perceptions_now is hiding the truth.  Why?  He has now gagged discussion on his inconsistency/bias ~ in this  thread (now locked by him:)

Link.

He has also gagged another (which he has now locked) in which I alert him to the fact that someone must have hacked his account:

Link.

He and I both know the truth and he is hiding it from Members.

perceptions_now, please advise if you give your express permission that the PM you sent to a Member you banned recently may post the PM you sent them which included the reason for that ban?

I’m sure Members will be capable of drawing the obvious conclusion if you do not provide that consent.  You are trying to hide the truth and suppress discussion on the issue.

Another thread? .......... get over it

John Smith wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 4:54pm:

Another thread? .......... get over it

I can be just as determined (and pig headed) as you are.

John Smith wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 4:54pm:

Another thread? .......... get over it

X2

Aussie wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 4:56pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 4:54pm: Another thread? .......... get over it I can be just as determined (and pig headed) as you are.

wanna bet?

Redmond Neck wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 5:05pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 4:54pm: Another thread? .......... get over it X2

X3 ::)

skippy. wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 5:08pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 5:05pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 4:54pm: Another thread? .......... get over it X2 X3 ::)

Silly me, here I was doing all that just for you so the truth could be revealed.  Now, you don't want the truth.  Strange fellow you are.

Aussie wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 5:10pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 5:08pm: Redmond Neck wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 5:05pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 4:54pm: Another thread? .......... get over it X2 X3 ::) Silly me, here I was doing all that just for you so the truth could be revealed.  Now, you don't want the truth.  Strange fellow you are.

All for me? I haven't been banned from here for a couple of years.  I thought you were doing it for the poor soul that was banned, whoever that is. Funny, you'd think they would have the guts to start all these threads themself instead of putting you offside with the mods for standing up for them. This country really needs more men like you with your honesty and integrity Auuuusssssiiiieee.

It started out trying to get an explanation, but then, you turned into an 'Aussie is lying' issue.   As pn knows, the Rules protect him as without his permission, the proof you were after will be suppressed by pn's denial of that permission.  How about you get on his case, and ask him why, because I do not know.

You won't, because you never were after the truth. 

I was pissed off by PN’s pissweak hiding by locking those two threads!

Hmmm behavior Aussie was accused of and that was all hiss boo but Perc does it and no mention?


Oh, the hypocrisy!


But

The modding here is too arbitrary and the GMods are not accountable at all. As shown by Perc.

Aussie wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 5:28pm:

It started out trying to get an explanation, but then, you turned into an 'Aussie is lying' issue.   As pn knows, the Rules protect him as without his permission, the proof you were after will be suppressed by pn's denial of that permission.  How about you get on his case, and ask him why, because I do not know. You won't, because you never were after the truth.

Not true. I am  calling for the poster who was banned to stand up for themself and shout out loud and proud " I was banned for saying go kill yourself" or whatever the expression was, and I was wronged. But you seem to be speaking on their behalf, very strange, why wouldn't they be speaking out themself? Have other posters wondered this too? Why would Auuusssssiiiie being doing all the speaking out on their behalf while they remain silent?
So to me the question is like a Seinfild episode it is the question you have when you're not having a question. It is a hypothetical as we don't have a poster willing to say it was them that was banned, so the banning never really happened,very strange.

---

So, you will demand answers from p_n if the relevant Member posts what you want, even though it is totally irrelevant who they are?

Aussie,

Is your nose growing again?

---

No.  I know the truth and I am posting it.

Are you sure your motive is a search for the truth or to make the GMods that do not comply with your wishes, look bad in your continuous campaign that will eventually conclude that only you are suitable to be a GMod here.

Super Nova wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 6:18pm:

Are you sure your motive is a search for the truth or to make the GMods that do not comply with your wishes, look bad in your continuous campaign that will eventually conclude that only you are suitable to be a GMod here.

That would certainly see every Moderstor leave their post.

Super Nova wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 6:18pm:

Are you sure your motive is a search for the truth or to make the GMods that do not comply with your wishes, look bad in your continuous campaign that will eventually conclude that only you are suitable to be a GMod here.

I think I have posted a zillion times that I am not interested in being a GMod here.  (I reckon it is impossible to enjoy general Membership at a place like this and be a GMod.)  Would you like me to say it again? I do not want to be a GMod.  Got it?

I do want consistency and no bias in GModeration.  You?

I have made no demand of any GMod.  I have asked p_n (basically) two questions and he has done just about everything he can not to provide candid answers so the truth can emerge.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 6:22pm:

Super Nova wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 6:18pm: Are you sure your motive is a search for the truth or to make the GMods that do not comply with your wishes, look bad in your continuous campaign that will eventually conclude that only you are suitable to be a GMod here. That would certainly see every Moderstor leave their post.

Oh....and you think that would be a bad thing, don't you.

Aussie wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 6:25pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 6:22pm: Super Nova wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 6:18pm: Are you sure your motive is a search for the truth or to make the GMods that do not comply with your wishes, look bad in your continuous campaign that will eventually conclude that only you are suitable to be a GMod here. That would certainly see every Moderstor leave their post. Oh....and you think that would be a bad thing, don't you.

I don’t think it would be a bad thing. Too many protected species here ATM.

Aussie wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 6:04pm:

So, you will demand answers from p_n if the relevant Member posts what you want, even though it is totally irrelevant who they are?

No it is not irrelevant. Until this mysterious poster comes forward this thread like all the threads you have started on this topic is hypothetical as without a poster it is not real. It does not matter who they are but it does matter that they can be  identified as being real and not a figment of your imagination.
Why are they letting this conversation continue and not revealing themself? This is really weird.

skippy. wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 7:03pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 6:04pm: So, you will demand answers from p_n if the relevant Member posts what you want, even though it is totally irrelevant who they are? No it is not irrelevant. Until this mysterious poster comes forward this thread like all the threads you have started on this topic is hypothetical as without a poster it is not real. It does not matter who they are but it does matter that they can be  identified as being real and not a figment of your imagination. Why are they letting this conversation continue and not revealing themself? This is really weird.

'They' are not.  I was the banned Member.  So....where to now?

I think I can advance this a tad further for you skippeeee.  This is just to demonstrate that I did receive a PM from p_n as follows:


Quote:

Sender: perceptions_now To: Aussie Subject: Suspension Date: Jan 16th, 2016 at 9:25am Aussie,

*snip*

So, I now am seeking the express permission of p_n to post the contents of that PM, which was the ban notification.

Will you push p_n to provide that permission skipppeeee or were you being disingenuous?

Aussie wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 7:39pm:

I think I can advance this a tad further for you skippeeee.  This is just to demonstrate that I did receive a PM from p_n as follows: Quote: Sender: perceptions_now To: Aussie Subject: Suspension Date: Jan 16th, 2016 at 9:25am Aussie, *snip* So, I now am seeking the express permission of p_n to post the contents of that PM, which was the ban notification. Will you push p_n to provide that permission skipppeeee or were you being disingenuous?

you were the one banned?  ;D ;D ;D ;D

he should ban you again for starting so many 'diva' threads.

Yeas, I was the banned Member, which should have been blindingly obvious.  But, now that irrelevant issue has been dealt with, I am keen to see if p_n will be candid, and whether skippeee will pursue that with him.

bugger aussie.

Lying by omission is still lying ya know. Entrapment is not a game everyone enjoys and you seeking to entrap a GMod is not a good look fro you but you enjoyed it anyway.

PN should just ignore you going forward.

Super Nova wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 7:50pm:

bugger aussie. Lying by omission is still lying ya know. Entrapment is not a game everyone enjoys and you seeking to entrap a GMod is not a good look fro you but you enjoyed it anyway. PN should just ignore you going forward.

This is precisely why I wanted to keep the ID out of the discussion.  There was no entrapment by me or anyone.  In fact, I went to deliberate lengths to keep the ID out of the discussion as it was entirely irrelevant.

Do not post lies here, SN.  There is no need to exaggerate the real position into the absurd with inflammatory and inappropriate language.

What did say that got you a spell in the sin box?

Its time wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 8:07pm:

What did say that got you a spell in the sin box?

In an obvious facetious reference to Clive Palmer ~ "Kill him."  Something Karnal has done a zillion times both before and after I had that ban/suspension.  That is why I am asking p_n to explain it all.  But, he is doing all he can to suppress the discussion and hide the truth.

*Edit* I don't care about the ban/suspension.  It was only 24 hours.  What I care about is the apparent inconsistency and bias which p_n has done just about all he can not to account for.

Aussie wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 7:56pm:

Do not post lies here, SN.  There is no need to exaggerate the real position into the absurd with inflammatory and inappropriate language.

I didn't post lies aussie.

Come on. You take the smallest of issues if it involves a GMod you blow them up to be so big.

That is not a lie. That is an observation.

In fact, it is the sort of bullying and stalking behavior you so often complain about.

Take a chill pill.

http://www.alfredny.biz/images/aa_live_and_let_live.jpg

You made an absurd allegation of 'entrapment,' which is a lie.  There was none.  Everything other than the (irrelevant) ID of the banned Member was out in the open.

It is over to p_n now to see if he will allow the whole truth of his inconsistency and bias to be made known.

Aussie wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 8:12pm:

Its time wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 8:07pm: What did say that got you a spell in the sin box? In an obvious facetious reference to Clive Palmer ~ "Kill him."  Something Karnal has done a zillion times both before and after I had that ban/suspension.  That is why I am asking p_n to explain it all.  But, he is doing all he can to suppress the discussion and hide the truth. *Edit* I don't care about the ban/suspension.  It was only 24 hours.  What I care about is the apparent inconsistency and bias which p_n has done just about all he can not to account for.

Maybe you were pizzn him off

"You made an absurd allegation of 'entrapment,' which is a lie."

Aussie you deliberately asked questions knowing the answer and who was banned, It was you.

You deliberately would not say who.

It would be fair to conclude that if you didn't get the correct response you would have accused PN of lying because you know the information and failed to disclose it. You deliberately would not disclosed until recently.

I call that entrapment. Setting someone up. Find you own words. It is setting a trap for them to fall into, is it not.... wot.

Aussie wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 7:56pm:

Super Nova wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 7:50pm: bugger aussie. Lying by omission is still lying ya know. Entrapment is not a game everyone enjoys and you seeking to entrap a GMod is not a good look fro you but you enjoyed it anyway. PN should just ignore you going forward. This is precisely why I wanted to keep the ID out of the discussion.  There was no entrapment by me or anyone.  In fact, I went to deliberate lengths to keep the ID out of the discussion as it was entirely irrelevant. Do not post lies here, SN.  There is no need to exaggerate the real position into the absurd with inflammatory and inappropriate language.

You wanted to keep the name of the poster out of it as you lied a couple of weeks ago when you and Phem, oops I mean AG ;D , said you had not been banned on the weekend of January 16. On that weekend you claimed you were not banned you were observed logged in here under two of your sox, you denied you were banned at the time but now you have admitted it.
You spent pages of bandwidth denying you were banned but it was a lie.
You even had Phem, oops AG,  back you up she lied too.
Oh yea, it sucks you got banned when others get away with the same thing. 8-)

Super Nova wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 8:26pm:

"You made an absurd allegation of 'entrapment,' which is a lie." Aussie you deliberately asked questions knowing the answer and who was banned, It was you. You deliberately would not say who. It would be fair to conclude that if you didn't get the correct response you would have accused PN of lying because you know the information and failed to disclose it. You deliberately would not disclosed until recently. I call that entrapment. Setting someone up. Find you own words. It is setting a trap for them to fall into, is it not.... wot.

The question (other than from skippeee and cods) was never who was banned.  p_n was never asked who was banned.  He was asked why he was inconsistent and biased.  The ID of the banned Member is/was 100% irrelevant to that fundamental issue.  That you are only interested in that irrelevant stuff is no surprise.  Why have you no interest in the conduct of the GMod?

skippy. wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 8:33pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 7:56pm: Super Nova wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 7:50pm: bugger aussie. Lying by omission is still lying ya know. Entrapment is not a game everyone enjoys and you seeking to entrap a GMod is not a good look fro you but you enjoyed it anyway. PN should just ignore you going forward. This is precisely why I wanted to keep the ID out of the discussion.  There was no entrapment by me or anyone.  In fact, I went to deliberate lengths to keep the ID out of the discussion as it was entirely irrelevant. Do not post lies here, SN.  There is no need to exaggerate the real position into the absurd with inflammatory and inappropriate language. You wanted to keep the name of the poster out of it as you lied a couple of weeks ago when you and Phem, oops I mean AG ;D , said you had not been banned on the weekend of January 16. On that weekend you claimed you were not banned you were observed logged in here under two of your sox, you denied you were banned at the time but now you have admitted it. You spent pages of bandwidth denying you were banned but it was a lie. You even had Phem, oops AG,  back you up she lied too. Oh yea, it sucks you got banned when others get away with the same thing. 8-)

Here we go with the irrelevant crap I knew would arrive.  I did not post (or log in) within the 24 hour ban period.  Ask Hicks who almost fell for the same mistake you are making.  I was golfing for most of the 24 hours, and when I did log in to see the pro forma ban notification, I stayed out until I was able to log in.....after the 24 hours had expired.  I made a post on the Saturday (before the ban) and on the next day, Sunday after the ban had expired.

I knew you had absolutely no interest in the actions of the GMod, and you have now proven me correct.  It is now all ab out me, and not the inconsistent and biased moderation of p_n.  Well done, skippeee.  You never fail to disappoint.

I have no idea what AG or Phemanderac posted on the issue, and I don't care.  It is irrelevant.  You will find no post by me saying I had not been banned.  You will find posts by me saying I did not circumvent the ban.

Aussie wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 8:35pm:

Super Nova wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 8:26pm: "You made an absurd allegation of 'entrapment,' which is a lie." Aussie you deliberately asked questions knowing the answer and who was banned, It was you. You deliberately would not say who. It would be fair to conclude that if you didn't get the correct response you would have accused PN of lying because you know the information and failed to disclose it. You deliberately would not disclosed until recently. I call that entrapment. Setting someone up. Find you own words. It is setting a trap for them to fall into, is it not.... wot. The question (other than from skippeee and cods) was never who was banned.  p_n was never asked who was banned.  He was asked why he was inconsistent and biased.  The ID of the banned Member is/was 100% irrelevant to that fundamental issue.  That you are only interested in that irrelevant stuff is no surprise.  Why have you no interest in the conduct of the GMod?

Many are interested in your dishonesty being exposed by yourself. I must admit I am very surprised you came clean, but you knew I knew it was you all along.

skippy. wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 8:44pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 8:35pm: Super Nova wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 8:26pm: "You made an absurd allegation of 'entrapment,' which is a lie." Aussie you deliberately asked questions knowing the answer and who was banned, It was you. You deliberately would not say who. It would be fair to conclude that if you didn't get the correct response you would have accused PN of lying because you know the information and failed to disclose it. You deliberately would not disclosed until recently. I call that entrapment. Setting someone up. Find you own words. It is setting a trap for them to fall into, is it not.... wot. The question (other than from skippeee and cods) was never who was banned.  p_n was never asked who was banned.  He was asked why he was inconsistent and biased.  The ID of the banned Member is/was 100% irrelevant to that fundamental issue.  That you are only interested in that irrelevant stuff is no surprise.  Why have you no interest in the conduct of the GMod? Many are interested in your dishonesty being exposed by yourself. I must admit I am very surprised you came clean, but you knew I knew it was you all along.

Well, now we have dealt with that irrelevancy, will I see anything posted by you addressing why p_n banned me, and not Karnal for exactly the same post?  Or will your interest disappear, and I will again be proven right about you skippeee.  All you want to do is anything you can not to deal with the real issue, if there is a chance (one you think exists) to engage in yet another 'Aussie' bash?

Let's see how genuine you are skippeeee.

Aussie wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 8:43pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 8:33pm: Aussie wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 7:56pm: Super Nova wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 7:50pm: bugger aussie. Lying by omission is still lying ya know. Entrapment is not a game everyone enjoys and you seeking to entrap a GMod is not a good look fro you but you enjoyed it anyway. PN should just ignore you going forward. This is precisely why I wanted to keep the ID out of the discussion.  There was no entrapment by me or anyone.  In fact, I went to deliberate lengths to keep the ID out of the discussion as it was entirely irrelevant. Do not post lies here, SN.  There is no need to exaggerate the real position into the absurd with inflammatory and inappropriate language. You wanted to keep the name of the poster out of it as you lied a couple of weeks ago when you and Phem, oops I mean AG ;D , said you had not been banned on the weekend of January 16. On that weekend you claimed you were not banned you were observed logged in here under two of your sox, you denied you were banned at the time but now you have admitted it. You spent pages of bandwidth denying you were banned but it was a lie. You even had Phem, oops AG,  back you up she lied too. Oh yea, it sucks you got banned when others get away with the same thing. 8-) Here we go with the irrelevant crap I knew would arrive.  I did not post (or log in) within the 24 hour ban period.  Ask Hicks who almost fell for the same mistake you are making.  I was golfing for most of the 24 hours, and when I did log in to see the pro forma ban notification, I stayed out until I was able to log in.....after the 24 hours had expired.  I made a post on the Saturday (before the ban) and on the next day, Sunday after the ban had expired. I knew you had absolutely no interest in the actions of the GMod, and you have now proven me correct.  It is now all ab out me, and not the inconsistent and biased moderation of p_n.  Well done, skippeee.  You never fail to disappoint. I have no idea what AG or Phemanderac posted on the issue, and I don't care.  It is irrelevant.  You will find no post by me saying I had not been banned.  You will find posts by me saying I did not circumvent the ban.

You logged in with two of your sox the day you were banned..FACT I have the screen shots to prove it.
Whoops here is another screen shot of you saying you had not been banned. :D ;D  you clearly wrote "was I under a ban,NAH I was not Skippeeee" oh dear proven another lie of yours.

---

You need to read what I post skippeeee.  Not read what you want.  Aussie2 did not log in during the ban period.  The GMods would have been all over it if I had.

Again.....it is proven....all you care about it is chasing me down a dry gulch, and you could not care about the issue......inconsistent and biased moderation by a GMod.

You are obsessed skippeee.  As NOIQ would say....I am living rent free in your head.  Get over it, and look at the real issue.

Andrei why did these two Aussie sox log in while he was banned?

---

You lied..AGAIN. ;D
Why did Aussie2 log in that day if your Aussie sock was not banned? When we know the Aussie sock was banned that day? Proof. 8-)

---

Are your forum dates out of whack, skippeee?  You did say they were, you know.

OK aussie. I will give you the benefit of the doubt.

I have a simple question.

Why do you pursue the GMods so rigorously on minor issues.

After all, we know when you were a GMod 9Admin) of the forum that shall not be named, you made it clear you didn't need to explain your decisions. Why should they.

An apparent bias maybe a question of balance. One punter does it all the time and one did it once. So for balance only the punter that has done something many times is banned for a small period. Discretions is the key to good moderation. It is not a court of law that requires evidence, proof and clear precedence. It is at the moderators discretion.

Why pursue them. It adds no value unless you seek to reduce their credibility which in itself is a forum destroying action.

The GMods should be allowed to just do what they do. They should not be accountable to you for what they do. You feel aggrieved clearly because you got banned and someone else didn't.

Oh dear. This is not about bias moderation. This is about you seeking revenge as always and you will use this to slander them by insinuating unfair moderation.

You will pursue PN on the very next thing that pops into your radar. Wait and see. No matter how small the infraction in your eyes, you will pursue with the hatred and vengeance that has made you infamous.

I do not regard it as a minor issue that a Member of a Forum is banned here where there are Rules.  I expect to be banned if I transgress them, and you will never hear from me about it.

When  anyone gets a ban which is inexplicable either under the Rules here or on precedent, you can expect I will get involved.  It is in my dna.

I am not after p_n.  (He could have knocked this off before, but he chose to gag and suppress.)  I simply want him to publicly explain his actions which are clearly outside the Rules and demonstrate inconsistency and bias.

Why don't you have the same regard as me for what Membership ought expect to benefit from?

"Was I under a ban? NAH I was not skippy"

You said I could not find you saying that Aaauuussssiiie, another lie. 8-)
Thanks for being part of your own humiliation it's been fun. 8-)
Have a nice night. ;D

skippy. wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 9:25pm:

"Was I under a ban? NAH I was not skippy" You said I could not find you saying that Aaauuussssiiie, another lie. 8-) Thanks for being part of your own humiliation it's been fun. 8-) Have a nice night. ;D

Rubbish, skippeeee.  Is your Forum calendar out of whack or not?  Answer that.  You said it was.  Now you are dodging with more rubbish.

Why are you so unable to focus on the fundamental issue which is GModeration inconsistency and bias, the proof of which p_n placed at my feet?

Aussie wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 9:29pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 9:25pm: "Was I under a ban? NAH I was not skippy" You said I could not find you saying that Aaauuussssiiie, another lie. 8-) Thanks for being part of your own humiliation it's been fun. 8-) Have a nice night. ;D Rubbish, skippeeee.  Is your Forum calendar out of whack or not?  Answer that.  You said it was.  Now you are dodging with more rubbish. Why are you so unable to focus on the fundamental issue which is GModeration inconsistency and bias, the proof of which p_n placed at my feet?

they are your own words Aaauuusssie from a post in Extremism exposed that all posters can access.
Here it is again you lied. This is fun hey? ;D

---

Screen shots don't lie Aussie  the screen shots are making you look even sadder than usual.
Andrei look at my screen shots of Aussies sox.
All posters look at Aussies own words from his own posts. As they said in the Aussssiiiie open Aaauuusssie game set match chump.  :)

Yes yes yes skippeee.  Keep posting the screen shot which is deceptive because your Forum calendar is out of whack.  You told us that.  Why waste your time like this?  Cease the obsession, it is harmful for you.  Address the issue skippeee. 

You wanted the banned Member to come out, and I have.  We got over that hurdle, and here you are...proving me right as to why I kept that undeclared, because I knew people like you from elsewhere would turn it into an irrelevant conversation.

What have you got to say about what p_n did, skippeeee?

When will you address the issue which is the inconsistent and biased GModeration of p_n?

skippy. wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 9:44pm:

Screen shots don't lie Aussie  the screen shots are making you look even sadder than usual. Andrei look at my screen shots of Aussies sox. All posters look at Aussies own words from his own posts. As they said in the Aussssiiiie open Aaauuusssie game set match chump.  :)

They do, on dates in your case skippeee.  You told us your Forum calendar was out of whack.  Will you confirm that anytime soon?

Anyone who checks Post # 79 in that Thread will see your screen shot shows the wrong date and time.  You know it as well.  You said your calendar was out.

Deal with the core issue of this Thread, skippeeee.

Aussie, how about locking this thread with the conclusion, there is NO CURRENT GMOD ISSUE.

That would be the right thing to do.

Have a nice day.

Aussie wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 9:56pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 9:44pm: Screen shots don't lie Aussie  the screen shots are making you look even sadder than usual. Andrei look at my screen shots of Aussies sox. All posters look at Aussies own words from his own posts. As they said in the Aussssiiiie open Aaauuusssie game set match chump.  :) They do, on dates in your case skippeee.  You told us your Forum calendar was out of whack.  Will you confirm that anytime soon? Anyone who checks Post # 79 in that Thread will see your screen shot shows the wrong date and time.  You know it as well.  You said your calendar was out. Deal with the core issue of this Thread, skippeeee.

You denied you were banned and now you've admitted it. You look really silly and a liar. ;D the mods really need to address the issue of you logging in with sox when your Aussie sock was banned though. When is PN going to address that? 8-)

skippy. wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 8:51am:

Aussie wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 9:56pm: skippy. wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 9:44pm: Screen shots don't lie Aussie  the screen shots are making you look even sadder than usual. Andrei look at my screen shots of Aussies sox. All posters look at Aussies own words from his own posts. As they said in the Aussssiiiie open Aaauuusssie game set match chump.  :) They do, on dates in your case skippeee.  You told us your Forum calendar was out of whack.  Will you confirm that anytime soon? Anyone who checks Post # 79 in that Thread will see your screen shot shows the wrong date and time.  You know it as well.  You said your calendar was out. Deal with the core issue of this Thread, skippeeee. You denied you were banned and now you've admitted it. You look really silly and a liar. ;D the mods really need to address the issue of you logging in with sox when your Aussie sock was banned though. When is PN going to address that? 8-)

I hope he does.  It will demonstrate that you are wrong, as usual.  I was not banned as I have said, when I logged in as you allege.  Still can't bring yourself to admit you posted that your Forum calendar is out of whack I see.

The screen shots taken clearly show the last time Aussie 2 and your lady Ignora account logged on. They are from your own profiles and say the last time those two accounts logged onto the forum. 8-) funny you would log on with those accounts at the same time your primary account was banned,wot? If as you claim your primary account was unbanned by then why did you use those other accounts to log on with at all?
THE PLOT THICKENS

Aussie wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 9:02am:

skippy. wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 8:51am: Aussie wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 9:56pm: skippy. wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 9:44pm: Screen shots don't lie Aussie  the screen shots are making you look even sadder than usual. Andrei look at my screen shots of Aussies sox. All posters look at Aussies own words from his own posts. As they said in the Aussssiiiie open Aaauuusssie game set match chump.  :) They do, on dates in your case skippeee.  You told us your Forum calendar was out of whack.  Will you confirm that anytime soon? Anyone who checks Post # 79 in that Thread will see your screen shot shows the wrong date and time.  You know it as well.  You said your calendar was out. Deal with the core issue of this Thread, skippeeee. You denied you were banned and now you've admitted it. You look really silly and a liar. ;D the mods really need to address the issue of you logging in with sox when your Aussie sock was banned though. When is PN going to address that? 8-) I hope he does.  It will demonstrate that you are wrong, as usual.  I was not banned as I have said, when I logged in as you allege.  Still can't bring yourself to admit you posted that your Forum calendar is out of whack I see.

I don't know about that Aussie. So far we have established you lied you were banned a couple of weeks ago even though at the time I pressed you on the subject and you denied it, the screen shot to prove that is up there.^^^^^^^^^^
I was also correct you logged on with two of your sox the weekend your primary account was banned. You denied that too then I produced a screen shot to prove it and a mod then deleted the Aussie 2 account. 8-)
Things not going to well old mate.

skippy. wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 5:08pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 5:05pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 4:54pm: Another thread? .......... get over it X2 X3 ::)

X4  >:(

skippy. wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 9:05am:

The screen shots taken clearly show the last time Aussie 2 and your lady Ignora account logged on. They are from your own profiles and say the last time those two accounts logged onto the forum. 8-) funny you would log on with those accounts at the same time your primary account was banned,wot? If as you claim your primary account was unbanned by then why did you use those other accounts to log on with at all? THE PLOT THICKENS

The only thing thickening is your brain.  I did not log in using any account whatsoever during the period of the ban which expired after 24 hours.  Did you not see the time/date on that portion of the PM I received from p_n which I posted?  Saturday the 16th January at 9.25 am.  The 24 hour ban expired at 9.25 am on Sunday the 17th January.

The times and dates on your screen shots are out of whack as you have previously posted.

Back to the drawing board you go, yet again, skippeeee.

Your profile shows you DID log in on the 16.01.16
FACT.
Answer the question aaaauuusssiiiiieeeeee, why did you use your two sock accounts to log in if your primary account was not banned?
Simple question, we all want to know the answer.

skippy. wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 9:48am:

Your profile shows you DID log in on the 16.01.16 FACT.

I probably did, prior to leaving to go to golf, and before p_n imposed the ban at around 9.25 am.  I would have been on the 7th tee at the course by then. 

Post a screen shot demonstrating that skippeeee.

skippy. wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 9:48am:

Your profile shows you DID log in on the 16.01.16 FACT. Answer the question aaaauuusssiiiiieeeeee, why did you use your two sock accounts to log in if your primary account was not banned? Simple question, we all want to know the answer.

Bump

Quote:

Answer the question aaaauuusssiiiiieeeeee, why did you use your two sock accounts to log in if your primary account was not banned? Simple question, we all want to know the answer.

I used no sock account to log in during the ban period which expired at 9.25 am on Sunday the 17th January.

Post that screen shot I just asked you for skippeeeee.

skippy. wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 9:48am:

Your profile shows you DID log in on the 16.01.16 FACT. Answer the question aaaauuusssiiiiieeeeee, why did you use your two sock accounts to log in if your primary account was not banned? Simple question, we all want to know the answer.

Bump 8-)

I have answered your question skippeeee. 

Now let's that screen shot I just asked you for.

What current GMod issue?

They're doing a great job.

Locking all those spam filled topics....good move GMods  :)

Aussie wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 10:45am:

I have answered your question skippeeee.  Now let's that screen shot I just asked you for.

Where? Link to where you explain why you logged on here the weekend you were banned with other sox. 8-)

Quite why people need multiple sock names, I will just never understand.
It's really a bit odd.

skippy. wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 10:55am:

Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 10:45am: I have answered your question skippeeee.  Now let's that screen shot I just asked you for. Where? Link to where you explain why you logged on here the weekend you were banned with other sox. 8-)

I'll answer it again for you skippeeee.  I was not logged in at any time during the ban period which commenced at 9.25 am on the Saturday, 16th and ended 9.25 am on the Sunday, 17th.

I may well have been logged in outside those times on each day.

Where is that screen shot, skippeeee, or is this a one way street, of you ask and I answer, I  ask and you ignore?

Still no explanation, lucky I am a very patient man,aaaauuusssssiiiiieeee. 8-) waitinggggggggg

Screen shot :o

---

skippy. wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 9:48am:

Your profile shows you DID log in on the 16.01.16 FACT. Answer the question aaaauuusssiiiiieeeeee, why did you use your two sock accounts to log in if your primary account was not banned? Simple question, we all want to know the answer.

My profile i.e. the Aussie account profile shows no such thing skippeeeee.

And, when will you confirm as you have in the past that your Forum calendar is out of whack?

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 11:38am:

Quite why people need multiple sock names, I will just never understand. It's really a bit odd.

Are they even allowed?

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 12:06pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 11:38am: Quite why people need multiple sock names, I will just never understand. It's really a bit odd. Are they even allowed?

You'd know.  You have a cast of thousands.

Aussie wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 12:06pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 9:48am: Your profile shows you DID log in on the 16.01.16 FACT. Answer the question aaaauuusssiiiiieeeeee, why did you use your two sock accounts to log in if your primary account was not banned? Simple question, we all want to know the answer. My profile i.e. the Aussie account profile shows no such thing skippeeeee. And, when will you confirm as you have in the past that your Forum calendar is out of whack?

The Aussie2 account profile does though and you have admitted that is yours. Oh dear. 8-)

Aussie wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 12:08pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 12:06pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 11:38am: Quite why people need multiple sock names, I will just never understand. It's really a bit odd. Are they even allowed? You'd know.  You have a cast of thousands.

Actually, you should never project your own online sins like that.

I only have 1 nic.

This is it.

Ask any GMod or FD himself.

Unlike you, I don't slither around with multi nics and unlike you I have nothing to hide.

:)

Oh look, FD himself is online right now.

Ask him on here in Chat....openly. For all to see.

skippy. wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 12:12pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 12:06pm: skippy. wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 9:48am: Your profile shows you DID log in on the 16.01.16 FACT. Answer the question aaaauuusssiiiiieeeeee, why did you use your two sock accounts to log in if your primary account was not banned? Simple question, we all want to know the answer. My profile i.e. the Aussie account profile shows no such thing skippeeeee. And, when will you confirm as you have in the past that your Forum calendar is out of whack? The Aussie2 account profile does though and you have admitted that is yours. Oh dear. 8-)

Yeas Aussie2 was me, and I began using as my main account after the Aussie account was corrupted some months ago..

Your screen shot shows an incorrect date and time, and this is because, as you have previously posted, your forum calendar/clock is out of whack.

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 12:12pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 12:08pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 12:06pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 11:38am: Quite why people need multiple sock names, I will just never understand. It's really a bit odd. Are they even allowed? You'd know.  You have a cast of thousands. Actually, you should never project your own online sins like that. I only have 1 nic. This is it. Ask any GMod or FD himself. Unlike you, I don't slither around with multi nics and unlike you I have nothing to hide. :) Oh look, FD himself is online right now. Ask him on here in Chat....openly. For all to see.

Come on! You love starting topics.

Ask any GM OR FD OPENLY how many nics I have.

Too scared hey!

I can assure you I'm not.

Why?

I've spoken the truth.

Try it sometime Aussie...it won't kill you. Promise!

Aussie wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 12:21pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 12:12pm: Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 12:06pm: skippy. wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 9:48am: Your profile shows you DID log in on the 16.01.16 FACT. Answer the question aaaauuusssiiiiieeeeee, why did you use your two sock accounts to log in if your primary account was not banned? Simple question, we all want to know the answer. My profile i.e. the Aussie account profile shows no such thing skippeeeee. And, when will you confirm as you have in the past that your Forum calendar is out of whack? The Aussie2 account profile does though and you have admitted that is yours. Oh dear. 8-) Yeas Aussie2 was me, and I began using as my main account after the Aussie account was corrupted some months ago.. Your screen shot shows an incorrect date and time, and this is because, as you have previously posted, your forum calendar/clock is out of whack.

It is not my calendar I am posting screen shots of it is your profile. I can't remember saying my forum clock was wrong, maybe I meant it was different to yours as I'm in NSW. :o

Never the less,even if my clock was out by a couple of hours it does not answer why you would need to log on with two of your sox on the same weekend your primary account was banned. You keep avoiding answering that Aaaaaaauuuuusssssiiiieeeeeeeeee?

skippy. wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 1:11pm:

Never the less,even if my clock was out by a couple of hours it does not answer why you would need to log on with two of your sox on the same weekend your primary account was banned. You keep avoiding answering that Aaaaaaauuuuusssssiiiieeeeeeeeee?

I'm not coming into your little game about who is or who is not a sock of mine, but I can assure you that when I go to the profile of Aussie2, it shows that the last time that account was on line was 11.42am on Sunday the 17th January.  The profile of Lady Ignora shows that account was last logged in at 11.49am the same day, Sunday the 17th January.  At that time, my ban had ended by over two hours.

Yet another dry gulch for you skippeeee.  You've wasted enough time chasing me nowhere, trying to beat this up into something it is not.

Now, can we get back to requesting p_n to explain why I was banned for posting, concerning Clive Palmer, (facetiously) "Kill him," yet Karnal has posted the same both before and since, and not banned?

I am unable to post the contents of the relevant PM sent to me by p_n without his express permission.  I have quoted the introductory section which shows the time, date and that it was a PM from him to me.

I want to move on too mate. So tell us why you logged in with two of your sox on the weekend you were banned and then we can address your questions?
Also care to share with us why you lied about being banned for the past three weeks? Thanks mate.
I wonder why Aussie2 is back? PN deleted that account a couple of weeks ago, according to you. Did you complain you had every right to run sox?

skippy. wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 1:33pm:

I want to move on too mate. So tell us why you logged in with two of your sox on the weekend you were banned and then we can address your questions? Also care to share with us why you lied about being banned for the past three weeks? Thanks mate. I wonder why Aussie2 is back? PN deleted that account a couple of weeks ago, according to you. Did you complain you had every right to run sox?

It does not matter if I logged in with a zillion socks if I did so outside a ban period.   The most I have said (or intended to say) is that I did not log in during a ban either as me, or as 'anyone' else.

And now you toss in more irrelevancy.  The Aussie2 account is still there...not deleted, and I never said it was.  I said it was banned.  I have not checked to see if it still is.  While it is banned, I cannot log in with it now to see what I may have sent via PM that day.

Now......'mate,' let's get on to p_n or have you lost interest in that now?

Crikey, is this rubbish still going?

Of course it is lol  ;D

Aussie2 profile

---

Lady Ignora profile:

Done this as a favor to Aussie and not because I want to get involved in that pissant childish snippy’s trolling.

---

Thanks Monk.  Your Forum calendar and clock match mine (other than as to the half hour time difference.)

Skippeeee, why have you been posting dodgy screen shots ~ shots which distort the truth by a vital 24 hours ~ in a useless attempt to attack me?   I reckon you knew your clock was 24 hours out of date, but tried to fudge that as a couple of or a few, hours.  No skippeeeee.  You tried to verbal me.

Your screen shot concerning Aussie2 account profile:

Last online: Jan 16th, 2016 at 12 13pm.
Last post:  Oct 23rd, 2015 at 4.26pm.
Lasdt PM: Jan 16th, 2016 at 12.42pm.

Monk's screenshot on the same account profile, Aussie2.

Last online:  Jan 17th, 2016 at 11.13am.
Last post:  Jan 24th, 2015 at 2.56pm.
Last PM:  Jan 17th, 2016 at 11.12 am.



Don't bother answering.  Move on 'mate.'  I am tiring of seeing your arse kicked.  There has to be a 'mercy' Rule applied here.

How about you now deal with the p_n issue?

Jovial Monk wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 3:12pm:

Aussie2 profile

Oh look! The Aussie2 a/c was created in 2013.

2 yrs BEFORE his ban.

And to think Aussie has been posting that he created it only last yr.

Liar liar, your pants are on fire!

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 9:34am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 7:59am: skippy. wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 7:56am: Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 6:34am: perceptions_now wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 11:28pm: Aussie wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 11:24pm: perceptions_now wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 11:21pm: Well, Well, Well, Look at what happens when we go out for dinner? Come back, just now & find out that I've missed out on "some" fun! Great!  Is it okay that Members may refer to another Member as 'retarded' or a 'retard?' So, you think that word is not appropriate? Would you want to see that word added onto the Spell Checker? Oh & I see AiA disagrees with your comments about Ignoring the Lady, so who is telling the truth??? Oh duh! Aussie is lying....again. Oh and he created that Aussie2 account well before he was banned. It was his well used sock...he chatted to it even. Its stage name was Vasco Pyjama initially. Upon being banned, he changed it from Vasco Pyjama to Aussie2. Fact! While Aussie is claiming he created that account due to " issues logging on with the Aussie account" those issues were last year, doesn't everyone remember? John smith had problems at the same time. Look at the screen shot, the Aussie2 account was created in 2013. As Lisa says it was not created as aussie2 initially but changed to that name, why did Aussie create a nick with a totally different name if he's intention was not to deceive?  And why was it logged on last weekend? I was online when Aussie was banned and his multi nic Vasco Pyjama logged in next. I watched as he then changed its stage name to Aussie2. I even went online and exposed him for all this. I was there.....watching it all unfold. This is the nic Aussie2. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?action=viewprofile;username=Phil_E._Buster It originally appeared on Oz Pol as Phil E Buster, then Vasco Pyjama then Aussie2. 3 online name changes. And in some cases....the nic Aussie was chatting to Phil E Buster/Vasco Pyjama in topics (ie the blooming fool was attempting to deceive us by making out there were 2 different entities online chatting to each other). Forgot to mention he created a "Mr Aussie" nick the same day he was banned. And despite Aussie's latest lie, the Phil E Buster, then Vasco Pyjama then Aussie2 nicks were created well before the date he was banned. And what's even more pathetic, Aussie used these pre prepared nicks in topics to chat to....to give the APPEARANCE that they were different entities.... when all along, he was chatting to himself! I was online when all this happened and I challenged and exposed Aussie for being such a manipulative liar!

Up!

How are your broadbeans going, Lisa?

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 3:39pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 3:12pm: Aussie2 profile Oh look! The Aussie2 a/c was created in 2013. 2 yrs BEFORE his ban. And to think Aussie has been posting that he created it only last yr. Liar liar, your pants are on fire!

Aussie2 was created after the Aussie account was corrupted.  Prior to that, it had other names......Phil E. Buster, Oliver Klozoff, and Vasco Pyjama.

Aussie wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 3:50pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 3:39pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 3:12pm: Aussie2 profile Oh look! The Aussie2 a/c was created in 2013. 2 yrs BEFORE his ban. And to think Aussie has been posting that he created it only last yr. Liar liar, your pants are on fire! Aussie2 was created after the Aussie account was corrupted.  Prior to that, it had other names......Phil E. Buster, Oliver Klozoff, and Vasco Pyjama.

No. The a/c was CREATED ONCE. That was back in 2013. We can thank Monk for revealing this.

Its stage name however kept changing. Its last name change was Aussie2.

At times however, you used your Aussie nic to chat to your multi nic.

When people chat to themselves, it's a sign of mental disturbance.

:o

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 12:34pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 12:12pm: Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 12:08pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 12:06pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 11:38am: Quite why people need multiple sock names, I will just never understand. It's really a bit odd. Are they even allowed? You'd know.  You have a cast of thousands. Actually, you should never project your own online sins like that. I only have 1 nic. This is it. Ask any GMod or FD himself. Unlike you, I don't slither around with multi nics and unlike you I have nothing to hide. :) Oh look, FD himself is online right now. Ask him on here in Chat....openly. For all to see. Come on! You love starting topics. Ask any GM OR FD OPENLY how many nics I have. Too scared hey! I can assure you I'm not. Why? I've spoken the truth. Try it sometime Aussie...it won't kill you. Promise!

Well......where is that topic Aussie?

Quick sticks!

Nothing to do with me revealing things, any member can go check profile pages.

I just posted unmodified profiles.

How are those fabulous broadbeans of yours, still picking?

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 3:56pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 3:50pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 3:39pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 3:12pm: Aussie2 profile Oh look! The Aussie2 a/c was created in 2013. 2 yrs BEFORE his ban. And to think Aussie has been posting that he created it only last yr. Liar liar, your pants are on fire! Aussie2 was created after the Aussie account was corrupted.  Prior to that, it had other names......Phil E. Buster, Oliver Klozoff, and Vasco Pyjama. No. The a/c was CREATED ONCE. That was back in 2013. We can thank Monk for revealing this. Its stage name however kept changing. Its last name change was Aussie2. At times however, you used your Aussie nic to chat to your multi nic. When people chat to themselves, it's a sign of mental disturbance. :o

Up!

Jones, get it into your head.  Aussie2 was created when Aussie was corrupted.  It began life as Phil E. Buster, then Oliver Klozof was created, then Vasco Pyjama was created, then...Aussie2 was created.

I am not going to keep saying that over and over to massage your pathetic ego.

Aussie wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 4:14pm:

Jones, get it into your head.  Aussie2 was created when Aussie was corrupted.  It began life as Phil E. Buster, then Oliver Klozof was created, then Vasco Pyjama was created, then...Aussie2 was created. I am not going to keep saying that over and over to massage your pathetic ego.

The actual account was created ONCE.

THAT WAS BACK IN 2013.

YOU THEN CHANGED ITS NAME SEVERAL TIMES INCLUDING THE TIME YOU BECAME EX AUSSIE.

YOU HAVE FALSELY STATED MANY TIMES THAT THIS 2013 ACCOUNT WAS CREATED WITH THE AGREEMENT/KNOWLEDGE OF FD ON THE DAY YOU BECAME EX AUSSIE IN 2015.

THAT IS A BLATANT LIE. IT WAS CREATED 2 YRS BEFORE THAT.

YOU HAVE ON OCCASIONS USED THE AUSSIE2 NIC TO CHAT TO IT UNDER ITS VARIOUS STAGE NAMES TO CREATE THE ILLUSION THAT YOU WERE CHATTING TO A DIFFERENT PERSON.

THAT SHOWS WHAT A MANIPULATIVE LIAR YOU REALLY ARE.

IT ALSO REVEALS HOW INSECURE AND DESPERATE YOU ARE TO FAKE SINCERITY AND ALTER THE PERCEPTION OF OTHERS ONLINE.

DESPITE WHAT YOU THINK, PEOPLE WHO POST WITH YOU ON OZPOL ARE NOT HERE TO BE FOOLED BY YOUR MANIPULATIVE DRAMAS AND GAMES....NOR ARE THEY HERE TO BE USED AS YOUR PAWNS IN SAID DRAMAS AND GAMES.

Just a quick note, as that's all I have the time or the inclination for!

The reason I have Aussie on my ignore list, for PM's, has again been illustrated in this and a few other recent threads. Oh & Aussie is in very, very select company on my ignore list, as there are only 2!

It, yet again, confirms my reasoning for largely disregarding Aussie!

Cheers!

perceptions_now wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 4:33pm:

Just a quick note, as that's all I have the time or the inclination for! The reason I have Aussie on my ignore list, for PM's, has again been illustrated in this and a few other recent threads. Oh & Aussie is in very, very select company on my ignore list, as there are only 2! It, yet again, confirms my reasoning for largely disregarding Aussie! Cheers!

Let's guess the 2nd nic on your ignore list.

Would it be the green apron wearing Mod of Oz Pol lol?

perceptions_now wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 4:33pm:

Just a quick note, as that's all I have the time or the inclination for! The reason I have Aussie on my ignore list, for PM's, has again been illustrated in this and a few other recent threads. Oh & Aussie is in very, very select company on my ignore list, as there are only 2! It, yet again, confirms my reasoning for largely disregarding Aussie! Cheers!

Good to see you to drop in and post what you like. 

How about you explain why you banned me for facetiously posting, concerning Clive Palmer, "Kill him," yet you did not act against Karnal for the same, both before and after I made that post.

I do hope you have integrity p_n, so how about demonstrating it?

(Jones, your definition of 'create' is different to mine.  Get over it.)

perceptions_now wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 4:33pm:

Just a quick note, as that's all I have the time or the inclination for! The reason I have Aussie on my ignore list, for PM's, has again been illustrated in this and a few other recent threads. Oh & Aussie is in very, very select company on my ignore list, as there are only 2! It, yet again, confirms my reasoning for largely disregarding Aussie! Cheers!

There you go Aussie.

The matter can be closed now, don't you think?

Super Nova wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 5:32pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 4:33pm: Just a quick note, as that's all I have the time or the inclination for! The reason I have Aussie on my ignore list, for PM's, has again been illustrated in this and a few other recent threads. Oh & Aussie is in very, very select company on my ignore list, as there are only 2! It, yet again, confirms my reasoning for largely disregarding Aussie! Cheers! There you go Aussie. The matter can be closed now, don't you think?

Oh!  Did p_n answer the question?  I did not see that.  What post # was it?

Reply #95

Super Nova wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 5:59pm:

Reply #95

That's an answer or a very stupid brush off?

Testing. ;D

Neferti wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 6:07pm:

Testing. ;D

Neferti.......when were able to access here?  I mean....was FD required to allow it after I agreed with your request......or ......  what?

Aussie wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 6:16pm:

Neferti wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 6:07pm: Testing. ;D Neferti.......when were able to access here?  I mean....was FD required to allow it after I agreed with your request......or ......  what?

I have no idea, Aussie.

Neferti wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 6:25pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 6:16pm: Neferti wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 6:07pm: Testing. ;D Neferti.......when were able to access here?  I mean....was FD required to allow it after I agreed with your request......or ......  what? I have no idea, Aussie.

You said I had to contact FD to 'wave his wand'....which I did......and yet, even though he has not been here......you are posting.

Aussie wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 6:30pm:

Neferti wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 6:25pm: Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 6:16pm: Neferti wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 6:07pm: Testing. ;D Neferti.......when were able to access here?  I mean....was FD required to allow it after I agreed with your request......or ......  what? I have no idea, Aussie. You said I had to contact FD to 'wave his wand'....which I did......and yet, even though he has not been here......you are posting

To be honest, aussie, I have never even tried to post here since you said I was banned.

Perhaps I was ALWAYS ABLE to post, I just didn't try ....

Neferti wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 6:39pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 6:30pm: Neferti wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 6:25pm: Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 6:16pm: Neferti wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 6:07pm: Testing. ;D Neferti.......when were able to access here?  I mean....was FD required to allow it after I agreed with your request......or ......  what? I have no idea, Aussie. You said I had to contact FD to 'wave his wand'....which I did......and yet, even though he has not been here......you are posting To be honest, aussie, I have never even tried to post here since you said I was banned. Perhaps I was ALWAYS ABLE to post, I just didn't try ....

Very probably.  FD reckons it is way too hard (not impossible) for him to put a software ban on anyone in any of the Member run Boards.

Anyway................carry on.  Play nice.


This is added by me in green....Mod......FD has not read the PM I sent him, so he/software had not banned you.  But.....credit to you as is due.  You complied voluntarily.  Thanks.

Aussie wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 6:44pm:

Neferti wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 6:39pm: Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 6:30pm: Neferti wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 6:25pm: Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 6:16pm: Neferti wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 6:07pm: Testing. ;D Neferti.......when were able to access here?  I mean....was FD required to allow it after I agreed with your request......or ......  what? I have no idea, Aussie. You said I had to contact FD to 'wave his wand'....which I did......and yet, even though he has not been here......you are posting To be honest, aussie, I have never even tried to post here since you said I was banned. Perhaps I was ALWAYS ABLE to post, I just didn't try .... Very probably.  FD reckons it is way too hard (not impossible) for him to put a software ban on anyone in any of the Member run Boards. Anyway................carry on.  Play nice. This is added by me in green....Mod......FD has not read the PM I sent him, so he/software had not banned you.  But.....credit to you as is due.  You complied voluntarily.  Thanks.

1. You must be colour blind. It's actually in red  :P

2. It's nice to see Nef posting in here again :)

Aussie wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 4:14pm:

Jones, get it into your head.  Aussie2 was created when Aussie was corrupted.  It began life as Phil E. Buster, then Oliver Klozof was created, then Vasco Pyjama was created, then...Aussie2 was created. I am not going to keep saying that over and over to massage your pathetic ego.

Some people amount to simpletons- plain and simple- but not plain enough for the simple ones.

She hates relationships so much and yet here she is again.  ::)

Aussie wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 1:25pm:

I'm not coming into your little game about who is or who is not a sock of mine

Wouldn't that get a tad awkward....

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 8:44pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 1:25pm: I'm not coming into your little game about who is or who is not a sock of mine Wouldn't that get a tad awkward....

;D

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 8:47pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 8:44pm: Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 1:25pm: I'm not coming into your little game about who is or who is not a sock of mine Wouldn't that get a tad awkward.... ;D

no it was heaps funnier than that 

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Super Nova wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 5:32pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 4:33pm: Just a quick note, as that's all I have the time or the inclination for! The reason I have Aussie on my ignore list, for PM's, has again been illustrated in this and a few other recent threads. Oh & Aussie is in very, very select company on my ignore list, as there are only 2! It, yet again, confirms my reasoning for largely disregarding Aussie! Cheers! There you go Aussie. The matter can be closed now, don't you think?

Nope...not for Aussie.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 8:44pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 1:25pm: I'm not coming into your little game about who is or who is not a sock of mine Wouldn't that get a tad awkward....

Not in the slightest, Hicks.  One thing you will never see me do is manufacture cousins, and call them honourable while they gun down other people doing what they peacefully should for their fallen mates being shot at.

While you are here, Hicks, can you explain why I got a ban for facetiously posting "kill him" about Clive Palmer yet Karnal never has been for doing the same either before or after my ban?

You give us a responsive answer to that, and you will get some respect from me.  I'm not holding my breath.

Aussie wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 8:57pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 8:44pm: Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 1:25pm: I'm not coming into your little game about who is or who is not a sock of mine Wouldn't that get a tad awkward.... Not in the slightest, Hicks.  One thing you will never see me do is manufacture cousins, and call them honourable while they gun down other people doing what they peacefully should for their fallen mates being shot at. While you are here, Hicks, can you explain why I got a ban for facetiously posting "kill him" about Clive Palmer yet Karnal never has been for doing the same either before or after my ban? You give us a responsive answer to that, and you will get some respect from me.  I'm not holding my breath.

Oi! You forgot to ask Andrei if I'm like you, a pathetic multi nic user!

>:(

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 12:12pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 12:08pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 12:06pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 11:38am: Quite why people need multiple sock names, I will just never understand. It's really a bit odd. Are they even allowed? You'd know.  You have a cast of thousands. Actually, you should never project your own online sins like that. I only have 1 nic. This is it. Ask any GMod or FD himself. Unlike you, I don't slither around with multi nics and unlike you I have nothing to hide. :) Oh look, FD himself is online right now. Ask him on here in Chat....openly. For all to see.

Up for Aussie!

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 9:00pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 8:57pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 8:44pm: Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 1:25pm: I'm not coming into your little game about who is or who is not a sock of mine Wouldn't that get a tad awkward.... Not in the slightest, Hicks.  One thing you will never see me do is manufacture cousins, and call them honourable while they gun down other people doing what they peacefully should for their fallen mates being shot at. While you are here, Hicks, can you explain why I got a ban for facetiously posting "kill him" about Clive Palmer yet Karnal never has been for doing the same either before or after my ban? You give us a responsive answer to that, and you will get some respect from me.  I'm not holding my breath. Oi! You forgot to ask Andrei if I'm like you, a pathetic multi nic user! >:(

I would not believe him either way.  You have compromised him with your 'lunch date with Hicks' tale.

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 9:01pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 12:12pm: Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 12:08pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 12:06pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 11:38am: Quite why people need multiple sock names, I will just never understand. It's really a bit odd. Are they even allowed? You'd know.  You have a cast of thousands. Actually, you should never project your own online sins like that. I only have 1 nic. This is it. Ask any GMod or FD himself. Unlike you, I don't slither around with multi nics and unlike you I have nothing to hide. :) Oh look, FD himself is online right now. Ask him on here in Chat....openly. For all to see. Up for Aussie!

Still no topic in Chat Aussie.

Why is that?

Scared of the truth are you?

Jones.....we all can read.  Once is enough in your case.  There is no need for your incessant attention seeking *bump* or *up* which you do all over the Forum if no-one has given a flying bugger what you post.

I accept your pathetic surrender.

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 9:00pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 8:57pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 8:44pm: Aussie wrote on Feb 2nd, 2016 at 1:25pm: I'm not coming into your little game about who is or who is not a sock of mine Wouldn't that get a tad awkward.... Not in the slightest, Hicks.  One thing you will never see me do is manufacture cousins, and call them honourable while they gun down other people doing what they peacefully should for their fallen mates being shot at. While you are here, Hicks, can you explain why I got a ban for facetiously posting "kill him" about Clive Palmer yet Karnal never has been for doing the same either before or after my ban? You give us a responsive answer to that, and you will get some respect from me.  I'm not holding my breath. Oi! You forgot to ask Andrei if I'm like you, a pathetic multi nic user! >:(

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

You have been cracking me up all day. The hide of you.

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 9:15pm:

I accept your pathetic surrender.

Great.  How about you start that Thread, Jones.  I don't care.

Aussie is banned for no good reason I can see so I am signing off until his ban is over.

Time for some new GMods, FD!

I'm surprised that he's been allowed to get away with his persecution of the global moderators for so long. Aussie wouldn't have tolerated it being done to him and has banned people over the years for much less as you would know Monk.

Persistent questioning and accusations have always been a pet hate of his. He needs to recognise that others don't like it being done to them either.

Jovial Monk wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2016 at 11:17am:

Aussie is banned for no good reason I can see so I am signing off until his ban is over.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-6CiTf-uIBac/VXiulx6nykI/AAAAAAAALGw/kwKNAe0SDPc/s640/buh-bye.jpg

Aussie wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2016 at 3:22pm:

Thanks Monk.  Your Forum calendar and clock match mine (other than as to the half hour time difference.) Skippeeee, why have you been posting dodgy screen shots ~ shots which distort the truth by a vital 24 hours ~ in a useless attempt to attack me?   I reckon you knew your clock was 24 hours out of date, but tried to fudge that as a couple of or a few, hours.  No skippeeeee.  You tried to verbal me. Your screen shot concerning Aussie2 account profile: Last online: Jan 16th, 2016 at 12 13pm. Last post:  Oct 23rd, 2015 at 4.26pm. Lasdt PM: Jan 16th, 2016 at 12.42pm. Monk's screenshot on the same account profile, Aussie2. Last online:  Jan 17th, 2016 at 11.13am. Last post:  Jan 24th, 2015 at 2.56pm. Last PM:  Jan 17th, 2016 at 11.12 am. Don't bother answering.  Move on 'mate.'  I am tiring of seeing your arse kicked.  There has to be a 'mercy' Rule applied here. How about you now deal with the p_n issue?

;D LOL until a couple of days ago you lied you'd been banned so how could I have been distorting anything?
Until yesterday we didn't know what time your ban even was. But now you're pretending I knew what time you were banned and that you were in fact banned even though you denied and lied that you had been, too funny. ;D
It must suck to be exposed as the liar you are, but nice try at deflection, the fact remains you've lied for weeks you were banned. 8-)

Oh thanks to monk for all but confirming Aussie also uses Lady Ignora as a sock, not that we needed it most of us already knew. ;D ;D
For Aussie-

---

Jovial Monk wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2016 at 11:17am:

Aussie is banned for no good reason I can see so I am signing off until his ban is over. Time for some new GMods, FD!

  ;D Nothing like a good flounce out to brighten the day.

Jovial Monk wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2016 at 11:17am:

Aussie is banned for no good reason I can see so I am signing off until his ban is over. Time for some new GMods, FD!

There you go all, a call for new GMods as predicted. Their objective is so obvious.

Guess who are the only one's good enough for the role.

skippy. wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2016 at 2:08pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Feb 3rd, 2016 at 11:17am: Aussie is banned for no good reason I can see so I am signing off until his ban is over. Time for some new GMods, FD!   ;D Nothing like a good flounce out to brighten the day.

Flounce number 26

Super Nova wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2016 at 4:13pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Feb 3rd, 2016 at 11:17am: Aussie is banned for no good reason I can see so I am signing off until his ban is over. Time for some new GMods, FD! There you go all, a call for new GMods as predicted. Their objective is so obvious. Guess who are the only one's good enough for the role.

Well, I think you'd make a great GMod Super Nova.

Cmon...let's go!

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2016 at 6:07pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 3rd, 2016 at 2:08pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Feb 3rd, 2016 at 11:17am: Aussie is banned for no good reason I can see so I am signing off until his ban is over. Time for some new GMods, FD!   ;D Nothing like a good flounce out to brighten the day. Flounce number 26

260 more like it lol  :P

Look FD given Aussie is making it a habit of being banned so often and proving pretty unreliable moderating  this board for the forum users pleasure  I'm happy to take one for the team and mod relationships. Just give me a call mate you know the number. 8-)

I support this Skip. That would be a good outcome. Unbiased moderation is the need and to deliver that, an unbiased moderator like you.

Super Nova wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2016 at 8:05pm:

I support this Skip. That would be a good outcome. Unbiased moderation is the need and to deliver that, an unbiased moderator like you.

Skip has successfully proven to be a very competent and fair Admin for FD's other political site.

Twice.

As such, I too would love to see him mod the Relationships forum permanently. The forum will run smoothly for a change and will once again be available for everyone to use as a safe space.

:)

At least skip will not spend all his time seeking to undermine the GMods.

Super Nova wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2016 at 8:36pm:

At least skip will not spend all his time obsessively seeking to stalk and troll the GMods.

Fixed.

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2016 at 8:51pm:

Super Nova wrote on Feb 3rd, 2016 at 8:36pm: At least skip will not spend all his time obsessively seeking to stalk and troll the GMods. Fixed.

Oh no Lisa, you changed my quote... call the police... against the rules...it is fraud... it is a forgery.... add it to the 'who can we dob on thread". Call FD.... the rules are broken.... oh no. Let's make a big deal.

Funny, thanks for correcting my post. :)

Super Nova wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2016 at 8:54pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 3rd, 2016 at 8:51pm: Super Nova wrote on Feb 3rd, 2016 at 8:36pm: At least skip will not spend all his time obsessively seeking to stalk and troll the GMods. Fixed. Oh no Lisa, you changed my quote... call the police... against the rules...it is fraud... it is a forgery.... add it to the 'who can we dob on thread". Call FD.... the rules are broken.... oh no. Let's make a big deal. Funny, thanks for correcting my post. :)

Link or it didn't happen.

Meantime, I'm going to start heaps and heaps of inane topics in Feedback or Chat about my never ending gripes, spats, dramas and delusions about FD, the GMods....and of course your unlinkable forgery :o ;D

And I will do so wearing my pretty green frock   :P

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2016 at 8:58pm:

Super Nova wrote on Feb 3rd, 2016 at 8:54pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 3rd, 2016 at 8:51pm: Super Nova wrote on Feb 3rd, 2016 at 8:36pm: At least skip will not spend all his time obsessively seeking to stalk and troll the GMods. Fixed. Oh no Lisa, you changed my quote... call the police... against the rules...it is fraud... it is a forgery.... add it to the 'who can we dob on thread". Call FD.... the rules are broken.... oh no. Let's make a big deal. Funny, thanks for correcting my post. :) Link or it didn't happen. Meantime, I'm going to start heaps and heaps of inane topics in Feedback or Chat about my never ending gripes, spats, dramas and delusions about FD, the GMods....and of course your unlinkable forgery :o ;D And I will do so wearing my pretty green frock   :P

Oh no, you changed your post since I read it.

Why. You added "And I will do so wearing my pretty green frock   "

Please explain. What are you trying to hide. I wish I took a screenshot. You fool no-one. I will report you.

;)

Super Nova wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2016 at 9:05pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 3rd, 2016 at 8:58pm: Super Nova wrote on Feb 3rd, 2016 at 8:54pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 3rd, 2016 at 8:51pm: Super Nova wrote on Feb 3rd, 2016 at 8:36pm: At least skip will not spend all his time obsessively seeking to stalk and troll the GMods. Fixed. Oh no Lisa, you changed my quote... call the police... against the rules...it is fraud... it is a forgery.... add it to the 'who can we dob on thread". Call FD.... the rules are broken.... oh no. Let's make a big deal. Funny, thanks for correcting my post. :) Link or it didn't happen. Meantime, I'm going to start heaps and heaps of inane topics in Feedback or Chat about my never ending gripes, spats, dramas and delusions about FD, the GMods....and of course your unlinkable forgery :o ;D And I will do so wearing my pretty green frock   :P Oh no, you changed your post since I read it. Why. You added "And I will do so wearing my pretty green frock   " Please explain. What are you trying to hide. I wish I took a screenshot. You fool no-one. I will report you. ;)

Link or it didn't happen!

Oh and if you do that, I will come in with one of my multi nics which are 3 yrs old, I will change its online screen name and make it look as though it is on my side.

I will chat to it for days....making you think there are 2 different people when in fact...it's me talking to I lmao  :P

(Remember the night Aussie was exposed for doing just that lol?)

You exposed nothing Jones.  There is nothing to expose.

Obviously, my ban is now over.  No PM waiting for me telling me why I was banned, so I have no idea why.   I'll follow the Rules and send a PM to FD/GMods (except p_n who has me blocked.)

I'd argue thing thread has run its course now?
The last page and a half have nothing to do with the original post.

That's usually a sign.

Noted and considered.  There's a PM in your inbox for your attention.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 9:19am:

I'd argue thing thread has run its course now? The last page and a half have nothing to do with the original post. That's usually a sign.

This thread was over after the first post.
It looks like Aussie is back! I wonder how long he will last this time? My offer is still on the table FD, all of these disruptions with the moderator continually being banned can not be good for the board. You know my number. 8-)

So classy, everyone gloating over the ban of one person- but then the usual antagonists are the main offender's and no surprises there.

Agnes wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 10:51am:

So classy, everyone gloating over the ban of one person- but then the usual antagonists are the main offender's and no surprises there.

Good to see, everyone having fun, hey Agnes!

Cheers!

perceptions_now wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 10:55am:

Agnes wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 10:51am: So classy, everyone gloating over the ban of one person- but then the usual antagonists are the main offender's and no surprises there. Good to see, everyone having fun, hey Agnes! Cheers!

 
Apparently the misfortune  of another person is what passes for "fun" around these parts P.N..

At least with the childish trolls from a certain place. Pathetic.

Thank goodness George is back.
The whole forum fell apart without him the last 24 hours.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 11:10am:

Thank goodness George is back. The whole forum fell apart without him the last 24 hours.

Really ?

When you give up being a mod here A.H we wont have to put up with the likes of LJ threatening everyone forum wide with a ban will we ?  You seem to be wasted as a mod- you have opinions and some good insights into most topic's.  I enjoy reading your stuff .

Agnes wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 10:51am:

So classy, everyone gloating over the ban of one person- but then the usual antagonists are the main offender's and no surprises there.

;D

---

.

I thought the last few pages were quite amusing!

I usually steer clear of this thread!

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 11:10am:

Thank goodness George is back. The whole forum fell apart without him the last 24 hours.

Nice to see GMods being so impartial. {sigh} if only!

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 11:10am:

Thank goodness George is back. The whole forum fell apart without him the last 24 hours.

;D

I love your sense of humour.

It reminds me of my mum's  :P

Redmond Neck wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 12:00pm:

I thought the last few pages were quite amusing! I usually steer clear of this thread! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

They were funny hey lol   :P

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 5:49pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 11:10am: Thank goodness George is back. The whole forum fell apart without him the last 24 hours. ;D I love your sense of humour. It reminds me of my mum's  :P

Oh!  Are we talking about the same 'mum' you said/posted had assaulted you, as in 'domestic violence?'

For our resident cab driver :

● Diddums

● Sour grapes

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 6:19pm:

For our resident cab driver : ● Diddums ● Sour grapes

Yeas Dear, it's terrible isn't it.  Now..................


Quote:

Oh!  Are we talking about the same 'mum' you said/posted had assaulted you, as in 'domestic violence?'

So....word has it you were banned  ;D

Sounds like you're still angry about it Cab Driver.

Diddums.

Sour grapes.

And umm...

Sucked in  :D

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 6:27pm:

So....word has it you were banned  ;D Sounds like you're still angry about it Cab Driver. Diddums. Sour grapes. And umm... Sucked in  :D

  You are a disgrace, and I think you could be drinking.

No point getting excited about Lisa and her gloating, AG, just plain not worth it.

My word declares I was banned, Jones.  I never get angry or suffer from sour grapes.  I'm very confident the GMod who banned me will soon tell me why.  They can also tell the entire Forum, that's fine by me.  I hope they do and I give them permission to do that if my permission is required.  While we are speaking about what 'word' has.......the word I am getting is that you (as is supported by your 'sucked in' remark) complained to your lunch date Hicks about something or other, and he obliged.  But, that is just pure ill informed speculation.

Moving on:


Quote:

Oh!  Are we talking about the same 'mum' you said/posted had assaulted you, as in 'domestic violence?'

Same to you, Aussie, Lisa’s gloating is just not worth a response.

Jovial Monk wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 6:46pm:

Same to you, Aussie, Lisa’s gloating is just not worth a response.

I really don't care about Jones.  She is small fry in a bigger ocean.

More like an amoeba in the Pacific ocean. So don’t respond.

Jovial Monk wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 6:53pm:

More like an amoeba in the Pacific ocean. So don’t respond.

Oh, okay...so I'll just leave it with this for Jones to tell us about, concerning a 'sense of humour' which reminds her of that Hicks has.


Quote:

Oh!  Are we talking about the same 'mum' you said/posted had assaulted you, as in 'domestic violence?'

Dear Aussie,

When will you stop these silly games of "pursue the moderator". You play it at every forum you are a member of.

Dear Monk,

When will you allow me to post at your fermentation blog here at OzPol?
Please advise the next time you want to through a wobbly and walk out of OzPol and abandon your position as Mod so others can consider taking it over from you.

Dear Super Nova......this is the Rule I persue, not a GMod.  Take the Rule away, I have nothing, but the Rule is there.  Not mine.  It is fd's:


Quote:

Suspensions If you break the rules, you will be suspended. Warnings are rarely given. If it is your first offence, it will probably be for approximately 1 day. Do not send and email asking why you were suspended. Do not create additional profiles to circumvent suspension. Wait until your suspension is removed, then view your recent posts. It should be obvious why you were susended. In 95% of cases it is for insulting other members. Please take the opportunity to learn from your mistake. If you are still not sure, send a personal message to the moderators via the forum. Do not start a thread on feedback asking why you were banned.

Did that.  No answer so far.  I am quite happy for the relevant GMod to post in open what I did to warrant the ban.  How else can I learn from my 'mistake?'

Will you ever.....just ever................look at reality instead of through your "Let's get Aussie glasses, no matter how dumb that is?"

Are you one of the blokes who'd rather die kneeling instead of standing tall?

  I know how hard it is to troll and scarper about the forum wracked with so much grief Lisa. Can I help you through this process - I have a few tip's having lost the love of my life she was always there for me, I miss her.   :'(  :'( :'(      those tears are genuine as I know all of yours are .?  ::)   I feel your pain.     :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

:-? :P
Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 5:49pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 11:10am: Thank goodness George is back. The whole forum fell apart without him the last 24 hours. ;D I love your sense of humour. It reminds me of my mum's  :P

I think that's a compliment?

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 8:32pm:

:-? :P Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 5:49pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 11:10am: Thank goodness George is back. The whole forum fell apart without him the last 24 hours. ;D I love your sense of humour. It reminds me of my mum's  :P I think that's a compliment?

Who knows?  The mother of Jones bashed her, so she posted in open.  You're on your own there Hicks.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 8:32pm:

:-? :P Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 5:49pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 11:10am: Thank goodness George is back. The whole forum fell apart without him the last 24 hours. ;D I love your sense of humour. It reminds me of my mum's  :P I think that's a compliment?

It is.

She's one in a million.

That means there are 6 more of her just in NSW lol.

She's unfortunately not well atm. Like all of us, she has some good days, some bad. We spent 5 hrs with her today.

The kids and I came home totally buggered lol  :P

Anyway Andrei....it's back to Aussie's SOUR GRAPES topic I guess  ::)

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 8:42pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 8:32pm: :-? :P Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 5:49pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 11:10am: Thank goodness George is back. The whole forum fell apart without him the last 24 hours. ;D I love your sense of humour. It reminds me of my mum's  :P I think that's a compliment? It is. She's one in a million. (That means there are 6 more of her just in NSW  :P) She's unfortunately not well atm. Like all of us, she has some good days, some bad. We spent 5 hrs with her today. The kids and I came home totally buggered lol  :P Anyway Andrei....

That's really great Jones.  Lucky she did not bash you when the kids were there to see it!  God!  Thank goodness they were were in the car with hubby.  It is hard to imagine anything worse than ankle biters under five years of age witnessing their Mother being beaten up by their Grandmother.  That would be just horrific!  Thank goodness for small mercies, ey Jones. 

She obviously has a terrific sense of humour. 

I don't think we need all of this personal antagonising and comments on people's families.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 8:54pm:

I don't think we need all of this personal antagonising and comments on people's families.

As we all know...Aussie is being his typical obnoxious self.

As such, he is his own worst enemy.

He is yet to realize this.

And given his age....chances are he never will.

Anyway....I'm happily chatting away elsewhere.

Might just leave you to the Sour Graped Cab Driver.

Enjoy!

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 8:54pm:

I don't think we need all of this personal antagonising and comments on people's families.

I thought there was a rule about posters family being off limits, if not there should be. Aussies attempts to harm Lisa via taunts  about her mother are as disgraceful as his cheer squads attempts to legitimise there whinging about his banning. ::)

skippy. wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 9:19pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 8:54pm: I don't think we need all of this personal antagonising and comments on people's families. I thought there was a rule about posters family being off limits, if not there should be. Aussies attempts to harm Lisa via taunts  about her mother are as disgraceful as his cheer squads attempts to legitimise there whinging about his banning. ::)

Oh didnt you know? In Aussie's disturbed mind, a poster's dying mum is fair game...an incessant online game.

Actually....it's all good. Why? Other members (incl FD who owns OzPol) will see Aussie at his best.

Hey Cletus...umm i mean skippy....tell us all about the time you left a post on your forum for 2 days...everyone saw Lisa's home address....you should be charged and locked up...are you going to aploagise now that the whole world now knows where she lives...should she take you to the police for the way you didn't take care of her privacy?

Agnes wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 9:38pm:

Hey Cletus...umm i mean skippy....tell us all about the time you left a post on your forum for 2 days...everyone saw Lisa's home address....you should be charged and locked up...are you going to aploagise now that the whole world now knows where she lives...should she take you to the police for the way you didn't take care of her privacy?

I don't get to see every  post made when it is made, unlike you I have a job and am often not around. But maybe next time you should refrain from posting her details given your IP address was the same as the poster that revealed those details. 8-)

skippy. wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 9:45pm:

Agnes wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:38pm: Hey Cletus...umm i mean skippy....tell us all about the time you left a post on your forum for 2 days...everyone saw Lisa's home address....you should be charged and locked up...are you going to aploagise now that the whole world now knows where she lives...should she take you to the police for the way you didn't take care of her privacy? I don't get to see every  post made, unlike you I have a job and am often not around. But maybe next time you should refrain from posting her details given your IP address was the same as the poster that revealed those details. 8-)

Skippy, she did the same dreadful thing on Yahoo.

Unfortunately, the home address in question isn't where I live.

It's only where she THINKS I live.

skippy. wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 9:45pm:

Agnes wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:38pm: Hey Cletus...umm i mean skippy....tell us all about the time you left a post on your forum for 2 days...everyone saw Lisa's home address....you should be charged and locked up...are you going to aploagise now that the whole world now knows where she lives...should she take you to the police for the way you didn't take care of her privacy? I don't get to see every  post made when it is made, unlike you I have a job and am often not around. But maybe next time you should refrain from posting her details given your IP address was the same as the poster that revealed those details. 8-)

Lol  if something sounds like a lie it usually is...nice try stain.  Say sorry too Lisa...

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 9:48pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:45pm: Agnes wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:38pm: Hey Cletus...umm i mean skippy....tell us all about the time you left a post on your forum for 2 days...everyone saw Lisa's home address....you should be charged and locked up...are you going to aploagise now that the whole world now knows where she lives...should she take you to the police for the way you didn't take care of her privacy? I don't get to see every  post made, unlike you I have a job and am often not around. But maybe next time you should refrain from posting her details given your IP address was the same as the poster that revealed those details. 8-) Skippy, she did the same dreadful thing on Yahoo. Unfortunately, the home address in question isn't where I live. It's only where she THINKS I live.

Yea she has form in these matters as you know.

skippy. wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 9:53pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:48pm: skippy. wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:45pm: Agnes wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:38pm: Hey Cletus...umm i mean skippy....tell us all about the time you left a post on your forum for 2 days...everyone saw Lisa's home address....you should be charged and locked up...are you going to aploagise now that the whole world now knows where she lives...should she take you to the police for the way you didn't take care of her privacy? I don't get to see every  post made, unlike you I have a job and am often not around. But maybe next time you should refrain from posting her details given your IP address was the same as the poster that revealed those details. 8-) Skippy, she did the same dreadful thing on Yahoo. Unfortunately, the home address in question isn't where I live. It's only where she THINKS I live. Yea she has form in these matters as you know.

She also has a lot of "issues".

Serious ones...as you know.

skippy. wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 9:45pm:

Agnes wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:38pm: Hey Cletus...umm i mean skippy....tell us all about the time you left a post on your forum for 2 days...everyone saw Lisa's home address....you should be charged and locked up...are you going to aploagise now that the whole world now knows where she lives...should she take you to the police for the way you didn't take care of her privacy? I don't get to see every  post made when it is made, unlike you I have a job and am often not around. But maybe next time you should refrain from posting her details given your IP address was the same as the poster that revealed those details. 8-)

I have zero idea what all this outburst is about, but I don't like the way it seems to be heading.

Back off.....everyone.

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 9:48pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:45pm: Agnes wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:38pm: Hey Cletus...umm i mean skippy....tell us all about the time you left a post on your forum for 2 days...everyone saw Lisa's home address....you should be charged and locked up...are you going to aploagise now that the whole world now knows where she lives...should she take you to the police for the way you didn't take care of her privacy? I don't get to see every  post made, unlike you I have a job and am often not around. But maybe next time you should refrain from posting her details given your IP address was the same as the poster that revealed those details. 8-) Skippy, she did the same dreadful thing on Yahoo Unfortunately, the home address in question isn't where I live. It's only where she THINKS I live.

You are as thick as a cinder block.

: : ::)

Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 9:56pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:53pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:48pm: skippy. wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:45pm: Agnes wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:38pm: Hey Cletus...umm i mean skippy....tell us all about the time you left a post on your forum for 2 days...everyone saw Lisa's home address....you should be charged and locked up...are you going to aploagise now that the whole world now knows where she lives...should she take you to the police for the way you didn't take care of her privacy? I don't get to see every  post made, unlike you I have a job and am often not around. But maybe next time you should refrain from posting her details given your IP address was the same as the poster that revealed those details. 8-) Skippy, she did the same dreadful thing on Yahoo. Unfortunately, the home address in question isn't where I live. It's only where she THINKS I live. Yea she has form in these matters as you know. She also has a lot of "issues". Serious ones...as you know.

Anyway Skip.

Thanks for your support through it all.

Much respect!

Mod. wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 9:57pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:45pm: Agnes wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:38pm: Hey Cletus...umm i mean skippy....tell us all about the time you left a post on your forum for 2 days...everyone saw Lisa's home address....you should be charged and locked up...are you going to aploagise now that the whole world now knows where she lives...should she take you to the police for the way you didn't take care of her privacy? I don't get to see every  post made when it is made, unlike you I have a job and am often not around. But maybe next time you should refrain from posting her details given your IP address was the same as the poster that revealed those details. 8-) I have zero idea what all this outburst is about, but I don't like the way it seems to be heading. Back off.....everyone.

*Bump*

Mod. wrote on Feb 4^th, 2016 at 9:57pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:45pm: Agnes wrote on Feb 4th, 2016 at 9:38pm: Hey Cletus...umm i mean skippy....tell us all about the time you left a post on your forum for 2 days...everyone saw Lisa's home address....you should be charged and locked up...are you going to aploagise now that the whole world now knows where she lives...should she take you to the police for the way you didn't take care of her privacy? I don't get to see every  post made when it is made, unlike you I have a job and am often not around. But maybe next time you should refrain from posting her details given your IP address was the same as the poster that revealed those details. 8-) I have zero idea what all this outburst is about, but I don't like the way it seems to be heading. Back off.....everyone.

;D

---

Just look at this people.


Quote:

Agnes (replying), skippy. (replying), Lisa Jones, Super Nova (replying), mantra, Mod..

Whatever it is, make it "play nice."

Now even Andrei and P_U are laughing at Aussie, not with him... it isn't just a PA thing.

.

---

Wow!

AiA wrote on Feb 5^th, 2016 at 4:13am:

Now even Andrei and P_U are laughing at Aussie, not with him... it isn't just a PA thing.

Agnes wrote on Feb 5^th, 2016 at 10:00am:

AiA wrote on Feb 5th, 2016 at 4:13am: Now even Andrei and P_U are laughing at Aussie, not with him... it isn't just a PA thing.

Someone has had their widdle bot bot smacked and they just don't like it.

Link.