http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2016-06-15/man-not-guilty-of-burglary-despite-soiled-underpants-crime-scene/7513748


Man not guilty of burglary despite his soiled underpants found at crime scene

A man accused of defecating during a burglary at a Canberra coffee shop has been found not guilty, despite his soiled underpants being found at the scene of the crime.

Wesley Matthew King was charged with four counts of burglary-related offences after a Braddon cafe was broken into in late 2014.

When police investigated the break-in they found a pair of soiled underpants in the shop's office, along with papers smeared with faeces.

Nearly $4,000 cash, an iPod and car keys were stolen from the office safe.

DNA tests on the underpants concluded they belonged to Mr King, however the ACT Supreme Court found that was not enough to prove he was responsible for the break-in.

Tests on the underpants found the DNA of another person, but police were not able to identify them.

In her judgment, Chief Justice Helen Murrell said she could not discount the possibility that someone else had been wearing Mr King's dirty underpants.

"I am not satisfied that guilt is the only available rational inference," she wrote.

"There is, for example, a reasonable [albeit small] possibility that the burglar was someone else who was wearing unwashed underpants that had previously been worn by the accused."

She found Mr King not guilty of all charges.

That is the best story I have heard in years!

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 5:37pm:

DNA tests on the underpants concluded they belonged to Mr King.

http://www.dvdizzy.com/images/a-c/csi1-05.jpg

Redmond Neck wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 5:42pm:

That is the best story I have heard in years! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

I know lol  ;D

Can you believe it?

In Canberra.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 5:42pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 15th, 2016 at 5:37pm: DNA tests on the underpants concluded they belonged to Mr King. http://www.dvdizzy.com/images/a-c/csi1-05.jpg

Nahhhh. Good pic. Wrong caption.

This one's better  :P

"When police investigated the break-in they found a pair of soiled underpants in the shop's office, along with papers smeared with faeces."

Redmond Neck wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 5:42pm:

That is the best story I have heard in years! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

someone else could have worn his soiled underpants..

red.... anyone you know who would do that??????...

this judge is kidding us isnt she????....

please say its joke.... :o

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 5:42pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 15th, 2016 at 5:37pm: DNA tests on the underpants concluded they belonged to Mr King. http://www.dvdizzy.com/images/a-c/csi1-05.jpg

they found other dna... omg... and they have let this guy go..

red.. make sure you double lock everything..

its all right for youse lot to make mock.. but we live here.

cods wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 5:52pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Jun 15th, 2016 at 5:42pm: That is the best story I have heard in years! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D someone else could have worn his soiled underpants.. red.... anyone you know who would do that??????... this judge is kidding us isnt she????.... please say it's joke.... :o

Cods, have you frequented any coffee shops in Canberra lately?

;D

Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 5:54pm:

cods wrote on Jun 15th, 2016 at 5:52pm: Redmond Neck wrote on Jun 15th, 2016 at 5:42pm: That is the best story I have heard in years! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D someone else could have worn his soiled underpants.. red.... anyone you know who would do that??????... this judge is kidding us isnt she????.... please say it's joke.... :o Cods, have you frequented any coffee shops in Canberra lately? ;D

I am not going to go there!  ;D

I think Red, as an insane lefty, is just glad that another scumbag criminal got off and is now free to inflict crime on someone else.

Redmond Neck wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 5:55pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 15th, 2016 at 5:54pm: cods wrote on Jun 15th, 2016 at 5:52pm: Redmond Neck wrote on Jun 15th, 2016 at 5:42pm: That is the best story I have heard in years! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D someone else could have worn his soiled underpants.. red.... anyone you know who would do that??????... this judge is kidding us isnt she????.... please say it's joke.... :o Cods, have you frequented any coffee shops in Canberra lately? ;D I am not going to go there!  ;D

I hope Cods hasn't been there lol!

This would have been a classic case for our resident cabbie driver criminal lawyer I reckon.

"Your Honour, I present as evidence, this poo."

;D

Coffee can give some people diar diorr dyare dihhore the runs.

Maybe he was drinking a coffee, pooed his pants before he could make it to the toilet, and ran to the nearby office to clean up.

Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 6:00pm:

This would have been a classic case for our resident cabbie driver criminal lawyer I reckon. "Your Honour, I present as evidence, this poo." ;D

This retired Lawyer has no interest at all in your crap Threads, Lisa Jones.

Was the evidence obtained after Lisa Jones laundering services?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 6:03pm:

Coffee can give some people diar diorr dyare dihhore the runs. Maybe he was drinking a coffee, pooed his pants before he could make it to the toilet, and ran to the nearby office to clean up.

Maybe he's Lisa Jones's employee and Lisa gave him the s h i t s. This is evidently a case of industrial dysentery.

I'm surprised no-one's made the connection. It's really quite simple!

The perpetrator simply neglected to bathe after his last 'date'.

See?

Queasy, but Easy Peasy.

8-)

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 6:03pm:

Coffee can give some people diar diorr dyare dihhore the runs. Maybe he was drinking a coffee, pooed his pants before he could make it to the toilet, and ran to the nearby office to clean up.

Ha!

Imagine being the police officer at the scene who had to gather the messy evidence.

;D

Lionel Edriess wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 6:18pm:

I'm surprised no-one's made the connection. It's really quite simple! The perpetrator simply neglected to bathe after his last 'date'. See? Queasy, but Easy Peasy. 8-)

Hot date no doubt lol  :P

Lionel Edriess wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 6:18pm:

I'm surprised no-one's made the connection. It's really quite simple! The perpetrator simply neglected to bathe after his last 'date'. See? Queasy, but Easy Peasy. 8-)

Lionel Edriess professes to be an expert on s h i t. No one will challenge that claim.

Laugh till you cry wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 9:41pm:

Lionel Edriess wrote on Jun 15th, 2016 at 6:18pm: I'm surprised no-one's made the connection. It's really quite simple! The perpetrator simply neglected to bathe after his last 'date'. See? Queasy, but Easy Peasy. 8-) Lionel Edriess professes to be an expert on s h i t. No one will challenge that claim.

And that response merely illustrates what a protected life you've led.

If you'd ever lived in the real world, you may have developed a veneer of cynicism, instead you've devolved into the generic field of a critic with no wit.

You, sir, are a cretin, not a crouton, and as such add little to such discourses.

Time for a new hobby.

8-)

Lionel Edriess wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 10:06pm:

Laugh till you cry wrote on Jun 15th, 2016 at 9:41pm: Lionel Edriess wrote on Jun 15th, 2016 at 6:18pm: I'm surprised no-one's made the connection. It's really quite simple! The perpetrator simply neglected to bathe after his last 'date'. See? Queasy, but Easy Peasy. 8-) Lionel Edriess professes to be an expert on s h i t. No one will challenge that claim. And that response merely illustrates what a protected life you've led. If you'd ever lived in the real world, you may have developed a veneer of cynicism, instead you've devolved into the generic field of a critic with no wit. You, sir, are a cretin, not a crouton, and as such add little to such discourses. Time for a new hobby. 8-)

You, sir, are a pompous ass that knows s h i t!

Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 5:54pm:

cods wrote on Jun 15th, 2016 at 5:52pm: Redmond Neck wrote on Jun 15th, 2016 at 5:42pm: That is the best story I have heard in years! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D someone else could have worn his soiled underpants.. red.... anyone you know who would do that??????... this judge is kidding us isnt she????.... please say it's joke.... :o Cods, have you frequented any coffee shops in Canberra lately? ;D

what pray are you suggesting??..



this is one bad story..

however my concern is tha whack who let him off... because she couldnt be sure he was the only one that wore them... ::) ::) ::) ::)


will someone tell her???.....maybe the paper was a clue..

Its quite common for offenders to defecate on the scene.

ian wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 11:30pm:

Its quite common for offenders to defecate on the scene.

Confession?

ian wrote on Jun 15^th, 2016 at 11:30pm:

Its quite common for offenders to defecate on the scene.

How do you know this?