Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Feedback >> GLOBAL MODERATOR
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1469795340

Message started by Andrei.Hicks on Jul 29th, 2016 at 10:28pm

Title: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Jul 29th, 2016 at 10:28pm
Good afternoon/evening everyone

Following discussion with Freediver, there's an obvious need for an additional Moderator to help cover the site.
I will be away for a few weeks holiday in the US this coming month and with it being largely FD and myself covering the moderation at the moment, it is time to add another GM to help us.

It's not a popularity contest and its not a public vote but we would like anyone who would like to perform the role to please PM FD and myself so we can see who is interested.

Many thanks.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Redneck on Jul 30th, 2016 at 2:57pm
bumped for those interested

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Jul 30th, 2016 at 6:59pm
Thank you Redneck.
We have received several nominations. If anyone else is interested please let us know.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by John Smith on Jul 30th, 2016 at 7:04pm
If you have no one else suitable, I'll put my hand up.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Setanta on Jul 30th, 2016 at 8:28pm
Can we nominate others we think would be reasonable?

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Setanta on Jul 30th, 2016 at 8:30pm

John Smith wrote on Jul 30th, 2016 at 7:04pm:
If you have no one else suitable, I'll put my hand up.


That's about where I stand. It's not a job I think I would enjoy but would do it to pull my weight if needed.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by John Smith on Jul 30th, 2016 at 8:34pm

Setanta wrote on Jul 30th, 2016 at 8:30pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 30th, 2016 at 7:04pm:
If you have no one else suitable, I'll put my hand up.


That's about where I stand. It's not a job I think I would enjoy but would do it to pull my weight if needed.


I'd have to 'act professionally' and stop calling people idiots if I was ' Gmod  ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Setanta on Jul 30th, 2016 at 8:49pm

John Smith wrote on Jul 30th, 2016 at 8:34pm:

Setanta wrote on Jul 30th, 2016 at 8:30pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 30th, 2016 at 7:04pm:
If you have no one else suitable, I'll put my hand up.


That's about where I stand. It's not a job I think I would enjoy but would do it to pull my weight if needed.


I'd have to 'act professionally' and stop calling people idiots if I was ' Gmod  ;D ;D ;D


That could be a chore for you, nothing is insurmountable though! I think someone who already posts with restraint on language etc would be a good choice. Issuevoter for example.


Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by John Smith on Jul 30th, 2016 at 9:29pm

Setanta wrote on Jul 30th, 2016 at 8:49pm:
That could be a chore for you



not really ... I know how to play nice when I have to.  ;)

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Rhino on Jul 30th, 2016 at 9:54pm
The moderation on this board couldnt get any worse.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Setanta on Jul 30th, 2016 at 10:00pm

John Smith wrote on Jul 30th, 2016 at 9:29pm:

Setanta wrote on Jul 30th, 2016 at 8:49pm:
That could be a chore for you



not really ... I know how to play nice when I have to.  ;)


I have nothing against you John, we're mostly towards the same side politically, I just think that someone that, that came naturally to would be a better choice than a nobbled poster that likes to mix it up.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:06pm
I have to say that Management here moves in mysterious ways.  It is clear, by Board activity, that BigVic has been appointed but Management have not given Members the courtesy of a formal notification by a Post from them.

Poor form.

However, congratulations Big Vic.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Leftwinger on Aug 7th, 2016 at 7:25pm
Well done Vic , great choice imo

Look out Cods  :), just kiddn

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 7th, 2016 at 8:36pm
My apologies for the delayed change announcement.
With the time difference and it being the start of the football season yesterday I was not on.

The Moderator pool has been increased to include -

BigVic
Setanta

Both excellent and capable candidates for my mind.

Many thanks.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Leftwinger on Aug 7th, 2016 at 8:47pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 8:36pm:
My apologies for the delayed change announcement.
With the time difference and it being the start of the football season yesterday I was not on.

The Moderator pool has been increased to include -

BigVic
Setanta

Both excellent and capable candidates for my mind.

Many thanks.


Excellent choices , can they do things on their own accord or do they have to have a circle jerk meeting with you and FD ?

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 7th, 2016 at 8:50pm
They have exactly the same powers I do.
They don't need mine or FD's approval.
However like before each moderator knows what others have done and I know both these guys will do an excellent job and give us good coverage in future months.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:00pm
Well, I am an honest person, so I'll say what I think.  Setanta, while being a good Poster most times, has let himself down on others, and posting male genitalia was one of those times which was a deal breaker (GMod wise) for me.  He is now vulnerable to those I need not name posting similar, and if, as he ought, he acts, they will rightly call hypocrisy.  I have other reasons I'll keep private because I ought, so, Setanta while I'd love to give you the kiss of death with my endorsement, I can't, and you know why.

I also should add that Setanta has helped me out big time on matters only he knows about, and he knows I am grateful for, and hugely appreciative of that.  Without the assistance he willingly gave me, I would have struggled on a project.

I just cannot support this decision, however.  Sorry.

:'(

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:28pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:00pm:
Well, I am an honest person, so I'll say what I think.  Setanta, while being a good Poster most times, has let himself down on others, and posting male genitalia was one of those times which was a deal breaker (GMod wise) for me.  He is now vulnerable to those I need not name posting similar, and if, as he ought, he acts, they will rightly call hypocrisy.  I have other reasons I'll keep private because I ought, so, Setanta while I'd love to give you the kiss of death with my endorsement, I can't, and you know why.

I also should add that Setanta has helped me out big time on matters only he knows about, and he knows I am grateful for, and hugely appreciative of that.  Without the assistance he willingly gave me, I would have struggled on a project.

I just cannot support this decision, however.  Sorry.

:'(


I may have to eat very tough crow about that post.  I'll leave it to Setanta to explain, if he chooses.

Title: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Agnes on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:30pm
is the new Global Mod...I think good choice. Aussie has called it but no announcement from admin yet.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Agnes on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:39pm
How does Aussie know?

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:41pm
well agnes as you know we were not invited to partake....I already know where I stand as far as gmods are concerned.. and fd would also know... this person hates me,...may not last long agnes...but I think fd is planning for that,

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:43pm

Agnes wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:39pm:
How does Aussie know?


Big Vic initially gave it away when he made that comment in Feedback about seeing "Members viewing" at the top of the page.  Only Mods can.

Then, later, (if you go to the Pol Sux Section,) you will see Big Vic has moved a couple of Threads.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Agnes on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:45pm

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:41pm:
well agnes as you know we were not invited to partake....I already know where I stand as far as gmods are concerned.. and fd would also know... this person hates me,...may not last long agnes...but I think fd is planning for that,

  Aussie could be completely wrong cods- good mods do not act on their personal likes or dislikes of posters. It could be anyone, Aussie is just having a guess.. how could BigVic or anyone else not love you?

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Redmond Neck on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:48pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:43pm:

Agnes wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:39pm:
How does Aussie know?


Big Vic initially gave it away when he made that comment in Feedback about seeing "Members viewing" at the top of the page.  Only Mods can.

Then, later, (if you go to the Pol Sux Section,) you will see Big Vic has moved a couple of Threads.


Well spotted Agent 86

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:50pm

Agnes wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:45pm:

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:41pm:
well agnes as you know we were not invited to partake....I already know where I stand as far as gmods are concerned.. and fd would also know... this person hates me,...may not last long agnes...but I think fd is planning for that,

  Aussie could be completely wrong cods- good mods do not act on their personal likes or dislikes of posters. It could be anyone, Aussie is just having a guess.. how could BigVic or anyone else not love you?


I dont think so.......its a bit rude not to tell everyone though dont you think??....

unless aussie is the go to man of course...

so yes thanks for the warning aussie..

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:53pm

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:50pm:

Agnes wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:45pm:

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:41pm:
well agnes as you know we were not invited to partake....I already know where I stand as far as gmods are concerned.. and fd would also know... this person hates me,...may not last long agnes...but I think fd is planning for that,

  Aussie could be completely wrong cods- good mods do not act on their personal likes or dislikes of posters. It could be anyone, Aussie is just having a guess.. how could BigVic or anyone else not love you?


I dont think so.......its a bit rude not to tell everyone though dont you think??....

unless aussie is the go to man of course...

so yes thanks for the warning aussie..




No-one has told me anything, cods.  I'm just someone who reads the Forum.



Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:53pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:43pm:

Agnes wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:39pm:
How does Aussie know?


Big Vic initially gave it away when he made that comment in Feedback about seeing "Members viewing" at the top of the page.  Only Mods can.

Then, later, (if you go to the Pol Sux Section,) you will see Big Vic has moved a couple of Threads.



thats interesting I dont usually bother with fB.. but since you said that took a peek   but nothing there announcing anything..aussie only your post.....

I dont think we are meant to know..... we are being watched,.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:59pm

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:53pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:43pm:

Agnes wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:39pm:
How does Aussie know?


Big Vic initially gave it away when he made that comment in Feedback about seeing "Members viewing" at the top of the page.  Only Mods can.

Then, later, (if you go to the Pol Sux Section,) you will see Big Vic has moved a couple of Threads.



thats interesting I dont usually bother with fB.. but since you said that took a peek   but nothing there announcing anything..aussie only your post.....

I dont think we are meant to know..... we are being watched,.


See this Post in Feedback ~ Board Movements Thread.


Quote:
Re: board movements
Reply #11 - Today at 8:37am Quote
Has the "Members Viewing This Topic" always been at the top of each topic pahge?   I can't remember seeing it there before!


All the GMods (Member Run Board Mods as well but only in their Board) know who is reading what across the Forum.  They will also know if you are preparing a Post to make in that Thread... but they do not know what you are preparing.)

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Redmond Neck on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:02pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:59pm:

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:53pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:43pm:

Agnes wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:39pm:
How does Aussie know?


Big Vic initially gave it away when he made that comment in Feedback about seeing "Members viewing" at the top of the page.  Only Mods can.

Then, later, (if you go to the Pol Sux Section,) you will see Big Vic has moved a couple of Threads.



thats interesting I dont usually bother with fB.. but since you said that took a peek   but nothing there announcing anything..aussie only your post.....

I dont think we are meant to know..... we are being watched,.


See this Post in Feedback ~ Board Movements Thread.


Quote:
Re: board movements
Reply #11 - Today at 8:37am Quote
Has the "Members Viewing This Topic" always been at the top of each topic pahge?   I can't remember seeing it there before!


All the GMods (Member Run Board Mods as well but only in their Board) know who is reading what across the Forum.  They will also know if you are preparing a Post to make in that Thread... but they do not know what you are preparing.)


What Aussie says is correct, I also picked up on that!

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:07pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:59pm:

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:53pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:43pm:

Agnes wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 2:39pm:
How does Aussie know?


Big Vic initially gave it away when he made that comment in Feedback about seeing "Members viewing" at the top of the page.  Only Mods can.

Then, later, (if you go to the Pol Sux Section,) you will see Big Vic has moved a couple of Threads.



thats interesting I dont usually bother with fB.. but since you said that took a peek   but nothing there announcing anything..aussie only your post.....

I dont think we are meant to know..... we are being watched,.


See this Post in Feedback ~ Board Movements Thread.


Quote:
Re: board movements
Reply #11 - Today at 8:37am Quote
Has the "Members Viewing This Topic" always been at the top of each topic pahge?   I can't remember seeing it there before!


All the GMods (Member Run Board Mods as well but only in their Board) know who is reading what across the Forum.  They will also know if you are preparing a Post to make in that Thread... but they do not know what you are preparing.)



that message isnt on my fb.. aussie...I guess it wasnt meant for us peasants...

he wont have any trouble following me around the traps then..... ;) ;)

is that personal abuse???... its hard to tell on here sometimes... well here one who wont be sending him any complaints....

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:08pm

Quote:
What Aussie says is correct,.....


Situation normal. 



8-)

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:09pm
ooops reading the wrong thread........

but no need to worry I got the bad news....

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:10pm
cods......see Post number 11 in the Board Movements Thread in Feedback.

Here.

Link.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Redmond Neck on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:15pm
Could be worse cods!

Could be BigOl

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:16pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:10pm:
cods......see Post number 11 in the Board Movements Thread in Feedback.

Here.

Link.



aussie I said I found it ... thanks....I was looking in the moderator thread....

at least fd has put the leading forum back where it was.. thats nice..

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:19pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:15pm:
Could be worse cods!

Could be BigOl



haha   not for me....bigvic thinks I am the curse of ozpol.. he hates me says I am the worst abuser on the forum...he has said it more than once so I know he means it..


couldnt be plainer than that could he???>>.

I am hoping you dont agree with him..

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Agnes on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:20pm
its a good sign he hasn't acted on anyone yet cods- not me not you.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:22pm

Agnes wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:20pm:
its a good sign he hasn't acted on anyone yet cods- not me not you.


Jaybuz!!!!  He's only been on the beat for a namo-second.  Fairbloodygoferfuxsake!

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:25pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:22pm:

Agnes wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:20pm:
its a good sign he hasn't acted on anyone yet cods- not me not you.


Jaybuz!!!!  He's only been on the beat for a namo-second.  Fairbloodygoferfuxsake!




hes watching and waiting I can feel it....

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Redmond Neck on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:49pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:15pm:
Could be worse cods!

Could be BigOl


I was only kidding BigOl, I just know you like to swear a bit!

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D



Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Aug 7th, 2016 at 4:50pm

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:19pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:15pm:
Could be worse cods!

Could be BigOl



haha   not for me....bigvic thinks I am the curse of ozpol.. he hates me says I am the worst abuser on the forum...he has said it more than once so I know he means it..


couldnt be plainer than that could he???>>.

I am hoping you dont agree with him..



I do not hate you at all - I don't hate anyone.   Volunteers were called for as GMs - I volunteered.     I figure if there are things about something that you do not like or agree with, then make your position known and if people agree with what you have put forward then so be it..    Having said that, I agree that I have posted that you are one, if not the worst, abuser of people on this board - frankly, it was your constant abuse and denigrating of people that led me to put my name forward. as a GM.  You also would have had an opportunity to nominate as well - I hope you did.

I have been a victim of your abuse and frankly I am not going to take it anymore.    Your constant abuse of people, telling all and sundry that people - because of political persuasion - enjoy people  dying in roofs or being smashed against rocks at Christmas Island is not in keeping with normal community values or thinking.

I have declared to the GMs as part of my submission that I have had issues with you in the past regarding abusive behaviour - you yourself know that because you have been banned because of it.  Therefore, I request you do not try and bait me, nor abuse me further - it won't work.   Should I find you have been abusing me or going outside what is acceptable behaviour on this board towards me, in order to keep impartial - I will take whatever evidence I have with my recommendations to another GM for consideration.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 4:58pm

Quote:
I will take whatever evidence I have with my recommendations to another GM for consideration.


Good luck finding one.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by bogarde73 on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:00pm
How do you feel about the world's public enemy no 1, ie the Muslim world.
Shall I pack my bags now?

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:04pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 4:58pm:

Quote:
I will take whatever evidence I have with my recommendations to another GM for consideration.


Good luck finding one.



see what I mean .. even you would have to admit..

that is EXTREME......I apologised to the gmod.. for my misbehavior I was also at his bidding banned...

but he has thrown it at me at every opportunity...

to my knowledge it was a first and last.. all though he constantly tell me I am the worst abuser on here...


as you can read once again with your own eyes....

I have made a strong point of staying away from this person.. because I couldnt stand HIS ABUSE.. although he claimed he has certain rights to say what he does to myself...

so as you can see..... how I will avoid this person who will now be watching me without me knowing it creeps me out.....


as far as I know this person has had me banned ONCE>.. and I too have had HIM BANNED.....


I do not like him and never will... he accepts an apology but still throws it back at you I dont like people like that]

I call them two faced...

ooops I feel a ban coming on..


Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:06pm

bogarde73 wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:00pm:
How do you feel about the world's public enemy no 1, ie the Muslim world.
Shall I pack my bags now?



I will be right behind you boges.... ,lololol

excuse me if that abuse...

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:12pm

Quote:
I do not like him and never will... he accepts an apology but still throws it back at you I dont like people like that]

I call them two faced...

ooops I feel a ban coming on..


cods, you don't like me and probably never will, but that does not mean much.  I reckon you now both have had a shot, so my best advice is for each to let it go at that.  Move on.  All good.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Black Orchid on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:12pm

Vic wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 4:50pm:
I do not hate you at all - I don't hate anyone.   Volunteers were called for as GMs - I volunteered.     I figure if there are things about something that you do not like or agree with, then make your position known and if people agree with what you have put forward then so be it..    Having said that, I agree that I have posted that you are one, if not the worst, abuser of people on this board - frankly, it was your constant abuse and denigrating of people that led me to put my name forward. as a GM.  You also would have had an opportunity to nominate as well - I hope you did.

I have been a victim of your abuse and frankly I am not going to take it anymore.    Your constant abuse of people, telling all and sundry that people - because of political persuasion - enjoy people  dying in roofs or being smashed against rocks at Christmas Island is not in keeping with normal community values or thinking.

I have declared to the GMs as part of my submission that I have had issues with you in the past regarding abusive behaviour - you yourself know that because you have been banned because of it.  Therefore, I request you do not try and bait me, nor abuse me further - it won't work.   Should I find you have been abusing me or going outside what is acceptable behaviour on this board towards me, in order to keep impartial - I will take whatever evidence I have with my recommendations to another GM for consideration.


Whoa, sorry, but that's pretty self centred and heavy duty.  GMods should not show bias and should be able to balance their personal likes/dislikes.  Easy to say, I know, but what you said constitutes a threat towards Cods and that is not at all balanced or non-biased and GMods should at least try to rise above pettiness and tit for tat.

Cods is definitely not the worst abuser here and it now seems that she will have a target on her back whilst the worst abusers will get a pass.

Probably putting a target on my own back now but it had to be said.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Redmond Neck on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:14pm
Dont forget cods there is always the sanatorium for banned forum tragics!

"Rednecks Detainee Centre For OzPol Bans"

Short term memberships available.

Sympathetic ear available

No bad language allowed....... within reason!

http://www.ozpoliticssux.com/forum/index.php


Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by bogarde73 on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:15pm
x 2 flower.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:19pm

Quote:
... but it had to be said...


No it did not, and you clearly did not carefully read what Big Vic posted. 

Give the bloke a fair go.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:20pm

Black Orchid wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:12pm:
Sorry, but that's pretty self centred and heavy duty.  GMods should not show bias and should be able to balance their personal likes/dislikes.  Easy to say, I know, but what you said constitutes a threat towards Cods and that is not at all balanced or non-biased.

Cods is definitely not the worst abuser here and it now seems that she will have a target on her back whilst the worst abusers will get a pass.

Probably putting a target on my own back now but it had to be said.



thanks BO .. I think he has made that LOUD AND CLEAR.....I am so glad someone has said I am not the worst abuser... because this person has said that on this forum so many times..... even though I can remember only having the one run in with him....go figure.

john smith is my main nemeses..and he palls in comparison....


if you have any probs BO please let me know I would hate anyone to attack you like I get attacked.....I will report it to fd...it isnt fair that you make an enemy of a gmod... because you stick up for someone....but then whats fair about this place.. I might stick to the food forum....I cant get into any trouble down there.....


well!!!! my cooking aint that bad..

thanks for the high 5.


aussie I dont dislike you you irritate me...

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Agnes on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:21pm

Vic wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 4:50pm:

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:19pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:15pm:
Could be worse cods!

Could be BigOl



haha   not for me....bigvic thinks I am the curse of ozpol.. he hates me says I am the worst abuser on the forum...he has said it more than once so I know he means it..


couldnt be plainer than that could he???>>.

I am hoping you dont agree with him..



I do not hate you at all - I don't hate anyone.   Volunteers were called for as GMs - I volunteered.     I figure if there are things about something that you do not like or agree with, then make your position known and if people agree with what you have put forward then so be it..    Having said that, I agree that I have posted that you are one, if not the worst, abuser of people on this board - frankly, it was your constant abuse and denigrating of people that led me to put my name forward. as a GM.  You also would have had an opportunity to nominate as well - I hope you did.

I have been a victim of your abuse and frankly I am not going to take it anymore.    Your constant abuse of people, telling all and sundry that people - because of political persuasion - enjoy people  dying in roofs or being smashed against rocks at Christmas Island is not in keeping with normal community values or thinking.

I have declared to the GMs as part of my submission that I have had issues with you in the past regarding abusive behaviour - you yourself know that because you have been banned because of it.  Therefore, I request you do not try and bait me, nor abuse me further - it won't work.   Should I find you have been abusing me or going outside what is acceptable behaviour on this board towards me, in order to keep impartial - I will take whatever evidence I have with my recommendations to another GM for consideration.



You have a job to do here- but we the posters here will stand up for anyone we feel have been treated unfairly by any mod here. Cods is considered as a valued member here and one that keeps the spirit of Ozpol alive and humming along. That said you will settle into the job and find your feet, wish you well in your endeavour Big Vic.


Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:23pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:14pm:
Dont forget cods there is always the sanatorium for banned forum tragics!

"Rednecks Detainee Centre For OzPol Bans"

Short term memberships available.

Sympathetic ear available

No bad language allowed....... within reason!

http://www.ozpoliticssux.com/forum/index.php



well where did that come from..?? did you start that up red???>.. looks like your work.. ;) ;)

well thats two forums I can go too......good to know..


not sure about the bad language though I forget whats bad and whats not anymore...does that count?.... how many strikes.. before you are cast out?>

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Black Orchid on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:26pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:19pm:

Quote:
... but it had to be said...


No it did not, and you clearly did not carefully read what Big Vic posted. 

Give the bloke a fair go.


Clearly I can read and comprehend just fine and I will say what I please.  I am happy to give anyone a fair go but I don't see this inaugural post as giving Cods, or anyone else, a fair go and I expect more from a GMod.

Mind your own beeswax for once.


Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Redmond Neck on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:28pm

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:23pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:14pm:
Dont forget cods there is always the sanatorium for banned forum tragics!

"Rednecks Detainee Centre For OzPol Bans"

Short term memberships available.

Sympathetic ear available

No bad language allowed....... within reason!

http://www.ozpoliticssux.com/forum/index.php



well where did that come from..?? did you start that up red???>.. looks like your work.. ;) ;)

well thats two forums I can go too......good to know..


not sure about the bad language though I forget whats bad and whats not anymore...does that count?.... how many strikes.. before you are cast out?>


It has no members really cods but gave me something to do during my last banning so thought it might be a service for the banned!

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:31pm

Black Orchid wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:19pm:

Quote:
... but it had to be said...


No it did not, and you clearly did not carefully read what Big Vic posted. 

Give the bloke a fair go.


Clearly I can read and comprehend just fine and I will say what I please.  I am happy to give anyone a fair go but I don't see this inaugural post as giving Cods, or anyone else, a fair go and I expect more from a GMod.

Mind your own beeswax for once.


Classic hypocrisy.  You are allowed your say.....and you would deny me mine. 

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:34pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:28pm:

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:23pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:14pm:
Dont forget cods there is always the sanatorium for banned forum tragics!

"Rednecks Detainee Centre For OzPol Bans"

Short term memberships available.

Sympathetic ear available

No bad language allowed....... within reason!

http://www.ozpoliticssux.com/forum/index.php



well where did that come from..?? did you start that up red???>.. looks like your work.. ;) ;)

well thats two forums I can go too......good to know..


not sure about the bad language though I forget whats bad and whats not anymore...does that count?.... how many strikes.. before you are cast out?>


It has no members really cods but gave me something to do during my last banning so thought it might be a service for the banned!

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D



well expect me soon wont you...lololol

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Agnes on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:34pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:31pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:19pm:

Quote:
... but it had to be said...


No it did not, and you clearly did not carefully read what Big Vic posted. 

Give the bloke a fair go.


Clearly I can read and comprehend just fine and I will say what I please.  I am happy to give anyone a fair go but I don't see this inaugural post as giving Cods, or anyone else, a fair go and I expect more from a GMod.

Mind your own beeswax for once.


Classic hypocrisy.  You are allowed your say.....and you would deny me mine. 

  Stop the bitching both of you..  >:(

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Agnes on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:37pm

Quote:
I have been a victim of your abuse and frankly I am not going to take it anymore.    Your constant abuse of people, telling all and sundry that people - because of political persuasion - enjoy people  dying in roofs or being smashed against rocks at Christmas Island is not in keeping with normal community values or thinking


Big Vic- there are much worse abusers here, I have seen at least 6. Cods has never once offended me.
The coming weeks will be  a test for you and if you OD on the modding- OP will empty. Steady as she goes.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:38pm

Quote:
Stop the bitching both of you..



Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:39pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:19pm:

Quote:
... but it had to be said...


No it did not, and you clearly did not carefully read what Big Vic posted. 

Give the bloke a fair go.



so you dont think BO should stick up for cods.. and say I am not the worst abuser on the forum?



is that what you are saying aussie???>..


Quote:
[quote]Should I find you have been abusing me or going outside what is acceptable behaviour on this board towards me, in order to keep impartial - I will take whatever evidence I have with my recommendations to another GM for consideration.



you dont think I have anything to worry about from a gmod... after that


I take it????.


funny how that doesnt seem like a threat to some...

it does to me... :( :(.


Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Redmond Neck on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:46pm
Perhaps a softly softly catch the monkey approach would be better BigVic

No need to start laying down the law on day one, let people have their say!

You might learn something about yourself, we are not all perfect, myself excepted of course!  ;D ;D ;D

You're not in the military now!








Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Redmond Neck on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:48pm
.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:50pm
[quote]Should I find you have been abusing me or going outside what is acceptable behaviour on this board towards me, in order to keep impartial - I will take whatever evidence I have with my recommendations to another GM for consideration.[/quote]




Quote:
you dont think I have anything to worry about from a gmod... after that


Indeed I do say you need NOT to worry from that Post.  In fact, you ought take considerable confidence.  What he has said is, that if he feels that he has been abused by you, he will take the position of ordinary Member, and refer it, like all ordinary Members do, to another GMod.

That is what he ought do, and that is what he assured you he will do, but, the Sisterhood had to come in wailing and having a go at the Debutante who has barely has time to don his garb for the Ball.

Give the bloke a go, Ladies, and get orf your brooms.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:53pm

Agnes wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:37pm:

Quote:
I have been a victim of your abuse and frankly I am not going to take it anymore.    Your constant abuse of people, telling all and sundry that people - because of political persuasion - enjoy people  dying in roofs or being smashed against rocks at Christmas Island is not in keeping with normal community values or thinking


Big Vic- there are much worse abusers here, I have seen at least 6. Cods has never once offended me.
The coming weeks will be  a test for you and if you OD on the modding- OP will empty. Steady as she goes.





I think about 90% of the members here are lefties... and they insult left right and centre.....yep even personal abuse... ::) ::)

as for the people drowning... and people dying in roof cavities... guess what.. THEY DID I DIDNT MAKE IT UP...and its usually addressed to people who have short memories....try looking at the top name I am replying too and it may make sense.......

what about people who call Libs FILTHY SCUM.... >:(

what about greg who will dance and celebrate a Libs death...... >:(

why is that.. why is it un acceptable  to tell the TRUTH....and remind some about people dying...




of course I know the left do not like being reminded.....about deaths at sea and 4 young men dying in roof tops... but it did happen and it wasnt the Libs fault...


I dont like being called FILTHY SCUM EITHER......but its there in black and white....


Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Redmond Neck on Aug 7th, 2016 at 6:01pm
With all due respect cods I think you notice all the things that the left say but ignore what is said by the right in return.

The left do the same including myself no doubt!

We are each as bad as each other!

Its a bloody forum FFS there is a lot of saying nasty stuff to get back at each other!

Dont take it to heart!

;)

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 6:04pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:50pm:
[quote]Should I find you have been abusing me or going outside what is acceptable behaviour on this board towards me, in order to keep impartial - I will take whatever evidence I have with my recommendations to another GM for consideration.





Quote:
you dont think I have anything to worry about from a gmod... after that


Indeed I do say you need to worry from that Post.  In fact, you ought take considerable confidence.  What he has said is, that if he feels that he has been abused by you, he will take the position of ordinary Member, and refer it, like all ordinary Members do, to another GMod.

That is what he ought do, and that is what he assured you he will do, but, the Sisterhood had to come in wailing and having a go at the Debutante who has barely has time to don his garb for the Ball.

Give the bloke a go, Ladies, and get orf your brooms.[/quote]


thats personal ABUSE aussie your a gonna.....

as for the gmod.. as far as I know aussie I have had one run in with him.....unless he has more than one name....I APOLOGISED>>


what more can I do.. he got me time in the pen as well.. he will never be satisfied....I am telling you now...

if I could be bothered I would go back and find out how many posts he made abusing me... yes abusing me....because thats the way I SEE IT>>

I dont care how you see it.. it doesnt affect you or your time on here.....

you want to take sides.. be my guest... but as you can see by the rest of his post... he condemn me for what I say to other lefties....its not all about him....

and yes I do see that as a threat.,...and from a gmod I have every right not to be happy and to feel uneasy...

when it comes to abuse I find others far far worse but this gentleman has said time and time again I am the worst..


you may be able to ignore if it was you he was calling out.... but I cant,..


Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Agnes on Aug 7th, 2016 at 6:04pm

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:53pm:

Agnes wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:37pm:

Quote:
I have been a victim of your abuse and frankly I am not going to take it anymore.    Your constant abuse of people, telling all and sundry that people - because of political persuasion - enjoy people  dying in roofs or being smashed against rocks at Christmas Island is not in keeping with normal community values or thinking


Big Vic- there are much worse abusers here, I have seen at least 6. Cods has never once offended me.
The coming weeks will be  a test for you and if you OD on the modding- OP will empty. Steady as she goes.





I think about 90% of the members here are lefties... and they insult left right and centre.....yep even personal abuse... ::) ::)

as for the people drowning... and people dying in roof cavities... guess what.. THEY DID I DIDNT MAKE IT UP...and its usually addressed to people who have short memories....try looking at the top name I am replying too and it may make sense.......

what about people who call Libs FILTHY SCUM.... >:(

what about greg who will dance and celebrate a Libs death...... >:(

why is that.. why is it un acceptable  to tell the TRUTH....and remind some about people dying...




of course I know the left do not like being reminded.....about deaths at sea and 4 young men dying in roof tops... but it did happen and it wasnt the Libs fault...


I dont like being called FILTHY SCUM EITHER......but its there in black and white....

  We are all adults here, we dont need a nanny- and most of what you posted also comes under the banner of free speech and we do live in democracy where our voices can and should be heard- I have seen some terrible human rights violations in this place, and not one of these abusers is ever picked up banned or suspended, they are repeat offenders too btw- now lets all calm our farms and have a nice lie down..

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 6:07pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 6:01pm:
With all due respect cods I think you notice all the things that the left say but ignore what is said by the right in return.

The left do the same including myself no doubt!

We are each as bad as each other!

Its a bloody forum FFS there is a lot of saying nasty stuff to get back at each other!

Dont take it to heart!

;)



not so darl.. this is personal attacks to MYSELF>>>.

kat is very very good at it...and greg has told me several times how much he hates Libs....I do read some bad stuff from righties and I have even had a go at them perhaps you have missed that.....but its not up to me to police the boards....as you can see and I have been down this road before and it gets on my nerves why is it alright for people to abuse me.. but should I hit back bang I am gone.......

red I am not sticking up for anyone else here......this is an attack on myself and I find it unfair.........thats all.. sorry if you dont like that.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 6:10pm

Agnes wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 6:04pm:
We are all adults here, we dont need a nanny- and most of what you posted also comes under the banner of free speech and we do live in democracy where our voices can and should be heard- I have seen some terrible human rights violations in this place, and not one of these abusers is ever picked up banned or suspended, they are repeat offenders too btw- now lets all calm our farms and have a nice lie down.



well said agnes... trouble is I dont have any POWER do I...and free speech probably doesnt include me...

I will try and move on but it does get harder.... and I am not sure its worth it..

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Redmond Neck on Aug 7th, 2016 at 6:28pm
You will no doubt take offence to this cods but I am offering it as a bit of advice!

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks"

I do think your aggressive style does draw  a lot of the attacks!

You whinge about Aussie always fighting back and you do exactly the same!

Take it on the chin sometimes is my advice,

It is not all that serious!


Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Black Orchid on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:13pm

Quote:
Well, I am an honest person, so I'll say what I think.  Setanta, while being a good Poster most times, has let himself down on others, and posting male genitalia was one of those times which was a deal breaker (GMod wise) for me.  He is now vulnerable to those I need not name posting similar, and if, as he ought, he acts, they will rightly call hypocrisy.  I have other reasons I'll keep private because I ought, so, Setanta while I'd love to give you the kiss of death with my endorsement, I can't, and you know why.

I also should add that Setanta has helped me out big time on matters only he knows about, and he knows I am grateful for, and hugely appreciative of that.  Without the assistance he willingly gave me, I would have struggled on a project.

I just cannot support this decision, however.  Sorry.


Hypocrisy much?  You never fail to deliver.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Setanta on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:21pm

Black Orchid wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:13pm:

Quote:
Well, I am an honest person, so I'll say what I think.  Setanta, while being a good Poster most times, has let himself down on others, and posting male genitalia was one of those times which was a deal breaker (GMod wise) for me.  He is now vulnerable to those I need not name posting similar, and if, as he ought, he acts, they will rightly call hypocrisy.  I have other reasons I'll keep private because I ought, so, Setanta while I'd love to give you the kiss of death with my endorsement, I can't, and you know why.

I also should add that Setanta has helped me out big time on matters only he knows about, and he knows I am grateful for, and hugely appreciative of that.  Without the assistance he willingly gave me, I would have struggled on a project.

I just cannot support this decision, however.  Sorry.


Hypocrisy much?  You never fail to deliver.


Anyway, I discovered this morning some time around 2am I was a gmod. No I did not put my hat in the ring beyond saying if you get stuck for one I'll consider it. Y'all have to live with it now as do I, I've become a cat herder. ;D

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Setanta on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:35pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:28pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:00pm:
Well, I am an honest person, so I'll say what I think.  Setanta, while being a good Poster most times, has let himself down on others, and posting male genitalia was one of those times which was a deal breaker (GMod wise) for me.  He is now vulnerable to those I need not name posting similar, and if, as he ought, he acts, they will rightly call hypocrisy.  I have other reasons I'll keep private because I ought, so, Setanta while I'd love to give you the kiss of death with my endorsement, I can't, and you know why.

I also should add that Setanta has helped me out big time on matters only he knows about, and he knows I am grateful for, and hugely appreciative of that.  Without the assistance he willingly gave me, I would have struggled on a project.

I just cannot support this decision, however.  Sorry.

:'(


I may have to eat very tough crow about that post.  I'll leave it to Setanta to explain, if he chooses.


You want me to explain the genitals or something else?

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:43pm
You know what I have asked of you.  Tell the Forum.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Black Orchid on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:44pm

Setanta wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:21pm:
Anyway, I discovered this morning some time around 2am I was a gmod. No I did not put my hat in the ring beyond saying if you get stuck for one I'll consider it. Y'all have to live with it now as do I, I've become a cat herder. ;D


I hate to tell you but that is putting your hat in the ring   ;)

I would offer congratulations but I think commiserations are more in order.  You do realise that your every post will now be scrutinised?   ;D

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Agnes on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:45pm
Confused - is Setanta a Gmod or Big Vic..?

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by freediver on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:50pm
Congratulations to the two winners, and thanks to everyone who voted.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Leftwinger on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:52pm
Swore I said congratulations to Sentana and Vic when this thread was in Feedback and now my post has disappeared ??????

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Leftwinger on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:53pm
Sentana can give us 24hr coverage as he always seems to be on  ;)

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:54pm

Agnes wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:45pm:
Confused - is Setanta a Gmod or Big Vic..?


Both.  Big Vic was up front and apart from there being no announcement publicly before he began using the buttons.....all good.

I am hoping Setanta tells us all what his story is.



Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Setanta on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:55pm

Black Orchid wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:44pm:

Setanta wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:21pm:
Anyway, I discovered this morning some time around 2am I was a gmod. No I did not put my hat in the ring beyond saying if you get stuck for one I'll consider it. Y'all have to live with it now as do I, I've become a cat herder. ;D


I hate to tell you but that is putting your hat in the ring   ;)

I would offer congratulations but I think commiserations are more in order.  You do realise that your every post will now be scrutinised?   ;D


It was a "please no!!" ;D

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:01pm

Black Orchid wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:19pm:

Quote:
... but it had to be said...


No it did not, and you clearly did not carefully read what Big Vic posted. 

Give the bloke a fair go.


Clearly I can read and comprehend just fine and I will say what I please.  I am happy to give anyone a fair go but I don't see this inaugural post as giving Cods, or anyone else, a fair go and I expect more from a GMod.

Mind your own beeswax for once.


I won't go massively into the process but BigVic has been open and honest about his prior concerns on some posts.
What he did say and has repeated here is that should he have concerns he would put those to us and then action would be taken/ not taken.
That's the whole point of more than one moderator.
I also have full confidence the two guys who join us are sensible, rational guys who will fit in well.

Bias isn't showed as moderators and it won't be from now either.

Both guys will be super additions who I strongly supported through the process.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:03pm
Rubbish.  When did you know Setanta was actively seeking the job?

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Black Orchid on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:09pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:01pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:19pm:

Quote:
... but it had to be said...


No it did not, and you clearly did not carefully read what Big Vic posted. 

Give the bloke a fair go.


Clearly I can read and comprehend just fine and I will say what I please.  I am happy to give anyone a fair go but I don't see this inaugural post as giving Cods, or anyone else, a fair go and I expect more from a GMod.

Mind your own beeswax for once.


I won't go massively into the process but BigVic has been open and honest about his prior concerns on some posts.
What he did say and has repeated here is that should he have concerns he would put those to us and then action would be taken/ not taken.
That's the whole point of more than one moderator.
I also have full confidence the two guys who join us are sensible, rational guys who will fit in well.

Bias isn't showed as moderators and it won't be from now either.

Both guys will be super additions who I strongly supported through the process.


I have no problem with the person ...  just the post.

With the amount of abuse and trolling that goes on here unhindered, singling Cods out like that on a personal level was not what I think is appropriate for a GMod to make as his first post.

It's all relative but I see it as totally inappropriate.  We obviously all have differing standards.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:17pm

Quote:
what I think is appropriate for a GMod to make as his first post.

It's all relative but I see it as totally inappropriate.


"Why don't you mind you own beezwax?'

Be fair, Black Orchid.....cods made several posts about her fear of being victimised by Big Vic, and I reckon his response was necessary and appropriate, even though I (and even you) may have worded it differently.

Jaybuz, who'd want to be appointed GMod here.  I will never even consider it for two reasons.  (a) All the vested interests come out and are critical, and (b) It would totally stuff your ability to post away as a Member.

Come on Setanta, tell the Forum the facts.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Setanta on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:22pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:54pm:

Agnes wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:45pm:
Confused - is Setanta a Gmod or Big Vic..?


Both.  Big Vic was up front and apart from there being no announcement publicly before he began using the buttons.....all good.

I am hoping Setanta tells us all what his story is.


I've told you in PM about 4 times now Aussie, one of which I said go ahead and use it in the forum.

Here again for you. When users were asked to nominate themselves, I did not. I had private communications and expressed that I didn't think it was a job for me and offered a couple of people I thought may suit. I did say that if they couldn't find someone else, and were stuck, I'd give it a go. FD decided to draft me, that's the story.

What more do you want me to say?

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:31pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:01pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:19pm:

Quote:
... but it had to be said...


No it did not, and you clearly did not carefully read what Big Vic posted. 

Give the bloke a fair go.


Clearly I can read and comprehend just fine and I will say what I please.  I am happy to give anyone a fair go but I don't see this inaugural post as giving Cods, or anyone else, a fair go and I expect more from a GMod.

Mind your own beeswax for once.


I won't go massively into the process but BigVic has been open and honest about his prior concerns on some posts.
What he did say and has repeated here is that should he have concerns he would put those to us and then action would be taken/ not taken.
That's the whole point of more than one moderator.
I also have full confidence the two guys who join us are sensible, rational guys who will fit in well.

Bias isn't showed as moderators and it won't be from now either.

Both guys will be super additions who I strongly supported through the process.

::) ::) ::)

you have banned me a couple of times andrei.. I have asked why at those times because neither I nor anyone else on the forum could figure it out..
'
you never did tell me   although I have been assured it is my right...

so its hard for me to believe there is no such thing as bias on here.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:32pm

freediver wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:50pm:
Congratulations to the two winners, and thanks to everyone who voted.




;D ;D ;D ;D ;D must have beena record... :)

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:33pm

Quote:
one of which I said go ahead and use it in the forum.



Nah.  Check back and read your PMs.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Setanta on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:40pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:33pm:

Quote:
one of which I said go ahead and use it in the forum.



Nah.  Check back and read your PMs.


I must have killed it but I'll post my own parts of my PMs to you so all can see it's been fully explained.


Quote:
It's not up to me who is worthy Aussie. I had no hand in the decision. Sure I could quit, that does not mean it will be given to those who nominated themselves. I am now privy to the discussion thread but was not before today. You want me to breach that confidentiality? I won't.

Would you like me not to be GMod? Perhaps X or X that I put forward when they approached me. FD for reasons I can read now, chose for some reason to make me a mod.  I didn't nominate myself and I'd be happy not to be and getting these PMs asking me to justify myself and others decisions and I have only excercised my powers in a mistake modification of one of Sprints posts. You have the truth, I've told you how it went down, live with it.



Quote:
If you think I put my name forward when they asked, I assure you I did not. They contacted me at the beginning of last month and asked, I said nah, not really, but I suppose if you get really stuck I'll consider it.  I had heard no more until I was not a mod one sec and a mod the next with extra buttons that I have to be extremely careful about.

Either way you want to take it, that's about how it happened.


Is that out in the open enough for you?

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by cods on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:47pm

Its time wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:52pm:
Swore I said congratulations to Sentana and Vic when this thread was in Feedback and now my post has disappeared ??????



thats nothing a WHOLE THREAD HAS NOW GONE>.

with no explanation...

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Rhino on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:51pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:01pm:
[
Bias isn't showed as moderators 

you are a funny guy.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Secret Wars on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:52pm
Today's not so brain teaser.

Aussie to discussion of moderation is like a blowfly to ....?

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 7th, 2016 at 11:01pm
Yeas, that is almost enough.  You do not want the job....you are aware that others (credible) did......and you are the Bradbury/default position.  I'd be handing Teddy back quick smart, as soon as I was made aware of that fact, as you have been.  If you truly do not want the job, that is.  Why accept a job you do not want, one which puts your enjoyment here under fetter, when there are others who actually want the job.  You are accepting you are the bottom of the barrel, yes that is the way it looks to me, and if I were any of the other Nominees who have not been treated as being even in the barrell, I'd be a tad shabby about my Membership here.

They are forgiven for saying....'I'm not good enough, not even worthy than some schmuck who does not want the job.'

My position would be 100% in the opposite direction if you had not posted in open, and sent to me via PM what you did over the last many days.

Over to you, Blue Leader.

:-[

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Agnes on Aug 7th, 2016 at 11:03pm

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:47pm:

Its time wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:52pm:
Swore I said congratulations to Sentana and Vic when this thread was in Feedback and now my post has disappeared ??????



thats nothing a WHOLE THREAD HAS NOW GONE>.

with no explanation...

  Yes the one I started cods.. a test glitch or something- but all gone..

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Setanta on Aug 7th, 2016 at 11:06pm
[quote author=Aussie link=1469795339/94#94 date=1470574890]Yeas, that is almost enough.  You do not want the job....you are aware that others (credible) did......and you are the Bradbury/default position.  I'd be handing Teddy back quick smart, as soon as I was made aware of that fact, as you have been.  If you truly do not want the job, that is.  Why accept a job you do not want, one which puts your enjoyment here under fetter, when there are others who actually want the job.  You are accepting you are the bottom of the barrel, yes that is the way it looks to me, and if I were any of the other Nominees who have not been treated as being even in the barrell, I'd be a tad shabby about my Membership here.

They are forgiven for saying....'I'm not good enough, not even worthy than some schmuck who does not want the job.'

My position would be 100% in the opposite direction if you had not posted in open, and sent to me via PM what you did over the last many days.

Over to you, Blue Leader.

:-[/quote]

Don't put words in my mouth Aussie. Yeas looking after you lot is like herding cats, no-one in their right mind would want to do it. As for the default position, you're not skinning my nose, it's a vote of confidence, one that must have been PMed to the GMods from other users or I would not be a mod. Give it a rest please Aussie and see how things pan out.

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Agnes on Aug 7th, 2016 at 11:32pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:01pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 5:19pm:

Quote:
... but it had to be said...


No it did not, and you clearly did not carefully read what Big Vic posted. 

Give the bloke a fair go.


Clearly I can read and comprehend just fine and I will say what I please.  I am happy to give anyone a fair go but I don't see this inaugural post as giving Cods, or anyone else, a fair go and I expect more from a GMod.

Mind your own beeswax for once.


I won't go massively into the process but BigVic has been open and honest about his prior concerns on some posts.
What he did say and has repeated here is that should he have concerns he would put those to us and then action would be taken/ not taken.
That's the whole point of more than one moderator.
I also have full confidence the two guys who join us are sensible, rational guys who will fit in well.

Bias isn't showed as moderators and it won't be from now either.

Both guys will be super additions who I strongly supported through the process.

  Is that funny in the same way "ordacity" was funny I wonder?  ::)

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:05am

Quote:
Don't put words in my mouth Aussie.


I have not put any words in your mouth.


Quote:
Yeas looking after you lot is like herding cats, no-one in their right mind would want to do it.


::)






Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Setanta on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:11am

Aussie wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:05am:

Quote:
Don't put words in my mouth Aussie.


I have not put any words in your mouth.

[quote]Yeas looking after you lot is like herding cats, no-one in their right mind would want to do it.


::)

[/quote]

Which might explain your fixation on it. Let it go.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:14am
Well I'm glad that's all cleared up.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Setanta on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:16am

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:14am:
Well I'm glad that's all cleared up.


Don't you start! ;D

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:22am

Setanta wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:11am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:05am:

Quote:
Don't put words in my mouth Aussie.


I have not put any words in your mouth.

[quote]Yeas looking after you lot is like herding cats, no-one in their right mind would want to do it.


::)


Which might explain your fixation on it. Let it go.
[/quote]

No, I did not accept a job I did not seek or want, and by some sort of weird gymnastics, then somehow try to retain credibility,  claim a 'mandate' or 'confidence' and then accept it, and at the same time, kick sand in the face of those who did.

Nah.

/end.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Setanta on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:26am

Aussie wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:22am:

Setanta wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:11am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:05am:

Quote:
Don't put words in my mouth Aussie.


I have not put any words in your mouth.

[quote]Yeas looking after you lot is like herding cats, no-one in their right mind would want to do it.


::)


Which might explain your fixation on it. Let it go.


No, I did not accept a job I did not seek or want, and by some sort of weird gymnastics, then somehow try to retain credibility,  claim a 'mandate' or 'confidence' and then accept it, and at the same time, kick sand in the face of those who did.

Nah.

/end.
[/quote]

Well I guess I'll just have to accept you're a better man than me Gunga Din. ;) Ask your peers perhaps. I'll just see how things work out.


Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:30am
No, I am not a better man than you at all, and seeking to lampoon me is pretty silly.  As for my 'peers,' I have quite a few as most people do.  You are not above yours, are you?

/End.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Setanta on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:37am

Aussie wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:30am:
No, I am not a better man than you at all, and seeking to lampoon me is pretty silly.  As for my 'peers,' I have quite a few as most people do.  You are not above yours, are you?

/End.


If we could have a valid vote on me as a mod, I'd be fine with it. I don't have the investment in this you do Ausssie. I was given mod, I'll learn and do the best I can. If the powers that be want to replace me, please do. I've had more messages in the last day day than I've had in a year.

I'm not even sure why you are crying about it. :-/

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 8th, 2016 at 1:14am
I have zero investment. You clearly do.  Ego.  I am not crying, (I have no doubt you'll do good job.  That is not the point.  You are, on your own admission, a default appointment.....and I have explained what message that ought send to you and others who did nominate for the job, and for whom you seem to have no respect whatsoever) and I'll bet most if not all of those messages were from me, and Mr Hicks.

What part of /end are you having trouble with?  I want to disengage, yet you feel some need to come back for another dose of my disagreement  about this appointment at both ends.  Let it go, Setanta. 

(Damn Ch 7 and the Olympic Games.   I'll be looking for any dog house soon.)

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Setanta on Aug 8th, 2016 at 1:54am

Aussie wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 1:14am:
I have zero investment. You clearly do.  Ego.  I am not crying, (I have no doubt you'll do good job.  That is not the point.  You are, on your own admission, a default appointment.....and I have explained what message that ought send to you and others who did nominate for the job, and for whom you seem to have no respect whatsoever) and I'll bet most if not all of those messages were from me, and Mr Hicks.

What part of /end are you having trouble with?  I want to disengage, yet you feel some need to come back for another dose of my disagreement  about this appointment at both ends.  Let it go, Setanta. 

(Damn Ch 7 and the Olympic Games.   I'll be looking for any dog house soon.)


Don't lose it cobber. I'm just a mod. If you get a groundswell of support to have me removed for whatever, do it. No, it's not a job I asked for but I will do what I think I am supposed to do.

Edit: A graphite rod up your arse might stop the melt down.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Emma Peel on Aug 8th, 2016 at 2:19am
Not "on" here much lately, so was unaware of the CALL for new mods.

I am happy for Setanta to fill that role as I have always found him to be a reasonable person. As for Big Vic, that is OK too, as I don't have much to do with this forum anymore.
I get sick of being the target of men who hate women who have their own lives and opinions. Very tiresome, but I didn't complain and NO MOD did anything about it.

So Setanta and Big Vic.. a question for you both.

IF a person is being trolled and abused re their views and gender and age, does that person HAVE TO COMPLAIN.?

Do the Mods only pay attention to the "squeaky wheels"?"

Personally I really don't get bothered by the abuse, it means nothing except to expose the abusers for the turds they are  ...... I just find it difficult to continue posting when all I get is ridiculous comments from some posters in reply.  It gets boring and takes away any credibility the topic may have had at the start.  It degrades the forum into an opportunity to abuse people, sadly.

So??  Must I complain  about this before the Mods notice?.

I have asked FD to respond to me on one topic, on the record, but was ignored. Should I have PM 'd him about his failure to respond.? When I wanted it on the record for all who bothered ,  to see.?

Wouldn't mind a reply from someone.  :)
 

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Setanta on Aug 8th, 2016 at 2:26am

Emma wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 2:19am:
Not "on" here much lately, so was unaware of the CALL for new mods.

I am happy for Setanta to fill that role as I have always found him to be a reasonable person. As for Big Vic, that is OK too, as I don't have much to do with this forum anymore.
I get sick of being the target of men who hate women who have their own lives and opinions. Very tiresome, but I didn't complain and NO MOD did anything about it.

So Setanta and Big Vic.. a question for you both.

IF a person is being trolled and abused re their views and gender and age, does that person HAVE TO COMPLAIN.?

Do the Mods only pay attention to the "squeaky wheels"?"

Personally I really don't get bothered by the abuse, it means nothing except to expose the abusers for the turds they are  ...... I just find it difficult to continue posting when all I get is ridiculous comments from some posters in reply.  It gets boring and takes away any credibility the topic may have had at the start.  It degrades the forum into an opportunity to abuse people, sadly.

So??  Must I complain  about this before the Mods notice?.

I have asked FD to respond to me on one topic, on the record, but was ignored. Should I have PM 'd him about his failure to respond.? When I wanted it on the record for all who bothered ,  to see.?

Wouldn't mind a reply from someone.  :)
 


For me, at this stage, yes. Unfortunately I read no-where near every thread. I doubt any of us could, it'd be a full time job.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Emma Peel on Aug 8th, 2016 at 2:40am
Thanks for your reply Setanta. I can understand that there are many many posts, and it would be impossible to cover them all.

As I said, I am not really bothered by these posters, who shall remain nameless , for now.  :)

I do wonder tho, whether my penchant for renaming some of them to amuse myself, and maybe have a dig, is considered abuse.
I'll give you an example   :)

A goodie IMHO,  Aquascoot .. I call him Cootie, now, after much to-ing and fro-ing. :)

Or 
Panther..  whom I have just started calling pussy. 

I think its amusing ... what do you think? :)


Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Emma Peel on Aug 8th, 2016 at 2:54am
Guess its just us 3 on now. The bloody Olympics..!!  :)

Cheers fellas.

I'm waiting for the equestrians to come back on.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by cods on Aug 8th, 2016 at 6:41am

Emma wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 2:40am:
Thanks for your reply Setanta. I can understand that there are many many posts, and it would be impossible to cover them all.

As I said, I am not really bothered by these posters, who shall remain nameless , for now.  :)

I do wonder tho, whether my penchant for renaming some of them to amuse myself, and maybe have a dig, is considered abuse.
I'll give you an example   :)

A goodie IMHO,  Aquascoot .. I call him Cootie, now, after much to-ing and fro-ing. :)

Or 
Panther..  whom I have just started calling pussy. 

I think its amusing ... what do you think? :)



well of course I have no clout here emma.. and being female I guess neither have you...however I do believe calling anyone other than their id is insulting in some folks eyes....it will depend on the person you chose to do that too I do think giving someone a silly name is a little childish if one want to be taken  serious on this forum...thats just me...I am sure the mods will find nothing wrong with it unless they get a complaint...

its when the gmods start to abuse you that you need to worry emma....

other than that just give back what you get.....and hope the mods take into account exactly why you said what you said..   after all it takes two to tango...and I am almost sure that isnt always the case.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Neferti on Aug 8th, 2016 at 6:58am

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 8:36pm:
My apologies for the delayed change announcement.
With the time difference and it being the start of the football season yesterday I was not on.

The Moderator pool has been increased to include -

BigVic
Setanta

Both excellent and capable candidates for my mind.

Many thanks.


Just in case certain people who have said that there was no announcement ..... here it is.  ;)

CONGRATULATIONS TO BOTH THE NEW GMODS.  8-)

PS It appears that the thread in Feedback and the one here have been combined.  ;D

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Redmond Neck on Aug 8th, 2016 at 8:26am
Anyway moving right along, congrats to both BigVic and Setanta.

BTW lads where do I send my anti-ban  bribe money?  ;D

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by AiA on Aug 8th, 2016 at 8:49am
I'll say it again:  Setanta will be a fine mod because he does not take himself nor this board too seriously and he has a sense of humour.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Aug 8th, 2016 at 8:51am

Redmond Neck wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 8:26am:
Anyway moving right along, congrats to both BigVic and Setanta.

BTW lads where do I send my anti-ban  bribe money?  ;D



Thanks Red!

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by AiA on Aug 8th, 2016 at 8:54am
Never have had a single interaction with BigVic so I cannot comment :)

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:00am

Emma wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 2:19am:
Not "on" here much lately, so was unaware of the CALL for new mods.

I am happy for Setanta to fill that role as I have always found him to be a reasonable person. As for Big Vic, that is OK too, as I don't have much to do with this forum anymore.
I get sick of being the target of men who hate women who have their own lives and opinions. Very tiresome, but I didn't complain and NO MOD did anything about it.

So Setanta and Big Vic.. a question for you both.

IF a person is being trolled and abused re their views and gender and age, does that person HAVE TO COMPLAIN.?

Do the Mods only pay attention to the "squeaky wheels"?"

Personally I really don't get bothered by the abuse, it means nothing except to expose the abusers for the turds they are  ...... I just find it difficult to continue posting when all I get is ridiculous comments from some posters in reply.  It gets boring and takes away any credibility the topic may have had at the start.  It degrades the forum into an opportunity to abuse people, sadly.

So??  Must I complain  about this before the Mods notice?.

I have asked FD to respond to me on one topic, on the record, but was ignored. Should I have PM 'd him about his failure to respond.? When I wanted it on the record for all who bothered ,  to see.?

Wouldn't mind a reply from someone.  :)
 


Hi Emma - for me - I am on here a fair bit as I am now retired after a few decades in the RAN.   I enjoy these boards but as stated before, I may not get the chance to view the total postings each day.  I have now 4 grandchildren to keep amused and, as we look after two each day whilst Mum works, I may find my time on here limited!    After 30 years I am now coming to grips with bottles and nappies again - I think sometimes I would rather be back in Darwin!

As for your main question, trolling and abuse seem to be the realm of only a few on here - but I agree it can be onerous and unenjoyable.    From my perspective I can only do what I see - so please advise if you wish

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by skippy. on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:11am
  Congratulations to both new mods. BOTH of you will do a fine job.
The fact ozzzzz is pissed off he can not manipulate his preferred  choice is enough for me to know the right decision was made. 8-)
How about everyone just give these two a fair go and see how they go? I screached that Andrei was a poor choice when he was made a G mod and I think I was proven wrong. Think of it this way ozzzzzz, it could have been worse, FD could have appointed me. 8-)

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lord Herbert on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:18am

Emma wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 2:19am:
Not "on" here much lately, so was unaware of the CALL for new mods.

I am happy for Setanta to fill that role as I have always found him to be a reasonable person. As for Big Vic, that is OK too, as I don't have much to do with this forum anymore.
I get sick of being the target of men who hate women who have their own lives and opinions. Very tiresome, but I didn't complain and NO MOD did anything about it.

So Setanta and Big Vic.. a question for you both.

IF a person is being trolled and abused re their views and gender and age, does that person HAVE TO COMPLAIN.?

Do the Mods only pay attention to the "squeaky wheels"?"

Personally I really don't get bothered by the abuse, it means nothing except to expose the abusers for the turds they are  ...... I just find it difficult to continue posting when all I get is ridiculous comments from some posters in reply.  It gets boring and takes away any credibility the topic may have had at the start.  It degrades the forum into an opportunity to abuse people, sadly.

So??  Must I complain  about this before the Mods notice?.

I have asked FD to respond to me on one topic, on the record, but was ignored. Should I have PM 'd him about his failure to respond.? When I wanted it on the record for all who bothered ,  to see.?

Wouldn't mind a reply from someone.  :)
 



Good post, Emma.  :)

And may I also add my congratulations to Setanta and BigVic for their elevation to the Pantheon of the Gods?

Worthy choices in my opinion.


Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lord Herbert on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:21am

Emma wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 2:40am:
Thanks for your reply Setanta. I can understand that there are many many posts, and it would be impossible to cover them all.

As I said, I am not really bothered by these posters, who shall remain nameless , for now.  :)

I do wonder tho, whether my penchant for renaming some of them to amuse myself, and maybe have a dig, is considered abuse.
I'll give you an example   :)

A goodie IMHO,  Aquascoot .. I call him Cootie, now, after much to-ing and fro-ing. :)

Or 
Panther..  whom I have just started calling pussy. 

I think its amusing ... what do you think? :)


Sorry, but these contravene 18c of the Sh!t-stirring Act.  :)

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by John Smith on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:25am
well hasn't this gotten off to a grand start

;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by skippy. on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:28am

John Smith wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:25am:
well hasn't this gotten off to a grand start

;D ;D ;D ;D

It always ends in tears if ozzzzz doesn't get his way.
The man must have shares in Kleenex.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by John Smith on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:33am
ohh, and if I can add one thing for Vic and setanta


can you let posters know why they are banned. I think it's the least a mod should do if they are going to ban someone.

It's ridiculous this shroud of secrecy that fd imposes on why people have been banned. Sometimes 'viewing your last 10 posts' just doesn't cut it.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lord Herbert on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:35am

John Smith wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:33am:
ohh, and if I can add one thing for Vic and setanta


can you let posters know why they are banned. I think it's the least a mod should do if they are going to ban someone.

It's ridiculous this shroud of secrecy that fd imposes on why people have been banned. Sometimes 'viewing your last 10 posts' just doesn't cut it.


Quite so.

And PLEASE stop using the term 'banned' for 'suspended'.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by John Smith on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:43am
ohh and ban Herb as often as you like .... just for kicks  ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:46am

Setanta wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:21pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 9:13pm:

Quote:
Well, I am an honest person, so I'll say what I think.  Setanta, while being a good Poster most times, has let himself down on others, and posting male genitalia was one of those times which was a deal breaker (GMod wise) for me.  He is now vulnerable to those I need not name posting similar, and if, as he ought, he acts, they will rightly call hypocrisy.  I have other reasons I'll keep private because I ought, so, Setanta while I'd love to give you the kiss of death with my endorsement, I can't, and you know why.

I also should add that Setanta has helped me out big time on matters only he knows about, and he knows I am grateful for, and hugely appreciative of that.  Without the assistance he willingly gave me, I would have struggled on a project.

I just cannot support this decision, however.  Sorry.


Hypocrisy much?  You never fail to deliver.


Anyway, I discovered this morning some time around 2am I was a gmod. No I did not put my hat in the ring beyond saying if you get stuck for one I'll consider it. Y'all have to live with it now as do I, I've become a cat herder. ;D


Setanta will be ok IMO (even though I think he's a tad weird).

:)

As for Aussie's comments .. □ <------ here's a small tissue ::)




Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:56am

Setanta wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:40pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 10:33pm:

Quote:
one of which I said go ahead and use it in the forum.



Nah.  Check back and read your PMs.


I must have killed it but I'll post my own parts of my PMs to you so all can see it's been fully explained.

[quote]It's not up to me who is worthy Aussie. I had no hand in the decision. Sure I could quit, that does not mean it will be given to those who nominated themselves. I am now privy to the discussion thread but was not before today. You want me to breach that confidentiality? I won't.

Would you like me not to be GMod? Perhaps X or X that I put forward when they approached me. FD for reasons I can read now, chose for some reason to make me a mod.  I didn't nominate myself and I'd be happy not to be and getting these PMs asking me to justify myself and others decisions and I have only excercised my powers in a mistake modification of one of Sprints posts. You have the truth, I've told you how it went down, live with it.



Quote:
If you think I put my name forward when they asked, I assure you I did not. They contacted me at the beginning of last month and asked, I said nah, not really, but I suppose if you get really stuck I'll consider it.  I had heard no more until I was not a mod one sec and a mod the next with extra buttons that I have to be extremely careful about.

Either way you want to take it, that's about how it happened.


Is that out in the open enough for you?
[/quote]

Christ...what's this nonsense all about?

If I were you Setanta, I would have just told him to bugger off.

It's what I always do if/when Aussie crosses the line.

And it works quite well too.

Oh and Aussie...here's another small tissue for you ----> □



Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Kat on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:58am

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 6:07pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 6:01pm:
With all due respect cods I think you notice all the things that the left say but ignore what is said by the right in return.

The left do the same including myself no doubt!

We are each as bad as each other!

Its a bloody forum FFS there is a lot of saying nasty stuff to get back at each other!

Dont take it to heart!

;)



not so darl.. this is personal attacks to MYSELF>>>.

kat is very very good at it...and greg has told me several times how much he hates Libs....I do read some bad stuff from righties and I have even had a go at them perhaps you have missed that.....but its not up to me to police the boards....as you can see and I have been down this road before and it gets on my nerves why is it alright for people to abuse me.. but should I hit back bang I am gone.......

red I am not sticking up for anyone else here......this is an attack on myself and I find it unfair.........thats all.. sorry if you dont like that.


Kat gives what Kat gets.

No more, no less.

And you've known that since the old Yahoo days.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lord Herbert on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:03am

John Smith wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:43am:
ohh and ban Herb as often as you like .... just for kicks  ;D ;D ;D


vaffanculo stupido!

>:(

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Black Orchid on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:03am
Let's hear it for the new Mods.  Hip hip hooray.   




Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:04am

Vic wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 4:50pm:

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:19pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:15pm:
Could be worse cods!

Could be BigOl



haha   not for me....bigvic thinks I am the curse of ozpol.. he hates me says I am the worst abuser on the forum...he has said it more than once so I know he means it..


couldnt be plainer than that could he???>>.

I am hoping you dont agree with him..



I do not hate you at all - I don't hate anyone.   Volunteers were called for as GMs - I volunteered.     I figure if there are things about something that you do not like or agree with, then make your position known and if people agree with what you have put forward then so be it..   

Having said that, I agree that I have posted that you are one, if not the worst, abuser of people on this board - frankly, it was your constant abuse and denigrating of people that led me to put my name forward. as a GM.  You also would have had an opportunity to nominate as well - I hope you did.

I have been a victim of your abuse and frankly I am not going to take it anymore.  Your constant abuse of people, telling all and sundry that people - because of political persuasion - enjoy people  dying in roofs or being smashed against rocks at Christmas Island is not in keeping with normal community values or thinking.


I have declared to the GMs as part of my submission that I have had issues with you in the past regarding abusive behaviour - you yourself know that because you have been banned because of it. 

Therefore, I request you do not try and bait me, nor abuse me further - it won't work.   Should I find you have been abusing me or going outside what is acceptable behaviour on this board towards me , in order to keep impartial- I will take whatever evidence I have with my recommendations to another GM for consideration.


I can't believe how you used this post to target and threaten Cods.

All it has achieved is expose just how unhinged you are.

Being a GM is not about getting power/control to threaten those you don't like/don't get on with. But you don't get that.

And next time you read your posts, proof read them against the standard of IRONY AND HYPOCRISY before pressing that enter key.

Got that?

Just so you know, your own targeted trolling and abuse of certain members will also be monitored and reported to FD.

At all times.

:)

PS I have reported your disgusting post to FD!

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by it_is_the_light on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:04am
many blessings ,

even though I voted for cods ..

congrats to setanta and big vic ..!



namaste

- : ) =




Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by cods on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:11am

Kat wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:58am:

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 6:07pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 6:01pm:
With all due respect cods I think you notice all the things that the left say but ignore what is said by the right in return.

The left do the same including myself no doubt!

We are each as bad as each other!

Its a bloody forum FFS there is a lot of saying nasty stuff to get back at each other!

Dont take it to heart!

;)



not so darl.. this is personal attacks to MYSELF>>>.

kat is very very good at it...and greg has told me several times how much he hates Libs....I do read some bad stuff from righties and I have even had a go at them perhaps you have missed that.....but its not up to me to police the boards....as you can see and I have been down this road before and it gets on my nerves why is it alright for people to abuse me.. but should I hit back bang I am gone.......

red I am not sticking up for anyone else here......this is an attack on myself and I find it unfair.........thats all.. sorry if you dont like that.


Kat gives what Kat gets.

No more, no less.

And you've known that since the old Yahoo days.



I dont think I have ever heard anyone call you FILTHY SCUM....nope not even on yahoo...and you are still abusing people for daring to like someone you dont...

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by cods on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:13am

it_is_the_light wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:04am:
many blessings ,

even though I voted for cods ..

congrats to setanta and big vic ..!



namaste

- : ) =



dont Lie Mr Light.. you will get a pimple on your tongue....you are lucky you were invited to vote.. I wasnt....so for sure I would nominate......only the chosen ones were invited..

do you know who put themselves forward..

it could even be on this thread.......all I know is I didnt.. :D :D :D

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by cods on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:14am

Black Orchid wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:03am:
Let's hear it for the new Mods.  Hip hip hooray.   




nah... thanks all the same.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:25am

cods wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:14am:

Black Orchid wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:03am:
Let's hear it for the new Mods.  Hip hip hooray.   




nah... thanks all the same.


I'm pretty sure BO was kidding Cods.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:27am

skippy. wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:28am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:25am:
well hasn't this gotten off to a grand start

;D ;D ;D ;D

It always ends in tears if ozzzzz doesn't get his way.
The man must have shares in Kleenex.


I've given our cabbie a few tissues in this topic already  ;D

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:28am

Setanta wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:37am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:30am:
No, I am not a better man than you at all, and seeking to lampoon me is pretty silly.  As for my 'peers,' I have quite a few as most people do.  You are not above yours, are you?

/End.


If we could have a valid vote on me as a mod, I'd be fine with it. I don't have the investment in this you do Ausssie. I was given mod, I'll learn and do the best I can. If the powers that be want to replace me, please do. I've had more messages in the last day day than I've had in a year.

I'm not even sure why you are crying about it. :-/


Oh duh!

He's jealous lol. :P

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by cods on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:30am

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:25am:

cods wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:14am:

Black Orchid wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:03am:
Let's hear it for the new Mods.  Hip hip hooray.   




nah... thanks all the same.


I'm pretty sure BO was kidding Cods.



are you suggesting she didnt bake that cake??????....its got made by BO written all over it.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Fireball on Aug 8th, 2016 at 11:57am
Such consternation about a time wasting little role which some members (aussie for one) consider a great way to inflate their already bulbous egos.

Get a bloody life!

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:19pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:04am:

Vic wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 4:50pm:

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:19pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:15pm:
Could be worse cods!

Could be BigOl



haha   not for me....bigvic thinks I am the curse of ozpol.. he hates me says I am the worst abuser on the forum...he has said it more than once so I know he means it..


couldnt be plainer than that could he???>>.

I am hoping you dont agree with him..



I do not hate you at all - I don't hate anyone.   Volunteers were called for as GMs - I volunteered.     I figure if there are things about something that you do not like or agree with, then make your position known and if people agree with what you have put forward then so be it..   

Having said that, I agree that I have posted that you are one, if not the worst, abuser of people on this board - frankly, it was your constant abuse and denigrating of people that led me to put my name forward. as a GM.  You also would have had an opportunity to nominate as well - I hope you did.

I have been a victim of your abuse and frankly I am not going to take it anymore.  Your constant abuse of people, telling all and sundry that people - because of political persuasion - enjoy people  dying in roofs or being smashed against rocks at Christmas Island is not in keeping with normal community values or thinking.


I have declared to the GMs as part of my submission that I have had issues with you in the past regarding abusive behaviour - you yourself know that because you have been banned because of it. 

Therefore, I request you do not try and bait me, nor abuse me further - it won't work.   Should I find you have been abusing me or going outside what is acceptable behaviour on this board towards me , in order to keep impartial- I will take whatever evidence I have with my recommendations to another GM for consideration.


I can't believe how you used this post to target and threaten Cods.

All it has achieved is expose just how unhinged you are.

Being a GM is not about getting power/control to threaten those you don't like/don't get on with. But you don't get that.

And next time you read your posts, proof read them against the standard of IRONY AND HYPOCRISY before pressing that enter key.

Got that?

Just so you know, your own targeted trolling and abuse of certain members will also be monitored and reported to FD.

At all times.

:)

PS I have reported your disgusting post to FD!



Thankyou LGLFH, I will take your well thought out comments on board. I am sure there is a need for them - somewhere

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:23pm

Vic wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:19pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:04am:

Vic wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 4:50pm:

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:19pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:15pm:
Could be worse cods!

Could be BigOl



haha   not for me....bigvic thinks I am the curse of ozpol.. he hates me says I am the worst abuser on the forum...he has said it more than once so I know he means it..


couldnt be plainer than that could he???>>.

I am hoping you dont agree with him..



I do not hate you at all - I don't hate anyone.   Volunteers were called for as GMs - I volunteered.     I figure if there are things about something that you do not like or agree with, then make your position known and if people agree with what you have put forward then so be it..   

Having said that, I agree that I have posted that you are one, if not the worst, abuser of people on this board - frankly, it was your constant abuse and denigrating of people that led me to put my name forward. as a GM.  You also would have had an opportunity to nominate as well - I hope you did.

I have been a victim of your abuse and frankly I am not going to take it anymore.  Your constant abuse of people, telling all and sundry that people - because of political persuasion - enjoy people  dying in roofs or being smashed against rocks at Christmas Island is not in keeping with normal community values or thinking.


I have declared to the GMs as part of my submission that I have had issues with you in the past regarding abusive behaviour - you yourself know that because you have been banned because of it. 

Therefore, I request you do not try and bait me, nor abuse me further - it won't work.   Should I find you have been abusing me or going outside what is acceptable behaviour on this board towards me , in order to keep impartial- I will take whatever evidence I have with my recommendations to another GM for consideration.


I can't believe how you used this post to target and threaten Cods.

All it has achieved is expose just how unhinged you are.

Being a GM is not about getting power/control to threaten those you don't like/don't get on with. But you don't get that.

And next time you read your posts, proof read them against the standard of IRONY AND HYPOCRISY before pressing that enter key.

Got that?

Just so you know, your own targeted trolling and abuse of certain members will also be monitored and reported to FD.

At all times.

:)

PS I have reported your disgusting post to FD!



Thankyou LGLFH, I will take your well thought out comments on board. I am sure there is a need for them - somewhere


Who/what is LGLFH?

Anyone know?



Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:28pm
Day 1 on the job and already you're abusing your "power" by CONTINUING to target, threaten and bait members.

Absolutely disgusting!

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:31pm

Quote:
Who/what is LGLFH?


Very probably ~ "lovely Greek Lady from Hurstville."


Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by John Smith on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:43pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:03am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:43am:
ohh and ban Herb as often as you like .... just for kicks  ;D ;D ;D


vaffanculo stupido!

>:(


mods !!!! Banning offense here.

He's trying to proposition me

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:46pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:43pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:03am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:43am:
ohh and ban Herb as often as you like .... just for kicks  ;D ;D ;D


vaffanculo stupido!

>:(


mods !!!! Banning offense here.

He's trying to proposition me



Then lie back and think of England old chap. 

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by John Smith on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:47pm

Vic wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:46pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:43pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:03am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 9:43am:
ohh and ban Herb as often as you like .... just for kicks  ;D ;D ;D


vaffanculo stupido!

>:(


mods !!!! Banning offense here.

He's trying to proposition me



Then lie back and think of England old chap. 


I'm a giver not a taker .... now if herb lies back I may just forgive him him indiscretion  :D :D

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by cods on Aug 8th, 2016 at 2:25pm

Fuzzball wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 11:57am:
Such consternation about a time wasting little role which some members (aussie for one) consider a great way to inflate their already bulbous egos.

Get a bloody life!

;D ;D ;D ;D

it pays well I believe...some folks will do anything for money. ::) ::)

and as has been pointed out a lot of disorderly rabble on here....fd has no taste he just lets anyone in..

and now he needs to bring in the rangers..... so he can go fishing...

Title: Re: Has been announced in Feedback that Big Vic
Post by Leftwinger on Aug 8th, 2016 at 8:16pm

Vic wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:19pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:04am:

Vic wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 4:50pm:

cods wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:19pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Aug 7th, 2016 at 3:15pm:
Could be worse cods!

Could be BigOl



haha   not for me....bigvic thinks I am the curse of ozpol.. he hates me says I am the worst abuser on the forum...he has said it more than once so I know he means it..


couldnt be plainer than that could he???>>.

I am hoping you dont agree with him..



I do not hate you at all - I don't hate anyone.   Volunteers were called for as GMs - I volunteered.     I figure if there are things about something that you do not like or agree with, then make your position known and if people agree with what you have put forward then so be it..   

Having said that, I agree that I have posted that you are one, if not the worst, abuser of people on this board - frankly, it was your constant abuse and denigrating of people that led me to put my name forward. as a GM.  You also would have had an opportunity to nominate as well - I hope you did.

I have been a victim of your abuse and frankly I am not going to take it anymore.  Your constant abuse of people, telling all and sundry that people - because of political persuasion - enjoy people  dying in roofs or being smashed against rocks at Christmas Island is not in keeping with normal community values or thinking.


I have declared to the GMs as part of my submission that I have had issues with you in the past regarding abusive behaviour - you yourself know that because you have been banned because of it. 

Therefore, I request you do not try and bait me, nor abuse me further - it won't work.   Should I find you have been abusing me or going outside what is acceptable behaviour on this board towards me , in order to keep impartial- I will take whatever evidence I have with my recommendations to another GM for consideration.


I can't believe how you used this post to target and threaten Cods.

All it has achieved is expose just how unhinged you are.

Being a GM is not about getting power/control to threaten those you don't like/don't get on with. But you don't get that.

And next time you read your posts, proof read them against the standard of IRONY AND HYPOCRISY before pressing that enter key.

Got that?

Just so you know, your own targeted trolling and abuse of certain members will also be monitored and reported to FD.

At all times.

:)

PS I have reported your disgusting post to FD!



Thankyou LGLFH, I will take your well thought out comments on board. I am sure there is a need for them - somewhere


:)

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Leftwinger on Aug 8th, 2016 at 8:19pm
FD give ya an American express centurion card Vic ?

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Emma Peel on Aug 8th, 2016 at 8:40pm
really Cods, you just can't help yourself can you?.

I agree FD is mostly absent, and has his own agenda,  but you need to understand that people don't like being lumped into some generalised target..  you know  Lefties and righties?  Libs and Labor...  I have more important issues in life than pollie BS.

I have at times found your posts offensive and indefensible,  in many instances.. you can be one-eyed, vacuous and vicious, and this shows in your posts. 
So blame yourself if you get suspended for it. Take responsibility for what you post, and stop thinking you are a victim of unfairness.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by AiA on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:31pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:31pm:

Quote:
Who/what is LGLFH?


Very probably ~ "lovely Greek Lady from Hurstville."


I have it from the horse's mouse it means "luscious gay lad from homoville"

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Emma Peel on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:44pm
::) that says a lot about you.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 9th, 2016 at 6:58am

AiA wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 10:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 12:31pm:

Quote:
Who/what is LGLFH?


Very probably ~ "lovely Greek Lady from Hurstville."


I have it from the horse's mouse it means "luscious gay lad from homoville"


You mean Aussie????

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by cods on Aug 9th, 2016 at 8:47am

Emma wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 8:40pm:
really Cods, you just can't help yourself can you?.

I agree FD is mostly absent, and has his own agenda,  but you need to understand that people don't like being lumped into some generalised target..  you know  Lefties and righties?  Libs and Labor...  I have more important issues in life than pollie BS.

I have at times found your posts offensive and indefensible,  in many instances.. you can be one-eyed, vacuous and vicious, and this shows in your posts. 
So blame yourself if you get suspended for it. Take responsibility for what you post, and stop thinking you are a victim of unfairness.




so has emma been sent to the sin bin for PERSONAL ABUSE....

just checking everything is a level playing field here..

you see emma

I FIND YOUR POST EXTREMELY  OFFENSIVE


is anyone of importance  watching what cods has to put up with 

or is it just the other way round.. ::)???>...


would just like some confirmation thats all..

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by cods on Aug 9th, 2016 at 9:24am
oh I see that post drew a raft of concerned people who care about people being personally abused... ::) ::) ::)


maybe I picked their morning tea break. :)

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 9th, 2016 at 9:28am

cods wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 9:24am:
oh I see that post drew a raft of concerned people who care about people being personally abused... ::) ::) ::)


maybe I picked their morning tea break. :)


;D ;D


Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Redmond Neck on Aug 9th, 2016 at 9:37am

cods wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 9:24am:
oh I see that post drew a raft of concerned people who care about people being personally abused... ::) ::) ::)


maybe I picked their morning tea break. :)


I think you expect too much of people cods, most of us just skim over little spats between other posters.

Otherwise we would be continually involved in silly sh1tfights.

If you find it offensive send a PM to the Gmods.   ;)



Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:06am

cods wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 8:47am:

Emma wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 8:40pm:
really Cods, you just can't help yourself can you?.

I agree FD is mostly absent, and has his own agenda,  but you need to understand that people don't like being lumped into some generalised target..  you know  Lefties and righties?  Libs and Labor...  I have more important issues in life than pollie BS.

I have at times found your posts offensive and indefensible,  in many instances.. you can be one-eyed, vacuous and vicious, and this shows in your posts. 
So blame yourself if you get suspended for it. Take responsibility for what you post, and stop thinking you are a victim of unfairness.




so has emma been sent to the sin bin for PERSONAL ABUSE....

just checking everything is a level playing field here..

you see emma

I FIND YOUR POST EXTREMELY  OFFENSIVE


is anyone of importance  watching what cods has to put up with 

or is it just the other way round.. ::)???>...


would just like some confirmation thats all..



Confirmed.  As a reader, I do not find her posts offensive - however, you may. Is she  stating an opinion that I would presume can be supported by fact?   Should you find it offensive or personal abuse - why not do what I have done when abused on here and report it.     Mind you, it takes a LOT to get me to that point, but I have reached it and have been satisfied that my submission has been dealt with.

Noting that, and should you decide you are aggrieved party I would suggest you take your grievance to a GM of your choice and let it be tested for non compliance with OZPOL rules, regulations and guidelines


Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:13am

Redmond Neck wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 9:37am:

cods wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 9:24am:
oh I see that post drew a raft of concerned people who care about people being personally abused... ::) ::) ::)


maybe I picked their morning tea break. :)


I think you expect too much of people cods, most of us just skim over little spats between other posters.

Otherwise we would be continually involved in silly sh1tfights.

If you find it offensive send a PM to the Gmods.   ;)


Yep....also a lot of us are busy with kids and/or watching Australia win Olympic Game medals.

My personal opinion? I think Emma's generally ok and was just venting a bit.

You could always answer her with :

Whatever you reckon!

:P






Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:25am
Big Vic,


Quote:
OZPOL rules, regulations and guidelines


I can see only Rules.  Can you tell Members where the 'regulations and guidelines' might be found?

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by AiA on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:30am

Aussie wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:25am:
Big Vic,


Quote:
OZPOL rules, regulations and guidelines


I can see only Rules.  Can you tell Members where the 'regulations and guidelines' might be found?


and so it begins ...

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:32am

AiA wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:30am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:25am:
Big Vic,


Quote:
OZPOL rules, regulations and guidelines


I can see only Rules.  Can you tell Members where the 'regulations and guidelines' might be found?


and so it begins ...


Agreed - lesson now learnt

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:33am

Aussie wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:25am:
Big Vic,


Quote:
OZPOL rules, regulations and guidelines


I can see only Rules.  Can you tell Members where the 'regulations and guidelines' might be found?


Pedantic. Even with your reputation, that's pedantic.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:36am

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:33am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:25am:
Big Vic,


Quote:
OZPOL rules, regulations and guidelines


I can see only Rules.  Can you tell Members where the 'regulations and guidelines' might be found?


Pedantic. Even with your reputation, that's pedantic.


How is it pedantic?  Vic referred to three things.....Rules....regulations......guidelines.  Where are the latter two?

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:37am

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:33am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:25am:
Big Vic,


Quote:
OZPOL rules, regulations and guidelines


I can see only Rules.  Can you tell Members where the 'regulations and guidelines' might be found?


Pedantic. Even with your reputation, that's pedantic.


Tis Ok Andrei, a valuable lesson of life has been learnt.


Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by aquascoot on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:37am
Personal abuse is not a problem.
It is merely another 'reference experience" from which one can improve oneself .0001%.
When abused, one should just reflect on the fact that one has to "draw state from within".
What does this mean?
It means that your mental "state" and the soundtrack playing in your head is your own personal responsibility.
It means , one should never hand over the "power" to another person to determine your mental "state".

A better way would be to say "draw happiness from within".

Petty BS type behaviours are "low vibration energy" and you dont want to get caught in low vibration energy as it will merely drag you down.

Nobody is universally liked and it is foolish to think that you would be "happy" if everyone liked you.

The only person everyone seems to like is Mark Wahlburg.

So, when abused, just go back to core principles

The 3 P's

presence...be present to the moment, do not worry about the past or the future.
passion...make sure you are following your passions
process orientation...this is achieving a "flow state". when you do a process like dancing, surfing, jogging, gym , swimming, rock climbing, knitting, doing a jigsaw, a crossword...you are doing "process orientation" which soothes the mind , as it makes you present to the current task .

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by skippy. on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:46am

aquascoot wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:37am:
Personal abuse is not a problem.
It is merely another 'reference experience" from which one can improve oneself .0001%.
When abused, one should just reflect on the fact that one has to "draw state from within".
What does this mean?
It means that your mental "state" and the soundtrack playing in your head is your own personal responsibility.
It means , one should never hand over the "power" to another person to determine your mental "state".

A better way would be to say "draw happiness from within".

Petty BS type behaviours are "low vibration energy" and you dont want to get caught in low vibration energy as it will merely drag you down.

Nobody is universally liked and it is foolish to think that you would be "happy" if everyone liked you.

The only person everyone seems to like is Mark Wahlburg.

So, when abused, just go back to core principles

The 3 P's

presence...be present to the moment, do not worry about the past or the future.
passion...make sure you are following your passions
process orientation...this is achieving a "flow state". when you do a process like dancing, surfing, jogging, gym , swimming, rock climbing, knitting, doing a jigsaw, a crossword...you are doing "process orientation" which soothes the mind , as it makes you present to the current task .

Well written, that is hard to argue with and one of your best posts I've read. You sound like you've gone all hippy on us. ;D

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by cods on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:49am

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:33am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:25am:
Big Vic,


Quote:
OZPOL rules, regulations and guidelines


I can see only Rules.  Can you tell Members where the 'regulations and guidelines' might be found?


Pedantic. Even with your reputation, that's pedantic.



funny andrei... you said loud and clear on another thread


you would not stand for PERSONAL ATTACKS you would deal with them''


tell me this is the only way for you to deal with them is BANNING THEM...

some do not see a problem with emmas post  to myself..

btw friends   i know the rules....about sending it to a gmod.......what I want to know is...

why I can be banned for sticking for myself.......

as some would remember.


others can spew this out...yet it isnt found to be offensive....?????????

which makes me think there is bias on here... >:(

I would prefer to know, as  I dont need lectures on rules and stuff....

like I say I have seen it in writing from andrei he wont stand for it...

unless!!!!!! well spill it out..

its obvious to me at any rate if !!!!

and dont forget andrei is on holiday..

I sent this [post]to a new gmod he wouldnt do anything as he doesnt find it offensive....


I am just asking.... is it offensive andrei??..

or is it perfectly acceptable to speak to people in this manner...

::) ::) ::) ::)


yes or no andrei......


\ this has not a thing to do with rules....


its do do with perception


we are at the mercy oif how a gmod interprets .



Quote:
you can be one-eyed, vacuous and vicious,



this is NOT personal abuse....


so what IS>..

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:52am

Quote:
this is NOT personal abuse....


It is clearly abuse cods, and IMO ought to have been acted upon.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:53am

AiA wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:30am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:25am:
Big Vic,


Quote:
OZPOL rules, regulations and guidelines


I can see only Rules.  Can you tell Members where the 'regulations and guidelines' might be found?


and so it begins ...


Yep. I laughed when I saw it.

But you have to admit.... the old ex cabbie is making a valid point in this instance.

There are no regulations and guidelines.



Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:59am

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:53am:

AiA wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:30am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:25am:
Big Vic,


Quote:
OZPOL rules, regulations and guidelines


I can see only Rules.  Can you tell Members where the 'regulations and guidelines' might be found?


and so it begins ...


Yep. I laughed when I saw it.

But you have to admit.... the old ex cabbie is making a valid point in this instance.

There are no regulations and guidelines.



Actually there are Lisa, they are listed for GMs to read on appointment.  As I stated to Cods,and I am paraphrasing here as I don't have the exact writing, f she has a complaint then take it to a GM of her choice and it will be taken into account with rules, regulations and guidelines.  Just because they cannot be seen by some posters does not mean they don't exist.  There is also a very comprehensive code of conduct for GMs.  That is also not in the public domain.

I just couldn't be bothered with an obvious (to me anyway) bait - that's why I didn't bother replying to the initial post

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:01am

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:53am:

AiA wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:30am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:25am:
Big Vic,


Quote:
OZPOL rules, regulations and guidelines


I can see only Rules.  Can you tell Members where the 'regulations and guidelines' might be found?


and so it begins ...


Yep. I laughed when I saw it.

But you have to admit.... the old ex cabbie is making a valid point in this instance.

There are no regulations and guidelines.


There are none Members can see, but I was wondering whether FD had, within the GMod secret talking Room, set out some 'regulations and guidelines.'  If there are, then it probably greatly assist Members if we all were privy to them.

If they don't exist anywhere, why is it too hard for a GMod to simply say so and all this malarkey is avoided?

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:04am

Vic wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:59am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:53am:

AiA wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:30am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:25am:
Big Vic,


Quote:
OZPOL rules, regulations and guidelines


I can see only Rules.  Can you tell Members where the 'regulations and guidelines' might be found?


and so it begins ...


Yep. I laughed when I saw it.

But you have to admit.... the old ex cabbie is making a valid point in this instance.

There are no regulations and guidelines.



Actually there are Lisa, they are listed for GMs to read on appointment.  As I stated to Cods,and I am paraphrasing here as I don't have the exact writing, f she has a complaint then take it to a GM of her choice and it will be taken into account with rules, regulations and guidelines.  Just because they cannot be seen by some posters does not mean they don't exist.  There is also a very comprehensive code of conduct for GMs.  That is also not in the public domain.

I just couldn't be bothered with an obvious (to me anyway) bait - that's why I didn't bother replying to the initial post


What obvious bait?

It was just a question.

And a bloody good one too IMO.

Now, why can't we access these so called regulations and guidelines?

Actually,  why am I asking a Master Baiter and Abuser like you?

BRB.....will ask FD myself.



Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:07am

Aussie wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:01am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:53am:

AiA wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:30am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:25am:
Big Vic,


Quote:
OZPOL rules, regulations and guidelines


I can see only Rules.  Can you tell Members where the 'regulations and guidelines' might be found?


and so it begins ...


Yep. I laughed when I saw it.

But you have to admit.... the old ex cabbie is making a valid point in this instance.

There are no regulations and guidelines.


There are none Members can see, but I was wondering whether FD had, within the GMod secret talking Room, set out some 'regulations and guidelines.'  If there are, then it probably greatly assist Members if we all were privy to them.

If they don't exist anywhere, why is it too hard for a GMod to simply say so and all this malarkey is avoided?


Bugger off. I'm trying to PM FD about this.

And you're holding me up. Grrrrrrr!

You could at least start a freaking topic about it in the interim!

Right.....

F R E E D I V E R  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:15am

Quote:
Actually there are Lisa, they are listed for GMs to read on appointment.  As I stated to Cods,and I am paraphrasing here as I don't have the exact writing, f she has a complaint then take it to a GM of her choice and it will be taken into account with rules, regulations and guidelines.  Just because they cannot be seen by some posters does not mean they don't exist.  There is also a very comprehensive code of conduct for GMs.  That is also not in the public domain.

I just couldn't be bothered with an obvious (to me anyway) bait - that's why I didn't bother replying to the initial post


No bait, Big Vic, a genuine question.  How many times do I have to say that I am literal.  You can bet I mean simply what I say.  There are no baits when such a simple, unambiguous and clear question is asked.

So......now you have confirmed what I suspected ~ there are other things written only GMods can see.....is it any wonder Members are totally confused?

Mere Members see nothing except the Rules, and they are clear and unambiguous.  Elsewhere, and where enforcement is considered, those Rules are expanded or perhaps even watered down......but for some inexplicable reason, Members are not to know about it that.

That is just complete insanity, and it is no wonder people are thoroughly pissed off and frustrated with how the Rules are so inconsistently applied or not applied.

It would make life here much better for all, especially the GMods, if everyone knew all the Rules, regulations and guidelines.

Mr Hicks, in light of Big Vic's candid comments, would you care to withdraw your allegation of pedantry, when, obviously, as Big Vic has now made clear, I was quite correct.  There are 'regulations and guidelines' Members heretofore knew nothing about.

Poor form Mr. Hicks, and good on you Vic.




Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:18am
Oh and whilst here.....I (and I'm sure everyone else here too) would like to know if these so called invisible to members "rules and regulations" include anything regarding multi nics.

Why?

The bloody last thing this forum needs is a GM, Global Modding everyone with 1 nic whilst retaining the potential to bait and abuse with other multi nics up their sleeve.

That's dirty, unfair and ought to be addressed out HERE IN THE OPEN IN FRONT OF ALL MEMBERS.


Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:22am

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:18am:
Oh and whilst here.....I (and I'm sure everyone else here too) would like to know if these so called invisible to members "rules and regulations" include anything regarding multi nics.

Why?

The bloody last thing this forum needs is a GM, Global Modding everyone with 1 nic whilst retaining the potential to bait and abuse with other multi nics up their sleeve.

That's dirty, unfair and ought to be addressed out HERE IN THE OPEN IN FRONT OF ALL MEMBERS.


I agree!  Where to now?

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:22am

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:33am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:25am:
Big Vic,


Quote:
OZPOL rules, regulations and guidelines


I can see only Rules.  Can you tell Members where the 'regulations and guidelines' might be found?


Pedantic. Even with your reputation, that's pedantic.


Ok fine...it's pedantic.

Now can you answer the question?

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:23am
And now, there will be fall-out for the honest broker, Big Vic. 

He will be feeling bad that he has 'let a cat out of the bag,' and other GMods will be telling him what a dangerous customer 'Aussie' is ~ that he walked into some trap, took some bait ~ when all that happened was....a simple question on Rules was asked, Mr Hicks runs interference to head off an answer, Big Vic did not pick up the smoke signals from Hicks, and he answers honestly.

Good on ya Vic, it is passed time Members were treated like dumbarse and sheepish 'mushrooms.'

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Secret Wars on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:26am
On the above log-in board there are rules listed.

I am guessing some members want prescriptive rules in detail so they can then with "dumb insolence" find ways around the letter of any laws and circumvent the spirit and intent of those rules whilst claiming innocence and protesting they are within the letter and a full stop of the rules.

Then they can argue endlessly about moderation, about why they and others were moderated, pedantic interpretations about rules, agitate against sitting moderators and generally make farkwits of themselves. 




Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:27am

Vic wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:22am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:18am:
Oh and whilst here.....I (and I'm sure everyone else here too) would like to know if these so called invisible to members "rules and regulations" include anything regarding multi nics.

Why?

The bloody last thing this forum needs is a GM, Global Modding everyone with 1 nic whilst retaining the potential to bait and abuse with other multi nics up their sleeve.

That's dirty, unfair and ought to be addressed out HERE IN THE OPEN IN FRONT OF ALL MEMBERS.


I agree!  Where to now?


Oh what utter feigned bullshit!

Anyway, I've posted my concerns here and I've contacted FD via PM.

FD needs to come online and post openly about the issues I've raised.

Bloody hell!



Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:30am

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:26am:
On the above log-in board there are rules listed.

I am guessing some members want prescriptive rules in detail so they can then with "dumb insolence" find ways around the letter of any laws and circumvent the spirit and intent of those rules whilst claiming innocence and protesting they are within the letter and a full stop of the rules.

Then they can argue endlessly about moderation, about why they and others were moderated, pedantic interpretations about rules, agitate against sitting moderators and generally make farkwits of themselves. 


You actually bothered to log in with your other multi nic just to post this garbage?

Bugger off or log in with you regular nic.

Your choice. Nong!

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by cods on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:36am

Aussie wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:52am:

Quote:
this is NOT personal abuse....


It is clearly abuse cods, and IMO ought to have been acted upon.




thats what I I mean aussie you see it as abuse a gmod doesnt..;.


all I want is clarification...

I did not report that btw.....I usually wait until I am hounded before I report someone...


I have put it there so I know where I stand...once and for all..

aussie when you are called the worst abuser on the forum....

I think even you can understand why I want clarification....no not an opinion.... the real guts of the issue...

emmas sent me a post.. I dont even know what or4 why I drew tose remarks.. all I said was fd likes fishing....however its for sure she means it......fine..

for aquas benefit i have no need or desire for everyone to like me....sheeeeees thats pretty obvious....

however .. if I am a target....which ius how I feel....

lets at least try and have a level playing field....

I dont do PMs.. they are secret and of no value

who answers them anyway..lets have this out in the open....

I have had some appalling things said to me....I have even had a few problems being on here,,

I know I am not alone...and aussie you put up with an awful lot  but you are also tougher and stronger than myself.....and seem to have a knack of dealing with it....



Aussie wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:15am:
Actually there are Lisa, they are listed for GMs to read on appointment.  As I stated to Cods,and I am paraphrasing here as I don't have the exact writing, f she has a complaint then take it to a GM of her choice and it will be taken into account with rules, regulations and guidelines.  Just because they cannot be seen by some posters does not mean they don't exist.  There is also a very comprehensive code of conduct for GMs.  That is also not in the public domain.

I just couldn't be bothered with an obvious (to me anyway) bait - that's why I didn't bother replying to the initial post


No bait, Big Vic, a genuine question.  How many times do I have to say that I am literal.  You can bet I mean simply what I say.  There are no baits when such a simple, unambiguous and clear question is asked.



thank you aussie.....I do not wish to deal with bigvic... he has said it loud and clear what he thinks of me aussie.. so I have not been anywhere near him in a long time....and nothing has changed..

this thread at least the title was started by andrei so the way I see it if its at the top of the page he will come on board eventually...

I do not expect new gmods to get the answer to this.. but as you well know andrei has actually voiced his opinion.. about personal abuse..even to acting if and when he sees it.. ::)

I dont want emma banned....her opinion is just as valid as anyone elses.....assuming we can all speak like that to anyone else.........

and by the look of this we can...

btw way.... I am also a baiter now??........at least I know... :D :D :D..

anyway nuff said....emma if your reading.. no hard feelings...sorry if  I offended you[ if only I knew when and where] I cant remember replying to her to be honest...


just for all those people whio think this old doll wont ever change... not so..

it was pointed out by some lefties..[not all] but some where upset about me referring to shorten as shortarse.....it was only stirring but none the less I stopped doing it....

see aussie I am not a lab hater.. ;) ;)


Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Secret Wars on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:38am

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:30am:

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:26am:
On the above log-in board there are rules listed.

I am guessing some members want prescriptive rules in detail so they can then with "dumb insolence" find ways around the letter of any laws and circumvent the spirit and intent of those rules whilst claiming innocence and protesting they are within the letter and a full stop of the rules.

Then they can argue endlessly about moderation, about why they and others were moderated, pedantic interpretations about rules, agitate against sitting moderators and generally make farkwits of themselves. 


You actually bothered to log in with your other multi nic just to post this garbage?

Bugger off or log in with you regular nic.

Your choice. Nong!


And what do you think is my regular nic?

Aussie thinks I am you.  Are you my regular nic?

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:39am

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:38am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:30am:

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:26am:
On the above log-in board there are rules listed.

I am guessing some members want prescriptive rules in detail so they can then with "dumb insolence" find ways around the letter of any laws and circumvent the spirit and intent of those rules whilst claiming innocence and protesting they are within the letter and a full stop of the rules.

Then they can argue endlessly about moderation, about why they and others were moderated, pedantic interpretations about rules, agitate against sitting moderators and generally make farkwits of themselves. 


You actually bothered to log in with your other multi nic just to post this garbage?

Bugger off or log in with you regular nic.

Your choice. Nong!


And what do you think is my regular nic?

Aussie thinks I am you.  Are you my regular nic?



LOL...

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:40am

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:38am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:30am:

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:26am:
On the above log-in board there are rules listed.

I am guessing some members want prescriptive rules in detail so they can then with "dumb insolence" find ways around the letter of any laws and circumvent the spirit and intent of those rules whilst claiming innocence and protesting they are within the letter and a full stop of the rules.

Then they can argue endlessly about moderation, about why they and others were moderated, pedantic interpretations about rules, agitate against sitting moderators and generally make farkwits of themselves. 


You actually bothered to log in with your other multi nic just to post this garbage?

Bugger off or log in with you regular nic.

Your choice. Nong!


And what do you think is my regular nic?

Aussie thinks I am you.  Are you my regular nic?


I could not care less what Aussie thinks.

I'm more concerned about the issues I've raised in this topic.

Now just bugger off. Please?

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by cods on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:41am

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:30am:

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:26am:
On the above log-in board there are rules listed.

I am guessing some members want prescriptive rules in detail so they can then with "dumb insolence" find ways around the letter of any laws and circumvent the spirit and intent of those rules whilst claiming innocence and protesting they are within the letter and a full stop of the rules.

Then they can argue endlessly about moderation, about why they and others were moderated, pedantic interpretations about rules, agitate against sitting moderators and generally make farkwits of themselves. 


You actually bothered to log in with your other multi nic just to post this garbage?

Bugger off or log in with you regular nic.

Your choice. Nong!



thats the whole point of the forum lisa... everyone has an opinion..

some are allowed to express it.. others are not??..

and all I want to know is WHY is that....funny how andrei has gone all of a sudden.....

I am sure one of the rules for the gmods is dont get into any arguments in public....they will come back to haunt you....... and lets face it

honest debate keeps the forum going....I would have been dumped years ago otherwise...

far too honest and up front...I need to learn how to bait without actually baiting......

you understand what I mean dont you lisa.??? ;) ;) ;)

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Secret Wars on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:46am

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:40am:

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:38am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:30am:

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:26am:
On the above log-in board there are rules listed.

I am guessing some members want prescriptive rules in detail so they can then with "dumb insolence" find ways around the letter of any laws and circumvent the spirit and intent of those rules whilst claiming innocence and protesting they are within the letter and a full stop of the rules.

Then they can argue endlessly about moderation, about why they and others were moderated, pedantic interpretations about rules, agitate against sitting moderators and generally make farkwits of themselves. 


You actually bothered to log in with your other multi nic just to post this garbage?

Bugger off or log in with you regular nic.

Your choice. Nong!


And what do you think is my regular nic?

Aussie thinks I am you.  Are you my regular nic?


I could not care less what Aussie thinks.

I'm more concerned about the issues I've raised in this topic.

Now just bugger off. Please?


You inserted yourself into this with an accusation that I posted garbage under a multi-nic as you call it, and demanded that I log in under my regular nick.

What do you think is my regular nic?  It was important to you a couple of posts ago, so no, I won't bugger off.

You invited the response and here I am responding.  8-)

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:53am

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:46am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:40am:

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:38am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:30am:

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:26am:
On the above log-in board there are rules listed.

I am guessing some members want prescriptive rules in detail so they can then with "dumb insolence" find ways around the letter of any laws and circumvent the spirit and intent of those rules whilst claiming innocence and protesting they are within the letter and a full stop of the rules.

Then they can argue endlessly about moderation, about why they and others were moderated, pedantic interpretations about rules, agitate against sitting moderators and generally make farkwits of themselves. 


You actually bothered to log in with your other multi nic just to post this garbage?

Bugger off or log in with you regular nic.

Your choice. Nong!


And what do you think is my regular nic?

Aussie thinks I am you.  Are you my regular nic?


I could not care less what Aussie thinks.

I'm more concerned about the issues I've raised in this topic.

Now just bugger off. Please?


You inserted yourself into this with an accusation that I posted garbage under a multi-nic as you call it, and demanded that I log in under my regular nick.

What do you think is my regular nic?  It was important to you a couple of posts ago, so no, I won't bugger off.

You invited the response and here I am responding.  8-)


May I sit in the Wardroom with a glass of red and observe?

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:54am

cods wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:41am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:30am:

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:26am:
On the above log-in board there are rules listed.

I am guessing some members want prescriptive rules in detail so they can then with "dumb insolence" find ways around the letter of any laws and circumvent the spirit and intent of those rules whilst claiming innocence and protesting they are within the letter and a full stop of the rules.

Then they can argue endlessly about moderation, about why they and others were moderated, pedantic interpretations about rules, agitate against sitting moderators and generally make farkwits of themselves. 


You actually bothered to log in with your other multi nic just to post this garbage?

Bugger off or log in with you regular nic.

Your choice. Nong!



thats the whole point of the forum lisa... everyone has an opinion..

some are allowed to express it.. others are not??..

and all I want to know is WHY is that....funny how andrei has gone all of a sudden.....

I am sure one of the rules for the gmods is dont get into any arguments in public....they will come back to haunt you....... and lets face it

honest debate keeps the forum going....I would have been dumped years ago otherwise...

far too honest and up front...I need to learn how to bait without actually baiting......

you understand what I mean dont you lisa.??? ;) ;) ;)


Of course I understand Cods.

Perhaps we should both start posting elsewhere.

The BS in OzPol has reached epidemic levels.

Such a shame actually.


Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by John Smith on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:56am

Aussie wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:52am:

Quote:
this is NOT personal abuse....


It is clearly abuse cods, and IMO ought to have been acted upon.



no it's not ...  Are you trying to say no one can say anything other than 'how wonderful you are' or else it is considered abuse?  Emma's entitled to her opinion just as you are entitled to be offended.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by skippy. on Aug 9th, 2016 at 12:00pm

Emma wrote on Aug 8th, 2016 at 8:40pm:
really Cods, you just can't help yourself can you?.

I agree FD is mostly absent, and has his own agenda,  but you need to understand that people don't like being lumped into some generalised target..  you know  Lefties and righties?  Libs and Labor...  I have more important issues in life than pollie BS.

I have at times found your posts offensive and indefensible,  in many instances.. you can be one-eyed, vacuous and vicious, and this shows in your posts. 
So blame yourself if you get suspended for it. Take responsibility for what you post, and stop thinking you are a victim of unfairness.

I don't think I have ever had discussions with Emma so I am not defending her nor anybody else.
But I don't see her comments as abuse,cods, sorry.
I take them as her OPINION OF YOU. You may not like that opinion but that is how I read it.
Do you deny you are one eyed in regard to politics? ( aren't most on here?)
Most posters here can be vicious in their defence or attacks, it's human nature to get your back up when confronted.
Please don't take this as being critical of you as it is not meant to be.
Just my two bobs worth.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Aug 9th, 2016 at 12:58pm
AS the original point of the point of the thread has now been addressed I will move to Feedback.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by cods on Aug 9th, 2016 at 1:03pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 11:56am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:52am:

Quote:
this is NOT personal abuse....


It is clearly abuse cods, and IMO ought to have been acted upon.



no it's not ...  Are you trying to say no one can say anything other than 'how wonderful you are' or else it is considered abuse?  Emma's entitled to her opinion just as you are entitled to be offended.



of course she is mr smith......but cods isnt.....doint you understand that...

as it is not long ago I called phil from Perth "slow.".. and you very quickly came to his defence saying it was abuse as far as he was concerned......

and thats what matters everyones idea of abuse is different...and I agreed with you....

and ever since I have not called anyone SLOW....

now you claim its ok for people to claim this about CODS..


Quote:
you can be one-eyed, vacuous and vicious, a


without fear of being banned.....

its more or less up to the receiver to toughen up...

as you say aussie has as much right to his opinion as you have.......I guess thats something..

just dont call anyone SLOW aussie..

who in this case is right?..

the poster or the receiver.... we cant both be right can we?

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by skippy. on Aug 9th, 2016 at 1:04pm
You may as well just lock it mate, half the forum are banned from feedback.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Aug 9th, 2016 at 1:05pm
Hi all, I notice people are replying but I would like to move this thread as it has achieved it's original intent and seems to be going off topic.   Aussie has created a thread in Relationships that may be more appropriate.  Will move once I see no viewers.

Thankyou

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Redmond Neck on Aug 9th, 2016 at 1:17pm

skippy. wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 1:04pm:
You may as well just lock it mate, half the forum are banned from feedback.


I think that was why it was moved from Feedback (and combined with another topic ?) in the first place.

Anyway perhaps Vic you might follow up with the big guy why so many are locked out of feedback!





Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by John Smith on Aug 9th, 2016 at 1:17pm

cods wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 1:03pm:
of course she is mr smith......but cods isnt.....doint you understand that...

as it is not long ago I called phil from Perth "slow.".. and you very quickly came to his defence saying it was abuse as far as he was concerned......

and thats what matters everyones idea of abuse is different...and I agreed with you....

and ever since I have not called anyone SLOW....



you called him slow because you disagreed with him on a political matter. You weren't describing Phil and it had nothing to do with the discussion at the time, it was a totally irrelevant cheap shot because you felt cornered.

Emma on the other hand is describing how you sometimes come across to others on this forum. It didn't sound to me like she was trying to take a shot at you.

It's all about the context.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Emma Peel on Aug 9th, 2016 at 5:35pm
OK  want to make this the last post.? Up to you people.
In response to Cods, I don't think that my post was abusive. As pointed out by others it was intended to help you understand why you get the negative posts you seem to. I said you CAN be etc etc, not that you are all the time, just that some of your posts are simply offensive and not always on topic, or defensible. I think most of us are guilty at some stage of this sort of thing, and it is up to you to be responsible for it, not being a victim all the time.
Because you sometimes DESERVE it.

Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. :)

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Neferti on Aug 9th, 2016 at 5:40pm

Vic wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 1:05pm:
Hi all, I notice people are replying but I would like to move this thread as it has achieved it's original intent and seems to be going off topic.   Aussie has created a thread in Relationships that may be more appropriate.  Will move once I see no viewers.

Thankyou


You seem to have missed my CONGRATULATIONS (and to Setanti (?) as well). 

Moving threads to Relationships is a good place to "dump stuff".  Freediver does it ALL the time. You need to ask Freediver WHY as NOBODY posts there, apart from the Usual Suspects.  ;)

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Aug 9th, 2016 at 5:45pm

Neferti wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 5:40pm:

Vic wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 1:05pm:
Hi all, I notice people are replying but I would like to move this thread as it has achieved it's original intent and seems to be going off topic.   Aussie has created a thread in Relationships that may be more appropriate.  Will move once I see no viewers.

Thankyou


You seem to have missed my CONGRATULATIONS (and to Setanti (?) as well). 

Moving threads to Relationships is a good place to "dump stuff".  Freediver does it ALL the time. You need to ask Freediver WHY as NOBODY posts there, apart from the Usual Suspects.  ;)



Oh, my apologies, I have missed a couple - Thankyou.   Still learning!

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Neferti on Aug 9th, 2016 at 5:54pm
You are most welcome.

IF you can work out how to reinstate everybody to be able to post in Feedback, that would earn you Brownie Points. ;)

I understand from Freediver that it involves doing something to EACH Member's account and is not as "simple" as reinstating everybody in one fell swoop.

I think that, at the time, those who were involved in a "discussion" in Feedback that went off track ... they were individually "banned" from posting in Feedback.  IF you have time (and energy) you might look into that .... many Members would be most grateful.  ;)

Perhaps those Members who can't post in Feedback should let you know?

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 9th, 2016 at 7:14pm

skippy. wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 1:04pm:
You may as well just lock it mate, half the forum are banned from feedback.


Those people were taken out of feedback because they turned the place into one massive sh.tfight if you recall skippy.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by John Smith on Aug 9th, 2016 at 7:17pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 7:14pm:

skippy. wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 1:04pm:
You may as well just lock it mate, half the forum are banned from feedback.


Those people were taken out of feedback because they turned the place into one massive sh.tfight if you recall skippy.



you mean like with this thread?  ;D ;D

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by mothra on Aug 9th, 2016 at 8:55pm
Congrats Bigvic and Setanta. Both excellent choices.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:38pm

mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 8:55pm:
Congrats Bigvic and Setanta. Both excellent choices.


Absolutely Mothra, they are.

All I would ask of posters is to give the two new blokes a chance and cut them a little slack.

Pick on me & FD with your issues on moderation if you need to....

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:52pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:38pm:

mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 8:55pm:
Congrats Bigvic and Setanta. Both excellent choices.


Absolutely Mothra, they are.

All I would ask of posters is to give the two new blokes a chance and cut them a little slack.

Pick on me & FD with your issues on moderation if you need to....


I've made it quite plain that I have complete confidence in their capacity to do a good job.  I have also made it plain that Setanta, who did not want the job, ought to have handed it back knowing as he does that other credible candidates had sought the job.  I've said that in private to him, and in public.  I have not changed my view, but, that's Life.



Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Leftwinger on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:54pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:38pm:

mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 8:55pm:
Congrats Bigvic and Setanta. Both excellent choices.


Absolutely Mothra, they are.

All I would ask of posters is to give the two new blokes a chance and cut them a little slack.

Pick on me & FD with your issues on moderation if you need to....


Sweet , isn't about time you made the coalition corruption thread a sticky ?

I don't ask for much , actually I don't ask for anything , do that and I promise I will make an effort to be nice to Lisa

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Emma Peel on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:58pm
Au contraire Aussie. You have NOT made that clear, and you continue to criticise Setanta, without warrant.   

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by Aussie on Aug 10th, 2016 at 1:23am

Emma wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 10:58pm:
Au contraire Aussie. You have NOT made that clear, and you continue to criticise Setanta, without warrant.   


I have, you know, and if you ask him, he will confirm.  But.....that's done and dusted.  He decided to disregard my comments, and that is his right.  There is no next chapter.  That is the end of the story.

I have no question about his capacity to do the job well.  In fact, if you had read all of what I have said, you would have seen how I had absolute faith in him.  But.....In my view, on this mater, he made a decision I disagree with, and I have said so.  That's it.

Title: Re: GLOBAL MODERATOR
Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Aug 10th, 2016 at 7:04am

mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2016 at 8:55pm:
Congrats Bigvic and Setanta. Both excellent choices.


Thankyou Mothra

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.