It's even closer.

Have decided to NOT drink anything because Donald Trump is a teetotaller.
Will set the alarm, have a coffee and toast while watching.

I'm all a jitter.

I love watching you masturbate.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 19^th, 2017 at 8:10am:

... Donald Trump is a teetotaller.

Okay, well that explains a lot.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 19^th, 2017 at 9:12am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 19th, 2017 at 8:10am: ... Donald Trump is a teetotaller. Okay, well that explains a lot.

Sprinty usually starts drinking at breakfast you see. By the time the day is over he is down two bottles of gin. But Trump's moral fibre has made Sprint a new man ...

AiA wrote on Jan 19^th, 2017 at 8:11am:

I love watching you masturbate.

ook.. well that explains a lot...  :D

AiA wrote on Jan 19^th, 2017 at 8:11am:

I love watching you masturbate.

That is certainly what he is doing.

Here is a list of performers for the celebration!
http://www.vulture.com/2017/01/donald-trump-inauguration-performers-guide.html

AuntieM wrote on Jan 19^th, 2017 at 5:08pm:

Here is a list of performers for the celebration! http://www.vulture.com/2017/01/donald-trump-inauguration-performers-guide.html

Man, that's a funny list    ;D

What the hell is Angelina Jolie's father doing on it?

You mean the actor who won 25 awards and 32 nominations?

AuntieM wrote on Jan 19^th, 2017 at 5:15pm:

You mean the actor who won 25 awards and 32 nominations?

Yes.

Is he going to sing, or is he putting on a one-man play?

AuntieM wrote on Jan 19^th, 2017 at 5:15pm:

You mean the actor who won 25 awards and 32 nominations?

Yo mean virtually the sole actor they could find willing to appear?

wow... major endorsement.

It's ok. I realize you've been living under a stump,and never heard of the Mormon Tabernacle Choir or the Rockettes...

To the nonabusive posters here.

This is going to be a real event.
I can feel it growing pace.
Think how the election results rolled in and confounded the 'predictions.'

This will be BIG.

I don't know. I'm just tired of hearing assholes whine and cry and pout.

GROW UP! CRY ME A RIVER, BUILD A DAMN BRIDGE, and GET THE HELL OVER IT, you losers!

AuntieM wrote on Jan 19^th, 2017 at 5:36pm:

I don't know. I'm just tired of hearing assholes whine and cry and pout. GROW UP! CRY ME A RIVER, BUILD A DAMN BRIDGE, and GET THE HELL OVER IT, you losers!

Lefty losers inauguration ....

http://www.partyinthepaddockfestival.com.au/

Wonder if the righties realise how desperate they all sound.

AiA wrote on Jan 19^th, 2017 at 8:11am:

I love watching you masturbate.

"
eeeewwwww!^

that list looks like a bunch of no accounts, but in the US a big deal maybe. ;)

Dnarever wrote on Jan 19^th, 2017 at 7:38pm:

Wonder if the righties realise how desperate they all sound.

You're an idiot. I'm an independent who voted for Obama and for Sanders.
On November 9, I wasn't happy Trump won, but I was relieved Clinton lost.

Now my country is moving on, and the only way we can is to watch, listen, give the new President a chance and hold him accountable AFTER he does something wrong, instead of trying to set him up for failure.

The people who are trying to set him up for failure are seditious conspirator a-holes.

AuntieM wrote on Jan 19^th, 2017 at 9:51pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jan 19th, 2017 at 7:38pm: Wonder if the righties realise how desperate they all sound. You're an idiot. I'm an independent who voted for Obama and for Sanders. On November 9, I wasn't happy Trump won, but I was relieved Clinton lost. Now my country is moving on, and the only way we can is to watch, listen, give the new President a chance and hold him accountable AFTER he does something wrong, instead of trying to set him up for failure. The people who are trying to set him up for failure are seditious conspirator a-holes.

Dnara acknowledges that his political opponents are "righties" meaning they are right and I am in fact an idiot!

Well said Dna most truthful comment you have made.
 

AuntieM wrote on Jan 19^th, 2017 at 9:51pm:

... The people who are trying to set him up for failure are seditious conspirator a-holes.

Do you mean like the GOP Congressmen and Senators who resisted and opposed every action of Obama and challenged his legitimacy?

2 more sleeps till Tumps Inauguration

Its only 1 day now. America is waking up and a new day is starting for the people. Its going to be a bit rough when a few many rotten teeth get extracted but it will be worth it.

Maybe Australia should look at draining your swamp - Lake Burley Griffin - plenty of scum there.

Richdude wrote on Jan 19^th, 2017 at 10:58pm:

2 more sleeps till Tumps Inauguration Its only 1 day now. America is waking up and a new day is starting for the people. Its going to be a bit rough when a few many rotten teeth get extracted but it will be worth it. Maybe Australia should look at draining your swamp - Lake Burley Griffin - plenty of scum there.

Trump has not drained the swamp he has however invited more alligators enjoy the incoming shitstorm rich

AuntieM wrote on Jan 19^th, 2017 at 9:51pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jan 19th, 2017 at 7:38pm: Wonder if the righties realise how desperate they all sound. You're an idiot. I'm an independent who voted for Obama and for Sanders. On November 9, I wasn't happy Trump won, but I was relieved Clinton lost. Now my country is moving on, and the only way we can is to watch, listen, give the new President a chance and hold him accountable AFTER he does something wrong, instead of trying to set him up for failure. The people who are trying to set him up for failure are seditious conspirator a-holes.

yes, that sounds more than reasonable.

I genuinely believe Donald Trump will be an excellent President.
I really wish we had someone here like him or like Nigel Farage.

All the very best to the USA

U....you need to read more...and with better comprehension.
From January 2009 til January 2015, Democrats controlled the Senate. From January 2009 til January 2011, the Democrats controlled the House as well as the Senate.
Rarely in US history, has a President enjoyed such a long period of his party's control.
http://wiredpen.com/resources/political-commentary-and-analysis/a-visual-guide-balance-of-power-congress-presidency/
Yes there were GOP congressmen who attempted to undermine Obama's initiatives in the course of their work, but that's quite different than dark-money-funded SuperPacs hiring people to slander, riot, and abuse private citizens and entertainers who they fear will validate the incoming President.

This is seditious conspiracy.

Seditious conspiracy is a crime that is committed when two or more persons conspire to forcibly: a. destroy or overthrow the U.S. government; b. create obstacles or prevent the execution of U.S. laws; c. oppose the authority of the U.S. government; or d. unlawfully possess or take property that belong to the nation. The first amendment of the U.S. constitution protects people who have differing ideas from rest of the population. But these rights are not available to persons who make threats. The U.S. Supreme Court has made it clear that free speech extends to protests, the exchange of ideas, and points in debate, but it does not include direct threats to a person's safety.

The following is an example of a federal statute on seditious conspiracy:

18 USCS § 2384. Seditious Conspiracy.

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
https://definitions.uslegal.com/s/seditious-conspiracy/

AuntieM wrote on Jan 19^th, 2017 at 11:15pm:

U....you need to read more...and with better comprehension. From January 2009 til January 2015, Democrats controlled the Senate. From January 2009 til January 2011, the Democrats controlled the House as well as the Senate. Rarely in US history, has a President enjoyed such a long period of his party's control. http://wiredpen.com/resources/political-commentary-and-analysis/a-visual-guide-balance-of-power-congress-presidency/ Yes there were GOP congressmen who attempted to undermine Obama's initiatives in the course of their work, but that's quite different than dark-money-funded SuperPacs hiring people to slander, riot, and abuse private citizens and entertainers who they fear will validate the incoming President. This is seditious conspiracy. Seditious conspiracy is a crime that is committed when two or more persons conspire to forcibly: a. destroy or overthrow the U.S. government; b. create obstacles or prevent the execution of U.S. laws; c. oppose the authority of the U.S. government; or d. unlawfully possess or take property that belong to the nation. The first amendment of the U.S. constitution protects people who have differing ideas from rest of the population. But these rights are not available to persons who make threats. The U.S. Supreme Court has made it clear that free speech extends to protests, the exchange of ideas, and points in debate, but it does not include direct threats to a person's safety. The following is an example of a federal statute on seditious conspiracy: 18 USCS § 2384. Seditious Conspiracy. If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both. https://definitions.uslegal.com/s/seditious-conspiracy/

yes, I think the 'media' and 'linked attitudes' against Trump are very inappropriate.
To say the least.

He has repeatedly stated how bad the press is.
He is not joking. This is why he is bringing in popular bloggers and the like.


he won a rigged 2 horse race in a landslide

This is how the vote went ............

http://static.snopes.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/3141-counties-trump-won.jpg

It's called a whipping

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 19^th, 2017 at 11:11pm:

AuntieM wrote on Jan 19th, 2017 at 9:51pm: Dnarever wrote on Jan 19th, 2017 at 7:38pm: Wonder if the righties realise how desperate they all sound. You're an idiot. I'm an independent who voted for Obama and for Sanders. On November 9, I wasn't happy Trump won, but I was relieved Clinton lost. Now my country is moving on, and the only way we can is to watch, listen, give the new President a chance and hold him accountable AFTER he does something wrong, instead of trying to set him up for failure. The people who are trying to set him up for failure are seditious conspirator a-holes. yes, that sounds more than reasonable. I genuinely believe Donald Trump will be an excellent President. I really wish we had someone here like him or like Nigel Farage. All the very best to the USA

You can emigrate to USA or UK if you believe these bozos are so good.

Quote:

yes, I think the 'media' and 'linked attitudes' against Trump are very inappropriate. To say the least. He has repeatedly stated how bad the press is. He is not joking. This is why he is bringing in popular bloggers and the like. he won a rigged 2 horse race in a landslide

You are correct about the media. Sharyl Attkisson, a former CBS reporter who was harassed when pursuing stories on the government, said it well.
"There is unprecedented, I believe, influence on the media, not just the news, but the images you see everywhere. By well-orchestrated and financed campaign of special interests, political interests and corporations. I think all of that comes into play."

At present, only 6% of Americans trust our media, and for good reason. They(over 90% of media) are owned by five global corporations, which are controlled by the wealthiest 0.01%, who invest not only in media as a tool for influencing public opinion -- but also invest heavily in both the Democratic and Republican parties' major players, as a means of managing outcomes to profit themselves.
http://www.activistpost.com/2016/04/death-of-mainstream-media-6-percent-trust.html

https://youtu.be/sE3MPHBJkcQ

AuntieM wrote on Jan 19^th, 2017 at 11:43pm:

Quote: yes, I think the 'media' and 'linked attitudes' against Trump are very inappropriate. To say the least. He has repeatedly stated how bad the press is. He is not joking. This is why he is bringing in popular bloggers and the like. he won a rigged 2 horse race in a landslide You are correct about the media. Sharyl Attkisson, a former CBS reporter who was harassed when pursuing stories on the government, said it well. "There is unprecedented, I believe, influence on the media, not just the news, but the images you see everywhere. By well-orchestrated and financed campaign of special interests, political interests and corporations. I think all of that comes into play." At present, only 6% of Americans trust our media, and for good reason. They(over 90% of media) are owned by five global corporations, which are controlled by the wealthiest 0.01%, who invest not only in media as a tool for influencing public opinion -- but also invest heavily in both the Democratic and Republican parties' major players, as a means of managing outcomes to profit themselves. http://www.activistpost.com/2016/04/death-of-mainstream-media-6-percent-trust.html

Quote:

............At present, only 6% of Americans trust our media..............

That's extraordinary.  What a sense of distrust.
It's hard to believe.
This is why I fully support Trump using twitter and Utube for 'Presidential comments.'
It is 100% efficient and 'unadulterated'.


Aust has quite given up on our politicians I believe.
We have been 'poorly managed' for well over a decade.

Planners say they are expecting no more than 900,000 people to attend Trump's ceremonies Jan. 20.
The D.C. Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management is planning for 800,000 to 900,000 people to attend the swearing-in ceremony and inaugural parade.
The U.S. Armed Forces Joint Task Force-National Capital Region (JTF-NCR), which provides support for the ceremonies, is expecting 800,000 people.
The Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Activities (JCCIC), which plans and executes all ceremonies, is expecting 700,000 to 750,000 people.
Anybody who is just saying there were a million people there without saying what method they used, that's just public relations being offered.Steve Doig
And Washington's destination marketing group, Destination D.C., is expecting 1 million people, when protesters are included in the count.
Trump's Presidential Inaugural Committee did not respond to inquiries about how many people they expect.
Estimates for inaugural crowds vary, but Obama is widely believed to have set the record for most well-attended inauguration. Former President Lyndon B. Johnson held the previous record, drawing an estimated 1.2 million people in 1965.
Here are the widely cited estimates for recent inaugurations:
President Bill Clinton, 1993: 800,000 people
President Bill Clinton, 1997: 250,000 people
President George W. Bush, 2001: 300,000 people
President George W. Bush, 2005: 400,000 people
President Barack Obama, 2009: 1.8 million people
President Barack Obama, 2013: 1 million people


Source: How Many People Will Attend Trump's Inauguration? Why to Take Turnout Estimates With a Grain of Salt | NBC4 Washington
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Trump-Inauguration-Crowd-Estimates-410559995.html#ixzz4WDUjMTCo

Trump has set up a creche.

Hands up all those who would be willing to leave their children in the care of a Trump creche.

Remembering, of course, that he's been accused of raping two small children, beating them, and then threatening to kill them and their families if they told anyone.

Makes you wonder why AuntieM supports this alleged child rapist.

Quote:

Aust has quite given up on our politicians I believe. We have been 'poorly managed' for well over a decade.

Well, we've been mismanaged at least since Nixon, and perhaps since Kennedy.  We've done it to ourselves, we have to undo it.

The first logical step is to make Citizens United a thing of the past, and make it clear that corporations are not citizens, and money is not speech.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 20^th, 2017 at 12:15am:

Never mind me, I'm drunk/stoned and having pervy fantasies, which causes me to obsess about things I imagine to be true about other people, so I can cling to the thought that I might be superior to someone, instead of just a boring one-thought pundit who doesn't keep his word when he places bets.