?

---

The Libs are in power so the answer is yes.

I believe they can, and do, but shouldn't.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1445407550/3#3

the libs have taken a page out of the training providers book.... sign up retards, disabled and those that don't understand to whatever they are trying to flog.

They must - we have an LNP 'government'.

No other explanation than rampant retardism is possible.

The answer is actually 'no'.

They cannot legally enter into a contract, much like a minor......unless they are of course influenced by the leftist collective....which is quite common ...as evidenced here... :D

Tony Abbott  was once PM , case rested .

John Smith wrote on Mar 11^th, 2016 at 7:39pm:

the libs have taken a page out of the training providers book.... sign up retards, disabled and those that don't understand to whatever they are trying to flog.

Privatise the vote?  Now there's an idea........

Let's talk to our shareholders....

"A vote is more efficient when handled by private enterprise rather than a hide-bound public body!! AEO has failed to deliver the goods and to provide value for money, and is, in fact, a massive burden on the voting public while providing massive retirement schemes for public servants who only work one day a year (yardle, yardle)! That much is obvious!  When we take into account the remuneration required for our board etc, and our paid staff.... it is obvious that such a venture needs NO government funding, but venture capital in the guise of donations!   A privatised Electoral Office would be much more efficient for the needs of the voting public... who can just come in, sign a paper, give their vote online or whatever while paying a toll, and/or offer a paper bag.. and be on their way!"

Its time wrote on Mar 11^th, 2016 at 11:32pm:

Tony Abbott  was once PM , case rested .

.....you voted for Tony did ya?

Bloke at the bar is thinking who is this knobhead who is more at place at a tapas and wine bar.

Swagman wrote on Mar 11^th, 2016 at 11:19pm:

The answer is actually 'no'. They cannot legally enter into a contract, much like a minor......unless they are of course influenced by the leftist collective....which is quite common ...as evidenced here... :D

the fact that matty and armpit vote says you're wrong.  ;D ;D

Its time wrote on Mar 11^th, 2016 at 11:46pm:

Bloke at the bar is thinking who is this knobhead who is more at place at a tapas and wine bar.

.....lookin at you was he?

"errr.. ahh... no... no.. umm... no.. they can't, Madame Speaker... but.. arrrh.... Sh1t... you know... ahhh.. happens!"

A man who actually believes that poor people don't use roads is entitled to vote....

http://www.netanimations.net/one-crazy-pig-with-pinwheel-going-weee-all-the-way-home.gif

http://s9.tinypic.com/vqp6bk_th.jpg

Swagman wrote on Mar 11^th, 2016 at 11:19pm:

The answer is actually 'no'. They cannot legally enter into a contract, much like a minor......unless they are of course influenced by the leftist collective....which is quite common ...as evidenced here... :D

Anyone over the age of eighteen that is on an electoral role can vote.
Many people with disabilities are capable of lodging a vote. I would be much more concerned about the old Alzheimers brigade rolling in that do totally rely on the advice of those that take them to vote.