Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Environment >> skepticalpsuedoscience cooke the books.
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1457845064

Message started by progressiveslol on Mar 13th, 2016 at 2:57pm

Title: skepticalpsuedoscience cooke the books.
Post by progressiveslol on Mar 13th, 2016 at 2:57pm
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/03/12/the-cook-97-consensus-paper-exposed-by-new-book-for-the-fraud-that-it-really-is/

Title: Re: skepticalpsuedoscience cooke the books.
Post by Bojack Horseman on Mar 13th, 2016 at 3:01pm
http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/07/whos-lying-now-its-brandon.html

Title: Re: skepticalpsuedoscience cooke the books.
Post by lee on Mar 13th, 2016 at 3:20pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 13th, 2016 at 3:01pm:
http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/07/whos-lying-now-its-brandon.html



Don't trust Miriam O'Brien aka Hotwhopper.

'In reality, we're probably causing more than 100% of the warming, which is offset to some extent by aerosols.'

http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/07/whos-lying-now-its-brandon.html

So she explicitly excludes the greening of the deserts (or anywhere else) as a source of increased CO2.


The Cook et al paper is available -
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024;jsessionid=E5EBAF4746195EE7124B22C209ADB3BE.c2.iopscience.cld.iop.org

You can do the research yourself.

There are many papers debunking Cook, not just Shollenberger.

Title: Re: skepticalpsuedoscience cooke the books.
Post by BatteriesNotIncluded on Mar 13th, 2016 at 3:29pm

lee wrote on Mar 13th, 2016 at 3:20pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 13th, 2016 at 3:01pm:
http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/07/whos-lying-now-its-brandon.html



Don't trust Miriam O'Brien aka Hotwhopper.

'In reality, we're probably causing more than 100% of the warming, which is offset to some extent by aerosols.'

http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/07/whos-lying-now-its-brandon.html

So she explicitly excludes the greening of the deserts (or anywhere else) as a source of increased CO2.


The Cook et al paper is available -
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024;jsessionid=E5EBAF4746195EE7124B22C209ADB3BE.c2.iopscience.cld.iop.org

You can do the research yourself.

There are many papers debunking Cook, not just Shollenberger.

the fiddlers are out: well done Jo, well done mate!!

http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=jo+hockey++cartoon&view=detailv2&id=B2F0B2CF2D6ED59C3141098E87C28E6569B400B1&selectedindex=11&ccid=IVVmw5c2&simid=608013726169107644&thid=OIP.M215566c397363ee6294cf500821642bao0&mode=overlay&first=1


Title: Re: skepticalpsuedoscience cooke the books.
Post by BatteriesNotIncluded on Mar 13th, 2016 at 3:30pm

lee wrote on Mar 13th, 2016 at 3:20pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 13th, 2016 at 3:01pm:
http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/07/whos-lying-now-its-brandon.html



Don't trust Miriam O'Brien aka Hotwhopper.

'In reality, we're probably causing more than 100% of the warming, which is offset to some extent by aerosols.'

http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/07/whos-lying-now-its-brandon.html

So she explicitly excludes the greening of the deserts (or anywhere else) as a source of increased CO2.


The Cook et al paper is available -
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024;jsessionid=E5EBAF4746195EE7124B22C209ADB3BE.c2.iopscience.cld.iop.org

You can do the research yourself.

There are many papers debunking Cook, not just Shollenberger.

the fiddlers are out: well done Jo, well done mate!!


The_economy_joe_hockey_and_tony_abbott.jpg (147 KB | 31 )

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.