With all the paraphernalia being posted in this section, we have all learnt a thing or two.

We know that in the past we had 20 times the CO2 that we have today in our atmosphere and guess what there was no runaway green house effect.

That's right once upon a time we had around 7000 ppm of CO2 in our atmosphere and life thrived.

The question everyone should be asking themselves is,

"Has CO2 ever controlled the temperature here on Earth?"

The answer from our past is,

NO CO2 has never controlled temperature here on Earth even when we had 20 times more in our atmosphere than we have today.

So if today we have some of the lowest temperatures and amounts of CO2 in our atmosphere ever in our history why all the panic???????????

http://i59.tinypic.com/2prts9t.jpg

Why because the oligarchy want a 2 trillion dollar market per annum paid by me and you and every other citizen of this Earth.

Have we ever had an industrial revolution before?

The facts you leave out are why those temperature changes existed and the relationship carbon sinks have with their ability to actually be carbon sinks i.e. the changes associated with temperature.

The keyword being 'relationships', but no one expects too many answers from a con-artist who voted to give the kids Rupert-Murdochs-copper-elephant in the Asian century: talk about intergenerational debt  ::) ::)

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 3:02pm:

Have we ever had an industrial revolution before? The facts you leave out are why those temperature changes existed and the relationship carbon sinks have with their ability to actually be carbon sinks i.e. the changes associated with temperature. The keyword being 'relationships', but no one expects too many answers from a con-artist who voted to give the kids Rupert-Murdochs-copper-elephant in the Asian century: talk about intergenerational debt  ::) ::)

Always count on Cerberus to come to the oligarchies defence.

Are you being payed champ!!!!!!!

Ajax wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 5:57pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 3:02pm: Have we ever had an industrial revolution before? The facts you leave out are why those temperature changes existed and the relationship carbon sinks have with their ability to actually be carbon sinks i.e. the changes associated with temperature. The keyword being 'relationships', but no one expects too many answers from a con-artist who voted to give the kids Rupert-Murdochs-copper-elephant in the Asian century: talk about intergenerational debt  ::) ::) Always count on Cerberus to come to the oligarchies defence. Are you being payed champ!!!!!!!

lol

CO2 levels are at historic lows, we are extremely fortunate that we are experiencing an upward trend, if levels got to 150ppm all life on Earth would end, the climate change cult has decided that 280ppm was the ideal level and this should be maintained, this is ridiculous considering how close that level is to 150 ppm, and ridiculous considering that CO2 levels have been far far higher in the past with no adverse effects.

innocentbystander. wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 7:16pm:

CO2 levels are at historic lows, we are extremely fortunate that we are experiencing an upward trend, if levels got to 150ppm all life on Earth would end, the climate change cult has decided that 280ppm was the ideal level and this should be maintained, this is ridiculous considering how close that level is to 150 ppm, and ridiculous considering that CO2 levels have been far far higher in the past with no adverse effects.

the mathematics of rates of change bore civilisation so why isn't innocent bystander employing it  :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

Does innoccent bystander have something to hide and how far does it go to explaining why he voted for Rupert Murdochs copper elephant in the allegedy clever country that built the asian century in the asian century? Perhaps innocent bystander is unAustralian,... just like Rupert Murdoch  ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

<surprise surprise, let's axe the mining tax and fill the internet with every other blue blooded foreign investor idea that helps the blue-chip companies fill their pockets with tax payer dollars and borrows the non-renewable resources of its host countries....>

  :-? :-?  :o  :) :) :) :) :)

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 8:40pm:

<surprise surprise, let's axe the mining tax and fill the internet with every other blue blooded foreign investor idea that helps the blue-chip companies fill their pockets with tax payer dollars and borrows the non-renewable resources of its host countries....>   :-? :-?  :o  :) :) :) :) :)

And the carbon tax?????

A 2 trillion dollar market per annum!!!!!!

Who's pockets will that fill?????

Not mine and yours because we'll be the ones paying for it.

Ajax wrote on Mar 1^st, 2015 at 12:28pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 8:40pm: <surprise surprise, let's axe the mining tax and fill the internet with every other blue blooded foreign investor idea that helps the blue-chip companies fill their pockets with tax payer dollars and borrows the non-renewable resources of its host countries....>   :-? :-?  :o  :) :) :) :) :) And the carbon tax????? A 2 trillion dollar market per annum!!!!!! Who's pockets will that fill????? Not mine and yours because we'll be the ones paying for it.

Get your naming systems right: either it's a market or a tax  ;D ;D ;D

And besides everyone knows today's industrial strength CO2 is far superior to the old mega levels of CO2. ;)

lee wrote on Mar 1^st, 2015 at 9:44pm:

And besides everyone knows today's industrial strength CO2 is far superior to the old mega levels of CO2. ;)

:o :o ..meaning what exactly?