.Surely a banning offence.
Guess who has interfered with the title of the Trump thread.

I agree, Bogey. If you can be banned for circumventing the swear filter in a conversational context or returning serve with an insult, surely interfering with someone else's thread is deserving of a ban. Surely.

I'm not even sure why the software would allow it. 

Surely the ability to edit anothers thread title is a feature that could and should be disabled.

... wrote on Mar 4^th, 2016 at 6:11pm:

I'm not even sure why the software would allow it.  Surely the ability to edit anothers thread title is a feature that could and should be disabled.

You can only do it in your own Post as I have in just this Post.

Aussie wrote on Mar 4^th, 2016 at 6:19pm:

... wrote on Mar 4th, 2016 at 6:11pm: I'm not even sure why the software would allow it.  Surely the ability to edit anothers thread title is a feature that could and should be disabled. You can only do it in your own Post as I have in just this Post.

But if I respond to your post with the altered title, it remains altered.

It's a stupid feature, and I suspect as easy as 1, 2 , 3 to disable.

... wrote on Mar 4^th, 2016 at 6:22pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 4th, 2016 at 6:19pm: ... wrote on Mar 4th, 2016 at 6:11pm: I'm not even sure why the software would allow it.  Surely the ability to edit anothers thread title is a feature that could and should be disabled. You can only do it in your own Post as I have in just this Post. But if I respond to your post with the altered title, it remains altered. It's a stupid feature, and I suspect as easy as 1, 2 , 3 to disable.

Hardly a big deal.

Well, It's enough of a "big deal" for people to purposely and repeatedly do, soo.....

Spot on, Honky. Why is it even possible?  If you don't like the thread title, start your own.

whats this thread about again?

John Smith wrote on Mar 4^th, 2016 at 8:47pm:

whats this thread about again?

These things, apparently.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/86/GreatTit002.jpg

John Smith and Aussie agree it's no biggie. That settles that.

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 4^th, 2016 at 9:20pm:

John Smith and Aussie agree it's no biggie. That settles that.

Glad you agree, 'newbie.'

Sarah's mum, cods, skippy, lisa jones, George, Andrei and countless others have you pegged,  'Aussie'.

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 4^th, 2016 at 9:28pm:

Sarah's mum, cods, skippy, lisa jones, George, Andrei and countless others have you pegged,  'Aussie'.

I have no idea what you are talking about.  And....this Thread is not the place.  If you'd like discuss whatever, may I suggest you take it to Relationships?

Awww, Troublemaker  got a bit butt sore about an off topic post. What was the point about the picture of the birds?

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 4^th, 2016 at 9:36pm:

What was the point about the picture of the birds?

they're tits :D :D :D

Posting tits... that's gotta be a banning offense? :D

What this thread's about is the attempt to interfere with freedom of speech on OzPol because you don't like a thread. In fact the person is going off his brain about it so much he has resorted to continuous spamming of the thread and now a deliberate title change.
I mention no names but the character SS Gruppenfuhrer comes to mind.

There is either freedom of expression without sabotage or there isn't. I wouldn't dream of attacking a thread in this way even though there have been many over the years I haven't agreed with.

John Smith wrote on Mar 4^th, 2016 at 9:37pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 4th, 2016 at 9:36pm: What was the point about the picture of the birds? they're tits :D :D :D

I actually had no idea what they were either , not bad Aussie , i like it  ;D

No problem.

bogarde73 wrote on Mar 4^th, 2016 at 4:39pm:

.Surely a banning offence. Guess who has interfered with the title of the Trump thread.

The title looks the same to me.