Heres a site for you Herb, you might need to get the moths out of your wallet though


'Sugar daddy' dating website may break sex work laws, police say

A popular "sugar daddy" dating website that links young women with wealthy older men who pay to meet up with them may break sex work laws, police have warned.

The SeekingArrangement website claims its Australian membership is growing exponentially and that it has 154,537 people signed up.

Sydney woman Ella (not her real name) has a full-time job, is a single mother and is starting a postgraduate university degree.

The 29-year-old has an arrangement with a businessman nearly twice her age and each time they meet he pays her $2,000.

"It's not sex for money, it's an exchange between two adults that have something to give each other, on levels far greater than just sexual," Ella said.

Read it here
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-01/sugar-daddy-dating-website-may-break-sex-laws-police-say/6269250

It beggars belief how some women attempt to excuse their vile behaviour, by dressing it up as something quite different.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 8:17am:

It beggars belief how some women attempt to excuse their vile behaviour, by dressing it up as something quite different.

Good on her for getting $2000 for it. Lot's of women sleep around for nothing, it's the smart ones that get paid for it. Having sex for money is not vile, it's a job like any other. I suppose it's not a profession you'd take up Lisa? Maybe when the twins are in school and hubby's at work? Think about it, anyway. You wouldn't get $2000 a hit like Ella, but every bit of small change helps when you've got a young family.

You really are a nasty piece of work. Still bitter about being outted as the mole and being permanently banned from another website I see. So you sit here festering over it and vent by using another member's family, ie her children in order to bait and flame.

Might be time to leave you to rot in your online filth. See ya. Not interested in revolting trolls like you.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 8:41am:

You really are a nasty piece of work. Still bitter about being outted as the mole and being permanently banned from another website I see. So you sit here festering over it and vent by using another member's family, ie her children in order to bait and flame. Might be time to leave you to rot in your online filth. See ya. Not interested in revolting trolls like you.

Have I? I didn't even know. Even if it's true, it's no great loss, I was only talking to you and your socks.


Always the victim, where's that tiny violin?

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 8:17am:

It beggars belief how some women attempt to excuse their vile behaviour, by dressing it up as something quite different.

"vile behaviour"?

How is sex between consenting adults "vile behaviour"?

I think Lisa only does sex to reproduce, not for money or pleasure.....not that there's anything wrong with that


BTW Lisa, I'm not banned at PA. Check out my replies over there.

Ohhhh, the silence in here is deafening.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 10:04am:

Ohhhh, the silence in here is deafening.

Where are you Lisa? not in the toilet, obviously.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 10:04am:

Ohhhh, the silence in here is deafening.

Lisa said, 'it seems you have been banned from PA'.

No, I'm still there.

Lisa said, 'it seems you've been banned from OzPol'.

No, I'm still here.

Ohhh HERE you are. By all means,  continue trolling.

We're all ears...and eyes lol.

I'll check up on your trolling later.

Keep up the good work.

Unlike you, I've got better topics to post in :)

Redmond Neck wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 7:51am:

[size=14] [b]'Sugar daddy' dating website may break sex work laws, police say A popular "sugar daddy" dating website that links young women with wealthy older men who pay to meet up with them may break sex work laws, police have warned. The SeekingArrangement website claims its Australian membership is growing exponentially and that it has 154,537 people signed up. Sydney woman Ella (not her real name) has a full-time job, is a single mother and is starting a postgraduate university degree. The 29-year-old has an arrangement with a businessman nearly twice her age and each time they meet he pays her $2,000. "It's not sex for money, it's an exchange between two adults that have something to give each other, on levels far greater than just sexual," Ella said. Read it here http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-01/sugar-daddy-dating-website-may-break-sex-laws-police-say/6269250

It sounds like typical call girl work. If the female can keep up her part of the act and gets paid well for doing it - then both parties are satisfied. It's a job the average woman can't do - so good luck to those who can.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 8:41am:

You really are a nasty piece of work. Still bitter about being outted as the mole and being permanently banned from another website I see. So you sit here festering over it and vent by using another member's family, ie her children in order to bait and flame. Might be time to leave you to rot in your online filth. See ya. Not interested in revolting trolls like you.

Dame Pansi is not the mole- that is me I thought everyone agreed ? and you still say that even though Aussie said there was "no mole"- nothing "nasty or "filthy "about her Lisa, but your response was very nasty. I think she is a lovely lady with a great sense of humour.  :)

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 8:29am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 2nd, 2015 at 8:17am: It beggars belief how some women attempt to excuse their vile behaviour, by dressing it up as something quite different. Good on her for getting $2000 for it. Lot's of women sleep around for nothing, it's the smart ones that get paid for it. Having sex for money is not vile, it's a job like any other. I suppose it's not a profession you'd take up Lisa? Maybe when the twins are in school and hubby's at work? Think about it, anyway. You wouldn't get $2000 a hit like Ella, but every bit of small change helps when you've got a young family.

   Entirely agree Dame Pansi  .

hell even i'd sleep with them for $2k  ;D ;D ;D ;D

John Smith wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 1:57pm:

hell even i'd sleep with them for $2k  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Even prostitutes have the choice to decline the sale, John.

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 2:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 2nd, 2015 at 1:57pm: hell even i'd sleep with them for $2k  ;D ;D ;D ;D Even prostitutes have the choice to decline the sale, John.

wrong way around ... i meant i would sleep with the wealthy older men if they paid me 2k a pop :D :D :D :D

John Smith wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 2:09pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Mar 2nd, 2015 at 2:01pm: John Smith wrote on Mar 2nd, 2015 at 1:57pm: hell even i'd sleep with them for $2k  ;D ;D ;D ;D Even prostitutes have the choice to decline the sale, John. wrong way around ... i meant i would sleep with the wealthy older men if they paid me 2k a pop :D :D :D :D

Ah! so you've got a price on your bum like Mr Abbott. I think I'd want more than $2000 for that , unless you like it......not that there's anything wrong with that