Australian Politics Forum

Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl Member Run Boards >> Environment >> "As it stands..." http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1448345319 Message started by Daleks_net_MUST_EXTERMINATE on Nov 24^th, 2015 at 4:08pm

Title: "As it stands..."
Post by Daleks_net_MUST_EXTERMINATE on Nov 24^th, 2015 at 4:08pm

...
As it stands, the big news about this El Nino is that it so hot globally relative to 97-98 when the El Nino event is not as strong as 97-98.

source: comment 2, http://www.skepticalscience.com/news.php?n=3194

Title: Re: "As it stands..."
Post by lee on Nov 24^th, 2015 at 4:56pm

Yes, it may or may not be stronger than 97/98. It doesn't appear, at this stage, to be a "Godzilla".

Title: Re: "As it stands..."
Post by progressiveslol on Nov 24^th, 2015 at 6:36pm

No the story is that the AGW loons were excited to the point of relying on this el nino to be the biggest, but it is anything but.

Back to BS stories AGW loons. Nothing to see here.

Title: Re: "As it stands..."
Post by Chimp_Logic on Nov 24^th, 2015 at 8:34pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 24^th, 2015 at 6:36pm:

No the story is that the AGW loons were excited to the point of relying on this el nino to be the biggest, but it is anything but.

Back to BS stories AGW loons. Nothing to see here.

what is the cyclical period of El Ninio?

show the data over time, and then apologise for not understanding the basics

apologise in writing and then self ban

Title: Re: "As it stands..."
Post by progressiveslol on Nov 24^th, 2015 at 10:28pm

Chimp_Logic wrote on Nov 24^th, 2015 at 8:34pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 24^th, 2015 at 6:36pm:

No the story is that the AGW loons were excited to the point of relying on this el nino to be the biggest, but it is anything but.

Back to BS stories AGW loons. Nothing to see here.

what is the cyclical period of El Ninio?

show the data over time, and then apologise for not understanding the basics

apologise in writing and then self ban

Just like getting anything but nonsense out of you, it just isn't going to happen.

Title: Re: "As it stands..."
Post by Chimp_Logic on Nov 24^th, 2015 at 10:33pm

....oh what's wrong progressivelol?

were you exposed in public as a clown maggot freak puppet and now you have gone all sooky sooky la la??

poor progressivelol sloth - poor sooky sooky progressivelol...he doesn't know how to handle the truth about his rotting putrid carcass

Title: Re: "As it stands..."
Post by Daleks_net_MUST_EXTERMINATE on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 3:22pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 24^th, 2015 at 6:36pm:

No the story is that the AGW loons were excited to the point of relying on this el nino to be the biggest, but it is anything but.

Back to BS stories AGW loons. Nothing to see here.

sorry buddy: you just can't read,

...
As it stands, the big news about this El Nino is that it so hot globally relative to 97-98 when the El Nino event is not as strong as 97-98.

source: comment 2, http://www.skepticalscience.com/news.php?n=3194

Title: Re: "As it stands..."
Post by Daleks_net_MUST_EXTERMINATE on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 3:24pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 24^th, 2015 at 10:28pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Nov 24^th, 2015 at 8:34pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 24^th, 2015 at 6:36pm:

No the story is that the AGW loons were excited to the point of relying on this el nino to be the biggest, but it is anything but.

Back to BS stories AGW loons. Nothing to see here.

what is the cyclical period of El Ninio?

show the data over time, and then apologise for not understanding the basics

apologise in writing and then self ban

Just like getting anything but nonsense out of you, it just isn't going to happen.

more unquantified argument from the copper internet lover : you must be a foreign vested interest from planet accountant ::)

Title: Re: "As it stands..."
Post by lee on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 3:47pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 3:22pm:

As it stands, the big news about this El Nino is that it so hot globally relative to 97-98 when the El Nino event is not as strong as 97-98.

source: comment 2, http://www.skepticalscience.com/news.php?n=3194

So sayeth the soothsayers from NASA/NOOA/GISS on the back of the Karl et al 2015 reconstructions.

Title: Re: "As it stands..."
Post by Daleks_net_MUST_EXTERMINATE on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 4:09pm

lee wrote on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 3:47pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 3:22pm:

So sayeth the soothsayers from NASA/NOOA/GISS on the back of the Karl et al 2015 reconstructions.

Your point being?

Title: Re: "As it stands..."
Post by lee on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 4:17pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 4:09pm:

Your point being?

it is quite ridiculous to point to levels of "hotness" compared to 97/98 when the adjustments have been made since.

Title: Re: "As it stands..."
Post by Daleks_net_MUST_EXTERMINATE on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 4:32pm

lee wrote on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 4:17pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 4:09pm:

Your point being?

it is quite ridiculous to point to levels of "hotness" compared to 97/98 when the adjustments have been made since.

Lol, so no adjustment should ever be made to anything ever?

Do you even know what you're talking about??

Title: Re: "As it stands..."
Post by Jovial Monk on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 4:41pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Nov 24^th, 2015 at 4:08pm:

Interesting.

Title: Re: "As it stands..."
Post by Chimp_Logic on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 5:03pm

lee's apology and self banishment is well overdue ladies and gentlemen

Title: Re: "As it stands..."
Post by lee on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 6:38pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 4:32pm:

Lol, so no adjustment should ever be made to anything ever?

So adjustments should be made where the p value is =>0.1? LOL

Title: Re: "As it stands..."
Post by Daleks_net_MUST_EXTERMINATE on Nov 26^th, 2015 at 12:22pm

lee wrote on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 6:38pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Nov 25^th, 2015 at 4:32pm:

Lol, so no adjustment should ever be made to anything ever?

So adjustments should be made where the p value is =>0.1? LOL

You're telling the story buddy ;)