Not really Dilbert, Scott Adams.

If you have a spare 3 hours, listen to this......

http://podcasts.joerogan.net/podcasts/scott-adams

Gordon wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 5:47pm:

Not really Dilbert, Scott Adams. If you have a spare 3 hours, listen to this...... http://podcasts.joerogan.net/podcasts/scott-adams

Three hours to listen to someone talk about an alleged child rapist?

Pass!

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 6:02pm:

Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 5:47pm: Not really Dilbert, Scott Adams. If you have a spare 3 hours, listen to this...... http://podcasts.joerogan.net/podcasts/scott-adams Three hours to listen to someone talk about an alleged child rapist? Pass!

Oh, ok. You know you could watch it at work and STILL have 5 hours left to stare out the window.

Gordon wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 6:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:02pm: Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 5:47pm: Not really Dilbert, Scott Adams. If you have a spare 3 hours, listen to this...... http://podcasts.joerogan.net/podcasts/scott-adams Three hours to listen to someone talk about an alleged child rapist? Pass! Oh, ok. You know you could watch it at work and STILL have 5 hours left to stare out the window.

Pass.

Alleged child rapists don't interest me all that much.

Gordon wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 6:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:02pm: Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 5:47pm: Not really Dilbert, Scott Adams. If you have a spare 3 hours, listen to this...... http://podcasts.joerogan.net/podcasts/scott-adams Three hours to listen to someone talk about an alleged child rapist? Pass! Oh, ok. You know you could watch it at work and STILL have 5 hours left to stare out the window.

"at work"  ;D ;D ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 6:34pm:

Alleged child rapists don't interest me all that much.

So they interest you a little? ;)

lee wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 6:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:34pm: Alleged child rapists don't interest me all that much. So they interest you a little? ;)

Yes.

When I see one convicted and sent to prison, that's interesting.

If this particular orange douche bag is eventually convicted, my interest will be piqued.

When he pays people off and threatens family members in order to make the allegations go away, I start to lose interest.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 6:38pm:

lee wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:35pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:34pm: Alleged child rapists don't interest me all that much. So they interest you a little? ;) Yes. When I see one convicted and sent to prison, that's interesting. If this particular orange douche bag is eventually convicted, my interest will be piqued. When he pays people off and threatens family members in order to make the allegations go away, I start to lose interest.

When Donald Trump, the ex-president looks back at his presidential days, all those years ago, he will be comforted in the knowledge that Greggy of Ozpolitics stuck a 9 inch shaver down his own throat, & twisted it madly until he bled out.....why, because no charges were ever brought against The Donald from all those bogus sexual allegations Greggy championed in his self inflicted obsession.....& all was well & peacfull in the land of the free & home of the brave as The Donald slept peacefully into his 110th year.

It still amazes me how many grubs crawl out from under their rocks to defend alleged child rapists.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 6:58pm:

It still amazes me how many grubs crawl out from under their rocks to defend alleged child rapists.

If the alegations were substantial why hasn't he been charged?

Gordon wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 7:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:58pm: It still amazes me how many grubs crawl out from under their rocks to defend alleged child rapists. If the alegations were substantial why hasn't he been charged?

New York’s five year statute of limitations.

What other defence are you going to put forward for this alleged child rapist?

It seems you rightards will do anything to make excuses for him.

Sick.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 7:08pm:

Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:58pm: It still amazes me how many grubs crawl out from under their rocks to defend alleged child rapists. If the alegations were substantial why hasn't he been charged? New York’s five year statute of limitations. What other defence are you going to put forward for this alleged child rapist? It seems you rightards will do anything to make excuses for him. Sick.

I'm a centrist racist humanist.  Try to keep up.

Gordon wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 7:12pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:08pm: Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:58pm: It still amazes me how many grubs crawl out from under their rocks to defend alleged child rapists. If the alegations were substantial why hasn't he been charged? New York’s five year statute of limitations. What other defence are you going to put forward for this alleged child rapist? It seems you rightards will do anything to make excuses for him. Sick. I'm a centrist racist humanist.  Try to keep up.

It seems you rightards and centrist racist humanists will do anything to make excuses for him.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 7:13pm:

Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:12pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:08pm: Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:58pm: It still amazes me how many grubs crawl out from under their rocks to defend alleged child rapists. If the alegations were substantial why hasn't he been charged? New York’s five year statute of limitations. What other defence are you going to put forward for this alleged child rapist? It seems you rightards will do anything to make excuses for him. Sick. I'm a centrist racist humanist.  Try to keep up. It seems you rightards and centrist racist humanists will do anything to make excuses for him.

My only interest in Trump is what he'll do as President. 

Gordon wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 7:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:13pm: Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:12pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:08pm: Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:58pm: It still amazes me how many grubs crawl out from under their rocks to defend alleged child rapists. If the alegations were substantial why hasn't he been charged? New York’s five year statute of limitations. What other defence are you going to put forward for this alleged child rapist? It seems you rightards will do anything to make excuses for him. Sick. I'm a centrist racist humanist.  Try to keep up. It seems you rightards and centrist racist humanists will do anything to make excuses for him. My only interest in Trump is what he'll do as President.

My guess is he'll do the exact same thing to his country as he allegedly did to those 13 year old girls ... from behind.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 7:19pm:

Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:13pm: Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:12pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:08pm: Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:58pm: It still amazes me how many grubs crawl out from under their rocks to defend alleged child rapists. If the alegations were substantial why hasn't he been charged? New York’s five year statute of limitations. What other defence are you going to put forward for this alleged child rapist? It seems you rightards will do anything to make excuses for him. Sick. I'm a centrist racist humanist.  Try to keep up. It seems you rightards and centrist racist humanists will do anything to make excuses for him. My only interest in Trump is what he'll do as President.  My guess is he'll do the exact same thing to his country as he allegedly did to those 13 year old girls ... from behind.

Time will tell.

That Scott Adams is an interesting bloke tho.

Gordon wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 7:23pm:

That Scott Adams is an interesting bloke tho.

He had trouble making up his mind on whom to support in the election.

Here's an interesting quote from the man:

"The reality is that women are treated differently by society for exactly the same reason that children and the mentally handicapped are treated differently."

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 6:58pm:

It still amazes me how many grubs crawl out from under their rocks to defend alleged child rapists.

Only alleged......still......Innocent as the white driven snow until proven guilty, in a unanimous decision, beyond a reasonable doubt, by a jury of his peers. ;)

As I said, it amazes me how many grubs crawl out from under their rocks to defend alleged child rapists.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 7:46pm:

As I said, it amazes me how many grubs crawl out from under their rocks to defend alleged child rapists.

Still......Innocent as the white driven snow until proven guilty, in a unanimous decision, beyond a reasonable doubt, by a jury of his peers. ;)

So many grubs willing to defend alleged child rapists.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 7:49pm:

So many grubs willing to defend alleged child rapists.

Who are...still......Innocent as the white driven snow until proven guilty, in a unanimous decision, beyond a reasonable doubt, by a jury of his peers. ;)

Every prediction about Trump had been wrong.

I have a feeling he's going to be the best USA pres in a long time 

Gordon wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 7:56pm:

Every prediction about Trump had been wrong. I have a feeling he's going to be the best USA pres in a long time

  +1   


Wunda wut happened to our  http://www.smileyfaze.tk/smileys/trollb.png   friend?

Gordon wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 7:56pm:

Every prediction about Trump had been wrong. I have a feeling he's going to be the best USA pres in a long time

"best" is subjective.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 8:08pm:

Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:56pm: Every prediction about Trump had been wrong. I have a feeling he's going to be the best USA pres in a long time  "best" is subjective.

Trump is innocent......Innocent as the white driven snow until proven guilty, in a unanimous decision, beyond a reasonable doubt, by a jury of his peers. ;)

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 7:08pm:

Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:58pm: It still amazes me how many grubs crawl out from under their rocks to defend alleged child rapists. If the alegations were substantial why hasn't he been charged? New York’s five year statute of limitations.

another lie.  There is no statute of limitations on rape or child sexual abuse.


Quote:

Sick.

yes. we know.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 6:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:02pm: Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 5:47pm: Not really Dilbert, Scott Adams. If you have a spare 3 hours, listen to this...... http://podcasts.joerogan.net/podcasts/scott-adams Three hours to listen to someone talk about an alleged child rapist? Pass! Oh, ok. You know you could watch it at work and STILL have 5 hours left to stare out the window. Pass. Alleged child rapists don't interest me all that much.

sure. Thats why your every post makes reference to child rape.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 7:49pm:

So many grubs willing to defend alleged child rapists.

Make this your signature and on every post just type in "see below".

It will save you time so you can post more often.

rhino wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 9:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:34pm: Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:02pm: Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 5:47pm: Not really Dilbert, Scott Adams. If you have a spare 3 hours, listen to this...... http://podcasts.joerogan.net/podcasts/scott-adams Three hours to listen to someone talk about an alleged child rapist? Pass! Oh, ok. You know you could watch it at work and STILL have 5 hours left to stare out the window. Pass. Alleged child rapists don't interest me all that much. sure. Thats why your every post makes reference to child rape.

That's because every post is about Trump.

You know, the alleged child rapist that you bend over backwards to defend.

rhino wrote on Nov 21^st, 2016 at 9:38pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:08pm: Gordon wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 7:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:58pm: It still amazes me how many grubs crawl out from under their rocks to defend alleged child rapists. If the alegations were substantial why hasn't he been charged? New York’s five year statute of limitations. another lie.  There is no statute of limitations on rape or child sexual abuse. Quote: Sick. yes. we know.

You might want to check New York's five year statute of limitations, because you've just made a massive fool of yourself (once again).

It's like shooting (retarded) fish in a barrel with you.

I do so enjoy it   ;D

Judge Ronnie Abrams has slated an initial status conference in the civil lawsuit   [ie NOT a criminal case] for 16 December in a New York district court.

A Guardian investigation this summer found that the lawsuit appeared to have been coordinated by a former producer on the Jerry Springer TV show who has been associated in the past with a range of disputed claims involving celebrities including OJ Simpson and Kurt Cobain. A publicist acting for “Jane Doe” also attempted to sell a video in which the woman describes her allegations against Trump to media outlets at a $1m price tag.

The court order gives no details of the legal complaint raised by “Jane Doe”. It instructs all parties to the case to set out in advance the nature of the allegations and the “principal defenses”, as well as any previous motions and discovery as well as the “estimated length of trial”.

The original federal lawsuit, filed in June, alleged that “Jane Doe” was sexually assaulted by Trump in 1994 at Epstein’s Manhattan home. Further claims were made that the real estate billionaire raped the then teenager at parties hosted by Epstein on the Upper East Side.

The Guardian investigationfound that a publicist calling himself “Al Taylor” attempted to sell the videotape of “Jane Doe” relating her allegations for $1m. It linked Taylor through a variety of means including shared email addresses and phone numbers to Norm Lubow, who used to work on Springer’s daytime talk show.

Lubow was connected to a contentious claim, raised in the 1998 documentary movie Kurt and Courtney, that Courtney Love offered a fellow musician $50,000 to murder her husband, Kurt Cobain of Nirvana. Love denied the charge.

According to the New York Post, Lubow was also behind a tabloid newspaper story that OJ Simpson bought illicit drugs on the day his estranged wife Nicole Brown was killed.

When the Guardian quizzed “Al Taylor” about his true identity, the publicist replied: “Just be warned, we’ll sue you if we don’t like what you write. We’ll sue your ass, own your ass and own your newspaper’s ass as well, punk.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/12/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-alleged-rape-lawsuit

*yawn*

Statutes of Limitations for Sexual Assault
New York17
N.Y. Crim. Pro. Law § 30.10

Rape; Criminal sexual act;
Aggravated sexual abuse;
Course of sexual conduct
against a child
None


Damn, made a fool out of myself by knowing things before I post. Got to watch that.

"On the fourth incident, she says Mr. Trump tied her to a bed and forcibly raped her, in a “savage sexual attack,” while she pleaded with him to stop. She says Mr. Trump violently struck her in the face. She says that afterward, if she ever revealed what he had done, Mr. Trump threatened that she and her family would be “physically harmed if not killed.” She says she has been in fear of him ever since.

"New York’s five year statute of limitations on this claim — the legal deadline for filing — has long since run. However, Jane Doe’s attorney, Thomas Meagher,"


;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

'Thomas Meagher, a patent and intellectual property attorney, filed the lawsuit for Doe even though he said he had never been involved in a case of this kind before.'

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/02/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-13-year-old-cancels-public-event

Probably didn't even know the law on that. :D :D :D :D :D :D

So she was so scared of him she filed a lawsuit? Then dropped it right on election eve?

lee wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2016 at 10:44am:

So she was so scared of him she filed a lawsuit? Then dropped it right on election eve?

That's correct.

There are allegations of a pay-off, and more threats of violence from Trump.

And Thomas Meagher was only in it for the intellectual property rights. :D :D :D :D