http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/clip_image006_thumb1.jpg

Figure 3: Processed data from Oct 1 – Nov 11, 2014

http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/clip_image012_thumb.jpg

Figure 5 : Processed data from Jan 1 – Feb 15, 2015

clip_image012

http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/clip_image014_thumb.jpg

Figure 7 : Processed data from Apr 1 – May 15, 2015

https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/oco2-1year-co2-globalmap.png

CO2 over the entire year from From September 2014 to October 2015

Source: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/10/04/finally-visualized-oco2-satellite-data-showing-global-carbon-dioxide-concentrations/

CO2 the well mixed gas?

lee wrote on Oct 5^th, 2015 at 11:12am:

http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/clip_image006_thumb1.jpg Figure 3: Processed data from Oct 1 – Nov 11, 2014 http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/clip_image012_thumb.jpg Figure 5 : Processed data from Jan 1 – Feb 15, 2015 clip_image012 http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/clip_image014_thumb.jpg Figure 7 : Processed data from Apr 1 – May 15, 2015 https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/oco2-1year-co2-globalmap.png CO2 over the entire year from From September 2014 to October 2015 Source: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/10/04/finally-visualized-oco2-satellite-data-showing-global-carbon-dioxide-concentrations/ CO2 the well mixed gas?

The arrow of time means: well, everything takes time.  ::) ::)

Why would there need to be circulation systems if things didn't take time?  :)

Boring.


Seasonal.


Boring.

Marla wrote on Oct 5^th, 2015 at 1:53pm:

Boring. Seasonal. Boring.

Notice how Australia just doesn't go red? And this from a place with the highest/capita emissions. Australia just doesn't rate.

"70% of the Australian mainland is classified as semi-arid, arid/or desert; making it the driest inhabited continent on Earth."

Yeah stay green, Australia.

Yeah, even with natural CO2 emissions, we don't rate.

OCO-2 shows total CO2.

And then there's the other 30%. With manufacturing etc.

lee wrote on Oct 5^th, 2015 at 11:12am:

CO2 the well mixed gas?

You don't understand hemispheric and seasonal differences?

There is also a diurnal cycle.

Keep going though, and you'll achieve a High School level of understanding one day.

- but you'll have to stay away from Watts up me.

lee wrote on Oct 5^th, 2015 at 1:54pm:

Marla wrote on Oct 5th, 2015 at 1:53pm: Boring. Seasonal. Boring. Notice how Australia just doesn't go red? And this from a place with the highest/capita emissions. Australia just doesn't rate.

Oh really? I didn't notice the bit where the CO2 levels on those maps were corrected for population size. Would you expect it to go red if a country the size of the mainland US has the population of the Netherlands?

Your Watts' arguments are at prep school drop-out level of understanding.

Try thinking for yourself instead of regurgitating the words of drongos like Watts.

John_Taverner wrote on Oct 5^th, 2015 at 3:11pm:

lee wrote on Oct 5th, 2015 at 1:54pm: Marla wrote on Oct 5th, 2015 at 1:53pm: Boring. Seasonal. Boring. Notice how Australia just doesn't go red? And this from a place with the highest/capita emissions. Australia just doesn't rate. Oh really? I didn't notice the bit where the CO2 levels on those maps were corrected for population size. Would you expect it to go red if a country the size of the mainland US has the population of the Netherlands?

Corrected? No. Correlated with seasonal changes? Yes.

Do grow up.

John_Taverner wrote on Oct 5^th, 2015 at 3:11pm:

Oh really? I didn't notice the bit where the CO2 levels on those maps were corrected for population size. Would you expect it to go red if a country the size of the mainland US has the population of the Netherlands?

You did notice that this is from the OCO-2 satellite is CO2 emissions? Total? Not just anthropogenic?

Did you notice the last map was for the 12 month period. If you go to the site you can get the entire quarterly series. But I doubt you would do that; it would interrupt your bias.

Perhaps NASA, who launched the satellite, can fudge some figures for you to account for population. Good luck with that.

lee wrote on Oct 5^th, 2015 at 1:54pm:

Marla wrote on Oct 5th, 2015 at 1:53pm: Boring. Seasonal. Boring. Notice how Australia just doesn't go red? And this from a place with the highest/capita emissions. Australia just doesn't rate.

Notice how the "G" means "Global"  :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Oct 5^th, 2015 at 4:56pm:

Notice how the "G" means "Global"

Yeah, showing maps of the globe and the variation in levels over those maps.

I'm glad you comprehend that bit.

lee wrote on Oct 5^th, 2015 at 5:16pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Oct 5th, 2015 at 4:56pm: Notice how the "G" means "Global" Yeah, showing maps of the globe and the variation in levels over those maps. I'm glad you comprehend that bit.

:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D Are you saying the atmosphere doesn't mix?

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Oct 5^th, 2015 at 5:45pm:

Are you saying the atmosphere doesn't mix?

Obviously not as much as you think.

lee wrote on Oct 5^th, 2015 at 6:48pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Oct 5th, 2015 at 5:45pm: Are you saying the atmosphere doesn't mix? Obviously not as much as you think.

very quantitative of you lee

poor lee

no numbers to show for he opinionated mass transfer coefficients.

poor poor sooky sooky lee

lee wrote on Oct 5^th, 2015 at 6:48pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Oct 5th, 2015 at 5:45pm: Are you saying the atmosphere doesn't mix? Obviously not as much as you think.

Unquantified argument means what?  :-[ :-[

-> geez, buddy: you must be the smart guy at the kiddies table or something  ;D ;D

No argument as such. It's just a nudge-nudge type of post which doesn't actually claim anything tangible.  It just hints that there is something that no climate scientist could never have thought of.  This is basically a graphical representation of CO2 fluxes intended to educate.  Of course Watts and his diligent servant Lee will try to twist such information for their own purposes.

lee wrote on Oct 5^th, 2015 at 1:54pm:

Notice how Australia just doesn't go red? And this from a place with the highest/capita emissions. Australia just doesn't rate.

Lee you really are king of the spin.
- For one thing your maps don't show CO2  emissions, they show CO2 concentrations . Given that the southern hemisphere has much stronger prevailing winds, those maps are exactly what I would expect to see.

Perhaps your worst deceit though is implying that these maps show that Australia "doesn't rate".
You haven't provided any absolute scale. All that we know from your maps is that the concentrations around Australia are less than in the northern hemisphere. They may be less but they are still high.

Here is a more interesting map from the same site that you neglected to provide; A map of global anthropomorphic emissions

---

...poor lee better check with his Super advisors, they seem to be nervous about where the Climate is heading.

Super funds with $1 trillion in assets push for action on climate

http://www.smh.com.au/business/banking-and-finance/super-funds-with-1-trillion-in-assets-push-for-action-on-climate-20151004-gk1812.html?btis

The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 6^th, 2015 at 9:40pm:

Perhaps your worst deceit though is implying that these maps show that Australia "doesn't rate". You haven't provided any absolute scale. All that we know from your maps is that the concentrations around Australia are less than in the northern hemisphere. They may be less but they are still high. Here is a more interesting map from the same site that you neglected to provide; A map of global anthropomorphic emissions

And how high does Australia rate, with all that green? Perhaps a few spots of brown? Red - to small to really see?

As I said COC-2 satellite CO2. The bottom map is from another source, as indicted in the text.

lee wrote on Oct 7^th, 2015 at 3:08pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 6th, 2015 at 9:40pm: Perhaps your worst deceit though is implying that these maps show that Australia "doesn't rate". You haven't provided any absolute scale. All that we know from your maps is that the concentrations around Australia are less than in the northern hemisphere. They may be less but they are still high. Here is a more interesting map from the same site that you neglected to provide; A map of global anthropomorphic emissions And how high does Australia rate, with all that green? Perhaps a few spots of brown? Red - to small to really see? As I said COC-2 satellite CO2. The bottom map is from another source, as indicted in the text.

lee has not much  ::)