Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Chat >> Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1484017639

Message started by Lord Herbert on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:07pm

Title: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Lord Herbert on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:07pm
link

Here's Piers Morgan giving Streep a serve:

"But putting all that to one side for a moment – and if Trump WAS mocking a man’s disability then I agree it was disgraceful - let’s move to what Streep said next: ‘Disrespect invites disrespect. Violence incites violence. When the powerful use their position to bully others, we all lose.’

At this point, I laughed out loud with incredulity.

Not at the words themselves, which are laudable.

No, it was at the hypocrisy.

You’d be hard-pushed to find an industry that encourages more disrespect and violence than Hollywood.

A place where rich powerful people make billions of dollars by regularly pandering to the lowest common denominators of sexism, racism, homophobia and misogyny.

And happily exploit ever more hideous, graphic violence to make a fast, easy buck.

And seethe from every tinsel-encrusted pore with the very kind of nasty, power-based bullying that Meryl Streep claims to be so incensed by in Trump.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:09pm
Big deal.

Great speech by Streep. Trump is not fit for the highest office in the land.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Lord Herbert on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:10pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:09pm:
Big deal.

Great speech by Streep. Trump is not fit for the highest office in the land.


Who is?

A Catholic priest?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:12pm
Not someone with no control of his emotions, not a fricking pig like Trump!

I would also LOVE to know what ties there are between Trump and Putin.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:13pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:09pm:
Big deal.

Great speech by Streep. Trump is not fit for the highest office in the land.


Trump is not fit for any office, in any land.




Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Unforgiven on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:16pm
Piers Morgan is a Donald Trump stooge paid for his service.

https://www.google.co.th/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=piers+morgan+controversy

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Gordon on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:17pm
If Streep wants to be taken seriously, she should put her name on a ballot paper then let her voice represent the people who voted for her.

Until then, she's just another showbiz person having a spray.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:19pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:12pm:
Not someone with no control of his emotions, not a fricking pig like Trump!

I would also LOVE to know what ties there are between Trump and Putin.



talking of someone with no control over his emotions..


really Monk... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

thats hilarious coming from you!

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Black Orchid on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:23pm

Quote:
You’d be hard-pushed to find an industry that encourages more disrespect and violence than Hollywood.

A place where rich powerful people make billions of dollars by regularly pandering to the lowest common denominators of sexism, racism, homophobia and misogyny.

And happily exploit ever more hideous, graphic violence to make a fast, easy buck.

And seethe from every tinsel-encrusted pore with the very kind of nasty, power-based bullying that Meryl Streep claims to be so incensed by in Trump.


What person in their right mind could not agree with that?

Remember I said "right mind"   8-)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:55pm
BO supports that crap so anybody in their right mind wouldn’t.

Besides which, has Streep played evil, murdering sort of parts? No, then that crap by that paid propagandist does not apply to her.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Gordon on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:57pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:55pm:
BO supports that crap so anybody in their right mind wouldn’t.

Besides which, has Streep played evil, murdering sort of parts? No, then that crap by that paid propagandist does not apply to her.


Like when she played the lady who killed a dingo?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by mothra on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:58pm
If ever a thread was mis-titled ......

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mistress Nicole on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Aussie on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:14pm

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


Let's see.

Meryl Streep's ability to communicate profound concepts or that of Nicole Page 2016.

Tough one, that.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by mothra on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:15pm

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.



Acting requires empathy.

Empathy requires a voice.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Gordon on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by mothra on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mistress Nicole on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:24pm

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Mothra, whilst it's possible, I simply can't believe trump would be so stupid as to deliberately pay out on a disabled man. If i really believed he had, I'd dump my opinion of him now.

I think this is a beat up.

Ps to all:
I am staying in a regional hotel. A 50 something white bloke with a young woman Asian mail order bride just checked in next to me.
I'm sure they have much in common.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Gordon on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:27pm

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Yup. She should just thank her mother or her dog and go home.
I'm not interested in actors using their public persona at awards ceremonies to gas off.

If she want's to speak at an event created for such a speech I'm all ears.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by aquascoot on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:28pm
what does hollywood represent in terms of helping people develop and advance?
Hollywood is just titillation and stimulation for the masses.
It is no different to coca cola, spicey takeaway foods, porn, amusement parks....its all just lower consciousness stimulation to feed stimulation addiction in the mediocre masses.


what does trump represent...building businesses, punching thru walls, risk taking , failure and success and never giving up, masculine energy, massive action, strength of will....this is all higher consciousness stuff for those playing at an elite level.

fat steve and his fat wife will probably side with Hollywood.  they are in lower consciousness. Hollywood and watching movies is the consolation prize for being a failure.
if you are a killer executor who takes massive action, you are the star of your own movie. Just like trump.
Streep lecturing Trump is laughable. Its like fat steve sitting on his couch screaming advice to the sports stars in a grand final. its so stupid, its amusing

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by mothra on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:34pm

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Yup. She should just thank her mother or her dog and go home.
I'm not interested in actors using their public persona at awards ceremonies to gas off.

If she want's to speak at an event created for such a speech I'm all ears.




Actors are empaths. They walk in more shoes than you or i. If they are good, they do it well.

I think that more than entitles them to be interesting in speeches.

Too many people mix up actors with celebrities.

I'm always keen to hear what a story teller has to say to me.

Did you watch her speech, Gordy?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Black Orchid on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:34pm

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Yup. She should just thank her mother or her dog and go home.
I'm not interested in actors using their public persona at awards ceremonies to gas off.

If she want's to speak at an event created for such a speech I'm all ears.


This is obviously hard for Mothra the Supreme to comprehend.

We are just "internet nobodies" after all     ;D

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Gordon on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:37pm

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Yup. She should just thank her mother or her dog and go home.
I'm not interested in actors using their public persona at awards ceremonies to gas off.

If she want's to speak at an event created for such a speech I'm all ears.




Actors are empaths. They alk in more shoes than you or i. If they are good, they do it well.

I think that nire than entitles them to be interesting in speeces.

Too many people mi up actors with celebrities.

I'm always keen tohear what a story teler has to say to me.

Did you wtch her speech, Gordy?


Yes. They should have just started the orchestra like at the Oscars.
If she wants to do a TED talk I'll listen but not during a friggin awards ceremony.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mr Hammer on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:37pm

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Yup. She should just thank her mother or her dog and go home.
I'm not interested in actors using their public persona at awards ceremonies to gas off.

If she want's to speak at an event created for such a speech I'm all ears.




Actors are empaths. They walk in more shoes than you or i. If they are good, they do it well.

I think that more than entitles them to be interesting in speeches.

Too many people mix up actors with celebrities.

I'm always keen to hear what a story teller has to say to me.

Did you watch her speech, Gordy?
What? You been sniffing ajax Mothballs?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by mothra on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:37pm

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Yup. She should just thank her mother or her dog and go home.
I'm not interested in actors using their public persona at awards ceremonies to gas off.

If she want's to speak at an event created for such a speech I'm all ears.


This is obviously hard for Mothra the Supreme to comprehend.

We are just "internet nobodies" after all     ;D



Are you lonely BO? You come across as really lonely.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mistress Nicole on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:40pm

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:37pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Yup. She should just thank her mother or her dog and go home.
I'm not interested in actors using their public persona at awards ceremonies to gas off.

If she want's to speak at an event created for such a speech I'm all ears.


This is obviously hard for Mothra the Supreme to comprehend.

We are just "internet nobodies" after all     ;D



Are you lonely BO? You come across as really lonely.


1) no she doesn't; and
2) low blow!

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mr Hammer on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:41pm
Mothra comes across as a man hater.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Black Orchid on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:42pm

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:37pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Yup. She should just thank her mother or her dog and go home.
I'm not interested in actors using their public persona at awards ceremonies to gas off.

If she want's to speak at an event created for such a speech I'm all ears.


This is obviously hard for Mothra the Supreme to comprehend.

We are just "internet nobodies" after all     ;D



Are you lonely BO? You come across as really lonely.


Why would you think that?  I am rarely here.

But coming from someone who often spends ALL night, and I do mean ALL night, here on a regular basis bickering and arguing I can see how you might get confused.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by mothra on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:45pm

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:42pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:37pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Yup. She should just thank her mother or her dog and go home.
I'm not interested in actors using their public persona at awards ceremonies to gas off.

If she want's to speak at an event created for such a speech I'm all ears.


This is obviously hard for Mothra the Supreme to comprehend.

We are just "internet nobodies" after all     ;D



Are you lonely BO? You come across as really lonely.


Why would you think that?  I am rarely here.

But coming from someone who often spends ALL night, and I do mean ALL night, here on a regular basis bickering and arguing I can see how you might get confused.



No Bo.. don't mistake my ahbit of not signing out as as presence here.

You, on the other hand come across as very bitter, I thought loneliness might explain it.

Maybe you have other reasons to be bitter?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Gordon on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:48pm

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:40pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:37pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Yup. She should just thank her mother or her dog and go home.
I'm not interested in actors using their public persona at awards ceremonies to gas off.

If she want's to speak at an event created for such a speech I'm all ears.


This is obviously hard for Mothra the Supreme to comprehend.

We are just "internet nobodies" after all     ;D



Are you lonely BO? You come across as really lonely.


1) no she doesn't; and
2) low blow!


Isn't it bizarre how the ones here who purport themselves to be the morally superior social justice warriors more often are the first to introduce personal offense. 

In just one page Mothra called me an internet nobody and someone else lonely, all uncalled for. I can't ever recall making personal comments about Mothra.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:48pm

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:17pm:
If Streep wants to be taken seriously, she should put her name on a ballot paper then let her voice represent the people who voted for her.

Until then, she's just another showbiz person having a spray.



Ironic, since the new president is actually a SHOWBIZ PERSON.

Trump oozes hypocrisy and the unwashed, ignorant clowns who voted for him dont see it.

But it is in deed ironic that when King Trump repeals Obamacare, the people who will be most hurt by it are Trump supporters. And when his truly idiotic economic policies cause unemployment to rise, it is the Trump supporters most likely to lose their jobs.

it will be funny to watch as the dim-witted Trumpoids slowly recognise that they have been well and truly shafted.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:51pm

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:24pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Mothra, whilst it's possible, I simply can't believe trump would be so stupid as to deliberately pay out on a disabled man. If i really believed he had, I'd dump my opinion of him now.

I think this is a beat up.

Ps to all:
I am staying in a regional hotel. A 50 something white bloke with a young woman Asian mail order bride just checked in next to me.
I'm sure they have much in common.



Well, you are going to have to change your opinion of the man. And to be honest, why do you think it would be even remotely out of character for the man? Did you listen to how he spoke of minorities, women, anyone poor?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Aussie on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:52pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


Yeas, that was the very obvious comment to make, and it staggers me that it really probably had to be made.  Unbelievable.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Black Orchid on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:54pm

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:45pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:42pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:37pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Yup. She should just thank her mother or her dog and go home.
I'm not interested in actors using their public persona at awards ceremonies to gas off.

If she want's to speak at an event created for such a speech I'm all ears.


This is obviously hard for Mothra the Supreme to comprehend.

We are just "internet nobodies" after all     ;D



Are you lonely BO? You come across as really lonely.


Why would you think that?  I am rarely here.

But coming from someone who often spends ALL night, and I do mean ALL night, here on a regular basis bickering and arguing I can see how you might get confused.



No Bo.. don't mistake my ahbit of not signing out as as presence here.

You, on the other hand come across as very bitter, I thought loneliness might explain it.

Maybe you have other reasons to be bitter?


My opinion differs to yours and I tried to leave it at that but you NEVER leave it at that.

Anyone who disagrees with you is called lonely, ignorant, unintelligent, bitter, a nobody etc etc etc for pages upon pages upon pages.

Have I abused you?  No!

Perhaps if you tried doing the same instead of attacking and trying (and failing) to demean those who disagree with you    ...  you might come across a bit more balanced.   As it stands instead of trying to put your point across and leaving it at that you choose to use put downs and aggression to try to demean those who disagree with you and guess what?

It fails every time.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Black Orchid on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


Entertainment Industry Awards nights are political opinion sites?  I don't think so.

Own goal!

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:52pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


Yeas, that was the very obvious comment to make, and it staggers me that it really probably had to be made.  Unbelievable.


Sometimes there are such gobsmackingly stupid things said that they stand out even here among regular stupidity.

I understand that partisan politics often limits a person's ability to be fully honest or individual in support of the 'party' or 'ideology' but I have nothing but contempt for those who dont have a higher standard than mere politics. What I see in the Trumpoids are people who would literally vote for a Hitler clone if he stood as a Republican and of such people I have nothing but utter contempt and derision for they truly deserve what they get.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Gordon on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:00pm

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


Entertainment Industry Awards nights are political opinion sites?  I don't think so.

Own goal!




ANYWHERE... is a political opinion zone. It is one of those things we like to call Freedom of Speech.  And after all, haven't you noticed how so many people agree with her sentiments? But even if they didnt, political opinion is a RIGHT.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by mothra on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:54pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:45pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:42pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:37pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Yup. She should just thank her mother or her dog and go home.
I'm not interested in actors using their public persona at awards ceremonies to gas off.

If she want's to speak at an event created for such a speech I'm all ears.


This is obviously hard for Mothra the Supreme to comprehend.

We are just "internet nobodies" after all     ;D



Are you lonely BO? You come across as really lonely.


Why would you think that?  I am rarely here.

But coming from someone who often spends ALL night, and I do mean ALL night, here on a regular basis bickering and arguing I can see how you might get confused.



No Bo.. don't mistake my ahbit of not signing out as as presence here.

You, on the other hand come across as very bitter, I thought loneliness might explain it.

Maybe you have other reasons to be bitter?


My opinion differs to yours and I tried to leave it at that but you NEVER leave it at that.

Anyone who disagrees with you is called lonely, ignorant, unintelligent, bitter, a nobody etc etc etc for pages upon pages upon pages.

Have I abused you?  No!

Perhaps if you tried doing the same instead of attacking and trying (and failing) to demean those who disagree with you    ...  you might come across a bit more balanced.   As it stands instead of trying to put your point across and leaving it at that you choose to use put downs and aggression to try to demean those who disagree with you and guess what?

It fails every time.



A suitable attempt at an intelligent outburst ... ftr you.

tell me BO, did you actually watch the clip you are deriding/.''Or is enough for you that Godie Hawn looked attractive and Meryl Streep gave an opinion?

I think you've evidenced that it is the latter.

Don;t stress BO. You'll get all you need from the nxt issue of No Idea.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.



Hasnt earned the right to speak?  NO ONE HAS TO EARN THAT RIGHT. It is an implicit right of living in a free democracy, something King Trump neither understands or respects.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Black Orchid on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:03pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:00pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


Entertainment Industry Awards nights are political opinion sites?  I don't think so.

Own goal!




ANYWHERE... is a political opinion zone. It is one of those things we like to call Freedom of Speech.  And after all, haven't you noticed how so many people agree with her sentiments? But even if they didnt, political opinion is a RIGHT.


Having a right means she can, and probably does, air her opinions in the company of friends/colleagues etc or in the appropriate forum.   

It's bad taste to do what she did when she has an audience that cannot escape her or her views and has to sit there and listen.

Just because we have free speech does not mean we should use that in a manner which exudes bad taste.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by mothra on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:05pm

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.


Hos has criticising a public figure making fun of a disabled person not earned?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Black Orchid on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:05pm

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:
blah blah blah blah blah


Please go and obsess over someone else.  I have absolutely no desire to converse with you.   

None!   :)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by mothra on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:07pm

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:03pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:00pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


Entertainment Industry Awards nights are political opinion sites?  I don't think so.

Own goal!




ANYWHERE... is a political opinion zone. It is one of those things we like to call Freedom of Speech.  And after all, haven't you noticed how so many people agree with her sentiments? But even if they didnt, political opinion is a RIGHT.


Having a right means she can, and probably does, air her opinions in the company of friends/colleagues etc or in the appropriate forum.   

It's bad taste to do what she did when she has an audience that cannot escape her or her views and has to sit there and listen.

Just because we have free speech does not mean we should use that in a manner which exudes bad taste.




LOL! SO all audiences should be screened for compliance?

I mean you don;t ant a 'captive' audience, do you?

;D


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Gordon on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:10pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:48pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:17pm:
If Streep wants to be taken seriously, she should put her name on a ballot paper then let her voice represent the people who voted for her.

Until then, she's just another showbiz person having a spray.



Ironic, since the new president is actually a SHOWBIZ PERSON.


Nothing ironic. He got the votes. Has she?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:10pm

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:03pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:00pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


Entertainment Industry Awards nights are political opinion sites?  I don't think so.

Own goal!




ANYWHERE... is a political opinion zone. It is one of those things we like to call Freedom of Speech.  And after all, haven't you noticed how so many people agree with her sentiments? But even if they didnt, political opinion is a RIGHT.


Having a right means she can, and probably does, air her opinions in the company of friends/colleagues etc or in the appropriate forum.   

It's bad taste to do what she did when she has an audience that cannot escape her or her views and has to sit there and listen.

Just because we have free speech does not mean we should use that in a manner which exudes bad taste.



Do you think there were many in THAT room that would have disagreed with her? IN fact, were there ANY at all?  Hollywood and actors have been a specific target for Trumps insane, unhinged vitriol. They certainly have not only the right, but the responsibility to return fire.

Anyhow, in a year's time Trump will have cause so much havoc and destruction that his support level may actually touch 0%

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by mothra on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:11pm

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:05pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:
blah blah blah blah blah


Please go and obsess over someone else.  I have absolutely no desire to converse with you.   

None!   :)



Yet here you are.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Aussie on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:11pm

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:05pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:
blah blah blah blah blah


Please go and obsess over someone else.  I have absolutely no desire to converse with you.   

None!   :)


Elsewhere there is a place where you, and I mean you literally, can edict who may converse and who may not.  This is not such a place.

Not many here are keen on 'drama queen' performances.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:12pm

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:10pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:48pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:17pm:
If Streep wants to be taken seriously, she should put her name on a ballot paper then let her voice represent the people who voted for her.

Until then, she's just another showbiz person having a spray.



Ironic, since the new president is actually a SHOWBIZ PERSON.


Nothing ironic. He got the votes. Has she?



So once again... your determination about havnt the right to express a political opinion is limited to not only being on the ballot, but winning? How exactly does that differ from North Korea or any other dictatorship?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Gordon on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:13pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.



Hasnt earned the right to speak?  NO ONE HAS TO EARN THAT RIGHT. It is an implicit right of living in a free democracy, something King Trump neither understands or respects.


Maybe she should run for president next election.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:15pm

aquascoot wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:28pm:
what does trump represent...









Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Black Orchid on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:15pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:10pm:
Do you think there were many in THAT room that would have disagreed with her? IN fact, were there ANY at all?  Hollywood and actors have been a specific target for Trumps insane, unhinged vitriol. They certainly have not only the right, but the responsibility to return fire.

Anyhow, in a year's time Trump will have cause so much havoc and destruction that his support level may actually touch 0%


I am sure there were PLENTY in that room who disagreed with her and how arrogant of you to think otherwise.

The point is they went there that night for AWARDS and not for political viewpoints.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:16pm

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:15pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:10pm:
Do you think there were many in THAT room that would have disagreed with her? IN fact, were there ANY at all?  Hollywood and actors have been a specific target for Trumps insane, unhinged vitriol. They certainly have not only the right, but the responsibility to return fire.

Anyhow, in a year's time Trump will have cause so much havoc and destruction that his support level may actually touch 0%


I am sure there were PLENTY in that room who disagreed with her and how arrogant of you to think otherwise.

The point is they went there that night for AWARDS and not for political viewpoints.


What political viewpoint did she express?


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Aussie on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:18pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:16pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:15pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:10pm:
Do you think there were many in THAT room that would have disagreed with her? IN fact, were there ANY at all?  Hollywood and actors have been a specific target for Trumps insane, unhinged vitriol. They certainly have not only the right, but the responsibility to return fire.

Anyhow, in a year's time Trump will have cause so much havoc and destruction that his support level may actually touch 0%


I am sure there were PLENTY in that room who disagreed with her and how arrogant of you to think otherwise.

The point is they went there that night for AWARDS and not for political viewpoints.


What political viewpoint did she express?


I can answer that, but I'll let you bait the hook before I interfere.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by mothra on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:15pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:10pm:
Do you think there were many in THAT room that would have disagreed with her? IN fact, were there ANY at all?  Hollywood and actors have been a specific target for Trumps insane, unhinged vitriol. They certainly have not only the right, but the responsibility to return fire.

Anyhow, in a year's time Trump will have cause so much havoc and destruction that his support level may actually touch 0%


I am sure there were PLENTY in that room who disagreed with her and how arrogant of you to think otherwise.

The point is they went there that night for AWARDS and not for political viewpoints.



Still haven't watched the speech hey?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.



Hasnt earned the right to speak?  NO ONE HAS TO EARN THAT RIGHT. It is an implicit right of living in a free democracy, something King Trump neither understands or respects.


Maybe she should run for president next election.



Well at least she is american. You have the audacity to express a political opinion while not even being a citizen of that country. Or maybe... just maybe... the right to hold and express a political opinion is one of Western Civilisations great banner acheivements?

This is what I despise about Trump supporters in general. Not just that they are stupid - which is self-evident - but that they embody the very worst in tolerance of diverging opinions.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:22pm

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:15pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:10pm:
Do you think there were many in THAT room that would have disagreed with her? IN fact, were there ANY at all?  Hollywood and actors have been a specific target for Trumps insane, unhinged vitriol. They certainly have not only the right, but the responsibility to return fire.

Anyhow, in a year's time Trump will have cause so much havoc and destruction that his support level may actually touch 0%


I am sure there were PLENTY in that room who disagreed with her and how arrogant of you to think otherwise.

The point is they went there that night for AWARDS and not for political viewpoints.



You obviously dont read much. One commentator said mockingly of Trumps claim that she was overrated 'Well she isnt a SCott Baiou', because Scott is about the only actor of note that anyone can find who supports Trump.  its like trying to find a technology guru who is a Trumpoid. There is one - just one - and Trump gave him a govt job.

You would have had more Trump supporters at a DNC rally.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Gordon on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:25pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.



Hasnt earned the right to speak?  NO ONE HAS TO EARN THAT RIGHT. It is an implicit right of living in a free democracy, something King Trump neither understands or respects.


Maybe she should run for president next election.



Well at least she is american. You have the audacity to express a political opinion while not even being a citizen of that country. Or maybe... just maybe... the right to hold and express a political opinion is one of Western Civilisations great banner acheivements?

This is what I despise about Trump supporters in general. Not just that they are stupid - which is self-evident - but that they embody the very worst in tolerance of diverging opinions.


Nice rant.  She should take her views to a TED talk or a YouTube monologue.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by mothra on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:25pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:22pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:15pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:10pm:
Do you think there were many in THAT room that would have disagreed with her? IN fact, were there ANY at all?  Hollywood and actors have been a specific target for Trumps insane, unhinged vitriol. They certainly have not only the right, but the responsibility to return fire.

Anyhow, in a year's time Trump will have cause so much havoc and destruction that his support level may actually touch 0%


I am sure there were PLENTY in that room who disagreed with her and how arrogant of you to think otherwise.

The point is they went there that night for AWARDS and not for political viewpoints.



You obviously dont read much. One commentator said mockingly of Trumps claim that she was overrated 'Well she isnt a SCott Baiou', because Scott is about the only actor of note that anyone can find who supports Trump.  its like trying to find a technology guru who is a Trumpoid. There is one - just one - and Trump gave him a govt job.

You would have had more Trump supporters at a DNC rally.



Trump said Meryl Streep was overated?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by mothra on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:27pm

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:25pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.



Hasnt earned the right to speak?  NO ONE HAS TO EARN THAT RIGHT. It is an implicit right of living in a free democracy, something King Trump neither understands or respects.


Maybe she should run for president next election.



Well at least she is american. You have the audacity to express a political opinion while not even being a citizen of that country. Or maybe... just maybe... the right to hold and express a political opinion is one of Western Civilisations great banner acheivements?

This is what I despise about Trump supporters in general. Not just that they are stupid - which is self-evident - but that they embody the very worst in tolerance of diverging opinions.


Nice rant.  She should take her views to a TED talk or a YouTube monologue.



No she should. like all of us. use the widest reaching medium she can.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:27pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm:
This is what I despise about Trump supporters in general. Not just that they are stupid - which is self-evident - but that they embody the very worst in tolerance of diverging opinions.


Amen.

Case in point: BO and Sprint.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:29pm

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:25pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:22pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:15pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:10pm:
Do you think there were many in THAT room that would have disagreed with her? IN fact, were there ANY at all?  Hollywood and actors have been a specific target for Trumps insane, unhinged vitriol. They certainly have not only the right, but the responsibility to return fire.

Anyhow, in a year's time Trump will have cause so much havoc and destruction that his support level may actually touch 0%


I am sure there were PLENTY in that room who disagreed with her and how arrogant of you to think otherwise.

The point is they went there that night for AWARDS and not for political viewpoints.



You obviously dont read much. One commentator said mockingly of Trumps claim that she was overrated 'Well she isnt a SCott Baiou', because Scott is about the only actor of note that anyone can find who supports Trump.  its like trying to find a technology guru who is a Trumpoid. There is one - just one - and Trump gave him a govt job.

You would have had more Trump supporters at a DNC rally.



Trump said Meryl Streep was overated?


The self-confessed orange sexual predator said she's "one of the most overrated actresses in Hollywood".

I'm sure she's devastated.



Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by mothra on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:29pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm:
This is what I despise about Trump supporters in general. Not just that they are stupid - which is self-evident - but that they embody the very worst in tolerance of diverging opinions.


Amen.

Case in point: BO and Sprint.



Thirded.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Aussie on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:31pm

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:29pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm:
This is what I despise about Trump supporters in general. Not just that they are stupid - which is self-evident - but that they embody the very worst in tolerance of diverging opinions.


Amen.

Case in point: BO and Sprint.



Thirded.


Fourthed!

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by mothra on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:31pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:29pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:25pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:22pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:15pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:10pm:
Do you think there were many in THAT room that would have disagreed with her? IN fact, were there ANY at all?  Hollywood and actors have been a specific target for Trumps insane, unhinged vitriol. They certainly have not only the right, but the responsibility to return fire.

Anyhow, in a year's time Trump will have cause so much havoc and destruction that his support level may actually touch 0%


I am sure there were PLENTY in that room who disagreed with her and how arrogant of you to think otherwise.

The point is they went there that night for AWARDS and not for political viewpoints.



You obviously dont read much. One commentator said mockingly of Trumps claim that she was overrated 'Well she isnt a SCott Baiou', because Scott is about the only actor of note that anyone can find who supports Trump.  its like trying to find a technology guru who is a Trumpoid. There is one - just one - and Trump gave him a govt job.

You would have had more Trump supporters at a DNC rally.



Trump said Meryl Streep was overated?


The self-confessed orange sexual predator said she's "one of the most overrated actresses in Hollywood".

I'm sure she's devastated.




God he's an idiot.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mr Hammer on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:32pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.



Hasnt earned the right to speak?  NO ONE HAS TO EARN THAT RIGHT. It is an implicit right of living in a free democracy, something King Trump neither understands or respects.


Maybe she should run for president next election.



Well at least she is american. You have the audacity to express a political opinion while not even being a citizen of that country. Or maybe... just maybe... the right to hold and express a political opinion is one of Western Civilisations great banner acheivements?

This is what I despise about Trump supporters in general. Not just that they are stupid - which is self-evident - but that they embody the very worst in tolerance of diverging opinions.
So you despise millions of American people because they voted for Trump?? :-?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mr Hammer on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:32pm
miam

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:32pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.



Hasnt earned the right to speak?  NO ONE HAS TO EARN THAT RIGHT. It is an implicit right of living in a free democracy, something King Trump neither understands or respects.


Maybe she should run for president next election.



Well at least she is american. You have the audacity to express a political opinion while not even being a citizen of that country. Or maybe... just maybe... the right to hold and express a political opinion is one of Western Civilisations great banner acheivements?

This is what I despise about Trump supporters in general. Not just that they are stupid - which is self-evident - but that they embody the very worst in tolerance of diverging opinions.
So you despise millions of American people because they voted for Trump?? :-?



Many more voted for Clinton.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mr Hammer on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:34pm
I doubt Trump supporters give a rats ass what you assholes think.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:35pm

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:25pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:22pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:15pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:10pm:
Do you think there were many in THAT room that would have disagreed with her? IN fact, were there ANY at all?  Hollywood and actors have been a specific target for Trumps insane, unhinged vitriol. They certainly have not only the right, but the responsibility to return fire.

Anyhow, in a year's time Trump will have cause so much havoc and destruction that his support level may actually touch 0%


I am sure there were PLENTY in that room who disagreed with her and how arrogant of you to think otherwise.

The point is they went there that night for AWARDS and not for political viewpoints.



You obviously dont read much. One commentator said mockingly of Trumps claim that she was overrated 'Well she isnt a SCott Baiou', because Scott is about the only actor of note that anyone can find who supports Trump.  its like trying to find a technology guru who is a Trumpoid. There is one - just one - and Trump gave him a govt job.

You would have had more Trump supporters at a DNC rally.



Trump said Meryl Streep was overated?


yep. You gotta admit that like her or not, you cant cal;l her anything less than a consummate actress with all the skills.  It just demonstrates yet again the immaturity of Trump.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by miketrees on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:38pm



I was ambivalent about Trump until I saw the reaction of the Trump haters.

They all seem to be people that I can't stand, so I am warming to Trump by default.

You haters should choke on some large black dick seriouasly

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:39pm

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:25pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:22pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:15pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:10pm:
Do you think there were many in THAT room that would have disagreed with her? IN fact, were there ANY at all?  Hollywood and actors have been a specific target for Trumps insane, unhinged vitriol. They certainly have not only the right, but the responsibility to return fire.

Anyhow, in a year's time Trump will have cause so much havoc and destruction that his support level may actually touch 0%


I am sure there were PLENTY in that room who disagreed with her and how arrogant of you to think otherwise.

The point is they went there that night for AWARDS and not for political viewpoints.



You obviously dont read much. One commentator said mockingly of Trumps claim that she was overrated 'Well she isnt a SCott Baiou', because Scott is about the only actor of note that anyone can find who supports Trump.  its like trying to find a technology guru who is a Trumpoid. There is one - just one - and Trump gave him a govt job.

You would have had more Trump supporters at a DNC rally.



Trump said Meryl Streep was overated?



IN his opinion... I happen to agree..I dont like anything she has done.. not a thing..but it is just my OPINION...

and I am not on a world stage...

and I am sure we would not know about trumps comment on twitter had it not been in the media....

but the globes were televised...



mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:31pm:
The self-confessed orange sexual predator said she's "one of the most overrated actresses in Hollywood".

I'm sure she's devastate


she would be she is showered with compliments where ever she goes........she isnt used to seeing comments like that in the open...

but she didnt care about what she said.. so its all fair in love and war as they say..


btw she meryl has every right to voice her concerns...why did she wait until 2017 to voice her concern about this disabled reporter????..

the moment took place in 2015...seems like she thought about it for a long time.or was she waiting for the moment. ::)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:39pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:32pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.



Hasnt earned the right to speak?  NO ONE HAS TO EARN THAT RIGHT. It is an implicit right of living in a free democracy, something King Trump neither understands or respects.


Maybe she should run for president next election.



Well at least she is american. You have the audacity to express a political opinion while not even being a citizen of that country. Or maybe... just maybe... the right to hold and express a political opinion is one of Western Civilisations great banner acheivements?

This is what I despise about Trump supporters in general. Not just that they are stupid - which is self-evident - but that they embody the very worst in tolerance of diverging opinions.
So you despise millions of American people because they voted for Trump?? :-?


yep. not because of diverging political opinions, but because Trump is and obviously so, the least qualified, least experience candidate for President.  He lied repeatedly and The Trumpoids just accepted it. He was rude, abusive, sexist racist and derogatory to all and yet they voted for him. They have no health care insurance and yet voted for someone who will remove Obamacare. And they believed the lie that he was going to bring manufacturing 'back again'.

When you are that degree of stupid and ignorant then yes, you deserve to be despised.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mr Hammer on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:39pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:32pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.



Hasnt earned the right to speak?  NO ONE HAS TO EARN THAT RIGHT. It is an implicit right of living in a free democracy, something King Trump neither understands or respects.


Maybe she should run for president next election.



Well at least she is american. You have the audacity to express a political opinion while not even being a citizen of that country. Or maybe... just maybe... the right to hold and express a political opinion is one of Western Civilisations great banner acheivements?

This is what I despise about Trump supporters in general. Not just that they are stupid - which is self-evident - but that they embody the very worst in tolerance of diverging opinions.
So you despise millions of American people because they voted for Trump?? :-?



Many more voted for Clinton.
so what?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:41pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:34pm:
I doubt Trump supporters give a rats ass what you assholes think.


They will one day. The day when they need surgery but Obamacare has gone so they will suffer in silence or die. Or when unemployment rises and the unqualified and uneducated - Trump heartland - gets fired first.

They shot themselves in the head and how can you not mock that?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:41pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:39pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:32pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.



Hasnt earned the right to speak?  NO ONE HAS TO EARN THAT RIGHT. It is an implicit right of living in a free democracy, something King Trump neither understands or respects.


Maybe she should run for president next election.



Well at least she is american. You have the audacity to express a political opinion while not even being a citizen of that country. Or maybe... just maybe... the right to hold and express a political opinion is one of Western Civilisations great banner acheivements?

This is what I despise about Trump supporters in general. Not just that they are stupid - which is self-evident - but that they embody the very worst in tolerance of diverging opinions.
So you despise millions of American people because they voted for Trump?? :-?



Many more voted for Clinton.
so what?


I just like rubbing it in.

More people wanted Clinton as President.

;D


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:42pm

miketrees wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:38pm:
I was ambivalent about Trump until I saw the reaction of the Trump haters.

They all seem to be people that I can't stand, so I am warming to Trump by default.

You haters should choke on some large black dick seriouasly


If that is the extent of your rationale then why do you think someone like you can be entrusted with the vote at all, anywhere?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:42pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:
Many more voted for Clinton.



Many more voted for neither. ;)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:43pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:39pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:32pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.



Hasnt earned the right to speak?  NO ONE HAS TO EARN THAT RIGHT. It is an implicit right of living in a free democracy, something King Trump neither understands or respects.


Maybe she should run for president next election.



Well at least she is american. You have the audacity to express a political opinion while not even being a citizen of that country. Or maybe... just maybe... the right to hold and express a political opinion is one of Western Civilisations great banner acheivements?

This is what I despise about Trump supporters in general. Not just that they are stupid - which is self-evident - but that they embody the very worst in tolerance of diverging opinions.
So you despise millions of American people because they voted for Trump?? :-?



Many more voted for Clinton.
so what?


The fact that you think it has no value kinda underlines my point.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Dsmithy70 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:44pm
Funny, same people here calling for the repeal of 18C telling others to shut up.

But not surprising, you typical trump supporter & Aussie cheerleader below.

http://imgur.com/gallery/rWIhcx6




Quote:
Sometimes there are such gobsmackingly stupid things said that they stand out even here among regular stupidity.

I understand that partisan politics often limits a person's ability to be fully honest or individual in support of the 'party' or 'ideology' but I have nothing but contempt for those who dont have a higher standard than mere politics. What I see in the Trumpoids are people who would literally vote for a Hitler clone if he stood as a Republican and of such people I have nothing but utter contempt and derision for they truly deserve what they get.



Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by The Mechanic on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:44pm

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:42pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:37pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Yup. She should just thank her mother or her dog and go home.
I'm not interested in actors using their public persona at awards ceremonies to gas off.

If she want's to speak at an event created for such a speech I'm all ears.


This is obviously hard for Mothra the Supreme to comprehend.

We are just "internet nobodies" after all     ;D



Are you lonely BO? You come across as really lonely.


Why would you think that?  I am rarely here.

But coming from someone who often spends ALL night, and I do mean ALL night, here on a regular basis bickering and arguing I can see how you might get confused.


that reminds me of the ole New Years Day Swamp Donkey thread where Mother was there all day long until I mentioned that she had been there all day long.. then "IT" disappeared until the next day  ;D

but having multiple Nics on the forum like the Old Swamp Donkey has.. you can share it around a bit ;) ;)

and then in the same breath she'll tell you that she's been out all day long having cappuccino's with the girls and shopping at the high end of town.. all the while.. posting in threads all over this forum..

talk about living in Lala land...  ;D

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1483227390/all

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mr Hammer on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:46pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:39pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:32pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.



Hasnt earned the right to speak?  NO ONE HAS TO EARN THAT RIGHT. It is an implicit right of living in a free democracy, something King Trump neither understands or respects.


Maybe she should run for president next election.



Well at least she is american. You have the audacity to express a political opinion while not even being a citizen of that country. Or maybe... just maybe... the right to hold and express a political opinion is one of Western Civilisations great banner acheivements?

This is what I despise about Trump supporters in general. Not just that they are stupid - which is self-evident - but that they embody the very worst in tolerance of diverging opinions.
So you despise millions of American people because they voted for Trump?? :-?


yep. not because of diverging political opinions, but because Trump is and obviously so, the least qualified, least experience candidate for President.  He lied repeatedly and The Trumpoids just accepted it. He was rude, abusive, sexist racist and derogatory to all and yet they voted for him. They have no health care insurance and yet voted for someone who will remove Obamacare. And they believed the lie that he was going to bring manufacturing 'back again'.

When you are that degree of stupid and ignorant then yes, you deserve to be despised.
Isn't it more stupid to keep voting in the cretins that keep sh itting on you? the political elite in the states don't give one ounce of thought for average americans. They spent 3 trillion dollars of their money  on those stupid wars while people lost their businesses and houses.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Dsmithy70 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:47pm

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mr Hammer on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:48pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:41pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:39pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:32pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.



Hasnt earned the right to speak?  NO ONE HAS TO EARN THAT RIGHT. It is an implicit right of living in a free democracy, something King Trump neither understands or respects.


Maybe she should run for president next election.



Well at least she is american. You have the audacity to express a political opinion while not even being a citizen of that country. Or maybe... just maybe... the right to hold and express a political opinion is one of Western Civilisations great banner acheivements?

This is what I despise about Trump supporters in general. Not just that they are stupid - which is self-evident - but that they embody the very worst in tolerance of diverging opinions.
So you despise millions of American people because they voted for Trump?? :-?



Many more voted for Clinton.
so what?


I just like rubbing it in.

More people wanted Clinton as President.

;D
You aint rubbing in jack poo. She's off having a cry somewhere because she lost . ;D

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:48pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:
Many more voted for Clinton.



Many more voted for neither.


Incorrect.

Approx. 66 million voted for Clinton.

Approx. 63 million voted for Trump.

The number of people who voted for neither, i.e. Stein, Johnson, McMullin et al. was only about 7 million.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mr Hammer on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:49pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:43pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:39pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:32pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.



Hasnt earned the right to speak?  NO ONE HAS TO EARN THAT RIGHT. It is an implicit right of living in a free democracy, something King Trump neither understands or respects.


Maybe she should run for president next election.



Well at least she is american. You have the audacity to express a political opinion while not even being a citizen of that country. Or maybe... just maybe... the right to hold and express a political opinion is one of Western Civilisations great banner acheivements?

This is what I despise about Trump supporters in general. Not just that they are stupid - which is self-evident - but that they embody the very worst in tolerance of diverging opinions.
So you despise millions of American people because they voted for Trump?? :-?



Many more voted for Clinton.
so what?


The fact that you think it has no value kinda underlines my point.
If you don't become president it means nothing.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Dsmithy70 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:49pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:46pm:
They spent 3 trillion dollars of their money  on those stupid wars while people lost their businesses and houses.


Wars that at the time repugs & Aussie Libs SUPPORTED
What happened to those that spoke against those wars Dixie Chicks anyone.
HYPOCRITE!!!!!!

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Rhino on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:50pm

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:45pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:42pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:37pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Yup. She should just thank her mother or her dog and go home.
I'm not interested in actors using their public persona at awards ceremonies to gas off.

If she want's to speak at an event created for such a speech I'm all ears.


This is obviously hard for Mothra the Supreme to comprehend.

We are just "internet nobodies" after all     ;D



Are you lonely BO? You come across as really lonely.


Why would you think that?  I am rarely here.

But coming from someone who often spends ALL night, and I do mean ALL night, here on a regular basis bickering and arguing I can see how you might get confused.



No Bo.. don't mistake my ahbit of not signing out as as presence here.

yes, forgetting to sign out. Thats it

Quote:
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Online
Australian Politics

Add to My Buddy List 
Posts: 13042
18.55 Posts per day

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by mothra on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:51pm

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:44pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:42pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:37pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Yup. She should just thank her mother or her dog and go home.
I'm not interested in actors using their public persona at awards ceremonies to gas off.

If she want's to speak at an event created for such a speech I'm all ears.


This is obviously hard for Mothra the Supreme to comprehend.

We are just "internet nobodies" after all     ;D



Are you lonely BO? You come across as really lonely.


Why would you think that?  I am rarely here.

But coming from someone who often spends ALL night, and I do mean ALL night, here on a regular basis bickering and arguing I can see how you might get confused.


that reminds me of the ole New Years Day Swamp Donkey thread where Mother was there all day long until I mentioned that she had been there all day long.. then "IT" disappeared until the next day  ;D

but having multiple Nics on the forum like the Old Swamp Donkey has.. you can share it around a bit ;) ;)

and then in the same breath she'll tell you that she's been out all day long having cappuccino's with the girls and shopping at the high end of town.. all the while.. posting in threads all over this forum..

talk about living in Lala land...  ;D

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1483227390/all


So I'm not Greg anymore?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:54pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:46pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:39pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:32pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.



Hasnt earned the right to speak?  NO ONE HAS TO EARN THAT RIGHT. It is an implicit right of living in a free democracy, something King Trump neither understands or respects.


Maybe she should run for president next election.



Well at least she is american. You have the audacity to express a political opinion while not even being a citizen of that country. Or maybe... just maybe... the right to hold and express a political opinion is one of Western Civilisations great banner acheivements?

This is what I despise about Trump supporters in general. Not just that they are stupid - which is self-evident - but that they embody the very worst in tolerance of diverging opinions.
So you despise millions of American people because they voted for Trump?? :-?


yep. not because of diverging political opinions, but because Trump is and obviously so, the least qualified, least experience candidate for President.  He lied repeatedly and The Trumpoids just accepted it. He was rude, abusive, sexist racist and derogatory to all and yet they voted for him. They have no health care insurance and yet voted for someone who will remove Obamacare. And they believed the lie that he was going to bring manufacturing 'back again'.

When you are that degree of stupid and ignorant then yes, you deserve to be despised.
Isn't it more stupid to keep voting in the cretins that keep sh itting on you? the political elite in the states don't give one ounce of thought for average americans. They spent 3 trillion dollars of their money  on those stupid wars while people lost their businesses and houses.


You mean the two wars that REPUBLICAN began? And so in response they vote in yet another REpublican who is far more of a war-monger than any of the last 5 presidents combined?  And who was it at the helm during the GFC? Republicans. So then idiot Trumpoids think 'gotta get me more of that!'


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Sir Bobby on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:56pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:13pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:09pm:
Big deal.

Great speech by Streep. Trump is not fit for the highest office in the land.


Trump is not fit for any office, in any land.



Trump is our saviour.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:57pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:47pm:


wow...

kinda hard to have sympathy for such a brain-dead idiot.

Like I said once before, a survey of all 60 million+ Trump voters found only 4 with an IQ above 100.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:00pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:49pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:43pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:39pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:32pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:01pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:56pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:49pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.


So you are not entitled to a political opinion unless you get elected?  WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ON A POLITICAL OPINION SITE?????


She's using her fame and influence in a way that it hasn't been earned. That's why.



Hasnt earned the right to speak?  NO ONE HAS TO EARN THAT RIGHT. It is an implicit right of living in a free democracy, something King Trump neither understands or respects.


Maybe she should run for president next election.



Well at least she is american. You have the audacity to express a political opinion while not even being a citizen of that country. Or maybe... just maybe... the right to hold and express a political opinion is one of Western Civilisations great banner acheivements?

This is what I despise about Trump supporters in general. Not just that they are stupid - which is self-evident - but that they embody the very worst in tolerance of diverging opinions.
So you despise millions of American people because they voted for Trump?? :-?



Many more voted for Clinton.
so what?


The fact that you think it has no value kinda underlines my point.
If you don't become president it means nothing.


Of course it means something. And if Trump were a half-decent person - which he isnt - with a decent team of political understanding staffers - which he hasnt - he will realise that he won by virtue of a system, not a vote. A decent person would have the decency to accept that and treat the electorate with compassion and understanding having realised he lost the election but won the position.

But Trump is still playing silly-buggers on Twitter while every other half-decent politician has the class to do better than that.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by The Mechanic on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:00pm

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:51pm:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:44pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:42pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:37pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Yup. She should just thank her mother or her dog and go home.
I'm not interested in actors using their public persona at awards ceremonies to gas off.

If she want's to speak at an event created for such a speech I'm all ears.


This is obviously hard for Mothra the Supreme to comprehend.

We are just "internet nobodies" after all     ;D



Are you lonely BO? You come across as really lonely.


Why would you think that?  I am rarely here.

But coming from someone who often spends ALL night, and I do mean ALL night, here on a regular basis bickering and arguing I can see how you might get confused.


that reminds me of the ole New Years Day Swamp Donkey thread where Mother was there all day long until I mentioned that she had been there all day long.. then "IT" disappeared until the next day  ;D

but having multiple Nics on the forum like the Old Swamp Donkey has.. you can share it around a bit ;) ;)

and then in the same breath she'll tell you that she's been out all day long having cappuccino's with the girls and shopping at the high end of town.. all the while.. posting in threads all over this forum..

talk about living in Lala land...  ;D

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1483227390/all


So I'm not Greg anymore?


did you miss the bit where I said that you are using multiple Nics???

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mr Hammer on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:02pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:
Many more voted for Clinton.



Many more voted for neither.


Incorrect.

Approx. 66 million voted for Clinton.

Approx. 63 million voted for Trump.

The number of people who voted for neither, i.e. Stein, Johnson, McMullin et al. was only about 7 million.
Are you sure about that douchebag?

Total US population- 324,954,000

15–64 years 66.2%

65 and over 14.4%

do the math.



Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Aussie on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:03pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:
Many more voted for Clinton.



Many more voted for neither.


Incorrect.

Approx. 66 million voted for Clinton.

Approx. 63 million voted for Trump.

The number of people who voted for neither, i.e. Stein, Johnson, McMullin et al. was only about 7 million.
Are you sure about that douchebag?

Total US population- 324,954,000

15–64 years 66.2%

65 and over 14.4%

do the math.


Voting is not compulsory.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:06pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:
Many more voted for Clinton.



Many more voted for neither.


Incorrect.

Approx. 66 million voted for Clinton.

Approx. 63 million voted for Trump.

The number of people who voted for neither, i.e. Stein, Johnson, McMullin et al. was only about 7 million.
Are you sure about that douchebag?


Absolutely 100% certain, without a shadow of a doubt.

The number of people who voted for neither Trump nor Clinton was approx. 7 million.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:07pm
Hmmm, what about abstainers?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mr Hammer on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:07pm

Bobby. wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:56pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:13pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:09pm:
Big deal.

Great speech by Streep. Trump is not fit for the highest office in the land.


Trump is not fit for any office, in any land.



Trump is our saviour.
Yeah Bob, he's ace. Anybody that gets these do-gooding sad sacks pissing in their pretty pink panties is a friend of mine.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:09pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:
Many more voted for Clinton.



Many more voted for neither.


Incorrect.

Approx. 66 million voted for Clinton.

Approx. 63 million voted for Trump.

The number of people who voted for neither, i.e. Stein, Johnson, McMullin et al. was only about 7 million.
Are you sure about that douchebag?

Total US population- 324,954,000

15–64 years 66.2%

65 and over 14.4%

do the math.


Voting is not compulsory.


Of those who did vote though, only 7 million voted for neither Trump nor Clinton.

Not sure what Lee and Hammer are on about.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:09pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:07pm:
Hmmm, what about abstainers?


The number of people who voted for neither Trump nor Clinton was approx. 7 million.

Lee was wrong.  As is Hammer.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by mothra on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:10pm

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:00pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:51pm:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:44pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:42pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:37pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:27pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).


Yup. She should just thank her mother or her dog and go home.
I'm not interested in actors using their public persona at awards ceremonies to gas off.

If she want's to speak at an event created for such a speech I'm all ears.


This is obviously hard for Mothra the Supreme to comprehend.

We are just "internet nobodies" after all     ;D



Are you lonely BO? You come across as really lonely.


Why would you think that?  I am rarely here.

But coming from someone who often spends ALL night, and I do mean ALL night, here on a regular basis bickering and arguing I can see how you might get confused.


that reminds me of the ole New Years Day Swamp Donkey thread where Mother was there all day long until I mentioned that she had been there all day long.. then "IT" disappeared until the next day  ;D

but having multiple Nics on the forum like the Old Swamp Donkey has.. you can share it around a bit ;) ;)

and then in the same breath she'll tell you that she's been out all day long having cappuccino's with the girls and shopping at the high end of town.. all the while.. posting in threads all over this forum..

talk about living in Lala land...  ;D

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1483227390/all


So I'm not Greg anymore?


did you miss the bit where I said that you are using multiple Nics???



Don't really know how to insult me so it sticks, do you Mechanic.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:10pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:07pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:56pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:13pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:09pm:
Big deal.

Great speech by Streep. Trump is not fit for the highest office in the land.


Trump is not fit for any office, in any land.



Trump is our saviour.
Yeah Bob, he's ace. Anybody that gets these do-gooding sad sacks pissing in the pretty pink panties is a friend of mine.

I look forward to your opinion of the pig in 12 and 24 months time. I added the 24 months option for the slow thinkers among the rightards here.Hang on, that is about all of them! LOL!

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mr Hammer on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:11pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:
Many more voted for Clinton.



Many more voted for neither.


Incorrect.

Approx. 66 million voted for Clinton.

Approx. 63 million voted for Trump.

The number of people who voted for neither, i.e. Stein, Johnson, McMullin et al. was only about 7 million.
Are you sure about that douchebag?

Total US population- 324,954,000

15–64 years 66.2%

65 and over 14.4%

do the math.


Voting is not compulsory.
So do you agree with pecca that only 7 million voting age people didn't vote???

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:13pm

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:10pm:
Don't really know how to insult me so it sticks, do you Mechanic.


That would mean The Mechanic has a brain and I am by NO means assured of that fact! Brainless Booby about sums up the mechanic.

Even a vegetarian can beat him in debate  ;) :)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:14pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:11pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:
Many more voted for Clinton.



Many more voted for neither.


Incorrect.

Approx. 66 million voted for Clinton.

Approx. 63 million voted for Trump.

The number of people who voted for neither, i.e. Stein, Johnson, McMullin et al. was only about 7 million.
Are you sure about that douchebag?

Total US population- 324,954,000

15–64 years 66.2%

65 and over 14.4%

do the math.


Voting is not compulsory.
So do you agree with pecca that only 7 million voting age people didn't vote???


Jesus Christ, I've never come across anyone as thick as you. Seriously.

Lee said "Many more voted for neither."

He's talking about people who voted, not people who didn't vote, you half-witted idiot.

Read it again: "Many more voted for neither."

He didn't say "Many more didn't vote for neither".

He said "Many more voted for neither."

And, he's wrong.

Only about 7 million voted for neither Trump nor Clinton.

Jesus, it's like talking to a 2 year old with you.







Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Aussie on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:15pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:11pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:
Many more voted for Clinton.



Many more voted for neither.


Incorrect.

Approx. 66 million voted for Clinton.

Approx. 63 million voted for Trump.

The number of people who voted for neither, i.e. Stein, Johnson, McMullin et al. was only about 7 million.
Are you sure about that douchebag?

Total US population- 324,954,000

15–64 years 66.2%

65 and over 14.4%

do the math.


Voting is not compulsory.
So do you agree with pecca that only 7 million voting age people didn't vote???


He has posted near enough to the correct figures.  You used the word 'voted.'  That excludes those who stayed at home and watched TV.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:15pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:07pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:56pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:13pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:09pm:
Big deal.

Great speech by Streep. Trump is not fit for the highest office in the land.


Trump is not fit for any office, in any land.



Trump is our saviour.
Yeah Bob, he's ace. Anybody that gets these do-gooding sad sacks pissing in their pretty pink panties is a friend of mine.


A clever person would have a somewhat higher standard than that. Hitlers election also had those do-gooder sad sacks 'pissing in their panties' too.  How'd that work out?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:16pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:
Many more voted for Clinton.



Many more voted for neither.


Incorrect.

Approx. 66 million voted for Clinton.

Approx. 63 million voted for Trump.

The number of people who voted for neither, i.e. Stein, Johnson, McMullin et al. was only about 7 million.


There was 58% voted. 42% didn't vote at all. So on your figures 58% equates to 106 million. 42% equates to 76.75 million, That's more than voted for Clinton or Trump individually.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:17pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:11pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:
Many more voted for Clinton.



Many more voted for neither.


Incorrect.

Approx. 66 million voted for Clinton.

Approx. 63 million voted for Trump.

The number of people who voted for neither, i.e. Stein, Johnson, McMullin et al. was only about 7 million.
Are you sure about that douchebag?

Total US population- 324,954,000

15–64 years 66.2%

65 and over 14.4%

do the math.


Voting is not compulsory.
So do you agree with pecca that only 7 million voting age people didn't vote???



Seriously??? this is what you understand from his post? I understand that being a Trumpoid that normal rules of intelligence (and artihmetic) might not apply but really?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:19pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:
Many more voted for Clinton.



Many more voted for neither.


Incorrect.

Approx. 66 million voted for Clinton.

Approx. 63 million voted for Trump.

The number of people who voted for neither, i.e. Stein, Johnson, McMullin et al. was only about 7 million.


There was 58% voted. 42% didn't vote at all. So on your figures 58% equates to 106 million. 42% equates to 76.75 million, That's more than voted for Clinton or Trump individually.


For goodness sake get your hand off it. You understanding would make no PResident or any australian government EVER elected by an absolute majority of potential voters.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mr Hammer on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:19pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:09pm:
[quote author=Jovial_Abbott link=1484017639/98#98 date=1484028466]Hmmm, what about abstainers?


The number of people who voted for neither Trump nor Clinton was approx. 7 million.

Lee was wrong.  As is Hammer.

[/quote];D ;D ;D Rougly 130 million people voted out of 325 million people.  You'll find that most adult American's didn't vote at all nincompoop. lee was entirely correct.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:21pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:
Many more voted for Clinton.



Many more voted for neither.


Incorrect.

Approx. 66 million voted for Clinton.

Approx. 63 million voted for Trump.

The number of people who voted for neither, i.e. Stein, Johnson, McMullin et al. was only about 7 million.


There was 58% voted. 42% didn't vote at all. So on your figures 58% equates to 106 million. 42% equates to 76.75 million, That's more than voted for Clinton or Trump individually.


Jesus Christ, another brain dead idiot.

You said: "Many more voted for neither."

Why are you now talking about people who didn't vote?

Here, see for yourself: http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?year=2016&minper=0&f=0&off=0&elect=0

I was about 1 million off, looking at those figures.

Approx. 8 million people voted for neither.

And, we can all agree that that is NOT more than 66 million.

FFS    ::)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:21pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:14pm:
Lee said "Many more voted for neither."

He's talking about people who voted, not people who didn't vote, you half-witted idiot.



Nope. people who didn't vote, voted for neither. It is really that simple.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Aussie on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:22pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:09pm:
[quote author=Jovial_Abbott link=1484017639/98#98 date=1484028466]Hmmm, what about abstainers?




The number of people who voted for neither Trump nor Clinton was approx. 7 million.

Lee was wrong.  As is Hammer.

[/quote];D ;D ;D Rougly 130 million people voted out of 325 million people.  You'll find that most adult American's didn't vote at all nincompoop. lee was entirely correct.


Lee and yourself said that more 'voted' for neither Trump nor Clinton.

Give it up, Hammer.  You are on a hiding to nothing here.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:23pm
If you didn’t vote, you didn’t vote.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:24pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:21pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:14pm:
Lee said "Many more voted for neither."

He's talking about people who voted, not people who didn't vote, you half-witted idiot.



Nope. people who didn't vote, voted for neither. It is really that simple.


nah nah. You dont get to include non-participants in the result of a race. You dont vote, you dont get counted. Hard to find that difficult to grasp.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:24pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:09pm:
[quote author=Jovial_Abbott link=1484017639/98#98 date=1484028466]Hmmm, what about abstainers?


The number of people who voted for neither Trump nor Clinton was approx. 7 million.

Lee was wrong.  As is Hammer.

[/quote];D ;D ;D Rougly 130 million people voted out of 325 million people.  You'll find that most adult American's didn't vote at all nincompoop. lee was entirely correct.


We're not talking about people who didn't vote, you idiot.

He said "Many more voted for neither."

I can't believe you are so thick that you don't understand the difference between those who voted and those who didn't.

::)

Approx. 8 million people voted for neither Trump nor Clinton.

Look at my link and do the maths, you buffoon.

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?year=2016&minper=0&f=0&off=0&elect=0


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:25pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:23pm:
If you didn’t vote, you didn’t vote.


Exactly. you voted for neither.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Aussie on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:25pm
Here:


Quote:
lee
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 6493
Gender: male
     
Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Reply #78 - Today at 2:42pm Quote
greggerypeccary wrote Today at 2:33pm:
Many more voted for Clinton.



Many more voted for neither. Wink

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:26pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:21pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:14pm:
Lee said "Many more voted for neither."

He's talking about people who voted, not people who didn't vote, you half-witted idiot.



Nope. people who didn't vote, voted for neither. It is really that simple.


You lying, thick POS.

This is your quote: "Many more voted for neither."

You said "voted for" not "didn't vote for".

Approx. 8 million people voted for neither Trump not Clinton.

I can't believe you and Hammer are actually this stupid.  Seriously.




Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:27pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:25pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:23pm:
If you didn’t vote, you didn’t vote.


Exactly. you voted for neither.


Now if you want to dig down to the true technical meaning of the phrase, you cant say that 'you voted for neither' if indeed you didnt vote at all.  Saying 'you voted' implies that you... voted. Which they didnt.

So if you want to be technical, you are very, very wrong.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:28pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:25pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:23pm:
If you didn’t vote, you didn’t vote.


Exactly. you voted for neither.



Approx. 8 million voted for neither.



Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:29pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:26pm:
You lying, thick POS.

This is your quote: "Many more voted for neither."

You said "voted for" not "didn't vote for".

Approx. 8 million people voted for neither Trump not Clinton.

I can't believe you and Hammer are actually this stupid.  Seriously.



Don't understand the complexities of English? If I had said "Of those people that voted many more voted for neither", you would be correct.

But that is not what I said. ;)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:30pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:25pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:23pm:
If you didn’t vote, you didn’t vote.


Exactly. you voted for neither.


So let me follow your logic.  There is a marathon taking place in a capital city with 2000 competitors. Ms X comes 2000th. According to your llogic she did not inf act come last but merely 2000th of 24million potential competitors who also 'ran' but didnt bother to show up. So instead of finishing in the bottom .2% she actually finished in the TOP  .01% worthy of a gold medal.!

Gotta love statistics!

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:31pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:29pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:26pm:
You lying, thick POS.

This is your quote: "Many more voted for neither."

You said "voted for" not "didn't vote for".

Approx. 8 million people voted for neither Trump not Clinton.

I can't believe you and Hammer are actually this stupid.  Seriously.



Don't understand the complexities of English? If I had said "Of those people that voted many more voted for neither", you would be correct.

But that is not what I said. ;)


I thought The Mechanic was thick, but you take the cake.  Seriously.

Approx. 8 million voted for neither.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:32pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:31pm:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:29pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:26pm:
You lying, thick POS.

This is your quote: "Many more voted for neither."

You said "voted for" not "didn't vote for".

Approx. 8 million people voted for neither Trump not Clinton.

I can't believe you and Hammer are actually this stupid.  Seriously.



Don't understand the complexities of English? If I had said "Of those people that voted many more voted for neither", you would be correct.

But that is not what I said. ;)


I thought The Mechanic was thick, but you take the cake.  Seriously.

Approx. 8 million voted for neither.


Your lack of comprehension skills is not my problem. :D :D :D :D :D

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Aussie on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:33pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:25pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:23pm:
If you didn’t vote, you didn’t vote.


Exactly. you voted for neither.


No, you did not, and to ignore the obvious, as you are doing, does not help your cause.

The people who stayed away from the Polling Booths did not make a vote as you asserted.  They stayed away, even though they might have preferred ??????.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:36pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:33pm:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:25pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:23pm:
If you didn’t vote, you didn’t vote.


Exactly. you voted for neither.


No, you did not, and to ignore the obvious, as you are doing, does not help your cause.

The people who stayed away from the Polling Booths did not make a vote as you asserted.  They stayed away, even though they might have preferred ??????.


UNfortunately Lee is performing the great TrumpTwist. This is where a trump supporter takes the most ludicrous lie or stupid statement of his king and twists and turns and adds 1+1 to get 20billion and states with confidence that Trump was right.

You will be seeing a lot of this over the next 12 months. AFter that, they will largely go silent as the massive disaster that is the Orange Fool desceond on us all.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Aussie on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:37pm
Keep digging Lee.  Let us know when you hit China.  Give it up.  You know it is just dumb.

Well, I hope you do.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:41pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:36pm:
UNfortunately Lee is performing the great TrumpTwist. This is where a trump supporter takes the most ludicrous lie or stupid statement of his king and twists and turns and adds 1+1 to get 20billion and states with confidence that Trump was right.



Please quote where I have said I supported Trump.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:42pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:37pm:
Keep digging Lee.  Let us know when you hit China.  Give it up.  You know it is just dumb.

Well, I hope you do.



I didn't know your comprehension skills were down with greg. So sad.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:43pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:41pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:36pm:
UNfortunately Lee is performing the great TrumpTwist. This is where a trump supporter takes the most ludicrous lie or stupid statement of his king and twists and turns and adds 1+1 to get 20billion and states with confidence that Trump was right.



Please quote where I have said I supported Trump.


Do you think you have to say those words to prove the point? If that assumption is wrong, then say so, but do more than SAY so, but ACT so.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:45pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:33pm:
The people who stayed away from the Polling Booths did not make a vote as you asserted. 



I did not say they voted. By their very absence they obviously did not vote for Clinton or Trump, or any one else.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Aussie on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:48pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:33pm:
The people who stayed away from the Polling Booths did not make a vote as you asserted. 



I did not say they voted. By their very absence they obviously did not vote for Clinton or Trump, or any one else.


You said that more people 'voted' for neither Trump nor Clinton.  That was incorrect,  Get over it.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:52pm
We were talking about people who voted. That was clear to anyone with a brain.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Black Orchid on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:55pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:57pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:47pm:


wow...

kinda hard to have sympathy for such a brain-dead idiot.

Like I said once before, a survey of all 60 million+ Trump voters found only 4 with an IQ above 100.


That goes down as one of the most ridiculous statements I have ever seen here.

Show us these legitimate surveys please!

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by aquascoot on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:58pm
so many people hating on Trump, but i think they really need to ask themselves "why"?

sure he's not going to do what he said (did howard, did gillard, did abbott)...so f*ing what.

what he is going to do is not let all those apathetic little toads keep being apathetic little toads.
the level of apathy is soooo crazy in the west.
the level of entitlement is soooo crazy in the west.

half the western world and certainly 90 % of the posters on this board have this crazy insane notion that they are "valuable" just by the nature of their existence.
Trump is going to shake things up.
To all those mediocre little pussies who just thought they could "coast" and that they could keep taking without contributing a dam thing, Trump represents a massive threat to their apathy, their durrr state and their survival as mediocre pussies.

So the poor little pussies just thought they could remain little creepy takers for eternity and offer no value.

well you are going to have to get up off your asses now and offer value.
you were asked nicely, Obama practically begged you to "invent some sh*t", "compete with asia". stop ebing so f*ing needy.

But you just wanted to stay little punk bitches and coast. Just cope, just "cope' with this harsh world.

The superior man loves diificulty, he loves a challenge, the superior man sees trump and says its time to "suit up".  the leftie mediocre taker sees trump and he just wants to go back to his mummys basement and have a cry. Seyonara suckers


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Gordon on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:59pm
.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Aussie on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:01pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:33pm:
The people who stayed away from the Polling Booths did not make a vote as you asserted. 





I did not say they voted. By their very absence they obviously did not vote for Clinton or Trump, or any one else.



So.....I guess that means (finally) that you now agree what Mr Peccary said was correct......about the VOTE COUNT.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:10pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:01pm:
So.....I guess that means (finally) that you now agree what Mr Peccary said was correct......about the VOTE COUNT.



Don't know; what did he say. I don't bother looking at his posts as a rule. ;)

Of those who voted, more went to Clinton, There were about 7 million to small parties.

But that is not what I was talking about. I was talking about the numbers who didn't vote for Clinton or Trump. Capiche?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Aussie on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:18pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:10pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:01pm:
So.....I guess that means (finally) that you now agree what Mr Peccary said was correct......about the VOTE COUNT.



Don't know; what did he say. I don't bother looking at his posts as a rule. ;)

Of those who voted, more went to Clinton, There were about 7 million to small parties.

But that is not what I was talking about. I was talking about the numbers who didn't vote for Clinton or Trump. Capiche?


Rubbish.  You are now saying you were referring to those who watched TV and stayed away from the Polling Booths.

Dumb crap.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:22pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:18pm:
Rubbish.  You are now saying you were referring to those who watched TV and stayed away from the Polling Booths.

Dumb crap.



Ah, a seer, a Nostradumbarse, a fortune teller perhaps. You are so ridiculous. :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Aussie on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:23pm

Quote:
Don't know; what did he say. I don't bother looking at his posts as a rule.


More rubbish!

You quoted what Mr Peccary said, and then made your silly comment that you now are trying to tap dance in custard about.

Dumb.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:24pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:48pm:
ou said that more people 'voted'
for neither Trump nor Clinton.



Exactly right. They didn't vote. Ergo they voted for neither Clinton or Trump.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:31pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:23pm:

Quote:
Don't know; what did he say. I don't bother looking at his posts as a rule.


More rubbish!

You quoted what Mr Peccary said, and then made your silly comment that you now are trying to tap dance in custard about.

Dumb.


To what exactly did I respond?


greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:
Many more voted for Clinton.


Yes? To which i responded many more voted for neither. Which is demonstrably true, as they didn't vote at all.

Build a bridge; get over it.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Sir Bobby on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:34pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:07pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:56pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:13pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:09pm:
Big deal.

Great speech by Streep. Trump is not fit for the highest office in the land.


Trump is not fit for any office, in any land.



Trump is our saviour.
Yeah Bob, he's ace. Anybody that gets these do-gooding sad sacks pissing in their pretty pink panties is a friend of mine.


hear hear sir Hammer.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by miketrees on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:38pm


When I first saw Lees non vote comment I knew exactly what he meant.

Staying home and not voting is still an action by many.
Also may have just been lazy by many as well.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Black Orchid on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:39pm

miketrees wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:38pm:
When I first saw Lees non vote comment I knew exactly what he meant.

Staying home and not voting is still an action by many.
Also may have just been lazy by many as well.


I think most people knew what Lee meant but anything for a pack attack!

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:58pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:23pm:
If you didn’t vote, you didn’t vote.



they abstained from voting....

I believe they do that at the UN... and yes those who didnt vote are counted...


it is the same here....the votes are called informal and yes they are counted....


I didnt vote for either Mr Shorten or Mr Turnbull at our last election....but I was counted....I just didnt like either of them and still dont...maybe all those American felt the same way who knows...

where do you go when you like neither and trust neither....thats right some hillbilly party that disrupts and costs the nation millions on trivia and spite...no thanks..

does anyone ask those who dont vote WHAT their reason was?????.....

I am amazed Hillary hasnt done a door to door

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:18pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:23pm:

Quote:
Don't know; what did he say. I don't bother looking at his posts as a rule.


More rubbish!

You quoted what Mr Peccary said, and then made your silly comment that you now are trying to tap dance in custard about.

Dumb.


To what exactly did I respond?


greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:
Many more voted for Clinton.


Yes? To which i responded many more voted for neither. Which is demonstrably true, as they didn't vote at all.


LOL    ;D

Do you have any idea how ridiculous that is?

It completely contradicts what you first claimed.

Approx. 8 million voted for neither, which is not more than the number who voted for Trump and Clinton.

Man, you're stupid.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:20pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:18pm:
Do you have any idea how ridiculous that is?

It completely contradicts what you first claimed.

Approx. 8 million voted for neither, which is not more than the number who voted for Trump and Clinton.



Based on your assumptions. Not based on what I wrote. But the hivemind has been diligent in your defense. ;)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:20pm

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

miketrees wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:38pm:
When I first saw Lees non vote comment I knew exactly what he meant.

Staying home and not voting is still an action by many.
Also may have just been lazy by many as well.


I think most people knew what Lee meant but anything for a pack attack!


He probably meant "more didn't vote for either", however, that's not what he said.

He referred to the people who DID vote, and in doing so he was wrong.

Anyway, the main thing to remember is, more people voted for Clinton.



Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:22pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:20pm:
He referred to the people who DID vote, and in doing so he was wrong.



Nope. You are making assumptions again. ;)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:23pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:20pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:18pm:
Do you have any idea how ridiculous that is?

It completely contradicts what you first claimed.

Approx. 8 million voted for neither, which is not more than the number who voted for Trump and Clinton.



Based on your assumptions. Not based on what I wrote.


Based on facts, in direct reply to what you wrote.

Approx. 8 million voted for neither, i.e. Stein and the other candidates.

Your statement clearly refers to people who voted, not those who didn't.

You were wrong, I caught you out, now you need to get over it.




Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:24pm

miketrees wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:38pm:
Staying home and not voting is still an action by many.


Yes.

It's not voting, though, and he was clearly referring to those who voted.

The clue is in the first few words of his (incorrect) statement.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:25pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:20pm:
He referred to the people who DID vote, and in doing so he was wrong.



Nope. You are making assumptions again. ;)


Nope.

Your statement refers only to those who voted.

You can't wiggle your way out of this one.

You're done like a dinner.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:26pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:23pm:
Your statement clearly refers to people who voted, not those who didn't.



Your assumption again. The 42% didn't vote, they did not vote for either Clinton OR Trump. Or anyone else for that matter.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Rhino on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:29pm
Someone give Pecca a teaspoon of cement.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:29pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:23pm:
You were wrong, I caught you out,



You couldn't catch a cold.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mr Hammer on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:42pm
Pecker's tears are giving me a stiffy.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:48pm
will someone give Lee 50 lashes.....

anything to shut the whining lefty up.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Lord Herbert on Jan 10th, 2017 at 7:40pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:12pm:
Not someone with no control of his emotions, not a fricking pig like Trump!

I would also LOVE to know what ties there are between Trump and Putin.


You haven't been reading the news from the US have you?

Don't look now but Trump has been putting together a team of professionals that will make him all but obsolete. It's his Chosen Few who will be running the show from the White House, with Trump himself being very much the intern and the apprentice.

If he gets in for a second term it will be then that he will flex his muscles and make a few insistent idiosyncratic demands of his Team America, but until then I believe he'll try to prove everyone wrong by keeping himself in check and not going off half-cock on anything.

I wonder what will define his presidency, and will he end up being the lame duck that Obama has been.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Lord Herbert on Jan 10th, 2017 at 7:41pm

rhino wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:29pm:
Someone give Pecca a teaspoon of cement.


Better still - a jug of PicoPrep.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 7:51pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:23pm:
Your statement clearly refers to people who voted, not those who didn't.



Your assumption again. The 42% didn't vote, they did not vote for either Clinton OR Trump. Or anyone else for that matter.


You didn't mention the people who DIDN'T vote.

You only mentioned the people who DID vote.

Approx. 8 million voted for neither Trump nor Clinton.

You can't wiggle your way out of this.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Dnarever on Jan 10th, 2017 at 7:54pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:09pm:
Big deal.

Great speech by Streep. Trump is not fit for the highest office in the land.


He would be an ideal candidate for the lowest office in the land though.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 10th, 2017 at 7:55pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 7:40pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:12pm:
Not someone with no control of his emotions, not a fricking pig like Trump!

I would also LOVE to know what ties there are between Trump and Putin.


You haven't been reading the news from the US have you?

Don't look now but Trump has been putting together a team of professionals that will make him all but obsolete. It's his Chosen Few who will be running the show from the White House, with Trump himself being very much the intern and the apprentice.

If he gets in for a second term it will be then that he will flex his muscles and make a few insistent idiosyncratic demands of his Team America, but until then I believe he'll try to prove everyone wrong by keeping himself in check and not going off half-cock on anything.

I wonder what will define his presidency, and will he end up being the lame duck that Obama has been.

Bwahahahahahaha Trump will be to Cabinet govt what abbott was to Cabinet govt.

He has appointed a bunch of nasties, I gathered that. I christian fundy as Vice Prez.

I can only see a trade war, a war on science and a war—on somebody, if we are REALLY lucky it will be a war with Russia. Booby might get his LIA/nuclear winter then.

Trump is a pig.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 10th, 2017 at 7:55pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:42pm:
Pecker's tears are giving me a stiffy.


Always thought you were a homosexual.


  ;) :)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Dnarever on Jan 10th, 2017 at 7:57pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 6:23pm:
Your statement clearly refers to people who voted, not those who didn't.



Your assumption again. The 42% didn't vote, they did not vote for either Clinton OR Trump. Or anyone else for that matter.


Optional voting - people have the right in the USA to not count.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:21pm
ahahahahahahahahah


Quote:
LOL in 2015 Trump said Meryl Streep was one of his favorite actresses!!! https://t.co/RQpkY1GrnB

— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) January 9, 2017

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:22pm
.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:22pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:21pm:
ahahahahahahahahah


Quote:
LOL in 2015 Trump said Meryl Streep was one of his favorite actresses!!! https://t.co/RQpkY1GrnB

— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) January 9, 2017


He's a total retard.

Seriously.

Why would anyone listen to anything that pathetic, alleged child rapist says?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:23pm
.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:25pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 7:51pm:
You didn't mention the people who DIDN'T vote.

You only mentioned the people who DID vote.

Approx. 8 million voted for neither Trump nor Clinton.

You can't wiggle your way out of this.



Oh is that where you get your comprehension skills from - The Wiggles. :D :D :D :D :D

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:26pm

Donald Trump: "Meryl Streep is excellent; she’s a fine person, too."

The lying douche-bag has been caught out again.

What a worthless POS that man pig is.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:32pm

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:55pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:57pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:47pm:


wow...

kinda hard to have sympathy for such a brain-dead idiot.

Like I said once before, a survey of all 60 million+ Trump voters found only 4 with an IQ above 100.


That goes down as one of the most ridiculous statements I have ever seen here.

Show us these legitimate surveys please!



It was obviously 'fake news' and true to form, the Trumpoids swallowed it.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:33pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:24pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:48pm:
ou said that more people 'voted'
for neither Trump nor Clinton.



Exactly right. They didn't vote. Ergo they voted for neither Clinton or Trump.


We have one pedant already - peccahead. Please dont join him because it is not a title you want,

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:35pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 3:33pm:
Many more voted for Clinton.



Many more voted for neither.


Let's break that sentence down, shall we.

Who are we talking about?

"voted for" - okay, you're talking about people who actually voted. No ambiguity there.

"neither" - okay, so not Trump and not Clinton. Again, no ambiguity.

So, you're talking about people who voted for Stein, Johnson, et al. as well as people who voted informally.

The total number of people who voted (which is the limited group you've described) is 137 million.

The total number of people who voted for Trump and Clinton is 129 million.

My maths makes that 8 million who voted for neither.

Looks like you got this one wrong.

Better luck next time    ;)


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:36pm

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

miketrees wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:38pm:
When I first saw Lees non vote comment I knew exactly what he meant.

Staying home and not voting is still an action by many.
Also may have just been lazy by many as well.


I think most people knew what Lee meant but anything for a pack attack!


nah... i think most people thought that no one could that pointless, pedantic or pathetic.  But if Trump has taught us anything... political belief can triumph only any logic or intelligence. All you have to do is believe and then watch the IQ points drift away.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:37pm

cods wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:58pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:23pm:
If you didn’t vote, you didn’t vote.



they abstained from voting....

I believe they do that at the UN... and yes those who didnt vote are counted...


it is the same here....the votes are called informal and yes they are counted....


I didnt vote for either Mr Shorten or Mr Turnbull at our last election....but I was counted....I just didnt like either of them and still dont...maybe all those American felt the same way who knows...

where do you go when you like neither and trust neither....thats right some hillbilly party that disrupts and costs the nation millions on trivia and spite...no thanks..

does anyone ask those who dont vote WHAT their reason was?????.....

I am amazed Hillary hasnt done a door to door



No they dont, you sozzled jerk. Your 'abstention' doesnt get counted if you dont show up to vote.  Have you ever voted while sober?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:39pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 7:40pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:12pm:
Not someone with no control of his emotions, not a fricking pig like Trump!

I would also LOVE to know what ties there are between Trump and Putin.


You haven't been reading the news from the US have you?

Don't look now but Trump has been putting together a team of professionals that will make him all but obsolete. It's his Chosen Few who will be running the show from the White House, with Trump himself being very much the intern and the apprentice.

If he gets in for a second term it will be then that he will flex his muscles and make a few insistent idiosyncratic demands of his Team America, but until then I believe he'll try to prove everyone wrong by keeping himself in check and not going off half-cock on anything.

I wonder what will define his presidency, and will he end up being the lame duck that Obama has been.



Because he has EVER done that before the election... or since?

delusional plus...

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:39pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:33pm:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:24pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:48pm:
ou said that more people 'voted'
for neither Trump nor Clinton.



Exactly right. They didn't vote. Ergo they voted for neither Clinton or Trump.


We have one pedant already - peccahead. Please dont join him because it is not a title you want,


Lovable pedant, if you don't mind.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:41pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:35pm:
"voted for" - okay, you're talking about people who actually voted. No ambiguity there.

"neither" - okay, so not Trump and not Clinton. Again, no ambiguity.


Actually "voted for neither" - because they didn't vote.

Bye

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:45pm

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:41pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:35pm:
"voted for" - okay, you're talking about people who actually voted. No ambiguity there.

"neither" - okay, so not Trump and not Clinton. Again, no ambiguity.


Actually "voted for neither" - because they didn't vote.

Bye


Incorrect.

Your statement limits the group to only those who voted.

It excludes everyone who didn't vote.

"voted for neither" - clear as day.

"voted"

Not "didn't vote".

You fvkked up big time.

Time to cop it on the chin, lick your wounds, and move on.




Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by jmjcare on Jan 10th, 2017 at 9:00pm

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).



Actors do what they do best........ACT

Did you ever watch these two

Women in the World 2012: Meryl Streep's Tribute to Hillary Clinton

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECNQDqMoAjw

Meryl Streep's Passionate 2016 Democratic National Convention Speech

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgrnwWU7xR8

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 10th, 2017 at 10:00pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:45pm:
Incorrect.

Your statement limits the group to only those who voted.



No. The voter pool is those eligible to vote.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Lord Herbert on Jan 11th, 2017 at 5:22am

Dnarever wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 7:57pm:
Optional voting - people have the right in the USA to not count.


Correct.

Australia still doesn't have democracy when it comes to getting your name crossed out at the polling booths instead of going off to play cricket or take a dip at the beach.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 6:29am

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:37pm:

cods wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:58pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:23pm:
If you didn’t vote, you didn’t vote.



they abstained from voting....

I believe they do that at the UN... and yes those who didnt vote are counted...


it is the same here....the votes are called informal and yes they are counted....


I didnt vote for either Mr Shorten or Mr Turnbull at our last election....but I was counted....I just didnt like either of them and still dont...maybe all those American felt the same way who knows...

where do you go when you like neither and trust neither....thats right some hillbilly party that disrupts and costs the nation millions on trivia and spite...no thanks..

does anyone ask those who dont vote WHAT their reason was?????.....

I am amazed Hillary hasnt done a door to door



No they dont, you sozzled jerk. Your 'abstention' doesnt get counted if you dont show up to vote.  Have you ever voted while sober?



dontcha luv a good honest comment from a god fearing christian .

it kinda gives  terrorism  a whole new perspective.. ::) ::)

if this is Christian... then you can count me out!

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 6:31am

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:25pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 7:51pm:
You didn't mention the people who DIDN'T vote.

You only mentioned the people who DID vote.

Approx. 8 million voted for neither Trump nor Clinton.

You can't wiggle your way out of this.



Oh is that where you get your comprehension skills from - The Wiggles. :D :D :D :D :D



and facebook.... ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 6:33am

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 10:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:45pm:
Incorrect.

Your statement limits the group to only those who voted.



No. The voter pool is those eligible to vote.




of course.. if they had all voted.....who knows???.. Trump in a landslide.... ;D ;D ;D

they would have all choked on their tears....what fun..

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by aquascoot on Jan 11th, 2017 at 6:36am

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 6:29am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:37pm:

cods wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:58pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:23pm:
If you didn’t vote, you didn’t vote.



they abstained from voting....

I believe they do that at the UN... and yes those who didnt vote are counted...


it is the same here....the votes are called informal and yes they are counted....


I didnt vote for either Mr Shorten or Mr Turnbull at our last election....but I was counted....I just didnt like either of them and still dont...maybe all those American felt the same way who knows...

where do you go when you like neither and trust neither....thats right some hillbilly party that disrupts and costs the nation millions on trivia and spite...no thanks..

does anyone ask those who dont vote WHAT their reason was?????.....

I am amazed Hillary hasnt done a door to door



No they dont, you sozzled jerk. Your 'abstention' doesnt get counted if you dont show up to vote.  Have you ever voted while sober?



dontcha luv a good honest comment from a god fearing christian .

it kinda gives  terrorism  a whole new perspective.. ::) ::)

if this is Christian... then you can count me out!



yes, longweekend needs to understand that if you want to claim to be a rightard and if you want to claim to be a christian you need to

master your emotions
control your outbursts
be a source of pure positive energy like the sun

he has not journeyed far along the narrow road to success.

he would do well to start a small business where the rough edges would be removed .  nothing will teach you more about remaining positive, and mastering your emotions then running a business.
the marketplace will ruthlessly destroy someone who is not calibrated and positive

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 6:45am

aquascoot wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 6:36am:
master your emotions
control your outbursts
be a source of pure positive energy like the sun

he has not journeyed far along the narrow road to success.

he would do well to start a small business where the rough edges would be removed .  nothing will teach you more about remaining positive, and mastering your emotions then running a business.
the marketplace will ruthlessly destroy someone who is not calibrated and positive



you are being far too kind aqua...

these are not outbursts they are planned abuse..

I have noticed it in many of his replies...

I avoid at all costs because its impossible to converse with this type of person who puts themselves above all others on every aspect...yep even Christ....

but its ok.. because it says so much about him.... dont you think?....

please dont refer to him as a rightard...even god wouldnt want  that....and no I dont wish him on the left either... :) :)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 6:46am

jmjcare wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 9:00pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:17pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.


She should get herself elected to office if she wants a policicat voice.
Until then, she's just another Hollywood bozo with an opinion.



Did you watch her speech?

Or are you just another internet nobody with an opinion(based on nothing at all).



Actors do what they do best........ACT

Did you ever watch these two

Women in the World 2012: Meryl Streep's Tribute to Hillary Clinton

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECNQDqMoAjw

Meryl Streep's Passionate 2016 Democratic National Convention Speech

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgrnwWU7xR8



they also get paid.. ;)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 6:55am

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 6:29am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:37pm:

cods wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 5:58pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 4:23pm:
If you didn’t vote, you didn’t vote.



they abstained from voting....

I believe they do that at the UN... and yes those who didnt vote are counted...


it is the same here....the votes are called informal and yes they are counted....


I didnt vote for either Mr Shorten or Mr Turnbull at our last election....but I was counted....I just didnt like either of them and still dont...maybe all those American felt the same way who knows...

where do you go when you like neither and trust neither....thats right some hillbilly party that disrupts and costs the nation millions on trivia and spite...no thanks..

does anyone ask those who dont vote WHAT their reason was?????.....

I am amazed Hillary hasnt done a door to door



No they dont, you sozzled jerk. Your 'abstention' doesnt get counted if you dont show up to vote.  Have you ever voted while sober?



dontcha luv a good honest comment from a god fearing christian .

it kinda gives  terrorism  a whole new perspective.. ::) ::)

if this is Christian... then you can count me out!


You brought this on yourself you sozzled cretin. Call me paedo not just once, but TWICE and you can expect to be dismissed as a retarded geriatric from hereon in.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:11am

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 6:55am:
You brought this on yourself you sozzled cretin. Call me paedo not just once, but TWICE and you can expect to be dismissed as a retarded geriatric from hereon in.



I have never called you a paedo... dont go down that road again... I said you were a PAEDO SUPPORTER>>.and that goes back to the time you said members of a community had no right to be informed when a paedo was released into their community.....

your claim they had done their jail time.. and they should be free to come and go as they wish...

I disagreed wholeheartedly
..

you are the one that m akes those claims not me....

I just smile  when you call yourself a Christian thats all...and every post makes you look less and less like any Christian I have ever come across...

if it isnt a sin to tell lies it should be...you would definitely have trouble  passing  the test.,..

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:31am

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 10:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:45pm:
Incorrect.

Your statement limits the group to only those who voted.



No. The voter pool is those eligible to vote.


Incorrect.

Your statement limited it to only those who voted.

"voted for"  No ambiguity whatsoever.

In which case, approx. 8 million voted for neither (i.e. the other candidates).

Thus, you were wrong.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:33am

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 6:33am:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 10:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:45pm:
Incorrect.

Your statement limits the group to only those who voted.



No. The voter pool is those eligible to vote.




of course.. if they had all voted.....who knows???.. Trump in a landslide.... ;D ;D ;D

they would have all choked on their tears....what fun..



Of those who voted, more voted for Clinton.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by red baron on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:40am
I agree with Donald Trump...Meryl Streep is the most over rated Actor in Hollywood History..Watching Mrs Rent An Accent is like chewing glass.

Meryl Streep should win the Marlon Brando Award for Political statements after his effort with the Indian accepting his Academy Award. He started the trend.

Actors are the most over pampered over indulged species on Earth. Their opinions don't amount to a hill of beans.

Actors should stick to their make believe world and leave Politics alone


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by red baron on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:41am
#

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:42am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:33am:

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 6:33am:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 10:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:45pm:
Incorrect.

Your statement limits the group to only those who voted.



No. The voter pool is those eligible to vote.




of course.. if they had all voted.....who knows???.. Trump in a landslide.... ;D ;D ;D

they would have all choked on their tears....what fun..



Of those who voted, more voted for Clinton.

  been eating too much garlic greg you do keep repeating yourself...time to get out more and extend your vocabulary you sound so fixated.. obsessive..paranoid..

all of those! :)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by red baron on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:42am
bump

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by red baron on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:43am
$

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:44am
Hey... they finally found TWO - yes TWO - people who didnt like Streeps speech!  mel gibson who is of course very well regarded for his fine temperament and character and one of the worlds best-loved and most skilled actors... Vince Vaughan LOL

TWO.


I liked CLooneys comment about Trump's tweet...  "Aren't you supposed to be running the country or something?"

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:47am

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:44am:
Hey... they finally found TWO - yes TWO - people who didnt like Streeps speech!  mel gibson who is of course very well regarded for his fine temperament and character and one of the worlds best-loved and most skilled actors... Vince Vaughan LOL

TWO.


I liked CLooneys comment about Trump's tweet...  "Aren't you supposed to be running the country or something?"



No george not till the 20th Jan try to keep up dear.

Barrack is still in charge.,

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:48am

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:11am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 6:55am:
You brought this on yourself you sozzled cretin. Call me paedo not just once, but TWICE and you can expect to be dismissed as a retarded geriatric from hereon in.



I have never called you a paedo... dont go down that road again... I said you were a PAEDO SUPPORTER>>.and that goes back to the time you said members of a community had no right to be informed when a paedo was released into their community.....

your claim they had done their jail time.. and they should be free to come and go as they wish...

I disagreed wholeheartedly
..

you are the one that m akes those claims not me....

I just smile  when you call yourself a Christian thats all...and every post makes you look less and less like any Christian I have ever come across...

if it isnt a sin to tell lies it should be...you would definitely have trouble  passing  the test.,..



Oh... that makes all the difference you sozzled retard. How about you use what little of your brain remain and start acting like someone who understands the basic principles of OPINION.  I dont give a crap if you agree with me or not. Nothing gives you the right to cast aspersions on another's character simple because you disagree.  Grow up and get a character that can handle robust debate or get out of here.

Vigilante.  (get the irony, yet?)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:48am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:33am:

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 6:33am:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 10:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:45pm:
Incorrect.

Your statement limits the group to only those who voted.



No. The voter pool is those eligible to vote.




of course.. if they had all voted.....who knows???.. Trump in a landslide.... ;D ;D ;D

they would have all choked on their tears....what fun..



Of those who voted, more voted for Clinton.



REALLY.. wow never heard  that...like wow..

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:51am

red baron wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:40am:
I agree with Donald Trump...Meryl Streep is the most over rated Actor in Hollywood History..Watching Mrs Rent An Accent is like chewing glass.

Meryl Streep should win the Marlon Brando Award for Political statements after his effort with the Indian accepting his Academy Award. He started the trend.

Actors are the most over pampered over indulged species on Earth. Their opinions don't amount to a hill of beans.

Actors should stick to their make believe world and leave Politics alone


So unless they support your political opinion they should be quiet?  Do you even listen to yourself?? I despise the Greens and their ilk, but I would be out protesting in support of their right to express their view if it were squashed.  Where would you be?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Dsmithy70 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:51am
Pretty sure it was Cods's  facebook page  ;)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:53am

red baron wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:40am:
I agree with Donald Trump...Meryl Streep is the most over rated Actor in Hollywood History..Watching Mrs Rent An Accent is like chewing glass.

Meryl Streep should win the Marlon Brando Award for Political statements after his effort with the Indian accepting his Academy Award. He started the trend.

Actors are the most over pampered over indulged species on Earth. Their opinions don't amount to a hill of beans.

Actors should stick to their make believe world and leave Politics alone



if only just one of them lived up to the illusion they give out...they are the most drug addled community in the world...in and out of marriages tossing their kids aside with their phony images of chest beating...makes me laugh when mere mortals fall all over their every word...gweg gets really carried away...he even fell in love with a judge of sorts.... ;D ;D ;D ;D.. just googled her and that was it... :D :D

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by John Smith on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:54am

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:48am:
I dont give a crap if you agree with me or not. Nothing gives you the right to cast aspersions on another's character simple because you disagree.  Grow up and get a character that can handle robust debate or get out of here.



ohh, that's bloody hilarious, especially seeing that it's coming from you. The one guy who ALWAYS ends up attacking other peoples character for their opinions  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:54am
In the demented, twisted world of the Trumpoids... nothing Trump has ever done has been illegal, immoral, unethical or wrong. Not paying staff?  no probs. ASsaulting women? no one cares. Attacking the disabled? why not?

And now we have the claim that Trump got more votes than Clinton and yes, Trump himself said that.


You will one day not far from now, read some of your silly comments and wonder how you were ever so conned and so easily manipulated.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:56am
There wouldnt be many actresses who wouldnt want to be as 'under-rated' or 'unskilled' as Meryl Streep.


I do wonder when the Retarded REpublican supporters are going to comment on the fact that the on living REpublican ex-President DIDNT vote for Trump.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by aquascoot on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:57am

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:44am:
Hey... they finally found TWO - yes TWO - people who didnt like Streeps speech!  mel gibson who is of course very well regarded for his fine temperament and character and one of the worlds best-loved and most skilled actors... Vince Vaughan LOL

TWO.


I liked CLooneys comment about Trump's tweet...  "Aren't you supposed to be running the country or something?"



Clooney is your typical democrat stuck in a fantasy world where unicorns fart rainbows.
Trump wont be 'running the country".
The entrepreneurs, movers , shakers and alpha male business dominators will be running the country.
What sort of country lets a "public servant" run it?
Venezuela perhaps.

Donald will be there as a role model and motivational speaker to get the RIGHT PEOPLE running the country.
and that certainly wont be washed up celebrities like Clooney and Streep FFS

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Dsmithy70 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:12am
f

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Dsmithy70 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:12am
l

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Dsmithy70 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:13am
i

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Dsmithy70 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:14am
p

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by aquascoot on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:14am

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:53am:

red baron wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:40am:
I agree with Donald Trump...Meryl Streep is the most over rated Actor in Hollywood History..Watching Mrs Rent An Accent is like chewing glass.

Meryl Streep should win the Marlon Brando Award for Political statements after his effort with the Indian accepting his Academy Award. He started the trend.

Actors are the most over pampered over indulged species on Earth. Their opinions don't amount to a hill of beans.

Actors should stick to their make believe world and leave Politics alone



if only just one of them lived up to the illusion they give out...they are the most drug addled community in the world...in and out of marriages tossing their kids aside with their phony images of chest beating...makes me laugh when mere mortals fall all over their every word...gweg gets really carried away...he even fell in love with a judge of sorts.... ;D ;D ;D ;D.. just googled her and that was it... :D :D


And this is exactly the point.
actors arent learning their 'craft' in the harsh reality of the marketplace.
trump is.
Actors arent subjected to the brutal feedback that a business owner is. they dont get beaten down for certain behaviours and have to learn the lessons and come back stronger and smarter.  They are living by definition in a fantasy world.

You cant be Donald Trump and have years and years of grinding it out, doing deals, hiring and firing, failing and succeeding without becoming very grounded and , yes, VERY HUMBLE about your successes. because a guy who makes it to the top is humbled by the journey it took to get there. He has been FORCED to learn the lessons, take the feedback and he has been brought back to reality again and again and again.
Streep has none of these lessons. Actors can carry on like divas, they are surrounded by "yes men".
A business person like Trump will always be stunting on their faces in terms of his own grounded awesomeness

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:18am

John Smith wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:54am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:48am:
I dont give a crap if you agree with me or not. Nothing gives you the right to cast aspersions on another's character simple because you disagree.  Grow up and get a character that can handle robust debate or get out of here.



ohh, that's bloody hilarious, especially seeing that it's coming from you. The one guy who ALWAYS ends up attacking other peoples character for their opinions  ;D ;D ;D ;D



me thinks he has corned the market on ABUSE to be honest...maybe he has just written..[lol] his new version of the Ten Commandments......now 12.

11/ it is better to abuse your opponent than to allow him or her to expose your true self...



12/ [i]Fight everything bad  said about yourself...with as much lies and abuse you can drum up.....this usually works in scaring them off. ;) ;)[/i]

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by aquascoot on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:29am
its more that people become "addicted' to their emotional state.

an angry person will look around trying to find some reason to get angry
a negative person will look to find the negative.

you could send a negative person to Hawaii and for 10 minutes they would be in awe of the waves and the rainforest and then , very quickly, they would be bitching about the cab driver.

emotional states are very addictive.
where ever you go, there you are

its why you want to addict yourself on gratitude and positivity. every morning , 20 minutes of thinking about all the things you are grateful for....then your life will never suck, because you have now addicted yourself on feeling good.
see how this works  ;)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:31am

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:48am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:33am:

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 6:33am:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 10:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:45pm:
Incorrect.

Your statement limits the group to only those who voted.



No. The voter pool is those eligible to vote.




of course.. if they had all voted.....who knows???.. Trump in a landslide.... ;D ;D ;D

they would have all choked on their tears....what fun..



Of those who voted, more voted for Clinton.



REALLY.. wow never heard  that...like wow..


Yes cods, really.

Of those who voted, MORE voted for Hillary Clinton than the alleged child rapist.

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php

i.e. Clinton won the popular vote.

More voters wanted her as POTUS.

Try to keep up, dear.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:34am
Jesus, how STUPID is horseboy?


Quote:
Donald will be there as a role model


Role model? Pussy snatching? Going bankrupt four times, never paying any tax?

Not to mention: the pig is now the head of the executive in the US. I think he will make a difference and it will not be for the better.

More manufacturing jobs? With all the robots in factories? More coal mining—with renewables cheaper than coal fired power? He won’t build the wall. He will deprive millions of Americans of health insurance tho.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by aquascoot on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:45am

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:34am:
Jesus, how STUPID is horseboy?


Quote:
Donald will be there as a role model


Role model? Pussy snatching? Going bankrupt four times, never paying any tax?

Not to mention: the pig is now the head of the executive in the US. I think he will make a difference and it will not be for the better.

More manufacturing jobs? With all the robots in factories? More coal mining—with renewables cheaper than coal fired power? He won’t build the wall. He will deprive millions of Americans of health insurance tho.


Monk , you are addicted to negativity.
Trump is SO CHARISMATIC that he took "the apprentice' from poor ratings to some of the highest ratings of all times.
And its a show about success.
Trump "vibes' with success.


Now you go back to watching Q and A with all the neurotic anxious and fearful lefties and keep vibing with failure.  They are 'addicted ' to their anxiety and fearful emotional state.  If you dont have strong personal boundaries and you watch the ABC , you will become addicted to the drug they pedal. Its called "failure".
Like medusa, it will destroy you. You can be addicted to the emotional state of failure if you want.
but why would you want that ?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:54am

aquascoot wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:57am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:44am:
Hey... they finally found TWO - yes TWO - people who didnt like Streeps speech!  mel gibson who is of course very well regarded for his fine temperament and character and one of the worlds best-loved and most skilled actors... Vince Vaughan LOL

TWO.


I liked CLooneys comment about Trump's tweet...  "Aren't you supposed to be running the country or something?"



Clooney is your typical democrat stuck in a fantasy world where unicorns fart rainbows.
Trump wont be 'running the country".
The entrepreneurs, movers , shakers and alpha male business dominators will be running the country.
What sort of country lets a "public servant" run it?
Venezuela perhaps.

Donald will be there as a role model and motivational speaker to get the RIGHT PEOPLE running the country.
and that certainly wont be washed up celebrities like Clooney and Streep FFS



this is another in the long line of somewhat delusional posts from you.

Clooney and Streep are 'washed up'?  I wish I was as 'washed up' as them!

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:56am

aquascoot wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:14am:

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:53am:

red baron wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:40am:
I agree with Donald Trump...Meryl Streep is the most over rated Actor in Hollywood History..Watching Mrs Rent An Accent is like chewing glass.

Meryl Streep should win the Marlon Brando Award for Political statements after his effort with the Indian accepting his Academy Award. He started the trend.

Actors are the most over pampered over indulged species on Earth. Their opinions don't amount to a hill of beans.

Actors should stick to their make believe world and leave Politics alone



if only just one of them lived up to the illusion they give out...they are the most drug addled community in the world...in and out of marriages tossing their kids aside with their phony images of chest beating...makes me laugh when mere mortals fall all over their every word...gweg gets really carried away...he even fell in love with a judge of sorts.... ;D ;D ;D ;D.. just googled her and that was it... :D :D


And this is exactly the point.
actors arent learning their 'craft' in the harsh reality of the marketplace.
trump is.
Actors arent subjected to the brutal feedback that a business owner is. they dont get beaten down for certain behaviours and have to learn the lessons and come back stronger and smarter.  They are living by definition in a fantasy world.

You cant be Donald Trump and have years and years of grinding it out, doing deals, hiring and firing, failing and succeeding without becoming very grounded and , yes, VERY HUMBLE about your successes. because a guy who makes it to the top is humbled by the journey it took to get there. He has been FORCED to learn the lessons, take the feedback and he has been brought back to reality again and again and again.
Streep has none of these lessons. Actors can carry on like divas, they are surrounded by "yes men".
A business person like Trump will always be stunting on their faces in terms of his own grounded awesomeness




actors dont exist in the 'harsh reality of their marketplace'????  Go to any maccas or restaurant in Hollywood and you will find your waiter or serving staff to be unemployed actors struggling with the 'harsh reality of their marketplace'.

seriously, get a brain.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:58am

aquascoot wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:45am:
ovial Monk wrote Today at 8:34am:
Jesus, how STUPID is horseboy?

Quote:
Donald will be there as a role model


Role model? Pussy snatching? Going bankrupt four times, never paying any tax?

Not to mention: the pig is now the head of the executive in the US. I think he will make a difference and it will not be for the better.

More manufacturing jobs? With all the robots in factories? More coal mining—with renewables cheaper than coal fired power? He won’t build the wall. He will deprive millions of Americans of health insurance tho.


Monk , you are addicted to negativity.
Trump is SO CHARISMATIC that he took "the apprentice' from poor ratings to some of the highest ratings of all times.
And its a show about success.
Trump "vibes' with success.


Now you go back to watching Q and A with all the neurotic anxious and fearful lefties and keep vibing with failure.  They are 'addicted ' to their anxiety and fearful emotional state.  If you dont have strong personal boundaries and you watch the ABC , you will become addicted to the drug they pedal. Its called "failure".
Like medusa, it will destroy you. You can be addicted to the emotional state of failure if you want.
but why would you want that ?




has he ever had a HISSY FIT the size of Monks... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D..



I dont think he has.. and certainly not the size we are seeing from our lefty chums..

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

has anyone seen a bigger or better temper tanny than shown by the left....what a massive spit of the dummy... ;D ;D ;D..

even puts monks HISSY in the shade.. sorry monk but really!!!!

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:59am
Horseboy sees everything through a self help book. That is why he makes a horses’ arse of himself frequently. Despite that, he is boring and irrelevant.

Trump is a pig who goes bankrupt regularly but only loses his investors’ money, never his own. What he will do the USA will not be good. Anyone can see that. He has slogans but not policies.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by aquascoot on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:00am

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:54am:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:57am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:44am:
Hey... they finally found TWO - yes TWO - people who didnt like Streeps speech!  mel gibson who is of course very well regarded for his fine temperament and character and one of the worlds best-loved and most skilled actors... Vince Vaughan LOL

TWO.


I liked CLooneys comment about Trump's tweet...  "Aren't you supposed to be running the country or something?"



Clooney is your typical democrat stuck in a fantasy world where unicorns fart rainbows.
Trump wont be 'running the country".
The entrepreneurs, movers , shakers and alpha male business dominators will be running the country.
What sort of country lets a "public servant" run it?
Venezuela perhaps.

Donald will be there as a role model and motivational speaker to get the RIGHT PEOPLE running the country.
and that certainly wont be washed up celebrities like Clooney and Streep FFS



this is another in the long line of somewhat delusional posts from you.

Clooney and Streep are 'washed up'?  I wish I was as 'washed up' as them!


my kids and their friends dont follow them on instagram.
i suppose throwing a diva fit might get them a few hits on youtube  ;)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by John Smith on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:05am

aquascoot wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:00am:
my kids and their friends dont follow them on instagram.



ohh, scoots kids don't follow them on instgram ... that settles it then, they're washed up :D :D :D

so tell me, who made your kids the arbiters of who is and isn't washed up?



fkken ell you say some stupid things sometimes.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:08am

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:59am:
Horseboy sees everything through a self help book. That is why he makes a horses” arse of himself frequently. Despite that, he is boring and irrelevant.

Trump is a pig who goes bankrupt regularly but only loses his investors’ money, never his own. What he will do the USA will not be good. Anyone can see that. He has slogans but not policies.



has he ever thrown a HISSY the size of the one you threw monk???>>.lolol.. come on fez up... has he???..

how about give him a chance.. I didnt see anything worth while from Obama in 8 years... so at least give this guy a chance..he cant be any worse....thats how I look at it.. as far as I know Guantanamo is still going strong and he promised to close that in his first year


Quote:
President Barack Obama signed an executive order on January 22, 2009, to close the detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, within a year. Seven years later, the prison for terrorism suspects remains open, with 61 detainees (as of August 2016).Feb 23, 2016


just sayin!

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:08am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:31am:

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:48am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:33am:

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 6:33am:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 10:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:45pm:
Incorrect.

Your statement limits the group to only those who voted.



No. The voter pool is those eligible to vote.




of course.. if they had all voted.....who knows???.. Trump in a landslide.... ;D ;D ;D

they would have all choked on their tears....what fun..



Of those who voted, more voted for Clinton.



REALLY.. wow never heard  that...like wow..


Yes cods, really.

Of those who voted, MORE voted for Hillary Clinton than the alleged child rapist.

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php

i.e. Clinton won the popular vote.

More voters wanted her as POTUS.

Try to keep up, dear.



I just wanted to see you say it again...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Yadda on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:13am

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:15pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.



Acting requires empathy.

Empathy requires a voice.




Acting requires empathy.

Acting requires an ability in a person, to convincingly portray a [personal] belief which is in fact false,      ....to deceive.




The suspension of disbelief which many people willing embrace, is a willingness to embrace self-deceit.   !!!!!


Quote:

The term suspension of disbelief or willing suspension of disbelief has been defined as a willingness to suspend one's critical faculties and believe the unbelievable; sacrifice of realism and logic for the sake of enjoyment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspension_of_disbelief




Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:15am

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:08am:
I just wanted to see you say it again...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


No probs.

Popular Vote

Clinton - 65,844,954 votes - THE WINNER!

Trump - 62,979,879 votes

Johnson - 4,488,919 votes

Stein - 1,457,044 votes

McMullin - 725,902 votes




Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Yadda on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:15am
bump





Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:27am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:15am:

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:08am:
I just wanted to see you say it again...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


No probs.

Popular Vote

Clinton - 65,844,954 votes - THE WINNER!

Trump - 62,979,879 votes

Johnson - 4,488,919 votes

Stein - 1,457,044 votes

McMullin - 725,902 votes






not sure who said you look so cute doing that.... but maybe not... :D :D

we do enjoy your happy though.. even though you lost in the real world

whats the incoming Preses.. name again???>.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by aquascoot on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:31am

John Smith wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:05am:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:00am:
my kids and their friends dont follow them on instagram.



ohh, scoots kids don't follow them on instgram ... that settles it then, they're washed up :D :D :D

so tell me, who made your kids the arbiters of who is and isn't washed up?



fkken ell you say some stupid things sometimes.


Kim kardashian has more relevance to the trajectory of the USA circa 2017 then Streep.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:33am

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:27am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:15am:

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:08am:
I just wanted to see you say it again...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


No probs.

Popular Vote

Clinton - 65,844,954 votes - THE WINNER!

Trump - 62,979,879 votes

Johnson - 4,488,919 votes

Stein - 1,457,044 votes

McMullin - 725,902 votes






not sure who said you look so cute doing that.... but maybe not... :D :D

we do enjoy your happy though.. even though you lost in the real world

whats the incoming Preses.. name again???>.


Mud.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:40am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:33am:

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:27am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:15am:

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:08am:
I just wanted to see you say it again...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


No probs.

Popular Vote

Clinton - 65,844,954 votes - THE WINNER!

Trump - 62,979,879 votes

Johnson - 4,488,919 votes

Stein - 1,457,044 votes

McMullin - 725,902 votes






not sure who said you look so cute doing that.... but maybe not... :D :D

we do enjoy your happy though.. even though you lost in the real world

whats the incoming Preses.. name again???>.


Mud.



who lost..

sour grapes..oh wait a minute the bitch slapped her workers didnt she..

violent sour grapes.. :)then again.. >:( >:(

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:42am

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:40am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:33am:

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:27am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:15am:

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:08am:
I just wanted to see you say it again...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


No probs.

Popular Vote

Clinton - 65,844,954 votes - THE WINNER!

Trump - 62,979,879 votes

Johnson - 4,488,919 votes

Stein - 1,457,044 votes

McMullin - 725,902 votes






not sure who said you look so cute doing that.... but maybe not... :D :D

we do enjoy your happy though.. even though you lost in the real world

whats the incoming Preses.. name again???>.


Mud.



who lost..


Trump, by almost 3 million votes.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Yadda on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:01am

aquascoot wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:29am:

where ever you go, there you are




LOL  !!!!

There's no arguing with that.     [....if we are sane.]         :)




aquascoot wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:29am:

its why you want to addict yourself on gratitude and positivity. every morning ,

20 minutes of thinking about all the things you are grateful for

....then your life will never suck, because you have now addicted yourself on feeling good.
see how this works  ;)


Absolutely, aquascoot.   !!

We should always be grateful, for every 'good thing' that perceive in our life.




Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:01am

aquascoot wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:00am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:54am:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:57am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:44am:
Hey... they finally found TWO - yes TWO - people who didnt like Streeps speech!  mel gibson who is of course very well regarded for his fine temperament and character and one of the worlds best-loved and most skilled actors... Vince Vaughan LOL

TWO.


I liked CLooneys comment about Trump's tweet...  "Aren't you supposed to be running the country or something?"



Clooney is your typical democrat stuck in a fantasy world where unicorns fart rainbows.
Trump wont be 'running the country".
The entrepreneurs, movers , shakers and alpha male business dominators will be running the country.
What sort of country lets a "public servant" run it?
Venezuela perhaps.

Donald will be there as a role model and motivational speaker to get the RIGHT PEOPLE running the country.
and that certainly wont be washed up celebrities like Clooney and Streep FFS



this is another in the long line of somewhat delusional posts from you.

Clooney and Streep are 'washed up'?  I wish I was as 'washed up' as them!


my kids and their friends dont follow them on instagram.
i suppose throwing a diva fit might get them a few hits on youtube  ;)



Your kids probably dont follow ANYONE over the age of 30. And I was unaware - as is the rest of the world - that instagram was the measure of success an celebrity.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:02am

Yadda wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:13am:

mothra wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:15pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
Like Matt Damon, the lady should just shuddup and act.



Acting requires empathy.

Empathy requires a voice.




Acting requires empathy.

Acting requires an ability in a person, to convincingly portray a [personal] belief which is in fact false,      ....to deceive.




The suspension of disbelief which many people willing embrace, is a willingness to embrace self-deceit.   !!!!!


Quote:

The term suspension of disbelief or willing suspension of disbelief has been defined as a willingness to suspend one's critical faculties and believe the unbelievable; sacrifice of realism and logic for the sake of enjoyment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspension_of_disbelief



You dont know much/anything about acting.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Yadda on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:02am
bump



Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Yadda on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:03am
bump





Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Yadda on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:04am
bump





Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Yadda on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:18am
bump




Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:19am

You're not doing it right, Yadda.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:05am

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:34am:
Jesus, how STUPID is horseboy?


Quote:
Donald will be there as a role model


Role model? Pussy snatching? Going bankrupt four times, never paying any tax?



And he was in a reality TV show.

I mean, come on.  Reality TV?

I've heard that in his younger days, before Daddy gave him all that money, he used to work at McDonald's.



Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:14am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:31am:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 10:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:45pm:
Incorrect.

Your statement limits the group to only those who voted.



No. The voter pool is those eligible to vote.


Incorrect.

Your statement limited it to only those who voted.

"voted for"  No ambiguity whatsoever.

In which case, approx. 8 million voted for neither (i.e. the other candidates).

Thus, you were wrong.



So, according to you, those voters who don't actively participate (write down their intentions) are non-voters whose non-votes are ignored.

Yet

According to you those who don't actively participate (write down their intentions), in disavowing Trump are non-voters whose non-votes (participation) are included as Trump supporters.

It seems your your stance depends on which barrow you are pushing. ;)


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:26am

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:14am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:31am:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 10:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:45pm:
Incorrect.

Your statement limits the group to only those who voted.



No. The voter pool is those eligible to vote.


Incorrect.

Your statement limited it to only those who voted.

"voted for"  No ambiguity whatsoever.

In which case, approx. 8 million voted for neither (i.e. the other candidates).

Thus, you were wrong.



So, according to you, those voters who don't actively participate (write down their intentions) are non-voters whose non-votes are ignored.


You were talking about people who actually voted.

Don't bring the non-voters into this.

You stated that: "Many more voted for neither."

So, we're clearly discussing the people who voted.

In rounded numbers, 137 million voted.

66 million voted for Clinton (the clear winner).

63 million voted for Trump.

So, 129 million voted for Clinton and Trump.

That means 8 million voted for neither.

i.e. they voted for Stein, Johnson, or one of the many other candidates.

Subsequently, you were wrong, as 8 million is less than 129 million, not more than.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:31am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:26am:
Don't bring the non-voters into this.



Thank you for not trying to defend your own hypocrisy. ;)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:32am

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:31am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:26am:
Don't bring the non-voters into this.



Thank you .


You're welcome.

I'm glad you've finally admitted defeat.

The main thing to remember is, Clinton whooped his arse in the popular vote.

1st place: Clinton

2nd place: Trump

3rd place: Johnson

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:27pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:32am:
I'm glad you've finally admitted defeat.



Truncating responses, to give a false narrative,  is the admission of defeat.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:47pm

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:32am:
I'm glad you've finally admitted defeat.



Truncating responses, to give a false narrative,  is the admission of defeat.



"Many more voted for neither."

Nope.

8 million is less than 129 million.

Year 9 maths, innit?


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Gordon on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:50pm
Good op-ed on Meryl.

Meryl Streep's rant on Donald Trump was hateful and ignorant

    Mark Davis

In view of what follows, I should say that I disagree with Donald Trump about Meryl Streep being "overrated." From the Holocaust TV miniseries in 1978, through her 19 Oscar nominations and three wins, she has become, on film, a national treasure.

At Sunday night's Golden Globes microphone, not so much.
I could not care less about her politics or the views of all of the actors and musicians whose work I consume. But if they take a particular pleasure in spewing derisive venom at every American who shares my views, then, as the saying goes, silence is complicity.

Wait, you may say, her remarks were reserved only for Donald Trump. No sale. In a tirade as filled with malice and slander as her Globes speech, the message is clear: no decent human being could have voted for a monster such as she described.
But what she described was a work of fiction as craftily concocted as Ricki and the Flash or The Devil Wears Prada. Except in her case, the devil wears Brioni suits and red ties.

Let's review. After describing an impressive cross-section of actors of a variety of races and national origins, she cobbled together this gem: "If we kick them all out, you'll have nothing to watch but football and mixed martial arts, which are not the arts!"

Last time I checked, Donald Trump was not planning to deport any of the bejewelled millionaires in the crowd. This colossal straw man is as telling as the clumsy attack on two forms of entertainment that are currently a far bigger deal than she is.

This ham-handed outburst, a textbook example of why Hollywood is so widely reviled, showed how low the pop-culture left will go to demonise Americans who oppose their views.

In her characterisation of Trump as mocking a disabled reporter, she is merely presumptuous. Evidence abounds of the president-elect using the same gestures to refer to many people flustered in a variety of settings from Ted Cruz to Donna Brazile to himself.

But in describing that misunderstood moment as making "its intended audience laugh and show their teeth," which "sank a hook in my heart," she makes clear the object of her derision. It is you, if you were a Trump voter. It is me. It is 63 million people.

So how are we to react to such rank political bigotry, this obvious characterisation of our next president – and his voters – as racists, xenophobes and bullies?

We can cancel our plans to catch Florence Foster Jenkins, I suppose. Maybe it sparks the urge to tell all the actors to just shut up and make movies.

You'll never hear that from me. I want all of Hollywood to show us exactly who they are, what they think and whom they despise. First of all, it is their right. But it is also of great benefit. Clarity is always useful, no matter what we learn.

And there is much to learn from this latest in a long series of insults from the preening ranks of Hollywood privilege. On one level, perhaps it is worthy to note that a woman (and an entire room) that applauded child rapist Roman Polanski for a 2003 directorial Oscar does not have much of a foundation for lecturing other people about much of anything.

But a larger truth is that there is nothing about making movies or music or playing a sport or any other platform of fame that makes anyone's opinions any more worthy. Or any less. So from actresses to plumbers to doctors to burger flippers to columnists, let everyone speak freely, and be judged by what they actually say.

And no matter from whom it may have come, that Sunday night rant was a wave of hateful condescension that added to the spectacle of sore losers incapable of coping with a White House that will no longer be an echo chamber for their views.

Dallas Morning News.http://www.smh.com.au/comment/meryl-streeps-rant-on-donald-trump-was-hateful-and-ignorant-20170110-gtp8yo.html

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:57pm

Gordon wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:50pm:
In her characterisation of Trump as mocking a disabled reporter, she is merely presumptuous.


No - she's telling the absolute truth.

He mocked a disabled man. Fact.

He's also admitted to sexually assaulting women, and he's been accused of raping, beating, and threatening children.

He doesn't pay tax, underpays workers, and has a long list of failed business ventures.

A worthless POS.  Nothing more.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Gordon on Jan 11th, 2017 at 1:00pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:47pm:

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:32am:
I'm glad you've finally admitted defeat.



Truncating responses, to give a false narrative,  is the admission of defeat.



"Many more voted for neither."

Nope.

8 million is less than 129 million.

Year 9 maths, innit?


Who's going to be Mr President in 10 days? That's the only thing that matters.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 1:04pm

Gordon wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 1:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:47pm:

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:32am:
I'm glad you've finally admitted defeat.



Truncating responses, to give a false narrative,  is the admission of defeat.



"Many more voted for neither."

Nope.

8 million is less than 129 million.

Year 9 maths, innit?


Who's going to be Mr President in 10 days? That's the only thing that matters.



Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 1:04pm

Gordon wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 1:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:47pm:

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:32am:
I'm glad you've finally admitted defeat.



Truncating responses, to give a false narrative,  is the admission of defeat.



"Many more voted for neither."

Nope.

8 million is less than 129 million.

Year 9 maths, innit?


Who's going to be Mr President in 10 days? That's the only thing that matters.



Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Gordon on Jan 11th, 2017 at 1:10pm
.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 1:24pm


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by AuntieM on Jan 11th, 2017 at 1:54pm
Sorry, but no, the Clinton Syndicate didn't wood anyone's arse in the popular vote.  She actually had less votes than Obsma did in 2012, despite a larger voter pool.
From the Atlantic:
As of Thursday, ballot counts collected by the Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections show Clinton received fewer votes than Obama did in 87 percent of U.S. counties
Without a few counties in New York and California, Trump won most of the country.  There are 3,141 counties in the United States.  Like him or not, Trump won 3,084 of them.
People just hated Clinton more than they hated Trump.
And then there is this...

[i]There were officially 14 voter fraud cases this year, 60,000 felons in Virginia being pardoned in time to vote, more than 1,000 illegal voters on the rolls in three Virginia counties and the troubling statistic of California's L.A. County as the repository for the most provisional ballots—40%—cast in the country.

The Election Integrity Project tells Independent Journal Review that 'voter impersonation' is easy and happens all the time.

Now, retired ICE special agent Claude Arnold has the answer to the question of whether illegal aliens vote in elections.

He told Fox News's Bill O'Reilly that he's worked in six states, arrested at least 1,000 illegal immigrants during his career and found that most of them had voter registration cards. He claimed that about 10% of them actually voted.

Arnold told O'Reilly:

“I routinely encountered people with voter registration cards. And as a part of my interview with them when they're arrested, I would ask them do you or have you voted? And often I would get the answer yes. So, that's not just anecdotal there are probably close to 100 people that did that in my career.”

The 'Motor Voter' law requires that all people receiving driver's licenses be offered voter registration cards. After 9/11, some states stopped giving licenses to illegal immigrants, though most have now reverted back to giving them out.[/id]




Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 1:59pm

AuntieM wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 1:54pm:
Sorry, but no, the Clinton Syndicate didn't wood anyone's arse in the popular vote. 


Yes, it most certainly did.

Clinton receive almost 3 million more votes than Trump.

She won it, easy.




Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by BigOl64 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 2:33pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:32am:

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:31am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:26am:
Don't bring the non-voters into this.



Thank you .


You're welcome.

I'm glad you've finally admitted defeat.

The main thing to remember is, Clinton whooped his arse in the popular vote.

1st place: Clinton

2nd place: Trump

3rd place: Johnson



The main thing to remember that clinton is not the president elect; even in Australia you can win the popular vote and not get into power. Just look at the tuckshop lady in QLD came in a very poor second in the vote and yet there she in handing out the sammies from the premiers chair. The popular vote is nothing in the world of politics.

Trump won, you and clinton lost; leave this site immediately.

Trump = president elect

Clinton = has been loser

Johnson = never was loser

Greggy = sad pathetic loser


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 2:55pm

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:14am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:31am:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 10:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:45pm:
Incorrect.

Your statement limits the group to only those who voted.



No. The voter pool is those eligible to vote.


Incorrect.

Your statement limited it to only those who voted.

"voted for"  No ambiguity whatsoever.

In which case, approx. 8 million voted for neither (i.e. the other candidates).

Thus, you were wrong.



So, according to you, those voters who don't actively participate (write down their intentions) are non-voters whose non-votes are ignored.

Yet

According to you those who don't actively participate (write down their intentions), in disavowing Trump are non-voters whose non-votes (participation) are included as Trump supporters.

It seems your your stance depends on which barrow you are pushing. ;)


I think the problem is a simple one. You are trying to include non-voters in a discussion about voters. To do so is beyond absurd.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 2:55pm

Gordon wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 1:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:47pm:

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:32am:
I'm glad you've finally admitted defeat.



Truncating responses, to give a false narrative,  is the admission of defeat.



"Many more voted for neither."

Nope.

8 million is less than 129 million.

Year 9 maths, innit?


Who's going to be Mr President in 10 days? That's the only thing that matters.



If you read today's report, the next President with be Vladimir Putin.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 2:57pm

AuntieM wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 1:54pm:
Sorry, but no, the Clinton Syndicate didn't wood anyone's arse in the popular vote.  She actually had less votes than Obsma did in 2012, despite a larger voter pool.
From the Atlantic:
As of Thursday, ballot counts collected by the Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections show Clinton received fewer votes than Obama did in 87 percent of U.S. counties
Without a few counties in New York and California, Trump won most of the country.  There are 3,141 counties in the United States.  Like him or not, Trump won 3,084 of them.
People just hated Clinton more than they hated Trump.
And then there is this...

[i]There were officially 14 voter fraud cases this year, 60,000 felons in Virginia being pardoned in time to vote, more than 1,000 illegal voters on the rolls in three Virginia counties and the troubling statistic of California's L.A. County as the repository for the most provisional ballots—40%—cast in the country.

The Election Integrity Project tells Independent Journal Review that 'voter impersonation' is easy and happens all the time.

Now, retired ICE special agent Claude Arnold has the answer to the question of whether illegal aliens vote in elections.

He told Fox News's Bill O'Reilly that he's worked in six states, arrested at least 1,000 illegal immigrants during his career and found that most of them had voter registration cards. He claimed that about 10% of them actually voted.

Arnold told O'Reilly:

“I routinely encountered people with voter registration cards. And as a part of my interview with them when they're arrested, I would ask them do you or have you voted? And often I would get the answer yes. So, that's not just anecdotal there are probably close to 100 people that did that in my career.”

The 'Motor Voter' law requires that all people receiving driver's licenses be offered voter registration cards. After 9/11, some states stopped giving licenses to illegal immigrants, though most have now reverted back to giving them out.[/id]



You cant seriously believe that a person who lost the popular vote by a huge amount still managed to win almost all of the counties? I know Trump supporters are bozos, but surely that must stretch credulity even for you.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:14pm

BigOl64 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 2:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:32am:

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:31am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:26am:
Don't bring the non-voters into this.



Thank you .


You're welcome.

I'm glad you've finally admitted defeat.

The main thing to remember is, Clinton whooped his arse in the popular vote.

1st place: Clinton

2nd place: Trump

3rd place: Johnson



The main thing to remember that clinton is not the president elect; even in Australia you can win the popular vote and not get into power.


Correct.

However, Clinton won the popular vote ... comfortably.

Just as I predicted, all along.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:15pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:14am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:31am:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 10:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 8:45pm:
Incorrect.

Your statement limits the group to only those who voted.



No. The voter pool is those eligible to vote.


Incorrect.

Your statement limited it to only those who voted.

"voted for"  No ambiguity whatsoever.

In which case, approx. 8 million voted for neither (i.e. the other candidates).

Thus, you were wrong.



So, according to you, those voters who don't actively participate (write down their intentions) are non-voters whose non-votes are ignored.

Yet

According to you those who don't actively participate (write down their intentions), in disavowing Trump are non-voters whose non-votes (participation) are included as Trump supporters.

It seems your your stance depends on which barrow you are pushing. ;)


I think the problem is a simple one. You are trying to include non-voters in a discussion about voters. To do so is beyond absurd.



You sir, are 100% correct.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Rhino on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:18pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:57pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:50pm:
In her characterisation of Trump as mocking a disabled reporter, she is merely presumptuous.


No - she's telling the absolute truth.

He mocked a disabled man. Fact.

He's also admitted to sexually assaulting women, and he's been accused of raping, beating, and threatening children.

He doesn't pay tax, underpays workers, and has a long list of failed business ventures.

A worthless POS.  Nothing more.

he was also the man on the grassy knoll, Fact.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:19pm

Gordon wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 1:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:47pm:

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 11:32am:
I'm glad you've finally admitted defeat.



Truncating responses, to give a false narrative,  is the admission of defeat.



"Many more voted for neither."

Nope.

8 million is less than 129 million.

Year 9 maths, innit?


Who's going to be Mr President in 10 days? That's the only thing that matters.



I dont know why you bother arguing with a robot gordy..especially one who can only repeat repeat repeat what its weirdo  weirdo weirdo weirdo owner believes even you must be sick sick sick sick  of the same the same the same the same the same the same the same dribbling malfunction..NO?.. :D :D :D :D

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Honky on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:19pm
.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:19pm

rhino wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:57pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 12:50pm:
In her characterisation of Trump as mocking a disabled reporter, she is merely presumptuous.


No - she's telling the absolute truth.

He mocked a disabled man. Fact.

He's also admitted to sexually assaulting women, and he's been accused of raping, beating, and threatening children.

He doesn't pay tax, underpays workers, and has a long list of failed business ventures.

A worthless POS.  Nothing more.

he was also the man on the grassy knoll, Fact.


Impossible.

He's not a man.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Honky on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:21pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 2:57pm:
You cant seriously believe that a person who lost the popular vote by a huge amount still managed to win almost all of the counties? I know Trump supporters are bozos, but surely that must stretch credulity even for you.


That'd be about right.

Take away california and Trump won the popular vote by 1.4million.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/12/17/without-california-trump-would...

Lotta people (and mexicans, both legal and illegal  Wink ) in california, but not so many counties.

Hilary barely won half the counties in california, but they were just the most populous ones.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:28pm

... wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:21pm:
Take away california and Trump won the popular vote by 1.4million.


Take away my uncle's balls, and he'd be my aunt.

The truth is, Clinton won the popular vote ... comfortably.

American voters are not getting the POTUS they wanted.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Honky on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:30pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:28pm:

... wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:21pm:
Take away california and Trump won the popular vote by 1.4million.


Take away my uncle's balls, and he'd be my aunt.

The truth is, Clinton won the popular vote ... comfortably.

American voters are not getting the POTUS they wanted.



That's nice, but you will note I was responding to someone who didn't believe he won most of the counties in the country, which he did. 

What part of that did you feel warranted the response you gave?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:34pm

... wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:28pm:

... wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:21pm:
Take away california and Trump won the popular vote by 1.4million.


Take away my uncle's balls, and he'd be my aunt.

The truth is, Clinton won the popular vote ... comfortably.

American voters are not getting the POTUS they wanted.



That's nice, but you will note I was responding to someone who didn't believe he won most of the counties in the country, which he did. 

What part of that did you feel warranted the response you gave?


Counties, schmounties.

Trump lost the popular vote, by millions of votes.

Thus, American voters are not getting the POTUS they wanted.

That's all that matters.

I give the bloated orange douche-bag two years - max.

He'll either be dead, in prison, sacked, or resigned by 2019.

I'm hoping for the earlier mentioned options.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Rhino on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:34pm
Peccas having another one of his episodes.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Honky on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:37pm
He sure is.  reminds me of Ned Flanders

Hillary...diddly...

popular vote...doodly

Trump...doo diddly

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gtFF9fpnvk

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:39pm
"While Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by at least 2.5 million votes, Trump won more than 2,700 out of 3,143 counties across the United States."

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/2193047-latest-numbers-on-the-election/

An arse kicking

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:40pm

rhino wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:34pm:
Peccas having another one of his episodes.


Indeed.

One of those episodes where I'm 100% right, and the rightards are 100% wrong.

It's just a talent I was born with.



Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:40pm

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:39pm:
" ... Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by at least 2.5 million votes..."

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/2193047-latest-numbers-on-the-election/

An arse kicking



Indeed.

She did well.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:43pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:40pm:

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:39pm:
" ... Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by at least 2.5 million votes..."

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/2193047-latest-numbers-on-the-election/

An arse kicking



Indeed.

She did well.


Indeed, I didn't think she would get 443 counties. :D :D :D

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Honky on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:44pm
Not well enough  ;D ;D ;D ;D

She got her participation trophy though, so that'll be nice for her.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:44pm

... wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:28pm:

... wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:21pm:
Take away california and Trump won the popular vote by 1.4million.


Take away my uncle's balls, and he'd be my aunt.

The truth is, Clinton won the popular vote ... comfortably.

American voters are not getting the POTUS they wanted.



That's nice, but you will note I was responding to someone who didn't believe he won most of the counties in the country, which he did. 

What part of that did you feel warranted the response you gave?


No, I would like to see a US govt official tally that confirms this ludicrous claim. Statistcially alone, it would be difficult to win virtually every county and still lose the popular vote by such an enormous margin.

IN essence, I dont believe you.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:45pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:28pm:
Take away my uncle's balls, and he'd be my aunt.




Or simply a cock n a frock. ;)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mr Hammer on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:45pm
One thing about do-gooders like Streep is they have heart bursts where they start blubbering. You almost start to believe that flowers and unicorns are going to start flying out of her asshole. They aren't in the real world. Too spoilt, too detached and too egotistical.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:45pm

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:40pm:

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:39pm:
" ... Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by at least 2.5 million votes..."

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/2193047-latest-numbers-on-the-election/

An arse kicking



Indeed.

She did well.


Indeed, I didn't think she would get 443 counties.


And win the popular vote.

She did, though: she won the popular vote ... comfortably.

Just like I always predicted.



Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Mr Hammer on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:45pm

rhino wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:34pm:
Peccas having another one of his episodes.
miam.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:48pm

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:39pm:
"While Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by at least 2.5 million votes, Trump won more than 2,700 out of 3,143 counties across the United States."

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/2193047-latest-numbers-on-the-election/

An arse kicking



A problem here might be the assumption that counties have any similarities to electorates we have here with their new-equal populations. for example. to quote from your own link...


Meanwhile, the Brookings Institute think tank said that the 420 counties that Clinton won generated 64 percent of America’s economic activity in 2015, and the 2,600-or-so counties Trump took generated a mere 36 percent.


in other words, the counties where people actually LIVE in significant numbers voted for Clinton.

It is an interesting statistic but is about as worthless as it gets.

Obama won in a landslide in 2008 and yet apparently only won 22% of the counties.  that pretty much underlines the worthless nature of this fact.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:48pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:45pm:
Just like I always predicted.



Nope. You bet she would win the election; not the popular vote. She lost the election.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:50pm
Last laugh belongs to the Democrats. Latest news is that Russia has BLACKMAIL information on Trump and will use it.

Wait until the hammer and scythe flag flies over much of Europe.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:51pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:50pm:
Latest news is that Russia has BLACKMAIL information on Trump and will use it.


Excellent!

The orange douche-bag, in an orange jumpsuit.

This is gonna be so good.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:53pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:48pm:
A problem here might be the assumption that counties have any similarities to electorates we have here with their new-equal populations. for example. to quote from your own link...



Who made any assumption on counties and population size?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Honky on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:53pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:44pm:

... wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:28pm:

... wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:21pm:
Take away california and Trump won the popular vote by 1.4million.


Take away my uncle's balls, and he'd be my aunt.

The truth is, Clinton won the popular vote ... comfortably.

American voters are not getting the POTUS they wanted.



That's nice, but you will note I was responding to someone who didn't believe he won most of the counties in the country, which he did. 

What part of that did you feel warranted the response you gave?


No, I would like to see a US govt official tally that confirms this ludicrous claim. Statistcially alone, it would be difficult to win virtually every county and still lose the popular vote by such an enormous margin.

IN essence, I dont believe you.



If you won't believe me, believe your own eyes:

http://time.com/4587866/donald-trump-election-map/

Not much blue on that map, is there?




electoral_map.PNG (174 KB | )

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:55pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:50pm:
Last laugh belongs to the Democrats. Latest news is that Russia has BLACKMAIL information on Trump and will use it.

Wait until the hammer and scythe flag flies over much of Europe.



Oh No. The very Democratic Snopes. :D :D :D :D :D :D

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Honky on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:55pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:44pm:

... wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:28pm:

... wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:21pm:
Take away california and Trump won the popular vote by 1.4million.


Take away my uncle's balls, and he'd be my aunt.

The truth is, Clinton won the popular vote ... comfortably.

American voters are not getting the POTUS they wanted.



That's nice, but you will note I was responding to someone who didn't believe he won most of the counties in the country, which he did. 

What part of that did you feel warranted the response you gave?


No, I would like to see a US govt official tally that confirms this ludicrous claim. Statistcially alone, it would be difficult to win virtually every county and still lose the popular vote by such an enormous margin.

IN essence, I dont believe you.



If you won't believe me, believe your own eyes:

http://time.com/4587866/donald-trump-election-map/

Not much blue on that map, is there?


electoral_map_001.PNG (174 KB | 15 )

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 4:22pm

... wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:44pm:

... wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:28pm:

... wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:21pm:
Take away california and Trump won the popular vote by 1.4million.


Take away my uncle's balls, and he'd be my aunt.

The truth is, Clinton won the popular vote ... comfortably.

American voters are not getting the POTUS they wanted.



That's nice, but you will note I was responding to someone who didn't believe he won most of the counties in the country, which he did. 

What part of that did you feel warranted the response you gave?


No, I would like to see a US govt official tally that confirms this ludicrous claim. Statistcially alone, it would be difficult to win virtually every county and still lose the popular vote by such an enormous margin.

IN essence, I dont believe you.



If you won't believe me, believe your own eyes:

http://time.com/4587866/donald-trump-election-map/

Not much blue on that map, is there?



And yet she won the popular vote. So how can that be possible? She also won states that the map has almost entirely red. How is that possible?  BECAUSE counties are about as meaningless as it gets. There are large red areas with a population of 200 and tiny blue areas with a population of 20,000. 

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by AnotherJourneyByTrain on Jan 11th, 2017 at 4:33pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10th, 2017 at 1:09pm:
Big deal.

Great speech by Streep. Trump is not fit for the highest office in the land.

I haven't read the copy: yes, I am THAT lazy: but the broad can eat me!

She is over-rated because Hollywood is stagnation personified.

Trump may not be qualified but look at the world around him: are the media qualified? Is democracy itself qualified?

Greed is abundant and to say Meryl Streep has less of a grasp of that reality than Donald Trump beguiles me: what's her postcode, for instance?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by AnotherJourneyByTrain on Jan 11th, 2017 at 4:48pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:50pm:
Last laugh belongs to the Democrats. Latest news is that Russia has BLACKMAIL information on Trump and will use it.

Wait until the hammer and scythe flag flies over much of Europe.

The democrats are just as corrupt as anyone else: those who use blackmail are simply fascists hiding behind other facists as they know they are open to blackamil themselves.... it's called slinging mud and usually stops at threats - it's all a posture and rap exercise ::)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by AnotherJourneyByTrain on Jan 11th, 2017 at 4:49pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:50pm:
Last laugh belongs to the Democrats. Latest news is that Russia has BLACKMAIL information on Trump and will use it.

Wait until the hammer and scythe flag flies over much of Europe.

The democrats are just as corrupt as anyone else: those who use blackmail are simply fascists hiding behind other facists as they know they are open to blackamil themselves.... it's called slinging mud and usually stops at threats - it's all a posture and rap exercise ::)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by AnotherJourneyByTrain on Jan 11th, 2017 at 4:49pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:50pm:
Last laugh belongs to the Democrats. Latest news is that Russia has BLACKMAIL information on Trump and will use it.

Wait until the hammer and scythe flag flies over much of Europe.

The democrats are just as corrupt as anyone else: those who use blackmail are simply fascists hiding behind other facists as they know they are open to blackamil themselves.... it's called slinging mud and usually stops at threats - it's all a posture and rap exercise ::)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Honky on Jan 11th, 2017 at 4:51pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 4:22pm:
Honky wrote Today at 1:53pm:
longweekend58 wrote Today at 1:44pm:
Honky wrote Today at 1:30pm:
greggerypeccary wrote Today at 1:28pm:
Honky wrote Today at 1:21pm:
Take away california and Trump won the popular vote by 1.4million.


Take away my uncle's balls, and he'd be my aunt.

The truth is, Clinton won the popular vote ... comfortably.

American voters are not getting the POTUS they wanted.




That's nice, but you will note I was responding to someone who didn't believe he won most of the counties in the country, which he did.

What part of that did you feel warranted the response you gave?


No, I would like to see a US govt official tally that confirms this ludicrous claim. Statistcially alone, it would be difficult to win virtually every county and still lose the popular vote by such an enormous margin.

IN essence, I dont believe you.



If you won't believe me, believe your own eyes:

http://time.com/4587866/donald-trump-election-map/

Not much blue on that map, is there?






And yet she won the popular vote. So how can that be possible? She also won states that the map has almost entirely red. How is that possible?  BECAUSE counties are about as meaningless as it gets. There are large red areas with a population of 200 and tiny blue areas with a population of 20,000.


I'm getting a bit sikc of spoonfeeding you this, when you'll just disreagrd it anyway, but take this very simple, and easily accessible example:

http://www.npr.org/2016/11/08/501078088/california-2016-presidential-and-state-election-results

Los Angeles      100% in      71.4%      23.4%      2.5%      2.1%      D +48      9,974,203

La County has a population of nearly 10 million and Clinton got 71.4% of the vote.  Nearly 12% of her national vote total in one county.  There were similar results in NY and Chicago, so it's pretty damn easy to see how it is possible.  Now stop being silly.





Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Frank on Jan 11th, 2017 at 4:54pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:40pm:

rhino wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:34pm:
Peccas having another one of his episodes.


Indeed.

One of those episodes where I'm 100% right, and the rightards are 100% wrong.

It's just a talent I was born with.


You are obsessive-compulsive about an irrelevant thing once again, Turdy McTurdface, that is your talent.  Now go 'n get flushed.



Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 5:02pm

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:48pm:
A problem here might be the assumption that counties have any similarities to electorates we have here with their new-equal populations. for example. to quote from your own link...



Who made any assumption on counties and population size?


anyone who repeatedly quotes the figure therefore assuming is has any relevance.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:52pm

TheFunPolice wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 4:49pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:50pm:
Last laugh belongs to the Democrats. Latest news is that Russia has BLACKMAIL information on Trump and will use it.

Wait until the hammer and scythe flag flies over much of Europe.

The democrats are just as corrupt as anyone else: those who use blackmail are simply fascists hiding behind other facists as they know they are open to blackamil themselves.... it's called slinging mud and usually stops at threats - it's all a posture and rap exercise ::)




but clinton is POPULAR.. and that counts with aussies....lololol...as for the Russians why would they blackmail the very man they are supposed to have risked WW111 to hack poor old Hills hoist...lolol just my little joke....

why???? why would they blackmail him after going to all that trouble...doesnt make sense...

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Frank on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:20pm
Who IS Streep?
A 67 year old  woman who has been memorising and repeating other people's words for decades.

And.... that's it.

She's given an award for repeating other people's words in an agreeable way for decades. Her views about politics are as relevant as your nanna's.






Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:22pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 5:02pm:
anyone who repeatedly quotes the figure therefore assuming is has any relevance.



You mean like greggy keeps repeating his? :D :D :D

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:23pm

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:22pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 5:02pm:
anyone who repeatedly quotes the figure therefore assuming is has any relevance.



You mean like greggy keeps repeating his?


We can leave the figures out, if you like.

We'll just stick to the facts: you were wrong.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:25pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:23pm:
We can leave the figures out, if you like.

We'll just stick to the facts: you were wrong.



Only in your dreams. ;)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:34pm

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:25pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:23pm:
We can leave the figures out, if you like.

We'll just stick to the facts: you were wrong.



Only in your dreams. ;)



do you think gweg cracked a wobbly like hills did when she whacked the blokes on her staff and sulked for about 24 hours with a bottle or two..lololololol

it sure sounds as if he kept her company..

sulking.and having a long running massive tantrum..


hilarious !. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by AuntieM on Jan 11th, 2017 at 9:56pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 2:57pm:

AuntieM wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 1:54pm:
Sorry, but no, the Clinton Syndicate didn't wood anyone's arse in the popular vote.  She actually had less votes than Obsma did in 2012, despite a larger voter pool.
From the Atlantic:
As of Thursday, ballot counts collected by the Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections show Clinton received fewer votes than Obama did in 87 percent of U.S. counties
Without a few counties in New York and California, Trump won most of the country.  There are 3,141 counties in the United States.  Like him or not, Trump won 3,084 of them.
People just hated Clinton more than they hated Trump.
And then there is this...

There were officially 14 voter fraud cases this year, 60,000 felons in Virginia being pardoned in time to vote, more than 1,000 illegal voters on the rolls in three Virginia counties and the troubling statistic of California's L.A. County as the repository for the most provisional ballots—40%—cast in the country.

The Election Integrity Project tells Independent Journal Review that 'voter impersonation' is easy and happens all the time.

Now, retired ICE special agent Claude Arnold has the answer to the question of whether illegal aliens vote in elections.

He told Fox News's Bill O'Reilly that he's worked in six states, arrested at least 1,000 illegal immigrants during his career and found that most of them had voter registration cards. He claimed that about 10% of them actually voted.

Arnold told O'Reilly:

“I routinely encountered people with voter registration cards. And as a part of my interview with them when they're arrested, I would ask them do you or have you voted? And often I would get the answer yes. So, that's not just anecdotal there are probably close to 100 people that did that in my career.”

The 'Motor Voter' law requires that all people receiving driver's licenses be offered voter registration cards. After 9/11, some states stopped giving licenses to illegal immigrants, though most have now reverted back to giving them out.[/id]



You cant seriously believe that a person who lost the popular vote by a huge amount still managed to win almost all of the counties? I know Trump supporters are bozos, but surely that must stretch credulity [i]even for youanyone who challenges longweekend's narrative.


Here, cupcake....another source -- this one reliably corporatist and using words simple enough even for you... Time...

See a Map That Shows Exactly How Donald Trump Won
Zeke J Miller @ZekeJMiller  Chris Wilson @chriswilsondc  Dec. 1, 2016
Of the 3,112 counties for which there is county-level data, 2,728 shifted toward the GOP, 383 shifted Democratic, and 1—Barrow County, Georgia—stayed exactly the same.

The counties where Clinton gained on Obama occurred in much larger counties, where a median of 75,554 people showed up to vote in 2016. The median for the 2,728 Republican-gaining counties is 9,905.

Shifts in partisan preference do not necessarily mean the county swapped its overall support from one party to the other. While Trump received considerably less support than Mitt Romney in Utah, for example, he still managed to win 27 of 29 counties in the reliably Republican state.

Overall, he won 2,622 predominantly small counties while Clinton won 490, most of which were much more populous. (Those figures may shift very slightly since some states take a long time to certify their results.) Still, the shifts were large enough for a number of pickups. At present count, Trump snagged 220 counties that voted for President Obama in 2012, while Clinton poached 17 that went for Mitt Romney.



I can't yet post links, but I'm sure you're a bright enough boy to use the title, author and date I provided from the header, to go access the article yourself.  There is a really useful little interactive graphic that breaks down the vote by county.

Particularly with four million provisional ballots (people without proof of ID or who weren't registered to vote that day), California represents a large pool of voters, that's true.  Clinton took the largest, most densely populated urban counties on the coasts (basically New York and CA).  The rest of that map, with the exception of the area around Las Vegas and some of Utah, is pretty solidly red.

These areas are also extraordinarily heavily populated with illegal aliens, with whom Trump is particularly unpopular.  I think we can all understand why.  According to a 2014 Pew study, illegal aliens accounted for 3.5 percent of the U.S. population of nearly 316 million in 2012, the share varied from less than 1 percent in 10 states to a high of 7.6 percent in Nevada. California and Texas, each at 6.3 percent, had the next-highest shares of people living there illegally.  10.2% of Nevada's workforce are illegal aliens, 69% of whom are Mexican.The Public Policy Institute of California reports that about 10% of the state's workforce are illegal aliens, and about 13% of California K-12 school children have an illegal alien parent.

It stands to reason these areas would have gone to Clinton. 

In the end, the US is not a democracy, it's a constitutional republic, and the electoral college was created to keep the residents of the cities from controlling outcomes of all elections and disenfranchising the rest of the country.

It is what it is

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by AuntieM on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:04pm

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:52pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 4:49pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:50pm:
Last laugh belongs to the Democrats. Latest news is that Russia has BLACKMAIL information on Trump and will use it.

Wait until the hammer and scythe flag flies over much of Europe.

The democrats are just as corrupt as anyone else: those who use blackmail are simply fascists hiding behind other facists as they know they are open to blackamil themselves.... it's called slinging mud and usually stops at threats - it's all a posture and rap exercise ::)




but clinton is POPULAR.. and that counts with aussies....lololol...as for the Russians why would they blackmail the very man they are supposed to have risked WW111 to hack poor old Hills hoist...lolol just my little joke....

why???? why would they blackmail him after going to all that trouble...doesnt make sense...


Clinton isn't popular at all, despite the fact that she tried to draw on her husband's ability to charm people.
From the Washington Times (although the numbers are consistent across many publications and polls)
Thirty-eight percent of registered voters now have a favorable view of Mrs. Clinton, compared to 59 percent who reported an unfavorable view. That’s down from her 46 percent/52 percent favorable/unfavorable split in early August, shortly after the Democrats’ convention in Philadelphia.
Among registered voters, she’s now on par with Republican nominee Donald Trump, who had a 37 percent/60 percent favorable/unfavorable split in the new poll — essentially unchanged from a 36 percent/61 percent split in early August.
Among all adults, 56 percent said they have an unfavorable view of Mrs. Clinton, compared to 63 percent for Mr. Trump.


A pretty small percentage of the population actually like Clinton or Trump.  It's just the truth.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Rhino on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:06pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:50pm:
Last laugh belongs to the Democrats. Latest news is that Russia has BLACKMAIL information on Trump and will use it.

Yes. Top secret. Thats why we all know about it.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:10pm

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:25pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:23pm:
We can leave the figures out, if you like.

We'll just stick to the facts: you were wrong.



Only in your dreams. ;)


No, in reality.

You were wrong.  So very wrong.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:12pm

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:34pm:

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:25pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 8:23pm:
We can leave the figures out, if you like.

We'll just stick to the facts: you were wrong.



Only in your dreams. ;)



do you think


No, he doesn't.

That's why he made such a huge mistake.



Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:12pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:10pm:
No, in reality.

You were wrong.  So very wrong.



Now you are in your own reality?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:14pm

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:12pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:10pm:
No, in reality.

You were wrong.  So very wrong.



Now


Now, and always.

You were just wrong.



Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Rhino on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:19pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:40pm:

rhino wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:34pm:
Peccas having another one of his episodes.


Indeed.

One of those episodes where I'm 100% right, and the rightards are 100% wrong.

It's just a talent I was born with.
well you were born with a vagina, we know that much.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:19pm

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:52pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 4:49pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:50pm:
Last laugh belongs to the Democrats. Latest news is that Russia has BLACKMAIL information on Trump and will use it.

Wait until the hammer and scythe flag flies over much of Europe.

The democrats are just as corrupt as anyone else: those who use blackmail are simply fascists hiding behind other facists as they know they are open to blackamil themselves.... it's called slinging mud and usually stops at threats - it's all a posture and rap exercise ::)




but clinton is POPULAR.. and that counts with aussies....lololol...as for the Russians why would they blackmail the very man they are supposed to have risked WW111 to hack poor old Hills hoist...lolol just my little joke....

why???? why would they blackmail him after going to all that trouble...doesnt make sense...



WHY OH WHY must you be so intolerably THICK. Blackmailing a failed candidate is worthless. Blackmailing a sitting president is gold.

Now how hard was that?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:20pm

rhino wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:40pm:

rhino wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:34pm:
Peccas having another one of his episodes.


Indeed.

One of those episodes where I'm 100% right, and the rightards are 100% wrong.

It's just a talent I was born with.
well you were born with a vagina, we know that much.


And we all know how much you hate those.


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Rhino on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:21pm
Not really blackmail if the whole world knows about it first.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:21pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:14pm:
Now, and always.

You were just wrong.



Yes, another truncated edit. it makes you appear more the fool. And you really didn't need to do so. We already know so. ;)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:22pm

rhino wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:06pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:50pm:
Last laugh belongs to the Democrats. Latest news is that Russia has BLACKMAIL information on Trump and will use it.

Yes. Top secret. Thats why we all know about it.



Im gonna go with US INtelligence services knowing more than you do and that is where the report comes from.  And after all, it certainly makes sense. Why would russia get involved with distorting the result of an election if not to get a man elected over whom they have something.  The only country standing in the way of Putin's push westward is the USA.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:24pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:22pm:
Im gonna go with US INtelligence services knowing more than you do


WMD's anyone?

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Rhino on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:25pm
US intelligence sources do not authenticate this story about Trump. Try again.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 12th, 2017 at 7:41am

rhino wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:21pm:
Not really blackmail if the whole world knows about it first.


We only know of its supposed existence. If you were Russia and holding this blackmail, wouldnt you let slip to the media that you had it so that Trump knows as well?  The power they have is in the content and they still hold all the cards.

Many years ago I read a book - The Red President.  it was fairly good, but now... seems prescient.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by longweekend58 on Jan 12th, 2017 at 7:43am

rhino wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:25pm:
US intelligence sources do not authenticate this story about Trump. Try again.


The problem is that while they dont authenticate it, they - and everyone else - has little doubt that it could be real. Trump is hardly an upstanding moral standard-bearer.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 12th, 2017 at 7:49am

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:21pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:14pm:
Now, and always.

You were just wrong.



Yes,


Indeed.



Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 12th, 2017 at 9:01am
everybody now.....hands behind your back.. [ fingers crossed]

GWEGGY IS ALWAYS 100% ABOUT EVERYTHING...

he loves himself.
he is never wrong
leaving means staying in gweggy language
gweggy never destroys a thread just because hes 100%
gweggy is a role model for 100% of everything..
gweggy never grumbles about other members
he is 100% behind their right to have an opinion..


the praise goes on..

lets all call gweggy" Mr 100%"... PLEASE!

he will be so busy clapping and jumping and cheering himself.. he may go away.



its just a thought though....worth a try! ::)


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 12th, 2017 at 9:27am

cods wrote on Jan 12th, 2017 at 9:01am:
lets all call gweggy "Mr 100%"... PLEASE!


Not a bad idea, old girl.

Can you put that up on your facebook page, just to spread the word?


Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 12th, 2017 at 12:55pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:19pm:

cods wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 7:52pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 4:49pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 3:50pm:
Last laugh belongs to the Democrats. Latest news is that Russia has BLACKMAIL information on Trump and will use it.

Wait until the hammer and scythe flag flies over much of Europe.

The democrats are just as corrupt as anyone else: those who use blackmail are simply fascists hiding behind other facists as they know they are open to blackamil themselves.... it's called slinging mud and usually stops at threats - it's all a posture and rap exercise ::)




but clinton is POPULAR.. and that counts with aussies....lololol...as for the Russians why would they blackmail the very man they are supposed to have risked WW111 to hack poor old Hills hoist...lolol just my little joke....

why???? why would they blackmail him after going to all that trouble...doesnt make sense...



WHY OH WHY must you be so intolerably THICK. Blackmailing a failed candidate is worthless. Blackmailing a sitting president is gold.

Now how hard was that?



coz he aint bloody sitting YET.. how thick are you?

fake news anyone.. ::) ::) ::) drongos.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 12th, 2017 at 12:56pm

rhino wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:21pm:
Not really blackmail if the whole world knows about it first.




hahahahah dont tell anyone who only believe it. if it fits in with their narrow minds..

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by AuntieM on Jan 12th, 2017 at 1:27pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 12th, 2017 at 7:43am:

rhino wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:25pm:
US intelligence sources do not authenticate this story about Trump. Try again.


The problem is that while they dont authenticate it, they - and everyone else - has little doubt that it could be real. Trump is hardly an upstanding moral standard-bearer.

And there is the problem. Do we hold the "National Enquirer" standard of "well it could be true", or do we wait and look for actual evidence?

Another possibility is that the whole"Russian hack" was engineered by those affiliated with the Clinton syndicate... knowing the end game was to smear Trump. The death of Seth Rich starts to fit with that scenario.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 12th, 2017 at 3:14pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12th, 2017 at 9:27am:

cods wrote on Jan 12th, 2017 at 9:01am:
lets all call gweggy "Mr 100%"... PLEASE!


Not a bad idea, old girl.

Can you put that up on your facebook page, just to spread the word?



I dont do facebook sweetheart...

will leave it with you as you do...and you do enjoy blowing your own trumpet.. :-*

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by cods on Jan 12th, 2017 at 3:15pm
  The only country standing in the way of Putin's push westward is the USA.[/quote]


;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

pathetic!

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 12th, 2017 at 3:41pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12th, 2017 at 7:49am:

lee wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:21pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11th, 2017 at 10:14pm:
Now, and always.

You were just wrong.



Yes,


Indeed.


::)

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by Dnarever on Jan 12th, 2017 at 8:58pm
Well nobody could seriously disagree with Meryl. If the US want any humanity it will need to come from outside government.

Title: Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Post by lee on Jan 12th, 2017 at 9:04pm

Dnarever wrote on Jan 12th, 2017 at 8:58pm:
Well nobody could seriously disagree with Meryl. If the US want any humanity it will need to come from outside government.



The humanist who supports abortion at any time in the pregnancy for any reason? :D :D :D

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.