Quote:

By Robert Spencer on Feb 11, 2017 02:41 pm 72 Muslims from countries covered by Trump ban convicted of terrorism How many is too many? What number of Americans killed by jihadis is enough for the Left? Is there any limit that will make them say, “All right, now we have to call a halt to this” and restrict immigration? Or is open borders the unalterable goal no matter how many Americans die in jihad massacres? Since 9/11, 72 individuals from the seven mostly Muslim countries covered by President Trump’s “extreme vetting” executive order have been convicted of terrorism, a finding that clashes sharply with claims from an appeals court that there is “no evidence” those countries have produced a terrorist. According to a report out Saturday, at least 17 claimed to be refugees from those nations, three came in as “students,” and 25 eventually became U.S. citizens. The Center for Immigration Studies calculated the numbers of convicted terrorists from the Trump Seven: — Somalia: 20 — Yemen: 19 — Iraq: 19 — Syria: 7 — Iran: 4 — Libya: 2 — Sudan: 1

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/02/72-muslims-from-countries-covered-by-trump-ban-convicted-of-terrorism


But that is no excuse.

Because it is still 'RACIST' to exclude moslems,        just because a moslem may decide at any moment that he really does HATE all infidels,
and that he has decided that he really does want to get into Allah's bordello in the sky!

/sarc off


"There is for you an excellent example (to follow) in Abraham and those with him, when they said to their people: "We are clear of you and of whatever ye worship besides Allah: we have rejected you, and there has arisen, between us and you, enmity and hatred for ever,- unless ye believe in Allah and Him alone"....."
Koran 60:4


"Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. "
Koran 9.29


"Fighting [against disbelievers] is prescribed for you, and [if] ye dislike it.....Allah knoweth, and ye know not."
Koran 2.216


"O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty (unto Him)."
Koran 9.123


"Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Qur'an: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme."
Koran 9.111




.





EXAMINE THE PURPOSEFUL, CRUEL AND EVIL MOSLEM HATRED AND INTENT, TOWARDS ALL NON-MOSELMS.

EXAMPLE #1,

------------ >



Quote:

Cleric preaches that violence is part of Islam 01/05/2007 In documents seen by The Daily Telegraph, al-Muhajiroun claimed: "Terrorism is a part of Islam" and "Allah made it obligatory to prepare and to terrify the enemy of Allah". The article advised: "The kuffar of USA and UK are without doubt our enemy. There is no such thing as an innocent kafir, innocence is only applicable for the Muslims. Not only is it obligatory to fight them, it is haram [forbidden] to feel sorry for them."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1550211/Cleric-preaches-that-violence-is-part-of-Islam.html





EXAMINE THE PURPOSEFUL, CRUEL AND EVIL MOSLEM HATRED AND INTENT, TOWARDS ALL NON-MOSELMS.

EXAMPLE #2,

------------ >


Quote:

Inside the sect that loves terror August 07, 2005 ......In public interviews Bakri condemned the killing of all innocent civilians. Later when he addressed his own followers he explained that he had in fact been referring only to Muslims as only they were innocent: “Yes I condemn killing any innocent people, but not any kuffar.”

these are old links, but the article is kosher.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1724541,00.html
another source, "Undercover in the academy of hatred"...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1458729/posts

a 3 month banning isn't enough...

it should be @ least 3 years before you even review the ban...

Yadda you must have been misinformed.
The good honest and politically neutral judges of the 9th District Appeals court have told us no terrorists are among all those lovely people from Somalia et al.

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Feb 13^th, 2017 at 6:47am:

a 3 month banning isn't enough... it should be @ least 3 years before you even review the ban...

yes, but that is only a single word editing .............

bogarde73 wrote on Feb 13^th, 2017 at 7:13am:

Yadda you must have been misinformed. The good honest and politically neutral judges of the 9th District Appeals court have told us no terrorists are among all those lovely people from Somalia et al.

No thats not what the ruling was about at all.

bogarde73 wrote on Feb 13^th, 2017 at 7:13am:

Yadda you must have been misinformed. The good honest and politically neutral judges of the 9th District Appeals court have told us no terrorists are among all those lovely people from Somalia et al.

bogarde,

Well, someone seems to be 'getting their wires crossed', either that, or some people are seriously misinterpreting the definitions of the terms that are being used, in reference to those bans ?

If you can believe the report below, it appears that many moslems who have entered the US in recent years, appear to have been involved in 'Jihad operations' [aka terror incidents].



re the immigration ban.....

"Last week, President Trump signed an executive order temporarily banning citizens from seven countries from entering the U.S. and indefinitely banning Syrian refugees."

The seven countries included; Iraq, Iran, Syria, Yemen, Sudan, Libya and Somalia.




Quote:

By Robert Spencer on Jan 28, 2017 11:10 am New York Times claims that “far-right media” is stoking “anxiety about Muslim refugees” Here’s some real news for the fake news purveyors over at the New York Times: the “far-right media” isn’t responsible for “anxiety about Muslim refugees.” Who is actually responsible? People such as Somali Muslim migrant Mohammad Barry, who in February 2016 stabbed multiple patrons at a restaurant owned by an Israeli Arab Christian; Ahmad Khan Rahami, an Afghan Muslim migrant who in September 2016 set off bombs in New York City and New Jersey; Arcan Cetin, a Turkish Muslim migrant who in September 2016 murdered five people in a mall in Burlington, Washington; Dahir Adan, another Somali Muslim migrant who in October 2016 stabbed mall shoppers in St. Cloud while screaming “Allahu akbar”; Abdul Razak Artan, yet another Somali Muslim migrant who in November 2016 injured nine people with car and knife attacks at Ohio State University. What’s more, all of the jihadis who murdered 130 people in Paris in November 2015 had just entered Europe as refugees.

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/01/new-york-times-claims-that-far-right-media-is-stoking-anxiety-about-muslim-refugees