Is a dead terrorist.  ;D


And they got that little scumbag's sister for good measure.  :) :) :)


allah akbar, ya scumbags.  8-)



NEIL Prakash, the Islamic State operative behind a string of failed Australian terror plots, has been killed in a US military air strike in Iraq.
His death was part of a series of targeted assassinations that also killed Australian woman Shadi Jabar, the sister of Parramatta shooter Farhad Jabar, The Australianreports.
US military officials have told the Australian government that Prakash and Jabar were killed in separate air strikes.
Prakash, the most senior Australian fighting with Islamic State, was killed last Friday along with about a dozen fighters in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul.
The Australian said a government official confirmed Prakash’s death on Wednesday night.
The official said Prakash had urged lone-wolf attacks against the US and Australia, had appeared in ISIL propaganda videos and magazines and actively recruited Australian men, women and children.
He was also involved in a string of failed Australian terror plots last year including a plan to run over and behead a policeman in Melbourne on Anzac Day and go on a shooting rampage with his gun.
A week before Prakash’s death, Shadi Jabar Khaled Mohammed was killed in a US air strike in al Bab, northern Syria along with her husband, Abu Saad al-Sudani.
She was the sister of Farhad Jabar, the 15-year-old terrorist who shot NSW police worker Curtis Cheng as he left Parramatta police station last year in an ISIL-inspired killing.

http://www.news.com.au/national/australian-is-operative-neil-prakash-dead/news-story/2fd8eb865b59c2501aa5e9ed2f41f974

They were not given due process of the law, so their regrettable deaths should be referred to Amnesty International, the International courts, and the UN. Its an outrage against people simply trying to follow their religion.

Nice job - I hope they kill all of them.

Bobby. wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 7:32am:

Nice job - I hope they kill all of them.

You're condoning summary executions, Booby.

That makes you no better than a terrorist.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 7:36am:

Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:32am: Nice job - I hope they kill all of them. You're condoning summary executions, Booby. That makes you no better than a terrorist.

What's it like being wrong about everything you say?
Does it get depressing?

..He was regarded as an enemy combatant under international law and is understood to have been on a so-called "kill list
http://m.smh.com.au/national/islamic-state-recruiter-neil-prakash-killed-by-us-strike-in-iraq-20160504-gomjgh.html

GordyL wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 7:43am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:36am: Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:32am: Nice job - I hope they kill all of them. You're condoning summary executions, Booby. That makes you no better than a terrorist. What's it like being wrong about everything you say? Does it get depressing? ..He was regarded as an enemy combatant under international law and is understood to have been on a so-called "kill list http://m.smh.com.au/national/islamic-state-recruiter-neil-prakash-killed-by-us-strike-in-iraq-20160504-gomjgh.html

Another one supporting summary executions.

Seems we have a few terrorists among us.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 7:36am:

Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:32am: Nice job - I hope they kill all of them. You're condoning summary executions, Booby. That makes you no better than a terrorist.

Only you would argue that killing the enemy is unacceptable in war.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 7:50am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:36am: Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:32am: Nice job - I hope they kill all of them. You're condoning summary executions, Booby. That makes you no better than a terrorist. Only you would argue that killing the enemy is unacceptable in war.

Only a terrorist would support summary executions.

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 7:50am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:36am: Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:32am: Nice job - I hope they kill all of them. You're condoning summary executions, Booby. That makes you no better than a terrorist. Only you would argue that killing the enemy is unacceptable in war.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Greggy is a limp wristed homo - he would give them flowers.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 7:52am:

BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:50am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:36am: Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:32am: Nice job - I hope they kill all of them. You're condoning summary executions, Booby. That makes you no better than a terrorist. Only you would argue that killing the enemy is unacceptable in war.  Only a terrorist would support summary executions.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

You are one of the best.

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 6:32am:

Is a dead terrorist.  ;D And they got that little scumbag's sister for good measure.  :) :) :) allah akbar, ya scumbags.  8-) NEIL Prakash, the Islamic State operative behind a string of failed Australian terror plots, has been killed in a US military air strike in Iraq. His death was part of a series of targeted assassinations that also killed Australian woman Shadi Jabar, the sister of Parramatta shooter Farhad Jabar, The Australianreports. US military officials have told the Australian government that Prakash and Jabar were killed in separate air strikes. Prakash, the most senior Australian fighting with Islamic State, was killed last Friday along with about a dozen fighters in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul. The Australian said a government official confirmed Prakash’s death on Wednesday night. The official said Prakash had urged lone-wolf attacks against the US and Australia, had appeared in ISIL propaganda videos and magazines and actively recruited Australian men, women and children. He was also involved in a string of failed Australian terror plots last year including a plan to run over and behead a policeman in Melbourne on Anzac Day and go on a shooting rampage with his gun. A week before Prakash’s death, Shadi Jabar Khaled Mohammed was killed in a US air strike in al Bab, northern Syria along with her husband, Abu Saad al-Sudani. She was the sister of Farhad Jabar, the 15-year-old terrorist who shot NSW police worker Curtis Cheng as he left Parramatta police station last year in an ISIL-inspired killing. http://www.news.com.au/national/australian-is-operative-neil-prakash-dead/news-story/2fd8eb865b59c2501aa5e9ed2f41f974

It's a good news day

Bobby. wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 7:52am:

BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:50am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:36am: Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:32am: Nice job - I hope they kill all of them. You're condoning summary executions, Booby. That makes you no better than a terrorist. Only you would argue that killing the enemy is unacceptable in war.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Greggy is a limp wristed homo - he would give them flowers.

And his arse  ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 7:46am:

GordyL wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:43am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:36am: Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:32am: Nice job - I hope they kill all of them. You're condoning summary executions, Booby. That makes you no better than a terrorist. What's it like being wrong about everything you say? Does it get depressing? ..He was regarded as an enemy combatant under international law and is understood to have been on a so-called "kill list http://m.smh.com.au/national/islamic-state-recruiter-neil-prakash-killed-by-us-strike-in-iraq-20160504-gomjgh.html Another one supporting summary executions. Seems we have a few terrorists among us.

I was stating the international legal position.

I know it's hard Greggy, but say it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkqgDoo_eZE

I like the way they call these people Australian just because they lived here. They were, first and foremost, followers of Mohammed. That was their allegiance.

gweg will organise a celebration of this persons life....

he doesnt deserve to be dead   gweg will tell you that...

and all those who claim he does..

are terrorists   gweg will tell you that., ::) ::)

the only bad guys are libs..

and gweggy says its ok to want them all dead. ::)

I also read the sister of the Parramatta shooter (Farhad Khalil Mohammad Jabar) shooter was killed last week in Syria.

I had no idea she was over there. At the time of the Parramatta shooting there were statements from Jabar's parents saying he was a good boy and they had no idea he was a terrorist.

So they've bred two terrorists and both are now dead......

gweggy only supports the

DEATH OF ALL LIBERALS>>>

cods wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:23am:

gweggy only supports the DEATH OF ALL LIBERALS>>>

I celebrate their deaths.

I don't support summary executions.

Big difference, cods.

GordyL wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:14am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:46am: GordyL wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:43am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:36am: Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:32am: Nice job - I hope they kill all of them. You're condoning summary executions, Booby. That makes you no better than a terrorist. What's it like being wrong about everything you say? Does it get depressing? ..He was regarded as an enemy combatant under international law and is understood to have been on a so-called "kill list http://m.smh.com.au/national/islamic-state-recruiter-neil-prakash-killed-by-us-strike-in-iraq-20160504-gomjgh.html Another one supporting summary executions. Seems we have a few terrorists among us. I was stating the international legal position. I know it's hard Greggy, but say it.

Greggy doesn't bother with the law when it comes to saving terrorists, then it is all lies and bullsh1t to cover up the fact this was a legal killing and a much deserved one at that.

GordyL wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:20am:

I also read the sister of the Parramatta (Farhad Khalil Mohammad Jabar) shooter was killed last week in Syria. I had no idea she was over there. At the time of the Parramatta shooting there were statements from Jabar's parents saying he was a good boy and they had no idea he was a terrorist. So they've bred two terrorists and both are now dead......

Just heard it on Sunrise.

Wonderful Australian family hey? Pffft!

All the freaking CLAN ought to be closely monitored by the authorities.

GordyL wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:14am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:46am: GordyL wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:43am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:36am: Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:32am: Nice job - I hope they kill all of them. You're condoning summary executions, Booby. That makes you no better than a terrorist. What's it like being wrong about everything you say? Does it get depressing? ..He was regarded as an enemy combatant under international law and is understood to have been on a so-called "kill list http://m.smh.com.au/national/islamic-state-recruiter-neil-prakash-killed-by-us-strike-in-iraq-20160504-gomjgh.html Another one supporting summary executions. Seems we have a few terrorists among us. I was stating the international legal position.

You're supporting summary executions.

That's no better than terrorism.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:25am:

cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:23am: gweggy only supports the DEATH OF ALL LIBERALS>>> Max 5500 characters. Remaining characters:  5215 Text size: 11 pt More Smilies View All Smilies Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features      Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry I celebrate their deaths. I don't support summary executions. Big difference, cods.

not if your a LIB.... :) :)..

death is death... its kinda final...

to wish someone dead......is just as bad as believing in the death penalty.......you just dont want to accept that..

cods wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:39am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:25am: cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:23am: gweggy only supports the DEATH OF ALL LIBERALS>>> Max 5500 characters. Remaining characters:  5215 Text size: 11 pt More Smilies View All Smilies Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features      Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry I celebrate their deaths. I don't support summary executions. Big difference, cods. not if your a LIB.... :) :).. death is death... its kinda final... to wish someone dead......is just as bad as believing in the death penalty.......you just dont want to accept that..

I have never wished anyone dead, cods.

I've said that I would celebrate when they are dead.

Are you too stupid to understand the difference?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:39am:

GordyL wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:46am: GordyL wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:43am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:36am: Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:32am: Nice job - I hope they kill all of them. You're condoning summary executions, Booby. That makes you no better than a terrorist. What's it like being wrong about everything you say? Does it get depressing? ..He was regarded as an enemy combatant under international law and is understood to have been on a so-called "kill list http://m.smh.com.au/national/islamic-state-recruiter-neil-prakash-killed-by-us-strike-in-iraq-20160504-gomjgh.html Another one supporting summary executions. Seems we have a few terrorists among us. I was stating the international legal position. You're supporting summary executions. That's no better than terrorism.

see


there you go.,.. a terrorists is a murderer they are judge and jury they do not discriminate..

you call a legal death an execution.....

what do you call a WAR death?.....do soldiers execute as well?

cods wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:43am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:39am: GordyL wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:46am: GordyL wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:43am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:36am: Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:32am: Nice job - I hope they kill all of them. You're condoning summary executions, Booby. That makes you no better than a terrorist. What's it like being wrong about everything you say? Does it get depressing? ..He was regarded as an enemy combatant under international law and is understood to have been on a so-called "kill list http://m.smh.com.au/national/islamic-state-recruiter-neil-prakash-killed-by-us-strike-in-iraq-20160504-gomjgh.html Another one supporting summary executions. Seems we have a few terrorists among us. I was stating the international legal position. You're supporting summary executions. That's no better than terrorism. see there you go.,.. a terrorists is a murderer they are judge and jury they do not discriminate.. you call a legal death an execution.....

It was a summary execution.

No better than terrorism.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:40am:

cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:39am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:25am: cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:23am: gweggy only supports the DEATH OF ALL LIBERALS>>> Max 5500 characters. Remaining characters:  5215 Text size: 11 pt More Smilies View All Smilies Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features      Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry I celebrate their deaths. I don't support summary executions. Big difference, cods. not if your a LIB.... :) :).. death is death... its kinda final... to wish someone dead......is just as bad as believing in the death penalty.......you just dont want to accept that.. I have never wished anyone dead, cods. I've said that I would celebrate when they are dead. Are you too stupid to understand the difference.

are you allowed to use the word stupid.. >:(


seems like you are losing the plot and the good old personal bit comes in..


you would celebrate the death of a lib

but not the death of a terrorist..


dancing on someones grave is not as bad as wanting them dead.. ::) ::)


makes sense to some.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:45am:

cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:43am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:39am: GordyL wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:46am: GordyL wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:43am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:36am: Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:32am: Nice job - I hope they kill all of them. You're condoning summary executions, Booby. That makes you no better than a terrorist. What's it like being wrong about everything you say? Does it get depressing? ..He was regarded as an enemy combatant under international law and is understood to have been on a so-called "kill list http://m.smh.com.au/national/islamic-state-recruiter-neil-prakash-killed-by-us-strike-in-iraq-20160504-gomjgh.html Another one supporting summary executions. Seems we have a few terrorists among us. I was stating the international legal position. You're supporting summary executions. That's no better than terrorism. see there you go.,.. a terrorists is a murderer they are judge and jury they do not discriminate.. you call a legal death an execution..... It was a summary execution. No better than terrorism.

you didnt answer the bit about our war heros... are they also executioners?????... >:( >:( >:( >:(

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:25am:

cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:23am: gweggy only supports the DEATH OF ALL LIBERALS>>> I celebrate their deaths. I don't support summary executions. Big difference, cods.

You celebrate the deaths of all Liberals?

So if my entire family (including myself) died....you'd be celebrating our deaths?

You need help. Urgently!

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:34am:

GordyL wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:20am: I also read the sister of the Parramatta (Farhad Khalil Mohammad Jabar) shooter was killed last week in Syria. I had no idea she was over there. At the time of the Parramatta shooting there were statements from Jabar's parents saying he was a good boy and they had no idea he was a terrorist. So they've bred two terrorists and both are now dead...... Just heard it on Sunrise. Wonderful Australian family hey? Pffft! All the freaking CLAN ought to be closely monitored by the authorities.

One child becoming a terrorist I can put down as a child going off the rails. Two children, the family needs to be looked at.

And here at the time all the do gooders were saying he was a good boy who was targeted by the wrong people..

Blah blah blah blah.

GordyL wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:57am:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:34am: GordyL wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:20am: I also read the sister of the Parramatta (Farhad Khalil Mohammad Jabar) shooter was killed last week in Syria. I had no idea she was over there. At the time of the Parramatta shooting there were statements from Jabar's parents saying he was a good boy and they had no idea he was a terrorist. So they've bred two terrorists and both are now dead...... Just heard it on Sunrise. Wonderful Australian family hey? Pffft! All the freaking CLAN ought to be closely monitored by the authorities. One child becoming a terrorist I can as a child going off the rails. Two children, the family needs to be looked at. And here at the time all the do gooders were saying he was a good boy who was targeted by the wrong people.. Blah blah blah blah.

I think you will find she left a few days before the shooting!   >:( >:( >:( >:(

teddybear wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:01am:

GordyL wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:57am: Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:34am: GordyL wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:20am: I also read the sister of the Parramatta (Farhad Khalil Mohammad Jabar) shooter was killed last week in Syria. I had no idea she was over there. At the time of the Parramatta shooting there were statements from Jabar's parents saying he was a good boy and they had no idea he was a terrorist. So they've bred two terrorists and both are now dead...... Just heard it on Sunrise. Wonderful Australian family hey? Pffft! All the freaking CLAN ought to be closely monitored by the authorities. One child becoming a terrorist I can as a child going off the rails. Two children, the family needs to be looked at. And here at the time all the do gooders were saying he was a good boy who was targeted by the wrong people.. Blah blah blah blah. I think you will find she left a few days before the shooting!   >:( >:( >:( >:(

That bloody terrorist bitch deserved to die IMO.

And her entire family ought to be WATCHED.

Something's not right.

Make no mistake, these middle Eastern terrorist families living in Oz, firmly believe in avenging the deaths of martyrs esp if these martyrs are their children.

Expect more terrorist rubbish to surface from this family.

cods wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:46am:

you would celebrate the death of a lib

Yep.

However, I'm not wishing death upon them.


cods wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:46am:

but not the death of a terrorist..

Incorrect. I celebrate the death of murderers too.

The only good  murdering terrorist is a dead murdering terrorist.

I don't support summary executions, though.

Do you understand the difference?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:14am:

cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:46am: you would celebrate the death of a lib Yep. However, I'm not wishing death upon them.

Get help.

Fast!

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:50am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:25am: cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:23am: gweggy only supports the DEATH OF ALL LIBERALS>>> I celebrate their deaths. I don't support summary executions. Big difference, cods. You celebrate the deaths of all Liberals? So if my entire family (including myself) died....you'd be celebrating our deaths? You need help. Urgently!

Does anyone else on Oz Pol find Greg's comments inappropriate and offensive?

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 6:32am:

Is a dead terrorist.  ;D And they got that little scumbag's sister for good measure.  :) :) :) allah akbar, ya scumbags.  8-) NEIL Prakash, the Islamic State operative behind a string of failed Australian terror plots, has been killed in a US military air strike in Iraq. His death was part of a series of targeted assassinations that also killed Australian woman Shadi Jabar, the sister of Parramatta shooter Farhad Jabar, The Australianreports. US military officials have told the Australian government that Prakash and Jabar were killed in separate air strikes.

Excellent... ! :)

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:50am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:25am: cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:23am: gweggy only supports the DEATH OF ALL LIBERALS>>> I celebrate their deaths. I don't support summary executions. Big difference, cods. You celebrate the deaths of all Liberals?

All the lying, immoral, criminal Liberals in the current government.

Abbott, et al.

If they all died tomorrow, the world would be a better place.

I'm not wishing death upon them, though.

Understand the difference?

And, I don't support summary execution.

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:23am:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:50am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:25am: cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:23am: gweggy only supports the DEATH OF ALL LIBERALS>>> I celebrate their deaths. I don't support summary executions. Big difference, cods. You celebrate the deaths of all Liberals? So if my entire family (including myself) died....you'd be celebrating our deaths? You need help. Urgently! Does anyone else on Oz Pol find Greg's comments inappropriate and offensive?

I have a better word than offensive!!  Imagine his poor father when he found out it got out of the bucket at the a#$&^*n  CLINIC!   >:( >:( >:(

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:26am:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:50am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:25am: cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:23am: gweggy only supports the DEATH OF ALL LIBERALS>>> I celebrate their deaths. I don't support summary executions. Big difference, cods. You celebrate the deaths of all Liberals? All the lying, immoral, criminal Liberals in the current government. Abbott, et al. If they all died tomorrow, the world would be a better place. I'm not wishing death upon them, though. Understand the difference? And, I don't support summary execution.

Haven't you got better things to do with your time other than to spew cr@p on forums?

And your sudden back pedalling isn't a good look either.

It took you over an hour to think of something which might make you look less disturbed. But your feeble attempt has failed to convince me....and no doubt many others who are reading this topic.

I'm very upset with you Greg. Pull your head in. Thank you.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 8:45am:

It was a summary execution. No better than terrorism.

Says ONLY you, no-one else suffers from that level of hysteria, terrorists get killed in wars, as did this one and the scumbag's sisters.

Remember the only good terrorist is a dead terrorist, that is why we declare war on them and proceed to dispatch them to their maker, tuit suit.

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:34am:

Haven't you got better things to do with your time other than to spew cr@p on forums? And your sudden back pedalling isn't a good look either. It took you over an hour to think of something which might make you look less disturbed. But your feeble attempt has failed to convince me....and no doubt many others who are reading this topic. I'm very upset with you Greg. Pull your head in. Thank you.

Above all else greg is a coward.

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:34am:

your sudden back pedalling isn't a good look either.

No back pedaling here, sweetheart.

I stand by every word I've said.

At least I'm not condoning summary executions.

teddybear wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:28am:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:23am: Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:50am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:25am: cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:23am: gweggy only supports the DEATH OF ALL LIBERALS>>> I celebrate their deaths. I don't support summary executions. Big difference, cods. You celebrate the deaths of all Liberals? So if my entire family (including myself) died....you'd be celebrating our deaths? You need help. Urgently! Does anyone else on Oz Pol find Greg's comments inappropriate and offensive? I have a better word than offensive!!  Imagine his poor father when he found out it got out of the bucket at the a#$&^*n  CLINIC!   >:( >:( >:(

I'm actually very shocked at Greg's comments.

It's just not normal to think like he does on the matter of celebrating the deaths of others.

And what's even more disturbing?  He STILL doesn't get it.

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:36am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:45am: It was a summary execution. No better than terrorism. Remember the only good terrorist is a dead terrorist

Remember?

I said it:

"The only good murdering terrorist is a dead murdering terrorist."   Greg, May 2016

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:39am:

It's just not normal to think like he does on the matter of celebrating the deaths of others.

Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists?

Child rapists?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 7:36am:

Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:32am: Nice job - I hope they kill all of them. You're condoning summary executions, Booby. That makes you no better than a terrorist.

greggery,

Those were not the summary execution(s) of innocent people.



Every moslem, is a moslem.

Moslem = = NOT innocent.




Yadda said.....
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1458713470/27#27

Quote:

QUESTION; What about the innocent moslems ? IMO, [logically] there are no innocent moslems [among persons who have come to the age of consent], and yet still declare themselves to be moslems. How so [logically] ? ------------ >

.




CRIMINAL INTENT, IN THE MOSLEM HEART
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1252898491/0#0

Quote:

Every moslem in Australia [and indeed, every moslem on the planet], by self declaring as a moslem, is self declaring a criminal intent [by our laws] against local non-moslems. ISLAM is a criminal compact among moslems, to wage a violent 'religious' war against non-moslems ['disbelievers']. .....Basically, fundamentally, all ISLAMIC doctrine translates as enmity, and encourages [criminal] violence, towards ALL non-moslems.

.




Yadda said....
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1459586210/51#51

Quote:

QUESTION; Who or what, is a moslem ??? A moslem is a follower of ISLAM.       < -------- dictionary definition. And mainstream ISLAM is a philosophy which [within its doctrines, and tenets, and laws] teaches every moslem,        .....that a moslem who murders an enemy of Allah, is a good and virtuous person. But, what or who, is 'an enemy of Allah' ??? ISLAM [in the Koran] defines anyone who is a disbeliever, as an enemy of Allah! Seriously,          ......is it any wonder that so many 'nice' people, suddenly buy an airline ticket for Turkey [i.e. Syria], or walk into a cafe in Martin Place, Sydney, or go to the local mosque to obtain a pistol,               .....and then turn into homicidal maniacs ? No,    ....it isn't. Because; Every moslem, is a moslem.

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:37am:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:34am: Haven't you got better things to do with your time other than to spew cr@p on forums? And your sudden back pedalling isn't a good look either. It took you over an hour to think of something which might make you look less disturbed. But your feeble attempt has failed to convince me....and no doubt many others who are reading this topic. I'm very upset with you Greg. Pull your head in. Thank you. Above all else greg is a coward.

A coward who hides behind the subtefuge of a nic in cyberspace during working hours to spew hateful disturbing crap about celebrating the death of fellow Australians.

And he STILL thinks it's all fine.

He just doesn't get it.

I'm gobsmacked.  ;D

Yadda wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:42am:

greggery, Those were not the summary execution(s) of innocent people.

Nobody said it was the summary execution(s) of innocent people.

Pay attention, okay?

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:44am:

BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:37am: Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:34am: Haven't you got better things to do with your time other than to spew cr@p on forums? And your sudden back pedalling isn't a good look either. It took you over an hour to think of something which might make you look less disturbed. But your feeble attempt has failed to convince me....and no doubt many others who are reading this topic. I'm very upset with you Greg. Pull your head in. Thank you. Above all else greg is a coward. A coward who hides behind the subtefuge of a nic in cyberspace during working hours to spew hateful disturbing crap about celebrating the death of fellow Australians. And he STILL thinks it's all fine. He just doesn't get it. I'm gobsmacked.

Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists?

Child rapists?

No? Why not?

I'm gobsmacked.

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:44am:

BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:37am: Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:34am: Haven't you got better things to do with your time other than to spew cr@p on forums? And your sudden back pedalling isn't a good look either. It took you over an hour to think of something which might make you look less disturbed. But your feeble attempt has failed to convince me....and no doubt many others who are reading this topic. I'm very upset with you Greg. Pull your head in. Thank you. Above all else greg is a coward. A coward who hides behind the subtefuge of a nic in cyberspace during working hours to spew hateful disturbing crap about celebrating the death of fellow Australians. And he STILL thinks it's all fine. He just doesn't get it. I'm gobsmacked.  ;D

It's a plucking village IDIOT !!    BYE BYE  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:44am:

BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:37am: Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:34am: Haven't you got better things to do with your time other than to spew cr@p on forums? And your sudden back pedalling isn't a good look either. It took you over an hour to think of something which might make you look less disturbed. But your feeble attempt has failed to convince me....and no doubt many others who are reading this topic. I'm very upset with you Greg. Pull your head in. Thank you. Above all else greg is a coward. A coward who hides behind the subtefuge of a nic in cyberspace during working hours to spew hateful disturbing crap about celebrating the death of fellow Australians. And he STILL thinks it's all fine. He just doesn't get it. I'm gobsmacked.

Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists?

Child rapists?

No? Why not? Do you support them?

I'm gobsmacked.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:42am:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:39am: It's just not normal to think like he does on the matter of celebrating the deaths of others. Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists? Child rapists?

No I don't celebrate their deaths.

Only a disturbed sociopath CELEBRATES DEATH.

And stop this sudden new nonsense!

YOU know full well that I (along with many others here) am disgusted that you have been posting about celebrating the death of fellow AUSTRALIANS on the basis of their political allegiance. 

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:26am:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:50am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:25am: cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:23am: gweggy only supports the DEATH OF ALL LIBERALS>>> I celebrate their deaths. I don't support summary executions. Big difference, cods. You celebrate the deaths of all Liberals? All the lying, immoral, criminal Liberals in the current government. Abbott, et al. If they all died tomorrow, the world would be a better place. I'm not wishing death upon them, though. Understand the difference? And, I don't support summary execution.

the only crims are in your tiny little mind...

thats the difference... you make yourself judge and jury just like your terrorist mates....if you are going to poin t to CRIME IN GOVT'' then we shall start with krudd/gillard/krudd show who got us into god awful DEBT WITHOUT A THING TO SHOW FOR IT>>

now that is/was a crime... >:( >:( >:(

a stinker of a crime.....

shall we start will their deaths.....along with the current leader who was also in there helping their cause... >:( >:( >:( >:(like the little snake in the grass he is.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:48am:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:44am: BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:37am: Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:34am: Haven't you got better things to do with your time other than to spew cr@p on forums? And your sudden back pedalling isn't a good look either. It took you over an hour to think of something which might make you look less disturbed. But your feeble attempt has failed to convince me....and no doubt many others who are reading this topic. I'm very upset with you Greg. Pull your head in. Thank you. Above all else greg is a coward. A coward who hides behind the subtefuge of a nic in cyberspace during working hours to spew hateful disturbing crap about celebrating the death of fellow Australians. And he STILL thinks it's all fine. He just doesn't get it. I'm gobsmacked.  Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists? Child rapists? No? Why not? Do you support them? I'm gobsmacked.

There is no need to spam this topic by repeating your revolting nonsense.

I can believe it, Greg is an idiot albeit an idiot with a spell checker.

A reasonable person would know that the majority of Libs and Labs are good people trying to do the best thing for the country and their constituents but coming at it from a different philosophical base. 

A reasonable person would know that both sides also include the wasters, incompetents and some dodgy characters. 

But Greg is an idiot and not a reasonable person.  He once even said he placed Abbott at the right hand of Hitler.  I called him on such a stupid statment and he stood by it.  How's that for some thinking?  A lack of historical knowledge and perspective there from the idiot.

Taking the next step from that to celebrating the deaths of all liberals is a logical continuation...for an idiot. 

Greg is amusingly stupid and partisan but unbalanced, his thought processes are binary, unable to process complexity or nuance  and he cannot be taken seriously. 

The only thing he has is stamina to endlessly repeat himself and reserves of time.  Far from being a highly paid what ever he is pretending to be, displaying such poverty of thought and critical examination, he is at best an underemployed lacky or unemployed.

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:51am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:48am: Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:44am: BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:37am: Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:34am: Haven't you got better things to do with your time other than to spew cr@p on forums? And your sudden back pedalling isn't a good look either. It took you over an hour to think of something which might make you look less disturbed. But your feeble attempt has failed to convince me....and no doubt many others who are reading this topic. I'm very upset with you Greg. Pull your head in. Thank you. Above all else greg is a coward. A coward who hides behind the subtefuge of a nic in cyberspace during working hours to spew hateful disturbing crap about celebrating the death of fellow Australians. And he STILL thinks it's all fine. He just doesn't get it. I'm gobsmacked.  Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists? Child rapists? No? Why not? Do you support them? I'm gobsmacked. There is no need to spam this topic by repeating your revolting nonsense.

Your hypocrisy has been duly noted.

Secret Wars wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:02am:

He once even said he placed Abbott at the right hand of Hitler.

Absolutely.

An inherently evil, dishonest, and potentially very dangerous individual.

Secret Wars wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:02am:

I can believe it, Greg is an idiot albeit an idiot with a spell checker. A reasonable person would know that the majority of Libs and Labs are good people trying to do the best thing for the country and their constituents but coming at it from a different philosophical base.  A reasonable person would know that both sides also include the wasters, incompetents and some dodgy characters.  But Greg is an idiot and not a reasonable person.  He once even said he placed Abbott at the right hand of Hitler.  I called him on such a stupid statment and he stood by it.  How's that for some thinking?  A lack of historical knowledge and perspective there from the idiot. Taking the next step from that to celebrating the deaths of all liberals is a logical continuation...for an idiot.  Greg is amusingly stupid and partisan but unbalanced, his thought processes are binary, unable to process complexity or nuance  and he cannot be taken seriously.  The only thing he has is stamina to endlessly repeat himself and reserves of time.  Far from being a highly paid what ever he is pretending to be, displaying such poverty of thought and critical examination, he is at best an underemployed lacky or unemployed.

Greg sits here incessantly during business hrs mind you.....to post sociopathic driven BS.

AND CELEBRATING THE DEATH OF OTHERS...OTHER AUSTRALIANS IN HIS CASE ....IS BOTH DISGUSTING AND DISTURBING.

What's even more problematic?  Greg thinks it's all perfectly ok.

:-X

cods wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:49am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:26am: Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:50am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:25am: cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 8:23am: gweggy only supports the DEATH OF ALL LIBERALS>>> I celebrate their deaths. I don't support summary executions. Big difference, cods. You celebrate the deaths of all Liberals? All the lying, immoral, criminal Liberals in the current government. Abbott, et al. If they all died tomorrow, the world would be a better place. I'm not wishing death upon them, though. Understand the difference? And, I don't support summary execution. the only crims are in your tiny little mind...

Tell us the one about how Bill Shorten was found guilty at the Royal Commission, cods.

I always get a good laugh from that one.

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:49am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:42am: Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:39am: It's just not normal to think like he does on the matter of celebrating the deaths of others. Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists? Child rapists? No I don't celebrate their deaths.

Their deaths sadden you, do they?

Strange.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:08am:

Secret Wars wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:02am: He once even said he placed Abbott at the right hand of Hitler.  Absolutely. An inherently evil, dishonest, and potentially very dangerous individual.

Ahhh so, THAT'S what you think Hitler was...A POTENTIALLY VERY DANGEROUS INDIVIDUAL.

You're definitely unwell.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:12am:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:49am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:42am: Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:39am: It's just not normal to think like he does on the matter of celebrating the deaths of others. Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists? Child rapists? No I don't celebrate their deaths. Their deaths sadden you, do they? Strange.

No they don't.

And as regards STRANGE?????

THAT word describes YOU.

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:16am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:12am: Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:49am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:42am: Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:39am: It's just not normal to think like he does on the matter of celebrating the deaths of others. Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists? Child rapists? No I don't celebrate their deaths. Their deaths sadden you, do they? Strange. No they don't.

Ah.

Back pedaling.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:48am:

Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists? Child rapists? No? Why not? Do you support them? I'm gobsmacked.

You need to get a lot less emotional about killing, it should be neither celebrated or commiserate; there is happiness in a job well done, and in this case 2 dead Aussie terrorist is a job very well done.


Now get back to hiding behind the women and children and let the professionals continue to do a great job.

Greg, haven't you got anything better to do today other than sit there during business hrs posting sociopathic driven garbage against fellow Australians?

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:18am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:48am: Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists? Child rapists? No? Why not? Do you support them? I'm gobsmacked. You need to get a lot less emotional about killing,

Nothing emotional about it.

I just don't support premeditated, state-sanctioned, summary executions.

It's no better than terrorism.

Moreover, those who do support premeditated, state-sanctioned, summary executions, are no better than terrorists.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:08am:

Secret Wars wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:02am: He once even said he placed Abbott at the right hand of Hitler.  Absolutely. An inherently evil, dishonest, and potentially very dangerous individual.

I understand rhetoric in the heat of political debate, but you have previously confirmed it was your considered opinion and you confirm it again.

To draw any sort of equivalency between Hitler and Abbott demonstrates in spades a distorted thought process, devoid of critical examination, historical knowledge, perspective or relationship to reality.

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:18am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:48am: Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists? Child rapists? No? Why not? Do you support them? I'm gobsmacked. You need to get a lot less emotional about killing, it should be neither celebrated or commiserate; there is happiness in a job well done, and in this case 2 dead Aussie terrorist is a job very well done. Now get back to hiding behind the women and children and let the professionals continue to do a great job.

Ah....Greg the coward.

I thought he just hid behind the anonymity of cyber personas  ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:24am:

BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:18am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:48am: Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists? Child rapists? No? Why not? Do you support them? I'm gobsmacked. You need to get a lot less emotional about killing, Nothing emotional about it. I just don't support premeditated, state-sanctioned, summary executions. It's no better than terrorism. Moreover, those who do support premeditated, state-sanctioned, summary executions, are no better than terrorists.

Good thing that killing the enemy in a time of war is not considered by anyone (you don't count) as an execution.


Now find somewhere else to be confused and wrong, numpty

Secret Wars wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:25am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:08am: Secret Wars wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:02am: He once even said he placed Abbott at the right hand of Hitler.  Absolutely. An inherently evil, dishonest, and potentially very dangerous individual. I understand rhetoric in the heat of political debate, but you have previously confirmed it was your considered opinion and you confirm it again. To draw any sort of equivalency between Hitler and Abbott demonstrates in spades a distorted thought process, devoid of critical examination, historical knowledge, perspective or relationship to reality.

You could have just said that he's a confirmed nutjob.

No one would have argued with you  ;D

Secret Wars wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:25am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:08am: Secret Wars wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:02am: He once even said he placed Abbott at the right hand of Hitler.  Absolutely. An inherently evil, dishonest, and potentially very dangerous individual. I understand ...

I've had the misfortune of reading several of your posts, and one thing stands out in all of them: you understand very little.

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:27am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:24am: BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:18am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:48am: Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists? Child rapists? No? Why not? Do you support them? I'm gobsmacked. You need to get a lot less emotional about killing, Nothing emotional about it. I just don't support premeditated, state-sanctioned, summary executions. It's no better than terrorism. Moreover, those who do support premeditated, state-sanctioned, summary executions, are no better than terrorists. Good thing that killing the enemy in a time of war is not considered by anyone (you don't count) as an execution. Now find somewhere else to be confused and wrong, numpty

;D ;D

I don't know who you are but I thank God you're here standing up against Greg's psychopath driven insanity.

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:27am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:24am: BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:18am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:48am: Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists? Child rapists? No? Why not? Do you support them? I'm gobsmacked. You need to get a lot less emotional about killing, Nothing emotional about it. I just don't support premeditated, state-sanctioned, summary executions. It's no better than terrorism. Moreover, those who do support premeditated, state-sanctioned, summary executions, are no better than terrorists. Good thing that killing the enemy in a time of war is not considered by anyone (you don't count) as an execution.

Summary execution.

Assassination.

Moreover, those who support it are no better than the terrorists.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:29am:

Secret Wars wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:25am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:08am: Secret Wars wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:02am: He once even said he placed Abbott at the right hand of Hitler.  Absolutely. An inherently evil, dishonest, and potentially very dangerous individual. I understand ... I've had the misfortune of reading several of your posts.....

MISFORTUNE? Is that all you've had.

We've ALL been left TERRORISED by your posts esp those in this topic.

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:18am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:48am: Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists? Child rapists? No? Why not? Do you support them? I'm gobsmacked. You need to get a lot less emotional about killing ... there is happiness in a job well done.

Exactly what the terrorists say.

Have you trained with them?

Secret Wars wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:25am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:08am: Secret Wars wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:02am: He once even said he placed Abbott at the right hand of Hitler.  Absolutely. An inherently evil, dishonest, and potentially very dangerous individual. I understand rhetoric in the heat of political debate, but you have previously confirmed it was your considered opinion and you confirm it again. To draw any sort of equivalency between Hitler and Abbott demonstrates in spades a distorted thought process, devoid of critical examination, historical knowledge, perspective or relationship to reality.

So in Greg's mind, Hitler was only POTENTIALLY VERY DANGEROUS.

Kinda says it all really.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:32am:

BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:27am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:24am: BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:18am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:48am: Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists? Child rapists? No? Why not? Do you support them? I'm gobsmacked. You need to get a lot less emotional about killing, Nothing emotional about it. I just don't support premeditated, state-sanctioned, summary executions. It's no better than terrorism. Moreover, those who do support premeditated, state-sanctioned, summary executions, are no better than terrorists. Good thing that killing the enemy in a time of war is not considered by anyone (you don't count) as an execution. Summary execution. Assassination. Moreover, those who support it are no better than the terrorists.

You are still wrong, and repeating your drivel does not make it any less wrong.


Killing the enemy according to the rules of engagement is NOT an execution or an assassination; now go be wrong somewhere else Man-child

Secret Wars wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:25am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:08am: Secret Wars wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:02am: He once even said he placed Abbott at the right hand of Hitler.  Absolutely. An inherently evil, dishonest, and potentially very dangerous individual. I understand rhetoric in the heat of political debate, but you have previously confirmed it was your considered opinion and you confirm it again. To draw any sort of equivalency between Hitler and Abbott demonstrates in spades a distorted thought process, devoid of critical examination, historical knowledge, perspective or relationship to reality.

hes a very confused individual....wont be long and long comes the personal abuse... hes good at that as well in an undercover way..

let the libs tell him shortarse in another hitler and he will claim he isnt a labrat..... ::) ::) ::)..

all of a sudden....dont forget this is the same person who condemns anyone for daring to be against boatpeople....yet his loathing of anything Lib is well noted on here... even down to wanting them all dead...

I mean he leaves terrorists in the shade when it comes to pure HATE......and spreading evil lies.......he sure is a mental case......I am thinking the less libs have to do with this type of person the better.....

he is a psycho

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:35am:

Exactly what the terrorists say. Have you trained with them?

Listen in on a lot of terrorist conversations do we?

Fkken numpty   ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:37am:

Secret Wars wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:25am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:08am: Secret Wars wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:02am: He once even said he placed Abbott at the right hand of Hitler.  Absolutely. An inherently evil, dishonest, and potentially very dangerous individual. I understand rhetoric in the heat of political debate, but you have previously confirmed it was your considered opinion and you confirm it again. To draw any sort of equivalency between Hitler and Abbott demonstrates in spades a distorted thought process, devoid of critical examination, historical knowledge, perspective or relationship to reality. So in Greg's mind, Hitler was only POTENTIALLY VERY DANGEROUS. Kinda says it all really.

Not too bright, are you?

That statement was about Abbott.

"An inherently evil, dishonest, and potentially very dangerous individual."

Hitler is dead, in case you didn't know. Dead people don't have any potential.

Thankfully, Abbott was removed before he could realise his full potential as a dangerous sociopath.

Quote:

wont be long and long comes the personal abuse

And right on cue, it arrives:


Quote:

he sure is a mental case

Quote:

he is a psycho

Great job cods.

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:20am:

Greg, haven't you got anything better to do today other than sit there during business hrs posting sociopathic driven garbage against fellow Australians?

He can't answer the question.

But we all know what it is.

No, Greg has nothing better to do today.

Our Greg will spend today's business hrs and no doubt more....posting even more insane dribble about how he thinks it's normal to celebrate death....in particular the death of fellow Australians who vote Liberal.

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:39am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:35am: Exactly what the terrorists say. Have you trained with them? Listen in on a lot of terrorist conversations do we? Fkken numpty   ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Good comeback!

Makes you wonder hey.

cods wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

....yet his loathing of anything Lib is well noted on here... even down to wanting them all dead...

I've never said I wanted anyone dead.

You must be "thinking" of someone else, dear.

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:44am:

BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:37am: Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:34am: Haven't you got better things to do with your time other than to spew cr@p on forums? And your sudden back pedalling isn't a good look either. It took you over an hour to think of something which might make you look less disturbed. But your feeble attempt has failed to convince me....and no doubt many others who are reading this topic. I'm very upset with you Greg. Pull your head in. Thank you. Above all else greg is a coward. A coward who hides behind the subtefuge of a nic in cyberspace during working hours to spew hateful disturbing crap about celebrating the death of fellow Australians. And he STILL thinks it's all fine. He just doesn't get it. I'm gobsmacked.  ;D

Up!

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 9:49am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:42am: Lisa Jones wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 9:39am: It's just not normal to think like he does on the matter of celebrating the deaths of others. Do you celebrate the death of killer terrorists? Child rapists? No I don't celebrate their deaths. Only a disturbed sociopath CELEBRATES DEATH. And stop this sudden new nonsense! YOU know full well that I (along with many others here) am disgusted that you have been posting about celebrating the death of fellow AUSTRALIANS on the basis of their political allegiance.

Up!

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

Killing the enemy according to the rules of engagement is NOT an execution or an assassination

Direct from your own OP:

"His death was part of a series of targeted assassinations ... "

The funny thing is, you don't even have the sense to see when I'm setting you up.

It's like shooting fish in a barrel.

Lisa Jones wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:43am:

BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:39am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:35am: Exactly what the terrorists say. Have you trained with them? Listen in on a lot of terrorist conversations do we? Fkken numpty   ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Good comeback! Makes you wonder hey.

Ol' greggy is a bit of a dill, but his lack of rigour and intellect tends to bore me. He'll repeat drivel until he can get you in a argument based on semantics. Then he'll wear you down until he wins some sh1t or other; nothing to do with anything but meaningless drivel.

His modus operandi is well known and well understood.  ;D ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:44am:

cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:38am: ....yet his loathing of anything Lib is well noted on here... even down to wanting them all dead... I've never said I wanted anyone dead. You must be "thinking" of someone else, dear.

oh yes you have... I will be glad when they are all dead.....

and now you say you will celebrate when they are all dead..

dancing on a person grave...... ::) ::)

and you see no connection..

what a con man you are

you ev en believe your own bleating...

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

Killing the enemy according to the rules of engagement is NOT an execution or an assassination

Direct from your very own OP:

"His death was part of a series of targeted assassinations ... "

What a shame and a disgrace you are!

cods wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:50am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:44am: cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:38am: ....yet his loathing of anything Lib is well noted on here... even down to wanting them all dead... I've never said I wanted anyone dead. You must be "thinking" of someone else, dear. oh yes you have...

No, I haven't.

You are telling lies, as usual.

Try to stick to the facts, dear.

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

Killing the enemy according to the rules of engagement is NOT an execution or an assassination

Straight from your very own OP:

"His death was part of a series of targeted assassinations ... "

Just ignore and report this fool folks.

His obscene offensive comments which have trolled this topic need to be communicated to FD et al.

Provide a link to his posts in your PMs.

After that, leave him here in this topic to rot in shame.

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

Killing the enemy according to the rules of engagement is NOT an execution or an assassination.

This thread was started by you, and this is directly from your OP:

"His death was part of a series of targeted assassinations ... "

Would you care to comment, BigO?

Has there been some sort of mistake?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 10:46am:

BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:38am: Killing the enemy according to the rules of engagement is NOT an execution or an assassination Direct from your own OP: "His death was part of a series of targeted assassinations ... " The funny thing is, you don't even have the sense to see when I'm setting you up. It's like shooting fish in a barrel.

You know how I accused you of being a Man-child, cancel that and look at yourself as only a child.

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 11:59am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:46am: BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 10:38am: Killing the enemy according to the rules of engagement is NOT an execution or an assassination Direct from your own OP: "His death was part of a series of targeted assassinations ... " The funny thing is, you don't even have the sense to see when I'm setting you up. It's like shooting fish in a barrel. You know how I ...

... said "Killing the enemy according to the rules of engagement is NOT an execution or an assassination"?

Yes. Yes I do.

I also remember this, from the OP:

"His death was part of a series of targeted assassinations ... "

No comment?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 7:52am:

BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:50am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:36am: Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:32am: Nice job - I hope they kill all of them. You're condoning summary executions, Booby. That makes you no better than a terrorist. Only you would argue that killing the enemy is unacceptable in war.  Only a terrorist would support summary executions.

Gandalf supports them. He has invented a 'tough titties/Jewish hive mind' theory to justify them. I think every single Muslim we have ever had on here supports them.

Let's put it to a poll (poll added).

My vote in 'no', obviously.

"A summary execution is an execution in which a person is accused of a crime and immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial."

What if .... marine life was sentient and denounced Freediver as a terrorist who eats their babies?

Two people in this forum support circumstances where a person is accused of a crime and then immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial.

They're as bad as terrorists.

and one person would celebrate seeing Liberals killed.. funny thing thats exactly how I see a terrorist....

look how they celebrated 9/11.... ::) ::)

funny old world

cods wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 4:58pm:

and one person would celebrate seeing Liberals killed..

Really? 

Who's that, cods?

Can you post a link?

I mean, we wouldn't want people to think you were telling more lies, would we now?

cods wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 4:58pm:

.. funny thing thats exactly how I see a terrorist....

This is how terrorists think, cods:

They fully support "an execution in which a person is accused of a crime and immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial".

Moreover, at least two people in this forum believe the exact same thing.

How does that make you feel, cods?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 4:48pm:

Two people in this forum support circumstances where a person is accused of a crime and then immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial. They're as bad as terrorists.

I am sure that before DNA was used (thanks Alec Jeffreys*) in detective work, many unfortunate people were executed for crimes that they did not commit.

However gaols are chock full of innocent people ... if you believed them.  ;)

I do not believe in Capital Punishment.

*
Quote:

Professor Sir Alec John Jeffreys, FRS (born 9 January 1950 in Oxford, Oxfordshire, England) is a British geneticist, who developed techniques for DNA fingerprinting and DNA profiling which are now used worldwide in forensic science to assist police detective work and to resolve paternity and immigration disputes.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 5:23pm:

cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 4:58pm: and one person would celebrate seeing Liberals killed.. Really?  Who's that, cods? Can you post a link? I mean, we wouldn't want people to think you were telling more lies, would we now?

Ya see, cods, that is where you get caught all the time.  A person posts one thing, and you see something else in it.  Mr Peccary did not ever say he would celebrate a Lib being killed.

He did say ~ not that I agree with him ~ he would celebrate the death of a Lib.

Huge difference.

Aussie wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 5:28pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 5:23pm: cods wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 4:58pm: and one person would celebrate seeing Liberals killed.. Really?  Who's that, cods? Can you post a link? I mean, we wouldn't want people to think you were telling more lies, would we now? Ya see, cods, that is where you get caught all the time.  A person posts one thing, and you see something else in it.

She still believes that Bill Shorten was found guilty at the Royal Commission.

This is what we're dealing with    ::)

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 12:44pm:

Let's put it to a poll (poll added). My vote in 'no', obviously. "A summary execution is an execution in which a person is accused of a crime and immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial."

In a war the enemy gets killed if possible.

What don't you understand?

Bobby. wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 5:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 12:44pm: Let's put it to a poll (poll added). My vote in 'no', obviously. "A summary execution is an execution in which a person is accused of a crime and immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial." In a war the enemy gets killed if possible. What don't you understand?

What war, Booby?

"His death was part of a series of targeted assassinations ... "

You condone summary executions, Booby.

You're no better than a terrorist.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 5:36pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 5:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 12:44pm: Let's put it to a poll (poll added). My vote in 'no', obviously. "A summary execution is an execution in which a person is accused of a crime and immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial." In a war the enemy gets killed if possible. What don't you understand? What war, sir Bobby? "His death was part of a series of targeted assassinations ... " You condone summary executions, Booby. You're no better than a terrorist.

The War on Terror.

Bobby. wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 5:39pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 5:36pm: Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 5:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 12:44pm: Let's put it to a poll (poll added). My vote in 'no', obviously. "A summary execution is an execution in which a person is accused of a crime and immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial." In a war the enemy gets killed if possible. What don't you understand? What war, Booby? "His death was part of a series of targeted assassinations ... " You condone summary executions, Booby. You're no better than a terrorist. The War on Terror.

Ah.

"The War on Terror."

Ah......Bobby, in a War...don't both sides get to shoot/bomb/blow things up or is only one allowed to?

Dear Greggy,
there has been a war on terror since Sept. 11th 2001.

Where have you been?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 5:36pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 5:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 12:44pm: Let's put it to a poll (poll added). My vote in 'no', obviously. "A summary execution is an execution in which a person is accused of a crime and immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial." In a war the enemy gets killed if possible. What don't you understand? What war, Booby? "His death was part of a series of targeted assassinations ... " You condone summary executions, Booby. You're no better than a terrorist.

Greggy, let's try and sort this out.

I think we all agree this guy's needed to be taken off the board as he was an evil character. 

So it comes down to method.

The ideal thing would be to capture him to deny him the status of martyrdom but to do so would put lives at risk.  Why risk the lives of good people when you can take him out with some ordinance?

We know the world you live in is a jolly place where it's easy to catch terrorists by setting a trap with a cardboard box a stick to hold it up some string and an Iced Vo Vo for bait.

But that's not the real world, Greggy. In the real world terrorists get bombs dropped on their heads.

This lesson in catching terrorist with Iced Vo Vos is free.

Bobby. wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 5:44pm:

Dear Greggy, there has been a war on terror since Sept. 11th 2001. Where have you been?

I've been exposing people like you, who openly support summary executions.

"His death was part of a series of targeted assassinations ... "

Aussie wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 5:44pm:

"The War on Terror." Ah......Bobby, in a War...don't both sides get to shoot/bomb/blow things up or is only one allowed to?

Dear Aussie,
in this case it's asymmetric warfare by terrorists against powerful states.

Where have you been for 15 years?

GordyL wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 5:45pm:

In the real world terrorists get bombs dropped on their heads.

Alleged terrorist.

He didn't face a court.

This was a summary execution.

An assassination.

No better than what the terrorists are involved in.

You've lowered yourself to their level.

Yes - it's a war on terror & we're in it:


President Bush

Quote:

"We have seen their kind before. They're the heirs of all the murderous ideologies of the 20th century. By sacrificing human life to serve their radical visions, by abandoning every value except the will to power, they follow in the path of fascism, Nazism and totalitarianism." And again, these are battles we have won, not easily and not immediately, but slowly, painfully over time.

And then Bush delivered the kind of line that you give your speechwriter a new nickname for, the kind of line that sends chills down the spine, and this time he was up to it.


Quote:

"And they will follow that path all the way to where it ends: in history's unmarked grave of discarded lies."

http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,175757,00.html

Aussie wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 5:44pm:

"The War on Terror." Ah......Bobby, in a War...don't both sides get to shoot/bomb/blow things up or is only one allowed to?

Did you eat some rancid ghee today old boy?
Have you heard IS has caused a death other two?
I bet if your beloved curry munchers were being killed you'd have a different attitude 

cods wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 4:58pm:

and one person would celebrate seeing Liberals killed.. funny thing thats exactly how I see a terrorist.... look how they celebrated 9/11.... ::) ::) funny old world

Dancing Israelis?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rStJ5BgadPs

GordyL wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 5:54pm:

Aussie wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 5:44pm: "The War on Terror." Ah......Bobby, in a War...don't both sides get to shoot/bomb/blow things up or is only one allowed to? Did you eat some rancid ghee today old boy? Have you heard IS has caused a death other two? I bet if your beloved curry munchers were being killed you'd have a different attitude

As a supporter of summary executions and assassinations, you're no better than a terrorist.

Bobby. wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 5:46pm:

Aussie wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 5:44pm: "The War on Terror." Ah......Bobby, in a War...don't both sides get to shoot/bomb/blow things up or is only one allowed to? Dear Aussie, in this case it's asymmetric warfare by terrorists against powerful states. Where have you been for 15 years?

Present as always Bobby.  What does it matter whether some obscure word is used.  It is a War, you said.  I say ~ okay, if that's the case, both sides to it are right to blow the crap out of each other, even on the streets of Paris etc etc.  Is that the War you had in mind Bobby?

President Bush,


Quote:

"We will direct every resource at our command — every means of diplomacy, every tool of intelligence, every instrument of law enforcement, every financial influence and every necessary weapon of war — to the destruction and to the defeat of the global terror network."

Bobby. wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 5:57pm:

President Bush, Quote: "We will direct every resource at our command — every means of diplomacy, every tool of intelligence, every instrument of law enforcement, every financial influence and every necessary weapon of war — to the destruction and to the defeat of the global terror network."

Do the same rules apply to the other side, Booby?

Aussie wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 5:57pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 5:46pm: Aussie wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 5:44pm: "The War on Terror." Ah......Bobby, in a War...don't both sides get to shoot/bomb/blow things up or is only one allowed to? Dear Aussie, in this case it's asymmetric warfare by terrorists against powerful states. Where have you been for 15 years? Present as always Bobby.  What does it matter whether some obscure word is used.  It is a War, you said.  I say ~ okay, if that's the case, both sides to it are right to blow the crap out of each other, even on the streets of Paris etc etc.  Is that the War you had in mind Bobby?

We all knew that the terrorists would deliberately target innocent civilians.

This is a war & we're all in it.

The greatest nightmare is if the terrorists ever get nuclear weapons.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 6:01pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 5:57pm: President Bush, Quote: "We will direct every resource at our command — every means of diplomacy, every tool of intelligence, every instrument of law enforcement, every financial influence and every necessary weapon of war — to the destruction and to the defeat of the global terror network." Do the same rules apply to the other side, sir Bobby?

The terrorists want to kill us all.

You would give them a bunch of roses.

Greggy is a terrorist sympathiser.

Bobby. wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 6:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 6:01pm: Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 5:57pm: President Bush, Quote: "We will direct every resource at our command — every means of diplomacy, every tool of intelligence, every instrument of law enforcement, every financial influence and every necessary weapon of war — to the destruction and to the defeat of the global terror network." Do the same rules apply to the other side, sir Bobby? The terrorists want to kill us all. You would give them a bunch of roses. Greggy is a terrorist sympathiser.

Answer the question, Booby.

Do the same rules apply to the other side, in this "war" of yours?

Summary execution is the wrong expression.

The correct expression is extrajudicial killings because they are performed outside the law.


Quote:

extrajudicial (ˌɛkstrədʒuːˈdɪʃəl) adj 1. (Law) outside the ordinary course of legal proceedings: extrajudicial evidence. 2. (Law) beyond the jurisdiction or authority of the court: an extrajudicial opinion. ˌextrajuˈdicially adv

Svengali wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 6:04pm:

Summary execution is the wrong expression. The correct expression is extrajudicial killings because they are performed outside the law. Quote: extrajudicial (ˌɛkstrədʒuːˈdɪʃəl) adj 1. (Law) outside the ordinary course of legal proceedings: extrajudicial evidence. 2. (Law) beyond the jurisdiction or authority of the court: an extrajudicial opinion. ˌextrajuˈdicially adv

I'll go with that.

Assassination, and extra-judicial killing.

Why does Booby support such things?

Is he a terrorist in disguise?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 6:06pm:

Svengali wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 6:04pm: Summary execution is the wrong expression. The correct expression is extrajudicial killings because they are performed outside the law. Quote: extrajudicial (ˌɛkstrədʒuːˈdɪʃəl) adj 1. (Law) outside the ordinary course of legal proceedings: extrajudicial evidence. 2. (Law) beyond the jurisdiction or authority of the court: an extrajudicial opinion. ˌextrajuˈdicially adv I'll go with that. Assassination, and extra-judicial killing. Why does Booby support such things? Is he a terrorist in disguise?

Bobby is a conflicted soul who is long overdue for an intervention.

Bobby's mind is clouded by the blitherings and hate rants of demented conservatives on this BBS.

Svengali wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 6:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 6:06pm: Svengali wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 6:04pm: Summary execution is the wrong expression. The correct expression is extrajudicial killings because they are performed outside the law. Quote: extrajudicial (ˌɛkstrədʒuːˈdɪʃəl) adj 1. (Law) outside the ordinary course of legal proceedings: extrajudicial evidence. 2. (Law) beyond the jurisdiction or authority of the court: an extrajudicial opinion. ˌextrajuˈdicially adv I'll go with that. Assassination, and extra-judicial killing. Why does Booby support such things? Is he a terrorist in disguise? Bobby is a conflicted soul who is long overdue for an intervention. Bobby's mind is clouded by the blitherings and hate rants of demented conservatives on this BBS.

The terrorists in Syria need to be rounded up, executed
& bulldozed into unmarked graves
just like Bush wanted to do.


Bush

Quote:

"And they will follow that path all the way to where it ends: in history's unmarked grave of discarded lies."

Svengali wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 6:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 6:06pm: Svengali wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 6:04pm: Summary execution is the wrong expression. The correct expression is extrajudicial killings because they are performed outside the law. Quote: extrajudicial (ˌɛkstrədʒuːˈdɪʃəl) adj 1. (Law) outside the ordinary course of legal proceedings: extrajudicial evidence. 2. (Law) beyond the jurisdiction or authority of the court: an extrajudicial opinion. ˌextrajuˈdicially adv I'll go with that. Assassination, and extra-judicial killing. Why does Booby support such things? Is he a terrorist in disguise? Bobby is a conflicted soul who is long overdue for an intervention. Bobby's mind is clouded by the blitherings and hate rants of demented conservatives on this BBS.

Not to mention the constant struggle with his sexuality.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Bobby. wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 6:13pm:

Svengali wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 6:08pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 6:06pm: Svengali wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 6:04pm: Summary execution is the wrong expression. The correct expression is extrajudicial killings because they are performed outside the law. Quote: extrajudicial (ˌɛkstrədʒuːˈdɪʃəl) adj 1. (Law) outside the ordinary course of legal proceedings: extrajudicial evidence. 2. (Law) beyond the jurisdiction or authority of the court: an extrajudicial opinion. ˌextrajuˈdicially adv I'll go with that. Assassination, and extra-judicial killing. Why does Booby support such things? Is he a terrorist in disguise? Bobby is a conflicted soul who is long overdue for an intervention. Bobby's mind is clouded by the blitherings and hate rants of demented conservatives on this BBS. The terrorists in Syria need to be rounded up, executed & bulldozed into unmarked graves just like Bush wanted to do.

That's terrorism, Booby.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 6:14pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 6:13pm: Svengali wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 6:08pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 6:06pm: Svengali wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 6:04pm: Summary execution is the wrong expression. The correct expression is extrajudicial killings because they are performed outside the law. Quote: extrajudicial (ˌɛkstrədʒuːˈdɪʃəl) adj 1. (Law) outside the ordinary course of legal proceedings: extrajudicial evidence. 2. (Law) beyond the jurisdiction or authority of the court: an extrajudicial opinion. ˌextrajuˈdicially adv I'll go with that. Assassination, and extra-judicial killing. Why does Booby support such things? Is he a terrorist in disguise? Bobby is a conflicted soul who is long overdue for an intervention. Bobby's mind is clouded by the blitherings and hate rants of demented conservatives on this BBS. The terrorists in Syria need to be rounded up, executed & bulldozed into unmarked graves just like Bush wanted to do. That's terrorism, sir Bobby.

Are you calling George Bush a terrorist?


Bush

Quote:

"And they will follow that path all the way to where it ends: in history's unmarked grave of discarded lies."

Svengali wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 6:04pm:

Summary execution is the wrong expression. The correct expression is extrajudicial killings because they are performed outside the law. Quote: extrajudicial (ˌɛkstrədʒuːˈdɪʃəl) adj 1. (Law) outside the ordinary course of legal proceedings: extrajudicial evidence. 2. (Law) beyond the jurisdiction or authority of the court: an extrajudicial opinion. ˌextrajuˈdicially adv

At long last a lefty who understand the process of killing enemy combatants in war.

There is no judge, the are no courts, there are rule of engagement, there is a target and an assigned weapons platform. Wam  bam you're dead

Let numpty know will ya.

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 6:17pm:

Svengali wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 6:04pm: Summary execution is the wrong expression. The correct expression is extrajudicial killings because they are performed outside the law. Quote: extrajudicial (ˌɛkstrədʒuːˈdɪʃəl) adj 1. (Law) outside the ordinary course of legal proceedings: extrajudicial evidence. 2. (Law) beyond the jurisdiction or authority of the court: an extrajudicial opinion. ˌextrajuˈdicially adv At long last a lefty who understand the process of killing enemy combatants in war.

What war is that, BigO?

"His death was part of a series of targeted assassinations".

BigOl64 wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 6:17pm:

Svengali wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 6:04pm: Summary execution is the wrong expression. The correct expression is extrajudicial killings because they are performed outside the law. Quote: extrajudicial (ˌɛkstrədʒuːˈdɪʃəl) adj 1. (Law) outside the ordinary course of legal proceedings: extrajudicial evidence. 2. (Law) beyond the jurisdiction or authority of the court: an extrajudicial opinion. ˌextrajuˈdicially adv At long last a lefty who understand the process of killing enemy combatants in war. There is no judge, the are no courts, there are rule of engagement, there is a target and an assigned weapons platform. Wam  bam you're dead Let numpty know will ya.

Bigol64's son is a jahadi?

Bigol64 needs an interpreter to communicate with its son?

Svengali wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 6:20pm:

BigOl64 wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 6:17pm: Svengali wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 6:04pm: Summary execution is the wrong expression. The correct expression is extrajudicial killings because they are performed outside the law. Quote: extrajudicial (ˌɛkstrədʒuːˈdɪʃəl) adj 1. (Law) outside the ordinary course of legal proceedings: extrajudicial evidence. 2. (Law) beyond the jurisdiction or authority of the court: an extrajudicial opinion. ˌextrajuˈdicially adv At long last a lefty who understand the process of killing enemy combatants in war. There is no judge, the are no courts, there are rule of engagement, there is a target and an assigned weapons platform. Wam  bam you're dead Let numpty know will ya. Bigol64's son is a jahadi? Bigol64 needs an interpreter to communicate with its son?

And Sir Booby is a homosexual, would-be terrorist.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Why are people spending so much energy defending this guy?

Dustwun wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 6:35pm:

Why are people spending so much energy defending this guy?

Nobody is defending him.

People are defending the rule of law.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 7:36am:

Bobby. wrote on May 5th, 2016 at 7:32am: Nice job - I hope they kill all of them. You're condoning summary executions, Booby. That makes you no better than a terrorist.

They were members of ISIS ... we are at war with ISIS

they weren't executed with out due process

they were enemy killed in strategic actions

End of............

There is no rule of law in a war zone Greg. You are supposed to kill people without trial. That's what a war is.

10 pages in and you are still stuck on this point.