Hygiene is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration.

---

Remember, cleanliness is next to Godliness.

Toilets don't clean themselves, you know.

The feminists stole my lunch.

A clean test paper is the sign of a clean mind. If I see any mess on those papers, it's an automatic fail. Don't say you weren't warned.

mothra wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 5:49pm:

The feminists stole my lunch.

Should really be:

The feminists wouldn't make me a sandwich.

mothra wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 5:49pm:

The feminists stole my lunch.

They're constantly graffitting the toilet doors. I don't know what's worse, the toilets in the Faculty of Engineering or those so-called "feminists" in the Arts Faculty.

If they wanted to be more feminine, you'd think they'd learn to keep their smutty thoughts to themselves.

Typical. 

mothra wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 5:53pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 5:49pm: The feminists stole my lunch. Should really be: The feminists wouldn't make me a sandwich.

I always pack my own lunch. If you want something done properly, do it yourself, that's my motto.

Now. Floors...

There's a spot right in the middle of the corridor. Someone could have a fall. 

You'll lose marks for that.

---

Who the hell is Mistie?

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 6:42pm:

Who the hell is Mistie?

There will be time for questions at the end, we have a lot to get through.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 6:42pm:

Who the hell is Mistie?

Its the dodo's pretend friend I have asked this before.

Moth is just coat tail riding cause greg hasn't woken up yet.

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 6:59pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 6:42pm: Who the hell is Mistie? There will be time for questions at the end, we have a lot to get through.

;D

Which uni does Mistie go to?

Add that question to the list. :P

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 7:00pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 6:42pm: Who the hell is Mistie? Its the dodo's pretend friend I have asked this before.

So many dodos.....and nongs about.

And they all seem to find their way here lol.

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 7:00pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 6:42pm: Who the hell is Mistie? Its the dodo's pretend friend I have asked this before.

You're free to leave if you want to talk. We need to get through Chapter 4 before the break.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 7:03pm:

He Man wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 7:00pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 6:42pm: Who the hell is Mistie? Its the dodo's pretend friend I have asked this before. So many dodos.....and nongs about. And they all seem to find their way here lol.

You - what did I just say?

I don't know why I bother, this place is full of progressives.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 6:42pm:

Who the hell is Mistie?

the janitor ... who else

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 7:41pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 6:42pm: Who the hell is Mistie? the janitor ... who else

Look what that dog Muttley dragged in. ::)

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 7:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 7:41pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 6:42pm: Who the hell is Mistie? the janitor ... who else Look what that dog Muttley dragged in. ::)

Muttley hasn't posted on this thread .... are you being paranoid again?  :D :D :D :D

Hi John wheres Fordy ?

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 7:46pm:

Hi John wheres Fordy ?

Muttley's taking them both for a walk  ;D

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 7:45pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 7:43pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 7:41pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 6:42pm: Who the hell is Mistie? the janitor ... who else Look what that dog Muttley dragged in. ::) Muttley hasn't posted on this thread .... are you being paranoid again?  :D :D :D :D

She thinks you're Muttley now John.

Don't ask for reasons. There aren't any.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 7:49pm:

He Man wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 7:46pm: Hi John wheres Fordy ? Muttley's taking them both for a walk  ;D

Frodo's not online atm. He's busy trying to hack his other 2 OzPol accounts.

He'll be online soon though.

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 7:46pm:

Hi John wheres Fordy ?

How would I know? Don't tell me you're buying into Lisa little conspiracy theory?  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

mothra wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 7:49pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 7:45pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 7:43pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 7:41pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 6:42pm: Who the hell is Mistie? the janitor ... who else Look what that dog Muttley dragged in. ::) Muttley hasn't posted on this thread .... are you being paranoid again?  :D :D :D :D She thinks you're Muttley now John. Don't ask for reasons. There aren't any.

seriously? http://itsnotenoughtodream.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/man-laughing.jpg

Quiet! This will be in the exam and I'm not going through it again.

Now. Tampon bins. Who's emptied one of these?

---

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 6:59pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 6:42pm: Who the hell is Mistie? There will be time for questions at the end, we have a lot to get through.

Oh come on!

I'm stuck in here with John Smith's Muttley dog Frodo......waiting for YOU to tell me who the hell Mistie is.

Not fair!!!!!

Mistie is Culture Warrior, and a few others besides.

Postmodern Trendoid is one i think.

mothra wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:06pm:

Mistie is Culture Warrior, and a few others besides. Postmodern Trendoid is one i think.

that'll give her paranoia a work out  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Culture Warrior/Post Modern Trendoid

Awesome posters.

Did not know they were the same person though.

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:11pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:06pm: Mistie is Culture Warrior, and a few others besides. Postmodern Trendoid is one i think. that'll give her paranoia a work out  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

It won't matter to her that he's a multi-sock. She agrees with him. He's a righty.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:15pm:

Did not know they were the same person though.

there's a lot you don't know!

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:20pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:15pm: Did not know they were the same person though. there's a lot you don't know!

Be careful....there's a lot I'm beginning to know.

The "progressives" will have you believe ladies' sanitary bins are an "oppressive patriarchal tool" or some other rubbish, but they're the best things to hit the cleaning industry in years. A good hygiene professional can make more in a day emptying Pink Lady bins than any other form of portable disposal unit. Why? We'll cover this in Bacterial Ontology next term, but it's something to aim for.

Oh, for God's sake, this one's full. I'd like a volunteer, please. Preferably a female.

---

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:21pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:20pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:15pm: Did not know they were the same person though. there's a lot you don't know! Be careful....there's a lot I'm beginning to know.

I'm sure the voices in your head are doing a good job of keeping you informed.

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:22pm:

The "progressives" will have you believe ladies' sanitary bins are an oppressive tool of patriarchy, but they're the best things to hit the cleaning industry in years. A good hygiene professional can make more in a day emptying Pink Lady bins than any other form of bin. Why? We'll cover this in Bacterial Ontology next term, but it's something to aim for. Oh, for God's sake, this one's full. I'd like a volunteer, please. Preferably a female.

You're in luck....Moth Eaten is your woman Karnal. Go for it!

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:27pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:22pm: The "progressives" will have you believe ladies' sanitary bins are an oppressive tool of patriarchy, but they're the best things to hit the cleaning industry in years. A good hygiene professional can make more in a day emptying Pink Lady bins than any other form of bin. Why? We'll cover this in Bacterial Ontology next term, but it's something to aim for. Oh, for God's sake, this one's full. I'd like a volunteer, please. Preferably a female. You're in luck....Mother Eaten is your woman Karnal. Go for it!

No he'd need a woman who thought more favourably of the thoughts of Schopenhauer on women.

That'd be you Lisa. You quite agree.

I'm out in the cloisters, protesting.

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:25pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:21pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:20pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:15pm: Did not know they were the same person though. there's a lot you don't know! Be careful....there's a lot I'm beginning to know. I'm sure the voices in your head are doing a good job of keeping you informed.

You're not good at this Frodo.

You never were.

Too transparent.....and dumb.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:27pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:22pm: The "progressives" will have you believe ladies' sanitary bins are an oppressive tool of patriarchy, but they're the best things to hit the cleaning industry in years. A good hygiene professional can make more in a day emptying Pink Lady bins than any other form of bin. Why? We'll cover this in Bacterial Ontology next term, but it's something to aim for. Oh, for God's sake, this one's full. I'd like a volunteer, please. Preferably a female. You're in luck....Mother Eaten is your woman Karnal. Go for it!

Thanks for volunteering. Now. How would you dispose of a tampon, dear? Don't be shy, be as honest as you can.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:29pm:

You're not good at this Frodo. You never were. Too transparent.....and dumb.

;D ;D ;D
you are the expert Lisa

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:30pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:27pm: Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:22pm: The "progressives" will have you believe ladies' sanitary bins are an oppressive tool of patriarchy, but they're the best things to hit the cleaning industry in years. A good hygiene professional can make more in a day emptying Pink Lady bins than any other form of bin. Why? We'll cover this in Bacterial Ontology next term, but it's something to aim for. Oh, for God's sake, this one's full. I'd like a volunteer, please. Preferably a female. You're in luck....Moth Eaten is your woman Karnal. Go for it! Thanks for volunteering Moth Eaten. Now. How would you dispose of a tampon, dear? Don't be shy, be as honest as you can.

Come on Moth.....don't be shy.

mothra wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:28pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:27pm: Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:22pm: The "progressives" will have you believe ladies' sanitary bins are an oppressive tool of patriarchy, but they're the best things to hit the cleaning industry in years. A good hygiene professional can make more in a day emptying Pink Lady bins than any other form of bin. Why? We'll cover this in Bacterial Ontology next term, but it's something to aim for. Oh, for God's sake, this one's full. I'd like a volunteer, please. Preferably a female. You're in luck....Mother Eaten is your woman Karnal. Go for it! No he'd need a woman who thought more favourably of the thoughts of Schopenhauer on women.

Hysterics, mainly. We'll cover this in Mental Hygiene I. We're doing ladies' sanitary products now.

Focus.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:31pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:30pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:27pm: Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:22pm: The "progressives" will have you believe ladies' sanitary bins are an oppressive tool of patriarchy, but they're the best things to hit the cleaning industry in years. A good hygiene professional can make more in a day emptying Pink Lady bins than any other form of bin. Why? We'll cover this in Bacterial Ontology next term, but it's something to aim for. Oh, for God's sake, this one's full. I'd like a volunteer, please. Preferably a female. You're in luck....Moth Eaten is your woman Karnal. Go for it! Thanks for volunteering Moth Eaten. Now. How would you dispose of a tampon, dear? Don't be shy, be as honest as you can. Come on Moth.....don't be shy.

No Lisa. I've already explained why it must be you.

You after all, doing it to help Mistie.

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:31pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:29pm: You're not good at this Frodo. You never were. Too transparent.....and dumb. ;D ;D ;D you are the expert Lisa

When it comes to recognizing the stench of an ex Yahoo multi troll such as yourself.....I am indeed THE EXPERT Frodo.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:35pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:31pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:29pm: You're not good at this Frodo. You never were. Too transparent.....and dumb. ;D ;D ;D you are the expert Lisa When it comes to recognizing the stench of an ex Yahoo multi troll such as yourself.....I am indeed THE EXPERT Frodo.

yes Lisa ...

You're an expert in stenches
You're an expert in Trolling
Your an expert in being transparent
You're an expert in being dumb

How can I argue with that?

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:33pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:28pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:27pm: Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:22pm: The "progressives" will have you believe ladies' sanitary bins are an oppressive tool of patriarchy, but they're the best things to hit the cleaning industry in years. A good hygiene professional can make more in a day emptying Pink Lady bins than any other form of bin. Why? We'll cover this in Bacterial Ontology next term, but it's something to aim for. Oh, for God's sake, this one's full. I'd like a volunteer, please. Preferably a female. You're in luck....Moth Eaten is your woman Karnal. Go for it! No he'd need a woman who thought more favourably of the thoughts of Schopenhauer on women. Hysterics, mainly. We'll cover this in Mental Hygiene I. We're doing ladies' sanitary products now. Focus.

Again....you're in luck Karnal. Moth Eaten is the expert you're looking for when it comes to mental issues. She specializes in the area of permanent stalking and insanity lol.

Lucky you!

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:33pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:28pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:27pm: Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:22pm: The "progressives" will have you believe ladies' sanitary bins are an oppressive tool of patriarchy, but they're the best things to hit the cleaning industry in years. A good hygiene professional can make more in a day emptying Pink Lady bins than any other form of bin. Why? We'll cover this in Bacterial Ontology next term, but it's something to aim for. Oh, for God's sake, this one's full. I'd like a volunteer, please. Preferably a female. You're in luck....Mother Eaten is your woman Karnal. Go for it! No he'd need a woman who thought more favourably of the thoughts of Schopenhauer on women. Hysterics, mainly. We'll cover this in Mental Hygiene I. We're doing ladies' sanitary products now. Focus.

No no it ties in!

Women are, according to Schopenhauer who is no doubt a favourite of Mistie's, enemies. By nature.

Lisa is a strong adherent to this philosophy whereas i like other women very much.

So much so i'm too busy protesting the patriarchy to deal with tampons right now.

Therefore there exists between Mistie and Lisa a contract of the mind as it were. They are kindred. It is obviously she who should deal with the tampon and the tampon remains a powerful symbol of Mental Hygiene, so we can request credit for the subject when we get there.

Take your problems to the Student Welfare Office. I won't have any bickering in my class.

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:38pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:35pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:31pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:29pm: You're not good at this Frodo. You never were. Too transparent.....and dumb. ;D ;D ;D you are the expert Lisa When it comes to recognizing the stench of an ex Yahoo multi troll such as yourself.....I am indeed THE EXPERT Frodo. yes Lisa ... You're an expert in stenches You're an expert in Trolling Your an expert in being transparent You're an expert in being dumb How can I argue with that?

You can't even read AND comprehend English sentences being typed at you.

So naturally...you are in no position to argue about anything.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:42pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:38pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:35pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:31pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:29pm: You're not good at this Frodo. You never were. Too transparent.....and dumb. ;D ;D ;D you are the expert Lisa When it comes to recognizing the stench of an ex Yahoo multi troll such as yourself.....I am indeed THE EXPERT Frodo. yes Lisa ... You're an expert in stenches You're an expert in Trolling Your an expert in being transparent You're an expert in being dumb How can I argue with that? You can't even read AND comprehend English sentences being typed at you. So naturally...you are in no position to argue about anything.

when it comes to the topics outlined above, I'm not even trying to argue with you Lisa ... I've already said you are the expert. What more do you want?

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:42pm:

Take your problems to the Student Welfare Office. I won't have any bickering in my class.

Oh but siiiir!

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:40pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:33pm: mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:28pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:27pm: Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:22pm: The "progressives" will have you believe ladies' sanitary bins are an oppressive tool of patriarchy, but they're the best things to hit the cleaning industry in years. A good hygiene professional can make more in a day emptying Pink Lady bins than any other form of bin. Why? We'll cover this in Bacterial Ontology next term, but it's something to aim for. Oh, for God's sake, this one's full. I'd like a volunteer, please. Preferably a female. You're in luck....Moth Eaten is your woman Karnal. Go for it! No he'd need a woman who thought more favourably of the thoughts of Schopenhauer on women. Hysterics, mainly. We'll cover this in Mental Hygiene I. We're doing ladies' sanitary products now. Focus. Again....you're in luck Karnal. Moth Eaten is the expert you're looking for when it comes to mental issues. She specializes in the area of permanent stalking and insanity lol. Lucky you!

Just think of it all in positive terms...you're giving that poor bugger Greg a well deserved break from her. :P

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:44pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:42pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:38pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:35pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:31pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:29pm: You're not good at this Frodo. You never were. Too transparent.....and dumb. ;D ;D ;D you are the expert Lisa When it comes to recognizing the stench of an ex Yahoo multi troll such as yourself.....I am indeed THE EXPERT Frodo. yes Lisa ... You're an expert in stenches You're an expert in Trolling Your an expert in being transparent You're an expert in being dumb How can I argue with that? You can't even read AND comprehend English sentences being typed at you. So naturally...you are in no position to argue about anything. when it comes to the topics outlined above, I'm not even trying to argue with you Lisa ... I've already said you are the expert. What more do you want?

In the words of awesome Aussie band Cold Chisel...

"You got nothing I want.

You got nothing I need."

It's amazing how many of your outlandish accusations are seconded by He Man Lisa.

Word for word.

I mean i would write it off as coincidence but the claims are just so silly that it's hard to believe one person came up with them, let alone 2.

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:42pm:

Take your problems to the Student Welfare Office. I won't have any bickering in my class.

It's a tad late for that.

As it so happens, I quite enjoy bickering with John Smith...irrespective of the id he logs in with.

It takes me back to our good old Yahoo days. :P

mothra wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:40pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:33pm: mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:28pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:27pm: Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:22pm: The "progressives" will have you believe ladies' sanitary bins are an oppressive tool of patriarchy, but they're the best things to hit the cleaning industry in years. A good hygiene professional can make more in a day emptying Pink Lady bins than any other form of bin. Why? We'll cover this in Bacterial Ontology next term, but it's something to aim for. Oh, for God's sake, this one's full. I'd like a volunteer, please. Preferably a female. You're in luck....Mother Eaten is your woman Karnal. Go for it! No he'd need a woman who thought more favourably of the thoughts of Schopenhauer on women. Hysterics, mainly. We'll cover this in Mental Hygiene I. We're doing ladies' sanitary products now. Focus. No no it ties in! Women are, according to Schopenhauer who is no doubt a favourite of Mistie's, enemies. By nature. Lisa is a strong adherent to this philosophy whereas i like other women very much. So much so i'm too busy protesting the patriarchy to deal with tampons right now. Therefore there exists between Mistie and Lisa a contract of the mind as it were. They are kindred. It is obviously she who should deal with the tampon and the tampon remains a powerful symbol of Mental Hygiene, so we can request credit for the subject when we get there.

You can take that up with the faculty office. We're currently dealing with the disposal of female sanitary products, a subject that will be covered in the exam. We're quite egalitarian when it comes to marking exam papers, ladies. 

Females will have to apply themselves just like everyone else. I won't be giving any leeway for victimhood. If you want that, you'll have to go to the Faculty of Arts.

---

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:55pm:

You can take that up with the faculty office. We're currently dealing with the disposal of female sanitary products, a subject that will be covered in the exam. We're quite egalitarian when it comes to marking exam papers, ladies.  Females will have to apply themselves just like everyone else. I won't be giving any leeway for victimhood. If you want that, you'll have to go to the Faculty of Arts.

But, but, but, that's Mistie's job!

mothra wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:44pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:42pm: Take your problems to the Student Welfare Office. I won't have any bickering in my class. Oh but siiiir!

Enough. When lifting, ladies, remember to bend your knees. That will definitely be in the exam. We take Workplace Health & Safety very seriously indeed.

---

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:54pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:42pm: Take your problems to the Student Welfare Office. I won't have any bickering in my class. It's a tad late for that. As it so happens, I quite enjoy bickering with John Smith...irrespective of the id he logs in with. It takes me back to our good old Yahoo days. :P

You - where's your yellow safety sign? See me after class.

mothra wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:44pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:42pm: Take your problems to the Student Welfare Office. I won't have any bickering in my class. Oh but siiiir!

And don't "sir" me. I'm a Health and Hygiene professional.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:54pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:42pm: Take your problems to the Student Welfare Office. I won't have any bickering in my class. It's a tad late for that. As it so happens, I quite enjoy bickering with John Smith...irrespective of the id he logs in with. It takes me back to our good old Yahoo days. :P

you need to stop listening to those voices in your head, the only ID's I've ever used are John Smith or Johnsmith. Only someone wit the IQ of a 10 yr old would think changing id's on an anonymous internet forum might be clever (Hi Misty)

Hi Fordy *waves*

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:20pm:

Hi Fordy *waves*

Did you know he's a big fella.....all 5ft 6 of him  ;D

A mop is a tool of the trade. Remember, there are no bad tools, only bad hygiene specialists.

---

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:38pm:

He Man wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 9:20pm: Hi Fordy *waves* Did you know he's a big fella.....all 5ft 6 of him  ;D

Sounds huge ;D

Prolly needs a few id's to go with that one. ;D

mothra wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:17pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:11pm: mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:06pm: Mistie is Culture Warrior, and a few others besides. Postmodern Trendoid is one i think. that'll give her paranoia a work out  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D It won't matter to her that he's a multi-sock. She agrees with him. He's a righty.

There's no rule against changing your name with the same account.

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 1^st, 2015 at 6:23am:

mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:17pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:11pm: mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:06pm: Mistie is Culture Warrior, and a few others besides. Postmodern Trendoid is one i think. that'll give her paranoia a work out  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D It won't matter to her that he's a multi-sock. She agrees with him. He's a righty. There's no rule against changing your name with the same account.

In the mind of the chronically insane....it is.

Just ignore IT.

The rest of us do lol  ;D

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 10:02pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 9:38pm: He Man wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 9:20pm: Hi Fordy *waves* Did you know he's a big fella.....all 5ft 6 of him  ;D Sounds huge ;D Prolly needs a few id's to go with that one. ;D

Yep.

Also note the number of posts per each nic he uses.

That alone tells the sad and sorry Yahoo rerun/story......

Wakey, wakey Lisa, the Janitor's looking for you to sort out the sanitary bin.

http://www.hotghettomess.com/wp-content/uploads/white-hot-tampon-in-mouth.jpg

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:40pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:33pm: mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:28pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:27pm: Melanias purse wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:22pm: The "progressives" will have you believe ladies' sanitary bins are an oppressive tool of patriarchy, but they're the best things to hit the cleaning industry in years. A good hygiene professional can make more in a day emptying Pink Lady bins than any other form of bin. Why? We'll cover this in Bacterial Ontology next term, but it's something to aim for. Oh, for God's sake, this one's full. I'd like a volunteer, please. Preferably a female. You're in luck....Moth Eaten is your woman Karnal. Go for it! No he'd need a woman who thought more favourably of the thoughts of Schopenhauer on women. Hysterics, mainly. We'll cover this in Mental Hygiene I. We're doing ladies' sanitary products now. Focus. Again....you're in luck Karnal. Moth Eaten is the expert you're looking for when it comes to mental issues. She specializes in the area of permanent stalking and insanity lol. Lucky you!

Back to the topic....

I'm sick of cleaning the footprints off the toilet bowl. Why do progressives squat?

http://journalistontherun.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/pedestal-squat-toilet.jpg

:-[quote author=pansi1951 link=1446277485/71#71 date=1446331082]I'm sick of cleaning the footprints off the toilet bowl. Why do progressives squat?

http://journalistontherun.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/pedestal-squat-toilet.jpg[/quote]

Good point. This is the custom of the weaker Asian races and their inferior culture, but yes, "progressives" often do this just to make things difficult.

There should be a penalty for misuse of student amenities.

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 1^st, 2015 at 6:44am:

Wakey, wakey Lisa, the Janitor's looking for you to sort out the sanitary bin. http://www.hotghettomess.com/wp-content/uploads/white-hot-tampon-in-mouth.jpg

Never dispose of female sanitary products in the wrong bin.

That will be in the exam.

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 1^st, 2015 at 6:23am:

mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:17pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:11pm: mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:06pm: Mistie is Culture Warrior, and a few others besides. Postmodern Trendoid is one i think. that'll give her paranoia a work out  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D It won't matter to her that he's a multi-sock. She agrees with him. He's a righty. There's no rule against changing your name with the same account.

No there is no rule.

It's just that the only reason to do it is to give the impression that somebody else agrees with you.

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 1^st, 2015 at 8:38am:

I'm sick of cleaning the footprints off the toilet bowl. Why do progressives squat? http://journalistontherun.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/pedestal-squat-toilet.jpg

We used to call that to 'kangaroo the dyke.'  There were some dunnies I would not want the cheeks of my arse on, let's me tells ya!

You should frequent better establishments.

mothra wrote on Nov 1^st, 2015 at 5:17pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 1st, 2015 at 6:23am: mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:17pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:11pm: mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:06pm: Mistie is Culture Warrior, and a few others besides. Postmodern Trendoid is one i think. that'll give her paranoia a work out  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D It won't matter to her that he's a multi-sock. She agrees with him. He's a righty. There's no rule against changing your name with the same account. No there is no rule. It's just that the only reason to do it is to give the impression that somebody else agrees with you.

How the hell did you come to that conclusion?

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 1^st, 2015 at 7:36pm:

mothra wrote on Nov 1st, 2015 at 5:17pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 1st, 2015 at 6:23am: mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:17pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:11pm: mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:06pm: Mistie is Culture Warrior, and a few others besides. Postmodern Trendoid is one i think. that'll give her paranoia a work out  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D It won't matter to her that he's a multi-sock. She agrees with him. He's a righty. There's no rule against changing your name with the same account. No there is no rule. It's just that the only reason to do it is to give the impression that somebody else agrees with you. How the hell did you come to that conclusion?

What other reason is there?

mothra wrote on Nov 1^st, 2015 at 7:44pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 1st, 2015 at 7:36pm: mothra wrote on Nov 1st, 2015 at 5:17pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 1st, 2015 at 6:23am: mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:17pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:11pm: mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:06pm: Mistie is Culture Warrior, and a few others besides. Postmodern Trendoid is one i think. that'll give her paranoia a work out  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D It won't matter to her that he's a multi-sock. She agrees with him. He's a righty. There's no rule against changing your name with the same account. No there is no rule. It's just that the only reason to do it is to give the impression that somebody else agrees with you. How the hell did you come to that conclusion? What other reason is there?

Lol grandmas paranoia knows no bounds she was babbling on about longy posting the other day.

Aussie wrote on Nov 1^st, 2015 at 5:26pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 1st, 2015 at 8:38am: I'm sick of cleaning the footprints off the toilet bowl. Why do progressives squat? http://journalistontherun.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/pedestal-squat-toilet.jpg We used to call that to 'kangaroo the dyke.'  There were some dunnies I would not want the cheeks of my arse on, let's me tells ya!

A clean lavatory is the sign of a clean society.

Open your books to chapter 10.

But sir there is only one book on our desks it is that quran book again are we doing fictional studies again sir ?

Aussie wrote on Nov 1^st, 2015 at 5:26pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 1st, 2015 at 8:38am: I'm sick of cleaning the footprints off the toilet bowl. Why do progressives squat? http://journalistontherun.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/pedestal-squat-toilet.jpg We used to call that to 'kangaroo the dyke.'  There were some dunnies I would not want the cheeks of my arse on, let's me tells ya!

I wouldn't leave home without them.

Toilet seat covers.....$2 pack of 10.

http://www.mikethebagman.com/toilet_seat_cover_1.jpg

He Man wrote on Nov 1^st, 2015 at 11:51pm:

But sir there is only one book on our desks it is that quran book again are we doing fictional studies again sir ?

FAIL!

Misty didn't say that.

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 6:26am:

He Man wrote on Nov 1st, 2015 at 11:51pm: But sir there is only one book on our desks it is that quran book again are we doing fictional studies again sir ? FAIL! Misty didn't say that.

There are no right or wrong answers here.

Just right and left answers.

---

Don't you think your mistie obsession is careering a little out of control.

He Man wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 1:08pm:

Don't you think your mistie obsession is careering a little out of control.

Put your hand up if you've got a question. We won't have any nonsense here.

Boring.....

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 1^st, 2015 at 7:36pm:

mothra wrote on Nov 1st, 2015 at 5:17pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 1st, 2015 at 6:23am: mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:17pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:11pm: mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:06pm: Mistie is Culture Warrior, and a few others besides. Postmodern Trendoid is one i think. that'll give her paranoia a work out  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D It won't matter to her that he's a multi-sock. She agrees with him. He's a righty. There's no rule against changing your name with the same account. No there is no rule. It's just that the only reason to do it is to give the impression that somebody else agrees with you. How the hell did you come to that conclusion?

Alcohol, meds, pills,  dope you name it.

He Man wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 1:08pm:

Don't you think your mistie obsession is careering a little out of control.

i  think there is a lot of freudian stuff going on with the lefties attack on mistie.

their main problem is that mistie is very intelligent and  fairly unflappable.

he tends not to get emotional .

this is a good rightard value.

its hard to be logical when you are always ruled by your emotional brain.

when training a horse, you have to realise they have a very big reactive (emotional) brain and  quite small logical brain.

so they tend to display aggression, fear, anxiety, fight or flight very readily and you have to "dumb down" the lesson to teach them anything.

and you have to get them in logic mode by being totally unemotional.

if we look at lefties as a social group, we see this same over developed emotional reactive brain.
so lefties are ruled by anger, fear, anxiety , fight or flight.

mistie may well be able to teach them some lessons but it would require him to have them, one on one in a closed environment ( i use a round yard) and to just keep repeating the lesson over and over.

like emotional horses , they have short attention spans and a great deal of difficulty "thinking",  they tend to just "react"

mistie does a good job trying with the lessons but it will never work over the internet. its a stimulus rich environment and they cant concentrate.

the other thing that is absolutely vital when teaching horses or lefties is that you MUST remove all other horses or lefties from the environment or they wont concentrate and they will focus on their herd and not on you.


the forum shows this over and over again.  the lefties posting and being distracted by other lefties which just ruins the learning experience.

Thanks Aqua for that comprehensive post it clears up so many things and answers a lot of questions with that clear precise illustration.

aquascoot wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 1:47pm:

He Man wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 1:08pm: Don't you think your mistie obsession is careering a little out of control. i  think there is a lot of freudian stuff going on with the lefties attack on mistie. their main problem is that mistie is very intelligent and  fairly unflappable. he tends not to get emotional . this is a good rightard value. its hard to be logical when you are always ruled by your emotional brain. when training a horse, you have to realise they have a very big reactive (emotional) brain and  quite small logical brain. so they tend to display aggression, fear, anxiety, fight or flight very readily and you have to "dumb down" the lesson to teach them anything. and you have to get them in logic mode by being totally unemotional. if we look at lefties as a social group, we see this same over developed emotional reactive brain. so lefties are ruled by anger, fear, anxiety , fight or flight. mistie may well be able to teach them some lessons but it would require him to have them, one on one in a closed environment ( i use a round yard) and to just keep repeating the lesson over and over. like emotional horses , they have short attention spans and a great deal of difficulty "thinking",  they tend to just "react" mistie does a good job trying with the lessons but it will never work over the internet. its a stimulus rich environment and they cant concentrate. the other thing that is absolutely vital when teaching horses or lefties is that you MUST remove all other horses or lefties from the environment or they wont concentrate and they will focus on their herd and not on you. the forum shows this over and over again.  the lefties posting and being distracted by other lefties which just ruins the learning experience.

Bwahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!

...............the learning experience  :)

He Man wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 2:15pm:

Thanks Aqua for that comprehensive post it clears up so many things and answers a lot of questions with that clear precise illustration.

That reminds me so much of someone.  Just can't quite get it off the tips of me typing fingers.

Aussie wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 2:22pm:

He Man wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 2:15pm: Thanks Aqua for that comprehensive post it clears up so many things and answers a lot of questions with that clear precise illustration. That reminds me so much of someone.  Just can't quite get it off the tips of me typing fingers.

Wash your fingers after going to the loo next time.

Most young horses are like lefties

skatty, pretty useless at doing a task, like to eat grass and run away when you try to catch them to do some work.

But as we get older (humans and horses) we usually develop.

As we develop , we become more rightard in our thinking.
We enjoy a challenge, we enjoy using our brain.
We dont run  away from hard work, we embrace a challenge.

Sure, the rightard way isnt the easy way, but it is the noble way.

Nothing brings more delight then a horse that acts like a true willing partner and wants to learn.
And these older, smarter horses ...when you put them in the paddock with the young skatty fizzy looney young horses...you can almost feel their contempt for these untrained fools they have to share resources with  ;) ;) ;) ;)

aquascoot wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 1:47pm:

He Man wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 1:08pm: Don't you think your mistie obsession is careering a little out of control. i  think there is a lot of freudian stuff going on with the lefties attack on mistie. their main problem is that mistie is very intelligent and  fairly unflappable. he tends not to get emotional . this is a good rightard value. its hard to be logical when you are always ruled by your emotional brain. when training a horse, you have to realise they have a very big reactive (emotional) brain and  quite small logical brain. so they tend to display aggression, fear, anxiety, fight or flight very readily and you have to "dumb down" the lesson to teach them anything. and you have to get them in logic mode by being totally unemotional. if we look at lefties as a social group, we see this same over developed emotional reactive brain. so lefties are ruled by anger, fear, anxiety , fight or flight. mistie may well be able to teach them some lessons but it would require him to have them, one on one in a closed environment ( i use a round yard) and to just keep repeating the lesson over and over. like emotional horses , they have short attention spans and a great deal of difficulty "thinking",  they tend to just "react" mistie does a good job trying with the lessons but it will never work over the internet. its a stimulus rich environment and they cant concentrate. the other thing that is absolutely vital when teaching horses or lefties is that you MUST remove all other horses or lefties from the environment or they wont concentrate and they will focus on their herd and not on you. the forum shows this over and over again.  the lefties posting and being distracted by other lefties which just ruins the learning experience.

Full marks. Good work.

You'll be a HACCAP accredited health & hygiene specialist in no time.

aquascoot wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 2:31pm:

And these older, smarter horses ...when you put them in the paddock with the young skatty fizzy looney young horses...you can almost feel their contempt for these untrained fools they have to share resources with  ;) ;) ;) ;)

http://www.netanimations.net/Animated_minuteman_on_horseback.gif

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 3:00pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 2:31pm: And these older, smarter horses ...when you put them in the paddock with the young skatty fizzy looney young horses...you can almost feel their contempt for these untrained fools they have to share resources with  ;) ;) ;) ;) http://www.netanimations.net/Animated_minuteman_on_horseback.gif

Most smart people, as they age, become socially liberal (ie  they support gay marriage and like hard working migrants) and they become fiscally conservative (they like governments to reduce taxes and they embrace free enterprise).

anyone who is over 35 and doesnt embrace free enterprise.
I'm telling you.
They have

Messed Up  ;)

aquascoot wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 3:05pm:

They have Messed Up  ;)

A good sanitation professional sees mess as a challenge.

Where there was mess, there shall HACCAP-approved health & hygiene practices be.

---

aquascoot wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 1:47pm:

he tends not to get emotional .

hence the 3 or 4 socks :D :D :D

John Smith wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 3:15pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 1:47pm: he tends not to get emotional . hence the 3 or 4 socks :D :D :D

Giddy up John ;D

He Man wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 3:45pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 3:15pm: aquascoot wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 1:47pm: he tends not to get emotional . hence the 3 or 4 socks :D :D :D Giddy up John ;D

I didn't know you offered donkey rides ....

John Smith wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 4:44pm:

He Man wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 3:45pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 3:15pm: aquascoot wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 1:47pm: he tends not to get emotional . hence the 3 or 4 socks :D :D :D Giddy up John ;D I didn't know you offered donkey rides ....

Sure I do, step right up folks to ride John Smith, 5 bucks a lap 3 for 12.

mothra wrote on Nov 1^st, 2015 at 7:44pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 1st, 2015 at 7:36pm: mothra wrote on Nov 1st, 2015 at 5:17pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 1st, 2015 at 6:23am: mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:17pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:11pm: mothra wrote on Oct 31st, 2015 at 8:06pm: Mistie is Culture Warrior, and a few others besides. Postmodern Trendoid is one i think. that'll give her paranoia a work out  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D It won't matter to her that he's a multi-sock. She agrees with him. He's a righty. There's no rule against changing your name with the same account. No there is no rule. It's just that the only reason to do it is to give the impression that somebody else agrees with you. How the hell did you come to that conclusion? What other reason is there?

So let me get this straight. The only reason why people change their names is the one and only explanation that you can come up with? Genius!

John Smith wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 3:15pm:

aquascoot wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 1:47pm: he tends not to get emotional . hence the 3 or 4 socks :D :D :D

Name them.

He Man wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 5:05pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 4:44pm: He Man wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 3:45pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 3:15pm: aquascoot wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 1:47pm: he tends not to get emotional . hence the 3 or 4 socks :D :D :D Giddy up John ;D I didn't know you offered donkey rides .... Sure I do, step right up folks to ride John Smith, 5 bucks a lap 3 for 12.

John is a tad leftard.


emotional, a bit anxious, lacks the confidence of the true rightard, temperamental, can anger easily

i wouldnt ride him as he has spent too much time in the paddock with the other lefties and they all tend to get a bit silly.

get a reliable rightard if you want a safe, confident, relaxed and comfortable ride.

John Howard should really stand at stud and we could send all the leftard women to him and we may be able to breed the "bad attitude" out of them.
Standing alongside him at stud would be Pete Costello and Peter Reith.
We tried an imported stallion T Abbott at stud but he was a flop  ;)

Just who the hell is Mistie?

Didn't the English try to breed the Scot out of the Scots in Braveheart?

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 5:24pm:

Just who the hell is Mistie? Didn't the English try to breed the Scot out of the Scots in Braveheart?

excellent idea.  the rule of "first night"
all left voting women should have to spend their first night with John or Peter

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 5:11pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 3:15pm: aquascoot wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 1:47pm: he tends not to get emotional . hence the 3 or 4 socks :D :D :D Name them.

You've forgotten them all already?

Mistie, culture warrior, postmodern trendoid and I left one spare because I can't keep track of all the socks on here.  :D :D :D

He Man wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 5:05pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 4:44pm: He Man wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 3:45pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 3:15pm: aquascoot wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 1:47pm: he tends not to get emotional . hence the 3 or 4 socks :D :D :D Giddy up John ;D I didn't know you offered donkey rides .... Sure I do, step right up folks to ride John Smith, 5 bucks a lap 3 for 12.

no prizes for second dopey  :D :D :D

John Smith wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 5:55pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 5:11pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 3:15pm: aquascoot wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 1:47pm: he tends not to get emotional . hence the 3 or 4 socks :D :D :D Name them. You've forgotten them all already? Mistie, culture warrior, postmodern trendoid and I left one spare because I can't keep track of all the socks on here.  :D :D :D

They're not socks if they're on the same account.

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 6:00pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 5:55pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 5:11pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 3:15pm: aquascoot wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 1:47pm: he tends not to get emotional . hence the 3 or 4 socks :D :D :D Name them. You've forgotten them all already? Mistie, culture warrior, postmodern trendoid and I left one spare because I can't keep track of all the socks on here.  :D :D :D They're not socks if they're on the same account.

you tell yourself that ... they're socks if you're pretending to be someone else

Quote:

you tell yourself that ... they're socks if you're pretending to be someone else

There is no hand grenade in this question.....take it quite literally.......what is the problem with pretending to be some other poster?

My writings are always my own. Who else's would they be?

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 6:05pm:

My writings are always my own. Who else's would they be?

no poo sherlock, even longie pretending to be Mria is still longie

however .... while I, as a long term poster on this forum, know your other names many have no idea and think that each of the characters are different people.

Quote:

......many have no idea and think that each of the characters are different people.

Precisely.  That is why you ought ask 'He Man' who s/he really is.

John Smith wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 6:08pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:05pm: My writings are always my own. Who else's would they be? no poo sherlock, even longie pretending to be Mria is still longie however .... while I, as a long term poster on this forum, know your other names many have no idea and think that each of the characters are different people.

So they're not socks. I am glad this has been cleared up.
Have you ever seen me deny the former names?

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 6:17pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:08pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:05pm: My writings are always my own. Who else's would they be? no poo sherlock, even longie pretending to be Mria is still longie however .... while I, as a long term poster on this forum, know your other names many have no idea and think that each of the characters are different people. So they're not socks. I am glad this has been cleared up. Have you ever seen me deny the former names?

No.....but you have not made a clear disclosure either.

John Smith wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 6:08pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:05pm: My writings are always my own. Who else's would they be? no poo sherlock, even longie pretending to be Mria is still longie however .... while I, as a long term poster on this forum, know your other names many have no idea and think that each of the characters are different people.

What kind of stupidity is this?

When someone changes their name, all former posts as well as all quotes change to the new name. Any new people would only see the current name, and if they looked at old posts, they would still only see the current name even for posts made years ago under a former name. There is nothing for them to get confused over as the member name is linked to one member account.

Also, as the name changes for all posts at the same time, it is impossible for someone to agree with themselves just by changing their name. That is what the whole sock issue allows to do as some members have multiple accounts for that reason.

It would have been much easier to admit your sock accusation was wrong then to come up with BS about new members getting confused.

Aussie wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 6:18pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:17pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:08pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:05pm: My writings are always my own. Who else's would they be? no poo sherlock, even longie pretending to be Mria is still longie however .... while I, as a long term poster on this forum, know your other names many have no idea and think that each of the characters are different people. So they're not socks. I am glad this has been cleared up. Have you ever seen me deny the former names? No.....but you have not made a clear disclosure either.

I'll do what I like within the rules of the forum, thank you.

Quantum wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 6:19pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:08pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:05pm: My writings are always my own. Who else's would they be? no poo sherlock, even longie pretending to be Mria is still longie however .... while I, as a long term poster on this forum, know your other names many have no idea and think that each of the characters are different people. What kind of stupidity is this? When someone changes their name, all former posts as well as all quotes change to the new name. Any new people would only see the current name, and if they looked at old posts, they would still only see the current name even for posts made years ago under a former name. There is nothing for them to get confused over as the member name is linked to one member account. Also, as the name changes for all posts at the same time, it is impossible for someone to agree with themselves just by changing their name. That is what the whole sock issue allows to do as some members have multiple accounts for that reason. It would have been much easier to admit your sock accusation was wrong then to come up with BS about new members getting confused.

Yes. I was going to mention that but it seemed so obvious that I thought even fools like John Smith and Aussie could have worked it out. I was wrong, it seems.

Quote:

I'll do what I like within the rules of the forum, thank you.

Sure, and I have no problem with that, but if you observe confusion as to your ID (as happened in this Thread,) you could have disclosed when it happened.

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 6:17pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:08pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:05pm: My writings are always my own. Who else's would they be? no poo sherlock, even longie pretending to be Mria is still longie however .... while I, as a long term poster on this forum, know your other names many have no idea and think that each of the characters are different people. So they're not socks. I am glad this has been cleared up. Have you ever seen me deny the former names?

I disagree, they're still socks ...it's irrelevant whether you deny anything or not

Nah they are not socks. Stop being a drama queen.

Rip up your text books and throw away your calculators. If John thinks 2+2=5 then the entire universe must be wrong!

John Smith wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 6:56pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:17pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:08pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:05pm: My writings are always my own. Who else's would they be? no poo sherlock, even longie pretending to be Mria is still longie however .... while I, as a long term poster on this forum, know your other names many have no idea and think that each of the characters are different people. So they're not socks. I am glad this has been cleared up. Have you ever seen me deny the former names? I disagree, they're still socks ...it's irrelevant whether you deny anything or not

I thought socks were separate accounts held by the same member and used to appear to be a different user.  Changing names doesn't fit that.

I sense a purge coming on this forum....... especially among those who serially insult others and 'flame' and spam the forum up with personal insult and vilification.

I'll drink to that!

He Man wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 7:05pm:

Nah they are not socks. Stop being a drama queen.

I leave the drama queening to you .... tell me, what was your moniker before Lisa He man

Quantum wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 7:09pm:

Rip up your text books and throw away your calculators. If John thinks 2+2=5 then the entire universe must be wrong!

perhaps you should check your batteries

A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The term, a reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from a sock, originally referred to a false identity assumed by a member of an Internet community who spoke to, or about, themselves while pretending to be another person.[1] The term now includes other misleading uses of online identities, such as those created to praise, defend or support a person or organization,[2] or to circumvent a suspension or ban from a website. A significant difference between the use of a pseudonym[3] and the creation of a sockpuppet is that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated with the puppeteer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29


it says nothing about separate accounts :D :D

John Smith wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 7:39pm:

He Man wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:05pm: Nah they are not socks. Stop being a drama queen. I leave the drama queening to you .... tell me, what was your moniker before Lisa He man

John Smith

He Man wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 7:41pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:39pm: He Man wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:05pm: Nah they are not socks. Stop being a drama queen. I leave the drama queening to you .... tell me, what was your moniker before Lisa He man John Smith

you couldn't pull it off ..... John smith has common sense, a trait you are obviously missing

John Smith wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 7:41pm:

Quantum wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:09pm: Rip up your text books and throw away your calculators. If John thinks 2+2=5 then the entire universe must be wrong! perhaps you should check your batteries A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The term, a reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from a sock, originally referred to a false identity assumed by a member of an Internet community who spoke to, or about, themselves while pretending to be another person.[1] The term now includes other misleading uses of online identities, such as those created to praise, defend or support a person or organization,[2] or to circumvent a suspension or ban from a website. A significant difference between the use of a pseudonym[3] and the creation of a sockpuppet is that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated with the puppeteer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29 it says nothing about separate accounts :D :D

Bit behind the times aren't you muppet. ;D

He Man wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 7:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:41pm: Quantum wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:09pm: Rip up your text books and throw away your calculators. If John thinks 2+2=5 then the entire universe must be wrong! perhaps you should check your batteries A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The term, a reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from a sock, originally referred to a false identity assumed by a member of an Internet community who spoke to, or about, themselves while pretending to be another person.[1] The term now includes other misleading uses of online identities, such as those created to praise, defend or support a person or organization,[2] or to circumvent a suspension or ban from a website. A significant difference between the use of a pseudonym[3] and the creation of a sockpuppet is that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated with the puppeteer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29 it says nothing about separate accounts :D :D Bit behind the times aren't you muppet. ;D

and still way ahead of you!

John Smith wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 7:45pm:

He Man wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:43pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:41pm: Quantum wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:09pm: Rip up your text books and throw away your calculators. If John thinks 2+2=5 then the entire universe must be wrong! perhaps you should check your batteries A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The term, a reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from a sock, originally referred to a false identity assumed by a member of an Internet community who spoke to, or about, themselves while pretending to be another person.[1] The term now includes other misleading uses of online identities, such as those created to praise, defend or support a person or organization,[2] or to circumvent a suspension or ban from a website. A significant difference between the use of a pseudonym[3] and the creation of a sockpuppet is that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated with the puppeteer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29 it says nothing about separate accounts :D :D Bit behind the times aren't you muppet. ;D and still way ahead of you!

You might like to turn around and face the way you are actually traveling instead of going backwards old boy.

Just tip.

John Smith wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 7:42pm:

He Man wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:41pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:39pm: He Man wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:05pm: Nah they are not socks. Stop being a drama queen. I leave the drama queening to you .... tell me, what was your moniker before Lisa He man John Smith you couldn't pull it off ..... John smith has common sense, a trait you are obviously missing

I have no intentions of pulling off John Smith, only John Smith can pull himself off. Yes that is a trait I am obviously missing.

Sorry bud.

He Man wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 7:57pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:45pm: He Man wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:43pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:41pm: Quantum wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:09pm: Rip up your text books and throw away your calculators. If John thinks 2+2=5 then the entire universe must be wrong! perhaps you should check your batteries A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The term, a reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from a sock, originally referred to a false identity assumed by a member of an Internet community who spoke to, or about, themselves while pretending to be another person.[1] The term now includes other misleading uses of online identities, such as those created to praise, defend or support a person or organization,[2] or to circumvent a suspension or ban from a website. A significant difference between the use of a pseudonym[3] and the creation of a sockpuppet is that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated with the puppeteer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29 it says nothing about separate accounts :D :D Bit behind the times aren't you muppet. ;D and still way ahead of you! You might like to turn around and face the way you are actually traveling instead of going backwards old boy. Just tip.

you just keep following old girl .... I'll worry about the navigating

John Smith wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 7:41pm:

Quantum wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:09pm: Rip up your text books and throw away your calculators. If John thinks 2+2=5 then the entire universe must be wrong! perhaps you should check your batteries A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The term, a reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from a sock, originally referred to a false identity assumed by a member of an Internet community who spoke to, or about, themselves while pretending to be another person.[1] The term now includes other misleading uses of online identities, such as those created to praise, defend or support a person or organization,[2] or to circumvent a suspension or ban from a website. A significant difference between the use of a pseudonym[3] and the creation of a sockpuppet is that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated with the puppeteer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29 it says nothing about separate accounts :D :D

Again, it would just be easier to admit you are wrong instead of going out of your way to prove it.

By your own quote, a sockpuppet is...

"a false identity assumed by a member of an Internet community who spoke to, or about, themselves while pretending to be another person."

"created to praise, defend or support a person or organization"

"To circumvent a suspension or ban from a website."

These require seperate accounts. Changing the name won't get past a ban, nor will it allow you to speak to yourself like you are a different person. Even the last part should have made it clear how totally and utterly smacking wrong you are;

"A significant difference between the use of a pseudonym and the creation of a sockpuppet is that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated with the puppeteer."

When "Morning mist" starts posting and agreeing with "cultural warrior" like they are two seperate people, then accuse him of using socks. Until then, grow a pair and admit you are wrong.

He Man wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 8:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:42pm: He Man wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:41pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:39pm: He Man wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:05pm: Nah they are not socks. Stop being a drama queen. I leave the drama queening to you .... tell me, what was your moniker before Lisa He man John Smith you couldn't pull it off ..... John smith has common sense, a trait you are obviously missing I have no intentions of pulling off John Smith, only John Smith can pull himself off. Yes that is a trait I am obviously missing. Sorry bud.

so why claim your moniker was John Smith :D :D :D

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 6:35pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:18pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:17pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:08pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:05pm: My writings are always my own. Who else's would they be? no poo sherlock, even longie pretending to be Mria is still longie however .... while I, as a long term poster on this forum, know your other names many have no idea and think that each of the characters are different people. So they're not socks. I am glad this has been cleared up. Have you ever seen me deny the former names? No.....but you have not made a clear disclosure either. I'll do what I like within the rules of the forum, thank you.

We advise a sanitary cover for the seat.

It’s for your own protection.

Melanias purse wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 9:57pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:35pm: Aussie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:18pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:17pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:08pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:05pm: My writings are always my own. Who else's would they be? no poo sherlock, even longie pretending to be Mria is still longie however .... while I, as a long term poster on this forum, know your other names many have no idea and think that each of the characters are different people. So they're not socks. I am glad this has been cleared up. Have you ever seen me deny the former names? No.....but you have not made a clear disclosure either. I'll do what I like within the rules of the forum, thank you. We advise a sanitary cover for the seat. It’s for your own protection.

Why do muslims make disclosures on the toilet seat.

Not everyone is muslim. ::)

A clean workplace is a safe workplace.

---

Quantum wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 8:04pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:41pm: Quantum wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:09pm: Rip up your text books and throw away your calculators. If John thinks 2+2=5 then the entire universe must be wrong! perhaps you should check your batteries A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The term, a reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from a sock, originally referred to a false identity assumed by a member of an Internet community who spoke to, or about, themselves while pretending to be another person.[1] The term now includes other misleading uses of online identities, such as those created to praise, defend or support a person or organization,[2] or to circumvent a suspension or ban from a website. A significant difference between the use of a pseudonym[3] and the creation of a sockpuppet is that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated with the puppeteer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29 it says nothing about separate accounts :D :D Again, it would just be easier to admit you are wrong instead of going out of your way to prove it. By your own quote, a sockpuppet is... "a false identity assumed by a member of an Internet community who spoke to, or about, themselves while pretending to be another person." irrelevant "created to praise, defend or support a person or organization" bingo "To circumvent a suspension or ban from a website."irrelevant These require seperate accounts. why? because you say so? no they don't ... Changing the name won't get past a ban, nor will it allow you to speak to yourself like you are a different person. you ever read postmodern trendoids posts? Even the last part should have made it clear how totally and utterly smacking wrong you are; "A significant difference between the use of a pseudonym and the creation of a sockpuppet is that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated with the puppeteer." When "Morning mist" starts posting and agreeing with "cultural warrior" like they are two seperate people, then accuse him of using socks. Until then, grow a pair and admit you are wrong.

good of you to leave out 'postmodern trendoid' ... otherwise you'd make yourself look silly again :D :D :D

"Progressives."

---

John Smith wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 10:49am:

Quantum wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 8:04pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:41pm: Quantum wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 7:09pm: Rip up your text books and throw away your calculators. If John thinks 2+2=5 then the entire universe must be wrong! perhaps you should check your batteries A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The term, a reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from a sock, originally referred to a false identity assumed by a member of an Internet community who spoke to, or about, themselves while pretending to be another person.[1] The term now includes other misleading uses of online identities, such as those created to praise, defend or support a person or organization,[2] or to circumvent a suspension or ban from a website. A significant difference between the use of a pseudonym[3] and the creation of a sockpuppet is that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated with the puppeteer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29 it says nothing about separate accounts :D :D Again, it would just be easier to admit you are wrong instead of going out of your way to prove it. By your own quote, a sockpuppet is... "a false identity assumed by a member of an Internet community who spoke to, or about, themselves while pretending to be another person." irrelevant "created to praise, defend or support a person or organization" bingo "To circumvent a suspension or ban from a website."irrelevant These require seperate accounts. why? because you say so? no they don't ... Changing the name won't get past a ban, nor will it allow you to speak to yourself like you are a different person. you ever read postmodern trendoids posts? Even the last part should have made it clear how totally and utterly smacking wrong you are; "A significant difference between the use of a pseudonym and the creation of a sockpuppet is that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated with the puppeteer." When "Morning mist" starts posting and agreeing with "cultural warrior" like they are two seperate people, then accuse him of using socks. Until then, grow a pair and admit you are wrong. good of you to leave out 'postmodern trendoid' ... otherwise you'd make yourself look silly again :D :D :D

A sock account is when one person has multiple accounts. This is again you doing nothing more than claiming that 2+2=5 because you have an agenda. Even your own quote proves you wrong and you are either to weak or dumb to admit it.

I guess in your twisted mind every member on this forum who changed their name to "sir" or "dame" was guilty of using a sock account.

rubbish ... adding sir or dame is not pretending to be someone else ... postmodern trendoid is.

get a grip and move on. You're making yourself look dumber than usual

Never mix your cleaning products.

If the "progressives" in charge of immigration thought the same way, we'd all be better off.

We'll cover this in Biological Hygiene I.

---

John Smith wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 12:16pm:

rubbish ... adding sir or dame is not pretending to be someone else ... postmodern trendoid is. get a grip and move on. You're making yourself look dumber than usual

Take your own advice. Claiming that a name change of the same account is having socks is BS.

You are 100% wrong, so stop being a gutless wonder trying to save face.

Quantum wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 2:37pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 12:16pm: rubbish ... adding sir or dame is not pretending to be someone else ... postmodern trendoid is. get a grip and move on. You're making yourself look dumber than usual Take your own advice. Claiming that a name change of the same account is having socks is BS. You are 100% wrong, so stop being a gutless wonder trying to save face.

Quantum

1. Hello

2. You're 100% correct.

3. Ignore John Smith.  He has many multis on this forum. He did the same for many yrs on Yahoo too.

4. Have an awesome day  :)

Quantum wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 6:19pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:08pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 6:05pm: My writings are always my own. Who else's would they be? no poo sherlock, even longie pretending to be Mria is still longie however .... while I, as a long term poster on this forum, know your other names many have no idea and think that each of the characters are different people. What kind of stupidity is this? When someone changes their name, all former posts as well as all quotes change to the new name. Any new people would only see the current name, and if they looked at old posts, they would still only see the current name even for posts made years ago under a former name. There is nothing for them to get confused over as the member name is linked to one member account. Also, as the name changes for all posts at the same time, it is impossible for someone to agree with themselves just by changing their name. That is what the whole sock issue allows to do as some members have multiple accounts for that reason. It would have been much easier to admit your sock accusation was wrong then to come up with BS about new members getting confused.

Hello again Qantum ....refer to my previous post.

Same points apply.  :)

Quantum wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 2:37pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 12:16pm: rubbish ... adding sir or dame is not pretending to be someone else ... postmodern trendoid is. get a grip and move on. You're making yourself look dumber than usual Take your own advice. Claiming that a name change of the same account is having socks is BS. You are 100% wrong, so stop being a gutless wonder trying to save face.

don't put words in my mouth ... I said mistie changing his name is the same as a sock. He does it and pretends he is someone else, That is a SOCK. Stop being such a stupid crunt for at least one day of your life.

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 3:06pm:

He did the same for many yrs on Yahoo too.

I joined yahoo about 2 months before it shut down ... prior to that I wasn't on any political forum. Get over your paranoia.

John aka many multis.

1. STFU

2 Get a job ya lazy bum and start paying some taxes.

And re your rescripted Yahoo BS.

Not interested.

See ya.

John Smith wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 3:13pm:

Quantum wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 2:37pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 12:16pm: rubbish ... adding sir or dame is not pretending to be someone else ... postmodern trendoid is. get a grip and move on. You're making yourself look dumber than usual Take your own advice. Claiming that a name change of the same account is having socks is BS. You are 100% wrong, so stop being a gutless wonder trying to save face. don't put words in my mouth ... I said mistie changing his name is the same as a sock. He does it and pretends he is someone else, That is a SOCK. Stop being such a stupid crunt for at least one day of your life.

BS


John Smith wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2015 at 3:15pm:

hence the 3 or 4 socks :D :D :D

Right there, black and white!

Made the accusation - can't back it up - claims others are stupid for calling him out on his BS.

Just another day on the forum dealing with John Smith. 

I dunno why you are so excited Quantum.  I 'get' what Mr Smith is saying, very clearly.  How come you are having trouble with it?

Aussie wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 3:27pm:

I dunno why you are so excited Quantum.  I 'get' what Mr Smith is saying, very clearly.  How come you are having trouble with it?

Not excited at all.

He made an accusation - got called out on it - tried to redefined the meaning of a word to pretend he wasn't wrong - got called out on that - quoted an article to support his redefinition - his own article proves him wrong so got called out on it again - still can't admit he is wrong.

Yes, it is very clear what Mr Smith is saying. He is speaking BS to save face.

Smith is a muppet, best ignored, unless you're bored.

Quantum wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 3:37pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 3:27pm: I dunno why you are so excited Quantum.  I 'get' what Mr Smith is saying, very clearly.  How come you are having trouble with it? Not excited at all. He made an accusation - got called out on it - tried to redefined the meaning of a word to pretend he wasn't wrong - got called out on that - quoted an article to support his redefinition - his own article proves him wrong so got called out on it again - still can't admit he is wrong. Yes, it is very clear what Mr Smith is saying. He is speaking BS to save face.

So...the whole thing is to get Mr Smith to say that he was wrong over a trivial issue.  Is that it?

Aussie wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 3:47pm:

Quantum wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 3:37pm: Aussie wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 3:27pm: I dunno why you are so excited Quantum.  I 'get' what Mr Smith is saying, very clearly.  How come you are having trouble with it? Not excited at all. He made an accusation - got called out on it - tried to redefined the meaning of a word to pretend he wasn't wrong - got called out on that - quoted an article to support his redefinition - his own article proves him wrong so got called out on it again - still can't admit he is wrong. Yes, it is very clear what Mr Smith is saying. He is speaking BS to save face. So...the whole thing is to get Mr Smith to say that he was wrong over a trivial issue.  Is that it?

I agree that it is trivia. So one has to wonder why Smith can't move on from it. Why not just be a man and say "oops, I shouldn't have said socks, I meant..." instead of trying to redefine the word and screaming out insults to save face? Why make such an issue over something so trivia? 

Ask yourself the same question.  People here incorrectly refer to others as trolls and stalkers, and you don't get excited about that.  Why get all hairy chested over this one?

Quantum wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 3:37pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 3:27pm: I dunno why you are so excited Quantum.  I 'get' what Mr Smith is saying, very clearly.  How come you are having trouble with it? Not excited at all. He made an accusation - got called out on it - tried to redefined the meaning of a word to pretend he wasn't wrong - got called out on that - quoted an article to support his redefinition - his own article proves him wrong so got called out on it again - still can't admit he is wrong. Yes, it is very clear what Mr Smith is saying. He is speaking BS to save face.

When I catch him out...he logs off.

And......one of his other nics come on.

It's the same shyte he did on Yahoo.

It all becomes very predictable and boring after a while.

Aussie wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 3:57pm:

Ask yourself the same question.  People here incorrectly refer to others as trolls and stalkers, and you don't get excited about that.  Why get all hairy chested over this one?

Wait, so if I bring up one person speaking crap, I now have to bring up every issue on the forum or I should stay quiet?

I am neither exited about this one, nor do I have the free time to bring up every other instance. I am not the forum police, don't pretend to be, and I have a job. 

Quantum wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 4:29pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 3:57pm: Ask yourself the same question.  People here incorrectly refer to others as trolls and stalkers, and you don't get excited about that.  Why get all hairy chested over this one? Wait, so if I bring up one person speaking crap, I now have to bring up every issue on the forum or I should stay quiet? I am neither exited about this one, nor do I have the free time to bring up every other instance. I am not the forum police, don't pretend to be, and I have a job.

So....why bother (for so long) with such a trivial issue as this one?

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 4:03pm:

Quantum wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 3:37pm: Aussie wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 3:27pm: I dunno why you are so excited Quantum.  I 'get' what Mr Smith is saying, very clearly.  How come you are having trouble with it? Not excited at all. He made an accusation - got called out on it - tried to redefined the meaning of a word to pretend he wasn't wrong - got called out on that - quoted an article to support his redefinition - his own article proves him wrong so got called out on it again - still can't admit he is wrong. Yes, it is very clear what Mr Smith is saying. He is speaking BS to save face. When I catch him out...he logs off. And......one of his other nics come on. It's the same shyte he did on Yahoo. It all becomes very predictable and boring after a while.

Considering he pumps out over 10,000 posts per year, I'm amazed he has time for other nics...

Aussie wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 4:31pm:

Quantum wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 4:29pm: Aussie wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 3:57pm: Ask yourself the same question.  People here incorrectly refer to others as trolls and stalkers, and you don't get excited about that.  Why get all hairy chested over this one? Wait, so if I bring up one person speaking crap, I now have to bring up every issue on the forum or I should stay quiet? I am neither exited about this one, nor do I have the free time to bring up every other instance. I am not the forum police, don't pretend to be, and I have a job.  So....why bother (for so long) with such a trivial issue as this one?

Because the self appointed forum cop keeps asking me questions about it...

Quantum wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 4:33pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 4:31pm: Quantum wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 4:29pm: Aussie wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 3:57pm: Ask yourself the same question.  People here incorrectly refer to others as trolls and stalkers, and you don't get excited about that.  Why get all hairy chested over this one? Wait, so if I bring up one person speaking crap, I now have to bring up every issue on the forum or I should stay quiet? I am neither exited about this one, nor do I have the free time to bring up every other instance. I am not the forum police, don't pretend to be, and I have a job.  So....why bother (for so long) with such a trivial issue as this one? Because the self appointed forum cop keeps asking me questions about it...

If you are referring to me....incorrect.  You have been banging on and on well prior to my entering the scene this afternoon. 

Quantum wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 4:32pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 4:03pm: Quantum wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 3:37pm: Aussie wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 3:27pm: I dunno why you are so excited Quantum.  I 'get' what Mr Smith is saying, very clearly.  How come you are having trouble with it? Not excited at all. He made an accusation - got called out on it - tried to redefined the meaning of a word to pretend he wasn't wrong - got called out on that - quoted an article to support his redefinition - his own article proves him wrong so got called out on it again - still can't admit he is wrong. Yes, it is very clear what Mr Smith is saying. He is speaking BS to save face. When I catch him out...he logs off. And......one of his other nics come on. It's the same shyte he did on Yahoo. It all becomes very predictable and boring after a while. Considering he pumps out over 10,000 posts per year, I'm amazed he has time for other nics...

30 000 posts over 3 yrs....just with his John Smith nic.

Sooooo....in his multi nic ridden mind...he's trying to shift post counts away from his John Smith nic towards his other nics.

Sometimes I just feel sorry for him.....other times I think nahh....he's a nong and he needs to know about it  ;D

This whole thread is just bullying. 

You should be getting a holiday for this.

Quantum wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 3:24pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 3:13pm: Quantum wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 2:37pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 12:16pm: rubbish ... adding sir or dame is not pretending to be someone else ... postmodern trendoid is. get a grip and move on. You're making yourself look dumber than usual Take your own advice. Claiming that a name change of the same account is having socks is BS. You are 100% wrong, so stop being a gutless wonder trying to save face. don't put words in my mouth ... I said mistie changing his name is the same as a sock. He does it and pretends he is someone else, That is a SOCK. Stop being such a stupid crunt for at least one day of your life. BS John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2015 at 3:15pm: hence the 3 or 4 socks :D :D :D Right there, black and white! Made the accusation - can't back it up - claims others are stupid for calling him out on his BS. Just another day on the forum dealing with John Smith.

yes Quantum :D :D :D , that 'hence the 3 or 4 socks ' was in a discussion about misty ... there is not BS except for the crap you put out.

I Made the claim that MISTY changing his name is the same as a sock, and you've yet to show me how it isn't.

I'll make it reeeeeaaaaallllllly simple for you,

when Misty posts as Postmodern Trendoid, is he pretending to be someone else or not?


Now go play with your Tonka trucks or something, you've obviously no idea what you are on about on a public forum.

... wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 5:13pm:

This whole thread is just bullying.  You should be getting a holiday for this.

Right now....I'm looking at holiday stays down the South Coast.

I am bloody exhausted.

Quantum wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 3:37pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 3:27pm: I dunno why you are so excited Quantum.  I 'get' what Mr Smith is saying, very clearly.  How come you are having trouble with it? Not excited at all. He made an accusation - got called out on it - tried to redefined the meaning of a word to pretend he wasn't wrong - got called out on that - quoted an article to support his redefinition - his own article proves him wrong so got called out on it again - still can't admit he is wrong. Yes, it is very clear what Mr Smith is saying. He is speaking BS to save face.

no BS, you're just to stupid to see it.

Quantum wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 4:32pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 4:03pm: Quantum wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 3:37pm: Aussie wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 3:27pm: I dunno why you are so excited Quantum.  I 'get' what Mr Smith is saying, very clearly.  How come you are having trouble with it? Not excited at all. He made an accusation - got called out on it - tried to redefined the meaning of a word to pretend he wasn't wrong - got called out on that - quoted an article to support his redefinition - his own article proves him wrong so got called out on it again - still can't admit he is wrong. Yes, it is very clear what Mr Smith is saying. He is speaking BS to save face. When I catch him out...he logs off. And......one of his other nics come on. It's the same shyte he did on Yahoo. It all becomes very predictable and boring after a while. Considering he pumps out over 10,000 posts per year, I'm amazed he has time for other nics...

I have no other nics that I use you idiot.

Lisa Jones wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2015 at 5:21pm:

... wrote on Nov 3rd, 2015 at 5:13pm: This whole thread is just bullying.  You should be getting a holiday for this. Right now....I'm looking at holiday stays down the South Coast. I am bloody exhausted.

Doing what?