In 1939 the German ocean liner the MS Saint Louis made a voyage from Europe to North America to try to find a home for 937 German Jewish refugees. These Jewish refugees trying to escape the anti-Jewish movement in Europe were denied entry into USA, Canada and Cuba.

Can anyone explain this to me?

I like to learn about WW2 and I do consider myself to be somewhat of a critical thinker.

Why would the United States and Canada refuse to help a boat load of Jewish refugees?

Could it be that for propaganda purposes the Jewish people have been exploited in a similar way to how the USA pretends that their Civil War was about freeing African American slaves?

The US side not only turned this boat of almost 1000 Jewish refugees away but they also fires a warning shot to keep the boat off Florida shores.


Why would the USA feel the need to do something like fire a warning shot at a boat full of 1000 Jewish people seeking help and safety?

A google search for Voyage of the Dammed now brings up a Doctor Who episode. This is only recent. The Voyage of the Dammed is known as The Voyage of the Dammed and a google search would find the topic straight up not that long ago. The refugees almost starved on the way back to Europe.

It doesnt make any sense does it? It does not fit the western narrative for WW2 in any way shape or form.

The Voyage of the Dammed was one clear thing that I have come across that made me question the stories we have been told about WW2.

I think The Voyage of the Dammed is a very good topic to learn about. After you explore that I would recommend learning about what the allies did to Dresden.

I think The Voyage of the Dammed and what happened at Dresden were two of the most horrible things of the period and they do not fit the narrative at all. It makes me sick to think about a ship full of Jewish people asking for help and America not only refusing any help but also firing on the ship.

Why didnt America help these Jewish refugees?   

If they had come to Australia Israel would have been founded in PNG or Nauru.

Unforgiven wrote on Aug 30^th, 2016 at 1:04am:

If they had come to Australia Israel would have been founded in PNG or Nauru.

.....  ........ ? Maybe you should read that again. Oh. I really dont think so. The Jews were living in Judah and Israel as far back as the Romans. Before even. They won that land from the Amalek. It is theirs.

Unforgiven wrote on Aug 30^th, 2016 at 1:04am:

If they had come to Australia Israel would have been founded in PNG or Nauru.

Plus us Aussies did a lot to establish modern Israel in WW1. Google Beersheba.

Aussie Aussie Aussie!