This had been raised in a current discussion about Membership.  It seem the little power group are seeking to cement themselves by restricting the rights of new Members to zero unless they have met some requirements like six months of active participation and a minimum post count of quality entries, quality to be determined by whoever is the Boss.

They say they are following a precedent set by Freediver.  That is crap.

Freediver allowed new Members immediate unrestricted participation including voting rights.  He allowed a crucial vote from a new Member Kiwi Dave and the very first post of that person was that crucial balance tipping vote.

Get real dwellers.  You ain't fooling anyone.

To expand on that.

Back when this happened, there was a Petition of some kind or other attacking me.  It was struggling to reach the required number to be effective under the Constitution.  It went on for ages, with numbers fluctauting over time but then was just one vote short to make it effective.

Out of the wide blue yonder, a new Member calling themselves Kiwi Dave arrived and her first post was that crucial vote.

I disallowed it believing it to be that of a sock, but Effendi then advised that it was in fact Nicole Page of original Debate & Relate fame (or infamy) whom, he said, he had approached elsewhere and enlisted her to Membership to make that crucial vote which he then acted upon by removing my access to the Admin buttons.

There is your precedent, sewer dwellers.

Being a quick learner, later, knowing of that precedent, I invited a few of my Cabbie mates (must surprise some that I do have many mates in real life) to enroll there and participate.  They voted because the precedent had been set by Effendi....Kiwi Dave.

Incorrect Super Nova.  You created that list.  By that stage FD had given up and simply rubber stamped everything you put in one of your rigged spreadsheet Tables.

The original precedent, unmistakeably and genuinely that of Effendi's is Kiwi Dave.

As AiA has acknowledged, since then, you people decided to ignore the Constitution and precedent to suit your own agendas.

Nifty deletion skippeeeee......but not nifty enough.

8-)

Attention FD. Can you get rid of this constant rubbish from this poster? Maybe put a new mod in relationships.

rhino wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 3:36pm:

Attention FD. Can you get rid of this constant rubbish from this poster? Maybe put a new mod in relationships.

If you don't like, don't use, Rhino.  No-one has a gun to your head and why do you give a twopenny stuff about it anyway?

rhino wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 3:36pm:

Attention FD. Can you get rid of this constant rubbish from this poster? Maybe put a new mod in relationships.

Agree with you Rhino..this person  is not well.

Aussie wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 3:38pm:

rhino wrote on May 2nd, 2017 at 3:36pm: Attention FD. Can you get rid of this constant rubbish from this poster? Maybe put a new mod in relationships. If you don't like, don't use, Rhino.  No-one has a gun to your head and why do you give a twopenny stuff about it anyway?

You constantly pollute this forum with your childish rubbish. You are the biggest troll here. I am at a loss to understand why you are allowed to continue this blatant disregard for forum rules. Despite which, agnes is right, you are not well. Seek professional help.

rhino wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 4:21pm:

Aussie wrote on May 2nd, 2017 at 3:38pm: rhino wrote on May 2nd, 2017 at 3:36pm: Attention FD. Can you get rid of this constant rubbish from this poster? Maybe put a new mod in relationships. If you don't like, don't use, Rhino.  No-one has a gun to your head and why do you give a twopenny stuff about it anyway? You constantly pollute this forum with your childish rubbish. You are the biggest troll here. I am at a loss to understand why you are allowed to continue this blatant disregard for forum rules. Despite which, agnes is right, you are not well. Seek professional help.

Show me which Rule, Rhino?

this is arsies private asylum...he cant move on from the past, he is lost stuck there...he will never move on.. the ghosts of PA haunt him..sounds a bit dramatic but its true.

Get help aussie. Go cook some pappadums and make a celebration feast for your bride returning from DisneyWorld..any day now. Take your mind off it for 20 seconds.

Quote:

Currently the "rule" is that you need to have been CONTRIBUTING in the POLITICAL Forum for 12 months before you earn a position to VOTE. Swearing unabashed in Sparta is NOT included in the amount of posts you have accumulated.

Post where and how that 'Rule' came into existence, Neferti.

Aussie wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 2:54pm:

To expand on that. Back when this happened, there was a Petition of some kind or other attacking me.  It was struggling to reach the required number to be effective under the Constitution.  It went on for ages, with numbers fluctauting over time but then was just one vote short to make it effective. Out of the wide blue yonder, a new Member calling themselves Kiwi Dave arrived and her first post was that crucial vote. I disallowed it believing it to be that of a sock, but Effendi then advised that it was in fact Nicole Page of original Debate & Relate fame (or infamy) whom, he said, he had approached elsewhere and enlisted her to Membership to make that crucial vote which he then acted upon by removing my access to the Admin buttons. There is your precedent, sewer dwellers. Being a quick learner, later, knowing of that precedent, I invited a few of my Cabbie mates (must surprise some that I do have many mates in real life) to enroll there and participate.  They voted because the precedent had been set by Effendi....Kiwi Dave.

Nice to know you still think of me Aussie. You are truly  obsessive Little Man.

Mistress Nicole wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 4:41pm:

Aussie wrote on May 2nd, 2017 at 2:54pm: To expand on that. Back when this happened, there was a Petition of some kind or other attacking me.  It was struggling to reach the required number to be effective under the Constitution.  It went on for ages, with numbers fluctauting over time but then was just one vote short to make it effective. Out of the wide blue yonder, a new Member calling themselves Kiwi Dave arrived and her first post was that crucial vote. I disallowed it believing it to be that of a sock, but Effendi then advised that it was in fact Nicole Page of original Debate & Relate fame (or infamy) whom, he said, he had approached elsewhere and enlisted her to Membership to make that crucial vote which he then acted upon by removing my access to the Admin buttons. There is your precedent, sewer dwellers. Being a quick learner, later, knowing of that precedent, I invited a few of my Cabbie mates (must surprise some that I do have many mates in real life) to enroll there and participate.  They voted because the precedent had been set by Effendi....Kiwi Dave. Nice to know you still think of me Aussie. You are truly  obsessive Little Man.

Not obsessive at all......nor little.  Just have a memory and can relate that to current bullshit being posted at the sewer.  That you turned up as Kiwi Dave and made that vote set the scene for what came later.

Christ the plot thickens!

Redmond Neck wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 4:58pm:

Christ the plot thickens!

    ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Redmond Neck wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 4:58pm:

Christ the plot thickens!

Yes.  Mistress Nicole is Nicole Page of Debate & Relate (the original and failed older version), and then, when a vote was needed.....Kiwi Dave.

Mr Neck, I can thoroughly understand your dilemma here.   You read competing Posts and, as you weren't there at the time......you are understandably confused.......no-one here or at the sewer has been there as long as I have (all the many, many originals abandoned ship many, many years ago when IQSRLOW was allowed in.)

A problem for them is that I have a very good memory and can read.

You'll work it out for yourself, I am sure.

Aussie wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 5:26pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on May 2nd, 2017 at 4:58pm: Christ the plot thickens! Yes.  Mistress Nicole is Nicole Page of Debate & Relate (the original and failed older version), and then, when a vote was needed.....Kiwi Dave. Mr Neck, I can thoroughly understand your dilemma here.   You read competing Posts and, as you weren't there at the time......you are understandably confused.......no-one here or at the sewer has been there as long as I have (all the many, many originals abandoned ship many, many years ago when IQSRLOW was allowed in.) A problem for them is that I have a very good memory and can read. You'll work it out for yourself, I am sure.

  You have walled yourself up in the registry of your computer arsie..you and it are one but neither you nor it understand each other lol. 2017 a Cyber Space Idiocy

Aussie wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 5:26pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on May 2nd, 2017 at 4:58pm: Christ the plot thickens! Yes.  Mistress Nicole is Nicole Page of Debate & Relate (the original and failed older version), and then, when a vote was needed.....Kiwi Dave. Mr Neck, I can thoroughly understand your dilemma here.   You read competing Posts and, as you weren't there at the time......you are understandably confused.......no-one here or at the sewer has been there as long as I have (all the many, many originals abandoned ship many, many years ago when IQSRLOW was allowed in.) A problem for them is that I have a very good memory and can read. You'll work it out for yourself, I am sure.

oh well that changes everything , so much clearer now lol   ;D ;D ;D ;D

Agnes wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 3:47pm:

rhino wrote on May 2nd, 2017 at 3:36pm: Attention FD. Can you get rid of this constant rubbish from this poster? Maybe put a new mod in relationships. Agree with you Rhino..this person  is not well.

Hi Agnes - I'd vote for you as Mod of relationships.

It used to be my forum and then I took a break Bobs ,but aussie took custody in my absence and that was that.. cods or mantra would make a great mod here

Agnes wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 8:01pm:

It used to be my forum and then I took a break Bobs ,but aussie took custody in my absence and that was that.. cods or mantra would make a great mod here

Maybe we should vote?

Aussie doesn't sound very happy here anyway.

This isn’t PA  :D :D :D :D No elections for Mods or GMods.

Bobby. wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 8:04pm:

Agnes wrote on May 2nd, 2017 at 8:01pm: It used to be my forum and then I took a break Bobs ,but aussie took custody in my absence and that was that.. cods or mantra would make a great mod here Maybe we should vote? Aussie doesn't sound very happy here anyway.

  It really does need a change- mothra would be good as well I think.

Agnes wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 8:01pm:

It used to be my forum and then I took a break Bobs ,but aussie took custody in my absence and that was that.. cods or mantra would make a great mod here

Why do people lie so blatantly?  You abandoned it Agnes.  Effendi asked for a volunteer, I offered......and here I am.

Aussie wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 8:14pm:

Agnes wrote on May 2nd, 2017 at 8:01pm: It used to be my forum and then I took a break Bobs ,but aussie took custody in my absence and that was that.. cods or mantra would make a great mod here Why do people lie so blatantly?  You abandoned it Agnes.  Effendi asked for a volunteer, I offered......and here I am.

Yes unfortunatley here you are....hopefully you will be replaced....and soon.

Agnes wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 8:12pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 2nd, 2017 at 8:04pm: Agnes wrote on May 2nd, 2017 at 8:01pm: It used to be my forum and then I took a break Bobs ,but aussie took custody in my absence and that was that.. cods or mantra would make a great mod here Maybe we should vote? Aussie doesn't sound very happy here anyway.   It really does need a change- mothra would be good as well I think.

Skippy has offered to be a mod here.

Jovial Monk wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 8:07pm:

This isn’t PA  :D :D :D :D No elections for Mods or GMods.

 

Do you want another forum Monk..another fermentations..lol

Just pointing out no Mod elections here.

Aussie wont be going anywhere..but I dont think he deserves this place..he is a maniac. Ivan Milat

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/05/21/article-2633599-1E0F535E00000578-424_634x457.jpg

Sanctimonious crap:


Quote:

In any case, this forum has something unique that no other forum has and it's worth something to everyone. It was always a platform for democracy and some have tried to make it a platform for their dictatorship. It was never set up for a dictatorship.

Yeas, it used to be unique until you and the Famous Five emptied the place and you now seek to make sure it stays that way......under your control.

There is a way to test that, you know.  That's this.....I'll get all my mates to register there.......we'll swamp you off the Planet.......

Is that okay?

Democracy????

Sure...after you have emptied the place of sound people and reject anyone who does not toe the line of the Famous Five.

Anyone who raises legitimate questions is accused of making things hard/difficult.


Quote:

Why are you making things so difficult for no good reason?

We can't have that, can we.

8-)

Quote:

He doesn't even try to hide his underhanded outrageous quest for power anymore. It must suck to be such a failure that FD had to sack him twice.

I never hide anything skippeee.  I am always out in the open, unapologetically, unlike you and your hidden Sub-Forums. 

Don't you understand the basic fact?  Which is:

If I wanted to, I could swamp the sewer with new Members, they will all meet whatever criteria you of the Famous Five impose ..... six months....12 months....and just ...... take over.

All within whatever provisions there are in the Constitution.

Ya see.....I do have many mates, not just Cabbies.

;D

How come not one of you lot cannot get even one Mate to register?  Have I got to do all the lifting?

And here you have evidence proving your point beyond doubt, Mr Neck.


Quote:

You could swamp us with women bashers like you. But you mistake us for being stupid enough to approve their memberships. Multiple new members that appear from nowhere don't just "show up" out of the blue. Only a buggerwit like you would hatch such a plan,Wile E coyote

How easy is it to expose them?

;D

And there you were like all of us Mr Neck, thinking that these additions to the Constitution were about something other than making sure the Famous Five stay in absolute control.


Quote:

Where a provision of the constitution undermines the authority of exalted leader, exalted leader is obliged to support the provision. This obligation comes without authority over the constitution or it's interpretation. That is, exalted leader is to serve the people via the constitution, but does not have final say on any constitutional matter. Exalted leader must facilitate the expression of the will of the members through constitutional processes by:     helping members to use the constitution     counting votes and signatures     suggesting the outcome of an election or referendum     suggesting the magic number

:)

Quote:

Of course no matter what happens now, given what is about to be included in the constitution ozzzz will never hold a position of power here ever again. 8-) So go your hardest women basher.

What a silly thing to post.  If I decide to swamp.....we will just change the Constitution just like you are doing......when a handful control the place now and change things to suit them and their agenda.  Easy, when you have the numbers skippeeeee.  I can get them any time no matter what is in the Constitution.  Heck, I can get them from all over the Country!

Doubt I'll bother, but.....stop kidding yourself skippeeeee.

You can of course try to neutralise me by getting your mates to register to shore up your position.

You have not thought this through, have you.

Why do I have to do all the heavy lifting, skippeeeee?

Ho ho ho.


Quote:

If the sad little ...  had any mates, as he claims, he would have already swamped this place over the past few years since he was booted. The best he can do is invent sox. :rofl Nup,he is hated even more in real life than he is in cyber life.

I did that skippeee.....you and Super Nova ignored their votes........ignoring the Constitution as AiA finally admits.

I can do it again.....ten fold...... no matter what your Famous Five do with the Constitution.  Sure, it will take time......but never underestimate my capacity to be patient.

Aussie wrote on May 2^nd, 2017 at 10:59pm:

I can do it again.....ten fold...... no matter what your Famous Five do with the Constitution.  Sure, it will take time......but never underestimate my capacity to be patient.

Think of all the arguments in the past about the Constitution Aussie - it's been done to death. You could argue about it until you turned blue, although it's more fun of course if you have equal numbers of opposition. Those threads went on for 40 or 50 pages and quickly.

Do you remember when I went into Wiki and changed it? That didn't go over well. When FD changed it back again - he explained that my change might be regretted later. I think he was right.

No matter how insightfully anyone interprets it Aussie - it can be interpreted differently by someone else. The bare bones of it is that it's a numbers game only.

Quote:

The bare bones of it is that it's a numbers game only.

Correct.

Aussie wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 10:04am:

Quote: The bare bones of it is that it's a numbers game only. Correct.

That was an obvious statement - I should have deleted it. As you can't get anywhere near the place - you have to build up your numbers another way with people here who are regulars.

Try and revive Relationships again Aussie - that's only my opinion. It was a busy board until a few months ago. I've noticed that a few of the excess threads lately are going into Extremism. It would be easier to put your efforts into attracting people to post here.

Mantra, I'm doing nothing about the sewer, and I will not, until there is an awareness there that the current regime is basically ~ 'corrupt.'

Aussie wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 10:40am:

Mantra, I'm doing nothing about the sewer, and I will not, until there is an awareness there that the current regime is basically ~ 'corrupt.'

FD owns it Aussie. He has the ultimate word.

I don't think there's anything you can do to change it. Unless you can find a dozen people who will support you and sell them to FD - it's a stalemate.

Was it Animal Mother who said words to the effect - "PA can be likened to the fish that John West rejects"?

Work on what you have Aussie - not on what you don't have.

mantra wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 10:58am:

Aussie wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 10:40am: Mantra, I'm doing nothing about the sewer, and I will not, until there is an awareness there that the current regime is basically ~ 'corrupt.' FD owns it Aussie. He has the ultimate word. I don't think there's anything you can do to change it. Unless you can find a dozen people who will support you and sell them to FD - it's a stalemate. Was it Animal Mother who said words to the effect - "PA can be likened to the fish that John West rejects"? Work on what you have Aussie - not on what you don't have.

FD doesnt care, it gives him a laugh.. nothing will ever change. I suggest you inject life back into this place and so far you have only ever used this place as your own personal launch pad`~ to launch spit bombs at PA ~ you are as much to blame as anyone else~ you should be ashamed..I set this forum up for pp who had RELATIONSHIP problems..but instead you have installed yourself as prisoner 594...and this place (which had so much promise) is just a place for you to wallow in your own insane ramblings where you salivate and relish acts of revenge)...I wish FD would replace you with some one half sane. You banned Mantra for 3 months..why did you do that Aussie..someone who now supports you for reasons only known to her ..why did you do that..expain to us why...and why anyone would ever want you as an admin anywhere- ever.?

Agnes wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 12:31pm:

FD doesnt care, it gives him a laugh.. nothing will ever change.

That sums it up AG.

Agnes wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 12:31pm:

mantra wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 10:58am: Aussie wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 10:40am: Mantra, I'm doing nothing about the sewer, and I will not, until there is an awareness there that the current regime is basically ~ 'corrupt.' FD owns it Aussie. He has the ultimate word. I don't think there's anything you can do to change it. Unless you can find a dozen people who will support you and sell them to FD - it's a stalemate. Was it Animal Mother who said words to the effect - "PA can be likened to the fish that John West rejects"? Work on what you have Aussie - not on what you don't have. FD doesnt care, it gives him a laugh.. nothing will ever change. I suggest you inject life back into this place and so far you have only ever used this place as your own personal launch pad`~ to launch spit bombs at PA ~ you are as much to blame as anyone else~ you should be ashamed..I set this forum up for pp who had RELATIONSHIP problems..but instead you have installed yourself as prisoner 594...and this place (which had so much promise) is just a place for you to wallow in your own insane ramblings where you salivate and relish acts of revenge)...I wish FD would replace you with some one half sane. You banned Mantra for 3 months..why did you do that Aussie..someone who now supports you for reasons only known to her ..why did you do that..expain to us why...and why anyone would ever want you as an admin anywhere- ever.?

On reflection, three months was too long but the ban was warranted because mantra made accusations that Members of my Administration had hacked her into her account.  What worse accusation can be levelled at Admin?

I then asked her to provide some proof of what she said happened and I gave her seven days to do so accompanied with advice that if she did not, a ban would follow.  She did not, and the ban was imposed.

Aussie wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 1:19pm:

Agnes wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 12:31pm: mantra wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 10:58am: Aussie wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 10:40am: Mantra, I'm doing nothing about the sewer, and I will not, until there is an awareness there that the current regime is basically ~ 'corrupt.' FD owns it Aussie. He has the ultimate word. I don't think there's anything you can do to change it. Unless you can find a dozen people who will support you and sell them to FD - it's a stalemate. Was it Animal Mother who said words to the effect - "PA can be likened to the fish that John West rejects"? Work on what you have Aussie - not on what you don't have. FD doesnt care, it gives him a laugh.. nothing will ever change. I suggest you inject life back into this place and so far you have only ever used this place as your own personal launch pad`~ to launch spit bombs at PA ~ you are as much to blame as anyone else~ you should be ashamed..I set this forum up for pp who had RELATIONSHIP problems..but instead you have installed yourself as prisoner 594...and this place (which had so much promise) is just a place for you to wallow in your own insane ramblings where you salivate and relish acts of revenge)...I wish FD would replace you with some one half sane. You banned Mantra for 3 months..why did you do that Aussie..someone who now supports you for reasons only known to her ..why did you do that..expain to us why...and why anyone would ever want you as an admin anywhere- ever.? On reflection, three months was too long but the ban was warranted because mantra made accusations that Members of my Administration had hacked her into her account.  What worse accusation can be levelled at Admin? I then asked her to provide some proof of what she said happened and I gave her seven days to do so accompanied with advice that if she did not, a ban would follow.  She did not, and the ban was imposed.

Weak as water...this is how you treat pp who are supposed to be a friend to you, you would sell your own grandmother for a $. I have experienced your nastiness first hand lately at Monks place too..trying to turn Mods here/red/etc against me..and not to mention Monk..but he is about as bright as you because he bought into  your insanity.I spit on him too because he was supposed to be some kind of friend to me but he never was..and never will be ever again.  It is no accident both you and monk are single.
  You really do belong at the sewer but they cannot stomach you either..a horrible trouble making "man.".

you dont have to ban me stupid..I ban myself..

Gee......such hate from someone so polite always.

:D

Agnes wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 1:45pm:

you dont have to ban me stupid..I ban myself..

What's your problem with Monk?

way more polite than you actually deserve.

Mod. wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 1:46pm:

Agnes wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 1:45pm: you dont have to ban me stupid..I ban myself.. What's your problem with Monk?

  You are his bestie..nuff said.

Agnes wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 1:47pm:

Mod. wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 1:46pm: Agnes wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 1:45pm: you dont have to ban me stupid..I ban myself.. What's your problem with Monk?   You are his bestie..nuff said.

News to me.  Even if true.....so what?

I banned you from my board for 3 months and a day, show you the error of your ways, mantra in the end asked me to end the ban.

We have had some furious argument and both Aussie and AG were dumped as Admins on my board because they gave me the chits.

Bestie?  ::)

I also think Aussie should totally ignore and forget PA which will then collapse in a heap for not having Aussie to whinge about anymore. I would have also banned snippy from Relationships when the marsupial chit was taunting Aussie for over a year.

Jovial Monk wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 1:53pm:

I banned you from my board for 3 months and a day, show you the error of your ways, mantra in the end asked me to end the ban. We have had some furious argument and both Aussie and AG were dumped as Admins on my board because they gave me the chits. Bestie?  ::) I also think Aussie should totally ignore and forget PA which will then collapse in a heap for not having Aussie to whinge about anymore. I would have also banned snippy from Relationships when the marsupial chit was taunting Aussie for over a year.

really , well I never noticed..now ban me forever from your dung heap..I wont be going back..now you and aussie can do the hampster dance in peace.....bbbbrrrrr

I don't issue bans capriciously or for personal reasons.

Aussie wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 2:00pm:

I don't issue bans capriciously or for personal reasons.

  You sir are a liar.

A 3 months for no reason...I call that personal. A member is allowed to call such grave matters as security to the attention of admin, it is her right to do so, but you reply with a 3 month ban!!!!!!! you numbskull..and knowing your penchant for trying to access stalking details of members...she had a right to call you on it!!!  Carly.

You sir are a stalker and a liar.

Agnes wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 2:04pm:

Aussie wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 2:00pm: I don't issue bans capriciously or for personal reasons.   You sir are a liar. A 3 months for no reason...I call that personal. A member is allowed to call such grave matters as security to the attention of admin, it is her right to do so, but you reply with a 3 month ban!!!!!!! you numbskull..and knowing your penchant for trying to access stalking details of members...she had a right to call you on it!!!  Carly. You sir are a stalker and a liar.

You are grasping at straws yet again Agnes.  Yes, it was right to bring the matter to my attention.  What was not right was not providing me with the details despite being given seven days to it.

That left the nasty allegation made in open with a great song and dance, and not substantiated or withdrawn.

Aussie wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 2:09pm:

Agnes wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 2:04pm: Aussie wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 2:00pm: I don't issue bans capriciously or for personal reasons.   You sir are a liar. A 3 months for no reason...I call that personal. A member is allowed to call such grave matters as security to the attention of admin, it is her right to do so, but you reply with a 3 month ban!!!!!!! you numbskull..and knowing your penchant for trying to access stalking details of members...she had a right to call you on it!!!  Carly. You sir are a stalker and a liar. You are grasping at straws yet again Agnes.  Yes, it was right to bring the matter to my attention.  What was not right was not providing me with the details despite being given seven days to it. That left the nasty allegation made in open with a great song and dance, and not substantiated or withdrawn.

You have form and priors..! You can't ask for trust.. You know where I live..good luck if you turn up here..you will need it I can tell you that much.

Aussie wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 2:09pm:

Agnes wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 2:04pm: Aussie wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 2:00pm: I don't issue bans capriciously or for personal reasons.   You sir are a liar. A 3 months for no reason...I call that personal. A member is allowed to call such grave matters as security to the attention of admin, it is her right to do so, but you reply with a 3 month ban!!!!!!! you numbskull..and knowing your penchant for trying to access stalking details of members...she had a right to call you on it!!!  Carly. You sir are a stalker and a liar. You are grasping at straws yet again Agnes.  Yes, it was right to bring the matter to my attention.  What was not right was not providing me with the details despite being given seven days to it. That left the nasty allegation made in open with a great song and dance, and not substantiated or withdrawn.

Details of the admin panel ? How was she supposed to do that as a member ? You knew she couldnt and so you were always going to ban her. No wonder so many are aggrieved by you I hope you are banned from here. tbh.

Quote:

You have form and priors..! You can't ask for trust.. You know where I live..good luck if you turn up here..you will need it I can tell you that much.

I don't recall asking for trust.  Perhaps you can show me where.

And......I would not have a clue where you live, and I am not interested either.

Jovial Monk wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 1:53pm:

I also think Aussie should totally ignore and forget PA which will then collapse in a heap for not having Aussie to whinge about anymore.

tru dat!

Quote:

Details of the admin panel ? How was she supposed to do that as a member ? You knew she couldnt and so you were always going to ban her. No wonder so many are aggrieved by you I hope you are banned from here. tbh

The Admin/Mod logs showed that nothing had happened with mantra's account.  That was precisely why I asked her to provide details so I could investigate.

Aussie wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 2:23pm:

Quote: Details of the admin panel ? How was she supposed to do that as a member ? You knew she couldnt and so you were always going to ban her. No wonder so many are aggrieved by you I hope you are banned from here. tbh The Admin/Mod logs showed that nothing had happened with mantra's account.  That was precisely why I asked her to provide details so I could investigate.

 
You would say that wouldnt you....so predictable.?

Aussie wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 1:19pm:

On reflection, three months was too long but the ban was warranted because mantra made accusations that Members of my Administration had hacked her into her account.  What worse accusation can be levelled at Admin? I then asked her to provide some proof of what she said happened and I gave her seven days to do so accompanied with advice that if she did not, a ban would follow.  She did not, and the ban was imposed.

I don't really want to get into this. At the time I couldn't upload the screenshot I'd taken - either onto photobucket or directly onto the forum because the file was too big. I think you had a similar problem a few months ago where you couldn't upload a screenshot here. I still haven't figured out how to get one onto a forum.

Agnes wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 3:37pm:

Aussie wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 2:23pm: Quote: Details of the admin panel ? How was she supposed to do that as a member ? You knew she couldnt and so you were always going to ban her. No wonder so many are aggrieved by you I hope you are banned from here. tbh The Admin/Mod logs showed that nothing had happened with mantra's account.  That was precisely why I asked her to provide details so I could investigate.   You would say that wouldnt you....so predictable.?

 

I also said it at the time.

mantra wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 3:42pm:

Aussie wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 1:19pm: On reflection, three months was too long but the ban was warranted because mantra made accusations that Members of my Administration had hacked her into her account.  What worse accusation can be levelled at Admin? I then asked her to provide some proof of what she said happened and I gave her seven days to do so accompanied with advice that if she did not, a ban would follow.  She did not, and the ban was imposed. I don't really want to get into this. At the time I couldn't upload the screenshot I'd taken - either onto photobucket or directly onto the forum because the file was too big. I think you had a similar problem a few months ago where you couldn't upload a screenshot here. I still haven't figured out how to get one onto a forum.

have you tried to resize it mantra..?

The really important thing is you should not have been given a ban at all...was it only banning offence because you questioned the dictator Aussie and made him lose face, you infuriated him..I suspect that this is what it was, there was no reason to ban you. Aussie pretends to be your friend until he decides you have somehow crossed him.. then out pops Aunty Acid.

Nifty edit Agnes:


Quote:

The really important thing is you should not have been given a ban at all...was it only banning offence because you questioned the dictator Aussie and made him lose face, you infuriated him..I suspect that this is what it was, there was no reason to ban you. Aussie pretends to be your friend until he decides you have somehow crossed him.. then out pops Aunty Acid.

"Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned."

Agnes wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 3:48pm:

have you tried to resize it mantra..?

Resizing probably wouldn't have made much difference to the size of the file AG and it would have been too difficult to see the details also. You've got to change the type of file it is apparently and that was beyond me at the time.

I'm past providing proof to anyone now. If they don't believe me - so be it.

I don't believe in long bans and never have. I wouldn't do it to anyone, so I'm always surprised when it's done to me especially because I'm conscientious about adhering to all the basic rules of a forum.

Aussie wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 3:54pm:

Nifty edit Agnes: Quote: The really important thing is you should not have been given a ban at all...was it only banning offence because you questioned the dictator Aussie and made him lose face, you infuriated him..I suspect that this is what it was, there was no reason to ban you. Aussie pretends to be your friend until he decides you have somehow crossed him.. then out pops Aunty Acid. "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned."

And an ugly woman you are too Arsie...err aunty acid

Agnes wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 4:03pm:

Aussie wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 3:54pm: Nifty edit Agnes: Quote: The really important thing is you should not have been given a ban at all...was it only banning offence because you questioned the dictator Aussie and made him lose face, you infuriated him..I suspect that this is what it was, there was no reason to ban you. Aussie pretends to be your friend until he decides you have somehow crossed him.. then out pops Aunty Acid. "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned." And an ugly woman you are too Arsie...err aunty acid

Just checked.  Yep.....I've got one of those dangly things Agnes.

mantra wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 4:02pm:

Agnes wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 3:48pm: have you tried to resize it mantra..? Resizing probably wouldn't have made much difference to the size of the file AG and it would have been too difficult to see the details also. You've got to change the type of file it is apparently and that was beyond me at the time. I'm past providing proof to anyone now. If they don't believe me - so be it. I don't believe in long bans and never have. I wouldn't do it to anyone, so I'm always surprised when it's done to me especially when I'm conscientious about adhering to all the basic rules of a forum.

  I think you could have made it legible mantra but matters not anymore...but anyway,..the ban totally unneccarry and just another knife wound Arsie has inflicted-- on himself.

Agnes wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 4:08pm:

I think you could have made it legible mantra but matters not anymore...but anyway,..the ban totally unneccarry and just a

I was upset at the time, but I eventually got over it AG. People play all sorts of games on these forums mainly over power. It's something we have to get used to or it just makes posting here too unpleasant.

Jayzuz!


Quote:

Around the Annual PA Election there used to be a flurry of "socks" joining up, hoping to be able to vote.

Indeed,  ~ created by NOIQ and AiA quite deliberately to disrupt an election.


Quote:

Freediver still oversees the votes and disallows whatever, as far as I am aware.

No, incorrect.  Super Nova has been calling that.....via his spreadsheet....and Effendi, probably because he could not care less...just rubber stamps it.

*snip*


Quote:

PS IF this post is copied elsewhere I will be reporting such person and advising Freediver.

Report and advise away, Neferti.

Aussie wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 2:23pm:

Quote: Details of the admin panel ? How was she supposed to do that as a member ? You knew she couldnt and so you were always going to ban her. No wonder so many are aggrieved by you I hope you are banned from here. tbh The Admin/Mod logs showed that nothing had happened with mantra's account.  That was precisely why I asked her to provide details so I could investigate.

 

So you say nothing happened so why did you ban her - this point was just bought to my attention - so why DID you ban Mantra for 3 months!!! - you skipped over this point !

So how was mantra going to prove anything because she needed access  to the mod panel to prove it!   You say that nothing showed on the mod panel and I think you did try to get into her account that was why you shut her down by banning her so you yourself would not be revealed as the one who tried to get into her account!!!!

This is the truth of the matter

Agnes wrote on May 3^rd, 2017 at 5:21pm:

Aussie wrote on May 3rd, 2017 at 2:23pm: Quote: Details of the admin panel ? How was she supposed to do that as a member ? You knew she couldnt and so you were always going to ban her. No wonder so many are aggrieved by you I hope you are banned from here. tbh The Admin/Mod logs showed that nothing had happened with mantra's account.  That was precisely why I asked her to provide details so I could investigate.   So you say nothing happened so why did you ban her - this point was just bought to my attention - so why DID you ban Mantra for 3 months!!! - you skipped over this point ! So how was mantra going to prove anything because she needed access  to the mod panel to prove it!   You say that nothing showed on the mod panel and I think you did try to get into her account that was why you shut her down by banning her so you yourself would not be revealed as the one who tried to get into her account!!!! This is the truth of the matter

Your desperation is becomming embarrassing Agnes.  You do understand that, don't you?

https://media.giphy.com/media/mmYy42RNrgA0w/giphy.gif

Quote:

Your desperation is becomming embarrassing Agnes.  You do understand that, don't you?

No it's not embarrassing Aussie. AG has added a bit of life to this thread - no-one else has bothered.

She's also made some good points by mentioning your banning methods back then. I don't think you would do the same now. AG's comments could apply to any moderator who bans someone for a very long time for personal reasons.

I know you're getting a lot of negative feedback lately. I switch off a bit and probably haven't noticed as much as I should have, but you must be doing something different lately because a few regular members seem upset with you.

My level of perceived popularity of a Forum has never been an influence on my conduct.  I stay pretty consistent and am willing to admit an error as I have for example, on your ban being too long....but not the ban itself.

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 4:55pm:

My level of perceived popularity of a Forum has never been an influence on my conduct.  I stay pretty consistent and am willing to admit an error as I have for example, on your ban being too long....but not the ban itself.

In retrospect - I appreciate your one week's notice.

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 4:55pm:

My level of perceived popularity of a Forum has never been an influence on my conduct.  I stay pretty consistent and am willing to admit an error as I have for example, on your ban being too long....but not the ban itself.

  What exactly was mantra banned for aussie...detail please. I dont think mantra even knows..

First.....this posted at the sewer by Neferti:


Quote:

I think he is smacking (the word was ferking, spelled correctly) himself up the arse. Now, THAT is an achievement and requires a very long dongle .... or perhaps he has borrowed Julia Gillard's thingie. :rofl

And that is what Super Nova expects me to just.....cop?  Nah.

And of course.....she really is quite the Lady, is Nappy.  Great advert for the sewer as it is typical of the place.

:D

Agnes wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 6:30pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 4:55pm: My level of perceived popularity of a Forum has never been an influence on my conduct.  I stay pretty consistent and am willing to admit an error as I have for example, on your ban being too long....but not the ban itself.   What exactly was mantra banned for aussie...detail please. I dont think mantra even knows..

Which part of my already oft given explanation here and many times elsewhere are you struggling with Agnes?

Agnes wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 6:30pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 4:55pm: My level of perceived popularity of a Forum has never been an influence on my conduct.  I stay pretty consistent and am willing to admit an error as I have for example, on your ban being too long....but not the ban itself.   What exactly was mantra banned for aussie...detail please. I dont think mantra even knows..

You struggle with reading and comprehension when it suits you ...try again, one more time for the hard of hearing...or is there NO good reason..being evasive makes you look bad.

Repeat:


Quote:

On reflection, three months was too long but the ban was warranted because mantra made accusations that Members of my Administration had hacked her into her account.  What worse accusation can be levelled at Admin? I then asked her to provide some proof of what she said happened and I gave her seven days to do so accompanied with advice that if she did not, a ban would follow.  She did not, and the ban was imposed.

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 6:51pm:

Repeat: Quote: On reflection, three months was too long but the ban was warranted because mantra made accusations that Members of my Administration had hacked her into her account.  What worse accusation can be levelled at Admin? I then asked her to provide some proof of what she said happened and I gave her seven days to do so accompanied with advice that if she did not, a ban would follow.  She did not, and the ban was imposed.

This is not a ban worthy reason..tell us why you think it is...how is this ban worthy in any way? You owe mantra a public apology for being unable to own what YOU did..and for the stress and upset you caused to her.

Agnes wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 7:05pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 6:51pm: Repeat: Quote: On reflection, three months was too long but the ban was warranted because mantra made accusations that Members of my Administration had hacked her into her account.  What worse accusation can be levelled at Admin? I then asked her to provide some proof of what she said happened and I gave her seven days to do so accompanied with advice that if she did not, a ban would follow.  She did not, and the ban was imposed. This is not a ban worthy reason..tell us why you think it is...how is this ban worthy in any way? You owe mantra a public apology for being unable to own what YOU did..and for the stress and upset you caused to her.

Sure.....I'll repeat it again for you:


Quote:

What worse accusation can be levelled at Admin? I then asked her to provide some proof of what she said happened and I gave her seven days to do so accompanied with advice that if she did not, a ban would follow.  She did not, and the ban was imposed.

Nothing will change Agnes.  That is what happened, and that is the reason the ban was imposed.

Any other questions Agnes?

Agnes wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 7:05pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 6:51pm: Repeat: Quote: On reflection, three months was too long but the ban was warranted because mantra made accusations that Members of my Administration had hacked her into her account.  What worse accusation can be levelled at Admin? I then asked her to provide some proof of what she said happened and I gave her seven days to do so accompanied with advice that if she did not, a ban would follow.  She did not, and the ban was imposed. This is not a ban worthy reason..tell us why you think it is...how is this ban worthy in any way? You owe mantra a public apology for being unable to own what YOU did..and for the stress and upset you caused to her.

again, you owe mantra a public apology..

She has already been given the only apology due.

Anything else Agnes?

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 7:27pm:

She has already been given the only apology due. Anything else Agnes?

Where is the public apology for the very public and cruel way you treated her? I havent seen it?

Agnes wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 7:50pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 7:27pm: She has already been given the only apology due. Anything else Agnes? Where is the public apology for the very public and cruel way you treated her? I havent seen it?

It was posted at the sewer ages ago Agnes.  I reinforced it here yesterday, or today. 

Anything else, Agnes?

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 7:58pm:

Agnes wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 7:50pm: Aussie wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 7:27pm: She has already been given the only apology due. Anything else Agnes? Where is the public apology for the very public and cruel way you treated her? I havent seen it? It was posted at the sewer ages ago Agnes.  I reinforced it here yesterday, or today.  Anything else, Agnes?

  I want to see the reinforcement I must have missed it....
"I am deeply sorry mantra for my disgraceful and hurtful actions that resulted in 3 months of distress and unhappiness and deprivation of your liberties.. I am deeply sorry for the hurt I have caused you...and the nasty insinuations that you were a liar and a fraud " 

Anything less than that is unacceptable . Try something different , try telling the truth, unvarnished.

Not gonna happen, Agnes.

Anything else, Agnes?

Agnes wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 8:31pm:

try telling the truth, unvarnished.

speaking of telling the truth, why is it that you think you can make claims about me and then ban me from Tavern when I reply? what sort of demented fkkwit are you?

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 9:07pm:

Agnes wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 8:31pm: try telling the truth, unvarnished. speaking of telling the truth, why is it that you think you can make claims about me and then ban me from Tavern when I reply? what sort of demented fkkwit are you?

personal abuse

I'm not going to describe Agnes.....I'll stick to facts.  She has banned me, she has banned Monk, I guess she has now banned you.......all because she does not like.  It is capricious and malicious.

I don't care, I doubt Monk does, and I doubt you will.

What I don't get is this.  She totally changed a Member's post in this Thread:

Link.

See Post # 95 .

It was originally a post made by Monk (when he was not banned) and in it, he was very supportive of cods and her situation.

Agnes (as Green Hornet) changed that to read:


Quote:

Re: any advice.. Reply #95 - Today at 7:47pm Quote I am a dipstick..

She made it appear that is what Monk posted.

She then, later, deleted it entirely, and it is what you see it to be now.

I reported all that to Effendi.  He has read the PM.  Nothing.

That is a very clear message from The Big Kahuna that Member Run Forum Mods can actually do what they please with no recourse.

Whatever bastard you or anyone might think I am.........I pale into insignificance, comparatively.

Agnes wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 9:23pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 9:07pm: Agnes wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 8:31pm: try telling the truth, unvarnished. speaking of telling the truth, why is it that you think you can make claims about me and then ban me from Tavern when I reply? what sort of demented fkkwit are you? personal abuse

personal abuse? you must be kidding. Asking you where the fkk I said I wanted to be a cat is not personal abuse. You're even more demented than I originally gave you credit for if you class that as abuse

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 9:26pm:

I'm not going to describe Agnes.....I'll stick to facts.  She has banned me, she has banned Monk, I guess she has now banned you.......all because she does not like.  It is capricious and malicious.

I'm starting to get the impression that she's worse than you  :D :D :D

This:


Quote:

what sort of demented fkkwit are you?

....is what she is referring to.

As it is a mere question, and not an allegation.....it stands.

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 9:31pm:

This: Quote: what sort of demented fkkwit are you? ....is what she is referring to. As it is a mere question, and not an allegation.....it stands.

ooh was that her whinging? I thought that was her reply to me  :D :D

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 9:26pm:

I'm not going to describe Agnes.....I'll stick to facts.  She has banned me, she has banned Monk, I guess she has now banned you.......all because she does not like.  It is capricious and malicious. I don't care, I doubt Monk does, and I doubt you will. What I don't get is this.  She totally changed a Member's post in this Thread: Link. See Post # 95 . It was originally a post made by Monk (when he was not banned) and in it, he was very supportive of cods and her situation. Agnes (as Green Hornet) changed that to read: Quote: Re: any advice.. Reply #95 - Today at 7:47pm Quote I am a dipstick.. She made it appear that is what Monk posted. She then, later, deleted it entirely, and it is what you see it to be now. I reported all that to Effendi.  He has read the PM.  Nothing. That is a very clear message from The Big Kahuna that Member Run Forum Mods can actually do what they please with no recourse. Whatever bastard you or anyone might think I am.........I pale into insignificance, comparatively.

Agnes.......my turn now.  Why did you use Mod buttons to change a Member's Post so that it appeared he was calling himself a dipstick, when in fact, what he posted was very sympathetic and supportive of Cods?

Why did you did you do that Agnes?

Oh, it gets better!  Agnes has now banned Mr Smith 'forever!'


Quote:

Re: Beautiful Animals.. Reply #21 - Today at 8:17pm Quote John Smith wrote Today at 8:14pm: Green Hornet wrote Today at 8:04pm: John Smith you are banned from The Tavern until until when? Forever

Unbelievable, but it is a learning curve for all the Member Run Forum Mods.  No matter what level of lunacy we might descend to.....all is well.

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 9:46pm:

Unbelievable, but it is a learning curve for all the Member Run Forum Mods.

I don't understand why FD puts the lunatics in charge of the asylums  ::) ::)

See who is in charge of Real Estate? LOL!

Jovial Monk wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 10:04pm:

See who is in charge of Real Estate? LOL!

when did that happen?

I guess “Leon Jones” asked FD to set up a Real Estate board, given how good she is with RE  :D :D :D

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 10:06pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 10:04pm: See who is in charge of Real Estate? LOL! when did that happen?

Years ago.

Years ago, and only like 1100 posts. Scintillating success.

Started in 2011, has 1111 posts.

Good one FD!

all this time and I hadn't noticed ... she must be good at it  :D :D :D

hehehehehe yeah, good at it, oh yeah.

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 9:46pm:

Oh, it gets better!  Agnes has now banned Mr Smith 'forever!' Quote: Re: Beautiful Animals.. Reply #21 - Today at 8:17pm Quote John Smith wrote Today at 8:14pm: Green Hornet wrote Today at 8:04pm: John Smith you are banned from The Tavern until until when? Forever Unbelievable, but it is a learning curve for all the Member Run Forum Mods.  No matter what level of lunacy we might descend to.....all is well.

it gets even better ... she pm'd me to tell me I was banned then when I tried to reply I found out I was on her ignore list

what a fkken coward

Yeah, same with me.

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 10:57pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 9:46pm: Oh, it gets better!  Agnes has now banned Mr Smith 'forever!' Quote: Re: Beautiful Animals.. Reply #21 - Today at 8:17pm Quote John Smith wrote Today at 8:14pm: Green Hornet wrote Today at 8:04pm: John Smith you are banned from The Tavern until until when? Forever Unbelievable, but it is a learning curve for all the Member Run Forum Mods.  No matter what level of lunacy we might descend to.....all is well. it gets even better ... she pm'd me to tell me I was banned then when I tried to reply I found out I was on her ignore list what a fkken coward

Just like you are a coward for exactly the same reason.

;D

Aussie wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 11:05pm:

John Smith wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 10:57pm: Aussie wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 9:46pm: Oh, it gets better!  Agnes has now banned Mr Smith 'forever!' Quote: Re: Beautiful Animals.. Reply #21 - Today at 8:17pm Quote John Smith wrote Today at 8:14pm: Green Hornet wrote Today at 8:04pm: John Smith you are banned from The Tavern until until when? Forever Unbelievable, but it is a learning curve for all the Member Run Forum Mods.  No matter what level of lunacy we might descend to.....all is well. it gets even better ... she pm'd me to tell me I was banned then when I tried to reply I found out I was on her ignore list what a fkken coward Just like you are a coward for exactly the same reason. ;D

rubbish ... I didn't send you a pm and then ignore you before you could reply. There's a big difference.

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 11:07pm:

Aussie wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 11:05pm: John Smith wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 10:57pm: Aussie wrote on May 4th, 2017 at 9:46pm: Oh, it gets better!  Agnes has now banned Mr Smith 'forever!' Quote: Re: Beautiful Animals.. Reply #21 - Today at 8:17pm Quote John Smith wrote Today at 8:14pm: Green Hornet wrote Today at 8:04pm: John Smith you are banned from The Tavern until until when? Forever Unbelievable, but it is a learning curve for all the Member Run Forum Mods.  No matter what level of lunacy we might descend to.....all is well. it gets even better ... she pm'd me to tell me I was banned then when I tried to reply I found out I was on her ignore list what a fkken coward Just like you are a coward for exactly the same reason. ;D rubbish ... I didn't send you a pm and then ignore you before you could reply. There's a big difference.

  You must be maggotty Smith ..you are not on my ignore list , but it sure wont be long after this

don't lie fAgness, i replied to your email and it told me that either the username was wrong or I was on ignore.

Since I replied to what you sent me, the username couldn't have been wrong. That leaves one option. You're a coward.

John Smith wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 11:22pm:

don't lie fAgness, i replied to your email and it told me that either the username was wrong or I was on ignore. Since I replied to what you sent me, the username couldn't have been wrong. That leaves one option. You're a coward.

  I advised you though GH and you tried to reply to agnes lol...yep you are drunk   ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

You are not blocked on neither agnes or Green Hornet

Jovial Monk wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 11:05pm:

Yeah, same with me.

  except you really are on my ignore list Monk. ;)