Here we see an Australia-based tinted female Muslim of Pakistani background and with a Muslim name whinging and whining about how it's not fair she and her husband were discriminated against at a US airport while Liddle Ol' white grannies with walking sticks - and oriental-looking people were waved through without any let or hindrance.

When will these arrogant and deceitful bitches ever admit to the fact that the vast majority of Muslim terrorists fit the profile of she and her husband - and not that of Caucasians or South East Asians.

14 people had just been killed in San Bernadino by a Pakistani female Muslim and her boyfriend - and yet this stupid woman with a doctorate wants to call 'Foul!' for being hauled off the Customs line for interviewing as a priority before any others who have no visible of written credentials for being Muslim.

My congratulations go to the US Homeland Security people for not kowtowing to political correctness or paying any attention to bitches like this one who stupidly and dishonestly believes Muslim travellers shouldn't be given any more attention than any other people.

"It is quite nerve-wrecking because you just wonder why you're being treated with such suspicion for no reason whatsoever."

Dr Faruqi said the process at the airport needed to be reviewed.

"Being asked how 'we got' Australian passports and then about my Pakistani history clearly points towards racial profiling," Dr Faruqi said in a statement.

"There is no excuse for treating people this way". 

link

Yeah Herb ... I can just see the Americans agreeing with everything you said if it had been one of THEIR politicians  :D :D :D

I actually support her,fellow Americans treating fellow westerns like crap.

How they think she got her passport,on gumtree?

What crap. If she comes from Pakistan, what other history are they going to ask her about? Her Welsh history? Asking someone how they got their passport is about as benign as it gets.

I recently travelled over a Thai/Malay border in a bus with some Vietnamese students. A Fin, a Thai, two Malays and myself were waved through, but the eight students were hassled. The Thai Army guy wanted a hundred dollars off each student.

They were consumately polite and good natured about it  but they knew how unfair it was. Vietnam’s an ASEAN country. The Thais have to let them through and be nice about it. No doubt, the army officer remembers the good old days of the cold war. We were there for over an hour of negotiations. The students could have flown with Air Asia for about $60.

In the end, they got off. They, ever so politely, appealed to the superior officer and won their case. I wondered why the first officer didn’t ask for five or ten dollars - they would have paid that. He was obviously trying to stuff them.around - refuse his service for being from a country his family fought once. Good old Oriental face saving.

I don’t like borders much, but as a jolly white chap, I’ve never had a problem - even with some considerably unlawful things in my posession. The world, it seems, always gives whitey his his due, as long as whitey is nice, but doesn’t take any nonsense from the little blighters.

And if not, pay up.. But not without strong words first.

Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 5:54am:

Here we see an Australia-based tinted female Muslim of Pakistani background and with a Muslim name whinging and whining about how it's not fair she and her husband were discriminated against at a US airport while Liddle Ol' white grannies with walking sticks - and oriental-looking people were waved through without any let or hindrance. When will these arrogant and deceitful bitches ever admit to the fact that the vast majority of Muslim terrorists fit the profile of she and her husband - and not that of Caucasians or South East Asians. 14 people had just been killed in San Bernadino by a Pakistani female Muslim and her boyfriend - and yet this stupid woman with a doctorate wants to call 'Foul!' for being hauled off the Customs line for interviewing as a priority before any others who have no visible of written credentials for being Muslim. My congratulations go to the US Homeland Security people for not kowtowing to political correctness or paying any attention to bitches like this one who stupidly and dishonestly believes Muslim travellers shouldn't be given any more attention than any other people. "It is quite nerve-wrecking because you just wonder why you're being treated with such suspicion for no reason whatsoever." Dr Faruqi said the process at the airport needed to be reviewed. "Being asked how 'we got' Australian passports and then about my Pakistani history clearly points towards racial profiling," Dr Faruqi said in a statement. "There is no excuse for treating people this way".  link

What does her having a doctorate have to do with this? Or is this an inferiority complex against someone let alone a Muslim woman having a qualification?

freediver wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 9:36am:

What crap. If she comes from Pakistan, what other history are they going to ask her about? Her Welsh history? Asking someone how they got their passport is about as benign as it gets.

LAX is renowned for having the rudest officials in the world. Worse than Soviet Moscow, worse than post-revolutionary Tehran. I’d rather be interviewed by the STAZI.

I’ve only travelled through on a British passport, which has its benefits, or did. I think the visa on arrival has been granted to Australians now too.

LAX is a shock to Australians, who are used to officials being nice. You’re really woken up to US global supremacy when you’re confronted with its border staff. Even we British have to defer to the higher authority - often a fat black woman or someone who looks Middle Eastern themselves, but appears to have been in the Marines.

The hostility by LAX customs isn’t so much a welcome to the US as a form of initiation. Once in, everyone’s friendly. Yanks are some of the nicest people in the world - as long as you don’t get on their wrong side.

Typical immigration questions in the USA:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfqLYfsVSy8

Bobby. wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 12:50pm:

Typical immigration questions in the USA: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfqLYfsVSy8

The irony Brian de Palma was pointing out in Scarface was that the Yanks deliberately let Cuban criminals in. They were cutting off their noses to spite their face (Castro), and this led to the biggest crime wave and killing spree in US history - Miami during the late 1980s.

Uncle is not so nice to the Muselman.

You probably mean Oliver Stone there Karnal.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 12:30pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 5:54am: Here we see an Australia-based tinted female Muslim of Pakistani background and with a Muslim name whinging and whining about how it's not fair she and her husband were discriminated against at a US airport while Liddle Ol' white grannies with walking sticks - and oriental-looking people were waved through without any let or hindrance. When will these arrogant and deceitful bitches ever admit to the fact that the vast majority of Muslim terrorists fit the profile of she and her husband - and not that of Caucasians or South East Asians. 14 people had just been killed in San Bernadino by a Pakistani female Muslim and her boyfriend - and yet this stupid woman with a doctorate wants to call 'Foul!' for being hauled off the Customs line for interviewing as a priority before any others who have no visible of written credentials for being Muslim. My congratulations go to the US Homeland Security people for not kowtowing to political correctness or paying any attention to bitches like this one who stupidly and dishonestly believes Muslim travellers shouldn't be given any more attention than any other people. "It is quite nerve-wrecking because you just wonder why you're being treated with such suspicion for no reason whatsoever." Dr Faruqi said the process at the airport needed to be reviewed. "Being asked how 'we got' Australian passports and then about my Pakistani history clearly points towards racial profiling," Dr Faruqi said in a statement. "There is no excuse for treating people this way".  link What does her having a doctorate have to do with this? Or is this an inferiority complex against someone let alone a Muslim woman having a qualification?

He jealous because he got no qualifications

A doctorate,no hijab and a member of a western parliament,whAt do you have to do to not get interrogated?

wally1 wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 1:40pm:

A doctorate,no hijab and a member of a western parliament,whAt do you have to do to not get interrogated?

Er... not be Pakistani, I fear.




Elsewhere in the Pakistani news...

The Pakistani national was charged with two counts of attempted rape, seven counts of sexual assault and four counts of common assault and appeared in the Southport Magistrates Court this morning.

The court heard the man allegedly sexually assaulted two of the females through their bikini bottoms.

His lawyer told the court that winds and big waves pushed her client into the women, who were swimming between the flags in separate groups.

But Magistrate John Costanzo said the man's explanation that heavy surf and wind conditions caused the alleged assaults seemed implausible.

"The Crown will argue that's the most unfortunate conspiracy of circumstances in history," he said.

Mr Costanzo denied the man's bail application because he was an unacceptable risk of re-offending.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 12:30pm:

What does her having a doctorate have to do with this? Or is this an inferiority complex against someone let alone a Muslim woman having a qualification?

A doctorate would seem to suggest the possessor has at least enough basic intelligence to work out why people of Middle Eastern appearance are being prioritised for questioning at entry points to the US and every other Western country.

She understands perfectly why, but wants to be a smart-arse bitch pretending that the terrorism has nothing to do with Muslims.

Soren wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 2:05pm:

wally1 wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 1:40pm: A doctorate,no hijab and a member of a western parliament,whAt do you have to do to not get interrogated? Er... not be Pakistani, I fear. Elsewhere in the Pakistani news... The Pakistani national was charged with two counts of attempted rape, seven counts of sexual assault and four counts of common assault and appeared in the Southport Magistrates Court this morning. The court heard the man allegedly sexually assaulted two of the females through their bikini bottoms. His lawyer told the court that winds and big waves pushed her client into the women, who were swimming between the flags in separate groups. But Magistrate John Costanzo said the man's explanation that heavy surf and wind conditions caused the alleged assaults seemed implausible. "The Crown will argue that's the most unfortunate conspiracy of circumstances in history," he said. Mr Costanzo denied the man's bail application because he was an unacceptable risk of re-offending.

And the relevance of these criminals to the above case?

wally1 wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 7:17pm:

And the relevance of these criminals to the above case?

Why, they're Pakis, silly. That stupid Greens woman is one.

Pointing out their inherent sexual deviance isn't racism. Pakis aren't a race.

No, the old boy is just referring to their culture. It's perfectly okay to do this.

Their level of tintedness just happens to correlate with their dirty little invertedness.

Add Islam and you've summed up the Muselman too.

Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 3:29pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 12:30pm: What does her having a doctorate have to do with this? Or is this an inferiority complex against someone let alone a Muslim woman having a qualification? A doctorate would seem to suggest the possessor has at least enough basic intelligence to work out why people of Middle Eastern appearance are being prioritised for questioning at entry points to the US and every other Western country. She understands perfectly why, but wants to be a smart-arse bitch pretending that the terrorism has nothing to do with Muslims.

Being a possessor of a PhD would also make her able to determine the flawed logic in automatically assuming that because she has an Aussie passport that shes highly likely to be Aussie.

It was overreach by the LAX staff. At the very least couldnt they have confirmed the legality of the passport first?

Quote:

At the very least couldnt they have confirmed the legality of the passport first?

Don't you think that asking where she got it from might have been part of that process?

freediver wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 8:50pm:

Quote: At the very least couldnt they have confirmed the legality of the passport first? Don't you think that asking where she got it from might have been part of that process?

Only if you suspect it to be illegal in the first place.

freediver wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 8:50pm:

Quote: At the very least couldnt they have confirmed the legality of the passport first? Don't you think that asking where she got it from might have been part of that process?

It's a good process. If it was forged, she'd tell them and give names - much easier than running it through the scanner.

It's tricks like these that keep Amerika safe.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 8:52pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 8:50pm: Quote: At the very least couldnt they have confirmed the legality of the passport first? Don't you think that asking where she got it from might have been part of that process? Only if you suspect it to be illegal in the first place.

That's kind of the point of checking isn't it?

freediver wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 8:59pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 8:52pm: freediver wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 8:50pm: Quote: At the very least couldnt they have confirmed the legality of the passport first? Don't you think that asking where she got it from might have been part of that process? Only if you suspect it to be illegal in the first place. That's kind of the point of checking isn't it?

But why suspect its illegal? If you suspect something, scan the passport. If it appears dodgy to the scanner, then ask.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 8:35pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 3:29pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 12:30pm: What does her having a doctorate have to do with this? Or is this an inferiority complex against someone let alone a Muslim woman having a qualification? A doctorate would seem to suggest the possessor has at least enough basic intelligence to work out why people of Middle Eastern appearance are being prioritised for questioning at entry points to the US and every other Western country. She understands perfectly why, but wants to be a smart-arse bitch pretending that the terrorism has nothing to do with Muslims. Being a possessor of a PhD would also make her able to determine the flawed logic in automatically assuming that because she has an Aussie passport that shes highly likely to be Aussie. It was overreach by the LAX staff. At the very least couldnt they have confirmed the legality of the passport first?

having a legal passport doesnt negate the threat of her being a terrorist, she was racially and culturally profiled, for good reason. The questions about the passport amount to nothing, they would have been checking for a lot of things, evasiveness, give away body language. etc.etc.

I see. You did not mean "please wait here for a few hours while we confirm with the Australian authorities whether this is real". You merely meant they should have scanned the passport before asking her about it?

ian wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 9:03pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 8:35pm: Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 3:29pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 12:30pm: What does her having a doctorate have to do with this? Or is this an inferiority complex against someone let alone a Muslim woman having a qualification? A doctorate would seem to suggest the possessor has at least enough basic intelligence to work out why people of Middle Eastern appearance are being prioritised for questioning at entry points to the US and every other Western country. She understands perfectly why, but wants to be a smart-arse bitch pretending that the terrorism has nothing to do with Muslims. Being a possessor of a PhD would also make her able to determine the flawed logic in automatically assuming that because she has an Aussie passport that shes highly likely to be Aussie. It was overreach by the LAX staff. At the very least couldnt they have confirmed the legality of the passport first? having a legal passport doesnt negate the threat of her being a terrorist, she was racially and culturally profiled, for good reason.

Why? Was she a terrorist?

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 9:04pm:

ian wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 9:03pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 8:35pm: Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 3:29pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 12:30pm: What does her having a doctorate have to do with this? Or is this an inferiority complex against someone let alone a Muslim woman having a qualification? A doctorate would seem to suggest the possessor has at least enough basic intelligence to work out why people of Middle Eastern appearance are being prioritised for questioning at entry points to the US and every other Western country. She understands perfectly why, but wants to be a smart-arse bitch pretending that the terrorism has nothing to do with Muslims. Being a possessor of a PhD would also make her able to determine the flawed logic in automatically assuming that because she has an Aussie passport that shes highly likely to be Aussie. It was overreach by the LAX staff. At the very least couldnt they have confirmed the legality of the passport first? having a legal passport doesnt negate the threat of her being a terrorist, she was racially and culturally profiled, for good reason. Why? Was she a terrorist?

I dont know.

ian wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 9:05pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 9:04pm: ian wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 9:03pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 8:35pm: Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 3:29pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 12:30pm: What does her having a doctorate have to do with this? Or is this an inferiority complex against someone let alone a Muslim woman having a qualification? A doctorate would seem to suggest the possessor has at least enough basic intelligence to work out why people of Middle Eastern appearance are being prioritised for questioning at entry points to the US and every other Western country. She understands perfectly why, but wants to be a smart-arse bitch pretending that the terrorism has nothing to do with Muslims. Being a possessor of a PhD would also make her able to determine the flawed logic in automatically assuming that because she has an Aussie passport that shes highly likely to be Aussie. It was overreach by the LAX staff. At the very least couldnt they have confirmed the legality of the passport first? having a legal passport doesnt negate the threat of her being a terrorist, she was racially and culturally profiled, for good reason. Why? Was she a terrorist? I dont know.

Good answer then we assume based on probability that she is not one.

ian wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 9:03pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 8:35pm: Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 3:29pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 12:30pm: What does her having a doctorate have to do with this? Or is this an inferiority complex against someone let alone a Muslim woman having a qualification? A doctorate would seem to suggest the possessor has at least enough basic intelligence to work out why people of Middle Eastern appearance are being prioritised for questioning at entry points to the US and every other Western country. She understands perfectly why, but wants to be a smart-arse bitch pretending that the terrorism has nothing to do with Muslims. Being a possessor of a PhD would also make her able to determine the flawed logic in automatically assuming that because she has an Aussie passport that shes highly likely to be Aussie. It was overreach by the LAX staff. At the very least couldnt they have confirmed the legality of the passport first? having a legal passport doesnt negate the threat of her being a terrorist,

Yes, Ian, but they would have asked her that too. If she was, she'd tell them, name names and provide details of her sinister organisation.

ian wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 9:05pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 9:04pm: ian wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 9:03pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 8:35pm: Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 3:29pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 12:30pm: What does her having a doctorate have to do with this? Or is this an inferiority complex against someone let alone a Muslim woman having a qualification? A doctorate would seem to suggest the possessor has at least enough basic intelligence to work out why people of Middle Eastern appearance are being prioritised for questioning at entry points to the US and every other Western country. She understands perfectly why, but wants to be a smart-arse bitch pretending that the terrorism has nothing to do with Muslims. Being a possessor of a PhD would also make her able to determine the flawed logic in automatically assuming that because she has an Aussie passport that shes highly likely to be Aussie. It was overreach by the LAX staff. At the very least couldnt they have confirmed the legality of the passport first? having a legal passport doesnt negate the threat of her being a terrorist, she was racially and culturally profiled, for good reason. Why? Was she a terrorist? I dont know.

Exactly. There are just some things we'll never know.

She'll always be a terrorist suspect, that's for sure.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 9:08pm:

ian wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 9:05pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 9:04pm: ian wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 9:03pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 8:35pm: Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 3:29pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 12:30pm: What does her having a doctorate have to do with this? Or is this an inferiority complex against someone let alone a Muslim woman having a qualification? A doctorate would seem to suggest the possessor has at least enough basic intelligence to work out why people of Middle Eastern appearance are being prioritised for questioning at entry points to the US and every other Western country. She understands perfectly why, but wants to be a smart-arse bitch pretending that the terrorism has nothing to do with Muslims. Being a possessor of a PhD would also make her able to determine the flawed logic in automatically assuming that because she has an Aussie passport that shes highly likely to be Aussie. It was overreach by the LAX staff. At the very least couldnt they have confirmed the legality of the passport first? having a legal passport doesnt negate the threat of her being a terrorist, she was racially and culturally profiled, for good reason. Why? Was she a terrorist? I dont know. Good answer then we assume based on probability that she is not one.

Are you kidding? The woman's tinted. Her name is Mehreen Faruqi.

Bojack do you have any reason to suspect they asked her about her passport before scanning it?

freediver wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 9:58pm:

Bojack do you have any reason to suspect they asked her about her passport before scanning it?

Good question, FD. Bojack should know for sure.

ian wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 9:03pm:

... having a legal passport doesnt negate the threat of her being a terrorist, she was racially and culturally profiled, for good reason. The questions about the passport amount to nothing, they would have been checking for a lot of things, evasiveness, give away body language. etc.etc.

Well said. They would all have done a basic course in kinesics.

This Muslim woman with a PhD - who since 9/11 still hasn't quite worked out that Muslim terrorism is perpetrated by ... Muslims ... was very lucky she wasn't turned over to a huge tattooed dyke in a boiler-suit and latex gloves for an intensive cavity search while in the Muslim prayer position.  

Melanias purse wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 10:43pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 9:58pm: Bojack do you have any reason to suspect they asked her about her passport before scanning it? Good question, FD. Bojack should know for sure.

Bojack seems to think the staff were over-reaching by not scanning it first:


Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 8:35pm:

It was overreach by the LAX staff. At the very least couldnt they have confirmed the legality of the passport first?

What is the world coming to when people get asked questions about the origin of their passports by immigration officials....

Sorry to interrupt, FD, but it can't be stressed enough just how lucky this whinging Muslim Greenie was to avoid an intensive cavity search by the US Home Guard Security cops.  8-)

disgusting image removed

This is the way Islam rolls.

There is silence about Muslim atrocities are perpetrated against mostly Muslims, but the vaguest slight by a non-muslim and it's always called out.

Sweat the small stuff, Muslims.

freediver wrote on Jan 17^th, 2016 at 9:00am:

Melanias purse wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 10:43pm: freediver wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 9:58pm: Bojack do you have any reason to suspect they asked her about her passport before scanning it? Good question, FD. Bojack should know for sure. Bojack seems to think the staff were over-reaching by not scanning it first: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 8:35pm: It was overreach by the LAX staff. At the very least couldnt they have confirmed the legality of the passport first? What is the world coming to when people get asked questions about the origin of their passports by immigration officials....

I know. It’s good investigative work though, FD. Your passport says where it’s from on the inside page.

Good to see you focusing on the big issues here.

GordyL wrote on Jan 17^th, 2016 at 1:26pm:

This is the way Islam rolls. There is silence about Muslim atrocities are perpetrated against mostly Muslims, but the vaguest slight by a non-muslim and it's always called out. Sweat the small stuff, Muslims.

I don’t think she’s a Muslim, Gordy.

Worse. She’s from the tinted races.

GordyL wrote on Jan 17^th, 2016 at 1:26pm:

This is the way Islam rolls. There is silence about Muslim atrocities are perpetrated against mostly Muslims, but the vaguest slight by a non-muslim and it's always called out. Sweat the small stuff, Muslims.

So true.

Welcome to the bored.

Melanias purse wrote on Jan 17^th, 2016 at 2:11pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2016 at 9:00am: Melanias purse wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 10:43pm: freediver wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 9:58pm: Bojack do you have any reason to suspect they asked her about her passport before scanning it? Good question, FD. Bojack should know for sure. Bojack seems to think the staff were over-reaching by not scanning it first: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 16th, 2016 at 8:35pm: It was overreach by the LAX staff. At the very least couldnt they have confirmed the legality of the passport first? What is the world coming to when people get asked questions about the origin of their passports by immigration officials.... I know. It’s good investigative work though, FD. Your passport says where it’s from on the inside page. Good to see you focusing on the big issues here.

Is being asked about the origins of your passport by immigration officials (before they scan it, apparently, thus overstepping the mark) a 'big issue'?

freediver wrote on Jan 16^th, 2016 at 9:58pm:

Bojack do you have any reason to suspect they asked her about her passport before scanning it?

If they did that wqould make little sense.

So the only job immigration people have is to scan passports? If the scanner says it is OK, job done?

freediver wrote on Jan 17^th, 2016 at 3:47pm:

So the only job immigration people have is to scan passports? If the scanner says it is OK, job done?

Why should a legal valid passport owned by a muslim be any different to a legal valid passport owned by yourself?

Have you considered getting a job with immigration? They might appreciate your laid-back attitude to security.

Nah i was overqualified

I think also I wanted to work more on the real immigration issue in this country and deny all the Poms, Irish and Kiwis access on the basis they tend to be visa overstayers

Are you saying you have tried already?

What part of overqualified didnt you get?

You should have told them your theory about why it is pointless asking questions. That would have reassured them you are not overqualified. They would have had to give some other reason.

No its pointless asking pointless questions without reason to.

E.g. a perfectly legal Australian passport.

Makes sense. Maybe you did tell them, but they just stuck with overqualified.

Possibly on the other hand FD i douibt you would have got t o interview.

Did you tell them Bojack? Maybe it never occurred to them That there is no need to ask questions once the electronic scanner goes green. You could have saved us from this big issue....