In order to accomodate the ladies who will no doubt lie anyway I'll give you a ten year span of choices.

21 ...............again

Try to be honest I'm interested in the age bracket of people that post on these forums. It's my belief most are fifty plus or at least in their forties, not all, just most.

45
  ;)

Redneck is a septuagenarian unfortunately!

On the lower end of course!  :)

:'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

Redmond Neck wrote on Mar 16^th, 2016 at 7:22pm:

Redneck is a septuagenarian unfortunately! On the lower end of course!  :) :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

you are an old bugger aren't you :D :D

While I acknowledge the bona fides of skippy's intent in commencing this Thread, I strongly urge that no-one provide an honest answer because there are people (like Neferti) here who will hang onto that information, and it will be thrown at you like a dead albatross anytime they feel like it.

32

Aussie wrote on Mar 16^th, 2016 at 7:48pm:

While I acknowledge the bona fides of skippy's intent in commencing this Thread, I strongly urge that no-one provide an honest answer because there are people (like Neferti) here who will hang onto that information, and it will be thrown at you like a dead albatross anytime they feel like it.

It's actually no ones business.
Many people here are such nosey parkers -
just gossip mongers.

Nobody will know what box you tick but you, talk about paranoid.

skippy. wrote on Mar 16^th, 2016 at 8:06pm:

Nobody will know what box you tick but you, talk about paranoid.

Yeas, that did occur to me and at one time, I would have agreed with you.  However, later experience establishes that there are people here (like Mr Hicks) who know what box you have ticked and they are not afraid to let you, and everyone else, know about it.

I am in the middle group.

I am older than 30 and younger than 40

Aussie wrote on Mar 16^th, 2016 at 8:12pm:

skippy. wrote on Mar 16th, 2016 at 8:06pm: Nobody will know what box you tick but you, talk about paranoid. Yeas, that did occur to me and at one time, I would have agreed with you.  However, later experience establishes that there are people here (like Mr Hicks) who know what box you have ticked and they are not afraid to let you, and everyone else, know about it.

You might want to explain that one.

At no point will anyone get such information from me.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 16^th, 2016 at 8:13pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 16th, 2016 at 8:12pm: skippy. wrote on Mar 16th, 2016 at 8:06pm: Nobody will know what box you tick but you, talk about paranoid. Yeas, that did occur to me and at one time, I would have agreed with you.  However, later experience establishes that there are people here (like Mr Hicks) who know what box you have ticked and they are not afraid to let you, and everyone else, know about it. You might want to explain that one. At no point will anyone get such information from me.

I don't need to explain it.  You just have just proven my point.  You know what box I tick in these Polls, and you have said so publicly.

Aussie wrote on Mar 16^th, 2016 at 8:12pm:

skippy. wrote on Mar 16th, 2016 at 8:06pm: Nobody will know what box you tick but you, talk about paranoid. Yeas, that did occur to me and at one time, I would have agreed with you.  However, later experience establishes that there are people here (like Mr Hicks) who know what box you have ticked and they are not afraid to let you, and everyone else, know about it.

I don't know what you're worried about Aussie you have advertised significant birthdays you have had online. I know what group you belong to as does anybody else that's been around for a few years.

Are you suggesting I would tell people what you put?

Sorry, I just realised I stuffed up the second option so I have changed it.

skippy. wrote on Mar 16^th, 2016 at 8:16pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 16th, 2016 at 8:12pm: skippy. wrote on Mar 16th, 2016 at 8:06pm: Nobody will know what box you tick but you, talk about paranoid. Yeas, that did occur to me and at one time, I would have agreed with you.  However, later experience establishes that there are people here (like Mr Hicks) who know what box you have ticked and they are not afraid to let you, and everyone else, know about it. I don't know what you're worried about Aussie you have advertised significant birthdays you have had online. I know what group you belong to as does anybody else that's been around for a few years.

True, and Neferti has used it when she wanted to throw a dead albatross at me.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 16^th, 2016 at 8:16pm:

Are you suggesting I would tell people what you put?

Have you forgotten?

People don't half get worked up about trivial issues on here.
I think some need to spend a bit more time in the fresh air and away from here?

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 16^th, 2016 at 8:28pm:

People don't half get worked up about trivial issues on here. I think some need to spend a bit more time in the fresh air and away from here?

If that's a 'go' at me......I don't regard it as trivial at all that any GMod would make any public comment about who had voted in a Poll.  Do you regard that as trivial, Mr Hicks?

60 plus covers quite a few decades.  There's a bit of difference between being 61 and being 101.

Also, given the behaviour of some forum members, maybe we need an option of 0-10.

Wolseley wrote on Mar 16^th, 2016 at 8:34pm:

60 plus covers quite a few decades.  There's a bit of difference between being 61 and being 101. Also, given the behaviour of some forum members, maybe we need an option of 0-10.

Children doesn't even cover some of the behaviour we have to put up with.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 16^th, 2016 at 8:51pm:

Wolseley wrote on Mar 16th, 2016 at 8:34pm: 60 plus covers quite a few decades.  There's a bit of difference between being 61 and being 101. Also, given the behaviour of some forum members, maybe we need an option of 0-10. Children doesn't even cover some of the behaviour we have to put up with.

Someone got a gun at your head, Mr Hicks?  No-one is begging, asking, requesting, requiring, or demanding you to put up with anything.  Maybe you need to spend a bit more time in the fresh air and away from here? If you decide that is the way to go (and no-one would want to hold you back,) please hand in that 'Sheriff' badge you once used as your avatar.  Just remember that cemeteries are full of indispensable people.

John Smith wrote on Mar 16^th, 2016 at 7:15pm:

45   ;)

You mean 4 going on 5.

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 17^th, 2016 at 7:09am:

John Smith wrote on Mar 16th, 2016 at 7:15pm: 45   ;) You mean 4 going on 5.

don't worry, one day, when you grow up, you can ask mummy to teach you how to read numbers

I do nothing for nothing.

If you want my honesty there has to be a financial incentive. Everything has its price in the free market.

skippy. wrote on Mar 16^th, 2016 at 7:13pm:

Try to be honest I'm interested in the age bracket of people that post on these forums. It's my belief most are fifty plus or at least in their forties, not all, just most.

I'm 45.

No big deal.

Nobody will know what box you tick but you

But I dont want to know

miketrees wrote on Mar 17^th, 2016 at 8:19pm:

Nobody will know what box you tick but you But I dont want to know

FD and the GMods do.  Previously, one GMod has improperly made public who has voted in these Polls.

Aussie wrote on Mar 17^th, 2016 at 8:24pm:

miketrees wrote on Mar 17th, 2016 at 8:19pm: Nobody will know what box you tick but you But I dont want to know FD and the GMods do.  Previously, one GMod has improperly made public who has voted in these Polls.

then dont tick the box. simples.

ian wrote on Mar 17^th, 2016 at 9:23pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 17th, 2016 at 8:24pm: miketrees wrote on Mar 17th, 2016 at 8:19pm: Nobody will know what box you tick but you But I dont want to know FD and the GMods do.  Previously, one GMod has improperly made public who has voted in these Polls. then dont tick the box. simples.

Agree.

bogarde73 wrote on Mar 17^th, 2016 at 9:25am:

I do nothing for nothing. If you want my honesty there has to be a financial incentive. Everything has its price in the free market.

not that, it's worthless. No one will pay you a single cent for it.

Well that means your wish for the truth is less valuable to you than parting with some money.
Doesn't everything work like that?
Let me see your thoughts on the "end of free"

the average age at this board is "deceased"

AiA wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 9:31am:

the average age at this board is "deceased"

If that was the case, surely nobody would be posting anything.

bogarde73 wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 7:16am:

Well that means your wish for the truth is less valuable to you than parting with some money. Doesn't everything work like that? Let me see your thoughts on the "end of free"

no, that means your age is worthless to anybody but you.

Wolseley wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 10:00am:

AiA wrote on Mar 18th, 2016 at 9:31am: the average age at this board is "deceased" If that was the case, surely nobody would be posting anything.

The value of most of the posts are equivalent to that....

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 9:13pm:

Wolseley wrote on Mar 18th, 2016 at 10:00am: AiA wrote on Mar 18th, 2016 at 9:31am: the average age at this board is "deceased" If that was the case, surely nobody would be posting anything. The value of most of the posts are equivalent to that....

How do you know?  Is that you revealing information you should not reveal..........yet again, Mr Hicks?

I'm old enough to know better, but young enough to do it anyway  ;D

There should be a 14 to 18 age slot in the poll to accommodate several of the juvenile idíots we have here.

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 17^th, 2016 at 7:09am:

John Smith wrote on Mar 16th, 2016 at 7:15pm: 45   ;) You mean 4 going on 5.

;D ;D ;D

If ONLY Marco Polo hadn't brought spaghetti and pasta back from his trips to China then Signore John Smith would have eaten a lot more protein-rich meat instead of that doughy crap the Italians love so much. 

bogarde73 wrote on Mar 17^th, 2016 at 9:25am:

I do nothing for nothing. If you want my honesty there has to be a financial incentive. Everything has its price in the free market.

God, you're not THAT old are you bogarde? Just hanging on by the skin of your dentures?

Lord Herbert wrote on Mar 19^th, 2016 at 7:39am:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Mar 17th, 2016 at 7:09am: John Smith wrote on Mar 16th, 2016 at 7:15pm: 45   ;) You mean 4 going on 5. ;D ;D ;D If ONLY Marco Polo hadn't brought spaghetti and pasta back from his trips to China then Signore John Smith would have eaten a lot more protein-rich meat instead of that doughy crap the Italians love so much.

I eat more meat than pasta dopey, but keep going, it's not like you've ever bothered with facts before, why would anyone start expecting you to now!

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 9:13pm:

Wolseley wrote on Mar 18th, 2016 at 10:00am: AiA wrote on Mar 18th, 2016 at 9:31am: the average age at this board is "deceased" If that was the case, surely nobody would be posting anything. The value of most of the posts are equivalent to that....

my point exactly which Wolseley couldn't see in his dotage ...

32....33 this year  :) why do you want to know skippy? How old are you?

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 17^th, 2016 at 8:15pm:

skippy. wrote on Mar 16th, 2016 at 7:13pm: Try to be honest I'm interested in the age bracket of people that post on these forums. It's my belief most are fifty plus or at least in their forties, not all, just most. I'm 45. No big deal.

K.  Are you Benjamin BUTTon?

People - and not just women, lie about their age because they don't want to be called old. No matter what age we reach - most of us probably still feel young. Age should be irrelevant on these anonymous forums.

A much more interesting poll would be the age of the person you're fkucing

ashlee wrote on Mar 19^th, 2016 at 3:39pm:

32....33 this year  :) why do you want to know skippy? How old are you?

I asked  because I made a comment on another thread that I believed most posters here were over fifty and that younger people, like you, we're probably not as interested in forums as the older generation, like me.
Looking at the poll I was pretty close in my assumptions.

mantra wrote on Mar 19^th, 2016 at 6:49pm:

People - and not just women, lie about their age because they don't want to be called old. No matter what age we reach - most of us probably still feel young. Age should be irrelevant on these anonymous forums.

nah ... aging has never bothered me



it's the alternative I don't like. :D :D

this poll reminds me of an old plaque we used to have hanging in the family room

From 20 to 30 if a man lives right
It’s once in the morning
and twice in the night
From 30 to 40
If he’s still lives right
He misses the morning
and sometimes the night
From 40 to 50
It’s just now and then
From 50 to 60
it’s Heaven knows when
from 60 to 70
if he’s still declined
but don't let him kid you,
it’s still on his mind

http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b307/magooscreations/301320_304531956231073_304522396232029_1525308_1373240969_n.jpg

Old enough to have an extensive collection of pleasurable memories - and the good sense not to look at them too often.

Was that mental age or physical age?  I'm 66 going on 16, and am ... cuddling with...  a 57 year old....half English, half Maori.

When I signed up to this forum a bit under 6 years ago, I thought most posters were teenagers or in their early 20s. I got the shock of my life when a seasoned poster informed me many were/are in their 50s/60s and beyond. It's has been a learning experience, that's for sure.

I'm always honest about my age - and every other thing as well..... why is this a matter of interest?  Am I somehow less incisive and less learned in my comments by being part of some amorphous age group?  Do I grow senile if I'm over 50 or become a sappy youth because I'm under 20? Or for that matter do I become different in my views because I'm a man or a woman or a whatever?

Why not value and judge my posts on their merit and not on some mythical age or other divide?

Politics of division has nearly destroyed this country... MY country that I own....  you want me to participate in the creation of artificial divides between people?

Oh.. the half-Maori lass loves me for myself....... and she knows better than you do....

John Smith wrote on Mar 19^th, 2016 at 8:54pm:

this poll reminds me of an old plaque we used to have hanging in the family room From 20 to 30 if a man lives right It’s once in the morning and twice in the night From 30 to 40 If he’s still lives right He misses the morning and sometimes the night From 40 to 50 It’s just now and then From 50 to 60 it’s Heaven knows when from 60 to 70 if he’s still declined but don't let him kid you, it’s still on his mind

How very crass, but not unexpected.

GordyL wrote on Mar 19^th, 2016 at 6:56pm:

A much more interesting poll would be the age of the person you're fkucing

Don't ask ian.

I'm sure there are laws against that.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26^th, 2016 at 10:31pm:

GordyL wrote on Mar 19th, 2016 at 6:56pm: A much more interesting poll would be the age of the person you're fkucing Don't ask ian. I'm sure there are laws against that.

Greggy - you're about 14 aren't you? -

far too young to be on an adult forum like this.

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26^th, 2016 at 10:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26th, 2016 at 10:31pm: GordyL wrote on Mar 19th, 2016 at 6:56pm: A much more interesting poll would be the age of the person you're fkucing Don't ask ian. I'm sure there are laws against that. Greggy - you're about 14 aren't you? -

Yes.

So why do you keep sending me personal messages asking for sexual favours?

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26^th, 2016 at 10:37pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26th, 2016 at 10:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26th, 2016 at 10:31pm: GordyL wrote on Mar 19th, 2016 at 6:56pm: A much more interesting poll would be the age of the person you're fkucing Don't ask ian. I'm sure there are laws against that. Greggy - you're about 14 aren't you? - Yes. So why do you keep sending me personal messages asking for sexual favours?

For the record - I've never sent Greggy a single PM.

He makes crap up because that's all he's got.

I think he was joking Bobby? lol

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26^th, 2016 at 10:37pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26th, 2016 at 10:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26th, 2016 at 10:31pm: GordyL wrote on Mar 19th, 2016 at 6:56pm: A much more interesting poll would be the age of the person you're fkucing Don't ask ian. I'm sure there are laws against that. Greggy - you're about 14 aren't you? - Yes. So why do you keep sending me personal messages asking for sexual favours?

;D ;D ( sorry for laughing at your expense Bobby but you tend to lead with your chin sometimes)

.

skippy. wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 8:01am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26th, 2016 at 10:37pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 26th, 2016 at 10:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26th, 2016 at 10:31pm: GordyL wrote on Mar 19th, 2016 at 6:56pm: A much more interesting poll would be the age of the person you're fkucing Don't ask ian. I'm sure there are laws against that. Greggy - you're about 14 aren't you? - Yes. So why do you keep sending me personal messages asking for sexual favours? ;D ;D ( sorry for laughing at your expense Bobby but you tend to lead with your chin sometimes)

Why apologise for what comes naturally effortless and without thought for the victim, skippeee?  That's what you do.  It is ~ you.

get over it aussie .. bobby's no more a victim than you are.

John Smith wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 5:44pm:

get over it aussie .. bobby's no more a victim than you are.

That's for him to say.  I think he has.

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 5:52pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:44pm: get over it aussie .. bobby's no more a victim than you are. That's for him to say.  I think he has.

rubbish. Funny how you don't take that point of view when lisa says she's a victim of your stalking her

John Smith wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 5:55pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:52pm: John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:44pm: get over it aussie .. bobby's no more a victim than you are. That's for him to say.  I think he has. rubbish. Funny how you don't take that point of view when lisa says she's a victim of your stalking her

I never sent any PM to Jones asking her for a date.   Have you?

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 6:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:55pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:52pm: John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:44pm: get over it aussie .. bobby's no more a victim than you are. That's for him to say.  I think he has. rubbish. Funny how you don't take that point of view when lisa says she's a victim of your stalking her I never sent any PM to Jones asking her for a date.   Have you?

what have PM's to do with anything?  :D :D

Maybe this ~ just a wild guess of course:


Quote:

So why do you keep sending me personal messages asking for sexual favours?

Quote:

For the record - I've never sent Greggy a single PM. He makes crap up because that's all he's got.

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 6:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:55pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:52pm: John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:44pm: get over it aussie .. bobby's no more a victim than you are. That's for him to say.  I think he has. rubbish. Funny how you don't take that point of view when lisa says she's a victim of your stalking her I never sent any PM to Jones asking her for a date.   Have you?

We will have to ask Lisa that, your word is nudda.

skippy. wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 6:27pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 6:02pm: John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:55pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:52pm: John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:44pm: get over it aussie .. bobby's no more a victim than you are. That's for him to say.  I think he has. rubbish. Funny how you don't take that point of view when lisa says she's a victim of your stalking her I never sent any PM to Jones asking her for a date.   Have you? We will have to ask Lisa that, your word is nudda.

LOl you so you want to trot out your meat puppet again-" Yes Aussie did ask me for a date the cab driver is jealous-  TRUTH  ^

Agnes wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 6:39pm:

skippy. wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 6:27pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 6:02pm: John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:55pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:52pm: John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:44pm: get over it aussie .. bobby's no more a victim than you are. That's for him to say.  I think he has. rubbish. Funny how you don't take that point of view when lisa says she's a victim of your stalking her I never sent any PM to Jones asking her for a date.   Have you? We will have to ask Lisa that, your word is nudda. LOl you so you want to trot out your meat puppet again-" Yes Aussie did ask me for a date the cab driver is jealous-  TRUTH  ^

UP FOR AUSSIE

Agnes wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 6:40pm:

Agnes wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 6:39pm: skippy. wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 6:27pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 6:02pm: John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:55pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:52pm: John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 5:44pm: get over it aussie .. bobby's no more a victim than you are. That's for him to say.  I think he has. rubbish. Funny how you don't take that point of view when lisa says she's a victim of your stalking her I never sent any PM to Jones asking her for a date.   Have you? We will have to ask Lisa that, your word is nudda. LOl you so you want to trot out your meat puppet again-" Yes Aussie did ask me for a date the cab driver is jealous-  TRUTH  ^ UP FOR AUSSIE

UP FOR THE CAB DRIVER!!!  ^

i RECKON IT MIGHT BE TIME TO SUMMON LISA..

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 6:16pm:

Maybe this ~ just a wild guess of course: Quote: So why do you keep sending me personal messages asking for sexual favours? [quote]For the record - I've never sent Greggy a single PM. He makes crap up because that's all he's got.

[/quote]

come on Aussie, you know we were talking about your claim that bobby is the victim. Don't try to worm out of it now

John Smith wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 6:58pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 6:16pm: Maybe this ~ just a wild guess of course: Quote: So why do you keep sending me personal messages asking for sexual favours? [quote]For the record - I've never sent Greggy a single PM. He makes crap up because that's all he's got.

come on Aussie, you know we were talking about your claim that bobby is the victim. Don't try to worm out of it now[/quote]

Not my claim.   It is the claim of Sir Bobby.


Quote:

So why do you keep sending me personal messages asking for sexual favours?

Quote:

For the record - I've never sent Greggy a single PM.

bobby didn't say he was a victim, you did. Don't try and worm out of it now

John Smith wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 7:09pm:

bobby didn't say he was a victim, you did. Don't try and worm out of it now

Unlike others, I am not about to re-write history, but ~ in any man's language, Sir Bobby is the victim of a false assertion made by Mr Peccary, who has made that assertion many times in many Threads.

It would wear anyone down in the context in which the assertion was made, being that Sir Bobby is homosexual.

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 7:13pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 7:09pm: bobby didn't say he was a victim, you did. Don't try and worm out of it now Unlike others, I am not about to re-write history, but ~ in any man's language, Sir Bobby is the victim of a false assertion made by Mr Peccary, who has made that assertion many times in many Threads. It would wear anyone down in the context in which the assertion was made, being that Sir Bobby is homosexual.

since you haven't got access to bobbys PM's, you aren't in a position to make that claim one way or another. All you know is that bobby said one thing, greg the other. For all you know greg could be the victim. 

You still haven't addressed how bobby denying a claim from Greg makes him a victim, while Lisa denying a claim from you doesn't make her a victim. Can you explain the difference to me?

Sure can.  I have never made a claim which Lisa could credibly deny.  Mr Peccary can establish his claim by posting the PMs.  I'm sure Sir Bobby will give his consent to that to ensure no Rule breach.

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 7:59pm:

Sure can.  I have never made a claim which Lisa could credibly deny.  Mr Peccary can establish his claim by posting the PMs.  I'm sure Sir Bobby will give his consent to that to ensure no Rule breach.

you're pulling crap out of your arse now Aussie. Desperation doesn't suit you ... although I'm guessing you're used to it.

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 7:59pm:

Sure can.  I have never made a claim which Lisa could credibly deny.  Mr Peccary can establish his claim by posting the PMs.  I'm sure Sir Bobby will give his consent to that to ensure no Rule breach.

What do the rules say about posting PMs?

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 8:15pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 7:59pm: Sure can.  I have never made a claim which Lisa could credibly deny.  Mr Peccary can establish his claim by posting the PMs.  I'm sure Sir Bobby will give his consent to that to ensure no Rule breach. What do the rules say about posting PMs?

You cannot post the content of a PM sent to you (without the consent of the sender.)  You can post the content of a PM you send to anyone.

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 8:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:15pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 7:59pm: Sure can.  I have never made a claim which Lisa could credibly deny.  Mr Peccary can establish his claim by posting the PMs.  I'm sure Sir Bobby will give his consent to that to ensure no Rule breach. What do the rules say about posting PMs? You cannot post the content of a PM sent to you (without the consent of the sender.)  You can post the content of a PM you send to anyone.

Sir Booby: do I have your consent to post the PMs you've sent me?

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 8:27pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:15pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 7:59pm: Sure can.  I have never made a claim which Lisa could credibly deny.  Mr Peccary can establish his claim by posting the PMs.  I'm sure Sir Bobby will give his consent to that to ensure no Rule breach. What do the rules say about posting PMs? You cannot post the content of a PM sent to you (without the consent of the sender.)  You can post the content of a PM you send to anyone. Sir Booby: do I have your consent to post the PMs you've sent me?

There ya go Mr Smith!  That's exactly the way I have handled all the stuff Jones falsely posted, and never once did she give that consent, and that refusal moved the light of suspicion off me and onto her, as it it will if Sir Bobby does not give his consent.

You did ask the correct person didn't you Mr Peccary.....not Sir Booby...no such Member.....it is Sir Bobby? You were addressing Sir Bobby, yeas?

Simple, isn't it Mr Smith?

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 8:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:27pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:15pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 7:59pm: Sure can.  I have never made a claim which Lisa could credibly deny.  Mr Peccary can establish his claim by posting the PMs.  I'm sure Sir Bobby will give his consent to that to ensure no Rule breach. What do the rules say about posting PMs? You cannot post the content of a PM sent to you (without the consent of the sender.)  You can post the content of a PM you send to anyone. Sir Booby: do I have your consent to post the PMs you've sent me? There ya go Mr Smith!  That's exactly the way I have handled all the stuff Jones falsely posted, and never once did she give that consent, and that refusal moved the light of suspicion off me and onto her, as it it will if Sir Bobby does not give his consent. Simple, isn't it?

except that Greg has asked before and Bobby has never given it.

Okay.....here is his very clear opportunity to do so.  Sir Bobby, do you consent to Mr Peccary posting in public any PMs you have sent to him 'seeking sexual favours?'

John Smith wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 8:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:30pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:27pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:15pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 7:59pm: Sure can.  I have never made a claim which Lisa could credibly deny.  Mr Peccary can establish his claim by posting the PMs.  I'm sure Sir Bobby will give his consent to that to ensure no Rule breach. What do the rules say about posting PMs? You cannot post the content of a PM sent to you (without the consent of the sender.)  You can post the content of a PM you send to anyone. Sir Booby: do I have your consent to post the PMs you've sent me? There ya go Mr Smith!  That's exactly the way I have handled all the stuff Jones falsely posted, and never once did she give that consent, and that refusal moved the light of suspicion off me and onto her, as it it will if Sir Bobby does not give his consent. Simple, isn't it? except that Greg has asked before and Bobby has never given it.

Correct.

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 7:59pm:

Sure can.  I have never made a claim which Lisa could credibly deny.  Mr Peccary can establish his claim by posting the PMs.  I'm sure Sir Bobby will give his consent to that to ensure no Rule breach.

I've seen her deny plenty of your claims.

John Smith wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 8:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:30pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:27pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:15pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 7:59pm: Sure can.  I have never made a claim which Lisa could credibly deny.  Mr Peccary can establish his claim by posting the PMs.  I'm sure Sir Bobby will give his consent to that to ensure no Rule breach. What do the rules say about posting PMs? You cannot post the content of a PM sent to you (without the consent of the sender.)  You can post the content of a PM you send to anyone. Sir Booby: do I have your consent to post the PMs you've sent me? There ya go Mr Smith!  That's exactly the way I have handled all the stuff Jones falsely posted, and never once did she give that consent, and that refusal moved the light of suspicion off me and onto her, as it it will if Sir Bobby does not give his consent. Simple, isn't it? except that Greg has asked before and Bobby has never given it.

Two minutes ago:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1459058261/38#38

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 8:27pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:15pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 7:59pm: Sure can.  I have never made a claim which Lisa could credibly deny.  Mr Peccary can establish his claim by posting the PMs.  I'm sure Sir Bobby will give his consent to that to ensure no Rule breach. What do the rules say about posting PMs? You cannot post the content of a PM sent to you (without the consent of the sender.)  You can post the content of a PM you send to anyone. Sir Booby: do I have your consent to post the PMs you've sent me?

Apologist.

Aussie wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 8:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:27pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:15pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 7:59pm: Sure can.  I have never made a claim which Lisa could credibly deny.  Mr Peccary can establish his claim by posting the PMs.  I'm sure Sir Bobby will give his consent to that to ensure no Rule breach. What do the rules say about posting PMs? You cannot post the content of a PM sent to you (without the consent of the sender.)  You can post the content of a PM you send to anyone. Sir Booby: do I have your consent to post the PMs you've sent me? There ya go Mr Smith!  That's exactly the way I have handled all the stuff Jones falsely posted, and never once did she give that consent, and that refusal moved the light of suspicion off me and onto her, as it it will if Sir Bobby does not give his consent. You did ask the correct person didn't you Mr Peccary.....not Sir Booby...no such Member.....it is Sir Bobby? You were addressing Sir Bobby, yeas? Simple, isn't it Mr Smith?

Another apologist.

Frank wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 9:29pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:27pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:15pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 7:59pm: Sure can.  I have never made a claim which Lisa could credibly deny.  Mr Peccary can establish his claim by posting the PMs.  I'm sure Sir Bobby will give his consent to that to ensure no Rule breach. What do the rules say about posting PMs? You cannot post the content of a PM sent to you (without the consent of the sender.)  You can post the content of a PM you send to anyone. Sir Booby: do I have your consent to post the PMs you've sent me? Apologist.

Hello Frank.  You appear to be new here.  Please read this Board's Rules and in conjunction, those of freediver's about Boards like this one.  They make me a God.  Okay?  That means a few basic things, like ...... oh....  "Don't piss me off or I'll ban you."  Sucks for Members I know, but just about everyone has managed to live with it even many of my detractors whom I have never banned.  No-one needs to walk on egg shells here, but it is vital that if I ask you to do or not do something, then it's best to do it, or not do it.  That's the way it is, and all within FD's Rules.  Sux I know.  You'd reckon I'd be less of a dictator, but me being one (i.e. a benevolent dictator) is part of the pretty obvious and unique attraction here.  I am unelected, and just appointed by FD.

So....if you get a PM from me, or see a post from me asking you to 'please co-operate,' it's a good idea to do that and not to, is a very bad choice..

One last fact (as if you did not know.....) I am Aussie.

Sir Booby: do I have your consent to post the PMs you've sent me?

Mod. wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 9:51pm:

Hello Frank.  You appear to be new here.  Please read this Board's Rules and in conjunction, those of freediver's about Boards like this one.  They make me a God.  Okay?

;D ;D ;D


Is it against Forum Rules to laugh at you???  You ARE ridiculous.  Is that OK or are you going to ban me for laughing at you for being a pompous ass?
Sorry - a pompous 'god'.


M'kay?



:D :D

Mod. wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 9:51pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 9:29pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:27pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 8:15pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 27th, 2016 at 7:59pm: Sure can.  I have never made a claim which Lisa could credibly deny.  Mr Peccary can establish his claim by posting the PMs.  I'm sure Sir Bobby will give his consent to that to ensure no Rule breach. What do the rules say about posting PMs? You cannot post the content of a PM sent to you (without the consent of the sender.)  You can post the content of a PM you send to anyone. Sir Booby: do I have your consent to post the PMs you've sent me? Apologist. Hello Frank.  You appear to be new here.  Please read this Board's Rules and in conjunction, those of freediver's about Boards like this one.  They make me a God.  Okay?  That means a few basic things, like ...... oh....  "Don't piss me off or I'll ban you."  Sucks for Members I know, but just about everyone has managed to live with it even many of my detractors whom I have never banned.  No-one needs to walk on egg shells here, but it is vital that if I ask you to do or not do something, then it's best to do it, or not do it.  That's the way it is, and all within FD's Rules.  Sux I know.  You'd reckon I'd be less of a dictator, but me being one (i.e. a benevolent dictator) is part of the pretty obvious and unique attraction here.  I am unelected, and just appointed by FD. So....if you get a PM from me, or see a post from me asking you to 'please co-operate,' it's a good idea to do that and not to, is a very bad choice.. One last fact (as if you did not know.....) I am Aussie.

You must have some serious issues, pal. Some really serious issues. 

Who talks like this unless they have some serious inferiority issues?   You sound like someone who has been pissed on for a long time.  And you are not going to take it any more, not on a faceless internet forum at any rate.  You assert yourself, pal.

Here we just sense that you are an insecure loser but can't know for sure (well, we can but can't be 100% (we can be, actually but will humour you and pretend we can't))


You ARE a god of an internet forum. Are you pleased?i

Mod. wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 9:51pm:

That means a few basic things, like ...... oh....  "Don't piss me off or I'll ban you."  ... That's the way it is, and all within FD's Rules.  Sux I know.  You'd reckon I'd be less of a dictator, but me being one (i.e. a benevolent dictator) is part of the pretty obvious and unique attraction here.  I am unelected, and just appointed by FD. One last fact (as if you did not know.....) I am Aussie.

:D :D :D :D


Which rules have I broken.

Advise, God.


:D

Watch out frank, he might ban you from the relationships forum. ooowah

I'm actually agreeing with Frank on this one ... Aussie are you deliberately trying to prove you're a tosser ?

John Smith wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 11:39pm:

I'm actually agreeing with Frank on this one ... Aussie are you deliberately trying to prove you're a tosser ?

Who needs proof?