| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Chat >> Eye candy for the lad's http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1464480164 Message started by Agnes on May 29th, 2016 at 10:02am |
|
|
Title: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on May 29th, 2016 at 10:02am Miss Sophia.. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Ajax on May 29th, 2016 at 1:11pm
Oh yeah Sophia was a babe in her day, so was Brigitte
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on May 29th, 2016 at 6:16pm
Victoria Secret model- Candice
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on May 29th, 2016 at 6:20pm Agnes wrote on May 29th, 2016 at 10:02am:
Ohhh yeah. A VERY beautiful European woman indeed :P |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Leftwinger on May 29th, 2016 at 7:53pm Agnes wrote on May 29th, 2016 at 10:02am:
oh lala :-* |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by The Mechanic on May 29th, 2016 at 8:42pm
Sprint doesn't like beautiful pictures of women...
he has had several threads taken down in the mens room.. but it seems he is very "into" buff men threads.. make of that what you will... :-/ |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on May 29th, 2016 at 8:51pm
sprint will cry again and have the photos removed.
He much prefers photos of girly looking men. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Leftwinger on May 29th, 2016 at 10:05pm Was always a fan of Claudia Schiffer , she wanted to go out with me once but I knew she was just after my money . |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Leftwinger on May 29th, 2016 at 10:09pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYMNFDtw9aI
This one is a keeper |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Aussie on May 29th, 2016 at 10:10pm John Smith wrote on May 29th, 2016 at 8:51pm:
He is a conundrum is Mr Cyclist. He gets all hairy chested about being a Christian and puritan on stuff like this.....yet has no compunction about, or shame for, referring to indigenous people as boooongs. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by AiA on May 30th, 2016 at 2:49am Aussie wrote on May 29th, 2016 at 10:10pm:
And you Oz? Fantasizing about young women with Down Syndrome. That is far more than a "conundrum" and goes far, far beyond "shame." |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Sprintcyclist on May 30th, 2016 at 7:33am Its time wrote on May 29th, 2016 at 10:05pm:
Good on you lefty. Just say 'NO'. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on May 30th, 2016 at 8:14am AiA wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 2:49am:
Actually AiA, it's beyond disgusting. Hence why I'm staying out of that revolting topic in his rubbish filled forum. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Aussie on May 30th, 2016 at 9:02am AiA wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 2:49am:
Why you have to introduce that gutter sleaze is totally beyond me. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by GordyL on May 30th, 2016 at 9:45am Aussie wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 9:02am:
Yuk images_043.jpeg (19 KB | ) |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by AiA on May 30th, 2016 at 9:53am Lisa Jones wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 8:14am:
Yes, sexual attraction to disability is beyond disgusting. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on May 30th, 2016 at 9:59am AiA wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 9:53am:
It's sexual obsession in his case. God knows what disturbing images he has on his hard drive. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by AiA on May 30th, 2016 at 10:03am Lisa Jones wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 9:59am:
The police should be contacted and his computer confiscated before some poor disabled young woman rides in his cab again. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on May 30th, 2016 at 10:04am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezg0pw4l0dY
Now here is a clip of a sexy lady ! |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on May 30th, 2016 at 10:05am AiA wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 9:53am:
Why? One of my best friends has been in a wheel chair since age 12, she is sexy lady and her disability stops her from doing not one thing that she chooses to do- her males counterparts are all "normal" abled men. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on May 30th, 2016 at 10:05am AiA wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:03am:
I was thinking along the same lines AiA. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on May 30th, 2016 at 10:07am Agnes wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:05am:
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by AiA on May 30th, 2016 at 10:07am Agnes wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:05am:
According to this Wikipedia article it is a "disorder": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attraction_to_disability |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on May 30th, 2016 at 10:11am
Not reading the cherry picked link btw- why is it wrong to want to date go out with a women with disability-?
I mean I read your comment about how ugly muslim women ( gross revolting hairy bodies and boobs to their knees) were and how you understood why they ( fc-king gross animal husbands) would want to have sex with young boys instead of their wives, someone is sick around here AiA that is for sure. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on May 30th, 2016 at 10:14am Agnes wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:05am:
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by AiA on May 30th, 2016 at 10:15am Agnes wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:11am:
Preying on young Down Syndrome women is not the same as a healthy male going on a date with a disabled woman. One is a "disorder," the other is not. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on May 30th, 2016 at 10:18am AiA wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:15am:
Not sticking up for anyone here dear AiA- but you I believe have no room to talk /put down anyone else about being sexually deviant- as you were. And this is just another tag team troll. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by AiA on May 30th, 2016 at 10:20am Agnes wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:18am:
Uh, no, the only other sexual deviant I know here is Jovial Monk whose attraction to canines is well documented Agnes. If he still posted here you could post some doggie porn for him. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on May 30th, 2016 at 10:21am AiA wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:15am:
And talking about a group of Muslim women as though they were lower than animals is par for the course with you- they are one of the most oppressed groups of women on the planet and you speak of them that way- DISGUSTING >:( |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on May 30th, 2016 at 10:22am AiA wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:20am:
Yuk. My coffee just came up. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by AiA on May 30th, 2016 at 10:23am Agnes wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:21am:
I feel for Muslim women Agnes and agree that they are oppressed. Why they put up with the restrictions of Islam is beyond me. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on May 30th, 2016 at 10:25am AiA wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:15am:
Such perpetrators will attempt to excuse/minimise their behaviour....when confronted. And he's done just that over in his rubbish filled forum. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Aussie on May 30th, 2016 at 10:31am Lisa Jones wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:25am:
What exactly are you saying my behaviour is? |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on May 30th, 2016 at 10:33am Lisa Jones wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:05am:
Someone needs to contact the authorities AiA. Now. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by AiA on May 30th, 2016 at 10:34am
I hope it isn't too late.
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on May 30th, 2016 at 10:37am AiA wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:34am:
I've taken screen shots of everything. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on May 30th, 2016 at 10:37am AiA wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:23am:
I do realise that everything is a joke to you and yes there is not a lot of stuff I don't laugh about but these women in these circumstances is not one of them . One of my best friends has been in a wheel chair for most of her life- she has been married to a non disabled man dated non disabled men, is a very successful author most of her life and has led a very normal life- she is not Downs but a disability is a disability and we should be more respectful than to joke and make fun of / or assume that they would not want to be desired or that desiring them is ugly ,wrong or freakish- they are pp like us |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Aussie on May 30th, 2016 at 10:38am Lisa Jones wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:37am:
Good. What is this behaviour of mine you are specifically referring to, Jones? |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by AiA on May 30th, 2016 at 10:38am Lisa Jones wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:37am:
How many taxi companies are in Qld? They should all be alerted to a possible predator in their midst. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on May 30th, 2016 at 10:39am
umm sorry guys "the authorities" take no notice of kids over the age of 55 fighting on forums like toddlers lol
Especially if one has leaky gut and the other excessive hair ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by AiA on May 30th, 2016 at 10:42am Agnes wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:39am:
55? not I. just us spring chickens here Agnes. and the authorities do take reports of sexual predators seriously. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on May 30th, 2016 at 10:44am Agnes wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:39am:
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Aussie on May 30th, 2016 at 10:45am Agnes wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 10:39am:
Especially when there is nothing anyone in authority would be remotely interested in. This is just the usual PA losers sleazy beatup. I'm sure they really truly genuinely believe their crap, but this abusive slur is just that and is exactly the same as pedo allegations. Completely unacceptable and utterly rejected by me. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on May 30th, 2016 at 10:58am This is a powerful contrast.. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Marla on May 30th, 2016 at 11:02am Lisa Jones wrote on May 29th, 2016 at 6:20pm:
Mona Johannesson. The modern Euro female. What is must be going through life looking like that. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on May 30th, 2016 at 11:07am
she is gorgeous Marla- as is the next first Lady Melania
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Marla on May 30th, 2016 at 11:29am
Or Victoria Lee
Believe she is Australian. The life of a supermodel. Jet-setting around the globe wearing clothes manufactured in third-world sweat shops owned by capitalist oligarchs. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on May 30th, 2016 at 11:41am
.
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by skippy. on May 30th, 2016 at 4:33pm GordyL wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 9:45am:
Don't you like women with tattoos ,Gordy? |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Leftwinger on May 30th, 2016 at 7:13pm Marla wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 11:02am:
Its tough Marla but i manage |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by The Mechanic on May 30th, 2016 at 8:09pm Marla wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 11:29am:
is that a boy with long hair? :-/ |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by freediver on May 31st, 2016 at 2:21pm Quote:
My thoughts too. She looks like she has the body of an old (male) drug addict. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by The Grappler on Jun 1st, 2016 at 1:00am
Just to make this strand a little easier on the eye.... cheez - you gotta bring in boys with funny bits?.... HERE!
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by The Grappler on Jun 1st, 2016 at 1:04am
Mam Mia!
What is this preoccupation with these starved looking feral chicks? No entertainment there at all! A woman needs to have a lovely svelte soft look - not some starved and ravaged by gym half-ling thing.... nice soft rounded buttocks with a positive posterior thrust and width and depth of carriage ....legs with a little congruence with the hips, not some drawn away and barely clinging to the bone desiccated fossils from some ancient dream or nightmare.... tits that don't look like some zombie nightmare thing to suck on or your grand mother's little ones.... Give me WOMEN of give me death!... |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Ajax on Jun 1st, 2016 at 6:38pm
Super models like this one are the split image of clothes on a coat hanger.
Absolutely formless. Needs more meat. Marla wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 11:29am:
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on Jun 1st, 2016 at 6:46pm The body in flesh may be lacking, but wow, just beautiful..Victoria Lee.. Click to resize |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by The Grappler on Jun 2nd, 2016 at 12:09am
Amazing that we gentlemen view a woman as prime material for her credentials in pushing out babies... yet once they do that three or four times... they lose that attraction.... and the very shape that provokes it....
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 2nd, 2016 at 9:13am freediver wrote on May 31st, 2016 at 2:21pm:
X2 |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Setanta on Jun 3rd, 2016 at 1:18am Marla wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 11:29am:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGZqDzb__bw&index=19&list=PLqfe7_XI5J00u_CJ2HgwQvsj1EiiwP6a7 She would be be a very handsome woman if she ate more. Do you starve yourself Bob? |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Marla on Jun 4th, 2016 at 10:06am
Daughter of all-time Aussie favorite Johnny Depp
She cleans up nice. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Ajax on Jun 4th, 2016 at 10:20am Marla wrote on Jun 4th, 2016 at 10:06am:
Looks like a glazed and painted porcelain doll. Plastic..... :) Real beauty doesn't require a tonne of war paint. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Marla on Jun 4th, 2016 at 11:19am
She looks like a (white) privileged garden gnome to me
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Mr Hammer on Jun 4th, 2016 at 4:14pm
White and privileged like you, champ?
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Jun 5th, 2016 at 10:22am
Lovely Grecian Lady from Hurstville. Who could resist?
13315620_115248855563447_3825481258896768389_n.jpg (77 KB | ) |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 10:49am
geez Vic .... warn a bloke before posting that.
At first glance I thought it was a bloke, it was only after looking again that I realised that it was Lisa |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Mr Hammer on Jun 5th, 2016 at 10:50am
That's a picture of Smithy's Italian mother.
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Jun 5th, 2016 at 10:55am John Smith wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 10:49am:
sorry John. It's a promo pic for "Visit Hurstville" A multicultural event that is to showcase the Greek Community and their traditions in the Hurstville area. Apart from a cavalcade of beauties as above, there are workshops that are a must to attend: "Decorating your Council Two Bedder" and "How to cope with an Incontinent Live In Mother" are just two that are VERY popular. Take the family down for an unforgettable experience! |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 11:01am Mr Hammer wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 10:50am:
just because you got a hard on as soon as you saw it. :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Ajax on Jun 5th, 2016 at 11:03am Vic wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 10:22am:
LOL is that your girlfriend mate......ROFL |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:02pm Mr Hammer wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 10:50am:
Smith is Aboriginal NOT Italian. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:03pm Ajax wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 11:03am:
It's a she male. So yes...IT is ;D |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Mr Hammer on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:07pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:02pm:
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Mr Hammer on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:08pm Vic wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 10:22am:
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:11pm Mr Hammer wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:07pm:
Duh! ::) |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Mr Hammer on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:13pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:11pm:
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:16pm Mr Hammer wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:13pm:
:P |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:21pm Kim K. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lord Herbert on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:24pm
You can't be serious.
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Sprintcyclist on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:28pm
back to the topic please ......
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:29pm Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:24pm:
She is seriously joking. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:31pm Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:24pm:
I don't like Kim personally, but she has a certain beauty about her, why can you not see it ? Kanye did.. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Setanta on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:33pm Agnes wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:31pm:
Probably the same reason I can't. As GordyL would say, Yuk! |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lord Herbert on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:33pm Marla wrote on Jun 4th, 2016 at 10:06am:
Actually, that's what she does need - a good washing to flush away all that gunk on her face. She wears more mascara than her father does. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Aussie on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:33pm Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:24pm:
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Setanta on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:34pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:28pm:
You have to leave that sort of eye candy in the boot these days Sprint, no longer too walk by your side. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lord Herbert on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:37pm Marla wrote on May 30th, 2016 at 11:29am:
... bones and more bones ... sharp edges from top to toe ... all elbows-and-knees like a human praying mantis. A man would end up bruised all over if he had a one-night stand with her. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Setanta on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:40pm Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:37pm:
Herb, leave your fantasies at home. She just needs some of John's Italian mother's cooking. She'll polish up, poor starved thing. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:42pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:02pm:
sei proprio una cretina |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:42pm
real beauty here- eye candy wot?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIgZ7gMze7A |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Aussie on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:42pm John Smith wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:42pm:
Don't understand Italian at all but that one is pretty clear! |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:42pm Setanta wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:40pm:
only if I can get a one night stand with her after she's finished eating :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:44pm Agnes wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:31pm:
she also has an arse the size of a barn door :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lord Herbert on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:45pm Marla wrote on Jun 4th, 2016 at 11:19am:
She has no idea how to stand. Whatever happened to Finishing School for young ladies who have recently completed their school years? Deportment, etiquette, table settings, conversation, how to stand, how to sit, etc. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:46pm John Smith wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:42pm:
^^^^Typical example of why dopes who pretend to be Italian should NOT use online translation apps. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:48pm Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:45pm:
Herb they are trained to walk this way- they are paid handsomely to do so as well. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:48pm Setanta wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:40pm:
Ummm, John's Aboriginal. He's not Italian. He played the same games on Yahoo with the same multi banned nics. Full time for over a decade. ;) |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:49pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:46pm:
typical example of why dopes who pretend to have a brain should NOT use their mouths |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:51pm John Smith wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:49pm:
;D ;D Why are you so ashamed of your Aboriginal heritage "John Smith"? |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Aussie on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:51pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:46pm:
Okay....so how do you say "you're just an idiot" in Italian? |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lord Herbert on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:52pm Agnes wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:31pm:
My problem with Kim - (who I genuinely feel sorry for) - is that I don't believe she has a functioning brain. In fact I believe an MRI would (sadly) reveal a peanut inside her skull like that cartoon of Homer Simpson. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:53pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:46pm:
Excusez moi s'il vous plait- Lisa ? |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:54pm Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:52pm:
actually, I think you are very wrong on that point .. she's very clever. She has no discernible talents and still managed to make more money than you or I combined |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Setanta on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:56pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:48pm:
Next you'll be telling me you're Turk not Greek! |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by ian on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:59pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:48pm:
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:00pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:51pm:
Hey....here's a question for everyone. If you were of Aboriginal descent....would you try and hide it online? If so why? I'm just trying to figure out why "John Smith" is trying so hard to be Italian on OzPol when he's clearly not. We all knew him from our Yahoo days....unfortunately. HE LIVED ONLINE UNDER SOOOOO MANY NICS INCL JOHN SMITH. MANY NICS/THOUSANDS OF POSTS....just like he's doing here on OzPol. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:01pm ian wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:59pm:
laughing at you is considered sensitive now? |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lord Herbert on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:01pm Setanta wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:40pm:
You've got a thought there. Lucky John to grow up with an Italian mum in the kitchen. I've watched a few 'My Kitchen Rules' episodes in which Italian women have been involved - and apart from being good-lookers with great personalities - they turned out some very tasty-looking dishes. I think it's time John invited us all down to his place for a nosh-up with his mum sweating over a hot stove in the kitchen. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by ian on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:03pm Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:01pm:
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Aussie on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:03pm
You are posting rubbish Jones. You can, of course, prove me wrong by listing all of Mr Smith's many other 'nics' here. I'll bet you don't.
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:05pm ian wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:59pm:
Mate he's NEVER worked. Ever! He's angry if you suggest employment. He talks of being self employed. He did that on Yahoo too. 100 000 posts later day in day out....kinda gave him away though lol. Can we help "John Smith" come out of his closet? I think we can. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lord Herbert on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:06pm Agnes wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:48pm:
The modelling industry is dominated by gays, and the last thing they want is for their female models to look attractive to men. It's counter-productive to their own sexuality. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Setanta on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:07pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:00pm:
Why would I care if what you said were true. I really don't get this thing some of you have with each other and have no interest. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:07pm Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:01pm:
had home made lasagna tonight herb ... will that do? :P |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:08pm ian wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:03pm:
we now all know what Ian considers 'home cooking' :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:08pm ian wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:03pm:
Umm no food...all grog. His fav liquor? Bourbon. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by ian on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:09pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:05pm:
We did catch him out big time when he pretended to have experience renovating houses. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:09pm Setanta wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:07pm:
she's trying to show you just how clever she is ... I think she's doing a great job. I for one am 100% convinced she's a complete idiot |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Setanta on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:10pm John Smith wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:07pm:
But was she? She doesn't look any more well fed. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:10pm Setanta wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:07pm:
Oi! Did you read the highlighted bit? If so then answer it. Otherwise bugger off. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:10pm ian wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:09pm:
did you? ;D ;D ;D dreaming about me again Ian? |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:11pm Setanta wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:10pm:
get outta here ... the wife was here. :D |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:12pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:08pm:
wouldn't drink Bourbon if you paid me. I'm a scotch drinker |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Setanta on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:12pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:10pm:
How can I honestly? I'm not aboriginal, so anything I say would be conjecture. I'll bugger off when I feel the need. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:13pm ian wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:09pm:
Was it laying tiles? If so then it's true. He can lay tiles thanks to an Aboriginal work for the dole project he was forced to undertake. He told us that over on Yahoo. But that was years ago. He's never renovated his home though. He doesn't own one. What else has he said? Hmmmm? |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lord Herbert on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:14pm John Smith wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:07pm:
You're not going to believe this, but I have never sat down to an Italian meal in a restaurant. I've just never got around to it. :-[You are definitely not going to believe this - but I'll have to google 'lasagna' just to know what it is ... :-[ :-[ :-[ |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:15pm Setanta wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:12pm:
Oh but you specialize in conjecture. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by ian on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:16pm John Smith wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:10pm:
Yes, we did. You stated that Bobby could easily somehow "patch up" a house which appeared to have severe structural issues. And after other posters advised Bobby to seek expert opinion before purchase and you looked like a know nothing you then pretended that it was you who gave him the advice to seek expert opinion. You are a liar John, just not a good one. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:17pm Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:14pm:
You're not going to believe this, but I have never sat down to an Italian meal in a restaurant. I've just never got around to it. :-[/quote] what's wrong with you? hint ... try to find a little trattoria on the backstreets somewhere rather than a big name restaurant. More chance of traditional homestyle cooking that way |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:18pm ian wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:16pm:
You saw a photo of 20 bricks and were able to determined structural issues were you? :D :D it was an easy fix ... you just need to put the time in. Not my fault you're to lazy to do it. And I was commenting on the missing mortar, not any structural issues. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:20pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:15pm:
;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Setanta on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:20pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:15pm:
Umm, mirror. I'm am not someone, as I posted above, that speculates over others lives, livelyhoods or families. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by ian on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:20pm John Smith wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:18pm:
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Setanta on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:22pm John Smith wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:20pm:
Oi! I'm white! ;D |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:22pm ian wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:20pm:
actually it's you that doesn't get it. I explained to bobby how to fix the problem with the missing mortar, as well as a run down on a couple of possible causes. It's not my fault you're a cretin who mistook that for a building inspection certificate :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:22pm ian wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:16pm:
What else has he said? I can assure you I know this fraud. He was the biggest troll on Yahoo for over a decade there. Over 100 000 posts....mainly abusive. Esp towards those who told him to get a job and stop bludging off the system. He used to go on about all the freebies he was entitled to because of his Aboriginality...to try and get back at those who could see he was rorting the system. Anyway....wonder how many thousands of posts he's clocked up on OzPol? Betcha it's a shocker lol. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:24pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:22pm:
about as well as you have proven you know any subject :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lord Herbert on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:24pm John Smith wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:17pm:
I've definitely seen the word 'Trattoria' here and there. After thinking a little more on this, maybe I've been avoiding Italian restaurants because I don't like being made a fuss of by the owner/managers. I've seen footage of Italian restaurants in New York where the owner/managers stroll amongst the 'guests' while singing and chatting and 'carrying on'. I like to keep a low profile when I'm eating in a restaurant. I'm not looking for hilarity and becoming part of the circus that some of these Italian managers in NY put on. I'm Anglo-Saxon, with all the traditional reserve and polite decorum of the traditional Englishman. :P |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:26pm
a pic of a beautiful specimen of woman- to all the troublemakers dragging this thread off topic.! Stay classy John, they cannot help it.
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Aussie on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:26pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:22pm:
Ya see, all was well when Lisa Jones believed that Mr Smith was part of her personal cheer squad, but as time went by, he realised that he needed to distance himself, and then, more recently, make it quite plain that he was quite the opposite. You know what they say about a woman scorned? |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:27pm ian wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:20pm:
Ha! I've got a better one. The dope stated that Auctioneers were not aware of the reserve price at an Auction. Oh and he was adamant about it. He was outted. He then suddenly logged off for a whole day. ;D I know.... ;D I'm still laughing here. :D |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:27pm Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:24pm:
so don't go to NY usually restaurant owners are very good at picking up on their customers vibe ... Some people like a chat, some don't. A restaurant owner who annoys or ignores his customers doesn't stay in business for very long. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:28pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:27pm:
I said the AGENT, not the auctioneer ... you idiot |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:29pm Agnes wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:26pm:
it's actually hilarious reading the crap they put up .. I don't know whats sadder, that they care so much or that they actually believe it ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lord Herbert on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:29pm Aussie wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:26pm:
She refuses to give the $5,000 Engagement ring back? |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:29pm John Smith wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:28pm:
;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Setanta on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:31pm Aussie wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:26pm:
They're easy to bed? ;) |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:32pm John Smith wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:29pm:
Anon IPs- think they know everything but in reality they know nothing.. don't let them drag you down..you are better than that. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Aussie on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:32pm Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:29pm:
It seems possible, doesn't it. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:33pm Setanta wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:31pm:
that's what they said about Loretta Bobbit :o :o :o |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:33pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:22pm:
Ohhhh look. John Smith Gold Member ***** Online Australian Politics Posts: 39920 OMG! 39 920 posts? Is this a record? |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Aussie on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:33pm Setanta wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:31pm:
Nah....ya get two more go's. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Aussie on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:35pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:33pm:
That sure is a lot of posts. But.....what's so wrong about that? |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:36pm John Smith wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:28pm:
You do realise that despite the fact that you're lying....even THIS latest admission makes you look sillier than ever. You cannot be THIS silly. Oh wait... |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Setanta on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:36pm John Smith wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:33pm:
I always laugh at that name. You've seen a bob tailed lizard, a bob tailed dog, you know how English surnames are quite often trade related... |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:39pm John Smith wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:28pm:
I'm the idiot? Read what you've just admitted. That makes YOU the idiot. Anyway...you're a WOFTAM. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:40pm
15000 posts is not bad for a woman with 3 sets of twins and a massive magical broad bean patch- and something like 6 loads of washing a day etc. And that doesn't take into account the post count of all the multis you have laying around here Lisa.. ;D ;D ;)
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:41pm
Nite ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:42pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:39pm:
not sure what you think it proves ... afterall, you're supposed to be the real estate agent, not me. And yet you thought an investment property worth $250k is subject to land tax :D :D :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Aussie on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:42pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:36pm:
Oh dear oh dear oh dear. The truth is here in the link which follows. Notice also how Jones was so close and supportive of Mr Smith on the issue. Mr Smith....take a bow. Link. Tell us who is the liar again Jones. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:43pm Setanta wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:36pm:
never thought of it that way ... :-? it was his destiny |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:46pm Agnes wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:41pm:
G'night |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Setanta on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:50pm John Smith wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:43pm:
She had a role to fulfil. Destiny. Throwing it out of a moving car is just icing. I've always wondered if the court would have been as understanding if he cut her cunny out. I threw her womb out on the m16 interchange. I didn't have womb in my car any more. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:59pm Aussie wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:42pm:
For the benefit of those who are not insane: That link? Me talking to Herb about whether or not he should sell up/not sell up. Next! |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Leftwinger on Jun 5th, 2016 at 10:06pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:39pm:
Correct |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Setanta on Jun 5th, 2016 at 10:07pm
For the totally sane, don't bother with any of it.
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 10:09pm Setanta wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 10:07pm:
8-) |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 5th, 2016 at 10:13pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:39pm:
Almost 40 000 posts and that's just with 1 of your nics. Says it all really. Nite loser! Pray for brains. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Black Orchid on Jun 5th, 2016 at 10:45pm
One dark ... one fair. Both beautiful imo.
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Setanta on Jun 5th, 2016 at 10:54pm
From all the talent so far I would have to say Depp's daughter. Maybe the other one if she had herself a feed or five.
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 5th, 2016 at 11:10pm Setanta wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 10:54pm:
I'm voting for Sophia in her younger days ... stunning |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on Jun 5th, 2016 at 11:34pm
Yep Sophia def..
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by AiA on Jun 6th, 2016 at 1:43am
Never have I found perfection beautiful. A woman has to have some quirky imperfection for me.
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Agnes on Jun 6th, 2016 at 2:14am AiA wrote on Jun 6th, 2016 at 1:43am:
I know what you mean. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by AiA on Jun 6th, 2016 at 2:35am Agnes wrote on Jun 6th, 2016 at 2:14am:
that ^^^ isn't what I had in mind but I can understand why Kathy Bates would be a body image role model for you Agnes. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Not_IQSRLOW on Jun 6th, 2016 at 6:28am AiA wrote on Jun 6th, 2016 at 2:35am:
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 6th, 2016 at 10:47am AiA wrote on Jun 6th, 2016 at 2:35am:
Oh dear :-X |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Mr Hammer on Jun 6th, 2016 at 12:47pm
Pecca's squeeze.
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Mr Hammer on Jun 6th, 2016 at 12:47pm
>:(
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Mr Hammer on Jun 6th, 2016 at 12:48pm
>:(
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 6th, 2016 at 12:48pm Mr Hammer wrote on Jun 6th, 2016 at 12:47pm:
;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Jun 6th, 2016 at 2:12pm
This lovely lady comes with a score board. And a beautiful lady she is too! Worth rubbing one out over!
13346557_141175626293817_8884894807111249956_n.jpg (52 KB | ) |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lord Herbert on Jun 6th, 2016 at 3:22pm John Smith wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 11:10pm:
She was a unique beauty in an angular and thrusting sort of way. She launched a Niagara of masturbation in her day. 8-) |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lord Herbert on Jun 6th, 2016 at 3:22pm
..
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 6th, 2016 at 3:24pm Vic wrote on Jun 6th, 2016 at 2:12pm:
500 for the nose? :o :o :o man I must be doing something wrong ... I didn't even think it was a target :D :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lord Herbert on Jun 6th, 2016 at 3:26pm Vic wrote on Jun 6th, 2016 at 2:12pm:
Plain and boring. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by UnSubRocky on Jun 8th, 2016 at 11:31pm
Plain and boring? What supermodel island are you residing, Herbert?
|
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by UnSubRocky on Jun 8th, 2016 at 11:36pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:33pm:
Indeed, how does one make time for 27 posts per day for 4 years, John? |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by John Smith on Jun 9th, 2016 at 9:45am UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 8th, 2016 at 11:36pm:
easy ... |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lord Herbert on Jun 9th, 2016 at 10:43am UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 8th, 2016 at 11:31pm:
Shallow, vapid, superficial, 2-dimentional. No breeding - no clahss. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by UnSubRocky on Jun 9th, 2016 at 10:21pm Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 9th, 2016 at 10:43am:
I guess my daughter would not turn heads in her direction, either, according to your criteria. Blonde, happy, healthy, intelligent, outgoing. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Setanta on Jun 10th, 2016 at 1:22am UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 9th, 2016 at 10:21pm:
Nope, don't wan't it... How much are you asking anyway? I might know someone... |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by UnSubRocky on Jun 10th, 2016 at 3:02am Setanta wrote on Jun 10th, 2016 at 1:22am:
Nevermind. Thought that maybe Herbert had a thing against blonde women. |
|
Title: Re: Eye candy for the lad's Post by Lord Herbert on Jun 10th, 2016 at 7:03am UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 9th, 2016 at 10:21pm:
;D ;D ;D God bless her! But for god sake tell her not to cheapen and ruin herself with bogan tattoos!! Or is it too late ... and you've already had to grit your teeth and smile through your disappointment? My condolences. |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |