You banned a Member for 24 hours because they posted, in exactly the same way as Karnal does......'Kill him.'

As I have made public, I reported Karnal for posting the same expression after that Member had been banned, and nothing happened.....and I agree......nothing should have.

So, why did you ban that Member for posting 'kill him?'

how does anyone know all this info about people being banned and why they are b anned???>.

in my case I didnt even know why I was banned..

just had to take a guess..

as far as I know perc doesnt have to tell anyone why they are banned..

why would he tell someone else why he banned someone????>> ::) ::) ::)

give the guy a break you wouldnt even know it was perc that banned someone..

or do you have special windows where you can actually watch everyone..????

I think its time fd did and investigation.. >:( >:( >:(

Aussie wrote on Jan 30^th, 2016 at 3:53pm:

You banned a Member for 24 hours because they posted, in exactly the same way as Karnal does......'Kill him.' As I have made public, I reported Karnal for posting the same expression after that Member had been banned, and nothing happened.....and I agree......nothing should have. So, why did you ban that Member for posting 'kill him?'

Then how can I get away with posting

hang em high

when ever a: murderer, rapist, pedophile or terrorist is discussed?

I got banned once but just figured that one of the mods must have got drunk and accidently slipped on the ban button , there is no other logical explanation, I would have to be the most respectable poster here, you would ban the pope before you banned me.   :)

innocentbystander. wrote on Jan 30^th, 2016 at 8:00pm:

I got banned once but just figured that one of the mods must have got drunk and accidently slipped on the ban button , there is no other logical explanation, I would have to be the most respectable poster here, you would ban the pope before you banned me.   :)

;D

Sometimes you are very funny IB.

Quote:

how does anyone know all this info about people being banned and why they are b anned???>. in my case I didnt even know why I was banned.. just had to take a guess..

And.....you should have been told.  As you well know, I agree with you 100% on this matter.


Quote:

as far as I know perc doesnt have to tell anyone why they are banned..

The Rules say otherwise.  Read them cods.


Quote:

why would he tell someone else why he banned someone????>> Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

He didn't.


Quote:

give the guy a break you wouldnt even know it was perc that banned someone..

Yeas I do.  And will that have any impact on your position?  I'm betting not.  He is your pin-up boy, just like Hicks is to Jones.  You don't care if PN has been *insert your own description* here.


Quote:

or do you have special windows where you can actually watch everyone..????

No I don't.


Quote:

I think its time fd did and investigation.. Angry Angry Angry

Don't hold your breath.

Setanta wrote on Jan 30^th, 2016 at 8:06pm:

innocentbystander. wrote on Jan 30th, 2016 at 8:00pm: I got banned once but just figured that one of the mods must have got drunk and accidently slipped on the ban button , there is no other logical explanation, I would have to be the most respectable poster here, you would ban the pope before you banned me.   :) ;D Sometimes you are very funny IB.

Yes that was a most entertaining post  :)

Aussie wrote on Jan 30^th, 2016 at 8:13pm:

give the guy a break you wouldnt even know it was perc that banned someone.. Yeas I do.  And will that have any impact on your position?  I'm betting not.  He is your pin-up boy, just like Hicks is to Jones.  You don't care if PN has been *insert your own description* here

HOW?????....how do you know???..

I do not know of anyone who has been told they are banned..

it just comes up..no reason no name of mod..

so how do you KNOW?...


my suggestion  is you are GUESSING.. and making more trouble..for gmods..

we know your game aussie...

andrei was the hit man for a long time now its perceps turn..

how many threads on this topic????... ::) ::) ::) ::)

and its always about someone else whos been banned ...or so you claim...

if you are not game to tell us HOW YOU COME BY ALL THIS INFO... then you shouldnt publish in the forum...you are just starting rumours in this case what you claim if perceps bias or favouritism...

kind of weak.. and troublemaking as far as I can see.....

now you mention karnal!!!!!!!

since when is it your job to point out what other members are doing or saying.... ::) ::) ::) ::)

Perhaps it was Aussie who was banned (by Perceptions Now) for 24 hours and that is why he logged in as Aussie2 on that weekend (16th?) and PMd PN to ask why? ;) Stranger things have happened.  ;D ;D

Neferti wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 9:20am:

Perhaps it was Aussie who was banned (by Perceptions Now) for 24 hours and that is why he logged in as Aussie2 on that weekend (16th?) and PMd PN to ask why? ;) Stranger things have happened.  ;D ;D

I got a 24 hour ban for farting here. I told Perceptions Now it was the dog but ...

AiA wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 9:40am:

Neferti wrote on Jan 31st, 2016 at 9:20am: Perhaps it was Aussie who was banned (by Perceptions Now) for 24 hours and that is why he logged in as Aussie2 on that weekend (16th?) and PMd PN to ask why? ;) Stranger things have happened.  ;D ;D I got a 24 hour ban for farting here. I told Perceptions Now it was the dog but ...

He banned you for lying because it was really the cat who farted.

Tough!

Next time don't lie about who farts in your home. Simple  :P

Quote:

if you are not game to tell us HOW YOU COME BY ALL THIS INFO... then you shouldnt publish in the forum...you are just starting rumours in this case what you claim if perceps bias or favouritism...

I was told by a very reliable source.  PN can deny it if it is untrue (which it is not.)  That person was banned for 24 hours for posting 'kill him,' something Karnal has done many times both before and after that ban.......and no action was taken against him, and neither should it have been taken.  Hence the question to PN......why was that person given a ban for something done by others many times, both before and since?

Aussie wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 10:07am:

Quote: if you are not game to tell us HOW YOU COME BY ALL THIS INFO... then you shouldnt publish in the forum...you are just starting rumours in this case what you claim if perceps bias or favouritism... I was told by a very reliable source.  PN can deny it if it is untrue (which it is not.)  That person was banned for 24 hours for posting 'kill him,' something Karnal has done many times both before and after that ban.......and no action was taken against him, and neither should it have been taken.  Hence the question to PN......why was that person given a ban for something done by others many times, both before and since?

so you say,.. why isnt the person fighting his own battles?????>>.


did someone report him to perc???>.

I was banned for saying something I have said a thousand times..., but it offended this one person who reported me...fair enough...

its all about the reporting I am sure as anyone that perc doesnt read every freaking post....

you have to be reported...


how many people have been banned thanks to your record abuse thread???????????????........

do the gmods thank you for saving them the hassle of finding the baddies?.

,maybe someone was deeply offended by the words Kill Him.

I dont appreciate "ferfuxsakes" either.

Perceptions for Questions Now.  :D

Quote:

so you say,.. why isnt the person fighting his own battles?????>>.

The ID of the person banned is irrelevant to the question asked.  It does not matter who they are.



Quote:

did someone report him to perc???>.

I don't know.  It is also irrelevant because:   Assuming there was a report sent; After that ban, I reported Karnal for posting the same thing to all the GMods/FD (except PN who has blocked me) and no action was taken against him.


Quote:

I was banned for saying something I have said a thousand times..., but it offended this one person who reported me...fair enough... its all about the reporting I am sure as anyone that perc doesnt read every freaking post.... you have to be reported...

I reported Karnal, so that deals with your point.



Quote:

how many people have been banned thanks to your record abuse thread???????????????........ do the gmods thank you for saving them the hassle of finding the baddies?.

I don't know, cods.


Quote:

,maybe someone was deeply offended by the words Kill Him.

Then Karnal ought to have been given a ban as well.


Quote:

I dont appreciate "ferfuxsakes" either.

Yeas, I know.

Aussie wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 11:08am:

I reported Karnal for posting the same thing to all the GMods/FD (except PN who has blocked me) and no action was taken against him.

Maybe that is part of the problem?  You are always reporting people.

Remember, even if they may have to act at times, the teacher never likes the class dobber.

Aussie wrote on Jan 30^th, 2016 at 3:53pm:

You banned a Member for 24 hours because they posted, in exactly the same way as Karnal does......'Kill him.' As I have made public, I reported Karnal for posting the same expression after that Member had been banned, and nothing happened.....and I agree......nothing should have. So, why did you ban that Member for posting 'kill him?'

I think everyone understands that when Karnal sais this it is clearly meant as humour.

In an "abuse" thread in Relationships it was mentioned that the words "Kill Him" was in reference to a facetious remark about Clive Palmer!

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1452685702/82#82

Are you sure it wasn't "Nuke Him"?

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1453268359/28#28


::)

Well the bible does state thou shalt not kill!!

Black Orchid wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 11:18am:

Aussie wrote on Jan 31st, 2016 at 11:08am: I reported Karnal for posting the same thing to all the GMods/FD (except PN who has blocked me) and no action was taken against him. Maybe that is part of the problem?  You are always reporting people. Remember, even if they may have to act at times, the teacher never likes the class dobber.

(I thought you said you rarely read my posts!)  How would you know way, one way or the other?

This is the PM I sent off to FD/GMods 'reporting' Karnal.


Quote:

Sender: Aussie To: Andrei.Hicks, Annie Anthrax, freediver, gandalf, mozzaok (Call Back) Subject: Complaint ~ Karnal Date: Jan 26th, 2016 at 11:54am In the recent weeks, a Member received a 24 hour ban for posting, ‘Kill him,” a facetious reference to Clive Palmer.  What follows are details of a post by Karnal, and is a signature phrase used by him  quite often.   If there is to be consistency/inconsistency , and no bias either pro Karnal or anti that Member, then so be it either way.  I’m sure Karnal will be happy to let us know if he receives a ban, but that is for him. Link. Post # 63. Quote: We'll ban them, kill them and nuke them.

Aussie wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 12:03pm:

This is the PM I sent off to FD/GMods 'reporting' Karnal. [quote] Sender: Aussie To: Andrei.Hicks, Annie Anthrax, freediver, gandalf, mozzaok (Call Back) Subject: Complaint ~ Karnal Date: Jan 26th, 2016 at 11:54am In the recent weeks, a Member received a 24 hour ban for posting, ‘Kill him,” a facetious reference to Clive Palmer.  What follows are details of a post by Karnal, and is a signature phrase used by him  quite often.   If there is to be consistency/inconsistency , and no bias either pro Karnal or anti that Member, then so be it either way.  I’m sure Karnal will be happy to let us know if he receives a ban, but that is for him. Link. Post # 63. Quote: We'll ban them, kill them and nuke them.

Neferti wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 11:37am:

In an "abuse" thread in Relationships it was mentioned that the words "Kill Him" was in reference to a facetious remark about Clive Palmer! http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1452685702/82#82 Are you sure it wasn't "Nuke Him"? http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1453268359/28#28 ::)

So the plot thickens. Since the anonymous person who said "nuke him" in a facetious reference to Clive Palmer that got the 24 hour BAN was .............. drum roll ........... AUSSIE?  :o

Commiserations, aussie. So sad that you had a 24 hour "rest" when some other people do worse things and nothing happens. You poor thing. You must have been devastated.  ;D

There should be a prize for the person who gets the most bans for "saying nothing abusive" around here.  ;D ;D

ho hum just a normal Sunday afternoon then?  ::)

Agnes wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 2:42pm:

ho hum just a normal Sunday afternoon then?  ::)

We need your input in the Games threads, AG.  ;)

well now that J Smith has taken Elvis I have lost the will to live. 

Neferti wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 2:33pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 31st, 2016 at 12:03pm: This is the PM I sent off to FD/GMods 'reporting' Karnal. [quote] Sender: Aussie To: Andrei.Hicks, Annie Anthrax, freediver, gandalf, mozzaok (Call Back) Subject: Complaint ~ Karnal Date: Jan 26th, 2016 at 11:54am In the recent weeks, a Member received a 24 hour ban for posting, ‘Kill him,” a facetious reference to Clive Palmer.  What follows are details of a post by Karnal, and is a signature phrase used by him  quite often.   If there is to be consistency/inconsistency , and no bias either pro Karnal or anti that Member, then so be it either way.  I’m sure Karnal will be happy to let us know if he receives a ban, but that is for him. Link. Post # 63. Quote: We'll ban them, kill them and nuke them. Neferti wrote on Jan 31st, 2016 at 11:37am: In an "abuse" thread in Relationships it was mentioned that the words "Kill Him" was in reference to a facetious remark about Clive Palmer! http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1452685702/82#82 Are you sure it wasn't "Nuke Him"? http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1453268359/28#28 ::) So the plot thickens. Since the anonymous person who said "nuke him" in a facetious reference to Clive Palmer that got the 24 hour BAN was .............. drum roll ........... AUSSIE?  :o Commiserations, aussie. So sad that you had a 24 hour "rest" when some other people do worse things and nothing happens. You poor thing. You must have been devastated.  ;D There should be a prize for the person who gets the most bans for "saying nothing abusive" around here.  ;D ;D

:D

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 12:02pm:

Well the bible does state thou shalt not kill!!

Aussie kills me every time he posts.  ;D

And here we go again another thread all about nothing. ::)

skippy. wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 6:24pm:

And here we go again another thread all about nothing. ::)

How can it be a 'nothing' when one person gets banned for posting 'kill him,' and another who did and does the same is not banned?  You can explain that, can you?

Aussie wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 6:26pm:

skippy. wrote on Jan 31st, 2016 at 6:24pm: And here we go again another thread all about nothing. ::) How can it be a 'nothing' when one person gets banned for posting 'kill him,' and another who did and does the same is not banned?  You can explain that, can you?

I don't believe a poster was banned, no one has come forward to say it was them until they do its a lie you made up.

skippy. wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 6:39pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 31st, 2016 at 6:26pm: skippy. wrote on Jan 31st, 2016 at 6:24pm: And here we go again another thread all about nothing. ::) How can it be a 'nothing' when one person gets banned for posting 'kill him,' and another who did and does the same is not banned?  You can explain that, can you? I don't believe a poster was banned, no one has come forward to say it was them until they do its a lie you made up.

Why don't you believe it?  Not one GMod/FD has come out and denied the banning even though I sent them all a PM and also made it public that I had done so.

Do you reckon that if you can post "kill him" and not get a ban, if I did, I should?

Where is the 'nothing' in that?  Don't you care about what is right and what is wrong?

Aussie wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 11:08am:

Quote: so you say,.. why isnt the person fighting his own battles?????>>. The ID of the person banned is irrelevant to the question asked.  It does not matter who they are. no it isnt??..you have used perceptions name you are trying to shame him into being biased....as you do with most gmods...name the person.. unless you are making it up as skippy suggests.. [quote]did someone report him to perc???>.

I don't know.  It is also irrelevant because:   Assuming there was a report sent; After that ban, I reported Karnal for posting the same thing to all the GMods/FD (except PN who has blocked me) and no action was taken against him.


you are very good at REPORTING... even in very sly ways...and you dont mind admitting it.... ::) ::) like here..

did you take on  this charity work of your own initiative???? or are you just supporting a "mate"
out of the goodness of your heart..?

we know it isnt to bring down a mod dont we?




Quote:

I was banned for saying something I have said a thousand times..., but it offended this one person who reported me...fair enough... its all about the reporting I am sure as anyone that perc doesnt read every freaking post.... you have to be reported...

I reported Karnal, so that deals with your point.


just because its reported doesnt mean action is taken????>..... or do you think aussie commands more action when he reports something...because he thinks he is more important than most?>.




Quote:

how many people have been banned thanks to your record abuse thread???????????????........ do the gmods thank you for saving them the hassle of finding the baddies?.

I don't know, cods.


Quote:

,maybe someone was deeply offended by the words Kill Him.

Then Karnal ought to have been given a ban as well.

WHY?   maybe the person karnal was tlaking too wasnt offended... only you are because you want to get back the gmods...

perc banned you,.... how dare he????.  let rip into perc...





Quote:

I dont appreciate "ferfuxsakes" either.

Yeas, I know.[/quote]



but I didnt report you...it just lowers my opinion of you thats all

Aussie wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 6:55pm:

skippy. wrote on Jan 31st, 2016 at 6:39pm: Aussie wrote on Jan 31st, 2016 at 6:26pm: skippy. wrote on Jan 31st, 2016 at 6:24pm: And here we go again another thread all about nothing. ::) How can it be a 'nothing' when one person gets banned for posting 'kill him,' and another who did and does the same is not banned?  You can explain that, can you? I don't believe a poster was banned, no one has come forward to say it was them until they do its a lie you made up. Why don't you believe it?  Not one GMod/FD has come out and denied the banning even though I sent them all a PM and also made it public that I had done so. Do you reckon that if you can post "kill him" and not get a ban, if I did, I should? Where is the 'nothing' in that?  Don't you care about what is right and what is wrong?

you just dont get it do you..
if bobby got banned for everything he called HANG EM HIGH>..he would never be unbanned..

its all in the content...strewth.....

shouldnt you be out collecting for the Save Clive Fund??????? :D :D :D :D :D

Aussie wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 6:55pm:

skippy. wrote on Jan 31st, 2016 at 6:39pm: Aussie wrote on Jan 31st, 2016 at 6:26pm: skippy. wrote on Jan 31st, 2016 at 6:24pm: And here we go again another thread all about nothing. ::) How can it be a 'nothing' when one person gets banned for posting 'kill him,' and another who did and does the same is not banned?  You can explain that, can you? I don't believe a poster was banned, no one has come forward to say it was them until they do its a lie you made up. Why don't you believe it?  Not one GMod/FD has come out and denied the banning even though I sent them all a PM and also made it public that I had done so. Do you reckon that if you can post "kill him" and not get a ban, if I did, I should? Where is the 'nothing' in that?  Don't you care about what is right and what is wrong?

The mods never admit anything you claim happened this is no different.
No body should believe you until someone owns up to being banned.
How would you know someone was banned anyway? Did they PM you and ask you to run a crusade?
I advise everyone to ignore you until such time a poster actually confirms this is true, if that happens you MAY have a genuine gripe to pursue.

Quote:

The mods never admit anything you claim happened this is no different.

They have on many occasions.  PN did on this occasion.  Why do you not accept that?  Not one GMod/FD has posted a denial, and PN has been here since this Thread was commenced as have FD and Hicks.



Quote:

No body should believe you until someone owns up to being banned.

What does it matter, even if it is a hypothetical.....which it is not.



Quote:

How would you know someone was banned anyway? Did they PM you and ask you to run a crusade?

I know, and what does it matter?  If you post 'kill him,' and get a ban and get told that is why......and then I post 'kill him' and not get a ban, is that a mere irrelevant nonsense?


Quote:

I advise everyone to ignore you until such time a poster actually confirms this is true, if that happens you MAY have a genuine gripe to pursue.

Even though your advice is prejudiced because of your experiences elsewhere, that may well yet happen.  But, all you are doing is fishing for something which is totally beside the point.

Why has every GMod/FD not responded with the challenge........'Aussie, you are lying?'

They haven't, and for one very good reason.  I am not.  I want it explained why one Member got banned for facetiously posting 'kill him,' by PN, (who blocks Members from communicating with him via PM) yet another (who posts it regularly) does not.

Supply the link to where a mod  says a poster was banned,Otherwise it's a lie.
Supply the poster otherwise it's a lie.
Supply the evidence otherwise it's a lie.
It matters as unless a poster owns up they were banned for this and told by a mod they were banned for this you're either lying or embellishing.
Why doesn't the poster supposedly banned own up?

Option three I reckon.

skippy. wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 8:59pm:

Supply the link to where a mod  says a poster was banned,Otherwise it's a lie. Supply the poster otherwise it's a lie. Supply the evidence otherwise it's a lie. It matters as unless a poster owns up they were banned for this and told by a mod they were banned for this you're either lying or embellishing. Why doesn't the poster supposedly banned own up?

So....you don't care about the fundamental principle.  All you want to know is who was banned for posting 'kill him' while another poster never has been. 

Why?  What changes whether it is Monk, Mothra, Soren, BigOl64 or whoever?

Aussie wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 9:15pm:

skippy. wrote on Jan 31st, 2016 at 8:59pm: Supply the link to where a mod  says a poster was banned,Otherwise it's a lie. Supply the poster otherwise it's a lie. Supply the evidence otherwise it's a lie. It matters as unless a poster owns up they were banned for this and told by a mod they were banned for this you're either lying or embellishing. Why doesn't the poster supposedly banned own up? So....you don't care about the fundamental principle.  All you want to know is who was banned for posting 'kill him' while another poster never has been.  Why?  What changes whether it is Monk, Mothra, Soren, BigOl64 or whoever?

where is the link from the mod saying they sent a PM banning someone for that? No link and it's all your word and your word is not good enough.
Because until they admit it was them this is all your word and forgive me for being honest but your word is worth s...
Did they PM you and tell you that a mod sent them a PM and told them they were banned for saying " kill him" ?
If it's true why won't they admit it here on the forum?
Sorry Aussie until someone admits it was them it's just you saying it's true and that is not proof.

Quote:

where is the link from the mod saying they sent a PM banning someone for that? No link and it's all your word and your word is not good enough. Because until they admit it was them this is all your word and forgive me for being honest but your word is worth s... Did they PM you and tell you that a mod sent them a PM and told them they were banned for saying " kill him" ? If it's true why won't they admit it here on the forum? Sorry Aussie until someone admits it was them it's just you saying it's true and that is not proof.

 

Okay. Let's get over that and move on.

If it is true, what is your position, or is your sole interest to discover who was banned?

Aussie wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 9:47pm:

Quote: where is the link from the mod saying they sent a PM banning someone for that? No link and it's all your word and your word is not good enough. Because until they admit it was them this is all your word and forgive me for being honest but your word is worth s... Did they PM you and tell you that a mod sent them a PM and told them they were banned for saying " kill him" ? If it's true why won't they admit it here on the forum? Sorry Aussie until someone admits it was them it's just you saying it's true and that is not proof.   Okay. Let's get over that and move on. If it is true, what is your position, or is your sole interest to discover who was banned?

Until someone admits they were banned this is all hypothetical. I don't believe it happened and given no one has come forward it just reinforces that opinion.

Very inconsistent modding here, that is for sure.

Monk, we need to spend more time at Aussies forum, turning into a good little site- lets go.

Aussie wrote on Jan 31^st, 2016 at 9:15pm:

skippy. wrote on Jan 31st, 2016 at 8:59pm: Supply the link to where a mod  says a poster was banned,Otherwise it's a lie. Supply the poster otherwise it's a lie. Supply the evidence otherwise it's a lie. It matters as unless a poster owns up they were banned for this and told by a mod they were banned for this you're either lying or embellishing. Why doesn't the poster supposedly banned own up? So....you don't care about the fundamental principle.  All you want to know is who was banned for posting 'kill him' while another poster never has been.  Why?  What changes whether it is Monk, Mothra, Soren, BigOl64 or whoever?

AHHHHHHHHHHH so you admit your dont kn ow who or what...


no one really cares all that much aussie..

for someone who never misses a chance to rub in ABOUT
"
FDs BLOODY RULES...

ho

w do you know if he hasnt a RULE with the GMODS>. not to divulge whos banned and why?????.....

its none of your business..

if it was they would plaster a note on the forum....cods is banned...

probably for bleeping someone off..

why dont you grow up aussie and stop telling people what to do....

no body else cares....unless you want a 24 hour watchdog.. who watches every word.. like the swear checker....

which you dont agree with either..

so how about you stop dobbing people in..


in this case perc....

you are the only one on here that has a problem with him.....

and most have a problem with you..

go away and think about it.

Jovial Monk wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 5:13am:

Very inconsistent modding here, that is for sure.

total rubbish......if you and aussie had your way..

we would all be lefties...with one eye closed permanently...never bicker.. only talk about brewing or dobbing....

cods wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 7:35am:

Jovial Monk wrote on Feb 1st, 2016 at 5:13am: Very inconsistent modding here, that is for sure. total rubbish......if you and aussie had your way.. we would all be lefties...with one eye closed permanently...never bicker.. only talk about brewing or dobbing....

I disagree cods. I have never seen any evidence that Aussie or Jovial Monk would require anyone to have any particular political point of view ... and both of them have proved themselves capable of speaking to a wide range of topics ...

Cods is fine, lovely. Cares too much maybe, gets wrapped up in issues.

All good.

The main offenders at it again in spite of the warning issued by pm by PN. they have once again  turned a thread into a troll thread against A. nothing has changed I see. cods is trying very hard not to get caught up in it.

Jovial Monk wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 11:41am:

Cods is fine, lovely. Cares too much maybe, gets wrapped up in issues. All good.

I dont like BULLYING...

and thats what this PERSONAL thread is all about

we have a prima donna here who thinks they have more rights than anyone else.....how dare percy prevent ... the P.D. from PMing him....

just who does he think he is????.... ::) ::)

percy is a gentleman...he does in my opinion treat everyone as an equal.....

you have someone who whinges constantly about PA...even wants it closed down... ::)

then when percy says enough is enough of the bitching over PA...and warns all involved...

the P.D... wants to complain....about it....as he cant get through on PM...


he makes an issue about being banned....as if we have never trod this path before........ ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

this is a personal get percy thread...

I dont care what anyone says.....

if you are not telling us who was banned for saying kill him......or give us the proof that was the reason for the ban..

then I for one dont believe it..

this person has posted names of people who have been banned including myself  in the past  .. so hes not shy about naming people.

if it was a get Percy thread, it is now a get Aussie thread from the usual antagonists.. they were warned, all of them. These threads should be locked as soon as they are started.

Quote:

I dont like BULLYING... and thats what this PERSONAL thread is all about

No it is not.  I am addressing a question/Thread to PN, something you have done at least twice in the recent past.


Quote:

we have a prima donna here who thinks they have more rights than anyone else.....how dare percy prevent ... the P.D. from PMing him.... just who does he think he is????.... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Well, if he closes the PM door, he will get questions in public.  That was of his choosing, not mine.


Quote:

percy is a gentleman...he does in my opinion treat everyone as an equal.....

No.  He banned a Member for posting (facetiously) 'kill him,' yet did not ban another Member for exactly the same thing.


Quote:

you have someone who whinges constantly about PA...even wants it closed down... Roll Eyes

I have not mentioned that place for ages, and I have never posted a wish that it close down.


Quote:

then when percy says enough is enough of the bitching over PA...and warns all involved... the P.D... wants to complain....about it....as he cant get through on PM...

Why are you making stuff up?



Quote:

he makes an issue about being banned....as if we have never trod this path before........ Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

The issue is not about being banned.  It is one of inconsistency and bias (both anti and pro.)


Quote:

this is a personal get percy thread...

Nah.  It is a Thread in which I am asking PN a question.


Quote:

I dont care what anyone says.....

Why bother being a Member here then?


Quote:

if you are not telling us who was banned for saying kill him......or give us the proof that was the reason for the ban..

The ID of the Member is totally irrelevant to the question.  The proof is the complete lack of denial from all the GMods and FD. 


Quote:

then I for one dont believe it..

PN do you give the relevant Member your express permission to post the "ban" PM you sent them?


Quote:

this person has posted names of people who have been banned including myself  in the past  .. so hes not shy about naming people.

How would I know every time someone was banned unless they revealed it themself, cods?

Do you ever think before before you hit the 'Post Message' button?

Jovial Monk wrote on Feb 1^st, 2016 at 5:13am:

Very inconsistent modding here, that is for sure.

Consistency is an impossible dream, just like the eradication of bias, to reject bias is to reject a million years of evolution, people generally don't have a problem with bias unless it is someone elses bias.  ;D 

Well, it seems I can finally post something, anything.
After receiving nearly a week long ban, from my Internet Providers - Optus/Telstra!

Having just received a phone call, the first in "some time", from Telstra, their Technician told me they had finally fixed the Telstra Exchange fault & both my internet & Landline were now ok & working again, after nearly a week.

Hip, Hip, Hooray!!!

Oh & as for Aussie, I'm sure HE KNOWS the answer to his question/s?
In Fact, he knows the answer/s to everything?
Just ask him & he will tell you!
In fact, he'll tell you, even if you don't ask & don't want to know!
And, therein could be the reason that I don't pay any attention to him.
In fact, I largely ignore him, where possible?
Unless, of course, his actions or lack of actions demand attention?

Anyway, IT IS A GOOD DAY INNDEED, TO BE ON THE INTERNET, AGAIN!!!

And, that's probably about enough, on a boring topic, like this, don't you think?!