We all saw him there for crissakes. Front & centre of the people seated behind her. The father of the person who murdered 49 Americans in Orlando, Florida.

Ask yourself who gets to sit in a position like that where you're in shot every time the camera is on Hillary.

He says he was invited by the Clintons.
She says he wasn't, he just put himself there.

I say she is a compulsive, brain-damaged, traitorous, lying Muslim apologist and complies with every Saudi request.

We already know from Benghazi how little she cares for American lives.

http://i.imgur.com/WTDnnwE.gif

Afraid you Aussies have to take of your "Muslim problem" on your own.

Funny pictures don't hide the truth about Hillary Clinton, Compulsive Liar.

bogarde73 wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 7:46am:

We all saw him there for crissakes. Front & centre of the people seated behind her. The father of the person who murdered 49 Americans in Orlando, Florida. Ask yourself who gets to sit in a position like that where you're in shot every time the camera is on Hillary. He says he was invited by the Clintons. She says he wasn't, he just put himself there. I say she is a compulsive, brain-damaged, traitorous, lying Muslim apologist and complies with every Saudi request. We already know from Benghazi how little she cares for American lives.

True, but she hasn't killed as many Americans as George W Bush and Dick Cheney did . . . yet.

bogarde73 wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 7:54am:

Funny pictures don't hide the truth about Hillary Clinton, Compulsive Liar.

http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/540/658/5e8.jpg

Another Hillary lie

I think boges was under the impression that only Aussie politicians lie  :D :D :D

A subliminal message from Hillary the Liar:

"O Prince of Saud, I beseech you, have I not put in a place of honour one of thy servants who has sacrificed his son in jihad. Have I not brought to my side one of thy servants, Huma.
Does this not demonstrate my loyalty to thine service?"

bogarde73 wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 7:46am:

We all saw him there for crissakes. Front & centre of the people seated behind her. The father of the person who murdered 49 Americans in Orlando, Florida. Ask yourself who gets to sit in a position like that where you're in shot every time the camera is on Hillary. He says he was invited by the Clintons. She says he wasn't, he just put himself there. I say she is a compulsive, brain-damaged, traitorous, lying Muslim apologist and complies with every Saudi request. We already know from Benghazi how little she cares for American lives.

Can you post the image please?

Rush: Media Would Have Noticed a Killer's Father at a Trump Rally

If the father of the man charged with killing nine members of an African-American church in Charleston, South Carolina had attended a Donald Trump rally, it would be getting a lot more media attention than the father of the Orlando shooter attending a Hillary Clinton rally, talk radio host Rush Limbaugh says.

"You guys remember the name Dylann Roof?" Limbaugh said on his program on Tuesday. "Imagine if his dad showed up at a Trump rally . . . You think Trump would have been exonerated?"

Limbaugh was referencing the appearance of Seddique Mateen at a Clinton rally in Kissimmee, Florida, near Orlando on Monday.

Mateen is the father of Omar Mateen, who killed 49 people at a gay nightclub in Orlando. He was spotted behind Clinton as she spoke to the crowd, remembering the victims of the attack.

But Limbaugh said the mainstream media was shrugging off the incident, and even former Ted Cruz staffer Alice Stewart "exonerated Hillary," saying she simply thinks "that some Hillary staffer screwed up."

Limbaugh doubted the same would be said had the Charleston shooter's father appeared at a Trump rally.

"Oh, he couldn't possibly have known that Dylann Roof's dad was there. No way! Some staffer's head's gotta roll for that," Limbaugh said, imitating what Stewart said about the Clinton incident.

"You think they would say that?" he asked. "I kinda don't think so."

Limbaugh also advised Trump to avoid talking about the incident, suggesting it might be a "potential trap" to lure him into making a comment similar to his criticism of Khizr and Ghazala Khan, the parents of a Muslim American Army captain killed in Iraq.

https://www.jihadwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Hillary-Clinton-Seddique-Mateen.png

I'm just an unbiased onlooker, but sure looks like an honoured guest to me.

He may have been there of his own free will.

bogarde73 wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 11:57am:

I'm just an unbiased onlooker, but sure looks like an honoured guest to me.

In what way?

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 12:42pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 11:57am: I'm just an unbiased onlooker, but sure looks like an honoured guest to me. In what way?

Often invited guests have seating positions such as that.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 12:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 12:42pm: bogarde73 wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 11:57am: I'm just an unbiased onlooker, but sure looks like an honoured guest to me. In what way? Often invited guests have seating positions such as that.

You know this because ... ?

........ I am a genius.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 12:55pm:

........ I am a genius.

That's true, Sprint.

Cesterete them.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 12:49pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 12:47pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 12:42pm: bogarde73 wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 11:57am: I'm just an unbiased onlooker, but sure looks like an honoured guest to me. In what way? Often invited guests have seating positions such as that. You know this because ... ?

I know this because she's a f**kng tool of the Saudis.

bogarde73 wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 11:57am:

I'm just an unbiased onlooker, but sure looks like an honoured guest to me.

Stop lying!


Quote:

Though on television it appeared that Mateen was close to Clinton, he was well outside of the security buffer zone in a location that a longtime Republican presidential campaign advance staffer described as a "tapestry" -- an area where a diverse group would be seated to reflect wide-ranging support for the candidate.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/orlando-shooters-father-attend-clinton-rally/story?id=41242838

bogarde73 wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 1:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 12:49pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 12:47pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 12:42pm: bogarde73 wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 11:57am: I'm just an unbiased onlooker, but sure looks like an honoured guest to me. In what way? Often invited guests have seating positions such as that. You know this because ... ? I know this because she's a f**kng tool of the Saudis.

What does that have to do with seating arrangements?

And ABC is as unbiased a news source as CNN, Reuters, NBC, NY Times, Washington Post, WSJ, HuffPost etc etc etc.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 12:55pm:

........ I am a genius.

Are you, really?

"The rally was a 3,000-person, open-door event for the public. This individual wasn't invited as a guest, and the campaign was unaware of his attendance until after the event."

bogarde73 wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 1:47pm:

And ABC is as unbiased a news source as CNN, Reuters, NBC, NY Times, Washington Post, WSJ, HuffPost etc etc etc.

So what news sources do you consider correct?

You just named some of the most reputable news agencies in the world, so who do you get your unbiased information from?

Or do you just "Feel it"


P.s it's not our ABC (just in case ;))

Dsmithy70 wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 1:56pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 1:47pm: And ABC is as unbiased a news source as CNN, Reuters, NBC, NY Times, Washington Post, WSJ, HuffPost etc etc etc. So what news sources do you consider correct?

The one that agrees with him.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 1:48pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 12:55pm: ........ I am a genius. Are you, really? "The rally was a 3,000-person, open-door event for the public. This individual wasn't invited as a guest, and the campaign was unaware of his attendance until after the event."

Yes I am.

As I said


Quote:

........ Re: Another Hillary lie Reply #11 - Today at 1:42pm  Quote    He may have been there of his own free will. .....

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 2:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 1:48pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 12:55pm: ........ I am a genius. Are you, really? "The rally was a 3,000-person, open-door event for the public. This individual wasn't invited as a guest, and the campaign was unaware of his attendance until after the event." Yes I am. As I said Quote: ........ Re: Another Hillary lie Reply #11 - Today at 1:42pm  Quote    He may have been there of his own free will. .....

This is what you said:

"Often invited guests have seating positions such as that."

You know that because ... ?

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 12:55pm:

........ I am a genius.

I'd go along with that Sprint

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 1:56pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jun 20th, 1970 at 3:47pm: And ABC is as unbiased a news source as CNN, Reuters, NBC, NY Times, Washington Post, WSJ, HuffPost etc etc etc. So what news sources do you consider correct? The one that agrees with him.

When I look at the trajectory of mainstream print and network on American politics in the last 6 months particularly, since Trump became a threat to the cosy left wing establishment, it's been a one way street.
You have to look at independent out of the loop sources to see or hear the truth.

bogarde73 wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 4:39pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 2:08pm: Dsmithy70 wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 1:56pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jun 20th, 1970 at 3:47pm: And ABC is as unbiased a news source as CNN, Reuters, NBC, NY Times, Washington Post, WSJ, HuffPost etc etc etc. So what news sources do you consider correct? The one that agrees with him. When I look at the trajectory of mainstream print and network on American politics in the last 6 months particularly, since Trump became a threat to the cosy left wing establishment, it's been a one way street. You have to look at independent out of the loop sources to see or hear the truth.

Yes, Bogie, like your new source, the wonderful Breitbart. They're not biased at all.


Quote:

Upheaval at Breitbart News as Workers Resign and Accusations Fly As a proudly renegade voice of the populist right, Breitbart News has long delighted in bedeviling liberals and establishment Republicans alike, emerging in recent years as one of the nation’s leading conservative media outlets. But in an ironic twist, Breitbart, a news and opinion website that welcomed the rise of Donald J. Trump as an outsider candidate, is now facing a problem similar to the one roiling the Republican Party it likes to torment: a scathing internal dispute, with Mr. Trump at its center. Several top executives and journalists at the site have resigned in the last week, saying the organization has turned into a shill for the Trump campaign and failed to support Michelle Fields, a Breitbart reporter who accused Mr. Trump’s campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, of grabbing and shoving her at a Florida rally last week. Ms. Fields reported the episode to the police, and a journalist for The Washington Post, Ben Terris, identified Mr. Lewandowski as the person who grabbed her. The Trump campaign has denied Ms. Fields’s account, and Breitbart, after initially requesting an apology, later published an article casting doubt on whether Mr. Lewandowski was involved. In a telephone interview, Ms. Fields, who also resigned on Monday, said that she “felt like my employer was working with the Trump campaign to assassinate my character.” “They were more interested in protecting Trump and coordinating with him on a message than they were about finding out the truth,” said Ms. Fields, who is 28. Messages left with Breitbart executives on Monday were not answered, and the site’s spokesman was among the employees who quit. The uproar entwines the growing concerns about violence at Mr. Trump’s rallies — protesters have been attacked, and reporters  ejected — with the squabbling that has erupted among right-leaning media organizations over Mr. Trump’s improbable political rise. It also offers a glimpse into the growing pains at Breitbart, which began as a cousin of the Drudge Report and has expanded into a broader, if still ideologically driven, news operation with journalists in London, Los Angeles and on the campaign trail. The present site retains the tabloid-style, shoot-from-the-hip mentality of its outspoken founder, Andrew Breitbart, who died in 2012. But employees who left in recent days said that Breitbart’s unabashed embrace of Mr. Trump, particularly at the seeming expense of its own reporter, struck them as a betrayal of its mission.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/15/business/media/upheaval-at-breitbart-news-as-workers-resign-and-accusations-fly.html?action=click&contentCollection=Politics&module=RelatedCoverage&region=Marginalia&pgtype=article

bogarde73 wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 4:39pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 2:08pm: Dsmithy70 wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 1:56pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jun 20th, 1970 at 3:47pm: And ABC is as unbiased a news source as CNN, Reuters, NBC, NY Times, Washington Post, WSJ, HuffPost etc etc etc. So what news sources do you consider correct? The one that agrees with him. When I look at the trajectory of mainstream print and network on American politics in the last 6 months particularly, since Trump became a threat to the cosy left wing establishment, it's been a one way street. You have to look at independent out of the loop sources to see or hear the truth.

very much so

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 11^th, 2016 at 4:59pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 4:39pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 2:08pm: Dsmithy70 wrote on Aug 11th, 2016 at 1:56pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jun 20th, 1970 at 3:47pm: And ABC is as unbiased a news source as CNN, Reuters, NBC, NY Times, Washington Post, WSJ, HuffPost etc etc etc. So what news sources do you consider correct? The one that agrees with him. When I look at the trajectory of mainstream print and network on American politics in the last 6 months particularly, since Trump became a threat to the cosy left wing establishment, it's been a one way street. You have to look at independent out of the loop sources to see or hear the truth. very much so

I get my news from Aquascoots posts, but that’s just me.