The crusty old pervert pedophile is being protected by the British establishment. Freemasons? Jews? Hillsong? or all of the above.

All we need to close this is denizen Herbert joining the accusers.

http://www.theguardian.com/law/2015/apr/28/lord-janner-alleged-victims-formal-review-dpp-decision-not-to-prosecute-child-abuse-claims


Quote:

Lord Janner's alleged victims seek formal review of DPP decision Move follows criticism of Alison Saunders’ decision not to prosecute 86-year-old former Labour MP over historical sex abuse claims on account of his dementia A group of people who say they were abused by Lord Janner are seeking a formal review of the decision not to prosecute the former Labour MP following child sex abuse claims. Alison Saunders, the director of public prosecutions, decided not to charge the 86-year-old peer on health grounds, despite saying there was enough evidence to prosecute for 22 sex offences against nine people. Janner, who now has dementia, was accused of carrying out a catalogue of abuse against young boys, and more than a dozen people came forward to claim he abused them during the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s. Lawyers representing a number of his alleged victims have written to the DPP to formally request a review of the decision. Analysis Critics of Lord Janner decision misunderstand justice system I want to know why allegations were not put Janner while he was still fit to stand trial but that is what a public inquiry should tell us - not a trial Read more Liz Dux, specialist abuse lawyer at the law firm Slater and Gordon, said: “Our clients … very much hope that she gives their request the careful attention it deserves. All they have ever wanted is for the opportunity to give their evidence and to be heard.” The Crown Prosecution Service faced criticism since the it was announced the peer would not face prosecution. In a letter to the Times, a cross-party group of MPs said the decision was damaging public confidence, while the deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, expressed sympathy with calls for a review. He added that it was essential people understood how the DPP had come to such a “highly controversial” decision. “I have to say here is an individual where there are some very serious allegations made and a lot of totally understandable disquiet that he is not going to be facing justice in any way,” Clegg said on LBC radio. Lord Falconer, a former lord chancellor, said Saunders was wrong, and suggested there should have been an open hearing before a jury to decide whether Janner was fit to enter a plea. Falconer also suggested a special hearing – known as a trial of facts – could test the allegations in Janner’s absence. The DPP said she made the right decision not to prosecute Janner, adding that his dementia was so severe he could “play no part in a trial”. Janner was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease in 2009 and requires round-the-clock care. The Labour party said he has been suspended in “light of these very serious allegations”, but his family has repeatedly denied he is connected to any wrongdoing. Some have defended Saunder’s decision on Janner. “He is unable to defend himself. No criminal trial could possibly be fair in such circumstances. Any judge would inevitably stop the proceedings as an abuse of process,” said David Pannick QC, who helped Nicholas Purnell QC and lawyer Jae Carwardine in making representations to the DPP that Janner should not be prosecuted because of his mental state.

Here we go yet again.  Allegations of ancient events thrown at someone when years have intervened, and they are no longer the individual who committed the atrocities....in this case.....the passing years have rendered him nutty, something he was not when the alleged events occurred.

I really am against this stuff.  There must be a limitation period, the terms of which I have not resolved in my own mind but it has to be some sort of combination of current age and years since the events alleged occurred.

If, for example, I did something at 22 and you caught me at age 42, fair enough.

If, for example, I did something at age 42 and you caught me at age 82.......nah.

Something along those lines.

Aussie wrote on Apr 29^th, 2015 at 6:55pm:

Here we go yet again.  Allegations of ancient events thrown at someone when years have intervened, and they are no longer the individual who committed the atrocities....in this case.....the passing years have rendered him nutty, something he was not when the alleged events occurred. I really am against this stuff.  There must be a limitation period, the terms of which I have not resolved in my own mind but it has to be some sort of combination of current age and years since the events alleged occurred. If, for example, I did something at 22 and you caught me at age 42, fair enough. If, for example, I did something at age 42 and you caught me at age 82.......nah. Something along those lines.

having dementia doesnt quite give the victims the justice they seek... thats the trouble...you say a time limit on people coming forward...yet you have no problems with pointing the finger at police when it comes to the Bali 9...no matter how long ago..

you think the parents of a young boy who disappeared for 8 years before his murderer was finally brought to justice should shut up and go away...

yet you would advocate Australia severing all ties with a country that carries out its very well known Laws...

I find that extraordinary. and not very consistent for someone who claims to be an ex solicitor.

cods wrote on Apr 29^th, 2015 at 7:34pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 29th, 2015 at 6:55pm: Here we go yet again.  Allegations of ancient events thrown at someone when years have intervened, and they are no longer the individual who committed the atrocities....in this case.....the passing years have rendered him nutty, something he was not when the alleged events occurred. I really am against this stuff.  There must be a limitation period, the terms of which I have not resolved in my own mind but it has to be some sort of combination of current age and years since the events alleged occurred. If, for example, I did something at 22 and you caught me at age 42, fair enough. If, for example, I did something at age 42 and you caught me at age 82.......nah. Something along those lines. having dementia doesnt quite give the victims the justice they seek... thats the trouble...you say a time limit on people coming forward...yet you have no problems with pointing the finger at police when it comes to the Bali 9...no matter how long ago.. you think the parents of a young boy who disappeared for 8 years before his murderer was finally brought to justice should shut up and go away... yet you would advocate Australia severing all ties with a country that carries out its very well known Laws... I find that extraordinary. and not very consistent for someone who claims to be an ex solicitor.

If I said any of those things, I'd understand you, but.....guess what......I did not.

That, cods, is a classic strawman.  You do know what that is, yeas?

I believe the establishment is circling the wagons to prevent further revelations of other pedophiles that would certainly be exposed by a serious investigation.

There is also the case of the enablers who turned a blind eye to the perversions instead of acting appropriately.

I believe the system is trying to prevent the exposure of others and thereby limit the embarrassment of the establishment.

Aussie wrote on Apr 29^th, 2015 at 7:40pm:

cods wrote on Apr 29th, 2015 at 7:34pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 29th, 2015 at 6:55pm: Here we go yet again.  Allegations of ancient events thrown at someone when years have intervened, and they are no longer the individual who committed the atrocities....in this case.....the passing years have rendered him nutty, something he was not when the alleged events occurred. I really am against this stuff.  There must be a limitation period, the terms of which I have not resolved in my own mind but it has to be some sort of combination of current age and years since the events alleged occurred. If, for example, I did something at 22 and you caught me at age 42, fair enough. If, for example, I did something at age 42 and you caught me at age 82.......nah. Something along those lines. having dementia doesnt quite give the victims the justice they seek... thats the trouble...you say a time limit on people coming forward...yet you have no problems with pointing the finger at police when it comes to the Bali 9...no matter how long ago.. you think the parents of a young boy who disappeared for 8 years before his murderer was finally brought to justice should shut up and go away... yet you would advocate Australia severing all ties with a country that carries out its very well known Laws... I find that extraordinary. and not very consistent for someone who claims to be an ex solicitor. If I said any of those things, I'd understand you, but.....guess what......I did not. That, cods, is a classic strawman.  You do know what that is, yeas?

yes you did.. not in those words maybe.. but thats what it looked like..

so dont go patting yourself on the back...

a lot of people see right through you aussie..

always in denial... ::) ::)

straw man  someone who believes he and only he is always right..I wonder who that reminds me of..

you said terrible things about the Morecombs and now the Indonesian Govt...

what denial do you have for that?

Svengali wrote on Apr 29^th, 2015 at 7:47pm:

I believe the establishment is circling the wagons to prevent further revelations of other pedophiles that would certainly be exposed by a serious investigation. There is also the case of the enablers who turned a blind eye to the perversions instead of acting appropriately. I believe the system is trying to prevent the exposure of others and thereby limit the embarrassment of the establishment.

isnt that always the case???... look at football what it covers up..so much money involved....would we want a house of cards coming down because of a sex charge???>..not really I guess...

at least he has been named... the shame will hang around for a long time.. and those who knew...will be looking over their shoulders..

I am just about always with the victims as they spend their whole lives haunted by what happened...

look at the royal commission...

will it stop it.. probably not but at least these people have been heard..sometimes thats all they want.

cods wrote on Apr 29^th, 2015 at 7:52pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 29th, 2015 at 7:40pm: cods wrote on Apr 29th, 2015 at 7:34pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 29th, 2015 at 6:55pm: Here we go yet again.  Allegations of ancient events thrown at someone when years have intervened, and they are no longer the individual who committed the atrocities....in this case.....the passing years have rendered him nutty, something he was not when the alleged events occurred. I really am against this stuff.  There must be a limitation period, the terms of which I have not resolved in my own mind but it has to be some sort of combination of current age and years since the events alleged occurred. If, for example, I did something at 22 and you caught me at age 42, fair enough. If, for example, I did something at age 42 and you caught me at age 82.......nah. Something along those lines. having dementia doesnt quite give the victims the justice they seek... thats the trouble...you say a time limit on people coming forward...yet you have no problems with pointing the finger at police when it comes to the Bali 9...no matter how long ago.. you think the parents of a young boy who disappeared for 8 years before his murderer was finally brought to justice should shut up and go away... yet you would advocate Australia severing all ties with a country that carries out its very well known Laws... I find that extraordinary. and not very consistent for someone who claims to be an ex solicitor. If I said any of those things, I'd understand you, but.....guess what......I did not. That, cods, is a classic strawman.  You do know what that is, yeas? yes you did.. not in those words maybe.. but thats what it looked like.. so dont go patting yourself on the back... a lot of people see right through you aussie.. always in denial... ::) ::) straw man  someone who believes he and only he is always right..I wonder who that reminds me of.. you said terrible things about the Morecombs and now the Indonesian Govt... what denial do you have for that?

Read and learn, cods.

Link.

The cops knew about Janner and did nothing. So the cops have a reason to support the closure of the case without prosecution because their own misdemeanors will remain hidden from public view.

Janner has been protected by the establishment since 1991. The enablers are now protecting themselves by preventing prosecution of Janner.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3058177/Home-Office-chiefs-ignored-FOURTH-warning-Janner-Officials-told-child-sex-claims-1995-report.html#ixzz3YhBl5v1f


Quote:

The Home Office was warned that Lord Janner was abusing young boys two decades ago but did nothing about it. An MP passed a dossier of information to the department in the hope it would kick-start a fresh police investigation. But instead the paperwork was shelved by officials until it was discovered in 2013 and belatedly passed to Leicestershire Police. The revelation will heighten fears that the peer, now 86, was the beneficiary of an Establishment cover-up. The missed opportunity to bring him to justice echoes the case of the late paedophile Liberal MP Cyril Smith who continued in public life despite repeated warnings of his crimes. It heaps pressure on the Home Office to reveal exactly who knew what and when about the disturbing allegations against Janner. Last night Labour’s Simon Danczuk – who outed Smith as a predatory child abuser – called on the department to ‘come clean’. ‘The Director of Public Prosecutions has admitted there were previously missed opportunities to investigate Lord Janner,’ he said. ‘The Home Office needs to come clean on what information was passed to officials in 1995. ‘This scandal is getting worse every day and the public are rightly angry at the shambolic way this case has been handled.’ Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders sparked fury earlier this month when she said Janner could face 22 charges but his health is too poor to put him on trial. She said that the former Leicester MP was investigated in 1991, 2002 and 2006 but mistakes meant he was never charged.

I don't agree that crimes of this nature should be swept under the carpet just because the accused is in his 80s or 90s, but if he has dementia, it does change the situation.  If his dementia has progressed to the stage where he could be said to be non compos mentis, then there would seem to be little point in proceeding.

The point in proceeding with the case is to expose those who protected him. A police detective was told to stop investigating Janner by a person of high position in the government.

The corrupt people in the police, public service and politics need to be identified and exposed

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/lord-janner-nspcc-head-demands-that-child-abuse-case-against-labour-peer-be-reopened-10205619.html


Quote:

A former detective inspector, Kelvyn Ashby, claimed that in 1991 he had found evidence to back up claims that Lord Janner, who at the time sat in the Commons,  had molested a teenage boy in his home and at a hotel. But he alleged he was told “from the very top” to drop the case as the suspect was an MP. “I felt we had enough to arrest him, but we didn’t because he was an MP,” the retired detective told The Mail on Sunday. “I think we should have done. I was gutted that we didn’t.” Lord Janner was accused of earlier child abuse in 1991, during the trial of a notorious paedophile, Frank Beck. In his defence, Beck claimed he had tried to stop a 13-year-old boy in his care from visiting Lord Janner and called the alleged victim – who was by then 30 – as a witness. The man claimed that Lord Janner had befriended him and forced him to have sex.

Public pressure is overcoming the establishment's attempt to protect Lord Janner and his enablers. The perpetrator Janner is claiming diminished defence capability by suffering from Alzheimers. However he had sufficient defence capability to transfer his GBP 2 million home to others to protect it from claims against him by victims. The guy is feigning diminished capability to avoid justice and the establishment system is supporting him.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/child-sex-abuse-inquiry-to-investigate-allegations-against-lord-greville-janner-10212928.html


Quote:

Organisations including the Leicestershire Police, the CPS, the Home Office and the care home where Lord Janner is accused of abusing victims in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980, will all come under scrutiny during the process. Allegations that senior officials also helped to cover up his abuse will also be examined. The announcement comes after Alison Saunders, the Director of Public Prosecutions, was heavily criticised for deciding not to prosecute Lord Janner, even though there is sufficient evidence to merit a court case. She has been asked to hand over all documents and evidence to the independent inquiry. Earlier today, a law firm representing alleged victims became the second to write to Ms Saunders in an attempt overturn her decision. Peter Garsden, whose firm is representing three clients in a civil child abuse claim against Lord Janner, has said he wants Ms Saunders to disclose the various reports which supported her conclusion. Mr Garsden said his clients were "outraged", and said they are considering a judicial review into the matter. Liz Dux, a specialist abuse lawyer at Slater and Gordon, said her firm had also contacted the DPP to formally request a review of the decision. Ms Dux said all her clients want is ”the opportunity to give their evidence and to be heard“. Lord Janner denies the allegations against him. His family have said he is "entirely innocent of any wrongdoing".

http://www.policeprofessional.com/news.aspx?id=21708

Quote:

Justice Lowell Goddard, the head of the inquiry examining allegations of a paedophile ring operating in Westminster in the 1980s, is to investigate whether child sexual abuse allegations against Lord Greville Janner were the subject of an establishment cover-up. Justice Goddard said "public concern" surrounding allegations that Lord Janner sexually abused vulnerable children who were resident in Leicestershire care homes in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, requires a "thorough and wholly independent investigation". The move follows the seeking of a formal review by the alleged victims to revisit the Crown Prosecution's (CPS) decision not to prosecute the Labour MP on grounds of poor health. Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders said earlier this month that Lord Janner should not be prosecuted because the severity of his dementia means he is unfit to stand trial. Justice Goddard said: "The depth of public concern surrounding the Janner case exemplifies the need for a thorough and wholly independent investigation into the adequacy of institutional responses to child sexual abuse, particularly where persons in positions of influence are alleged to have abused children in institutional settings and have, for one reason or another, escaped prosecution over a number of years. "It would of course be quite wrong to pre-judge the outcome of our inquiries in any way, but there is, in my view, a clear public interest in conducting an exhaustive and critical examination of the institutional decision-making processes in this case and in exposing them to public scrutiny."

Former head of British military is now implicated. How deep and wide is the pit of depravity in the British establishment.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/vip-paedophile-scandal-former-head-5612869

Former head of British military is now implicated. How deep and wide is the pit of depravity in the British establishment.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/vip-paedophile-scandal-former-head-5612869

The establishment cover-up continues. Dementia and Alzheimers is not a barrier to prosecution as the following precedent evidences.

http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/councillorspolitical-party-affiliated/cover-ups/

Quote:

On Twitter this morning, we decided to challenge the CPS, and researched our own database where offenders with dementia have been taken to court – Remarkable response with many journalists already sharing our findings Here is a number of cases where other paedophiles with dementia have been found GUILTY in court 72-year-old Dementia sufferer is jailed for “appalling” child sex offences committed 40 years ago http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/20…/…/07/brian-ash-millendreath/ Paedophile suffered from dementia & Alzheimer’s disease at TIME of offences – Guilty http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/…/03/12/douglas-turner-barnsta…/ Paedophile with severe dementia found guilty of abusing 6 under-age girls in a trial held in his absence http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/…/michael-collingwood-tedburn-…/ Paedophile with dementia was remanded in custody – Found guilty at trial & then jailed http://wp.me/p2gE9F-3UV Eastham paedophile had vascular problems and resulting dementia – Found guilty in court http://wp.me/p2gE9F-41C Paedophile suffers from dementia & heart problems – Found guilty & jailed http://wp.me/p2gE9F-6We Judge convicts paedophile with korsakoff’s syndrome, a form of dementia. http://wp.me/p2gE9F-71N Paedophile with dementia walks free from court after abusing girls as young as two http://wp.me/p2gE9F-8Kv Suffers from dementia,mentally incapable of standing trial – Not be able to understand proceedings – Found guilty http://wp.me/p2gE9F-aiE 82-year-old Belfast pensioner with dementia found guilty http://wp.me/p2gE9F-fn5 Wick/Bristol paedophile Teacher recently assessed for dementia found guilty & jailed http://wp.me/p2gE9F-g3j 78-year-old Cornton paedophile who has dementia & is nearly deaf found guilty and jailed http://wp.me/p2gE9F-hgl Harworth paedophile with vascular dementia found Guilty – However walked free from court http://wp.me/p2gE9F-hhU Chippenham/London paedophile Teacher molested children – suffered from dementia – Found guilty & jailed for 7 years http://wp.me/p2gE9F-huk Stoke paedophile with fronto-temporal dementia – Found guilty http://wp.me/p2gE9F-hz9 Stanmore paedophile suffered from dementia & Alzheimer’s – Found guilty & jailed http://wp.me/p2gE9F-iI2 Swindon paedophile systematically sexually abused a young girl in the 1970s – Had dementia & found Guilty http://wp.me/p2gE9F-iOG Huddersfield paedophile unfit to plead to charges against him cause of dementia BUT was tried & found guilty by jury http://wp.me/p2gE9F-jhB Paedophile who abused two boys over 30 years ago detained indefinitely under hospital order – Had dementia – GUILTY http://wp.me/p2gE9F-gf8 Janner not too ill to claim expenses Westminster attendance records show Janner attended the House of Lords almost daily and claimed more than £100,000 in expenses in the four years after he was diagnosed with the disease. He only stopped attending Parliament – and claiming up to £300 a day for doing so – when child abuse police raided his house on December 2013. Even in that month he attended the Lords 12 times. Analysis of records shows Janner continued speaking fluently for years after his diagnosis and was also alert enough to claim expenses among the highest in the Lords. In the 12 months up to April 2009, the year of his diagnosis, he attended the Lords 143 times – only just shy of the 147 maximum possible. And he managed to fill in forms procuring himself £12,075 in subsistence payments and £13,468 in ‘office costs’ – with another £691 in mileage claims for his car. In the following year, up to April 2010, he attended 136 days at the Lords out of a maximum 142 and claimed £10,986 subsistence, £11,625 office costs and £589 mileage. In the year to April 2011 he turned up 126 days out of 137, and claimed expenses totalling £34,014. In the year to April 2012, Janner attended 143 days out of a maximum of 156. He also managed to claim a hefty £28,800 in expenses. In the following year, up to April 2013, he turned up 136 days out of 144, and claimed expenses totalling £24,600. In April, May and June 2013 he attended every one of the 30 days the Lords sat, claiming a total of £6,450 in expenses. In July he was absent just one out of 20 days, claiming £2,850 for the remaining 19. And in August, September, October and November, he did not miss a single sitting out of 32 days, and claimed £4,800 in expenses. Janner’s history and the child sex abuse case he avoided

Was Tony Blair one of Lord Janners protectors?

http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/media/images/82359000/jpg/_82359412_jannerandblair.jpg

Lord Janner was a director of his firm while purportedly suffering dementia. The establishment  is still working hard to protect Janner. However the press seem to have got hold of the issue and are pursuing it appropriately.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3064947/Lord-Janner-director-firm-THREE-WEEKS-ago-emerges-damning-dossier-alleges-police-chief-allowed-peer-molest-young-boys.html

[quote]
Lord Janner was still director of his firm THREE WEEKS ago, it emerges as damning dossier alleges police chief allowed peer to molest young boys

    Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders sparked outrage when she ruled the Labour peer's dementia meant he would not be prosecuted

    Yet less than a week earlier, the former Labour MP was at the top of a list of company directors for his firm West Heath Road Seasons Ltd
    Janner, 86, stood down as a director of the company on April 10, six days before Miss announced would not be charged with 22 child sex offences

Lord Janner served as a company director until six days before being ruled too unwell to be tried for suspected child abuse.

Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders sparked outrage when she said his dementia meant he could not understand what would happen in a courtroom.

Yet less than a week earlier, the Labour peer was at the top of a list of company directors for his firm West Heath Road Seasons Ltd.

In official documents lodged at Companies House, he listed his occupation as: ‘Working Peer, Writer, Lecturer.’

Lord Janner served as a company director until six days before being ruled too unwell to be tried for suspected child abuse.

Lord Janner served as a company director until six days before being ruled too unwell to be tried for suspected child abuse.

The company, which manages Janner’s £2million home and seven other flats in his luxury north London development, had reserves of £8,350, the latest accounts show.

Janner, 86, stood down as a director of the company on April 10, six days before the chief prosecutor announced he would escape being charged with 22 child sex offences.

It follows the revelation Janner transferred ownership of his apartment to his three children in the same month his Parliamentary office was searched by police last year, and four months after a similar raid on his home.

Now it can also be revealed the alleged paedophile used his holiday home on the south coast to entertain teenage boys, according to former neighbours.

The Labour grandee was a regular visitor to the flat in a discreet gated block with stunning sea views until it was sold last year.

The peer bought his two-bedroom holiday apartment in the upmarket East Cliff area of Bournemouth in 1987.

One former neighbour, who did not want to be named, said: ‘He was sometimes seen at the flat with much younger boys in their teens or early 20s.

Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders sparked outrage when she said Lord Janner's dementia meant he could not understand what would happen in a courtroom.

Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders sparked outrage when she said Lord Janner's dementia meant he could not understand what would happen in a courtroom

At the time it was definitely noticed, but no one talked about things like that in public back then.’ Janner’s flat was on the seventh floor of a large clifftop block with views over the sea and the building’s outdoor swimming pool.

Neighbours said the peer, who was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease in 2009, was seen ‘coming and going’ as recently as last year.

A long-term resident said: ‘[Janner] was always in and out, in and out. Always in a hurry.

Justice Lowell Goddard the New Zealand judge who is to head the new child abuse inquiry in England.

‘I last saw him in 2014. He seemed exactly the same, no difference to his health – very busy. There is a wonderful community here but I don’t think he made friends with anyone.’

Former Bournemouth mayor Anne Filer, who is a leading member of the town’s Jewish community, said she never heard even a ‘whisper’ of concerns about Janner’s behaviour.

The peer owned a share of the freehold for the seaside flat until March 1996, when he transferred it to his wife Myra and daughter Marion, official records show.

Less than a week before the announcement he wouldn't be charged, Lord Janner was at the top of a list of company directors for his firm West Heath Road Seasons Ltd.

Less than a week before the announcement he wouldn't be charged, Lord Janner was at the top of a list of company directors for his firm West Heath Road Seasons Ltd

His wife died at the end of that year, and the apartment is thought to have passed into his daughter’s ownership before being sold in June last year for £300,000.

Leicestershire Police declined to comment on whether they were looking into Janner’s activities in Bournemouth, saying only that their inquiry remained a ‘live investigation’.

Meanwhile, the police watchdog, the Independent Police Complaints Commission, said it was carrying out its own investigation into Leicestershire Police’s response to complaints of abuse by Janner and others made in 1991, 2001 and 2006.

Another of the peer’s alleged victims has come forward to describe how he was abused at a working men’s club in the 1970s.

The man said Janner befriended him wh

Freemasonry is implicated in the Lord Janner coverup. Janner is  Freemason and the police investigating him were Freemasons.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3064947/Lord-Janner-director-firm-THREE-WEEKS-ago-emerges-damning-dossier-alleges-police-chief-allowed-peer-molest-young-boys.html


Quote:

Rape Of Justice Evidence doctored. Witnesses threatened. The damning child sex abuse dossier that alleges Lord Janner was allowed to molest young boys by one of Britain's highest ranking police chiefs Guy Adams investigates    The tale of corruption and criminality is so sinister that it might have been plucked from the plot of a late-night TV drama. At its heart is a famous politician with a dark secret: he has for years been living a vile double life as a prolific abuser of children. His crimes are known to the forces of law and order in the city that he represents. Yet the local police chief, a close friend and fellow Freemason, works to ensure that he is never brought to justice. At one point, when the ‘untouchable’ Parliamentarian is threatened with exposure, in a messy court case, local detectives falsify criminal evidence in an effort to protect him. Soon afterwards, the politician sends ‘heavies’ to knock on the doors of witnesses, in the hope of intimidating them into staying silent. Then allies in City Hall instruct staff to shred documents that might result in his repellent activities becoming public. Finally, the police chief launches an organised campaign to destroy the reputation of a brave whistle-blower who is attempting to expose the whole, stinking business. As a result, the abuse continues unchecked, on an industrial scale. Dozens, if not scores, more vulnerable children are abused. Many still bear the scars to this day. Corruption being a two-way street, the politician, meanwhile, helps funnel public money to the very police force whose bosses are helping him stay out of jail. Sounds appalling, doesn’t it? But these deeply disturbing events have not been taken from a fictitious crime novel or TV script. Instead, they are contained in a dossier of legal documents which outline events that took place in a British city during the 1980s and 1990s. That city is Leicester. And the politician is Greville Janner, the Labour Peer and former MP who has in recent weeks been accused of countless child sex crimes, over a career that spanned four decades. His family have strenuously denied any such wrong-doing. The fate of the 86-year-old is at the centre of a political storm after Alison Saunders, the Director of Public Prosecutions, decided that he should never be tried for his alleged crimes, which include 16 indecent assaults, and six counts of buggery, against nine children, because he is suffering from dementia. In light of the ensuing controversy, which has seen more than 30 extra victims come forward, the aforementioned legal dossier, which I obtained a copy of this week, makes explosive reading. Comprising dozens of letters, affidavits, witness statements and hundreds of pages of court papers, it offers a contemporaneous take from someone close to the case on how he believed Janner both committed his vile crimes and got away with them. At the heart of the alleged conspiracy is a man called Michael Hirst. He was the Chief Constable of Leicestershire for much of the 1980s, and went on to become a director of the private security company Group 4. According to the legal papers, which date from the early 1990s, Mr Hirst just happened to be ‘very close friends’ with Greville Janner. Both men, the dossier alleges, were Freemasons. As a result of their relationship, it claims that Janner was protected from prosecution — even though his ‘activities with young boys’ were ‘well known by police’. Although they knew that the MP had ‘been at it for years,’ junior officers said he was ‘never arrested, because strings are always pulled up above’. In return, the documents claim, Janner repeatedly ‘stood up in Parliament asking for more money for Leicestershire constabulary.’ They also suggest that Janner’s criminal activities spanned several towns, regions and police jurisdictions. In the market town of Coalville, for example, he ‘was involved setting up young homosexuals with flats in Agar Nook [a deprived housing estate] with the East Midlands Housing Association, and then calling round for payment in kind’. At Leicester’s Holiday Inn, where the MP often stayed, the documents claim a witness ‘remembered the management closing the swimming pool to hotel guests, allowing Janner to swim in the pool with a young boy’. In London, where he lived with his wife and children, and spent most weeknights, the papers allege that ‘the Met [police] at Notting Hill have a file relating to Janner and young boys’. As far away as Scotland, an alleged victim approached staff at Edinburgh West Police Station in July 1991 and ‘made allegations of being buggered by Greville Janner while … on holiday for two weeks in Scotland alone with Janner’. At this point, it should be stressed that the incriminating version of events outlined in the papers was compiled by one man.

Continued:


Quote:

The trial also revealed a sensational side plot in which a witness claimed to have been repeatedly abused by Janner during the 1970s, when he’d been aged between 14 and 16. The witness, by the time of the court case a married father of three in his 30s, gave a credible account of being subjected to a terrifying sexual assault at the MP’s London home, while Janner’s wife and children were away. He claimed to have then had an illegal sexual relationship with Janner which lasted for almost two years. The man showed the jury affectionate letters from the MP, talked of being given expensive presents by him and told how he’d been taken to the Houses of Parliament, Labour HQ, and a string of expensive hotels. Their abusive relationship only ended, he claimed, when he moved into a home run by Beck, who forbade him from seeing the MP. Defence lawyers therefore attempted to use his testimony to argue that Beck was a protector, rather than abuser of boys. They described him as a ‘fall guy’ who was being prosecuted to protect the MP. The jury, of course, disagreed. But after the 1991 conviction, Ian Henning, an employee of Leicester law firm Greene D’Sa, remained convinced of Beck’s innocence, and Janner’s guilt. He began working on an appeal. It had the support of prisoners’ rights campaigner and Labour peer Lord Longford (who also believed in Beck’s innocence) and was to be handled in court by Anthony Scrivener, a QC famed for representing the Guildford Four (whose convictions were quashed after being wrongly jailed for 15 years for blowing up two pubs in the Surrey town in an IRA bombing campaign). The documents quoted on these pages were all produced by Henning for that appeal. As well as advocating Beck’s innocence, they offer a hair-raising, first-hand take on both Greville Janner’s alleged involvement in the case and its purported cover-up. One of the papers is a witness statement written in 1993. In it, Henning claims that during the run-up to Beck’s 1991 trial, junior police officers repeatedly told him that they were also investigating Janner for alleged child abuse. ‘On more than one occasion, police officers said “you must be the only bloke in Leicester who doesn’t know what he [Janner] gets up to”,’ it reads. ‘Police officers would be challenging and vociferous in making remarks such as “oh, it’s well known,” or “I’ve known about him for years”.’ The same police officers also claimed the MP was being protected by Chief Constable Hirst, Henning states. Often, they would remark that ‘Janner and the chief constable are close personal friends’, or ask: ‘Why do you think that he [Janner] keeps standing up in Parliament asking for more money for Leicestershire Constabulary? No other Leicester MP does. ‘One remark repeatedly made to me by numerous police officers while referring to Janner was “you’re in Leicester now and anything to do with Greville Janner will be covered up”.’ And so it proved. Elsewhere in the 1993 document, which runs to 38 pages, Henning tells how, on May 11, 1990, detectives visited the home of Jennifer Lesiakowski, a former care home resident who alleged that she had been raped by Frank Beck. They took a statement, and persuaded her to give evidence for the prosecution at his trial. ‘In her statement, [Lesiakowski] made reference to Greville Janner MP,’ Henning writes. ‘However, on May 17, 1990, the police officers returned to Lesiakowski with a typed copy of her original statement in which all reference to Greville Janner had been edited out.’ The documents also talk of how murky efforts began to be made to silence the alleged male Janner victim who intended to speak for the defence at the 1991 trial (and was by then living in Barnsley, South Yorkshire). ‘[He] was approached on two occasions by people who stated that they were representatives of Greville Janner and warned of the consequences for the witness, his wife and three young children if he attended any court hearing,’ Henning’s statement continues. Henning says: ‘I assisted the witness to report these threats to the South Yorkshire and Leicestershire constabularies, as it was a deliberate attempt to pervert the course of justice and frightened [the victim] and his family.’ As a result of the sinister visits, the victim moved home. But attempts to intimidate him continued. ‘During October 1991, [the victim] told me [Henning] that the tenants who moved into his old address answered a knock at their front door to two men who stated that they had been sent by Greville Janner to warn [the victim] not to give evidence in the Beck trial.’ These shady figures weren’t the only people apparently attempting to protect Janner in the run-up to Beck’s trial, however. So, too, were Leicester social services, in whose homes many of Janner’s purported victims had lived. With regard to the man intended to testifty in court, Henning claims that ‘all mention of Greville Janner had been removed from [his] Social Services file.’ ‘The “Befriender” record, which regulations require be affixed to the inside of the front cover of all Social Service files, detailing any period a child spends away from the Children’s Home with a “befriender”, was missing.’

Freemasonry needs to be in the dock with Janner.

Continued:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3064947/Lord-Janner-director-firm-THREE-WEEKS-ago-emerges-damning-dossier-alleges-police-chief-allowed-peer-molest-young-boys.html


Quote:

These shady figures weren’t the only people apparently attempting to protect Janner in the run-up to Beck’s trial, however. So, too, were Leicester social services, in whose homes many of Janner’s purported victims had lived. With regard to the man intended to testifty in court, Henning claims that ‘all mention of Greville Janner had been removed from [his] Social Services file.’ ‘The “Befriender” record, which regulations require be affixed to the inside of the front cover of all Social Service files, detailing any period a child spends away from the Children’s Home with a “befriender”, was missing.’ Other files which might have exposed Janner’s abuse of other children were simply destroyed. ‘In early February 1991, I received information that files relating to the children who had attended the Beeches Children’s Home during the “Beck era” had been taken by the gardener to County Hall, where a council employee ... had shredded them,’ Henning writes. Eventually, two of the relatively junior detectives working on the case — named as Mick Creedon and Kelvyn Ashby — were told by their superiors to drop all inquiries into the MP. ‘There is no doubt in my mind that initially both Detective Inspector Ashby and Detective Sergeant Creedon intended to arrest Greville Janner,’ reads a different legal paper, compiled by Henning in 1991. ‘But as time progressed, using their own words, “we were prevented from doing so by higher ranking officers”.’ Both Ashby and Creedon have recently confirmed that version of events. Creedon — now Chief Constable of Derbyshire — says the decision to stop investigating Janner ‘was taken by people more senior than me’. Did those ‘senior’ people include Chief Constable Hirst? Creedon has so far declined to name names to the Press, though he may be more forthcoming to the Independent Police Complaints Commission, which is believed to be investigating this affair. As for Hirst, he is unable to pass comment, having died. But his widow, Ruth, denies that he was either a Freemason or a particularly close friend of the MP. ‘I think Michael thought Janner was guilty,’ she said this week. ‘I don’t know who made the decision not to arrest [Janner] but I suspect it was somebody higher up than Michael.’ One thing Hirst certainly did preside over, however, was a bizarre and — in retrospect — very sinister attempt to silence Ian Henning in the months and years that followed the Beck trial. It began in late 1991, when Leicestershire police announced that Henning would no longer be considered a ‘suitable person to attend an interview of a suspect or person in custody at a police station’. In a letter to Henning’s law firm Greene D’Sa, they added that the force had written to both the Law Society and the Solicitors Complaints Bureau to have Henning struck off, on the grounds that (among other things) he’d improperly briefed the media about Janner’s involvement in the Beck case. Henning, who denied that allegation, was then arrested. His house was searched and several documents and items of evidence relating to Janner seized, never to be seen again. It took ten months for police to announce that no charges would actually be filed against him. In the meantime, he won leave to seek a judicial review of the decision to ban him from doing legal work in police stations. ‘My arrest was a response by the Leicestershire Constabulary to bully, threaten and intimidate me into silence,’ he wrote in papers prepared for that case. ‘Why are the Leicestershire Constabulary so interested in the welfare of Greville Janner. Is he a client of the constabulary?’ A good question. But one that would, sadly, never be asked in court. In May 1994, Frank Beck suffered a fatal heart attack at Whitemoor prison in Cambridgeshire, forcing his appeal to be abandoned. To this day, many friends believe Beck was innocent, and Janner guilty — though others say there is ample evidence that both men were guilty, and were in fact accomplices. Eighteen months later, Henning’s judicial review was also abandoned. He, too, died suddenly and unexpectedly, in a road accident in December 1995, aged 57, before the case could be heard. ‘Ian never saw justice,’ his widow, Dee, told me this week. ‘He had absolutely no doubt of Janner’s involvement in paedophilia, and believed to the end that things had been covered up, and covered up far too easily. ‘We don’t know how many children suffered as a result of that cover up. But at least we are finally starting to see his crimes laid bare in print. Janner may never be prosecuted, but I think Ian would see that as the next best thing.’

Lord Janner was acting as a company director and attended parliament and claimed expenses for parliamentary attendance days before he was assessed as unfit to be tried due to dementia.

The Establishment and Freemasons are working hard to get Janner off scot free.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/05/02/01/00D84F9400000190-0-image-m-28_1430526766280.jpg