Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Chat >> Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1438142248

Message started by Lord Herbert on Jul 29th, 2015 at 1:57pm

Title: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by Lord Herbert on Jul 29th, 2015 at 1:57pm
Lefties do this all the time when they have no other answer to commonsense.

Here's an example ...

link ... eat ya heart out, Marla.

It's legal, it's cheap, it's very temporary, and it's harmless ... but this Lefty in uniform would FAR prefer that these sniffers went back to hard drugs, or started 'experimenting' with hard drugs.

What a myopic clown.

Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by Kiron22 on Jul 29th, 2015 at 2:03pm
What the bugger are you talking about? It's the right wing that want to ban every drug under the sun and the left that has been campaigning for legalization and decriminalization everywhere.

Also

>2015
>Calling Nangs "Hippy Crack"

bugger me dead the media comes up with the shittiest names for drugs (like MDMA "Molly"). I've never once in my life heard of Nangs being called "hippy crack" and I've been around people who seemed to breath Nangs more than they did Oxygen.

Also the Daily Mail is a right wing newspaper.

Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by greggerypeccary on Jul 29th, 2015 at 2:04pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 1:57pm:
It's legal, it's cheap, it's very temporary, and it's harmless ...

Except, when it's not.

" ... it can also lead to oxygen deprivation, resulting in loss of blood pressure, fainting and heart attacks. Seventeen Britons have died after taking it between 2006 and 2012."


Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 1:57pm:
What a myopic clown.

Don't be too hard on yourself, Herbie.

Nobody expects you to actually read the stories you post - we know you only read the headlines.

Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by Lord Herbert on Jul 29th, 2015 at 2:23pm

Kiron22 wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 2:03pm:
Also the Daily Mail is a right wing newspaper.


Correction: The Daily Mail is perceived to be 'right wing' because it doesn't promote Leftwing views.


I've seen plenty of Leftwing bias on various news stories in the DM.

In fact I even posted some examples here when karnal whinged about it being Rightwing.



Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by greggerypeccary on Jul 29th, 2015 at 2:28pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 1:57pm:
It's legal, it's cheap, it's very temporary, and it's harmless ...



From the same right wing newspaper, Herbie:

"Nitrous oxide dissolves in the bloodstream, reducing the amount of oxygen flowing to the brain and other vital organs. This can have devastating consequences, causing strokes, blackouts, seizures and heart attacks.
There is also a risk of asphyxiation, which can lead to brain damage, or death by asphyxiation."


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2720285/Hippy-crack-epidemic-Costing-little-3-hit-s-inhaled-openly-Britain-s-streets-But-young-professionals-getting-high-laughing-gas-don-t-realise-s-deadly.html

Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by Muttley on Jul 29th, 2015 at 2:30pm
Can't agree with you on this Herb........temporary debatable...harmless also debatable......
Corrupting...no doubt


Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by greggerypeccary on Jul 29th, 2015 at 2:33pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 1:57pm:
... it's harmless ...



More from your favourite right wing paper:

" 'Hippy crack' craze will kill more teens, warns doctor: Experts predict rise in deaths linked to nitrous oxide which has already killed 17 people this year"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3058299/Hippy-crack-craze-kill-teens-warns-doctor-Experts-predict-rise-deaths-linked-nitrous-oxide-killed-17-people-year.html

Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by Lord Herbert on Jul 29th, 2015 at 2:57pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 2:28pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 1:57pm:
It's legal, it's cheap, it's very temporary, and it's harmless ...



From the same right wing newspaper, Herbie:

"Nitrous oxide dissolves in the bloodstream, reducing the amount of oxygen flowing to the brain and other vital organs. This can have devastating consequences, causing strokes, blackouts, seizures and heart attacks.
There is also a risk of asphyxiation, which can lead to brain damage, or death by asphyxiation."


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2720285/Hippy-crack-epidemic-Costing-little-3-hit-s-inhaled-openly-Britain-s-streets-But-young-professionals-getting-high-laughing-gas-don-t-realise-s-deadly.html


One in how many thousands?

Why doesn't this Leftwing-luvvie of a copper rail instead against the pubs distributing alcohol?

Are any of these nitrous oxide junkies in rehab? No? Why not? Because it's as harmless as Red Bull or the milder forms of marijuana.

Remember that girl who died of an eccy at a rave party? ... and then the papers were filled with dire warnings and long articles for months on end.

The Fact: She was the one-in-a-million for whom those pills could be lethal. Tens of thousands since then have had no problem with it.


Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by Lord Herbert on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:05pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 2:33pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 1:57pm:
... it's harmless ...



More from your favourite right wing paper:

" 'Hippy crack' craze will kill more teens, warns doctor: Experts predict rise in deaths linked to nitrous oxide which has already killed 17 people this year"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3058299/Hippy-crack-craze-kill-teens-warns-doctor-Experts-predict-rise-deaths-linked-nitrous-oxide-killed-17-people-year.html


OD-ing on it is something else. Let's have the stats on those who died after moderate use for recreational purposes.

I could OD on the 'Arnott's SHAPES EXTREME Peri Peri Chicken Slam biscuits' that I'm eating right now if I didn't know when to stop. 

Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by Bojack Horseman on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:11pm
And yet somehow beyond worst case scenarios such as polygamous marriages is OK from the right, when arguing against gay marriage.

Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by Lord Herbert on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:16pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:11pm:
And yet somehow beyond worst case scenarios such as polygamous marriages is OK from the right, when arguing against gay marriage.


I'm Ultra-Right, butt I'm all for the homos pairing off with one another and leaving straight late-teenaged schoolboys alone without being ogled and pestered by them. The more 'gay-marriages' the better it is for straight guys who don't want to be pestered by these anal-obsessives.

Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by greggerypeccary on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:17pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:05pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 2:33pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 1:57pm:
... it's harmless ...



More from your favourite right wing paper:

" 'Hippy crack' craze will kill more teens, warns doctor: Experts predict rise in deaths linked to nitrous oxide which has already killed 17 people this year"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3058299/Hippy-crack-craze-kill-teens-warns-doctor-Experts-predict-rise-deaths-linked-nitrous-oxide-killed-17-people-year.html


OD-ing on it is something else. Let's have the stats on those who died after moderate use for recreational purposes.

I could OD on the 'Arnott's SHAPES EXTREME Peri Peri Chicken Slam biscuits' that I'm eating right now if I didn't know when to stop. 



It's not harmless.

"Nitrous oxide dissolves in the bloodstream, reducing the amount of oxygen flowing to the brain and other vital organs. This can have devastating consequences, causing strokes, blackouts, seizures and heart attacks.

There is also a risk of asphyxiation, which can lead to brain damage, or death by asphyxiation."



Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by Lord Herbert on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:18pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:17pm:
It's not harmless.


Are you an anal-obsessive, gregg? I'll dance at your wedding I promise you.



Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by greggerypeccary on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:19pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:16pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:11pm:
And yet somehow beyond worst case scenarios such as polygamous marriages is OK from the right, when arguing against gay marriage.


I'm Ultra-Right, butt I'm all for the homos pairing off with one another and leaving straight late-teenaged schoolboys alone without being ogled and pestered by them. The more 'gay-marriages' the better it is for straight guys who don't want to be pestered by these anal-obsessives.



What about heteros leaving straight late-teenaged schoolgirls alone without being ogled and pestered by them?


Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by Lord Herbert on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:29pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:19pm:
What about heteros leaving straight late-teenaged schoolgirls alone without being ogled and pestered by them?


Are you paedophobic? I didn't know you were paedophobic.

Homophobic ... Islamophobic ... You see, we can play that game too with made-up words.

What would your friends say if they knew you are paedophobic? Have you told your family yet? Afraid they might reject you? Terrified of what your father might say?

Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by greggerypeccary on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:31pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:29pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:19pm:
What about heteros leaving straight late-teenaged schoolgirls alone without being ogled and pestered by them?


Are you paedophobic? I didn't know you were paedophobic.

Homophobic ... Islamophobic ... You see, we can play that game too with made-up words.

What would your friends say if they knew you are paedophobic? Have you told your family yet? Afraid they might reject you? Terrified of what your father might say?



Just answer the question, Herbie.

What about heteros leaving straight late-teenaged schoolgirls alone without being ogled and pestered by them?

Should Bindi have to put up with that sort of behaviour?


Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by Lord Herbert on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:34pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:31pm:
Should Bindi have to put up with that sort of behaviour?


Bindi is getting screwed by an American boyfriend at this very moment, if you need to know.  8-)

Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by greggerypeccary on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:34pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:29pm:
Homophobic ... Islamophobic ... You see, we can play that game too with made-up words.




All words are "made-up", Herbie.

You're having an off day today.

Time for a swig of sherry, and a little nana nap.




Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by greggerypeccary on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:36pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:31pm:
Should Bindi have to put up with that sort of behaviour?


Bindi is getting screwed by an American boyfriend at this very moment, if you need to know.  8-)



Crikey!

My condolences to you, Herbie.


Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by Lord Herbert on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:44pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:36pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:31pm:
Should Bindi have to put up with that sort of behaviour?


Bindi is getting screwed by an American boyfriend at this very moment, if you need to know.  8-)



Crikey!

My condolences to you, Herbie.


:P

Title: Re: Choosing worst case scenarios as justification ...
Post by Soren on Aug 9th, 2015 at 12:57pm
Why are the benefits of marriage restricted to couples?? It's totally unfair.

Why shouldn't singles enjoy the same benefits as gay couples?


Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.