What is with the sudden influx of Ozpol members using guest posting in the Vortex at Political Animal to sling schitt? Greggerypeccary, Soren, et al seem to be using it to say what they can't here ....

AiA wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 8:27am:

What is with the sudden influx of Ozpol members using guest posting in the Vortex at Political Animal to sling schitt? Greggerypeccary, Soren, et al seem to be using it to say what they can't here ....

You would have absolutely no idea who it is, so why even suggest "Greggerypeccary, Soren, et al?"

lol... I just had another look at that place (The Vortex). Took me a while to find it again, even with a Google search.

Looks like there's enough mental issues on display for an entire psychiatric conference. And I thought this place was bad. :o

Now I suppose we'll have a few Carl D 'clones' appearing there. Oh, wait... I mean a few more... I've seen my name there in the past (even though none of them were actually me). ::)

Edit: it didn't take long, did it? I see I've been mentioned there already. Must be so many bored people with nothing to do all day but play stupid online games... no wonder the country is rapidly going down the toilet.

By the way, I'm actually every single person on this forum and Polanimal. In fact, I'm every single person who is and has ever been online (I bet some people would even believe that). :D

AiA wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 8:27am:

What is with the sudden influx of Ozpol members using guest posting in the Vortex at Political Animal to sling schitt? Greggerypeccary, Soren, et al seem to be using it to say what they can't here ....

I've never been a member of Political Animal (never even seen it).

If there's a greggerypeccary there, he's not the same one that everyone loves here.

Greg,

I know that.
You know that.
They know that.
Everybody knows.
Even the OP knows, I'll bet.

It's all just a silly little game, let them have their 'fun'.

R
AiA wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 8:27am:

What is with the sudden influx of Ozpol members using guest posting in the Vortex at Political Animal to sling schitt? Greggerypeccary, Soren, et al seem to be using it to say what they can't here ....

PA has free speech for all ( bar one or two who's only intention was to destroy the forum) so I'm not surprised we have many posters from Oz Pol expressing their dismay about  this place At PA. 8-)the funny thing is the same posters that attempted to bring down PA are doing the same thing here, and getting the same results, hated by most posters here. 8-)

Quote:

PA has free speech for all ( bar

Perhaps you best be honest and say ~ "PA has free speech for some.  Anyone who expresses bona fide disgust and revulsion at what the place has become will not be allowed to say so."

That's the sort of free speech there is for the mythical all at PA.

Aussie wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 4:42pm:

Quote: PA has free speech for all ( bar Perhaps you best be honest and say ~ "PA has free speech for some.  Anyone who expresses bona fide disgust and revulsion at what the place has become will not be allowed to say so." That's the sort of free speech there is for the mythical all at PA.

Oh the ironing.  Aussie banging on about free speech.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D :D

Hilarious.

Secret Wars wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 4:55pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 7th, 2015 at 4:42pm: Quote: PA has free speech for all ( bar Perhaps you best be honest and say ~ "PA has free speech for some.  Anyone who expresses bona fide disgust and revulsion at what the place has become will not be allowed to say so." That's the sort of free speech there is for the mythical all at PA. Oh the ironing.  Aussie banging on about free speech. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D :D Hilarious.

No me 'banging on' about it.  That'd be skippeeeee.  I'm on record here as holding the opinion that there is no such thing as 'free speech,' as has just been demonstrated by skippeee.

Aussie wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 4:59pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Dec 7th, 2015 at 4:55pm: Aussie wrote on Dec 7th, 2015 at 4:42pm: Quote: PA has free speech for all ( bar Perhaps you best be honest and say ~ "PA has free speech for some.  Anyone who expresses bona fide disgust and revulsion at what the place has become will not be allowed to say so." That's the sort of free speech there is for the mythical all at PA. Oh the ironing.  Aussie banging on about free speech. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D :D Hilarious. No me 'banging on' about it.  That'd be skippeeeee.  I'm on record here as holding the opinion that there is no such thing as 'free speech,' as has just been demonstrated by skippeee.

...and as better demonstrated by your censorship. 

I'm not the bloke claiming there is 'free speech.'  Quite often, the Rules of places like this (FD's Rules) curtail it, just like I have a Rule for the Abuse Thread that there be no commentary.  Anarchist are you?

If Aussie is one thing it's consistent. Consistently wrong.

skippy. wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 5:22pm:

If Aussie is one thing it's consistent. Consistently wrong.

Saying it does not make it so skippeeeeee.

Well I am surprised I must say, I thought it was already pretty full of schitt...

PA is full of schitt.

Plus it is just a clique. If you don’t belong to the clique you probably can’t open an account.

Value of PA: less than zero.

There is no clique Monk. There was at one point quite a while ago, but the members who post there now are all individuals - unlike here where they need a group of mates backing them up to feel secure. PA has actually become quite sensible lately and even though some of the members here deny posting in the Vortex, I can't see any of the PA members pretending to be any of the Ozpolitic regulars. Greg says he doesn't post there, so it would have to be an enemy of his from here who is pretending to be him.

Phemanderac wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 5:25pm:

Well I am surprised I must say, I thought it was already pretty full of schitt...

I see Aussie whistled. Good boy, roll over.

So Aussie can go back to PA and be welcomed?

No of course not, AiA, SN, Roach, Naffy, Body Odor etc will vote to kick him out again.

You should stick to the truth, mantra, reality.

mantra wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 5:39pm:

There is no clique Monk. There was at one point quite a while ago, but the members who post there now are all individuals - unlike here where they need a group of mates backing them up to feel secure. PA has actually become quite sensible lately and even though some of the members here deny posting in the Vortex, I can't see any of the PA members pretending to be any of the Ozpolitic regulars. Greg says he doesn't post there, so it would have to be an enemy of his from here who is pretending to be him.

Of course there is a clique which excludes anyone who does not lick the boots of skippeeeee and does make critical comments of the cess pit it now is.

As for who might be who either from there here or here there, you'd have no idea at all ~ no-one would without cross referencing of IPs and I'll bet that is not happening.

skippy. wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 5:46pm:

Phemanderac wrote on Dec 7th, 2015 at 5:25pm: Well I am surprised I must say, I thought it was already pretty full of schitt... I see Aussie whistled. Good boy, roll over.

There ya go Phemanderac, you are just putty in my hands.

How soon they forget Phem was an Original.

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 5:48pm:

How soon they forget Phem was an Original.

Indeed....posted as Sapling and at least one other tag which escapes me ATM

And this crap about OP members posting in the Vortex:

:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

Just same old same old PA trolls.

Oh contrarie Monsieur, the Chinese student has been extraordinarily busy. 😎

mantra wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 5:39pm:

There is no clique Monk. There was at one point quite a while ago, but the members who post there now are all individuals - unlike here where they need a group of mates backing them up to feel secure. PA has actually become quite sensible lately and even though some of the members here deny posting in the Vortex, I can't see any of the PA members pretending to be any of the Ozpolitic regulars. Greg says he doesn't post there, so it would have to be an enemy of his from here who is pretending to be him.

there is a clique

Agnes wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 6:35pm:

mantra wrote on Dec 7th, 2015 at 5:39pm: There is no clique Monk. There was at one point quite a while ago, but the members who post there now are all individuals - unlike here where they need a group of mates backing them up to feel secure. PA has actually become quite sensible lately and even though some of the members here deny posting in the Vortex, I can't see any of the PA members pretending to be any of the Ozpolitic regulars. Greg says he doesn't post there, so it would have to be an enemy of his from here who is pretending to be him. there is a clique

I'm very surprised Mantra made the claim, as, apart from all the other available evidence, there is the Confidential section which only a favoured few ~ a clique ~ (based on an absurd and artificial arbitrary criteria) get access to.

mantra tends to look on the bright side.

Its sad to be afraid of your shadow, there it is, no over there, no over there. ::) Paranoia does strange things to ones mind, as is evident in the last few posts. 8-)

skippy. wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 6:45pm:

Its sad to be afraid of your shadow, there it is, no over there, no over there. ::) Paranoia does strange things to ones mind, as is evident in the last few posts. 8-)

*just to make sure you do not make a sneaky edit as you did in your prior post*

Aussie wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 6:48pm:

skippy. wrote on Dec 7th, 2015 at 6:45pm: Its sad to be afraid of your shadow, there it is, no over there, no over there. ::) Paranoia does strange things to ones mind, as is evident in the last few posts. 8-) *just to make sure you do not make a sneaky edit as you did in your prior post*

Nothing sneaky about it,chump. When posters want to add something or fix a typo they edit it. If you were not so tech illiterate  you'd already know that.   ::)

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 5:53pm:

And this crap about OP members posting in the Vortex: :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D Just same old same old PA trolls.

  Yes.

Aussie wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 5:49pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 7th, 2015 at 5:48pm: How soon they forget Phem was an Original. Indeed....posted as Sapling and at least one other tag which escapes me ATM

No-one remembers him. Even those who've been members since FD took over.


Aussie wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 6:43pm:

I'm very surprised Mantra made the claim, as, apart from all the other available evidence, there is the Confidential section which only a favoured few ~ a clique ~ (based on an absurd and artificial arbitrary criteria) get access to.

I would prefer that Confidential didn't have a password and was open to all members, but I'm in the minority. PA has always had a majority rules ethos as you would know Aussie. It was the same when you were EL. You closed PA up too.

Sapling had long gone by the time FD came on the scene.  (You seem not to know that PA had been operating for years before then.)

No, it was never majority rules except at election time.  It is not majority rules now either ~  only those skippeeee selects (the clique) get a say. 

When did I close PA off to people by using a password block??

Poor mantra loyally supporting Skip. The place is a tip, mantra, has been for years.

Aussie wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:59am:

Sapling had long gone by the time FD came on the scene.  (You seem not to know that PA had been operating for years before then.) No, it was never majority rules except at election time.  It is not majority rules now either ~  only those skippeeee selects (the clique) get a say.  When did I close PA off to people by using a password block??

The only people that care about Saplng is Sapling, and you. Like you what happened years ago is irelivent, only losers hold onto the past...consistently.
Lies lies and more lies, you seem to make a habit of that. ::)

skippy. wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 7:53am:

Aussie wrote on Dec 8th, 2015 at 6:59am: Sapling had long gone by the time FD came on the scene.  (You seem not to know that PA had been operating for years before then.) No, it was never majority rules except at election time.  It is not majority rules now either ~  only those skippeeee selects (the clique) get a say.  When did I close PA off to people by using a password block?? Lies lies and more lies, you seem to make a habit of that. ::)

Just saying so, does not make it so skippeeee.

Aussie wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 7:55am:

skippy. wrote on Dec 8th, 2015 at 7:53am: Aussie wrote on Dec 8th, 2015 at 6:59am: Sapling had long gone by the time FD came on the scene.  (You seem not to know that PA had been operating for years before then.) No, it was never majority rules except at election time.  It is not majority rules now either ~  only those skippeeee selects (the clique) get a say.  When did I close PA off to people by using a password block?? Lies lies and more lies, you seem to make a habit of that. ::) Just saying so, does not make it so skippeeee.

Here comes Aussies "doh, you sneakily changed your post" rant.

Aussie wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 7:55am:

skippy. wrote on Dec 8th, 2015 at 7:53am: Aussie wrote on Dec 8th, 2015 at 6:59am: Sapling had long gone by the time FD came on the scene.  (You seem not to know that PA had been operating for years before then.) No, it was never majority rules except at election time.  It is not majority rules now either ~  only those skippeeee selects (the clique) get a say.  When did I close PA off to people by using a password block?? Lies lies and more lies, you seem to make a habit of that. ::) Just saying so, does not make it so skippeeee.

rotflmao oh the irony. ;D

Aussie wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:59am:

Sapling had long gone by the time FD came on the scene.  (You seem not to know that PA had been operating for years before then.)

Haha. That's funny Aussie. I would think that every member of Ozpolitic and PA knows by now that there was a more superior PA pre FD, but as you and possibly AiA are the only surviving members of those bygone days - it's ancient history now.


Quote:

No, it was never majority rules except at election time.  It is not majority rules now either ~  only those skippeeee selects (the clique) get a say.  When did I close PA off to people by using a password block??

You didn't need a password. PA was closed off to general viewing by non members and only those few privileged members remaining had access to the guts of the forum. I remember looking at the site one day and finding it locked up tight with only 2 sub-forums available for viewing. Today there are 4 forums which people can read and access easily.

mantra wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:02pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 8th, 2015 at 6:59am: Sapling had long gone by the time FD came on the scene.  (You seem not to know that PA had been operating for years before then.) Haha. That's funny Aussie. I would think that every member of Ozpolitic and PA knows by now that there was a more superior PA pre FD, but as you and possibly AiA are the only surviving members of those bygone days - it's ancient history now. Quote: No, it was never majority rules except at election time.  It is not majority rules now either ~  only those skippeeee selects (the clique) get a say.  When did I close PA off to people by using a password block?? You didn't need a password. PA was closed off to general viewing by non members and only those few privileged members remaining had access to the guts of the forum. I remember looking at the site one day and finding it locked up tight with only 2 sub-forums available for viewing. Today there are 4 forums which people can read and access easily.

ele is about the most original of the originals. Doesn’t post in the cesspit anymore. xbzz too.

Sorry mantra, this is not true:


Quote:

You didn't need a password. PA was closed off to general viewing by non members and only those few privileged members remaining had access to the guts of the forum. I remember looking at the site one day and finding it locked up tight with only 2 sub-forums available for viewing. Today there are 4 forums which people can read and access easily.

If that happened (and I never saw it,) it would have had nothing to do with me.  I would not have had a clue how to do it, and that would still be the case.


Quote:

ele is about the most original of the originals. Doesn’t post in the cesspit anymore. xbzz too.

Absolutely correct.  (It's xbz, and it is a delight to see that they both post at your joint now.) 

skippy. wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 7:53am:

The only people that care about Saplng is Sapling, and you

That's not actually accurate, but then you and accuracy do not good bedfellow make...


skippy. wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 7:53am:

only losers hold onto the past...consistently.

So, you admit to being a loser, along with your pals then. Good onya for your bout of honesty...

Cool story bro.....

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

mantra wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:21am:

Aussie wrote on Dec 7th, 2015 at 5:49pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 7th, 2015 at 5:48pm: How soon they forget Phem was an Original. Indeed....posted as Sapling and at least one other tag which escapes me ATM No-one remembers him. Even those who've been members since FD took over. Aussie wrote on Dec 7th, 2015 at 6:43pm: I'm very surprised Mantra made the claim, as, apart from all the other available evidence, there is the Confidential section which only a favoured few ~ a clique ~ (based on an absurd and artificial arbitrary criteria) get access to. I would prefer that Confidential didn't have a password and was open to all members, but I'm in the minority. PA has always had a majority rules ethos as you would know Aussie. It was the same when you were EL. You closed PA up too.

I remember Sapling. Was that not back during the ABC days Phem?

Agnes wrote on Dec 7^th, 2015 at 9:49pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 7th, 2015 at 5:53pm: And this crap about OP members posting in the Vortex: :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D Just same old same old PA trolls.   Yes.

No, someone from here posted both FD's and Gandalf's personal details at PA. FD is aware of the situation.

How do you know it is someone from here?

Mellie did post some of FDs personal details some years ago after all.

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 9^th, 2015 at 10:42am:

How do you know it is someone from here?

I don't. FD does.

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 9^th, 2015 at 10:42am:

How do you know it is someone from here? Mellie did post some of FDs personal details some years ago after all.

Wondered why the weirdo was banned 4eva - well then serves her right- she is a fine example of PA. She is lucky she is allowed to post over there even.

Question, why have a vortex if you are all going to come here and piss and moan about anyone posting over there , you have two choices regard s who posts there- PAs members and those here. So why whinge- you are defeating the purpose of the vortex by making those who post there feel bad-

Grow up the lot of you, you are all adults right? Come here looking for attention. ????

AiA wrote on Dec 9^th, 2015 at 10:43am:

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 9th, 2015 at 10:42am: How do you know it is someone from here? I don't. FD does.

Hmmm some of the accounts here belong to denizens of the cesspit. Somebody published IQ’s real name there.

It all just seems like another reason to send PA adrift.

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 9^th, 2015 at 11:55am:

AiA wrote on Dec 9th, 2015 at 10:43am: Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 9th, 2015 at 10:42am: How do you know it is someone from here? I don't. FD does. Hmmm some of the accounts here belong to denizens of the cesspit. Somebody published IQ’s real name there. It all just seems like another reason to send PA adrift.

You will have to take those personal details up with FD. He knows more about it than you or I do. I only know what he tells me.

AiA wrote on Dec 9^th, 2015 at 12:06pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 9th, 2015 at 11:55am: AiA wrote on Dec 9th, 2015 at 10:43am: Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 9th, 2015 at 10:42am: How do you know it is someone from here? I don't. FD does. Hmmm some of the accounts here belong to denizens of the cesspit. Somebody published IQ’s real name there. It all just seems like another reason to send PA adrift. You will have to take those personal details up with FD. He knows more about it than you or I do. I only know what he tells me.

Why does he tell you and not others? If it has happened is it not a good reason to cut PA adrift?

You can read it for yourself if you know where to look. Take it up with him.

So FD posted the info somewhere. Not quite “telling” you.

The publication of people’s private information is a pretty regular occurrence at PA, isn’t it? The people who disclose personal info never get a lifetime ban, do they?  Mostly they get no ban at all, right?

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 9^th, 2015 at 12:17pm:

So FD posted the info somewhere. Not quite “telling” you. The publication of people’s private information is a pretty regular occurrence at PA, isn’t it? The people who disclose personal info never get a lifetime ban, do they?  Mostly they get no ban at all, right?

Quite rare as far as I can tell. After guest posting was restricted it doesn't happen anymore. It is hard to ban guests, you know.

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 9^th, 2015 at 12:17pm:

So FD posted the info somewhere. Not quite “telling” you. The publication of people’s private information is a pretty regular occurrence at PA, isn’t it? The people who disclose personal info never get a lifetime ban, do they?  Mostly they get no ban at all, right?

Yes Monk and one female here has her details published regularly and it is let sit there for long periods of time..but close the vortex to protect members safety, it just doesnt happen.. it must be so important to the viability of PA, they just cannot afford too..so then I wonder why a thread like this, how does it serve PA, it wont only make some not post there again.

IQ published my personal info, including a photo.

I know IQ posted what he thought was AG’s details, ditto for Aussie. SN used a photo of one of Aussie’s properties as avatar.

AiA published about 15 of Annie’s PMs to her great distress.

IQ hacked poor Skippy’s accounts, told Ethnic Skippy’s name.

Somebody posted IQ’s real name.

Several I have forgotten. Oh yeah, it hardly ever happens and there is no punishment for such disclosure.

Really, PA is much more trouble than it is worth.

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 9^th, 2015 at 12:27pm:

AiA published about 15 of Annie’s PMs to her great distress.

That isn't as true as you often claim, as you well know. I don't say anything out of respect to annielaurie. That thread still exists at PA. It is dated "Wed Dec 28, 2011 10:33 am" and began not with any PMs being published but instead a number of posts from open forum you well know. Those posts involve you and Lisa Jones plotting to overthrow PA.

Monk your list is just the tip of the iceberg- when a person was driven out of PA the admin or a mod would enter that persons account and post some very disturbing stuff under the departed members name That is very important for anyone contemplating signing up- as long as your name remains at PA it is not safe. YOU, your identity are not safe.

Now skippy is admin, its settled down, but he wont be admin forever. To tell members that IQ is gone, how does that reassure anyone, it doesnt reassure me- he can come back anytime, but under a diff nick. He has hacked and stalked so many accounts ( mine too ), threatening vile acts of harm and posts animal porn .

Woman are degraded and treated like mindless cattle.  The only way you survive there as a woman is to suck up to the "powers" ( admin)  or turn feral like like  them.  I post there rarely, I am not liked and I know the moment something awful happens to me, I am turned on and spurned. Cast out.  I like a one or two there but one woman in particular hates me and I recently saw a nasty thing she said about me, posted in the vortex. No doubt by someone who hates her. The nasty thing that was said about me, came from the secret locked room that I am not allowed to post in, even though I have posted there since it opened in 2007!!! and they say there is no clique

Quote:

Those posts involve you and Lisa Jones plotting to overthrow PA.

Me and Lisa, oh yeah, I only choose ditzes to plot with. That is the lie you used to “justify” posting Annie’s PMs. PMs, Private Messages, see that word “Private?” I will make it clear so even you cannot miss it:

P R I V A T E

It was Annies’ PMs you posted.

FD isn’t covered with glory here either. He ignored Annie’s desperate request to him to delete her PMs. He didn’t and he didn’t give you a permanent ban either.

By letting things like this go unpunished it just encourages more and worse transgressions.

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 9^th, 2015 at 12:42pm:

Quote: Those posts involve you and Lisa Jones plotting to overthrow PA. Me and Lisa, oh yeah, I only choose ditzes to plot with. That is the lie you used to “justify” posting Annie’s PMs. PMs, Private Messages, see that word “Private?” I will make it clear so even you cannot miss it: P R I V A T E It was Annies’ PMs you posted. FD isn’t covered with glory here either. He ignored Annie’s desperate request to him to delete her PMs. He didn’t and he didn’t give you a permanent ban either. By letting things like this go unpunished it just encourages more and worse transgressions.

Annie and I have been in contact many, many times since that thread from years back and she has stated publicly that there is no bad blood between us. Why do you continue? Out of respect for annielaurie I suggest you stop.

AiA wrote on Dec 9^th, 2015 at 12:45pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 9th, 2015 at 12:42pm: Quote: Those posts involve you and Lisa Jones plotting to overthrow PA. Me and Lisa, oh yeah, I only choose ditzes to plot with. That is the lie you used to “justify” posting Annie’s PMs. PMs, Private Messages, see that word “Private?” I will make it clear so even you cannot miss it: P R I V A T E It was Annies’ PMs you posted. FD isn’t covered with glory here either. He ignored Annie’s desperate request to him to delete her PMs. He didn’t and he didn’t give you a permanent ban either. By letting things like this go unpunished it just encourages more and worse transgressions. Annie and I have been in contact many, many times since that thread from years back and she has stated publicly that there is no bad blood between us. Why do you continue? Out of respect for annielaurie I suggest you stop.

Oh now we respect Annie AiA ? .. Annie doesnt read these boards anymore thankfully, but I do see why Monk is furious.

Mongrel denying what he did, how low can you go?

Yes, I respect annielaurie and consider her my friend. I suggest you not escalate this.

I was just pointing out the disclosure at PA of peoples’ personal details was not as rare as you said.

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 9^th, 2015 at 12:50pm:

I was just pointing out the disclosure at PA of peoples’ personal details was not as rare as you said.

I know what you are doing and I suggest you stop.

AiA wrote on Dec 9^th, 2015 at 12:49pm:

Yes, I respect annielaurie and consider her my friend. I suggest you not escalate this.

Well then, I would hope at last the pms she wanted deleted have been deleted- out of respect for her wishes and rights over her intellectual property / privacy- have they been deleted?

There is far more to this story as both of you know and out of respect for annie I suggest you let it lie.

Yeah, they were deleted.

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 9^th, 2015 at 12:58pm:

Yeah, they were deleted.

You can't take a hint can you Monk?

a sudden influx of schitt, this is what you wanted AiA.

Agnes wrote on Dec 9^th, 2015 at 1:00pm:

a sudden influx of schitt, this is what you wanted AiA.

FD knows who posted those personal details and is taking care of it.

Agnes wrote on Dec 9^th, 2015 at 12:41pm:

Monk your list is just the tip of the iceberg- when a person was driven out of PA the admin or a mod would enter that persons account and post some very disturbing stuff under the departed members name That is very important for anyone contemplating signing up- as long as your name remains at PA it is not safe. YOU, your identity are not safe. Now skippy is admin, its settled down, but he wont be admin forever. To tell members that IQ is gone, how does that reassure anyone, it doesnt reassure me- he can come back anytime, but under a diff nick. He has hacked and stalked so many accounts ( mine too ), threatening vile acts of harm and posts animal porn . Woman are degraded and treated like mindless cattle.  The only way you survive there as a woman is to suck up to the "powers" ( admin)  or turn feral like like  them.  I post there rarely, I am not liked and I know the moment something awful happens to me, I am turned on and spurned. Cast out.  I like a one or two there but one woman in particular hates me and I recently saw a nasty thing she said about me, posted in the vortex. No doubt by someone who hates her. The nasty thing that was said about me, came from the secret locked room that I am not allowed to post in, even though I have posted there since it opened in 2007!!!

Who said IQ is gone? Not me.

mantra did.