Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> General Board >> Police discrimination against aborigines
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1453370030

Message started by Honky on Jan 21st, 2016 at 7:53pm

Title: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Honky on Jan 21st, 2016 at 7:53pm
Yes, those abors sure do get harrassed for no reason. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhJcN8-Ja7I


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Honky on Jan 21st, 2016 at 7:58pm
We all know aborigines claim to be harrassed by police, but considering this ghastly lady actually filmed and uploaded it to prove such harrassment, seemingly oblivious to how it would be perceived by others, we have to call into question the accuracy of such claims.


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:02pm

I didn't know they were Aboriginal, and it's not even important.

The important thing is, that kid is a little turd and he'll almost certainly spend most of his adult life in prison.

The mother is a stupid bitch - the kid has no chance.


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Setanta on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:09pm

... wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 7:58pm:
We all know aborigines claim to be harrassed by police, but considering this ghastly lady actually filmed and uploaded it to prove such harrassment, seemingly oblivious to how it would be perceived by others, we have to call into question the accuracy of such claims.


Jesus that was some restraint on behalf of the coppers. "This is going on facebook, this is going viral" to show what, Mum? You should have your kids removed? ::)

poo... "Shut up Raymond, you wanna go to [juvenile correction institution]?"

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Aussie on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:15pm

Setanta wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:09pm:

... wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 7:58pm:
We all know aborigines claim to be harrassed by police, but considering this ghastly lady actually filmed and uploaded it to prove such harrassment, seemingly oblivious to how it would be perceived by others, we have to call into question the accuracy of such claims.


Jesus that was some restraint on behalf of the coppers. "This is going on facebook, this is going viral" to show what, Mum? You should have your kids removed? ::)

poo... "Shut up Raymond, you wanna go to [juvenile correction institution]?"


I agree with the negative comments...but.....why did the Cops do all that.....and then.............let him go?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Setanta on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:27pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:15pm:

Setanta wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:09pm:

... wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 7:58pm:
We all know aborigines claim to be harrassed by police, but considering this ghastly lady actually filmed and uploaded it to prove such harrassment, seemingly oblivious to how it would be perceived by others, we have to call into question the accuracy of such claims.


Jesus that was some restraint on behalf of the coppers. "This is going on facebook, this is going viral" to show what, Mum? You should have your kids removed? ::)

poo... "Shut up Raymond, you wanna go to [juvenile correction institution]?"


I agree with the negative comments...but.....why did the Cops do all that.....and then.............let him go?


I'll describe my answer... When someone did something you didn't understand and some one asked you, where I grew up in Perth, we used to make a visual metaphor, gesture, of a wanking hand on the nose and say fsck nose...

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Aussie on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:32pm
Anyone know why they let him go?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:39pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:02pm:
I didn't know they were Aboriginal, and it's not even important.

The important thing is, that kid is a little turd and he'll almost certainly spend most of his adult life in prison.

The mother is a stupid bitch - the kid has no chance.
Of course the fact he is Aboriginal is important, they commit crime out of all proportion to their numbers and this kid is symptomatic of that fact. if they only committed crime in proportion to their numbers we could halve the number of prisons in this country. Billions of dollars are thrown at Abos every year, and their problems are getting worse. Why do you think that is Greggary? Do you think it might have something to do with the fact that people like you are too scared to admit its an issue?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Aussie on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:43pm

Quote:
Billions of dollars are thrown at Abos every year, and their problems are getting worse.


Billions!!!!  Link please.  And if you are right about that, why are the Libs tossing 'billions' at failed programmes which make 'their problems' worse?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:43pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:32pm:
Anyone know why they let him go?
HANDCUFFS MUST NOT BE USED
When youth will be left unsupervised
To detain
To punish
To coerce
To intimidate
To attach youth to a fixed object (such as a pole, fence, radiator, banister, etc.)
HANDCUFFS MAY BE USED
For safety purposes when arresting and transporting youth
When youth will be under constant supervision
To prevent youth from hurting himself or others
http://strategiesforyouth.org/for-police/how-to/how-to-handcuff-youth/

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by double plus good on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:43pm
Pecker, seriously,  you didn't know they are abos? For an intelligent man sometimes you can be incredibly.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Aussie on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:46pm

Quote:
HANDCUFFS MAY BE USED
For safety purposes when arresting and transporting youth
When youth will be under constant supervision
To prevent youth from hurting himself or others


Given they let him go.....which criteria justified the cuffs?

Why did they let him go?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by innocentbystander. on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:53pm
Young aborigines are taught that they are not responsible for their actions because of Captain Cook.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:55pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:43pm:
Pecker, seriously,  you didn't know they are abos? For an intelligent man sometimes you can be incredibly.


On the news, their faces were blurred.

I still don't see why their Aboriginality is relevant, though.


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by double plus good on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:57pm
It's relevant in the fact that he'll be soft soaped. You know, Pecker, cultural sensitivity.  That's your area of expertise.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Setanta on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:58pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:55pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:43pm:
Pecker, seriously,  you didn't know they are abos? For an intelligent man sometimes you can be incredibly.


On the news, their faces were blurred.

I still don't see why their Aboriginality is relevant, though.


Culture.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:01pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:57pm:
It's relevant in the fact that he'll be soft soaped.


Is that something you used to do in prison?


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:01pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:46pm:

Quote:
HANDCUFFS MAY BE USED
For safety purposes when arresting and transporting youth
When youth will be under constant supervision
To prevent youth from hurting himself or others


Given they let him go.....which criteria justified the cuffs?

Why did they let him go?
forget it. i should have known better than to reply to one of your facile requests for information. You certainly are no one with any knowledge of the law.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Aussie on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:05pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:01pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:46pm:

Quote:
HANDCUFFS MAY BE USED
For safety purposes when arresting and transporting youth
When youth will be under constant supervision
To prevent youth from hurting himself or others


Given they let him go.....which criteria justified the cuffs?

Why did they let him go?
forget it. i should have known better than to reply to one of your facile requests for information. You certainly are no one with any knowledge of the law.


So they hassle this arsehole, hand cuff him......and then........let him go.

I'm wanting to know why.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by double plus good on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:06pm
Pecker, only to abos. Whitey gets the wire brush.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by double plus good on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:07pm
Aussie, read very carefully. BECAUSE HE'S AN ABO. Capiche?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Aussie on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:09pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:07pm:
Aussie, read very carefully. BECAUSE HE'S AN ABO. Capiche?


Ah!  Okay.  So the Cops will hassle Aboriginal arsehole kids, hand cuff them, and then let them go.  I see.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:09pm
Aboriginal.

Just for those that don't know how to spell it.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Setanta on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:16pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:09pm:
Aboriginal.

Just for those that don't know how to spell it.


Isn't it spelled indigenous?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:17pm

Setanta wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:09pm:
Aboriginal.

Just for those that don't know how to spell it.


Isn't it spelled indigenous?



No, that's the other one.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:18pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:07pm:
Aussie, read very carefully. BECAUSE HE'S AN ABO. Capiche?


Why do they handcuff Aboriginal kids and then let them go?

Wouldn't it be easier to not handcuff them in the first place.

Explain yourself, Homo.


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by double plus good on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:19pm
If you really were a lawyer you'd know that, Aussie. A copper's career is on the line when dealing with abos. Same with Muslims. It's that good ole victim status that requires that all sensitive types (like Mothra) view any interaction with the police as good old fascist whitey picking on the minority.  If you were a police officer, why would you put yourself through that?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:20pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:19pm:
If you really were a lawyer you'd know that, Aussie. A copper's career is on the line when dealing with abos. Same with Muslims. It's that good ole victim status that requires that all sensitive types (like Mothra) view any interaction with the police as good old fascist whitey picking on the minority.  If you were a police officer, why would you put yourself through that?


So, why did they handcuff him?


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by double plus good on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:20pm
Simple, Pecker. He knew the leftard social mecia would be on him like white on rice.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:21pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:20pm:
Simple, Pecker. He knew the leftard social mecia would be on him like white on rice.


So, why did he handcuff him?


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:23pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:19pm:
If you really were a lawyer you'd know that, Aussie. A copper's career is on the line when dealing with abos. Same with Muslims. It's that good ole victim status that requires that all sensitive types (like Mothra) view any interaction with the police as good old fascist whitey picking on the minority.  If you were a police officer, why would you put yourself through that?




I do? Link please.

Getting a little tired of being told what i think on here today.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:25pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:20pm:
Simple, Pecker. He knew the leftard social mecia would be on him like white on rice.


So, why did he handcuff him?


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Aussie on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:28pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:19pm:
If you really were a lawyer you'd know that, Aussie. A copper's career is on the line when dealing with abos. Same with Muslims. It's that good ole victim status that requires that all sensitive types (like Mothra) view any interaction with the police as good old fascist whitey picking on the minority.  If you were a police officer, why would you put yourself through that?


Oh I see.  So Cops hassle and handcuff arsehole Aboriginal kids to protect their career, and then after their career has been protected, they let the arsehole kid go.  I see, really I do..........see.  I'm convinced the Law will support that.  Truly, I am, convinced.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by double plus good on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:28pm
I'd have an easier time explaining this to the kids. He was being treated like any other juvenile delinquent,  right. You with me? All of a sudden he's got this foul mouthed abo woman filming him while she and the kid are swearing and spitting at him. You still with me? At some point, logic's kicked in, and the copper's thought, 'I don't want to do my career over some smashed bus windows'. So the officer lets the little scum bag go. You get it?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:30pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:28pm:
I'd have an easier time explaining this to the kids. He was being treated like any other juvenile delinquent,  right. You with me? All of a sudden he's got this foul mouthed abo woman filming him while she and the kid are swearing and spitting at him. You still with me? At some point, logic's kicked in, and the copper's thought, 'I don't want to do my career over some smashed bus windows'. So the officer lets the little scum bag go. You get it?


So, the cop didn't know the kid was Aboriginal until he heard his mother talk - is that what you're saying, Homo?


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by double plus good on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:35pm
The kids obviously abo, Pecker. I think you're the only one that couldn't see that. No it was the foul mouth 'mother' and the camera phone and the fear of becoming an internet talking point. Oh, how leftards love defending abos. And Muslims. Even when they're pieces of s.h.i.t.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:35pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:28pm:
I'd have an easier time explaining this to the kids.


Your comfort zone.


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:36pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:35pm:
The kids obviously abo


So, why did the cop handcuff him?


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Aussie on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:38pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:28pm:
I'd have an easier time explaining this to the kids. He was being treated like any other juvenile delinquent,  right. You with me? All of a sudden he's got this foul mouthed abo woman filming him while she and the kid are swearing and spitting at him. You still with me? At some point, logic's kicked in, and the copper's thought, 'I don't want to do my career over some smashed bus windows'. So the officer lets the little scum bag go. You get it?


Ah.  Enlightenment at last.  The hassle and the handcuffing of an arsehole kid was fine, until the Copper was being filmed, and made accountable.  Instead of doing his job as he swore an Oath to do.....he chose not to do his job, let the kid go to protect his career.

I get it now.  Thanks. 

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by double plus good on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:38pm
Really. That's what youre asking? Again.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by SupositoryofWisdom on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:39pm
Certainly needs to be sat down a given a no shitter , is this going to turn in to another all muslims are terrorists style of thread from fringe dwelling loonies on the right, ive worked with a few aboriginals and even met their families and this little disrespectful ahole isnt indicative of what ive seen.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:39pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:38pm:
Really. That's what youre asking? Again.


Yes.

Do you have an answer, Homo?


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:39pm

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:39pm:
Certainly needs to be sat down a given a no shitter , is this going to turn in to another all muslims are terrorists style of thread from fringe dwelling loonies on the right, ive worked with a few aboriginals and even met their families and this little disrespectful ahole isnt indicative of what ive seen.




Likewise.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by double plus good on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:39pm
You don't  think that happens, Aussie?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Setanta on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:40pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:17pm:

Setanta wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:09pm:
Aboriginal.

Just for those that don't know how to spell it.


Isn't it spelled indigenous?



No, that's the other one.


Other what? The one not locked in the attic? ;)


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:41pm

Setanta wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:40pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:17pm:

Setanta wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:16pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:09pm:
Aboriginal.

Just for those that don't know how to spell it.


Isn't it spelled indigenous?



No, that's the other one.


Other what?



Polite term of reference.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by double plus good on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:42pm
Suppository, the first sentence of your post doesn't make sense. Please, self edit before posting.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:42pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:35pm:
Oh, how leftards love defending abos.


Like this, you mean?

" ... that kid is a little turd and he'll almost certainly spend most of his adult life in prison.

"The mother is a stupid bitch - the kid has no chance."


Is that the sort of defence you're talking about, Homo?

Oh, and by the way, if the cop didn't want to "do his career" AND he knew the kid was an Aboriginal, why did he handcuff him, Homo?



Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by John Smith on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:42pm
I don't know whats worse, the dumb kid, his brain dead mother, or the fringe loonies salivating over this as if it proves something  :D :D :D

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by SupositoryofWisdom on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:43pm
Certainly needs to be sat down a given a no shitter , is this going to turn in to another all muslims are terrorists style of thread from fringe dwelling loonies on the right, ive worked with a few aboriginals and even met their families and this little disrespectful ahole isnt indicative of what ive seen.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:43pm

John Smith wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:42pm:
I don't know whats worse...


At this stage, it's Homo.

Let's see if he can get himself out of this hole he's dug.


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by davo on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:43pm
Not sure why he wasn't taken to the station and charged did the cop not say you've been involved in smashing bus windows?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:44pm

John Smith wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:42pm:
I don't know whats worse, the dumb kid, his brain dead mother, or the fringe loonies salivating over this as if it proves something  :D :D :D




The fringe loonies. At least that's what i'm putting my money on.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Aussie on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:44pm

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:39pm:
Certainly needs to be sat down a given a no shitter , is this going to turn in to another all muslims are terrorists style of thread from fringe dwelling loonies on the right, ive worked with a few aboriginals and even met their families and this little disrespectful ahole isnt indicative of what ive seen.


He is a little foul mouthed grub, as his Mother.  I make no bones about that.  However, both of them being a 'grub' or 'arsehole' does not justify what I saw.  If they arrested and handcuffed him, the little Aboriginal prick ought to have been unceremoniously tossed in the Paddy Wagon.....off to the Cop Shop and dealt with according to Law.

Why did they let him go?


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by double plus good on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:44pm
Spelling mistakes and poor use of punctuation.  Bee in your bonnet, hmmmm?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:46pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:44pm:
Spelling mistakes and poor use of punctuation.  Bee in your bonnet, hmmmm?




You can talk. Even though i spelled it out for you you still can't spell Aboriginal.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:46pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:44pm:

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:39pm:
Certainly needs to be sat down a given a no shitter , is this going to turn in to another all muslims are terrorists style of thread from fringe dwelling loonies on the right, ive worked with a few aboriginals and even met their families and this little disrespectful ahole isnt indicative of what ive seen.


He is a little foul mouthed grub as his Mother.  I make no bones about that.  However, both of them being a 'grub' or 'arsehole' does not justify what I saw.  If they arrested and handcuffed him, the little Aboriginal prick ought to have been unceremoniously tossed in the Paddy Wagon.....off to the Cop Shop and dealt with according to Law.

Why did they let him go?


Cops do this to scare kids every day.


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by double plus good on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:47pm
No hole, Pecker. I know I'm right and I don't give a fiddler's fart what you bumlicking leftards think. See, no hole.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:47pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:46pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:44pm:
Spelling mistakes and poor use of punctuation.  Bee in your bonnet, hmmmm?




You can talk. Even though i spelled it out for you you still can't spell Aboriginal.


To be fair, that's the least of his problems.


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:47pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:47pm:
No hole, Pecker. I know I'm right  ...



About what, Homo?


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by John Smith on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:48pm

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:43pm:
Certainly needs to be sat down a given a no shitter , is this going to turn in to another all muslims are terrorists style of thread from fringe dwelling loonies on the right, ive worked with a few aboriginals and even met their families and this little disrespectful ahole isnt indicative of what ive seen.


I've worked with plenty .... most were pretty good, had one or two just as bad as this kid.  I can say the same about every other race I've worked with.


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by SupositoryofWisdom on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:48pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:42pm:
Suppository, the first sentence of your post doesn't make sense. Please, self edit before posting.


It means he needs to be sat down by somebody that tells him how his life is going to play out  if he doesnt pull his head in

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Aussie on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:49pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:46pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:44pm:

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:39pm:
Certainly needs to be sat down a given a no shitter , is this going to turn in to another all muslims are terrorists style of thread from fringe dwelling loonies on the right, ive worked with a few aboriginals and even met their families and this little disrespectful ahole isnt indicative of what ive seen.


He is a little foul mouthed grub as his Mother.  I make no bones about that.  However, both of them being a 'grub' or 'arsehole' does not justify what I saw.  If they arrested and handcuffed him, the little Aboriginal prick ought to have been unceremoniously tossed in the Paddy Wagon.....off to the Cop Shop and dealt with according to Law.

Why did they let him go?


Cops do this to scare kids every day.


They do not, every day, arrest and handcuff the brats and then let them go. Potential suit for unlawful 'deprivation of liberty' right there.  Stupid cops.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:50pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:49pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:46pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:44pm:

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:39pm:
Certainly needs to be sat down a given a no shitter , is this going to turn in to another all muslims are terrorists style of thread from fringe dwelling loonies on the right, ive worked with a few aboriginals and even met their families and this little disrespectful ahole isnt indicative of what ive seen.


He is a little foul mouthed grub as his Mother.  I make no bones about that.  However, both of them being a 'grub' or 'arsehole' does not justify what I saw.  If they arrested and handcuffed him, the little Aboriginal prick ought to have been unceremoniously tossed in the Paddy Wagon.....off to the Cop Shop and dealt with according to Law.

Why did they let him go?


Cops do this to scare kids every day.


They do not, every day, arrest and handcuff the brats and then let them go. Potential suit for unlawful 'deprivation of liberty' right there.  Stupid cops.


Nah, they do.

I had it done to me when I was a kid (last century).


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by SupositoryofWisdom on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:50pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:44pm:

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:39pm:
Certainly needs to be sat down a given a no shitter , is this going to turn in to another all muslims are terrorists style of thread from fringe dwelling loonies on the right, ive worked with a few aboriginals and even met their families and this little disrespectful ahole isnt indicative of what ive seen.


He is a little foul mouthed grub, as his Mother.  I make no bones about that.  However, both of them being a 'grub' or 'arsehole' does not justify what I saw.  If they arrested and handcuffed him, the little Aboriginal prick ought to have been unceremoniously tossed in the Paddy Wagon.....off to the Cop Shop and dealt with according to Law.

Why did they let him go?


?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by double plus good on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:51pm
In other words, 'sat down AND given a no shitter'. You posted,  'sat down a given a no shitter'. Remember to breathe, libertarian.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:53pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:51pm:
In other words, 'sat down AND given a no shitter'. You posted,  'sat down a given a no shitter'. Remember to breathe, libertarian.


Why did the cop handcuff him, Homo?


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by SupositoryofWisdom on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:55pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:51pm:
In other words, 'sat down AND given a no shitter'. You posted,  'sat down a given a no shitter'. Remember to breathe, libertarian.


Don't sweat the small stuff ol buddy  :)

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by SupositoryofWisdom on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:56pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:47pm:
No hole, Pecker. I know I'm right and I don't give a fiddler's fart what you bumlicking leftards think. See, no hole.


What does no hole mean ?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:57pm

Homo, if the cop didn't want to "do his career" AND he knew that the kid was an Aboriginal, why did he handcuff him?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:58pm

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:56pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:47pm:
No hole, Pecker. I know I'm right and I don't give a fiddler's fart what you bumlicking leftards think. See, no hole.


What does no hole mean ?


I guess it's been filled in.


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by davo on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:58pm
I wonder what lesson Raymond got from that? you can cause malicious damage with no repercussions?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:58pm

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:56pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:47pm:
No hole, Pecker. I know I'm right and I don't give a fiddler's fart what you bumlicking leftards think. See, no hole.


What does no hole mean ?




Is it something to do with the soap he was talking about earlier?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:02pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:58pm:

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:56pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:47pm:
No hole, Pecker. I know I'm right and I don't give a fiddler's fart what you bumlicking leftards think. See, no hole.


What does no hole mean ?




Is it something to do with the soap he was talking about earlier?


He was getting his hole soft soaped in prison, apparently.

I wonder what he was in for.


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by double plus good on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:03pm
Suppository it's either ole or ol'. Not 'ol'. And I'm not your buddy.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:04pm

Homo, if the cop didn't want to "do his career" AND he knew that the kid was an Aboriginal, why did he handcuff him?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Karnal on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:04pm

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:56pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:47pm:
No hole, Pecker. I know I'm right and I don't give a fiddler's fart what you bumlicking leftards think. See, no hole.


What does no hole mean ?


We don’t kiss and tell, Suppository, but  I’ll let you come to your own conclusion.

Suffice to say, Homo is not adverse to taking it up his colostomy tube, but he prefers you to pull out if he’s full.

Spray on his face if you can bear to look at it.

Miam miam indeed.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by SupositoryofWisdom on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:06pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:03pm:
Suppository it's either ole or ol'. Not 'ol'. And I'm not your buddy.


Hmmm cryptic

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by SupositoryofWisdom on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:10pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:03pm:
Suppository it's either ole or ol'. Not 'ol'. And I'm not your buddy.


And it says we're buddies , but if you friended me for my ole im flattered but sadly must decline .

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by SupositoryofWisdom on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:11pm

Melanias purse wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:04pm:

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:56pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:47pm:
No hole, Pecker. I know I'm right and I don't give a fiddler's fart what you bumlicking leftards think. See, no hole.


What does no hole mean ?


We don’t kiss and tell, Suppository, but  I’ll let you come to your own conclusion.

Suffice to say, Homo is not adverse to taking it up his colostomy tube, but he prefers you to pull out if he’s full.

Spray on his face if you can bear to look at it.

Miam miam indeed.


Nomb nomb nomb

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:13pm

Homo, if the cop didn't want to "do his career" AND he knew that the kid was an Aboriginal, why did he handcuff him?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:15pm

Melanias purse wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:04pm:

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:56pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:47pm:
No hole, Pecker. I know I'm right and I don't give a fiddler's fart what you bumlicking leftards think. See, no hole.


What does no hole mean ?


We don’t kiss and tell, Suppository, but  I’ll let you come to your own conclusion.

Suffice to say, Homo is not adverse to taking it up his colostomy tube, but he prefers you to pull out if he’s full.

Spray on his face if you can bear to look at it.

Miam miam indeed.




Is that when we use the soft soap?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:18pm

John Smith wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:48pm:

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:43pm:
Certainly needs to be sat down a given a no shitter , is this going to turn in to another all muslims are terrorists style of thread from fringe dwelling loonies on the right, ive worked with a few aboriginals and even met their families and this little disrespectful ahole isnt indicative of what ive seen.


I've worked with plenty .... most were pretty good, had one or two just as bad as this kid.  I can say the same about every other race I've worked with.
Both you and suppositry are full of it. Im sure the real estate industry is full of Aboriginal people.
Regardless, if they are the same as any other race in regards to crime then how come the jails are full of them out of all proportion to their numbers?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:20pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:18pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:48pm:

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:43pm:
Certainly needs to be sat down a given a no shitter , is this going to turn in to another all muslims are terrorists style of thread from fringe dwelling loonies on the right, ive worked with a few aboriginals and even met their families and this little disrespectful ahole isnt indicative of what ive seen.


I've worked with plenty .... most were pretty good, had one or two just as bad as this kid.  I can say the same about every other race I've worked with.
Both you and suppositry are full of it. Im sure the real estate industry is full of Aboriginal people.
Regardless, if they are the same as any other race in regards to crime then how come the jails are full of them out of all proportion to their numbers?



Because there is significantly more social disadvantage and grief and loss amongst their numbers.

I've answered this for you before Ian.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Aussie on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:21pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:18pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:48pm:

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:43pm:
Certainly needs to be sat down a given a no shitter , is this going to turn in to another all muslims are terrorists style of thread from fringe dwelling loonies on the right, ive worked with a few aboriginals and even met their families and this little disrespectful ahole isnt indicative of what ive seen.


I've worked with plenty .... most were pretty good, had one or two just as bad as this kid.  I can say the same about every other race I've worked with.
Both you and suppositry are full of it. Im sure the real estate industry is full of Aboriginal people.
Regardless, if they are the same as any other race in regards to crime then how come the jails are full of them out of all proportion to their numbers?


That's not the question.  Why did they arrest and handcuff him and then let him go?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm
Try again,   Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:24pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Try again,   Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .



What utter bollocks.

I'm never going to agree to that.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by SupositoryofWisdom on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:25pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:18pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:48pm:

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:43pm:
Certainly needs to be sat down a given a no shitter , is this going to turn in to another all muslims are terrorists style of thread from fringe dwelling loonies on the right, ive worked with a few aboriginals and even met their families and this little disrespectful ahole isnt indicative of what ive seen.


I've worked with plenty .... most were pretty good, had one or two just as bad as this kid.  I can say the same about every other race I've worked with.
Both you and suppositry are full of it. Im sure the real estate industry is full of Aboriginal people.
Regardless, if they are the same as any other race in regards to crime then how come the jails are full of them out of all proportion to their numbers?


If i said i hadnt come across bad examples of aboriginees then you could call me full of it

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:28pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .



Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:31pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:24pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Try again,   Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .



What utter bollocks.

I'm never going to agree to that.
Nonetheless, true. The only group in our society any of whom have a guaranteed government job if they wish. Extra social security  benefits and cheap loans for Aboriginals, employment quotas in private enterprise. free pass in many things including housing, education etc.. Free legal service. Yet their self caused misery prevails, why is that Mothra? You will say racism, i will say rubbish. Indians, Chinese, people of all races succeed in this country, without the extra assistance Aboriginal people have access to.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Honky on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:32pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:31pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:24pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Try again,   Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .



What utter bollocks.

I'm never going to agree to that.
Nonetheless, true. The only group in our society any of whom have a guaranteed government job if they wish. Extra social security  benefits and cheap loans for Aboriginals, employment quotas in private enterprise. free pass in many things including housing, education etc.. Free legal service. Yet their self caused misery prevails, why is that Mothra? You will say racism, i will say rubbish. Indians, Chinese, people of all races succeed in this country, without the extra assistance Aboriginal people have access to.



Yeah, but...they're aboriginal.  That's a pretty big handicap. 

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:35pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:31pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:24pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Try again,   Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .



What utter bollocks.

I'm never going to agree to that.
Nonetheless, true. The only group in our society any of whom have a guaranteed government job if they wish. Extra social security  benefits and cheap loans for Aboriginals, employment quotas in private enterprise. free pass in many things including housing, education etc.. Free legal service. Yet their self caused misery prevails, why is that Mothra? You will say racism, i will say rubbish. Indians, Chinese, people of all races succeed in this country, without the extra assistance Aboriginal people have access to.



You think generational welfare is a privilege? Family scattering? The legacy of genocide? Low literacy rates? Generational abuse?

Have you ever actually ever met an Indigenous person? Asked them what thee think is going on?

Bet you haven't.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:35pm
Fact: The overwhelming vast majority of people in this country whom identify as Aboriginal have more non Aboriginal genetics than Aboriginal. For the purpose of this information thread these are the people I am referring to, those of mixed ancestry who identify as Aboriginal.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against Aboriginals
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:37pm

... wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:32pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:31pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:24pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Try again,   Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .



What utter bollocks.

I'm never going to agree to that.
Nonetheless, true. The only group in our society any of whom have a guaranteed government job if they wish. Extra social security  benefits and cheap loans for Aboriginals, employment quotas in private enterprise. free pass in many things including housing, education etc.. Free legal service. Yet their self caused misery prevails, why is that Mothra? You will say racism, i will say rubbish. Indians, Chinese, people of all races succeed in this country, without the extra assistance Aboriginal people have access to.



Yeah, but...they're aboriginal.  That's a pretty big handicap. 



You're supposed to use a capital 'A'.

Oh, and i fixed your thread title for you.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:38pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:35pm:
Fact: The overwhelming vast majority of people in this country whom identify as Aboriginal have more non Aboriginal genetics than Aboriginal. For the purpose of this information thread these are the people I am referring to, those of mixed ancestry who identify as Aboriginal.



And if they look Aboriginal? Were raised amongst Aboriginals? Choose to identify as Aboriginal?

Is that alright with you?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:41pm
The boy that is the subject of this thread probably has white blood. Does that stop you and all the other great unwashed from calling him an 'abo''?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:42pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:35pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:31pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:24pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Try again,   Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .



What utter bollocks.

I'm never going to agree to that.
Nonetheless, true. The only group in our society any of whom have a guaranteed government job if they wish. Extra social security  benefits and cheap loans for Aboriginals, employment quotas in private enterprise. free pass in many things including housing, education etc.. Free legal service. Yet their self caused misery prevails, why is that Mothra? You will say racism, i will say rubbish. Indians, Chinese, people of all races succeed in this country, without the extra assistance Aboriginal people have access to.



You think generational welfare is a privilege? Family scattering? The legacy of genocide? Low literacy rates? Generational abuse?

Have you ever actually ever met an Indigenous person? Asked them what thee think is going on?

Bet you haven't.
i work with aboriginal offenders every day, I am intimately acquainted with their attitudes. they think generational welfare is a right, stolen children and genocide are both myths easily dispelled by historical fact.  Low literacy rates and generational abuse are largely perpetuated by people like yourself failing to understand that they need to be compelled to adhere to the same morals and standards we expect everyone else in our society to adhere to.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by davo on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:43pm

... wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:32pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:31pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:24pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Try again,   Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .



What utter bollocks.

I'm never going to agree to that.
Nonetheless, true. The only group in our society any of whom have a guaranteed government job if they wish. Extra social security  benefits and cheap loans for Aboriginals, employment quotas in private enterprise. free pass in many things including housing, education etc.. Free legal service. Yet their self caused misery prevails, why is that Mothra? You will say racism, i will say rubbish. Indians, Chinese, people of all races succeed in this country, without the extra assistance Aboriginal people have access to.



Yeah, but...they're aboriginal.  That's a pretty big handicap. 

I agree imagine being looked down upon because of the colour of your skin

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:43pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:42pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:35pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:31pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:24pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Try again,   Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .



What utter bollocks.

I'm never going to agree to that.
Nonetheless, true. The only group in our society any of whom have a guaranteed government job if they wish. Extra social security  benefits and cheap loans for Aboriginals, employment quotas in private enterprise. free pass in many things including housing, education etc.. Free legal service. Yet their self caused misery prevails, why is that Mothra? You will say racism, i will say rubbish. Indians, Chinese, people of all races succeed in this country, without the extra assistance Aboriginal people have access to.



You think generational welfare is a privilege? Family scattering? The legacy of genocide? Low literacy rates? Generational abuse?

Have you ever actually ever met an Indigenous person? Asked them what thee think is going on?

Bet you haven't.
i work with aboriginal offenders every day, I am intimately acquainted with their attitudes. they think generational welfare is a right, stolen children and genocide are both myths easily dispelled by historical fact.  Low literacy rates and generational abuse are largely perpetuated by people like yourself failing to understand that they need to be compelled to adhere to the same morals and standards we expect everyone else in our society to adhere to.




The Stolen Generation and Genocide are myths?

You can't be serious.

And it's people like me on the coal face. Get your facts straight.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:43pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:41pm:
The boy that is the subject of this thread probably has white blood. Does that stop you and all the other great unwashed from calling him an 'abo''?

Its about culture, not race. Abo is short for Aboriginal. Just like we call English people Poms and italians wogs.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:44pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:43pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:41pm:
The boy that is the subject of this thread probably has white blood. Does that stop you and all the other great unwashed from calling him an 'abo''?

Its about culture, not race. Abo is short for Aboriginal. Just like we call English people Poms and italians wogs.



It's an offensive term. SOmething you would know had you ever met an Indigenous person as an equal.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against Aboriginals
Post by Honky on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:45pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:37pm:

... wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:32pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:31pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:24pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Try again,   Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .



What utter bollocks.

I'm never going to agree to that.
Nonetheless, true. The only group in our society any of whom have a guaranteed government job if they wish. Extra social security  benefits and cheap loans for Aboriginals, employment quotas in private enterprise. free pass in many things including housing, education etc.. Free legal service. Yet their self caused misery prevails, why is that Mothra? You will say racism, i will say rubbish. Indians, Chinese, people of all races succeed in this country, without the extra assistance Aboriginal people have access to.



Yeah, but...they're aboriginal.  That's a pretty big handicap. 



You're supposed to use a capital 'A'.

Oh, and i fixed your thread title for you.
k

Ooh you go girl!

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:45pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:43pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:41pm:
The boy that is the subject of this thread probably has white blood. Does that stop you and all the other great unwashed from calling him an 'abo''?

Its about culture, not race. Abo is short for Aboriginal. Just like we call English people Poms and italians wogs.



Anyway, he is subject top your racism despite his "white blood".

So why do you have a problem with him identifying as Aboriginal?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against Aboriginals
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:46pm

... wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:45pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:37pm:

... wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:32pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:31pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:24pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Try again,   Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .



What utter bollocks.

I'm never going to agree to that.
Nonetheless, true. The only group in our society any of whom have a guaranteed government job if they wish. Extra social security  benefits and cheap loans for Aboriginals, employment quotas in private enterprise. free pass in many things including housing, education etc.. Free legal service. Yet their self caused misery prevails, why is that Mothra? You will say racism, i will say rubbish. Indians, Chinese, people of all races succeed in this country, without the extra assistance Aboriginal people have access to.



Yeah, but...they're aboriginal.  That's a pretty big handicap. 



You're supposed to use a capital 'A'.

Oh, and i fixed your thread title for you.
k

Ooh you go girl!




Time for bed i think Honky. You're just embarrassing yourself now.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Honky on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:48pm
No, you're embarrassing me.  You sure stuck it to me with those capital letters.  Keep fighting the good fight. 

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:49pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:43pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:42pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:35pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:31pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:24pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Try again,   Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .



What utter bollocks.

I'm never going to agree to that.
Nonetheless, true. The only group in our society any of whom have a guaranteed government job if they wish. Extra social security  benefits and cheap loans for Aboriginals, employment quotas in private enterprise. free pass in many things including housing, education etc.. Free legal service. Yet their self caused misery prevails, why is that Mothra? You will say racism, i will say rubbish. Indians, Chinese, people of all races succeed in this country, without the extra assistance Aboriginal people have access to.



You think generational welfare is a privilege? Family scattering? The legacy of genocide? Low literacy rates? Generational abuse?

Have you ever actually ever met an Indigenous person? Asked them what thee think is going on?

Bet you haven't.
i work with aboriginal offenders every day, I am intimately acquainted with their attitudes. they think generational welfare is a right, stolen children and genocide are both myths easily dispelled by historical fact.  Low literacy rates and generational abuse are largely perpetuated by people like yourself failing to understand that they need to be compelled to adhere to the same morals and standards we expect everyone else in our society to adhere to.




The Stolen Generation and Genocide are myths?

You can't be serious.

And it's people like me on the coal face. Get your facts straight.
Check the historical record. The only children removed were those of mixed race, this was because the full bloods would not accept them, the kids either had a life of being outcasts from both white and Abo society or were severely abused by the full bloods. In some cases they even killed mixed race infants. The so called "stolen generation" was an attempt to rescue these mixed race children and assimilate them into our society, this was born of altruism. At the time it was considered that the tribal Aboriginals would die out anyway, there was no attempt at genocide, that is a complete myth not supported by historical fact.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:50pm

... wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:48pm:
No, you're embarrassing me.  You sure stuck it to me with those capital letters.  Keep fighting the good fight. 



A mere sign of respect. Respect you evidently lack utterly.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:50pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:49pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:43pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:42pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:35pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:31pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:24pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Try again,   Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .



What utter bollocks.

I'm never going to agree to that.
Nonetheless, true. The only group in our society any of whom have a guaranteed government job if they wish. Extra social security  benefits and cheap loans for Aboriginals, employment quotas in private enterprise. free pass in many things including housing, education etc.. Free legal service. Yet their self caused misery prevails, why is that Mothra? You will say racism, i will say rubbish. Indians, Chinese, people of all races succeed in this country, without the extra assistance Aboriginal people have access to.



You think generational welfare is a privilege? Family scattering? The legacy of genocide? Low literacy rates? Generational abuse?

Have you ever actually ever met an Indigenous person? Asked them what thee think is going on?

Bet you haven't.
i work with aboriginal offenders every day, I am intimately acquainted with their attitudes. they think generational welfare is a right, stolen children and genocide are both myths easily dispelled by historical fact.  Low literacy rates and generational abuse are largely perpetuated by people like yourself failing to understand that they need to be compelled to adhere to the same morals and standards we expect everyone else in our society to adhere to.




The Stolen Generation and Genocide are myths?

You can't be serious.

And it's people like me on the coal face. Get your facts straight.
Check the historical record. The only children removed were those of mixed race, this was because the full bloods would not accept them, the kids either had a life of being outcasts from both white and Abo society or were severely abused by the full bloods. In some cases they even killed mixed race infants. The so called "stolen generation" was an attempt to rescue these mixed race children and assimilate them into our society, this was born of altruism. At the time it was considered that the tribal Aboriginals would die out anyway, there was no attempt at genocide, that is a complete myth not supported by historical fact.



Absolute and highly offensive lies.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:51pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:45pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:43pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:41pm:
The boy that is the subject of this thread probably has white blood. Does that stop you and all the other great unwashed from calling him an 'abo''?

Its about culture, not race. Abo is short for Aboriginal. Just like we call English people Poms and italians wogs.



Anyway, he is subject top your racism despite his "white blood".

So why do you have a problem with him identifying as Aboriginal?
I dont judge people on skin colour, that would be stupid. And i dont have a problem with him identifying as Aboriginal. Im just calling it how it is.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by davo on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:52pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:50pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:49pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:43pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:42pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:35pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:31pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:24pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Try again,   Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .



What utter bollocks.

I'm never going to agree to that.
Nonetheless, true. The only group in our society any of whom have a guaranteed government job if they wish. Extra social security  benefits and cheap loans for Aboriginals, employment quotas in private enterprise. free pass in many things including housing, education etc.. Free legal service. Yet their self caused misery prevails, why is that Mothra? You will say racism, i will say rubbish. Indians, Chinese, people of all races succeed in this country, without the extra assistance Aboriginal people have access to.



You think generational welfare is a privilege? Family scattering? The legacy of genocide? Low literacy rates? Generational abuse?

Have you ever actually ever met an Indigenous person? Asked them what thee think is going on?

Bet you haven't.
i work with aboriginal offenders every day, I am intimately acquainted with their attitudes. they think generational welfare is a right, stolen children and genocide are both myths easily dispelled by historical fact.  Low literacy rates and generational abuse are largely perpetuated by people like yourself failing to understand that they need to be compelled to adhere to the same morals and standards we expect everyone else in our society to adhere to.




The Stolen Generation and Genocide are myths?

You can't be serious.

And it's people like me on the coal face. Get your facts straight.
Check the historical record. The only children removed were those of mixed race, this was because the full bloods would not accept them, the kids either had a life of being outcasts from both white and Abo society or were severely abused by the full bloods. In some cases they even killed mixed race infants. The so called "stolen generation" was an attempt to rescue these mixed race children and assimilate them into our society, this was born of altruism. At the time it was considered that the tribal Aboriginals would die out anyway, there was no attempt at genocide, that is a complete myth not supported by historical fact.



Absolute and highly offensive lies.

Ha put a link Honky

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:54pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:50pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:49pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:43pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:42pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:35pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:31pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:24pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Try again,   Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .



What utter bollocks.

I'm never going to agree to that.
Nonetheless, true. The only group in our society any of whom have a guaranteed government job if they wish. Extra social security  benefits and cheap loans for Aboriginals, employment quotas in private enterprise. free pass in many things including housing, education etc.. Free legal service. Yet their self caused misery prevails, why is that Mothra? You will say racism, i will say rubbish. Indians, Chinese, people of all races succeed in this country, without the extra assistance Aboriginal people have access to.



You think generational welfare is a privilege? Family scattering? The legacy of genocide? Low literacy rates? Generational abuse?

Have you ever actually ever met an Indigenous person? Asked them what thee think is going on?

Bet you haven't.
i work with aboriginal offenders every day, I am intimately acquainted with their attitudes. they think generational welfare is a right, stolen children and genocide are both myths easily dispelled by historical fact.  Low literacy rates and generational abuse are largely perpetuated by people like yourself failing to understand that they need to be compelled to adhere to the same morals and standards we expect everyone else in our society to adhere to.




The Stolen Generation and Genocide are myths?

You can't be serious.

And it's people like me on the coal face. Get your facts straight.
Check the historical record. The only children removed were those of mixed race, this was because the full bloods would not accept them, the kids either had a life of being outcasts from both white and Abo society or were severely abused by the full bloods. In some cases they even killed mixed race infants. The so called "stolen generation" was an attempt to rescue these mixed race children and assimilate them into our society, this was born of altruism. At the time it was considered that the tribal Aboriginals would die out anyway, there was no attempt at genocide, that is a complete myth not supported by historical fact.



Absolute and highly offensive lies.
The state government even created a position called "Lord protector of the Aboriginals". Hardly an attempt at genocide. All on the historical record Mothra, all you have to do is research, just like I did. And now I know. And you can know too. All you need are facts, not emotion.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:55pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:51pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:45pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:43pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:41pm:
The boy that is the subject of this thread probably has white blood. Does that stop you and all the other great unwashed from calling him an 'abo''?

Its about culture, not race. Abo is short for Aboriginal. Just like we call English people Poms and italians wogs.



Anyway, he is subject top your racism despite his "white blood".

So why do you have a problem with him identifying as Aboriginal?
I dont judge people on skin colour, that would be stupid. And i dont have a problem with him identifying as Aboriginal. Im just calling it how it is.



No. You're calling it how you see it. Which is contradictory and myopic.

... and highly offensive.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:56pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:54pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:50pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:49pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:43pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:42pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:35pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:31pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:24pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Try again,   Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .



What utter bollocks.

I'm never going to agree to that.
Nonetheless, true. The only group in our society any of whom have a guaranteed government job if they wish. Extra social security  benefits and cheap loans for Aboriginals, employment quotas in private enterprise. free pass in many things including housing, education etc.. Free legal service. Yet their self caused misery prevails, why is that Mothra? You will say racism, i will say rubbish. Indians, Chinese, people of all races succeed in this country, without the extra assistance Aboriginal people have access to.



You think generational welfare is a privilege? Family scattering? The legacy of genocide? Low literacy rates? Generational abuse?

Have you ever actually ever met an Indigenous person? Asked them what thee think is going on?

Bet you haven't.
i work with aboriginal offenders every day, I am intimately acquainted with their attitudes. they think generational welfare is a right, stolen children and genocide are both myths easily dispelled by historical fact.  Low literacy rates and generational abuse are largely perpetuated by people like yourself failing to understand that they need to be compelled to adhere to the same morals and standards we expect everyone else in our society to adhere to.




The Stolen Generation and Genocide are myths?

You can't be serious.

And it's people like me on the coal face. Get your facts straight.
Check the historical record. The only children removed were those of mixed race, this was because the full bloods would not accept them, the kids either had a life of being outcasts from both white and Abo society or were severely abused by the full bloods. In some cases they even killed mixed race infants. The so called "stolen generation" was an attempt to rescue these mixed race children and assimilate them into our society, this was born of altruism. At the time it was considered that the tribal Aboriginals would die out anyway, there was no attempt at genocide, that is a complete myth not supported by historical fact.



Absolute and highly offensive lies.
The state government even created a position called "Lord protector of the Aboriginals". Hardly an attempt at genocide. All on the historical record Mothra, all you have to do is research, just like I did. And now I know. And you can know too. All you need are facts, not emotion.



I've done plenty of research. They didn't just take mixed blood children and the families never rejected them.

That is a lie white people tell themselves to make themselves feel better.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by davo on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:56pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:54pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:50pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:49pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:43pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:42pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:35pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:31pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:24pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:23pm:
Try again,   Aboriginal people are socially advantaged, not disadvantaged. Their grief and loss is self caused .



What utter bollocks.

I'm never going to agree to that.
Nonetheless, true. The only group in our society any of whom have a guaranteed government job if they wish. Extra social security  benefits and cheap loans for Aboriginals, employment quotas in private enterprise. free pass in many things including housing, education etc.. Free legal service. Yet their self caused misery prevails, why is that Mothra? You will say racism, i will say rubbish. Indians, Chinese, people of all races succeed in this country, without the extra assistance Aboriginal people have access to.



You think generational welfare is a privilege? Family scattering? The legacy of genocide? Low literacy rates? Generational abuse?

Have you ever actually ever met an Indigenous person? Asked them what thee think is going on?

Bet you haven't.
i work with aboriginal offenders every day, I am intimately acquainted with their attitudes. they think generational welfare is a right, stolen children and genocide are both myths easily dispelled by historical fact.  Low literacy rates and generational abuse are largely perpetuated by people like yourself failing to understand that they need to be compelled to adhere to the same morals and standards we expect everyone else in our society to adhere to.




The Stolen Generation and Genocide are myths?

You can't be serious.

And it's people like me on the coal face. Get your facts straight.
Check the historical record. The only children removed were those of mixed race, this was because the full bloods would not accept them, the kids either had a life of being outcasts from both white and Abo society or were severely abused by the full bloods. In some cases they even killed mixed race infants. The so called "stolen generation" was an attempt to rescue these mixed race children and assimilate them into our society, this was born of altruism. At the time it was considered that the tribal Aboriginals would die out anyway, there was no attempt at genocide, that is a complete myth not supported by historical fact.



Absolute and highly offensive lies.
The state government even created a position called "Lord protector of the Aboriginals". Hardly an attempt at genocide. All on the historical record Mothra, all you have to do is research, just like I did. And now I know. And you can know too. All you need are facts, not emotion.

Jesus buggeren Christ Ian why they bugger did they need a protector absolute garbage

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by davo on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:59pm
And yet the government apologised for the stolen generation why apologise if you've done nothing wrong?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:00pm

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:59pm:
And yet the government apologised for the stolen generation why apologise if you've done nothing wrong?




It's quite astonishing isn't it?

Stolen Generation deniers are like Creationists. You know they exist but it's always a surprise when you come across one.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:09pm

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:59pm:
And yet the government apologised for the stolen generation why apologise if you've done nothing wrong?
I didnt say nothing wrong was done, I am saying that the attempt was altruistic. I see you dont have any arguement, just like Mothra. A fool who doesnt educate themselves is destined to remain a fool.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:11pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:00pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:59pm:
And yet the government apologised for the stolen generation why apologise if you've done nothing wrong?




It's quite astonishing isn't it?

Stolen Generation deniers are like Creationists. You know they exist but it's always a surprise when you come across one.
and yet you have no valid response to my facts.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by davo on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:11pm
mothra I understand people are bigoted and I accept that bigots are everywhere, I guess its hard for people who aren't discriminated against to understand

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:13pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:11pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:00pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:59pm:
And yet the government apologised for the stolen generation why apologise if you've done nothing wrong?




It's quite astonishing isn't it?

Stolen Generation deniers are like Creationists. You know they exist but it's always a surprise when you come across one.
and yet you have no valid response to my facts.




Already responded.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:14pm

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:11pm:
mothra I understand people are bigoted and I accept that bigots are everywhere, I guess its hard for people who aren't discriminated against to understand



Yeah i know. They'll swallow any old swill, so long as it feeds their prejudice.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by davo on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:14pm
A fact for you Ian is the Aboriginals would have been very happy for the  white man to not land here

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by John Smith on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:15pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:18pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:48pm:

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:43pm:
Certainly needs to be sat down a given a no shitter , is this going to turn in to another all muslims are terrorists style of thread from fringe dwelling loonies on the right, ive worked with a few aboriginals and even met their families and this little disrespectful ahole isnt indicative of what ive seen.


I've worked with plenty .... most were pretty good, had one or two just as bad as this kid.  I can say the same about every other race I've worked with.
Both you and suppositry are full of it. Im sure the real estate industry is full of Aboriginal people.
Regardless, if they are the same as any other race in regards to crime then how come the jails are full of them out of all proportion to their numbers?


you really are an id iot aren't you?..... I was referring to my 15 odd yrs of painting for the Dept. of Housing .. ... or are you going to claim there are no abo's in Dept of housing as well? :D :D :D

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:17pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:09pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:59pm:
And yet the government apologised for the stolen generation why apologise if you've done nothing wrong?
I didnt say nothing wrong was done, I am saying that the attempt was altruistic. I see you dont have any arguement, just like Mothra. A fool who doesnt educate themselves is destined to remain a fool.




I'm well educated, thank you very much.

I also count Indigenous people amongst my friends. I've listened to their stories.

Beats your trawling through web sites that tell you what you want to hear.

The Stolen Generation is not a myth. They didn't just take mixed blood children. The children taken were wanted by their parents. They were grieved and mourned and sung to. And fought for.


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:19pm

John Smith wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:15pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:18pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:48pm:

Its time wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 9:43pm:
Certainly needs to be sat down a given a no shitter , is this going to turn in to another all muslims are terrorists style of thread from fringe dwelling loonies on the right, ive worked with a few aboriginals and even met their families and this little disrespectful ahole isnt indicative of what ive seen.


I've worked with plenty .... most were pretty good, had one or two just as bad as this kid.  I can say the same about every other race I've worked with.
Both you and suppositry are full of it. Im sure the real estate industry is full of Aboriginal people.
Regardless, if they are the same as any other race in regards to crime then how come the jails are full of them out of all proportion to their numbers?


you really are an id iot aren't you?..... I was referring to my 15 odd yrs of painting for the Dept. of Housing .. ... or are you going to claim there are no abo's in Dept of housing as well? :D :D :D




Ian's never met an Aboriginal that he didn't not like.

Even though he says most of them aren't really Aboriginal.

Go figure.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:20pm
heres some facts. I suggest you read this article in full as it dispells many of the myths regarding the "Stolen generation"

Quote:
Read had written that governments removed children as young as possible and reared them in institutions isolated from any contact with Aboriginal culture. "Welfare officers, removing children solely because they were Aboriginal," he said, "intended and arranged that they should lose their Aboriginality, and that they never return home."

The majority were allegedly babies and infants. The SBS television series First Australians claimed most of the 50,000 were aged under five. Henry Reynolds explained the rationale: "The younger the child the better, before habits were formed, attachments made, language learned, traditions absorbed."

It is not difficult to prove these assertions are untrue. When you look at the surviving individual case records in NSW, as I did for the period 1907 to 1932, they reveal that 66 per cent of the 800 children then removed were teenagers aged 13 to 19 years. Some 23 per cent were aged six to 12, and only 10 per cent were babies to five-year-olds.

Most of them came from Aboriginal welfare stations and reserves. Two-thirds of the teenagers went not to institutions but into the workforce as apprentices.

For white children in welfare institutions, apprenticeship was then the standard destination too. At the time, for both white and black children, apprenticeship meant leaving home for four years and living with an employer. The principal occupations targeted by these job placement schemes, agriculture for boys and domestic service for girls, were the same for both black and white apprentices.

In Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory in the first half of the 20th century, laws and policies forbade the removal of full-blood children.



Quote:
Only half-caste children could be removed. However, in WA, half-castes could not be removed under the age of six. In the post-war Northern Territory, 80 per cent of children in the Retta Dixon Home in Darwin and almost all those at the St Mary's hostel in Alice Springs (the Territory's sole institutions for part-Aboriginal children) were of school age, between five and 15. This was not surprising since the main reason for these homes' existence was to provide board for children sent by their parents to go to school.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/inquirer/flawed-history-keeps-myth-alive-about-the-stolen-generations/story-e6frg6z6-1225824632357

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by John Smith on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:21pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:09pm:
I am saying that the attempt was altruistic.


ooh, OK then, why didn't you say so  ... that makes it all better!

The priest buggering the 10 yr old was being altruistic too ... he was trying to exorcise the demons :D :D :D

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:21pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:49pm:
The only children removed were those of mixed race, this was because the full bloods ...


The point where you lost all credibility.


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by John Smith on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:22pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:20pm:
heres some facts. I suggest you read this article in full as it dispells many of the myths regarding the "Stolen generation"

Quote:
Read had written that governments removed children as young as possible and reared them in institutions isolated from any contact with Aboriginal culture. "Welfare officers, removing children solely because they were Aboriginal," he said, "intended and arranged that they should lose their Aboriginality, and that they never return home."

The majority were allegedly babies and infants. The SBS television series First Australians claimed most of the 50,000 were aged under five. Henry Reynolds explained the rationale: "The younger the child the better, before habits were formed, attachments made, language learned, traditions absorbed."

It is not difficult to prove these assertions are untrue. When you look at the surviving individual case records in NSW, as I did for the period 1907 to 1932, they reveal that 66 per cent of the 800 children then removed were teenagers aged 13 to 19 years. Some 23 per cent were aged six to 12, and only 10 per cent were babies to five-year-olds.

Most of them came from Aboriginal welfare stations and reserves. Two-thirds of the teenagers went not to institutions but into the workforce as apprentices.

For white children in welfare institutions, apprenticeship was then the standard destination too. At the time, for both white and black children, apprenticeship meant leaving home for four years and living with an employer. The principal occupations targeted by these job placement schemes, agriculture for boys and domestic service for girls, were the same for both black and white apprentices.

In Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory in the first half of the 20th century, laws and policies forbade the removal of full-blood children.


[quote]Only half-caste children could be removed. However, in WA, half-castes could not be removed under the age of six. In the post-war Northern Territory, 80 per cent of children in the Retta Dixon Home in Darwin and almost all those at the St Mary's hostel in Alice Springs (the Territory's sole institutions for part-Aboriginal children) were of school age, between five and 15. This was not surprising since the main reason for these homes' existence was to provide board for children sent by their parents to go to school.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/inquirer/flawed-history-keeps-myth-alive-about-the-stolen-generations/story-e6frg6z6-1225824632357[/quote]



I notice you're missing NSW, Tassie and Victoria from there ... why is that?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:22pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:17pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:09pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:59pm:
And yet the government apologised for the stolen generation why apologise if you've done nothing wrong?
I didnt say nothing wrong was done, I am saying that the attempt was altruistic. I see you dont have any arguement, just like Mothra. A fool who doesnt educate themselves is destined to remain a fool.




I'm well educated, thank you very much.

I also count Indigenous people amongst my friends. I've listened to their stories.

Beats your trawling through web sites that tell you what you want to hear.

The Stolen Generation is not a myth. They didn't just take mixed blood children. The children taken were wanted by their parents. They were grieved and mourned and sung to. And fought for.
I dont need web sites Mothra.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:22pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:20pm:
heres some facts. I suggest you read this article in full as it dispells many of the myths regarding the "Stolen generation"

Quote:
Read had written that governments removed children as young as possible and reared them in institutions isolated from any contact with Aboriginal culture. "Welfare officers, removing children solely because they were Aboriginal," he said, "intended and arranged that they should lose their Aboriginality, and that they never return home."

The majority were allegedly babies and infants. The SBS television series First Australians claimed most of the 50,000 were aged under five. Henry Reynolds explained the rationale: "The younger the child the better, before habits were formed, attachments made, language learned, traditions absorbed."

It is not difficult to prove these assertions are untrue. When you look at the surviving individual case records in NSW, as I did for the period 1907 to 1932, they reveal that 66 per cent of the 800 children then removed were teenagers aged 13 to 19 years. Some 23 per cent were aged six to 12, and only 10 per cent were babies to five-year-olds.

Most of them came from Aboriginal welfare stations and reserves. Two-thirds of the teenagers went not to institutions but into the workforce as apprentices.

For white children in welfare institutions, apprenticeship was then the standard destination too. At the time, for both white and black children, apprenticeship meant leaving home for four years and living with an employer. The principal occupations targeted by these job placement schemes, agriculture for boys and domestic service for girls, were the same for both black and white apprentices.

In Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory in the first half of the 20th century, laws and policies forbade the removal of full-blood children.


[quote]Only half-caste children could be removed. However, in WA, half-castes could not be removed under the age of six. In the post-war Northern Territory, 80 per cent of children in the Retta Dixon Home in Darwin and almost all those at the St Mary's hostel in Alice Springs (the Territory's sole institutions for part-Aboriginal children) were of school age, between five and 15. This was not surprising since the main reason for these homes' existence was to provide board for children sent by their parents to go to school.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/inquirer/flawed-history-keeps-myth-alive-about-the-stolen-generations/story-e6frg6z6-1225824632357[/quote]



Ohhhhh ... the Australian.  Well that trumps all of the eye witness accounts i've heatd.

Are you for real?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:23pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:22pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:17pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:09pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:59pm:
And yet the government apologised for the stolen generation why apologise if you've done nothing wrong?
I didnt say nothing wrong was done, I am saying that the attempt was altruistic. I see you dont have any arguement, just like Mothra. A fool who doesnt educate themselves is destined to remain a fool.




I'm well educated, thank you very much.

I also count Indigenous people amongst my friends. I've listened to their stories.

Beats your trawling through web sites that tell you what you want to hear.

The Stolen Generation is not a myth. They didn't just take mixed blood children. The children taken were wanted by their parents. They were grieved and mourned and sung to. And fought for.
I dont need web sites Mothra.




Yet you just qioted from the Australian.  ;D

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:24pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:22pm:
I dont need web sites Mothra.


So why did you post this?

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/inquirer/flawed-history-keeps-myth-alive-about-the-stolen-generations/story-e6frg6z6-1225824632357

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:26pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:22pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:20pm:
heres some facts. I suggest you read this article in full as it dispells many of the myths regarding the "Stolen generation"

Quote:
Read had written that governments removed children as young as possible and reared them in institutions isolated from any contact with Aboriginal culture. "Welfare officers, removing children solely because they were Aboriginal," he said, "intended and arranged that they should lose their Aboriginality, and that they never return home."

The majority were allegedly babies and infants. The SBS television series First Australians claimed most of the 50,000 were aged under five. Henry Reynolds explained the rationale: "The younger the child the better, before habits were formed, attachments made, language learned, traditions absorbed."

It is not difficult to prove these assertions are untrue. When you look at the surviving individual case records in NSW, as I did for the period 1907 to 1932, they reveal that 66 per cent of the 800 children then removed were teenagers aged 13 to 19 years. Some 23 per cent were aged six to 12, and only 10 per cent were babies to five-year-olds.

Most of them came from Aboriginal welfare stations and reserves. Two-thirds of the teenagers went not to institutions but into the workforce as apprentices.

For white children in welfare institutions, apprenticeship was then the standard destination too. At the time, for both white and black children, apprenticeship meant leaving home for four years and living with an employer. The principal occupations targeted by these job placement schemes, agriculture for boys and domestic service for girls, were the same for both black and white apprentices.

In Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory in the first half of the 20th century, laws and policies forbade the removal of full-blood children.


[quote]Only half-caste children could be removed. However, in WA, half-castes could not be removed under the age of six. In the post-war Northern Territory, 80 per cent of children in the Retta Dixon Home in Darwin and almost all those at the St Mary's hostel in Alice Springs (the Territory's sole institutions for part-Aboriginal children) were of school age, between five and 15. This was not surprising since the main reason for these homes' existence was to provide board for children sent by their parents to go to school.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/inquirer/flawed-history-keeps-myth-alive-about-the-stolen-generations/story-e6frg6z6-1225824632357




Ohhhhh ... the Australian.  Well that trumps all of the eye witness accounts i've heatd.

Are you for real?[/quote]Its all historical record. But how could I guess that you would denigrate the source. Dont like to be proved wrong do you? theres a whole industry based on the so called "stolen generation" that have a vested interest, one worth billions a year in keeping this myth alive.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:28pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:26pm:
Its all historical record. But how could I guess that you would denigrate the source. Dont like to be proved wrong do you? theres a whole industry based on the so called "stolen generation" that have a vested interest, one worth billions a year in keeping this myth alive.


This is where you provide evidence ...


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:28pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:26pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:22pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:20pm:
heres some facts. I suggest you read this article in full as it dispells many of the myths regarding the "Stolen generation"

Quote:
Read had written that governments removed children as young as possible and reared them in institutions isolated from any contact with Aboriginal culture. "Welfare officers, removing children solely because they were Aboriginal," he said, "intended and arranged that they should lose their Aboriginality, and that they never return home."

The majority were allegedly babies and infants. The SBS television series First Australians claimed most of the 50,000 were aged under five. Henry Reynolds explained the rationale: "The younger the child the better, before habits were formed, attachments made, language learned, traditions absorbed."

It is not difficult to prove these assertions are untrue. When you look at the surviving individual case records in NSW, as I did for the period 1907 to 1932, they reveal that 66 per cent of the 800 children then removed were teenagers aged 13 to 19 years. Some 23 per cent were aged six to 12, and only 10 per cent were babies to five-year-olds.

Most of them came from Aboriginal welfare stations and reserves. Two-thirds of the teenagers went not to institutions but into the workforce as apprentices.

For white children in welfare institutions, apprenticeship was then the standard destination too. At the time, for both white and black children, apprenticeship meant leaving home for four years and living with an employer. The principal occupations targeted by these job placement schemes, agriculture for boys and domestic service for girls, were the same for both black and white apprentices.

In Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory in the first half of the 20th century, laws and policies forbade the removal of full-blood children.


[quote]Only half-caste children could be removed. However, in WA, half-castes could not be removed under the age of six. In the post-war Northern Territory, 80 per cent of children in the Retta Dixon Home in Darwin and almost all those at the St Mary's hostel in Alice Springs (the Territory's sole institutions for part-Aboriginal children) were of school age, between five and 15. This was not surprising since the main reason for these homes' existence was to provide board for children sent by their parents to go to school.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/inquirer/flawed-history-keeps-myth-alive-about-the-stolen-generations/story-e6frg6z6-1225824632357




Ohhhhh ... the Australian.  Well that trumps all of the eye witness accounts i've heatd.

Are you for real?
Its all historical record. But how could I guess that you would denigrate the source. Dont like to be proved wrong do you? theres a whole industry based on the so called "stolen generation" that have a vested interest, one worth billions a year in keeping this myth alive.
[/quote]



Worth billions a year is it? I'm sure you won't mind qualifying that?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:28pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:23pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:22pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:17pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:09pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:59pm:
And yet the government apologised for the stolen generation why apologise if you've done nothing wrong?
I didnt say nothing wrong was done, I am saying that the attempt was altruistic. I see you dont have any arguement, just like Mothra. A fool who doesnt educate themselves is destined to remain a fool.




I'm well educated, thank you very much.

I also count Indigenous people amongst my friends. I've listened to their stories.

Beats your trawling through web sites that tell you what you want to hear.

The Stolen Generation is not a myth. They didn't just take mixed blood children. The children taken were wanted by their parents. They were grieved and mourned and sung to. And fought for.
I dont need web sites Mothra.




Yet you just qioted from the Australian.  ;D
You required a source, i dont need one as I stated. Already researched by me. Hard to understand? Sucks to be proven so easily wrong doesnt it?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:29pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:28pm:
Sucks to be proven so easily wrong doesnt it?


You're the expert.


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:31pm
$3.5bn a year failing to lift Aborigines out of the 1970s
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/indigenous/bn-a-year-failing-to-lift-aborigines-out-of-the-1970s/story-fn9hm1pm-1226110502808

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:31pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:28pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:23pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:22pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:17pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:09pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 10:59pm:
And yet the government apologised for the stolen generation why apologise if you've done nothing wrong?
I didnt say nothing wrong was done, I am saying that the attempt was altruistic. I see you dont have any arguement, just like Mothra. A fool who doesnt educate themselves is destined to remain a fool.




I'm well educated, thank you very much.

I also count Indigenous people amongst my friends. I've listened to their stories.

Beats your trawling through web sites that tell you what you want to hear.

The Stolen Generation is not a myth. They didn't just take mixed blood children. The children taken were wanted by their parents. They were grieved and mourned and sung to. And fought for.
I dont need web sites Mothra.




Yet you just qioted from the Australian.  ;D
You required a source, i dont need one as I stated. Already researched by me. Hard to understand? Sucks to be proven so easily wrong doesnt it?




Do you seriously think you've proven me wrong?

Do some research of your won. Ask the people invilved. Would you stoop so low as to speak with an Aboriginal person?

Here's a starting point. Take your time.

http://stolengenerationstestimonies.com/index.php/testimonies/index.1.html

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:32pm

Homo, if the cop didn't want to "do his career" AND he knew that the kid was an Aboriginal, why did he handcuff him?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by davo on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:32pm
Ian all Im asking is that you try to understand a different point of view,I have listened to my cousins stories of what its like to be Aboriginal growing up in Australia

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:32pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:31pm:
$3.5bn a year failing to lift Aborigines out of the 1970s
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/indigenous/bn-a-year-failing-to-lift-aborigines-out-of-the-1970s/story-fn9hm1pm-1226110502808




Well that doesn't sound emotive ....   ;D

But that wasn't your claim Ian. You said the "Stolen Generation myth is costing us billions per year".

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:33pm
Its all bs Mothra, you have been sucked in. Being a woman you rely on emotion, I rely on facts. The facts prove you wrong. Engage your analytical brain.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:33pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:31pm:
$3.5bn a year failing to lift Aborigines out of the 1970s
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-


Your problem with the '70s is ... ?


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:34pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:33pm:
I rely on facts.


So, why don't you post them in this forum?


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:35pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:33pm:
Its all bs Mothra, you have been sucked in. Being a woman you rely on emotion, I rely on facts. The facts prove you wrong. Engage your analytical brain.




Being a woman i am naturally smarter than you and better at interpersonal skills.

I have researched  the Stolen GenerationS and spoken at length with people who were victim to it.

Don't try to patronise me. It won't work.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:35pm

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:32pm:
Ian all Im asking is that you try to understand a different point of view,I have listened to my cousins stories of what its like to be Aboriginal growing up in Australia

other racial groups dont have any problem succeeeding, its all about not playing the victim and not expecting handouts.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:36pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:35pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:32pm:
Ian all Im asking is that you try to understand a different point of view,I have listened to my cousins stories of what its like to be Aboriginal growing up in Australia

other racial groups dont have any problem succeeeding, its all about not playing the victim and not expecting handouts.




Generational grief and loss.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:36pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:35pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:33pm:
Its all bs Mothra, you have been sucked in. Being a woman you rely on emotion, I rely on facts. The facts prove you wrong. Engage your analytical brain.




Being a woman i am naturally smarter than you and better at interpersonal skills.

I have researched  the Stolen GeneratioS and spoken at length with people who were victim to it.

Don't try to patronise me. It won't work.


Come on Mother, that's not fair.

ian sat next to an Aboriginal on a bus once.



Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by davo on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:37pm
So Ian if I were to call my children a worthless piece of crap everyday I wonder what adults they would grow up to be?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:38pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:35pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:33pm:
Its all bs Mothra, you have been sucked in. Being a woman you rely on emotion, I rely on facts. The facts prove you wrong. Engage your analytical brain.




Being a woman i am naturally smarter than you and better at interpersonal skills.

I have researched  the Stolen GeneratioS and spoken at length with people who were victim to it.

Don't try to patronise me. It won't work.
No patronisation, all you have displayed so far in response to my factual information is emotional based responses. That also is  fact. You appear unable to engage your analytical brain, that is more difficult for a woman and some men to do. you arent alone in this, Greggary has the same issue. Your first step should be to research some factual information, rather than emotional stories.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:38pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:36pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:35pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:33pm:
Its all bs Mothra, you have been sucked in. Being a woman you rely on emotion, I rely on facts. The facts prove you wrong. Engage your analytical brain.




Being a woman i am naturally smarter than you and better at interpersonal skills.

I have researched  the Stolen GeneratioS and spoken at length with people who were victim to it.

Don't try to patronise me. It won't work.


Come on Mother, that's not fair.

ian sat next to an Aboriginal on a bus once.



But was it a proper Aboriginal or one of those pretend ones he thinks most of them are ... until it doesn't;t suit him anymore to focus on the "white blood"?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:39pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:38pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:35pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:33pm:
Its all bs Mothra, you have been sucked in. Being a woman you rely on emotion, I rely on facts. The facts prove you wrong. Engage your analytical brain.




Being a woman i am naturally smarter than you and better at interpersonal skills.

I have researched  the Stolen GeneratioS and spoken at length with people who were victim to it.

Don't try to patronise me. It won't work.
No patronisation, all you have displayed so far in response to my factual information is emotional based responses. That also is  fact. You appear unable to engage your analytical brain, that is more difficult for a woman and some men to do. you arent alone in this, Greggary has the same issue. Your first step should be to research some factual information, rather than emotional stories.




Nope. Have you ample rebuttal and an excellent link.

Did you bother looking at it?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:39pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:36pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:35pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:32pm:
Ian all Im asking is that you try to understand a different point of view,I have listened to my cousins stories of what its like to be Aboriginal growing up in Australia

other racial groups dont have any problem succeeeding, its all about not playing the victim and not expecting handouts.




Generational grief and loss.
excuses.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:40pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:39pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:36pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:35pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:32pm:
Ian all Im asking is that you try to understand a different point of view,I have listened to my cousins stories of what its like to be Aboriginal growing up in Australia

other racial groups dont have any problem succeeeding, its all about not playing the victim and not expecting handouts.




Generational grief and loss.
excuses.




Nope, Variables.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by davo on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:38pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:36pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:35pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:33pm:
Its all bs Mothra, you have been sucked in. Being a woman you rely on emotion, I rely on facts. The facts prove you wrong. Engage your analytical brain.




Being a woman i am naturally smarter than you and better at interpersonal skills.

I have researched  the Stolen GeneratioS and spoken at length with people who were victim to it.

Don't try to patronise me. It won't work.


Come on Mother, that's not fair.

ian sat next to an Aboriginal on a bus once.



But was it a proper Aboriginal ...


That's the problem: ian has no idea what a "proper Aboriginal" is.


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:43pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:39pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:38pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:35pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:33pm:
Its all bs Mothra, you have been sucked in. Being a woman you rely on emotion, I rely on facts. The facts prove you wrong. Engage your analytical brain.




Being a woman i am naturally smarter than you and better at interpersonal skills.

I have researched  the Stolen GeneratioS and spoken at length with people who were victim to it.

Don't try to patronise me. It won't work.
No patronisation, all you have displayed so far in response to my factual information is emotional based responses. That also is  fact. You appear unable to engage your analytical brain, that is more difficult for a woman and some men to do. you arent alone in this, Greggary has the same issue. Your first step should be to research some factual information, rather than emotional stories.




Nope. Have you ample rebuttal and an excellent link.

Did you bother looking at it?
yep. All based on emotion. No facts evident. As if theres no vested interest for those people. you are such a sucker.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by davo on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm
Wow is that Fcken hard to understand the  Aboriginals are treated like second class citizens when all they want is to be treated fairly

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:45pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:43pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:39pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:38pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:35pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:33pm:
Its all bs Mothra, you have been sucked in. Being a woman you rely on emotion, I rely on facts. The facts prove you wrong. Engage your analytical brain.




Being a woman i am naturally smarter than you and better at interpersonal skills.

I have researched  the Stolen GeneratioS and spoken at length with people who were victim to it.

Don't try to patronise me. It won't work.
No patronisation, all you have displayed so far in response to my factual information is emotional based responses. That also is  fact. You appear unable to engage your analytical brain, that is more difficult for a woman and some men to do. you arent alone in this, Greggary has the same issue. Your first step should be to research some factual information, rather than emotional stories.




Nope. Have you ample rebuttal and an excellent link.

Did you bother looking at it?
yep. All based on emotion. No facts evident. As if theres no vested interest for those people. you are such a sucker.



Tiy nean based on testimonials.

And you didn't take the time to look at even one of those videos.

Don't add lying to your ever expanding list of charming qualities.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:46pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?



They don't?

And anyway, generational grief and loss.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:47pm

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:
Wow is that Fcken hard to understand the  Aboriginals are treated like second class citizens when all they want is to be treated fairly

rubbish. They arent. Any perception of them as second class is caused by their behaviour, nothing to do with skin colour.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by davo on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:48pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?

no because they are judged as black thieving front bottom and that's the point they are pre judged by the colour of their skin

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:48pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:47pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:
Wow is that Fcken hard to understand the  Aboriginals are treated like second class citizens when all they want is to be treated fairly

rubbish. They arent. Any perception of them as second class is caused by their behaviour, nothing to do with skin colour.



Yet you describe them as a homogeneous blob.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:49pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?


What does skin colour have to do with anything?


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:46pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?



They don't?

And anyway, generational grief and loss.
yes, you keep parrotting that, as if it has some special meaning for Abos. It doesnt. they were killing their infants as a method of population control, pedophilia was culturally  acceptable as was domestic violence and sexual abuse , before Europeans came. Average life expectancy around 30.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:49pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?


What does skin colour have to do with anything?




Ian;s cross because all of that "white blood" isn't presenting itself in easy to identify ways. He so badly wants to label them all fake "abos" but they just persist in looking so damned dark skinned.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by The Grappler on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:54pm
Where's Bobby when you need him...
Hang_em_high_001.jpg (4 KB | 10 )

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:54pm

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:48pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?

no because they are judged as black thieving nice person and that's the point they are pre judged by the colour of their skin
Clearly, as i have pointed out , that is nonsense.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:55pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:46pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?



They don't?

And anyway, generational grief and loss.
yes, you keep parrotting that, as if it has some special meaning for Abos. It doesnt. they were killing their infants as a method of population control, pedophilia was culturally  acceptable as was domestic violence and sexual abuse , before Europeans came. Average life expectancy around 30.



Oh! A new tangent! Given up on the old one have you?

Youi just want to prove now how essentially inferior they are? Rrrrrrrrright?

This is all from your illustrious research is it? White people never did anything like that.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:56pm

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:54pm:
Where's Bobby when you need him...


In a Kings Cross bath house?


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:56pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:49pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?


What does skin colour have to do with anything?




Ian;s cross because all of that "white blood" isn't presenting itself in easy to identify ways. He so badly wants to label them all fake "abos" but they just persist in looking so damned dark skinned.
You are the one concentrating on skin colour. I mentioned early on that its about culture not skin colour. You seem to have an obsession with skin colour, it means little to me.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:57pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:55pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:46pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?



They don't?

And anyway, generational grief and loss.
yes, you keep parrotting that, as if it has some special meaning for Abos. It doesnt. they were killing their infants as a method of population control, pedophilia was culturally  acceptable as was domestic violence and sexual abuse , before Europeans came. Average life expectancy around 30.



Oh! A new tangent! Given up on the old one have you?

Youi just want to prove now how essentially inferior they are? Rrrrrrrrright?

This is all from your illustrious research is it? White people never did anything like that.
So you are saying this was ok because white people used to do it?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:57pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:57pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:55pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:46pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?



They don't?

And anyway, generational grief and loss.
yes, you keep parrotting that, as if it has some special meaning for Abos. It doesnt. they were killing their infants as a method of population control, pedophilia was culturally  acceptable as was domestic violence and sexual abuse , before Europeans came. Average life expectancy around 30.



Oh! A new tangent! Given up on the old one have you?

Youi just want to prove now how essentially inferior they are? Rrrrrrrrright?

This is all from your illustrious research is it? White people never did anything like that.
So you are saying this was ok because white people used to do it?


Did i?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:57pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm:
pedophilia was culturally  acceptable


Ah, so we've moved on to Catholicism.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by davo on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:57pm
Ian all im saying is try to look at life from the other side of the fence, can you truly understand what its like to be growing up as an Aboriginal?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:58pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:56pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:49pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?


What does skin colour have to do with anything?




Ian;s cross because all of that "white blood" isn't presenting itself in easy to identify ways. He so badly wants to label them all fake "abos" but they just persist in looking so damned dark skinned.
You are the one concentrating on skin colour. I mentioned early on that its about culture not skin colour. You seem to have an obsession with skin colour, it means little to me.




How do you recognise them as "abos" then Ian?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:58pm

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:57pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:57pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:55pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:46pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?



They don't?

And anyway, generational grief and loss.
yes, you keep parrotting that, as if it has some special meaning for Abos. It doesnt. they were killing their infants as a method of population control, pedophilia was culturally  acceptable as was domestic violence and sexual abuse , before Europeans came. Average life expectancy around 30.



Oh! A new tangent! Given up on the old one have you?

Youi just want to prove now how essentially inferior they are? Rrrrrrrrright?

This is all from your illustrious research is it? White people never did anything like that.
So you are saying this was ok because white people used to do it?


Did i?
So which is it? ok or not ok?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:59pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:57pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm:
pedophilia was culturally  acceptable


Ah, so we've moved on to Catholicism.



Be fair now Greg. The Protestants do it too.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:59pm

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:58pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:57pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:57pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:55pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:46pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?



They don't?

And anyway, generational grief and loss.
yes, you keep parrotting that, as if it has some special meaning for Abos. It doesnt. they were killing their infants as a method of population control, pedophilia was culturally  acceptable as was domestic violence and sexual abuse , before Europeans came. Average life expectancy around 30.



Oh! A new tangent! Given up on the old one have you?

Youi just want to prove now how essentially inferior they are? Rrrrrrrrright?

This is all from your illustrious research is it? White people never did anything like that.
So you are saying this was ok because white people used to do it?


Did i?
So which is it? ok or not ok?




What?  Your bigotry?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:00am
Not ok.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:00am

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:58pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:56pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:49pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?


What does skin colour have to do with anything?




Ian;s cross because all of that "white blood" isn't presenting itself in easy to identify ways. He so badly wants to label them all fake "abos" but they just persist in looking so damned dark skinned.
You are the one concentrating on skin colour. I mentioned early on that its about culture not skin colour. You seem to have an obsession with skin colour, it means little to me.




How do you recognise them as "abos" then Ian?


I believe this is yours, ian:



Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:02am

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:58pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:56pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:49pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?


What does skin colour have to do with anything?




Ian;s cross because all of that "white blood" isn't presenting itself in easy to identify ways. He so badly wants to label them all fake "abos" but they just persist in looking so damned dark skinned.
You are the one concentrating on skin colour. I mentioned early on that its about culture not skin colour. You seem to have an obsession with skin colour, it means little to me.




How do you recognise them as "abos" then Ian?

Cultural clues. how do you recognise them?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:03am

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:00am:
Not ok.
so you agree pedophilia was culturally  acceptable.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:04am

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:02am:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:58pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:56pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:49pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?


What does skin colour have to do with anything?




Ian;s cross because all of that "white blood" isn't presenting itself in easy to identify ways. He so badly wants to label them all fake "abos" but they just persist in looking so damned dark skinned.
You are the one concentrating on skin colour. I mentioned early on that its about culture not skin colour. You seem to have an obsession with skin colour, it means little to me.




How do you recognise them as "abos" then Ian?

Cultural clues. how do you recognise them?



So you judge by the behaviour you have assigned "them"?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:04am

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:03am:
pedophilia was acceptable.


No surprises here.


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:06am

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:03am:

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:00am:
Not ok.
so you agree pedophilia was culturally  acceptable.




Not across the board. Neither was cannibalism .. although some white folk got their arses eaten.

Again, you seem to think this diverse and beautiful people were and are a homogeneous blob.

That's prejudice Ian. You can overcome it with education and positive exposure.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:07am

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:06am:
Again, you seem to think ...


Link?



Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:09am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:07am:

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:06am:
Again, you seem to think ...


Link?




Will something from the Australian do?

Rupert is sure to have a take on this.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:10am

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:04am:

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:02am:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:58pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:56pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:49pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?


What does skin colour have to do with anything?




Ian;s cross because all of that "white blood" isn't presenting itself in easy to identify ways. He so badly wants to label them all fake "abos" but they just persist in looking so damned dark skinned.
You are the one concentrating on skin colour. I mentioned early on that its about culture not skin colour. You seem to have an obsession with skin colour, it means little to me.




How do you recognise them as "abos" then Ian?

Cultural clues. how do you recognise them?



So you judge by the behaviour you have assigned "them"?
I dont assign behaviour, I recognise it. And I have a vast experience at recognising it. Emotion doesnt cloud my judgement.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:15am

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:10am:

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:04am:

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:02am:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:58pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:56pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:49pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?


What does skin colour have to do with anything?




Ian;s cross because all of that "white blood" isn't presenting itself in easy to identify ways. He so badly wants to label them all fake "abos" but they just persist in looking so damned dark skinned.
You are the one concentrating on skin colour. I mentioned early on that its about culture not skin colour. You seem to have an obsession with skin colour, it means little to me.




How do you recognise them as "abos" then Ian?

Cultural clues. how do you recognise them?



So you judge by the behaviour you have assigned "them"?
I dont assign behaviour, I recognise it. And I have a vast experience at recognising it. Emotion doesnt cloud my judgement.




Yes it does. Bigotry is an emotion.

You big girl.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:15am

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:06am:

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:03am:

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:00am:
Not ok.
so you agree pedophilia was culturally  acceptable.




Not across the board. Neither was cannibalism .. although some white folk got their arses eaten.

Again, you seem to think this diverse and beautiful people were and are a homogeneous blob.

That's prejudice Ian. You can overcome it with education and positive exposure.
yes, it was across the board. Cannibalism, perhaps not. infanticide was practised mainly by the desert tribes.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by davo on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:16am

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:10am:

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:04am:

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:02am:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:58pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:56pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:49pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?


What does skin colour have to do with anything?




Ian;s cross because all of that "white blood" isn't presenting itself in easy to identify ways. He so badly wants to label them all fake "abos" but they just persist in looking so damned dark skinned.
You are the one concentrating on skin colour. I mentioned early on that its about culture not skin colour. You seem to have an obsession with skin colour, it means little to me.




How do you recognise them as "abos" then Ian?

Cultural clues. how do you recognise them?



So you judge by the behaviour you have assigned "them"?
I dont assign behaviour, I recognise it. And I have a vast experience at recognising it. Emotion doesnt cloud my judgement.

Broaden your horizons Ian  ;)

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:19am

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:15am:

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:10am:

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:04am:

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:02am:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:58pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:56pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:49pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?


What does skin colour have to do with anything?




Ian;s cross because all of that "white blood" isn't presenting itself in easy to identify ways. He so badly wants to label them all fake "abos" but they just persist in looking so damned dark skinned.
You are the one concentrating on skin colour. I mentioned early on that its about culture not skin colour. You seem to have an obsession with skin colour, it means little to me.




How do you recognise them as "abos" then Ian?

Cultural clues. how do you recognise them?



So you judge by the behaviour you have assigned "them"?
I dont assign behaviour, I recognise it. And I have a vast experience at recognising it. Emotion doesnt cloud my judgement.




Yes it does. Bigotry is an emotion.

You big girl.
For me to be a bigot my beleifs would have to be irrational, clearly they arent.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:20am

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:15am:

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:06am:

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:03am:

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:00am:
Not ok.
so you agree pedophilia was culturally  acceptable.




Not across the board. Neither was cannibalism .. although some white folk got their arses eaten.

Again, you seem to think this diverse and beautiful people were and are a homogeneous blob.

That's prejudice Ian. You can overcome it with education and positive exposure.
yes, it was across the board. Cannibalism, perhaps not.




No. It wasn't.

You have evidence to back up your claim that paedophilia was "across the board"? From the Australian i hope.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:24am

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:20am:

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:15am:

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:06am:

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:03am:

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:00am:
Not ok.
so you agree pedophilia was culturally  acceptable.




Not across the board. Neither was cannibalism .. although some white folk got their arses eaten.

Again, you seem to think this diverse and beautiful people were and are a homogeneous blob.

That's prejudice Ian. You can overcome it with education and positive exposure.
yes, it was across the board. Cannibalism, perhaps not.




No. It wasn't.

You have evidence to back up your claim that paedophilia was "across the board"? From the Australian i hope.

Nope. going to bed now. Into the heart of darkness tomorrow. Need my sleep.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:28am

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:19am:

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:15am:

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:10am:

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:04am:

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:02am:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:58pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:56pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:49pm:

ian wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:44pm:

oh dear wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 11:41pm:
They don't want handouts all they want is a fair go, they are instantly judged for the colour of their skin
Thats rubbish , how come other people with dark skin colour dont have this issue in this country? If I get a good suntan does my level of discrimination rise?


What does skin colour have to do with anything?




Ian;s cross because all of that "white blood" isn't presenting itself in easy to identify ways. He so badly wants to label them all fake "abos" but they just persist in looking so damned dark skinned.
You are the one concentrating on skin colour. I mentioned early on that its about culture not skin colour. You seem to have an obsession with skin colour, it means little to me.




How do you recognise them as "abos" then Ian?

Cultural clues. how do you recognise them?



So you judge by the behaviour you have assigned "them"?
I dont assign behaviour, I recognise it. And I have a vast experience at recognising it. Emotion doesnt cloud my judgement.




Yes it does. Bigotry is an emotion.

You big girl.
For me to be a bigot my beleifs would have to be irrational, clearly they arent.




Yes. They are.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by mothra on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:42am
Come on Ian. Please tell me, of the some 250 tribal groups, each with their own beliefs and traditions, all of them practiced paedophilia?

How do you define paedophilia?


You must know something the many studying historians don't, to have such intimate knowledge.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by The Grappler on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 8:43am
This is about the social and moral values passed down to young kids in the suburbs in this day and age - not about paedophilia or feminism or Blackism or whatever.

The little penis was arrested and let off with a warning - his mother's antics were abominable and totally out of synch with the fact that her little penis had committed a serious crime that has, in the past, resulted in people being killed.

His attitude and behaviour and that of his mates/siblings in standing in the way of police are an outrage to any reasonable law-abiding citizen, and would, in an adult, have lead to further arrests for hindering and obstructing, and all on mum's video.

This is what happens in a run-down society without fathers... ask aquascoot....

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by double plus good on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:10pm
I grew up in the next suburb over and am well acquainted with some of these aboriginal families. They teach their kids to hate the white man so the kids grow up believing  they have permission to run amok and do whatever they want. A well known anti social aboriginal family from the Mt Druitt area are the Beale's. The famous Wallaby player Kurtley Beale is a member. I find it amusing that Australian  high society  are clapping and cheering for an aboriginal from a scummy Mt Druitt crimo family. If it was a white kid from a scummy Mt Druitt crimo family they wouldn't be clapping. It's trendy for leftard snots to clap for a token darkie.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:18pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:10pm:
I grew up in the next suburb over and am well acquainted with some of these aboriginal families.


Let me guess.

Tree-lopping?  Goat meat?


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Bojack Horseman on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:21pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:10pm:
I grew up in the next suburb over and am well acquainted with some of these aboriginal families. They teach their kids to hate the white man so the kids grow up believing  they have permission to run amok and do whatever they want. A well known anti social aboriginal family from the Mt Druitt area are the Beale's. The famous Wallaby player Kurtley Beale is a member. I find it amusing that Australian  high society  are clapping and cheering for an aboriginal from a scummy Mt Druitt crimo family. If it was a white kid from a scummy Mt Druitt crimo family they wouldn't be clapping. It's trendy for leftard snots to clap for a token darkie.



Yet somehow even with him being from a scummy Mt Druitt family, he went to Joeys (albeit on a scholarship)

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by John Smith on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:25pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:10pm:
The famous Wallaby player Kurtley Beale is a member. I find it amusing that Australian  high society  are clapping and cheering for an aboriginal from a scummy Mt Druitt crimo family



So Kurtley should be judged on his families actions and not on his own accomplishments?

Is it just me or are the rabid right becoming more rabid?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:33pm

John Smith wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:25pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:10pm:
The famous Wallaby player Kurtley Beale is a member. I find it amusing that Australian  high society  are clapping and cheering for an aboriginal from a scummy Mt Druitt crimo family



So Kurtley should be judged on his families actions and not on his own accomplishments?

Is it just me or are the rabid right becoming more rabid?


It's not just you.

And Homo's in a world of his own.


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by double plus good on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 1:58pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:33pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:25pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:10pm:
The famous Wallaby player Kurtley Beale is a member. I find it amusing that Australian  high society  are clapping and cheering for an aboriginal from a scummy Mt Druitt crimo family



So Kurtley should be judged on his families actions and not on his own accomplishments?

Is it just me or are the rabid right becoming more rabid?


It's not just you.

And Homo's in a world of his own.
Obviously you wouldn't like the Beale family camping out near your yuppie bachelor pad pecca.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 2:22pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 1:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:33pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:25pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:10pm:
The famous Wallaby player Kurtley Beale is a member. I find it amusing that Australian  high society  are clapping and cheering for an aboriginal from a scummy Mt Druitt crimo family



So Kurtley should be judged on his families actions and not on his own accomplishments?

Is it just me or are the rabid right becoming more rabid?


It's not just you.

And Homo's in a world of his own.
Obviously you wouldn't like the Beale family camping out near your yuppie bachelor pad pecca.


I've explained this to you before, but you seem incapable of comprehending basic English.

I don't want any unauthorised campers near me.

Their skin colour, race, religion, sex, etc. is completely irrelevant (a bit like you, actually).


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Bojack Horseman on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 2:36pm

double plus good wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 1:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:33pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:25pm:

double plus good wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:10pm:
The famous Wallaby player Kurtley Beale is a member. I find it amusing that Australian  high society  are clapping and cheering for an aboriginal from a scummy Mt Druitt crimo family



So Kurtley should be judged on his families actions and not on his own accomplishments?

Is it just me or are the rabid right becoming more rabid?


It's not just you.

And Homo's in a world of his own.
Obviously you wouldn't like the Beale family camping out near your yuppie bachelor pad pecca.



I'd give them the benefit of the doubt over yourself DPG.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Phemanderac on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:04pm
I wonder if reading articles and looking for follow up articles ever struck posters here as a good idea.

A couple of points...

Firstly, the "kid" has since been charged and will face juvenile court... I guess that means he was let go into his mother's custody (rightly or wrongly).

The "kid" was not forthcoming with information, nor was he in company with a responsible adult - hence hand cuffs in the first place - considering the implications of his crime.

I also find it quite ironic that a select few managed to pick up on the Child and his Mother being Aboriginal in a flash yet completely failed to notice one of the arresting officers being Aboriginal... Which effectively flushes your blatant racist crap down the toilet, except I suspect those with said tendencies will lack the honesty, self reflection, integrity and brains to acknowledge having gone off half cocked...

The kid is a brat, he has been charged and, arguably, his mother should have a few reports to child protection agencies done, that said, I would not be at all surprised if there are existing reports already in the system.

In short, storm meet tea cup.

::) ::) ::)

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Aussie on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:15pm

Phemanderac wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:04pm:
I wonder if reading articles and looking for follow up articles ever struck posters here as a good idea.

A couple of points...

Firstly, the "kid" has since been charged and will face juvenile court... I guess that means he was let go into his mother's custody (rightly or wrongly).

The "kid" was not forthcoming with information, nor was he in company with a responsible adult - hence hand cuffs in the first place - considering the implications of his crime.

I also find it quite ironic that a select few managed to pick up on the Child and his Mother being Aboriginal in a flash yet completely failed to notice one of the arresting officers being Aboriginal... Which effectively flushes your blatant racist crap down the toilet, except I suspect those with said tendencies will lack the honesty, self reflection, integrity and brains to acknowledge having gone off half cocked...

The kid is a brat, he has been charged and, arguably, his mother should have a few reports to child protection agencies done, that said, I would not be at all surprised if there are existing reports already in the system.

In short, storm meet tea cup.

::) ::) ::)


Is there a link to where the little prick was charged?

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:25pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2016 at 8:02pm:
I didn't know they were Aboriginal, and it's not even important.

The important thing is, that kid is a little turd and he'll almost certainly spend most of his adult life in prison.

The mother is a stupid bitch - the kid has no chance.


Was that Westie bogan an Abo?

Funny....I'm darker than she is.

Oh and that revolting child in her "care" needs to be taken off her asap.




Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:32pm
https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/30620813/disturbing-video-of-boy-12-being-arrested-for-throwing-rocks-at-buses/


Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Phemanderac on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:38pm
Nope, no link sorry, well to be fair, there probably is one, just not from me...

I would almost be willing to bet the video linked in the OP probably had the story with it, but just the video got linked - wonder why that may be?

It is in more than a few newspapers though.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Black Orchid on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:41pm
I have a friend who is a nurse and transferred to the Nepean Hospital recently to work in mental health.  She said it is scary out there and she is petrified most shifts.  No security at the hospital and it gets inundated with drunk, abusive Aboriginals (with a smattering of other bogans) daily.

This family in this video is feral.  The whole area is feral.  They should undertake another 'stolen generation' initiative in areas like this where this sort of behaviour is rife.  The police officers were extremely patient.

There is an Aboriginal body out there who is supposed to work in conjunction with DOCS but they warn their Aboriginal clients when DOCS are going to do a 'spot check'.    This is disgraceful and hardly in the best interests of the many children in that area who are at risk.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Aussie on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:55pm

Phemanderac wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:38pm:
Nope, no link sorry, well to be fair, there probably is one, just not from me...

I would almost be willing to bet the video linked in the OP probably had the story with it, but just the video got linked - wonder why that may be?

It is in more than a few newspapers though.


Okay.  But, I do not understand why he was handcuffed, and then released.  I saw nothing in the circumstances change at all.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Black Orchid on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 4:10pm

Quote:
Police in the video can be heard explaining to the mother that her son was suspected of throwing rocks at cars and buses in the area.

But the boy’s mother appeared on The Today Show this morning and said the boys hadn’t been doing anything wrong.

They weren’t throwing rocks that day, I was with them,” she said, explaining she had left them to go somewhere else before she heard they had been detained.

I got a phone call to say that my son was arrested at the shops.”


Well she obviously was not with them.


Quote:
The clip was uploaded by the mother, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, with a caption complaining her son had to “put up” with regular attention from police.


She identified herself in the video and even gave her address.


Quote:
A police spokesman said last night: “Sadly this is the sort of stuff we have to put up with all the time.”


Enough said.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/boy-12-abuses-police-after-being-arrested-for-throwing-rocks-at-passing-vehicles/news-story/406bb00af6de7113a99bba9da8b9e9d7

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Alinta on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 4:31pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:55pm:

Phemanderac wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:38pm:
Nope, no link sorry, well to be fair, there probably is one, just not from me...

I would almost be willing to bet the video linked in the OP probably had the story with it, but just the video got linked - wonder why that may be?

It is in more than a few newspapers though.


Okay.  But, I do not understand why he was handcuffed, and then released.  I saw nothing in the circumstances change at all.


The best I can find is when officers requested/ were taking his details, "he was so enraged he had to be restrained by handcuffs". 

http://tenplay.com.au/news/national/january/footage-emerges-of-12yo-boy-abusing-police

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Aussie on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 4:38pm

Alinta wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 4:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:55pm:

Phemanderac wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:38pm:
Nope, no link sorry, well to be fair, there probably is one, just not from me...

I would almost be willing to bet the video linked in the OP probably had the story with it, but just the video got linked - wonder why that may be?

It is in more than a few newspapers though.


Okay.  But, I do not understand why he was handcuffed, and then released.  I saw nothing in the circumstances change at all.


The best I can find is when officers requested/ were taking his details, "he was so enraged he had to be restrained by handcuffs". 


Okay.  But......I saw nothing about his 'rage' change.  It was his potty mouth doing the 'outrage,' not his arms/hands?  The placement of the cuffs did nothing to shut the little prick up, and it hardly could.

Makes no sense.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Alinta on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 5:00pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 4:38pm:

Alinta wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 4:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:55pm:

Phemanderac wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:38pm:
Nope, no link sorry, well to be fair, there probably is one, just not from me...

I would almost be willing to bet the video linked in the OP probably had the story with it, but just the video got linked - wonder why that may be?

It is in more than a few newspapers though.


Okay.  But, I do not understand why he was handcuffed, and then released.  I saw nothing in the circumstances change at all.


The best I can find is when officers requested/ were taking his details, "he was so enraged he had to be restrained by handcuffs". 


Okay.  But......I saw nothing about his 'rage' change.  It was his potty mouth doing the 'outrage,' not his arms/hands?  The placement of the cuffs did nothing to shut the little prick up, and it hardly could.

Makes no sense.


Certainly looks that way.......I never like to quote the media as any reliable authority, but can't find anything from the officers that clarifies  the use of handcuffs in this instance.   

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 11:04pm

mothra wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 12:42am:
Come on Ian. Please tell me, of the some 250 tribal groups, each with their own beliefs and traditions, all of them practiced paedophilia?

How do you define paedophilia?


You must know something the many studying historians don't, to have such intimate knowledge.

theres zero argument about this fact amongst historians. Infanticide also=zero argument. cannibalism, debatable.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 11:05pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 4:38pm:

Alinta wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 4:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:55pm:

Phemanderac wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:38pm:
Nope, no link sorry, well to be fair, there probably is one, just not from me...

I would almost be willing to bet the video linked in the OP probably had the story with it, but just the video got linked - wonder why that may be?

It is in more than a few newspapers though.


Okay.  But, I do not understand why he was handcuffed, and then released.  I saw nothing in the circumstances change at all.


The best I can find is when officers requested/ were taking his details, "he was so enraged he had to be restrained by handcuffs". 


Okay.  But......I saw nothing about his 'rage' change.  It was his potty mouth doing the 'outrage,' not his arms/hands?  The placement of the cuffs did nothing to shut the little prick up, and it hardly could.

Makes no sense.
You were there? tell us more.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Setanta on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 11:09pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 4:38pm:

Alinta wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 4:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:55pm:

Phemanderac wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:38pm:
Nope, no link sorry, well to be fair, there probably is one, just not from me...

I would almost be willing to bet the video linked in the OP probably had the story with it, but just the video got linked - wonder why that may be?

It is in more than a few newspapers though.


Okay.  But, I do not understand why he was handcuffed, and then released.  I saw nothing in the circumstances change at all.


The best I can find is when officers requested/ were taking his details, "he was so enraged he had to be restrained by handcuffs". 


Okay.  But......I saw nothing about his 'rage' change.  It was his potty mouth doing the 'outrage,' not his arms/hands?  The placement of the cuffs did nothing to shut the little prick up, and it hardly could.

Makes no sense.


He was cuffed for his own or others safety. Little prick should have been removed from that "mother"... And yes her colour has nothing to do with that. That kid has no hope of a meaningful future.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Aussie on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 11:11pm

Quote:
.
You were there? tell us more.


Of course I was.  I am the little prick's Mother and I also took the video.  Come on Ian, catch up!

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 11:16pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:55pm:


.  But, I do not understand 
That fact is patently obvious. theres a lot you dont understand, and never will. The reality is that you come here to display that fact so often.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Aussie on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 11:17pm

Quote:
He was cuffed for his own or others safety.


Just as well too I say.  I saw several moments when he was about to give himself an uppercut.  Thank goodness they handcuffed him.  I also saw how terrifying that little prick must have been to those adult yet puny weakling coppers who were way outgunned by the little prick.  I get it now.  All good.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Setanta on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 11:23pm

ian wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 11:16pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 3:55pm:


.  But, I do not understand 
That fact is patently obvious. theres a lot you dont understand, and never will. The reality is that you come here to display that fact so often.


Don't be a dick Aussie, the kid is feral, There is a reason for that. Do your kids do it? Mine don't. That mum is a sack of shyte. That's why Raymond does what he does and not your kids or mine. Culture.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by ian on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 11:24pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 11:11pm:

Quote:
.
You were there? tell us more.


Of course I was.  I am the little prick's Mother and I also took the video.  Come on Ian, catch up!
so you werent there. Now you know everything about the incident from a 30 second youtube clip. Not only are you bereft of any legal knowledge relating to this incident but you dont know any of  the circumstances, still, like the ego challenged inferiority complex riddled little man you are you choose to judge.

Title: Re: Police discrimination against aborigines
Post by Lord Herbert on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 7:54am

Setanta wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 11:23pm:
Don't be a dick Aussie, the kid is feral, There is a reason for that. Do your kids do it? Mine don't. That mum is a sack of shyte. That's why Raymond does what he does and not your kids or mine. Culture.


Correct.

The "We wuz robbed!" Urban Generational Aboriginal Victimhood Culture underlies their justification for all the anti-social and criminal behaviour of themselves and their feral brats.

Deportation back to the south east coastal region of India is the Final Solution for these misfits.


Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.