The Science is never in.. 

throughout the years we develop different and more advance technologies which gives us better insights to our pasts...

and yet we still believe in Evolution and other such horseshit..

like... Global Warming for instance...  :D

But....

Why are scientists such liars???

why do scientists get the sack when they go against the flow and prove previous scientists wrong??

Telling the Truth??

with their more advanced technology and education??

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdqYPjA9VxA

A post on science by the Mechanic. Now that's gotta be good.

Are you suggesting evolution is horseshit?>

At least one of those seems to be a creationist/intelligent design freak.

The only way to show evolution is not real is to discard tonnes of fossils and the whole science of genetics.

As to global cooling, ahahaha, how come most of the US and Canada had temperatures over 40°F above normal? This crap only makes sense when you stop using your senses. It is crap!

Jovial Monk wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 6:51pm:

As to global cooling, ahahaha, how come most of the US and Canada had temperatures over 40°F above normal?

Citation needed. In what time period?

This NH winter.

Jovial Monk wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 7:23pm:

This NH winter.

Now for the citation. Perhaps even a newspaper headline. ;)

Look in environment.

Jovial Monk wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 7:44pm:

Look in environment.

There are 58 pages in Environment. Pass.

Not even for your delusions. ;)

Enquiring mind wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 6:27pm:

A post on science by the Mechanic. Now that's gotta be good.

of course ... why wouldn't you listen to mechanic, with his conspiracy theory websites, over highly trained scientists that are at the top of their fields?

Are we all proud of our fellow Aussie done good in the USA, Ken Ham?

lee wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 8:02pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on May 6th, 2017 at 7:44pm: Look in environment. There are 58 pages in Environment. Pass. Not even for your delusions. ;)

Actually, doofus, I posted something from a US ag report and it quoted the warm winter and early spring temperatures.

there seem to be no lows that the scientific world won't sink, to protect their flat earth theories...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8W8aGH80uVQ

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 6:39pm:

Are you suggesting evolution is horseshit?>

Evolution accounts for most of what we see in nature but not all of it.

I was watching a doco recently in which they showed the life-cycle of Botflies.

All very evolutionary until it got to the part where they showed the larvae of botflies have several rows of bristles on its body that are angled backwards so that you can't pull them out of where they are lodged in your skin.

That design took intelligence, thought, and planning.

And then there was a very deep ocean fish with a glowing fishing rod on its head to attract prey. 'Evolution'? Hardly.

It takes genius to come up with a solution for survival in this way.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4KT8ifY2oA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKjFVBVGad0

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 6:39pm:

Are you suggesting evolution is horseshit?>

if you'd have watched the clip you wouldn't be asking me such dumb questions.. dur...

Another stupid YouTube.

Go away and come back when you have a scientific paper to quote.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 8:58pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on May 6th, 2017 at 6:39pm: Are you suggesting evolution is horseshit?> Evolution accounts for most of what we see in nature but not all of it. I was watching a doco recently in which they showed the life-cycle of Botflies. All very evolutionary until it got to the part where they showed the larvae of botflies have several rows of bristles on its body that are angled backwards so that you can't pull them out of where they are lodged in your skin. That design took intelligence, thought, and planning. And then there was a very deep ocean fish with a glowing fishing rod on its head to attract prey. 'Evolution'? Hardly. It takes genius to come up with a solution for survival in this way. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4KT8ifY2oA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKjFVBVGad0

You just have no conception of geologic time, ’Erbert.

.

Jovial Monk wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 8:25pm:

lee wrote on May 6th, 2017 at 8:02pm: Jovial Monk wrote on May 6th, 2017 at 7:44pm: Look in environment. There are 58 pages in Environment. Pass. Not even for your delusions. ;) Actually, doofus, I posted something from a US ag report and it quoted the warm winter and early spring temperatures.

Well doofus, with your propensity to misread things, I would like confirmation. ;)

You have been hitting the stupid pills, or the booze, pretty heavily tonight.

Look in Environment, doofus.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 6:39pm:

Are you suggesting evolution is horseshit?>

http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/jon-popcorn.gif

Jovial Monk wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 9:34pm:

You have been hitting the stupid pills, or the booze, pretty heavily tonight. Look in Environment, doofus.

With 58 pages of threads each with their own pages of posts? Dream on, doofus. ;)

Have a look  ::) ::) ::)

lee wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 10:27pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on May 6th, 2017 at 8:55pm: During February, the average contiguous U.S. temperature was 41.2°F, 7.3°F above the 20th century average. A long way from 40ºF above normal. ;)

It can't have been that one. ;)

Gordon wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 8:24pm:

Are we all proud of our fellow Aussie done good in the USA, Ken Ham?

Canadian Yid, is he?

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 6:21pm:

The Science is never in..  throughout the years we develop different and more advance technologies which gives us better insights to our pasts... and yet we still believe in Evolution and other such horseshit.. like... Global Warming for instance...  :D But.... Why are scientists such liars??? why do scientists get the sack when they go against the flow and prove previous scientists wrong?? Telling the Truth?? with their more advanced technology and education?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdqYPjA9VxA

OK ..  god knows why but i actually watched that youtube from start to finish. Let me tell you it was a hoot and a half.

Worst. Science. Ever.

The scientist who first identified T-rex soft tissue and was interviewed, although edited with extreme bias, in this video, Mary Schweitzer, went on to unravel just how soft tissue was found in millions of year old bones.

And found out why.

http://www.livescience.com/41537-t-rex-soft-tissue.html

This video is simply the worst. science. ever.

But, what have we come to expect from the Mechanic?

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 6:21pm:

and yet we still believe in Evolution and other such horseshit..

Lord Herbert wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 8:58pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on May 6th, 2017 at 6:39pm: Are you suggesting evolution is horseshit?> Evolution accounts for most of what we see in nature but not all of it. I was watching a doco recently in which they showed the life-cycle of Botflies. All very evolutionary until it got to the part where they showed the larvae of botflies have several rows of bristles on its body that are angled backwards so that you can't pull them out of where they are lodged in your skin. That design took intelligence, thought, and planning. And then there was a very deep ocean fish with a glowing fishing rod on its head to attract prey. 'Evolution'? Hardly. It takes genius to come up with a solution for survival in this way.

Oh dear Oh dear. Surely in 21st century we don't still have creationists? Well they would be rightards because they aren't the sharpest tools in the shed.

Botflies - so the larvae with backward facing bristles have a greater chance of surviving and passing on their genes. Larvae with forward facing bristles get pulled out and don't pass on their genes. That is exactly how natural selection works

Bio-luminescence is quite common in sea creatures. The fact that one of them uses it to attract prey means that it gets more to eat and is more likely to pass it's genes on to the next generation. Once again this is natural selection 101.

Those who believe in "Intelligent design" might like to ponder the life cycle of a jewel wasp (also known as an emerald wasp) which uses a cockroach to reproduce.

It stings the cockroach in a specific area of the brain which turns it into a zombie. It then leads the cockroach back to its nest and lays an egg on it. The larvae then hatches and over a period of eight days, consumes the cockroach's internal organs in an order which maximizes the likelihood that the cockroach will stay alive. This is to keep the cockroach fresh.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emerald_cockroach_wasp

Why would an "intelligent design" create a life cycle that is so incredibly cruel?
Many atheists regard this as evidence that God doesn't exist.

I'm not so sure the Mechanic believes in intelligent design, Barnacle, but it's something to aspire to, I guess.

mothra wrote on May 7^th, 2017 at 9:17am:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on May 6th, 2017 at 6:21pm: The Science is never in..  throughout the years we develop different and more advance technologies which gives us better insights to our pasts... and yet we still believe in Evolution and other such horseshit.. like... Global Warming for instance...  :D But.... Why are scientists such liars??? why do scientists get the sack when they go against the flow and prove previous scientists wrong?? Telling the Truth?? with their more advanced technology and education?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdqYPjA9VxA OK ..  god knows why but i actually watched that youtube from start to finish. Let me tell you it was a hoot and a half. Worst. Science. Ever. The scientist who first identified T-rex soft tissue and was interviewed, although edited with extreme bias, in this video, Mary Schweitzer, went on to unravel just how soft tissue was found in millions of year old bones. And found out why. http://www.livescience.com/41537-t-rex-soft-tissue.html This video is simply the worst. science. ever. But, what have we come to expect from the Mechanic?

oh.. I didn't realise that you knew more about science than scientists...

but then again..

what can we expect from a nincompoop who still believes in flat Earth, global warming and that we came from monkey's...

cuckoo cuckoo...  :D

Charles Darwin would like to weigh into this one.
The world is not flat.
Their are fish around with eyes like flashlights, squid change colours, when did creationism kick in and is it still there.
Monkeys have 99.999999996% DNA the same as human, could be just coincidence though.

Not monkeys, apes.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 8:58pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on May 6th, 2017 at 6:39pm: Are you suggesting evolution is horseshit?> Evolution accounts for most of what we see in nature but not all of it. I was watching a doco recently in which they showed the life-cycle of Botflies. All very evolutionary until it got to the part where they showed the larvae of botflies have several rows of bristles on its body that are angled backwards so that you can't pull them out of where they are lodged in your skin. That design took intelligence, thought, and planning. And then there was a very deep ocean fish with a glowing fishing rod on its head to attract prey. 'Evolution'? Hardly. It takes genius to come up with a solution for survival in this way.

No it doesn't. Evolution can still explain these.

If you had a botfly larvae without bristles and one that develops some small bristles through mutation, which one survives better?

If the fish had a small bioluminescence patch compared to one without a patch?

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on May 6^th, 2017 at 9:01pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on May 6th, 2017 at 6:39pm: Are you suggesting evolution is horseshit?> if you'd have watched the clip you wouldn't be asking me such dumb questions.. dur...

The monkeys comment later confirmed it. No evolutionist ever said we descend from monkeys. We descended from ape like ancestors.

Someone mentioned the wasp earlier.\


I'll throw in the recurrent laryngeal nerve. PLease explain it.

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on May 7^th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on May 7th, 2017 at 9:17am: President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on May 6th, 2017 at 6:21pm: The Science is never in..  throughout the years we develop different and more advance technologies which gives us better insights to our pasts... and yet we still believe in Evolution and other such horseshit.. like... Global Warming for instance...  :D But.... Why are scientists such liars??? why do scientists get the sack when they go against the flow and prove previous scientists wrong?? Telling the Truth?? with their more advanced technology and education?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdqYPjA9VxA OK ..  god knows why but i actually watched that youtube from start to finish. Let me tell you it was a hoot and a half. Worst. Science. Ever. The scientist who first identified T-rex soft tissue and was interviewed, although edited with extreme bias, in this video, Mary Schweitzer, went on to unravel just how soft tissue was found in millions of year old bones. And found out why. http://www.livescience.com/41537-t-rex-soft-tissue.html This video is simply the worst. science. ever. But, what have we come to expect from the Mechanic? oh.. I didn't realise that you knew more about science than scientists... but then again.. what can we expect from a nincompoop who still believes in flat Earth, global warming and that we came from monkey's... cuckoo cuckoo...  :D

I want to laugh ... but i'm compelled towards pity.