Australian Politics Forum

Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl General Discussion >> General Board >> For the Benefit of cods http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1452666901 Message started by greggerypeccary on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 4:35pm

Title: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 4:35pm

The QLD Court of Appeal is led by the most senior member of the Queensland judiciary, Chief Justice Catherine Holmes.

Catherine is, and always has been, a female.

http://www.sclqld.org.au/judicial-papers/judicial-profiles/profiles/ceholmes

Just to avoid any further confusion.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Greg
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 4:42pm

Stop spamming!

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 4:47pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 4:42pm:

Stop spamming!

This thread provides important factual information.

The aim is to educate (and to stop wasting time in other threads).

If you think the information is wrong, or that there is no need for education, take it up with the mods.

Thank you.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Greg
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 4:54pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 4:47pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 4:42pm:

Stop spamming!

You're just baiting Cods.

With the same post.

Stop it!

Now where's my Naughty Corner topic?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:08pm

WASTE TIME and SPACE LIKE THIS YOU MEAN

Quote:

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #810 - Today at 11:18am Quote
It seems that cods and Lisa both had loads of washing that required urgent attention.

Quote:

So, you'll accept the outcome no matter what happens?

Quote:

Will you accept the outcome, no matter what happens?

Quote:

Who told you that he smothered her

Quote:

Who told you that he smothered her?

all very FACTUAL INFORMATION...lisa.. ::) ::) ::)

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Greg
Post by cods on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:09pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 4:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 4:47pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 4:42pm:

Stop spamming!

You're just baiting Cods.

With the same post.

Stop it!

Now where's my Naughty Corner topic?

have you tried aussie RECORD ABUSE THREAD>.. its where gweggy does his best posting////

all FACTUAL AND IMPORTANT MIND

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:12pm

ooooops another riveting FACTUAL post..

Quote:

Thank you.

it clearly states:

"Cause of Death cannot be determined ... "

So, who told you that he smothered her?

they come so thick and fast some days.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Redneck on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:17pm

Is this another stalking cods topic?

Where is Aussie?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:19pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 4:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 4:47pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 4:42pm:

Stop spamming!

You're just baiting Cods.

I'm doing no such thing.

I'm trying to help her, so that she doesn't look so silly in the other thread.

She's got it into her mind, somehow, that the QLD Court of Appeal is made up of "faceless men".

Moreover, she complains that there should have been a female judge involved.

This thread clears it up for her.

The QLD Court of Appeal is led by the most senior member of the Queensland judiciary, Chief Justice Catherine Holmes.

Catherine is neither faceless, nor a man.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Redneck on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:21pm

That is exactly what he is up to

Dont reply at all cods

REPORTED TO FREEDIVER!

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:22pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:17pm:

Is this another stalking cods topic?

Where is Aussie?

Do you have the slightest idea why this Thread exists? If not, I'm happy to explain it to you.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:23pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:17pm:

Is this another stalking cods topic?

It's an educational thread.

If you think any of the information is incorrect, by all means let me know.

If you think I'm being abusive, or breaking any forum rules, by all means report me to the mods.

Thank you.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Redneck on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:26pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:22pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:17pm:

Is this another stalking cods topic?

Where is Aussie?

Do you have the slightest idea why this Thread exists? If not, I'm happy to explain it to you.

PLEASE DONT TELL ME!

I HAVE NO DESIRE TO KNOW THANK YOU!

I AM SURE IT IS VERY IMPORTANT BUT NO

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:26pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:17pm:

Is this another stalking cods topic?

Where is Aussie?

they dont call it stalking red..

its called FACTUAL INFORMATION...

they are both full of it.. ::) ::) ::) ::)

and dont forget its an attention thingy... ;) ;)

he has already posted this in the Baden Clay thread....

just didnt get enough attention...... :( :(

if you check out AUSSIES RECORD ABUSE thread..

you will see gweggies name page after page after page.....after page after page... a bit sad really..

but cods is tough...

I can handle all this stalking...

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:27pm

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:17pm:

Is this another stalking cods topic?

Where is Aussie?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:27pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:22pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:17pm:

Is this another stalking cods topic?

Where is Aussie?

Do you have the slightest idea why this Thread exists? If not, I'm happy to explain it to you.

PLEASE DONT TELL ME!

I HAVE NO DESIRE TO KNOW THANK YOU!

I AM SURE IT IS VERY IMPORTANT BUT NO

Stop 'drama queening' then.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:28pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:21pm:

That is exactly what he is up to

Dont reply at all cods

REPORTED TO FREEDIVER!

your a gentleman red....

the misogynists wont like it...

and they will probably attack cods more now..

but like I said I can handle it.. let them do their worst..

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:29pm

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:28pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:21pm:

That is exactly what he is up to

Dont reply at all cods

REPORTED TO FREEDIVER!

your a gentleman red....

the misogynists wont like it...

and they will probably attack cods more now..

but like I said I can handle it.. let them do their worst..

Nobody is attacking cods.

It's an educational thread.

If you think any of the information is incorrect, by all means let me know.

If you think I'm being abusive, or breaking any forum rules, by all means report me to the mods.

Thank you.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by captain spaulding on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:29pm

Herb would never start a thread like this.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:30pm

captain spaulding wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:29pm:

Herb would never start a thread like this.

That's correct.

Herb starts troll threads.

This is an educational thread.

If you think any of the information is incorrect, by all means let me know.

If you think I'm being abusive, or breaking any forum rules, by all means report me to the mods.

Thank you.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by captain spaulding on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:33pm

You can wrap it up any way you like, Pecker. Only the bumlickers on OP have any doubts about your role as pedantic troll and thread spamming contrarian.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:34pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:29pm:

If you think I'm being abusive, or breaking any forum rules, by all means report me to the mods

he has..

your little mate aussie will tell you'

its against FDs rules to use personal names when starting a thread..

its personal abuse...

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:35pm

captain spaulding wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:33pm:

You can wrap it up any way you like, Pecker. Only the bumlickers on OP have any doubts about your role as pedantic troll and thread spamming contrarian.

correct... lets watch the wriggling begin...

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:35pm

captain spaulding wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:33pm:

You can wrap it up any way you like, Pecker. Only the bumlickers on OP have any doubts about your role as pedantic troll and thread spamming contrarian.

Hi Jones. Yet another sock. Well done.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:36pm

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:29pm:

If you think I'm being abusive, or breaking any forum rules, by all means report me to the mods

he has..

your little mate aussie will tell you'

its against FDs rules to use personal names when starting a thread..

its personal abuse...

No it is not. It is contrary to my Rules in Relationships.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:37pm

ooooooooooooooooops... the little DICTATOR then gweggy..

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Those Who Don't Know
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:39pm

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:29pm:

If you think I'm being abusive, or breaking any forum rules, by all means report me to the mods

he has..

your little mate aussie will tell you'

its against FDs rules to use personal names when starting a thread..

its personal abuse...

This is an educational thread.

If you think any of the information is incorrect, by all means let me know.

If you think I'm being abusive, or breaking any forum rules, by all means report me to the mods.

If it makes you happier, I'll change the thread title.

Thank you.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Redneck on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:39pm

Well I am out of here have fun stalkers!

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by The Mechanic on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:41pm

more abuse by gweggy

mothra or her socks will be along any time soon now

the king and queen of Abusers..

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:41pm

its an attention to gweggy thread..

and I wouldnt dream of you changing it...and beside FD would like to read it I am sure...

hes a great one for education is that man.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:42pm

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:43pm

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:41pm:

more abuse by gweggy

This is an educational thread.

If you think any of the information is incorrect, by all means let me know.

If you think I'm being abusive, or breaking any forum rules, by all means report me to the mods.

If you have nothing valuable to contribute, you are free to avoid the thread.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by The Mechanic on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:43pm

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:41pm:

its an attention to gweggy thread..

and I wouldnt dream of you changing it...and beside FD would like to read it I am sure...

hes a great one for education is that man.

another gweggy attempt to humiliate and belittle yet another forum member..

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:44pm

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:43pm:

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:41pm:

its an attention to gweggy thread..

and I wouldnt dream of you changing it...and beside FD would like to read it I am sure...

hes a great one for education is that man.

another gweggy attempt to humiliate and belittle yet another forum member..

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:45pm

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:41pm:

more abuse by gweggy

mothra or her socks will be along any time soon now

the king and queen of Abusers..

it is confusing isnt it...??????

theres our gweggy naming every man and his dog

IN AUSSIES "RECORD ABUSE THREAD"..

he has pages to his name...

and then he makes a thread like this?????>.. ::) ::)

after already making the post on another thread....

remarkable. :D

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Redneck on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:46pm

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:43pm:

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:41pm:

its an attention to gweggy thread..

and I wouldnt dream of you changing it...and beside FD would like to read it I am sure...

hes a great one for education is that man.

another gweggy attempt to humiliate and belittle yet another forum member..

Spot On!

Him and the usual suspects!

They will be sharpening their teeth as we speak!

Anyway I am now definitely out of here second attempt!

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:48pm

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:45pm:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:41pm:

more abuse by gweggy

mothra or her socks will be along any time soon now

the king and queen of Abusers..

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:49pm

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:43pm:

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:41pm:

its an attention to gweggy thread..

and I wouldnt dream of you changing it...and beside FD would like to read it I am sure...

hes a great one for education is that man.

another gweggy attempt to humiliate and belittle yet another forum member..

Mechanic, when 'you' (i.e. me and others) have been spending endless time and effort trying to assist cods come to grips with the process/Law in that Baden-Clay thread, and after all that effort, she posts:

Quote:

why didnt the appeal court have at least one female judge??... ooops mustnt even think like that...

.....after having been previously informed at least twice (once with an image of all three Judges) that there was a female Judge, what do you do to get the fact across to her?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:56pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:49pm:

.....after having been previously informed at least twice (once with an image of all three Judges) that there was a female Judge, what do you do to get the fact across to her?

Start an educational thread that clears it up once and for all, and that doesn't involve any abuse or name-calling?

Yes, that's what I thought it needed.

The QLD Court of Appeal is led by the most senior member of the Queensland judiciary, Chief Justice Catherine Holmes.

Catherine is, and always has been, a female.

She is neither faceless, nor a man.

http://www.sclqld.org.au/judicial-papers/judicial-profiles/profiles/ceholmes

If this information is incorrect, I'll make the necessary alterations.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 6:38pm

well its not HOW [b"]YOU"[/b] SEE IT.. gweg...

its how its TAKEN BY THE OTHER PERSON........

I know its hard for you and aussie to understand others on here have an OPINION..

I know hard to believe... :o

I understand that you guys know it all...and we are just mere peasants....who lets face it..

have no appreciation of the AWESOME company we are in.. :) :)

some of us females try to understand,

that in your home life.. you are more than probably under your partners thumb...cowed down to the point where you have no where else to get out

all those misogynist thoughts....and all those little quips about washing.. and being simple just plain getting everything wrong..

are mainly just bullying put downs...

but all EDUCATIONAL put downs..and thats the point....

I am sure all the girls reading this post will agree with me...

we girls should always at all times remember our place....

the men ....

can I call you that???... have made it clear...

cods has no place in their amazing company...

they are far too good for her..

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 6:41pm

Tell me cods, when you posted that the Baden-Clay Court of Appeal had not one female Judge (yes...that's what you said, ostensibly as a genuine authority on it) were you right, or totally incorrect? Let's get real.

No opinion involved. It is a simple matter of very obvious fact which you continue to pretend does not exist.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 6:49pm

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 6:38pm:

I know its hard for you and aussie to understand others on here have an OPINION..

No, I don't find it hard to believe at all.

We all have opinions.

However, this thread is about facts.

The QLD Court of Appeal is led by the most senior member of the Queensland judiciary, Chief Justice Catherine Holmes.

Catherine is neither faceless, nor a man.

That's not my opinion - it's just a fact.

If you think I'm wrong, I'm happy to hear why.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:06pm

Quote:

So, who told you that he smothered her?

still wasting time and space... aint it the truth

did I say she was a man????>.....she looks a bit transgender... but where did I say she was a man....

no dear this is all about your manhood.. which seems to be very low....and you need that boost dont you dear.....

stop if you can repeating yourself...its kind of well ..............I think most know what it is...I dont want to end up in the record abuse thread...yuck yuck...

I am sure fd will be impressed with your take on this thread...hes one of you after all...

.and I am sure andrei... thinks you are up there with the intellectual best...longweekend springs to mind..

its all about self esteem dear..or is it called libido these days.... only you would know....

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:09pm

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:06pm:

did I say she was a man????

Yes.

You said the QLD Court of Appeal was made up of "faceless men".

However, the QLD Court of Appeal is led by the most senior member of the Queensland judiciary, Chief Justice Catherine Holmes.

Catherine is neither faceless, nor a man.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by cods on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:14pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:09pm:

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:06pm:

did I say she was a man????

oh come on gweggy that was days ago....long before anything was put up about who they were by the current know it all..

you are scraping the bottom of the barrel arent you??...

but if thats all you have got.. how come it took you so long to EDUCATE ME>>>.or try too. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

dont tell me you just did a search on that didnt you.???... :D :D :D :D

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by Aussie on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:17pm

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:09pm:

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:06pm:

did I say she was a man????

Incorrect. It was because you kept referring to "faceless men" that I took the time and trouble to even post photos of all the Appeal Court Judges. Would you like the link and post numbers?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:22pm

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:09pm:

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:06pm:

did I say she was a man????

oh come on gweggy that was days ago....

Today, you said:

"why didnt the appeal court have at least one female judge??"

Today, at 2:04 pm (my time). A little over three hours ago.

Today, cods.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1449536783/848#848

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 8:46pm

This has taken me over an hour and a half to research and prepare, and it was not time spent to vindicate this Thread or to demean cods…but these are the facts and they may assist cods and others to understand the level of frustration some might experience when one is wrestling with custard.

"A few days ago" says cods. Nah cods, it goes back to the 12th December, 2015, a month. The post # refer to this Thread:

Link.

This was part of her post # 120 made on the 12th December, 2015:

Quote:

.. but by a faceless court…

Part of cod’s post #184 made on the 29th December, 2015:

Quote:

then along come some faceless person and say ok lets change that to GUILTY OF MANSLAUGHTER...

I posted at post #205 0n the 29th December, 2015:

Quote:

And what is this 'faceless' rubbish? They were/are Supreme Court Judges Holmes, Fraser and Gotterson. I'll see if I can get some photos so you can stop with the 'faceless' garbage.

…and that post had photos of all three Judges…including the female Holmes.

Yet…cods at her post # 391 on the 1st January, 2016 says again:

Quote:

its left to two or three faceless people...to actually make the judgement.... not the jury...

And on…..cods at her post # 606 on the 9th January, 2016:

Quote:

3 blokes say he wasnt......

and we have to sit back and accept it......really...

can you tell me whats the point of having a jury...in the first place.. when their verdict can be throw out by 3 men..??????

My reply at Post # 607 (immediately after cods’ post on the 9th January, 2016:

Quote:

Jesus wept.

My further comment at Post # 616 on the 9th January, 2016:

Quote:

I posted 'Jesus wept' because even though I have told you in this Thread, (I even found photos and showed them to you/all) you still have no idea that there were not 'three men.' There were two men, and one woman who is the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland.

And on she goes with Post # 638 on the 10th January, 2016:

Quote:

as 3 wisemen would reason it...

And then, today…cods at Post # 848:

Quote:

why didnt the appeal court have at least one female judge??... ooops mustnt even think like that...

I mean.....come on. Fair is fair, no?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 9:20pm

Extraordinary.

It really is.

And I'm not trying to demean cods either.

The media must shoulder some of the blame.

People watch garbage like ACA and 60 Minutes and get sucked right in.

Those ridiculous phrases like "faceless men" get thrown about so much, that the average punter begins to believe them.

I don't watch those shows, obviously, but I'm assuming that they've been using the "faceless men" line in regards to the QLD Appeal Court.

If they say it often enough, people start to believe that crap.

And that's all they ever broadcast: crap.

I was willing to give cods the benefit of the doubt, and that's why I started this thread.

So, now that we all know that they aren't "faceless men", perhaps we can move on in the hope that we never hear that ridiculous phrase again.

And, we can all acknowledge that a woman was involved in the decision.

A very impressive woman, by the way.

Check out her CV: quite remarkable.

cods would actually like her.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 9:35pm

Another very important aspect of it is this, and it is why I took issue with her on the matter. As I was reading again that entire and long Thread, cods makes many references to misogyny implying that the Appeal Court was swayed because it was comprised of all males with an anti female pro male bias.

Yet, the most basic facts just do not support the contention, and probably suggests a large degree of misandry on her part.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by cods on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:04pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:22pm:

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:09pm:

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:06pm:

did I say she was a man????

oh come on gweggy that was days ago....

so that your version of me calling her a man.... >:( >:(

well I never...

and your little mate pointed out almost immediately he said I had been told TWICE ALREADY...

WOW what a nerve of cods.......either didnt read or forgot.. what a nerve..what a crime...

I am hoping fd gets red complaint....and realises you are full of it...

I told red watch out for the wriggle off the hook and here it is..

now gweggy thinks he is saying something good about a female... judge of all people.... well for all we know she could be a GAY judge.. ::) ::)

I still havent decided why this is so important to the Baden Clay thread.. but it obviously is to you two....

and there comes aussie changing the subject.....cods makes many reference to migogyny

as he admits its a long post... I dont think it was addressed to him.. but neither here nor there..

from memory I said it about 3 times... which in aussie speak is MANY.. which I presume by that he means I had no right to dare bring it up even .... ;D ;D

but notice ..... suggests a large degree on her part of ...misandry.... ::) ::)thank god for gillard....we would never know what that means otherwise would we..

but now its not about female judges its about misogyny and misandry... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Red if you are reading this.. I TOLD YA SO..

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:07pm

they just keep acomin

Quote:

How would you know, one way or the other?

How would any of us know?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by ian on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:16pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 9:20pm:

People watch garbage like ACA and 60 Minutes and get sucked right in.

Those ridiculous phrases like "faceless men" get thrown about so much, that the average punter begins to believe them.

I don't watch those shows, obviously, but I'm assuming that they've been using the "faceless men" line in regards to the QLD Appeal Court.

If you dont watch these shows then how do you know they throw the phrases about? All about the drama and the attention for you isnt it Greggary. At first I thought these threads were all about bullying Cods, now I realise its more about your hysterical shrieking drama queen act. You really are a jelly spined ponce.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:25pm

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:08pm:

WASTE OF TIME and SPACE LIKE THIS YOU MEAN

Quote:

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #810 - Today at 11:18am Quote
It seems that cods and Lisa both had loads of washing that required urgent attention.

[quote]So, you'll accept the outcome no matter what happens?

Quote:

Will you accept the outcome, no matter what happens?

Quote:

Who told you that he smothered her

Quote:

Who told you that he smothered her?

all very FACTUAL INFORMATION...lisa.. ::) ::) ::)[/quote]

Yes...exactly.

And it's the reason why that Clay topic has turned to sh!t.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:30pm

Nah. That Thread has great on going value in its genuine attempt to assist lay people understand what the process is and what the Law is. There are those who are doing their best to come to grips with that from both sides, and then there is one who arrives and posts garbage.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:33pm

ian wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 9:20pm:

Greg doesn't watch ANY show.

Why?

He's super glued to the Internet 24/7....and his contributions there oscillate btwn stalking and spamming every topic he enters.

Does he ever stop for a toilet break?

No, of course not. He's also super glued a catheter to his tiny appendage.

:-/ ::) :-?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:37pm

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:43pm:

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:41pm:

its an attention to gweggy thread..

and I wouldnt dream of you changing it...and beside FD would like to read it I am sure...

hes a great one for education is that man.

another gweggy attempt to humiliate and belittle yet another forum member..

That's correct.

Ultimately, it says more about HIM than his targeted victim.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:41pm

captain spaulding wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:33pm:

You can wrap it up any way you like, Pecker. Only the bumlickers on OP have any doubts about your role as pedantic troll and thread spamming contrarian.

Actually, that describes Greg perfectly.

Well done.

Hopefully Greg will pull his head in. He can be very nice at times.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:48pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:21pm:

That is exactly what he is up to

Dont reply at all cods

REPORTED TO FREEDIVER!

I've now reported BOTH Greg and Aussie to Freediver.

Vicious tag team targeting/stalking of victims online is not ok. Ever!

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Agnes on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 11:05pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:48pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:21pm:

That is exactly what he is up to

Dont reply at all cods

REPORTED TO FREEDIVER!

I've now reported BOTH Greg and Aussie to Freediver.

Vicious tag team targeting/stalking of victims online is not ok. Ever!

Oh really, you mean like the way you and AiA and skippy etc, come in here after certain pp, trolling in your tag team as you lot so often do, and then report them for reacting to your trolling making it seem to mods that the victim , in fact the person being trolled , is the trouble maker, you lot plan this in PA and then come in here and try to get pp banned- you lot have been doing it for a while- good one Lisa or is that Capt Spaulding- I think you are a tad bit dis ingenious if I may say so. ::)

i will be on the lookout for more of the same behavior and I will be reporting this behavior, with proof to Free Diver. every time it happens from now on. >:(

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Agnes on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 11:18pm

Agnes wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 11:05pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:48pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:21pm:

That is exactly what he is up to

Dont reply at all cods

REPORTED TO FREEDIVER!

I've now reported BOTH Greg and Aussie to Freediver.

Vicious tag team targeting/stalking of victims online is not ok. Ever!

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by The Grappler on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 11:20pm

I think it says more about those who continually engage in these internecine wars than it does about any individual named.......

I think some are 'reading in' far too much...

Now - I might slag off at Longy - but Longy has been slagging off at me for months and utterly deserves it and wrapping him/her around factual fingers is fun - but a lot of this disputation is just mis-reading and - as I said - reading in about the intentions of a poster.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Agnes on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 11:25pm

I think if you are going to accuse someone of any behaviour, you need to examine your own behaviour first.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by The Grappler on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 11:32pm

Agnes wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 11:25pm:

I think if you are going to accuse someone of any behaviour, you need to examine your own behaviour first.

As Greg would say - Indeed.......

But I prithee, Madam - let us not fight about such things - I have no interest in doing so or in continuing some insanity brought over from Political Animal... there are far better things we can do with our time..... let us not argue from both ends... but rather let us meet in the middle more often....

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Agnes on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 12:52am

Agnes wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 11:18pm:

Agnes wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 11:05pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:48pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:21pm:

That is exactly what he is up to

Dont reply at all cods

REPORTED TO FREEDIVER!

I've now reported BOTH Greg and Aussie to Freediver.

Vicious tag team targeting/stalking of victims online is not ok. Ever!

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by The Grappler on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 1:13am

I'm really not up on all this chasing one another in ever-diminishing circles.... I think you all need to call a truce and smoke the peace pipe.....

Like any long-established couple - some of you seem to have held on to any number of past gripes and have not ... (baaap - buzz word coming)... 'moved on'!

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:14am

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:04pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:22pm:

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:09pm:

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 7:06pm:

did I say she was a man????

oh come on gweggy that was days ago....

so that your version of me calling her a man.... >:( >:(

That's you not accepting the fact that she's a woman.

Do you now at least acknowledge that a woman was involved, and that the three judges are not "faceless"?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:25am

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:04pm:

now gweggy thinks he is saying something good about a female... judge of all people....

It has nothing to do with good or bad.

I'm saying she is a female.

You said the judges were all "faceless men".

You said there should have been a female judge on the Court of Appeal.

I'm explaining to you that there was a female.

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:04pm:

.... well for all we know she could be a GAY judge..

How is that at all relevant?

What point are you trying to make with such an assumption?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:38am

well suddenly it bothers you that I say faceless men when describing the judges....but when I say 12 good men and true about the jury... its doesnt bring on a fit of despair and baying like I have never seen before...

do you know what the jury was made up of???>..

because I do....

faceless men...what an insult what a crime....does it matter... at the end of the day this is about the LAW

which btw is faceless and sexless......

keep on dodging you and your mate are good at that..

is this REALLY ABOUT ME SAYIng SHE IS A WOMEN..

ARE YOU SERIOUS.........

have you got her birth cert???????????????...

BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT

have you got her blood details?????

I NEED PROOF OF WHAT YOU CLAIM...

a picture can tell a thousand words.......

SO SHOW ME THE PROOF.............

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:44am

Agnes wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 11:25pm:

I think if you are going to accuse someone of any behaviour, you need to examine your own behaviour first.

well said agnes

you need to start a thread with that..

ye who is without sin throw the first stone...

words to that effect..

its laughable in the extreme isnt it...

constant pot calling kettle stuff...

at least if we have a thread like that

it would give both sides of the argument instead of just the selected part.. ::) ::) ::)

which very conveniently doesnt tell the whole story.

its time to make STALKING for the sheer hell of it.. ABUSE..

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:46am

Aussie wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:30pm:

so the term FACELESS MEN.. is unacceptable.. its abuse....

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:51am

Another day.

Another topic full of utter nonsense.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:54am

cods wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:46am:

Aussie wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 10:30pm:

so the term FACELESS MEN.. is unacceptable.. its abuse....

No, it's not abuse.

It's inaccurate nonsense.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 9:24am

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:51am:

Another day.

Another topic full of utter nonsense.

Is this nonsense?

The QLD Court of Appeal is led by the most senior member of the Queensland judiciary, Chief Justice Catherine Holmes.

Catherine is neither faceless nor a man.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Redneck on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 9:40am

Who let the dogs out

https://youtu.be/GqMNUPx3MJM

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 9:43am

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 9:40am:

Who let the dogs out

https://youtu.be/GqMNUPx3MJM

Awwww cute :)

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Redneck on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 9:52am

Better version more appropriate!

https://youtu.be/Qkuu0Lwb5EM

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:02am

Impressive.

University Education

Master of Laws (Adv), University of Queensland (1998)
Bachelor of Arts (Hons), University of Queensland (1989)
Graduate Diploma of Legal Practice, Queensland Institute of Technology (1983)
Bachelor of Laws, University of Queensland (1980)
Bachelor of Economics, Australian National University (1977)

Judicial Career

Chief Justice of Queensland, Supreme Court of Queensland (2015-)
Acting Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Queensland (2015)
Judge, Queensland Court of Appeal (2006-)
Judge, Queensland Mental Health Court (2004-2006)
Judge, Supreme Court of Queensland (2000-2006)
Acting Judge, District Court of Queensland (1999)

Pre-judicial Career

Appointed Senior Counsel (1999)
Counsel Assisting the Forde Commission of Inquiry into Child Abuse (1998-1999)
Deputy President, Queensland Community Corrections Board (1997)
Part-time Member, Anti-Discrimination Tribunal (1994-2000)
Crown Prosecutor, Office of Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (1984-1986)
Foundation Member, Women's Legal Service Queensland (1984)
Admitted as a Barrister of the Supreme Court of Queensland (1984)
Admitted as a Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Queensland (1982)

The Honourable Chief Justice Catherine E Holmes

http://www.sclqld.org.au/judicial-papers/judicial-profiles/profiles/ceholmes

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:10am

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:51am:

Another day.

Another topic full of utter nonsense.

You really shouldn't be surprised anymore.
Often topics are best left ignored.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:11am

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 9:52am:

Better version more appropriate!

https://youtu.be/Qkuu0Lwb5EM

Ha!

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:12am

Aussie wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 9:35pm:

Excellent point.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:14am

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:10am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:51am:

Another day.

Another topic full of utter nonsense.

You really shouldn't be surprised anymore.
Often topics are best left ignored.

I know.

IMO, topics like this are a total waste of forum space.

They make you wonder about the mindset of those who bother to start them.

Anyway.....

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:19am

Staying on topic:

The QLD Court of Appeal is led by the most senior member of the Queensland judiciary, Chief Justice Catherine Holmes.

Catherine is, and always has been, a female.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:23am

She is also married to a male and has two kids....a pretty strong indication she is not 'gay' as was suggested by cods.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:29am

Aussie wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:23am:

She is also married to a male and has two kids....a pretty strong indication she is not 'gay' as was suggested by cods.

I wonder why she made such a suggestion in the first place.

There's absolutely no evidence to suggest that Catherine is gay.

Moreover, if she was, it's completely irrelevant.

A very strange comment, to say the least.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by Alinta on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:32am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:02am:

Impressive credentials indeed.

I for one wish to be further educated on her performance during her judicial career prior to the Baden Clay case.......judgements? appeal/s against her judgements? would be of considerable assistance.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:35am

Alinta wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:32am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:02am:

Impressive credentials indeed.

Yes, she's certainly achieved quite a lot.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by Aussie on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:56am

Alinta wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:32am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:02am:

I'm not sure those stats would be publicly available. I've never seen any reported.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by Alinta on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 11:01am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:35am:

Alinta wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:32am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:02am:

Impressive credentials indeed.

Yes, she's certainly achieved quite a lot.

Yes, her credentials certainly indicate that.

As any proficient educator would, I'm sure you wish to assist in increasing your students' knowledge of Justice Holmes' achievements. To this end, please supply me with link/s to her judgements, or appeals against her judgements, prior to the Baden-Clay case.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 11:04am

Alinta wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 11:01am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:35am:

Alinta wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:32am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:02am:

Impressive credentials indeed.

Yes, she's certainly achieved quite a lot.

I don't have that information, sorry.

Perhaps a google search will assist you.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Alinta on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 11:20am

"I don't have that information, sorry."

OK, I didn't think you did..........

"Perhaps a google search will assist you"

I already had and yes it did...........I hate it when my educator has less knowledge than (as a student) I have. Such is life.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 11:25am

Alinta wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 11:20am:

You seem to have misunderstood the reason this thread was created.

It's sole purpose was to establish the fact that the QLD Court of Appeal is not made up of "faceless men".

"The QLD Court of Appeal is led by the most senior member of the Queensland judiciary, Chief Justice Catherine Holmes.

"Catherine is, and always has been, a female.

"Just to avoid any further confusion."

However, if you'd like to provide more information about the judge in the OP, that would be most welcome.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 11:43am

Seeing as some people are interested, here's some more information about the female judge.

"Catherine Holmes has become Queensland's first female chief justice, rising to lead a judiciary which hopes to rebuild after a period of unprecedented bad blood.

"Unlike her predecessor Tim Carmody, there have so far been no public attacks against Justice Holmes' appointment.

"She has more experience in the judiciary's highest echelons, with years experience in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal.

"She also ran the landmark Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry into the 2011 disasters."

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-09-07/who-is-catherine-holmes/6756168

And, despite the protests from cods, it appears that she really is a woman.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Alinta on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 11:52am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 11:25am:

Alinta wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 11:20am:

Nah... I didn't misunderstand. Whether correct or not, I have my own view on why you created the thread.....that view is unimportant, as on face value it appears to be for the reason you state.

My contribution here was merely a pretty much tongue in cheek effort to discover the depth of your research on Justice Holmes.......just game playing.......you know.....

Title: Re: For the Benefit of Mr Kite
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 11:59am

Alinta wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 11:52am:

Nah... I didn't misunderstand. Whether correct or not, I have my own view on why you created the thread.....that view is unimportant, as on face value it appears to be for the reason you state.

It's exactly for the reason I stated.

i.e. to make it absolutely clear to everyone that the QLD Court of Appeal has a female judge (to avoid any further confusion).

Learning more about the woman, and her impressive achievements, has been a bonus.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 3:50pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:14am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 10:10am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:51am:

Another day.

Another topic full of utter nonsense.

You really shouldn't be surprised anymore.
Often topics are best left ignored.

I know.

IMO, topics like this are a total waste of forum space.

They make you wonder about the mindset of those who bother to start them.

Anyway.....

oh it isnt hard to guess what the MINDSET is of the originator...BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT..

I have gone to all the bother of finding out where I dared to claim these

were FACELESS MEN>>.

sorry if that offends anyone like lisa or andrei..

I realise I have pooped two people off for sure...

anyway I dared to say to my utter shame....this word or words...on the 15th DEC 2015 in the Baden clay thread reply 184.. in reply to quantum...

gweg then comes thrashing in.. on the 13/1/2016 reply 859.. punching the air....about Catherine.... ::) ::)

from there he has really excelled himself with my very own..beash cods to death thread..

it isnt enough they get me on the Baden clay...and in AUSSIES PERSONALLY LISTED RECORD ABUSE THREAD>>.

andrei whilst you are here... are you ok with all this

being dished out to cods???... I just want an opinion thats all...I just feel if I was denigrating someone anyone like these guys are doing here...

not only would I feel disgusted with myself...

but I would somehow expect maybe a hint from a mod.. that it isnt noice...

am I wrong.. you and lisa obviously chat about this... but you dont seem horrified... by it....

and as you can see they are actually jumping on every word... that cods says and its turned into more venom..and spite... even though these gentlemen dont see it that way...

andrei I accept full responsibility for daring to say faceless men.. when all the while Catherine was there.. bless her cotton socks..

but apart from that I have no idea why these two gentleman have decided to attack me or show me up or EDUCATE me as they claim..they are doing...

so I hold no responsibility for this LOW CLASS thread....

and just so there is ABSOLUTELY no CONFUSION as to WHY THIS THREAD WAS CREATED>..

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1452666901/94

For the Benefit of cods

thats the title....even after one or two attempts to change it..

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Redneck on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:00pm

Sucked in again cods!

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:04pm

Quote:

but apart from that I have no idea why these two gentleman have decided to attack me or show me up or EDUCATE me as they claim..they are doing...

Not an attack. For more than a month (despite having been advised otherwise twice....once with even a photo) you have been posting that the Appeal Court was made up of men (as though that meant some sort of gender bias....possibly hinting pro Mr Baden Clay and anti Mrs Baden-Clay) and finally the last straw when you actually posted that there was no female Judge on that Appeal Court....when there was.

This Thread is a due correction, not an attack.

And you could kill it all off by simply saying....."Ooops, I stuffed that up." Instead, you keep trying to justify it.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:21pm

cods wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 3:50pm:

and just so there is ABSOLUTELY no CONFUSION as to WHY THIS THREAD WAS CREATED>..

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1452666901/94

For the Benefit of cods

Correct.

You are the one who was struggling to accept the fact that the Court of Appeal was not made up of "faceless men".

It's all sorted now.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:58pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:21pm:

cods wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 3:50pm:

and just so there is ABSOLUTELY no CONFUSION as to WHY THIS THREAD WAS CREATED>..

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1452666901/94

For the Benefit of cods

Correct.

You are the one who was struggling to accept the fact that the Court of Appeal was not made up of "faceless men".

It's all sorted now.

for you???

not for me SIR.. not for me.. I thin k i said faceless men twice... aussie will fill you in.....

over almost 60 pages????....

you went 29 days before you attacked me....

yes it is an ATTACK A PERSONAL ATTACK....

I have now done an aussie and gone back through this VERY SO CALLED EDUCATIONAL THREAD...

not a LETS GET CODS THREAD...as you claim

here is what I counted.. between you two gentleman...who are only trying to educate...

well one is the other wants a CONFESSION>..

and as I have been threatened on many occasions he wont back off until he gets said CONFESSION>.

answer me because I will keep asking until you do...

beep beep.

anyway here is what i got..

SHE... was used 5 times

HER was used 5 times

YOU was used 14 times

CODS was used 7 times

lets not mention the subtle puts downs about watching ACA or 60 Minutes...

[I prefer FACEBOOK like gweg] ::) ::) sarcasm there.

it is an ATTACK ON CODS...

you can back off you can claim all I have to do IS CON FESS....you can claim its not abusive in any way you are just educating.someone...

and there is no MALICE>>>

what a shame CODS DOESNT SEE IT THAT WAY and the supporters she has on here do not see it that way either...funny that

thanks to all those who have come out on the side of FAIRNESS

is this FAIR????,... is it WARRANTED???...

has the accused been found guilty

BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT

ONLY IF THEY GET A CONFESSION.... >:(

is this a kangaroo court...????

not only found guilty by THIS COURT... ::)

but also embarrassed and humiliated in a very

PUBLIC FORUM....

and you think its all sorted... >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

i

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 5:05pm

Enough, cods. You got it wrong. You stuffed up. Why not just say so? It all then goes away. But, if you keep that sort of response up, you are inviting detailed factual replies which you will likely not like at all.

Quote:

why didnt the appeal court have at least one female judge??

It did.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 5:28pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 5:05pm:

why didnt the appeal court have at least one female judge??

It did.

Not an attack. For more than a month (despite having been advised otherwise twice....once with even a photo) you have been posting that the Appeal Court was made up of men (as though that meant some sort of gender bias....possibly hinting pro Mr Baden Clay and anti Mrs Baden-Clay) and finally the last straw when you actually posted that there was no female Judge on that Appeal Court....when there was.

This Thread is a due correction, not an attack.

And you could kill it all off by simply saying....."Ooops, I stuffed that up." Instead, you keep trying to justify it.

I CAN "KILL IT"

INSTEAD "YOU" KEEP TRYING TO JUSTIFY IT?...

if only I confess this INQUISITION will go away...

something tells me no it wont..

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 5:36pm

As nothing else has worked, maybe you should try it......for the first time?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 5:57pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 5:36pm:

As nothing else has worked, maybe you should try it......for the first time?

you havent learnt much have you...

this is a public forum...as far as I am aware no one set you up to

BE JUDGE UMPIRE JURY AND HANGMAN..

you and your friend think you have every right to humiliate someone at your pleasure...you think you have the upper hand on every thread...and everything is under your CONTROL...

well not this person...I am afraid...I am happy for this thread to be at the top... so everyone can read..

what a little DICTATOR you are..

how you take it upon yourself...to enjoy putting down others...and keeping people in their" place"

how dare anyone who has no knowledge of the law say anything in a thread that relies on the law..

who do these people think they are?? daring to argue with the,likes of aussie and greg..

how dare they disagree with the LAW>.

just who are these people?????....

aussie tells them something and they have to hide to IGNORE it...

aussie ,and greg dont put people down they

EDUCATE THEM...everyone knows that!!...

aussie even has a special thread called RECORD ABUSE>...so everyone he dislike will be named and shamed... [well thats the plan]..

.sadly its mainly the same two people that rush in with their version of abuse...

this isnt abuse is it???

no you have both said that several times...

its to EDUCATE CODS...

NO MALICE INTENDED...

but then.

you are not being ridiculed and monitored are you?....

your not having every word collected for future use against said criminal...[cods].. we all know you are very very good at bringing up things that happened months even years ago....

and you tell me this will all go away. if only I CONFESS......

do I worry about your INQUISITION>..

not at all.. it says more about you and your little mate than it does about me....

I think you will find....

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:04pm

Cods!

When you next post in here, just type these 3 words at Aussie and/Greg :

WHATEVER YOU RECKON.

Then don't post in here again.

If you do this :

1. The sanity of OzPol posters will no longer be at risk.

2. I will personally send you $1000.

Thank you.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Setanta on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:37pm

Cods, I don't see you being ridiculed. I see you being brought to task about your OPINION, which was wrong. Yes you are entitled to one but others are also entitled to poke holes in what you say, you were wrong but you are like the Fonz. Sometimes it's better to just say, "my bad", and move on rather than turning it into something else.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwkU8-d1gIk

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:41pm

cods wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:21pm:

cods wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 3:50pm:

and just so there is ABSOLUTELY no CONFUSION as to WHY THIS THREAD WAS CREATED>..

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1452666901/94

For the Benefit of cods

Correct.

You are the one who was struggling to accept the fact that the Court of Appeal was not made up of "faceless men".

It's all sorted now.

for you???

For everyone.

There was confusion about the Court of Appeal.

Now we all know that it's not made up of "faceless men", and that one of the judges is a woman.

Moreover, we have learned what a well-educated and high-achieving woman she is (something I didn't know the full extent of until I did further research for this thread).

This has been a very informative, and enjoyable thread for everyone involved.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:42pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:04pm:

Please cods, I beg you to do that. Please! I want to see Jones find $1000 and send it to you. I want you to have that money! Please!!!!! Do it!!

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 7:20pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:41pm:

cods wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:21pm:

cods wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 3:50pm:

and just so there is ABSOLUTELY no CONFUSION as to WHY THIS THREAD WAS CREATED>..

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1452666901/94

For the Benefit of cods

Correct.

You are the one who was struggling to accept the fact that the Court of Appeal was not made up of "faceless men".

It's all sorted now.

for you???

when your fan club improves by more than one.. we may think on that.,.

in the mean time tell lisa...I dont think shes enjoyed it. at all...

and I am sure andrei hasnt.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 7:21pm

cods wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 7:20pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:41pm:

cods wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:21pm:

cods wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 3:50pm:

and just so there is ABSOLUTELY no CONFUSION as to WHY THIS THREAD WAS CREATED>..

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1452666901/94

For the Benefit of cods

Correct.

You are the one who was struggling to accept the fact that the Court of Appeal was not made up of "faceless men".

It's all sorted now.

for you???

when your fan club improves by more than one.. we may think on that.,.

in the mean time tell lisa...I dont think shes enjoyed it. at all...

and I am sure andrei hasnt.

What's not to enjoy?

Education is always a wonderful thing.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 7:27pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:42pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:04pm:

Please cods, I beg you to do that. Please! I want to see Jones find $1000 and send it to you. I want you to have that money! Please!!!!! Do it!!

How come you don't want $1000.00 cods? Or are you like me.....and you know as well as I do there is no way Jones can or would deliver?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 7:27pm

am surprised you are taking so much time off from DOBBING fellow members in to come and start a thread full of malice...because someone wont BOW TO YOU...

petty pathetic trivial and banal in the extreme..
I have been advised to move on and leave the petty minded to their own..pettiness... so i might agree and do just that...and leave you to wallow in whatever it is that giving you a high....I guess you dont get many of those these days.

I did say MIGHT....

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Agnes on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 7:43pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:27pm:

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:17pm:

Is this another stalking cods topic?

Where is Aussie?

Y'all just need to quit it, stalking by any other name is still stalking ! I suspect cods is tougher than the lot of you put together, she is almost as tough as her rat hunting moggy I bet, but just leave poor cods alone guys, give her a break?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Agnes on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 7:45pm

Agnes wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 7:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:27pm:

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:17pm:

Is this another stalking cods topic?

Where is Aussie?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 7:45pm

cods wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 7:27pm:

Don't might! Leave this thread but not before posting, and make sure you use capitals....this:

WHATEVER YOU RECKON

As soon as you do that, I will start a Thread to ensure you get your $1000.00 from Jones.

Deal?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 7:55pm

Agnes wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 7:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:27pm:

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:17pm:

Is this another stalking cods topic?

Where is Aussie?

Y'all just need to quit it, stalking by any other name is still stalking !

Quit educating people? No.

Moreover, there's no stalking here.

I started a thread in order to clarify a point.

That point has now been clarified, and accepted.

If anyone is being stalked, it's me.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Agnes on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 7:56pm

I would ask for at least double that, and what ever you do dont give your personal info to anyone in here- phone or address or bank details..

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:05pm

Agnes wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 7:56pm:

I would ask for at least double that, and what ever you do dont give your personal info to anyone in here- phone or address or bank details..

Oh.....I can organise it through any number of Solicitor's Trust Accounts and they do not divulge anything to anybody, including me or either of cods or Jones. If they did....struck off.

Come on cods......do it!!!

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Agnes on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:09pm

Agnes wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 7:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:27pm:

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:17pm:

Is this another stalking cods topic?

Where is Aussie?

ridicule/stalk, what ever Peccary, its definitely not education.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Aussie on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:21pm

Agnes wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:09pm:

Agnes wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 7:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:27pm:

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:17pm:

Is this another stalking cods topic?

Where is Aussie?

ridicule/stalk, what ever Peccary, its definitely not education.

Agnes, do you understand why the Thread was commenced?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:22pm

Agnes wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:09pm:

Agnes wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 7:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:27pm:

cods wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 13^th, 2016 at 5:17pm:

Is this another stalking cods topic?

Where is Aussie?

ridicule/stalk, what ever Peccary, its definitely not education.

Of course it's education.

cods was unaware that the Court of Appeal had a female judge.

Now she does know, thanks to me.

I'm here to help.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Setanta on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:50pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:22pm:

Of course it's education.

cods was unaware that the Court of Appeal had a female judge.

Now she does know, thanks to me.

I'm here to help.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOVQ4vAmM7Y
;D

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:25am

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:04pm:

Ok....I have that $1000 in cash right here, right now.

Now, let me see if Cods was clever enough to listen.

BRB.....

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:29am

Just read back.....it seems $1000 wasn't enough of an incentive.

Oh well.

Some people are just too hard to please lol. :P

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:40am

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:25am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:04pm:

Ok....I have that $1000 in cash right here, right now.

Now, let me see if Cods was clever enough to listen.

BRB.....

I take it you are stirring lisa??.... does that give you some kind of high as well???....

you see I dont see this thread as a joke....or an education...I see it as pure MALICE....

you think screaming abuse back at people who attack you very carefully....is the way to go...

why I dont know... making silly statements like this... is bizarre as far as I am concerned...

you think the thread is dumb.... good oh.. dont read it...I find the thread PERSONAL ABUSE.. and I am the one in the gunsite.... I have a right to complain...no matter what others think.. oh itas all in fun.. oh thats right its an education...oh thats ok its a joke...

its me thats being demeaned..its me thats being mocked...why..

because I didnt answer aussie when he claimed he had told me twice before which i had no recollection of..

a crime according to the educators on this forum...

how dare this person not bow down to us???...

who the hell does she think she is..

lets show her up...yep this could have all been said on the Baden Clay thread......

but they wanted to make it really PUBLIC..

I tell you what lisa......I feel like I have been King hit.. I am like a one punch victim...

sounds dramatic. ::) ::) ::)...well its verbal assault.....no other word for it..

I hope my condemnation will prevent these people ever doing this again to someone... even yourself lisa...

I hope you are worth more than being publicly humiliated like this.....I find it despicable... not amusing......

and if you think words like'
'
WHATEVER YOU RECKON will stop the bullying.. then good luck with that thought.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:40am

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:29am:

Just read back.....it seems $1000 wasn't enough of an incentive.

Oh well.

Some people are just too hard to please lol. :P

thanks for your support lisa... >:( >:( >:(

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:45am

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:40am:

you see I dont see this thread as a joke...

Good, because it's not meant to be.

It's purely educational.

The QLD Court of Appeal is led by the most senior member of the Queensland judiciary, Chief Justice Catherine Holmes.

Catherine is, and always has been, a female.

Moreover, she is not "faceless".

Just to avoid any further confusion.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:52am

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:40am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:29am:

Just read back.....it seems $1000 wasn't enough of an incentive.

Oh well.

Some people are just too hard to please lol. :P

thanks for your support lisa... >:( >:( >:(

;D

Actually, I was trying to support you...but in a novel way.

I was hoping you'd play along.

Don't worry about the fact that you lost $1000 on January 14 2016.

We're heading down to Canberra soon for a bit of a holiday (mainly passing through to get to other places around there).

If you like, how about we (as in you and me) go out for a nice lunch/coffee somewhere?

Please...just make sure it's somewhere VERY nice.

You choose the venue.

I'm paying.

Deal?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:52am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:45am:

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:40am:

you see I dont see this thread as a joke...

that is of course what you would like to believe

and if you think the more you repeat something the more it becomes the truth..

you are very sadly mistaken...

there is no confusion none whatever

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:13am

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:52am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:45am:

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:40am:

you see I dont see this thread as a joke...

that is of course what you would like to believe

I always believe the truth.

This thread was created to avoid any further confusion surrounding the Court of Appeal.

And, it appears to have worked.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:26am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:13am:

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:52am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:45am:

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:40am:

you see I dont see this thread as a joke...

that is of course what you would like to believe

I always believe the truth.

This thread was created to avoid any further confusion surrounding the Court of Appeal.

And, it appears to have worked.

can you clarify that with evidence beond a reasonable doubt..???

you and your little mate are the only ones who give s sh!te ..so lets see what confusion its fixed..

as you are convinced it will get you off the hook

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:29am

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:26am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:13am:

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:52am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:45am:

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:40am:

you see I dont see this thread as a joke...

that is of course what you would like to believe

I always believe the truth.

This thread was created to avoid any further confusion surrounding the Court of Appeal.

And, it appears to have worked.

can you clarify that with evidence beond a reasonable doubt..???

No, I cannot.

However, I've seen you acknowledge that there is a female judge in the QLD Court of Appeal on at least two occasions, so we are at least making some progress.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by AiA on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:30am

cods gets all the benefits. what about the rest of us?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:38am

AiA wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:30am:

cods gets all the benefits. what about the rest of us?

Well, there was this:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1452666901/77#77

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:53am

AiA wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:30am:

cods gets all the benefits. what about the rest of us?

perhaps you would like to explain.. what BENEFITS were they???

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:38am:

AiA wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:30am:

cods gets all the benefits. what about the rest of us?

Well, there was this:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1452666901/77#77

ONE >:(.......who was thrilled to be educated......

perhaps its your little mate by another name..

perhaps you would like to tell us all about your qualifications as an educator???

... I am sure you wouldnt cheat and use google..as the brains behind your EDUCATIONAL posts..

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:55am

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:53am:

AiA wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:30am:

cods gets all the benefits. what about the rest of us?

perhaps you would like to explain.. what BENEFITS were they???

You now know that the QLD Court of Appeal isn't made up of "faceless men".

Thus, you won't embarrass yourself in the future by saying things like "why didnt the appeal court have at least one female judge?".

Surely that's beneficial.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:00am

AiA wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:30am:

cods gets all the benefits. what about the rest of us?

Oh for God's sake AiA, you can come for lunch/coffee also. Happy now?

Sheesh....talk about being jealous!

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:17am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:55am:

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:53am:

AiA wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:30am:

cods gets all the benefits. what about the rest of us?

perhaps you would like to explain.. what BENEFITS were they???

I wasnt embarrassed....... when do you plan to create another thread about me using the term.. jurymen???????????........

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:18am

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:17am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:55am:

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:53am:

AiA wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 9:30am:

cods gets all the benefits. what about the rest of us?

perhaps you would like to explain.. what BENEFITS were they???

I wasnt embarrassed.......

Good.

And you won't be in the future either, thanks to my educational thread.

Life is good.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:22am

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:17am:

....... when do you plan to create another thread about me using the term.. jurymen???????????........

No time soon.

I don't know who was on the jury.

Do you?

Anyway, if you've made a mistake we can clear it up in this thread - there's no need to start another one.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:31am

Cods, Greg's jealous.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:34am

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:52am:

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:40am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:29am:

Just read back.....it seems $1000 wasn't enough of an incentive.

Oh well.

Some people are just too hard to please lol. :P

thanks for your support lisa... >:( >:( >:(

I am sorry lisa I dont see this as novel... I see it as BULLYING....especially of a female...

as has been explained to me..

had i bowed down and CONFESSED...for the cime of saying faceless men.. when at least one was a women...

i would not have had to be EDUCATED into what an amazing women she is???????..

can you read the sarcasm into that.??..

so no I wont be placated on this...

I dont do deals.. not my go..

i dont like bullying of any kind and if it means standing up and being shot down... so be it.... its better than letting people think they can walk all over me and say what they like about others... with no heed to what harm they are doing...

its disgusting and cowardly..

no matter how they jump and twist to think otherwise..

it changes nothing.

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by aussie100percent on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:34am

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:31am:

Cods, Greg's jealous.

;D ;D ;D ;D Is that his only problem? ;)

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by cods on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:35am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:22am:

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:17am:

....... when do you plan to create another thread about me using the term.. jurymen???????????........

No time soon.

I don't know who was on the jury.

Do you?

Anyway, if you've made a mistake we can clear it up in this thread - there's no need to start another one.

I thought it was your aim.. to put me down.. I wouldnt want you to miss an opportunity

surely I should have said jury men and women...

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:42am

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:34am:

.... say what they like about others... with no heed to what harm they are doing...

its disgusting and cowardly..

" ... well for all we know she could be a GAY judge.. ::) ::) " cods, January 13

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1452666901/50#50

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:44am

aussie100percent wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:34am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:31am:

Cods, Greg's jealous.

;D ;D ;D ;D Is that his only problem? ;)

Hell no lol!

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:47am

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:35am:

I thought it was your aim.. to put me down..

You were mistaken.

The aim of the thread is clearly stated in the OP:

"Just to avoid any further confusion."

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:35am:

surely I should have said jury men and women...

Did the jury consist of men and women?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by Lisa Jones on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:47am

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 10:34am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:52am:

cods wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:40am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:29am:

Just read back.....it seems $1000 wasn't enough of an incentive.

Oh well.

Some people are just too hard to please lol. :P

thanks for your support lisa... >:( >:( >:(

You're a tough negotiator. Aren't you?

And to think, I was going to bring along a bag of freshly picked chokos too.

:-/ :( :-?

Title: Re: For the Benefit of cods
Post by perceptions_now on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 3:03pm

Schools out, time for a break!