Quote:

............Hundreds of Germans are attempting to bring criminal charges against Chancellor Angela Merkel, accusing her of treason by opening the borders of Germany to mass migration. The Federal Prosecutors office in Karlsruhe, Germany, has received over 400 letters calling for it to open an investigation into Chancellor Merkel, the elected leader of the German government for high treason. The complaints cite the chancellor’s decision to open the borders of the nation to all comers in September, since when they claim “an unhindered flow of refugees have poured into Germany”. Under German law, anyone who attempts to affect change to the German republic or damage the constitutional order by force or threat of force is guilty of high treason. The letter, of which dozens more are received by the state prosecutor every day and is reproduced by Compact magazine, insists the migrant flood satisfies the conditions, as demographic change is altering the existence of the republic. In introducing the pro-forma letter, Compact offers a quote commonly misattributed to American founding father Thomas Jefferson justifying the action: “When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty, before adding “now everything is at stake”. Citing the German constitution, which in article 20 paragraph enshrines the right of Germans “to resist any person seeking to abolish this constitutional order, if no other remedy is available”, the call to action remarks that to “safeguard our identity” their goal is now “the overthrow of the chancellor”. The forcing of migrants on communities, which involves the government seizing property such as parks, sports centres, and private dwellings to create asylum accommodation is a form of violence, the letter contends, making Chancellor Merkel’s actions genuinely treasonous. Despite the carefully formulated argument and provision of evidence, the petitions for action may yet be thrown out by the court. Hard-left Taz newspaper reports the court is unlikely to accept that migrant violence constitutes an attempt by Chancellor Merkel to change the nature of Germany in a way that clearly violates the law.........

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/10/29/hundreds-germans-trying-bring-treason-charges-angela-merkel-migration-policy/

Or to put it another way 0.001% of the population is attempting to bring charges

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 1:09pm:

Or to put it another way 0.001% of the population is attempting to bring charges

Laying charges for high treason only requires one single person, as it is not a popularity contest. Either she is a treasonous piece of sh1t, hell bent on destroying her country or she is not. Im thinking prosecutor have a good shot at the very least removing her from office or preferably getting her locked up for treason.

BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 1:43pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:09pm: Or to put it another way 0.001% of the population is attempting to bring charges Laying charges for high treason only requires one single person, as it is not a popularity contest. Either she is a treasonous piece of sh1t, hell bent on destroying her country or she is not. Im thinking prosecutor have a good shot at the very least removing her from office or preferably getting her locked up for treason.

Lol, yeah right.

If the law were applied without fear nor favour, hers would be an open and shut case of treason - along with most western leaders. 

---

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 1:49pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:43pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:09pm: Or to put it another way 0.001% of the population is attempting to bring charges Laying charges for high treason only requires one single person, as it is not a popularity contest. Either she is a treasonous piece of sh1t, hell bent on destroying her country or she is not. Im thinking prosecutor have a good shot at the very least removing her from office or preferably getting her locked up for treason. Lol, yeah right.

How many people do you think it takes to lay charges? 


Jeez mate, you can't even pretend you know anything about this subject. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 2:27pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:49pm: BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:43pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:09pm: Or to put it another way 0.001% of the population is attempting to bring charges Laying charges for high treason only requires one single person, as it is not a popularity contest. Either she is a treasonous piece of sh1t, hell bent on destroying her country or she is not. Im thinking prosecutor have a good shot at the very least removing her from office or preferably getting her locked up for treason. Lol, yeah right. How many people do you think it takes to lay charges?  Jeez mate, you can't even pretend you know anything about this subject. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

I'm stating about the success of thecharges

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 1:09pm:

Or to put it another way 0.001% of the population is attempting to bring charges

That could work.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 2:32pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 2:27pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:49pm: BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:43pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:09pm: Or to put it another way 0.001% of the population is attempting to bring charges Laying charges for high treason only requires one single person, as it is not a popularity contest. Either she is a treasonous piece of sh1t, hell bent on destroying her country or she is not. Im thinking prosecutor have a good shot at the very least removing her from office or preferably getting her locked up for treason. Lol, yeah right. How many people do you think it takes to lay charges?  Jeez mate, you can't even pretend you know anything about this subject. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D I'm stating about the success of thecharges

No you were not, try again.


The answer is one, the success if anyone's guess. But having her removed from office pending charges would be a good start to recover their country.

BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 2:44pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 2:32pm: BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 2:27pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:49pm: BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:43pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:09pm: Or to put it another way 0.001% of the population is attempting to bring charges Laying charges for high treason only requires one single person, as it is not a popularity contest. Either she is a treasonous piece of sh1t, hell bent on destroying her country or she is not. Im thinking prosecutor have a good shot at the very least removing her from office or preferably getting her locked up for treason. Lol, yeah right. How many people do you think it takes to lay charges?  Jeez mate, you can't even pretend you know anything about this subject. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D I'm stating about the success of thecharges No you were not, try again. The answer is one, the success if anyone's guess. But having her removed from office pending charges would be a good start to recover their country.

Ok *reads my own mind, again* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges.

Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges
Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges

i think she's put on more weight...possibly eating too many kebabs.
she is a most unattractive woman.
can she not afford a hair stylist, some botox and a personal trainer ?

aquascoot wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 3:07pm:

i think she's put on more weight...possibly eating too many kebabs. she is a most unattractive woman. can she not afford a hair stylist, some botox and a personal trainer ?

Not sure, shes probably more worried about running the country.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 3:18pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 3:07pm: i think she's put on more weight...possibly eating too many kebabs. she is a most unattractive woman. can she not afford a hair stylist, some botox and a personal trainer ? Not sure, shes probably more worried about running the country.

well Queen Elizabeth has a whole empire to run and she still looks presentable.

aquascoot wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 3:07pm:

i think she's put on more weight...possibly eating too many kebabs. she is a most unattractive woman. can she not afford a hair stylist, some botox and a personal trainer ?

Exactly. Now if she was an Alpha, she'd do all those things.

Self-realization 101, innit.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl2PmC9VAAAqwK6.jpg

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 3:21pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 3:07pm: i think she's put on more weight...possibly eating too many kebabs. she is a most unattractive woman. can she not afford a hair stylist, some botox and a personal trainer ? Exactly. Now if she was an Alpha, she'd do all those things. Self-realization 101, innit.

well a successful woman should look after her diet and have a fitness regime. if you cant even be disciplined enough to do that, you certainly dont have the self discipline to run a country !!!

aquascoot wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 3:20pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 3:18pm: aquascoot wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 3:07pm: i think she's put on more weight...possibly eating too many kebabs. she is a most unattractive woman. can she not afford a hair stylist, some botox and a personal trainer ? Not sure, shes probably more worried about running the country. well Queen Elizabeth has a whole empire to run and she still looks presentable.

Run? Not really.

aquascoot wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 3:25pm:

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 3:21pm: aquascoot wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 3:07pm: i think she's put on more weight...possibly eating too many kebabs. she is a most unattractive woman. can she not afford a hair stylist, some botox and a personal trainer ? Exactly. Now if she was an Alpha, she'd do all those things. Self-realization 101, innit. well a successful woman should look after her diet and have a fitness regime. if you cant even be disciplined enough to do that, you certainly dont have the self discipline to run a country !!!

What about blokes.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 2:56pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 2:44pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 2:32pm: BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 2:27pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:49pm: BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:43pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:09pm: Or to put it another way 0.001% of the population is attempting to bring charges Laying charges for high treason only requires one single person, as it is not a popularity contest. Either she is a treasonous piece of sh1t, hell bent on destroying her country or she is not. Im thinking prosecutor have a good shot at the very least removing her from office or preferably getting her locked up for treason. Lol, yeah right. How many people do you think it takes to lay charges?  Jeez mate, you can't even pretend you know anything about this subject. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D I'm stating about the success of thecharges No you were not, try again. The answer is one, the success if anyone's guess. But having her removed from office pending charges would be a good start to recover their country. Ok *reads my own mind, again* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges. Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges Want me to interpret myself again. *reads own mind for another time* Yes I was stating about the success of the charges

Reads what you actually wrote, you were stating the bringing of charges which is NOT the relative success of those charges.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 1:49pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:43pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:09pm: Or to put it another way 0.001% of the population is attempting to bring charges Laying charges for high treason only requires one single person, as it is not a popularity contest. Either she is a treasonous piece of sh1t, hell bent on destroying her country or she is not. Im thinking prosecutor have a good shot at the very least removing her from office or preferably getting her locked up for treason. Lol, yeah right.

I posted the yeah right in response to the last sentence  Im thinking prosecutor have a good shot at the very least removing her from office or preferably getting her locked up for treason.


That is success of charges.



*drops mic, exits stage left*

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 3:33pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:49pm: BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:43pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:09pm: Or to put it another way 0.001% of the population is attempting to bring charges Laying charges for high treason only requires one single person, as it is not a popularity contest. Either she is a treasonous piece of sh1t, hell bent on destroying her country or she is not. Im thinking prosecutor have a good shot at the very least removing her from office or preferably getting her locked up for treason. Lol, yeah right. I posted the yeah right in response to the last sentence  Im thinking prosecutor have a good shot at the very least removing her from office or preferably getting her locked up for treason. That is success of charges. *drops mic, exits stage left*

Stating what you meant, after being pummeled from pillar to your post, is not mic drop worthy.  ;D ;D

Be specific about what you are replying to, by removing everything else, or even better highlight the single sentence you are referring to, otherwise you will just look like a bit of dill.

You just standing there like stunned mullet holding the mic while being dragged off stage.  :)

BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 4:12pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 3:33pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:49pm: BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:43pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:09pm: Or to put it another way 0.001% of the population is attempting to bring charges Laying charges for high treason only requires one single person, as it is not a popularity contest. Either she is a treasonous piece of sh1t, hell bent on destroying her country or she is not. Im thinking prosecutor have a good shot at the very least removing her from office or preferably getting her locked up for treason. Lol, yeah right. I posted the yeah right in response to the last sentence  Im thinking prosecutor have a good shot at the very least removing her from office or preferably getting her locked up for treason. That is success of charges. *drops mic, exits stage left* Stating what you meant, after being pummeled from pillar to your post, is not mic drop worthy.  ;D ;D Be specific about what you are replying to, by removing everything else, or even better highlight the single sentence you are referring to, otherwise you will just look like a bit of dill. You just standing there like stunned mullet holding the mic while being dragged off stage.  :)

Or even better, ask me what I meant instead of assuming I meant what you wanted me to mean.

aquascoot wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 3:07pm:

i think she's put on more weight...possibly eating too many kebabs. she is a most unattractive woman. can she not afford a hair stylist, some botox and a personal trainer ?

Considering how many rapist she has let into the country looking a bit shlt probably isn't a bad strategy.

Quantum wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 4:51pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 3:07pm: i think she's put on more weight...possibly eating too many kebabs. she is a most unattractive woman. can she not afford a hair stylist, some botox and a personal trainer ? Considering how many rapist she has let into the country looking a bit shlt probably isn't a bad strategy.

;D Too true.

She is not a German.

http://www.angelfire.com/wizard/pixie666/Merkel_Is_Jewish_.pdf

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 4:21pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 4:12pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 3:33pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:49pm: BigOl64 wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:43pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 1st, 2016 at 1:09pm: Or to put it another way 0.001% of the population is attempting to bring charges Laying charges for high treason only requires one single person, as it is not a popularity contest. Either she is a treasonous piece of sh1t, hell bent on destroying her country or she is not. Im thinking prosecutor have a good shot at the very least removing her from office or preferably getting her locked up for treason. Lol, yeah right. I posted the yeah right in response to the last sentence  Im thinking prosecutor have a good shot at the very least removing her from office or preferably getting her locked up for treason. That is success of charges. *drops mic, exits stage left* Stating what you meant, after being pummeled from pillar to your post, is not mic drop worthy.  ;D ;D Be specific about what you are replying to, by removing everything else, or even better highlight the single sentence you are referring to, otherwise you will just look like a bit of dill. You just standing there like stunned mullet holding the mic while being dragged off stage.  :) Or even better, ask me what I meant instead of assuming I meant what you wanted me to mean.

I thought Bigole was right its what I thought you meant as well.. ::) ::)

In the sense that an SS soldier copped a bullet in the head in order to further the aims of the even greater good of Adolph Hitlers Nazi Germany Merkel feels that if some 14 year old girl is pack raped in Cologne then that is a sacrifice that should be made in order to further Merkels leftist Germany.

This is also a glowing example of the left and the fascists intersection. 

https://www.rt.com/news/339477-erdogan-treason-le-pen/

Merkel agreement with Turkish President Erdogan 'real treason' – Marine Le Pen
Published time: 13 Apr, 2016 16:50

https://img.rt.com/files/2016.04/original/570e76e4c46188f96b8b45b6.jpg

Marine Le Pen, leader of the French National Front party, has called Angela Merkel's talks with Turkey over the migrant deal “real treason,” saying Erdogan's government shows “unacceptable leniency” towards Islamic State and “buys oil from terrorists.”

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/angela-merkel-hit-by-leaked-forecast-of-15-million-migrants/news-story/f18b16b548247b42f634a8c0c8f6f197

Angela Merkel hit by leaked forecast of 1.5 million migrants

Quote:

Chancellor Angela Mer­kel is facing open dissent from members of her coalition government amid predictions that the number of migrants arriving in Germany this year could reach 1.5 million. The figure — almost double the official forecasts — added to the impression Ms Merkel had lost control of the issue amid polls showing her popularity ratings, which had defied gravity for so long, were beginning to plummet. Ms Merkel has refused to talk about limits to the number of refugees Germany can accommodate but Sigmar Gabriel, her deputy and the leader of the Social Democratic party, has declared that the time has come to reduce arrivals. The new estimate of 1.5 million came in a confidential government paper leaked to the newspaper Bild. It is widely believed the source of the leak was the interior ministry. The secret document said each refugee had a “family factor” of four to eight people, meaning they could be expected to arrange for up to eight relatives to join them once settled in Germany, as they were entitled to do if granted refugee status. As Bild pointed out, this could mean that 7.36 million eventually arrived as a result of this year’s influx. Germany’s population is now 80 million. “We believe that in the fourth quarter of the year there will be between 7000 and 10,000 illegal border crossings every day,” the document stated. “These high figures for asylum-seekers threaten to put extreme pressure on the (German) states and communities.” The document put a figure on potential arrivals from October to December of 920,000, Bild said. In contrast to some expert views, it did not foresee a reduction during the winter months despite the harsher weather and more difficult travelling conditions. Fewer asylum-seekers were expected from the Balkan states after Germany’s information campaign to deter people from that region but an increase was foreseen from conflict zones, especially Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere called last week for annual limits on refugees and proposed that any arrivals above the quota should be sent to somewhere safe in their region. He added these were his personal views and not those of the government. He is seen as one of Ms Merkel’s closest advisers and she later praised his work while refusing to place a limit on migrant numbers. Now she also faces open dissent from Mr Gabriel. “We must urgently achieve a clear reduction in the number of refugees in the coming year in Germany,” the deputy chancellor told Suddeutsche Zeitung. He added: “We must also think about the cohesion of German ­society.” Ms Merkel’s stance towards asylum-seekers is said to have made her a contender for this year’s Nobel peace prize, which will be announced on Friday, but it has also led to the shine coming off her popular support. A poll last week showed that her personal support rating had fallen to 54 per cent, down nine points in a month. Thousands took to the streets of the eastern city of Dresden yesterday, accusing Ms Merkel of “crimes against the German ­people” and “treason”. “It won’t stop with 1.5 or two million,” said Lutz Bachmann, the co-founder of the anti-Islam ­PEGIDA movement, which organised the march. “They will have their wives come, and one, two, three children. It is an impossible task to integrate these people.” Meanwhile, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan urged the EU to consider a no-fly zone and safe haven area in Syria during talks to address Europe’s migrant crisis. Speaking after discussions in Brussels, Mr Erdogan said Turkey was bearing the brunt of the crisis and pressed the bloc to act against “state-sponsored terrorism” in Syria as President Bashar al-Assad’s regime battles rebels and militants. The EU said Turkey must do more to stop the flow of refugees who have landed on its shores. “It is indisputable that Europe has to manage its borders better. We expect Turkey to do the same,” the EU president, Donald Tusk, said. The “root cause” of the refugee crisis was the “state-sponsored terrorism actually carried out by Assad himself,” Mr Erdogan said, saying three things needed to be done to end the crisis. “One is to focus on training and equipment, the second is to declare a safe zone that would be protected from terrorism and the third is a no-fly zone,” Mr Erdogan said. Western officials had previously cast doubt on the Turkish proposals for a no-fly “safe zone” in northern Syria where refugees could take shelter from the bloody conflict. Brussels and Ankara also reportedly discussed a European Commission plan that would see Turkey join Greek coastguard pat­rols in the eastern Aegean, co-­ordinated by EU border agency Frontex. Any migrants picked up would be taken back to Turkey where six new camps for up to two million people would be built, co-financed by the EU.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/angela-merkel-hit-by-leaked-forecast-of-15-million-migrants/news-story/f18b16b548247b42f634a8c0c8f6f197

Quote:

Brussels and Ankara also reportedly discussed a European Commission plan that would see Turkey join Greek coastguard pat­rols in the eastern Aegean, co-­ordinated by EU border agency Frontex. Any migrants picked up would be taken back to Turkey where six new camps for up to two million people would be built, co-financed by the EU.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/angela-merkel-hit-by-leaked-forecast-of-15-million-migrants/news-story/f18b16b548247b42f634a8c0c8f6f197
THE TIMES12:00AM OCTOBER 7, 2015

Top to Allax Bottom to Abdullah.

http://feedmelols.com/uploads/V1yHH.jpg