they are inventing any excuse to spit their dummies..

pathetic.

Pathetic, leftards, just pathetic.

thats not loud enough...

how many have left for Canada??>.. did Miley Cruse leave yet.. just checking in case she coming this way..

SHAME LABOR SHAME

Can one still say that, dear?

cods wrote on Nov 26^th, 2016 at 4:33pm:

they are inventing any excuse to spit their dummies.. pathetic.

Is this in the right sub political forum?     I don't know a lot about American Politics.

what are you on about Cods? Trump is the most left wing politician the yanks have had in eons, if not ever.

John Smith wrote on Nov 26^th, 2016 at 5:12pm:

what are you on about Cods? Trump is the most left wing politician the yanks have had in eons, if not ever.

Yes agree!

I thought the yanks only had the right and the nearly right!

If you mentioned the word union you were a communist!

;D ;D ;D ;D

Sorry about the length - but this is a simple explanation.  I get a bit lost with the political system our American cousins use.

"In general, the Republican Party is often referred to as the "right wing," while "left wing" denotes the Democratic Party. So, a "right wing" Democrat would be a conservative democrat, while a "left wing" Republican would be a liberal Republican.

However, these labels are the opinions of the speaker. When a person uses jargon such as this in conversation, I've found that it is best to ask that person to describe exactly what he/she means because what it means to one person may not be the same meaning to another.

To me, this two-party system is like a balanced scale. On one side is the Democratic Party while on the other is the Republican Party. The platform of each party changes with the various elections, so one time the Democrats will promote and idea while the Republicans may champion the same idea during a different election.

The main difference between the two parties boils down to this. Democrats believe that the Federal government should ensure that every citizen should receive the same, fair treatment, as well as being responsible for "curing" the nation's ills, such as poverty.

Republicans generally believe that government should be minimized, except to provide for the common defense of the country through a strong military; this frame of reference believes that limited government would allow its citizens to address the ills of society, such as unemployment through job development.


http://www.education.com/question/social-studies-wing-republican-democrat/

Vic wrote on Nov 26^th, 2016 at 5:23pm:

Sorry about the length - but this is a simple explanation.  I get a bit lost with the political system our American cousins use. "In general, the Republican Party is often referred to as the "right wing," while "left wing" denotes the Democratic Party. So, a "right wing" Democrat would be a conservative democrat, while a "left wing" Republican would be a liberal Republican. However, these labels are the opinions of the speaker. When a person uses jargon such as this in conversation, I've found that it is best to ask that person to describe exactly what he/she means because what it means to one person may not be the same meaning to another. To me, this two-party system is like a balanced scale. On one side is the Democratic Party while on the other is the Republican Party. The platform of each party changes with the various elections, so one time the Democrats will promote and idea while the Republicans may champion the same idea during a different election. The main difference between the two parties boils down to this. Democrats believe that the Federal government should ensure that every citizen should receive the same, fair treatment, as well as being responsible for "curing" the nation's ills, such as poverty. Republicans generally believe that government should be minimized, except to provide for the common defense of the country through a strong military; this frame of reference believes that limited government would allow its citizens to address the ills of society, such as unemployment through job development. http://www.education.com/question/social-studies-wing-republican-democrat/

That's true, Vic, but Trump has just blown this formula up. Trump has socialist policies on US industry and libertarian policies on tax. He aims to restore tariffs, provide corporate handouts, protect favoured companies and foster monopolies. At the same time, he plans to halve corporate tax from 33 to 15%, cut income taxes, and do away with Obamacare (which will cost the states billions in Medicaid). The effect of these policies, according to the independent ratings agencies, will be ten trillion on the deficit in 8 years.

Trump's a big spender and a low taxer. He is, as they say, all things to all people. And he will find out very quickly that these policies aren't feasable, as "the Establishment" and the "mainstream media" and all those people who've been so mean and nasty to Trump, have been saying all along.

Year 9 maths, innit. 

John Smith wrote on Nov 26^th, 2016 at 5:12pm:

what are you on about Cods? Trump is the most left wing politician the yanks have had in eons, if not ever.

cods is trying to convince this wide brown land of yadda yadda yadda that the conservative bluec*** actually cares about who died for this country... after years of sonic boom no less.

If cods looked to Colin Barnet it would relaise he couldn't even pourse the word, "BOOM". He famously called it a small uptick in one section of the economy: AND THAT IS FOR bugger**'N SUPER CERIAL AND CODS WILL BE THE FIRST TO ADMIT IT IF ASKED BECAUSE IT IS SCRIPTURAL... THERE IS NO HDIDING FROM THE FACT THE SO CALLED LIBERAL  VOTERS, BUT I CHOOSE TO CALL THEM BABY EATERS,... HAVE NO FRIGGIN' SOCIAL LISCENCE TO CALL AUSTRALIA HOME LET ALONE EARTH.


GO PLANET ACCOUNTANTS FOREVER- YEH, WWE ALL KNOW THE SECRET TO SUCCESS IS DISPASSION  ::)

...........BORING

TheFunPolice wrote on Nov 27^th, 2016 at 4:15pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 26th, 2016 at 5:12pm: what are you on about Cods? Trump is the most left wing politician the yanks have had in eons, if not ever. cods is trying to convince this wide brown land of yadda yadda yadda that the conservative bluec*** actually cares about who died for this country... after years of sonic boom no less. If cods looked to Colin Barnet it would relaise he couldn't even pourse the word, "BOOM". He famously called it a small uptick in one section of the economy: AND THAT IS FOR bugger**'N SUPER CERIAL AND CODS WILL BE THE FIRST TO ADMIT IT IF ASKED BECAUSE IT IS SCRIPTURAL... THERE IS NO HDIDING FROM THE FACT THE SO CALLED LIBERAL  VOTERS, BUT I CHOOSE TO CALL THEM BABY EATERS,... HAVE NO FRIGGIN' SOCIAL LISCENCE TO CALL AUSTRALIA HOME LET ALONE EARTH. GO PLANET ACCOUNTANTS FOREVER- YEH, WWE ALL KNOW THE SECRET TO SUCCESS IS DISPASSION  ::) ...........BORING

have you run out of meds today drah.......

planet accountants.. you sound like you have lost the plot sunshine..

time to go back to climate change.. ;D ;D ;D

https://youtu.be/Zn3f0Xav6-w

Watch how silly this (Rachel Maddow) clip seems now!!!

her arrogance is typical of the left.
put a burqua on her and deport her.
it's what she wants

this is a fav of mine


https://youtu.be/yg6sDWEKt20

Chris Matthews: "Well That’s a Bitch” - After Trump Wins

https://youtu.be/hQKU-rYAe9Y

Watch CNN anchor get the smile wiped from his face!!!

cnn have no idea on how irrelevant they are

cods wrote on Nov 27^th, 2016 at 4:23pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Nov 27th, 2016 at 4:15pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 26th, 2016 at 5:12pm: what are you on about Cods? Trump is the most left wing politician the yanks have had in eons, if not ever. cods is trying to convince this wide brown land of yadda yadda yadda that the conservative bluec*** actually cares about who died for this country... after years of sonic boom no less. If cods looked to Colin Barnet it would relaise he couldn't even pourse the word, "BOOM". He famously called it a small uptick in one section of the economy: AND THAT IS FOR bugger**'N SUPER CERIAL AND CODS WILL BE THE FIRST TO ADMIT IT IF ASKED BECAUSE IT IS SCRIPTURAL... THERE IS NO HDIDING FROM THE FACT THE SO CALLED LIBERAL  VOTERS, BUT I CHOOSE TO CALL THEM BABY EATERS,... HAVE NO FRIGGIN' SOCIAL LISCENCE TO CALL AUSTRALIA HOME LET ALONE EARTH. GO PLANET ACCOUNTANTS FOREVER- YEH, WWE ALL KNOW THE SECRET TO SUCCESS IS DISPASSION  ::) ...........BORING have you run out of meds today drah....... planet accountants.. you sound like you have lost the plot sunshine.. time to go back to climate change.. ;D ;D ;D

cods has read no literature: must be all the methylated spirits ruining ye olde eyesight.. purple cataracts perhaps???????????????????  :o :o :o :o :o :o :o

Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 27^th, 2016 at 4:55pm:

https://youtu.be/hQKU-rYAe9Y Watch CNN anchor get the smile wiped from his face!!! cnn have no idea on how irrelevant they are

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?


--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?


--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?


--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?


--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?


--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?

--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
--> the mutli-year sea ice in the arctic whispered to donald duck eactly WHAT?
:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o

will lefties ever get over losing?

Us lefties didn't lose anything.

However you righties who are please that your guy who specialises in sexual assault won is disturbing.

Just shows that you will proudly put up with anything to get your side up

I'm jealous of people who complain and feel sorry for themselves and are cry babies.

I think they are optomists.

i have always seen life as pretty harsh and tough and have always thought that its going to be a struggle to fulfil even some of your dreams and not end up having a mediocre life.

i fully understand where complaining, cry baby mentality and feeling sorry for yourself come from, but i feel that if i were to indulge in these behaviours, i"m not going to make it to the top of the mountain.

i see these sort of behaviours as 10kg weights in your back pack, just weighing you down.
certain optomists may think they can carry all this extra weight and still make it. But i think i'd just get stuck 1/2 way up the mountain and freeze to death.
So i'm really jealous of the optomism shown by people who think they have the time to indulge in complaining and self pity.  You have a far more positive view of the world then i do.

Also, i think they must have had an easy life where most things went right.
To cry about an election result?
Really?

My life has been so harsh that i think a member of my family would have to die before i could cry nowadays.
If you can start sobbing about Hilary losing, you must have had a great life. You mustnt have had anything go wrong   YET.....I'm jealous of you

Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 27^th, 2016 at 4:50pm:

this is a fav of mine https://youtu.be/yg6sDWEKt20 Chris Matthews: "Well That’s a Bitch” - After Trump Wins

"Mark Shouldice, known professionally as Mark Dice, is a conservative American author, independent media analyst, and conspiracy theorist based in San Diego, California, who argues that the New World Order secret societies, such as the Illuminati, the Bilderberg Group, Skull and Bones, and Bohemian Grove, direct human affairs and global politics, particularly those of the United States."

;D

aquascoot wrote on Nov 27^th, 2016 at 8:06pm:

I think they are optomists.

You mean they do eye checks?

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 9:59am:

[quote author=aquascoot link=1480141985/17#17 date=1480241196] I think they are optomists.

Pedantry is very lower consciousness.
When presented with new ideas to consider. we can do the brutal hard work of getting down , elbows deep in the mud, and reflecting on this information or we can be a knit picker who remains stuck in "mental sloth and inertia".
Most people will choose the latter  ;)

Hard to argue the point when you don't know what the point is. That is why pedantism and spelling are important.

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 11:12am:

When presented with new ideas to consider.

yes, and yet despite you introducing the new idea  ... you took offense. How can anyone know what your new idea is if you spell something completely different to what you wanted to say?

LOL.

So i write about the different views of the optimist/optomist  and the pessimist and you two seriously thought i was talking about the people who make spectacles.


Now who is being a bit dishonest here  ;)

this is the path of the inferior pedant
this is a long way off the narrow road to success.
this is the highway to mediocrity  ;)

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 11:57am:

LOL. So i write about the different views of the optimist/optomist  and the pessimist and you two seriously thought i was talking about the people who make spectacles. Now who is being a bit dishonest here  ;) this is the path of the inferior pedant this is a long way off the narrow road to success. this is the highway to mediocrity  ;)

\


No, just wondering that if you can't be bothered to spell correctly, how do we know you've put the least bit of thought into anything else you type.

cods wrote on Nov 26^th, 2016 at 4:33pm:

they are inventing any excuse to spit their dummies.. pathetic.

Have you ever asked the question as to why I - an avowed right-wing conservative - opposes Trump? Has it ever occured to you or any of your other non-thinking travellers that there might be something more to leadership that mere politics? What about questions of competence or character or honesty?  Trump scores very badly on all of those things but because hie is right-wing... that's all you need to know.

idiot.

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 11:57am:

So i write about the different views of the optimist/optomist  and the pessimist and you two seriously thought i was talking about the people who make spectacles.

it's probably not the first time you've gotten excited about Tony Robbins glasses

longweekend58 wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 12:06pm:

cods wrote on Nov 26th, 2016 at 4:33pm: they are inventing any excuse to spit their dummies.. pathetic. What about questions of competence or character or honesty?  Trump scores very badly on all of those things

Not to mention that he is almost certainly mentally unstable.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 12:52pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 12:06pm: cods wrote on Nov 26th, 2016 at 4:33pm: they are inventing any excuse to spit their dummies.. pathetic. What about questions of competence or character or honesty?  Trump scores very badly on all of those things Not to mention that he is almost certainly mentally unstable.

And He whipped hillary and the Clintons corrupt connections soundly

Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 1:09pm:

NorthOfNorth wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 12:52pm: longweekend58 wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 12:06pm: cods wrote on Nov 26th, 2016 at 4:33pm: they are inventing any excuse to spit their dummies.. pathetic. What about questions of competence or character or honesty?  Trump scores very badly on all of those things Not to mention that he is almost certainly mentally unstable. And He whipped hillary and the Clintons corrupt connections soundly

So its seems we're at least all agreed on : Incompetent, flawed character, dishonest, mentally unstable and that he won the presidential election (notwithstanding Trump's own claims of massive electoral fraud).

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 11:59am:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 11:57am: LOL. So i write about the different views of the optimist/optomist  and the pessimist and you two seriously thought i was talking about the people who make spectacles. Now who is being a bit dishonest here  ;) this is the path of the inferior pedant this is a long way off the narrow road to success. this is the highway to mediocrity  ;) \ No, just wondering that if you can't be bothered to spell correctly, how do we know you've put the least bit of thought into anything else you type.

pedantry over spelling is spending

"Significant time on insignificant things".

like i said, i dont have time to waste on insignificant things (self pity, pedantry, being butt hurt about trump).
I'm a pessimist. i dont think you can make it to the top of the mountain if you get too involved in trivial stuff (like a typo) :)

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 1:37pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 11:59am: aquascoot wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 11:57am: LOL. So i write about the different views of the optimist/optomist  and the pessimist and you two seriously thought i was talking about the people who make spectacles. Now who is being a bit dishonest here  ;) this is the path of the inferior pedant this is a long way off the narrow road to success. this is the highway to mediocrity  ;) \ No, just wondering that if you can't be bothered to spell correctly, how do we know you've put the least bit of thought into anything else you type. pedantry over spelling is spending "Significant time on insignificant things". like i said, i dont have time to waste on insignificant things (self pity, pedantry, being butt hurt about trump). I'm a pessimist. i dont think you can make it to the top of the mountain if you get too involved in trivial stuff (like a typo) :)

As I said, if you don't put the effort into spelling, I'm not sure you've put any actual effort into what you're saying. And the impression I get is that your brain wanders, but with no regard for evidence. Essentially a lot of confirmation bias mixed in with Dunning-Kruger.

John Smith wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 12:21pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 11:57am: So i write about the different views of the optimist/optomist  and the pessimist and you two seriously thought i was talking about the people who make spectacles. it's probably not the first time you've gotten excited about Tony Robbins glasses

Now John.
i am going to have to rename you John Mosquito.
The mosquito is a taker and a pest and it contributes nothing of value. It is harmful and annoying.

But there is a bright side to your presence on this forum.

The buddha was once asked  "what should we do about the annoying mosquito , which buzzes around and tries to take from us and is just annoying".
He replied that we must welcome the mosquito . The mosquito which annoys one who is meditating or in higher consciousness, is a reminder that we must not be distracted by petty little things. The mosquito represents all the petty little BS which we can let get under our skin (literally) and the correct response is to use it as the emotional juice to develop resilience, persistence and the will power to stay in higher consciousness despite such distractions.  In as much as the "noble rightard" has to deal with the non contributing, parasitic taker species of the leftard pedant, the noble rightard can go deeper into his strength and move more quickly up the narrow road to success.
as such, you are a blessing to this forum

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 1:39pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 1:37pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 11:59am: aquascoot wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 11:57am: LOL. So i write about the different views of the optimist/optomist  and the pessimist and you two seriously thought i was talking about the people who make spectacles. Now who is being a bit dishonest here  ;) this is the path of the inferior pedant this is a long way off the narrow road to success. this is the highway to mediocrity  ;) \ No, just wondering that if you can't be bothered to spell correctly, how do we know you've put the least bit of thought into anything else you type. pedantry over spelling is spending "Significant time on insignificant things". like i said, i dont have time to waste on insignificant things (self pity, pedantry, being butt hurt about trump). I'm a pessimist. i dont think you can make it to the top of the mountain if you get too involved in trivial stuff (like a typo) :) As I said, if you don't put the effort into spelling, I'm not sure you've put any actual effort into what you're saying. And the impression I get is that your brain wanders, but with no regard for evidence. Essentially a lot of confirmation bias mixed in with Dunning-Kruger.

i will take this on board. constructive criticism is always welcomed. Pedantry...not so much  ;)

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 1:46pm:

i will take this on board. constructive criticism is always welcomed. Pedantry...not so much  ;)

No you won't.

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 1:37pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 11:59am: aquascoot wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 11:57am: LOL. So i write about the different views of the optimist/optomist  and the pessimist and you two seriously thought i was talking about the people who make spectacles. Now who is being a bit dishonest here  ;) this is the path of the inferior pedant this is a long way off the narrow road to success. this is the highway to mediocrity  ;) \ No, just wondering that if you can't be bothered to spell correctly, how do we know you've put the least bit of thought into anything else you type. pedantry over spelling is spending "Significant time on insignificant things". like i said, i dont have time to waste on insignificant things (self pity, pedantry, being butt hurt about trump). I'm a pessimist. i dont think you can make it to the top of the mountain if you get too involved in trivial stuff (like a typo) :)

There is no mountain.

(A horse once told me so! {Hey, I just realised why Dads horse stood on my 6yo toe: yay me!!!})  ;)

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 1:48pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 1:46pm: i will take this on board. constructive criticism is always welcomed. Pedantry...not so much  ;) No you won't.

i appreciate all feedback. feedback shows a level of motivation that is higher then fat steve , sitting on his couch with his fat wife, bitching about "this harsh world".
steve is in total taker mode.
feedback requires the output of energy (a contribution).
as such any feed back is higher consciousness then apathy

TheFunPolice wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 2:27pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 1:37pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 11:59am: aquascoot wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 11:57am: LOL. So i write about the different views of the optimist/optomist  and the pessimist and you two seriously thought i was talking about the people who make spectacles. Now who is being a bit dishonest here  ;) this is the path of the inferior pedant this is a long way off the narrow road to success. this is the highway to mediocrity  ;) \ No, just wondering that if you can't be bothered to spell correctly, how do we know you've put the least bit of thought into anything else you type. pedantry over spelling is spending "Significant time on insignificant things". like i said, i dont have time to waste on insignificant things (self pity, pedantry, being butt hurt about trump). I'm a pessimist. i dont think you can make it to the top of the mountain if you get too involved in trivial stuff (like a typo) :) There is no mountain. (A horse once told me so! {Hey, I just realised why Dads horse stood on my 6yo toe: yay me!!!})  ;)

horses will only stand on toes to establish your place in the peck order of the herd.
if you get a horse in a halter and make it walk backwards ( a sign of equine submission), then you can be sure that horse will never step on your toes again as it now sees you as a 'higher horse"

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 2:55pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 1:48pm: aquascoot wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 1:46pm: i will take this on board. constructive criticism is always welcomed. Pedantry...not so much  ;) No you won't. i appreciate all feedback. feedback shows a level of motivation that is higher then fat steve , sitting on his couch with his fat wife, bitching about "this harsh world". steve is in total taker mode. feedback requires the output of energy (a contribution). as such any feed back is higher consciousness then apathy

iT'S ALL FALSe DICHOTOMY: you should sell books broseph!

;D

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 2:55pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 1:48pm: aquascoot wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 1:46pm: i will take this on board. constructive criticism is always welcomed. Pedantry...not so much  ;) No you won't. i appreciate all feedback. feedback shows a level of motivation that is higher then fat steve , sitting on his couch with his fat wife, bitching about "this harsh world". steve is in total taker mode. feedback requires the output of energy (a contribution). as such any feed back is higher consciousness then apathy

What's worse, ignorance or apathy?

Who knows? Who cares?

AQUASCOOT IS STUPID AND IT CAN'T BE FIXED

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 2:59pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 2:55pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 1:48pm: aquascoot wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 1:46pm: i will take this on board. constructive criticism is always welcomed. Pedantry...not so much  ;) No you won't. i appreciate all feedback. feedback shows a level of motivation that is higher then fat steve , sitting on his couch with his fat wife, bitching about "this harsh world". steve is in total taker mode. feedback requires the output of energy (a contribution). as such any feed back is higher consciousness then apathy What's worse, ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?

i think apathy and laziness are the larger and growing problems of today.
its always been possible to be ignorant and still thrive...pass on your DNA.
But throughout all of recorded human history, if you were lazy or apathetic, you probably would perish.
nature treats laziness and apathy as genes to be erradicated.
A horse , in nature , that was apathetic about the wolf or lazy about the wolf would be detroyed quick smart...thus ending the lazy and apthetic gene.
A horse might spook and bolt away from a chihuahua .
now you could call that horse and say...how stupid are you. But the stupidity gene doesnt affect his survival.

Nature will, i surmise, find a way to rid the planet of the apathy and laziness gene...probably during a period of chaos.
welfare, jobs for durrrr state people, chronic tv addiction, addiction to sitting on the couch, disengagement and a desire to exert onself as little as possible and just cope and "pleasure yourself"....these values (the value of the inferior mediocre man) are incompatable with evolution. i would advice strongly to resist going down the evolutionary dead end that is the mediocre welfare state  ;) ;)

i hope the left never get over losing brexit and the US.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 4:48pm:

i hope the left never get over losing brexit and the US.

oh no dont say that....their wailing  kind of gets boring after all this time.......

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 1:44pm:

Now John. i am going to have to rename you John Mosquito.

no very alpha of you horseboy.  :D :D

John Smith wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 5:12pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 1:44pm: Now John. i am going to have to rename you John Mosquito. no very alpha of you horseboy.  :D :D

the most alpha of alpha stallions will still be attacked by the mosquito. it will (hopefully) teach him to ignore petty little BS irritations and concentrate on keeping the herd safe from the wolf. For this, i thank you for helping me focus on more significant problems

Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 4:48pm:

i hope the left never get over losing brexit and the US.

-> sprint obviously doesn't even know what the left is :D :D :D

will the tit for tat never end???>.so bloody boring.,

same people same words... ughhhhhhhhhhhhhh

cods wrote on Nov 30^th, 2016 at 11:04am:

will the tit for tat never end???>.so bloody boring., same people same words... ughhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Politics is tribal: that's why the multi-year sea ice in the arctic is bugger**'d!

The banks and the miners take the lions share of everything and the media say it's good for us and we should just swallow it like good sheeple.

cods wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 4:54pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 4:48pm: i hope the left never get over losing brexit and the US. oh no dont say that....their wailing  kind of gets boring after all this time.......

Pathetic, leftards, just pathetic.

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 5:17pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 5:12pm: aquascoot wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 1:44pm: Now John. i am going to have to rename you John Mosquito. no very alpha of you horseboy.  :D :D the most alpha of alpha stallions will still be attacked by the mosquito. it will (hopefully) teach him to ignore petty little BS irritations and concentrate on keeping the herd safe from the wolf. For this, i thank you for helping me focus on more significant problems

you have bigger problems than you realise.

aquascoot wrote on Nov 28^th, 2016 at 5:17pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 5:12pm: aquascoot wrote on Nov 28th, 2016 at 1:44pm: Now John. i am going to have to rename you John Mosquito. no very alpha of you horseboy.  :D :D the most alpha of alpha stallions will still be attacked by the mosquito. it will (hopefully) teach him to ignore petty little BS irritations and concentrate on keeping the herd safe from the wolf. For this, i thank you for helping me focus on more significant problems

  I know all about mozzies.. ::)

will lefties ever get over losing?

On the other topic you are going off about sexual predators and on this one you celebrate one.

Difficult to understand.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1480309455