I can't find it.  But I do know that Mr Hicks told us all that abuse of Family Members would attract a ban.

Anyone know where he posted that?  Mr Hicks himself may be able to help us here.

Aussie wrote on Mar 12^th, 2016 at 9:10pm:

I can't find it.  But I do know that Mr Hicks told us all that abuse of Family Members would attract a ban. Anyone know where he posted that?  Mr Hicks himself may be able to help us here.

why?..

Aussie wrote on Mar 12^th, 2016 at 9:10pm:

I can't find it.  But I do know that Mr Hicks told us all that abuse of Family Members would attract a ban. Anyone know where he posted that?  Mr Hicks himself may be able to help us here.

So the reality is that you don't know.

cods wrote on Mar 12^th, 2016 at 9:12pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 12th, 2016 at 9:10pm: I can't find it.  But I do know that Mr Hicks told us all that abuse of Family Members would attract a ban. Anyone know where he posted that?  Mr Hicks himself may be able to help us here. why?..

Because I am trying to find where he announced it, as he did, so it can be made part of the Rules here.

So you have no idea if he said anything and you have no idea that I'd he did, someone was banned for it yet you think you can somehow dictate what should be a rule.

Interesting thought process.

Jennifer wrote on Mar 12^th, 2016 at 9:23pm:

So you have no idea if he said anything and you have no idea that I'd he did, someone was banned for it yet you think you can somehow dictate what should be a rule. Interesting thought process.

As I thought. You have nothing.

His comments on the matter started here at Post # 177


Quote:

I don't think we need all of this personal antagonising and comments on people's families.

Link.

And he firmed that up later somewhere where a Poster made some comment about his lunch date’s Family.   That is the one I am after.

Aussie wrote on Mar 12^th, 2016 at 9:38pm:

His comments on the matter started here at Post # 177 Quote: I don't think we need all of this personal antagonising and comments on people's families. And he firmed that up later somewhere where a Poster made some comment about his lunch date’s Family.   That is the one I am after.

So you have nothing.

PM of mine to Mr Hicks on the date which is self evident:


Quote:

Subject: Re: Abuse of Family Member ~ Cynik Date: Feb 9th, 2016 at 6:03am Aussie wrote on Feb 8th, 2016 at 6:54pm: You said you would ban if people made posts concerning a Member’s family. This posted by “new” Member Cynik referring to the Mother of John Smith. Post # 93: Quote: Her moans and begging for it were spoke in a universal language. From this Thread: Link.

While I am not allowed to reveal what Mr Hicks sent back to me..........the poster 'Cynik' has not been seen here since.

I recall that Andrei Hicks posted that abuse by Andrei Hicks would not be tolerated.

Svengali wrote on Mar 12^th, 2016 at 10:52pm:

I recall that Andrei Hicks posted that abuse by Andrei Hicks would not be tolerated.

Andrei enjoys a little play on words occasionally......  8-)

Andrei is a hypocrite of the highest order.

mothra wrote on Mar 13^th, 2016 at 12:58am:

Andrei is a hypocrite of the highest order.

Now, now - he does act at times when it is necessary.... and I don't think he acts on any left/right basis...... though some say he does, that is not my experience.  I often disagree with Andrei and he doesn't come after me.... but then... I don't come after him, but state my opposition position...

Andrei has abused me personally. He has also, on numerous occasions while being a part of the conversation, ignored me being abused personally.

He lets what he wants go through to the keeper.

He is highly inconsistent

He certainly has a left/right bias..

mothra wrote on Mar 13^th, 2016 at 1:12am:

Andrei has abused me personally. He has also, on numerous occasions while being a part of the conversation, ignored me being abused personally. He lets what he wants go through to the keeper. He is highly inconsistent He certainly has a left/right bias..

Report him to himself, then.. that should work...

Maybe Mr Hicks will clarify the matter.  I know he posted an edict about abuse of family, but I just can't find it.

please Mr hicks think carefully before you give aussie more RULES that he can whip people with...

why you need andreis rules anyway I dont know aussie..

you make up so many of your own....relationships is almost a concentration  camp.

Aussie wrote on Mar 13^th, 2016 at 10:04am:

Maybe Mr Hicks will clarify the matter.  I know he posted an edict about abuse of family, but I just can't find it.

Only Aussie, the Great Prevaricator, issues "edicts."

mothra wrote on Mar 13^th, 2016 at 1:12am:

Andrei has abused me personally. He has also, on numerous occasions while being a part of the conversation, ignored me being abused personally. He lets what he wants go through to the keeper. He is highly inconsistent He certainly has a left/right bias..

  I have seen many inconsistencies by Andrei.

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 13^th, 2016 at 1:21am:

mothra wrote on Mar 13th, 2016 at 1:12am: Andrei has abused me personally. He has also, on numerous occasions while being a part of the conversation, ignored me being abused personally. He lets what he wants go through to the keeper. He is highly inconsistent He certainly has a left/right bias.. Report him to himself, then.. that should work...

That should cause Andrei to get a grip of himself.