| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1451962153 Message started by Kiron22 on Jan 5th, 2016 at 12:49pm |
|
|
Title: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by Kiron22 on Jan 5th, 2016 at 12:49pm
A leading emergency doctor has slammed the NSW government's ultimatum to festival organisers that they will be shut down if drug overdoses continue, saying it will push festivals underground and lead to more deaths.
Dr David Caldicott, an emergency specialist at Canberra's Calvary Hospital, said the proposal advocated by NSW Deputy Premier Troy Grant and backed by Premier Mike Baird was based in the regressive ideology of drug prohibition, which he likened to the "ideological equivalent to climate change denialism". "What will happen is that these festivals will go ahead, they just won't go ahead in any sort of supervised environment," he said. "You'll get what happened in the United States in the 1980s which was a wide variety of unsupervised raves and a vast number of people getting hurt and killed." On Sunday, Mr Baird declared "enough was enough" after a 23-year-old woman was taken to hospital with a suspected MDMA overdose at the Field Day music festival, where 184 people were charged with drug offences. Mr Baird flagged an overhaul of musical festival permit system, telling the Sunday Telegraph he would call on "relevant ministers to review the current system of regulating events held on public land, including the system for granting permits for public events such as music festivals". Dr Caldicott, who has been a vocal advocate of the introduction of pill-testing at festivals, described the threat to shut down non-compliant festivals as "the last dying throes of prohibitionists". "There are so many other things that are far more intelligent that we can do before banning music festivals. It's right up there with police dogs as an idea – it's unlikely to have any effect whatsoever and it's probably going to cause more deaths. So at least law enforcement in NSW is being consistent. "At the moment, the health policy in Australia is create a drug-free Australia, which is ludicrous. It's never happened anywhere else in the world, why do we personally believe it could possibly happen in Australia where more people are using drugs per capita than many places elsewhere in the world? "It's kind of like the drug equivalent of climate change denialism. The politicians are concerned about how it appears to a very vocal group of prohibitionists." The recent spate of high profile fatal overdoses at music festivals, including Sydney women Sylvia Choi, 25, in December and Georgina Barrter, 19, at the 2014 Harbourlife festival, has failed to dent the supply and demand for ecstasy, the street name for MDMA. In the 2015 annual survey of 700 ecstasy users across Australia, conducted by the National Alcohol and Drug Research Centre, 83 per cent of NSW users found it "easy" or "very easy" to buy ecstasy pills, powder or capsules. Nationally, just 8 per cent said the drug was difficult to obtain. Amanda Roxburgh, who researches methamphetamine-related deaths (which includes ecstasy) at the NADRC, said the market had recovered after a big dip in ecstasy availability throughout 2009-2010, but synthetic drugs were emerging as a leading cause for concern. "Part of what has happened in that time is the massive emergence of newer analog drugs," which are chemically analogous to ecstasy but have been slightly changed to get around criminal legislation and detection, she said. "Often what happens is people are buying what they think is ecstasy and it's something much more toxic." Ms Roxburgh said data collection of ecstasy-related deaths was stymied by backlogs in coronial inquests and the high demand on forensic testing. The latest available data is from 2010, when 18 people died nationally from methamphetamine as the primary cause of such death, but is not further broken down into ecstasy-related deaths. The last comprehensive analysis of ecstasy-related deaths, published in 2009, revealed 82 deaths between 2000-2005, of which only 19 were considered to be due to ecstasy toxicity alone. "We do have work in progress trying to update ecstasy-related deaths but we won't capture the most recent deaths because it takes quite some time to go through the coronial processes," Dr Roxburgh said. "I suspect we are still not going to see that they are large in number." http://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw-government-drug-approach-like-climate-change-denialism-says-doctor-20160104-glyyhp.html |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by Swagman on Jan 5th, 2016 at 1:01pm
What's your message Kiron? The State Govt is wrong to try and stop kids dying from overdosing on illegal drugs?
Other Doctors don't have the same opinion about the same Govt's alcohol lock out laws? (More or less the same thing) http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-01-12/doctors-warn-against-relaxing-nsw-lockout-laws-as-injuries-drop/6012042 Quote:
|
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by Kiron22 on Jan 5th, 2016 at 1:16pm
They are not anywhere near the same thing also they are wrong on the lockout laws.
The only reason Lockout laws "worked" is because they absolutely killed nightlife and caused all the clubs to shut down, people can't go out anymore, how is that good policy? Aren't you supposed to be small Government? How are festival organizers supposed to fight dangerous drug use while testing stations and other proper first aid measures are banned? I've been to festivals where you have to go through full police checkpoints and still drugs flowed like candy inside. Prohibition doesn't work and can never work. Another point I would make is that MDMA and other popular festival drugs for the most part are actually safe when used correctly and are far safer than alcohol, In my over a decade of going to raves and parties where MDMA is widely used, I've never seen an overdose caused by it and I've never seen a single fight due to the actual effects of MDMA (it increases empathy while alcohol increases aggression). Also another point is that the media is generally full of poo and doesn't even know what it's talking about half the time, for example, one music festival I was at a girl died from OD'ing about... 20 meters from me in the next camp site, what happened is that she died of Alcohol and GHB poisoning, but what did the media report it as? MDMA. The fact is, drug prohibition is a failure and doesn't even make any sense, most these drugs are only dangerous because of prohibition means you don't know what you're getting, also keeping everything underground creates connections between regular people and organized crime who will always try push more dangerous drugs on you, one day you might just be buying weed or MDMA, but next the dealer is pushing Speed on you then Ice. If you were able to buy safe drugs through safe official channels, this would never, ever be an issue and you would probably see use in other dangerous drugs fall since that connection would be severed. One only needs to look at the Colorado and Washington to see what a booming success legalization has been. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by innocentbystander. on Jan 5th, 2016 at 3:10pm
Unfortunately, and for the most part, we are being governed by f--king idiots. :'(
|
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by innocentbystander. on Jan 5th, 2016 at 3:12pm Kiron22 wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 12:49pm:
The doctor is a f--king idiot too for mentioning climate change denial, he should keep his religious views out of it. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by The Grappler on Jan 5th, 2016 at 3:17pm
I can see it now:-
Available at your nearest supermarket or pharmacy, right alongside Regularijuana and Green Machine Hash.. with the right prescription you can even get new improved Shareoin and California Poppy, and for those Long Slow Days.....try The Acid Test... |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by longweekend58 on Jan 5th, 2016 at 5:16pm
the communist ponytail supporting drugs. how unsurprising.
give it up kiron. you are an old out-dated commie/hippie who no longer relates to modern society. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by Karnal on Jan 5th, 2016 at 5:19pm longweekend58 wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 5:16pm:
Thank God you’re back, Longy. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by Kiron22 on Jan 5th, 2016 at 5:46pm longweekend58 wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 5:16pm:
Can't wait for when they are forced to drug test pollies and you find out half the LNP are cokeheads. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by cods on Jan 5th, 2016 at 6:07pm Kiron22 wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 5:46pm:
and ALL the Labor members have empty heads... .. its all sex videos..between their ears...mistresses and porn.. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by longweekend58 on Jan 5th, 2016 at 7:35pm Kiron22 wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 5:46pm:
but you think drugs are harmless and good so what's the problem, pony-tail? |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by Kiron22 on Jan 5th, 2016 at 7:43pm
Many drugs are essentially harmless on a risk assessment scale, Cocaine isn't one of those since the effects of coke are essentially alcohol x10 with a huge ego.
Your attitude is exactly why we can't have a conversation about drugs, because you always get hyperbolic crap comparing Marijuana or MDMA to Heroin or ice. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by longweekend58 on Jan 6th, 2016 at 8:17am Kiron22 wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 7:43pm:
we cant have the conversation because you draw the line way too far away from safety. You want drugs. You like drugs. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 6th, 2016 at 9:21am Swagman wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 1:01pm:
Don't you know by now? The idiotic left would rather we did nothing than try something to stop kids dying from drug overdoses. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by Kiron22 on Jan 6th, 2016 at 11:01am longweekend58 wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 8:17am:
Safety? I'm backed up by scientific data, many drugs are far, far safer alternatives to Alcohol, MDMA's "danger" can be counteracted with f**ing Gatorade for goodness sake. It's non-addictive, it's got largely no proven long term side effects, it's effects are uplifting empathy. What's dangerous about Marijuana? Oh boy? People are going to inject 6 whole marijuanas and overdose in your opinion? For Armchair's stupid comment. Australians are not even "overdosing" on MDMA or other pure party drugs, they are ODing on GHB an incredibly dangerous substance that causes alcohol poisoning if the person is drinking or cheap research chemicals from china like PMA being sold as MDMA. Want to stop people from ODing? Actually legalize drugs based on harm risk assessment (many have already been scientifically done) and provide real drug safety courses throughout school. Hell I would argue there should be a drug an alcohol license you need to go get before you even are allowed to buy drugs and alcohol and you need to pass a test on first aid and drug safety. Prohibition is the biggest failure there is, you can't stop people from doing drugs, especially when half these drugs are safer, non-addictive and have better effects than alcohol. The only people who want to do NOTHING to stop kids from overdosing is the right, you idiots still want to keep drug testing stations illegal ffs. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by Kat on Jan 6th, 2016 at 11:14am Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 9:21am:
Even for you, that's one helluva dumb comment. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by longweekend58 on Jan 6th, 2016 at 3:16pm Kiron22 wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 11:01am:
yeah like that's gonna work. get serious, ponytail. all you are doing is describing a walk on a path next to a cliff and saying which places you can put you feet real close to the edge without falling over when you should be teaching kids to not even be on the bloody path in the first place! |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by Kiron22 on Jan 6th, 2016 at 6:09pm
Why wouldn't it work? The point of the license is to get information about drug and alcohol and first aid out there and get a populace who have basic first aid training.
Also "Don't do drugs" has worked so well hasn't it, drug usage is trending upwards, there is a reason Alcohol prohibition lasted a decade before being dismantled. Again, most drugs aren't even dangerous when used correctly and pure and most were banned largely based on the whims of politicians based on their own prejudices. There is no reason why people shouldn't be allowed to do Marijuana, MDMA, LSD. We live in a country where two incredibly deadly and addictive substances are legal, tobacco and Alcohol, it's completely insane that safer alternatives are made illegal based on stupid prejudices of conservatives. All the data agrees with me, a huge portion of drugs out there should be legal and are essentially not dangerous. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by longweekend58 on Jan 7th, 2016 at 8:13am
the moment you say LSD and MDMA are safer than tobacco and alcohol is the moment all credibility is lost.
licensing... are you stupid or what? people are actually going to go and get drug licenses?? get real. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by Kiron22 on Jan 7th, 2016 at 12:40pm
Are you serious? Alcohol is a chemically addictive dangerous drug which kills thousands of people every year and causes mass aggression.
You have to be off your rocker to think Alcohol can't be dangerous, the only reason you think it is safe is because its normalized. Fun fact, people used to make MDMA drink cocktails and people have been taking psychedelics for thousands of years. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by longweekend58 on Jan 7th, 2016 at 5:06pm Kiron22 wrote on Jan 7th, 2016 at 12:40pm:
your comprehension is as bad as your political ideology. I didnt say alcohol was safe. i said it is SAFER... SAFER than MDMA and LSD - a rather obvious proposition. but let me guess... you take these drugs and are seeking for YOUR idiocy to be normalised. right? |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by Kiron22 on Jan 7th, 2016 at 6:45pm
Except what you stat is not backed up by any scientific or medical research.
It is FACT, SCIENTIFIC FACT, 100% PROVEN that MDMA and LSD are safer than Alcohol. That chart I posted wasn't made by nobodies, it was made by the top medical researchers in the UK in a Government funded study. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by longweekend58 on Jan 8th, 2016 at 8:18am Kiron22 wrote on Jan 7th, 2016 at 6:45pm:
sounds like a climate change 'fact'. a highly addictive hallucinogen (LSD) is safer than alcohol? only an idiot or a drug taker themselves (like you) would believe that. BTW in todays news it was announced that drugs were a BIGGER cause in fatal accidents than alcohol. Just say no. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by Kiron22 on Jan 8th, 2016 at 10:41am
>Highly addictive
Oh right, you're a troll. 0/10. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by mothra on Jan 8th, 2016 at 10:44am longweekend58 wrote on Jan 8th, 2016 at 8:18am:
LSD is not addictive. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 8th, 2016 at 11:47am Kiron22 wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 6:09pm:
I agree with the essence of your posting. decriminalisation of ALL drugs is my preferred option. What we are doing now is failing badly |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by Kiron22 on Jan 8th, 2016 at 2:03pm
Mine is that drugs should be legalized based on harm mean score, things that are highly addictive and with dangerous health and social costs should stay illegal.
All drugs should be decriminalized for low amount of possession, drugs are a health issue, they shouldn't be a legal one, people shouldn't be afraid to seek help. One of the main reasons I think MDMA should be legal is that its safe when pure and sourced from decent sources and done in correct dosages, by being able to buy MDMA from a chemist, you suddenly break the link people have with illegal drug dealers and thus have less of a chance of being pushed on hard drugs. Sadly Australia will be one of the last places in the western world that will have serious drug reform I think. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by longweekend58 on Jan 8th, 2016 at 5:28pm mothra wrote on Jan 8th, 2016 at 10:44am:
another dumb druggie with a reduced IQ courtesy of chemicals. |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by mothra on Jan 8th, 2016 at 8:27pm longweekend58 wrote on Jan 8th, 2016 at 5:28pm:
Lysergic Acid Diethylamide, commonly known as LSD, is taken by mouth. It has a slightly bitter taste, and is available in tablets, capsules or as a liquid. Acid is commonly sold on a piece of blotter paper, and the user simply chews or swallows it to ingest the drug - without having to buy or conceal any paraphernalia to do so. LSD has zero physical addiction potential. It is not physically addictive and it is not a drug that you will want to immediately do again. This is not the type of drug where a user experiences withdrawal if another dose isn't ingested within a relatively short period of time. http://www.thegooddrugsguide.com/lsd/addiction.htm |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by mothra on Jan 8th, 2016 at 8:30pm
So whenever you're ready to apologise Longy, you can leave it here or in the thread where you said unlawful and illegal are 100% synonymous.
|
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by malcolmISthetumbleweed on Jan 11th, 2016 at 5:08pm Swagman wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 1:01pm:
So you think boxing should be banned? :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by malcolmISthetumbleweed on Jan 11th, 2016 at 5:09pm Kiron22 wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 1:16pm:
swaggy is a fascist: he aint small government and never was :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by malcolmISthetumbleweed on Jan 11th, 2016 at 5:10pm innocentbystander. wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 3:10pm:
The arrogant get ruled by the arrogant: you should read more before biting off mommys tit ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by malcolmISthetumbleweed on Jan 11th, 2016 at 5:12pm Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 3:17pm:
please never say the word SHARON in any variation ever again: thankyou,... now i need to throw up : "...it's all coming back bugger******************************************** ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ...." :-[ |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by malcolmISthetumbleweed on Jan 11th, 2016 at 5:14pm Melanias purse wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 5:19pm:
the internet is healed: yay ::) ::) ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by malcolmISthetumbleweed on Jan 11th, 2016 at 5:15pm cods wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 6:07pm:
never met a cheating liberal voter ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by malcolmISthetumbleweed on Jan 11th, 2016 at 5:18pm longweekend58 wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 7:35pm:
lol, longy still thinks liberal voting mummys and daddys don't use their sons and daughters drug money to pay off the spare rental ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Just check out Julie Bishops electorate: case closed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by malcolmISthetumbleweed on Jan 11th, 2016 at 5:19pm longweekend58 wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 8:17am:
libs love selling drugs: and getting raided and stuff too yay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by malcolmISthetumbleweed on Jan 11th, 2016 at 5:20pm Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 9:21am:
armchair thinks libs don't sell drugs to pay off daddys assets ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ....is he for super cereal???????????????????????????????????????????? :o |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by malcolmISthetumbleweed on Jan 11th, 2016 at 5:23pm longweekend58 wrote on Jan 8th, 2016 at 5:28pm:
yeh, because longy has the stats to prove it ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by malcolmISthetumbleweed on Jan 11th, 2016 at 5:25pm mothra wrote on Jan 8th, 2016 at 8:30pm:
longy aint apoligising for copper internet so why would you think IT is apologising for losing another internet showdown ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by innocentbystander. on Jan 11th, 2016 at 5:59pm mothra wrote on Jan 8th, 2016 at 10:44am:
No, once you've had it you will never want it again ;D |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by malcolmISthetumbleweed on Jan 11th, 2016 at 6:03pm innocentbystander. wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 5:59pm:
I think you just repeated the obvious ::) ::) May aswell smoke liberal daddy through a crackpipe for a boring spare rental wink wink wink wink wink! Once again: check out Julie Bishops electorate for further details ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by innocentbystander. on Jan 11th, 2016 at 6:34pm BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 11th, 2016 at 6:03pm:
You're a walking talking advert on the dangers of drugs, kiddies take note, do you really want to end up like this? |
|
Title: Re: Doctor: Liberal approach to drugs like AGW denial. Post by Kiron22 on Jan 11th, 2016 at 7:49pm
You don't want to reuse LSD because it's an incredibly mentally exhausting drug to use, Psychedelics like LSD are generally 4-5 hours of fun and often 5 hours of "What the bugger am I doing with my life?" They are very introspective and LSD especially can get pretty mind tricky after the half-way point in the trip, not hallucination wise (that only lasts for the first few hours), but analytical wise, you start over-analyzing everything.
Also Psychedelics have something called "Tolerance" which means the more you use it, the less it's effects become dramatically, take LSD one day, you will only get half the effect if you take it the day after, if you take it the day after that, there will be little effect at all. Psychedelics need a "cooldown" time and this can last upto a month, this is why they have little chance of being abused. |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |