases in 2006 were in homosexual men, with the African American population being particularly affected.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 6:17pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 6:15pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:37pm: Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:20pm: Meanwhile the SSM Nazis launch a vicious attack on a dissenter.... https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/36946222/online-petition-wants-dr-pansy-lai-from-sydney-deregistered/?cmp=ydn&utm_source=Marketing&utm_medium=Emarsys&utm_campaign=DailySnapshot&utm_content= A woman that appeared in the advertisement for the 'no' camp in the same-sex marriage debate is now at the centre of an online campaign to have her medical licence stripped. The online petition has just over 6,000 signatures and calls for a "review of the registration of Dr Pansy Lai". Dr Lai, a GP in northern Sydney, appeared as one of three mothers in the Marriage Coalition advertisement that first aired at the end of last month. She told The Australian she has been inundated with phone and social media threats since the ad was released and said she had reported one threat to police that she would be shot "this week". The online petition, backed by GetUp!, calls on the Australian Medical Association to deregister Dr Lai "for violation of its code of ethics and violation of the Declaration of Geneva by her participation in the recent 'no' campaign against marriage equality". "It is clear that Dr Pansy Lai has misused her privileged position as a medical practitioner in the harmful and hateful 'no' campaign, which is a clear violation of her oath to the Declaration," the petition reads. Coalition for Marriage spokeswoman Monica Doumit said after the threat to Dr Lai’s career from this petition, that it would now apply to any doctor who spoke against the 'Yes' case, The Australian reports. “In seeking to ruin the career of a doctor who dares to disagree with its agenda, the same-sex marriage lobby has shown, yet again, that it has no interest in freedom of speech,” Ms Doumit said. “The petition against Dr Lai is a threat not only to her, but to any others who might try to voice their opinion. The message is loud and clear: agree on same-sex marriage or else.” Dr Lai has been a campaigner against gay rights and activism for some time, taking the lead to secure 17,500 votes against the Safe Schools anti-bullying program, which she said last year discriminated against Chinese culture. Just one day after the 'no' ad was aired, the 'yes' camp aired their first commerical claiming the 'no' camp is "trying to mislead us". The ad features Dr Kerryn Phelps. It begins with the grandmother watching the "No" video before telling the camera "sadly some are trying to mislead us, like this ad does by saying there will be a negative impact" if Australia allows same-sex couples to get married. Dr Kerryn Phelps features in the "yes" commercial. Source: Supplied The online petition against Dr Lai concludes that "she has used her standing as a medical professional to directly cause harm to the LGBTIQ population, in direct opposition to her ethical obligation to be supporting the health and welfare of people". Dr Lai said she was speaking out against same-sex marriage as a parent. this is the way of the left. violence and threats Feel free to label them Nazis any time you wish.... ;D Now that WOULD be the pot calling the kettle black.

How so?  Where has Sprint threatened to kill someone who supports SSM or sent messages to some supporter threatening him/her or organised a campaign to destroy their livelihood?  When people set out to intimidate someone of a differing view and who is open and public about it, and places their life and their livelihood under threat..... which then is the Nazi???

These fiends should be hunted down and given the full wrath of the appropriate laws...... using  a carriage service to implement a hate campaign should cop five years.... as a start....

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 6:21pm:

AIDS Rate 50 Times Higher in Homosexual Men: Center for Disease Control By Patrick B. Craine https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/aids-rate-50-times-higher-in-homosexual-men-center-for-disease-control ATLANTA, Georgia, August 24, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - An official with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced the CDC's estimate Monday that in the United States AIDS is fifty times more prevalent among men who have sex with men ('MSM') than the rest of the population.  Dr. Amy Lansky revealed this statistic during a plenary session at the 2009 HIV Prevention Conference in Atlanta. The CDC had already revealed last year that approximately 53% of the estimated 56,300 new HIV cases in 2006 were in homosexual men, with the African American population being particularly affected.

Irrelevant.

This is about same sex marriage.

HIV: NSW 'on track' to virtually eliminate transmission by 2020

After a rapid decline in new infections, New South Wales Health says it is on track to virtually eliminate HIV transmission by 2020.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-23/record-low-hiv-rates-in-nsw/8835380


2017 ... not 2009 Bobby !

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 6:23pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 6:17pm: Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 6:15pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:37pm: Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 4th, 2017 at 2:20pm: Meanwhile the SSM Nazis launch a vicious attack on a dissenter.... https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/36946222/online-petition-wants-dr-pansy-lai-from-sydney-deregistered/?cmp=ydn&utm_source=Marketing&utm_medium=Emarsys&utm_campaign=DailySnapshot&utm_content= A woman that appeared in the advertisement for the 'no' camp in the same-sex marriage debate is now at the centre of an online campaign to have her medical licence stripped. The online petition has just over 6,000 signatures and calls for a "review of the registration of Dr Pansy Lai". Dr Lai, a GP in northern Sydney, appeared as one of three mothers in the Marriage Coalition advertisement that first aired at the end of last month. She told The Australian she has been inundated with phone and social media threats since the ad was released and said she had reported one threat to police that she would be shot "this week". The online petition, backed by GetUp!, calls on the Australian Medical Association to deregister Dr Lai "for violation of its code of ethics and violation of the Declaration of Geneva by her participation in the recent 'no' campaign against marriage equality". "It is clear that Dr Pansy Lai has misused her privileged position as a medical practitioner in the harmful and hateful 'no' campaign, which is a clear violation of her oath to the Declaration," the petition reads. Coalition for Marriage spokeswoman Monica Doumit said after the threat to Dr Lai’s career from this petition, that it would now apply to any doctor who spoke against the 'Yes' case, The Australian reports. “In seeking to ruin the career of a doctor who dares to disagree with its agenda, the same-sex marriage lobby has shown, yet again, that it has no interest in freedom of speech,” Ms Doumit said. “The petition against Dr Lai is a threat not only to her, but to any others who might try to voice their opinion. The message is loud and clear: agree on same-sex marriage or else.” Dr Lai has been a campaigner against gay rights and activism for some time, taking the lead to secure 17,500 votes against the Safe Schools anti-bullying program, which she said last year discriminated against Chinese culture. Just one day after the 'no' ad was aired, the 'yes' camp aired their first commerical claiming the 'no' camp is "trying to mislead us". The ad features Dr Kerryn Phelps. It begins with the grandmother watching the "No" video before telling the camera "sadly some are trying to mislead us, like this ad does by saying there will be a negative impact" if Australia allows same-sex couples to get married. Dr Kerryn Phelps features in the "yes" commercial. Source: Supplied The online petition against Dr Lai concludes that "she has used her standing as a medical professional to directly cause harm to the LGBTIQ population, in direct opposition to her ethical obligation to be supporting the health and welfare of people". Dr Lai said she was speaking out against same-sex marriage as a parent. this is the way of the left. violence and threats Feel free to label them Nazis any time you wish.... ;D Now that WOULD be the pot calling the kettle black. How so?

Sprint is the most intolerant, bigoted, racist, homophobic fascist in this forum ... by a long shot.

He's the closest thing to a Nazi I've seen in quite some time.