Are muzzo terrorists mentally ill?

A simple question too hard to a swer for sympathiser apologists

Aren't all mass murderers mentally ill?

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:29pm:

Aren't all mass murderers mentally ill?

Now we are getting somewhere
Now do you agree that All muzzo terrorists are mentally ill to comit these attrocities?

Valkie wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:29pm: Aren't all mass murderers mentally ill? Now we are getting somewhere Now do you agree that All muzzo terrorists are mentally ill to comit these attrocities?

In my opinion, all mass murderers have some sort of mental health issue.

No sane person would kill scores of innocent people.

Are you trying to make excuses for mass murderers, Valkie?

Are you using the 'insanity' defence?

That would make you an apologist, wouldn't it?

LOL at the poll.

Poor Valkie.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:34pm:

Are you trying to make excuses for mass murderers, Valkie? Are you using the 'insanity' defence? That would make you an apologist, wouldn't it?

No, Im simply working through a thesis.

Now that we have agreed that only mentally il people would carry out these attrocious and barbaric acts, we can extrapolate that illness to anyone who praises or rejoices these barbaric acts can we not?

mothra wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:34pm:

LOL at the poll. Poor Valkie.

I can just picture the veins sticking out on his neck.

What's got me curious, though, is why Valkie is so eager to construct an insanity defence case.

Is he an apologist for mass murderers?

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:32pm:

Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:29pm: Aren't all mass murderers mentally ill? Now we are getting somewhere Now do you agree that All muzzo terrorists are mentally ill to comit these attrocities? In my opinion, all mass murderers have some sort of mental health issue. No sane person would kill scores of innocent people.

no ones heard of the HOLOCAUST I presume..

or Hiroshima

I will leave it to the EXPURTS..  we have so many.so lucky..

cods wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:41pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:32pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:29pm: Aren't all mass murderers mentally ill? Now we are getting somewhere Now do you agree that All muzzo terrorists are mentally ill to comit these attrocities? In my opinion, all mass murderers have some sort of mental health issue. No sane person would kill scores of innocent people. no ones heard of the HOLOCAUST I presume.. or Hiroshima I will leave it to the EXPURTS..  we have so many.so lucky..

You think Hitler was sane?

Really?

You have stuck your foot in it now, too late to back out

Now that we have established that all terrorists are mentally ill.
Would or would not, anyone who praises, apologises or celebrates these barbaric acts be therefore
Also mentall ill?

Come on, ansewr truthfully

YES OR NO

Valkie wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:44pm:

You have stuck your foot in it now, too late to back out Now that we have established that all terrorists are mentally ill. Would or would not, anyone who praises, apologises or celebrates these barbaric acts be therefore Also mentall ill? Come on, ansewr truthfully YES OR NO

Dear o dear.

Valkie, I know what you're thinking before you even know what you're thinking (and I'm being very generous with the use of the word "thinking", by the way).

However, I'm gonna have to stop you in your tracks, and make you look like a complete idiot (yes, again).

1.6 billion Muslims do NOT praise, apologise for, or celebrate Islamic terrorism.

Only a very, very small minority do.

And when I say 'small', think Donald Trump's hands 'small'.

Valkie wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:44pm:

You have stuck your foot in it now, too late to back out Now that we have established that all terrorists are mentally ill. Would or would not, anyone who praises, apologises or celebrates these barbaric acts be therefore Also mentall ill? Come on, ansewr truthfully YES OR NO

Still waiting for an answer????????????
::)

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:50pm:

Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:44pm: You have stuck your foot in it now, too late to back out Now that we have established that all terrorists are mentally ill. Would or would not, anyone who praises, apologises or celebrates these barbaric acts be therefore Also mentall ill? Come on, ansewr truthfully YES OR NO Dear o dear. Valkie, I know what you're thinking before you even know what you're thinking (and I'm being very generous with the use of the word "thinking", by the way). However, I'm gonna have to stop you in your tracks, and make you look like a complete idiot (yes, again). 1.6 billion Muslims do NOT praise, apologise for, or celebrate Islamic terrorism. Only a very, very small minority do. And when I say 'small', think Donald Trump's hands 'small'.

I'm feeling quite sorry for him at this point.

mothra wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:50pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:44pm: You have stuck your foot in it now, too late to back out Now that we have established that all terrorists are mentally ill. Would or would not, anyone who praises, apologises or celebrates these barbaric acts be therefore Also mentall ill? Come on, ansewr truthfully YES OR NO Dear o dear. Valkie, I know what you're thinking before you even know what you're thinking (and I'm being very generous with the use of the word "thinking", by the way). However, I'm gonna have to stop you in your tracks, and make you look like a complete idiot (yes, again). 1.6 billion Muslims do NOT praise, apologise for, or celebrate Islamic terrorism. Only a very, very small minority do. And when I say 'small', think Donald Trump's hands 'small'. I'm feeling quite sorry for him at this point.

I know   ;D

Me too.

I knew where he was heading last Wednesday, but I've just been having fun stringing him along.

Valkie wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:50pm:

Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:44pm: You have stuck your foot in it now, too late to back out Now that we have established that all terrorists are mentally ill. Would or would not, anyone who praises, apologises or celebrates these barbaric acts be therefore Also mentall ill? Come on, ansewr truthfully YES OR NO Still waiting for an answer???????????? ::)

So the pecca cant come up with a response so motheaten tries to change the subject.
But Ill accept an answer from either pecca or moth.

We have established that ALL terrorists are mentally ill.
Therefore would or would not ANYONE who praises, celebrates or promtes those who carried out tgese acts also be, in fact, MENTALLY ILL as well?

Answer away motheaten or pecca, answer away

mothra wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:50pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:44pm: You have stuck your foot in it now, too late to back out Now that we have established that all terrorists are mentally ill. Would or would not, anyone who praises, apologises or celebrates these barbaric acts be therefore Also mentall ill? Come on, ansewr truthfully YES OR NO Dear o dear. Valkie, I know what you're thinking before you even know what you're thinking (and I'm being very generous with the use of the word "thinking", by the way). However, I'm gonna have to stop you in your tracks, and make you look like a complete idiot (yes, again). 1.6 billion Muslims do NOT praise, apologise for, or celebrate Islamic terrorism. Only a very, very small minority do. And when I say 'small', think Donald Trump's hands 'small'. I'm feeling quite sorry for him at this point.

Watch him now pretend that he didn't see my answer.

;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:43pm:

cods wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:41pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:32pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:29pm: Aren't all mass murderers mentally ill? Now we are getting somewhere Now do you agree that All muzzo terrorists are mentally ill to comit these attrocities? In my opinion, all mass murderers have some sort of mental health issue. No sane person would kill scores of innocent people. no ones heard of the HOLOCAUST I presume.. or Hiroshima I will leave it to the EXPURTS..  we have so many.so lucky.. You think Hitler was sane? Really?

millions of Germans did... ::)

and btw Hitler didnt actually  pull the lever attached to  the gas chambers... ::) ::)

cods wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:43pm: cods wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:41pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:32pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:29pm: Aren't all mass murderers mentally ill? Now we are getting somewhere Now do you agree that All muzzo terrorists are mentally ill to comit these attrocities? In my opinion, all mass murderers have some sort of mental health issue. No sane person would kill scores of innocent people. no ones heard of the HOLOCAUST I presume.. or Hiroshima I will leave it to the EXPURTS..  we have so many.so lucky.. You think Hitler was sane? Really? millions of Germans did... ::) and btw Hitler didnt actually  pull the lever attached to  the gas chambers... ::) ::)

Oh well, if that's the case ...

Valkie wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:55pm:

Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:50pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:44pm: You have stuck your foot in it now, too late to back out Now that we have established that all terrorists are mentally ill. Would or would not, anyone who praises, apologises or celebrates these barbaric acts be therefore Also mentall ill? Come on, ansewr truthfully YES OR NO Still waiting for an answer???????????? ::) So the pecca cant come up with a response so motheaten tries to change the subject. But Ill accept an answer from either pecca or moth. We have established that ALL terrorists are mentally ill. Therefore would or would not ANYONE who praises, celebrates or promtes those who carried out tgese acts also be, in fact, MENTALLY ILL as well? Answer away motheaten or pecca, answer away

Isn't it cute how he thinks he has a point?

The answer to your question is no. Hatred isn't a mental illness. Otherwise you'd have to stick your hand up. Now i'm not saying you're notmentally ill, i strongly suspect you are, but that is beside the point.

Tell me Valkie, was it mental illness that compelled you to take so much delight in the death of the London terrorist that you wanted him buried with a pig's carcass to send a message to "the muzzies"?

mothra wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 5:05pm:

Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:55pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:50pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:44pm: You have stuck your foot in it now, too late to back out Now that we have established that all terrorists are mentally ill. Would or would not, anyone who praises, apologises or celebrates these barbaric acts be therefore Also mentall ill? Come on, ansewr truthfully YES OR NO Still waiting for an answer???????????? ::) So the pecca cant come up with a response so motheaten tries to change the subject. But Ill accept an answer from either pecca or moth. We have established that ALL terrorists are mentally ill. Therefore would or would not ANYONE who praises, celebrates or promtes those who carried out tgese acts also be, in fact, MENTALLY ILL as well? Answer away motheaten or pecca, answer away Isn't it cute how he thinks he has a point? The answer to your question is no. Hatred isn't a mental illness. Otherwise you'd have to stick your hand up. Now i'm not saying you're notmentally ill, i strongly suspect you are, but that is beside the point.

It was cute at first, but now it's a little disturbing.

What sort of person thinks that every single Muslim in the world praises, celebrates or promotes terrorism?

I mean, really?   :-/

Not even Booby is that thick.

Its nice to see you apologists squirm.

You say many muzzos did not celebrate.

How do you know?
Did you see tgem all?
And anyway, Im not trying to establish 100% muslim mental illness....yet
I just wish to establish that to praise, celebrate or endorse a terrorist act, one must also be mentally ill.

I saw the ones in Australia cheer, celebrate and praise the terrorists of the twin towers.
Until somone pointed out that this was bad press, suddenly it was all. "OH SO SAD"

But with all your twisting, squirming and misdirection, I am not letting this go.

We have established that to carry out a terrorist act, anyone has to be mentally ill.

Therefore anyone who praises, celebrates or otherwise endorses terror attacks must also be mentally ill.

Do you or do you not AGREE

YES OR NO

Valkie wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 5:09pm:

Its nice to see you apologists squirm. You say muzzos did not celebrate. How do you know? Did you see tgem all? And anyway, Im not trying to establish 100% muslim mental illness....yet I just wish to establish that to praise, celebrate or endorse a terrorist act, one must also be mentally ill. I saw the ones in Australia cheer, celebrate and praise the terrorists of the twin towers. Until somone pointed out that this was bad press, suddenly it was all. "OH SO SAD" But with all your twisting, squirming and misdirection, I am not letting this go. We have established that to carry out a terrorist act, anyone has to be mentally ill. Therefore anyone who praises, celebrates or otherwise endorses terror attacks must also be mentally ill. Do you or do you not AGREE YES OR NO

Gotta stop you right there.

Nobody has said that.

Ever.

Valkie wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:28pm:

Are muzzo terrorists mentally ill? A simple question too hard to a swer for sympathiser apologists

I suspect the entire human race becomes neurotic at an early age, and in one form or another. Religion is a common neurosis. A compulsion to achieve the last word on an internet forum is a neurosis. A need to overtake in traffic that is moving at the speed limit, is a neurosis.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 5:10pm:

Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 5:09pm: Its nice to see you apologists squirm. You say muzzos did not celebrate. How do you know? Did you see tgem all? And anyway, Im not trying to establish 100% muslim mental illness....yet I just wish to establish that to praise, celebrate or endorse a terrorist act, one must also be mentally ill. I saw the ones in Australia cheer, celebrate and praise the terrorists of the twin towers. Until somone pointed out that this was bad press, suddenly it was all. "OH SO SAD" But with all your twisting, squirming and misdirection, I am not letting this go. We have established that to carry out a terrorist act, anyone has to be mentally ill. Therefore anyone who praises, celebrates or otherwise endorses terror attacks must also be mentally ill. Do you or do you not AGREE YES OR NO Gotta stop you right there. Nobody has said that. Ever.

Still trying to change the subject I see
Lets not get lost in semantics

As we have established mentally ill people commit terrorism
Therefore those who celebrate, apologise, or otherwise endorse the terorist or the act are in fact
MENTALLY ILL

YES OR NO

mothra wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 5:07pm:

Tell me Valkie, was it mental illness that compelled you to take so much delight in the death of the London terrorist that you wanted him buried with a pig's carcass to send a message to "the muzzies"?

Valike?

mothra wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 5:20pm:

mothra wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 5:07pm: Tell me Valkie, was it mental illness that compelled you to take so much delight in the death of the London terrorist that you wanted him buried with a pig's carcass to send a message to "the muzzies"? Valike?

He's busy, ... trying to construct an insanity defence for mass murderers.

Shall I get my fork?


http://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-stick-a-fork-in-him-he-s-done-leo-durocher-53-87-10.jpg

Valkie wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:28pm:

Are muzzo terrorists mentally ill? A simple question too hard to a swer for sympathiser apologists

I do not think they are mentally ill.

Some are doctors, Uni students, have good jobs and the like.

Tf
mothra wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 5:20pm:

mothra wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 5:07pm: Tell me Valkie, was it mental illness that compelled you to take so much delight in the death of the London terrorist that you wanted him buried with a pig's carcass to send a message to "the muzzies"? Valike?

This is not about me.
This is a question about the mentality of people or individuals who celebrate, commit, or otherwise endorse terrorism or terrorists.

Now please try to keep up and on subject
Your distraction intended to change the subject is rejected at this time.

As we have established, only mentally ill people commit terrorism.
Do you agree or not that therefore anyone who celebrates, rejoices or otherwise endorses either the act or the terrorist is, in fact, MENTALLY ILL.

YES OR NO

Valkie wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 5:32pm:

Tf mothra wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 5:20pm: mothra wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 5:07pm: Tell me Valkie, was it mental illness that compelled you to take so much delight in the death of the London terrorist that you wanted him buried with a pig's carcass to send a message to "the muzzies"? Valike? This is not about me. This is a question about the mentality of people or individuals who celebrate, commit, or otherwise endorse terrorism or terrorists. Now please try to keep up and on subject Your distraction intended to change the subject is rejected at this time. As we have established, only mentally ill people commit terrorism. Do you agree or not that therefore anyone who celebrates, rejoices or otherwise endorses either the act or the terrorist is, in fact, MENTALLY ILL. YES OR NO

But Valkie, i've already answered your question.

Would you like to answer mine?

Do you think people who take so much delight in the death of another person that they would like to see them buried with a pig's carcass to cause the maximum amount of offence that they can are mentally ill?

Sprintcyclist wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 5:30pm:

Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 4:28pm: Are muzzo terrorists mentally ill? A simple question too hard to a swer for sympathiser apologists I do not think they are mentally ill. Some are doctors, Uni students, have good jobs and the like.

Sprinty.

Nice to see you've gotten off the couch, put away the tissue box (after watching women's football), and have decided to contribute.

I hear what you're saying, however, are you really suggesting that doctors, Uni students, and people with good jobs are exempt from mental illness?

What's the difference between a fervent dogmatic belief and mental illness?

Those that would commit acts such as suicide bombings are insane.

The leaders who plan and convince young men to commit these acts, not so much.

They are the more dangerous threat then the nutcases who blow themselves up.

Raven wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 5:38pm:

What's the difference between a fervent dogmatic belief and mental illness? Those that would commit acts such as suicide bombings are insane. The leaders who plan and convince young men to commit these acts, not so much. They are the more dangerous threat then the nutcases who blow themselves up.

Sorry Raven but you're wrong.
I could recommend a bunch of reading on this but illness point you towards maajid nawaz, a reformed Islamist and champion of an Islamic reformation,  who explains very clearly that the tales of an afterlife and it's rewards are overemphasised in Islam and give too much compulsion to martyr.

You and I think someone must be crazy to be a suicide bomber. They are sane and rational.

Raven wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 5:38pm:

What's the difference between a fervent dogmatic belief and mental illness? Those that would commit acts such as suicide bombings are insane. The leaders who plan and convince young men to commit these acts, not so much. They are the more dangerous threat then the nutcases who blow themselves up.

the leaders will never blow themselves up....lol..thats why they pick youth... who are too dumb to ask..

why not you sir?....

  :D :D :D.. they are not insane   just brain washed into believing...

remember Jonestown.??... brainwashed followers will do anything.

mothra wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 5:35pm:

Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 5:32pm: Tf mothra wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 5:20pm: mothra wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 5:07pm: Tell me Valkie, was it mental illness that compelled you to take so much delight in the death of the London terrorist that you wanted him buried with a pig's carcass to send a message to "the muzzies"? Valike? This is not about me. This is a question about the mentality of people or individuals who celebrate, commit, or otherwise endorse terrorism or terrorists. Now please try to keep up and on subject Your distraction intended to change the subject is rejected at this time. As we have established, only mentally ill people commit terrorism. Do you agree or not that therefore anyone who celebrates, rejoices or otherwise endorses either the act or the terrorist is, in fact, MENTALLY ILL. YES OR NO But Valkie, i've already answered your question. Would you like to answer mine? Do you think people who take so much delight in the death of another person that they would like to see them buried with a pig's carcass to cause the maximum amount of offence that they can are mentally ill?

I will answer your question, but you must promise to answer mine

I take no delight in the death of this piece of human trash, better he had lived and seen the suffering and pain he has caused.
Better that he come to realise that his actions caused so much pain and hopefully he would feel some remorse.
No I take no pleasure in his death, but yes I do believe in sending a message.
These barbarians are superstitious and woukd possibly balk at they themselves being buried with a pigs carcass, it is in fact meant to insult the terrorists.
The individuals carcass is nothing but a collection of meat and chemicals, the soul has left the building.
The pigs carcass is to prevent the same happening again.
Much the same as a fine prevents recurrence,  sort of.

Now answer my question
As we have established, only mentaly il people become terrorists.
Therefore, if you folow the established thread, ANYONE who celebrates, rejoices, is part of or condones the act of terrorism or tge terrorist must also, by logic, also be mentally ill.

Is this not so?

YES OR NO

Valkie wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 6:20pm:

The pigs carcass is to prevent the same happening again. Much the same as a fine prevents recurrence,  sort of.

Good point, Valkie.

I can report, that in the last 12 months, not one single person has been fined for speeding on Australian roads.

Moreover, nobody has attacked speed camera operators or inflicted wilful damage on any of the cameras.

I think if we just make the fines high enough, terrorists won't do nasty things any more.

After all, they're reasonable people just like you and me, aren't they?

Valkie has demonstrated his own mental instability, and by his own criteria has labeled himself a risk to society if somebody gifts Valkie some balls.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 6:25pm:

Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 6:20pm: The pigs carcass is to prevent the same happening again. Much the same as a fine prevents recurrence,  sort of. Good point, Valkie. I can report, that in the last 12 months, not one single person has been fined for speeding on Australian roads. Moreover, nobody has attacked speed camera operators or inflicted wilful damage on any of the cameras. I think if we just make the fines high enough, terrorists won't don't nasty things any more. After all, they're reasonable people just like you and me, aren't they?

Twist, squirm, deviate spiral off on a tangent.

Back to the question.

As we have established, ANYONE who commits a terrorist act is mentally ill.
You have agreed to this, it is therefore a done deal

Now, if we extrapolate on this we can hypothesize that if the terorist is mentally ill
ANYONE who celebrates the act, endorses the act, or otherwise condones the act through action or deliberate inaction, must also be MENTALLY ILL.

In addition anyone who praises the terrorist, condones his actions or uses him as an example to be followed must also be mentally ill.

Do you not AGREE

YES OR NO

Valkie wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 6:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 6:25pm: Valkie wrote on Mar 25th, 2017 at 6:20pm: The pigs carcass is to prevent the same happening again. Much the same as a fine prevents recurrence,  sort of. Good point, Valkie. I can report, that in the last 12 months, not one single person has been fined for speeding on Australian roads. Moreover, nobody has attacked speed camera operators or inflicted wilful damage on any of the cameras. I think if we just make the fines high enough, terrorists won't don't nasty things any more. After all, they're reasonable people just like you and me, aren't they? Twist, squirm, deviate spiral off on a tangent. Back to the question. As we have established, ANYONE who commits a terrorist act is mentally ill. You have agreed to this, it is therefore a done deal Now, if we extrapolate on this we can hypothesize that if the terorist is mentally ill ANYONE who celebrates the act, endorses the act, or otherwise condones the act through action or deliberate inaction, must also be MENTALLY ILL. In addition anyone who praises the terrorist, condones his actions or uses him as an example to be followed must also be mentally ill. Do you not AGREE YES OR NO

YES

Valkie wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 4:44pm:

You have stuck your foot in it now, too late to back out Now that we have established that all terrorists are mentally ill. Would or would not, anyone who praises, apologises or celebrates these barbaric acts be therefore Also mentall ill? Come on, ansewr truthfully YES OR NO

yes, Herb is mentally ill. your point?

We have established something here.

We have established that terrorists are mentally ill and dangerious.
We have also established that anyone who praises, condones or otherwise, through action or inaction, promotes the act as an example to be follows is also mentally ill and dangerious.

Now we look at recent terrorist acts, many of the muslim community, as a collective praises, celebrates and extoles the virtues of this act, they take pleasure in the death of inocent people.
Not all granted, but a sizable percentage go on the web and cheer, praise and otherwise rejioce in terrorism.

When an entity has a sizable percentage of its members mentally ill (AS WE HAVE ESTABLISHED) the entity as a whole must be considered contaminated or at least suspect and definitely dangerious.

By further extrapolation, and Im being quite firm here, we have the apologists who themselves by way of apologising, diverting attention away from trivializing or making the action less than a barbaric act are in fact part of the problem and quite possibly mentally ill as well.

There you have it
Eastblished
Terrorists are mentally ill
People who praise, condone, protect, apologise or otherwise promote terrorism are mentally ill.

Finally
The muslim religion, or a very large and sangerious percentage of it, are in fact, mentally ill and dangerious.
How do we tell the difference between mentally ill muslims and sane muslims?
We cant and therein lies the problem.

Therefore ALL MUSLIMS MUST BE SUSPECTED MENTALLY ILL AND DANGERIOUS.

Valkie wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 7:06pm:

We have established something here. We have established that terrorists are mentally ill and dangerious. We have also established that anyone who praises, condones or otherwise, through action or inaction, promotes the act as an example to be follows is also mentally ill and dangerious. Now we look at recent terrorist acts, many of the muslim community, as a collective praises, celebrates and extoles the virtues of this act, they take pleasure in the death of inocent people. Not all granted, but a sizable percentage go on the web and cheer, praise and otherwise rejioce in terrorism. When an entity has a sizable percentage of its members mentally ill (AS WE HAVE ESTABLISHED) the entity as a whole must be considered contaminated or at least suspect and definitely dangerious. By further extrapolation, and Im being quite firm here, we have the apologists who themselves by way of apologising, diverting attention away from trivializing or making the action less than a barbaric act are in fact part of the problem and quite possibly mentally ill as well. There you have it Eastblished Terrorists are mentally ill People who praise, condone, protect, apologise or otherwise promote terrorism are mentally ill. Finally The muslim religion, or a very large and sangerious percentage of it, are in fact, mentally ill and dangerious. How do we tell the difference between mentally ill muslims and sane muslims? We cant and therein lies the problem. Therefore ALL MUSLIMS MUST BE SUSPECTED MENTALLY ILL AND DANGERIOUS.

Why are you only looking at Muslim terrorist attacks?

The majority of terrorist attacks are carried out by non-Muslims.

Try as you might
You have admitted that terrorists are  mentaly ill, it matters not if they be muslim or other.
You have admitted that anyone who praises, condones or otherwise seeks to promote terrorism is also mentally ill.

Now.
Of all the other non muslim acts of teror which group, organisation or entity is to blame?
Is it an established and well knkw group?
Does this group praise, condone or promote terrorism?

Now
A large proportion of muslims DO in fact praise, promote and condone terorism.
Making the CULT mentally ill or at least heavily populated by mentally ill persons.

What part of this dont you get?

Oh yhats right
You lot are apologist sympathisers
Panic mode
Divert, change the subject and insult

I care not
I have proved my point and you have helped.
I know it hurts, but ?...........hel who cares.

Valkie wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 7:38pm:

Try as you might You have admitted that terrorists are  mentaly ill, it matters not if they be muslim or other. You have admitted that anyone who praises, condones or otherwise seeks to promote terrorism is also mentally ill. Now. Of all the other non muslim acts of teror which group, organisation or entity is to blame? Is it an established and well knkw group? Does this group praise, condone or promote terrorism? Now A large proportion of muslims DO in fact praise, promote and condone terorism. Making the CULT mentally ill or at least heavily populated by mentally ill persons. What part of this dont you get? Oh yhats right You lot are apologist sympathisers Panic mode Divert, change the subject and insult I care not I have proved my point and you have helped. I know it hurts, but ?...........hel who cares.

Has Turnbull taken your medication off the PBS?

Siding sycophants strengthen stupidity