| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> General Board >> Do We Need A Dodgy Car Lemon Law http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1432677633 Message started by imcrookonit on May 27th, 2015 at 8:00am |
|
|
Title: Do We Need A Dodgy Car Lemon Law Post by imcrookonit on May 27th, 2015 at 8:00am
Official review to protect owners sold dodgy ‘lemon’ cars
May 21, 2015 NEWS.com.au Buyer beware ... Consumer groups and members of the Federal Government are calling for an investigation into sales of ‘lemon’ cars. :-? EXCLUSIVE: Momentum is building for a national “lemon law” to help owners of dodgy cars, with a key federal senator declaring support for increased protection amid revelations the consumer cops are examining “vehicle manufacturer conduct”. Ahead of an official review of existing legislation — a News Corp Australia probe of the case for a lemon law reveals: INFLUENTIAL but rarely-heard-from crossbench senator Ricky Muir of the Australian Motoring Enthusiast Party wants the review to consider “greater consumer protection … in the area of motor vehicle sales and repairs”; :) HIGHLY regarded Consumer Action Law Centre is seeking a law that defines a lemon as “a vehicle has been repaired at least three times by the manufacturer or importer and the vehicle still has a defect or if the vehicle is out of service for 20 or more days in total due to a defect; THE Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is “actively investigating … vehicle manufacturer conduct in the context of consumer guarantee obligations” and is “increasingly concerned about reports of consumers having difficulty with their new cars”; and THERE is no evidence that any new car owner has obtained a refund or replacement using the Australian Consumer Law (ACL), introduced in 2011. Consumer Action CEO Gerard Brody said in the ACL review it would also argue for a switch in the “onus of proof” for at least the first six months of ownership. “The trader should be required to prove that the goods are of an acceptable quality rather than this burden sitting with the consumer,” Mr Brody said. “We find that recalcitrant traders repeatedly repair cars and say they are working when they aren’t. This requires consumers to complain and complain and end up the tribunal which can mean they give up.” :( The federal minister responsible for consumer affairs Bruce Billson revealed the ACCC investigation to News Corp Australia yesterday. Of the existing law, he said: “If you buy a motor vehicle and it has a major failure, you have the right to choose between a refund or a replacement product. While not called a ‘lemon law’, consumer guarantees can provide similar redress.” That said, the review of the ACL later this year “will be an opportunity to test how well the law is working and to see if changes are needed”. Top consumer group Choice’s spokesman Tom Godfrey said the ACL review was timely. “Too often we hear of consumers being driven into the aftermarket and given the run around by dealers when they seek redress,” Mr Godfrey said. “Some consumers are wondering how car companies are getting away with off-loading lemons”. :( |
|
Title: Re: Do We Need A Dodgy Car Lemon Law Post by cods on May 27th, 2015 at 10:45am
Do We Need A Dodgy Car Lemon Law
only if you have ever been sold one ... I would think? you can take back a dodgy umbrella or a dodgy washing machine.. why not a car? |
|
Title: Re: Do We Need A Dodgy Car Lemon Law Post by The Grappler on May 27th, 2015 at 11:13am
I see absolutely no problem with returning a seriously faulty new vehicle under warranty. It should be a basic right if faults are above a certain level.
Simple really - full replacement warranty - then the comp-any wil flog the car off to one of its workers at a discount that still covers costs or ship it to Bangla Desh.... "Not worrying here - excellent car is manufactured only yesterday, and is added extra prayer mat provided and bead curtains hanging from windows! For man of particular bent, we have technical model complete with universal mount in utility back!! This special export model Ethiopia and Sudan and similar - very strong.. very good vehicle for work in negotiating peace settlement!!!!" |
|
Title: Re: Do We Need A Dodgy Car Lemon Law Post by cods on May 27th, 2015 at 11:18am Grappler Racist Filth wrote on May 27th, 2015 at 11:13am:
dodgy trade in laws need to be fixed as well... maybe a law on how to trade in that old codger ::) ::) ::)on a newer model. |
|
Title: Re: Do We Need A Dodgy Car Lemon Law Post by The Grappler on May 27th, 2015 at 3:27pm cods wrote on May 27th, 2015 at 11:18am:
Yeah - maybe trade the old worn out model on a new one that handles tighter.... For Sale - Wife.... special soft tail model, extra big bore cylinder to take bigger piston, suspension a little saggy and needs TLC, high wattage headlights, suction induction system in perfect operating condition, ignition a little touchy and hard to start up on a cold morning.. Comes complete with four wheel trailer and all accessories including baby ... unlimited funds spent on maintenance to date.... Only selling due to sickness of whole thing... grab a bargain, but be careful to get permission first..... Already got those - they're called 'divorce laws'.... |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |