Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Chat >> perceptions
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446927457

Message started by cods on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:17am

Title: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:17am
[urlhttp://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336][/url]


howdy percy...I see you sent this thread to 'relationships'.. sadly I dont post in there  anymore so that stopped my contribution...however said thread is now locked so neither can anyone else post there..

I just wish to say..

its sad when threads get posted there as there is a control person who insists on being... in control...of every thread.

so unless you post what he approves of you are either banished or the thread is locked...

would it be possible to move the unstable 'deckchairs' to a safer place in future where neither the poster nor the posts are harassed into submission...

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 8th, 2015 at 9:40am
My my, you are quite the whinger aren't you cods!  Go and and have another look.  The thread is not locked, and nothing has been deleted, and a persistent nuisance (right across the Forum) has been asked not to post.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Neferti on Nov 8th, 2015 at 10:00am
Don't tell porkies, arsie. The thread in question (http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336) WAS locked when Cods started this thread as I checked. You have now unlocked it.  ::)


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 8th, 2015 at 10:11am
Indeed.  I might as well use this opportunity to pass on some useful information the general Membership will not be aware of ...... and as a result, they will make posts based on complete ignorance, and in some cases, an anxiety to have a go at someone doing a job.

Every Member Run Board Moderator (as well as the GMods) has a facility which allows them to see who is reading a Thread, and also, that same facility tells us who is preparing a reply to post.

After I had asked Karnel not to post ~ using that facility ~ I saw s/he was preparing a reply.  So, to save them from themself, I locked the Thread, thus preventing them from becomming vulnerable to further adverse action.

When I returned to the Forum this morning, I unlocked the Thread.....as Karnel by then had been given plenty of time to avoid acting foolishly and in the heat of the moment.




Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Ex Dame Pansi on Nov 8th, 2015 at 10:40am


It's alive!



http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 8th, 2015 at 3:54pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 10:11am:
Indeed.  I might as well use this opportunity to pass on some useful information the general Membership will not be aware of ...... and as a result, they will make posts based on complete ignorance, and in some cases, an anxiety to have a go at someone doing a job.

Every Member Run Board Moderator (as well as the GMods) has a facility which allows them to see who is reading a Thread, and also, that same facility tells us who is preparing a reply to post.

After I had asked Karnel not to post ~ using that facility ~ I saw s/he was preparing a reply.  So, to save them from themself, I locked the Thread, thus preventing them from becomming vulnerable to further adverse action.

When I returned to the Forum this morning, I unlocked the Thread.....as Karnel by then had been given plenty of time to avoid acting foolishly and in the heat of the moment.



then why not say that in the first post... unless you were trying to make me out a liar.,... of course.. on ly Nef was also on the forum early...


do you have trouble lying straight in bed aussie???...

you are such a dictator how dare you spend half your time on here spying on everyone...is that realy what FD gave you that power for???????....

does anyone else here feel that IS AN ABUSE OF POWER??...its almost like Normans spyhole in the wall... >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(..

I am sorry to me that an ABUSE..

its against the LAW to perv on people.. isnt this almost the same thing.....I knwo you can only do it in relationships... but I know you can see myself who doesnt post there...

what threads I am reading...

>:( >:(


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 8th, 2015 at 3:56pm

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 10:40am:
It's alive!



http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336



good luck with that pansi I wish you well...aussie will see every move before you actually make it...

what a creep I always suspected now I know for sure..

it creeps me out the gmods are sitting there watching whos watching and reading by all accounts.....

can anyone explain the purpose of that???????????

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 8th, 2015 at 3:59pm
You are just so ignorant, cods.  One does not have to go looking.  It is there right before our eyes whenever we go to a Thread.  It is an automatic, highly visible thing.  It is a useful tool as I demonstrated last night by locking the Thread before Karnel made it worse for himself.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by He Man on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:01pm

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 3:56pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 10:40am:
It's alive!



http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336



good luck with that pansi I wish you well...aussie will see every move before you actually make it...

what a creep I always suspected now I know for sure..

it creeps me out the gmods are sitting there watching whos watching and reading by all accounts.....

can anyone explain the purpose of that???????????


people being freaks

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:04pm

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 3:56pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 10:40am:
It's alive!



http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336



good luck with that pansi I wish you well...aussie will see every move before you actually make it...

what a creep I always suspected now I know for sure..

it creeps me out the gmods are sitting there watching whos watching and reading by all accounts.....

can anyone explain the purpose of that???????????


It is exactly the same thing you see on the main page when you log in, cods.  Down the bottom, you will see a list of who is on line/logged in.  This feature does the same.  It tells 'us' who is 'logged in' to the Thread, and which of them is preparing a response.  Nothing more.   

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by He Man on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:08pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:04pm:

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 3:56pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 10:40am:
It's alive!



http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336



good luck with that pansi I wish you well...aussie will see every move before you actually make it...

what a creep I always suspected now I know for sure..

it creeps me out the gmods are sitting there watching whos watching and reading by all accounts.....

can anyone explain the purpose of that???????????


It is exactly the same thing you see on the main page when you log in, cods.  Down the bottom, you will see a list of who is on line/logged in.  This feature does the same.  It tells 'us' who is 'logged in' to the Thread, and which of them is preparing a response.  Nothing more.   


Thats correct mods of members boards can only see who is there and who is preparing a response. Its like pissing in the wind. All aussie would be doing is getting excited about a pending post almost peeing his pants just so he could then tell the poster not to post there anymore. The only reason he can even do that is because freediver encourages the fool to run the ozpolitic trash can relationships. He cant even see IP addresses. Oh he can poo his pants and modify peoples posts so there is no point posting there anyways.

He is a nut and relies on freediver to can peoples asses if he can trick them into posting after he writes a banning posts.

The guy is nothing but a silly child cods.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Secret Wars on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:12pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 10:11am:
  So, to save them from themself, I locked the Thread, thus preventing them from becomming vulnerable to further adverse action.

When I returned to the Forum this morning, I unlocked the Thread.....as Karnel by then had been given plenty of time to avoid acting foolishly and in the heat of the moment.


;D ;D

A more accurate and truthful statement would be "so no one could post anything about else about me when I wasn't around to delete it I locked the thread when I went to bed".




Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:13pm
There you go, cods.  You have support from one (not two) of the quality and highly regarded Members here.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Ex Dame Pansi on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:31pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:04pm:

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 3:56pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 10:40am:
It's alive!



http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336



good luck with that pansi I wish you well...aussie will see every move before you actually make it...

what a creep I always suspected now I know for sure..

it creeps me out the gmods are sitting there watching whos watching and reading by all accounts.....

can anyone explain the purpose of that???????????


It is exactly the same thing you see on the main page when you log in, cods.  Down the bottom, you will see a list of who is on line/logged in.  This feature does the same.  It tells 'us' who is 'logged in' to the Thread, and which of them is preparing a response.  Nothing more.   



It's probably like the chat function.

It tells you when the other person is typing but you can't read it until they send it to you.

I wouldn't worry too much, the government will have drones taking pics of your toilet habits soon, now that creeps me out.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:36pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:04pm:

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 3:56pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 10:40am:
It's alive!



http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336



good luck with that pansi I wish you well...aussie will see every move before you actually make it...

what a creep I always suspected now I know for sure..

it creeps me out the gmods are sitting there watching whos watching and reading by all accounts.....

can anyone explain the purpose of that???????????


It is exactly the same thing you see on the main page when you log in, cods.  Down the bottom, you will see a list of who is on line/logged in.  This feature does the same.  It tells 'us' who is 'logged in' to the Thread, and which of them is preparing a response.  Nothing more.   



but you are the only one that appears to ACT  on  it....

yes I did know about the window....pervs also know about windows....

I just wasnt aware it was used like you use it???...

how dare anyone stop someone from posting.. how dare they break someones faith in FOS your complaints about karmel were bizarre

you have the audacity to start a thread...to encourage others to make notes about abusing members..  ::) ::) ::)

you want this to be brought to FDs attention...

you know he will never take any notice of you personally...so we have been told...so thats a good way of knocking someone you dont like off....we know andrei keeps an eye on relationships....so you live in hope...

forgetting you are only delivering one side of the problem...but thats ok as long as it stirs up hate and contention..

you are not worthy of being a mod......I never agreed with all the attacks about your past as a moderator but I can see their points now..

look at the way you have just had a poke at myself...

this is just one very small example..



Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 9:40am:
My my, you are quite the whinger aren't you cods!  Go and and have another look.  The thread is not locked, and nothing has been deleted, and a persistent nuisance (right across the Forum) has been asked not to post.




that thread was LOCKED..

n o note from the MOD which is usual when he is just closing it down for a short while[ another bizarre act]..

nope he claims hes doing it for karmels own good...as if.. ::) ::) ::)


but I am the whinger.. not the mod of  bad/relationships..... does he whinge about others... never!


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:41pm

Secret Wars wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:12pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 10:11am:
  So, to save them from themself, I locked the Thread, thus preventing them from becomming vulnerable to further adverse action.

When I returned to the Forum this morning, I unlocked the Thread.....as Karnel by then had been given plenty of time to avoid acting foolishly and in the heat of the moment.


;D ;D

A more accurate and truthful statement would be "so no one could post anything about else about me when I wasn't around to delete it I locked the thread when I went to bed".




that could be the very case... I do not see the need to be watching who is going to post in your forum really what has it got to do with anything....thats like someone being about to see what is put in your letterbox..and seeing who is writing to whom....its no ones business...

who is on the forum may or may not count....to me thats also not a big deal...but I can see the point of it if one is trying to avoid someone...

and for all we know that might be a rule in regards to having a website like this...I would think owners also have to comply with rules..


the point of this thread is to get percy to transplant them somewhere without the interference
at least I havent seen any other mod act this way....

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:44pm
Yeas, cods....you are the whinger.  If you bothered to read the posts of Agnes in the Tavern/CWA, she too has used the same features, and not one word did we hear from you.  You have your little 'Aussie' hatred going on, and there is nothing anyone can say which will deter you from proving over and over and over just exactly how ignorant you are.  I could tell you a zillion times that today is Sunday, others might endorse that...yet, if it suited your pre-programmed agenda, you would find some way to tell us all that today is Saturday and that 'Aussie' made it all up as part of some gigantic anti cods conspiracy.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 8th, 2015 at 5:17pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:44pm:
Yeas, cods....you are the whinger.  If you bothered to read the posts of Agnes in the Tavern/CWA, she too has used the same features, and not one word did we hear from you.  You have your little 'Aussie' hatred going on, and there is nothing anyone can say which will deter you from proving over and over and over just exactly how ignorant you are.  I could tell you a zillion times that today is Sunday, others might endorse that...yet, if it suited your pre-programmed agenda, you would find some way to tell us all that today is Saturday and that 'Aussie' made it all up as part of some gigantic anti cods conspiracy.


I knew I had read that word... and you fixed it didnt you...what a creep...

your post btw is one long put down of cods.. yet you complain about anyone daring to point out your faults which you never admit too its always because of some other reason never because you are a dictator...

I am not the only one that says it aussie...and when we have our confronts.. its usually you and me I dont join in your other little hassels..

why would I deter from something that you do all the time?????>..

you are claiming what I am saying is untrue...


the last part oif your statement says it all cods says SUnday is Saturday and no one will change her mind...


I would be one of the most truthful people on here its you that twists everything and changes and disappears..things not I...even on this small thread....

you are good at it aussie no one disputes that I am just saying its creepy to spy on people and it is...and I am surprised if others do it...

yes I did see agnes disappear something in the CWA and yes we did discuss it via PM....

not only am I not responsible for others actions   I cannot do anything about them either.....

hence this thread....

you take offence at anyone picking out something like locking a thread......yet you havent complained when I have actually started a thread on the very same thing in the past......

asking why is a thread locked..locking a thread in your forum doesnt b other me at all.. except when the thread has been sent there via another mod....I am just asking can they go somewhere else....percy is usually agreeable to someone asking a simple question...a couple of thread I did engage in went there and that stops me posting in the topic...

that I know is my choice..and the reason is self explanatory if you read this thread...

your last post is a real personal attack...you havent mentioned me drinking will that be next ::) ::).

you do jump on everyone else barrow when it suits..

I am pointing out facts...things you do... if I make a mistake I usually apologise... if I get reported I always get banned...one thing I am not aussie is a liar...I can prove most things I say about someone.. but I cant usually be bothered... you enjoy doing that    I dont its not what I come on here for..



Title: Re: perceptions
Post by skippy. on Nov 8th, 2015 at 5:42pm
A plea to the G mods, please move threads to Extremism exposed so as he who will not be mentioned can not be given the power to control that he so craves. Cods is correct the thread was locked last night, I was flabbergasted a mod would ban a poster for not disclosing if he had a sock but then I realised the mod was he who will not be mentioned and sighed in disbelief he is still allowed to control even a miniscule corner of this forum.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 8th, 2015 at 5:48pm
I'll ignore skippeeee as he has his own little crusade from the days of PA.

Cods, I cannot respond to that mad women's breakfast of a post for that very reason.  It is impossible to have a sensible discussion with you because you go off on so many tangents, (perhaps deliberate but I don't know) posted in such a way as makes it not worth the effort.  All I'll do is post this as follows, and invite you to tell me what is it is about.


Quote:
Agnes
Moderator
*****
Offline


l'amour est tout ce dont
vous avez besoin

Posts: 1872
     
Re: C.W.A.
Reply #878 - Oct 25th, 2015 at 3:31pm Quote
Aussie if that reply is not nice it will go missing.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:00pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 5:48pm:
I'll ignore skippeeee as he has his own little crusade from the days of PA.

Cods, I cannot respond to that mad women's breakfast of a post for that very reason.  It is impossible to have a sensible discussion with you because you go off on so many tangents, (perhaps deliberate but I don't know) posted in such a way as makes it not worth the effort.  All I'll do is post this as follows, and invite you to tell me what is it is about.


Quote:
Agnes
Moderator
*****
Offline


l'amour est tout ce dont
vous avez besoin

Posts: 1872
     
Re: C.W.A.
Reply #878 - Oct 25th, 2015 at 3:31pm Quote
Aussie if that reply is not nice it will go missing.




fair enough ... let me just say..

thats the first time I have seen that post... but as I have pointed out and you have done it again..

there is another part to the post....what led up to it..

but you have conveniently left that part out...give me the whole link..


however.,. I wont ramble on as its all too much for you i will just say this..

you wanted to post in the CWA... and agnes asked for my opinion and I told her I had no problem at all....

and then suddenly fireworks started between you which I have no clue about......

the last we spoke about it was when I gave her my opinion...

you are one for the rules.. well if agnes has rules then its up to you to abide by them just the same as it is for me...  if you have a problem with agnes... she is not ME.. I have nothing to do with telling agnes how to run her board...

give me the link... if you expect me to answer you.. I will try to do it without rambling.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:04pm

skippy. wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 5:42pm:
A plea to the G mods, please move threads to Extremism exposed so as he who will not be mentioned can not be given the power to control that he so craves. Cods is correct the thread was locked last night, I was flabbergasted a mod would ban a poster for not disclosing if he had a sock but then I realised the mod was he who will not be mentioned and sighed in disbelief he is still allowed to control even a miniscule corner of this forum.




why extremism skippy....isnt that a bit drastic.. I am scared to use that forum....

maybe a trashcan board where threads that annoy the mods can go...lolol

I am disappointed in aussie as he is still doing his best to put me down as if I dream up things...he knows as well as I do HE LOCKED IT...and he doesnt like being exposed..... so cods is mad rambles all the time.. dont bother?????mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:08pm
There you go again.....posting ignorant stuff.  I did lock it, I have already said I did, and explained why....yet, that explanation is not good enough for you cods, even though it is the bare truth.  We can't have fact getting in the way of your fantasy can we, cods.  I unlocked it this morning for the reason given.  Why else, cods?

How about you tell me what Agnes was saying in that post and why she said it?  Too hard for you, or would you rather not have to confront fact?

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:14pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:08pm:
There you go again.....posting ignorant stuff.  I did lock it, I have already said I did, and explained why....yet, that explanation is not good enough for you cods, even though it is the bare truth.  We can't have fact getting in the way of your fantasy can we, cods.  I unlocked it this morning for the reason given.  Why else, cods?

How about you tell me what Agnes was saying in that post and why she said it?  Too hard for you, or would you rather not have to confront fact?


Oh.....and I should add that I have not the slightest problem with what Agnes posted (in the CWA Thread, cods) as I understood what she meant.  The point is.....how come you did not wade in with all guns imploding, as usual.

Cods, you want to eat your cake and still have it.  You can't, you know.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:53pm

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 3:56pm:
it creeps me out the gmods are sitting there watching whos watching and reading by all accounts.....

can anyone explain the purpose of that???????????


Cods if you think we sit and watch who is reading what thread you seriously over estimate the freetime in people's lives.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by skippy. on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:55pm

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:04pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 5:42pm:
A plea to the G mods, please move threads to Extremism exposed so as he who will not be mentioned can not be given the power to control that he so craves. Cods is correct the thread was locked last night, I was flabbergasted a mod would ban a poster for not disclosing if he had a sock but then I realised the mod was he who will not be mentioned and sighed in disbelief he is still allowed to control even a miniscule corner of this forum.




why extremism skippy....isnt that a bit drastic.. I am scared to use that forum....

maybe a trashcan board where threads that annoy the mods can go...lolol

I am disappointed in aussie as he is still doing his best to put me down as if I dream up things...he knows as well as I do HE LOCKED IT...and he doesnt like being exposed..... so cods is mad rambles all the time.. dont bother?????mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

I chose Extremism exposed as that is where mozz used to move threads and as far as I know it's still unmoderated so control freak mods can not control the discussion as they can in boards like Relationships.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 8th, 2015 at 7:04pm

skippy. wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:55pm:

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:04pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 5:42pm:
A plea to the G mods, please move threads to Extremism exposed so as he who will not be mentioned can not be given the power to control that he so craves. Cods is correct the thread was locked last night, I was flabbergasted a mod would ban a poster for not disclosing if he had a sock but then I realised the mod was he who will not be mentioned and sighed in disbelief he is still allowed to control even a miniscule corner of this forum.




why extremism skippy....isnt that a bit drastic.. I am scared to use that forum....

maybe a trashcan board where threads that annoy the mods can go...lolol

I am disappointed in aussie as he is still doing his best to put me down as if I dream up things...he knows as well as I do HE LOCKED IT...and he doesnt like being exposed..... so cods is mad rambles all the time.. dont bother?????mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

I chose Extremism exposed as that is where mozz used to move threads and as far as I know it's still unmoderated so control freak mods can not control the discussion as they can in boards like Relationships.


You would not know and only you care, skippee (for your own PA reasons) and cods, for hers.  I don't, and I have said all I need here.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by He Man on Nov 8th, 2015 at 7:22pm

skippy. wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 5:42pm:
A plea to the G mods, please move threads to Extremism exposed so as he who will not be mentioned can not be given the power to control that he so craves. Cods is correct the thread was locked last night, I was flabbergasted a mod would ban a poster for not disclosing if he had a sock but then I realised the mod was he who will not be mentioned and sighed in disbelief he is still allowed to control even a miniscule corner of this forum.


Yeah well there is only one moderator here worth his salt and actually turns up. Unfortunately there are others who are not worth their salt.

Gandalf being a gmod is a joke, its just a free felafel by freediver clearly to keep him posting here so he can make an ass out of islam when gandalf tries to actually defend his version of it. Gandaft chomps down hard on that felafel.

Unfortunately people have to put up with gandafts hissy fit bannings when his fragile mohammed teddy bear islamic tendencies get offended.

Aussie is used to moderate the ozpolitic toilet. I have no problem with that but a new area called MISC should be created and only moderated by gmods, not the Aussie dipstick exploiting the system.

He feeds off the fact someone he banned accidentally clicks on a link to make a post on the forum home page down the bottom. Then he sooks to freediver who clearly hasn't got the time to check it and gets them banned. That's the problem.

Aussie is the forum sooky baby.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by mothra on Nov 8th, 2015 at 7:42pm
Gandalf is a great GMod. You are just showing your prejudice. Pathetic.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by He Man on Nov 8th, 2015 at 7:44pm

mothra wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 7:42pm:
Gandalf is a great GMod. You are just showing your prejudice. Pathetic.


On your bike troll. Yes you are pathetic.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by skippy. on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:03pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 7:04pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:55pm:

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:04pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 5:42pm:
A plea to the G mods, please move threads to Extremism exposed so as he who will not be mentioned can not be given the power to control that he so craves. Cods is correct the thread was locked last night, I was flabbergasted a mod would ban a poster for not disclosing if he had a sock but then I realised the mod was he who will not be mentioned and sighed in disbelief he is still allowed to control even a miniscule corner of this forum.




why extremism skippy....isnt that a bit drastic.. I am scared to use that forum....

maybe a trashcan board where threads that annoy the mods can go...lolol

I am disappointed in aussie as he is still doing his best to put me down as if I dream up things...he knows as well as I do HE LOCKED IT...and he doesnt like being exposed..... so cods is mad rambles all the time.. dont bother?????mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

I chose Extremism exposed as that is where mozz used to move threads and as far as I know it's still unmoderated so control freak mods can not control the discussion as they can in boards like Relationships.


You would not know and only you care, skippee (for your own PA reasons) and cods, for hers.  I don't, and I have said all I need here.

Why wouldn't I know? All you do is prove I am right. I doubt you mean anything to anyone. :)

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by He Man on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:08pm
If Aussie was permanently banned from here by Freediver like Freediver permanently banned him from polanimal you would physically hear the sigh in front of your PC from all the ozpol posters in unison.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Muttley on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:17pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:14pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:08pm:
There you go again.....posting ignorant stuff.  I did lock it, I have already said I did, and explained why....yet, that explanation is not good enough for you cods, even though it is the bare truth.  We can't have fact getting in the way of your fantasy can we, cods.  I unlocked it this morning for the reason given.  Why else, cods?

How about you tell me what Agnes was saying in that post and why she said it?  Too hard for you, or would you rather not have to confront fact?


Oh.....and I should add that I have not the slightest problem with what Agnes posted (in the CWA Thread, cods) as I understood what she meant.  The point is.....how come you did not wade in with all guns imploding, as usual.

Cods, you want to eat your cake and still have it.  You can't, you know.



Bushy, you’re an arrogant bastard who thinks he can “save them from themself"…..your words. Don’t flatter yourself cabbie, you have neither the brains nor the sophistication to save anybody from anything. Concentrate on cleaning up the vomit from your weekend customers, let the adults decide when and what they want to post, unless of course you are the “Mod” stroking your pathetic ego.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by John Smith on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:19pm

He Man wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:08pm:
If Aussie was permanently banned from here by Freediver like Freediver permanently banned him from polanimal you would physically hear the sigh in front of your PC from all the ozpol posters in unison.



I reckon you would at that, too!  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by He Man on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:28pm

John Smith wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:19pm:

He Man wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:08pm:
If Aussie was permanently banned from here by Freediver like Freediver permanently banned him from polanimal you would physically hear the sigh in front of your PC from all the ozpol posters in unison.



I reckon you would at that, too!  ;D ;D ;D ;D


I like it when you get a threat on PM to stop posting and he cc's fd.
FD's eyes ,must be rolling right out the door.

Bloody hilarious, he writes it like you give a stuff about posting in relationship . ;D

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by skippy. on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:37pm

He Man wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:08pm:
If Aussie was permanently banned from here by Freediver like Freediver permanently banned him from polanimal you would physically hear the sigh in front of your PC from all the ozpol posters in unison.

It was me who permanently banned Aussie from PA. send your gifts of appreciation to Skippy@waratahnationalpark.com.au. Gifts over two dollars are tax deductible. 8-)

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by He Man on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:45pm
;D

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:48pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:08pm:
There you go again.....posting ignorant stuff.  I did lock it, I have already said I did, and explained why....yet, that explanation is not good enough for you cods, even though it is the bare truth.  We can't have fact getting in the way of your fantasy can we, cods.  I unlocked it this morning for the reason given.  Why else, cods?

How about you tell me what Agnes was saying in that post and why she said it?  Too hard for you, or would you rather not have to confront fact?



how abouit you explain why Neferti jumped in then????????

why would she do that if you hadnt given the impression in your very first post... that you hadnt locked it...that cods was rambling??>..


we love the way you twist things....I love the way you altered that first message although I cant prove it...but I know you did.

I DONT KNOW WHAT THE MESSAGE FROM AGNES WAS OR IS.. I HAVE ASKED FOR THE LINK TO THE WHOLE PAGE...WHY DONT YOU PUT UP THE LINK..

DONT MAKE THIS OUT TO BE CODS IS AVOIDING ANSWERING YOU...


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:51pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:53pm:

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 3:56pm:
it creeps me out the gmods are sitting there watching whos watching and reading by all accounts.....

can anyone explain the purpose of that???????????


Cods if you think we sit and watch who is reading what thread you seriously over estimate the freetime in people's lives.



I CAN ASSURE YOU I DONT... however we do have one mod that seems to do just that.. and I dont like singling one person out like he does for contempt...

I just dont understand why mods are given that insulting spy hole which I am sure most members dont ahve a clue about....even to the fact you can watch to see if we are replying  what does it all stand for????>..

and why do some mods take advantage of it????...

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by John Smith on Nov 8th, 2015 at 9:01pm

He Man wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:28pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:19pm:

He Man wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:08pm:
If Aussie was permanently banned from here by Freediver like Freediver permanently banned him from polanimal you would physically hear the sigh in front of your PC from all the ozpol posters in unison.



I reckon you would at that, too!  ;D ;D ;D ;D


I like it when you get a threat on PM to stop posting and he cc's fd.
FD's eyes ,must be rolling right out the door.

Bloody hilarious, he writes it like you give a stuff about posting in relationship . ;D


I don't receive PM's from him, I've blocked him so he can't annoy me.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by skippy. on Nov 8th, 2015 at 9:09pm
I
cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:51pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:53pm:

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 3:56pm:
it creeps me out the gmods are sitting there watching whos watching and reading by all accounts.....

can anyone explain the purpose of that???????????


Cods if you think we sit and watch who is reading what thread you seriously over estimate the freetime in people's lives.



I CAN ASSURE YOU I DONT... however we do have one mod that seems to do just that.. and I dont like singling one person out like he does for contempt...

I just dont understand why mods are given that insulting spy hole which I am sure most members dont ahve a clue about....even to the fact you can watch to see if we are replying  what does it all stand for????>..

and why do some mods take advantage of it????...

Some people are born stalkers,cods. I'll tell you a little story about he who shall not be named. At PA we had a facility where Posters could see  when posters were PMing other posters. If you clicked on the who is online facility it would tell you what board posters were reading or if they were PMing someone. He who shall not be named used to sit there telling posters on the forum who they had been PMing his expression for this was " you've been on the Tom toms to so and so" paranoia reigns supreme in his mind.. So to stop he who shall not be named doing this FD changed the option so if you look at who is online now it always says for every poster " on the Tom toms" true story. ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 8th, 2015 at 9:12pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:14pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:08pm:
There you go again.....posting ignorant stuff.  I did lock it, I have already said I did, and explained why....yet, that explanation is not good enough for you cods, even though it is the bare truth.  We can't have fact getting in the way of your fantasy can we, cods.  I unlocked it this morning for the reason given.  Why else, cods?

How about you tell me what Agnes was saying in that post and why she said it?  Too hard for you, or would you rather not have to confront fact?


Oh.....and I should add that I have not the slightest problem with what Agnes posted (in the CWA Thread, cods) as I understood what she meant.  The point is.....how come you did not wade in with all guns imploding, as usual.

Cods, you want to eat your cake and still have it.  You can't, you know.




how do you talk to this person... ::) ::) ::)

I have ASKED FOR A LINK.. dont tell me anyone understands what you have put up even agnes would have trouble... ::) ::) get a life aussie..

btw here is your first post.. followed by nefertis




Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 14071
Re: perceptions
Reply #1 - Today at 9:40am Quote  My my, you are quite the whinger aren't you cods!  Go and and have another look.  The thread is not locked, and nothing has been deleted, and a persistent nuisance (right across the Forum) has been asked not to post.
Back to top      



Posts: 3012
Gender: female
Re: perceptions
Reply #2 - Today at 10:00am Quote  Don't tell porkies, arsie. The thread in question (http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336) WAS locked when Cods started this thread as I checked. You have now unlocked it.  Roll Eyes


stop making things up.... you called me ignorant in that message as well..but I cant prove it.. you are as cunning as a fox...any wonder I dont post in your box...

totally untrustworthy.

then he runs 


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by He Man on Nov 8th, 2015 at 9:15pm

John Smith wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 9:01pm:

He Man wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:28pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:19pm:

He Man wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:08pm:
If Aussie was permanently banned from here by Freediver like Freediver permanently banned him from polanimal you would physically hear the sigh in front of your PC from all the ozpol posters in unison.



I reckon you would at that, too!  ;D ;D ;D ;D


I like it when you get a threat on PM to stop posting and he cc's fd.
FD's eyes ,must be rolling right out the door.

Bloody hilarious, he writes it like you give a stuff about posting in relationship . ;D


I don't receive PM's from him, I've blocked him so he can't annoy me.


I was gonna do that but then I thought to myself. The frequency was manageable and I get a kick out of sending one back to the nut.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 8th, 2015 at 9:26pm

skippy. wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 9:09pm:
I
cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:51pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:53pm:

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 3:56pm:
it creeps me out the gmods are sitting there watching whos watching and reading by all accounts.....

can anyone explain the purpose of that???????????


Cods if you think we sit and watch who is reading what thread you seriously over estimate the freetime in people's lives.



I CAN ASSURE YOU I DONT... however we do have one mod that seems to do just that.. and I dont like singling one person out like he does for contempt...

I just dont understand why mods are given that insulting spy hole which I am sure most members dont ahve a clue about....even to the fact you can watch to see if we are replying  what does it all stand for????>..

and why do some mods take advantage of it????...

Some people are born stalkers,cods. I'll tell you a little story about he who shall not be named. At PA we had a facility where Posters could see  when posters were PMing other posters. If you clicked on the who is online facility it would tell you what board posters were reading or if they were PMing someone. He who shall not be named used to sit there telling posters on the forum who they had been PMing his expression for this was " you've been on the Tom toms to so and so" paranoia reigns supreme in his mind.. So to stop he who shall not be named doing this FD changed the option so if you look at who is online now it always says for every poster " on the Tom toms" true story. ;D ;D ;D



it sounds horrible....I do hope thats stopped... why cause trouble what is it with some people.??

look I have got m ore than my fair share of enemies on here... but I have never ever made up lies about anyone..and I used to stick up for aussie because I always thought there was a lot of exaggeration attached to everything   remember how he used to say he was doing everyone a favour.. now I understand and  I get his obsession  with  PMs they do play a big part in some folks lives...

I like the way aussie will have an argument with myself.. then out of the blue start telling everyone I am rambling and he doesnt understand a word I am saying...

then he drags out some bizarre post that I am supposed to have read yet not got nasty about.. and he wants to know WHY...no he DEMANDS to know why???...

it that his way of derailing the topic???>..maybe this thread actually was asking percy to transfer threads somewhere else.. because the fact is.. I DONT post in relationships.. so thats one of the reasons..lolol..

my bad!

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 8th, 2015 at 9:28pm

skippy. wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:37pm:

He Man wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 8:08pm:
If Aussie was permanently banned from here by Freediver like Freediver permanently banned him from polanimal you would physically hear the sigh in front of your PC from all the ozpol posters in unison.

It was me who permanently banned Aussie from PA. send your gifts of appreciation to Skippy@waratahnationalpark.com.au. Gifts over two dollars are tax deductible. 8-)



pop into the cwa sometime and have a  glass of mead and a scone any time...lolol

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Black Orchid on Nov 8th, 2015 at 9:45pm
I won't post in Relationships either and I find it disappointing that so many threads are moved there by the GMods.

Leave Cods alone, aussie.  Your abusive posts to her are unacceptable.  If anyone is ignorant here it is yourself!

Cods?   When aussie starts lying and deflecting (in the hope he can sway peoples' perception) the best thing to do is ignore him.  Amoral comes to mind.

Perhaps a petition for another dumping ground for topics that the GMods want to move?  One that will NOT be moved to Relationships because then the petition will not get a fair hearing?


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by He Man on Nov 8th, 2015 at 10:13pm
Agreed another dumping ground, a place where people won't accidentally post after being banned by the fool from relationships.

Remove his abuse of power getting people banned that accidentally click on a forum homepage link to respond to a poster not realizing its in his toilet.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:13am

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 9:45pm:
I won't post in Relationships either and I find it disappointing that so many threads are moved there by the GMods.

Leave Cods alone, aussie.  Your abusive posts to her are unacceptable.  If anyone is ignorant here it is yourself!

Cods?   When aussie starts lying and deflecting (in the hope he can sway peoples' perception) the best thing to do is ignore him.  Amoral comes to mind.

Perhaps a petition for another dumping ground for topics that the GMods want to move?  One that will NOT be moved to Relationships because then the petition will not get a fair hearing?


cods is ignorant of (i.e. ~ does not know) the facts, and she posts in said ignorance.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Redneck on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:19am

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:04pm:

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 3:56pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 10:40am:
It's alive!



http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336



good luck with that pansi I wish you well...aussie will see every move before you actually make it...

what a creep I always suspected now I know for sure..

it creeps me out the gmods are sitting there watching whos watching and reading by all accounts.....

can anyone explain the purpose of that???????????


It is exactly the same thing you see on the main page when you log in, cods.  Down the bottom, you will see a list of who is on line/logged in.  This feature does the same.  It tells 'us' who is 'logged in' to the Thread, and which of them is preparing a response.  Nothing more.   


I didnt realise it showed who was preparing a response, I thought it just showed who was viewing the board.



Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:28am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:13am:

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 9:45pm:
I won't post in Relationships either and I find it disappointing that so many threads are moved there by the GMods.

Leave Cods alone, aussie.  Your abusive posts to her are unacceptable.  If anyone is ignorant here it is yourself!

Cods?   When aussie starts lying and deflecting (in the hope he can sway peoples' perception) the best thing to do is ignore him.  Amoral comes to mind.

Perhaps a petition for another dumping ground for topics that the GMods want to move?  One that will NOT be moved to Relationships because then the petition will not get a fair hearing?


cods is ignorant of (i.e. ~ does not know) the facts, and she posts in said ignorance.




aussie I DO NOT KNOW WHAT FACTS YOU ARE REFERRING TOO


the FACT is I have asked on numerous occasions for you to post the link that you want a response
too??.....

if that is what you call IGNORANT.. then I am guilty as charged..

a few people are reading this and they I am sure would like to know the history???...

you are accusing me of NOT doing something you claim I should have done.... ::) ::)

I think if this was a court room your feeble attempts to tell the world how IGNORANT I am would be tossed out..

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:31am

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:19am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:04pm:

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 3:56pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 10:40am:
It's alive!



http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336



good luck with that pansi I wish you well...aussie will see every move before you actually make it...

what a creep I always suspected now I know for sure..

it creeps me out the gmods are sitting there watching whos watching and reading by all accounts.....

can anyone explain the purpose of that???????????


It is exactly the same thing you see on the main page when you log in, cods.  Down the bottom, you will see a list of who is on line/logged in.  This feature does the same.  It tells 'us' who is 'logged in' to the Thread, and which of them is preparing a response.  Nothing more.   


I didnt realise it showed who was preparing a response, I thought it just showed who was viewing the board.



I am still waiting to see that part as well....  ::) ::)

at least on skype there is no doubt....but I still dont know what they are writing..

I still do not know how aussie knows what they are planning to write???..he locked that thread to prevent karmal saying... WHAT! ::) ::) ::)

now explain that aussie

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:33am

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:31am:

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:19am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:04pm:

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 3:56pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 10:40am:
It's alive!



http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336



good luck with that pansi I wish you well...aussie will see every move before you actually make it...

what a creep I always suspected now I know for sure..

it creeps me out the gmods are sitting there watching whos watching and reading by all accounts.....

can anyone explain the purpose of that???????????


It is exactly the same thing you see on the main page when you log in, cods.  Down the bottom, you will see a list of who is on line/logged in.  This feature does the same.  It tells 'us' who is 'logged in' to the Thread, and which of them is preparing a response.  Nothing more.   


I didnt realise it showed who was preparing a response, I thought it just showed who was viewing the board.



I am still waiting to see that part as well....  ::) ::)

at least on skype there is no doubt....but I still dont know what they are writing..

I still do not know how aussie knows what they are planning to write???..he locked that thread to prevent karmal saying... WHAT! ::) ::) ::)

now explain that aussie


cods, ferfuxsake....read what is posted.  All it tells the Mod is ....... that someone is preparing a response

IT DOES NOT GIVE ANY INDICATION WHAT THAT RESPONSE IS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:34am
Further, Karnel was asked not to post at all....so it does not matter what he was preparing.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Redneck on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:35am

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 9:12pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:14pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:08pm:
There you go again.....posting ignorant stuff.  I did lock it, I have already said I did, and explained why....yet, that explanation is not good enough for you cods, even though it is the bare truth.  We can't have fact getting in the way of your fantasy can we, cods.  I unlocked it this morning for the reason given.  Why else, cods?

How about you tell me what Agnes was saying in that post and why she said it?  Too hard for you, or would you rather not have to confront fact?


Oh.....and I should add that I have not the slightest problem with what Agnes posted (in the CWA Thread, cods) as I understood what she meant.  The point is.....how come you did not wade in with all guns imploding, as usual.

Cods, you want to eat your cake and still have it.  You can't, you know.




how do you talk to this person... ::) ::) ::)

I have ASKED FOR A LINK.. dont tell me anyone understands what you have put up even agnes would have trouble... ::) ::) get a life aussie..

btw here is your first post.. followed by nefertis




Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 14071
Re: perceptions
Reply #1 - Today at 9:40am Quote  My my, you are quite the whinger aren't you cods!  Go and and have another look.  The thread is not locked, and nothing has been deleted, and a persistent nuisance (right across the Forum) has been asked not to post.
Back to top      



Posts: 3012
Gender: female
Re: perceptions
Reply #2 - Today at 10:00am Quote  Don't tell porkies, arsie. The thread in question (http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336) WAS locked when Cods started this thread as I checked. You have now unlocked it.  Roll Eyes


stop making things up.... you called me ignorant in that message as well..but I cant prove it.. you are as cunning as a fox...any wonder I dont post in your box...

totally untrustworthy.

then he runs 



I thinks she has got you Aussie, fess up like a man you tried to twist the facts rather than being honest.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:41am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:34am:
Further, Karnel was asked not to post at all....so it does not matter what he was preparing.



hilarious IT MAKES SENSE TO YOU..

so you stop everyone from replying because we have a naughty boy on the forum.....well well well I do hope FD is reading this...the way your mind works is off the planet,.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:42am
No, all she has is her knockers in a twist.  I had unlocked the Thread prior to making that post....so what I said was 100% correct.  The Thread was then not locked.  I could hardly deny what is true.....I had locked it the prior night for the reason given, and when I returned to OzPol next morning I unlocked it....again....for the reason given.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:47am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:33am:
cods, ferfuxsake....read what is posted.  All it tells the Mod is ....... that someone is preparing a response. 

IT DOES NOT GIVE ANY INDICATION WHAT THAT RESPONSE IS!




aussie I know this wont work for you!

but..

I was kind of joking being sarcastic about the mind reading bit?? ::) ::) ::)..

if you had those powers I think we would have learnt about them yonks ago...

stop deflecting dear everyones awake up to you...

this is about what you DO.....the fact is you DO WHAT YOU DO and blame someone else for doing it??.. you ban and lock when the ban doesnt work...

its all about WHAT YOU THINK its not because you have had complaints from anyone...

its a form of censorship you twist the very loosely monitored rules to fit where you want them to fit...

and they appear to apply  to everyone bar yourself...

thats how transparent you are....



Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:48am

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:41am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:34am:
Further, Karnel was asked not to post at all....so it does not matter what he was preparing.



hilarious IT MAKES SENSE TO YOU..

so you stop everyone from replying because we have a naughty boy on the forum.....well well well I do hope FD is reading this...the way your mind works is off the planet,.


Yeas....sometimes the foolishness of one can impact on many more, but that's the way the cookie crumbles when one has limited administrative tools available.

cods you wanted me to go do your homework for you and hand feed to you what you are too lazy to find for yourself, even though I told you it was the CWA Thread and gave you a copy of the relevant post.

Here is the:

Link.

Post # 878.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:50am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:42am:
No, all she has is her knockers in a twist.  I had unlocked the Thread prior to making that post....so what I said was 100% correct.  The Thread was then not locked.  I could hardly deny what is true.....I had locked it the prior night for the reason given, and when I returned to OzPol next morning I unlocked it....again....for the reason given.




you are lying again... how come neferti saw it???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????...

this isnt about you unlocking it... its about you locking it...in the first place....as some one pointed out you want to go to bed and you dont want to miss anything that karmel will put up and maybe show you up....

karmel did nothing at all to be banned....nothing at all mate sorry me thinks its you who has their knickers.. call them knockers if you will in a TWIST

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:00am

Quote:
this is about what you DO.....the fact is you DO WHAT YOU DO and blame someone else for doing it??.. you ban and lock when the ban doesnt work...


Again, you are ignorant of the facts.  Read the Forum Rules cods.  All Mods like me can do is ask people .... we have no ban button.  So, if someone has been asked not to post, and I can see they are about to post, the only tool I have is to lock (or hide) the thread.  If I did not do that, I then  would be forced into a detailed PM and posting exchange with the relevant member and FD.  I am making life easy for me.   As I said, one bad apple will impact on the whole box full.


Quote:
its all about WHAT YOU THINK its not because you have had complaints from anyone...

its a form of censorship you twist the very loosely monitored rules to fit where you want them to fit...


no cods, it is about moderating that Board with limited tools.  It is far simpler for a GMod who just has to push the ban button...and then only the relevant Member is effected.  But, Mods like me do not have that tool.


Quote:
and they appear to apply  to everyone bar yourself...

thats how transparent you are....


How many other Mods or GMods attempt to explain what has happened as much as I do, cods?  I could just always adopt the 'no correspondence will be entered into' position, and that would lack transparency.  It may be the best thing to do, in fact.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:03am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:48am:

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:41am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:34am:
Further, Karnel was asked not to post at all....so it does not matter what he was preparing.



hilarious IT MAKES SENSE TO YOU..

so you stop everyone from replying because we have a naughty boy on the forum.....well well well I do hope FD is reading this...the way your mind works is off the planet,.


Yeas....sometimes the foolishness of one can impact on many more, but that's the way the cookie crumbles when one has limited administrative tools available.

cods you wanted me to go do your homework for you and hand feed to you what you are too lazy to find for yourself, even though I told you it was the CWA Thread and gave you a copy of the relevant post.

Here is the:

Link.

Post # 878.



whew at long last



Quote:
Re: C.W.A.
Reply #878 - Oct 25th, 2015 at 4:31pm Quote  Aussie if that reply is not nice it will go missing.



well I guess I am missing something.........

what was I supposed to do about that"terrible" comment????......

like I have already pointed out what went on between you and agnes I HAVE NO IDEA...

your alto ego Phyllis was more than welcome the more the merrier....agnes is hell bent on the topic staying on topic..... its her forum her rules..

aussie I have no ides what made her ban you I received no PM regarding it you kn ow more than I....

but this is not about you and agnes and myself... its about percy sending threads to relationships...

if you dont wish to talk about that.. then please dont...

but this deflecting is getting tiresome almost childish if this was in relationships it would be locked by now...just as you start losing the battle.. :D :D :D :D


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:08am

Quote:
you are lying again... how come neferti saw it??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????...


How many times must you be told?  I had locked the Thread, and it was still locked (obviously) when Neferti looked at whatever early hour it was.  Later, when I logged in.....I unlocked it.....saw your post in this Thread....and posted the truth.....which was.....at that time, the Thread was not locked.  I'm not going to keep repeating myself.


Quote:
this isnt about you unlocking it... its about you locking it...in the first place....as some one pointed out you want to go to bed and you dont want to miss anything that karmel will put up and maybe show you up....


It is irrelevant what Karnel wanted to post...even if it was complementary of me, or not  (He had the entire rest of the Forum to post whatever he wanted.  He did not.)  He had been asked not to post anything at all in Relationships....and I have explained why.......he was intending to breach, so I locked the Thread, as is my right as the Moderator.


Quote:
karmel did nothing at all to be banned....nothing at all mate sorry me thinks its you who has their knickers.. call them knockers if you will in a TWIST


I gave him an instruction as FD's Rules provide.  Maybe you should read them, cods.  You'll find them in the Feedback section.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:11am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:00am:

Quote:
this is about what you DO.....the fact is you DO WHAT YOU DO and blame someone else for doing it??.. you ban and lock when the ban doesnt work...


Again, you are ignorant of the facts.  Read the Forum Rules cods.  All Mods like me can do is ask people .... we have no ban button.  So, if someone has been asked not to post, and I can see they are about to post, the only tool I have is to lock (or hide) the thread.  If I did not do that, I then  would be forced into a detailed PM and posting exchange with the relevant member and FD.  I am making life easy for me.   As I said, one bad apple will impact on the whole box full.

[quote]its all about WHAT YOU THINK its not because you have had complaints from anyone...

its a form of censorship you twist the very loosely monitored rules to fit where you want them to fit...


no cods, it is about moderating that Board with limited tools.  It is far simpler for a GMod who just has to push the ban button...and then only the relevant Member is effected.  But, Mods like me do not have that tool.


Quote:
and they appear to apply  to everyone bar yourself...

thats how transparent you are....


How many other Mods or GMods attempt to explain what has happened as much as I do, cods?  I could just always adopt the 'no correspondence will be entered into' position, and that would lack transparency.  It may be the best thing to do, in fact.[/quote]


aussie more deflecting.. more cods fault not mine.. lolol..

aussie if you read the others that have come into this thread

they are all saying the same thing.. you are a control freak...

and no one likes it....simple really...this effort spells it out nicely...

you are always blaming FDs rules.. never ever fails... yet you twist the rules to suit yourself..your own controlling way of reading them...

aussie I am sure FD doesnt want any mod to lock and ban like you do...

I have heard fd has you on his ban list why I wouldnt begin to guess.... ::) ::) ::) ::).

transparency isnt about explaining the rules... WE ARE NOT STOOOPID WE DO UNDERSTAND THEM...

its a bit like speeding we all know about them but we all break them at some stage..

however if they put a camera on every corner and we got a ticket every day.... would that work do you think??? wouldnt it drive everyone bonkers???....

well thats what you do...you watch everythign that happens on relationships and make it your business...

its like being in playskool..
".now if anyone gets out of step they will be OUT.."

so please dont upset the teacher..


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:12am
FD PLEASE WRITE A NEW RULE BOOK........

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Neferti on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:15am

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:50am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:42am:
No, all she has is her knockers in a twist.  I had unlocked the Thread prior to making that post....so what I said was 100% correct.  The Thread was then not locked.  I could hardly deny what is true.....I had locked it the prior night for the reason given, and when I returned to OzPol next morning I unlocked it....again....for the reason given.




you are lying again... how come neferti saw it???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????...

this isnt about you unlocking it... its about you locking it...in the first place....as some one pointed out you want to go to bed and you dont want to miss anything that karmel will put up and maybe show you up....

karmel did nothing at all to be banned....nothing at all mate sorry me thinks its you who has their knickers.. call them knockers if you will in a TWIST


Right.  I will spell this out in clear English.

When I checked OzPol yesterday morning (Sunday 8th November) around 6.15 am (Canberra DST time), one of the first posts in the list was from Cods, at 6.17 am (also Canberra DST). I was not logged in. I then looked at Relationships to see what Cods was talking about and noticed that she was correct ... that thread was LOCKED.

Arsie would probably still be asleep at 5.15 Queensland time, since Qld is an hour behind Canberra DST.  He then unlocked the thread, so the next time I looked it was unlocked.  However, it WAS LOCKED when I first checked it, after reading Cod's 6.17 post.

Cods is correct.  Arse unlocked the thread AFTER she created this thread. I saw it with my own eyes.

P.S. My "knockers" aren't twisted.  >:(

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:15am
cods, you say about The Tavern and Agnes:


Quote:
its her forum her rules..


What do you mean?

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:17am

Neferti wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:15am:

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:50am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:42am:
No, all she has is her knockers in a twist.  I had unlocked the Thread prior to making that post....so what I said was 100% correct.  The Thread was then not locked.  I could hardly deny what is true.....I had locked it the prior night for the reason given, and when I returned to OzPol next morning I unlocked it....again....for the reason given.




you are lying again... how come neferti saw it???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????...

this isnt about you unlocking it... its about you locking it...in the first place....as some one pointed out you want to go to bed and you dont want to miss anything that karmel will put up and maybe show you up....

karmel did nothing at all to be banned....nothing at all mate sorry me thinks its you who has their knickers.. call them knockers if you will in a TWIST


Right.  I will spell this out in clear English.

When I checked OzPol yesterday morning (Sunday 8th November) around 6.15 am (Canberra DST time), one of the first posts in the list was from Cods, at 6.17 am (also Canberra DST). I was not logged in. I then looked at Relationships to see what Cods was talking about and noticed that she was correct ... that thread was LOCKED.

Arsie would probably still be asleep at 5.15 Queensland time, since Qld is an hour behind Canberra DST.  He then unlocked the thread, so the next time I looked it was unlocked.  However, it WAS LOCKED when I first checked it, after reading Cod's 6.17 post.

Cods is correct.  Arse unlocked the thread AFTER she created this thread. I saw it with my own eyes.

P.S. My "knockers" aren't twisted.  >:(



thank you thank you.. I inderstand that..

sadly aussie wont he thinks he unlocked it and thats what this is about...I think my knockers are definitely in a twist....lolololo..

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Redneck on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:18am
You are rather anal-retentive in the way you mod your board Aussie!

Just saying!

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Neferti on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:19am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:15am:
cods, you say about The Tavern and Agnes:


Quote:
its her forum her rules..


What do you mean?


That is perfectly CLEAR to me. Why are you asking silly questions?  ;D

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:20am

Neferti wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:15am:

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:50am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:42am:
No, all she has is her knockers in a twist.  I had unlocked the Thread prior to making that post....so what I said was 100% correct.  The Thread was then not locked.  I could hardly deny what is true.....I had locked it the prior night for the reason given, and when I returned to OzPol next morning I unlocked it....again....for the reason given.




you are lying again... how come neferti saw it???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????...

this isnt about you unlocking it... its about you locking it...in the first place....as some one pointed out you want to go to bed and you dont want to miss anything that karmel will put up and maybe show you up....

karmel did nothing at all to be banned....nothing at all mate sorry me thinks its you who has their knickers.. call them knockers if you will in a TWIST


Right.  I will spell this out in clear English.

When I checked OzPol yesterday morning (Sunday 8th November) around 6.15 am (Canberra DST time), one of the first posts in the list was from Cods, at 6.17 am (also Canberra DST). I was not logged in. I then looked at Relationships to see what Cods was talking about and noticed that she was correct ... that thread was LOCKED.

Arsie would probably still be asleep at 5.15 Queensland time, since Qld is an hour behind Canberra DST.  He then unlocked the thread, so the next time I looked it was unlocked.  However, it WAS LOCKED when I first checked it, after reading Cod's 6.17 post.

Cods is correct.  Arse unlocked the thread AFTER she created this thread. I saw it with my own eyes.

P.S. My "knockers" aren't twisted.  >:(


All of that is correct.  The first thing I did when I logged in yesterday was to unlock the Thread.  (It was locked for the reason given....not to close it permanently.)   I then saw a Thread titled 'perceptions,' wondered what that was about...read it...and made the post.  It is all very, very simple and all very logical.   Yet, cods has to see if she can make it all in to some conspiracy.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Neferti on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:22am

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:18am:
You are rather anal-retentive in the way you mod your board Aussie!

Just saying!


Arsie is just ANAL, period.  ;D

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:23am

Neferti wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:19am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:15am:
cods, you say about The Tavern and Agnes:


Quote:
its her forum her rules..


What do you mean?


That is perfectly CLEAR to me. Why are you asking silly questions?  ;D


Let's see if cods can answer it.  Surely she will not have one rule for me and the complete reverse for another Board Moderator, would she?

Mr R. Neck.....you do not get the Forum riff raff as I do in Relationships.  I have no complaints about that, but you do need to compare apples with apples.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Redneck on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:24am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:20am:

Neferti wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:15am:

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:50am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:42am:
No, all she has is her knockers in a twist.  I had unlocked the Thread prior to making that post....so what I said was 100% correct.  The Thread was then not locked.  I could hardly deny what is true.....I had locked it the prior night for the reason given, and when I returned to OzPol next morning I unlocked it....again....for the reason given.




you are lying again... how come neferti saw it???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????...

this isnt about you unlocking it... its about you locking it...in the first place....as some one pointed out you want to go to bed and you dont want to miss anything that karmel will put up and maybe show you up....

karmel did nothing at all to be banned....nothing at all mate sorry me thinks its you who has their knickers.. call them knockers if you will in a TWIST


Right.  I will spell this out in clear English.

When I checked OzPol yesterday morning (Sunday 8th November) around 6.15 am (Canberra DST time), one of the first posts in the list was from Cods, at 6.17 am (also Canberra DST). I was not logged in. I then looked at Relationships to see what Cods was talking about and noticed that she was correct ... that thread was LOCKED.

Arsie would probably still be asleep at 5.15 Queensland time, since Qld is an hour behind Canberra DST.  He then unlocked the thread, so the next time I looked it was unlocked.  However, it WAS LOCKED when I first checked it, after reading Cod's 6.17 post.

Cods is correct.  Arse unlocked the thread AFTER she created this thread. I saw it with my own eyes.

P.S. My "knockers" aren't twisted.  >:(


All of that is correct.  The first thing I did when I logged in yesterday was to unlock the Thread.  (It was locked for the reason given....not to close it permanently.)   I then saw a Thread titled 'perceptions,' wondered what that was about...read it...and made the post.  It is all very, very simple and all very logical.   Yet, cods has to see if she can make it all in to some conspiracy.


Well to the casual observer Aussie it certainly seems you locked the thread to spite karnel  and prevent her posting which seems rather childish.



Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:27am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:15am:
cods, you say about The Tavern and Agnes:


Quote:
its her forum her rules..


What do you mean?



aussie you rave on about what a wonderful mod you are you are doing everything step by step to FDs bible on rules...you are following them perfectly...

so I was pointing out that agnes has the same POWER that you have as a Members run MODERATOR...

she can also ban and lock or lock and ban... I do know the performance of telling said person 3 time via PM that they are going to be banned.. I do know the mod doesnt actually do said banning...

as far as I know n o mod has b een turned down ..

I was banned myself from the tavern a long time ago I went through the ritual..


now you want to know what I mean??????...

even though you havent explained what it was that agnes said.. that was so bad I should have got excited about it...????.....

nef has just dismissed your claim....shes a good one she has the times and can actually be bothered checking them all...well done to her....she read my thread before she checked yours in relationships.to see what I was talking about...

she isnt buying into who or what is right.. just pointing out the FACTS...


aussie why would I mention a thread being locked if it wasnt??????.................btw I wasnt jumping up and down about that I was just annoyed I could post in that thread because of where it was.....and was asking perc to find another dumping ground...now this is turning into a get agnes thread....

auissie a lot of this would go away if you just admitted you go to far ..

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:29am

Quote:
Well to the casual observer Aussie it certainly seems you locked the thread to spite karnel  and prevent her posting which seems rather childish.


I locked the Thread for the reason given.  At that stage I had already formally asked Karnel not to post in Relationships (as the FD Rules require.)  S/he was then (after being instructed not to post) preparing a response to post.  If s/he managed to post it, that would force me into a long and tedious PM and posting exchange between me, s/him and FD.  I will do whatever makes it easy for me. 

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:34am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:23am:

Neferti wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:19am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:15am:
cods, you say about The Tavern and Agnes:


Quote:
its her forum her rules..


What do you mean?


That is perfectly CLEAR to me. Why are you asking silly questions?  ;D


Let's see if cods can answer it.  Surely she will not have one rule for me and the complete reverse for another Board Moderator, would she?

Mr R. Neck.....you do not get the Forum riff raff as I do in Relationships.  I have no complaints about that, but you do need to compare apples with apples.




what rule is that aussie....all she said was


'IF' your reply is not nice.. it will go missing..

whats wrong with that????.. its a threat is that against one of FDs rules????...did she send your reply into oblivion is that whats this is all about????>..

we notice you only answer a question  with a question its becoming very boring and repetitive...

the fact is aussie you did threaten karmel with banning and when that didnt happen fast enough you locked the thread..

I havent seen CWA locked???????..... >:( >:( >:(

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:35am

Quote:
even though you havent explained what it was that agnes said


Read what she posted cods.  I have no problem with it...as I knew what Agnes meant which is.

Using the very facility you are whingeing about (the one which allows a Mod to see who is preparing a reply) she saw that I was preparing a reply....and alerted me to her position that whatever it was I was preparing to post had better be nice etc.

Do you understand?

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:36am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:29am:

Quote:
Well to the casual observer Aussie it certainly seems you locked the thread to spite karnel  and prevent her posting which seems rather childish.


I locked the Thread for the reason given.  At that stage I had already formally asked Karnel not to post in Relationships (as the FD Rules require.)  S/he was then (after being instructed not to post) preparing a response to post.  If s/he managed to post it, that would force me into a long and tedious PM and posting exchange between me, s/him and FD.  I will do whatever makes it easy for me. 



we know aussie stop repeating it.. it dosent make it the right thing to do the more times you say it...

you lock certain threads because you cant watch them whilst you are asleep...


its all very clear.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:38am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:35am:

Quote:
even though you havent explained what it was that agnes said


Read what she posted cods.  I have no problem with it...as I knew what Agnes meant which is.

Using the very facility you are whingeing about (the one which allows a Mod to see who is preparing a reply) she saw that I was preparing a reply....and alerted me to her position that whatever it was I was preparing to post had better be nice etc.

Do you understand?


now you are assuming I am a mind reader and should have know what was going on when that post appeared... aussie I dont even recall seeing that post when it happened...

and as I have only just learnt you can see a person making a reply.... WHAT THE?....

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Neferti on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:39am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:29am:

Quote:
Well to the casual observer Aussie it certainly seems you locked the thread to spite karnel  and prevent her posting which seems rather childish.


I locked the Thread for the reason given.  At that stage I had already formally asked Karnel not to post in Relationships (as the FD Rules require.)  S/he was then (after being instructed not to post) preparing a response to post.  If s/he managed to post it, that would force me into a long and tedious PM and posting exchange between me, s/him and FD. I will do whatever makes it easy for me. 


Yeas. Anal is the word.  ;D You could just ignore posts from people you don't "like" or who "annoy" you, Arsie, instead of going through all that palaver.  You are a very strange person, you should try playing more golf.  ;)

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:40am

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:36am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:29am:

Quote:
Well to the casual observer Aussie it certainly seems you locked the thread to spite karnel  and prevent her posting which seems rather childish.


I locked the Thread for the reason given.  At that stage I had already formally asked Karnel not to post in Relationships (as the FD Rules require.)  S/he was then (after being instructed not to post) preparing a response to post.  If s/he managed to post it, that would force me into a long and tedious PM and posting exchange between me, s/him and FD.  I will do whatever makes it easy for me. 



we know aussie stop repeating it.. it dosent make it the right thing to do the more times you say it...

you lock certain threads because you cant watch them whilst you are asleep...


its all very clear.


Rubbish.....I'd see it next morning and have to go through the tedious process.  It is about making moderation life easier for me cods.

You now say you have never seen the CWA locked.  You have very selective sight.  Read these posts...the CWA was locked.

Link.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:43am

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:38am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:35am:

Quote:
even though you havent explained what it was that agnes said


Read what she posted cods.  I have no problem with it...as I knew what Agnes meant which is.

Using the very facility you are whingeing about (the one which allows a Mod to see who is preparing a reply) she saw that I was preparing a reply....and alerted me to her position that whatever it was I was preparing to post had better be nice etc.

Do you understand?


now you are assuming I am a mind reader and should have know what was going on when that post appeared... aussie I dont even recall seeing that post when it happened...

and as I have only just learnt you can see a person making a reply.... WHAT THE?....


It is about your being ignorant cods, and about you blasting off not knowing all the facts. Even when they are explained to you, you seem compelled to continue an argument trying to justify yourself after having made posts in complete ignorance of all the circumstances.  It is Catch 22 with you...all the time.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:46am
Further cods, there are now five Threads listed as locked on the first page in The Tavern.  I do not have a problem with that, yet you whinge that I lock threads, and you say absolutely nothing when another Mod does exactly the same thing.

Get it, cods?

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Redneck on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:46am
You could just use the delete button to delete Karnals posts if they were naughty or whatever, but I supposed that doesnt create enough attention.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:52am

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:46am:
You could just use the delete button to delete Karnals posts if they were naughty or whatever, but I supposed that doesnt create enough attention.


Yeas I could.  It would be a disaster (creating much more attention) for two established reasons.

1.  I would have Mr Smith (and to a lesser extent, cods) complaining incessantly that I was censoring people.  Mr Smith raved on about that for ages when I did it.

2.  'Karnel' would get the message that there was another way to make life harder for the Mod and to continue disrupting.  Just keep posting drivel, forcing the Mod. to keep deleting.......and on and on and on.  Nah.

Mr Neck....there is always a valid and logical reason.  Sometimes Mods get it wrong, but lessons are then learned.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:02am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:40am:

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:36am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:29am:

Quote:
Well to the casual observer Aussie it certainly seems you locked the thread to spite karnel  and prevent her posting which seems rather childish.


I locked the Thread for the reason given.  At that stage I had already formally asked Karnel not to post in Relationships (as the FD Rules require.)  S/he was then (after being instructed not to post) preparing a response to post.  If s/he managed to post it, that would force me into a long and tedious PM and posting exchange between me, s/him and FD.  I will do whatever makes it easy for me. 



we know aussie stop repeating it.. it dosent make it the right thing to do the more times you say it...

you lock certain threads because you cant watch them whilst you are asleep...


its all very clear.


Rubbish.....I'd see it next morning and have to go through the tedious process.  It is about making moderation life easier for me cods.

You now say you have never seen the CWA locked.  You have very selective sight.  Read these posts...the CWA was locked.

Link.



no darl   that was pansi being naughty....she doesnt have the POWER remember???...it could well have been locked If it was I didnt see it....... can you prove I DID?...

I am happy to let you call me IGNORANT as long as you can prove what I am saying is wrong...

agnes did start a cwa 2  was that because it was locked.. i dont know...

a mods life isnt meant to be easy aussie why do the job if its so hard.. no other mod finds the need to do that....

I dont care what threads are locked I really dont all I was asking is for percy not to send threads there that I would like to post in...and usually do so before they are moved.....I ahv e no control over your behaviour in relationships or agnes in the tavern.... why are you making this into a cods is UNFAIR or selective

.. had you not said the thread isnt locked..making it look like cods was lying...

then this thread would have died hours ago..

maybe percy doesnt agree with me...maybe perc had been told by fd move it all to relationships... I dont know...

I dont have special powers and I cant mind read....I failed that course...

your argument is unrealistic

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Lisa Jones on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:08am
Can someone give me a 1 sentence summary of this Aussie centred drama topic?

Ta.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by John Smith on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:14am

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:18am:
You are rather anal-retentive in the way you mod your board Aussie!

Just saying!


now there's an understatement

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:18am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:46am:
Further cods, there are now five Threads listed as locked on the first page in The Tavern.  I do not have a problem with that, yet you whinge that I lock threads, and you say absolutely nothing when another Mod does exactly the same thing.

Get it, cods?



I counted 6.. SO WHAT?...agnes does what agnes does I cant stop her...check it out with her....

please read the OP.. I mentioned locked in passing   I was making a request to percy......you are the one that turned it into a LOCKED THREAD thread..

had you said..

I unlocked the thread first thing this morning...
but no you said

the thread isnt locked......

and didnt own up until nef spoke up....

I am sorry but in my court of law that stinks....and it still does the way you are doing your best to side track this..,

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by John Smith on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:18am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:52am:
I would have Mr Smith (and to a lesser extent, cods) complaining incessantly that I was censoring people.  Mr Smith raved on about that for ages when I did it.



you were being a dick (again) ....  you don't have to like what people say, you don't have to agree, you don't even have to read it ... but you don't get to pick and choose which comments you allow and which you don't.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:20am

Quote:
no darl   that was pansi being naughty....she doesnt have the POWER remember???...it could well have been locked If it was I didnt see it....... can you prove I DID?...


I have no idea whether you saw it or not cods.  It was not pansi who locked the Thread.  It was Agnes.  See post #887.


Quote:
I am happy to let you call me IGNORANT as long as you can prove what I am saying is wrong...


I do know that you are posting in ignorance.  For example, you did not know what facilities the Mods have, yet that does not stop you from having a whinge.  You continue on and on and on and on, even after you are given an honest explanation.


Quote:
agnes did start a cwa 2  was that because it was locked.. i dont know...


Neither do I, and it is entirely up to Agnes.


Quote:
a mods life isnt meant to be easy aussie why do the job if its so hard.. no other mod finds the need to do that....


I am quite content to do the job, and just like FD/the Gmods, I'll always make it as easy as I can for myself.  I have just proven to you (locked Threads in the Tavern...deleted posts in the Tavern) that other Mods do find the same need I find, yet that goes right over your head.


Quote:
I dont care what threads are locked I really dont all I was asking is for percy not to send threads there that I would like to post in...and usually do so before they are moved.....I ahv e no control over your behaviour in relationships or agnes in the tavern.... why are you making this into a cods is UNFAIR or selective


Really?  Read your OP and subsequent posts.  You have decided not to post in Relationships.  That is your decision, (fine by me) and yet, when there is a consequence you don't like, you whinge and expect others to change standard procedures to suit just you.  The solution lies in your hands.  Swallow your pride and post.  No-one is stopping you.


Quote:
.. had you not said the thread isnt locked..making it look like cods was lying...

then this thread would have died hours ago..


You would have preferred I lied and said that the Thread is locked?


Quote:
maybe percy doesnt agree with me...maybe perc had been told by fd move it all to relationships... I dont know...


Instead of making this a public issue, you could have sent him a PM.  Nah, you wanted the drama, you got it, and now you want people to feel sorry for you.


Quote:
I dont have special powers and I cant mind read....I failed that course...


Well, maybe next time, ask privately, and you will avoid the problem


Quote:
your argument is unrealistic


Not my problem.  It is the truth.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:22am

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:46am:
You could just use the delete button to delete Karnals posts if they were naughty or whatever, but I supposed that doesnt create enough attention.



red never ever use the word delete to someone like aussie...

agnes has done the same she admits it.. however I dont approve its a power I wouldn t give people...I dont know what fd is thinking to be honest...

we all make mistakes but to give the few absolute power is wrong..... abuse is one thing I can understand that needing some control... but to be able to delete posts or change them to please oneself is not my idea of a level playing field..

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Redneck on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:24am
Can you believe this rubbish!!

LOL  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

The whole topic I mean!

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Redneck on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:28am

John Smith wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:18am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:52am:
I would have Mr Smith (and to a lesser extent, cods) complaining incessantly that I was censoring people.  Mr Smith raved on about that for ages when I did it.



you were being a dick (again) ....  you don't have to like what people say, you don't have to agree, you don't even have to read it ... but you don't get to pick and choose which comments you allow and which you don't.


Aussie if you included in your warning to Kamal that her posts would be deleted if they were naughty or whatever the problem was, I dont think anyone would have cause to complain and if they did then give them the Michelle Payne response "Go and Get Stuffed"

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Redneck on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:31am

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:22am:

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:46am:
You could just use the delete button to delete Karnals posts if they were naughty or whatever, but I supposed that doesnt create enough attention.



red never ever use the word delete to someone like aussie...

agnes has done the same she admits it.. however I dont approve its a power I wouldn t give people...I dont know what fd is thinking to be honest...

we all make mistakes but to give the few absolute power is wrong..... abuse is one thing I can understand that needing some control... but to be able to delete posts or change them to please oneself is not my idea of a level playing field..


It is all about Aussie being an attention seeker I suspect.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:32am

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:31am:

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:22am:

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:46am:
You could just use the delete button to delete Karnals posts if they were naughty or whatever, but I supposed that doesnt create enough attention.



red never ever use the word delete to someone like aussie...

agnes has done the same she admits it.. however I dont approve its a power I wouldn t give people...I dont know what fd is thinking to be honest...

we all make mistakes but to give the few absolute power is wrong..... abuse is one thing I can understand that needing some control... but to be able to delete posts or change them to please oneself is not my idea of a level playing field..


It is all about Aussie being an attention seeker I suspect.


And you'd be quite wrong, but.....carry on.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:39am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:20am:
no darl   that was pansi being naughty....she doesnt have the POWER remember???...it could well have been locked If it was I didnt see it....... can you prove I DID?...


I have no idea whether you saw it or not cods.  It was not pansi who locked the Thread.  It was Agnes.  See post #887.



you are wrong again dear... I was banned at that time.. and both pansi and agnes knew it...it was locked in honor of myself...its called girls sticking together...

the point is aussie you want a response from myself   over the threads being locked in the tavern... I pick on you but not agnes WHY????....

as I have pointed out I wasnt picking on you.....I think my language to perc would have been a bit stronger if I was....I was making  a suggestion

please try and get that if you go back to the first page a light should pop on..


its me now that going ON AND ON AND ON....help

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:42am

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:28am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:18am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:52am:
I would have Mr Smith (and to a lesser extent, cods) complaining incessantly that I was censoring people.  Mr Smith raved on about that for ages when I did it.



you were being a dick (again) ....  you don't have to like what people say, you don't have to agree, you don't even have to read it ... but you don't get to pick and choose which comments you allow and which you don't.


Aussie if you included in your warning to Kamal that her posts would be deleted if they were naughty or whatever the problem was, I dont think anyone would have cause to complain and if they did then give them the Michelle Payne response "Go and Get Stuffed"




red I wasnt complaining    I was asking perc... now I am wrong I should have sent him  a PM.. ho hum .. he is even taking control on a forum not his own... :( :( :( :(

its all about what aussie WANTS...

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:44am

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:24am:
Can you believe this rubbish!!

LOL  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

The whole topic I mean!


you dont mind all the posts the mods want to remove get  sent to relationships>>>>

I just thought there may be a better place thats all...how do we get whole threads deleted??????>.. :D :D :D

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:48am

John Smith wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:18am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:52am:
I would have Mr Smith (and to a lesser extent, cods) complaining incessantly that I was censoring people.  Mr Smith raved on about that for ages when I did it.



you were being a dick (again) ....  you don't have to like what people say, you don't have to agree, you don't even have to read it ... but you don't get to pick and choose which comments you allow and which you don't.



sadly thats what I have been saying...but as we know we say one thing aussie says another... and nothing will change it...

its my reason for not posting in his domain....others take that risk its their business aussie makes out all mods do the same thing...maybe even abuse the POWER...I also disagree with that..but get sick of talking to a brick wall.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:49am

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:39am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:20am:
no darl   that was pansi being naughty....she doesnt have the POWER remember???...it could well have been locked If it was I didnt see it....... can you prove I DID?...


I have no idea whether you saw it or not cods.  It was not pansi who locked the Thread.  It was Agnes.  See post #887.



you are wrong again dear... I was banned at that time.. and both pansi and agnes knew it...it was locked in honor of myself...its called girls sticking together...

the point is aussie you want a response from myself   over the threads being locked in the tavern... I pick on you but not agnes WHY????....

as I have pointed out I wasnt picking on you.....I think my language to perc would have been a bit stronger if I was....I was making  a suggestion

please try and get that if you go back to the first page a light should pop on..


its me now that going ON AND ON AND ON....help


Yeas, and you expected me to just say nothing about this crap?


Quote:
its sad when threads get posted there as there is a control person who insists on being... in control...of every thread.

so unless you post what he approves of you are either banished or the thread is locked...

would it be possible to move the unstable 'deckchairs' to a safer place in future where neither the poster nor the posts are harassed into submission...


Of course, you weren't taking a cheap shot at me, were you cods?  Butter would not melt in your mouth, would it.

Seems to be a nasty habit you are picking up cods....getting banned.

First you insist that the CWA was not locked, and now you blythly say it was.....and that you knew it was locked by way of sisterhood support for you.  Do you really you wonder why I raise a quizzical eyebrow in your direction?

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:53am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:49am:

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:39am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:20am:
no darl   that was pansi being naughty....she doesnt have the POWER remember???...it could well have been locked If it was I didnt see it....... can you prove I DID?...


I have no idea whether you saw it or not cods.  It was not pansi who locked the Thread.  It was Agnes.  See post #887.



you are wrong again dear... I was banned at that time.. and both pansi and agnes knew it...it was locked in honor of myself...its called girls sticking together...

the point is aussie you want a response from myself   over the threads being locked in the tavern... I pick on you but not agnes WHY????....

as I have pointed out I wasnt picking on you.....I think my language to perc would have been a bit stronger if I was....I was making  a suggestion

please try and get that if you go back to the first page a light should pop on..


its me now that going ON AND ON AND ON....help


Yeas, and you expected me to just say nothing about this crap?


Quote:
its sad when threads get posted there as there is a control person who insists on being... in control...of every thread.

so unless you post what he approves of you are either banished or the thread is locked...

would it be possible to move the unstable 'deckchairs' to a safer place in future where neither the poster nor the posts are harassed into submission...


Of course, you weren't taking a cheap shot at me, were you cods?  Butter would not melt in your mouth, would it.

Seems to be a nasty habit you are picking up cods....getting banned.

First you insist that the CWA was not locked, and now you blythly say it was.....and that you knew it was locked by way of sisterhood support for you.  Do you really you wonder why I raise a quizzical eyebrow in your direction?



oh dear bad cods... was it locked I have no idea you are telling me it was.. I am assuming you wouldnt tell a whopper to get off the hook would you.,..

WHO BLOODY CARES only you..yep I am getting into a nasty habit of getting banned SO BLOODY WHAT?...

what has that got to do with the OP...

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Redneck on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:56am

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:42am:

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:28am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 9:18am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:52am:
I would have Mr Smith (and to a lesser extent, cods) complaining incessantly that I was censoring people.  Mr Smith raved on about that for ages when I did it.



you were being a dick (again) ....  you don't have to like what people say, you don't have to agree, you don't even have to read it ... but you don't get to pick and choose which comments you allow and which you don't.


Aussie if you included in your warning to Kamal that her posts would be deleted if they were naughty or whatever the problem was, I dont think anyone would have cause to complain and if they did then give them the Michelle Payne response "Go and Get Stuffed"




red I wasnt complaining    I was asking perc... now I am wrong I should have sent him  a PM.. ho hum .. he is even taking control on a forum not his own... :( :( :( :(

its all about what aussie WANTS...


Cods I wasnt suggesting you would complain,  that was really a response to this Aussie quote on why he couldnt use the delete button


Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:52am:

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 8:46am:
You could just use the delete button to delete Karnals posts if they were naughty or whatever, but I supposed that doesnt create enough attention.


Yeas I could.  It would be a disaster (creating much more attention) for two established reasons.

1.  I would have Mr Smith (and to a lesser extent, cods) complaining incessantly that I was censoring people.  Mr Smith raved on about that for ages when I did it.

2.  'Karnel' would get the message that there was another way to make life harder for the Mod and to continue disrupting.  Just keep posting drivel, forcing the Mod. to keep deleting.......and on and on and on.  Nah.

Mr Neck....there is always a valid and logical reason.  Sometimes Mods get it wrong, but lessons are then learned.


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 10:09am
Cods ~ version 355463431:


Quote:
it was locked in honor of myself


Cods ~ version 355463432:


Quote:
was it locked I have no idea you are telling me it was.



Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 10:11am
:'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

in hindsight... in hindsight I wish I hadnt got up yesterday... someone shoot me...

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Redneck on Nov 9th, 2015 at 10:46am

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 10:09am:
Cods ~ version 355463431:


Quote:
it was locked in honor of myself


Cods ~ version 355463432:

[quote]was it locked I have no idea you are telling me it was.


[/quote]

And how much time did you waste finding that!



Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 10:47am

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 10:46am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 10:09am:
Cods ~ version 355463431:


Quote:
it was locked in honor of myself


Cods ~ version 355463432:

[quote]was it locked I have no idea you are telling me it was.


And how much time did you waste finding that!


[/quote]

About ten seconds, tops.  Both posts are on the same page.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by perceptions_now on Nov 9th, 2015 at 11:28am
Noted!

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by He Man on Nov 9th, 2015 at 12:10pm
Get a life.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 1:07pm

perceptions_now wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 11:28am:
Noted!




perc  I trust you will give it some DEEP thought..

it is/was just a suggestion maybe an aussie proof place... is there such a place??....  :D :D :D :D :D

no we are mostly all banned from feedback..oh well it was worth a try..

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 1:10pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 10:46am:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 10:09am:
Cods ~ version 355463431:


Quote:
it was locked in honor of myself


Cods ~ version 355463432:

[quote]was it locked I have no idea you are telling me it was.


And how much time did you waste finding that!


[/quote]


no red it was important time...we have some folks who  like to be right.. on everything...

isnt it wonderful we can press a button and switch them off sometimes....praise the lord..imagine having this nit picking at you day and night... ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Black Orchid on Nov 9th, 2015 at 1:51pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:34am:
Further, Karnel was asked not to post at all....so it does not matter what he was preparing.



You are a dishonest person, aussie, and when you feel you are losing your grip you either spend pages and pages taking a thread off track by twisting and turning or you create threads under your control in Relationships intended to cause dissension and division.

This leads to another problem that is beginning to rear its head here at OzPol.   A Mod is quite entitled to request someone not post in their sub-forum but there should be an equal rule stating that such Mod NEEDS A GOOD REASON for said decision other than dislike of particular posters and/or guesswork. 

The job of a good Mod is to be unbiased and above the fray.  It is not the job of a Mod to demand answers to ridiculous questions and then initiate a ban if said answers are unacceptable or not forthcoming.

You demanded Karnel tell you who his/her puppeteer is and when Karnel did not respond to your liking you donned your silly green cloak and launched into your ridiculous ban sequence.  Andrei has even said that socks are no problem unless they are trying to circumvent a ban (like you did recently when you could not log in   ::)).

If people are going to be banned here because you (or any other Mod) demand answers to questions that are none of your business there is little hope left for OzPol and you will achieved your goal of dividing members, creating more and more dissension and in-fighting and leaving a wasteland in your wake.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 2:10pm

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 1:51pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 7:34am:
Further, Karnel was asked not to post at all....so it does not matter what he was preparing.



You are a dishonest person, aussie, and when you feel you are losing your grip you either spend pages and pages taking a thread off track by twisting and turning or you create threads under your control in Relationships intended to cause dissension and division.

This leads to another problem that is beginning to rear its head here at OzPol.   A Mod is quite entitled to request someone not post in their sub-forum but there should be an equal rule stating that such Mod NEEDS A GOOD REASON for said decision other than dislike of particular posters and/or guesswork. 

The job of a good Mod is to be unbiased and above the fray.  It is not the job of a Mod to demand answers to ridiculous questions and then initiate a ban if said answers are unacceptable or not forthcoming.

You demanded Karnel tell you who his/her puppeteer is and when Karnel did not respond to your liking you donned your silly green cloak and launched into your ridiculous ban sequence.  Andrei has even said that socks are no problem unless they are trying to circumvent a ban (like you did recently when you could not log in   ::)).

If people are going to be banned here because you (or any other Mod) demand answers to questions that are none of your business there is little hope left for OzPol and you will achieved your goal of dividing members, creating more and more dissension and in-fighting and leaving a wasteland in your wake.


I am not going to keep raking over these coals other than to say that I reject all of that emotional, hysterical rant entirely, and to add....from FD's Rules:


Quote:
Member run boards
Do not use a member run board if you do not accept the standards applied by the moderator. While the rules outlined here apply to the entire forum, moderators of member run boards may go beyond them and be as strict, biased, vague, or whatever, as they want. Diversity of moderating style is encouraged rather than conformity to universal standards. If you have a problem with the moderation, please take it up with the moderator via PM or on their board. If you do not get a satisfactory resolution, cease using the board. Do not post complaints about moderation on the feedback board. This will result in your suspension from the feedback board and/or the member run board in question.


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Black Orchid on Nov 9th, 2015 at 2:20pm
FD needs to change these rules before you kill OzPol altogether.  He obviously made the rules based on potential Mods applying adult and unbiased behaviour.

Neither of which apply to you.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 2:39pm

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 2:20pm:
FD needs to change these rules before you kill OzPol altogether.  He obviously made the rules based on potential Mods applying adult and unbiased behaviour.

Neither of which apply to you.


No need for the personal abuse typical of people from PA. 

In fact, quite the opposite ~ FD anticipates and actively encourages as much diversity as he can get which is exactly why he included this in his Rules:



Quote:
....moderators of member run boards may go beyond them and be as strict, biased, vague, or whatever, as they want.



Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Black Orchid on Nov 9th, 2015 at 2:45pm
Keep pushing that barrow.

*shakes head*

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 3:00pm

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 2:45pm:
Keep pushing that barrow.

*shakes head*


As I shake mine that people will start these whinges and less than a handful of others will  join in not knowing what they are talking about, and in complete ignorance of the Rules.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 4:21pm

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 2:20pm:
FD needs to change these rules before you kill OzPol altogether.  He obviously made the rules based on potential Mods applying adult and unbiased behaviour.

Neither of which apply to you.



well BO we dont often come to the same conclusion but here we have it..

aussie did his level best to get RID OF ANDREI.. its still there for all to add too.. he has many times tried to destroy people he doesnt like...even using  their names which he claims is against not his rules.. FDs rules... ::)

accept right now there is one with longy on his forum...maybe old but it isnt locked is it????..why because its a well know fact he doesnt like longy/maria..

greg has fallen into aussies web by attacking everything anyone says and using it blindly....

well done aussie  that way you can spend time on here ridiculing as you think rather than watch relationships...

BO is correct you shouldnt be a mod even in the members forum...you completely abuse the privilege ..

but its up to people whether they take that risk after all...you dont just lock things you alter posts without consent...its a terrible thing to do...

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 4:29pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 2:45pm:
Keep pushing that barrow.

*shakes head*


As I shake mine that people will start these whinges and less than a handful of others will  join in not knowing what they are talking about, and in complete ignorance of the Rules.



not so aussie why do you make out everyone on here is either IGNORANT STUPID or CANT READ FOR THEMSELVES..

how rude and condescending of you.. ::) ::)

people go and read relationships I read it to see who is aussie working a gang up to this week...its good to know  who the spider has caught....you are good aussie I will give you that much.. people like whingeing... in your case its more BITCHING and SPITE...

every knows the RULES... if we abuse them we get banned.........mods dont seem to get banned for going too far...like starting a thread to get as many people to put what they call abuse in in the hope FD will see it and ban said people...

did it work aussie????.....

when you only read one side it kind of looks like malice to me.

you didnt request reason for the abuse.... the person posting it could have been even more belligerent.


do you agree aussie the word moderator means just that.....moderation..a mediator.... ;D ;D

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Redneck on Nov 9th, 2015 at 4:31pm
Hey Karnal, look at all the trouble you have caused,

Aussie has been mental all day,

quoting rules (he is the only person that reads them I think.)

Looking up peoples quotes for gotcha moments against the person who couldnt gives a rats arse anyway.


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 4:34pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 4:31pm:
Hey Karnal, look at all the trouble you have caused,

Aussie has been mental all day,

quoting rules (he is the only person that reads them I think.)

Looking up peoples quotes for gotcha moments against the person who couldnt gives a rats arse anyway.


I suspected you misunderstood Mr Neck.  It was never our regular and very clever Karnal.  It was Karnel, a deliberate imposter.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Redneck on Nov 9th, 2015 at 4:42pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 4:34pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 4:31pm:
Hey Karnal, look at all the trouble you have caused,

Aussie has been mental all day,

quoting rules (he is the only person that reads them I think.)

Looking up peoples quotes for gotcha moments against the person who couldnt gives a rats arse anyway.


I suspected you misunderstood Mr Neck.  It was never our regular and very clever Karnal.  It was Karnel, a deliberate imposter.


My apologies, I just thought the spelling had gone awry!

I did wonder about karnal being in trouble as I agree with you description of her!



Title: Re: perceptions
Post by skippy. on Nov 9th, 2015 at 4:48pm
Like sands through the hour glass so is the daze of he who's name will not be uttered life. 

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:07pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 4:42pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 4:34pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 4:31pm:
Hey Karnal, look at all the trouble you have caused,

Aussie has been mental all day,

quoting rules (he is the only person that reads them I think.)

Looking up peoples quotes for gotcha moments against the person who couldnt gives a rats arse anyway.


I suspected you misunderstood Mr Neck.  It was never our regular and very clever Karnal.  It was Karnel, a deliberate imposter.


My apologies, I just thought the spelling had gone awry!

I did wonder about karnal being in trouble as I agree with you description of her!



aussie digs deep red... even when andrei tells him there is no rule about it...unless said sock is covering for someone banned..  now if the real karmal is such a toff.. he wouldnt be banned would he... so whats it got to do with anyone DEMANDING with THREATS who you are...

if you ever dare to step over the threshold of PA you will  find much mickey taking with IDs???.....they clone just about everyone....you... or  at least most shrug it off..

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:09pm

skippy. wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 4:48pm:
Like sands through the hour glass so is the daze of he who's name will not be uttered life. 



if life dull over the road skippy and this is more fun to read...lolol.. sounds like it...

imagine how it would liven up if only aussie was unbanned...... ;) ;) ;).. a nice Xmas present skip if your in a good mood that is... pistols at dawn....  ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Black Orchid on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:18pm

Quote:
well BO we dont often come to the same conclusion but here we have it..

aussie did his level best to get RID OF ANDREI.. its still there for all to add too.. he has many times tried to destroy people he doesnt like...even using  their names which he claims is against not his rules.. FDs rules... ::)

accept right now there is one with longy on his forum...maybe old but it isnt locked is it????..why because its a well know fact he doesnt like longy/maria..

greg has fallen into aussies web by attacking everything anyone says and using it blindly....

well done aussie  that way you can spend time on here ridiculing as you think rather than watch relationships...

BO is correct you shouldnt be a mod even in the members forum...you completely abuse the privilege ..

but its up to people whether they take that risk after all...you dont just lock things you alter posts without consent...its a terrible thing to do...


Not entirely true, Cods. 

Back when aussie started all the PA hate-filled nonsense in Relationships you were his biggest champion and day after day accused ALL PA members of being less than reputable.  It was very frustrating and quite wrong.

I agree with you quite often and I have also stood up for you,  especially after you realised that aussie's accusations, lies and finger pointing were mostly deflections, misrepresentations, lies and an effort to create disharmony and an 'us' and 'them'  discord.  Luckily it failed.

I have no problem with you and, at that time, I would have just preferred you to make your own judgments rather than listening to the little dictator.

All water under the bridge but just setting the record straight.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Neferti on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:20pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 4:34pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 4:31pm:
Hey Karnal, look at all the trouble you have caused,

Aussie has been mental all day,

quoting rules (he is the only person that reads them I think.)

Looking up peoples quotes for gotcha moments against the person who couldnt gives a rats arse anyway.


I suspected you misunderstood Mr Neck.  It was never our regular and very clever Karnal.  It was Karnel, a deliberate imposter.


So you stated that you DEFENDED CRIMINALS as a living?  Why then are you suddenly picking on MERE socks?  They haven't done anything.  ;D

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Neferti on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:24pm

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:18pm:

Quote:
well BO we dont often come to the same conclusion but here we have it..

aussie did his level best to get RID OF ANDREI.. its still there for all to add too.. he has many times tried to destroy people he doesnt like...even using  their names which he claims is against not his rules.. FDs rules... ::)

accept right now there is one with longy on his forum...maybe old but it isnt locked is it????..why because its a well know fact he doesnt like longy/maria..

greg has fallen into aussies web by attacking everything anyone says and using it blindly....

well done aussie  that way you can spend time on here ridiculing as you think rather than watch relationships...

BO is correct you shouldnt be a mod even in the members forum...you completely abuse the privilege ..

but its up to people whether they take that risk after all...you dont just lock things you alter posts without consent...its a terrible thing to do...


Not entirely true, Cods. 

Back when aussie started all the PA hate-filled nonsense in Relationships you were his biggest champion and day after day accused ALL PA members of being less than reputable.  It was very frustrating and quite wrong.

I agree with you quite often and I have also stood up for you,  especially after you realised that aussie's accusations, lies and finger pointing were mostly deflections, misrepresentations, lies and an effort to create disharmony and an 'us' and 'them'  discord.  Luckily it failed.

I have no problem with you and, at that time, I would have just preferred you to make your own judgments rather than listening to the little dictator.

All water under the bridge but just setting the record straight.


Exactly.  Well said Black Orchid.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:34pm

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:18pm:

Quote:
well BO we dont often come to the same conclusion but here we have it..

aussie did his level best to get RID OF ANDREI.. its still there for all to add too.. he has many times tried to destroy people he doesnt like...even using  their names which he claims is against not his rules.. FDs rules... ::)

accept right now there is one with longy on his forum...maybe old but it isnt locked is it????..why because its a well know fact he doesnt like longy/maria..

greg has fallen into aussies web by attacking everything anyone says and using it blindly....

well done aussie  that way you can spend time on here ridiculing as you think rather than watch relationships...

BO is correct you shouldnt be a mod even in the members forum...you completely abuse the privilege ..

but its up to people whether they take that risk after all...you dont just lock things you alter posts without consent...its a terrible thing to do...


Not entirely true, Cods. 

Back when aussie started all the PA hate-filled nonsense in Relationships you were his biggest champion and day after day accused ALL PA members of being less than reputable.  It was very frustrating and quite wrong.

I agree with you quite often and I have also stood up for you especially after you realised that aussie's accusations, lies and finger pointing were mostly deflections, misrepresentations, lies and an effort to create disharmony and an 'us' and 'them'  discord.  Luckily it failed.

I have no problem with you and, at that time, I just would have preferred you to make your own judgment rather than listening to the little dictator.

All water under the bridge but just setting the record straight.



thank you..

as you probably know aussie can be quite charming...yes I know in hindsight.. but to be honest aussie was always very kind to me I needed help and he would step up.. I have never denied that.... in fact when I suddenly started getting banned and couldnt understand why aussie stepped up for me...but like everything he goes over the top and started a campaign to get rid of andrei..which he claimed was what I wanted?????.. this was when I started to realise how aussi can manipulate people into being  suckers if you like.. I didnt like it...he then started altering my posts !again i was horrified...then PMs started being an issue....I have always answered aussies PMs   however I then decided not to anymore....as he couldnt be trusted he would make announcements..not disclosure but made sure everyone  knew so and so was sending him PMs...

something I wasnt comfortable with..I did think the attacks from PA were unfounded not so much unfounded as exaggerated .. and as I said aussie up till then had always treated me with respect...if I come over too strong in my support I am sorry about that as if you remember it was everyone against everyone else in those days.........I did eventually start saying dont bring the bad stuff over here.....as we didnt know what the hell you were all on about...

I am sorry its come down to this.. but as we know some folks will never ever own their mistakes..and if aussie wasnt a mod I guess it would all be water under the b ridge..   my main inten tion on here is to discuss the topic and not the person...

but guess who turned this into warfare.... thats right.. cods! ::).

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:37pm
Indeed.  Her OP contained this obvious peace offering:


Quote:
its sad when threads get posted there as there is a control person who insists on being... in control...of every thread.

so unless you post what he approves of you are either banished or the thread is locked...

would it be possible to move the unstable 'deckchairs' to a safer place in future where neither the poster nor the posts are harassed into submission...

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Neferti on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:42pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:37pm:
Indeed.  Her OP contained this obvious peace offering:


Quote:
its sad when threads get posted there as there is a control person who insists on being... in control...of every thread.

so unless you post what he approves of you are either banished or the thread is locked...

would it be possible to move the unstable 'deckchairs' to a safer place in future where neither the poster nor the posts are harassed into submission...


link?

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:43pm

Neferti wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:42pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:37pm:
Indeed.  Her OP contained this obvious peace offering:


Quote:
its sad when threads get posted there as there is a control person who insists on being... in control...of every thread.

so unless you post what he approves of you are either banished or the thread is locked...

would it be possible to move the unstable 'deckchairs' to a safer place in future where neither the poster nor the posts are harassed into submission...


link?


You are kidding me!!!!!  Try post # 1 in this very Thread.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:53pm
perceptions
Yesterday at 6:17am Quote  [urlhttp://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336][/url]


howdy percy...I see you sent this thread to 'relationships'.. sadly I dont post in there  anymore so that stopped my contribution...however said thread is now locked so neither can anyone else post there..

I just wish to say..

its sad when threads get posted there as there is a control person who insists on being... in control...of every thread.

so unless you post what he approves of you are either banished or the thread is locked...

would it be possible to move the unstable 'deckchairs' to a safer place in future where neither the poster nor the posts are harassed into submission...
Back to top      



here it is nef??.... yours was the 3rd post..

as you can see aussie is being selective with his links...


and the her and she is cool too... whats up aussie.. am I in the sin bin????>..


are you claiming you are not a control freak??????????????????... just checking..

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Black Orchid on Nov 9th, 2015 at 6:05pm

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:34pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:18pm:

Quote:
well BO we dont often come to the same conclusion but here we have it..

aussie did his level best to get RID OF ANDREI.. its still there for all to add too.. he has many times tried to destroy people he doesnt like...even using  their names which he claims is against not his rules.. FDs rules... ::)

accept right now there is one with longy on his forum...maybe old but it isnt locked is it????..why because its a well know fact he doesnt like longy/maria..

greg has fallen into aussies web by attacking everything anyone says and using it blindly....

well done aussie  that way you can spend time on here ridiculing as you think rather than watch relationships...

BO is correct you shouldnt be a mod even in the members forum...you completely abuse the privilege ..

but its up to people whether they take that risk after all...you dont just lock things you alter posts without consent...its a terrible thing to do...


Not entirely true, Cods. 

Back when aussie started all the PA hate-filled nonsense in Relationships you were his biggest champion and day after day accused ALL PA members of being less than reputable.  It was very frustrating and quite wrong.

I agree with you quite often and I have also stood up for you especially after you realised that aussie's accusations, lies and finger pointing were mostly deflections, misrepresentations, lies and an effort to create disharmony and an 'us' and 'them'  discord.  Luckily it failed.

I have no problem with you and, at that time, I just would have preferred you to make your own judgment rather than listening to the little dictator.

All water under the bridge but just setting the record straight.



thank you..

as you probably know aussie can be quite charming...yes I know in hindsight.. but to be honest aussie was always very kind to me I needed help and he would step up.. I have never denied that.... in fact when I suddenly started getting banned and couldnt understand why aussie stepped up for me...but like everything he goes over the top and started a campaign to get rid of andrei..which he claimed was what I wanted?????.. this was when I started to realise how aussi can manipulate people into being  suckers if you like.. I didnt like it...he then started altering my posts !again i was horrified...then PMs started being an issue....I have always answered aussies PMs   however I then decided not to anymore....as he couldnt be trusted he would make announcements..not disclosure but made sure everyone  knew so and so was sending him PMs...

something I wasnt comfortable with..I did think the attacks from PA were unfounded not so much unfounded as exaggerated .. and as I said aussie up till then had always treated me with respect...if I come over too strong in my support I am sorry about that as if you remember it was everyone against everyone else in those days.........I did eventually start saying dont bring the bad stuff over here.....as we didnt know what the hell you were all on about...

I am sorry its come down to this.. but as we know some folks will never ever own their mistakes..and if aussie wasnt a mod I guess it would all be water under the b ridge..   my main inten tion on here is to discuss the topic and not the person...

but guess who turned this into warfare.... thats right.. cods! ::).



All good   :)

I always find that if someone tries to sway your opinion about another person that it's best to ignore it, sit back and make your own judgment through your own experiences.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 9th, 2015 at 6:14pm

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 6:05pm:
All good   

I always find that if someone tries to sway your opinion about another person that it's best to ignore it, sit back and make your own judgment through your own experiences




absolutely.... its a great one for being able to say.. I told you SO... ;D ;D ;D.. but yes to each hnis own we have to understand  we have to walk in someone elses shoes to get the point....I have never been a member of PA.. so was none the wiser...mind you I dont regret sticking up for him.... at that time.. but I am sure he doesnt appreciate it anyway...


he has now started another ... thread in relationships having a go at you GUESSED IT...I have read on here where some claim FD refuses to open aussies PMs.. how true it is I dont know but it has been said on more than  one occasion  in fact aussie has even started threads to FD because he cannot contact him.... ::) ::) ::)..

guess who is banned from feedback thats right a mod?.

however he is now into self preservation mode its his good name I guess..  8-)he is  very strange when I think about it he draws attention to this type of thing as if its a medal of honor...

no one has even mentioned me mentioning  it on here..... ::) ::) ::)... who cares???>..dunno.

yet he is doing his best to put cods in the dog house.. although no he didnt by name just his usual innuendo... ;D ;D

at least now its no holds barred.....

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 10th, 2015 at 7:49am
just to show how immature Mr aussie is.. he has now put a post of mine in his infamous "abuse thread" in relationships....

there is no abuse just a request

how ever he does abuse myself in the same post but he conveniently doesnt show that part...

where he accuses me of posting a dogs breakfast.......

just telling you about his usual double standards...

that he thinks there is nothing wrong with.... >:( >:(

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 10th, 2015 at 12:53pm
Geebuz, I wish you'd read the Rules, cods.  If you did, you would not make so many basic elementary blunders.  This is the Rule:


Quote:
Personal criticism
Do not post personal criticism of other members. Do not respond to personal criticism of yourself or other members. This is the biggest problem on OzPolitic. Too many members are easily baited into off-topic personal exchanges. If you participate in any kind of flame war you will be suspended, regardless of who started it or who you think ‘deserved it’.


See ~ the Rule refers to criticism of a person/member.  It does not refer to what they have posted.  Huge difference.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 10th, 2015 at 5:12pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 12:53pm:
Geebuz, I wish you'd read the Rules, cods.  If you did, you would not make so many basic elementary blunders.  This is the Rule:


Quote:
Personal criticism
Do not post personal criticism of other members. Do not respond to personal criticism of yourself or other members. This is the biggest problem on OzPolitic. Too many members are easily baited into off-topic personal exchanges. If you participate in any kind of flame war you will be suspended, regardless of who started it or who you think ‘deserved it’.


See ~ the Rule refers to criticism of a person/member.  It does not refer to what they have posted.  Huge difference.



Hilarious.. honestly Mr Aussie if I could I would frame this post..

once again you have pulled FDs rules out of the box.. and thumped them down on the table... ::) ::) ho hum

can you now show me WHERE IT SAYS..

these rules

DO NOT APPLY TO MR AUSSIE

he is free to say and do whatever he likes..



I will just make a quick list of the insults you have thrown my way on this thread alone.. none of them PERSONAL OF COURSE>>>... and or FLAMING.

here we go..

ignorant..you are so ignorant cods..

ignorant [a couple of times.].

mad womens breakfast [post19]

CODS FERFUXSAKE READ..... huhum... the rules... ::) ::)

a whinger more than once....

dogs breakfast...

all nice and polite I presume by fds rules...mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm



Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 10th, 2015 at 5:17pm
Guilty to all of that.  It is fact, cods.  You are a whinger.  You are ignorant.  The word has a technical meaning.........not knowing relevant facts.

My use of it is in that sense, as I have posted up there ^^^^^^^ but you would not have bothered to read it.

And no, I have no immunity from the application of the Rules which, in any event, you seem to regard as irrelevant.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Neferti on Nov 10th, 2015 at 5:42pm
Said the spider to the fly.



spider_web.jpg (46 KB | 18 )

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Black Orchid on Nov 10th, 2015 at 6:03pm
Cods, pretend every post he makes is in Relationships and ignore it.  I know it is easy to say but the best way to put out a fire is to kill the flame. 

He can't continue his dramas and abuse if there are no participants.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Phemanderac on Nov 10th, 2015 at 6:05pm

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:34pm:
but as we know some folks will never ever own their mistakes.


Excellent and well made point... "some" might be a bit understated but otherwise  :D


cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:34pm:
my main inten tion on here is to discuss the topic and not the person...


This, in the middle of several lengthy posts discussing who again?

A Person...

At least though you're aware that some do not own their mistakes.


cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:34pm:
but guess who turned this into warfare.... thats right.. cods! ::).


Wow, even I would never have said that about you Cods. You don't turn it into warfare at all. You certainly enjoy throwing fuel on the fire, but I don't think I ever see you lighting the actual match.

Don't be so tough on yourself.

;)

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Redneck on Nov 10th, 2015 at 7:30pm
My advice cods is ignore the rules idiot!

Dont even reply!

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Nov 10th, 2015 at 7:39pm
Aussie has no immunity from the global rules on abuse in any part of this board, including relationships.
I would however add that from what I read below he hasn't broken them either.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 10th, 2015 at 8:11pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 7:39pm:
Aussie has no immunity from the global rules on abuse in any part of this board, including relationships.
I would however add that from what I read below he hasn't broken them either.


That is interesting and is maybe why people get confused with each other, sometimes.  Mr Hicks obviously has things set so that the last post of any Thread is the first seen on page one of a Thread.  Me, and probably others......have it set so that the last post of a Thread, is the last on the last page!

That little blue arrow just to the left of the word 'perceptions' in the Thread topic is the tool to use to adjust it.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Agnes on Nov 10th, 2015 at 9:19pm
I come late to this thread- but it is just Aussie once again displaying his mangy tattered grubby plumage. I say shut up Aussie you huge tool. No one cares and stop dragging me into your STUPID shi.t fights- Leave cods alone you gutless spiv !

I think it's time you got one of these. Now shut up.


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 10th, 2015 at 9:22pm

Agnes wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 9:19pm:
I come late to this thread- but it is just Aussie once again displaying his mangey plumage. I say shut up Aussie you huge tool. No one cares and stop dragging me into your STUPID shi.t fights- Leave cods alone you gutless spiv !

I think it's time you got one of these. Now shut up.



That'll work Agnes.  Way to go!  I'm renowned for responding positively to that sort of post.

Read the OP.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Agnes on Nov 10th, 2015 at 9:27pm


You know this could have been you Aussie.. * DANG!*

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 10th, 2015 at 9:43pm

Agnes wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 9:27pm:


You know this could have been you Aussie.. * DANG!*


'Kill them.'

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 10th, 2015 at 10:14pm

Phemanderac wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 6:05pm:

cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:34pm:
but as we know some folks will never ever own their mistakes.


Excellent and well made point... "some" might be a bit understated but otherwise  :D


cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:34pm:
my main inten tion on here is to discuss the topic and not the person...


This, in the middle of several lengthy posts discussing who again?

A Person...

At least though you're aware that some do not own their mistakes.


cods wrote on Nov 9th, 2015 at 5:34pm:
but guess who turned this into warfare.... thats right.. cods! ::).


Wow, even I would never have said that about you Cods. You don't turn it into warfare at all. You certainly enjoy throwing fuel on the fire, but I don't think I ever see you lighting the actual match.

Don't be so tough on yourself.

;)



run along spiv... your pitiful remarks WOW moments  are not needed here...

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 10th, 2015 at 10:16pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 7:39pm:
Aussie has no immunity from the global rules on abuse in any part of this board, including relationships.
I would however add that from what I read below he hasn't broken them either.




didnt ask you did I I asked aussie.. hes the one talking about being =nice to others...

I presume as you like banning myself you think I have dished out the abuse to aussie on this thread????...

just tell me where...of course ferfuxsakes only??.. >:( >:( >:(

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 10th, 2015 at 10:20pm

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 6:03pm:
Cods, pretend every post he makes is in Relationships and ignore it.  I know it is easy to say but the best way to put out a fire is to kill the flame. 

He can't continue his dramas and abuse if there are no participants.



I would I would love to do just that but when he tries to make me look a liar and claim the thread wasnt locked...

then he changes his post...he called me ignorant then changed it to whinger....like he is prone to do.. and Nef came in and said I was right and still he went on and on and on.. one feels obliged to reply.....what annoys me is when someone like andrei pops in not to prevent any of the abuse...like ferfuxsakes cods..... but to more or less claim he is doing ok...am I pissed off you betcha ...

i will take you advice though I will I will I will..yahhhhhhhhhhh I hate this place.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 10th, 2015 at 10:28pm
I changed nothing cods.  I have posted many times that I had locked the Thread.....did you not see those posts?  And, seeing as how you raised the 'liar' issue.....which one of these is the truth?  Both posts were made by you.

First, you said:




Quote:
it was locked in honor of myself



And then:



Quote:
was it locked I have no idea you are telling me it was.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 10th, 2015 at 11:05pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 7:30pm:
My advice cods is ignore the rules idiot!

Dont even reply!


This just arrived on my FB page.  Someone posted it, not addressed to me but there is some subtle message in there, Mr R. Neck.


Quote:
A mother was working in the kitchen, listening to her five-year-old son playing with his new electric train set in the living room.
She heard the train stop and her son saying, 'All of You b*****ds who want off, get off now, 'cos we're in a hurry! And all of you b*****ds who are getting on, get on now, 'cos we're going down the tracks'.
The horrified mother went in and told her son, 'We don't use that kind of language in this house. Now I want you to go to your room and stay there for
TWO HOURS.
When you come out, you may play with your train, but I want you to use nice language.'
Two hours later, the son came out of the bedroom and resumed playing with his train. Soon the train stopped and the mother heard her son say,
'All passengers who are disembarking the train, please remember to take all of your belongings with you.
We thank you for travelling with us today and hope your trip was a pleasant one.'
She hears the little boy continue,
'For those of you just boarding, we ask you to stow all of your hand luggage under your seat. Remember, there is no smoking on the train.
We hope you will have a pleasant and relaxing journey with us today.'
As the mother began to smile, the child added..........
'For those of you who are pissed off about the TWO HOUR delay, please see the fat controller in the kitchen.


Cheers!

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Agnes on Nov 10th, 2015 at 11:40pm
If only you knew when to shut up askhole!  You make me sick!

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by The Grappler on Nov 11th, 2015 at 12:33am
After the past few weeks with She Man/'Me Hand'/Life and Death et al, The Lord of Hosts:-


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 11th, 2015 at 10:21am

Agnes wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 11:40pm:
If only you knew when to shut up askhole!  You make me sick!


It is pretty simple really.  If you stop poking the sleeping bear with a stick, he'll stay asleep.

Read from the OP on.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 11th, 2015 at 10:31am

Agnes wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 11:40pm:
If only you knew when to shut up askhole!  You make me sick!

;) ;)

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by AiA on Nov 11th, 2015 at 10:33am
What a croc o’ sh*t!

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Lisa Jones on Nov 13th, 2015 at 1:32pm

AiA wrote on Nov 11th, 2015 at 10:33am:
What a croc o’ sh*t!


Aussie or this topic?

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by The Grappler on Nov 13th, 2015 at 2:06pm

Agnes wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 11:40pm:
If only you knew when to shut up askhole!  You make me sick!



Please,Agnes - we're working to cut out the personal stuff here....  join the Crusade for God, Right and Country!  (yee-hah)...

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 13th, 2015 at 2:47pm

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 2:06pm:

Agnes wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 11:40pm:
If only you knew when to shut up askhole!  You make me sick!



Please,Agnes - we're working to cut out the personal stuff here....  join the Crusade for God, Right and Country!  (yee-hah)...

thats true grap... but even you must agree thats its not ONLY the abuse that is personal????....when you get followed relentlessly it gets just as annoying.....maybe we can  all start doing that... you know being a PEST...is that any better???>..

one of the reasons for this thread was to draw percys attention to dropping everything in relationships.... would he mind putting them somewhere else as  a few people do not use that forum..... everyone has their own reasons for not doing so...but when a thread starts off in chat and suddenly ends up there .... it can be frustrating..... thats all it was.. a request  to PERCY....

silly me mentioned "WHY"... big mistake.. I will try an circumvent the need in future.. :( :( :( :(


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 13th, 2015 at 2:57pm

cods wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 2:47pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 2:06pm:

Agnes wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 11:40pm:
If only you knew when to shut up askhole!  You make me sick!



Please,Agnes - we're working to cut out the personal stuff here....  join the Crusade for God, Right and Country!  (yee-hah)...

thats true grap... but even you must agree thats its not ONLY the abuse that is personal????....when you get followed relentlessly it gets just as annoying.....maybe we can  all start doing that... you know being a PEST...is that any better???>..

one of the reasons for this thread was to draw percys attention to dropping everything in relationships.... would he mind putting them somewhere else as  a few people do not use that forum..... everyone has their own reasons for not doing so...but when a thread starts off in chat and suddenly ends up there .... it can be frustrating..... thats all it was.. a request  to PERCY....

silly me mentioned "WHY"... big mistake.. I will try an circumvent the need in future.. :( :( :( :(


Yeas Dear, but if you used the PM facility, that would mean there would be no public drama, wouldn't it?  In your OP, you took an unnecessary swipe and then you complain when you get a response to it.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Lisa Jones on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:04pm

cods wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 2:47pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 2:06pm:

Agnes wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 11:40pm:
If only you knew when to shut up askhole!  You make me sick!



Please,Agnes - we're working to cut out the personal stuff here....  join the Crusade for God, Right and Country!  (yee-hah)...

thats true grap... but even you must agree thats its not ONLY the abuse that is personal????....when you get followed relentlessly it gets just as annoying.....maybe we can  all start doing that... you know being a PEST...is that any better???>..

one of the reasons for this thread was to draw percys attention to dropping everything in relationships.... would he mind putting them somewhere else as  a few people do not use that forum..... everyone has their own reasons for not doing so...but when a thread starts off in chat and suddenly ends up there .... it can be frustrating..... thats all it was.. a request  to PERCY....

silly me mentioned "WHY"... big mistake.. I will try an circumvent the need in future.. :( :( :( :(


Cods...you have every right to ask why. We all do.

And just like everyone else, you have every right to ask that question HERE ON THE FORUM.

If others don't like it...THEY can bugger off.


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:15pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:04pm:

cods wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 2:47pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 2:06pm:

Agnes wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 11:40pm:
If only you knew when to shut up askhole!  You make me sick!



Please,Agnes - we're working to cut out the personal stuff here....  join the Crusade for God, Right and Country!  (yee-hah)...

thats true grap... but even you must agree thats its not ONLY the abuse that is personal????....when you get followed relentlessly it gets just as annoying.....maybe we can  all start doing that... you know being a PEST...is that any better???>..

one of the reasons for this thread was to draw percys attention to dropping everything in relationships.... would he mind putting them somewhere else as  a few people do not use that forum..... everyone has their own reasons for not doing so...but when a thread starts off in chat and suddenly ends up there .... it can be frustrating..... thats all it was.. a request  to PERCY....

silly me mentioned "WHY"... big mistake.. I will try an circumvent the need in future.. :( :( :( :(


Cods...you have every right to ask why. We all do.

And just like everyone else, you have every right to ask that question HERE ON THE FORUM.

If others don't like it...THEY can bugger off.




thanks lisa ... if you go back to page one.. the first 3 posts...it will of course make more sense.....accept for one small detail  aussies 1st post was altered  but I cannot prove that and really dont want to.. but it shows why I will not post in relationships...this thread from then on went pearshaped...and turned into an all about aussie thread.. ::) ::).. some folks like to sound of their own voice in this case their words in print....

I can post on this forum without his consent.... at least he hasnt shown me FDs rules that tells me otherwise....so no I have no intentions of pming anyone to suit his nibs... for someone who starts more threads about other people or putting other people down.. he has a lot to talk about dont you think???>.. ;D ;D

I do love people who can see everyone elses faults but never their own... as I find their own faults usually outnumber anyone they complain about...

lisa if you are happy with Percy dropping any misplaced thread into relationship.. please say so.....

I havent heard from perc so not sure if hes annoyed about this or not he just said it was noted....and of course he can still be sending them there for all I know..

it was just a thought request if you like...NOT AN ORDER??? :D :D :D :D.sheeeeeeeeeze 11 pages..

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:20pm

Quote:
thanks lisa ... if you go back to page one.. the first 3 posts...it will of course make more sense.....accept for one small detail  aussies 1st post was altered


No it was not, cods....not one word.  If there was an edit...there would be a record of it.  Ask the GMods.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Lisa Jones on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:20pm

cods wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:15pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:04pm:

cods wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 2:47pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 2:06pm:

Agnes wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 11:40pm:
If only you knew when to shut up askhole!  You make me sick!



Please,Agnes - we're working to cut out the personal stuff here....  join the Crusade for God, Right and Country!  (yee-hah)...

thats true grap... but even you must agree thats its not ONLY the abuse that is personal????....when you get followed relentlessly it gets just as annoying.....maybe we can  all start doing that... you know being a PEST...is that any better???>..

one of the reasons for this thread was to draw percys attention to dropping everything in relationships.... would he mind putting them somewhere else as  a few people do not use that forum..... everyone has their own reasons for not doing so...but when a thread starts off in chat and suddenly ends up there .... it can be frustrating..... thats all it was.. a request  to PERCY....

silly me mentioned "WHY"... big mistake.. I will try an circumvent the need in future.. :( :( :( :(


Cods...you have every right to ask why. We all do.

And just like everyone else, you have every right to ask that question HERE ON THE FORUM.

If others don't like it...THEY can bugger off.




thanks lisa ... if you go back to page one.. the first 3 posts...it will of course make more sense.....accept for one small detail  aussies 1st post was altered  but I cannot prove that and really dont want to.. but it shows why I will not post in relationships...this thread from then on went pearshaped...and turned into an all about aussie thread.. ::) ::).. some folks like to sound of their own voice in this case their words in print....

I can post on this forum without his consent.... at least he hasnt shown me FDs rules that tells me otherwise....so no I have no intentions of pming anyone to suit his nibs... for someone who starts more threads about other people or putting other people down.. he has a lot to talk about dont you think???>.. ;D ;D

I do love people who can see everyone elses faults but never their own... as I find their own faults usually outnumber anyone they complain about...

lisa if you are happy with Percy dropping any misplaced thread into relationship.. please say so.....

I havent heard from perc so not sure if hes annoyed about this or not he just said it was noted....and of course he can still be sending them there for all I know..

it was just a thought request if you like...NOT AN ORDER??? :D :D :D :D.sheeeeeeeeeze 11 pages..


Cods, I have read back.....and yes I totally agree with your sentiments.

As regards Percy....I would like him to stop pointing topics at the porcelain (toilet aka Relationships).


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Lisa Jones on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:25pm

cods wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 10:20pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 6:03pm:
Cods, pretend every post he makes is in Relationships and ignore it.

I know it is easy to say but the best way to put out a fire is to kill the flame. 

He can't continue his dramas and abuse if there are no participants.



I would I would love to do just that but when he tries to make me look a liar and claim the thread wasnt locked...

then he changes his post...he called me ignorant then changed it to whinger....like he is prone to do.. and Nef came in and said I was right and still he went on and on and on.. one feels obliged to reply.....what annoys me is when someone like andrei pops in not to prevent any of the abuse...like ferfuxsakes cods..... but to more or less claim he is doing ok...am I pissed off you betcha ...

i will take you advice though I will I will I will..yahhhhhhhhhhh I hate this place.



1. Cods you are describing Aussie's notorious online rabid baiting and trolling behaviour.

2. The advice given to you by BO is spot on.

3. Ignore him/post over him. I do that all the time now. It works very well too. :)

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:25pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:20pm:

Quote:
thanks lisa ... if you go back to page one.. the first 3 posts...it will of course make more sense.....accept for one small detail  aussies 1st post was altered


No it was not, cods....not one word.  If there was an edit...there would be a record of it.  Ask the GMods.


Oh.....and the record would show in the very post itself if there had been an edit.

[I have not changed this post ..... just added this bit.  See the little notification at the bottom right, cods?]

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Lisa Jones on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:36pm

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:17am:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336


howdy percy...I see you sent this thread to 'relationships'.. sadly I dont post in there  anymore so that stopped my contribution...however said thread is now locked so neither can anyone else post there..

I just wish to say..

its sad when threads get posted there as there is a control person who insists on being... in control...of every thread.

so unless you post what he approves of you are either banished or the thread is locked...

would it be possible to move the unstable 'deckchairs' to a safer place in future where neither the poster nor the posts are harassed into submission...


The Extremism forum is far more moderate than Relationships.

That might be a better alternative.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:39pm
That's just about made sure it will never happen.  The 'kiss of death.'

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Lisa Jones on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:42pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:36pm:

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:17am:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336


howdy percy...I see you sent this thread to 'relationships'.. sadly I dont post in there  anymore so that stopped my contribution...however said thread is now locked so neither can anyone else post there..

I just wish to say..

its sad when threads get posted there as there is a control person who insists on being... in control...of every thread.

so unless you post what he approves of you are either banished or the thread is locked...

would it be possible to move the unstable 'deckchairs' to a safer place in future where neither the poster nor the posts are harassed into submission...


The Extremism forum is far more moderate than Relationships.

That might be a better alternative.


Or even the Fringe forum. It's far more mainstream than Relationships.

Says it all really.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:49pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:42pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:36pm:

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:17am:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336


howdy percy...I see you sent this thread to 'relationships'.. sadly I dont post in there  anymore so that stopped my contribution...however said thread is now locked so neither can anyone else post there..

I just wish to say..

its sad when threads get posted there as there is a control person who insists on being... in control...of every thread.

so unless you post what he approves of you are either banished or the thread is locked...

would it be possible to move the unstable 'deckchairs' to a safer place in future where neither the poster nor the posts are harassed into submission...


The Extremism forum is far more moderate than Relationships.

That might be a better alternative.


Or even the Fringe forum. It's far more mainstream than Relationships.

Says it all really.


What says it all Lisa Jones, are the facts:

Fringe:  164 Topics      4331 Threads       Unmoderated.
Relationships:  727 Topics    31139 Threads      Moderated.

Please keep providing that 'kiss of death' Lisa Jones.



Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Black Orchid on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:51pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:25pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:20pm:

Quote:
thanks lisa ... if you go back to page one.. the first 3 posts...it will of course make more sense.....accept for one small detail  aussies 1st post was altered


No it was not, cods....not one word.  If there was an edit...there would be a record of it.  Ask the GMods.


Oh.....and the record would show in the very post itself if there had been an edit.

[I have not changed this post ..... just added this bit.  See the little notification at the bottom right, cods?]


That depends on how long you take before you edit.

See I came back to add this but where is the little note at the bottom right?

Not there!

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Black Orchid on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:51pm

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:51pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:25pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:20pm:

Quote:
thanks lisa ... if you go back to page one.. the first 3 posts...it will of course make more sense.....accept for one small detail  aussies 1st post was altered


No it was not, cods....not one word.  If there was an edit...there would be a record of it.  Ask the GMods.


Oh.....and the record would show in the very post itself if there had been an edit.

[I have not changed this post ..... just added this bit.  See the little notification at the bottom right, cods?]


That depends on how long you take before you edit.


This is just a copy of my original post.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Lisa Jones on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:51pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:42pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:36pm:

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:17am:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336


howdy percy...I see you sent this thread to 'rerelationshi'.. sadly I dont post in there  anymore so that stopped my contribution...however said thread is now locked so neither can anyone else post there..

I just wish to say..

its sad when threads get posted there as there is a control person who insists on being... in control...of every thread.

so unless you post what he approves of you are either banished or the thread is locked...

would it be possible to move the unstable 'deckchairs' to a safer place in future where neither the poster nor the posts are harassed into submission...


The Extremism forum is far more moderate than Relationships.

That might be a better alternative.


Or even the Fringe forum. It's far more mainstream than Relationships.

Says it all really.


Might send a PM to a few people about this actually Cods.

BRB.....

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Black Orchid on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:54pm

Aussie wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:25pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:20pm:

Quote:
thanks lisa ... if you go back to page one.. the first 3 posts...it will of course make more sense.....accept for one small detail  aussies 1st post was altered


No it was not, cods....not one word.  If there was an edit...there would be a record of it.  Ask the GMods.


Oh.....and the record would show in the very post itself if there had been an edit.

[I have not changed this post ..... just added this bit.  See the little notification at the bottom right, cods?]


Incorrect old boy.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Redneck on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:58pm
IGNORE THIS TOPIC

DONT FEED THE AUSSIE TROLL

ADVICE WHICH I AM ABOUT TO TAKE MYSELF

;)

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Black Orchid on Nov 13th, 2015 at 4:01pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:58pm:
IGNORE THIS TOPIC

DONT FEED THE AUSSIE TROLL

ADVICE WHICH I AM ABOUT TO TAKE MYSELF

;)


The best advice, of course, but sometimes it is just nice to tell the know-it-all troll how wrong he is.  If one can be bothered, of course.

Is there a RULE about that I wonder?   :)

Ooops I changed my post and still no little edit note at the bottom right.  Gee wizz.


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 13th, 2015 at 4:26pm

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:51pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:25pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:20pm:

Quote:
thanks lisa ... if you go back to page one.. the first 3 posts...it will of course make more sense.....accept for one small detail  aussies 1st post was altered


No it was not, cods....not one word.  If there was an edit...there would be a record of it.  Ask the GMods.


Oh.....and the record would show in the very post itself if there had been an edit.

[I have not changed this post ..... just added this bit.  See the little notification at the bottom right, cods?]


That depends on how long you take before you edit.

See I came back to add this but where is the little note at the bottom right?

Not there!



thats what I mean BO about posting in relationships.. it isnt SAFE...and so much denial...

the thread was unlocked by the time someone posted their first post.. after all it was done then.. but not when I posted the op...it makes it look like I was lying to perceptions....I dont care really about the mod over there but I do care about my truthfulness being questioned....it is a fact that thread.post. get moved and changed and disappear and get locked for as many hours as it suits...

is that really the way we want things run here???????...

I for one say NO... dont you dare touch my post.. in fact I will say HOW DARE YOU...

and I stand by my right to say so in public...

I wont be told to PM someone...

I am over it..

I often reply to a post and when I take a second look there is a bit more added to it....after its been posted.. it happen quite often...


but thats not what this thread is about....but some want to make it so... >:(

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 13th, 2015 at 4:32pm

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 4:01pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:58pm:
IGNORE THIS TOPIC

DONT FEED THE AUSSIE TROLL

ADVICE WHICH I AM ABOUT TO TAKE MYSELF

;)


The best advice, of course, but sometimes it is just nice to tell the know-it-all troll how wrong he is.  If one can be bothered, of course.

Is there a RULE about that I wonder?   :)

Ooops I changed my post and still no little edit note at the bottom right.  Gee wizz.


You must have made it within some nominated period set by FD.  However, as always.....I'll stick with the facts, and the basic one is that nothing in my first post in this Thread was altered.

I made that post (according to my Forum clock) on the 8th November at 8.40 am.

Although cods and I had made many posts prior, it was not until 4.17pm on that same day that cods (see post # 17) even hinted at some edit.....

"I know I had read that word....and you fixed it didnt you.."

By then, I had used the word 'ignorant' (it is still there for all to see) but it was never in my first post.  (Not that it would matter if it was.)

Those are the facts.  You lot from PA can carry on as much as you like....nothing will change those facts, and it certainly will have exactly zero impact on me.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 13th, 2015 at 4:36pm

Quote:
I am over it..


So why come back for more of the same? 

(A few who want to ride on your coat tails will provide you with no comfort, cods.  If you cease stoking the fire, it will die off.  Keep throwing wood chips in, and it will re-ignite.)

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Black Orchid on Nov 13th, 2015 at 4:38pm
It's all in his wording, Cods.  It always is.

He said something like "The thread isn't locked.  Go and look".  Implying that what you said was a lie.  Then carried on with an 11 page drama calling you ignorant etc.

He should have said "The thread isn't locked anymore.  I unlocked it 60 seconds ago when I saw this thread".  That would have been the honest thing to say but that is not how he works and that is why it is best not to take the bait.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 13th, 2015 at 4:38pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:51pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:42pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 3:36pm:

cods wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 6:17am:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1446813336


howdy percy...I see you sent this thread to 'rerelationshi'.. sadly I dont post in there  anymore so that stopped my contribution...however said thread is now locked so neither can anyone else post there..

I just wish to say..

its sad when threads get posted there as there is a control person who insists on being... in control...of every thread.

so unless you post what he approves of you are either banished or the thread is locked...

would it be possible to move the unstable 'deckchairs' to a safer place in future where neither the poster nor the posts are harassed into submission...


The Extremism forum is far more moderate than Relationships.

That might be a better alternative.


Or even the Fringe forum. It's far more mainstream than Relationships.

Says it all really.


Might send a PM to a few people about this actually Cods.

BRB.....


I dont think so lisa let people decide for themselves.....I wasnt intending causing trouble  just wasnt happy about threads I wanted to post in suddenly going where this angel feared to tread....I dont want to bring aussie down this thread should have petered out about page 2 mark...however its been derailed and now its more about people than threads  lololol..

aussie is trying to make me look bad by telling me I should have sent a PM.... as per usual I am the baddie... ::) ::).. and as he has pointed out relationships does have a lot of interest.....so its funny he is making such a fuss really.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Lisa Jones on Nov 13th, 2015 at 4:44pm
It's Friday night Cods!

Yay!

Hello weekend!

Wooooo hoooo!

Who cares about a lonely maniac control freak lying online stalker like Aussie. I know I don't.

Real life beckons.

See ya later Cods. Oh and just ignore the nutter. Let him talk to himself :)


Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 13th, 2015 at 4:45pm

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 4:38pm:
It's all in his wording, Cods.  It always is.

He said something like "The thread isn't locked.  Go and look".  Implying that what you said was a lie.  Then carried on with an 11 page drama calling you ignorant etc.

He should have said "The thread isn't locked anymore.  I unlocked it 60 seconds ago when I saw this thread".  That would have been the honest thing to say but that is not how he works and that is why it is best not to take the bait.


...or....just take what I post literally.  I mean what I post, and it is hardly my error if people do not understand simple grammar.  I posted the truth ~ that was not good enough, and off we went into never never land with people (from PA) having their little blunt axe to grind.....and cods becomes the unwitting whetting ingredient.

Ho hum.

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 13th, 2015 at 4:45pm

Black Orchid wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 4:38pm:
It's all in his wording, Cods.  It always is.

He said something like "The thread isn't locked.  Go and look".  Implying that what you said was a lie.  Then carried on with an 11 page drama calling you ignorant etc.

He should have said "The thread isn't locked anymore.  I unlocked it 60 seconds ago when I saw this thread".  That would have been the honest thing to say but that is not how he works and that is why it is best not to take the bait.



exactly  if he had said that nothing would have happened...I dont care anymore I really dont but I dont like being called ignorant.. or writing a dogs breakfast or being addressed like ferfuxsakes cods...I call that abuse but of of course aussie doesnt... he has the cheek to put "my abuse" in his hate thread...hahaha...

I am waking up slow but sure I notice he is now bringing in PA.. I mean ...come on.. I have seen you post many times here....same with lisa...but as you say its all in the words... sidetracking...deflecting...denial...its all there for everyone to see...aussie cannot prove he didnt alter his first post and I cant prove he did....

so there will always be that doubt wont there?.....it wont bother me because it was only a word...but my point is.. when someone changes things after the fact.. and he cannot deny that he does it....then who gets the benefit of the doubt when its needed???????????

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by cods on Nov 13th, 2015 at 4:48pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 13th, 2015 at 4:44pm:
It's Friday night!

Yay!

Hello weekend!

Wooooo hoooo!

Who cares about a lonely maniac control freak lying online stalker like Aussie. I know I don't.

Real life beckons.

See ya  :)




  everyday is the weekend for me.. how selfish..

have a nice one you guys... I have enjoyed the chatting actually....and I am very glad that others see where I am coming from....are we all in favour of Perce sending loose threads somewhere other than relationships...???

hands up!

sorry aussie you lose...

Title: Re: perceptions
Post by Aussie on Nov 13th, 2015 at 4:55pm

Quote:
exactly  if he had said that nothing would have happened...I dont care anymore I really dont but I dont like being called ignorant.. or writing a dogs breakfast or being addressed like ferfuxsakes cods...I call that abuse but of of course aussie doesnt... he has the cheek to put "my abuse" in his hate thread...hahaha...


Are you punch drunk or something? You keep coming back for more from me.  Why not just let it drop cods, as while you keep taking swipes at me, I will respond as follows:

I am hardly going to say nothing when you are dropping cow patties all over me as you did in your OP.  You very often post as an ignorant cods, (as even "Maria" has now gone public about after defending you on many occasions) and your posts are more often than not...a 'mad woman's breakfast.' 

You were never addressed as 'ferfuxsake.'  It is similar to "Bloody hell, cods...will you please read and understand what people are telling you."

That'd be a great idea.

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.