| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> CPA Backs The Greens http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1463541411 Message started by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 1:16pm |
|
|
Title: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 1:16pm
$1 trillion for the military
The media called it a bland budget. Big business is extremely disappointed with the budget and the Coalition’s record. As far as it is concerned the Coalition have had almost three years to carry out a major overhaul of the role of government and how it raises income and spending priorities. The Coalition has failed dismally in the eyes of many members of the Business Council of Australia* (BCA). It was not for lack of policy. After all, the BCA drew up an economic and social blueprint for the Coalition. As soon as the Abbott government came to office it commissioned a National Commission of Audit. Former BCA CEO Bruce Shepherd was its chair. The BCA’s chief economist and director of policy, Peter Crone, led the Commission’s Secretariat. As a former adviser to the Howard and Victorian Kennett governments, Crone had impeccable neo-liberal credentials for the job. (See Guardian, “Abbott’s audit: By big business, For big business”, #1616, 30-10-2013) Corporate blueprint The Audit report spelled out a clear neo-liberal agenda, as dictated by global capital, for privatisation of government, deregulation, competition policy, dismantling the social security system and a takeover of the state by big business. The model is similar to the British conservative government’s Big Society. The Abbott/Hockey government publicly supported most of its recommendations. These recommendations included: aged pension to be set at 28 percent of average weekly earnings (amounting to a real reduction) tougher means test for aged pension to include part or full value of home in the assets slower roll out of National Disability Insurance Scheme co-payments for Medicare with abolition of bulk billing means testing Medicare those on incomes above the threshold required to take out private health insurance for medical coverage deregulation of private health insurance premiums higher threshold for Medicare safety net price rises for medications on Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme Family Tax Benefit Part B abolished with a new supplement paid to sole parent families who lose this benefit a single means tested child care assistance system cuts to eligibility for carer payments and carer allowance minimum wage to be set by states and reduced funding cuts for higher education repayment of student loans cut in at minimum wage at higher interest rates funding cuts to foreign aid program funding cuts to Indigenous programs funding cuts to ABC and SBS abolition and mergers of government departments and agencies such as of Border Control Australia by merging the Department of Immigration and Australian Customs privatisation of government services and entities including Snowy Hydro, , Australia Post, and Defence Housing review of GST rate (increase in GST) single parenting payments be reduced from a maximum of 25% of Male Total Weekly Earnings to 25% of Average Weekly Earnings (a reduction of 16.6%) abolition of the Clean Energy Finance Corporation abolition of the Australian Renewable Energy Agency increase in military spending to two percent of GDP. The Audit’s only reference to “climate” was to abolish the Climate Change Authority! The only reference to “environment” was to the “fiscal environment”! In Treasurer Scott Morrison’s 2016-17 budget speech these two words don’t even rate a mention, not even a token reference. Horror budget The 2014-15 horror budget which contributed to the downfall of Prime Minster Tony Abbott and Treasurer Joe Hockey contained most of these measures or slight variations of them. The few that didn’t appear have been the subject of rumours and the usual denials. It was, as the Guardian said at the time, a budget “By big business, For big business”, with a massive program of cuts to spending on health, education, social security payments, public sector workforce and other areas of benefit to people. All of this to fund corporate tax cuts and tax cuts for the rich. The changes to Medicare are in train. The proposed $7, and later $5 co-payment, is being introduced by stealth with what will amount to a six year freeze on rebates paid to bulk-billing doctors. The cuts to family tax benefits are also waiting in the wings having been blocked by the Senate. The attempt to deregulate university fees is stalled in the Senate. The Abbott/Hockey $26 billion budget cut to schools were not mentioned. They remain on the agenda but thinly covered up by a $1.2 billion “increase” over three years, with strings attached. Likewise, the Abbott/Hockey $54 billion cut to public hospital funding has been buried from view by a $2.9 billion “increase” to funding. Again these cuts have not gone away. Hockey came up with some of his own cuts, in addition to those designed by the BCA. One of the cruellest of these sought to deny young people access to unemployment benefits for six months, followed by an obligatory six months of “work for the dole.” Fortunately, this and some of the others failed to pass through the Senate. The GST reared its ugly head but when the opinion polls pointed to its unpopularity, was removed from the table. It now waits hidden under the table until after the elections. Workers’ nightmare, bosses’ dream Regardless of who wins the elections, a few months down the track Moodys and the other private ratings agencies will also rear their ugly heads. They will point to the budget deficit, now almost twice the size of Labor’s “tsunami” deficit of 2013-14. There will be t |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 1:17pm
There will be the all-too-familiar warnings of a downgrading from AAA if the “hard decisions” are not taken to cut social spending, downsize the public sector and slash corporate taxes.
If the Coalition gain control of both Houses of Parliament then there will be no stopping them – the BCA will be smiling from ear to ear with the prospect of lower taxes, higher profits and super-exploitation of workers. And it won’t just be a lower minimum wage that the BCA have in mind. Workers and their trade unions can expect a beefed-up Australian Building and Construction Commission, individual work contracts, massive penalties for industrial action, no restrictions on hours of work, unpaid overtime, unsafe working conditions. But you would never guess any of this from Treasurer Scott Morrison’s speech and the “bland” budget delivered on May 3 that the BCA’s blueprint and the contents of the 2014 anti-people budget are still at the top of the agenda. Workers have a rosy future if you believed Morrison. He uses the word “jobs” over 35 times in his 2016-17, 30-minute budget speech. The only jobs this budget will create are in the military sector and a small number of manufacturing jobs that feed it. The bloated military budget of $1 trillion in the coming 20 years serves the interests of US war hawks. The same money spent on the manufacturing sector, on developing renewable energy, building buses and trains or public housing would create hundreds of thousands more jobs and be of benefit to the people and the planet. The word “plan” is used 29 times. In this case there is a plan, the BCA’s blueprint for big business profits, but its details are on hold until after the elections in the event of a Coalition victory. But you would never guess from the Treasurer’s speech that these plans are still on the agenda, just hidden from view. The government’s anti-people agenda emphasises the importance of ensuring the Coalition do not gain control of the Senate. They must be thrown out of office. The Communist Party of Australia supports the election of Australian Greens and left and progressive candidates to the Senate in the coming election. http://www.cpa.org.au/guardian/2016/1731/01-deep-social-cuts.html |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on May 18th, 2016 at 1:22pm
"The Communist Party of Australia supports the election of Australian Greens and left and progressive candidates to the Senate in the coming election."
Somehow, I don't think the average australian would see this as a good endorsement. If it were the CPA as in Accountants - maybe - but not the one you have trotted out |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 1:26pm
verses Murdoch endorsement of the coalition and/or labor.
At the very least, the CPA has articulated solid reasons for their support. daily-tele-albo.png (131 KB | 22
) |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by cods on May 18th, 2016 at 1:35pm
fancy being endorsed by the COMMUNIST PARTY of AUSTRALIA..
well it says it all the Greens party has been infiltrated by the CPA...thank you for that news greenwin...... over the years we have all noticed the change in the Greens basics they dont mention trees anymore... ::) ::)... they do their best to PANIC people into thinking the world will end... and we notice they will jump into bed on any cause that may get them a vote... ::) ::) ::) but now they appear to be in bed with the CPA.. who would also stoop to doing anything to divide this great country of ours... >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 1:39pm
Does that mean Murdoch has infiltrated the Labor and Liberal parties cod?
|
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by BigOl64 on May 18th, 2016 at 1:40pm Vic wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 1:22pm:
People who have a sound understanding of economics will not be endorsing the greens; ratbag commos, yeah I can see them being all in. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 1:46pm BigOl64 wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 1:40pm:
Your endorsing the Greens, has been noted. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Wolseley on May 18th, 2016 at 1:47pm cods wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 1:35pm:
Maybe there is something in that old joke about Greens and watermelons after all. This is hardly the sort of endorsement that will attract any voters to The Greens at all, in fact it will probably cause quite a few to desert them. Not so much an endorsement - more like a warning perhaps. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by cods on May 18th, 2016 at 1:51pm ____ wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 1:39pm:
murdoch is one man he isnt a cause.. greeny sure he has power through his empire.....but his influence is only imagined......COMMUNISM is more than that and you have to belong which means you have already been INFLUENCED a bit like ISIS :D :D.. their influence is against anything Australia is or believe in... they believe in dividing.. then conquering.. of course you dont see it though....because your mob want this country on its knees... |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 1:52pm
The CPA has articulated a logical argument for their support of The Greens.
Let's see if anyone can find fault with it. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by cods on May 18th, 2016 at 1:53pm Wolseley wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 1:47pm:
yeah well one of their mouth pieces lee Rhiannon was a member of the communist party... probably still is....horrible women.. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Team Froggie on May 18th, 2016 at 1:53pm Vic wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 1:22pm:
I'll second that.... |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by cods on May 18th, 2016 at 1:54pm ____ wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 1:52pm:
yeah well you rejoice in it sunshine.....you aint an aussie thats for sure. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 1:54pm cods wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 1:51pm:
Oh yes he is. Murdock wants yes men in government, so to advance his business interests. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 1:55pm cods wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 1:54pm:
I am laughing how reaction is the main driver of the righties posting. Verses a position of logic from the CPA. A position the Righties can't find fault in. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by cods on May 18th, 2016 at 1:56pm
all I know is if the CPA endorsed the Libs I would be shattered....and you are thrilled..
says it all really. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by lee on May 18th, 2016 at 1:57pm
And here I was reading the headline and thought they meant Certified Practising Accountant. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Team Froggie on May 18th, 2016 at 1:59pm Vic wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 1:22pm:
Perhaps a case of...... shot-foot_94b19.jpg (47 KB | 13
) |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 1:59pm cods wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 1:56pm:
The CPA don't endorse party's who's agenda is to empower the ultra rich, by destroying everyone else. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by cods on May 18th, 2016 at 2:02pm ____ wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 1:59pm:
keep trying greeny you could end up convincing yourself... ;D ;D so far it isnt working with the ozpol members.. ;) |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Team Froggie on May 18th, 2016 at 2:02pm lee wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 1:57pm:
SLOL |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Wolseley on May 18th, 2016 at 2:06pm ____ wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 1:55pm:
If that's logical, then there must be about ten times as much money in the government's coffers than anyone thought. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by bogarde73 on May 18th, 2016 at 2:07pm
I'm going to plagiarise my good friend IB and say, the Communists didn't die, they just morphed into the Greens and the EU.
|
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 2:08pm cods wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 2:02pm:
I'm happy to debate the reasons why the CPA have endorsed The Greens. Stated in the first and second post. Just because no one can find fault in the reasons, seems all ozpol members agree with the reasons CPA stated. Including you. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Wolseley on May 18th, 2016 at 2:49pm ____ wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 2:08pm:
One of the most ridiculous examples of reasoning on this forum. In any case, you seem to have ignored my comment earlier on this page. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by John Smith on May 18th, 2016 at 2:52pm
'The Communist Party of Australia supports the election of Australian Greens'
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D green slime probably see's that as a good thing |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 3:01pm Wolseley wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 2:49pm:
Your opinion was read. A lot of opinions are read, and then moved on from. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 3:02pm John Smith wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 2:52pm:
Name calling John. Trolling usually represents desperation. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Baronvonrort on May 18th, 2016 at 3:13pm ____ wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 3:02pm:
The Greens= Green on the outside like a watermelon and Commie red to the core |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by John Smith on May 18th, 2016 at 4:25pm ____ wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 3:02pm:
no, joy at support from the communist party represents desperation calling you green slime is merely an indicator of what I think of you |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 4:50pm Baronvonrort wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 3:13pm:
That's so original. I've never heard that before Did you think that up yourself? |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 4:53pm John Smith wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 4:25pm:
You don't come up on my radar outside reading your desperation to get my attention. Sorry. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by John Smith on May 18th, 2016 at 4:57pm ____ wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 4:53pm:
of course not, I'm not gay ... your gaydar only picks up poofs |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Redneck on May 18th, 2016 at 5:34pm ____ wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 4:53pm:
Drop your dacks and point your bum at him is all that needed to get his attention John. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Team Froggie on May 18th, 2016 at 5:39pm
Hey, you two....
I'm trying to drink a hot coffee here!!! |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 5:39pm John Smith wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 4:57pm:
My gaydar pick up men. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 5:40pm
...
|
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Baronvonrort on May 18th, 2016 at 5:43pm ____ wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 4:50pm:
I am just reminding everyone the Greens are commies pretending to be environmentalists |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by John Smith on May 18th, 2016 at 8:45pm ____ wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 5:39pm:
generally a requirement to being a poof, yes .... your point? |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 8:52pm Baronvonrort wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 5:43pm:
Everyone will be commies once dangerous climate change collapses our food chain. It's that, or cannibals. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by Greens_Win on May 18th, 2016 at 8:53pm John Smith wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 8:45pm:
That's why you don't register. |
|
Title: Re: CPA Backs The Greens Post by John Smith on May 18th, 2016 at 8:55pm ____ wrote on May 18th, 2016 at 8:53pm:
I don't register cause I'm not a faggot like you .... |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |